96-1340 Council File # � ' "1�
Green Sheet # 3 S
RESOLUTION
CITY OF SAINT PAUL, MINNESOTA �
Presented By
Referred To Committee: Date
1
2 WHEREAS, in November 1994, the City of Saint Paul initiated an Environmental Impact Statement for
3 proposed Phalen Boulevard; and
4
5 WHEREAS, in August 1996, the Saint Paul City Council adopted a Final Scoping Decision for the EIS
6 that directs which project alternatives will be studied in the EIS and the details of that study; and
7
8 WHEREAS, to conduct the EIS, the City's Department of Planning and Economic Development will need
9 to secure permission from affected property owners for a variety of purposes including access, surveying,
10 monitoring, testing, and surface and subsurface investigations;
11
12 NOW, THEREFORE, BE IT RESOLVED, that the City Council hereby authorizes the proper City
13 officials to enter. into agreements to effectuate the completion of the EIS.
14
Yeas Navs Absent Requested by Department of:
a e ✓
ostrom r
uerin � in & Economic Develo ment
arris ✓
e ar ✓ � �
ettman ✓
une �— BY�
Adopted by uncil: Dat '1 9(o Form Appr d by C' y Attorney
Adoption rt'f ied b c' ecre�a`ry
By: By� < �� � ��
� �;• Approved by Mayor for Sub sion to
Approved by Mayor. Date / .5 � Council
By: �� BY� `� lv ` ��x.�/�
R�. - 3�io
�975�
EICOUNCII DATE I ITIAT D
— lahn i �o a q � GREEN SHEET
CONTACT PER30N&PHONE INITIAUDATE INITIAL/DATE
DEPARTMENT DIRECTOR CITY COUNCIL
N��` �'(���C A881GN CITY ATTORNEY �CITY CLERK
NUMEER FOR
MUST BE O UNCIL AGENDA BY(DATE) ROUTINO BUDQET DIRECTOR �FIN.&MOT.BERVICES pIR,
OC 1 . 3 �� ORDER MAYOR(OR ASSISTAN� n
y_�
TOTAL#OF SIG ATURE PAGES � (CLIP ALL LOCATIONS FOR SIGNATURE)
ACTION REQUE3TED:
14af��ot hesolr�i'r�, at.��B,o,r�r�,'� S-�a'�F � SeCU�-e. Ira�-,`�vs �rr�%ss%�,.,s
�dr W d�k i r► Ph4 rQ h �o u l�v cc r aL �l S S`�r,c o/Jc, � �e a .
RECOMMENDATIONS:Approve(A)or Reject(R) PERSONAL SERVICE CONTRACTS MU8T ANSWER THE FOILOWING GUESTIONS:
_PLANNING COMMISSIQN _CIVIL 3ERVICE COMMISSION 1• Has this persoNfirm ever worked under a contract for this department7
CIB COMMrt7EE YES NO
2. Has this person/firm ever been a cNy employee?
sTA� — YES NO
_DISTRICT COURT _ 3. Does this person/Firm
possess a skill not normally posseased by any current city employee?
SUPPORTS WHiCH COUNCIL OBJECTIVE? YES NO
Explsin ell yes answsn on tsp�rat�shest end ettech to 9rosn sheet
INITIATINO PROBLEM,ISSUE,OPPORTUNITY(Who.Whet,When,Where,Why):
?h� C�� !�a s a�j ye c. f e d �,e n o,-,,,�,/e fi'�.n,. o�F �h �/s o,.,
� r v�a s e d �hcc ie h ,3Q u l� uQ r�, `�,e wd r k �. �/ rec�u �"�-e a--
VOlrie a � p2rmiSs .��nS 7 z�r Lt CCPs S S�� rv�� ��n� � ��c ,
� �
ADVANTACiE3 IF APPROVED:
�I S �t�N��—OC PPc� L'TTl C i�Q �7� C..c� .
DISADVANTAOES IF APPROVED: I������
�� �� �
� ���RI�Y
DISADVANTACiES IF NOT APPROVED:
�lS eahno�' �racP� � w ;�-4•�� �acG, sinJclQ �u�pas �
�P i�rn i �" i� u Q S t- C e�r,-�� r�Q ��a �,c.SL• ��Y- �v u r� c � !
� pp
rv� � . � a Counc� R���ch Cenfibr
. � � ��n�
TOTAL AMOUNT OF TRANSACTION s w COST/REVENUE BUDGETED(CIRCLE ONE) YES NO
FUNDIWG SOURCE �--' ACTIVITY NUMBER
FINANCIAL INFORA�SATION:(EXPLAIN)