96-1103 Council File # �� �
`o I � � �f ��� Green Sheet # � d�►
� � RESOLUTION
�°f"� ;� CI OF INT PAUL, MINNESOTA / �
.��
Presented B ,� ' �` -� � ! �' `�--.._.__ ___
Y
, j
Referred To Committee: Date
1
2 Whereas, Donald and Debra Wright made application to the Board of Zoning Appeals
3 for a variance from the strict application of the provisions of the Saint Paul Zoning Code for
4 property located at 2103 Hartford Avenue, legally described as Lot 2, Bertha's
5 Rearrangement; and
6
7 Whereas, The purpose of the application was to vary the standards of the Zoning Code
8 so as to allow the continued use of a parking space in a required front yard in a R-4 Zoning
9 District; and
10
11 Whereas, The Board of Zoning Appeals conducted a public hearing on May 13, 1996,
12 after having provided notice to affected property owners, and the Board, by its Resolution
13 No.96-101 adopted May 28, 1996, decided to deny the application based on the following
14 findings and conclusions:
15
16 1. There is ample room to provide additional off-street parking in
17 the rear yard and the front yard parking is a convenience rather
18 than a hardship.
19
20 2. The house is setback 35 feet from the street. The garage is
21 located about 20 feet from the rear of the house. Both situations
22 create a long walk for the applicants' elderly relatives. The
23 driveway/parking space was in existence when the applicants
24 purchased the house and is not a circumstance created by the
25 applicants.
26
27 3. The applicants state that the nearby college, St. Catherine's,
28 generates a lot of traffic on Hartford Avenue presenting a danger
29 to children laying in the area. Reducing the amount of on-street
30 parking wherever possible will make it easier for drivers to see
31 the children. However, there is room to provide additional off-
32 street parking in the rear.
33
34 4. The applicant has submitted letters from his neighbors at 2099
35 and 2107 Hartford Avenue stating that they have no objection to
36 the continued use of the driveway for parking. This, together
37 with the fact that the parking has been in existence since 1969
38 without complaint, would seem to indicate that the parking has
39 not adversely affected the neighborhood.
40
41 5. The proposed variance, if granted would not alter or change the
42 zoning classification of the property.
43
� ac. — ��03
�(� � ����reas, Pursuant to the provisions of Section 64.205, Donald and Debra Wright, duly
I� e City Clerk an appeal from the determination made by the Board of Zoning
3 Appeals, requesting that a heazing be held before the City Council for the purpose of
4 considering the actions taken by the said Board; and
5
6 Whereas, Acting pursuant to Sections 64.205 through 64.208, and upon notice to
7 affected parties a public hearing was duly conducted by the City Council on July 24, 1996
8 where all interested parties were given an opportunity to be heard; and
9
10 Whereas, The Council, having heard the statements made, and having considered the
11 variance application, the report of staff, the record, minutes and resolution of the Board of
12 Zoning Appeals, does hereby
13
14 Resolve, That the Council of the City of Saint Paul does hereby reverse the decision of
15 the Board of Zoning Appeals in this matter, based on the following findings of the Council:
16
17 A. The findings of fact set forth in the Staff Report to the BZA supported a
18 recommendation by Staff to approve the variance. The Council now adopts
19 those facts as its own. Those facts are:
20
21 1. The applicants state that the driveway originally ran all the way
22 back to the garage until sometime in 1969 when a kitchen
23 addition was added to the east side of the house. Since that time
24 the access to the garage has been through the alley and the
25 driveway has been sued for parking. The applicants would like
26 to retain the driveway for parking as a convenience for his
27 elderly relatives and as a short term parking area.
28
29 2. The house is setback 35 feet from the street. The garage is
30 located about 20 feet from the rear of the house. Both situations
31 create a long walk for the applicants' elderly relatives. The
32 driveway/parking space was in existence when the applicants
33 purchased the house and is not a circumstance created by the
34 applicants.
35
36 3. The applicants state that the nearby college, St. Catherine's,
37 generates a lot of traffic on Hartford Avenue presenting a danger
38 to children laying in the area. Reducing the amount of on-street
39 parking wherever possible will make it easier for drivers to see
40 the children.
41
42 4. The applicant has submitted letters from his neighbors at 2099
43 and 2107 Hartford Avenue stating that they have no objection to
44 the continued use of the driveway for parking. This, together
45 with the fact that the parking has been in existence since 1969
46 without complaint, would seem to indicate that the parking has
47 not adversely affected the neighborhood.
48
49 5. The proposed variance, if granted would not alter or change the
50 zoning classification of the property.
51
��lr° ` :�'� F t � �. �The facts above stated in the Staff Report recommendation to approve the q` —``Q'3
� � �--' E i �.� ;var►iance further the general welfare of the City.
3
4 And Be It Further Resolved, That the appeal of Donald and Debra Wright be and is
5 hereby granted; and,
6
7 Be It Finally Resolved, That the City Clerk shall mail a copy of this resolution to
8 Donald and Debra Wright, the Zoning Administrator, Planning Commission and Board of
9 Zoning Appeals.
� Navs Absent Requested by Department of:
a ev
Bostrom
arris �
uerin
e ar �
ettman �
une BY�
Form Approved by City Attorney
Adopted by Council: Date �
Adoption Certified by Council Secretary By: �������y� �/2 7 �(
By� Approved by Mayor for Submission to
Approved by Mayor: Date � C� Council
By: / ' ` � G� By:
� .�t�-1.�03
� ���N � ��EElV S�EET N_ 36372
Cit Council 9/4/%
s ��ew►ar�ror oipEC�roR � � �cm couNC�� - - �"m�►va►�
Councilmember Harris 266-8630 �R� ❑cmnrroRNev { �cmc��c
81'(��) qpyT� �BUDOET DIRECt�OR ' �FIN.6 MOT.9ERVICEB DIR.
Se t. 11 1996 °noEe ❑"""'roA t°R"ss�sr""�r� ❑
TOTAL#E OF 81�iNATURE PAGES (CLIP AL�LOCATIONB FOR$IC;NATURE) �,
ACTION REGUE8TED: ,
Finalizing City Council Action taken July 24, 1996, by granti}�g a variance to allow parking
within a required front yard at 2103 Hartford Avenue. '
RECOMMENdAT10N8:Appow(A)a R�j�ot(R) PER80NAL SERVICE CONTRACTS MUST ANsWER THE ROLLOMIING GUESTION�:
_PUWNNiO CO�uN�810N _;GVfl.8ERNICE c�MMN8310N 1. Hu iMs p�►SOnRirm sVer worked under a c�tlhict fOr Uds d�parqnsM? -
_CIB COMAAITTEE _ YES NO
2. Has this peroonRfrm ever been a clty emplo�res?
—�� — YES NO �
_o18TRICT COUR'T _. 3. Doea this psrson/firm poaeess a sklll not noFinaliy Pwsassd bY�Y ou��Y�Yre�
SUPPORTS WNICH COUNGL OBJECTIVE9 YES NO
Explain all ya answ�n on s�nN sfa�t�nd�tUeh to prNn sM�t
iNmnrx�o w�oe��,�esue.oProwruNm�wno.wnn.wnsn,wn�,nmr):
I
ADVANTI�E8 IF APPRONED:
I
D18/1DVANTAOE8IF APPAOVED:
1i1NN 14N �� L/a Ilt1
SEP 0 4 1996
� — ---- �
a�,�$�►��o:
�
TOTAL AMOUNT OR TWANSACTION : COBT/REVENUE BUDQETEQ(CIRCLE ONE) YES NO
FtlNDING SOUIlCE ACTIVITY NUMBER �
FINANCIAI IPIFORMATION:(EXPLAIN)
OFFICE OF LICENSE,INSPECTIONS AND � �_`�O�
ENVIRONMENTAL PROTECTION
Roben Kessler,Director
CITY OF SAINT PAUL LOWRY PROFESSIONAL Te[ephone:612-266-9090
Norm Coleman, Mayor BUILDING Facsimile: 612-266-9099
Suite 300 612-266-9124
350 St.Peter Street
Saint Pau[,Minnesota 55102-1510
w
June 25, 1996
Ms.Nancy Anderson
City Council Research Office
Room 310 City Hall
Saint Paul,Minnesota 55102
Dear Ms. Anderson:
I would like to confirm that���[ig before the City Council is scheduled fo��
�1996 for the following appeal of a Board of Zoning Appeals decision:
Appellant: ����t
File Number: 96-155
Purpose: Appeal of a Board of Zoning Appeals decision denying a
variance to allow parking within a required front yard.
Address: 2103 Hartford Ave.
Legal Description of Property: Lot 2,Bertha's Rearrangement.
Previous Action: Board of Zoning Appeals; 6 in favor, 1 against
My understanding is that this public hearing request will appear on the agenda for the
July 24, 1996 City Council meeting at 4:30 p.m. and that you will , in
the Saint Paul Legal Ledger. Please call me at 266-9082 if you have any questions.
Sincerely,
John Hazdwick �� ���� ��
Zoning Technician ,U��,� °���
cc: Council Member Harris.
_.__,...,.�.y..�,�.n:.q.r`- .
�A������t�,
�.,_...
� The Saint Paul City Council will conducf a public hearing oa Wednea � . _
.�p�24,1996,to conaider the a�eal of Donald.and L?ebra Wright fo a deci��
1�[�he Board of Zoniag Appeals denying a variance to allo�v parking with�i:
r�iired froat yard at 2103 Haztford Avenua •
f�ed:June 27. 1996 _ _ _
�TCY ANDER30N '
,�stant City Councii S�
_ �J�M�e�.�MN . _
� �.- 1�03
GUIDELINES FOR VARIANCE REQUESTS TO ALLOW PARKING
WITHIN A REQUIRED YARD FOR ONE AND TWO FAMILY
DWELLINGS.
Staff will recommend denial of variance requests to allow the continuation of parking within a
required yard unless the following conditions are met:
1. The parking space has been in existence and used continuously since October 25, 1975.
2. The applicant can demonstrate hardship in that there is no feasible alternative location for the
parking space. For the purpose of this condition hardship shall include ; a disability by a resident
of the property that qualifies for a State Handicap Pazking Permit,topography that makes rear
yard parking impossible, the lack of a11ey access to the property, or insufficient lot size to
provide off-street parking in a non-required yard.
3. The applicant submits a petition from property owners within 100 feet of the property along
either side of the street stating that they have no objection to the pazking.
4. The parking space is paved or the applicant agrees to pave the space within 120 days.
ADOPTED AND APPROVED BY THE BOARD OF ZONING
APPEALS ON JUNE 24, 1996
MOVED BY: T�»y
SECONDED BY: wuson
IN FAVOR: �
, ,
Q.,�,:-.�.�0 3
;:::��i����::�:::::::::>::>:.:::::::_>:>::�:::::.>:::::;:>:::::>:.;.>:<:>::>:::::<:>::::::.:::::::>::.:::::`:::
::;>::>::»;�:>�::;:.!��:::�`::>::>:::<:>:>::::>:::::
:_>.:.::>:::.::;�:>�:::�:<::::��::>�:::::>::»::::::>:<:�:<>:>::
APPLICATION FOR APPEAL :::::�������:��:::::>:>�'��������`�:�::;::::::::> .. ::::::�'..�`.�........:.:.::.:;:.::.;:.:;;:.:::.::.:;.;;::.:
:�::::�`��::::�t:::::>::::>::��:::>::::>::>::<::>::<:<�:::::::::>::::>::>::<::::«::::::>
�f�, .�.�.�.,,�,..,,�..�,...::>::>:
.(�; v�'�Y�l:�S>:::i:::::::ir::Fr:i:::::::i:{�ii
+�::i.�i>:MI�'{�i ..::.:�:::.�::.::::::::::::::i:�i:�.
:ii::'riiiiiiii:::i::i:::i:ii.�.:
::i••ii'::�::Fiiiiiiiir::i::i?::ii::::yj::ii:ii:::iy::ii::ii::i::i::i:
Department of Planning and Economic Deve[opment >::>:����:����������:................::::::.�::::::::::::::::::::::::::::.;;:.;:.;:
.;;:.:;:«».»�:.;:.;;:.:;:.:;.;;::.;;::.::;:.;:.;:.:<:.;;;:.;:;:.;:<.:.:;.;:.;;:.>::>::>::>
Zonin Section
g
:<;:>::>;:::::x::>:::::;::?<::<':<::.:<::>
::>::�����:::::�.'z>::?::?::�:'�?:::':::;`s�;::>:<:<:`€:::[:`>;:':
�� 1100 Ci Hall Annex
:::::�.::'�11f.!�:,:�:#!���«���.::<:::�::>::>::>':::>:::::<::
�1'
2
S West Fourth
Street
Saint Paul
MN SSIO
,
2
2
66-6589
APPELLA�IT Name �c•� � t�e6b;e 1Jr�qki-
Address 2to3 ��ert���� �?Je - !0%7- �
City St. pa�l St�ZipSS/ILp Daytime phone
PROPERTY Zoning File Name��� a �e�d�e !.����k�'"'
LOCATION �
Address/Location��_����c�� �i Prc� �Qi s�,
TYPE OF APPEAL: Application is hereby made for an appeal to the: �
❑ Board of Zoning Appeals �f City ;ouncil
under the provisions of Chapter :��, �ection , Faragrapt� or'the Zoning Code, to
appeal a decision made by the S�, p� u 1 'Z o�, ►1� �pap rcj
on '� �c _ , 19�. File number: -�1�- 078
(date of ecision)
GROUNDS FOR APPEAL: Fxplain why you feel there has been an error in any requirement,
permit, decision or refusal made by an administrative o�cial, or an error in fact, procedure or
finding made by ti�e Board of Zoning Appea!s or the Planning Commission.
See ��tclpsecl A�c,�4y�
�J6/^1:�96000�xr�.�fr{�'' �i.:*_�i;
4s�80 ',fAFi'�i�'Ce. �n�� �C1
L�Fi�i tiE.1".1�1 �i�
Attach additional sheet if necessary)
Applicant's signature � Date �� City agent
�l� - 1��3
June 21, 1996
Mr. John Hardwick
Lowry Professional Building Suite 300
350 St. Peter Street
St.Paul,MN 55102-1510
Dear Mr.Hardwick:
Please be advised that we aze appealing the Zoning Boards denial of our driveway variance to the St. Paul
City Council. I have enclosed a complete package for you on all material submitted to each
councilmember's office.
Sincerely,
�J�:� � _ �����'
Donald B. Wright
�I (.- 1�b3
LETTER TO COUNCILMEMBERS
9c.-��o3
June 21, 1996
St. Paul City Council
310 City Hall
15 West Kellogg Boulevard
St. Paul, MN 55102
RE: Driveway Vaziance Denial By the St. Paul Zoning Board
Don&Debbie Wright, Owners
2103 Hartford Ave.
St. Paul, MN 55116
Zoning Boazd File# 96-078
St. Paul City Council Members:
This letter is being written to notify the St. Paul City Council that Don & Debbie Wright, the
owners of 2103 Hartford Ave., are appealing the St. Paul Zoning Boazd's denial of their driveway
variance application as was set forth in the Boazd's meeting of May 13, 1996.
We find it necessary to appeal our case to the St. Paul City Council based upon the following facts.
Fact Number One:
The City Staff Report submitted to the Zoning Board by John Hardwick recommended approval of
our variance application based on findings one through six of their report.
Fact Number Two:
The first order of new business at the May 13, 1996 Board meeting was an application for minor
variance to allow front yard parking. The variance application was submitted by Carol & Kevin
Tumquist 86 Cook Ave. West. (file # 96-077) This properry tumed out to be a duplex and the
applicants were requesting off street pazking for their tenants. The Board na.rrowly approved the
variance application by a four in favor to three against vote. After the vote was taken, I felt
confident my variance application would also be approved.
Fact Number Three:
The second order of business was our application for minor variance to allow front yazd pazking. I
was shocked when the Board voted six in favor to one against to deny our variance application.
Why did the Turnquist's variance pass while our variance was denied? Several reasons come to
Psge 1
Q �- 1� �3
mind. First,the Board gave special consideration to renta.l property versus a single family residence.
Second, the Board reacts differently on front yard parking depending on the neighborhood. Third,
the Board felt we had no right to a front yard driveway since we have a garage and the possibility of
parking in the back yard.
Fact Number Four:
In denying our variance, it was the Board's contention in finding number one of the Staff Report
there is ample room in the back yazd to park a vehicle. This decision was based on a picture shown
to the Board of an additional parking space for a sma.11 tent trailer in the backyazd running parallel
to the alley. (Exhibit VI) Upon your review of the picture marked(E�ibit Vn you should come to
the conclusion there is insufficient room to make an additional parking space parallel to the garage.
Subsequent to the picture shown to the Boazd, a fence has now been installed sectioning off the
trailer parking space from the rest of the back yard. Therefore, because of the limited space in the
back yard it was unreasonable of the Board to have assumed there was ample room in the back yard
for parking without seeing the backyard in its present condition prior to the installation of the fence.
Fact Number Five:
The Board also denied our variance based on their opinion the front driveway is a convenience
rather than a necessity due to hardship. I am not disputing the fact the Board has decided the
driveway is a convenience. I am disputing this convenience has been in existence for at least sixty
years according to Joseph J. Ruzichka who has lived in our neighborhood for that length of
time.(Exhibit III notarized statement) Unfortunately, when I appeared before the Board on May 13,
1996, I was not aware of the facts attested to by Mr. Ruzichka in his statement. Since there is not
an appeal process to the Zoning Board based on additional facts, I am currently submitting this
statement as part of my appeal.
Fact Number Six:
Mr. John Hardwick, Office of License, Inspections, and Environmental Protection, had indicated in
several conversarions that if a similaz statement of Mr. Ruzichka's had been submitted to the LIEP
Office prior to my appearance before the Board, then my application for variance could�have been
administratively approved saving myself and the City of St. Paul valuable time and money.
Fact Number Seven:
In finding number three of the Staff Report, the Board reiterated there was ample room in the back
yard for additional parking based upon incomplete facts. I can only conclude the Boazd based their
decision on the fact that the granting of the variance is not in keeping with the spirit and intent of the
code. This conclusion is based on the Boazd's inability or refusal to respond on how the granting of
the variance would adversely af�ect the health, safety, comfort, morals, and welfare of the residents
of St. Paul. The spirit and intent of the current code (as amended and passed in 1975) should ha.ve
no bearing on a driveway which has been in existence for forty years prior to the passing of the
current code.
Page 2
� � -1��3
My wife and I have been homeowners in the City of St. Paul for the past eleven years. In those
eleven years we ha.ve made significant improvements to our property. These improvements have
benefited our neighborhood by increasing property values and the desirability of families to move
into our communiTy versus moving to the suburbs.
We aze urging the members of the City Council to overium the Zoning Boazd decision denying our
variance application. Both the City of St. Paul and I have expended considerable time and money
pursuing a situation which has existed for sixty years. Retaining our driveway has not, nor will it in
the future, adversely affect the health, safety, morals and welfare of our neighborhood or the
inhabitants of the City of St. Paul.
Sincerely,
[k/� �- ��"�,,r'v''�
Donald B. Wright
cc: John Hazdwick
Page 3
�I � • 1��3
STAFF REPORT & �TTACHMENTS
EXHIBIT I
BOARD OF ZONING APPEALS STAFF REPORT � � • � ` �3
1. APPLICANT: DONALD & DEBRA WRIGHT FII.E#96-078
2. CLASSIFICATION: Minor Variance DATE OF HEARIlVG: OS/l3/96
3. LOCATION: 2103 HARTFO�tD AVENUE
4. LEGAL DESCRIPTION: Lot 2, Bertha's Rearrangement.
5, pLANNING DISTRICT: 15
6. PRESENT ZONIlVG: R-4 ZONIlVG CODE REFERENCE: 62.104 (11)
7. STAFF INVESTIGATION AND REPORT: DATE: 04/24/96 BY: John Hardwick
8 DATE RECEIVED: 04/17/96 DEADLIlV'E FOR ACTION: 6/16/96
_
A. PURPOSE: A variance to allow parl:ing within a required front yard.
B. ACTION REQUESTED: Section 62.104 (11) states: "off•street parking spaces shall not be
within a required front or side yard and shall be a minimum of 4 fcet from any side lot line".
C. STTE AND AREA CONDTITONS: This is a 43 by 125 foot lot with a two-car detached garage
in the rear yard. There is alley access to the rear of the property.
Surrounding Land Use: Primarily single family homes.
D. BACKGROUND: As part of the street paving project planned for Hartford Avenue this
summer,the Public Works Department notifie�the applicants that they would not provide a curb
cut for his driveway which led to an apparent illegal parking space.
E. FINDIl�IGS: �
1. The property in question cannot be put to a reasonable use under the strict provisions of the
code.
The applicants state that the driveway originally ran all the way back to the garage until
sometime in 1969 when a kitchen addition was added to the east side of the house. Since
that time the access to the garage has been through the alley and the driveway has been used
for parking. The applicants would like to retain the driveway for parking as a convenience
for his elderly relatives and as a short term parking area.
2. The plight of the land owner is due to circumstances unique to this property, and these
circumstances were not created by the land owner.
�'
File#96-078
Page Two
This house is setback 35 feet from the street. The garage is located about 20 feet from the
rear of the house: Bath situations create a long walk for the applicants'elderly relatives. The
driveway/paridng space was in existence when the applicants purchased the house and is not
a circumstance created by the applicants.
3. The proposed variance is in keeping with the spirit and intent of the code, and is consistent
with the health, safety, comfort,morals and welfare of the inhabitants of the City of St. Paul.
The applicants state that the nearby college, St. Catherine's, generates a lot of traffic on
Hartford Avenue presenting a danger to children playing in the area. Reducing the amount
of on-street parking wherever possible will make it easier for drivers to see the children.
4. The proposed variance ��ill not impair an adequate supply of light and air to adjacent
property, nor will it alter the essential character of the surrounding area or unreasonably
diminish established property values within the surrounding area.
The applicant has submitted letters from his neighbors at 2099 and 2107 Hartford Avenue
stating that they have no objection to the continued use of the driveway for parking. This,
together with the fact that the parking has been in existence since 1969 without complaint,
wouId seem to indicate that the parking has not adversely affected the neighborhood.
5. The variance, if granted,would not pernut any use that is not permitted under the provisions
of the code for the property in the district where the a$'ected land is located, nor would it
alter or change the zoning district classification of the properry.
The proposed variance, if granted would not alter or change the zoning classification of the
property.
6. The request for variance is not based primarily on a desire to increase the value or income
potential of the parcel of land.
F. DISTRICT COUNCIL RECOMME:��DATION: As of the date of this report we have not
received a recommendation from District 15.
G. STAFF RECOMMENDATION: Based on findings 1 through 6, staff recommends approval
of the variance.
�Z
�.,. �
' �' ZONING BOARD
�+e�
���;�,o� � `� ���3
APPLICATION FOR ZONING ORDINANCE VARIANCE
- CITY OF SAINT PAUL . ( .� " � " "
A VARIANCE OF ZONING CODE CHAPTER �Z ,SECTION����� PARAGRAPH ��
' iS REQUESTED IN CONFORMI7Y WITH THE POWERS VESTED IN THE BOARD OF ZONING AP-
. �
:: �PEALS TO PERMR THE �7 � ►�� 2C K'•u �jC~� ON PROPERTY
� DESCRIBED BELOW. �'L�' .
� A. Applicant; NAME: ` I D~4 Jc� d �e�p�G Lr � ��4 1�T
ADDRESS �JP� T74 T '}�p rc1 ��e •
'� DAYTIME TELEPHONE NO. �°������ ZIP CODE'�����P
1. PropeAy interest of applicant(owner,contract urchaser,et .) .
' '• . . ��...5 n l`�� � � : •;� �'� ;' : ,_ • �.�T. � ' � !� , �► .
2. Name ot owner(it diflerent) •
B. Properry Oescripticn: ADDRESS � ��� �� � '��Q'�� �'��=-
�F ; � r.:• �=
�. 1. Legal description: LOT �= BLOCK�F�+%�{�^�^�r�TDD.
�
2. Lot size: 'y�� � `"� � /�S � L
3. Present Use � • �!, '� �F":�• �y present Zoning Dist. � �'L�
C. Reasons for Request: SP P �i ��+��r Fc� '�l.�t�P�
1. Proposed use
2. What physical characteristics of the property prevent its being used for any oT the permitted
uses in your zone?(topography,soil conditions,size and shape of lot,etc.)
3. State the specific variation requested,giving distances where appropriate. (
/�- r�c c.�! �P,ZK ;�✓J 1,:;� ��✓ f+' I Zr�c.;+-t,v
, 'r�l�'�, �}�t� � . .
, . , y. t � ; . ; . ; � :. .� . .
. , �.
4. Explain how your case contortns to eact�of the following:
a. That the strict application ot the provisions of the Zoning Ordinance would resuR in peculiar�
or exceptional practical difficutties,or exceptional undue hardships. � _
- . � '�'��
S� � �rL�
K b. That the granti�g M a variance will i 1 r: �@fl ,. ON�Xnr. 1
; - : not be a subsranba� oeaimeM to 4QB0 VAfiIANCE �*lEO.C�(?
'r � public pood or a substantial impair- (? ,
• ' ment ot the iMant and purpose of $UBT'iL �t 1$Q�Qp .
� � the Zoning Ordinance. *1�f7.00 �.
CHANGE �,pp
A�/'�� -
� ��� �
Sipnaturo�l✓�'��� `�3 �••� t3
IL
April 15, ]996 �
Donald B. &Deborah A. Wright
2103 Hartford A��e.
St. Paul,MN 55116
Mr.John Hard��ick
Office of License,Inspections&En�zronmental Protcction
Lo��7�Professional Building, Suite 300
350 St. Peter Su�et
St.Paul,NiN 55102-1510
RE: Variance Application For Retaining Dri��ew�ay
Dear Mr.Hard«�ck:
T'his letter is being ���inen to requcst our desire to rctain access to our front �•ard dri��eW�ay in the
upcoming reconsUVCtion of Hartford Arenue this summet. We Wish to apply for the �•ariance of the
zoning code to allow pazking in our present dri��ew�ay. �
The proposed use of the driveway wyll remain as off street short term parking for us and for our .
handicapped, elderl�� relatives . One ad�•antage to the public in retaining the a:isting drivew�a}• a�ould be
saferi�. The fe«•er parked cars on Hartford, the greater the��sibilit�• of children pla�zng on the sideH•alk
for motorists using Hartford.
The onl}•ph}•sical characteristic of our propem�that needs to be noted is our dri��eWa�•abuu our neighbor's
lot linc. (sa enclosed plat dra��zng) As far as I can detemune,this has ban the case for at least tu•enry
se��en��ears. T'he access to the garage had been from the e�►isting front dri��ew�a�•until the kitchen addition
�•as added to the east side of the house sometime prior to 1969. This changed the acass to the garage
from thc existing drivew•a}•to the alley.
Since our dri��e��a�� has been in existence for many ��ears and has ban used as shon term parking for
residenu and their.7sitors, I believe granung the��ariance w•ould not deter from the o��erall appearance of
our street or create a detriment to the public. Actually, the public benefits by increasing the safen• of
neighborhood children and motorists.
I ha��e enclosed m�•check in the amount of S 180.00 to cover the��arianee appIication fa along v►yth a plat
draWing outlining our lot and the dri��ew�a���•hich���e hope to retain. I have also enclosed two letters from
neighbors that adjoin our property indicating they ha��e no objections to retaining our dri��ew�ay.
If}�ou have any questions concerning our applicadon,I can be reached duzing business hours at 66'1-7824.
Thank you for your assistana.
Sincerely,
41���..Q,.� � . 1,..�y�"
Donald B. Wright
Enclosures
/y
�
_ �
qc, -��03
April 1 S, 1996
Doanld&Deborah Wright
2103 Hartford Ave.
St. Paul, MN 55116
Dick dc Sue Long
2099 Hartford A��e.
St.Paul MN 55116
RE: Dm�e�•ay Variance Applicavon
Dear Dick&Sue:
As��ou are aw•aze,the Cit}•of St. Paul has notified the residents of Hartford A��enue that their sveet W�11
undergo reconstruction this summer. The Cit�•has informed us that the�•�iil]not replaa our driveway
apron v��thout an apprrn•ed�•ariance.
Since�re a�sh to continue using our dri��e��•a}•,��•e are appl�•ing to the Cin•of St. Paul!or the appropriate
�•ariance appro�•al. The Cin•has suggested the appro�•al process���ould increase if�ve obtain letters from
our neighbors indicating the�•ha��e no objection to ow dri��e��•ac.
I v►•ould appreciate}•our signing this letter indicadng�•ou ha�•e no objection to our retaining our drivew•ay.
Thank�•ou for�•our cooperadon.
Sincerel�•,
�, 4'��l.-� � • ��
� �f%
Donald B. Wright
Dick or Sue Long v�
� ` ' __ ' �, � /Yi�
`%'VOY� � .
_ � [�t, t
•///,:r� A • `
. /
�5
�� �
April I5, 1996
Doanld&Dcborah Wright
2103 Hartford A��e.
St.Paul,MN 55116
Dean&Julie Hughes
2107 Hartford Ave.
St.Paul NIN 55116
RE: Drivev��a}�Variance Application
Dear Dean&Julie:
As you aze aware,the Cin�of St.Paul has notified the residenu of Hartford Avenue that their suat W�II
undergo reconstruttion this summer. The Cit��has informed us that thcy wzll not replace our drivew•ay
apron without an approved�•ariance.
Since w�e Wish to continue using our dri�•e�ra�•,��•e are appl��ng to the Cin�of St. Paul for the appropriate
�•ariance appro�•al. 'I�e City has suggested the appro�•al process Would increase if We obtain lettcrs from
our neighbors indicaung they ha��e no objection to our drire�ra��.
I w•ould appreciate�•our signing this letter indicating��ou ha��e no objection to our retaining our dri��eWay.
Thank�•ou for�•our cooperavon.
Sincerely,
lJG.�..�.1� -�. �1�- �
Donald B. Wright "
Dean or Julie Hughes
�CY
� iLE
qc. � �� e3
May 1, 1996
Zoning Administration
City of St. Paul
Of f ice of LIEP �
350 St. Peter Street - Suite 300
St. Paul, MN 55102-1510
File No. : 96-078
Zoning Administration:
I am writing in obiection of allowing parking in the front yard of
2103 Hartford Avenue or any other front yard in the neighborhood.
It would be a distraction, reduces the value of homes and the
beauty of the area.
Please o n t allow front yard parking in our neighborhood.
Sincerely,
��
v � ^����
len Jed loh
representinq 2098-2100 Hartford Avenue
��
,
c ,6� �.,,� �� � ���
�� 9 � �'a- Q �=�
�� l-�a,�.Q �'Il� .�s ��� � � Z � 7
�� � �g y�
�.
1� � �
z� � ��- -
�� �
�
� ���
�- �
3 ��/� �G� r �1&� 36 L/
(.J �" ���•�
�� I��� /'�N .�f"ioL _ i �"� lc�
�
� p � y- 6 � v 7�
-�e
�
, ,
� � �
�
. ,
. .w.� a-
� �Q �_ �-
� �. � � 3 � � �`�
-��� � �
�-��— �
�- �� �- .
�i ,t,v a-- r- �-- �
^ ����
�C��-�� �-
� ,�� �_
��
� �
�� - ,zC
� '
��� �
�`-v _�-
�
iy�� �-� �
�'`� ,/ 1 g
v.. - . -
, � 1D` �?4�Fi�n�cl �; J '�' �� �
��- �'�e!�1 )� '}s�f'� l�I�Li` -
� Ae �rt�a �.5 ��?rra �ci�^�P���"
d
� Lot � � � �_ 11 �3
! d = ao '
. Ai�eY
�r= '
.
a�/ ' o
�
R� C;e.rct9 �
r
` i�
�,-�
L1
W
� �o�� �
. � G
t1J � .
� ,
,
�
1��r-r-�f� ���
19
�..����
�"1�'�I M � � � �
1•
��1 H � ,�� � � _
� C �1 � A
` � �O �►�I.T N `
j � �► C ; t �, ' �I.f � i e e � ���.r N ' i f
1 L cse \ --�-..e .a
.,�. . L
� � r r� � f ;
1 � r0�� M i tN1 /t � � ' , i �R �
..a ( . � � c � `
, � h�1
: F � '
• r�,� � '�� f ^ .....� e �
2 ...t,.r .� t N i f
'�,, s �� 7 �� 7 i � ..w
•I �
� ' � � 4 , �� `
ir,r. i t ` ` t
: � � i I �
8 ��
rV
� `I
_� � � � � �
� -�--� � •.
� � r.w .a
� ; � • • � '�� � �.
♦
{ � ( �•�T....,r .. L, . `�
� ..... .� � �+� • � �
� � _� ��s :
� � • ` �
; , 1l • �
t n a'� M 16 4 �� C�'• f �• � t 1 ti ' •,� S .P �
+ i ti !
� .•...s .. f �a.Q j : ""'
; '�` _ �4 I I "g r/ 1Tl i � i , 1 t
f L � �
� ' 3 5 M 3 ' ! � E�• � � �' —` �
1 � � f i � r� _1 : i e ♦�
! f i� lI� � . �i� a� � ..ra• �
� � .e.� = �.. �+T s � .� '`
� ��'J �� s �
� i .e+s r M
` 1 � "
s �
;� ,�... + �
� .- ' I' , �
. � •` �/ � \
.� �
��- J \ �t
� ►, \`1
�� . � .. .�.,�.
__._,_.�-_._.—
..d
CITIZEN PARTICIPA'IION PIAIv'NI'NG DISTRICTS
1. SUT'RAY•BATIZ.ECREEK•HIGHWOOD
� 2. HAZEL PARK HADEN•PROSPERITY H1I.LCREST
. 3. WEST SIDE
4. DAYTON'S BLUFF
5. PAYI��•PHAI.EN
6. NORTH EI�TD
7. THOMAS-DALE -
� 8. SUMMIT-UI�'IVERSIIY . .
. � 9. WEST SEVENTH
10. COMO
' � 11. HAMLINE-MIDWAY
12. ST.ANT�iONY PARK
13. MERRIAM PARK-LEXINGTON HAMLII�'E-SNELLiI�G HAMLIIv'E
. 14. MACALES'1�R GROVELAI�'D
� � ' I5. HIGHIAND •
16. SUMMIT HILL .
17. DOWN'fOWN . .
• Z�
, . - - _ _q-�..�---; �.. _-_
--- ,
�.� i � � � �¢'� � � � ; � ; � � �;�°�,00'o �'o'�� o
. , � � � � � � ; ; ; , � . , _
_ � _ �_ � � . a
� � ! : � ; , � � l� - 1� 0�3
. � , � � � � I � -�-_
; .
O O O�O O O � O O O � O O O�Oi O'O;O O�O�O.O; O �O. -D-" ,
' ' � .
:.:::.J-U-�10 ��� �. � � � : A V E...�.. + : .
�--- .
�°� o - �- o;o;o� o'o�o! � o 0 0�0 0 0! 0!0 0 n," � � �
� - � , : ; � � . � �f-=� I
_ t ► i � ' 1 , __ �
1. _.�_
; _.__ O .
' j � I � . I , � I . —_ �
. + � ' • • . I ' ; � O ttF
..�,.1 i _'l�, ���'� � ��� 0:0 Q� �j0� � � � � �'� � O �
� I�� I LE S � � � � � �� � - AV E . ;
= o 0 0 :o. :�-- _ fl o 0 0 0 0. o o ��� ' Q �o 0 0�0�� � fl�°- �-� -
� - I � i � , I . I ! _
- = - - - -= _ _, ' ; fl°' j
o � � � , � � I �
j � I i �� l`�_
0 o.a0000000� � o 000000 000� o . _
� , � . .
. I ..
_. - WAT�ON . .. . � � AVE . _ _ _ .
� o�o �o o -� 'o 0 0 0 0 ;o�o� o 0 0� o c o 0 0 0 �Q-° ����
o ' � r� �
� �
o � � � _ �
; � ; ; � ; . �
. `�w ,
0 0� o: o� o 0 0, o'o' o o :o�o 0 0'o 0 o a p ;
HARTFOR D AV E .
i � � , .
o � � � o o�o; oo o �o;o o �# �¢� b o 0 0 -� j
, � , ; . � , � � � - -- :
_ � o , .
i ; ; ; • + t . . � I i � _ O �
� � . : • � : � � � � _ ___ i
aooQ � ;o: a o ;ao�oo�o 0000000000 � N . �
BAYARD AVE� ' - . _ __ . • . ;
APPIiCAN� rJrn�� � �Pbra I��C,T}�,"i�" LEGEND
`.1
PURPOSE M inor V��IQ�I'L �� Zoning district boundary
FiLE tt � O' �7� OATE �5•�•9� � subjecl propeny �"' o�h�
, •
PLNG. DIST. �� MAP Jl Z�"�� 0 one tamiiy • � ^ commercial
¢ rNo iamtiy . � .... induslriai .
SCALE t' � a00'• ��Q rrn,It;ple family V vacant
"7 1
ac. - � � o3
MAY 13 BOARD MEETING &
ATTACHMENTS
EXHIBIT II
q `- � � o�
BOARD OF ZONING APPEALS PUBLIC HEARING
MAY 13, 1996 3 PM
ROOM 5-330 CIT'Y HALL
ST. PAUL,MIIJNESOTA
I. APPROVAL OF IvnNiTfES OF APRIL 22. 1996
The minutes of the April 22 meeting will be mailed with the May 28th meeting gacket.
II. NEW BUSINESS
A. Applicant - CAROL&KEVIN TURNQUIST
. (#96-077)
Location � - 86 Cook Ave W
Zoning - R-4
Purpose: MINOR VARIANCE - A variance w allow parking within a
required front yard.
B. Applicant - DONALD&DEBRA WRIGH'T
(#96-078)
Location - 2103 Hartford Ave
Zoning - R-4
Purpose: MINOR VARIANCE - A variance to allow parking within a
required front yard.
C. Applicant - RAMSEY HILL LMT
PARTNERSHIP(#96-083)
Location - 478-486 Marshall Ave
��S - RM-2
Purpose: MAJOR VARIANCE - A variance to allow maneuvering in a
public right-of-way in order to
construct a parking lot along the
. alley.
D. Applicant - CHET EMERSON,BOYS& -
GIRLS CLUB(#96-084)
Location - 291 E. Belvidere St
Zoning - R-4
Purpose: MAJOR VARIANCE - A variance of the off-street parldng
requirements in order to consttuct a
recreation center for the Boys and
Crirls Club;fifly-four spaccs are
required and sixteen spaces are
proposed,a variance of thiriy-eight
spaces is requested.
Board of Zoning Appeals Agenda
May 13, 1996
Page Two
E. Applicant - MELISSA MCDONALD&
LAWRENCE EDWARDS
(�{96-087)
I,ocation - 2337 Chilcombe Ave
��g - R-3
Purpose: ivm�10R VARIANCE - A siae yara setbacic variance in order to
cons�uct a carport on the east side of the
house;a six foot setback is required and a
zero setbackis requested.
F. Applicant � � - SUPER AMERICA GROUP,INC.
(�8)
Location - 1580 Ford Parkway
Zoning - B-2
Purpose: MAJOR VARIANCE - A variance of the off-strat parldng
requirements,a side yard setbacl:
variance and a front yard setback
variance in order to construct a new
gas station convenience store.
Thirteen parking spaces are required
and eight are proposed,a twenty-five
foot setback from Ford Parlcway is
required and a twenty-two foot
setback is proposed,a ten foot side
yard setback from the west pmperry
line is required aad a 5ve foot
sdback is propose�.
G. Applicant _ - DUANE HART(#96-089)
Location - 19aoc Parkland Court
��g - R-2
Purpose: MAJOR VARIANCE - A front yard setbacic variance in ordcr
to construd a new single-family
ho�ne. A 44 foot setback is required
and a S foot setback is proposcd. A
variance of 39 feet is requested.
III. DUPLEX&TRIPLEX CONVERSION GUIDELINES FOR ZONIIJG CASES
N. ADJOt;fFWMENT
APPLICANT: You or your representative should attend this meeting to answer say questions the
Board may hava
q ` - 1tn3
tita�� 13. 1996
Board of Zonir.g Appcals
Cit�•of St. Paul
Ofiice of L[EP
3�U St. Peter Street-Suite 3UU
St. Paul MN 5�102
Our purpose in this presentation is to respond to the objection to our request for a variance. This
objection has been put forth by the tenant(Ellen Jeddeloh,currentl�•living at 2U98 Hartford Ave)and the
non occapant oR ners(George and Margen-Jeddeloh,of 2098-2100 Hartford A��e. �cho resides at 597
Mount Curve Blvd).
We feel that their concerns regarding our request to keep our front drive���a�•are unfounded for
the follo«ing reasons:
1)We currendy use our dri��en�a�•for shoR term parking,such as loading and unloading
our car and for the con��enience and safety of our handicapped elderly pareau. Because n�e are using our
drivea�a�-for short tezm parldng,�re do nat see this as a distraction to the neighborhood or deten irom the
attracti�•eness of our neighborhood.
Z)Our house�was built in 193�along with the garage and drive«-a�-. The dri�•en•a��led
from!he street direcd��to the garage. Prior to 1969 our house had an addition to the kitchen�vhich cut off
the dri��e«�a��from going to the garage. The oc�ners at that dme,re��ersed the car entrance to the garage
from the south side to the north side. We ha�•e li��ed at 2103 Hartford since 1985.�ti•e ha�•e never kno«n
am•case n�hich a sale of a home has been ad��ersel�•effecied b�•our drivewa3�. We ha�•e inciuded a letter
from Edina Realty,stating our driveti��ay has not reduced the��alue of our home or our neighboring homes.
We a•ould like to point out the objections�vhich have been made are&om one famil��onh•.father.
mother and daughter. Mr.and Mrs.Jeddeloh are non occupaat o�vners,and Ellen Jeddeloh is a tenant
Please see attached telephone listing,because Mr. and Mrs. Jeddeloh are non occupant o«ners,n�e feel
the��are looking at thzir business interest not familr needs. The Jeddeloh's purchased their duples about
fi�•e years ago. Their decision in purchasing 2098-2100 Hartford was not hindered at that time because
of our front yard drive�vay�.
We also feel by using our dm�eway for short term parking,this allows for unobstructed�ie«•to
the mortorist when uaveling drnvn Hartford Hartford is used by man��mortorists because of the
com•enience of getting from Cleveland to Cretin or�zce versa��ithout am•stop signs. There is a das-care
«ithin nro houses of ours,and the children's safen•is alwavs an issue.
q �• � � '�3
We ha�•c made significant impro�•ements to the appearance of our homc in e�.::ss of�2�.�nui.
Because of these impro�•ements.�ve ha��e kept up n�ith the appcarance���hich benefits our ncighborhood
and the cin�of St. Pau[. 8��making these impro�•cments. ��c fccl thal«�e ha��c sho��n�.�::art��cn�strong
good residents of the cit��of St. Paul and suppoR cit}�li�ing instead of suburban li��in�=.
Please note there are four attachments.«�hich are as follo���s:
1)Letter from Edina Realh�.
2)Cop��of the telephone listing�vhich sho«�s current address of the o«ners and tenant of ZU98 -
2100 Hartford
3)Map of our neighborhood sho«ing addresses of the residences�cho ha��e not objected to us
retaining our driveway,a�nd the address of the objecting p�uties duples.
#)Current pictures of our home. (The pipes«�hich r-ou see in front of our homz is«�ork�rhich is
currently in progress by the city of St.Paul).
In conclusion«•e hope that«�e l�ave effecti��el�-sho�rn that our dri�•e«�a��is noc a distraction or
detriment to the atuacti��eness of our neighborhood or am�cause for concem regardin�a lo�rer��alue of
surrounding homes.
Don and Debbie Wright
2103 Hartford Ave
St Paul NiN 55116
Home 699-1581
Work(Don)667-7824
Work(Debbie)973-686I
����� q �- � � ��
��►° � �-�
.......� r'i..
:.�4,
��.;J•'?�
� .... �„r.....,,�..�,...
f-ii�;filand Park ��fa�• l2, 1996
;�; �.Cl�.el�uld.��..
��. [';���1,11� 55116
Zoning Administration
(�iZ)698-'_-34 City of St. Paul
Office of LIEP
F�X 350 St. Peter Street-Suite 300
i612)690z�39 St. Paul, MN >j 102-1510
RE: File No.: 96-078
2103 Hartford Avenue
St. Paul. ��Ii�i 5�116
Dear Zonin� Administration,
On behalf of Edina Realty, «�e do not see the drive�va��under its present
conditions or functions a decrease to the property value of that tiome nor the
surrounding homes in the neighborhood. Based on our e�perience and know-
ledQe of the marketing process and familiarit}• of the area, �ve do not see the
driveway as havin� a negative effect on the salability or market �-alue of the home.
Sincerely, �
Edina Realty :�ssociation of Realtors
11� � — `
� (.- � 1t� 3
94 lAH-lil Your 6TE Sun Community Directory _
JansenPaulW JensenDavidH 2Of.�.u.••5�1�«�„s� r�;': :. J�I:f4zti ;;5'Nat;a,t.
1235 E wM?Pc Is ee^,ta �.u�P.c..:�al.,; r.^:;,�a ':• JensenDonaldR 12'ie�r,ra�v�»�S 22_-;S:z Jimen�
Ogt 1JBS IA42fnr��•�.:
Cannerce.._ __.... 690-2201 ,knsenfenis „i:aiE� ;;i6�tx�wu,tc.
JaMenTedJr 45iS;C'.a�r:� 291-8566 2103Gnoarcna��s;,.xi BWi��w:,�.r�:•-�� 69S•3•1:1 JirikBC �;,Tuscaraa:.
JanskyBl 160 V:cS��•n..5 __ .. 224•3859 ,lenSenHenryC 46+��xae;:vr S� 695-;32i JmillGaria 493 Asniar:z.
JanskyQiarlesM 9a?Pa�xeA.IsDcu.°,��i 222•6567 JensenJason I83aGr3nc.• 67_-:i:f JoKaro ii9oGr,uba.
Jansltyfredf 8 Catherine 2116 Jar�;=• 698-3107 �enJerald 296 G•a,-,5�5. 649•2=42 Joanis YliHiam Iv wnscF.• �.
Ja�iSOrICJ 2161 Far�n;Ar. ._ .. 690•5191 JEnSEnJem/ 1018 dSO s.�;S.�M:�1 22:•2335 JoanniG�J a09 asrua�u:.
JanssenJ 2000 7�r 5:w _.......... 690-4607 JensenJim&linda :153 James-. 69;•2291 JobChrisB Cheryl 967�a-.
Jansse�fJC 1440 Ra•�boW�Av........._ 699-4637 JensenK 2056 Bayarc.. _ 696-99�2 Job.lEanette t59 Forc�.:.
JarKSenJart�esR JensenKA 1870vaxe:. _.. . 699•G148 JobeDonaldG SS3�Mr.:�;;>
1911 Sairders A.(s lanse)Gatewa�Fox;..__ 699-6183 JensenNari 934 Grr.,::. .. _ 291-2594 ; JobePeterJ
JanssenThomasR 1852 S:anfad av Is ra,r,� _ 698•2096 JensenKevinW 1:5:e�:�.g:cn P�..,5(s..>� _ 690-Oi23 �r'i:="•'�a$t 5 Re�a;.:•
JanssonPam 478 te.mg:on Pkwy 5...... _. 690-0322 JensenKristen 22c�H.,-arw Pw»� _ 69S-�.y JobstPeter 705 Summ��:.
JantyUristine 35a&�mnac 5�........._ 690-0385 Jensenl 170v Bonzr.::. 690•5&79 Joe6 Stan's8ar 9a9�r 5•:.
Janusdika5 1898 Rome Ar...............____....._ 698-4661 JensenLeonardE :68 Saracoga Sc S Re••=: __ ._ 699•)460 Joelle'sHairOesignsfor�den:.
JaixrschkaCxoB Mathieu Tom 1371 E ea�or a�. 698-4709 JeruenLisaM 1 l7a Granc av. .. . _ _ ......228•3025 16��kanaobn Av.......
JapuntichD 2135 Stanfor0 Av..........__..__._..._ 698-9297 JensenLisaM 932 L:�.Larc Ar _..._ __._ .....292•9182 Johann�onJM 2259 Ro;:..
JaquaBobJ t886 M�ss�ss�oa R'ner�vC 5 ...... . _ 598-1893 Jensenlouis 85 Ca:rtee Sc.... __ 69&-8251 JohannpsonJohnC USi::-
JardineJamesA 2335 Scewart A....._ _ __._ 699•3545 JMISEfIM2it 294 tA�:,r$:$...... _._ . .227-7;35 � JonannessenK 760 rn:.�r.-
Jard'u�eJames&Nanty 16138oNane.:• .._._ 690-3930 JensenMelvinR 18r'S Y.G'CESiHA.lsrau�a�n<.I Re;rc.; 69S•5573 � Johannessohnlarty 13i:�.-_
JamanGrodyG 927 Bayarc Av.......... 227-6126 JensenNE 1132 B�-�r�t G��_ _._. 690•"s576 ! JohansenA 1168 Granc c•
JarakiV'KtaP 33B Mxa�ener 5t(s T=e�sai _._ _....699-7220 JensenNelsC 1515�anco:M Av ls E�tat-':Re:ueE.... .699•17i1 � JohansenCharles 1320 S:--
JarosLeoJ 978 E�eana a� ............... __..__.. 222-6725 JensenPat 66e l+xc,,a. __..... __ 292-,965 JohansenJames 894 S�C.;•=
� JarpeA 35lemgem V�cwy 5.................. ......_... ......222-4413 JensenRusselJBJulieE 1082 Summrt:. _..................297-&918 JohansenNK a36 Houy c:
JarvisVV�&Debra 881S�GaiAr..............._...._ ....292-8386 JeM¢�5 1402Pat'.t1�R�..........._.._ ...645•2150 JohansenPau!R 1651H�-:
JuchkeJohnG U09 k�+e��erAv......... .....................698-5709 JensenSD 19a3 Rar�e�or.a�.........._ _................698-9132 JohaMOnCEric 2044 Dor,�:
JasperJett&Sue 1277�,raAv......_ ............. ......690-9187 JensenScottW 356:rvx5t..._._ .. 225•1984 JohansonPaul SBSS�i�:•:.
JaspersonCYndi 18485:CwrAv......_ ..............___....698-1380 Jeruen5usan 60�uzr�5�5.. ........_ _......_....225-9058 Johl9renElkabeth 2159?c_•
Jaspersanf 1406,wmes a..................__......................699-5930 Jensen5vend 407r m:n..........___.. _._......_....227•3856 John&PaW'sBu 731 Ra��c_:
JassM 130a5tClaiar...................... . _....................699-3369 JerttenThomasBMaren a86Hamne:.: ..........698-03b3 JohnLA 1a82l+icano.
JaSSOR&G 1776 5t C1ar Av.............__............... ........699-4565 JensonRenEe........ .__...._......-__ _......_..T27-5638 JohnMiChad 21a Er�e 5t
Jasbam0anie18Joan 1320Hartfaat. ........._..___..699-7986 JensonRoa 1985G��c.�........._._.... .........690-2962 JohnScott&Nancy 5875.--
JaxDapMe U08 weMes�ey A..........._ .....................698-7172 JenssenChristopher 57v lawH a� _ _.............225•8259 Johrtsl 665 Summit Ar
JaxEugeneJ 1151Gooarknar..........__ .........__.......222-6469 JentinkFrank 334:.te�5c.._..._._ _... _... .225-1532 JoMsLarty IO7Wanc:.
JaxF11614,AMwR�.........................._ _....................690-2521 JenuWiNiamE t2;:ra�rsA��s�na��si __._....698-J666 JohnsRobertC 140;mcu;._
JaxMeganO 1708wHksRrar StJOSe;nHOSC��al.._.......698-7172 JenzThomas 5335cmm;�a._......____ _....292•9340 JohrtsTaibrs 712C�ere�a�:=.
JayEA 899qevdanaav5......................_.....................698-0457 JepsonEarll V546a�xtAv(svaecl ..............698•5131 JohrtsaiRichazdW 432ie,^;
� JaYSteve�17409Natowcav�Y.Av...................................699'�O Je►9��BRoxtanne 1�a0RnerDr ...�....690-9d28 JOHNSON & SONS-f
� . • a • JerikovskYTK 339weNSCerSc_._..._ _............222•5739 1736GranaAv............__
; JeddebhEllen 2098 Harttaa Av..............................._.... 98- 615 JembergJohn 666 S�^m�t av......._... 227-2350 JohnsonA 616 5uiv�xt a�
i • Jed 97�. c e Bnt is t.�arcervl.........699-281 JemetlJ 1366 eene<>::_.................. _ .............690-9403 ,IohnsonAS 899 C�ewn:=.:
� - ersJamesA JemellJan IOSV Gca,::cc a�.......__. ...228-0722 JohnsonAlan 2a3 wes�em c.:
: 1613 Sw�ders Ar Is BarOaral�ca�es:a t�«ege_...........h">5-46's8 JeromeHS 145 w�5;5........ ... ...690•36G9 ,�Mpn AliceA 1680 Ra,c:.-
= Je(fersonGM 2025R�ontre�Av........_ ...__.. __ .....699-8267 Jerome'sHairFashions 167aGranaa. ... ................699•JO1i ,�p��AAenD 1621PT<.^.--�
: JetfersonHowardf 280acn,�oneS;.....__........__........227-5136 Jerry'slnvitation5ervice 2081r+�esa, _...................695•S3I2 dphnSOnARonV 307Har.-.-,:.
; JeffersonKennethW 36rrorbertP�fsJZan1 Re;�r�c......_.690-1881 JerskeYJamesfX 656Gec�navS__.. __690-9569 JohnsonAnneC 888G�anc�,
r. JeNeryBJ 2151 J:,iec a._....................._.....................699-9364 JerskeYJamesfX 1v12 Fora Pkwy...._.. ........698-3616 JohnsonArleneM 85a tm�a_c
� JEf}!►yJal11l50 2019 Pme�wr5t Av RBtreC._.__. .. ...698-OM169 JMOfIMarjo►i! 1611 BE?cnwood Ar..... ....................699•9d00 JOhMOflArthuf 1309 hla�n2•t-
� JeNerydan 1980 Itn St W................... ............... 698-4074 JersonSidneYN 13116eecnwood a.ls h;xnel...............699•9400 �p��G 2353 Yc.�;-
� �nekAlasF JersonSWCy 1611 Ee1^.wood av........ . . .699-9400 JohnsonBarbarol 1015 C���
...........
1666 James Ar Is 61ae.lu�e1 Sdmidc 6re+ery...................698-3047 JweC 931 St Pa�d a......................... ......6%-a014 JoMsonBen 585 Hdr a._.
� JNinekAma 328 7m Sc v�................_ . .........._._.......225-4231 JerueRobertlSr labn aanaoio�a�_.... 690•1109 Johr�sonBertha 1925 r+o:•a.:
' Jdinek&th 1576 PorttaM Av........... _ . ....... . ......645-4397 Jerusalem 0avidM 'eZ le.egton P�..�S.:�anKel __.....698-6791 JohnSOnBeM 307 Hamn.:.:
a JelinekEmilW 832 wauon a........................... __.....227-3945 JervaMichad 2285 Y.•Mart a. ._..._ 699-�i774 JohnsonBefh 1126 tmce�r:.
_......
3 Jdi�tlkJ2111lSL 670lintdn Av................_._......_._.......2T5-9024 JlrviSE 64�Cleve�mt A.5.................._ _...................698-8360 JOtMf006EthAM 465 S;tnr�-
� Jel'ukkJoln 1666 James R...........................................698•3047 JeskeDJ 2153 JekE'S0�'Rc............._... _...................69O�SO Johnson&tlYAnn 2ll 1,I.�c=
JdinekP 987 BaY�d Av........................................_........224-7139 JeSklL 568 l'ntdn A� _...................... ................298'9238 JOhnson6ob 666 AsnianC;�
JelinekRidc 1666damesa...................__........._..........698-3047 JesPKSOnHeid� SaC;<•^+a�5.........._ ............699-8956 JohnsonBrad 1322arton.,
� JM'�ndcArlene 1703Jer�ersonnv.........._.......................690-3713 Jessen0 1877JeNrs�+ar_........_.... ................698•9567 JoMson&ian 1932tu�,�aur.
JlIIiSOnCynUfiO 4i3 Asttarb Av................_._.........._.....222-IZ59 JesSlnThortfMA 31!�ex:ant Fv._..... ...293'1607 JohnSOn8ri2n 626 wswK�c.
Ja�kinsD 559 SneY+g�v 5..................................._........699-0627 JessmTim 1033 Porrzna a��s trm�.... _ ....................227-iS03 Jdx�son&ian&Romelle 1Se;
JenkimDavid 2007 Pi,enurst Ar........... ........................690-1398 JeSSerCome9 831�c+ry a�............_...._ _..................293-160T Jolrison&uteEdward 6?5�:
� JenkinsJCameron 1573HarttadA..... ........................69&%23 JasonlucindaE 19aZt�ncanA..._....._____.................699•6769 Joh+sa+BurtonR 1&aa�„c-
JenkinsRkhirdC 1177EdgtuMeRd..............................699-0092 JewitNOVitiate 1035S:mm�tAv............. _........._.......224-5593 JphnsonCE 662KemetnS
q JeMcauTim 1615 Fad Pkwy.............._ .......................690-7618 JettAO 632 Sne�ne��S..................... ........_..........699-9683 JoMsonCJ 1395 E�eana:�
� JerdcS�aytonT 1834 MsszsioDi River BirO S.._...._._.......698-8955 JettAD 126 YK�aw S:S _......._..._... _...........227-A951 ����James 1139 Da,a•-
S JennelceGary lv2a Fore v�w�............_........ . __.698•2660 JetteMaria 486 Nz.-*�a,S..._._ .. __. 698•0936 JohnsonCl 596 Grana G�
+ JennenTim 569 Porttane tv............... _..... ......_._...224-4675 JewdIKR 17?0 Gch:c'.v.........._ __.......693-3169 ,IohnsonCl 607 h Ham.r•;:.
:• JennessDouglasF 2061 S��eoardRd.._ . 698•3092 JewettStephen&Oawn S85 St Ca•a. _....290-OS29 JohnsonChl 1156 Fa::m;•.•�_•
; JenniPAilipM 472 Porranc av Is Jane1 __ __224•6763 Jewish Community Center 1375 5:P� 698-0751 JohnsonCtd 1596 wa;s;^:.
: JenningsJohn SSB lntdn av ........._ 228•9401 Hwlth Oub.. ___........ . 699•JOLO JohnsonCari 1006 Raroo:;.
3 JenningsRandy 558 Lmcan av..............___._.___....228-9401 JewishFamilyService %90 Cleve�ar�c t,5 _..._r..._.._...698-0161 ,bMwnCaA 2067 Sneca;c s
� JamingsThomasF 1521e��ngton PkM�5 _ . . 227•1592 JewishNewtomersProgrom 790 Ge.e S.._.... 690•1707 JohnSOnCarIA 2152 f�ea=:�=.
JennyGaig WeightLossCenter 755 C�ruw G�S.. . .698-a565 JewishSinglesHotline 1375 St Pz�!a. 698-8513 ,lchnsonCarlA 856 l�xo'^:.
JenschCC 197 aron St 5... ....._. .227-2789 JewishUnitedWnd&Council �90 Oe.e v a�5. ........690-1707 ,lohnsonChantel 2055 Gr:-�:.
JensenAngela 10971a�can av............. _ ._......_... .293•9411 JewishWazVeteraraOevtOfMN 20a: xcan av.......690-2775 JohnsonCharktR
� Jeiuen8ip&Colleen 415 Pasca�5t S 690-0708 JexMarleah 1980 7-5c'.v .....- ....699-5�56 U88 5argent av(s a�a0
JensenChrisR 392 warw+c►St....... ._ ....699•7241 JetuskiM 1925 r+r'ati:+.. _ _..... ...698-5730 JohnsonCheryl 42l a>�:a _..
JensenClayton 1315RanaoronAv... .698-8007 JezewskiG 1253CK.ra�cnrS 690-4102 ,�p�p�qy�npp� �p� :..
JensenDB 18975tCtarR� __ 698-5741 JiXuan 595Ckvc+a�ta.S _ _... 690-3056 JohnsonChrista r la
JeMenDavidC 1863 Je��NSOnAv _ __ _ 698-0490 Jifrylube 2379 7n� :v _ 690-1OS5 JohnsonClarence0?c�� �
JensenDavidC 669 5ne�!,;ar S __ 699-2141 JilkKristin 658 Ge.n .� _ _ 698•5375 JchnsonCliffordJ 9:%�. .
` �O t 595 G _J�rectones Cor�c•are^ �.t9?5�'E Ovecm��e:C:�.:..
. r�t�E�t�� �- - - ------- ----- - -— - -q�-� .---- v- — _ ---
� �
�-� 1�i�;��� o � ; o � � o � ������o!c o;�'o �� �fio
� 1 � i I � i
_..�._1_- ----1----�--�-- � ' ' � q C'110,3
� ,
� ,
� . , , ; ' ; i I L _ o
0 0 0� 0 0 0 � o oi o � o 0 0�0�0 0;0 0�0�0'0 0 �o�-D-- I
� ; , � � ,
� '
� `�J U�N 0 A V E ._- �
-- I
, � � ,
° o� - :o;o o, o� o, o;o' o 0 0 ; 0�0 0; o� o' o; o Q._"- --� �
� � . � ; ,
- � I I ! ' ' � I ' ' ' --- i
� i 1 _i
�
..�. T�� O I
1 f ���
1 I . . . . , � ---
� ' ' ► ' � ' � .—o�.
_ ; � � ; � ; �
� � _;�; O�O�� O O; O�O. O 0► O: O, O C�� O ` O;O O O �
� f�� 1LES � - AVE . ;
i ,
= o oo. o: :��� o_.aoo:oo�o. o o ;�� 1Q �000'o� � ' �°- �_�f� _ . � . , .
� ( � Ii � I ' F - i
- - - � - - - � �--L-t-�,� fl a
� --rt-- - - - - -i i i--;-' I : �. _ �
� T , �_ �
i � � I � I I �� -
o� o.00000�oo;o► � o 00000�o�000; . o . . . -
� . � � . E .
� _ =. WATSON . . . AVE . --- - I . .
�- o�o �o �o -� :'o 0 0 0 0 ;o o� o!o o; o c o 0 0 0 �- ° �
. Q_ ��
, :--
° . � r � i
o � � _
I � � � ' _7�'1— i
, • o �
0 0� 0: 0 0 0 '0�0'0� 0 0 :o�o 0 0� 0 0 0 oi ' �LJ � ,
I . . , , Q .
HARTFOR D ` �°A�-
° a o3�° AVE .
K n`f
�0 1 o O o o�o;o0 0 ;'o`o � � i� , b o 0 0 -o- ;
; ; ; � ' ' : � ' i � � — -- - •
t o •
M � I
; ! ' � , , i ' � ; j I � �- i
aooQ � fl : a o ;ao�o�o�o 0000000000 � N i
�
6AYARD AVE .i � - - - -- � � � . -
, . .
APPLICANT ���[-� S VP�('4 IA�Ci_� LEGEND
PURPOSE Mino� V�rIQ,�1t'_r� ���' �oning disir�ct boundary
Q _ ry f� subjed pro�eny n�
F►lEx (�0 n71� _ DATE �5��3 •9� �"
Z,S o one tamily • . ^ commerc�al
PLNG. OIST �� ►f�P � � —
� rNo lam�ty . � �... �ndustr�al
SCA�E t' - 400' ;b,�Q muniple tam�ly V vacant
ZI
q �,_ � � o �
NOTARIZED STATEMENT
EXHIBIT III
�{ (. - lt ��
June 11, 1996
St. Paul City Council
310 City Hall
15 West Kellogg Boulevard
Ladies&Gendemen:
I have been a resident of St. Paul for 60 years. During that time I have resided on the corner of Hartford
and Cleveland Avenues at 603 South Cleveland.
Having lived on this corner for 60 yeazs, I am very familiar with the houses on Hartford Avenue and the
history of the neighborhood. The purpose of this letter is to verify to the City of St. Paul the property
located at 2103 Hartford Avenue owned by Don&Debbie Wright has had a driveway accessible from the
street since I moved to the neighborhood 60 years ago.
Sincerely, ' ���}�i ,�,���-+�-,
�
Joseph J. Ruzichka
603 South Cleveland
St. Paul,MN 55116
L�/ ( C��'- �
MARGA A.WEBER •
� NOTARY PUBLIC'MINNESOTA
,� RAMSEY COUNTY
� My Comm.Expires Jan.31.2000�
� �• 11b3
MAY 28 BOARD MEETING
APPROVING BOARD RESOLUTION
ON FILE # 96-078
EXHIBIT IV
;
Bo�oFZO�G�P�.SP����G � a �- �� �3
MAY 28, 1996 3 PM
ROOM 300,350 ST.PETER STREET
LOWRY PROFESSIONAL BUII.DING �
ST.PAUL,MINNESOTA
I. APPROVAL OF MIIVUTES OF APRII.22 AND MAY 13 1996
II. APPROVAL OF RESOLUTION: File#96-078 Donald 8t Debra Wright
III. NEW BUSINESS
A. APPli� - ALFRED SNIITH(#96-10�
�� - 2060 Randolph Ave�nue
��S - B-2
Purpose: MAJOR VARIANCE - A variance of the off-street parldng
requirements in orde,r to construct an
addition to t�building at 2060
Randolph to be used as a restaurant
The proposod reststaaivant requires 24
P�8 SPaoes, 11 Parldng spaces are
propo�i,a variance of 13 spaces is
requated
B. Applicant • DEAN&JULIANNE HUGHES
(#96-101)
Location - 2107 Hartford Avenue
ZoninB - R-4
Purpose: MINOR VARIANCE - A variance to allowed continued
� parldng within a required front yard
C. Applicant - MICAAEL&DE1vISE SCOTT
(#96-104)
Location - 1514 Iglehart Avenue
��g - RT-1
Purpose: MINOR VARIANCE - A front ya�d setback variance in order
to construct a porch add.ition,a 23
foot setback is required and a 15 foot
setback is rcquested A variance of 8
feet is requirod.
.. . .. ' ' .� ,.. . . . , � � . . . . �3 '�`S, _ . . "y�.' S'_``
� � . . .. { . �, . .. �.
Board of Zoning Appeals Ag�nda �
May 28, 1996
Page Two
D. Applicant - ST.PAUL DEVELOPMENT
CORP(#96-10�
Lacation - 469 Selby Aven�
Zoning - RM-2
Purpose: MAJOR VARIANCE - A side yard sttback variancx in order
to construct detached garages on the
east side of the bw7ding. A 15 foot
side yard setback is requirod and a 3
foot setback is proposed. A variance
of 12 fxt is requircd.
N. FRONT YARD DRIVEWAY GUIDELINES
V. DUPLEX 8c TRIPLEX CONVERSION GUIDELINES .
VI. ADJOI;fRNMENT
APPLICANT: You or your representative
should attend this meeting to answer any
questions the Board may have.
� (, - 11 b3
BOA,RD OF ZONING APPEALS
RESOLUTION DENYING VARIANCE
ON FILE # 96-078
EXHIBIT V
� � -� 1103
CITY OF SAINT PAUL
BOARD OF ZONII\TG APPEALS RESOLUTION
ZONING FILE NUniBER: 9G-078
DATE: 1�1�y 2s, 1996
WHEREAS,DONALD WRIGHT and DEBRA WRIGHT ha��e applied for a variance from�he strict
application of thc pro��isions of Scction 62.10-�(11)of thc Saint Paui Lcgislati��c Code pertaining to allo��ing
parl;ing r��thin a required front�•ard in the R-4 zoning district at 2103 HARTFORD AVEAIIJE;and
WHEREAS,the Saint Paul Board of Zoning Appeals conductcd a public hearing on OS/13/96,pursuant to
said appeal in accordance wlth the requirements of Section 64.205 of the Legislative Code;and
WHEREAS,the Saint Paul Board of Zoning Appeals based upon evidence presented at the public hearing,as
substantially reflected in the minutes,made the follo��ing findings of f�ct:
1. The property in question can be pui to a rcasonable use undcr the strict pro��isions of the code.
Thcre is ample room to pro�•ide additional off•strcet parl:ing in the rear yard and the front yard parking is
a covenience rather than a hardship.
2. The plight of the land o���ncr is due to circurnstances unique to this property,and these circumstances
were not created by the land o�tiner.
This house is setback 35 feet from the street The garage is located about 20 fcet from the rear of the
house. Both situations create a lon,�ralk for the applicants'elderly relatives. 'I'he drivev►•ay/parking
space w•as in�istence��•hen the applicants purchased the house and is not a circumstance created by the
applicants.
3. The proposed variance is not in keeping w�eh the spirit and intent of the code,and is consistent w�th the
health,safety,comfort,morals and«�elfaze of the inhabitants of the City of St. Paul.
The applicants state that the nearby collegc,St Catherine's,gencrates a lot of trafTic on Hartford Avenue
pre.senting a danger to children playing in the area.Reducing the amount of on-street parking wherever
possible�ti�ill mal:e it easier for driven to see the children.Ho�ve��er,there is room to nrovide additional
off•street parking in the rear��ard.
4. The proposed variance will not impair an adequate supply of light and air to adjacent property,nor�ill it
alter the essential character of the surrounding area or unreasonably diminish established property values
�ithin the surrounding area.
The applicant has submitted letters from his neighbors at 2099 and 2107 Hartford Avenue stating that
they have no objection to the continued use of the driveway for pazlang. This,together w�th the fact that
the parking has been in e�istence since 1969 Hithout complaint,would seem to indicate that the parking
has not adversely affected the neighborhood.
� ` -11 �3
File:96-078
Page T�•o
S. The��ariance,if granted,would not permit any use that is not permittcd under the pro�•isions of the code
for the property in the district���hcre the affected land is locatcd,nor«�ould it alter or chanse the zoning
disvict classification of the property.
The proposed��ariance,if ganled��•ould not altcr or change the zoning classification of the property.
6. The request for variancc is not based primaril��on a dcsire to increase the��alue or income potential of�he
parcel of land.
NOW,THEREFORE,BE IT RESOLVED,by the Saint Paul Board of Zoning Appeals that the applicalion
to w•ai�•e the provisions of Section 62.10�(11)to allow parl:ing w�thin a required front}•ard on property
located at 2103 HARTFORD AVENUE and legally described as Lot 2,Bertha's Rearrangement;in
accordance with the application for variance and thc sile plan on filc���th the Zoning Administrator is hcrcby
denied.
1�ZOVED BY: Bogen
SECONDED BY: Tu»y
IN FAVOR: 6
AGAINST: �
MAILED: June 11, 1996
TIA�IE LIMIT: No order of the Board of Zoning Appeals permitting the erection or slteration
of a building or off-street parking tacility shall be valid for a period longer than
one year,unless a buiiding permit for such erection or alteration is obtained
within such period and such ereciien or alteration is proceeding pursuant to the
terms of such permi� The Board of Zoning Appeals or the�ty Council may
grant an eztension not to exceed one year. In granting such extension,the
Board of Zoning Appeals may decide to hold a public 6earing.
APPEAL: Decisions of the Baard of Zoning Appeals are final subject to appeal to the�ty
Council within 15 days by anyone affected by the decision. Building permits
shall not be issued after an appeal has been filed. If permits have been issued
before an appeal has been filed,then the permits are suspended and
construction shall cease untit the City Counc;i has made a final determination of
the appeal.
� �. - 1103
Fle#96-078
Page Three
CERTIFICATION: �,the undersigned Secretary to the Board of Zoning Appeals tor the City of
Saint Paul,Alinnesota,do hereby certify that I have compared the toregoing
copy with the original record in my o�ce; and find the same to be a true and
correct copy of said original and of the whole thereof,as based on approved
minutes of the Saint Paul Board of Zoning Appeals meeting held on A�ay 13,
1996 and on record in the Office of License Inspection and Environmental
Protection,350 St. Peter Street,Saint Paul,Alinnesota.
...
SAINT PAUL BOARD OF ZOr1I1�'G APPEALS
�
Sue Synstegaard
Secretary to the Board
Qc. - � � n3
HOMEOWNER PICTURES
. EXHIBIT VI
y � . � S��rf: ,t
� . .•
� . �� �� ��� .�
• t' { � wl r
' �I N ' �f� . ' ,
�; . ..i, , a� / .'
:��,�� �.,��. F.;_,,, y� ,
r -��
�� �..�.. �;. . ��� � � --
.,_ , . . ; . - , " ��: . �l.�"�r,
-•.i • �.4•}.�L.' 4�i�.! �.1-; � . ' 'a��
�� �*
,.`x�k C•;. �I��°r.y� i� � ... � ..
, I
A �
. ;'!�
✓rew•,:.
�
� ,
� ' � .
a �
,Y`• , +
'S
♦
:� s• ��
,�
. � r
.y �`
- �� �' .
•� , f� �
�«, �.� � �
f'�S• - '
1 T� >
f� �+�.�+.��
. �. .
_'9:^_l, .,,wr
�:�.�3�t;.C" , . .
� - �
OFFICE OF THE CITY ATTORNEY
Timothy E Marx, City Attorney
Q � � , � h �
CITY OF SAINT PAUL Civil Division
Norm Coleman, Mayor 400 City Hall Telephone: 612 266-8710
I S West Kellogg Blvd. Facsimile: 612 298-5619
Saint Paul, Minnesota 55102
ii
August 29, 1996
Ms . Nancy Anderson
Secretary to City Council
310 City Hall
Saint Paul, MN 55102
Re: Appeal of Donald and Debra Wright of a decision of the Board
of Zoning Appeals heard by City Council on July 24, 1996 .
Appeal by Dean and Julianne Hughes of a decision of the Board
of Zoning Appeals heard by City Council on July 24, 1996 .
Dear Ms . Anderson:
Attached please find two resolutions for the two above-entitled
matters . The first resolution pertains to the appeal of Donald and
Debra Wright, 2103 Hartford Avenue. The second resolution pertains
to that of Dean and Julianne Hughes, 2107 Hartford Avenue . Both
appeals dealt with the Board of Zoning Appeals denial of parking
spaces in a required front yard.
The Council, at its public hearing of July 24, 1996, reversed the
decisions of the Board of Zoning Appeals in both matters and
granted both variances.
Please see that these matters are set on the appropriate consent
agenda. If you have any questions, please contact me.
Very truly yours,
����v
PETER W. WARNER
Assistant City Attorney
PWW/rmb
Enclosures