01-140OR�GI�IAL
Council File # 01. 140
Green Sheet # l06''I4C
RESOLUTION
CITY OF SAINT PAUL, MINNESOTA
Presented By
Referred to
Committee: Date
1 WI�REAS, the City of Saint Paul, Ramsey County and the Saint Paul Public Schools
2 comprise the Joint Property T� Advisory Committee(JPTAC) pursuant to M.S. 383A.75, and
a�
WIIEREAS, the State of Minnesota created a Youth Initiative (Bonding) Grant Program
4 in 1996 and continued the program in 1998 to make available funding to design, fixrnish, equip,
5 repair, replace, or construct parks and recreation buildings and school buildings to provide youth
6 in grades fourth through eighth with enrichment activities during non-school hours and that will
7 provide equal access and prograuuning for girls, and
8 WHEREAS, the membership bodies of JPTAC formed a steering committee for each
9 grant year to recommend projects to be included in the applicarion to the State of Minnesota for
10 grant funding, and
11 WHEREAS, JPTAC reviewed and approved the recommendations of the steering
12 committees and passed them on to its membership's elected bodies for review and consideration,
13 and
14 WHEREAS, in the 1996 grant program the Saint Paul City Council by its resolution 97-
15 1576 approved the Sackett Park Restaration project for $50,000 and the Martin Luther King
16 Community and Recreation Center project for $1,225,396, and
17 WHEREAS, in the 1998 grant program the Saint Paul City Council by its resolution 99-
18 632 approved the Martin Luther King Community & Recreation Center for $800,000 and by its
19 resolution 00-707 approved the Scheffer Recreation Center project for $510,609, and
20 WHEREAS, the Boys and Girls Club of the Twin Cities has declared that the Sackett
21 Park project will not be done and the $50,000 is therefore available for reallocation, and
22 WHEREAS, the additional fixnding needed for the Scheffer Recreation Center project to
23 make it a viable project has not been forthcoming, and the $510,609 is therefore available for
24 reallocation, and
25
26
WHEREAS, the State of Minnesota has given the City permission to move funds
between projects, and
S
Page 1 of 2
O���f�IAL
RESOLUTION
Presented By
Referred to
Council File # Ot�1�t0
Green Sheet #
27
28
29
30
31
32
33
34
35
36
37
38
Requested by:
of Parks and
WHEREAS, bids received for the Martin Luther King project on September 8, 2000
exceeded available funding,and
WHEREAS, the Division of Pazks and Recreation recommends reallocating funds from
the Sackett Park project and the Scheffer Recreation Center project to the Martin Luther King
project such that the Martin Luther King project can be rebid for spring 2001 conshuction,
NOW THEREFORE BE IT RESOLVED, that the Council of the City of Saint Paul
concurs with the reallocation of funds from the Sackett Park project and the Scheffer Recreation
Center project to the Martin Luther King project, and
FURTHER RESOLVED, that the City inform JPTAC of ir s decision to reallocate said
funds, and
FINALLY RESOLVED, that the necessary Capital Improvement Budget resolution shall
be prepared and presented to the CIB Committee and City Council for review and approval.
Adopted by Council : Date � � �`{ �pp,
Adoption Certified by Council Secretary
BY 1 \. _ c1- - �,,,.�'�e ,�.,_`----
� h jL � r
Approved by Mayor: Date: �J /!! Gy /
BY� � �
By �.�-- �
Form Approved by City zattorney
By: C/ � �u<
Approved by Mayor for Submission to
Counc�.
Hy � L
Page 2 of 2
CITY OF SAINT PAUL, MINNESOTA
v
DEPAFTMENT/OFFICE/COUNCIL DATEINITIATED GREEN SHEET NO. 106745
Parks and Recreation Jan 31, 2001 p� —� p
CONTACT PEFSON AND PHONE INfiIAVDATE INITIAU�ATE
Vince Gillespie 266-6408 SIGNI\`� � DEPARIMENTD�RECTOR 5 CITVCOUNCIL
NUMBEN FOR�, 2 CITY ATTORNEY F) C17Y CLERK
FOUTING
MUST BE ON COUNCIL AGENDA BV (DATEI OR�EP 3 FINANCIAL SEFVICES DIR. FINANCIAL SERVlACCTG
February fX, 2001 4 MAYOR (OR ASSISTANn ��y 7 Parks and Recreation
�
TOTAL # OF SIGNATURE PAGES � (CLIP ALL LOCATIONS FOR SIGNATURq
ACTION ftEQUESTED:
Approve resolution reallocating funds from Sackett Park and Scheffer Rec Center Youth Initiative Bonding projects to
the Martin Luther King project so that it can be rebid for spring construction.
flECOMMENDATtONS: Appmve IA) o� flejec[ iP) PERSONAL SERVSCE CONTRACTS MUST ANSWER Tfif FOLLOWING QUESTlONS:
_ PLANNING COMMISSION �. Has this person/firm ever worketl under a conttatt tor [his department? ,
CIB COMMITTEE YES NO
CIVIL SERVICE COMMISSION 2. Has this person/fitm eve� been a ci[y employe¢?
VES NO
3. Does (his person/tirm possess a skill not normally possessed by any current city employee?
- VES NO
- 4. Is [his persoNfirm a targetetl ventlor?
YES NO
Explain all yes answers on separate sheet antl attach ro grean sheet.
INITIA7ING PROBLEM ISSUE, OPPORTUNITY (Who, What When. Whe�e. Whyl ,
The original construction bid of the Martin Luther King project exceeded available funding. Additional funds are
necessary tor this project to be built. Funds are available from other projects. The Boys and Girls Club of the Twin
Cities has ended its proposed project at Sackett Park and the project at Scheffer Recreation Center does not have
adequate funds for a viable project.
ADVANTAGESIFAPPROVED -
The Martin Luther King project will be able to be bid for spring 2001 construction.
DISADVANTAGES IF APPROVED
None
DISADVANTAGES IF NOT APPROVED
The Martin Luther King project will not be able to be bid. The City would be in jeopardy of losing State funding for the
project.
TOTAL AMOVNT OF TRANSACTION S COST/REVENUE BUDGEfED (CIftCLE ONE) VES NO
FUNDING SOURCE ACTIVfTY NIIMBER O
� �JQN�v� �JG�I..�C
FINANCIAL INFOFMATION: (EXPLAIN�
Budget Resolution to follow ��p� � � ��y��
OR�GI�IAL
Council File # 01. 140
Green Sheet # l06''I4C
RESOLUTION
CITY OF SAINT PAUL, MINNESOTA
Presented By
Referred to
Committee: Date
1 WI�REAS, the City of Saint Paul, Ramsey County and the Saint Paul Public Schools
2 comprise the Joint Property T� Advisory Committee(JPTAC) pursuant to M.S. 383A.75, and
a�
WIIEREAS, the State of Minnesota created a Youth Initiative (Bonding) Grant Program
4 in 1996 and continued the program in 1998 to make available funding to design, fixrnish, equip,
5 repair, replace, or construct parks and recreation buildings and school buildings to provide youth
6 in grades fourth through eighth with enrichment activities during non-school hours and that will
7 provide equal access and prograuuning for girls, and
8 WHEREAS, the membership bodies of JPTAC formed a steering committee for each
9 grant year to recommend projects to be included in the applicarion to the State of Minnesota for
10 grant funding, and
11 WHEREAS, JPTAC reviewed and approved the recommendations of the steering
12 committees and passed them on to its membership's elected bodies for review and consideration,
13 and
14 WHEREAS, in the 1996 grant program the Saint Paul City Council by its resolution 97-
15 1576 approved the Sackett Park Restaration project for $50,000 and the Martin Luther King
16 Community and Recreation Center project for $1,225,396, and
17 WHEREAS, in the 1998 grant program the Saint Paul City Council by its resolution 99-
18 632 approved the Martin Luther King Community & Recreation Center for $800,000 and by its
19 resolution 00-707 approved the Scheffer Recreation Center project for $510,609, and
20 WHEREAS, the Boys and Girls Club of the Twin Cities has declared that the Sackett
21 Park project will not be done and the $50,000 is therefore available for reallocation, and
22 WHEREAS, the additional fixnding needed for the Scheffer Recreation Center project to
23 make it a viable project has not been forthcoming, and the $510,609 is therefore available for
24 reallocation, and
25
26
WHEREAS, the State of Minnesota has given the City permission to move funds
between projects, and
S
Page 1 of 2
O���f�IAL
RESOLUTION
Presented By
Referred to
Council File # Ot�1�t0
Green Sheet #
27
28
29
30
31
32
33
34
35
36
37
38
Requested by:
of Parks and
WHEREAS, bids received for the Martin Luther King project on September 8, 2000
exceeded available funding,and
WHEREAS, the Division of Pazks and Recreation recommends reallocating funds from
the Sackett Park project and the Scheffer Recreation Center project to the Martin Luther King
project such that the Martin Luther King project can be rebid for spring 2001 conshuction,
NOW THEREFORE BE IT RESOLVED, that the Council of the City of Saint Paul
concurs with the reallocation of funds from the Sackett Park project and the Scheffer Recreation
Center project to the Martin Luther King project, and
FURTHER RESOLVED, that the City inform JPTAC of ir s decision to reallocate said
funds, and
FINALLY RESOLVED, that the necessary Capital Improvement Budget resolution shall
be prepared and presented to the CIB Committee and City Council for review and approval.
Adopted by Council : Date � � �`{ �pp,
Adoption Certified by Council Secretary
BY 1 \. _ c1- - �,,,.�'�e ,�.,_`----
� h jL � r
Approved by Mayor: Date: �J /!! Gy /
BY� � �
By �.�-- �
Form Approved by City zattorney
By: C/ � �u<
Approved by Mayor for Submission to
Counc�.
Hy � L
Page 2 of 2
CITY OF SAINT PAUL, MINNESOTA
v
DEPAFTMENT/OFFICE/COUNCIL DATEINITIATED GREEN SHEET NO. 106745
Parks and Recreation Jan 31, 2001 p� —� p
CONTACT PEFSON AND PHONE INfiIAVDATE INITIAU�ATE
Vince Gillespie 266-6408 SIGNI\`� � DEPARIMENTD�RECTOR 5 CITVCOUNCIL
NUMBEN FOR�, 2 CITY ATTORNEY F) C17Y CLERK
FOUTING
MUST BE ON COUNCIL AGENDA BV (DATEI OR�EP 3 FINANCIAL SEFVICES DIR. FINANCIAL SERVlACCTG
February fX, 2001 4 MAYOR (OR ASSISTANn ��y 7 Parks and Recreation
�
TOTAL # OF SIGNATURE PAGES � (CLIP ALL LOCATIONS FOR SIGNATURq
ACTION ftEQUESTED:
Approve resolution reallocating funds from Sackett Park and Scheffer Rec Center Youth Initiative Bonding projects to
the Martin Luther King project so that it can be rebid for spring construction.
flECOMMENDATtONS: Appmve IA) o� flejec[ iP) PERSONAL SERVSCE CONTRACTS MUST ANSWER Tfif FOLLOWING QUESTlONS:
_ PLANNING COMMISSION �. Has this person/firm ever worketl under a conttatt tor [his department? ,
CIB COMMITTEE YES NO
CIVIL SERVICE COMMISSION 2. Has this person/fitm eve� been a ci[y employe¢?
VES NO
3. Does (his person/tirm possess a skill not normally possessed by any current city employee?
- VES NO
- 4. Is [his persoNfirm a targetetl ventlor?
YES NO
Explain all yes answers on separate sheet antl attach ro grean sheet.
INITIA7ING PROBLEM ISSUE, OPPORTUNITY (Who, What When. Whe�e. Whyl ,
The original construction bid of the Martin Luther King project exceeded available funding. Additional funds are
necessary tor this project to be built. Funds are available from other projects. The Boys and Girls Club of the Twin
Cities has ended its proposed project at Sackett Park and the project at Scheffer Recreation Center does not have
adequate funds for a viable project.
ADVANTAGESIFAPPROVED -
The Martin Luther King project will be able to be bid for spring 2001 construction.
DISADVANTAGES IF APPROVED
None
DISADVANTAGES IF NOT APPROVED
The Martin Luther King project will not be able to be bid. The City would be in jeopardy of losing State funding for the
project.
TOTAL AMOVNT OF TRANSACTION S COST/REVENUE BUDGEfED (CIftCLE ONE) VES NO
FUNDING SOURCE ACTIVfTY NIIMBER O
� �JQN�v� �JG�I..�C
FINANCIAL INFOFMATION: (EXPLAIN�
Budget Resolution to follow ��p� � � ��y��
OR�GI�IAL
Council File # 01. 140
Green Sheet # l06''I4C
RESOLUTION
CITY OF SAINT PAUL, MINNESOTA
Presented By
Referred to
Committee: Date
1 WI�REAS, the City of Saint Paul, Ramsey County and the Saint Paul Public Schools
2 comprise the Joint Property T� Advisory Committee(JPTAC) pursuant to M.S. 383A.75, and
a�
WIIEREAS, the State of Minnesota created a Youth Initiative (Bonding) Grant Program
4 in 1996 and continued the program in 1998 to make available funding to design, fixrnish, equip,
5 repair, replace, or construct parks and recreation buildings and school buildings to provide youth
6 in grades fourth through eighth with enrichment activities during non-school hours and that will
7 provide equal access and prograuuning for girls, and
8 WHEREAS, the membership bodies of JPTAC formed a steering committee for each
9 grant year to recommend projects to be included in the applicarion to the State of Minnesota for
10 grant funding, and
11 WHEREAS, JPTAC reviewed and approved the recommendations of the steering
12 committees and passed them on to its membership's elected bodies for review and consideration,
13 and
14 WHEREAS, in the 1996 grant program the Saint Paul City Council by its resolution 97-
15 1576 approved the Sackett Park Restaration project for $50,000 and the Martin Luther King
16 Community and Recreation Center project for $1,225,396, and
17 WHEREAS, in the 1998 grant program the Saint Paul City Council by its resolution 99-
18 632 approved the Martin Luther King Community & Recreation Center for $800,000 and by its
19 resolution 00-707 approved the Scheffer Recreation Center project for $510,609, and
20 WHEREAS, the Boys and Girls Club of the Twin Cities has declared that the Sackett
21 Park project will not be done and the $50,000 is therefore available for reallocation, and
22 WHEREAS, the additional fixnding needed for the Scheffer Recreation Center project to
23 make it a viable project has not been forthcoming, and the $510,609 is therefore available for
24 reallocation, and
25
26
WHEREAS, the State of Minnesota has given the City permission to move funds
between projects, and
S
Page 1 of 2
O���f�IAL
RESOLUTION
Presented By
Referred to
Council File # Ot�1�t0
Green Sheet #
27
28
29
30
31
32
33
34
35
36
37
38
Requested by:
of Parks and
WHEREAS, bids received for the Martin Luther King project on September 8, 2000
exceeded available funding,and
WHEREAS, the Division of Pazks and Recreation recommends reallocating funds from
the Sackett Park project and the Scheffer Recreation Center project to the Martin Luther King
project such that the Martin Luther King project can be rebid for spring 2001 conshuction,
NOW THEREFORE BE IT RESOLVED, that the Council of the City of Saint Paul
concurs with the reallocation of funds from the Sackett Park project and the Scheffer Recreation
Center project to the Martin Luther King project, and
FURTHER RESOLVED, that the City inform JPTAC of ir s decision to reallocate said
funds, and
FINALLY RESOLVED, that the necessary Capital Improvement Budget resolution shall
be prepared and presented to the CIB Committee and City Council for review and approval.
Adopted by Council : Date � � �`{ �pp,
Adoption Certified by Council Secretary
BY 1 \. _ c1- - �,,,.�'�e ,�.,_`----
� h jL � r
Approved by Mayor: Date: �J /!! Gy /
BY� � �
By �.�-- �
Form Approved by City zattorney
By: C/ � �u<
Approved by Mayor for Submission to
Counc�.
Hy � L
Page 2 of 2
CITY OF SAINT PAUL, MINNESOTA
v
DEPAFTMENT/OFFICE/COUNCIL DATEINITIATED GREEN SHEET NO. 106745
Parks and Recreation Jan 31, 2001 p� —� p
CONTACT PEFSON AND PHONE INfiIAVDATE INITIAU�ATE
Vince Gillespie 266-6408 SIGNI\`� � DEPARIMENTD�RECTOR 5 CITVCOUNCIL
NUMBEN FOR�, 2 CITY ATTORNEY F) C17Y CLERK
FOUTING
MUST BE ON COUNCIL AGENDA BV (DATEI OR�EP 3 FINANCIAL SEFVICES DIR. FINANCIAL SERVlACCTG
February fX, 2001 4 MAYOR (OR ASSISTANn ��y 7 Parks and Recreation
�
TOTAL # OF SIGNATURE PAGES � (CLIP ALL LOCATIONS FOR SIGNATURq
ACTION ftEQUESTED:
Approve resolution reallocating funds from Sackett Park and Scheffer Rec Center Youth Initiative Bonding projects to
the Martin Luther King project so that it can be rebid for spring construction.
flECOMMENDATtONS: Appmve IA) o� flejec[ iP) PERSONAL SERVSCE CONTRACTS MUST ANSWER Tfif FOLLOWING QUESTlONS:
_ PLANNING COMMISSION �. Has this person/firm ever worketl under a conttatt tor [his department? ,
CIB COMMITTEE YES NO
CIVIL SERVICE COMMISSION 2. Has this person/fitm eve� been a ci[y employe¢?
VES NO
3. Does (his person/tirm possess a skill not normally possessed by any current city employee?
- VES NO
- 4. Is [his persoNfirm a targetetl ventlor?
YES NO
Explain all yes answers on separate sheet antl attach ro grean sheet.
INITIA7ING PROBLEM ISSUE, OPPORTUNITY (Who, What When. Whe�e. Whyl ,
The original construction bid of the Martin Luther King project exceeded available funding. Additional funds are
necessary tor this project to be built. Funds are available from other projects. The Boys and Girls Club of the Twin
Cities has ended its proposed project at Sackett Park and the project at Scheffer Recreation Center does not have
adequate funds for a viable project.
ADVANTAGESIFAPPROVED -
The Martin Luther King project will be able to be bid for spring 2001 construction.
DISADVANTAGES IF APPROVED
None
DISADVANTAGES IF NOT APPROVED
The Martin Luther King project will not be able to be bid. The City would be in jeopardy of losing State funding for the
project.
TOTAL AMOVNT OF TRANSACTION S COST/REVENUE BUDGEfED (CIftCLE ONE) VES NO
FUNDING SOURCE ACTIVfTY NIIMBER O
� �JQN�v� �JG�I..�C
FINANCIAL INFOFMATION: (EXPLAIN�
Budget Resolution to follow ��p� � � ��y��