Loading...
96-1103 Council File # �� � `o I � � �f ��� Green Sheet # � d�► � � RESOLUTION �°f"� ;� CI OF INT PAUL, MINNESOTA / � .�� Presented B ,� ' �` -� � ! �' `�--.._.__ ___ Y , j Referred To Committee: Date 1 2 Whereas, Donald and Debra Wright made application to the Board of Zoning Appeals 3 for a variance from the strict application of the provisions of the Saint Paul Zoning Code for 4 property located at 2103 Hartford Avenue, legally described as Lot 2, Bertha's 5 Rearrangement; and 6 7 Whereas, The purpose of the application was to vary the standards of the Zoning Code 8 so as to allow the continued use of a parking space in a required front yard in a R-4 Zoning 9 District; and 10 11 Whereas, The Board of Zoning Appeals conducted a public hearing on May 13, 1996, 12 after having provided notice to affected property owners, and the Board, by its Resolution 13 No.96-101 adopted May 28, 1996, decided to deny the application based on the following 14 findings and conclusions: 15 16 1. There is ample room to provide additional off-street parking in 17 the rear yard and the front yard parking is a convenience rather 18 than a hardship. 19 20 2. The house is setback 35 feet from the street. The garage is 21 located about 20 feet from the rear of the house. Both situations 22 create a long walk for the applicants' elderly relatives. The 23 driveway/parking space was in existence when the applicants 24 purchased the house and is not a circumstance created by the 25 applicants. 26 27 3. The applicants state that the nearby college, St. Catherine's, 28 generates a lot of traffic on Hartford Avenue presenting a danger 29 to children laying in the area. Reducing the amount of on-street 30 parking wherever possible will make it easier for drivers to see 31 the children. However, there is room to provide additional off- 32 street parking in the rear. 33 34 4. The applicant has submitted letters from his neighbors at 2099 35 and 2107 Hartford Avenue stating that they have no objection to 36 the continued use of the driveway for parking. This, together 37 with the fact that the parking has been in existence since 1969 38 without complaint, would seem to indicate that the parking has 39 not adversely affected the neighborhood. 40 41 5. The proposed variance, if granted would not alter or change the 42 zoning classification of the property. 43 � ac. — ��03 �(� � ����reas, Pursuant to the provisions of Section 64.205, Donald and Debra Wright, duly I� e City Clerk an appeal from the determination made by the Board of Zoning 3 Appeals, requesting that a heazing be held before the City Council for the purpose of 4 considering the actions taken by the said Board; and 5 6 Whereas, Acting pursuant to Sections 64.205 through 64.208, and upon notice to 7 affected parties a public hearing was duly conducted by the City Council on July 24, 1996 8 where all interested parties were given an opportunity to be heard; and 9 10 Whereas, The Council, having heard the statements made, and having considered the 11 variance application, the report of staff, the record, minutes and resolution of the Board of 12 Zoning Appeals, does hereby 13 14 Resolve, That the Council of the City of Saint Paul does hereby reverse the decision of 15 the Board of Zoning Appeals in this matter, based on the following findings of the Council: 16 17 A. The findings of fact set forth in the Staff Report to the BZA supported a 18 recommendation by Staff to approve the variance. The Council now adopts 19 those facts as its own. Those facts are: 20 21 1. The applicants state that the driveway originally ran all the way 22 back to the garage until sometime in 1969 when a kitchen 23 addition was added to the east side of the house. Since that time 24 the access to the garage has been through the alley and the 25 driveway has been sued for parking. The applicants would like 26 to retain the driveway for parking as a convenience for his 27 elderly relatives and as a short term parking area. 28 29 2. The house is setback 35 feet from the street. The garage is 30 located about 20 feet from the rear of the house. Both situations 31 create a long walk for the applicants' elderly relatives. The 32 driveway/parking space was in existence when the applicants 33 purchased the house and is not a circumstance created by the 34 applicants. 35 36 3. The applicants state that the nearby college, St. Catherine's, 37 generates a lot of traffic on Hartford Avenue presenting a danger 38 to children laying in the area. Reducing the amount of on-street 39 parking wherever possible will make it easier for drivers to see 40 the children. 41 42 4. The applicant has submitted letters from his neighbors at 2099 43 and 2107 Hartford Avenue stating that they have no objection to 44 the continued use of the driveway for parking. This, together 45 with the fact that the parking has been in existence since 1969 46 without complaint, would seem to indicate that the parking has 47 not adversely affected the neighborhood. 48 49 5. The proposed variance, if granted would not alter or change the 50 zoning classification of the property. 51 ��lr° ` :�'� F t � �. �The facts above stated in the Staff Report recommendation to approve the q` —``Q'3 � � �--' E i �.� ;var►iance further the general welfare of the City. 3 4 And Be It Further Resolved, That the appeal of Donald and Debra Wright be and is 5 hereby granted; and, 6 7 Be It Finally Resolved, That the City Clerk shall mail a copy of this resolution to 8 Donald and Debra Wright, the Zoning Administrator, Planning Commission and Board of 9 Zoning Appeals. � Navs Absent Requested by Department of: a ev Bostrom arris � uerin e ar � ettman � une BY� Form Approved by City Attorney Adopted by Council: Date � Adoption Certified by Council Secretary By: �������y� �/2 7 �( By� Approved by Mayor for Submission to Approved by Mayor: Date � C� Council By: / ' ` � G� By: � .�t�-1.�03 � ���N � ��EElV S�EET N_ 36372 Cit Council 9/4/% s ��ew►ar�ror oipEC�roR � � �cm couNC�� - - �"m�►va►� Councilmember Harris 266-8630 �R� ❑cmnrroRNev { �cmc��c 81'(��) qpyT� �BUDOET DIRECt�OR ' �FIN.6 MOT.9ERVICEB DIR. Se t. 11 1996 °noEe ❑"""'roA t°R"ss�sr""�r� ❑ TOTAL#E OF 81�iNATURE PAGES (CLIP AL�LOCATIONB FOR$IC;NATURE) �, ACTION REGUE8TED: , Finalizing City Council Action taken July 24, 1996, by granti}�g a variance to allow parking within a required front yard at 2103 Hartford Avenue. ' RECOMMENdAT10N8:Appow(A)a R�j�ot(R) PER80NAL SERVICE CONTRACTS MUST ANsWER THE ROLLOMIING GUESTION�: _PUWNNiO CO�uN�810N _;GVfl.8ERNICE c�MMN8310N 1. Hu iMs p�►SOnRirm sVer worked under a c�tlhict fOr Uds d�parqnsM? - _CIB COMAAITTEE _ YES NO 2. Has this peroonRfrm ever been a clty emplo�res? —�� — YES NO � _o18TRICT COUR'T _. 3. Doea this psrson/firm poaeess a sklll not noFinaliy Pwsassd bY�Y ou��Y�Yre� SUPPORTS WNICH COUNGL OBJECTIVE9 YES NO Explain all ya answ�n on s�nN sfa�t�nd�tUeh to prNn sM�t iNmnrx�o w�oe��,�esue.oProwruNm�wno.wnn.wnsn,wn�,nmr): I ADVANTI�E8 IF APPRONED: I D18/1DVANTAOE8IF APPAOVED: 1i1NN 14N �� L/a Ilt1 SEP 0 4 1996 � — ---- � a�,�$�►��o: � TOTAL AMOUNT OR TWANSACTION : COBT/REVENUE BUDQETEQ(CIRCLE ONE) YES NO FtlNDING SOUIlCE ACTIVITY NUMBER � FINANCIAI IPIFORMATION:(EXPLAIN) OFFICE OF LICENSE,INSPECTIONS AND � �_`�O� ENVIRONMENTAL PROTECTION Roben Kessler,Director CITY OF SAINT PAUL LOWRY PROFESSIONAL Te[ephone:612-266-9090 Norm Coleman, Mayor BUILDING Facsimile: 612-266-9099 Suite 300 612-266-9124 350 St.Peter Street Saint Pau[,Minnesota 55102-1510 w June 25, 1996 Ms.Nancy Anderson City Council Research Office Room 310 City Hall Saint Paul,Minnesota 55102 Dear Ms. Anderson: I would like to confirm that���[ig before the City Council is scheduled fo�� �1996 for the following appeal of a Board of Zoning Appeals decision: Appellant: ����t File Number: 96-155 Purpose: Appeal of a Board of Zoning Appeals decision denying a variance to allow parking within a required front yard. Address: 2103 Hartford Ave. Legal Description of Property: Lot 2,Bertha's Rearrangement. Previous Action: Board of Zoning Appeals; 6 in favor, 1 against My understanding is that this public hearing request will appear on the agenda for the July 24, 1996 City Council meeting at 4:30 p.m. and that you will , in the Saint Paul Legal Ledger. Please call me at 266-9082 if you have any questions. Sincerely, John Hazdwick �� ���� �� Zoning Technician ,U��,� °��� cc: Council Member Harris. _.__,...,.�.y..�,�.n:.q.r`- . �A������t�, �.,_... � The Saint Paul City Council will conducf a public hearing oa Wednea � . _ .�p�24,1996,to conaider the a�eal of Donald.and L?ebra Wright fo a deci�� 1�[�he Board of Zoniag Appeals denying a variance to allo�v parking with�i: r�iired froat yard at 2103 Haztford Avenua • f�ed:June 27. 1996 _ _ _ �TCY ANDER30N ' ,�stant City Councii S� _ �J�M�e�.�MN . _ � �.- 1�03 GUIDELINES FOR VARIANCE REQUESTS TO ALLOW PARKING WITHIN A REQUIRED YARD FOR ONE AND TWO FAMILY DWELLINGS. Staff will recommend denial of variance requests to allow the continuation of parking within a required yard unless the following conditions are met: 1. The parking space has been in existence and used continuously since October 25, 1975. 2. The applicant can demonstrate hardship in that there is no feasible alternative location for the parking space. For the purpose of this condition hardship shall include ; a disability by a resident of the property that qualifies for a State Handicap Pazking Permit,topography that makes rear yard parking impossible, the lack of a11ey access to the property, or insufficient lot size to provide off-street parking in a non-required yard. 3. The applicant submits a petition from property owners within 100 feet of the property along either side of the street stating that they have no objection to the pazking. 4. The parking space is paved or the applicant agrees to pave the space within 120 days. ADOPTED AND APPROVED BY THE BOARD OF ZONING APPEALS ON JUNE 24, 1996 MOVED BY: T�»y SECONDED BY: wuson IN FAVOR: � , , Q.,�,:-.�.�0 3 ;:::��i����::�:::::::::>::>:.:::::::_>:>::�:::::.>:::::;:>:::::>:.;.>:<:>::>:::::<:>::::::.:::::::>::.:::::`::: ::;>::>::»;�:>�::;:.!��:::�`::>::>:::<:>:>::::>::::: :_>.:.::>:::.::;�:>�:::�:<::::��::>�:::::>::»::::::>:<:�:<>:>:: APPLICATION FOR APPEAL :::::�������:��:::::>:>�'��������`�:�::;::::::::> .. ::::::�'..�`.�........:.:.::.:;:.::.;:.:;;:.:::.::.:;.;;::.: :�::::�`��::::�t:::::>::::>::��:::>::::>::>::<::>::<:<�:::::::::>::::>::>::<::::«::::::> �f�, .�.�.�.,,�,..,,�..�,...::>::>: .(�; v�'�Y�l:�S>:::i:::::::ir::Fr:i:::::::i:{�ii +�::i.�i>:MI�'{�i ..::.:�:::.�::.::::::::::::::i:�i:�. :ii::'riiiiiiii:::i::i:::i:ii.�.: ::i••ii'::�::Fiiiiiiiir::i::i?::ii::::yj::ii:ii:::iy::ii::ii::i::i::i: Department of Planning and Economic Deve[opment >::>:����:����������:................::::::.�::::::::::::::::::::::::::::.;;:.;:.;: .;;:.:;:«».»�:.;:.;;:.:;:.:;.;;::.;;::.::;:.;:.;:.:<:.;;;:.;:;:.;:<.:.:;.;:.;;:.>::>::>::> Zonin Section g :<;:>::>;:::::x::>:::::;::?<::<':<::.:<::> ::>::�����:::::�.'z>::?::?::�:'�?:::':::;`s�;::>:<:<:`€:::[:`>;:': �� 1100 Ci Hall Annex :::::�.::'�11f.!�:,:�:#!���«���.::<:::�::>::>::>':::>:::::<:: �1' 2 S West Fourth Street Saint Paul MN SSIO , 2 2 66-6589 APPELLA�IT Name �c•� � t�e6b;e 1Jr�qki- Address 2to3 ��ert���� �?Je - !0%7- � City St. pa�l St�ZipSS/ILp Daytime phone PROPERTY Zoning File Name��� a �e�d�e !.����k�'"' LOCATION � Address/Location��_����c�� �i Prc� �Qi s�, TYPE OF APPEAL: Application is hereby made for an appeal to the: � ❑ Board of Zoning Appeals �f City ;ouncil under the provisions of Chapter :��, �ection , Faragrapt� or'the Zoning Code, to appeal a decision made by the S�, p� u 1 'Z o�, ►1� �pap rcj on '� �c _ , 19�. File number: -�1�- 078 (date of ecision) GROUNDS FOR APPEAL: Fxplain why you feel there has been an error in any requirement, permit, decision or refusal made by an administrative o�cial, or an error in fact, procedure or finding made by ti�e Board of Zoning Appea!s or the Planning Commission. See ��tclpsecl A�c,�4y� �J6/^1:�96000�xr�.�fr{�'' �i.:*_�i; 4s�80 ',fAFi'�i�'Ce. �n�� �C1 L�Fi�i tiE.1".1�1 �i� Attach additional sheet if necessary) Applicant's signature � Date �� City agent �l� - 1��3 June 21, 1996 Mr. John Hardwick Lowry Professional Building Suite 300 350 St. Peter Street St.Paul,MN 55102-1510 Dear Mr.Hardwick: Please be advised that we aze appealing the Zoning Boards denial of our driveway variance to the St. Paul City Council. I have enclosed a complete package for you on all material submitted to each councilmember's office. Sincerely, �J�:� � _ �����' Donald B. Wright �I (.- 1�b3 LETTER TO COUNCILMEMBERS 9c.-��o3 June 21, 1996 St. Paul City Council 310 City Hall 15 West Kellogg Boulevard St. Paul, MN 55102 RE: Driveway Vaziance Denial By the St. Paul Zoning Board Don&Debbie Wright, Owners 2103 Hartford Ave. St. Paul, MN 55116 Zoning Boazd File# 96-078 St. Paul City Council Members: This letter is being written to notify the St. Paul City Council that Don & Debbie Wright, the owners of 2103 Hartford Ave., are appealing the St. Paul Zoning Boazd's denial of their driveway variance application as was set forth in the Boazd's meeting of May 13, 1996. We find it necessary to appeal our case to the St. Paul City Council based upon the following facts. Fact Number One: The City Staff Report submitted to the Zoning Board by John Hardwick recommended approval of our variance application based on findings one through six of their report. Fact Number Two: The first order of new business at the May 13, 1996 Board meeting was an application for minor variance to allow front yard parking. The variance application was submitted by Carol & Kevin Tumquist 86 Cook Ave. West. (file # 96-077) This properry tumed out to be a duplex and the applicants were requesting off street pazking for their tenants. The Board na.rrowly approved the variance application by a four in favor to three against vote. After the vote was taken, I felt confident my variance application would also be approved. Fact Number Three: The second order of business was our application for minor variance to allow front yazd pazking. I was shocked when the Board voted six in favor to one against to deny our variance application. Why did the Turnquist's variance pass while our variance was denied? Several reasons come to Psge 1 Q �- 1� �3 mind. First,the Board gave special consideration to renta.l property versus a single family residence. Second, the Board reacts differently on front yard parking depending on the neighborhood. Third, the Board felt we had no right to a front yard driveway since we have a garage and the possibility of parking in the back yard. Fact Number Four: In denying our variance, it was the Board's contention in finding number one of the Staff Report there is ample room in the back yazd to park a vehicle. This decision was based on a picture shown to the Board of an additional parking space for a sma.11 tent trailer in the backyazd running parallel to the alley. (Exhibit VI) Upon your review of the picture marked(E�ibit Vn you should come to the conclusion there is insufficient room to make an additional parking space parallel to the garage. Subsequent to the picture shown to the Boazd, a fence has now been installed sectioning off the trailer parking space from the rest of the back yard. Therefore, because of the limited space in the back yard it was unreasonable of the Board to have assumed there was ample room in the back yard for parking without seeing the backyard in its present condition prior to the installation of the fence. Fact Number Five: The Board also denied our variance based on their opinion the front driveway is a convenience rather than a necessity due to hardship. I am not disputing the fact the Board has decided the driveway is a convenience. I am disputing this convenience has been in existence for at least sixty years according to Joseph J. Ruzichka who has lived in our neighborhood for that length of time.(Exhibit III notarized statement) Unfortunately, when I appeared before the Board on May 13, 1996, I was not aware of the facts attested to by Mr. Ruzichka in his statement. Since there is not an appeal process to the Zoning Board based on additional facts, I am currently submitting this statement as part of my appeal. Fact Number Six: Mr. John Hardwick, Office of License, Inspections, and Environmental Protection, had indicated in several conversarions that if a similaz statement of Mr. Ruzichka's had been submitted to the LIEP Office prior to my appearance before the Board, then my application for variance could�have been administratively approved saving myself and the City of St. Paul valuable time and money. Fact Number Seven: In finding number three of the Staff Report, the Board reiterated there was ample room in the back yard for additional parking based upon incomplete facts. I can only conclude the Boazd based their decision on the fact that the granting of the variance is not in keeping with the spirit and intent of the code. This conclusion is based on the Boazd's inability or refusal to respond on how the granting of the variance would adversely af�ect the health, safety, comfort, morals, and welfare of the residents of St. Paul. The spirit and intent of the current code (as amended and passed in 1975) should ha.ve no bearing on a driveway which has been in existence for forty years prior to the passing of the current code. Page 2 � � -1��3 My wife and I have been homeowners in the City of St. Paul for the past eleven years. In those eleven years we ha.ve made significant improvements to our property. These improvements have benefited our neighborhood by increasing property values and the desirability of families to move into our communiTy versus moving to the suburbs. We aze urging the members of the City Council to overium the Zoning Boazd decision denying our variance application. Both the City of St. Paul and I have expended considerable time and money pursuing a situation which has existed for sixty years. Retaining our driveway has not, nor will it in the future, adversely affect the health, safety, morals and welfare of our neighborhood or the inhabitants of the City of St. Paul. Sincerely, [k/� �- ��"�,,r'v''� Donald B. Wright cc: John Hazdwick Page 3 �I � • 1��3 STAFF REPORT & �TTACHMENTS EXHIBIT I BOARD OF ZONING APPEALS STAFF REPORT � � • � ` �3 1. APPLICANT: DONALD & DEBRA WRIGHT FII.E#96-078 2. CLASSIFICATION: Minor Variance DATE OF HEARIlVG: OS/l3/96 3. LOCATION: 2103 HARTFO�tD AVENUE 4. LEGAL DESCRIPTION: Lot 2, Bertha's Rearrangement. 5, pLANNING DISTRICT: 15 6. PRESENT ZONIlVG: R-4 ZONIlVG CODE REFERENCE: 62.104 (11) 7. STAFF INVESTIGATION AND REPORT: DATE: 04/24/96 BY: John Hardwick 8 DATE RECEIVED: 04/17/96 DEADLIlV'E FOR ACTION: 6/16/96 _ A. PURPOSE: A variance to allow parl:ing within a required front yard. B. ACTION REQUESTED: Section 62.104 (11) states: "off•street parking spaces shall not be within a required front or side yard and shall be a minimum of 4 fcet from any side lot line". C. STTE AND AREA CONDTITONS: This is a 43 by 125 foot lot with a two-car detached garage in the rear yard. There is alley access to the rear of the property. Surrounding Land Use: Primarily single family homes. D. BACKGROUND: As part of the street paving project planned for Hartford Avenue this summer,the Public Works Department notifie�the applicants that they would not provide a curb cut for his driveway which led to an apparent illegal parking space. E. FINDIl�IGS: � 1. The property in question cannot be put to a reasonable use under the strict provisions of the code. The applicants state that the driveway originally ran all the way back to the garage until sometime in 1969 when a kitchen addition was added to the east side of the house. Since that time the access to the garage has been through the alley and the driveway has been used for parking. The applicants would like to retain the driveway for parking as a convenience for his elderly relatives and as a short term parking area. 2. The plight of the land owner is due to circumstances unique to this property, and these circumstances were not created by the land owner. �' File#96-078 Page Two This house is setback 35 feet from the street. The garage is located about 20 feet from the rear of the house: Bath situations create a long walk for the applicants'elderly relatives. The driveway/paridng space was in existence when the applicants purchased the house and is not a circumstance created by the applicants. 3. The proposed variance is in keeping with the spirit and intent of the code, and is consistent with the health, safety, comfort,morals and welfare of the inhabitants of the City of St. Paul. The applicants state that the nearby college, St. Catherine's, generates a lot of traffic on Hartford Avenue presenting a danger to children playing in the area. Reducing the amount of on-street parking wherever possible will make it easier for drivers to see the children. 4. The proposed variance ��ill not impair an adequate supply of light and air to adjacent property, nor will it alter the essential character of the surrounding area or unreasonably diminish established property values within the surrounding area. The applicant has submitted letters from his neighbors at 2099 and 2107 Hartford Avenue stating that they have no objection to the continued use of the driveway for parking. This, together with the fact that the parking has been in existence since 1969 without complaint, wouId seem to indicate that the parking has not adversely affected the neighborhood. 5. The variance, if granted,would not pernut any use that is not permitted under the provisions of the code for the property in the district where the a$'ected land is located, nor would it alter or change the zoning district classification of the properry. The proposed variance, if granted would not alter or change the zoning classification of the property. 6. The request for variance is not based primarily on a desire to increase the value or income potential of the parcel of land. F. DISTRICT COUNCIL RECOMME:��DATION: As of the date of this report we have not received a recommendation from District 15. G. STAFF RECOMMENDATION: Based on findings 1 through 6, staff recommends approval of the variance. �Z �.,. � ' �' ZONING BOARD �+e� ���;�,o� � `� ���3 APPLICATION FOR ZONING ORDINANCE VARIANCE - CITY OF SAINT PAUL . ( .� " � " " A VARIANCE OF ZONING CODE CHAPTER �Z ,SECTION����� PARAGRAPH �� ' iS REQUESTED IN CONFORMI7Y WITH THE POWERS VESTED IN THE BOARD OF ZONING AP- . � :: �PEALS TO PERMR THE �7 � ►�� 2C K'•u �jC~� ON PROPERTY � DESCRIBED BELOW. �'L�' . � A. Applicant; NAME: ` I D~4 Jc� d �e�p�G Lr � ��4 1�T ADDRESS �JP� T74 T '}�p rc1 ��e • '� DAYTIME TELEPHONE NO. �°������ ZIP CODE'�����P 1. PropeAy interest of applicant(owner,contract urchaser,et .) . ' '• . . ��...5 n l`�� � � : •;� �'� ;' : ,_ • �.�T. � ' � !� , �► . 2. Name ot owner(it diflerent) • B. Properry Oescripticn: ADDRESS � ��� �� � '��Q'�� �'��=- �F ; � r.:• �= �. 1. Legal description: LOT �= BLOCK�F�+%�{�^�^�r�TDD. � 2. Lot size: 'y�� � `"� � /�S � L 3. Present Use � • �!, '� �F":�• �y present Zoning Dist. � �'L� C. Reasons for Request: SP P �i ��+��r Fc� '�l.�t�P� 1. Proposed use 2. What physical characteristics of the property prevent its being used for any oT the permitted uses in your zone?(topography,soil conditions,size and shape of lot,etc.) 3. State the specific variation requested,giving distances where appropriate. ( /�- r�c c.�! �P,ZK ;�✓J 1,:;� ��✓ f+' I Zr�c.;+-t,v , 'r�l�'�, �}�t� � . . , . , y. t � ; . ; . ; � :. .� . . . , �. 4. Explain how your case contortns to eact�of the following: a. That the strict application ot the provisions of the Zoning Ordinance would resuR in peculiar� or exceptional practical difficutties,or exceptional undue hardships. � _ - . � '�'�� S� � �rL� K b. That the granti�g M a variance will i 1 r: �@fl ,. ON�Xnr. 1 ; - : not be a subsranba� oeaimeM to 4QB0 VAfiIANCE �*lEO.C�(? 'r � public pood or a substantial impair- (? , • ' ment ot the iMant and purpose of $UBT'iL �t 1$Q�Qp . � � the Zoning Ordinance. *1�f7.00 �. CHANGE �,pp A�/'�� - � ��� � Sipnaturo�l✓�'��� `�3 �••� t3 IL April 15, ]996 � Donald B. &Deborah A. Wright 2103 Hartford A��e. St. Paul,MN 55116 Mr.John Hard��ick Office of License,Inspections&En�zronmental Protcction Lo��7�Professional Building, Suite 300 350 St. Peter Su�et St.Paul,NiN 55102-1510 RE: Variance Application For Retaining Dri��ew�ay Dear Mr.Hard«�ck: T'his letter is being ���inen to requcst our desire to rctain access to our front �•ard dri��eW�ay in the upcoming reconsUVCtion of Hartford Arenue this summet. We Wish to apply for the �•ariance of the zoning code to allow pazking in our present dri��ew�ay. � The proposed use of the driveway wyll remain as off street short term parking for us and for our . handicapped, elderl�� relatives . One ad�•antage to the public in retaining the a:isting drivew�a}• a�ould be saferi�. The fe«•er parked cars on Hartford, the greater the��sibilit�• of children pla�zng on the sideH•alk for motorists using Hartford. The onl}•ph}•sical characteristic of our propem�that needs to be noted is our dri��eWa�•abuu our neighbor's lot linc. (sa enclosed plat dra��zng) As far as I can detemune,this has ban the case for at least tu•enry se��en��ears. T'he access to the garage had been from the e�►isting front dri��ew�a�•until the kitchen addition �•as added to the east side of the house sometime prior to 1969. This changed the acass to the garage from thc existing drivew•a}•to the alley. Since our dri��e��a�� has been in existence for many ��ears and has ban used as shon term parking for residenu and their.7sitors, I believe granung the��ariance w•ould not deter from the o��erall appearance of our street or create a detriment to the public. Actually, the public benefits by increasing the safen• of neighborhood children and motorists. I ha��e enclosed m�•check in the amount of S 180.00 to cover the��arianee appIication fa along v►yth a plat draWing outlining our lot and the dri��ew�a���•hich���e hope to retain. I have also enclosed two letters from neighbors that adjoin our property indicating they ha��e no objections to retaining our dri��ew�ay. If}�ou have any questions concerning our applicadon,I can be reached duzing business hours at 66'1-7824. Thank you for your assistana. Sincerely, 41���..Q,.� � . 1,..�y�" Donald B. Wright Enclosures /y � _ � qc, -��03 April 1 S, 1996 Doanld&Deborah Wright 2103 Hartford Ave. St. Paul, MN 55116 Dick dc Sue Long 2099 Hartford A��e. St.Paul MN 55116 RE: Dm�e�•ay Variance Applicavon Dear Dick&Sue: As��ou are aw•aze,the Cit}•of St. Paul has notified the residents of Hartford A��enue that their sveet W�11 undergo reconstruction this summer. The Cit�•has informed us that the�•�iil]not replaa our driveway apron v��thout an apprrn•ed�•ariance. Since�re a�sh to continue using our dri��e��•a}•,��•e are appl�•ing to the Cin•of St. Paul!or the appropriate �•ariance appro�•al. The Cin•has suggested the appro�•al process���ould increase if�ve obtain letters from our neighbors indicating the�•ha��e no objection to ow dri��e��•ac. I v►•ould appreciate}•our signing this letter indicadng�•ou ha�•e no objection to our retaining our drivew•ay. Thank�•ou for�•our cooperadon. Sincerel�•, �, 4'��l.-� � • �� � �f% Donald B. Wright Dick or Sue Long v� � ` ' __ ' �, � /Yi� `%'VOY� � . _ � [�t, t •///,:r� A • ` . / �5 �� � April I5, 1996 Doanld&Dcborah Wright 2103 Hartford A��e. St.Paul,MN 55116 Dean&Julie Hughes 2107 Hartford Ave. St.Paul NIN 55116 RE: Drivev��a}�Variance Application Dear Dean&Julie: As you aze aware,the Cin�of St.Paul has notified the residenu of Hartford Avenue that their suat W�II undergo reconstruttion this summer. The Cit��has informed us that thcy wzll not replace our drivew•ay apron without an approved�•ariance. Since w�e Wish to continue using our dri�•e�ra�•,��•e are appl��ng to the Cin�of St. Paul for the appropriate �•ariance appro�•al. 'I�e City has suggested the appro�•al process Would increase if We obtain lettcrs from our neighbors indicaung they ha��e no objection to our drire�ra��. I w•ould appreciate�•our signing this letter indicating��ou ha��e no objection to our retaining our dri��eWay. Thank�•ou for�•our cooperavon. Sincerely, lJG.�..�.1� -�. �1�- � Donald B. Wright " Dean or Julie Hughes �CY � iLE qc. � �� e3 May 1, 1996 Zoning Administration City of St. Paul Of f ice of LIEP � 350 St. Peter Street - Suite 300 St. Paul, MN 55102-1510 File No. : 96-078 Zoning Administration: I am writing in obiection of allowing parking in the front yard of 2103 Hartford Avenue or any other front yard in the neighborhood. It would be a distraction, reduces the value of homes and the beauty of the area. Please o n t allow front yard parking in our neighborhood. Sincerely, �� v � ^���� len Jed loh representinq 2098-2100 Hartford Avenue �� , c ,6� �.,,� �� � ��� �� 9 � �'a- Q �=� �� l-�a,�.Q �'Il� .�s ��� � � Z � 7 �� � �g y� �. 1� � � z� � ��- - �� � � � ��� �- � 3 ��/� �G� r �1&� 36 L/ (.J �" ���•� �� I��� /'�N .�f"ioL _ i �"� lc� � � p � y- 6 � v 7� -�e � , , � � � � . , . .w.� a- � �Q �_ �- � �. � � 3 � � �`� -��� � � �-��— � �- �� �- . �i ,t,v a-- r- �-- � ^ ���� �C��-�� �- � ,�� �_ �� � � �� - ,zC � ' ��� � �`-v _�- � iy�� �-� � �'`� ,/ 1 g v.. - . - , � 1D` �?4�Fi�n�cl �; J '�' �� � ��- �'�e!�1 )� '}s�f'� l�I�Li` - � Ae �rt�a �.5 ��?rra �ci�^�P���" d � Lot � � � �_ 11 �3 ! d = ao ' . Ai�eY �r= ' . a�/ ' o � R� C;e.rct9 � r ` i� �,-� L1 W � �o�� � . � G t1J � . � , , � 1��r-r-�f� ��� 19 �..���� �"1�'�I M � � � � 1• ��1 H � ,�� � � _ � C �1 � A ` � �O �►�I.T N ` j � �► C ; t �, ' �I.f � i e e � ���.r N ' i f 1 L cse \ --�-..e .a .,�. . L � � r r� � f ; 1 � r0�� M i tN1 /t � � ' , i �R � ..a ( . � � c � ` , � h�1 : F � ' • r�,� � '�� f ^ .....� e � 2 ...t,.r .� t N i f '�,, s �� 7 �� 7 i � ..w •I � � ' � � 4 , �� ` ir,r. i t ` ` t : � � i I � 8 �� rV � `I _� � � � � � � -�--� � •. � � r.w .a � ; � • • � '�� � �. ♦ { � ( �•�T....,r .. L, . `� � ..... .� � �+� • � � � � _� ��s : � � • ` � ; , 1l • � t n a'� M 16 4 �� C�'• f �• � t 1 ti ' •,� S .P � + i ti ! � .•...s .. f �a.Q j : ""' ; '�` _ �4 I I "g r/ 1Tl i � i , 1 t f L � � � ' 3 5 M 3 ' ! � E�• � � �' —` � 1 � � f i � r� _1 : i e ♦� ! f i� lI� � . �i� a� � ..ra• � � � .e.� = �.. �+T s � .� '` � ��'J �� s � � i .e+s r M ` 1 � " s � ;� ,�... + � � .- ' I' , � . � •` �/ � \ .� � ��- J \ �t � ►, \`1 �� . � .. .�.,�. __._,_.�-_._.— ..d CITIZEN PARTICIPA'IION PIAIv'NI'NG DISTRICTS 1. SUT'RAY•BATIZ.ECREEK•HIGHWOOD � 2. HAZEL PARK HADEN•PROSPERITY H1I.LCREST . 3. WEST SIDE 4. DAYTON'S BLUFF 5. PAYI��•PHAI.EN 6. NORTH EI�TD 7. THOMAS-DALE - � 8. SUMMIT-UI�'IVERSIIY . . . � 9. WEST SEVENTH 10. COMO ' � 11. HAMLINE-MIDWAY 12. ST.ANT�iONY PARK 13. MERRIAM PARK-LEXINGTON HAMLII�'E-SNELLiI�G HAMLIIv'E . 14. MACALES'1�R GROVELAI�'D � � ' I5. HIGHIAND • 16. SUMMIT HILL . 17. DOWN'fOWN . . • Z� , . - - _ _q-�..�---; �.. _-_ --- , �.� i � � � �¢'� � � � ; � ; � � �;�°�,00'o �'o'�� o . , � � � � � � ; ; ; , � . , _ _ � _ �_ � � . a � � ! : � ; , � � l� - 1� 0�3 . � , � � � � I � -�-_ ; . O O O�O O O � O O O � O O O�Oi O'O;O O�O�O.O; O �O. -D-" , ' ' � . :.:::.J-U-�10 ��� �. � � � : A V E...�.. + : . �--- . �°� o - �- o;o;o� o'o�o! � o 0 0�0 0 0! 0!0 0 n," � � � � - � , : ; � � . � �f-=� I _ t ► i � ' 1 , __ � 1. _.�_ ; _.__ O . ' j � I � . I , � I . —_ � . + � ' • • . I ' ; � O ttF ..�,.1 i _'l�, ���'� � ��� 0:0 Q� �j0� � � � � �'� � O � � I�� I LE S � � � � � �� � - AV E . ; = o 0 0 :o. :�-- _ fl o 0 0 0 0. o o ��� ' Q �o 0 0�0�� � fl�°- �-� - � - I � i � , I . I ! _ - = - - - -= _ _, ' ; fl°' j o � � � , � � I � j � I i �� l`�_ 0 o.a0000000� � o 000000 000� o . _ � , � . . . I .. _. - WAT�ON . .. . � � AVE . _ _ _ . � o�o �o o -� 'o 0 0 0 0 ;o�o� o 0 0� o c o 0 0 0 �Q-° ���� o ' � r� � � � o � � � _ � ; � ; ; � ; . � . `�w , 0 0� o: o� o 0 0, o'o' o o :o�o 0 0'o 0 o a p ; HARTFOR D AV E . i � � , . o � � � o o�o; oo o �o;o o �# �¢� b o 0 0 -� j , � , ; . � , � � � - -- : _ � o , . i ; ; ; • + t . . � I i � _ O � � � . : • � : � � � � _ ___ i aooQ � ;o: a o ;ao�oo�o 0000000000 � N . � BAYARD AVE� ' - . _ __ . • . ; APPIiCAN� rJrn�� � �Pbra I��C,T}�,"i�" LEGEND `.1 PURPOSE M inor V��IQ�I'L �� Zoning district boundary FiLE tt � O' �7� OATE �5•�•9� � subjecl propeny �"' o�h� , • PLNG. DIST. �� MAP Jl Z�"�� 0 one tamiiy • � ^ commercial ¢ rNo iamtiy . � .... induslriai . SCALE t' � a00'• ��Q rrn,It;ple family V vacant "7 1 ac. - � � o3 MAY 13 BOARD MEETING & ATTACHMENTS EXHIBIT II q `- � � o� BOARD OF ZONING APPEALS PUBLIC HEARING MAY 13, 1996 3 PM ROOM 5-330 CIT'Y HALL ST. PAUL,MIIJNESOTA I. APPROVAL OF IvnNiTfES OF APRIL 22. 1996 The minutes of the April 22 meeting will be mailed with the May 28th meeting gacket. II. NEW BUSINESS A. Applicant - CAROL&KEVIN TURNQUIST . (#96-077) Location � - 86 Cook Ave W Zoning - R-4 Purpose: MINOR VARIANCE - A variance w allow parking within a required front yard. B. Applicant - DONALD&DEBRA WRIGH'T (#96-078) Location - 2103 Hartford Ave Zoning - R-4 Purpose: MINOR VARIANCE - A variance to allow parking within a required front yard. C. Applicant - RAMSEY HILL LMT PARTNERSHIP(#96-083) Location - 478-486 Marshall Ave ��S - RM-2 Purpose: MAJOR VARIANCE - A variance to allow maneuvering in a public right-of-way in order to construct a parking lot along the . alley. D. Applicant - CHET EMERSON,BOYS& - GIRLS CLUB(#96-084) Location - 291 E. Belvidere St Zoning - R-4 Purpose: MAJOR VARIANCE - A variance of the off-street parldng requirements in order to consttuct a recreation center for the Boys and Crirls Club;fifly-four spaccs are required and sixteen spaces are proposed,a variance of thiriy-eight spaces is requested. Board of Zoning Appeals Agenda May 13, 1996 Page Two E. Applicant - MELISSA MCDONALD& LAWRENCE EDWARDS (�{96-087) I,ocation - 2337 Chilcombe Ave ��g - R-3 Purpose: ivm�10R VARIANCE - A siae yara setbacic variance in order to cons�uct a carport on the east side of the house;a six foot setback is required and a zero setbackis requested. F. Applicant � � - SUPER AMERICA GROUP,INC. (�8) Location - 1580 Ford Parkway Zoning - B-2 Purpose: MAJOR VARIANCE - A variance of the off-strat parldng requirements,a side yard setbacl: variance and a front yard setback variance in order to construct a new gas station convenience store. Thirteen parking spaces are required and eight are proposed,a twenty-five foot setback from Ford Parlcway is required and a twenty-two foot setback is proposed,a ten foot side yard setback from the west pmperry line is required aad a 5ve foot sdback is propose�. G. Applicant _ - DUANE HART(#96-089) Location - 19aoc Parkland Court ��g - R-2 Purpose: MAJOR VARIANCE - A front yard setbacic variance in ordcr to construd a new single-family ho�ne. A 44 foot setback is required and a S foot setback is proposcd. A variance of 39 feet is requested. III. DUPLEX&TRIPLEX CONVERSION GUIDELINES FOR ZONIIJG CASES N. ADJOt;fFWMENT APPLICANT: You or your representative should attend this meeting to answer say questions the Board may hava q ` - 1tn3 tita�� 13. 1996 Board of Zonir.g Appcals Cit�•of St. Paul Ofiice of L[EP 3�U St. Peter Street-Suite 3UU St. Paul MN 5�102 Our purpose in this presentation is to respond to the objection to our request for a variance. This objection has been put forth by the tenant(Ellen Jeddeloh,currentl�•living at 2U98 Hartford Ave)and the non occapant oR ners(George and Margen-Jeddeloh,of 2098-2100 Hartford A��e. �cho resides at 597 Mount Curve Blvd). We feel that their concerns regarding our request to keep our front drive���a�•are unfounded for the follo«ing reasons: 1)We currendy use our dri��en�a�•for shoR term parking,such as loading and unloading our car and for the con��enience and safety of our handicapped elderly pareau. Because n�e are using our drivea�a�-for short tezm parldng,�re do nat see this as a distraction to the neighborhood or deten irom the attracti�•eness of our neighborhood. Z)Our house�was built in 193�along with the garage and drive«-a�-. The dri�•en•a��led from!he street direcd��to the garage. Prior to 1969 our house had an addition to the kitchen�vhich cut off the dri��e«�a��from going to the garage. The oc�ners at that dme,re��ersed the car entrance to the garage from the south side to the north side. We ha�•e li��ed at 2103 Hartford since 1985.�ti•e ha�•e never kno«n am•case n�hich a sale of a home has been ad��ersel�•effecied b�•our drivewa3�. We ha�•e inciuded a letter from Edina Realty,stating our driveti��ay has not reduced the��alue of our home or our neighboring homes. We a•ould like to point out the objections�vhich have been made are&om one famil��onh•.father. mother and daughter. Mr.and Mrs.Jeddeloh are non occupaat o�vners,and Ellen Jeddeloh is a tenant Please see attached telephone listing,because Mr. and Mrs. Jeddeloh are non occupant o«ners,n�e feel the��are looking at thzir business interest not familr needs. The Jeddeloh's purchased their duples about fi�•e years ago. Their decision in purchasing 2098-2100 Hartford was not hindered at that time because of our front yard drive�vay�. We also feel by using our dm�eway for short term parking,this allows for unobstructed�ie«•to the mortorist when uaveling drnvn Hartford Hartford is used by man��mortorists because of the com•enience of getting from Cleveland to Cretin or�zce versa��ithout am•stop signs. There is a das-care «ithin nro houses of ours,and the children's safen•is alwavs an issue. q �• � � '�3 We ha�•c made significant impro�•ements to the appearance of our homc in e�.::ss of�2�.�nui. Because of these impro�•ements.�ve ha��e kept up n�ith the appcarance���hich benefits our ncighborhood and the cin�of St. Pau[. 8��making these impro�•cments. ��c fccl thal«�e ha��c sho��n�.�::art��cn�strong good residents of the cit��of St. Paul and suppoR cit}�li�ing instead of suburban li��in�=. Please note there are four attachments.«�hich are as follo���s: 1)Letter from Edina Realh�. 2)Cop��of the telephone listing�vhich sho«�s current address of the o«ners and tenant of ZU98 - 2100 Hartford 3)Map of our neighborhood sho«ing addresses of the residences�cho ha��e not objected to us retaining our driveway,a�nd the address of the objecting p�uties duples. #)Current pictures of our home. (The pipes«�hich r-ou see in front of our homz is«�ork�rhich is currently in progress by the city of St.Paul). In conclusion«•e hope that«�e l�ave effecti��el�-sho�rn that our dri�•e«�a��is noc a distraction or detriment to the atuacti��eness of our neighborhood or am�cause for concem regardin�a lo�rer��alue of surrounding homes. Don and Debbie Wright 2103 Hartford Ave St Paul NiN 55116 Home 699-1581 Work(Don)667-7824 Work(Debbie)973-686I ����� q �- � � �� ��►° � �-� .......� r'i.. :.�4, ��.;J•'?� � .... �„r.....,,�..�,... f-ii�;filand Park ��fa�• l2, 1996 ;�; �.Cl�.el�uld.��.. ��. [';���1,11� 55116 Zoning Administration (�iZ)698-'_-34 City of St. Paul Office of LIEP F�X 350 St. Peter Street-Suite 300 i612)690z�39 St. Paul, MN >j 102-1510 RE: File No.: 96-078 2103 Hartford Avenue St. Paul. ��Ii�i 5�116 Dear Zonin� Administration, On behalf of Edina Realty, «�e do not see the drive�va��under its present conditions or functions a decrease to the property value of that tiome nor the surrounding homes in the neighborhood. Based on our e�perience and know- ledQe of the marketing process and familiarit}• of the area, �ve do not see the driveway as havin� a negative effect on the salability or market �-alue of the home. Sincerely, � Edina Realty :�ssociation of Realtors 11� � — ` � (.- � 1t� 3 94 lAH-lil Your 6TE Sun Community Directory _ JansenPaulW JensenDavidH 2Of.�.u.••5�1�«�„s� r�;': :. J�I:f4zti ;;5'Nat;a,t. 1235 E wM?Pc Is ee^,ta �.u�P.c..:�al.,; r.^:;,�a ':• JensenDonaldR 12'ie�r,ra�v�»�S 22_-;S:z Jimen� Ogt 1JBS IA42fnr��•�.: Cannerce.._ __.... 690-2201 ,knsenfenis „i:aiE� ;;i6�tx�wu,tc. JaMenTedJr 45iS;C'.a�r:� 291-8566 2103Gnoarcna��s;,.xi BWi��w:,�.r�:•-�� 69S•3•1:1 JirikBC �;,Tuscaraa:. JanskyBl 160 V:cS��•n..5 __ .. 224•3859 ,lenSenHenryC 46+��xae;:vr S� 695-;32i JmillGaria 493 Asniar:z. JanskyQiarlesM 9a?Pa�xeA.IsDcu.°,��i 222•6567 JensenJason I83aGr3nc.• 67_-:i:f JoKaro ii9oGr,uba. Jansltyfredf 8 Catherine 2116 Jar�;=• 698-3107 �enJerald 296 G•a,-,5�5. 649•2=42 Joanis YliHiam Iv wnscF.• �. Ja�iSOrICJ 2161 Far�n;Ar. ._ .. 690•5191 JEnSEnJem/ 1018 dSO s.�;S.�M:�1 22:•2335 JoanniG�J a09 asrua�u:. JanssenJ 2000 7�r 5:w _.......... 690-4607 JensenJim&linda :153 James-. 69;•2291 JobChrisB Cheryl 967�a-. Jansse�fJC 1440 Ra•�boW�Av........._ 699-4637 JensenK 2056 Bayarc.. _ 696-99�2 Job.lEanette t59 Forc�.:. JarKSenJart�esR JensenKA 1870vaxe:. _.. . 699•G148 JobeDonaldG SS3�Mr.:�;;> 1911 Sairders A.(s lanse)Gatewa�Fox;..__ 699-6183 JensenNari 934 Grr.,::. .. _ 291-2594 ; JobePeterJ JanssenThomasR 1852 S:anfad av Is ra,r,� _ 698•2096 JensenKevinW 1:5:e�:�.g:cn P�..,5(s..>� _ 690-Oi23 �r'i:="•'�a$t 5 Re�a;.:• JanssonPam 478 te.mg:on Pkwy 5...... _. 690-0322 JensenKristen 22c�H.,-arw Pw»� _ 69S-�.y JobstPeter 705 Summ��:. JantyUristine 35a&�mnac 5�........._ 690-0385 Jensenl 170v Bonzr.::. 690•5&79 Joe6 Stan's8ar 9a9�r 5•:. Janusdika5 1898 Rome Ar...............____....._ 698-4661 JensenLeonardE :68 Saracoga Sc S Re••=: __ ._ 699•)460 Joelle'sHairOesignsfor�den:. JaixrschkaCxoB Mathieu Tom 1371 E ea�or a�. 698-4709 JeruenLisaM 1 l7a Granc av. .. . _ _ ......228•3025 16��kanaobn Av....... JapuntichD 2135 Stanfor0 Av..........__..__._..._ 698-9297 JensenLisaM 932 L:�.Larc Ar _..._ __._ .....292•9182 Johann�onJM 2259 Ro;:.. JaquaBobJ t886 M�ss�ss�oa R'ner�vC 5 ...... . _ 598-1893 Jensenlouis 85 Ca:rtee Sc.... __ 69&-8251 JohannpsonJohnC USi::- JardineJamesA 2335 Scewart A....._ _ __._ 699•3545 JMISEfIM2it 294 tA�:,r$:$...... _._ . .227-7;35 � JonannessenK 760 rn:.�r.- Jard'u�eJames&Nanty 16138oNane.:• .._._ 690-3930 JensenMelvinR 18r'S Y.G'CESiHA.lsrau�a�n<.I Re;rc.; 69S•5573 � Johannessohnlarty 13i:�.-_ JamanGrodyG 927 Bayarc Av.......... 227-6126 JensenNE 1132 B�-�r�t G��_ _._. 690•"s576 ! JohansenA 1168 Granc c• JarakiV'KtaP 33B Mxa�ener 5t(s T=e�sai _._ _....699-7220 JensenNelsC 1515�anco:M Av ls E�tat-':Re:ueE.... .699•17i1 � JohansenCharles 1320 S:-- JarosLeoJ 978 E�eana a� ............... __..__.. 222-6725 JensenPat 66e l+xc,,a. __..... __ 292-,965 JohansenJames 894 S�C.;•= � JarpeA 35lemgem V�cwy 5.................. ......_... ......222-4413 JensenRusselJBJulieE 1082 Summrt:. _..................297-&918 JohansenNK a36 Houy c: JarvisVV�&Debra 881S�GaiAr..............._...._ ....292-8386 JeM¢�5 1402Pat'.t1�R�..........._.._ ...645•2150 JohansenPau!R 1651H�-: JuchkeJohnG U09 k�+e��erAv......... .....................698-5709 JensenSD 19a3 Rar�e�or.a�.........._ _................698-9132 JohaMOnCEric 2044 Dor,�: JasperJett&Sue 1277�,raAv......_ ............. ......690-9187 JensenScottW 356:rvx5t..._._ .. 225•1984 JohansonPaul SBSS�i�:•:. JaspersonCYndi 18485:CwrAv......_ ..............___....698-1380 Jeruen5usan 60�uzr�5�5.. ........_ _......_....225-9058 Johl9renElkabeth 2159?c_• Jaspersanf 1406,wmes a..................__......................699-5930 Jensen5vend 407r m:n..........___.. _._......_....227•3856 John&PaW'sBu 731 Ra��c_: JassM 130a5tClaiar...................... . _....................699-3369 JerttenThomasBMaren a86Hamne:.: ..........698-03b3 JohnLA 1a82l+icano. JaSSOR&G 1776 5t C1ar Av.............__............... ........699-4565 JensonRenEe........ .__...._......-__ _......_..T27-5638 JohnMiChad 21a Er�e 5t Jasbam0anie18Joan 1320Hartfaat. ........._..___..699-7986 JensonRoa 1985G��c.�........._._.... .........690-2962 JohnScott&Nancy 5875.-- JaxDapMe U08 weMes�ey A..........._ .....................698-7172 JenssenChristopher 57v lawH a� _ _.............225•8259 Johrtsl 665 Summit Ar JaxEugeneJ 1151Gooarknar..........__ .........__.......222-6469 JentinkFrank 334:.te�5c.._..._._ _... _... .225-1532 JoMsLarty IO7Wanc:. JaxF11614,AMwR�.........................._ _....................690-2521 JenuWiNiamE t2;:ra�rsA��s�na��si __._....698-J666 JohnsRobertC 140;mcu;._ JaxMeganO 1708wHksRrar StJOSe;nHOSC��al.._.......698-7172 JenzThomas 5335cmm;�a._......____ _....292•9340 JohrtsTaibrs 712C�ere�a�:=. JayEA 899qevdanaav5......................_.....................698-0457 JepsonEarll V546a�xtAv(svaecl ..............698•5131 JohrtsaiRichazdW 432ie,^; � JaYSteve�17409Natowcav�Y.Av...................................699'�O Je►9��BRoxtanne 1�a0RnerDr ...�....690-9d28 JOHNSON & SONS-f � . • a • JerikovskYTK 339weNSCerSc_._..._ _............222•5739 1736GranaAv............__ ; JeddebhEllen 2098 Harttaa Av..............................._.... 98- 615 JembergJohn 666 S�^m�t av......._... 227-2350 JohnsonA 616 5uiv�xt a� i • Jed 97�. c e Bnt is t.�arcervl.........699-281 JemetlJ 1366 eene<>::_.................. _ .............690-9403 ,IohnsonAS 899 C�ewn:=.: � - ersJamesA JemellJan IOSV Gca,::cc a�.......__. ...228-0722 JohnsonAlan 2a3 wes�em c.: : 1613 Sw�ders Ar Is BarOaral�ca�es:a t�«ege_...........h">5-46's8 JeromeHS 145 w�5;5........ ... ...690•36G9 ,�Mpn AliceA 1680 Ra,c:.- = Je(fersonGM 2025R�ontre�Av........_ ...__.. __ .....699-8267 Jerome'sHairFashions 167aGranaa. ... ................699•JO1i ,�p��AAenD 1621PT<.^.--� : JetfersonHowardf 280acn,�oneS;.....__........__........227-5136 Jerry'slnvitation5ervice 2081r+�esa, _...................695•S3I2 dphnSOnARonV 307Har.-.-,:. ; JeffersonKennethW 36rrorbertP�fsJZan1 Re;�r�c......_.690-1881 JerskeYJamesfX 656Gec�navS__.. __690-9569 JohnsonAnneC 888G�anc�, r. JeNeryBJ 2151 J:,iec a._....................._.....................699-9364 JerskeYJamesfX 1v12 Fora Pkwy...._.. ........698-3616 JohnsonArleneM 85a tm�a_c � JEf}!►yJal11l50 2019 Pme�wr5t Av RBtreC._.__. .. ...698-OM169 JMOfIMarjo►i! 1611 BE?cnwood Ar..... ....................699•9d00 JOhMOflArthuf 1309 hla�n2•t- � JeNerydan 1980 Itn St W................... ............... 698-4074 JersonSidneYN 13116eecnwood a.ls h;xnel...............699•9400 �p��G 2353 Yc.�;- � �nekAlasF JersonSWCy 1611 Ee1^.wood av........ . . .699-9400 JohnsonBarbarol 1015 C��� ........... 1666 James Ar Is 61ae.lu�e1 Sdmidc 6re+ery...................698-3047 JweC 931 St Pa�d a......................... ......6%-a014 JoMsonBen 585 Hdr a._. � JNinekAma 328 7m Sc v�................_ . .........._._.......225-4231 JerueRobertlSr labn aanaoio�a�_.... 690•1109 Johr�sonBertha 1925 r+o:•a.: ' Jdinek&th 1576 PorttaM Av........... _ . ....... . ......645-4397 Jerusalem 0avidM 'eZ le.egton P�..�S.:�anKel __.....698-6791 JohnSOnBeM 307 Hamn.:.: a JelinekEmilW 832 wauon a........................... __.....227-3945 JervaMichad 2285 Y.•Mart a. ._..._ 699-�i774 JohnsonBefh 1126 tmce�r:. _...... 3 Jdi�tlkJ2111lSL 670lintdn Av................_._......_._.......2T5-9024 JlrviSE 64�Cleve�mt A.5.................._ _...................698-8360 JOtMf006EthAM 465 S;tnr�- � Jel'ukkJoln 1666 James R...........................................698•3047 JeskeDJ 2153 JekE'S0�'Rc............._... _...................69O�SO Johnson&tlYAnn 2ll 1,I.�c= JdinekP 987 BaY�d Av........................................_........224-7139 JeSklL 568 l'ntdn A� _...................... ................298'9238 JOhnson6ob 666 AsnianC;� JelinekRidc 1666damesa...................__........._..........698-3047 JesPKSOnHeid� SaC;<•^+a�5.........._ ............699-8956 JohnsonBrad 1322arton., � JM'�ndcArlene 1703Jer�ersonnv.........._.......................690-3713 Jessen0 1877JeNrs�+ar_........_.... ................698•9567 JoMson&ian 1932tu�,�aur. JlIIiSOnCynUfiO 4i3 Asttarb Av................_._.........._.....222-IZ59 JesSlnThortfMA 31!�ex:ant Fv._..... ...293'1607 JohnSOn8ri2n 626 wswK�c. Ja�kinsD 559 SneY+g�v 5..................................._........699-0627 JessmTim 1033 Porrzna a��s trm�.... _ ....................227-iS03 Jdx�son&ian&Romelle 1Se; JenkimDavid 2007 Pi,enurst Ar........... ........................690-1398 JeSSerCome9 831�c+ry a�............_...._ _..................293-160T Jolrison&uteEdward 6?5�: � JenkinsJCameron 1573HarttadA..... ........................69&%23 JasonlucindaE 19aZt�ncanA..._....._____.................699•6769 Joh+sa+BurtonR 1&aa�„c- JenkinsRkhirdC 1177EdgtuMeRd..............................699-0092 JewitNOVitiate 1035S:mm�tAv............. _........._.......224-5593 JphnsonCE 662KemetnS q JeMcauTim 1615 Fad Pkwy.............._ .......................690-7618 JettAO 632 Sne�ne��S..................... ........_..........699-9683 JoMsonCJ 1395 E�eana:� � JerdcS�aytonT 1834 MsszsioDi River BirO S.._...._._.......698-8955 JettAD 126 YK�aw S:S _......._..._... _...........227-A951 ����James 1139 Da,a•- S JennelceGary lv2a Fore v�w�............_........ . __.698•2660 JetteMaria 486 Nz.-*�a,S..._._ .. __. 698•0936 JohnsonCl 596 Grana G� + JennenTim 569 Porttane tv............... _..... ......_._...224-4675 JewdIKR 17?0 Gch:c'.v.........._ __.......693-3169 ,IohnsonCl 607 h Ham.r•;:. :• JennessDouglasF 2061 S��eoardRd.._ . 698•3092 JewettStephen&Oawn S85 St Ca•a. _....290-OS29 JohnsonChl 1156 Fa::m;•.•�_• ; JenniPAilipM 472 Porranc av Is Jane1 __ __224•6763 Jewish Community Center 1375 5:P� 698-0751 JohnsonCtd 1596 wa;s;^:. : JenningsJohn SSB lntdn av ........._ 228•9401 Hwlth Oub.. ___........ . 699•JOLO JohnsonCari 1006 Raroo:;. 3 JenningsRandy 558 Lmcan av..............___._.___....228-9401 JewishFamilyService %90 Cleve�ar�c t,5 _..._r..._.._...698-0161 ,bMwnCaA 2067 Sneca;c s � JamingsThomasF 1521e��ngton PkM�5 _ . . 227•1592 JewishNewtomersProgrom 790 Ge.e S.._.... 690•1707 JohnSOnCarIA 2152 f�ea=:�=. JennyGaig WeightLossCenter 755 C�ruw G�S.. . .698-a565 JewishSinglesHotline 1375 St Pz�!a. 698-8513 ,lchnsonCarlA 856 l�xo'^:. JenschCC 197 aron St 5... ....._. .227-2789 JewishUnitedWnd&Council �90 Oe.e v a�5. ........690-1707 ,lohnsonChantel 2055 Gr:-�:. JensenAngela 10971a�can av............. _ ._......_... .293•9411 JewishWazVeteraraOevtOfMN 20a: xcan av.......690-2775 JohnsonCharktR � Jeiuen8ip&Colleen 415 Pasca�5t S 690-0708 JexMarleah 1980 7-5c'.v .....- ....699-5�56 U88 5argent av(s a�a0 JensenChrisR 392 warw+c►St....... ._ ....699•7241 JetuskiM 1925 r+r'ati:+.. _ _..... ...698-5730 JohnsonCheryl 42l a>�:a _.. JensenClayton 1315RanaoronAv... .698-8007 JezewskiG 1253CK.ra�cnrS 690-4102 ,�p�p�qy�npp� �p� :.. JensenDB 18975tCtarR� __ 698-5741 JiXuan 595Ckvc+a�ta.S _ _... 690-3056 JohnsonChrista r la JeMenDavidC 1863 Je��NSOnAv _ __ _ 698-0490 Jifrylube 2379 7n� :v _ 690-1OS5 JohnsonClarence0?c�� � JensenDavidC 669 5ne�!,;ar S __ 699-2141 JilkKristin 658 Ge.n .� _ _ 698•5375 JchnsonCliffordJ 9:%�. . ` �O t 595 G _J�rectones Cor�c•are^ �.t9?5�'E Ovecm��e:C:�.:.. . r�t�E�t�� �- - - ------- ----- - -— - -q�-� .---- v- — _ --- � � �-� 1�i�;��� o � ; o � � o � ������o!c o;�'o �� �fio � 1 � i I � i _..�._1_- ----1----�--�-- � ' ' � q C'110,3 � , � , � . , , ; ' ; i I L _ o 0 0 0� 0 0 0 � o oi o � o 0 0�0�0 0;0 0�0�0'0 0 �o�-D-- I � ; , � � , � ' � `�J U�N 0 A V E ._- � -- I , � � , ° o� - :o;o o, o� o, o;o' o 0 0 ; 0�0 0; o� o' o; o Q._"- --� � � � . � ; , - � I I ! ' ' � I ' ' ' --- i � i 1 _i � ..�. T�� O I 1 f ��� 1 I . . . . , � --- � ' ' ► ' � ' � .—o�. _ ; � � ; � ; � � � _;�; O�O�� O O; O�O. O 0► O: O, O C�� O ` O;O O O � � f�� 1LES � - AVE . ; i , = o oo. o: :��� o_.aoo:oo�o. o o ;�� 1Q �000'o� � ' �°- �_�f� _ . � . , . � ( � Ii � I ' F - i - - - � - - - � �--L-t-�,� fl a � --rt-- - - - - -i i i--;-' I : �. _ � � T , �_ � i � � I � I I �� - o� o.00000�oo;o► � o 00000�o�000; . o . . . - � . � � . E . � _ =. WATSON . . . AVE . --- - I . . �- o�o �o �o -� :'o 0 0 0 0 ;o o� o!o o; o c o 0 0 0 �- ° � . Q_ �� , :-- ° . � r � i o � � _ I � � � ' _7�'1— i , • o � 0 0� 0: 0 0 0 '0�0'0� 0 0 :o�o 0 0� 0 0 0 oi ' �LJ � , I . . , , Q . HARTFOR D ` �°A�- ° a o3�° AVE . K n`f �0 1 o O o o�o;o0 0 ;'o`o � � i� , b o 0 0 -o- ; ; ; ; � ' ' : � ' i � � — -- - • t o • M � I ; ! ' � , , i ' � ; j I � �- i aooQ � fl : a o ;ao�o�o�o 0000000000 � N i � 6AYARD AVE .i � - - - -- � � � . - , . . APPLICANT ���[-� S VP�('4 IA�Ci_� LEGEND PURPOSE Mino� V�rIQ,�1t'_r� ���' �oning disir�ct boundary Q _ ry f� subjed pro�eny n� F►lEx (�0 n71� _ DATE �5��3 •9� �" Z,S o one tamily • . ^ commerc�al PLNG. OIST �� ►f�P � � — � rNo lam�ty . � �... �ndustr�al SCA�E t' - 400' ;b,�Q muniple tam�ly V vacant ZI q �,_ � � o � NOTARIZED STATEMENT EXHIBIT III �{ (. - lt �� June 11, 1996 St. Paul City Council 310 City Hall 15 West Kellogg Boulevard Ladies&Gendemen: I have been a resident of St. Paul for 60 years. During that time I have resided on the corner of Hartford and Cleveland Avenues at 603 South Cleveland. Having lived on this corner for 60 yeazs, I am very familiar with the houses on Hartford Avenue and the history of the neighborhood. The purpose of this letter is to verify to the City of St. Paul the property located at 2103 Hartford Avenue owned by Don&Debbie Wright has had a driveway accessible from the street since I moved to the neighborhood 60 years ago. Sincerely, ' ���}�i ,�,���-+�-, � Joseph J. Ruzichka 603 South Cleveland St. Paul,MN 55116 L�/ ( C��'- � MARGA A.WEBER • � NOTARY PUBLIC'MINNESOTA ,� RAMSEY COUNTY � My Comm.Expires Jan.31.2000� � �• 11b3 MAY 28 BOARD MEETING APPROVING BOARD RESOLUTION ON FILE # 96-078 EXHIBIT IV ; Bo�oFZO�G�P�.SP����G � a �- �� �3 MAY 28, 1996 3 PM ROOM 300,350 ST.PETER STREET LOWRY PROFESSIONAL BUII.DING � ST.PAUL,MINNESOTA I. APPROVAL OF MIIVUTES OF APRII.22 AND MAY 13 1996 II. APPROVAL OF RESOLUTION: File#96-078 Donald 8t Debra Wright III. NEW BUSINESS A. APPli� - ALFRED SNIITH(#96-10� �� - 2060 Randolph Ave�nue ��S - B-2 Purpose: MAJOR VARIANCE - A variance of the off-street parldng requirements in orde,r to construct an addition to t�building at 2060 Randolph to be used as a restaurant The proposod reststaaivant requires 24 P�8 SPaoes, 11 Parldng spaces are propo�i,a variance of 13 spaces is requated B. Applicant • DEAN&JULIANNE HUGHES (#96-101) Location - 2107 Hartford Avenue ZoninB - R-4 Purpose: MINOR VARIANCE - A variance to allowed continued � parldng within a required front yard C. Applicant - MICAAEL&DE1vISE SCOTT (#96-104) Location - 1514 Iglehart Avenue ��g - RT-1 Purpose: MINOR VARIANCE - A front ya�d setback variance in order to construct a porch add.ition,a 23 foot setback is required and a 15 foot setback is rcquested A variance of 8 feet is requirod. .. . .. ' ' .� ,.. . . . , � � . . . . �3 '�`S, _ . . "y�.' S'_`` � � . . .. { . �, . .. �. Board of Zoning Appeals Ag�nda � May 28, 1996 Page Two D. Applicant - ST.PAUL DEVELOPMENT CORP(#96-10� Lacation - 469 Selby Aven� Zoning - RM-2 Purpose: MAJOR VARIANCE - A side yard sttback variancx in order to construct detached garages on the east side of the bw7ding. A 15 foot side yard setback is requirod and a 3 foot setback is proposed. A variance of 12 fxt is requircd. N. FRONT YARD DRIVEWAY GUIDELINES V. DUPLEX 8c TRIPLEX CONVERSION GUIDELINES . VI. ADJOI;fRNMENT APPLICANT: You or your representative should attend this meeting to answer any questions the Board may have. � (, - 11 b3 BOA,RD OF ZONING APPEALS RESOLUTION DENYING VARIANCE ON FILE # 96-078 EXHIBIT V � � -� 1103 CITY OF SAINT PAUL BOARD OF ZONII\TG APPEALS RESOLUTION ZONING FILE NUniBER: 9G-078 DATE: 1�1�y 2s, 1996 WHEREAS,DONALD WRIGHT and DEBRA WRIGHT ha��e applied for a variance from�he strict application of thc pro��isions of Scction 62.10-�(11)of thc Saint Paui Lcgislati��c Code pertaining to allo��ing parl;ing r��thin a required front�•ard in the R-4 zoning district at 2103 HARTFORD AVEAIIJE;and WHEREAS,the Saint Paul Board of Zoning Appeals conductcd a public hearing on OS/13/96,pursuant to said appeal in accordance wlth the requirements of Section 64.205 of the Legislative Code;and WHEREAS,the Saint Paul Board of Zoning Appeals based upon evidence presented at the public hearing,as substantially reflected in the minutes,made the follo��ing findings of f�ct: 1. The property in question can be pui to a rcasonable use undcr the strict pro��isions of the code. Thcre is ample room to pro�•ide additional off•strcet parl:ing in the rear yard and the front yard parking is a covenience rather than a hardship. 2. The plight of the land o���ncr is due to circurnstances unique to this property,and these circumstances were not created by the land o�tiner. This house is setback 35 feet from the street The garage is located about 20 fcet from the rear of the house. Both situations create a lon,�ralk for the applicants'elderly relatives. 'I'he drivev►•ay/parking space w•as in�istence��•hen the applicants purchased the house and is not a circumstance created by the applicants. 3. The proposed variance is not in keeping w�eh the spirit and intent of the code,and is consistent w�th the health,safety,comfort,morals and«�elfaze of the inhabitants of the City of St. Paul. The applicants state that the nearby collegc,St Catherine's,gencrates a lot of trafTic on Hartford Avenue pre.senting a danger to children playing in the area.Reducing the amount of on-street parking wherever possible�ti�ill mal:e it easier for driven to see the children.Ho�ve��er,there is room to nrovide additional off•street parking in the rear��ard. 4. The proposed variance will not impair an adequate supply of light and air to adjacent property,nor�ill it alter the essential character of the surrounding area or unreasonably diminish established property values �ithin the surrounding area. The applicant has submitted letters from his neighbors at 2099 and 2107 Hartford Avenue stating that they have no objection to the continued use of the driveway for pazlang. This,together w�th the fact that the parking has been in e�istence since 1969 Hithout complaint,would seem to indicate that the parking has not adversely affected the neighborhood. � ` -11 �3 File:96-078 Page T�•o S. The��ariance,if granted,would not permit any use that is not permittcd under the pro�•isions of the code for the property in the district���hcre the affected land is locatcd,nor«�ould it alter or chanse the zoning disvict classification of the property. The proposed��ariance,if ganled��•ould not altcr or change the zoning classification of the property. 6. The request for variancc is not based primaril��on a dcsire to increase the��alue or income potential of�he parcel of land. NOW,THEREFORE,BE IT RESOLVED,by the Saint Paul Board of Zoning Appeals that the applicalion to w•ai�•e the provisions of Section 62.10�(11)to allow parl:ing w�thin a required front}•ard on property located at 2103 HARTFORD AVENUE and legally described as Lot 2,Bertha's Rearrangement;in accordance with the application for variance and thc sile plan on filc���th the Zoning Administrator is hcrcby denied. 1�ZOVED BY: Bogen SECONDED BY: Tu»y IN FAVOR: 6 AGAINST: � MAILED: June 11, 1996 TIA�IE LIMIT: No order of the Board of Zoning Appeals permitting the erection or slteration of a building or off-street parking tacility shall be valid for a period longer than one year,unless a buiiding permit for such erection or alteration is obtained within such period and such ereciien or alteration is proceeding pursuant to the terms of such permi� The Board of Zoning Appeals or the�ty Council may grant an eztension not to exceed one year. In granting such extension,the Board of Zoning Appeals may decide to hold a public 6earing. APPEAL: Decisions of the Baard of Zoning Appeals are final subject to appeal to the�ty Council within 15 days by anyone affected by the decision. Building permits shall not be issued after an appeal has been filed. If permits have been issued before an appeal has been filed,then the permits are suspended and construction shall cease untit the City Counc;i has made a final determination of the appeal. � �. - 1103 Fle#96-078 Page Three CERTIFICATION: �,the undersigned Secretary to the Board of Zoning Appeals tor the City of Saint Paul,Alinnesota,do hereby certify that I have compared the toregoing copy with the original record in my o�ce; and find the same to be a true and correct copy of said original and of the whole thereof,as based on approved minutes of the Saint Paul Board of Zoning Appeals meeting held on A�ay 13, 1996 and on record in the Office of License Inspection and Environmental Protection,350 St. Peter Street,Saint Paul,Alinnesota. ... SAINT PAUL BOARD OF ZOr1I1�'G APPEALS � Sue Synstegaard Secretary to the Board Qc. - � � n3 HOMEOWNER PICTURES . EXHIBIT VI y � . � S��rf: ,t � . .• � . �� �� ��� .� • t' { � wl r ' �I N ' �f� . ' , �; . ..i, , a� / .' :��,�� �.,��. F.;_,,, y� , r -�� �� �..�.. �;. . ��� � � -- .,_ , . . ; . - , " ��: . �l.�"�r, -•.i • �.4•}.�L.' 4�i�.! �.1-; � . ' 'a�� �� �* ,.`x�k C•;. �I��°r.y� i� � ... � .. , I A � . ;'!� ✓rew•,:. � � , � ' � . a � ,Y`• , + 'S ♦ :� s• �� ,� . � r .y �` - �� �' . •� , f� � �«, �.� � � f'�S• - ' 1 T� > f� �+�.�+.�� . �. . _'9:^_l, .,,wr �:�.�3�t;.C" , . . � - � OFFICE OF THE CITY ATTORNEY Timothy E Marx, City Attorney Q � � , � h � CITY OF SAINT PAUL Civil Division Norm Coleman, Mayor 400 City Hall Telephone: 612 266-8710 I S West Kellogg Blvd. Facsimile: 612 298-5619 Saint Paul, Minnesota 55102 ii August 29, 1996 Ms . Nancy Anderson Secretary to City Council 310 City Hall Saint Paul, MN 55102 Re: Appeal of Donald and Debra Wright of a decision of the Board of Zoning Appeals heard by City Council on July 24, 1996 . Appeal by Dean and Julianne Hughes of a decision of the Board of Zoning Appeals heard by City Council on July 24, 1996 . Dear Ms . Anderson: Attached please find two resolutions for the two above-entitled matters . The first resolution pertains to the appeal of Donald and Debra Wright, 2103 Hartford Avenue. The second resolution pertains to that of Dean and Julianne Hughes, 2107 Hartford Avenue . Both appeals dealt with the Board of Zoning Appeals denial of parking spaces in a required front yard. The Council, at its public hearing of July 24, 1996, reversed the decisions of the Board of Zoning Appeals in both matters and granted both variances. Please see that these matters are set on the appropriate consent agenda. If you have any questions, please contact me. Very truly yours, ����v PETER W. WARNER Assistant City Attorney PWW/rmb Enclosures