96-1441 . ' S ' Council File#
9 G ly4 I ���
Cireen Sheet#�osod
LUTION �
O S T UL,MIIVNE50TA
Presented By: '
Referred To: Committee: Date_
1 R'HEREA5,the Natio Inst' e of Justice(1�TI�has offered a solicitation for law enforcement
2 technology which includea computer-based training,and
3
4 WHEREAS,the Saint Paul Police Department(SPPD)wishea to take advantage of the solicitaHon by
5 submitting a grant application for computer-based training in the amount of$98,892,and
6
7 WHEREA5,the Saint Paul City Council has allowed the SPPD to submit grants for technologlcal
8 enhancements for the more eflicient operation of the SPPD,
9
10 THEREFORE BE IT RESOLVED THAT The Saint Paul Police Department be authorized to submit
11 a grant application to the 1vIJ for computer-based training in the amount of$98,892.
12
13
14
15
16
17
18
19
20
21
22
23
25
26
27
28
eas ays t
B� Requested by D artment of:
Bostrom
Guerin p ��
Harris �
Megard �/ ��
Rettman � ✓ -
Thune i/ Approval Recommended y ger Director:
By:
Adopted by Council:Date: Q�-�� �q�� Form pr ve orne .
Adopti n Certified by Council Secretary: By:
//-/" ��
BY'
Approved by Mayor:Date: �Z l 3 �G Appro by Mayor for u 's�i to Council:
By: By:
/ ^ r
� '' ��._Iyy� ,/
, . d , t.J
3 �� �4
DEP�RTIAENTAFFICE/COIJNCII DATE INITIATED
Saint Paul Police Department 10/31/96 G R E E N SH E ET
CONTACT PERSON 3 PHONE INITIAL/DATE INITIAUDATE
DEPARTMENT DIRECTOR CITY COUNCIL
Chief William K. Finney AS810N CITYATTORNEV CITYCLERK
, NUMBER FOR
MUST BE ON COUNCIL AGENDA BY(pATE) RO��NQ GET DIRECTOR �FIN.8 MQT,BERVICES DIR.
ORDER AYOR(OR ASSISTANT) �
TOTAL#OF SIGNATURE PAGES (CLIP ALL LOCATIONS FOR SIGNATURE)
ACTION RE�UE3TED:
Authority to submit grant application to NIJ for computer-based training for law
enforcement academies, in-service and other specialized service training needs
' RECOMMENDATIONS:Approve(A)or Reject(R) PERSONAL 8ERVICE CONTRACTS MUST ANSWER THE FOLLOWING�UE8TION8:
i
_PLANNINa COMMISSIQN _CIVIL 3EI��ON 1• Has this pereon/firm ever worked under a coMract for this department?
_CIB COMMITTEE _ YES NO
_STAFF _ AAf 2• Has this person/firm ever been a city employee?
'7•Z� YES NO
_DISTRICT COUR7 _ 3. Does this person/firm possess a skfll not normally posaeased by any current city employee?
SUPPORTS WHICH COUNCIL 08JECTIVE9 MAYOR'S OFFI E YES NO
Ezplain all yss answers on ssparat��h�st and ettach to presn shest
INITIATING PROBLEM,ISSUE,OPPpRTUNITY(Who,Whet,Whsn,Where,Why):
The National Institute of Justice has solicitated grant applications for computer-based
training. The SPPD would make more efficient and flexible use of its training unit's
products of in-service and other specialized training. The SPPD requests authority to
submit a grant application for this solicitation.
ADVANTAQES IF APPROVED:
The SPPD would receive $98,892 to establish computer-based training for its training unit.
��������
v
' DISADVANTAOES IF APPROVED:
NOV 1 i 1996
r�n�+�'
; None coun��� ��y.::����� Cen �r ���1C` ATT�RNEY
DEC 0 2 ►�96
DISADVANTAOES IF NOT APPROVED: � "
The SPPD would not receive $98,892 to establish computer-based training for its
training unit.
; 98,892
TOTAL AMOUNT OF TRAN8ACTION S COST/REVENUE BUD(iETEO(CIRCLE ONE) YES NO
National Institute of Justice
FUNDIIiCi SOURCE ACTIVITY NUMBER
FINANCIAL INFORII�fATION:(EXPLAIN)
' # ' �
ROUTING ORDER:
Below are correct routings for the five most frequent types oi dxuments:
CONTRACTS(assumes authorized budget exists) COUNCIL RESOLUTION(Amend Budgeta/Accept.(irenta)
1. Outside Agency 1. Department Director
2. Department Director 2. Budget Oirector
3. City Attomey 3. City Attomey
4. Mayor(for contracts over$25,000) 4. Mayor/Assistant
5. Human Rights(for contracts over$50,000) 5. City Councl
6. Finance and Management Services Director 6. Chief Accountant,Finanoe and Management Servioes
7. Finance Accounting
ADMINISTRATIVE ORDERS(Budget Revision) COUNCII RESOLUTION(all othsra,and Ordinences)
1. Activity Manager 1. Department Director
2. Department Accountant 2. Ciry Attorney
3. Department Director 3. Mayor Assistant
4. Budget Director 4. City Council
5. City Clerk
6. Chief Accountant, Fina�ce and Management Services
ADMINISTRATIVE ORDERS(ali others)
1. Department Director
2. Ciry Attomey
3. Finance and Management Services Director
4. City Clerk
TOTAL NUMBER OF SIGNATURE PAGES
Indicate the#�of pages on which signatures are required and papsrciip or flay
eech of these pages.
ACTION REQUESTED
Describe what the projecUrequest seeks to accomplish in either chronologi-
cal order or order of importance,whichever is most appropriate for the
issue.Do not write complete sentences. Begin each item in your list with
a verb.
RECOMMENDATIONS
Complete ii the issue in question has been presented before any body,public
or private.
SUPPORTS WHICH COUNCIL OBJECTIVE�
indicate which Council ob(ective(s)your pro�ecVrequest supports by listing
the key word(s) (HOUSINGr RECREATION, NEIGHBORHOODS,ECONOMIC DEVELOPMENT,
BUDGET,SEWER SEPARATION). (SEE COMPLETE LIST IN INSTRUCTIONAL MANUAL.)
PERSONAL SERVICE CONTRACTS:
This information witl be used to determine the ciry'�liability tor workers compensatlon claims,taxes and proper cfvil service hiring rulea.
INITIATING PROBLEM, ISSUE,OPPORTUNITY
Explain the situation or conditions that created a need for your project
or request.
ADVANTAGES IF APPROVED
Indicate whether this is simply an annual budget procedure required by law/
charter or whether there are specific ways ln which the City of Saint Paul
and its citizens will bene(it trom this projecUaction.
DISADVANTAGES IF APPROVED
What negative effects or major changes to existing or past processes might
this project/request produce if it is passed(e.g.,traffic delays,nofse,
tax increases or assessments)?To Whom?When?For how long?
DISADVANTAGES IF NOT APPROVED
What will be the negative consequences i(the promised action is not
approved?Inability to deliver service?Contfnued high traffic,noise,
accident rate�Loss of revenue?
FINANCIAI IMPACT
Although you must tailor the information you provide here to the issue you
are addressing, in general you must answer two questions:How much is it
going to cost?Who is going to pay?
, . �t6 - lyy �
Tab A. SF 424
�
OMB A �r`_ 'y y 1
' APPLICATION FOR Z,o,,�S�BM„-rEO Appl(cant Identifier PP oval No.0348-0p43'
FEDERAL ASSISTANCE
. c
1.APE OF SUBMISSION: : �� 3.DATE RECEIVED BY STATE State Applicatio�Identifier
pplication : Preapplicatfon ,
❑ Construction � Construction
4.DATE RECEIVED BY FEDERALAGENCY Federel Identifier
[� Non-Construction ; � Non-Constructfon
5. APPLICANT INFORMATION
Legal Name: Organizational Unit:
City of Saint Paul Saint Paul Police Department
Address(give city,county,state,and zip code): Name and telephone number of the person to be contacted on matters involving
100 E3st Eleventh Street thisapplication(giveareacode)
Saint Paul, MN 55101 Sergeant John Cannefax
(612) 292-3555
County of Ramsey
6. EMPLOYER IDENTIFICATION NUMBER(EIN): 7. TYPE OF APPLICANT:(enter appropriate/etter in box)
A. State H. Independent School Dist.
1 6 � 0 5 5 2 1 B. County I. State Controlled Institution oi Higher Learning
8. TYPE OF APPUCATION: C. MUlliCip81 J. Private University
D.Township K. Indian Tribe
� New ❑ Continuation ❑ Revision E. Interstate
L. Individual
❑ ❑ F. Intertnunicipal M. Profit Organization
If Revision,enter appropriate letter(s)in box(es): G. Special District N. Other(Specify):
A. IncreaseAward B. DecreaseAward C. IncreaseDuration
D. Decrease Duration Other(specily): 9. NAME OF FEDERAL AGENCY:
HUD
10. CATALOG OF FEDERAL DOMESTIC 11. DESCFiIPTIVE TITLE OF APPLICANT'S PROJECT:
ASSISTANCE NUMBER: I ` ■ ,5 O
T�.2e: Tu,StiGC� 'I�.e�t'_ct�'ch�
17C�Vc?I�G ►'Y�P�'lfi Ct{1G� EJCt�t,'C.t�t�f1 �r'C C'C'� Computer-Based Law Enforcement Training
12. AREAS AFFECTED BY PROJECT(ciHes,counties,states,etc.):
Saint Paul, MN
Ramsey County, MN
ad'acent metropolitan areas
13. PROPOSED PROJECT: 14. CONGRESSIONAL DISTRICTS OF:
Start Date Ending Date a. Applicant � ,_ ; b. Project
1/1/97 12/30/97 Minnesota, Fourth District ' Minnesota, Fourth District
15. ESTIMATED FUNDING: 16. IS APPLICATION SUBJECT TO REVIEW BY STATE EXECUTIVE ORDER 12372 PROCESS7
a. Federal $ 98'892 .00 a. YES. THIS PREAPPLICATION/APPLICATION WAS MADEAVAILABIETOTHE
STATE EXECUTIVE ORDER 12372 PROCESS FOR REVIEW ON:
b. Applicant $ �
DATE
a State $ �
� b NO. � PROGRAM IS NOT COVEREO BY E.O.12372
d. Local $ .00
� OR PROGRAM HAS NOT BEEN SELECTED BY STATE FOR REVIEW
e. Other $ .00
f. Program Income $ ,p� 17. IS THE APPLICANT DELINQUENT ON ANY FEDERAL DEBT7
g.TOTAL $ 00 � Yes If"Yes,"attach an explanation. ❑X No
98,892
18. TO THE BEST OF MY KNOWLEDCaE AND BELIEF,ALL DATq N THIS APPLICATIOWPREAPPLICATION ARE TRUE MfD CORRECT,THE OOCUMENT HAS BEEN DULY
AUTHORIZED BY THE GOVERNItVG BODY OF THE APPLICANTAND THE APPLICANT WILL COMPLY WITH THE ATTACHED ASSURANCES IF THE ASSISTANCE IS AWARDED
a. Typed Name of Authorized Re esentati b. Title c Telepr�o nu
William K. inney Chief of Police (b12-Z��2-3�.��8)
d. Signatur Autho d Re r tative � e. Date Signed
` • 10/25/96
Previous Editions Not Usable
Standard Fortn 424 (REV 4-88)
Prescribed by OMB Circular A-102
� � `� L- ►`�y�►
Tab B. OJP Form 7150/1, Budget Detail Worksheet
a
OMB APPROVAL NO.1121-0188
EXPIRES 5-98
B ud et Detail Worksh `��' � �y y �
eet
A. Personnel - List each position by title and name of employee, if available. Show the annual
salary rate and the percentage of time to be devoted to the project. Compensation paid for employees
engaged in grant activities must be consistent with that paid for similar work within the applicant
organization.
Name/Position Computation Cost
TOTAL
B. Fringe BenefitS -Fringe bene�ts should be based on actual known costs or an established
formula. Fringe benefits are for the personnel listed in budget category (A) and only for the +
percentage of time devoted to the project.
Name.�osition Computation Cost
a
TOTAL
OJP FORM 7150/1(5-95)
� � � � q t� - i�y�
� C. Travel - Itemize travel expenses of project personnel by purpose (e.g., staff to training, field
interviews, advisory group meeting, etc.). Show the basis of computation (e.g., six people to 3-day
training at $X airfare, $X lodging, $X subsistence). In training projects, travel and meals for trainees
should be listed separately. Show the number of trainees and the unit costs involved. Identify the
location of travel, if known.
Purpose of Travel Location Item Computation Cost
TOTAL
D. Equipment - List non-expendable items that are to be purchased. Non-expendable equipment
is tangible property having a useful life of more than two years and an acquisition cost of$5,000 or
more per unit. Expendable items should be included either in the "supplies" category or in the
"Other" category. Applicants should analyze the cost benefits of purchasing versus leasing
equipment, especially high cost items and those subject to rapid technical advances. Rented or leased �
equipment costs should be listed in the "Contractual" category. Explain how the equipment is
necessary for the success of the project.Attach a nanative describing the procurement method to be
used.
Item Computation Cost
WISEware 10,000
WISEopts 10,000
Course Creation Station 17,500
Stand Alone Work Stations (8) @ $3299 26,392
Course Software 20,OOOTOTAL 83,892
E. Supplies -List items by type (office supplies, postage,training materials, copying paper, and � '
expendable equipment items costing less that$5,000, such as books, hand held tape recorders) and
show the basis for computation. Generally, supplies include any materials that are expendable or
consumed during the course of the project.
Supply Items Computation Cost
TOTAL
F. Construction-As a rule, construction costs are not allowable. In some cases, minor repairs or
renovations may be allowable. Check with the program office before budgeting funds in this
category.
Purpose Description of Work Cost
�
TOTAL
� q �- I�y �
' �. Consultants/Contracts
Consultant Fees: For each consultant enter the name, if known, service to be provided, hourly or
daily fee (8-hour day), and estimated time on the project. Consultant fees in excess of$250 per day
require additional justification.
Name of Consultant Service Provided Computation Cost
Metropolitan State University Evaluation $15,000
School of Law Enforcement
Subtotal 15,000
Consultant Expenses: List all expenses to be paid from the grant to the individual consultants in
addition to their fees (i.e., travel, meals, lodging, etc.)
Item Location Computation Cost
Subtotal
Contracts: Provide a description of the product or service to be procured by contract and an estimate
of the cost. Applicants are encouraged to promote free and open competition in awarding contracts.
A separate justification must be provided for sole source contracts in excess of$100,000.
t
Item Cost
Subtotal
TOTAL 15.000
(H) Other Costs -List items (e.g., rent, reproduction, telephone,janitorial or security services, �
and investigative or confidential funds)by major type and the basis of the computation. For example,
provide the square footage and the cost per square foot for rent, or provide a monthly rental cost and
how many months to rent.
Description Computation Cost
TOTAL
(I) I11d1reCt COStS - Indirect costs are allowed only if the applicant has a Federally approved
indirect cost rate.A copy of the rate approval, (a fully executed, negotiated agreement), must be
attached. If the applicant does not have an approved rate, one can be requested by contacting the ..
applicant's cognizant Federal agency, which will review all documentation and approve a rate for the
applicant organization, or if the applicant's accounting system permits, costs may be allocated in the
direct cost categories.
�escription Computation Cost
TOTAL
� � Budget Summary-When you have completed the budget worksheet, transfer the totals for each
category to the spaces below. Compute the total direct costs and the total project costs. Indicate the
amount of Federal funds requested and the amount of non-Federal funds that will support the project.
Budget Category Amount �'+"�y y,
A. Personnel
B. Fringe Benefits
C. 1�ave1
D. Equipment 83,892
E. Supplies
F. Construction
15,000
G. Consultants/Contracts
H.Other
Total Direct Costs 98'892
I. Indirect Costs
TOTALPROJECTCOSTS 98,892
Federal Request 98.892
Non-Federal Amount
,
� � q �- �y�l�
Tab C. Budget Narrative
►
BUDGET NARRATIVE
��' �yy�
The SPPD proposal consists of utilizing the WISE Interactive Studies Enterprise, Inc. system to
create the training compact discs (CD's). The proposed budget consists of all necessary equipment,
software and instruction to create and disseminate on-site generated training CD's. The WISE
program allows maximum freedom to design the software to the needs of the SPPD Training Unit's
In-Service Training Program and Professional Development Institute offerings.
The SPPD would contract with Metro State University, School of Law Enforcement for an evaluation
ofthe computer-based training project. This evaluation would enable the SPPD to offer additional
training and compare the training with other training opportunities.
►
�l �.- �y��
Tab D. OJP Form 4000/3, Assurances
�
OMB APPROVAL NO.1121-0140
EXPIRES:1/31/96
ASSURANCES � � � �y y �
The Applicant hereby assures and certifies compliance with all Federal statutes, regulations, policies, guidelines and requirements,
including OMB Circulars No.A-21,A-110,A-122,A-128,A-87;E.O. 12372 and Uniform Administrative Requirements for Grants and
Cooperative Agreements-28 CFR,Part 66,Common Rule,that govern the application,acceptance and use of Federal funds for this
federally-assisted project. Also the Applicant assures and certifies that:
1. It possesses legal authority to apply for the grant; that a 10. It will assist the Federal grantor agency in its compliance with
resolution,motion or similar action has been duly adopted or Section 106 of the National Historic Preservation Act of 1966
passed as an official act of the applicanYs governing body, as amended (16 USC 470), Executive Order 11593, and the
authorizing the filing of the application, includi�g all under- Archeological and Historical Preservation Act of 1966 (16
standings and assurances contained therein, and directi�g USC 569a-1 et seq.) by(a)consulting with the State Historic
and authorizing the person identified as the official represen- Preservation Officer on the conduct of investigations, as
tative of the applicant to act in connection with the application necessary,to identify properties listed in or eligible for inclu-
and to provide such additional information as may be re- sion in the National Register of Historic Places that are
quired. subject to adverse effects (see 36 CFR Part 800.8) by the
activity, and notifying the Federal grantor agency of the
2. It will comply with requirements of the provisions of the existence of any such properties, and by (b) complying with
Uniform Relocation Assistance and Real Property Acquisi- all requirements established by the Federal grantor agency to
tions Act of 1970 P.L. 91-646) which provides for fair and avoid or mitigate adverse effects upon such properties.
equitable treatment of persons displaced as a result of Fed-
eral and federally-assisted programs. 1 1. It will comply,and assure the compliance of all its subgrantees
and contractors,with the applicable provisions of Title I of the
3. It will comply with provisions of Fede�al law which limit certain Omnibus Crime Control and Safe Streets Act of 1968, as
political activities of employees of a State or local unit of amended, the Juvenile Justice and Delinquency Prevention
government whose principal employment is in connection Act, or the Victims of Crime Act, as appropriate; the provi-
with an activity financed in whole or i�part by Federal grants. sions of the current edition of the Office of Justice Programs
(5 USC 1501, et seq.) Financiat and Administrative Guide for Grants, M7100.1;and
all other applicable Federal laws,orders,circulars,or regula-
4. It will comply with the minimum wage and maximum hours tions.
provisions of the Federal Fair Labor Standa�ds Act if appli-
cable. 12. It will comply with the provisions of 28 CFR applicable to grants
and cooperative agreements including Part 18,Administrative
5. It will establish safeguards to prohibit employees from using Review Procedure; Part 20,Criminal Justice Information Sys-
their positions for a purpose that is or give the appearance of tems; Part 22, Confidentiality of Identifiable Research and
being motivated by a desire for private gain for themselves or Statistical Information; Part 23, Criminal Intelligence Systems
others, particularly those with whom they have family, busi- Operating Policies; Part 30, Intergovernmental Review of De-
ness, or other ties. partment of Justice Programs and Activities; Part 42, Nondis-
crimination/Equal Employment Opportunity Policies and Pro-
6. It will give the sponsoring agency or the Comptroller Generat, cedures; Part 61, Procedures for Implementing the National
through any authorized representative,access to and the rig ht Environmental Policy Act; Part 63, Floodplain Management
to examine all records,books,papers,ordocuments related to and Wetland Protection Procedures;and Federal laws or regu-
the grant. lations applicable to Federal Assistance Programs.
7. It will comply wiih all requirements imposed by the Federal 13. It will comply, and a�l its contractors will comply, with the
Sponsoring agency concerning special requirements of law, nondiscrimination requirements of the Omnibus Crime Con-
program requirements,and otheradministrative requirements. trol and Safe Streets Act of 1968, as amended, 42 USC
3789(d), or Victims of Crime Act(as appropriate); Title VI of„
8. It will insure that the facilities under its ownership, lease or the Civil Rights Act of 1964, as amended; Section 504 of the
supervision which shall be utilized in the accomplishment of Rehabilitation Act of 1973, as amended;Subtitle A,Title II of
the project are not listed in the Environmental protection the Americans With Disabilities Act (ADA) (1990); Title IX of
Agency's (EPA-list of Violating Facilities and that it will notify the Education Amendments of 1972; the Age Discrimination
the Federal grantor agency of the receipt of any communica- Act of 1975;Department of Justice Non-Discrimination Regu-
tion from the Director of the EPA Office of Federal Activities lations, 28 CFR Part 42, Subparts C, D, E, and G; and
indicating that a facility to be used in the project is under Department of Justice regulations on disability discrimina-
consideration for listing by the EPA. tion, 28 CFR Part 35 and Part 39.
9. it will comply with the flood insurance purchase requirements 14. In the event a Federal or State court or Federal or State
of Section 102(a) of the Flood Disaster Protection Act of administrative agency makes a finding of discrimination after
1973, Public Law 93-234, 87 Stat. 975, approved December a due process hearing on the�rounds of race,color, religion,
31, 1976. Section 102(a) requires, on and after March 2, national origin, sex, or disability against a recipient of funds,
1975, the purchase of flood insurance in communities where the recipient will forward a copy of the finding to the Office for
such insurance is available as a condition for the receipt of Civil Rights, Office of Justice Programs.
any Federal financial assistance for construction or acquisi-
tion purposes for use in any area that had been identified by 15. It will provide an Equal Employment Opportunity Program if
the Secretary of the Department of Housing and Urban Devel- required to maintain one,where the application is for$500,000
opment as an area having special flood hazards.The phrase or more.
"Federal financial assistance" includes any form of loan,
grant, guaranty, insurance payment, rebate, subsidy, disas- 16. It will comply with the provisions of the Coastal Barrier
ter assistance loan or grant, or any other form of direct or Resources Act(P.L.97-348)dated October 19,1982(16 USC
indirect Federal assist 3501 et seq.) which prohibits the expenditure of most new
Federal funds within the units of the Coastal Barrier Re-
sources System.
� �' October 25, 1996
Signature Date
OJP FORM 4000/3(Rev.1•93)PREVIOUS EDITION ARE OBSOLETE.
ATTACHMENT TO SF-424.
9t- tyyl
Tab E. OJP Form 4061/6, Certifications
�
�,-""Y��' U.S.DEPARTMENT OF JUSTICE a �` '11 � `
' � OFFICE OF JUSTICE PROGRAMS � �
�3�� OFFICE OF THE COMPTROLLER
CERTIFICATIONS REGARDING LOBBYING; DEBARMENT, SUSPENSION AND
OTHER RESPONSIBILITY MATTERS;AND DRUG-FREE WORKPLACE REQUIREMENTS -
Applicants should refer to the regulations cited below to determine the certification to which they are required to
attest. Applicants should also review the instructions for certification included in the regulations before completing this
form. Signature of this form provides for compiiance with certification requirements under 28 CFR Part 69, "New
Restrictions on Lobbying" and 28 CFR Part 67, "Government-wide Debarment and Suspension (Nonpro-curement) and
Government-wide Requirements for Drug-Free Workplace (Grants)."The certifications shall be treated as a material
representation of fact upon which reliance will be placed when the Department of Justice determines to award the
covered transaction, grant, or cooperative agreement.
1. LOBBYING
public(Federal,State,or local)transaction or contract under a
As required by Section 1352,Title 31 of the U.S.Code,and public transaction;violation of Federal or State antitrust statutes
implemented at 28 CFR Part 69,for persons entering into a or commission of embezzlement,theft,forgery,
grant or cooperative agreement over$100,000,as defined at bribery,falsification or destruction of records,making false
28 CFR Part 69,the applicant certifies that: statements,or receiving stolen property;
(a) No Federat appropriated funds have been paid or will be (c)Are not presently indicted for or otherwise criminally or
paid, by or on behalf of the undersigned,to any person for in- civilly charged by a governmental entity(Federal, State,or
fluencing or attempting to influence an officer or employee of any local)with commission of any of the offenses enumerated in
agency,a Member of Congress, an officer or employee of paragraph(1)(b)of this certification;and
Congress, or an employee of a Member of Congress in con-
nection with the making of any Federal grant, the entering into (d)Have not within a three-year period preceding this applica-
of any cooperative agreement,and the extension,continuation, tion had one or more public transactions(Federal,State,or
renewal,amendment,or modification of any Federal grant or local)terminated for cause or default;and
cooperative agreement;
B.Where the applicant is unable to certify to any of the
(b) If any funds other than Federal appropriated funds have statements in this certification,he or she shall attach an
been paid or will be paid to any person for influencing or at- explanation to this application.
tempting to influence an officer or employee of any agency, a
Member of Congress, an officer or employee of Congress, or
an employee of a Member of Congress in connection with this 3.DRUG-FREE WORKPLACE
Federal grant or cooperative agreement, the undersigned shall (GRANTEES OTHER THAN INDIVIDUALS)
complete and submit Standard Form - LLL, "Disclosure of
Lobbying Activities,"in accordance with its instructions; As required by the Drug-Free Workplace Act of 1988,and
(c)The undersigned shall require that the language of this cer- implemented at 28 CFR Part 67,Subpart F,for grantees,as
tification be included in the award documents for all subawards defined at 28 CFR Part 67 Sections 67.615 and 67.620—
at all tiers(including subgrants,contracts under grants and A.The applicant certifies that it will or will continue to provide
cooperative agreements,and subcontracts)and that all sub- a drug-free workplace by:
recipients shall certify and disclose accordingly.
(a)Publishing a statement notifying employees that the
unlawful manufacture,distribution,dispensing, possession,or
2.DEBARMENT,SUSPENSION,AND OTHER use of a controlled substance is prohibited in the grantee's
workplace and specifying the actions that will be taken against
RESPONSIBILITY MATTERS employees for violation of such prohibition;
(DIRECT RECIPIENT) (b)Establishing an on-going drug-free awareness program to
As required by Executive Order 12549, Debarment and inform employees about—
Suspension, and implemented at 28 CFR Part 67,for prospec- (1)The dangers of drug abuse in the workplace;
tive participants in primary covered transactions, as defined at �2�The grantee's policy of maintaining a drug-free workplace;
28 CFR Part 67, Section 67.510—
(3)Any available drug counseling,rehabilitation,and employee
A. The applicant certifies that it and its principals: assistance programs;and
(a)Are not presently debarred, suspended, proposed for debar- (4)The penalties that may be imposed upon employees for
ment, declared ineligible, sentenced to a denial of Federal drug abuse violations occurring in the workplace;
benefits by a State or Federal court, or voluntarily excluded
from covered transactions by any Federal department (c) Making it a requirement that each employee to be engaged
or agency; in the performance of the grant be given a copy of the state-
ment required by paragraph (a);
(b) Have not within a three-year period preceding this applica-
tion been convicted of or had a civil judgment rendered against (d) Notifying the employee in the statement required by para-
them for commission of fraud or a criminal offense in connec- graph(a)that,as a condition of employment under the grant,
tion with obtaining,attempting to obtain,or performing a the employee will—
OJP FORM 4061/6(3-91)REPLACES OJP FORMS 4061/2,4061/3 AND 4061/4 WHICH ARE OBSOLETE. �
(1)Abide by the terms of the statement;and
(2)Notify the empioyer in writing of his or her conviction for a
violation of a criminal drug statute occurring in the workplace
no later than five calendar days after such conviction;
Check � if there are workplaces on file that are not indentified
(e) Notifying the agency,in writing,within 10 calendar days here.
after receiving notice under subparagraph (d)(2)from an Section 67,630 of the regulations provides that a grantee that
employee or otherwise receiving actual notice of such convic-tion.
Employers of convicted employees must provide notice,inciuding is a State may elect to make one certification in each Federal
position title,to: Department of Justice,Office of fiscal year.A copy of which should be included with each ap-
Justice Programs,ATTN:Control Desk,633 Indiana Avenue, Plication for Department of Justice funding. States and State
N.W.,Washington,D.C.20531.Notice shall inciude the iden- agencies may elect to use OJP Form 4061/7.
tification number(s)of each affected grant; Check ❑ if the State has elected to complete OJP Form
(f)Taking one of the following actions,within 30 calendar 4061/7.
days of receiving notice under subparagraph (d)(2),with
respect to any employee who is so convicted— DRUG-FREE WORKPLACE
(1)Taking appropriate personnel action against such an (GRANTEES WHO ARE INDIVIDUALS)
employee, up to and including termination, consistent with the As required by the Drug-Free Workplace Act of 1988,and
requirements of the Rehabilitation Act of 1973,as amended;or implemented at 28 CFR Part 67,Subpart F,for grantees,as
(2) Requiring such employee to participate satisfactorily in a defined at 28 CFR Part 67; Sections 67.615 and 67.620—
drug abuse assistance or rehabilitation program approved for A.As a condition of the grant, I certify that I will not engage
such purposes by a Federal,State,or local health,law enforce- in the unlawful manufacture,distribution,dis ensin
ment, or other appropriate agency; p g,posses-
sion, or use of a controlled substance in conducting any
(g)Making a good faith effort to continue to maintain a drug- activity with the grant;and
free workplace through implementation of paragraphs(a), (b),
(c), (d), (e), and(f). B. If convicted of a criminal drug offense resulting from a
violation occurring during the conduct of any grant activity, I
B.The grantee may insert in the space provided be�ow the will report the conviction,in writing,within 10 calendar days
site(s)for the performance of work done in connection with of the conviction,to: Department of Justice, Office of Justice
the specific grant: Programs,ATTN:Control Desk, 633 Indiana Avenue, N.W.,
Place of Performance(Street address,city,county,state,zip Washington,D.C.20531.
code)
As the duly authorized representative of the applicant, I hereby certify that the applicant wili comply with the above certifications.
1.Grantee Name and Address: Saint Paul Police Department
100 East Eleventh Street
Saint Paul, MN 55101
2.Application Number and/or Project Name 3.Grantee IRSNendor Number
NI;7 Solicitation for Law Enforcement, Courts
and Corrections Technology Development, 41-6005521
Implementation and Evaluation
4.Typed Name and Title of Authorized Representative
William K. Finney ief of Police
5. gnatu
6. Date
� ti
October 25, 1996
� � 9c •tyy�
Tab F. OJP Form 7120/1 �
This Tab Not Applicable
�
� � qc._ ��y�
Tab G. Project Abstract
s
� a �.- tyy�
ABSTRACT
The Saint Paul Police Department(SPPD)proposes to expand their training unit to include computer-
based training. This technology would give them the ability to provide the maximum fle�cibility and
efficiency for not only in-service training to SPPD sworn personnel, but it would also include and
expand training offerings for law enforcement agencies in the region surrounding the Saint Paul Police
Department.
The SPPD has already distinguished itself by offering quality in-service training and has been regarded
as a local center for law enforcement training. With computer-based training the SPPD could enlarge
the offerings to the regional law enforcement community and expand into areas not previously
covered. Evaluation of cunent course offerings and of the needs of the regional law enforcement
agencies would become a focus for the department. As smaller and smaller departments become
computer proficient, it is critical that regional based training facilities offer not only a full range of
offerings to the profession, but that all methods of instruction are utilized. Due to the lack of any
other local training facility investigating this technological outreach focus, the SPPD Training Unit
becoming computer-based would provide a needed resource for the Upper Midwest region.
�
� °��- 1y41
Tab H. Project Narrative
�
� � q �- iyy�
PROJECT NARRATIVE
The Saint Paul Police Department(SPPD) currently provides law enforcement training for agencies
located within both the metropolitan area of the cities of Saint Paul and Minneapolis and from the
lazger region which includes mostly rural areas of the Upper Midwest. The number of municipalities
and counties which have made use of the training programs of the SPPD ranges between 60-701oca1
law enforcement departments per year. The training curricula of the SPPD's Professional
Development Institute, includes the following:
• Street Safe-- Officer Survival
• Criminal Interview and Interrogation
• Advanced Criminal Interview and Interrogation
• Peer Support
• Background Investigation
• Supervision of Police Personnel
• Field Training Officer
• Workplace Violence
i
• Basic SWAT Skills
• Instructor Development
• Graffiti Seminar
• Risk Management
• Other Management Directives
� � �1 �. -1yy �
The average number of law enforcement personnel outside of the SPPD's sworn personnel utilizing
this resource is 425 annually.
In-Service Training for SPPD during 1996 sworn personnel included the following topics:
• Use of Force
• Officer Survival .
• Workplace Conduct
• Gun Interdiction
• Off-Duty Officer Survival
• Room Search Tactics
• Defensive Tactics
• Police Pursuit Policy
• Psychology of Pursuits
• Workplace Conduct
• MN POST Model Ethics Policy
• Positional Asphyxia Update
�
• Problem Solving
• Community Oriented Policing
� Criminal Neglect and Child Endangerment
• Gang Update
• City Licenses and Inspection Update
� � q�-i�t� 1
The minimum number of hours required in order for sworn personnel to maintain their Peace Officer
License(POST regulation)is 16 hours per year. Most sworn officers within SPPD have significantly
higher training hours in their personnel files due both to the rapidly changing science of law
enforcement and their individual commitment to professionalism.
This proposal would allow the SPPD to greatly expand this needed training resource to those rural
areas of the Upper Midwest which do not have benefit of other law enforcement training facilities
nearby. The nearest NLT funded locally initiated research partnership site is Omaha,Nebraskal. There
appears to be a dearth of research activity recognition in the Upper Midwest area. Although not
conclusive, it does suggest that the region sunounding Saint Paul is under-resourced for law
enforcement training as well.
The ability to receive advanced training locally is of primary importance. With each region of the
country having its own persona, the unassuming and polite personality of the Midwesterner is best
understood by another Midwesterner. This language and personality commonality reinforces the
training in those areas which are unique to law enforcement, especially in interactions with the
criminal mind.
�
The City of Saint Paul compares favorably to other local police departments in its population size,
250,000 to 499,999, on training criteria. According to a BJS study of 1993 local police
1Searching For Answers,NIJ 1995 Annual Report to Congress, July, 1996, p.10, figure 6.
� � q � - �441
departments2, Saint Paul compared positively in the following examples:
• 8% of all departments had some type of degree requirement for new recruits. Saint Paul
requires a two-year degree of all recruits.
• The average number of training hours required of new police o�'icers totaled 1,100 in those
departments serving populations of 100,000 or more. Saint Paul requires 1,120 hours.
• Eighty percent of departments serving a population of 250,000 or more operated a training
academy. Saint Paui is part of that large majority.
The BJS study also compares police departments in use of computers. In every category Saint Paul
was equal to or ahead of its population range3. The BJS did not, however, include information on
whether those departments utilized a computer-based training component within their training units.4
Computer-based training is a logical extension for a pro-active training unit in this computer
proficient society.
PROPOSAL
Under this proposal,the standard classroom style instruction would be supplemented with the more
; technologically advanced instructional delivery systems via a computer-based interactive multi-media
instruction. Applications for this type of training would include:
ZI.ocal Police Departments, 1993. Reaves, Brian, PhD., Bureau of Justice Statistics, April,
1996.
3 Ibid, pps. 18-19.
4 Ibid. p. 19.
� °I � ' 1y4�
• recruit academy classes
• annual in-service classes
• refresher training for those officers absent for extended periods due to special
assignments
• specialized training
Currently, the training unit operates out of a section of the SPPD main headquarters. Computer-
based training, especially in the area of in-service, refresher training and specialized training could
take place at other SPPD facilities where space is not as much of a premium. Additionally, the
computer-based segments could be offered simultaneously in conjunction with other training
functions. The interaction of both live and canned segments offers not only variety and creative use
of materials, but saves the instructors' time. This approach takes the entire training progam to a
higher level of technological interaction with which the law enforcement officer is already familiar due
to squad caz MDT's, records, administrative use of PC's, etc. Thus, training could be offered during
all shifts each day, seven days a week. Course content and viewing would be under strict control and
the specialized needs of each officer can also be addressed. Because the individual officer is already
proficient in the use of computers, the transition to this format will be minimal. A total of eight
d monitors would be stationed within various SPPD facilities to maximize the use of the computer
based segments. Instructors will be able to monitor mandatory educational requirements and
document each individual officer's progress. Instruction may be monitored by subject or by individual
officer, thereby facilitating performance evaluations. The Minnesota Peace Officers Standards and
Training (POST Board) has already given tentative approval to the SPPD for computer-based
training. This approval is evidence of the recognition of the SPPD's reputation for quality in-service
� � � �- 14�1 �
training throughout the region.
On review of computer-based training courses on the International Association of Chiefs of Police
Internet (IACP NET), there appear to be a growing number of correspondence-based computer
training companies for law enforcement training. Because the vast majority of all police departments
are small, (99 percent work in departments in cities with populations of 249,999 or belows), the
ability for these sworn personnel to interact with other sworn personnel in a common setting without
it being cost prohibitive is a critical safety and training factor for law enforcement. The plethora of
correspondence based computer training facilities may seem to be on the cutting edge and it may
appear expedient for these small agencies to utilize their products, but the lack in networking and
interaction with other sworn personnel from like-sized departments is isolating and detrimental to
their overall law enforcement professionalism.
The Training Unit of the SPPD is an ideal candidate to provide local law enforcement agencies with
advanced professional training. Although it is a department of a large city(population 272,235), it +
prides itself on its small town atmosphere and approach. Sworn personnel from small agencies have
communicated their preference for training at Saint Paul because of the level of professionalism
d coupled with the authenticity of it being a working law enforcement department with which they can
identify. With the ability to offer computer-based training, this resource will continue to expand and
serve its constituents with state of the art techniques.
Lieutenant Nancy DiPerna, Commander of the Training Unit along with Sergeants Mark Kempe and
5 Ibid, p. 2.
� � �t � - Iyy1
John Cannefax will develop and produce the computer-based training components to dovetail with
their cunent instruction. The weaving of computer usage with "live" instruction will insure the
maximum level of quality instruction.
EVALUATION
The SPPD would evaluate its computer-based training with assistance from Metropolitan State
University, School of Law Enforcement. Based in Saint Paul, MSU would design and administer an
evaluation for participants in the Professional Development Institute. With information from this
partnership, future offerings and other projections can be developed.
,
/
� ��. - lyy �
Tab I. Qualifications of the Applicants
,
. •
q � - �yy1
RESIIME
PERSONAL
Nancy E. Di Perna
4315 Kirste}� Court
Eagan, Minnesota 55123
EDUCATION
1994; Master of Arts Degree
Education and Public Safety Administration
University of Saint Thomas
1978; Bachelor of Arts Degree
Sociology
Hamline University
1974; High School Diploma
Kellogg High School
WORR EXPERIENCE
January, 1995 to Present
Services Section Commander
April, 1995 to Present
Executive Officer to Deputy Chief Ekwall
Support Services Division
January, 1994 to January, 1995
Special Investigations Unit Commander
January, 1993 to January, 1995 +
Patrol Lieutenant
Northwest Team
May, 1990 to January, 1993
:� Vice Unit Commander
March, 1986 to May, 1990
Internal Affairs Investigator
June, 1985 to March, 1986
Acting Sergeant, Narcotics Unit
TRAINING/BOARDS/COMMISSIONS
FBI National Academy Graduate
Leadership Saint Paul Graduate
Latimer Leadership Graduate
Enterprise Community Board Member
' aC. • 144 �
RESUME
MARK C. KEMPE
EDUCATION
Cretin High School, Saint Paul, Minnesota. 1970-1974
Saint Mary's College, Winona, Minnesota. 1974-1978
- Bachelor of Arts Degree, Cum Laude
- Double major; Criminal Justice and History
Hamline University Law School, Saint Paul, Minnesota. 1978
- Completed first year studies ---
Stritch College, Milwaukee, Wisconsin. 1991-1993
- Master of Science Degree in Management
Northwestern University, Evanston, Illinois. 1993
- School of Police Staff and Command, Traffic Institute
EXPERIENCE
Police Officer, Rochester (MN) Police Department 1979-1982
- Patrol Officer - Field Training Officer
- Board of Directors, Police Benevolent Association
Police Officer, Edina (MN) Police Department 1981-1982 �
- Patrol Officer - EMT
Police Officer, Saint Paul (MN) Police Department 1982-pres.
- Distinguished Recruit Award
+ - Patrol Officer - Field Training Officer
- Street Crimes Unit - Critical Incident Response Team
Promoted to Sergeant, April 10, 1988
Vice Unit 1988-1991
- Unit Citation;for coord�nating a three year prostitution
investigation. First RICO action ever prosecuted in the
State of Minnesota.
- surveillance and undercover investigations
- pen register and wire tap investigations
- liaison with County Attorney's Office
� . . .
� q�-1441
Critical Incident Response Team Supervisor 1990-pres.
- Unit Citation;for Mobile Field Force in-service
[)IStrl[CtLOIt.
- Mobile Field Force (riot control) design and instruction.
- supervision of thirty tactical team members.
- planning and execution of over one hundred high risk
operations.
-Acting CIRT Executive O�cer, Ryan/Jones murders, 8/26/94
- featured speaker, Wisconsin Association of SWAT Personnel
Annual Conference, 2/14/96.
Crimes Against Persons/Sex Crimes Unit 1991-1993
- investigations including child abuse and
criminal sexual conduct cases.
- interviewing, court testimony and complaint preparation
1Yaining Unit 1993-pres.
- Unit Citation;for quantity and quality of training
provided to new and existing St. Paul O�cers.
- in-service training design and implementation.
- Academy Director classes 1994-1 and 1994-2.
- Asst. Director classes 1993-2 and 1995-1. Responsible
for curriculum design, instructor selection, contracts,
record keeping and personnel management for new recruits.
- Department Use of Force, Field Training Program
and POST coordinator.
Coordinator/Lead Instructor, Saint Paul Connections Program 1995-pres. '
- A joint program with the Saint Paul School Dist. to introduce
interested inner city children to police work.
�
PROFFSSIONAL ASSOCIATIONS
American Society of Law Enforcement Trainers (ASLET).
Association of Training Officers of Mirmesota (ATOM).
National Tactical Officers Association (NTOA).
Minnesota Police and Peace Officers Association (MPPOA).
Saint Paul Police Federation.
Saint Paul Police Ranking Officers Association.
. . , .
� �� - �y��
ACTIVITIFS
Habitat for Humanity
Saint Paul Connections Youth Program
Saint Paul Police Pension Committee
St. Joseph's Church
Ramsey Co. Family Violence Intervention Team
Police Federation Wage Team
PERSONAL
Residence: 310 Christine Lane, West Saint Paul, MN 55118.
Married for fifteen years, four children.
.