271844 WHITE — CITV CLERK COIIRCII . ��������
PINK — FbNANCE TT
� GANARV — DEPARTMENT G I TY OF SA I NT PA ll L � � �
BLUE - MAVOR File� NO•
ncil Resolution .
Presented By '
Referred To Committee: Date
Out of Committee By Date
WHEREAS, the City Council desires to implement the RESIDENTIAL STREET PAVING PROGRAM
in an orderly manner, be it
RESOLVED, that the attached guidelines for the development of the 1979 Residential
Street Paving Program are hereby 'adopted.
COUNCILMEN Requested by Department of:
Yeas Nays
Butler Publ ic Works (DJD)
-_�� [n Favor -
Hant �
�z�*�' __ Against , BY
�.ee��er+►'�PDiDbyC
Te��
Form Appro d by Cit rney
Adopted by Council: Date �� �'�+ ��
Certified Passed by Council Secretary BY � ,
B}�
1
Appro e 17avor: Date 7 �9� Approved by Mayor for Submission to Council
By BY
�uBUS++EO sEP 3� 197a
o� oi: �2/i��5
� Rev. : /8/76
EXPLANATION OF ADMINISTRATIVE ORDERS, �e���
RESOLUTIONS, AND ORDINANCES
,. Dat�t: September 22, 1978 ` • . . ,
TO: MAYOR GEORGE LATSMER .
FR: ' Public Works Paving Oesign •
�: Implementation of Residential Street Paving Program
, �
.
ACT�ON REQUESTED: .
Approve and submit for City Council action
� PUR�O5E AND RATIONALE FOR THIS ACTION: '
To obtain CounciT approval �For the 197g Residential Street Improvement program
� development guidelines. -
ATTACHMENTS: .
- Resotution
D1D:ddr
_ ,
�'I'1'-Y v��+' ���LI?�� ��1�3� �.'"-`� � '� ,..� ��/'{+1
j •J` y l
/ �.`�
,' � �i i; '��::` O_l�.L�I t:,'I� O:� 1•tI I�: C L'L'Y' CO�:�GIL
`_ 1,:�;,i`.:��`�` _� �..:�� ,
� .:�\�'�'� _���. � �_,�
���.
: ���`_-� D a�e : September 25, 1978
��`,, ,
Cfl �s`� �.} ��i � �. � � ° �3r� ��-`
? 0 : �oin� Paul Cify Cour� cii =
�� 0 ��� = Cat`iti731�$�� OCi PUBLIC WORKS _
ROSALIE BUTLER ; �„�;�;--.� -, -�`1�S the fvlt�;�ing
reporf on C. F. � C3y dinance
. [� RssotU�ior�
- - � �;h or -
� ���-� � 1979 ResidentTal Street Paving Program Guidelir�es
At its meetang of September 25, the committee recommended � .
approval of the 1979 Residential Street Paving Program
Guidelines. .
. . , . . i - . . . .
!I"Y i?�LI. S�VENTH FLOO?t S_'�3\I' P��UL, P:fI\\ESfJ-C�1 5�10�
`� �� � �
i� 1979 RESIDENTIAL STREET PAVING PROGRAM �
PROGRAM DEVELOPMENT GUIDELINES
GOAL
It is the goal of the residential street paving program to improve the quality
of the neighborhoods by replacing all presently oil-surfaced streets with a
permanent roadway, properly graded, surfaced and curbed, and by installing
sidewalks and street lights .as appropriate to each area.
PROGRAM DEVELOPMENT
1 . ELIGIBLE IMPROVEMENTS AND AREAS
a. Only presently oil-surfaced streets shall be included in this program.
These street surfaces have been built up over the years by a yearly
oil and sand treatment (lately, every third year) . Some of these
streets have had curbing installed on them.
b. Only streets in which utilities are complete and adequate or streets
in which utilities will be installed as part of the improvement will
be included in the program.
c. Areas shall be established� to obtain maximum effect and efficient con-
struction. Cost should generally be in the $150,000 to $400,000 range.
It is estimated that 4 areas will be approved under C.D. funding
(Community Development) and 2 areas will be approved under CIB funding
(Capital lmprovement Bonds) .
d. No more than one area will be selected per District for 1979. Districts
are encouraged to submit only their highest priority projects.
2. SELECTION CRITERIA
� a. The recomtnendations of the appropriate citizen group (this means the
recognized District Council where one exists) and consistency with a
district plan will be given consideration.
Consideration will also be given in areas where no district pta�nning
effort exists, at least until it is clear that all districts in the
City have had ample opportunity (including adequate staff assistance)
to develop a district plan. If a project is proposed for a district
which has not completed a district plan, the citizen group will be
contacted to determine the support for a paving project.
b. Relationship to other public improvements such as Parks, Utilities,
Sewers, Lighting, etc.
�
_2_
j .
Concentration of improvements may significantly strengthen the total
impact. All public improvement needs will be considered in a proposed
project area. Priority will be given to areas where other needed public
improvements will be provided in conjunction with the street program or
where public improvements already exist.
c. A portion of the street improvement activity in each year should be
located in areas selected for neighborhood revitalization in conjunction
with other physicel and social improvements and in areas of sound liousing
in order to help prevent deterioration and blight. Funds for residential
street improvements will be allocated in aceordance with "Capitat Allo-
cation Policy: 1979, 1980, 1981".
Community Development Block Grant funds will be used in CDBG eligible
areas, but special consideration will be given to ITA's.
Capital Improvement Bond funds should be allocated to Conservation t
and II areas or improvement areas not eligible for CDBG funding.
d. The continuity of programs in specific areas
Continuity of paving program over severat years in one large residential
area is an important factor in overall impact and effectiveness. For
this reason, priority should be given to project opportunities adjacent
to improvements completed in a previous year.
Priority consideration shall be given to streets in areas previously
approved by the City Council , but which were deleted to keep the projects
within budget.
e. Coordination with neighborhood improvement programs
Priority should be given to areas where residents are already involved
' in strengtheni.ng housing maintenance efforts and other neighborhood
improvement projects.
f. Condition of existing street
Priorities should be based on the general condition, appearance, service-
ability and extraordinary maintenance needs of the existing streets and
to the possibility of unusual construction costs.
3. PROJECT STANDARDS (The following is a new Section)
Standard street construction consists of the following:
a. �A 32' wide street with asphait pavement and concrete curb and gutter.
Arterial streets will be built to Municipal State Aid (MSA) Standards.
a�.
a -3-
b. Sidewalk reconstruction will be based on a condition inspection by
the Department of Public Works. ,
- All old tile sidewalk will be replaced with new sidewatk. �
- All scaled, cracked or tree heaved sidewalk will be replaced if, in
the opinion of the Department of Public Works, it constitutes a
tripping hazard.
- Reconstructed sidewalks will be 5' wide except spot panel replacement
of 6' wide walk.
c. New catch basins
d. Ornamental lighting (with underground wiring) . Only the new energy
efficient sodium vapor lighting will be considered (those lights with
, the golden hue) .
e. All driveways will be reconstructed between the sidewalk and curb with
new concrete driveways.
f. All outwalks will be reconstructed between the sidewalk and curb with
new 2' wide concrete outwalks.
g. Boulevards will be regraded and sodded where necessary - usually this
is the entire boulevard.
h. The City Parks Department will complete their planting program in this .
area after other work is done. Tree planting is done only in the Spring
or Fall .
It should be emphasized that a request by a District Council for special
design i_tems (i .e. , stone curb, historic light fixtures, textured concrete
surface, etc.) which are other than the above listed standard construction,
will be considered by the City Council and subject to their approval . The
Council consideration witl include an analysis of the additional cost for
non-standard work.
4. ESTIMATED COST (The following is a new Section)
The estimated cost for these projects during 1979 is $85.00 per lineal foot
of street (that's $448,800 per mile) , and inctudes everything. The cost of
a proposed project can be determined two ways.
l . If the blocks are standard "long blocks" (660' ) and "short blocks" (330' ) ,
�estimate the length by multiplying the number of long blocks times 660,
add the short blocks times 330 and multiplying this times $85.00 for total
project cost.
2. Catl Tom Kuhfeld, Ed Tio.or Dan Dunford, and they will figure it out.
. (29�-5311) .