Loading...
96-1441 . ' S ' Council File# 9 G ly4 I ��� Cireen Sheet#�osod LUTION � O S T UL,MIIVNE50TA Presented By: ' Referred To: Committee: Date_ 1 R'HEREA5,the Natio Inst' e of Justice(1�TI�has offered a solicitation for law enforcement 2 technology which includea computer-based training,and 3 4 WHEREAS,the Saint Paul Police Department(SPPD)wishea to take advantage of the solicitaHon by 5 submitting a grant application for computer-based training in the amount of$98,892,and 6 7 WHEREA5,the Saint Paul City Council has allowed the SPPD to submit grants for technologlcal 8 enhancements for the more eflicient operation of the SPPD, 9 10 THEREFORE BE IT RESOLVED THAT The Saint Paul Police Department be authorized to submit 11 a grant application to the 1vIJ for computer-based training in the amount of$98,892. 12 13 14 15 16 17 18 19 20 21 22 23 25 26 27 28 eas ays t B� Requested by D artment of: Bostrom Guerin p �� Harris � Megard �/ �� Rettman � ✓ - Thune i/ Approval Recommended y ger Director: By: Adopted by Council:Date: Q�-�� �q�� Form pr ve orne . Adopti n Certified by Council Secretary: By: //-/" �� BY' Approved by Mayor:Date: �Z l 3 �G Appro by Mayor for u 's�i to Council: By: By: / ^ r � '' ��._Iyy� ,/ , . d , t.J 3 �� �4 DEP�RTIAENTAFFICE/COIJNCII DATE INITIATED Saint Paul Police Department 10/31/96 G R E E N SH E ET CONTACT PERSON 3 PHONE INITIAL/DATE INITIAUDATE DEPARTMENT DIRECTOR CITY COUNCIL Chief William K. Finney AS810N CITYATTORNEV CITYCLERK , NUMBER FOR MUST BE ON COUNCIL AGENDA BY(pATE) RO��NQ GET DIRECTOR �FIN.8 MQT,BERVICES DIR. ORDER AYOR(OR ASSISTANT) � TOTAL#OF SIGNATURE PAGES (CLIP ALL LOCATIONS FOR SIGNATURE) ACTION RE�UE3TED: Authority to submit grant application to NIJ for computer-based training for law enforcement academies, in-service and other specialized service training needs ' RECOMMENDATIONS:Approve(A)or Reject(R) PERSONAL 8ERVICE CONTRACTS MUST ANSWER THE FOLLOWING�UE8TION8: i _PLANNINa COMMISSIQN _CIVIL 3EI��ON 1• Has this pereon/firm ever worked under a coMract for this department? _CIB COMMITTEE _ YES NO _STAFF _ AAf 2• Has this person/firm ever been a city employee? '7•Z� YES NO _DISTRICT COUR7 _ 3. Does this person/firm possess a skfll not normally posaeased by any current city employee? SUPPORTS WHICH COUNCIL 08JECTIVE9 MAYOR'S OFFI E YES NO Ezplain all yss answers on ssparat��h�st and ettach to presn shest INITIATING PROBLEM,ISSUE,OPPpRTUNITY(Who,Whet,Whsn,Where,Why): The National Institute of Justice has solicitated grant applications for computer-based training. The SPPD would make more efficient and flexible use of its training unit's products of in-service and other specialized training. The SPPD requests authority to submit a grant application for this solicitation. ADVANTAQES IF APPROVED: The SPPD would receive $98,892 to establish computer-based training for its training unit. �������� v ' DISADVANTAOES IF APPROVED: NOV 1 i 1996 r�n�+�' ; None coun��� ��y.::����� Cen �r ���1C` ATT�RNEY DEC 0 2 ►�96 DISADVANTAOES IF NOT APPROVED: � " The SPPD would not receive $98,892 to establish computer-based training for its training unit. ; 98,892 TOTAL AMOUNT OF TRAN8ACTION S COST/REVENUE BUD(iETEO(CIRCLE ONE) YES NO National Institute of Justice FUNDIIiCi SOURCE ACTIVITY NUMBER FINANCIAL INFORII�fATION:(EXPLAIN) ' # ' � ROUTING ORDER: Below are correct routings for the five most frequent types oi dxuments: CONTRACTS(assumes authorized budget exists) COUNCIL RESOLUTION(Amend Budgeta/Accept.(irenta) 1. Outside Agency 1. Department Director 2. Department Director 2. Budget Oirector 3. City Attomey 3. City Attomey 4. Mayor(for contracts over$25,000) 4. Mayor/Assistant 5. Human Rights(for contracts over$50,000) 5. City Councl 6. Finance and Management Services Director 6. Chief Accountant,Finanoe and Management Servioes 7. Finance Accounting ADMINISTRATIVE ORDERS(Budget Revision) COUNCII RESOLUTION(all othsra,and Ordinences) 1. Activity Manager 1. Department Director 2. Department Accountant 2. Ciry Attorney 3. Department Director 3. Mayor Assistant 4. Budget Director 4. City Council 5. City Clerk 6. Chief Accountant, Fina�ce and Management Services ADMINISTRATIVE ORDERS(ali others) 1. Department Director 2. Ciry Attomey 3. Finance and Management Services Director 4. City Clerk TOTAL NUMBER OF SIGNATURE PAGES Indicate the#�of pages on which signatures are required and papsrciip or flay eech of these pages. ACTION REQUESTED Describe what the projecUrequest seeks to accomplish in either chronologi- cal order or order of importance,whichever is most appropriate for the issue.Do not write complete sentences. Begin each item in your list with a verb. RECOMMENDATIONS Complete ii the issue in question has been presented before any body,public or private. SUPPORTS WHICH COUNCIL OBJECTIVE� indicate which Council ob(ective(s)your pro�ecVrequest supports by listing the key word(s) (HOUSINGr RECREATION, NEIGHBORHOODS,ECONOMIC DEVELOPMENT, BUDGET,SEWER SEPARATION). (SEE COMPLETE LIST IN INSTRUCTIONAL MANUAL.) PERSONAL SERVICE CONTRACTS: This information witl be used to determine the ciry'�liability tor workers compensatlon claims,taxes and proper cfvil service hiring rulea. INITIATING PROBLEM, ISSUE,OPPORTUNITY Explain the situation or conditions that created a need for your project or request. ADVANTAGES IF APPROVED Indicate whether this is simply an annual budget procedure required by law/ charter or whether there are specific ways ln which the City of Saint Paul and its citizens will bene(it trom this projecUaction. DISADVANTAGES IF APPROVED What negative effects or major changes to existing or past processes might this project/request produce if it is passed(e.g.,traffic delays,nofse, tax increases or assessments)?To Whom?When?For how long? DISADVANTAGES IF NOT APPROVED What will be the negative consequences i(the promised action is not approved?Inability to deliver service?Contfnued high traffic,noise, accident rate�Loss of revenue? FINANCIAI IMPACT Although you must tailor the information you provide here to the issue you are addressing, in general you must answer two questions:How much is it going to cost?Who is going to pay? , . �t6 - lyy � Tab A. SF 424 � OMB A �r`_ 'y y 1 ' APPLICATION FOR Z,o,,�S�BM„-rEO Appl(cant Identifier PP oval No.0348-0p43' FEDERAL ASSISTANCE . c 1.APE OF SUBMISSION: : �� 3.DATE RECEIVED BY STATE State Applicatio�Identifier pplication : Preapplicatfon , ❑ Construction � Construction 4.DATE RECEIVED BY FEDERALAGENCY Federel Identifier [� Non-Construction ; � Non-Constructfon 5. APPLICANT INFORMATION Legal Name: Organizational Unit: City of Saint Paul Saint Paul Police Department Address(give city,county,state,and zip code): Name and telephone number of the person to be contacted on matters involving 100 E3st Eleventh Street thisapplication(giveareacode) Saint Paul, MN 55101 Sergeant John Cannefax (612) 292-3555 County of Ramsey 6. EMPLOYER IDENTIFICATION NUMBER(EIN): 7. TYPE OF APPLICANT:(enter appropriate/etter in box) A. State H. Independent School Dist. 1 6 � 0 5 5 2 1 B. County I. State Controlled Institution oi Higher Learning 8. TYPE OF APPUCATION: C. MUlliCip81 J. Private University D.Township K. Indian Tribe � New ❑ Continuation ❑ Revision E. Interstate L. Individual ❑ ❑ F. Intertnunicipal M. Profit Organization If Revision,enter appropriate letter(s)in box(es): G. Special District N. Other(Specify): A. IncreaseAward B. DecreaseAward C. IncreaseDuration D. Decrease Duration Other(specily): 9. NAME OF FEDERAL AGENCY: HUD 10. CATALOG OF FEDERAL DOMESTIC 11. DESCFiIPTIVE TITLE OF APPLICANT'S PROJECT: ASSISTANCE NUMBER: I ` ■ ,5 O T�.2e: Tu,StiGC� 'I�.e�t'_ct�'ch� 17C�Vc?I�G ►'Y�P�'lfi Ct{1G� EJCt�t,'C.t�t�f1 �r'C C'C'� Computer-Based Law Enforcement Training 12. AREAS AFFECTED BY PROJECT(ciHes,counties,states,etc.): Saint Paul, MN Ramsey County, MN ad'acent metropolitan areas 13. PROPOSED PROJECT: 14. CONGRESSIONAL DISTRICTS OF: Start Date Ending Date a. Applicant � ,_ ; b. Project 1/1/97 12/30/97 Minnesota, Fourth District ' Minnesota, Fourth District 15. ESTIMATED FUNDING: 16. IS APPLICATION SUBJECT TO REVIEW BY STATE EXECUTIVE ORDER 12372 PROCESS7 a. Federal $ 98'892 .00 a. YES. THIS PREAPPLICATION/APPLICATION WAS MADEAVAILABIETOTHE STATE EXECUTIVE ORDER 12372 PROCESS FOR REVIEW ON: b. Applicant $ � DATE a State $ � � b NO. � PROGRAM IS NOT COVEREO BY E.O.12372 d. Local $ .00 � OR PROGRAM HAS NOT BEEN SELECTED BY STATE FOR REVIEW e. Other $ .00 f. Program Income $ ,p� 17. IS THE APPLICANT DELINQUENT ON ANY FEDERAL DEBT7 g.TOTAL $ 00 � Yes If"Yes,"attach an explanation. ❑X No 98,892 18. TO THE BEST OF MY KNOWLEDCaE AND BELIEF,ALL DATq N THIS APPLICATIOWPREAPPLICATION ARE TRUE MfD CORRECT,THE OOCUMENT HAS BEEN DULY AUTHORIZED BY THE GOVERNItVG BODY OF THE APPLICANTAND THE APPLICANT WILL COMPLY WITH THE ATTACHED ASSURANCES IF THE ASSISTANCE IS AWARDED a. Typed Name of Authorized Re esentati b. Title c Telepr�o nu William K. inney Chief of Police (b12-Z��2-3�.��8) d. Signatur Autho d Re r tative � e. Date Signed ` • 10/25/96 Previous Editions Not Usable Standard Fortn 424 (REV 4-88) Prescribed by OMB Circular A-102 � � `� L- ►`�y�► Tab B. OJP Form 7150/1, Budget Detail Worksheet a OMB APPROVAL NO.1121-0188 EXPIRES 5-98 B ud et Detail Worksh `��' � �y y � eet A. Personnel - List each position by title and name of employee, if available. Show the annual salary rate and the percentage of time to be devoted to the project. Compensation paid for employees engaged in grant activities must be consistent with that paid for similar work within the applicant organization. Name/Position Computation Cost TOTAL B. Fringe BenefitS -Fringe bene�ts should be based on actual known costs or an established formula. Fringe benefits are for the personnel listed in budget category (A) and only for the + percentage of time devoted to the project. Name.�osition Computation Cost a TOTAL OJP FORM 7150/1(5-95) � � � � q t� - i�y� � C. Travel - Itemize travel expenses of project personnel by purpose (e.g., staff to training, field interviews, advisory group meeting, etc.). Show the basis of computation (e.g., six people to 3-day training at $X airfare, $X lodging, $X subsistence). In training projects, travel and meals for trainees should be listed separately. Show the number of trainees and the unit costs involved. Identify the location of travel, if known. Purpose of Travel Location Item Computation Cost TOTAL D. Equipment - List non-expendable items that are to be purchased. Non-expendable equipment is tangible property having a useful life of more than two years and an acquisition cost of$5,000 or more per unit. Expendable items should be included either in the "supplies" category or in the "Other" category. Applicants should analyze the cost benefits of purchasing versus leasing equipment, especially high cost items and those subject to rapid technical advances. Rented or leased � equipment costs should be listed in the "Contractual" category. Explain how the equipment is necessary for the success of the project.Attach a nanative describing the procurement method to be used. Item Computation Cost WISEware 10,000 WISEopts 10,000 Course Creation Station 17,500 Stand Alone Work Stations (8) @ $3299 26,392 Course Software 20,OOOTOTAL 83,892 E. Supplies -List items by type (office supplies, postage,training materials, copying paper, and � ' expendable equipment items costing less that$5,000, such as books, hand held tape recorders) and show the basis for computation. Generally, supplies include any materials that are expendable or consumed during the course of the project. Supply Items Computation Cost TOTAL F. Construction-As a rule, construction costs are not allowable. In some cases, minor repairs or renovations may be allowable. Check with the program office before budgeting funds in this category. Purpose Description of Work Cost � TOTAL � q �- I�y � ' �. Consultants/Contracts Consultant Fees: For each consultant enter the name, if known, service to be provided, hourly or daily fee (8-hour day), and estimated time on the project. Consultant fees in excess of$250 per day require additional justification. Name of Consultant Service Provided Computation Cost Metropolitan State University Evaluation $15,000 School of Law Enforcement Subtotal 15,000 Consultant Expenses: List all expenses to be paid from the grant to the individual consultants in addition to their fees (i.e., travel, meals, lodging, etc.) Item Location Computation Cost Subtotal Contracts: Provide a description of the product or service to be procured by contract and an estimate of the cost. Applicants are encouraged to promote free and open competition in awarding contracts. A separate justification must be provided for sole source contracts in excess of$100,000. t Item Cost Subtotal TOTAL 15.000 (H) Other Costs -List items (e.g., rent, reproduction, telephone,janitorial or security services, � and investigative or confidential funds)by major type and the basis of the computation. For example, provide the square footage and the cost per square foot for rent, or provide a monthly rental cost and how many months to rent. Description Computation Cost TOTAL (I) I11d1reCt COStS - Indirect costs are allowed only if the applicant has a Federally approved indirect cost rate.A copy of the rate approval, (a fully executed, negotiated agreement), must be attached. If the applicant does not have an approved rate, one can be requested by contacting the .. applicant's cognizant Federal agency, which will review all documentation and approve a rate for the applicant organization, or if the applicant's accounting system permits, costs may be allocated in the direct cost categories. �escription Computation Cost TOTAL � � Budget Summary-When you have completed the budget worksheet, transfer the totals for each category to the spaces below. Compute the total direct costs and the total project costs. Indicate the amount of Federal funds requested and the amount of non-Federal funds that will support the project. Budget Category Amount �'+"�y y, A. Personnel B. Fringe Benefits C. 1�ave1 D. Equipment 83,892 E. Supplies F. Construction 15,000 G. Consultants/Contracts H.Other Total Direct Costs 98'892 I. Indirect Costs TOTALPROJECTCOSTS 98,892 Federal Request 98.892 Non-Federal Amount , � � q �- �y�l� Tab C. Budget Narrative ► BUDGET NARRATIVE ��' �yy� The SPPD proposal consists of utilizing the WISE Interactive Studies Enterprise, Inc. system to create the training compact discs (CD's). The proposed budget consists of all necessary equipment, software and instruction to create and disseminate on-site generated training CD's. The WISE program allows maximum freedom to design the software to the needs of the SPPD Training Unit's In-Service Training Program and Professional Development Institute offerings. The SPPD would contract with Metro State University, School of Law Enforcement for an evaluation ofthe computer-based training project. This evaluation would enable the SPPD to offer additional training and compare the training with other training opportunities. ► �l �.- �y�� Tab D. OJP Form 4000/3, Assurances � OMB APPROVAL NO.1121-0140 EXPIRES:1/31/96 ASSURANCES � � � �y y � The Applicant hereby assures and certifies compliance with all Federal statutes, regulations, policies, guidelines and requirements, including OMB Circulars No.A-21,A-110,A-122,A-128,A-87;E.O. 12372 and Uniform Administrative Requirements for Grants and Cooperative Agreements-28 CFR,Part 66,Common Rule,that govern the application,acceptance and use of Federal funds for this federally-assisted project. Also the Applicant assures and certifies that: 1. It possesses legal authority to apply for the grant; that a 10. It will assist the Federal grantor agency in its compliance with resolution,motion or similar action has been duly adopted or Section 106 of the National Historic Preservation Act of 1966 passed as an official act of the applicanYs governing body, as amended (16 USC 470), Executive Order 11593, and the authorizing the filing of the application, includi�g all under- Archeological and Historical Preservation Act of 1966 (16 standings and assurances contained therein, and directi�g USC 569a-1 et seq.) by(a)consulting with the State Historic and authorizing the person identified as the official represen- Preservation Officer on the conduct of investigations, as tative of the applicant to act in connection with the application necessary,to identify properties listed in or eligible for inclu- and to provide such additional information as may be re- sion in the National Register of Historic Places that are quired. subject to adverse effects (see 36 CFR Part 800.8) by the activity, and notifying the Federal grantor agency of the 2. It will comply with requirements of the provisions of the existence of any such properties, and by (b) complying with Uniform Relocation Assistance and Real Property Acquisi- all requirements established by the Federal grantor agency to tions Act of 1970 P.L. 91-646) which provides for fair and avoid or mitigate adverse effects upon such properties. equitable treatment of persons displaced as a result of Fed- eral and federally-assisted programs. 1 1. It will comply,and assure the compliance of all its subgrantees and contractors,with the applicable provisions of Title I of the 3. It will comply with provisions of Fede�al law which limit certain Omnibus Crime Control and Safe Streets Act of 1968, as political activities of employees of a State or local unit of amended, the Juvenile Justice and Delinquency Prevention government whose principal employment is in connection Act, or the Victims of Crime Act, as appropriate; the provi- with an activity financed in whole or i�part by Federal grants. sions of the current edition of the Office of Justice Programs (5 USC 1501, et seq.) Financiat and Administrative Guide for Grants, M7100.1;and all other applicable Federal laws,orders,circulars,or regula- 4. It will comply with the minimum wage and maximum hours tions. provisions of the Federal Fair Labor Standa�ds Act if appli- cable. 12. It will comply with the provisions of 28 CFR applicable to grants and cooperative agreements including Part 18,Administrative 5. It will establish safeguards to prohibit employees from using Review Procedure; Part 20,Criminal Justice Information Sys- their positions for a purpose that is or give the appearance of tems; Part 22, Confidentiality of Identifiable Research and being motivated by a desire for private gain for themselves or Statistical Information; Part 23, Criminal Intelligence Systems others, particularly those with whom they have family, busi- Operating Policies; Part 30, Intergovernmental Review of De- ness, or other ties. partment of Justice Programs and Activities; Part 42, Nondis- crimination/Equal Employment Opportunity Policies and Pro- 6. It will give the sponsoring agency or the Comptroller Generat, cedures; Part 61, Procedures for Implementing the National through any authorized representative,access to and the rig ht Environmental Policy Act; Part 63, Floodplain Management to examine all records,books,papers,ordocuments related to and Wetland Protection Procedures;and Federal laws or regu- the grant. lations applicable to Federal Assistance Programs. 7. It will comply wiih all requirements imposed by the Federal 13. It will comply, and a�l its contractors will comply, with the Sponsoring agency concerning special requirements of law, nondiscrimination requirements of the Omnibus Crime Con- program requirements,and otheradministrative requirements. trol and Safe Streets Act of 1968, as amended, 42 USC 3789(d), or Victims of Crime Act(as appropriate); Title VI of„ 8. It will insure that the facilities under its ownership, lease or the Civil Rights Act of 1964, as amended; Section 504 of the supervision which shall be utilized in the accomplishment of Rehabilitation Act of 1973, as amended;Subtitle A,Title II of the project are not listed in the Environmental protection the Americans With Disabilities Act (ADA) (1990); Title IX of Agency's (EPA-list of Violating Facilities and that it will notify the Education Amendments of 1972; the Age Discrimination the Federal grantor agency of the receipt of any communica- Act of 1975;Department of Justice Non-Discrimination Regu- tion from the Director of the EPA Office of Federal Activities lations, 28 CFR Part 42, Subparts C, D, E, and G; and indicating that a facility to be used in the project is under Department of Justice regulations on disability discrimina- consideration for listing by the EPA. tion, 28 CFR Part 35 and Part 39. 9. it will comply with the flood insurance purchase requirements 14. In the event a Federal or State court or Federal or State of Section 102(a) of the Flood Disaster Protection Act of administrative agency makes a finding of discrimination after 1973, Public Law 93-234, 87 Stat. 975, approved December a due process hearing on the�rounds of race,color, religion, 31, 1976. Section 102(a) requires, on and after March 2, national origin, sex, or disability against a recipient of funds, 1975, the purchase of flood insurance in communities where the recipient will forward a copy of the finding to the Office for such insurance is available as a condition for the receipt of Civil Rights, Office of Justice Programs. any Federal financial assistance for construction or acquisi- tion purposes for use in any area that had been identified by 15. It will provide an Equal Employment Opportunity Program if the Secretary of the Department of Housing and Urban Devel- required to maintain one,where the application is for$500,000 opment as an area having special flood hazards.The phrase or more. "Federal financial assistance" includes any form of loan, grant, guaranty, insurance payment, rebate, subsidy, disas- 16. It will comply with the provisions of the Coastal Barrier ter assistance loan or grant, or any other form of direct or Resources Act(P.L.97-348)dated October 19,1982(16 USC indirect Federal assist 3501 et seq.) which prohibits the expenditure of most new Federal funds within the units of the Coastal Barrier Re- sources System. � �' October 25, 1996 Signature Date OJP FORM 4000/3(Rev.1•93)PREVIOUS EDITION ARE OBSOLETE. ATTACHMENT TO SF-424. 9t- tyyl Tab E. OJP Form 4061/6, Certifications � �,-""Y��' U.S.DEPARTMENT OF JUSTICE a �` '11 � ` ' � OFFICE OF JUSTICE PROGRAMS � � �3�� OFFICE OF THE COMPTROLLER CERTIFICATIONS REGARDING LOBBYING; DEBARMENT, SUSPENSION AND OTHER RESPONSIBILITY MATTERS;AND DRUG-FREE WORKPLACE REQUIREMENTS - Applicants should refer to the regulations cited below to determine the certification to which they are required to attest. Applicants should also review the instructions for certification included in the regulations before completing this form. Signature of this form provides for compiiance with certification requirements under 28 CFR Part 69, "New Restrictions on Lobbying" and 28 CFR Part 67, "Government-wide Debarment and Suspension (Nonpro-curement) and Government-wide Requirements for Drug-Free Workplace (Grants)."The certifications shall be treated as a material representation of fact upon which reliance will be placed when the Department of Justice determines to award the covered transaction, grant, or cooperative agreement. 1. LOBBYING public(Federal,State,or local)transaction or contract under a As required by Section 1352,Title 31 of the U.S.Code,and public transaction;violation of Federal or State antitrust statutes implemented at 28 CFR Part 69,for persons entering into a or commission of embezzlement,theft,forgery, grant or cooperative agreement over$100,000,as defined at bribery,falsification or destruction of records,making false 28 CFR Part 69,the applicant certifies that: statements,or receiving stolen property; (a) No Federat appropriated funds have been paid or will be (c)Are not presently indicted for or otherwise criminally or paid, by or on behalf of the undersigned,to any person for in- civilly charged by a governmental entity(Federal, State,or fluencing or attempting to influence an officer or employee of any local)with commission of any of the offenses enumerated in agency,a Member of Congress, an officer or employee of paragraph(1)(b)of this certification;and Congress, or an employee of a Member of Congress in con- nection with the making of any Federal grant, the entering into (d)Have not within a three-year period preceding this applica- of any cooperative agreement,and the extension,continuation, tion had one or more public transactions(Federal,State,or renewal,amendment,or modification of any Federal grant or local)terminated for cause or default;and cooperative agreement; B.Where the applicant is unable to certify to any of the (b) If any funds other than Federal appropriated funds have statements in this certification,he or she shall attach an been paid or will be paid to any person for influencing or at- explanation to this application. tempting to influence an officer or employee of any agency, a Member of Congress, an officer or employee of Congress, or an employee of a Member of Congress in connection with this 3.DRUG-FREE WORKPLACE Federal grant or cooperative agreement, the undersigned shall (GRANTEES OTHER THAN INDIVIDUALS) complete and submit Standard Form - LLL, "Disclosure of Lobbying Activities,"in accordance with its instructions; As required by the Drug-Free Workplace Act of 1988,and (c)The undersigned shall require that the language of this cer- implemented at 28 CFR Part 67,Subpart F,for grantees,as tification be included in the award documents for all subawards defined at 28 CFR Part 67 Sections 67.615 and 67.620— at all tiers(including subgrants,contracts under grants and A.The applicant certifies that it will or will continue to provide cooperative agreements,and subcontracts)and that all sub- a drug-free workplace by: recipients shall certify and disclose accordingly. (a)Publishing a statement notifying employees that the unlawful manufacture,distribution,dispensing, possession,or 2.DEBARMENT,SUSPENSION,AND OTHER use of a controlled substance is prohibited in the grantee's workplace and specifying the actions that will be taken against RESPONSIBILITY MATTERS employees for violation of such prohibition; (DIRECT RECIPIENT) (b)Establishing an on-going drug-free awareness program to As required by Executive Order 12549, Debarment and inform employees about— Suspension, and implemented at 28 CFR Part 67,for prospec- (1)The dangers of drug abuse in the workplace; tive participants in primary covered transactions, as defined at �2�The grantee's policy of maintaining a drug-free workplace; 28 CFR Part 67, Section 67.510— (3)Any available drug counseling,rehabilitation,and employee A. The applicant certifies that it and its principals: assistance programs;and (a)Are not presently debarred, suspended, proposed for debar- (4)The penalties that may be imposed upon employees for ment, declared ineligible, sentenced to a denial of Federal drug abuse violations occurring in the workplace; benefits by a State or Federal court, or voluntarily excluded from covered transactions by any Federal department (c) Making it a requirement that each employee to be engaged or agency; in the performance of the grant be given a copy of the state- ment required by paragraph (a); (b) Have not within a three-year period preceding this applica- tion been convicted of or had a civil judgment rendered against (d) Notifying the employee in the statement required by para- them for commission of fraud or a criminal offense in connec- graph(a)that,as a condition of employment under the grant, tion with obtaining,attempting to obtain,or performing a the employee will— OJP FORM 4061/6(3-91)REPLACES OJP FORMS 4061/2,4061/3 AND 4061/4 WHICH ARE OBSOLETE. � (1)Abide by the terms of the statement;and (2)Notify the empioyer in writing of his or her conviction for a violation of a criminal drug statute occurring in the workplace no later than five calendar days after such conviction; Check � if there are workplaces on file that are not indentified (e) Notifying the agency,in writing,within 10 calendar days here. after receiving notice under subparagraph (d)(2)from an Section 67,630 of the regulations provides that a grantee that employee or otherwise receiving actual notice of such convic-tion. Employers of convicted employees must provide notice,inciuding is a State may elect to make one certification in each Federal position title,to: Department of Justice,Office of fiscal year.A copy of which should be included with each ap- Justice Programs,ATTN:Control Desk,633 Indiana Avenue, Plication for Department of Justice funding. States and State N.W.,Washington,D.C.20531.Notice shall inciude the iden- agencies may elect to use OJP Form 4061/7. tification number(s)of each affected grant; Check ❑ if the State has elected to complete OJP Form (f)Taking one of the following actions,within 30 calendar 4061/7. days of receiving notice under subparagraph (d)(2),with respect to any employee who is so convicted— DRUG-FREE WORKPLACE (1)Taking appropriate personnel action against such an (GRANTEES WHO ARE INDIVIDUALS) employee, up to and including termination, consistent with the As required by the Drug-Free Workplace Act of 1988,and requirements of the Rehabilitation Act of 1973,as amended;or implemented at 28 CFR Part 67,Subpart F,for grantees,as (2) Requiring such employee to participate satisfactorily in a defined at 28 CFR Part 67; Sections 67.615 and 67.620— drug abuse assistance or rehabilitation program approved for A.As a condition of the grant, I certify that I will not engage such purposes by a Federal,State,or local health,law enforce- in the unlawful manufacture,distribution,dis ensin ment, or other appropriate agency; p g,posses- sion, or use of a controlled substance in conducting any (g)Making a good faith effort to continue to maintain a drug- activity with the grant;and free workplace through implementation of paragraphs(a), (b), (c), (d), (e), and(f). B. If convicted of a criminal drug offense resulting from a violation occurring during the conduct of any grant activity, I B.The grantee may insert in the space provided be�ow the will report the conviction,in writing,within 10 calendar days site(s)for the performance of work done in connection with of the conviction,to: Department of Justice, Office of Justice the specific grant: Programs,ATTN:Control Desk, 633 Indiana Avenue, N.W., Place of Performance(Street address,city,county,state,zip Washington,D.C.20531. code) As the duly authorized representative of the applicant, I hereby certify that the applicant wili comply with the above certifications. 1.Grantee Name and Address: Saint Paul Police Department 100 East Eleventh Street Saint Paul, MN 55101 2.Application Number and/or Project Name 3.Grantee IRSNendor Number NI;7 Solicitation for Law Enforcement, Courts and Corrections Technology Development, 41-6005521 Implementation and Evaluation 4.Typed Name and Title of Authorized Representative William K. Finney ief of Police 5. gnatu 6. Date � ti October 25, 1996 � � 9c •tyy� Tab F. OJP Form 7120/1 � This Tab Not Applicable � � � qc._ ��y� Tab G. Project Abstract s � a �.- tyy� ABSTRACT The Saint Paul Police Department(SPPD)proposes to expand their training unit to include computer- based training. This technology would give them the ability to provide the maximum fle�cibility and efficiency for not only in-service training to SPPD sworn personnel, but it would also include and expand training offerings for law enforcement agencies in the region surrounding the Saint Paul Police Department. The SPPD has already distinguished itself by offering quality in-service training and has been regarded as a local center for law enforcement training. With computer-based training the SPPD could enlarge the offerings to the regional law enforcement community and expand into areas not previously covered. Evaluation of cunent course offerings and of the needs of the regional law enforcement agencies would become a focus for the department. As smaller and smaller departments become computer proficient, it is critical that regional based training facilities offer not only a full range of offerings to the profession, but that all methods of instruction are utilized. Due to the lack of any other local training facility investigating this technological outreach focus, the SPPD Training Unit becoming computer-based would provide a needed resource for the Upper Midwest region. � � °��- 1y41 Tab H. Project Narrative � � � q �- iyy� PROJECT NARRATIVE The Saint Paul Police Department(SPPD) currently provides law enforcement training for agencies located within both the metropolitan area of the cities of Saint Paul and Minneapolis and from the lazger region which includes mostly rural areas of the Upper Midwest. The number of municipalities and counties which have made use of the training programs of the SPPD ranges between 60-701oca1 law enforcement departments per year. The training curricula of the SPPD's Professional Development Institute, includes the following: • Street Safe-- Officer Survival • Criminal Interview and Interrogation • Advanced Criminal Interview and Interrogation • Peer Support • Background Investigation • Supervision of Police Personnel • Field Training Officer • Workplace Violence i • Basic SWAT Skills • Instructor Development • Graffiti Seminar • Risk Management • Other Management Directives � � �1 �. -1yy � The average number of law enforcement personnel outside of the SPPD's sworn personnel utilizing this resource is 425 annually. In-Service Training for SPPD during 1996 sworn personnel included the following topics: • Use of Force • Officer Survival . • Workplace Conduct • Gun Interdiction • Off-Duty Officer Survival • Room Search Tactics • Defensive Tactics • Police Pursuit Policy • Psychology of Pursuits • Workplace Conduct • MN POST Model Ethics Policy • Positional Asphyxia Update � • Problem Solving • Community Oriented Policing � Criminal Neglect and Child Endangerment • Gang Update • City Licenses and Inspection Update � � q�-i�t� 1 The minimum number of hours required in order for sworn personnel to maintain their Peace Officer License(POST regulation)is 16 hours per year. Most sworn officers within SPPD have significantly higher training hours in their personnel files due both to the rapidly changing science of law enforcement and their individual commitment to professionalism. This proposal would allow the SPPD to greatly expand this needed training resource to those rural areas of the Upper Midwest which do not have benefit of other law enforcement training facilities nearby. The nearest NLT funded locally initiated research partnership site is Omaha,Nebraskal. There appears to be a dearth of research activity recognition in the Upper Midwest area. Although not conclusive, it does suggest that the region sunounding Saint Paul is under-resourced for law enforcement training as well. The ability to receive advanced training locally is of primary importance. With each region of the country having its own persona, the unassuming and polite personality of the Midwesterner is best understood by another Midwesterner. This language and personality commonality reinforces the training in those areas which are unique to law enforcement, especially in interactions with the criminal mind. � The City of Saint Paul compares favorably to other local police departments in its population size, 250,000 to 499,999, on training criteria. According to a BJS study of 1993 local police 1Searching For Answers,NIJ 1995 Annual Report to Congress, July, 1996, p.10, figure 6. � � q � - �441 departments2, Saint Paul compared positively in the following examples: • 8% of all departments had some type of degree requirement for new recruits. Saint Paul requires a two-year degree of all recruits. • The average number of training hours required of new police o�'icers totaled 1,100 in those departments serving populations of 100,000 or more. Saint Paul requires 1,120 hours. • Eighty percent of departments serving a population of 250,000 or more operated a training academy. Saint Paui is part of that large majority. The BJS study also compares police departments in use of computers. In every category Saint Paul was equal to or ahead of its population range3. The BJS did not, however, include information on whether those departments utilized a computer-based training component within their training units.4 Computer-based training is a logical extension for a pro-active training unit in this computer proficient society. PROPOSAL Under this proposal,the standard classroom style instruction would be supplemented with the more ; technologically advanced instructional delivery systems via a computer-based interactive multi-media instruction. Applications for this type of training would include: ZI.ocal Police Departments, 1993. Reaves, Brian, PhD., Bureau of Justice Statistics, April, 1996. 3 Ibid, pps. 18-19. 4 Ibid. p. 19. � °I � ' 1y4� • recruit academy classes • annual in-service classes • refresher training for those officers absent for extended periods due to special assignments • specialized training Currently, the training unit operates out of a section of the SPPD main headquarters. Computer- based training, especially in the area of in-service, refresher training and specialized training could take place at other SPPD facilities where space is not as much of a premium. Additionally, the computer-based segments could be offered simultaneously in conjunction with other training functions. The interaction of both live and canned segments offers not only variety and creative use of materials, but saves the instructors' time. This approach takes the entire training progam to a higher level of technological interaction with which the law enforcement officer is already familiar due to squad caz MDT's, records, administrative use of PC's, etc. Thus, training could be offered during all shifts each day, seven days a week. Course content and viewing would be under strict control and the specialized needs of each officer can also be addressed. Because the individual officer is already proficient in the use of computers, the transition to this format will be minimal. A total of eight d monitors would be stationed within various SPPD facilities to maximize the use of the computer based segments. Instructors will be able to monitor mandatory educational requirements and document each individual officer's progress. Instruction may be monitored by subject or by individual officer, thereby facilitating performance evaluations. The Minnesota Peace Officers Standards and Training (POST Board) has already given tentative approval to the SPPD for computer-based training. This approval is evidence of the recognition of the SPPD's reputation for quality in-service � � � �- 14�1 � training throughout the region. On review of computer-based training courses on the International Association of Chiefs of Police Internet (IACP NET), there appear to be a growing number of correspondence-based computer training companies for law enforcement training. Because the vast majority of all police departments are small, (99 percent work in departments in cities with populations of 249,999 or belows), the ability for these sworn personnel to interact with other sworn personnel in a common setting without it being cost prohibitive is a critical safety and training factor for law enforcement. The plethora of correspondence based computer training facilities may seem to be on the cutting edge and it may appear expedient for these small agencies to utilize their products, but the lack in networking and interaction with other sworn personnel from like-sized departments is isolating and detrimental to their overall law enforcement professionalism. The Training Unit of the SPPD is an ideal candidate to provide local law enforcement agencies with advanced professional training. Although it is a department of a large city(population 272,235), it + prides itself on its small town atmosphere and approach. Sworn personnel from small agencies have communicated their preference for training at Saint Paul because of the level of professionalism d coupled with the authenticity of it being a working law enforcement department with which they can identify. With the ability to offer computer-based training, this resource will continue to expand and serve its constituents with state of the art techniques. Lieutenant Nancy DiPerna, Commander of the Training Unit along with Sergeants Mark Kempe and 5 Ibid, p. 2. � � �t � - Iyy1 John Cannefax will develop and produce the computer-based training components to dovetail with their cunent instruction. The weaving of computer usage with "live" instruction will insure the maximum level of quality instruction. EVALUATION The SPPD would evaluate its computer-based training with assistance from Metropolitan State University, School of Law Enforcement. Based in Saint Paul, MSU would design and administer an evaluation for participants in the Professional Development Institute. With information from this partnership, future offerings and other projections can be developed. , / � ��. - lyy � Tab I. Qualifications of the Applicants , . • q � - �yy1 RESIIME PERSONAL Nancy E. Di Perna 4315 Kirste}� Court Eagan, Minnesota 55123 EDUCATION 1994; Master of Arts Degree Education and Public Safety Administration University of Saint Thomas 1978; Bachelor of Arts Degree Sociology Hamline University 1974; High School Diploma Kellogg High School WORR EXPERIENCE January, 1995 to Present Services Section Commander April, 1995 to Present Executive Officer to Deputy Chief Ekwall Support Services Division January, 1994 to January, 1995 Special Investigations Unit Commander January, 1993 to January, 1995 + Patrol Lieutenant Northwest Team May, 1990 to January, 1993 :� Vice Unit Commander March, 1986 to May, 1990 Internal Affairs Investigator June, 1985 to March, 1986 Acting Sergeant, Narcotics Unit TRAINING/BOARDS/COMMISSIONS FBI National Academy Graduate Leadership Saint Paul Graduate Latimer Leadership Graduate Enterprise Community Board Member ' aC. • 144 � RESUME MARK C. KEMPE EDUCATION Cretin High School, Saint Paul, Minnesota. 1970-1974 Saint Mary's College, Winona, Minnesota. 1974-1978 - Bachelor of Arts Degree, Cum Laude - Double major; Criminal Justice and History Hamline University Law School, Saint Paul, Minnesota. 1978 - Completed first year studies --- Stritch College, Milwaukee, Wisconsin. 1991-1993 - Master of Science Degree in Management Northwestern University, Evanston, Illinois. 1993 - School of Police Staff and Command, Traffic Institute EXPERIENCE Police Officer, Rochester (MN) Police Department 1979-1982 - Patrol Officer - Field Training Officer - Board of Directors, Police Benevolent Association Police Officer, Edina (MN) Police Department 1981-1982 � - Patrol Officer - EMT Police Officer, Saint Paul (MN) Police Department 1982-pres. - Distinguished Recruit Award + - Patrol Officer - Field Training Officer - Street Crimes Unit - Critical Incident Response Team Promoted to Sergeant, April 10, 1988 Vice Unit 1988-1991 - Unit Citation;for coord�nating a three year prostitution investigation. First RICO action ever prosecuted in the State of Minnesota. - surveillance and undercover investigations - pen register and wire tap investigations - liaison with County Attorney's Office � . . . � q�-1441 Critical Incident Response Team Supervisor 1990-pres. - Unit Citation;for Mobile Field Force in-service [)IStrl[CtLOIt. - Mobile Field Force (riot control) design and instruction. - supervision of thirty tactical team members. - planning and execution of over one hundred high risk operations. -Acting CIRT Executive O�cer, Ryan/Jones murders, 8/26/94 - featured speaker, Wisconsin Association of SWAT Personnel Annual Conference, 2/14/96. Crimes Against Persons/Sex Crimes Unit 1991-1993 - investigations including child abuse and criminal sexual conduct cases. - interviewing, court testimony and complaint preparation 1Yaining Unit 1993-pres. - Unit Citation;for quantity and quality of training provided to new and existing St. Paul O�cers. - in-service training design and implementation. - Academy Director classes 1994-1 and 1994-2. - Asst. Director classes 1993-2 and 1995-1. Responsible for curriculum design, instructor selection, contracts, record keeping and personnel management for new recruits. - Department Use of Force, Field Training Program and POST coordinator. Coordinator/Lead Instructor, Saint Paul Connections Program 1995-pres. ' - A joint program with the Saint Paul School Dist. to introduce interested inner city children to police work. � PROFFSSIONAL ASSOCIATIONS American Society of Law Enforcement Trainers (ASLET). Association of Training Officers of Mirmesota (ATOM). National Tactical Officers Association (NTOA). Minnesota Police and Peace Officers Association (MPPOA). Saint Paul Police Federation. Saint Paul Police Ranking Officers Association. . . , . � �� - �y�� ACTIVITIFS Habitat for Humanity Saint Paul Connections Youth Program Saint Paul Police Pension Committee St. Joseph's Church Ramsey Co. Family Violence Intervention Team Police Federation Wage Team PERSONAL Residence: 310 Christine Lane, West Saint Paul, MN 55118. Married for fifteen years, four children. .