96-1548 Council File # c�\����
Green Sheet # � ������
RESOLUTION
CITY OF SAINT PAUL, MINNESOTA
Presented By
Referred To Committee: Date
1
2 WHEREAS, Minn. Stat. § 471.705, subd. 1 a (1994), provides that a governing body
3 of a public employer may by majority vote in a public meeting decide to hold a closed
4 meeting to consider strategy for labor negotiations; and
5
6 WHEREAS, it is necessary for the Council of the City of Saint Paul to meet and
7 discuss various labor negotiation issues; now, therefore, be it
8
9 RESOLVED, that the Council of the City of Saint Paul will hold a closed meeting to
10 consider strategy for labor negotiations pursuant to the provisions of Minn. Stat. § 471.705,
11 subd. la (1994), said meeting to be held on December 18, 1996, at 2:30 p.m. in the Council
12 Conference Room; and be it
13
14 FURTHER RESOLVED, that the proceedings of the said closed meeting will be taped
15 and such tape shall be preserved in accordance with Minn. Stat. § 471.705, subd. 1 a.
Yeas Navs Absent Requested by Department of:
a ev —� �� �-
�rom � '�6 G�1S
arri s `/
uerin
e ar
ettman ."
une By�
�
Form Approved by City Attorney
Adopted by Council: Date ��
Adoption Certified by Council Secretary BY: ��
BY� 1���� ��c,--' �'— Approved by Mayor for Submission to
p Council 1
Approved by Mayor: Date / Z �
By: � (� By: ��
�`- _
Qb- 15W�4o� 44
DEPMRIMENTIOFFICER;OUNCIL DATE INITIATED
cit un GREEN SHEET
INITIAL/DATE INITIAWATE
CONTA PERSON 6 PHONE �DEPARTMENT DIRECTOR �CITY COUNCIL
Dan BOStY'O]II� 266-8660 ABSION �CITYATTORNEY �CITYCLERK
NUMBER FOR
MU3T BE ON COUNCIL AOENDA BY(DATE) ROUTINQ �BUDOET pIRECTOR �FIN.6 MQT.SERVICES DIR.
ORDER MAYOR(OR A331STANn
On December 11, 1996 ❑ ❑
TOTAL#OF SIGNATURE PA�'3ES (CLIP ALL LOCATIONS FOR SIGNATURE)
ACTION REQUESTED:
Scheduling a City Council closed meeting on December 18, 1996, at 2:30 p.m. , Northwest
Conference Room, 310 City Hall, to consider strategy for labor negotiations.
RECOMMENDATIONS;APProve(A)or Re�ect(R) pERSONAL SERVICE CONTRACTS MUST ANSWER THE FOLLOWING�UESTIONB:
_PLANNING COMMtS31QN _ CIVIL SERVICE COMMISSION �• Has this pe�son/firm ever worked under a contraGt for this depertment?
_CIB COMMITTEE _ YES NO
2. Has this person/firm ever been a city employee?
_STAFF — YES NO
_DISTRICT COURT _ 3. Does this person/firm possess a skill not normally possessed by any current city emptoyee?
SUPPORTS WHICH COUNCIL OBJECTIVE7 YES NO
Explain all yas enswers on saparate shest and ettach to yro��sheet
INITIATINQ PR08LEM,ISSUE,OPPARTUNITY(Who,What,When,Where,Why):
v
ADVANTAOES IF APPROVED:
DISADVANTACiES IF APPROVED:
�a4�'ii�;!! r� �� .�.,,r.�^ ��",::� � ,
C�l:t� 12 ���b
DISADVANTAf3E3 IF NOT APPROVED:
TOTAL AMOUNT OF TRANSACTION S COST/REVENUE BUDGETED(CIRCLE ONE) YES NO
FUNDIf�1G SOURCE ACTIVITY NUMBER
FINANCIAL INFORWSATION:(EXPLAIN)