The URL can be used to link to this page

01-24. Council File # O - RESOLUTtON C1TY OF SAINT PAUL, MINNESOTA ��.. Presented bv , �' � �' i� Referred To Green Sheet # 106009 �a Committee Date 1 BE IT RESOLVED, that the Council of the City of Saint Paul hereby certifies and approves the January 2, 2 2001 decision of the Legislative Hearing Officer on Properiy Code Enforcement Appeals for the following 3 addresses: 4 Pro�erty Ap ealed Appellant 5 1120 Grand Avenue I�io one appeazed to represent this property. 6 Decision: Variance granted on the nonconfornung doors with ihe following conditions: 1) when the 7 nonconforming doors need to be replaced, they will be replaced with conforniing fire rated doors, 2) the 8 building must otherwise be in compliance. 9 1610 Charles Avenue No one appeared to represent this properry. 10 Decision: Variance granted on the nonconforming doors with the following conditions: 1) when the 11 nonconforming doors need to be replaced, they will be replaced with conforming fire rated doors, 2) the 12 building must otherwise be in compliance. 13 Blakey 14 Coleman I S Harris 16 Benanav 1 � Reiter 18 Bostrom 19 Lantry Yeas ✓ � � Nays � Absent 20 Adopted by Council: Date: 21 Adopfion Certified by Council cretary 22 By: ��.,�� _� �._� 23 Approved by Mayor: 24 Date: i� ZZ. 26� J 25 $y: Requested by Department of: : Form Approved by City Attorney � Approved by Mayor for Submission to Council 1 : o�-aH City Council Offices 1-03-2001 GREEN SHEET No10�OD9 .:r• �:ia Rq1iWG OROER TOTAL # OF SIGNATURE PAGES ? �'u:.°JC?S4�?! rnr�ou+c�. ❑ OIY�ii01lEY ❑ t1IYCLi111I ❑ RUtICI�LifIlYlCli/CR ❑ RIUIOLLiFR191ttTG ❑ wvairoR�amr�xn � (CLIP ALL LOCATIONS FOR SIGNATURE) Approving the January 2, 2001, decisions of the Legislative Hearing Officer on the Property Code Enforcement Appeals Eor the following addresses: 1120 Grand Avenue, 1610 Charles Aven PUINNING COMMISSION CIB CAMMIT'TEE CIVIL SEiN{CE CAHIM{SS{ON IFAPPROVED s SWRCE Hac this peBaNfirtn everxrofketl under a contract far this tlepartment? YES NO Nee thls O�rm evef 6een a city empbyee? YES NO Does Mie pelsWilfifm D� a SIo71 nOt ndmel�YP� M' �Y curteM ciF/ emWoYee9 VES NO la ttila pereonlfi�m a ferpeted vendaYl YES I� cosrmEVequEeuooeren�Grtc�eowfl R�� ['T�;L INFORMATON (IXPWM ai- �Y NOTES OF TI� PROPERTY CODE ENFORCEMENT MEETING Tuesday, 7anuary 2, 2001 Room 330 Courthouse Gerry Strathman, Legislative Hearing Officer STAFF PRESEI3T: Mike Urmann, Fire Prevention; Chuck Votel, Code Enforcement. The meeting was called to order at 1:30 p.m. 1120 Grand Avenue Mr. Urmann said he spoke to the appellant and explained the standard appeal would be recommended. Mr. Strathman granted a variance on the nonconforming doors with the following conditions: 1) when the doors need to be replaced, they will be replaced with conforming fire rated doors, and 2) the building must otherwise be in compliance. 1610 Charles Avenue Mr. Urmann said he spoke to the appellant and explained the standard appeal would be recommended. Mr. Strathman granted a vaziance on the nonconforming doars with the following conditions: i) when the doors need to be replaced, they will be replaced with conforming fire rated doars, and 2) the building must otherwise be in compliance. 1148 East Minnehaha Avenue (Appeal of Summary Abatement Order listed under Legislative Hearing, action taken at the Property Code Enforcement Hearing) No one appeared to represent this properry. Chuck Votel appeared and stated Code Enfarcement has been dealing with this properry for the last year. The current owner purchased the property sometime last Spring. At the time of purchase the owner was notified of outstanding correction orders. The arders have not been complied with. Henry Thomas, owner, was informed that the properry needed to be registered as a rental dwelling under city provisions. Mr. Thomas agreed to this, but failed to comply and was issued a citation for not registering the property. Recently there was a fire in the second floor. An inspection was completed and it was determined that second floor unit is uniivable, due to the extent of water and smoke damage. The first floor tenant was unavailable, however, there was a padlock on the door which indicated the door was being locked from the outside. A notice of condemnation as unfit for human habitafion and order to vacated, was issued on December 27, 2000 with a compliance date of 7anuary 2, 2001. On 7anuary 2, 2001, the first floor tenant contacted Code Enforcement. The tenant is no longer living in the first floor unit. An inspection of the unit was completed and there was little water or smoke damage. The heat ot _ 3y PROPERTY CODE ENFORCEMENT NOTES OF 1-�2-2001 Page 2 in the unit is very sporadic. The basement is wide open and full of garhage and rubbish. The tenant stated that people are breaking into the basement repeatedly to party. The tenant is not residing in the first floor unit for safety reason and intends to vacate personal belongings in two to three weeks. Code Enforcement is requesting that the appeal be denied since the second floor unit is vacant and the first floor unit has vacated everytlung except personal belongings. The owner needs to make repaus to the property before it can be occupied. Gerry Strathman stated, let the record show that the appellant did not appeaz. A time period of twenty five minutes elapsed after the scheduled heazing at 130 p.m. Gerry Strathman recommended the appeal be denied based on the staff report, and no one appeared to represent the properry. The meeting was adjourned at 1:55 p.m. sjw . Council File # O - RESOLUTtON C1TY OF SAINT PAUL, MINNESOTA ��.. Presented bv , �' � �' i� Referred To Green Sheet # 106009 �a Committee Date 1 BE IT RESOLVED, that the Council of the City of Saint Paul hereby certifies and approves the January 2, 2 2001 decision of the Legislative Hearing Officer on Properiy Code Enforcement Appeals for the following 3 addresses: 4 Pro�erty Ap ealed Appellant 5 1120 Grand Avenue I�io one appeazed to represent this property. 6 Decision: Variance granted on the nonconfornung doors with ihe following conditions: 1) when the 7 nonconforming doors need to be replaced, they will be replaced with conforniing fire rated doors, 2) the 8 building must otherwise be in compliance. 9 1610 Charles Avenue No one appeared to represent this properry. 10 Decision: Variance granted on the nonconforming doors with the following conditions: 1) when the 11 nonconforming doors need to be replaced, they will be replaced with conforming fire rated doors, 2) the 12 building must otherwise be in compliance. 13 Blakey 14 Coleman I S Harris 16 Benanav 1 � Reiter 18 Bostrom 19 Lantry Yeas ✓ � � Nays � Absent 20 Adopted by Council: Date: 21 Adopfion Certified by Council cretary 22 By: ��.,�� _� �._� 23 Approved by Mayor: 24 Date: i� ZZ. 26� J 25 $y: Requested by Department of: : Form Approved by City Attorney � Approved by Mayor for Submission to Council 1 : o�-aH City Council Offices 1-03-2001 GREEN SHEET No10�OD9 .:r• �:ia Rq1iWG OROER TOTAL # OF SIGNATURE PAGES ? �'u:.°JC?S4�?! rnr�ou+c�. ❑ OIY�ii01lEY ❑ t1IYCLi111I ❑ RUtICI�LifIlYlCli/CR ❑ RIUIOLLiFR191ttTG ❑ wvairoR�amr�xn � (CLIP ALL LOCATIONS FOR SIGNATURE) Approving the January 2, 2001, decisions of the Legislative Hearing Officer on the Property Code Enforcement Appeals Eor the following addresses: 1120 Grand Avenue, 1610 Charles Aven PUINNING COMMISSION CIB CAMMIT'TEE CIVIL SEiN{CE CAHIM{SS{ON IFAPPROVED s SWRCE Hac this peBaNfirtn everxrofketl under a contract far this tlepartment? YES NO Nee thls O�rm evef 6een a city empbyee? YES NO Does Mie pelsWilfifm D� a SIo71 nOt ndmel�YP� M' �Y curteM ciF/ emWoYee9 VES NO la ttila pereonlfi�m a ferpeted vendaYl YES I� cosrmEVequEeuooeren�Grtc�eowfl R�� ['T�;L INFORMATON (IXPWM ai- �Y NOTES OF TI� PROPERTY CODE ENFORCEMENT MEETING Tuesday, 7anuary 2, 2001 Room 330 Courthouse Gerry Strathman, Legislative Hearing Officer STAFF PRESEI3T: Mike Urmann, Fire Prevention; Chuck Votel, Code Enforcement. The meeting was called to order at 1:30 p.m. 1120 Grand Avenue Mr. Urmann said he spoke to the appellant and explained the standard appeal would be recommended. Mr. Strathman granted a variance on the nonconforming doors with the following conditions: 1) when the doors need to be replaced, they will be replaced with conforming fire rated doors, and 2) the building must otherwise be in compliance. 1610 Charles Avenue Mr. Urmann said he spoke to the appellant and explained the standard appeal would be recommended. Mr. Strathman granted a vaziance on the nonconforming doars with the following conditions: i) when the doors need to be replaced, they will be replaced with conforming fire rated doars, and 2) the building must otherwise be in compliance. 1148 East Minnehaha Avenue (Appeal of Summary Abatement Order listed under Legislative Hearing, action taken at the Property Code Enforcement Hearing) No one appeared to represent this properry. Chuck Votel appeared and stated Code Enfarcement has been dealing with this properry for the last year. The current owner purchased the property sometime last Spring. At the time of purchase the owner was notified of outstanding correction orders. The arders have not been complied with. Henry Thomas, owner, was informed that the properry needed to be registered as a rental dwelling under city provisions. Mr. Thomas agreed to this, but failed to comply and was issued a citation for not registering the property. Recently there was a fire in the second floor. An inspection was completed and it was determined that second floor unit is uniivable, due to the extent of water and smoke damage. The first floor tenant was unavailable, however, there was a padlock on the door which indicated the door was being locked from the outside. A notice of condemnation as unfit for human habitafion and order to vacated, was issued on December 27, 2000 with a compliance date of 7anuary 2, 2001. On 7anuary 2, 2001, the first floor tenant contacted Code Enforcement. The tenant is no longer living in the first floor unit. An inspection of the unit was completed and there was little water or smoke damage. The heat ot _ 3y PROPERTY CODE ENFORCEMENT NOTES OF 1-�2-2001 Page 2 in the unit is very sporadic. The basement is wide open and full of garhage and rubbish. The tenant stated that people are breaking into the basement repeatedly to party. The tenant is not residing in the first floor unit for safety reason and intends to vacate personal belongings in two to three weeks. Code Enforcement is requesting that the appeal be denied since the second floor unit is vacant and the first floor unit has vacated everytlung except personal belongings. The owner needs to make repaus to the property before it can be occupied. Gerry Strathman stated, let the record show that the appellant did not appeaz. A time period of twenty five minutes elapsed after the scheduled heazing at 130 p.m. Gerry Strathman recommended the appeal be denied based on the staff report, and no one appeared to represent the properry. The meeting was adjourned at 1:55 p.m. sjw . Council File # O - RESOLUTtON C1TY OF SAINT PAUL, MINNESOTA ��.. Presented bv , �' � �' i� Referred To Green Sheet # 106009 �a Committee Date 1 BE IT RESOLVED, that the Council of the City of Saint Paul hereby certifies and approves the January 2, 2 2001 decision of the Legislative Hearing Officer on Properiy Code Enforcement Appeals for the following 3 addresses: 4 Pro�erty Ap ealed Appellant 5 1120 Grand Avenue I�io one appeazed to represent this property. 6 Decision: Variance granted on the nonconfornung doors with ihe following conditions: 1) when the 7 nonconforming doors need to be replaced, they will be replaced with conforniing fire rated doors, 2) the 8 building must otherwise be in compliance. 9 1610 Charles Avenue No one appeared to represent this properry. 10 Decision: Variance granted on the nonconforming doors with the following conditions: 1) when the 11 nonconforming doors need to be replaced, they will be replaced with conforming fire rated doors, 2) the 12 building must otherwise be in compliance. 13 Blakey 14 Coleman I S Harris 16 Benanav 1 � Reiter 18 Bostrom 19 Lantry Yeas ✓ � � Nays � Absent 20 Adopted by Council: Date: 21 Adopfion Certified by Council cretary 22 By: ��.,�� _� �._� 23 Approved by Mayor: 24 Date: i� ZZ. 26� J 25 $y: Requested by Department of: : Form Approved by City Attorney � Approved by Mayor for Submission to Council 1 : o�-aH City Council Offices 1-03-2001 GREEN SHEET No10�OD9 .:r• �:ia Rq1iWG OROER TOTAL # OF SIGNATURE PAGES ? �'u:.°JC?S4�?! rnr�ou+c�. ❑ OIY�ii01lEY ❑ t1IYCLi111I ❑ RUtICI�LifIlYlCli/CR ❑ RIUIOLLiFR191ttTG ❑ wvairoR�amr�xn � (CLIP ALL LOCATIONS FOR SIGNATURE) Approving the January 2, 2001, decisions of the Legislative Hearing Officer on the Property Code Enforcement Appeals Eor the following addresses: 1120 Grand Avenue, 1610 Charles Aven PUINNING COMMISSION CIB CAMMIT'TEE CIVIL SEiN{CE CAHIM{SS{ON IFAPPROVED s SWRCE Hac this peBaNfirtn everxrofketl under a contract far this tlepartment? YES NO Nee thls O�rm evef 6een a city empbyee? YES NO Does Mie pelsWilfifm D� a SIo71 nOt ndmel�YP� M' �Y curteM ciF/ emWoYee9 VES NO la ttila pereonlfi�m a ferpeted vendaYl YES I� cosrmEVequEeuooeren�Grtc�eowfl R�� ['T�;L INFORMATON (IXPWM ai- �Y NOTES OF TI� PROPERTY CODE ENFORCEMENT MEETING Tuesday, 7anuary 2, 2001 Room 330 Courthouse Gerry Strathman, Legislative Hearing Officer STAFF PRESEI3T: Mike Urmann, Fire Prevention; Chuck Votel, Code Enforcement. The meeting was called to order at 1:30 p.m. 1120 Grand Avenue Mr. Urmann said he spoke to the appellant and explained the standard appeal would be recommended. Mr. Strathman granted a variance on the nonconforming doors with the following conditions: 1) when the doors need to be replaced, they will be replaced with conforming fire rated doors, and 2) the building must otherwise be in compliance. 1610 Charles Avenue Mr. Urmann said he spoke to the appellant and explained the standard appeal would be recommended. Mr. Strathman granted a vaziance on the nonconforming doars with the following conditions: i) when the doors need to be replaced, they will be replaced with conforming fire rated doars, and 2) the building must otherwise be in compliance. 1148 East Minnehaha Avenue (Appeal of Summary Abatement Order listed under Legislative Hearing, action taken at the Property Code Enforcement Hearing) No one appeared to represent this properry. Chuck Votel appeared and stated Code Enfarcement has been dealing with this properry for the last year. The current owner purchased the property sometime last Spring. At the time of purchase the owner was notified of outstanding correction orders. The arders have not been complied with. Henry Thomas, owner, was informed that the properry needed to be registered as a rental dwelling under city provisions. Mr. Thomas agreed to this, but failed to comply and was issued a citation for not registering the property. Recently there was a fire in the second floor. An inspection was completed and it was determined that second floor unit is uniivable, due to the extent of water and smoke damage. The first floor tenant was unavailable, however, there was a padlock on the door which indicated the door was being locked from the outside. A notice of condemnation as unfit for human habitafion and order to vacated, was issued on December 27, 2000 with a compliance date of 7anuary 2, 2001. On 7anuary 2, 2001, the first floor tenant contacted Code Enforcement. The tenant is no longer living in the first floor unit. An inspection of the unit was completed and there was little water or smoke damage. The heat ot _ 3y PROPERTY CODE ENFORCEMENT NOTES OF 1-�2-2001 Page 2 in the unit is very sporadic. The basement is wide open and full of garhage and rubbish. The tenant stated that people are breaking into the basement repeatedly to party. The tenant is not residing in the first floor unit for safety reason and intends to vacate personal belongings in two to three weeks. Code Enforcement is requesting that the appeal be denied since the second floor unit is vacant and the first floor unit has vacated everytlung except personal belongings. The owner needs to make repaus to the property before it can be occupied. Gerry Strathman stated, let the record show that the appellant did not appeaz. A time period of twenty five minutes elapsed after the scheduled heazing at 130 p.m. Gerry Strathman recommended the appeal be denied based on the staff report, and no one appeared to represent the properry. The meeting was adjourned at 1:55 p.m. sjw