01-189ORIGI�IAL �''�.���►- 0�-�.3,ao��
RESOLUTION
CITY OF SAINT PAUL, MINNESOTA
Presented By
Referred To
Council File # O \ — �g�
Green Sheet # rp�'3 e�.G
3�
Committee: Date
k
1 WHEREAS, Citizen Service Office, Division of Code Enforcement has requested the City Council
2 to hold public hearings to consider the advisability and necessity of ordering the repair or wrecking and
3 removal of a two-story, wood frame, stone/mortar exterior, single family, fire damaged dwelling located on
4 property hereinafter referred to as the "Subject Property" and commonly known as 2257 Hillside Avenue.
5 This property is legally described as follows, to wit:
Lot 15 and the West 112 of Lot 14, Block 43, St. Anthony Park North.
10
11
12
13
14
15
16
17
18
19
20
21
22
23
24
25
26
27
28
29
30
31
32
33
34
35
36
37
38
39
WIIEREAS, based upon the records in the Ramsey County Recorder's Office and information
obtained by Division of Code Enforcement on or before September 18, 2000, the following aze the now
known interested or responsible parties for the Subject Property: Kim & Nancy Mc Callum, 874 Hague
Avenue, St. Paul, NIN 55104; Nancy Mc Callum, c/o James Lang, 581 Grand Avenue #5, St. Paul, MN
55102; Homestead Mortgage Corp., 4105 Lexington Avenue North, Arden Hills, MN 55126; First Bank
of South Dakota Natl. Assoc., c/o Stein, Moore & Fay, P.A., 1010 Minnesota Building,
St. Paul, MN 55101
WHEREAS, Division of Code Enfarcement has served in accordance with the provisions of w
Chapter 45 of the Saint Paul Legislative Code an order identified as an"Order to Abate Nuisance °°�
Building(s)" dated October 24, 2000; and
WHEREAS, this order informed the then known interested or responsible parties that the structure .`�
located on the Subject Property is a nuisance building(s) pursuant to Chapter 45; and
WHEREAS, this order informed the interested or responsible parties that they must repair or
demolish the structure located on the Subject Property by November 27, 2000; and
WFIEREAS, the enforcement officer has posted a placard on the Subject Property declazing this
building(s) to constitute a nuisance condition; subject to demolition; and
WIIEREAS, this nuisance condition has not been corrected and Division of Code Enforcement
requested that the City Clerk schedule public hearings before the Legislative Hearing Officer of the City
Council and the Saint Paul City Council; and
WHEREAS, the interested and responsible parties have been served notice in accordance with the
provisions of Chapter 45 of the Saint Paul Legislative Code, of the time, date, place and purpose of the
public hearings; and
WfIEREAS, a hearing was held before the Legislative Hearing Officer of the Saint Paul City
Council on Tuesday, February 6, 2001 to heaz testimony and evidence, and after receiving testimony and
o � _��
g
9
10
11
12
13
14
15
16
17
18
19
20
21
22
23
24
25
26
27
28
29
30
31
32
33
34
35
36
37
38
39
40
41
42
43
44
45
46
47
48
49
50
51
52
53
WHEREAS, a hearing was held before the Legislative Hearing Officer of the Saint Paul City
Council on Tuesday, February 6, 2001 to heaz testimony and evidence, and after receiving testimony and
evidence, made the recommendation to approve the request to order the interested or responsible parties to
make the Subject Property safe and not detrimental to the public peace, health, safety and welfaze and
remove its blighting influence on the community by rehabilitating this structure in accordance with all
applicable codes and ordinances, or in the alternative by demolishing and removing the structure in
accordance with all applicable codes and ordinances. The rehabilitation or demolition of the structure to be
com leted within d a,ys after the dat of the Council Hearin - and � 1 � �� �`� +`�_ ,�,
p nnV=.ia:�jM��hn 1 �t'hi� en.�,. a�w.... �wt� �
'�S�
WHEREAS, a hearing was held before the Saint Paul City Council on Wednesday, February 2��
2001 and the testimony and evidence including the acrion taken by the Legislative Hearing Officer wa.�
considered by the Council; now therefore
�1 o,we b.� t
BE IT RESOLVED, that based upon the testnnony and evidence presented at the above reference
public hearings, the Saint Paul City Council hereby adopts the following Findings and Order concerning
the Subject Property at 2257 Hillside Avenue:
1. That the Subject Properiy comprises a nuisance condition as defined in Saint Paul
Legislative Code, Chapter 45.
2. That the costs of demolition and removal of this building(s) is estimated to exceed three
thousand dollars ($3,000.00).
3. That there now exists and has existed multiple Housing or Building code violations at the
Subject Property.
4. That an Order to Abate Nuisance Building(s) was sent to the then known responsible parties
to correct the deficiencies or to demolish and remove the building(s).
5. That the deficiencies causing this nuisance condition have not been corrected.
6. That Division of Code Enforcement has posted a placard on the Subj ect Property which
declares it to be a nuisance condition subject to demolition.
7. That this building has been routinely monitored by the Citizen Service Offices, Division of
Code Enforcement, Vacant/Nuisance Buildings.
8. That the known interested parties and owners are as previously stated in this resolution and '
that the notification requirements of Chapter 45 have been fulfilled.
��� '
The Saint Paul City Council hereby makes the following order:
The above referenced interested or responsible parties shall make the Subject Properiy safe and not
detrimental to the public peace, health, safety and welfare and remove its blighting influence on the
community by rehabilitating this structure and correcting all deficiencies as prescribed in the above
referenced Order to Abate Nuisance Building(s) in accordance with all applicable codes and
ardinances, or in the alternative by demolishing and removing the structure in accordance with all
applicable codes and oxdinances. The rehabilitation or demolition and removal of the structure
must be completed withi v�rReenfl�5}days after the date of the Council Hearing.
o�.h..r.�,r t �► e�h�� (,r 8'0�
OR1GI�lAL
2
3
4
5
6
7
10
11
12
o � -�89
2. If the above corrective action is not completed within this period of time the Citizen Service Office,
Division of Code Enforcement is hereby authorized to take whatever steps are necessary to
demolish and remove this structure, fill the site and chazge the costs incurred against the Subject
Property pursuant to the provisions of Chapter 45 of the Saint Paul Legislative Code.
3. In the event the building is to be demolished and removed by the City of Saint Paul, all personal
properry or fixtures of any kind which interfere with the demolition and removal shall be removed
from the property by the responsible parties by the end of this time penod. If all personal property
is not removed, it shall be considered to be abandoned and the City of Saint Paul shall remove and
dispose of such properiy as provided by law.
4. It is further ardered, that a copy of this resolution be mailed to the owners and interested parties in
accordance with Chapter 45 of the Saint Paul Legislative Code.
Adopted by Council: Date p� , 3T � �
Adoption Certified by Council Secretary
�y� � . A
Approved by Mayor: Date �B �S�
By:
Requested by Department of:
Citizen Service Office: Code Enforcement
8��,.�,�,t ��'ti`�
°�,,�,-°_
Form Approved by City Attomey
By: L . '
Approved by Mayor for Submission to Council
BY� ���y��G�
Division of Code Enforcement
.. :� .
ee ota couria�acemn er (on�rq
;dnesdav, Februarv 28, 20Q1,
TOTAL # OF SIGNATURE
����
ovizroi GREEN SHEET
c�r. ,_��
8�_�
No 102326
c,;r=_� = w
�aaww /�� (n
xwmotwrs �rnrwlrouEr /!L(./`' arvuwc
ua
eamxc
�� ❑swur�u.aaiucFSOOC wuxcw�aomKCro
� WYORI�MAilMR) ❑
:S I (CUP ALL LOCATIONS FOR SIGNATURE)
✓
City Council to pass this resolufion which will order the owner(s) to remove or repair the referenced building(s). If
the owner fails to comply with the resolution, the Citizen Service Office, Division of Code Enfoiceme�t�i,s �ered
to remove the building. The subject properiy is located at 2257 Hillside Avenue. ��s'� �?^�'�'�� A
� �� � � ���
PLANNING COMMISSION
CIB COMMI7TEE
qVIL SERVICE COMMISSION
t50NAL SERVICE CONiRACfS MUST ANSWER THE FOLLON47NG Q
Has Nis Pe«�rm erer worketl urMer a conGact tor thie departmeM'1
VES NO
� m� a�re�r� �. e� a�y emdov��
YES NO
Dces thie persoMrm possess a sldil not noimallypoeseseeC by any cutterR dty employee9
YES Ntr
Ia this persaVfirm a targeted oxndaYl � ,
� WES NO `
, This building(s) is a nuisance building(s) as defined 'an Chapter 45, and a vacant building as defined in Chapter 43 of
the Saint Paul Legislative Code. The owners, interested parties and responsible parties known to the Enforcement
Officer were given an order to repair or remove the building at 2257 Hillside Avenue by November 27, 2000, and
have failed to coxnply"with those orders.
�a�"�';�.� �s ��
The City will eliminate a nuisance.
��6� � � �9
1 � z���,
��TY A�"�"��F�E�E�'
The City will spend funds to wreck and remove this building(s). These costs will be assessed to the property,
collected as a special assessment against the properry taaces.
A nuisance condition will remain unabated in the City. This building(s) wili continue to blight the community
,p t�.�vvv - y i.i�vvv
OF SRANSACTION S
souRCE Nnicanra Hnncing Ahatamant
iNFOananoN �FxaaM. . .
CASTrttEVEtiUE8UD6ET�D(GRCLEONE� � NO
ACTNT'NUMBER ��7�1�
°1-�9
REPORT
Date: September 25, 2001
Time: 10:00 am.
Place: Room 330 City Hall
15 West Kellogg Boulevazd
LEGISLATIVE HEARING
Gerry Strathman
Legislarive Hearing Officer
Summary Abatement Order Appeal for 159& Hazel Street North.
(Laid over from 9-4-01)
Legislative Hearing Officer recommends denying the appeal.
2. Resolution ordering the owner to remove or repair the properry at 2257 Hillside Avenue.
If the owner fails to comply, Code Enforcement is ordered to remove the building.
(Laid over from 4-17-01)
Legislative Hearing Officer recommends granting the owner six months to complete the
rehabilitation of the properiy on condition that a$2,000 bond is posted by noon of
Wednesday, October 3, 2001.
3. Laid Over Summary Abatement:
JO105V Towing of abandoned vehicle at 376 Marvland Avenue East.
Legislative Hearing Officer recommends reducing the assessment to $105 pius the $45
service fee for a total assessment of $150.
4. Summary Abatement Order appeal for 697 Sunev Avenue.
I.egislative Hearing Officer recommends denying the appeal.
5. Resolntion Qrdering the owner to remove or repair Yhe property at 850 Sims Avenue. If
#he owner fails to comply, Code Enforcement is ordered to remove the building.
Legislative Hearing Officer recommends laying over to the October 16, 2001, Legislative
Hearing.
6. Resolution ordering the owner to remove or repair the property at 715 Preble Street. If
the owner fails to comply, Code Enforcement is ordered to remove the building.
Legislative Hearing Officer recommends granting the owner sis months to complete the
rehabilitation of the properiy on condition that the following is done by noon of
Wednesday, October 3, 2001: 1) Pay the vacant building fee, 2) Get a code compliance
inspecrion, 3) Post a$2,000 bond.
O�-Ur1
LEGISLATIVE HEARING REPORT OF SEPTEMBER 25, 2001 Page 2
7. Resolution ordering the owner to remove or repair the properry at 39'7 Aldine Street. If
the owner fails to comply, Code Enforcement is ordered to remove the building.
(Case is closed.)
8. Resolution ordering the owner to remove or repair the properry at.473 Hatch Avenue. If
the owner fails to comply, Code Enforcement is ordered to remove the building.
Legislarive Aearing Officer recommends approval.
0
a1-lr�
LEGISLATIVE HEARING MINUTES OF APRIL 17, 2001
Page 4
yj Resolution ordering the owner to remove or repair the bnilding at 2257 Hillside Avenue. If
'y� the owner faiLs to comply with the resolution, Code Enforcement is ordered to remove the
building.
(Laid over from 2-13-01)
(Photographs were presented and later returned.)
Jennifer Benzel, U.S. Bank National Association, appeazed. Ms. Benzel stated there was a
foreclosure sale on 3-2-01. The properiy owners filed an affidavit saying the property was not
abandoned. The owners have a full redemption rights of six months before U.S. Bank can do
anything with the property. If the properry is not redeemed, U.S. Bank will continue forwazd
with theu plan, which is to get the properry mazketed and sold. They have people interested in
the property.
Gerry Strathman stated the property has an abandoned look to it. He asked did the owners say
what they intended to do with the building. Ms. Benzel responded the3r attorney filed an
affidavit essentially saying it was not abandoned.
Steve Magner stated he was surprised that the mortgagee filed that affidavit. The property has
been negiected for a long time. Prior to the mortgage company taking caze of the outside of the
property, the City had to do it. Mr. Magner does not see the benefit of giving the owner more
leeway. The property is in dire straits. Ms. Benzel responded U.S. Bank will continue to take
caze of the pmperty. The redemption period will end 9-2-01. They aze bound by law.
Mr. Strathman stated he wanted to be clear on the maintenance of the exterior. Ms. Benzel
responded U. S. bank has secured the building, taken caze of the sidewalks, and will be taking
caze of the lawn throughout the summer.
Gerry Strathman recommends laying over to the September 18, 2001, Legislative Hearing on
condition that the exterior of the building is maintained.
Resotution ordering the owner to remove or repair the building at 964 Woodbridge Street.
If the owner fails to comply with the resolufion, Code �nforcement is ordered to remove
the building.
(Laid over from 2-20-01)
(Steve Magner presented photographs.)
Steve Magner reported the last time this was laid over was for the closing of a sale. The new
owner is required to post a bond and will be granted 180 days to complete rehabilitation of this
properry.
Yee Fang appeazed and stated he talked to Mr. Magner yesterday.
Gerry Strathman recommends granting the owner six months to complete rehabilitation of the
MINUTES OF Tf� LEGISLATIVE HEARING fl �' , �9
Tuesday, April 17, 2001
Room 330 Courthouse
Gerry Strathman, Legislative Hearing Officer
STAFF PRESENT: John Betz, Code Enforcement; Steve Magner, Code Enforcement
The meeting was called to order at 10:02 am.
Laid over summary abatements from the City Council Meeting of Apri14, 2001
File JO1L0 Boarding-up of vacant buildings at the following addresses: 136 Wilder
Street,1197 Ross Avenue,1165 Hudson Road
Abandoned vehicle at the following address: 615 Charles Avenue
Property Clean-up at the following addresses: 1835 St. Clair Avenue, 707
Jessamine Avenue East
136 Wilder SYreetNorth (JOIBDUP)
James Fitzpatrick, owner, stated he is being chazged with boazding up a garage door. He had
some personal injuries, which delayed him closing up the garage. Also, it took a week to get a
gazage door ordered and installed.
Steve Magner reported he issued a summary abatement order on 8-31-00 to secure the garage.
On 9-7-00, one window was boazded, but the vacant building placards were torn down. The
work order was sent on 9-13-00 about a wide open vehicle door, attached garage. There was no
response from the owner. On 12-9-00, the garage was still open. The inspector tried to contact
the property owner and left a detailed message.
(Mr. Magner showed a photograph.)
Gerry Strathman stated the owaer had a couple of weeks to make the repair and staff attempted to
contact him. It is uncleaz why the repair was not made. Mr. Fitzpatrick responded he was
injured while doing the work, which delayed it. Also, he had no problem with the door. Mr.
Strathman explained that the City code requires that all buildings be secured and access restricted
to prevent them &om being an attracrive nuisance for children, vagrants, criminals, etc.
Gerry Strathman recommends approval of the assessment.
1197 Ross Avenue (701BDUP)
Mazk Boeltl, owner, appeazed and stated he had an arson on his garage on 10-30-00. The Fire
Department got done about 2:00 a.m. and said they had to secure the building. It was boazded ai
about 4:00 a.m. He found out later he was chazged to secure the building. If he had known this,
he would have gotten his own wood.
�p� . \t�1
LEGISLATIVE HEARING MINiJTES OF APRIL 17, 2�01
Page 2
Gerry Strathman asked why the insurance would not pay for it. Mr. BoelU responded they paid
for the contents of the garage. They paid $8300 and it cost $8800 to rebuild it. Also, there aze
not many people roaming the streets at 230 am. Mr. Strathman responded the Fire Department
has orders not to leave the property unsecured because the City is liable if something happens.
Mr. Boeld responded he has seen garages open. Steve Magner stated the Fire Department will
not leave a scene without securing it, particulazly an arson, becausa it is technically a crime
scene.
Mr. Strathman asked about the number of boazds. Mr. Magner responded there were nine boards
and a secure. The cost reflects what the contractor did. Mr. Strathman e�cplained that annually
the City puts out an RFP (Request for Proposal) for people who want to do these emergency
boardings.
BoelU questioned the cost, which is $745. Mr. Magner responded the cost includes the
following: nine boards at $50 a piece, securing one door, the trip chazge of $200, and $45
service fee.
Gerry Strathman recommends approval of the assessment.
1165 Hudson Road (JOIBDUP)
(Note: 1165 Hudson has two swnmary abatements. 301 SiJM has already been ratified by the
City Council. The secretary made a mistake, and it should have been laid over. Both
assessments will be discussed here.)
Cserald Frisch, 2350 W. '7"' Street, owner, appeared and stated he is a developer and attorney. He
is the owner of this property and is in partnership with the City of St. Paut PED (Planning and
Economic Development). He is preparing to go before the Metropolitan Planning Commission
for money to clean up the site, which has been vacant for a year. He has worked with
Councilmember Lanhy's office, Brian Sweeney (PED), Sheryl Pemberton (PED), the
neighborhood, and the district council. Mr. Frisch has a contract for someone to clean up the
property. Mr. Frisch has cooperated with the City to have snow dumped there ttus yeaz. He does
not think he should have tlus assessment because he has no knowledge of this work being done
by the City. Whenever he received notices, it is taken caze of. If this is something that slipped
thcough the cracks, he should not haue a further assessment. He is in the process of arranging for
the demolition of this building and the construction of senior housing.
Gerry Strathman stated orders were sent on August 11, 20, and September 5. Mr. Frisch
responded that each time, the probiem has been cleazed. Dumping is done there all the time. He
has spent about $5,000 last yeaz in removing debris that other peopie have brought onto the
P�Pert3'•
Steve Magner stated there is a dumping problem there. There was a sununary abatement issued
on 9-5-00 to cut the grass and secure the building. The grass was cut, but the building was still
open to access. Code Enforcement hied to contact the owner. Mr. Frisch never sent back the
vacant building registration form or the $20 vacant building fee. Code Enforcement just has the
o�� 1d�9
LEGISLATIVE HEARING MINUTES OF APRIL 17, 2001
Page 3
company name and could not find the phone number; therefore, the inspectoi could not speak to
anyone verbally. The clean up was $18.98 plus the $45 in;�rrattve charges.
(A videotape was shown)
Mr. Frisch stated there is no doubt that new debris was delivered there, but nothing shows it was
there for an extended period of time. He is paying $22,000 in taaces, has undertaken a major
renovation in Saint Paul, and is entifled to certain consideration by the City.
Gerry Strathman recommends approval of the assessment. Notice was given and the work was
done. Mr. Magner stated he has talked to Mr. Frisch a number of times about this issue. The
parties that are opening lris mail should fill out the vacant building registration form properly,
and then Code Enforcement would have documentation of phone numbers so that someone could
be called to avoid future assessments.
615 Chazles Avenue (JO101 V)
(No one appeared to represent the property.)
Gerry Strathman recommends approval of the assessment.
1835 St. Clair Avenue (JOISUM)
(I3o one appeared to represent the properry.)
Gerry Suathman recommends approval of the assessment.
707 Jessamine Avenue East (JOiSUM)
Va Yang, owner, appeazed and stated he did not receive notice. The couch and refrigerator had
only been there for a few days.
John Betz reported a notice was mailed on 10-18-00 for rubbish, discazded furnilure, and
appliances in yazd to be removed by 10-24-00. Mr. Yang responded he cleans the yazd every
week.
(A videotape was shown.)
Gerry Strathman recommends approvai of the assessment. A notice was sent by U.S. Mail,
which is considered delivery by law. It is unlmown why Mr. Yang did not receive it. The City
did the work.
O�-\��
LEGISLATIVE HEARING MINUTES OF APRIL 17, 2001
�
Resolution ordering the owner to remove or repair the building at 2257 Hillside Avenue. If
the owner fails to comply with the resolntion, Code Enforcement is ordered to remove the
building.
(Laid over from 2-13-01)
(Photographs were presented and later returned.)
Jennifer Benzel, U.S. Bank National Association, appeazed. Ms. Benzel stated there was a
foreclosure sale on 3-2-01. The properry owners filed an affidavit saying the properry was not
abandoned. The owners have a full redemption rights of siY months before U.S. Bank can do
anything with the property. If the property is not redeemed, U.S. Bank will continue forwazd
with their plan, which is to get the properry mazketed and sold. They have people interested in
the property.
Gerry Strathman stated the property has an abandoned look to it. He asked did the owners say
what they intended to do with the buiiding. Ms. Benzel responded their attorney filed an
affidavit essenrially saying it was not abandoned.
Steve Magner stated he was surprised that the mortgagee filed that affidavit. The property has
been neglected for a long time. Prior to the mortgage company taking care of the outside of the
property, the City had to do it. Mr. Magner does not see the benefit of giving the owner more
leeway. The property is in dire straits. Ms. Benzel responded I3.S. Bank will continue to take
caze of the properry. The redemption period will end 9-2-01. They are bound by law.
Mr. Strathman stated he wanted to be clear on the maintenance of the eatterior. Ms. Benzel
responded U.S. bank has secured the building, taken caze of the sidewalks, and will be taking
care of the lawn throughout the summer.
Gerry Strathman recommends laying over to the September 18, 2001, Legislative Hearing on
condition that the ea�terior of the building is maintained.
Resolution ordering the owner to remove or repair the building at 964 WoodbridPe Street.
If the owner fails to comply with the resolution, Code Enforcement is ordered to remove
the building.
(Laid over from 2-20-01)
(Steve Magner presented photographs.)
Steve Magner reported the last time tlus was laid over was for the closing of a sa1e. The new
owner is required to post a bond and will be granted 180 days to complete rehabilitafion of this
property.
Yee Fang appeared and stated he talked to Mr. Magner yesterday.
Gerry Strathman recommends granting the owner six months to complete rehabilitation of the
LEGISLATIVE HEARING MINUTES OF APRIL 17, 2001
Summary Abatements:
J0102A
J0102V
JOlO1B
SSWREPAIR
a�-i�
Page 6
Property clean-np during Jannary 2001 and part of February 2001.
Towing of abandoned velucles from private property during October and
November 2000. Additional properties to be assessed are: 873 Marion
Street, towed November 1999; $10 Sherburne Conwav, 2052
Fairmount towed January 2000; 1148 Minnehaha, towed March 2000; 45
Winona and 1037 Payne, towed April 2000.
Boarding np of vacant properties during November and December 2000.
Sanitary sewer service repairs
927 Hudson Road (J0102A)
(The owner appeared for the properry; however, Code Enforcement had not received the green
cazd indicating this address would be appealed.)
Gerry Strathman recommends laying over to the May 15, 2001, Legislarive Hearing.
915 Agate Street (J0102V}
(No one appeared to represent the progerty.)
John Betz reported there seemed to be confusion at the Impound Lot; this assessment may not be
warranted. He suggested a layover.
Gerry Strathman recommends laying over to the May 15, 2001, Legislative Hearing.
1787 Ames Avenue (SSWREPAIR)
(No one appeared to represent the property, and the appeal was denied. However, the owner
called Mr. Strathman after the meeting and requested that she be heazd at another legislative
hearing. Therefore, Mr. S�attuuan changed his recommendation.)
Gerry Strathman recommends laying over to the May 15, 2001, Legislative Hearing.
416 Charles Avenue (J0102A)
(No one appeazed to represent this properry.)
Gerry Strathman recommends laying over to the May 15, 2001, Legislative Hearing.
958 Marvland Avenue East (J0102A)
Thomas and Lola Alvazado, owners, appeared. Ms. Alvarado stated they never received a notice.
She tlunks the items aze from the neighbors. She does not haue access to that side of the gazage
LEGISLATIVE HEARING MINUTES OF APRIL 17, 2001
where this cleanup was done.
(A videotape was shown.)
o\-t�9
Page 7
Mr. Alvarado stated tUat is not his properly. If he had received notice, he would have cleaned it.
They have no tires in their garage.
(Mr. Betz showed a photograph.)
After viewing the photograph, Gerry Strathman stated the trash is right against the garage. Mr.
Alvarado responded he did not know that was their properry. Ms. Alvarado stated she had a
realtor look at the site and she was told that is their properry line; however, that is not their
gazbage. She does not have access to that side of the garage. The next door neighbors enter that
side and pazk there. The Alvarados aze on the other side of the garage. They drive a 1999
vehicle and would have no business with six tires on that side of the gazage. The neighbors
continue to dump gazbage. The Alvarados installed a temporary fencing.
Mr. Strathman asked did they receive notice. Ms. Alvazado responded no and she is home
everyday and gets the mail everyday.
John Betz reported there was a problem with ownership information received from Ramsey
County for about two months. The notice was sent to the Hudsons. Ms. Alvazado responded that
is who the house was purchased from.
Gerry Strathman recommends deleting the assessment because of a notification problem. He
wamed the owners that they aze responsible for what is on their property whether it is their
garage or not. Ms. Alvarado stated they plan to install a privacy fence.
754 Minnehaha Avenue West (SSWREPAIR)
Cameron Lepisto, owner, appeazed and stated he had sewer problems. He received a notice to
get it repaired, which he did. Within a week, he got a notice that more sewer work needed to be
done on the second half. He would like any duplication of charges to be taken off his
assessment.
John Betz reported that there was a break in the sewer line discovered by the Sewer Division of
Pubiic Works. Someone contacted Code Enforcement to have the work done so it could be
billed as an assessment. The contractor went to Public Works and was told the break was in the
middle of the street and the service to the property had fallen offthe main sewer system. The
contractor completed the work. As he was getting in his truck, he found mdent holes in the
boulevard. Unbeknownst to him, the building is serviced by two separate lines. He proceeded to
repair it.
Mr. Betz called the contractor and asked him if he could have done it all at one time and how
much were the dupiication costs. The contractor stated it would have been between $200 to $300
LEGISLATIVE HEARING MIIIUTES OF APRIL 17, 2001
o�- �1
Page 8
to bring all the equipment back again. The Sewer Division informed the contractor there was one
sewer line going to the building when actually there was two. The contractor could have done
them both at the same time.
Gerry Strathman recommends reducing the assessment by $300 for a total assessment of
$6,825.Q2.
1027 Pazk Street (J0102A)
(No one appeared to represent the property.)
Gerry Strathman recommends approval of the assessment.
1037 Pavne Street (J0102V)
(No one appeazed to represent the property.)
Legislative Hearing Officer recommends approval of the assessment.
596 Portland Avenue (30102A)
Raymond Heichel, ovmer, appeazed and stated he purchased a refrigerator at Twin City
Appliance. They were to pick up the old refrigerator, but they could not do it that day. If Mr.
Heichel had been given a notice, he would have taken the refrigerator to them.
7ohn Betz reported his office issued a notice on 12-28-00 to discazd a refrigerator, doors, rubbish
with a compliance date of 1-4-01. The City removed the refrigerator on 1-10-01. An inspector
knocked on the door and xeceived no answer. (Mr. Betz showed Mr. Heichel a copy of the
notice.)
Mr. Heichel stated sometimes his mail goes to another address, and the mail is not brought back.
He asked that this assessment be waived. Mr. Strathman responded that he could not do that
because his records show that the notice was sent.
Mr. Betz asked does he lives at 596 Portland. Mr. Heichel responded he does, but sometimes he
is not there. Mr. Strathman asked was he gone during Cluistmas. Mr. Heichel responded yes.
Gerry Strathman recommends approval of the assessment. Notification was sent and the work
was done. Legai requirement is to send it by U.S. mail.
675 Sherburne Avenue (J0102A)
(No one appeazed to represent the properry.)
LEGISLATIVE HEARING MINUTES OF APRIL 17, 2001
Gerry Strathman recommends approval of the assessment.
730 Sherburne Avenue
(Note: this address was levied on 4-4-01.)
(I3o one appeazed to represent the property.)
Gerry Strathman recommends approvai of the assessment.
687 Western Avenue North (70102�
o, _ �r�
Page 9
Anthony Oji, owner, appeazed and stated he cannot get a title on the vehicle. The caz was taken
away from the pazking lot and then he was told to come here.
John Betz reported there were no current plates on the vehicle. The City considers a vehicle
abandoned if the plates aze more than 40 days old and the vehicle is inoperable, unsecured. If
they aze in these conditions, the velucle has to be kept in a gazage. On 10-7-00, an inspector
found three vehicles and none had plates. Notice was sent to Mr. Oji to bring it into compliance,
remove them, or garage them by 10-21-00. The inspector was back on 10-23-00 and one vehicle
remained. The inspector tried to call Mr. Oji, but the phone system would not accept
unidentified calls, which come out of the police facility. A work order was sent to the Police
Department, and they impounded the vehicle.
Mr. Strathman asked how long did he have the caz before it was towed. Mr. Oji responded since
August 8. Mr. Strathman stated it was three months waiting for repair. Under the City's law,
vehicles cannot be stored outdoors.
Mr. Betz stated he is not aware of what happens when a vehicle is purchased from the Impound
Lot. He asked was there any temporary licensing situation. (Mr. Betz looked at the paperwork
provided by Mr. Oji.)
Gerry Strathivan recommends reducing the assessment from $637.10 to $400.00 plus the $45.00
service fee for a total assessment of $445.00. The owner was notified properly and the vehicle
was improperly stored; however, the vehicle charge is too high.
336 Lafond Avenue (J0102A)
Edgaz Poland and his daughter appeazed. The daughter stated there was a fire on a Saturday
afternoon. She heard the fire hvcks, realized it was her father's house, and went to the house.
She told the firemen she would boazd the properiy. When she got back, the house was already
boarded. She did not think much about it because her father was having open heart surgery at the
time. The firemen threw out some debris onto the sidewalk. When she got there Monday
morning, the debris was gone and there was a bill on one of the windows. She is protesting that
she was there at the scene, was willing to do the work, the work was done without her
a�_��y
LEGISLATIVE HEARING MINIJTES OF APRIL 17, 2001 Page 10
knowledge, aud the bill was for over $900. Steve Magner reported the boazd up is not on the
agenda today; the only item on the agenda today is the cleanup for $334.
Steve Magner reported the fire occurred on 2-3-01. There was debris all over the sidewatk. It
was a hazard because of the items that were used to put out the fire. Code Enforcement tried to
contact the owner, but were unable to reach him. An emergency summary abatement was issued
to clean up the sidewalk. Mr. Magner posted a copy on the door at 12:45 p.m. indicating the
action would be taken. Parks and Recreation went out that afternoon to do the cleanup. The
work was done on 2-5-01.
Gerry Strathman recommends approval of the assessment. The actions the City took were
reasonable and appropriate under the circumstances.
543 Van Buren Avenue (JOl O1B)
(No one appeazed to represent the property.)
Gerry Strathman recommends approval of the assessment.
609 Smith Avenue South (JOlO1B)
(No one appeared.to represent the property.)
Gerry Strathman recommends approval of the assessment.
675 Portiand Avenue (JOlO1B)
Lois Casey, owner, appeared and stated she was awakened about her garage being on fue. She
toid the Fire ➢epartmeut that she would lock up the gazage. The gazage was boazded the ne�
morning without her consent. Used wood was put on the gazage, it was put on at an angle, and is
not covering the entire hole. Gerry Strathman responded the wood is trivial. The real charge is
for the contractor coming out in the middle of the night.
Ms. Casey stated her insurance company said they would pay the fee. Mr. Magner responded
most insurance companies pick up the cost of securing the property to stop further degradazion.
Gerry Strathman recommends approval of the assessment.
Resolution ordering the owner to remove or repair the property at 1236 Seventh Street
East. If the owner fails to comply with the order, Code Enforcement is ordered to remove
the building.
(Steve Magner presented photographs.)
Robert and Mazlyn Weber, owners, appeazed.
�+-�t1
LEGISLATIVE HEARING MTNUTES OF APRIL 17, 2001 Page 11
Steve Magner reported the certificate of occupancy was revoked in 1995. Seven summary
abatement notices have been issued to remove vehicles, cut grass, remove tires, secure building,
remove snow. On 1-31-01, an inspection of the building was conducted, a list of deficiencies
which constitute a nuisance conditions was developed, and photographs were taken. Vacant
building fees have ben paid. Real estate taYes are unpaid in the amount of $2,564. Taxation has
placed an estimated mazket value of $74,800 on this property. As of 4-17-01, a code compliance
inspection has not been applied for, and a$2,000 bond has not bene posted. The cost to repair is
estimated at $80,000 to $100, 000; cost to demolish, $16,000 to $18,000.
Ms. Weber stated she is looking for an e�rtension of time because they aze planning to sell the
property. If things were posted, sometimes they are taken off of the building. The first letter they
received was in February and forwarded to them in Alabama. It got there four days after the
inspecfion. She wrote a letter on 2-21-01 to inform the City that she would like this matter put
on hold until they return on Apri14. She received a letter delivered by hand about this hearing.
She didn't see anything posted on the building. She would like some rime to contact the realtor
and to get some idea of the value. It is a sound building. They were womed about the roof
caving in during the winter, but it didn't.
Gerry Strathman asked how long it would take to sell this building. Ms. Weber stated she did not
know. Mr. Weber responded three months.
Mr. Magner reported there were a number of complaints about this property over the years. `The
certificate of occupancy was revoked in 1995 by the Fire Department for failure to bring the
building into compliance, which means the building cannot be used for any form of occupancy.
Code Enforcement mailed out a vacant building registration notice. Mr. Magner had a
conversation with the owners on 5-24-00. At that time, they wanted to sell the building and to
figure out what they needed to do. Mr. Magner stated he would hold off enforcement of the
vacant building fees for 90 days provided they fill out the vacant building notice. At the end of
the 90 days, the understanding was the owners were to submit a plan for the structure. Finally,
they paid the fees on 7-28-00. At that time, they said they would sell as is. Mr. Magner does not
see any cooperation from the owners.
Ms. Weber asked about the cars. Mr. Strathman responded that is not before him today. Today,
we aze talking about whether the City wili order the building removed. If the City proceeds with
this action, the City will demolish the properiy, and the owners will have a vacant lot and a bill.
Ms. Weber stated she would like eatra time to sell the property. Mr. 5trathman responded this
has gone on for a long time. He will allow 60 days.
Gerry Strathman recommends laying over to the June 19, 2001, Legislafive Hearing.
Appeal of Summary Abatement Order for 775 Ashland Avenue.
Dr. 7ames Shelton, owner, appeazed and stated he had a gazage that went down because of the
ice. He has insurance, a claim number, an adjuster. He is suppose to have a check coming in the
MINUTES OF TE� LEGISLATIVE HEARING
Tuesday, September 25, 2001
Gerry Strathman, Legislative Hearing Officer
Room 330 Courthouse
The meeting was called to order at 10:04 a.m.
o�-���
��.
STAFF PRESENT: Roxanna Flink, Real Estate; Steve Magner, Code Enforcement; Hazold
Robinson, Code Enforcement;
Snmmary Abatement Order Appeal for 1598 Hazel Street North. (Laid over from 9-4-01)
Gerry Strathman stated that the appellant was going to consult with City staff and others as to
whether the garden was consistent with the City's ordinance with respect to natural gazdens,
prairie growth, etc. He asked did the owner have time to do that.
Walt Montpetit, owner, appeared and stated a City representative called him last Friday and left a
voice mail. He was out of town and just returned Sunday evening. He has not had a chance to
have a conversation with City inspectors as far as what was a landscape design versus weeds and
tall grass.
Aarold Robinson reparted he could not find a specific ordinance to cover these things. The
ordinance does read grass and weeds over 8 inches high must be cut. There are some specific
plants and landscape designs that aze excluded from this. It is not composting because it is not a
contained area. It is not covered under the grass and weed ordinance because it is tall grass that
has been allowed to grow. He cannot exempt it.
Mr. Strathman asked is there someone in the City that knows plants well enough to make a
determination as ta if these plants aze accepted under state law. Mr. Robinson responded he has
been on the properry, and it is basically tall grass and weeds.
Mr. StraUunan asked what makes the owner think it is something other than tall grass and weeds.
Mr. Montpetit responded the area is set aside from the rest of the yard. He looks at it as part of
his landscape scheme. It is a wooded lot adjacent to the rest of the lot that is groomed, even
though iY is a small azea. He does not know anyone who cuts weeds and tall grass out of a
wooded iot. �-Ie asked is ius yard designaied as a yard or as a wooded lot. Mr. Robinson
responded that specificaliy a wooded lot has tv have a 3r�, and this backyazd does not have a
tree. Mr. Montpetit responded there are trees back in the comer. Mr. Robinson stated this
properiy is defmitely not a wooded lot.
From the description he included with his appeal, stated Mr. Strathman, there is a map that shows
the nature gazden is behind the gazage and surrounded by a six foot privacy fence. He asked how
this came to the City's attention. Mr. Robinson responded it was a complaint based inspection.
Mr. Montpetit stated he belongs to the yacht club and a member complained to the City about
weeds and tall grass on Harriet Island. This member was told it was part of the landscape scene.
C> �- \��
LEGISLATIVE HEARING MINUTES FOR SEPTEMBER 25, 2001 page 2
It is no different than his weeds and tall grass, said Mr. Montpetit. He does not know what
species needs to be cut and which species he can plant to conform.
(Mr. Robinson gave Mr. Montpe6t documents about a company that specializes in this subject.)
Gerry Strathman recommends denying the appeal. It does not appeaz that what Mr. Montpetit
wants to do is provided for under the City ordinance.
� Resolution ordering the owaer to remove or repair the property at 2257 Hillside Avenue.
If the owner fails to comply, Code Enforcement is ordered to remove the building.
(Laid over from 417-01)
The foliowing appeazed: Kim McCallum, 929 Selby Avenue, and Steve Gibbs, Western
National, 41 12th Avenue North, Hopkins.
Steve Magner reported this building has been vacant since December 3, 1999. There ha�e been
five sununary abatement notices to secure the dwelling, cut tall grass, remove refuse, remove
snow andior ice. On October 19, 2000, an inspection of the building was conducted, a list of
deficiencies which constitute a nuisance condition was developed, and photographs were taken.
An order to abate a nuisance buiiding was issued on October 24, 2000, with a compliance date of
November 27. As of this date, the properiy remains in a condition which comprises a nuisance as
defined by the legisla6ve code. The real estates tases aze unpaid of $6,333. Taxation has placed
an estimated mazket value of $56,600 on the land, and $5,000 on the building. On July 25, 2001,
a code compliance inspection was done. A$2,000 bond has not been posted. Estimated cost to
repair is $100,000 to $150,000; estimated cost to demolish, $12,000 to $15,000.
This was originally before the Legislative Hearing Officer in Mazch, said Mr. Magner. It was
laid over because the second mortgage company was going through a foreclosure process, wanted
to clear the ti#le, pay off the insurauce company, and then sell it. The second mortgage company
has been paid off and is na Tonger involved with Ihis properry. The original owner has physical
control of the buiiding, but there is sdll an issue with the insurance company for the first
mortgage company.
Mr. McCallum stated he plans to take the ne�ct week and decide to sell the properry, rehabilitate
it, or teaz it down and rebuild. As of yesterday, there was a settlement.
Mr. Gibbs stated Westem National will be satisfied with the agreement. They are now in the
middle of foreclosure on the property. They will be out of the pieture when that happens and the
McCallums can take whatever action they would like.
Mr. Strathman asked is he prepazed to post the $2,000 bond. Mr. McCallum responded he is.
Gerry Strathman recommends granting the owner six months to complete the rehabilitation of the
property on condition that a$2,000 bond is posted by noon of Wednesday, October 3, 2001.
LEGISLATIVE HEARING MINUTES FOR SEPTEMBER 25, 2001
o` ��
Page 6
cannot get the code compliance issues done until the fire damage is cleaned up to see what she is
left with, but she cannot get the fire damage taken caze of until she gets the code compliance
issues taken care of.
Mr. Strathman asked was she aware that the repair cost may be between $50,000 to $60,000.
Ms. Davis responded over half the list has been fixed. VJith the fire damage, there is additional
work to be done. The mortgage company is holding $30,000.
Mr. Strathman asked is the August 3, 2000, code compliance inspection an accurate
representation of what needs to be done. Mr. Magner responded Don Wagner (License,
Inspections, Environmental Protection) would have to go through the building and make a
determination as to what has to be completed, was it done under permit, and can it be signed off.
If not, it has to be done under permit. Most likely, Mr. Wagner will not give a code compliance
certificate without including the fire damage items.
Another code compliance inspecUOn is needed, asked Mr. Strathman. Mr. Magner responded
vacant building fees need to be paid, a code compliance inspecrion completed, and a bond needs
to be posted. Also, the building should be unoccupied and secwed.
Gerry Strathman recommends granting the owner six months to complete the rehabilitation of the
property on condition that the foliowing is done by noon of Wednesday, October 3, 2001: 1) Pay
the vacant building fee, 2) Get a code compiiance inspection, 3) Post a$2,000 bond.
Resolution ordering the owner to remove or repair the property at 397 Aldine Street. If the
owner faiis to comply, Code Enforcement is ordered to remove the building.
Steve Magner reported the house has been moved to another location.
(Case is closed.)
Resolation ordering the owner to remove or repair the property at 473 Hatch Avenue. If
the owner faiis to eomply, Code Enforcement is ordered to remove the building.
(Steve Magner submitted photographs.)
Steve Magner reported this property has been condemned and vacant since November 2000.
Five summary abatement notices have been issued to cut tall grass and remove refuse. On
August 1, 2001, an inspection of the building was conducted, a iist of deficiencies which
constitute a nuisance condition was developed, and photographs were taken. An order to abate a
nuisance condition was issued on August 6 with a compliance date of August 21. As of this date,
this properiy remains in a condition which comprises a nuisance as defined by the legislative
code. The City has boazded the building against trespass. The vacant building fees aze due.
Real estate tases aze unpaid of $209038. Taxation has placed an estimated mazket value of
$6,500 on the land. Before the fire, the estimated market value of the building was $34,800. As
c� � ��
LEGISLATIVE HEARING REPORT OF SEPTEMBER 25, 2001 Page 7
of today, a code compliance inspection has not been applied for and a bond has not been posted.
The estimated cost to repair is $40,000 to $50,000; estimated cost to demolish, $6,000 to $7,000.
Mr. Magner stated the owner has tried to sell the properry with no luck due to the small size of
the structure, low ceilings, and numerous problems with the building. About a month ago, the
owner asked Mr. Magner what would happen if the City demolished the structure. Mr. Magner
ezcplained the lot would remain his property, and the cost of the demolition would be assessed on
the taxes.
Gerry Strathman recommends approval.
The meeting was adjourued at 11:02 a.m.
�
ORIGI�IAL �''�.���►- 0�-�.3,ao��
RESOLUTION
CITY OF SAINT PAUL, MINNESOTA
Presented By
Referred To
Council File # O \ — �g�
Green Sheet # rp�'3 e�.G
3�
Committee: Date
k
1 WHEREAS, Citizen Service Office, Division of Code Enforcement has requested the City Council
2 to hold public hearings to consider the advisability and necessity of ordering the repair or wrecking and
3 removal of a two-story, wood frame, stone/mortar exterior, single family, fire damaged dwelling located on
4 property hereinafter referred to as the "Subject Property" and commonly known as 2257 Hillside Avenue.
5 This property is legally described as follows, to wit:
Lot 15 and the West 112 of Lot 14, Block 43, St. Anthony Park North.
10
11
12
13
14
15
16
17
18
19
20
21
22
23
24
25
26
27
28
29
30
31
32
33
34
35
36
37
38
39
WIIEREAS, based upon the records in the Ramsey County Recorder's Office and information
obtained by Division of Code Enforcement on or before September 18, 2000, the following aze the now
known interested or responsible parties for the Subject Property: Kim & Nancy Mc Callum, 874 Hague
Avenue, St. Paul, NIN 55104; Nancy Mc Callum, c/o James Lang, 581 Grand Avenue #5, St. Paul, MN
55102; Homestead Mortgage Corp., 4105 Lexington Avenue North, Arden Hills, MN 55126; First Bank
of South Dakota Natl. Assoc., c/o Stein, Moore & Fay, P.A., 1010 Minnesota Building,
St. Paul, MN 55101
WHEREAS, Division of Code Enfarcement has served in accordance with the provisions of w
Chapter 45 of the Saint Paul Legislative Code an order identified as an"Order to Abate Nuisance °°�
Building(s)" dated October 24, 2000; and
WHEREAS, this order informed the then known interested or responsible parties that the structure .`�
located on the Subject Property is a nuisance building(s) pursuant to Chapter 45; and
WHEREAS, this order informed the interested or responsible parties that they must repair or
demolish the structure located on the Subject Property by November 27, 2000; and
WFIEREAS, the enforcement officer has posted a placard on the Subject Property declazing this
building(s) to constitute a nuisance condition; subject to demolition; and
WIIEREAS, this nuisance condition has not been corrected and Division of Code Enforcement
requested that the City Clerk schedule public hearings before the Legislative Hearing Officer of the City
Council and the Saint Paul City Council; and
WHEREAS, the interested and responsible parties have been served notice in accordance with the
provisions of Chapter 45 of the Saint Paul Legislative Code, of the time, date, place and purpose of the
public hearings; and
WfIEREAS, a hearing was held before the Legislative Hearing Officer of the Saint Paul City
Council on Tuesday, February 6, 2001 to heaz testimony and evidence, and after receiving testimony and
o � _��
g
9
10
11
12
13
14
15
16
17
18
19
20
21
22
23
24
25
26
27
28
29
30
31
32
33
34
35
36
37
38
39
40
41
42
43
44
45
46
47
48
49
50
51
52
53
WHEREAS, a hearing was held before the Legislative Hearing Officer of the Saint Paul City
Council on Tuesday, February 6, 2001 to heaz testimony and evidence, and after receiving testimony and
evidence, made the recommendation to approve the request to order the interested or responsible parties to
make the Subject Property safe and not detrimental to the public peace, health, safety and welfaze and
remove its blighting influence on the community by rehabilitating this structure in accordance with all
applicable codes and ordinances, or in the alternative by demolishing and removing the structure in
accordance with all applicable codes and ordinances. The rehabilitation or demolition of the structure to be
com leted within d a,ys after the dat of the Council Hearin - and � 1 � �� �`� +`�_ ,�,
p nnV=.ia:�jM��hn 1 �t'hi� en.�,. a�w.... �wt� �
'�S�
WHEREAS, a hearing was held before the Saint Paul City Council on Wednesday, February 2��
2001 and the testimony and evidence including the acrion taken by the Legislative Hearing Officer wa.�
considered by the Council; now therefore
�1 o,we b.� t
BE IT RESOLVED, that based upon the testnnony and evidence presented at the above reference
public hearings, the Saint Paul City Council hereby adopts the following Findings and Order concerning
the Subject Property at 2257 Hillside Avenue:
1. That the Subject Properiy comprises a nuisance condition as defined in Saint Paul
Legislative Code, Chapter 45.
2. That the costs of demolition and removal of this building(s) is estimated to exceed three
thousand dollars ($3,000.00).
3. That there now exists and has existed multiple Housing or Building code violations at the
Subject Property.
4. That an Order to Abate Nuisance Building(s) was sent to the then known responsible parties
to correct the deficiencies or to demolish and remove the building(s).
5. That the deficiencies causing this nuisance condition have not been corrected.
6. That Division of Code Enforcement has posted a placard on the Subj ect Property which
declares it to be a nuisance condition subject to demolition.
7. That this building has been routinely monitored by the Citizen Service Offices, Division of
Code Enforcement, Vacant/Nuisance Buildings.
8. That the known interested parties and owners are as previously stated in this resolution and '
that the notification requirements of Chapter 45 have been fulfilled.
��� '
The Saint Paul City Council hereby makes the following order:
The above referenced interested or responsible parties shall make the Subject Properiy safe and not
detrimental to the public peace, health, safety and welfare and remove its blighting influence on the
community by rehabilitating this structure and correcting all deficiencies as prescribed in the above
referenced Order to Abate Nuisance Building(s) in accordance with all applicable codes and
ardinances, or in the alternative by demolishing and removing the structure in accordance with all
applicable codes and oxdinances. The rehabilitation or demolition and removal of the structure
must be completed withi v�rReenfl�5}days after the date of the Council Hearing.
o�.h..r.�,r t �► e�h�� (,r 8'0�
OR1GI�lAL
2
3
4
5
6
7
10
11
12
o � -�89
2. If the above corrective action is not completed within this period of time the Citizen Service Office,
Division of Code Enforcement is hereby authorized to take whatever steps are necessary to
demolish and remove this structure, fill the site and chazge the costs incurred against the Subject
Property pursuant to the provisions of Chapter 45 of the Saint Paul Legislative Code.
3. In the event the building is to be demolished and removed by the City of Saint Paul, all personal
properry or fixtures of any kind which interfere with the demolition and removal shall be removed
from the property by the responsible parties by the end of this time penod. If all personal property
is not removed, it shall be considered to be abandoned and the City of Saint Paul shall remove and
dispose of such properiy as provided by law.
4. It is further ardered, that a copy of this resolution be mailed to the owners and interested parties in
accordance with Chapter 45 of the Saint Paul Legislative Code.
Adopted by Council: Date p� , 3T � �
Adoption Certified by Council Secretary
�y� � . A
Approved by Mayor: Date �B �S�
By:
Requested by Department of:
Citizen Service Office: Code Enforcement
8��,.�,�,t ��'ti`�
°�,,�,-°_
Form Approved by City Attomey
By: L . '
Approved by Mayor for Submission to Council
BY� ���y��G�
Division of Code Enforcement
.. :� .
ee ota couria�acemn er (on�rq
;dnesdav, Februarv 28, 20Q1,
TOTAL # OF SIGNATURE
����
ovizroi GREEN SHEET
c�r. ,_��
8�_�
No 102326
c,;r=_� = w
�aaww /�� (n
xwmotwrs �rnrwlrouEr /!L(./`' arvuwc
ua
eamxc
�� ❑swur�u.aaiucFSOOC wuxcw�aomKCro
� WYORI�MAilMR) ❑
:S I (CUP ALL LOCATIONS FOR SIGNATURE)
✓
City Council to pass this resolufion which will order the owner(s) to remove or repair the referenced building(s). If
the owner fails to comply with the resolution, the Citizen Service Office, Division of Code Enfoiceme�t�i,s �ered
to remove the building. The subject properiy is located at 2257 Hillside Avenue. ��s'� �?^�'�'�� A
� �� � � ���
PLANNING COMMISSION
CIB COMMI7TEE
qVIL SERVICE COMMISSION
t50NAL SERVICE CONiRACfS MUST ANSWER THE FOLLON47NG Q
Has Nis Pe«�rm erer worketl urMer a conGact tor thie departmeM'1
VES NO
� m� a�re�r� �. e� a�y emdov��
YES NO
Dces thie persoMrm possess a sldil not noimallypoeseseeC by any cutterR dty employee9
YES Ntr
Ia this persaVfirm a targeted oxndaYl � ,
� WES NO `
, This building(s) is a nuisance building(s) as defined 'an Chapter 45, and a vacant building as defined in Chapter 43 of
the Saint Paul Legislative Code. The owners, interested parties and responsible parties known to the Enforcement
Officer were given an order to repair or remove the building at 2257 Hillside Avenue by November 27, 2000, and
have failed to coxnply"with those orders.
�a�"�';�.� �s ��
The City will eliminate a nuisance.
��6� � � �9
1 � z���,
��TY A�"�"��F�E�E�'
The City will spend funds to wreck and remove this building(s). These costs will be assessed to the property,
collected as a special assessment against the properry taaces.
A nuisance condition will remain unabated in the City. This building(s) wili continue to blight the community
,p t�.�vvv - y i.i�vvv
OF SRANSACTION S
souRCE Nnicanra Hnncing Ahatamant
iNFOananoN �FxaaM. . .
CASTrttEVEtiUE8UD6ET�D(GRCLEONE� � NO
ACTNT'NUMBER ��7�1�
°1-�9
REPORT
Date: September 25, 2001
Time: 10:00 am.
Place: Room 330 City Hall
15 West Kellogg Boulevazd
LEGISLATIVE HEARING
Gerry Strathman
Legislarive Hearing Officer
Summary Abatement Order Appeal for 159& Hazel Street North.
(Laid over from 9-4-01)
Legislative Hearing Officer recommends denying the appeal.
2. Resolution ordering the owner to remove or repair the properry at 2257 Hillside Avenue.
If the owner fails to comply, Code Enforcement is ordered to remove the building.
(Laid over from 4-17-01)
Legislative Hearing Officer recommends granting the owner six months to complete the
rehabilitation of the properiy on condition that a$2,000 bond is posted by noon of
Wednesday, October 3, 2001.
3. Laid Over Summary Abatement:
JO105V Towing of abandoned vehicle at 376 Marvland Avenue East.
Legislative Hearing Officer recommends reducing the assessment to $105 pius the $45
service fee for a total assessment of $150.
4. Summary Abatement Order appeal for 697 Sunev Avenue.
I.egislative Hearing Officer recommends denying the appeal.
5. Resolntion Qrdering the owner to remove or repair Yhe property at 850 Sims Avenue. If
#he owner fails to comply, Code Enforcement is ordered to remove the building.
Legislative Hearing Officer recommends laying over to the October 16, 2001, Legislative
Hearing.
6. Resolution ordering the owner to remove or repair the property at 715 Preble Street. If
the owner fails to comply, Code Enforcement is ordered to remove the building.
Legislative Hearing Officer recommends granting the owner sis months to complete the
rehabilitation of the properiy on condition that the following is done by noon of
Wednesday, October 3, 2001: 1) Pay the vacant building fee, 2) Get a code compliance
inspecrion, 3) Post a$2,000 bond.
O�-Ur1
LEGISLATIVE HEARING REPORT OF SEPTEMBER 25, 2001 Page 2
7. Resolution ordering the owner to remove or repair the properry at 39'7 Aldine Street. If
the owner fails to comply, Code Enforcement is ordered to remove the building.
(Case is closed.)
8. Resolution ordering the owner to remove or repair the properry at.473 Hatch Avenue. If
the owner fails to comply, Code Enforcement is ordered to remove the building.
Legislarive Aearing Officer recommends approval.
0
a1-lr�
LEGISLATIVE HEARING MINUTES OF APRIL 17, 2001
Page 4
yj Resolution ordering the owner to remove or repair the bnilding at 2257 Hillside Avenue. If
'y� the owner faiLs to comply with the resolution, Code Enforcement is ordered to remove the
building.
(Laid over from 2-13-01)
(Photographs were presented and later returned.)
Jennifer Benzel, U.S. Bank National Association, appeazed. Ms. Benzel stated there was a
foreclosure sale on 3-2-01. The properiy owners filed an affidavit saying the property was not
abandoned. The owners have a full redemption rights of six months before U.S. Bank can do
anything with the property. If the properry is not redeemed, U.S. Bank will continue forwazd
with theu plan, which is to get the properry mazketed and sold. They have people interested in
the property.
Gerry Strathman stated the property has an abandoned look to it. He asked did the owners say
what they intended to do with the building. Ms. Benzel responded the3r attorney filed an
affidavit essentially saying it was not abandoned.
Steve Magner stated he was surprised that the mortgagee filed that affidavit. The property has
been negiected for a long time. Prior to the mortgage company taking caze of the outside of the
property, the City had to do it. Mr. Magner does not see the benefit of giving the owner more
leeway. The property is in dire straits. Ms. Benzel responded U.S. Bank will continue to take
caze of the pmperty. The redemption period will end 9-2-01. They aze bound by law.
Mr. Strathman stated he wanted to be clear on the maintenance of the exterior. Ms. Benzel
responded U. S. bank has secured the building, taken caze of the sidewalks, and will be taking
caze of the lawn throughout the summer.
Gerry Strathman recommends laying over to the September 18, 2001, Legislative Hearing on
condition that the exterior of the building is maintained.
Resotution ordering the owner to remove or repair the building at 964 Woodbridge Street.
If the owner fails to comply with the resolufion, Code �nforcement is ordered to remove
the building.
(Laid over from 2-20-01)
(Steve Magner presented photographs.)
Steve Magner reported the last time this was laid over was for the closing of a sale. The new
owner is required to post a bond and will be granted 180 days to complete rehabilitation of this
properry.
Yee Fang appeazed and stated he talked to Mr. Magner yesterday.
Gerry Strathman recommends granting the owner six months to complete rehabilitation of the
MINUTES OF Tf� LEGISLATIVE HEARING fl �' , �9
Tuesday, April 17, 2001
Room 330 Courthouse
Gerry Strathman, Legislative Hearing Officer
STAFF PRESENT: John Betz, Code Enforcement; Steve Magner, Code Enforcement
The meeting was called to order at 10:02 am.
Laid over summary abatements from the City Council Meeting of Apri14, 2001
File JO1L0 Boarding-up of vacant buildings at the following addresses: 136 Wilder
Street,1197 Ross Avenue,1165 Hudson Road
Abandoned vehicle at the following address: 615 Charles Avenue
Property Clean-up at the following addresses: 1835 St. Clair Avenue, 707
Jessamine Avenue East
136 Wilder SYreetNorth (JOIBDUP)
James Fitzpatrick, owner, stated he is being chazged with boazding up a garage door. He had
some personal injuries, which delayed him closing up the garage. Also, it took a week to get a
gazage door ordered and installed.
Steve Magner reported he issued a summary abatement order on 8-31-00 to secure the garage.
On 9-7-00, one window was boazded, but the vacant building placards were torn down. The
work order was sent on 9-13-00 about a wide open vehicle door, attached garage. There was no
response from the owner. On 12-9-00, the garage was still open. The inspector tried to contact
the property owner and left a detailed message.
(Mr. Magner showed a photograph.)
Gerry Strathman stated the owaer had a couple of weeks to make the repair and staff attempted to
contact him. It is uncleaz why the repair was not made. Mr. Fitzpatrick responded he was
injured while doing the work, which delayed it. Also, he had no problem with the door. Mr.
Strathman explained that the City code requires that all buildings be secured and access restricted
to prevent them &om being an attracrive nuisance for children, vagrants, criminals, etc.
Gerry Strathman recommends approval of the assessment.
1197 Ross Avenue (701BDUP)
Mazk Boeltl, owner, appeazed and stated he had an arson on his garage on 10-30-00. The Fire
Department got done about 2:00 a.m. and said they had to secure the building. It was boazded ai
about 4:00 a.m. He found out later he was chazged to secure the building. If he had known this,
he would have gotten his own wood.
�p� . \t�1
LEGISLATIVE HEARING MINiJTES OF APRIL 17, 2�01
Page 2
Gerry Strathman asked why the insurance would not pay for it. Mr. BoelU responded they paid
for the contents of the garage. They paid $8300 and it cost $8800 to rebuild it. Also, there aze
not many people roaming the streets at 230 am. Mr. Strathman responded the Fire Department
has orders not to leave the property unsecured because the City is liable if something happens.
Mr. Boeld responded he has seen garages open. Steve Magner stated the Fire Department will
not leave a scene without securing it, particulazly an arson, becausa it is technically a crime
scene.
Mr. Strathman asked about the number of boazds. Mr. Magner responded there were nine boards
and a secure. The cost reflects what the contractor did. Mr. Strathman e�cplained that annually
the City puts out an RFP (Request for Proposal) for people who want to do these emergency
boardings.
BoelU questioned the cost, which is $745. Mr. Magner responded the cost includes the
following: nine boards at $50 a piece, securing one door, the trip chazge of $200, and $45
service fee.
Gerry Strathman recommends approval of the assessment.
1165 Hudson Road (JOIBDUP)
(Note: 1165 Hudson has two swnmary abatements. 301 SiJM has already been ratified by the
City Council. The secretary made a mistake, and it should have been laid over. Both
assessments will be discussed here.)
Cserald Frisch, 2350 W. '7"' Street, owner, appeared and stated he is a developer and attorney. He
is the owner of this property and is in partnership with the City of St. Paut PED (Planning and
Economic Development). He is preparing to go before the Metropolitan Planning Commission
for money to clean up the site, which has been vacant for a year. He has worked with
Councilmember Lanhy's office, Brian Sweeney (PED), Sheryl Pemberton (PED), the
neighborhood, and the district council. Mr. Frisch has a contract for someone to clean up the
property. Mr. Frisch has cooperated with the City to have snow dumped there ttus yeaz. He does
not think he should have tlus assessment because he has no knowledge of this work being done
by the City. Whenever he received notices, it is taken caze of. If this is something that slipped
thcough the cracks, he should not haue a further assessment. He is in the process of arranging for
the demolition of this building and the construction of senior housing.
Gerry Strathman stated orders were sent on August 11, 20, and September 5. Mr. Frisch
responded that each time, the probiem has been cleazed. Dumping is done there all the time. He
has spent about $5,000 last yeaz in removing debris that other peopie have brought onto the
P�Pert3'•
Steve Magner stated there is a dumping problem there. There was a sununary abatement issued
on 9-5-00 to cut the grass and secure the building. The grass was cut, but the building was still
open to access. Code Enforcement hied to contact the owner. Mr. Frisch never sent back the
vacant building registration form or the $20 vacant building fee. Code Enforcement just has the
o�� 1d�9
LEGISLATIVE HEARING MINUTES OF APRIL 17, 2001
Page 3
company name and could not find the phone number; therefore, the inspectoi could not speak to
anyone verbally. The clean up was $18.98 plus the $45 in;�rrattve charges.
(A videotape was shown)
Mr. Frisch stated there is no doubt that new debris was delivered there, but nothing shows it was
there for an extended period of time. He is paying $22,000 in taaces, has undertaken a major
renovation in Saint Paul, and is entifled to certain consideration by the City.
Gerry Strathman recommends approval of the assessment. Notice was given and the work was
done. Mr. Magner stated he has talked to Mr. Frisch a number of times about this issue. The
parties that are opening lris mail should fill out the vacant building registration form properly,
and then Code Enforcement would have documentation of phone numbers so that someone could
be called to avoid future assessments.
615 Chazles Avenue (JO101 V)
(No one appeared to represent the property.)
Gerry Strathman recommends approval of the assessment.
1835 St. Clair Avenue (JOISUM)
(I3o one appeared to represent the properry.)
Gerry Suathman recommends approval of the assessment.
707 Jessamine Avenue East (JOiSUM)
Va Yang, owner, appeazed and stated he did not receive notice. The couch and refrigerator had
only been there for a few days.
John Betz reported a notice was mailed on 10-18-00 for rubbish, discazded furnilure, and
appliances in yazd to be removed by 10-24-00. Mr. Yang responded he cleans the yazd every
week.
(A videotape was shown.)
Gerry Strathman recommends approvai of the assessment. A notice was sent by U.S. Mail,
which is considered delivery by law. It is unlmown why Mr. Yang did not receive it. The City
did the work.
O�-\��
LEGISLATIVE HEARING MINUTES OF APRIL 17, 2001
�
Resolution ordering the owner to remove or repair the building at 2257 Hillside Avenue. If
the owner fails to comply with the resolntion, Code Enforcement is ordered to remove the
building.
(Laid over from 2-13-01)
(Photographs were presented and later returned.)
Jennifer Benzel, U.S. Bank National Association, appeazed. Ms. Benzel stated there was a
foreclosure sale on 3-2-01. The properry owners filed an affidavit saying the properry was not
abandoned. The owners have a full redemption rights of siY months before U.S. Bank can do
anything with the property. If the property is not redeemed, U.S. Bank will continue forwazd
with their plan, which is to get the properry mazketed and sold. They have people interested in
the property.
Gerry Strathman stated the property has an abandoned look to it. He asked did the owners say
what they intended to do with the buiiding. Ms. Benzel responded their attorney filed an
affidavit essenrially saying it was not abandoned.
Steve Magner stated he was surprised that the mortgagee filed that affidavit. The property has
been neglected for a long time. Prior to the mortgage company taking care of the outside of the
property, the City had to do it. Mr. Magner does not see the benefit of giving the owner more
leeway. The property is in dire straits. Ms. Benzel responded I3.S. Bank will continue to take
caze of the properry. The redemption period will end 9-2-01. They are bound by law.
Mr. Strathman stated he wanted to be clear on the maintenance of the eatterior. Ms. Benzel
responded U.S. bank has secured the building, taken caze of the sidewalks, and will be taking
care of the lawn throughout the summer.
Gerry Strathman recommends laying over to the September 18, 2001, Legislative Hearing on
condition that the ea�terior of the building is maintained.
Resolution ordering the owner to remove or repair the building at 964 WoodbridPe Street.
If the owner fails to comply with the resolution, Code Enforcement is ordered to remove
the building.
(Laid over from 2-20-01)
(Steve Magner presented photographs.)
Steve Magner reported the last time tlus was laid over was for the closing of a sa1e. The new
owner is required to post a bond and will be granted 180 days to complete rehabilitafion of this
property.
Yee Fang appeared and stated he talked to Mr. Magner yesterday.
Gerry Strathman recommends granting the owner six months to complete rehabilitation of the
LEGISLATIVE HEARING MINUTES OF APRIL 17, 2001
Summary Abatements:
J0102A
J0102V
JOlO1B
SSWREPAIR
a�-i�
Page 6
Property clean-np during Jannary 2001 and part of February 2001.
Towing of abandoned velucles from private property during October and
November 2000. Additional properties to be assessed are: 873 Marion
Street, towed November 1999; $10 Sherburne Conwav, 2052
Fairmount towed January 2000; 1148 Minnehaha, towed March 2000; 45
Winona and 1037 Payne, towed April 2000.
Boarding np of vacant properties during November and December 2000.
Sanitary sewer service repairs
927 Hudson Road (J0102A)
(The owner appeared for the properry; however, Code Enforcement had not received the green
cazd indicating this address would be appealed.)
Gerry Strathman recommends laying over to the May 15, 2001, Legislarive Hearing.
915 Agate Street (J0102V}
(No one appeared to represent the progerty.)
John Betz reported there seemed to be confusion at the Impound Lot; this assessment may not be
warranted. He suggested a layover.
Gerry Strathman recommends laying over to the May 15, 2001, Legislative Hearing.
1787 Ames Avenue (SSWREPAIR)
(No one appeared to represent the property, and the appeal was denied. However, the owner
called Mr. Strathman after the meeting and requested that she be heazd at another legislative
hearing. Therefore, Mr. S�attuuan changed his recommendation.)
Gerry Strathman recommends laying over to the May 15, 2001, Legislative Hearing.
416 Charles Avenue (J0102A)
(No one appeazed to represent this properry.)
Gerry Strathman recommends laying over to the May 15, 2001, Legislative Hearing.
958 Marvland Avenue East (J0102A)
Thomas and Lola Alvazado, owners, appeared. Ms. Alvarado stated they never received a notice.
She tlunks the items aze from the neighbors. She does not haue access to that side of the gazage
LEGISLATIVE HEARING MINUTES OF APRIL 17, 2001
where this cleanup was done.
(A videotape was shown.)
o\-t�9
Page 7
Mr. Alvarado stated tUat is not his properly. If he had received notice, he would have cleaned it.
They have no tires in their garage.
(Mr. Betz showed a photograph.)
After viewing the photograph, Gerry Strathman stated the trash is right against the garage. Mr.
Alvarado responded he did not know that was their properry. Ms. Alvarado stated she had a
realtor look at the site and she was told that is their properry line; however, that is not their
gazbage. She does not have access to that side of the garage. The next door neighbors enter that
side and pazk there. The Alvarados aze on the other side of the garage. They drive a 1999
vehicle and would have no business with six tires on that side of the gazage. The neighbors
continue to dump gazbage. The Alvarados installed a temporary fencing.
Mr. Strathman asked did they receive notice. Ms. Alvazado responded no and she is home
everyday and gets the mail everyday.
John Betz reported there was a problem with ownership information received from Ramsey
County for about two months. The notice was sent to the Hudsons. Ms. Alvazado responded that
is who the house was purchased from.
Gerry Strathman recommends deleting the assessment because of a notification problem. He
wamed the owners that they aze responsible for what is on their property whether it is their
garage or not. Ms. Alvarado stated they plan to install a privacy fence.
754 Minnehaha Avenue West (SSWREPAIR)
Cameron Lepisto, owner, appeazed and stated he had sewer problems. He received a notice to
get it repaired, which he did. Within a week, he got a notice that more sewer work needed to be
done on the second half. He would like any duplication of charges to be taken off his
assessment.
John Betz reported that there was a break in the sewer line discovered by the Sewer Division of
Pubiic Works. Someone contacted Code Enforcement to have the work done so it could be
billed as an assessment. The contractor went to Public Works and was told the break was in the
middle of the street and the service to the property had fallen offthe main sewer system. The
contractor completed the work. As he was getting in his truck, he found mdent holes in the
boulevard. Unbeknownst to him, the building is serviced by two separate lines. He proceeded to
repair it.
Mr. Betz called the contractor and asked him if he could have done it all at one time and how
much were the dupiication costs. The contractor stated it would have been between $200 to $300
LEGISLATIVE HEARING MIIIUTES OF APRIL 17, 2001
o�- �1
Page 8
to bring all the equipment back again. The Sewer Division informed the contractor there was one
sewer line going to the building when actually there was two. The contractor could have done
them both at the same time.
Gerry Strathman recommends reducing the assessment by $300 for a total assessment of
$6,825.Q2.
1027 Pazk Street (J0102A)
(No one appeared to represent the property.)
Gerry Strathman recommends approval of the assessment.
1037 Pavne Street (J0102V)
(No one appeazed to represent the property.)
Legislative Hearing Officer recommends approval of the assessment.
596 Portland Avenue (30102A)
Raymond Heichel, ovmer, appeazed and stated he purchased a refrigerator at Twin City
Appliance. They were to pick up the old refrigerator, but they could not do it that day. If Mr.
Heichel had been given a notice, he would have taken the refrigerator to them.
7ohn Betz reported his office issued a notice on 12-28-00 to discazd a refrigerator, doors, rubbish
with a compliance date of 1-4-01. The City removed the refrigerator on 1-10-01. An inspector
knocked on the door and xeceived no answer. (Mr. Betz showed Mr. Heichel a copy of the
notice.)
Mr. Heichel stated sometimes his mail goes to another address, and the mail is not brought back.
He asked that this assessment be waived. Mr. Strathman responded that he could not do that
because his records show that the notice was sent.
Mr. Betz asked does he lives at 596 Portland. Mr. Heichel responded he does, but sometimes he
is not there. Mr. Strathman asked was he gone during Cluistmas. Mr. Heichel responded yes.
Gerry Strathman recommends approval of the assessment. Notification was sent and the work
was done. Legai requirement is to send it by U.S. mail.
675 Sherburne Avenue (J0102A)
(No one appeazed to represent the properry.)
LEGISLATIVE HEARING MINUTES OF APRIL 17, 2001
Gerry Strathman recommends approval of the assessment.
730 Sherburne Avenue
(Note: this address was levied on 4-4-01.)
(I3o one appeazed to represent the property.)
Gerry Strathman recommends approvai of the assessment.
687 Western Avenue North (70102�
o, _ �r�
Page 9
Anthony Oji, owner, appeazed and stated he cannot get a title on the vehicle. The caz was taken
away from the pazking lot and then he was told to come here.
John Betz reported there were no current plates on the vehicle. The City considers a vehicle
abandoned if the plates aze more than 40 days old and the vehicle is inoperable, unsecured. If
they aze in these conditions, the velucle has to be kept in a gazage. On 10-7-00, an inspector
found three vehicles and none had plates. Notice was sent to Mr. Oji to bring it into compliance,
remove them, or garage them by 10-21-00. The inspector was back on 10-23-00 and one vehicle
remained. The inspector tried to call Mr. Oji, but the phone system would not accept
unidentified calls, which come out of the police facility. A work order was sent to the Police
Department, and they impounded the vehicle.
Mr. Strathman asked how long did he have the caz before it was towed. Mr. Oji responded since
August 8. Mr. Strathman stated it was three months waiting for repair. Under the City's law,
vehicles cannot be stored outdoors.
Mr. Betz stated he is not aware of what happens when a vehicle is purchased from the Impound
Lot. He asked was there any temporary licensing situation. (Mr. Betz looked at the paperwork
provided by Mr. Oji.)
Gerry Strathivan recommends reducing the assessment from $637.10 to $400.00 plus the $45.00
service fee for a total assessment of $445.00. The owner was notified properly and the vehicle
was improperly stored; however, the vehicle charge is too high.
336 Lafond Avenue (J0102A)
Edgaz Poland and his daughter appeazed. The daughter stated there was a fire on a Saturday
afternoon. She heard the fire hvcks, realized it was her father's house, and went to the house.
She told the firemen she would boazd the properiy. When she got back, the house was already
boarded. She did not think much about it because her father was having open heart surgery at the
time. The firemen threw out some debris onto the sidewalk. When she got there Monday
morning, the debris was gone and there was a bill on one of the windows. She is protesting that
she was there at the scene, was willing to do the work, the work was done without her
a�_��y
LEGISLATIVE HEARING MINIJTES OF APRIL 17, 2001 Page 10
knowledge, aud the bill was for over $900. Steve Magner reported the boazd up is not on the
agenda today; the only item on the agenda today is the cleanup for $334.
Steve Magner reported the fire occurred on 2-3-01. There was debris all over the sidewatk. It
was a hazard because of the items that were used to put out the fire. Code Enforcement tried to
contact the owner, but were unable to reach him. An emergency summary abatement was issued
to clean up the sidewalk. Mr. Magner posted a copy on the door at 12:45 p.m. indicating the
action would be taken. Parks and Recreation went out that afternoon to do the cleanup. The
work was done on 2-5-01.
Gerry Strathman recommends approval of the assessment. The actions the City took were
reasonable and appropriate under the circumstances.
543 Van Buren Avenue (JOl O1B)
(No one appeazed to represent the property.)
Gerry Strathman recommends approval of the assessment.
609 Smith Avenue South (JOlO1B)
(No one appeared.to represent the property.)
Gerry Strathman recommends approval of the assessment.
675 Portiand Avenue (JOlO1B)
Lois Casey, owner, appeared and stated she was awakened about her garage being on fue. She
toid the Fire ➢epartmeut that she would lock up the gazage. The gazage was boazded the ne�
morning without her consent. Used wood was put on the gazage, it was put on at an angle, and is
not covering the entire hole. Gerry Strathman responded the wood is trivial. The real charge is
for the contractor coming out in the middle of the night.
Ms. Casey stated her insurance company said they would pay the fee. Mr. Magner responded
most insurance companies pick up the cost of securing the property to stop further degradazion.
Gerry Strathman recommends approval of the assessment.
Resolution ordering the owner to remove or repair the property at 1236 Seventh Street
East. If the owner fails to comply with the order, Code Enforcement is ordered to remove
the building.
(Steve Magner presented photographs.)
Robert and Mazlyn Weber, owners, appeazed.
�+-�t1
LEGISLATIVE HEARING MTNUTES OF APRIL 17, 2001 Page 11
Steve Magner reported the certificate of occupancy was revoked in 1995. Seven summary
abatement notices have been issued to remove vehicles, cut grass, remove tires, secure building,
remove snow. On 1-31-01, an inspection of the building was conducted, a list of deficiencies
which constitute a nuisance conditions was developed, and photographs were taken. Vacant
building fees have ben paid. Real estate taYes are unpaid in the amount of $2,564. Taxation has
placed an estimated mazket value of $74,800 on this property. As of 4-17-01, a code compliance
inspection has not been applied for, and a$2,000 bond has not bene posted. The cost to repair is
estimated at $80,000 to $100, 000; cost to demolish, $16,000 to $18,000.
Ms. Weber stated she is looking for an e�rtension of time because they aze planning to sell the
property. If things were posted, sometimes they are taken off of the building. The first letter they
received was in February and forwarded to them in Alabama. It got there four days after the
inspecfion. She wrote a letter on 2-21-01 to inform the City that she would like this matter put
on hold until they return on Apri14. She received a letter delivered by hand about this hearing.
She didn't see anything posted on the building. She would like some rime to contact the realtor
and to get some idea of the value. It is a sound building. They were womed about the roof
caving in during the winter, but it didn't.
Gerry Strathman asked how long it would take to sell this building. Ms. Weber stated she did not
know. Mr. Weber responded three months.
Mr. Magner reported there were a number of complaints about this property over the years. `The
certificate of occupancy was revoked in 1995 by the Fire Department for failure to bring the
building into compliance, which means the building cannot be used for any form of occupancy.
Code Enforcement mailed out a vacant building registration notice. Mr. Magner had a
conversation with the owners on 5-24-00. At that time, they wanted to sell the building and to
figure out what they needed to do. Mr. Magner stated he would hold off enforcement of the
vacant building fees for 90 days provided they fill out the vacant building notice. At the end of
the 90 days, the understanding was the owners were to submit a plan for the structure. Finally,
they paid the fees on 7-28-00. At that time, they said they would sell as is. Mr. Magner does not
see any cooperation from the owners.
Ms. Weber asked about the cars. Mr. Strathman responded that is not before him today. Today,
we aze talking about whether the City wili order the building removed. If the City proceeds with
this action, the City will demolish the properiy, and the owners will have a vacant lot and a bill.
Ms. Weber stated she would like eatra time to sell the property. Mr. 5trathman responded this
has gone on for a long time. He will allow 60 days.
Gerry Strathman recommends laying over to the June 19, 2001, Legislafive Hearing.
Appeal of Summary Abatement Order for 775 Ashland Avenue.
Dr. 7ames Shelton, owner, appeazed and stated he had a gazage that went down because of the
ice. He has insurance, a claim number, an adjuster. He is suppose to have a check coming in the
MINUTES OF TE� LEGISLATIVE HEARING
Tuesday, September 25, 2001
Gerry Strathman, Legislative Hearing Officer
Room 330 Courthouse
The meeting was called to order at 10:04 a.m.
o�-���
��.
STAFF PRESENT: Roxanna Flink, Real Estate; Steve Magner, Code Enforcement; Hazold
Robinson, Code Enforcement;
Snmmary Abatement Order Appeal for 1598 Hazel Street North. (Laid over from 9-4-01)
Gerry Strathman stated that the appellant was going to consult with City staff and others as to
whether the garden was consistent with the City's ordinance with respect to natural gazdens,
prairie growth, etc. He asked did the owner have time to do that.
Walt Montpetit, owner, appeared and stated a City representative called him last Friday and left a
voice mail. He was out of town and just returned Sunday evening. He has not had a chance to
have a conversation with City inspectors as far as what was a landscape design versus weeds and
tall grass.
Aarold Robinson reparted he could not find a specific ordinance to cover these things. The
ordinance does read grass and weeds over 8 inches high must be cut. There are some specific
plants and landscape designs that aze excluded from this. It is not composting because it is not a
contained area. It is not covered under the grass and weed ordinance because it is tall grass that
has been allowed to grow. He cannot exempt it.
Mr. Strathman asked is there someone in the City that knows plants well enough to make a
determination as ta if these plants aze accepted under state law. Mr. Robinson responded he has
been on the properry, and it is basically tall grass and weeds.
Mr. StraUunan asked what makes the owner think it is something other than tall grass and weeds.
Mr. Montpetit responded the area is set aside from the rest of the yard. He looks at it as part of
his landscape scheme. It is a wooded lot adjacent to the rest of the lot that is groomed, even
though iY is a small azea. He does not know anyone who cuts weeds and tall grass out of a
wooded iot. �-Ie asked is ius yard designaied as a yard or as a wooded lot. Mr. Robinson
responded that specificaliy a wooded lot has tv have a 3r�, and this backyazd does not have a
tree. Mr. Montpetit responded there are trees back in the comer. Mr. Robinson stated this
properiy is defmitely not a wooded lot.
From the description he included with his appeal, stated Mr. Strathman, there is a map that shows
the nature gazden is behind the gazage and surrounded by a six foot privacy fence. He asked how
this came to the City's attention. Mr. Robinson responded it was a complaint based inspection.
Mr. Montpetit stated he belongs to the yacht club and a member complained to the City about
weeds and tall grass on Harriet Island. This member was told it was part of the landscape scene.
C> �- \��
LEGISLATIVE HEARING MINUTES FOR SEPTEMBER 25, 2001 page 2
It is no different than his weeds and tall grass, said Mr. Montpetit. He does not know what
species needs to be cut and which species he can plant to conform.
(Mr. Robinson gave Mr. Montpe6t documents about a company that specializes in this subject.)
Gerry Strathman recommends denying the appeal. It does not appeaz that what Mr. Montpetit
wants to do is provided for under the City ordinance.
� Resolution ordering the owaer to remove or repair the property at 2257 Hillside Avenue.
If the owner fails to comply, Code Enforcement is ordered to remove the building.
(Laid over from 417-01)
The foliowing appeazed: Kim McCallum, 929 Selby Avenue, and Steve Gibbs, Western
National, 41 12th Avenue North, Hopkins.
Steve Magner reported this building has been vacant since December 3, 1999. There ha�e been
five sununary abatement notices to secure the dwelling, cut tall grass, remove refuse, remove
snow andior ice. On October 19, 2000, an inspection of the building was conducted, a list of
deficiencies which constitute a nuisance condition was developed, and photographs were taken.
An order to abate a nuisance buiiding was issued on October 24, 2000, with a compliance date of
November 27. As of this date, the properiy remains in a condition which comprises a nuisance as
defined by the legisla6ve code. The real estates tases aze unpaid of $6,333. Taxation has placed
an estimated mazket value of $56,600 on the land, and $5,000 on the building. On July 25, 2001,
a code compliance inspection was done. A$2,000 bond has not been posted. Estimated cost to
repair is $100,000 to $150,000; estimated cost to demolish, $12,000 to $15,000.
This was originally before the Legislative Hearing Officer in Mazch, said Mr. Magner. It was
laid over because the second mortgage company was going through a foreclosure process, wanted
to clear the ti#le, pay off the insurauce company, and then sell it. The second mortgage company
has been paid off and is na Tonger involved with Ihis properry. The original owner has physical
control of the buiiding, but there is sdll an issue with the insurance company for the first
mortgage company.
Mr. McCallum stated he plans to take the ne�ct week and decide to sell the properry, rehabilitate
it, or teaz it down and rebuild. As of yesterday, there was a settlement.
Mr. Gibbs stated Westem National will be satisfied with the agreement. They are now in the
middle of foreclosure on the property. They will be out of the pieture when that happens and the
McCallums can take whatever action they would like.
Mr. Strathman asked is he prepazed to post the $2,000 bond. Mr. McCallum responded he is.
Gerry Strathman recommends granting the owner six months to complete the rehabilitation of the
property on condition that a$2,000 bond is posted by noon of Wednesday, October 3, 2001.
LEGISLATIVE HEARING MINUTES FOR SEPTEMBER 25, 2001
o` ��
Page 6
cannot get the code compliance issues done until the fire damage is cleaned up to see what she is
left with, but she cannot get the fire damage taken caze of until she gets the code compliance
issues taken care of.
Mr. Strathman asked was she aware that the repair cost may be between $50,000 to $60,000.
Ms. Davis responded over half the list has been fixed. VJith the fire damage, there is additional
work to be done. The mortgage company is holding $30,000.
Mr. Strathman asked is the August 3, 2000, code compliance inspection an accurate
representation of what needs to be done. Mr. Magner responded Don Wagner (License,
Inspections, Environmental Protection) would have to go through the building and make a
determination as to what has to be completed, was it done under permit, and can it be signed off.
If not, it has to be done under permit. Most likely, Mr. Wagner will not give a code compliance
certificate without including the fire damage items.
Another code compliance inspecUOn is needed, asked Mr. Strathman. Mr. Magner responded
vacant building fees need to be paid, a code compliance inspecrion completed, and a bond needs
to be posted. Also, the building should be unoccupied and secwed.
Gerry Strathman recommends granting the owner six months to complete the rehabilitation of the
property on condition that the foliowing is done by noon of Wednesday, October 3, 2001: 1) Pay
the vacant building fee, 2) Get a code compiiance inspection, 3) Post a$2,000 bond.
Resolution ordering the owner to remove or repair the property at 397 Aldine Street. If the
owner faiis to comply, Code Enforcement is ordered to remove the building.
Steve Magner reported the house has been moved to another location.
(Case is closed.)
Resolation ordering the owner to remove or repair the property at 473 Hatch Avenue. If
the owner faiis to eomply, Code Enforcement is ordered to remove the building.
(Steve Magner submitted photographs.)
Steve Magner reported this property has been condemned and vacant since November 2000.
Five summary abatement notices have been issued to cut tall grass and remove refuse. On
August 1, 2001, an inspection of the building was conducted, a iist of deficiencies which
constitute a nuisance condition was developed, and photographs were taken. An order to abate a
nuisance condition was issued on August 6 with a compliance date of August 21. As of this date,
this properiy remains in a condition which comprises a nuisance as defined by the legislative
code. The City has boazded the building against trespass. The vacant building fees aze due.
Real estate tases aze unpaid of $209038. Taxation has placed an estimated mazket value of
$6,500 on the land. Before the fire, the estimated market value of the building was $34,800. As
c� � ��
LEGISLATIVE HEARING REPORT OF SEPTEMBER 25, 2001 Page 7
of today, a code compliance inspection has not been applied for and a bond has not been posted.
The estimated cost to repair is $40,000 to $50,000; estimated cost to demolish, $6,000 to $7,000.
Mr. Magner stated the owner has tried to sell the properry with no luck due to the small size of
the structure, low ceilings, and numerous problems with the building. About a month ago, the
owner asked Mr. Magner what would happen if the City demolished the structure. Mr. Magner
ezcplained the lot would remain his property, and the cost of the demolition would be assessed on
the taxes.
Gerry Strathman recommends approval.
The meeting was adjourued at 11:02 a.m.
�
ORIGI�IAL �''�.���►- 0�-�.3,ao��
RESOLUTION
CITY OF SAINT PAUL, MINNESOTA
Presented By
Referred To
Council File # O \ — �g�
Green Sheet # rp�'3 e�.G
3�
Committee: Date
k
1 WHEREAS, Citizen Service Office, Division of Code Enforcement has requested the City Council
2 to hold public hearings to consider the advisability and necessity of ordering the repair or wrecking and
3 removal of a two-story, wood frame, stone/mortar exterior, single family, fire damaged dwelling located on
4 property hereinafter referred to as the "Subject Property" and commonly known as 2257 Hillside Avenue.
5 This property is legally described as follows, to wit:
Lot 15 and the West 112 of Lot 14, Block 43, St. Anthony Park North.
10
11
12
13
14
15
16
17
18
19
20
21
22
23
24
25
26
27
28
29
30
31
32
33
34
35
36
37
38
39
WIIEREAS, based upon the records in the Ramsey County Recorder's Office and information
obtained by Division of Code Enforcement on or before September 18, 2000, the following aze the now
known interested or responsible parties for the Subject Property: Kim & Nancy Mc Callum, 874 Hague
Avenue, St. Paul, NIN 55104; Nancy Mc Callum, c/o James Lang, 581 Grand Avenue #5, St. Paul, MN
55102; Homestead Mortgage Corp., 4105 Lexington Avenue North, Arden Hills, MN 55126; First Bank
of South Dakota Natl. Assoc., c/o Stein, Moore & Fay, P.A., 1010 Minnesota Building,
St. Paul, MN 55101
WHEREAS, Division of Code Enfarcement has served in accordance with the provisions of w
Chapter 45 of the Saint Paul Legislative Code an order identified as an"Order to Abate Nuisance °°�
Building(s)" dated October 24, 2000; and
WHEREAS, this order informed the then known interested or responsible parties that the structure .`�
located on the Subject Property is a nuisance building(s) pursuant to Chapter 45; and
WHEREAS, this order informed the interested or responsible parties that they must repair or
demolish the structure located on the Subject Property by November 27, 2000; and
WFIEREAS, the enforcement officer has posted a placard on the Subject Property declazing this
building(s) to constitute a nuisance condition; subject to demolition; and
WIIEREAS, this nuisance condition has not been corrected and Division of Code Enforcement
requested that the City Clerk schedule public hearings before the Legislative Hearing Officer of the City
Council and the Saint Paul City Council; and
WHEREAS, the interested and responsible parties have been served notice in accordance with the
provisions of Chapter 45 of the Saint Paul Legislative Code, of the time, date, place and purpose of the
public hearings; and
WfIEREAS, a hearing was held before the Legislative Hearing Officer of the Saint Paul City
Council on Tuesday, February 6, 2001 to heaz testimony and evidence, and after receiving testimony and
o � _��
g
9
10
11
12
13
14
15
16
17
18
19
20
21
22
23
24
25
26
27
28
29
30
31
32
33
34
35
36
37
38
39
40
41
42
43
44
45
46
47
48
49
50
51
52
53
WHEREAS, a hearing was held before the Legislative Hearing Officer of the Saint Paul City
Council on Tuesday, February 6, 2001 to heaz testimony and evidence, and after receiving testimony and
evidence, made the recommendation to approve the request to order the interested or responsible parties to
make the Subject Property safe and not detrimental to the public peace, health, safety and welfaze and
remove its blighting influence on the community by rehabilitating this structure in accordance with all
applicable codes and ordinances, or in the alternative by demolishing and removing the structure in
accordance with all applicable codes and ordinances. The rehabilitation or demolition of the structure to be
com leted within d a,ys after the dat of the Council Hearin - and � 1 � �� �`� +`�_ ,�,
p nnV=.ia:�jM��hn 1 �t'hi� en.�,. a�w.... �wt� �
'�S�
WHEREAS, a hearing was held before the Saint Paul City Council on Wednesday, February 2��
2001 and the testimony and evidence including the acrion taken by the Legislative Hearing Officer wa.�
considered by the Council; now therefore
�1 o,we b.� t
BE IT RESOLVED, that based upon the testnnony and evidence presented at the above reference
public hearings, the Saint Paul City Council hereby adopts the following Findings and Order concerning
the Subject Property at 2257 Hillside Avenue:
1. That the Subject Properiy comprises a nuisance condition as defined in Saint Paul
Legislative Code, Chapter 45.
2. That the costs of demolition and removal of this building(s) is estimated to exceed three
thousand dollars ($3,000.00).
3. That there now exists and has existed multiple Housing or Building code violations at the
Subject Property.
4. That an Order to Abate Nuisance Building(s) was sent to the then known responsible parties
to correct the deficiencies or to demolish and remove the building(s).
5. That the deficiencies causing this nuisance condition have not been corrected.
6. That Division of Code Enforcement has posted a placard on the Subj ect Property which
declares it to be a nuisance condition subject to demolition.
7. That this building has been routinely monitored by the Citizen Service Offices, Division of
Code Enforcement, Vacant/Nuisance Buildings.
8. That the known interested parties and owners are as previously stated in this resolution and '
that the notification requirements of Chapter 45 have been fulfilled.
��� '
The Saint Paul City Council hereby makes the following order:
The above referenced interested or responsible parties shall make the Subject Properiy safe and not
detrimental to the public peace, health, safety and welfare and remove its blighting influence on the
community by rehabilitating this structure and correcting all deficiencies as prescribed in the above
referenced Order to Abate Nuisance Building(s) in accordance with all applicable codes and
ardinances, or in the alternative by demolishing and removing the structure in accordance with all
applicable codes and oxdinances. The rehabilitation or demolition and removal of the structure
must be completed withi v�rReenfl�5}days after the date of the Council Hearing.
o�.h..r.�,r t �► e�h�� (,r 8'0�
OR1GI�lAL
2
3
4
5
6
7
10
11
12
o � -�89
2. If the above corrective action is not completed within this period of time the Citizen Service Office,
Division of Code Enforcement is hereby authorized to take whatever steps are necessary to
demolish and remove this structure, fill the site and chazge the costs incurred against the Subject
Property pursuant to the provisions of Chapter 45 of the Saint Paul Legislative Code.
3. In the event the building is to be demolished and removed by the City of Saint Paul, all personal
properry or fixtures of any kind which interfere with the demolition and removal shall be removed
from the property by the responsible parties by the end of this time penod. If all personal property
is not removed, it shall be considered to be abandoned and the City of Saint Paul shall remove and
dispose of such properiy as provided by law.
4. It is further ardered, that a copy of this resolution be mailed to the owners and interested parties in
accordance with Chapter 45 of the Saint Paul Legislative Code.
Adopted by Council: Date p� , 3T � �
Adoption Certified by Council Secretary
�y� � _.� A
Approved by Mayor: Date �B �S�
By:
Requested by Department of:
Citizen Service Office: Code Enforcement
8��,.�,�,t ��'ti`�
°�,,�,-°_
Form Approved by City Attomey
By: L . '
Approved by Mayor for Submission to Council
BY� ���y��G�
Division of Code Enforcement
.. :� .
ee ota couria�acemn er (on�rq
;dnesdav, Februarv 28, 20Q1,
TOTAL # OF SIGNATURE
����
ovizroi GREEN SHEET
c�r. ,_��
8�_�
No 102326
c,;r=_� = w
�aaww /�� (n
xwmotwrs �rnrwlrouEr /!L(./`' arvuwc
ua
eamxc
�� ❑swur�u.aaiucFSOOC wuxcw�aomKCro
� WYORI�MAilMR) ❑
:S I (CUP ALL LOCATIONS FOR SIGNATURE)
✓
City Council to pass this resolufion which will order the owner(s) to remove or repair the referenced building(s). If
the owner fails to comply with the resolution, the Citizen Service Office, Division of Code Enfoiceme�t�i,s �ered
to remove the building. The subject properiy is located at 2257 Hillside Avenue. ��s'� �?^�'�'�� A
� �� � � ���
PLANNING COMMISSION
CIB COMMI7TEE
qVIL SERVICE COMMISSION
t50NAL SERVICE CONiRACfS MUST ANSWER THE FOLLON47NG Q
Has Nis Pe«�rm erer worketl urMer a conGact tor thie departmeM'1
VES NO
� m� a�re�r� �. e� a�y emdov��
YES NO
Dces thie persoMrm possess a sldil not noimallypoeseseeC by any cutterR dty employee9
YES Ntr
Ia this persaVfirm a targeted oxndaYl � ,
� WES NO `
, This building(s) is a nuisance building(s) as defined 'an Chapter 45, and a vacant building as defined in Chapter 43 of
the Saint Paul Legislative Code. The owners, interested parties and responsible parties known to the Enforcement
Officer were given an order to repair or remove the building at 2257 Hillside Avenue by November 27, 2000, and
have failed to coxnply"with those orders.
�a�"�';�.� �s ��
The City will eliminate a nuisance.
��6� � � �9
1 � z���,
��TY A�"�"��F�E�E�'
The City will spend funds to wreck and remove this building(s). These costs will be assessed to the property,
collected as a special assessment against the properry taaces.
A nuisance condition will remain unabated in the City. This building(s) wili continue to blight the community
,p t�.�vvv - y i.i�vvv
OF SRANSACTION S
souRCE Nnicanra Hnncing Ahatamant
iNFOananoN �FxaaM. . .
CASTrttEVEtiUE8UD6ET�D(GRCLEONE� � NO
ACTNT'NUMBER ��7�1�
°1-�9
REPORT
Date: September 25, 2001
Time: 10:00 am.
Place: Room 330 City Hall
15 West Kellogg Boulevazd
LEGISLATIVE HEARING
Gerry Strathman
Legislarive Hearing Officer
Summary Abatement Order Appeal for 159& Hazel Street North.
(Laid over from 9-4-01)
Legislative Hearing Officer recommends denying the appeal.
2. Resolution ordering the owner to remove or repair the properry at 2257 Hillside Avenue.
If the owner fails to comply, Code Enforcement is ordered to remove the building.
(Laid over from 4-17-01)
Legislative Hearing Officer recommends granting the owner six months to complete the
rehabilitation of the properiy on condition that a$2,000 bond is posted by noon of
Wednesday, October 3, 2001.
3. Laid Over Summary Abatement:
JO105V Towing of abandoned vehicle at 376 Marvland Avenue East.
Legislative Hearing Officer recommends reducing the assessment to $105 pius the $45
service fee for a total assessment of $150.
4. Summary Abatement Order appeal for 697 Sunev Avenue.
I.egislative Hearing Officer recommends denying the appeal.
5. Resolntion Qrdering the owner to remove or repair Yhe property at 850 Sims Avenue. If
#he owner fails to comply, Code Enforcement is ordered to remove the building.
Legislative Hearing Officer recommends laying over to the October 16, 2001, Legislative
Hearing.
6. Resolution ordering the owner to remove or repair the property at 715 Preble Street. If
the owner fails to comply, Code Enforcement is ordered to remove the building.
Legislative Hearing Officer recommends granting the owner sis months to complete the
rehabilitation of the properiy on condition that the following is done by noon of
Wednesday, October 3, 2001: 1) Pay the vacant building fee, 2) Get a code compliance
inspecrion, 3) Post a$2,000 bond.
O�-Ur1
LEGISLATIVE HEARING REPORT OF SEPTEMBER 25, 2001 Page 2
7. Resolution ordering the owner to remove or repair the properry at 39'7 Aldine Street. If
the owner fails to comply, Code Enforcement is ordered to remove the building.
(Case is closed.)
8. Resolution ordering the owner to remove or repair the properry at.473 Hatch Avenue. If
the owner fails to comply, Code Enforcement is ordered to remove the building.
Legislarive Aearing Officer recommends approval.
0
a1-lr�
LEGISLATIVE HEARING MINUTES OF APRIL 17, 2001
Page 4
yj Resolution ordering the owner to remove or repair the bnilding at 2257 Hillside Avenue. If
'y� the owner faiLs to comply with the resolution, Code Enforcement is ordered to remove the
building.
(Laid over from 2-13-01)
(Photographs were presented and later returned.)
Jennifer Benzel, U.S. Bank National Association, appeazed. Ms. Benzel stated there was a
foreclosure sale on 3-2-01. The properiy owners filed an affidavit saying the property was not
abandoned. The owners have a full redemption rights of six months before U.S. Bank can do
anything with the property. If the properry is not redeemed, U.S. Bank will continue forwazd
with theu plan, which is to get the properry mazketed and sold. They have people interested in
the property.
Gerry Strathman stated the property has an abandoned look to it. He asked did the owners say
what they intended to do with the building. Ms. Benzel responded the3r attorney filed an
affidavit essentially saying it was not abandoned.
Steve Magner stated he was surprised that the mortgagee filed that affidavit. The property has
been negiected for a long time. Prior to the mortgage company taking caze of the outside of the
property, the City had to do it. Mr. Magner does not see the benefit of giving the owner more
leeway. The property is in dire straits. Ms. Benzel responded U.S. Bank will continue to take
caze of the pmperty. The redemption period will end 9-2-01. They aze bound by law.
Mr. Strathman stated he wanted to be clear on the maintenance of the exterior. Ms. Benzel
responded U. S. bank has secured the building, taken caze of the sidewalks, and will be taking
caze of the lawn throughout the summer.
Gerry Strathman recommends laying over to the September 18, 2001, Legislative Hearing on
condition that the exterior of the building is maintained.
Resotution ordering the owner to remove or repair the building at 964 Woodbridge Street.
If the owner fails to comply with the resolufion, Code �nforcement is ordered to remove
the building.
(Laid over from 2-20-01)
(Steve Magner presented photographs.)
Steve Magner reported the last time this was laid over was for the closing of a sale. The new
owner is required to post a bond and will be granted 180 days to complete rehabilitation of this
properry.
Yee Fang appeazed and stated he talked to Mr. Magner yesterday.
Gerry Strathman recommends granting the owner six months to complete rehabilitation of the
MINUTES OF Tf� LEGISLATIVE HEARING fl �' , �9
Tuesday, April 17, 2001
Room 330 Courthouse
Gerry Strathman, Legislative Hearing Officer
STAFF PRESENT: John Betz, Code Enforcement; Steve Magner, Code Enforcement
The meeting was called to order at 10:02 am.
Laid over summary abatements from the City Council Meeting of Apri14, 2001
File JO1L0 Boarding-up of vacant buildings at the following addresses: 136 Wilder
Street,1197 Ross Avenue,1165 Hudson Road
Abandoned vehicle at the following address: 615 Charles Avenue
Property Clean-up at the following addresses: 1835 St. Clair Avenue, 707
Jessamine Avenue East
136 Wilder SYreetNorth (JOIBDUP)
James Fitzpatrick, owner, stated he is being chazged with boazding up a garage door. He had
some personal injuries, which delayed him closing up the garage. Also, it took a week to get a
gazage door ordered and installed.
Steve Magner reported he issued a summary abatement order on 8-31-00 to secure the garage.
On 9-7-00, one window was boazded, but the vacant building placards were torn down. The
work order was sent on 9-13-00 about a wide open vehicle door, attached garage. There was no
response from the owner. On 12-9-00, the garage was still open. The inspector tried to contact
the property owner and left a detailed message.
(Mr. Magner showed a photograph.)
Gerry Strathman stated the owaer had a couple of weeks to make the repair and staff attempted to
contact him. It is uncleaz why the repair was not made. Mr. Fitzpatrick responded he was
injured while doing the work, which delayed it. Also, he had no problem with the door. Mr.
Strathman explained that the City code requires that all buildings be secured and access restricted
to prevent them &om being an attracrive nuisance for children, vagrants, criminals, etc.
Gerry Strathman recommends approval of the assessment.
1197 Ross Avenue (701BDUP)
Mazk Boeltl, owner, appeazed and stated he had an arson on his garage on 10-30-00. The Fire
Department got done about 2:00 a.m. and said they had to secure the building. It was boazded ai
about 4:00 a.m. He found out later he was chazged to secure the building. If he had known this,
he would have gotten his own wood.
�p� . \t�1
LEGISLATIVE HEARING MINiJTES OF APRIL 17, 2�01
Page 2
Gerry Strathman asked why the insurance would not pay for it. Mr. BoelU responded they paid
for the contents of the garage. They paid $8300 and it cost $8800 to rebuild it. Also, there aze
not many people roaming the streets at 230 am. Mr. Strathman responded the Fire Department
has orders not to leave the property unsecured because the City is liable if something happens.
Mr. Boeld responded he has seen garages open. Steve Magner stated the Fire Department will
not leave a scene without securing it, particulazly an arson, becausa it is technically a crime
scene.
Mr. Strathman asked about the number of boazds. Mr. Magner responded there were nine boards
and a secure. The cost reflects what the contractor did. Mr. Strathman e�cplained that annually
the City puts out an RFP (Request for Proposal) for people who want to do these emergency
boardings.
BoelU questioned the cost, which is $745. Mr. Magner responded the cost includes the
following: nine boards at $50 a piece, securing one door, the trip chazge of $200, and $45
service fee.
Gerry Strathman recommends approval of the assessment.
1165 Hudson Road (JOIBDUP)
(Note: 1165 Hudson has two swnmary abatements. 301 SiJM has already been ratified by the
City Council. The secretary made a mistake, and it should have been laid over. Both
assessments will be discussed here.)
Cserald Frisch, 2350 W. '7"' Street, owner, appeared and stated he is a developer and attorney. He
is the owner of this property and is in partnership with the City of St. Paut PED (Planning and
Economic Development). He is preparing to go before the Metropolitan Planning Commission
for money to clean up the site, which has been vacant for a year. He has worked with
Councilmember Lanhy's office, Brian Sweeney (PED), Sheryl Pemberton (PED), the
neighborhood, and the district council. Mr. Frisch has a contract for someone to clean up the
property. Mr. Frisch has cooperated with the City to have snow dumped there ttus yeaz. He does
not think he should have tlus assessment because he has no knowledge of this work being done
by the City. Whenever he received notices, it is taken caze of. If this is something that slipped
thcough the cracks, he should not haue a further assessment. He is in the process of arranging for
the demolition of this building and the construction of senior housing.
Gerry Strathman stated orders were sent on August 11, 20, and September 5. Mr. Frisch
responded that each time, the probiem has been cleazed. Dumping is done there all the time. He
has spent about $5,000 last yeaz in removing debris that other peopie have brought onto the
P�Pert3'•
Steve Magner stated there is a dumping problem there. There was a sununary abatement issued
on 9-5-00 to cut the grass and secure the building. The grass was cut, but the building was still
open to access. Code Enforcement hied to contact the owner. Mr. Frisch never sent back the
vacant building registration form or the $20 vacant building fee. Code Enforcement just has the
o�� 1d�9
LEGISLATIVE HEARING MINUTES OF APRIL 17, 2001
Page 3
company name and could not find the phone number; therefore, the inspectoi could not speak to
anyone verbally. The clean up was $18.98 plus the $45 in;�rrattve charges.
(A videotape was shown)
Mr. Frisch stated there is no doubt that new debris was delivered there, but nothing shows it was
there for an extended period of time. He is paying $22,000 in taaces, has undertaken a major
renovation in Saint Paul, and is entifled to certain consideration by the City.
Gerry Strathman recommends approval of the assessment. Notice was given and the work was
done. Mr. Magner stated he has talked to Mr. Frisch a number of times about this issue. The
parties that are opening lris mail should fill out the vacant building registration form properly,
and then Code Enforcement would have documentation of phone numbers so that someone could
be called to avoid future assessments.
615 Chazles Avenue (JO101 V)
(No one appeared to represent the property.)
Gerry Strathman recommends approval of the assessment.
1835 St. Clair Avenue (JOISUM)
(I3o one appeared to represent the properry.)
Gerry Suathman recommends approval of the assessment.
707 Jessamine Avenue East (JOiSUM)
Va Yang, owner, appeazed and stated he did not receive notice. The couch and refrigerator had
only been there for a few days.
John Betz reported a notice was mailed on 10-18-00 for rubbish, discazded furnilure, and
appliances in yazd to be removed by 10-24-00. Mr. Yang responded he cleans the yazd every
week.
(A videotape was shown.)
Gerry Strathman recommends approvai of the assessment. A notice was sent by U.S. Mail,
which is considered delivery by law. It is unlmown why Mr. Yang did not receive it. The City
did the work.
O�-\��
LEGISLATIVE HEARING MINUTES OF APRIL 17, 2001
�
Resolution ordering the owner to remove or repair the building at 2257 Hillside Avenue. If
the owner fails to comply with the resolntion, Code Enforcement is ordered to remove the
building.
(Laid over from 2-13-01)
(Photographs were presented and later returned.)
Jennifer Benzel, U.S. Bank National Association, appeazed. Ms. Benzel stated there was a
foreclosure sale on 3-2-01. The properry owners filed an affidavit saying the properry was not
abandoned. The owners have a full redemption rights of siY months before U.S. Bank can do
anything with the property. If the property is not redeemed, U.S. Bank will continue forwazd
with their plan, which is to get the properry mazketed and sold. They have people interested in
the property.
Gerry Strathman stated the property has an abandoned look to it. He asked did the owners say
what they intended to do with the buiiding. Ms. Benzel responded their attorney filed an
affidavit essenrially saying it was not abandoned.
Steve Magner stated he was surprised that the mortgagee filed that affidavit. The property has
been neglected for a long time. Prior to the mortgage company taking care of the outside of the
property, the City had to do it. Mr. Magner does not see the benefit of giving the owner more
leeway. The property is in dire straits. Ms. Benzel responded I3.S. Bank will continue to take
caze of the properry. The redemption period will end 9-2-01. They are bound by law.
Mr. Strathman stated he wanted to be clear on the maintenance of the eatterior. Ms. Benzel
responded U.S. bank has secured the building, taken caze of the sidewalks, and will be taking
care of the lawn throughout the summer.
Gerry Strathman recommends laying over to the September 18, 2001, Legislative Hearing on
condition that the ea�terior of the building is maintained.
Resolution ordering the owner to remove or repair the building at 964 WoodbridPe Street.
If the owner fails to comply with the resolution, Code Enforcement is ordered to remove
the building.
(Laid over from 2-20-01)
(Steve Magner presented photographs.)
Steve Magner reported the last time tlus was laid over was for the closing of a sa1e. The new
owner is required to post a bond and will be granted 180 days to complete rehabilitafion of this
property.
Yee Fang appeared and stated he talked to Mr. Magner yesterday.
Gerry Strathman recommends granting the owner six months to complete rehabilitation of the
LEGISLATIVE HEARING MINUTES OF APRIL 17, 2001
Summary Abatements:
J0102A
J0102V
JOlO1B
SSWREPAIR
a�-i�
Page 6
Property clean-np during Jannary 2001 and part of February 2001.
Towing of abandoned velucles from private property during October and
November 2000. Additional properties to be assessed are: 873 Marion
Street, towed November 1999; $10 Sherburne Conwav, 2052
Fairmount towed January 2000; 1148 Minnehaha, towed March 2000; 45
Winona and 1037 Payne, towed April 2000.
Boarding np of vacant properties during November and December 2000.
Sanitary sewer service repairs
927 Hudson Road (J0102A)
(The owner appeared for the properry; however, Code Enforcement had not received the green
cazd indicating this address would be appealed.)
Gerry Strathman recommends laying over to the May 15, 2001, Legislarive Hearing.
915 Agate Street (J0102V}
(No one appeared to represent the progerty.)
John Betz reported there seemed to be confusion at the Impound Lot; this assessment may not be
warranted. He suggested a layover.
Gerry Strathman recommends laying over to the May 15, 2001, Legislative Hearing.
1787 Ames Avenue (SSWREPAIR)
(No one appeared to represent the property, and the appeal was denied. However, the owner
called Mr. Strathman after the meeting and requested that she be heazd at another legislative
hearing. Therefore, Mr. S�attuuan changed his recommendation.)
Gerry Strathman recommends laying over to the May 15, 2001, Legislative Hearing.
416 Charles Avenue (J0102A)
(No one appeazed to represent this properry.)
Gerry Strathman recommends laying over to the May 15, 2001, Legislative Hearing.
958 Marvland Avenue East (J0102A)
Thomas and Lola Alvazado, owners, appeared. Ms. Alvarado stated they never received a notice.
She tlunks the items aze from the neighbors. She does not haue access to that side of the gazage
LEGISLATIVE HEARING MINUTES OF APRIL 17, 2001
where this cleanup was done.
(A videotape was shown.)
o\-t�9
Page 7
Mr. Alvarado stated tUat is not his properly. If he had received notice, he would have cleaned it.
They have no tires in their garage.
(Mr. Betz showed a photograph.)
After viewing the photograph, Gerry Strathman stated the trash is right against the garage. Mr.
Alvarado responded he did not know that was their properry. Ms. Alvarado stated she had a
realtor look at the site and she was told that is their properry line; however, that is not their
gazbage. She does not have access to that side of the garage. The next door neighbors enter that
side and pazk there. The Alvarados aze on the other side of the garage. They drive a 1999
vehicle and would have no business with six tires on that side of the gazage. The neighbors
continue to dump gazbage. The Alvarados installed a temporary fencing.
Mr. Strathman asked did they receive notice. Ms. Alvazado responded no and she is home
everyday and gets the mail everyday.
John Betz reported there was a problem with ownership information received from Ramsey
County for about two months. The notice was sent to the Hudsons. Ms. Alvazado responded that
is who the house was purchased from.
Gerry Strathman recommends deleting the assessment because of a notification problem. He
wamed the owners that they aze responsible for what is on their property whether it is their
garage or not. Ms. Alvarado stated they plan to install a privacy fence.
754 Minnehaha Avenue West (SSWREPAIR)
Cameron Lepisto, owner, appeazed and stated he had sewer problems. He received a notice to
get it repaired, which he did. Within a week, he got a notice that more sewer work needed to be
done on the second half. He would like any duplication of charges to be taken off his
assessment.
John Betz reported that there was a break in the sewer line discovered by the Sewer Division of
Pubiic Works. Someone contacted Code Enforcement to have the work done so it could be
billed as an assessment. The contractor went to Public Works and was told the break was in the
middle of the street and the service to the property had fallen offthe main sewer system. The
contractor completed the work. As he was getting in his truck, he found mdent holes in the
boulevard. Unbeknownst to him, the building is serviced by two separate lines. He proceeded to
repair it.
Mr. Betz called the contractor and asked him if he could have done it all at one time and how
much were the dupiication costs. The contractor stated it would have been between $200 to $300
LEGISLATIVE HEARING MIIIUTES OF APRIL 17, 2001
o�- �1
Page 8
to bring all the equipment back again. The Sewer Division informed the contractor there was one
sewer line going to the building when actually there was two. The contractor could have done
them both at the same time.
Gerry Strathman recommends reducing the assessment by $300 for a total assessment of
$6,825.Q2.
1027 Pazk Street (J0102A)
(No one appeared to represent the property.)
Gerry Strathman recommends approval of the assessment.
1037 Pavne Street (J0102V)
(No one appeazed to represent the property.)
Legislative Hearing Officer recommends approval of the assessment.
596 Portland Avenue (30102A)
Raymond Heichel, ovmer, appeazed and stated he purchased a refrigerator at Twin City
Appliance. They were to pick up the old refrigerator, but they could not do it that day. If Mr.
Heichel had been given a notice, he would have taken the refrigerator to them.
7ohn Betz reported his office issued a notice on 12-28-00 to discazd a refrigerator, doors, rubbish
with a compliance date of 1-4-01. The City removed the refrigerator on 1-10-01. An inspector
knocked on the door and xeceived no answer. (Mr. Betz showed Mr. Heichel a copy of the
notice.)
Mr. Heichel stated sometimes his mail goes to another address, and the mail is not brought back.
He asked that this assessment be waived. Mr. Strathman responded that he could not do that
because his records show that the notice was sent.
Mr. Betz asked does he lives at 596 Portland. Mr. Heichel responded he does, but sometimes he
is not there. Mr. Strathman asked was he gone during Cluistmas. Mr. Heichel responded yes.
Gerry Strathman recommends approval of the assessment. Notification was sent and the work
was done. Legai requirement is to send it by U.S. mail.
675 Sherburne Avenue (J0102A)
(No one appeazed to represent the properry.)
LEGISLATIVE HEARING MINUTES OF APRIL 17, 2001
Gerry Strathman recommends approval of the assessment.
730 Sherburne Avenue
(Note: this address was levied on 4-4-01.)
(I3o one appeazed to represent the property.)
Gerry Strathman recommends approvai of the assessment.
687 Western Avenue North (70102�
o, _ �r�
Page 9
Anthony Oji, owner, appeazed and stated he cannot get a title on the vehicle. The caz was taken
away from the pazking lot and then he was told to come here.
John Betz reported there were no current plates on the vehicle. The City considers a vehicle
abandoned if the plates aze more than 40 days old and the vehicle is inoperable, unsecured. If
they aze in these conditions, the velucle has to be kept in a gazage. On 10-7-00, an inspector
found three vehicles and none had plates. Notice was sent to Mr. Oji to bring it into compliance,
remove them, or garage them by 10-21-00. The inspector was back on 10-23-00 and one vehicle
remained. The inspector tried to call Mr. Oji, but the phone system would not accept
unidentified calls, which come out of the police facility. A work order was sent to the Police
Department, and they impounded the vehicle.
Mr. Strathman asked how long did he have the caz before it was towed. Mr. Oji responded since
August 8. Mr. Strathman stated it was three months waiting for repair. Under the City's law,
vehicles cannot be stored outdoors.
Mr. Betz stated he is not aware of what happens when a vehicle is purchased from the Impound
Lot. He asked was there any temporary licensing situation. (Mr. Betz looked at the paperwork
provided by Mr. Oji.)
Gerry Strathivan recommends reducing the assessment from $637.10 to $400.00 plus the $45.00
service fee for a total assessment of $445.00. The owner was notified properly and the vehicle
was improperly stored; however, the vehicle charge is too high.
336 Lafond Avenue (J0102A)
Edgaz Poland and his daughter appeazed. The daughter stated there was a fire on a Saturday
afternoon. She heard the fire hvcks, realized it was her father's house, and went to the house.
She told the firemen she would boazd the properiy. When she got back, the house was already
boarded. She did not think much about it because her father was having open heart surgery at the
time. The firemen threw out some debris onto the sidewalk. When she got there Monday
morning, the debris was gone and there was a bill on one of the windows. She is protesting that
she was there at the scene, was willing to do the work, the work was done without her
a�_��y
LEGISLATIVE HEARING MINIJTES OF APRIL 17, 2001 Page 10
knowledge, aud the bill was for over $900. Steve Magner reported the boazd up is not on the
agenda today; the only item on the agenda today is the cleanup for $334.
Steve Magner reported the fire occurred on 2-3-01. There was debris all over the sidewatk. It
was a hazard because of the items that were used to put out the fire. Code Enforcement tried to
contact the owner, but were unable to reach him. An emergency summary abatement was issued
to clean up the sidewalk. Mr. Magner posted a copy on the door at 12:45 p.m. indicating the
action would be taken. Parks and Recreation went out that afternoon to do the cleanup. The
work was done on 2-5-01.
Gerry Strathman recommends approval of the assessment. The actions the City took were
reasonable and appropriate under the circumstances.
543 Van Buren Avenue (JOl O1B)
(No one appeazed to represent the property.)
Gerry Strathman recommends approval of the assessment.
609 Smith Avenue South (JOlO1B)
(No one appeared.to represent the property.)
Gerry Strathman recommends approval of the assessment.
675 Portiand Avenue (JOlO1B)
Lois Casey, owner, appeared and stated she was awakened about her garage being on fue. She
toid the Fire ➢epartmeut that she would lock up the gazage. The gazage was boazded the ne�
morning without her consent. Used wood was put on the gazage, it was put on at an angle, and is
not covering the entire hole. Gerry Strathman responded the wood is trivial. The real charge is
for the contractor coming out in the middle of the night.
Ms. Casey stated her insurance company said they would pay the fee. Mr. Magner responded
most insurance companies pick up the cost of securing the property to stop further degradazion.
Gerry Strathman recommends approval of the assessment.
Resolution ordering the owner to remove or repair the property at 1236 Seventh Street
East. If the owner fails to comply with the order, Code Enforcement is ordered to remove
the building.
(Steve Magner presented photographs.)
Robert and Mazlyn Weber, owners, appeazed.
�+-�t1
LEGISLATIVE HEARING MTNUTES OF APRIL 17, 2001 Page 11
Steve Magner reported the certificate of occupancy was revoked in 1995. Seven summary
abatement notices have been issued to remove vehicles, cut grass, remove tires, secure building,
remove snow. On 1-31-01, an inspection of the building was conducted, a list of deficiencies
which constitute a nuisance conditions was developed, and photographs were taken. Vacant
building fees have ben paid. Real estate taYes are unpaid in the amount of $2,564. Taxation has
placed an estimated mazket value of $74,800 on this property. As of 4-17-01, a code compliance
inspection has not been applied for, and a$2,000 bond has not bene posted. The cost to repair is
estimated at $80,000 to $100, 000; cost to demolish, $16,000 to $18,000.
Ms. Weber stated she is looking for an e�rtension of time because they aze planning to sell the
property. If things were posted, sometimes they are taken off of the building. The first letter they
received was in February and forwarded to them in Alabama. It got there four days after the
inspecfion. She wrote a letter on 2-21-01 to inform the City that she would like this matter put
on hold until they return on Apri14. She received a letter delivered by hand about this hearing.
She didn't see anything posted on the building. She would like some rime to contact the realtor
and to get some idea of the value. It is a sound building. They were womed about the roof
caving in during the winter, but it didn't.
Gerry Strathman asked how long it would take to sell this building. Ms. Weber stated she did not
know. Mr. Weber responded three months.
Mr. Magner reported there were a number of complaints about this property over the years. `The
certificate of occupancy was revoked in 1995 by the Fire Department for failure to bring the
building into compliance, which means the building cannot be used for any form of occupancy.
Code Enforcement mailed out a vacant building registration notice. Mr. Magner had a
conversation with the owners on 5-24-00. At that time, they wanted to sell the building and to
figure out what they needed to do. Mr. Magner stated he would hold off enforcement of the
vacant building fees for 90 days provided they fill out the vacant building notice. At the end of
the 90 days, the understanding was the owners were to submit a plan for the structure. Finally,
they paid the fees on 7-28-00. At that time, they said they would sell as is. Mr. Magner does not
see any cooperation from the owners.
Ms. Weber asked about the cars. Mr. Strathman responded that is not before him today. Today,
we aze talking about whether the City wili order the building removed. If the City proceeds with
this action, the City will demolish the properiy, and the owners will have a vacant lot and a bill.
Ms. Weber stated she would like eatra time to sell the property. Mr. 5trathman responded this
has gone on for a long time. He will allow 60 days.
Gerry Strathman recommends laying over to the June 19, 2001, Legislafive Hearing.
Appeal of Summary Abatement Order for 775 Ashland Avenue.
Dr. 7ames Shelton, owner, appeazed and stated he had a gazage that went down because of the
ice. He has insurance, a claim number, an adjuster. He is suppose to have a check coming in the
MINUTES OF TE� LEGISLATIVE HEARING
Tuesday, September 25, 2001
Gerry Strathman, Legislative Hearing Officer
Room 330 Courthouse
The meeting was called to order at 10:04 a.m.
o�-���
��.
STAFF PRESENT: Roxanna Flink, Real Estate; Steve Magner, Code Enforcement; Hazold
Robinson, Code Enforcement;
Snmmary Abatement Order Appeal for 1598 Hazel Street North. (Laid over from 9-4-01)
Gerry Strathman stated that the appellant was going to consult with City staff and others as to
whether the garden was consistent with the City's ordinance with respect to natural gazdens,
prairie growth, etc. He asked did the owner have time to do that.
Walt Montpetit, owner, appeared and stated a City representative called him last Friday and left a
voice mail. He was out of town and just returned Sunday evening. He has not had a chance to
have a conversation with City inspectors as far as what was a landscape design versus weeds and
tall grass.
Aarold Robinson reparted he could not find a specific ordinance to cover these things. The
ordinance does read grass and weeds over 8 inches high must be cut. There are some specific
plants and landscape designs that aze excluded from this. It is not composting because it is not a
contained area. It is not covered under the grass and weed ordinance because it is tall grass that
has been allowed to grow. He cannot exempt it.
Mr. Strathman asked is there someone in the City that knows plants well enough to make a
determination as ta if these plants aze accepted under state law. Mr. Robinson responded he has
been on the properry, and it is basically tall grass and weeds.
Mr. StraUunan asked what makes the owner think it is something other than tall grass and weeds.
Mr. Montpetit responded the area is set aside from the rest of the yard. He looks at it as part of
his landscape scheme. It is a wooded lot adjacent to the rest of the lot that is groomed, even
though iY is a small azea. He does not know anyone who cuts weeds and tall grass out of a
wooded iot. �-Ie asked is ius yard designaied as a yard or as a wooded lot. Mr. Robinson
responded that specificaliy a wooded lot has tv have a 3r�, and this backyazd does not have a
tree. Mr. Montpetit responded there are trees back in the comer. Mr. Robinson stated this
properiy is defmitely not a wooded lot.
From the description he included with his appeal, stated Mr. Strathman, there is a map that shows
the nature gazden is behind the gazage and surrounded by a six foot privacy fence. He asked how
this came to the City's attention. Mr. Robinson responded it was a complaint based inspection.
Mr. Montpetit stated he belongs to the yacht club and a member complained to the City about
weeds and tall grass on Harriet Island. This member was told it was part of the landscape scene.
C> �- \��
LEGISLATIVE HEARING MINUTES FOR SEPTEMBER 25, 2001 page 2
It is no different than his weeds and tall grass, said Mr. Montpetit. He does not know what
species needs to be cut and which species he can plant to conform.
(Mr. Robinson gave Mr. Montpe6t documents about a company that specializes in this subject.)
Gerry Strathman recommends denying the appeal. It does not appeaz that what Mr. Montpetit
wants to do is provided for under the City ordinance.
� Resolution ordering the owaer to remove or repair the property at 2257 Hillside Avenue.
If the owner fails to comply, Code Enforcement is ordered to remove the building.
(Laid over from 417-01)
The foliowing appeazed: Kim McCallum, 929 Selby Avenue, and Steve Gibbs, Western
National, 41 12th Avenue North, Hopkins.
Steve Magner reported this building has been vacant since December 3, 1999. There ha�e been
five sununary abatement notices to secure the dwelling, cut tall grass, remove refuse, remove
snow andior ice. On October 19, 2000, an inspection of the building was conducted, a list of
deficiencies which constitute a nuisance condition was developed, and photographs were taken.
An order to abate a nuisance buiiding was issued on October 24, 2000, with a compliance date of
November 27. As of this date, the properiy remains in a condition which comprises a nuisance as
defined by the legisla6ve code. The real estates tases aze unpaid of $6,333. Taxation has placed
an estimated mazket value of $56,600 on the land, and $5,000 on the building. On July 25, 2001,
a code compliance inspection was done. A$2,000 bond has not been posted. Estimated cost to
repair is $100,000 to $150,000; estimated cost to demolish, $12,000 to $15,000.
This was originally before the Legislative Hearing Officer in Mazch, said Mr. Magner. It was
laid over because the second mortgage company was going through a foreclosure process, wanted
to clear the ti#le, pay off the insurauce company, and then sell it. The second mortgage company
has been paid off and is na Tonger involved with Ihis properry. The original owner has physical
control of the buiiding, but there is sdll an issue with the insurance company for the first
mortgage company.
Mr. McCallum stated he plans to take the ne�ct week and decide to sell the properry, rehabilitate
it, or teaz it down and rebuild. As of yesterday, there was a settlement.
Mr. Gibbs stated Westem National will be satisfied with the agreement. They are now in the
middle of foreclosure on the property. They will be out of the pieture when that happens and the
McCallums can take whatever action they would like.
Mr. Strathman asked is he prepazed to post the $2,000 bond. Mr. McCallum responded he is.
Gerry Strathman recommends granting the owner six months to complete the rehabilitation of the
property on condition that a$2,000 bond is posted by noon of Wednesday, October 3, 2001.
LEGISLATIVE HEARING MINUTES FOR SEPTEMBER 25, 2001
o` ��
Page 6
cannot get the code compliance issues done until the fire damage is cleaned up to see what she is
left with, but she cannot get the fire damage taken caze of until she gets the code compliance
issues taken care of.
Mr. Strathman asked was she aware that the repair cost may be between $50,000 to $60,000.
Ms. Davis responded over half the list has been fixed. VJith the fire damage, there is additional
work to be done. The mortgage company is holding $30,000.
Mr. Strathman asked is the August 3, 2000, code compliance inspection an accurate
representation of what needs to be done. Mr. Magner responded Don Wagner (License,
Inspections, Environmental Protection) would have to go through the building and make a
determination as to what has to be completed, was it done under permit, and can it be signed off.
If not, it has to be done under permit. Most likely, Mr. Wagner will not give a code compliance
certificate without including the fire damage items.
Another code compliance inspecUOn is needed, asked Mr. Strathman. Mr. Magner responded
vacant building fees need to be paid, a code compliance inspecrion completed, and a bond needs
to be posted. Also, the building should be unoccupied and secwed.
Gerry Strathman recommends granting the owner six months to complete the rehabilitation of the
property on condition that the foliowing is done by noon of Wednesday, October 3, 2001: 1) Pay
the vacant building fee, 2) Get a code compiiance inspection, 3) Post a$2,000 bond.
Resolution ordering the owner to remove or repair the property at 397 Aldine Street. If the
owner faiis to comply, Code Enforcement is ordered to remove the building.
Steve Magner reported the house has been moved to another location.
(Case is closed.)
Resolation ordering the owner to remove or repair the property at 473 Hatch Avenue. If
the owner faiis to eomply, Code Enforcement is ordered to remove the building.
(Steve Magner submitted photographs.)
Steve Magner reported this property has been condemned and vacant since November 2000.
Five summary abatement notices have been issued to cut tall grass and remove refuse. On
August 1, 2001, an inspection of the building was conducted, a iist of deficiencies which
constitute a nuisance condition was developed, and photographs were taken. An order to abate a
nuisance condition was issued on August 6 with a compliance date of August 21. As of this date,
this properiy remains in a condition which comprises a nuisance as defined by the legislative
code. The City has boazded the building against trespass. The vacant building fees aze due.
Real estate tases aze unpaid of $209038. Taxation has placed an estimated mazket value of
$6,500 on the land. Before the fire, the estimated market value of the building was $34,800. As
c� � ��
LEGISLATIVE HEARING REPORT OF SEPTEMBER 25, 2001 Page 7
of today, a code compliance inspection has not been applied for and a bond has not been posted.
The estimated cost to repair is $40,000 to $50,000; estimated cost to demolish, $6,000 to $7,000.
Mr. Magner stated the owner has tried to sell the properry with no luck due to the small size of
the structure, low ceilings, and numerous problems with the building. About a month ago, the
owner asked Mr. Magner what would happen if the City demolished the structure. Mr. Magner
ezcplained the lot would remain his property, and the cost of the demolition would be assessed on
the taxes.
Gerry Strathman recommends approval.
The meeting was adjourued at 11:02 a.m.
�