01-1200s
5�.+' i _ 'w� i , , . i.�
Presented By
Referred To
Committee: Date
�a
4
5
6
7
8
9
10
11
12
13
14
15
16
17
18
19
20
21
22
23
24
25
26
27
28
29
30
31
32
33
34
35
36
37
38
WHEREAS, Citizen Service Office, Division of Code Enforcement has requested the City Council
to hold public hearings to consider the advisability and necessity of ordering the repair or wrecking and
removal of a two-story, wood frame, single family dwelling located on property hereinafter referred to as
the "Subject Property" and commonly known as 531 Ohio Street. This property is legally described as
follows, to wit:
Lot 3, Block 8, Dawson's Addition to Saint Paul.
WHEREAS, based upon the records in the Ramsey County Recorder's Offlce and informarion
obtained by Division of Code Enfarcement on or before May 18, 2001, the following are the now lrnown
interested or responsible parties far the Subj ect: State of MN Trust Exempt, 50 West Kellogg Blvd., Ste.
620B, St. Paul, MN 55102; Margaret Bischel, 5544 12�' Avenue South, Mpls., MN 55417; Curt Potts,
981 Payne Avenue, St. Pau1, MN 55101; Legal Ledger Inc., 322 Minnesota Street Ste. E-1432,
St. Paul, MN 55101; Attorney Doug Rainbow, 250 Second Avenue South, Mpls., MN 55401,
Re: Thomas Kirkland; Attomey Keith Simmons, 18830 Eastwood Drive, Excelisor, MN 55331,
Re: Metro Contracting
WHEREAS, Division of Code Enforcement has served in accordance with the provisions of
Chapter 45 of the Saint Paul Legislative Code an order identified as an"Order to Abate Nuisance
Building(s)" dated September 17 2001; and
WHEREAS, this order informed the then known interested or responsible parties that the shucture
located on the Subject Property is a nuisance building(s) pursuant to Chapter 45; and
WHEREAS, this order informed the interested or responsible parties that they must repair or
demolish the struchxre located on the Subject Property by August 22, 2001; and
WHEREAS, the enforcement officer has posted a placard on the Subject Property declaring this
building(s) to constitute a nuisance condition; subject to demolition; and
WIIEREAS, this nuisance condition has not been corrected and Division of Code Enforcement
requested that the City Clerk schedule public hearings before the Legislative Hearing Officer of the City
Council and the Saint Paul City Council; and
WHEREAS, the interested and responsible parties have been served notice in accordance with the
provisions of Chapter 45 of the Saint Paul Legislative Code, of the tixne, date, place and purpose of the
public hearings; and
Council File # 0 � —\�oo
Green Sheet # � UZ3 �J�"{
RESOLUTION
CITY S T PAUL, MINNE
�
3q
ot-\aoo
1 WF3EREAS, a hearing was held before the Legislative Hearing Officer of the Saint Paul City
2 Council on Tuesday, November 6, 2001 to hear testnnony and evidence, and after receiving testimony and
3 evidence, made the recommendation to approve the request to order the interested or responsible parties to
4 make the Subject Property safe and not detrimental to the public peace, health, safety and welfare and
5 remove its blighting influence on the community by rehabilitating this structure in accordance with all
6 applicable codes and ordinances, or in the alternafive by demolishing and removing the structure in
7 accordance with all applicable codes and ordinances. The rehabilitation or demolition of the structure to be
8 completed within fifteen (15) days after the date of the Council Hearing; and
9
10
11
12
13
14
15
16
17
18
19
20
21
22
23
24
25
26
27
28
29
30
31
32
33
34
35
36
37
38
39
40
41
42
43
44
45
46
47
48
49
50
51
52
53
54
WHEREAS, a hearing was held before the Saint Paul City Council on Wednesday, November 28,
2001 and the testimony and evidence including the action taken by the Legislative Hearing Officer was
considered by the Council; now therefare
BE IT RESOLVED, that based upon the testimony and evidence presented at the above referenced
public hearings, the Saint Paul City Council hereby adopts the following Findings and Order concerning
the Subject Property at 531 Ohio Street:
That the Subject Property comprises a nuisance condition as defined in Saint Paul
Legislative Code, Chapter 45.
2.
3.
4.
5.
6.
7.
8.
That the costs of demolition and removal of this building(s) is estimated to exceed three
thousand dollars ($3,000.00).
That there now exists and has existed multiple Housing or Building code violations at the
Subj ect Property.
That an Order to Abate Nuisance Building(s) was sent to the then known responsible parties
to correct the deficiencies or to demolish and remove the building(s).
That the deficiencies causing this nuisance condition have not been conected.
That Division of Code Enforcement has posted a placard on the Subject Property which
declares it to be a nuisance condition subject to demolition.
That this building has been routinely monitored by the Citizen Service Offices, Division of
Code Enforcement, Vacant/Nuisance Buildings.
That the known interested parties and owners are as previously stated in this resolution and
that the notification requirements of Chapter 45 have been fulfilled.
ORDER
The Saint Paul City Council hereby makes the following order:
1. The above referenced interested or responsible parties shall make the Subject Property safe and not
detrimental to the public peace, health, safety and welfare and remove its blighting influence on the
community by rehabilitating this structure and correcting all deficiencies as prescribed in the above
referenced Order to Abate Nuisance Building(s) in accordance with all applicable codes and
ordinances, or in the altemative by demolishing and removing the stnxcture in accordance with all
applicable codes and ordinances. The rehabilitation or demolition and removal of the shucture
must be completed within fifteen (15) days after the date of the Council Hearing.
2. If the above corrective action is not completed within this period of tune the Citizen Service Office,
Division of Code Enforcement is hereby authorized to take whatever steps are necessary to
demolish and remove this structure, fill the site and charge the costs incurred against the Subject
0�-\�
Property pursuant to the provisions of Chapter 45 of the Saint Paul Legislative Code.
2
3 3. In the event the building is to be demolished and removed by the City of Saint Paul, all personal
4 property or fistures of any kind which interfere with the demolition and removal shall be removed
5 from the property by the responsible parties by the end of this tune period. If all personal property
6 is not removed, it shall be considered to be abandoned and the City of Saint Paul shall remove and
7 dispose of such property as provided by law.
9 4. It is fi�.rther ordered, that a copy of this resolution be mailed to the owners and interested parties in
accordance with Chapter 45 of the Saint Paul Legislative Code.
Requested by Deparhnent of:
Adopted by Council: Date 7. �ilp �
Adoption Certified by Councii Secretary
BY� �.� '� . \� .,.. -
Approved by Mayor: Date� � ��/ �
By:
Citizen Service Office• Code Enforcement
By: �� —
� �
Form Approved by City Attorney
By: cX _
Approved by Mayor for Submission to Council
By: <-� (l. ��7/�
J. ., n.. ,. . . . . , .
"`°"� � Division ofCode Eiiforcement
266-8439
IUST BE ON COUNGL AGHmA BY (DA7q
Wednesday, November 28, 2001
owrewnurm
10/12%Ol � "
nou��+c
TOTAL # OF SIGNATURf PAGES
SHEET
Y
0\-1�}00
No102359
� an�TrouEr � ❑ arcuFwc _
�..�.�.��:�. �..���
� MYORPRAi9S�AM�1 , ❑
(CLIP ALL LOCATIONS FOR SIGNATURE)
r , City Council to pass this resolution which will order the owner(s) to remove or repair the referenced building(s). If
: the owner fails to comply with the resolution, the Citizen Service Office, Division of Code Enforcement is ordered
, to remove the building. The subject property is located at 531 Ohio Street.
PLANNING CAMMISSION
CIB COMMIT'fEE
CML SERVICE COMMISSION
RSONAL SERVICE CONTRACIS MUST ANSWER T/lf FOLLOWIN6 QUES7ION5:
Hac this persorJfinn everxorlced under a cmtract torthie deoerlmenl?
YES NO
Fks 1MS peBaJfirm e�er been a Wy emqoyce9 , .
YES NO
Dces thia peisawJfinn P� a sldll not namal�YP�aesseU M enY current city emd%'eea
YES NO
Ic this P�e�rin a targeted VendoY! �
YES NO '
the Saint Paul Legislative Code. The owners, interested parties and responsible parties laiown to the Enforcement
Officer were given an order to repair or remove the building at 531 Ohio Street by August 22, 1001, and have
failed to comply with those orders.
The City wiil eliminate a nuisance. e ��� 6 ` ° ' �`� ��.���C�� ��S��rCh �
OCT 19 26�� 0£T 3� 20�1
� � � ClI�Y a4�'�O�I�EY �
�� DVMJJAGES IFJ)PPROVEQ '
e l:ity �nll spena fixnds to wreck and remove this building(s). These costs will be assessed to the property,
collected as a speciai assessment,against the property taxes.
�nmsan�ce�c"o °� ' � tY• S� ) g� tY•
��it�ion �nll remain unabated in the Ci This buildin s will continue tq bli t the cominuni
OF TRANSACTION S
sourtce Nuisance Housing Abatement
�� '�.-:%�a�
cosrmev�ue suoiaereo t��R�� a+t7 O
�cr�vmNw�e� 33261
NO
�
REPORT
Date: November 6, 2001
Time: 10:00 am.
Place: Room 330 City Hall
� 15 West Kellogg Boulevazd
LEGISLATIVE HEARING
Gerry Strathman
Legislafive Hearing Officer
1. Resolution ordering the owner to remove or repair the property at 705 Sims Avenue. If
the owner fails to comply, Code Enforcement is ordered to remove the building.
Legislative Hearing Officer recommends granting the owner six months to complete the
rehabilitation of this properry on condition that the vacant building fee is paid by noon of
November 28, 2001.
2. Resolution ordering the owner to remove or repair the properry at 531 Ohio Street. If the
owner fails to comply, Code Enforcement is ordered to remove the building.
(Laid over from 10-2-01)
Legislative Hearing Officer recommends approval.
3. Resolution ordering the owner to remove or repair the property at 847 Lexin2ton Pazkway
South. If the owner fails to comply, Code Enforcement is ordered to remove the building.
(Laid over from 9-4-01)
Legislative Hearing Officer recommends approval.
4. Resolution ordering the owner to remnove or repair the property at 1619 Seventh Street
East. If the owner fails to comply, Code Enforcement is ordered to remove the building.
Legislative Hearing Officer recommends approval.
5. Appeal of summary abatement order for 1539 Blair Avenue.
(Case closed.)
6. Appeal of summary abatement order and velricle abatement order for 1323 Bush Avenue
Legislative Hearing Officer recommends d�nping the appeai.
Appeal of sumxnary abatement order and vehicle abatement order for 1327 Bush Avenue
Legislarive Hearing Officer recommends denying the appeal.
�1
0�-\�
REPORT
Date: October 2, 2001
Time: 10:00 a.m.
Place: Room 330 City Hall
15 West Kellogg Boulevazd
LEGISLATIVE HEARING
Gerry Strathman
Legislaflve Hearing Officer
Laid over sununary abatement appeal:
J0102G1 Grass Cutting (by private contractor) at 664 Edmund Avenue.
Legislative Hearing Officer recommends approval of the assessment.
(Note: The City Council approved this assessment at their October 2 meeting.)
2. Resolution ordering the owner to remove or repair the property at 393 Sidnev Street East.
If the owner fails to comply, Code Enforcement is ordered to remove the building.
(Laid over from 9-4-01)
Legislative Hearing Officer recommends laying over to the October 16, 2001, Legislative
Hearing.
Resolution ardering the owner to remove or repair the property at 1104 Rice Street. If the
owner fails to comply, Code Enfarcement is ordered to remove the building.
Legislative Hearing Officer recommends the owner be given six months to complete the
rehabilitation of the property on condition that the following is done by noon of October
24, 2001: 1) Get a code compliance inspection, 2) Post a$2000 bond.
4. Suzmnary abatement arder appeal for 2043 Manitou Avenue.
Legislative Hearing Officer recommends denying the appeal, but amending the
compliance date to October 15, 2001.
� 5. Resolution ordering the owner to remove or repair the property at 531 Ohio Street. If the
owner fails to comply, Code Enforcement is ordered to remove the building.
Legislative Hearing Officer recommends laying over to the November 6, 2001,
Legislative Hearing.
f�Yil
MINUTES OF THE LEGISLATIVE HEARING
Tuesday, October 2, 2001
Room 330 City Hall
Gerry Strathman, Legislative Hearing Officer
STAFF PRESENT: Fong Lor, License, Inspections, Environmental Protection; Steve Magner,
Code Enforcement
The meeting was called to order at 10:00 a.m.
Laid Over Summary Abatement Appeal:
J0102G1 Grass Cutting (by private contractor) at 664 Edmund Avenue.
(Fong Lor provided interpreting services for this address.)
The following owners appeazed: Lee Lor and Tong Vang, 305 Aurora Avenue.
Gerry Strathman had Fong Lor e�lain to the owner that he is here as a translator and not as a
representative on the owner's behalf.
0�-taoo
(Steve Magner presented photographs to Mr. Sirathman. They were also shown to Lee Lor. The
photographs were later returned.)
Mr. Strathman stated this has to do with cleaning up of refuse and cutting tall weeds and grass at
664 Edmund in the amount of $120.
Mr. Lor asked when the woxk was done. Mr. Strathman responded June 1, 2001.
Ms. Vang stated the house was on fire at one time, and they no longer live in that house. She
asked why no one informed her that the grass was going to be cut. Mr. Strathman responded
notice was sent to 664 Edmund Avenue. It should have been forwazded to them if there was a
forwazding address.
Ms. Vang stated when they moved to a different location, they sent a form to the post o�ce to
inform them of the new address. She never received a notice of this assessment. Mr. Strathman
responded it was mailed to that address. It appears the City has met the legal requirement. As
long as they are the owner, they are responsible far keeping the grass cut and the yard clear.
Mr. Lor stated he believes that if the properry was damaged and he no longer lives there, his
insurance should take care of some of the issues. Mr. Strathxnan responded that may be possible,
but that is between him and the insurance company. As far as the City is concerned, the cleanup
was done and the proper procedures were followed. It is a proper charge, and the City will be
expecting him to pay it.
p�_`�.ao
LEGISLATIVE HEARING MINi JTES OF OCTOBER 2, 2001 Page 2
Mr. Lor stated the City should be required to send two to three notices before the work is done.
Mr. Strathman responded the City is required to send one and that notice was sent.
Not only does their properry have tall weeds, Ms. Vang stated, the neighbors have the same
problem. She asked can the City tell the neighbors to do the same thing. Generally, responded
Mr. Stratl�man, the City responds to complaints; someone must have complained about this
property and an inspector was sent out.
Ms. Vang stated they should be excused for one time because they never received the notice. Mr.
Strathman responded he cannot do that. Steve Magner responded he received a vacant building
registration form on September 17, 2001, signed by Yee Lor. The form has 664 Edmund Avenue
as their address. It would be advantageous for them to give Code Enforcement their new address
to minimize any future summary abatement. Eventually the post office will stop forwarding mail
because there is an expiration on forwarding mail from a previous address. Mr. Lor responded
his insurance agent told him he cannot notify us about his new address.
Gerry Strathman recommended approval of the assessment. It would be in the owner's interest to
give Code Enfarcement his current address.
Resolution ordering the owner to remove or repair the property at 393 Sidney Street East.
If the owner fails to comply, Code Enforcement is ordered to remove the building.
(Laid over from 9-4-01)
George Borer, 386 Wabasha StreetNorth, #1200, representing Lutheran Social Services,
appeared and stated there has been a delay with the court appointed appraisers. They have not
finished their appraisals of the property. Yesterday, one of them thought it should be valued
more than the proposed sale price. Mr. Borer sent him various documents, and the appraiser has
finally concluded the value of the property is less than the sale price. That should be the last
obstacle.
Gerry Strathman asked when this will close. Mr. Barer responded the court will not approve the
sale until the appraisals are in. Both appraisers indicate they will have them in within a week.
His understanding is the neighborhood alliance is willing to close immediately upon the filing of
the appraisals.
Mr. Strathman asked can the matter be done by October 16. Mr. Borer responded he hopes so.
He will tell the Alliance that it is imperative that the matter is closed by that date. Mr. Magner
suggested this matter be laid over to October 16, and if there is a closing on ar approxunately on
that date, the matter can go straight to City Council on October 24, and the resolution could be
amended. It would just be a matter of posting a bond.
Gerry Strathman laid over to October 16, 2001, for the property to go through closing. Mr.
Magner stated the Alliance will need to post a bond before noon of October 24.
v�-\�o
LEGISLATIVE HEARING MINLJT'ES OF OCTOBER 2, 2001 Page 3
Resolution ordering the owner to remove or repair the property at 1104 Rice Street. If the
owner fails to comply, Code Enforcement is ordered to remove the building.
(Photogaphs were submitted by Mr. Magner.)
Steve Magner reported this is a steeUmasonry frame commercial structure. The building was
condemned in October 2000 and has been vacant since then. There have been four sununary
abatement notices to remove refuse and abate inoperable vehicles. On July 31, 2001, an
inspection of the building was conducted, a list of deficiencies which constitute a nuisance
condition was developed, and photograplvs were taken. An order to abate a nuisance building
was issued on August 6, 2001, with a compliance date of August 21. As of this date, this
property remains in a condition which comprises a nuisance as defined by the legislative code.
The vacant building fees are paid. Reai estate taxes are unpaid of $2,745.93. Taxation has
placed an estimated market value of $14,400 on the land and $57,100 on the building. The
estimated cost to repair is $100,000; estimated cost to demolish, $10,000 to $12,000. Mr.
Magner has not had good feedback from the owner. There aze numerous complaints regarding
cats in the building. There is an excessive amount of storage. The roof structure is allowing
moisture to enter the building.
Cheryl Hilyar, 8961 37th Street North, Lake Elmo, owner, appeared and stated she plans to wark
closely with the inspector and remove everythiug from the back of the building. There are
outside tools which will be removed or a storage shed built for them. All the storage from the
inside of the building needs to be removed. She needs to get a new water heater installed. The
furnace went out The water meter exploded. She needs to make water repairs. She needs to
power wash the inside of the building. She needs to paint the trim, doors, and caulking around
the doors and make the outside look presentable. The neighbor next door, who built this
building, is supporting her in fixing it.
Mr. Strathman asked is she aware of the roof problems. Ms. Hilyar responded she has not been
up there, but someone told her it is strong. She has estimates on the repairs. She also has
support from the hazdwaze store next door.
Gerry Strathman recommended that the owner be given six months to complete the rehabilitation
of the property on condifion that the following is done by noon of October 24, 2001: 1) Get a
code compliance inspection done, 2) post a$2000 bond.
Summary Abatement Order Appeal for 2043 Manitou Avenue.
Mazlene A. Campbell, owner, appeared and stated this 1972 vehicle was brought back to its
original state. She told her son he could store it alongside the garage. She did not know it had to
haue something underneath it. The vehicle does not leak anything, so she thought it was safe
enough to store on the ground. She was told she could put gravel underneath it ar move the
bt�lyoa
LEGISLATIVE HEARING MIN CJTES OF OCTOBER 2, 2001 Page 4
vehicle. She has someone that can store the vehicle for her, but she cannot get it to that location
untii October 13. It has new tabs.
Gerry Strathman denied the appeal, but amended the compliance date on the Vehicle Abatement
Order to October 15, 2001. The inspector will not order it towed unfil after that date.
� Resolution ordering the owner to remove or repair the property at 531 Ohio Street. If the
owner fails to comply, Code Enforcement is ordered to remove the building.
Steve Magner reported that this properry has gone tax forfeit to the State of Minnesota. It was
originally suppose to forfeit on August 1. The reason it did not was because they had a
notification problem of serving the individuals with this properiy. Since then, they held it over
for up to two months. As of September 11, Mr. Magner found out that Ramsey County did take
possession of the building. This enters into a problem far Code Enforcement doing properry
notification. He recommends laying over to the November 6 Legjslative Hearing for re-
no6fication. Chris Kujala (Ramsey County Tax Forfeited Lands) does not plan to oppose any
action taken with this property at this time.
Gerry Strathman laid over to the November 6, 2001, Legislative Hearing.
The meeting was adjourned at 10:38 a.m.
rrn
.
CITIZEN SERVICE OFFICE
Fred Ow,au, Ciry Clerk
DIVISIONOFPROPER7YCODEENFORCEMENT �� �,}OO
Michae[RMarehead,ProgramManager � �
CITY OF SA1NT PAUL
Norm Coleman, Mayor
October 12, 2001
Nuisance Bui7ding Code Enforcemerst
ISH!KeQoggBlvd.Rm.190 Tal.• 651d66-8440
SaintPaul,MN55702 Faz:651-266-8426--
�
.l
OCT i 5 2��1
�i��� 1����!��EY
NOTICE OF PUBLIC HEARINGS
Council President and
Members of the City Council
Citizen Service Office, Vacant/Nuisance Buildings Enforcement Division has requested the City
Council schedule public hearings to consider a resolution ardering the repair or removal of the
nuisance building(s) located at:
531 Ohio Street
The City Council has scheduled the date of these hearings as follows:
Legislative Hearing - Tuesday, November 6, 2001
City Council Hearing - Wednesday, November 28, 2001
The owners and responsible parties of record are:
Name and Last Known Address
State of MN Trust Exempt
50 West Kellogg Blvd., Ste. 620B
St. Paul, MN 55102
Mugaret Bischei
5544 12�` Avenue South
Mpls., MN 55417
Curt Potts
981 Payne Avenue
St. Paul, MN 55101
Interest
Fee Owner
7udgment Creditor
Jud�nent Creditor .
531 Ohio Street
October 12, 2001
Page 2
Name and Last Known Address
Interest
O1 —\i� �O
Legal Ledger Inc.
322 Minnesota Street Ste. E-1432
St. Paul, MN 55101
Attomey Doug Rainbow
250 Second Avenue South
Mpls., MN 55401
Re: Thomas Kirkland
Attomey Keith Simmons
18830 Eastwood Drive
Excelisor, MN 55331
Re: Metro Contracting
The legal description of this property is:
Lot 3, Block 8, Dawson's Addition to Saint Paul.
Jud�nent Creditor
Jud�ment Creditor
Jud�ment Creditor
- Division of Code Enforcement has declared this building(s) to constitute a"nuisance" as defined
by Legislative Code, Chapter 45. Division of Code Enfarcement has issued an order to the then
known responsible parties to eliminate this nuisance condition by correcting the deficiencies or
by razing and removing this buildina(s).
Inasmuch as this Order to Abate has not been complied with the nuisance condition remains
unabated, the community continues to suffer the blighting influence of this property. It is the
recommendation of the Division of Code Enforcement that the City Council pass a resolution
ordering the responsible parties to either repair, or demolish and remove this buiiding in a timely
manner, and failing that, authorize the Division of Code Enforcement to proceed to demolition
and removal, and to assess the costs incurred against the real estate as a special assessment to be
collected in the same manner as tases.
Sincerely,
�teve �a�rcer
Steve Magner
Vacant Buildings Supervisor
Division of Code Enforcement
Citizen Service Office
SM:mI
cc: Frank Berg, Building Inspection and Desigi
Meghan Riley, City Attomeys Office
Nancy Anderson, Assistant Secretary to the Council
Laurie Kaplan, PED-Housing Division
o� ��o
3� .
MINUTES OF THE LEGISLATIVE HEARING
Tuesday, November 6, 2001
Gerry Strathman, Legislative Hear'sng Officer
Room 330 Courthouse
The meeting was called to order at 10:10 a.m.
STAFF PRESENT: Steve Magner, Code Enforcement
Resolution ordering the owner to remove or repair the property at 705 Sims Avenue. If the
owner fails to comply, Code Enforcement is ordered to remove the building.
(Steve Magner submitted photographs.)
Mike Haus, 2357 Rogers, Mendota Heights, appeared and stated he does not own the property
now. He purchased the property in 1994 and sold it on a contract for deed. It was owner
occupied. The new owner was given $2,000 to do garage work at the time. They did not do the
work, they stopped making payment, and stopped doing repairs on the home. Mr. Haus became
the owner again after four nonpayments. He obtained a list for the repair work to be done, and
paid the $2,000 bond to ensure the work would be done. The new buyer is purchasing the
property on a contract for deed; he should be at this meeting shortly. Mr. Haus is funding 100%
of whatever he needs to do to bring it up to code. The work has already been started, siding has
already been removed, and other siding has been purchased.
Gerry Strathman asked are they intending to rehabilitate this property and post the bond. Mr.
Haus responded the bond has been posted, and a permit has been taken out with the City. The
work has been started. This has all been done within 30 days of gaining back ownership of the
property.
Steve Magner reported that Code Enforcement condemned the properry October 9, 2000. At that
time, Sherri Beth Fonest was the occupant and was purchasing it on a contract for deed. Since
that time, Code Enforcement has performed about 100 inspections, including night inspections.
They haue issued numerous citations for illegal occupancy. On about three occasions, the Police
Department has removed people from the house. Code Enforcement has spent thousands of
dollars of sunmiary abatement money in boazding up the property, cleaning the yazd, removing
junk vehicles, etc. The property is no longer in the FoaesYs hands, and the property has gone
back to the contract holder. There is a new contract with a second par[y. Mr. Magner would like
the City to be assured that the rehabilitation would occur in a timely manner and the contract
purchaser follows a11 the guidelines. The vacant building fee needs to be paid.
Gerry Strathman asked about the other parties on the notice of public hearing: Jason Max Clark,
Eric Scott Peterson, Randi Rae-Ann Linderman. Mr. Magner responded those aze parties that
were removed for unlawful occupancy of the dwelling and issued citations. They are associates
or blood relatives of Ms. Forrest.
Warren Abel, 701 Sims Avenue, appeazed and stated this properiy has been a problem for a
number of yeazs for debris in the yazd, cars left on the street, people coming and going, and
v�-�Zoc�
LEGISLATIVE HEARING MINUTES OF NOVEMBER 6, 2001 Page 2
possible illegal activities. When it became vacant about seven years ago, Mr. Abel was on the
boazd of ESNDC (East Side Neighborhood Development Company), which looked at the
property for rehabilitation. There were structural problems with the properry. They were unable
to come to an agreement with the heirs about the price. It went out onto the common mazket for
sale, and the structural problems were covered over. Mr. Abel would be concemed that the work
presently being done would continue to leave the problems covered over. The asbestos siding
was removed over the weekend. Mr. Abel was told on Friday, that the owner was not going to
get a state permit to remove the asbestos because he and his friends were going to do it. Last
night, they were at the house until 10:45 hammering and n,nn;ng saws. Mr. Abel would like to
see the property rehuaed to a state in which they will not cause a problem. Several million
dollars have been put into this neighborhood. He would like to see this property raised to that
level.
Mr. Magner stated he had a frank conversation with the new contract purchaser, who is
supposedly coming today. He esplained the work would have to be done to code by a licensed
person. Also, he explained the property cannot be legally occupied until Don Wagner (License,
Inspections, Environmental Protection) or one of his designees issues a code compliance
certificate. He indicated he wanted to have people in the properry guazding it and working at the
property all day and night. The City's main concern is that the dwelling is rehabilitated in a
timely fashion.
Gerry Strathman recommends the owner be granted six months to rehabilitate this building on
the condirion that the vacant building fee is paid by noon of November 28, 2001. Don Wagner
said he will accept the current code inspection, stated Mr. Magner.
� Resolution ordering the owner to remove or repair the property at 531 Ohio Street. If the
owner fails to compiy, Code Enforcement is ordered to remove the building.
(Laid over from 10-2-01)
(Steve Magner submitted photographs.)
(No one appeared to represent the property.)
Gerry Strathman stated this properry was in the process of going tax forfeit. Steve Magner
responded the property did go tax forfeit after Code Enforcement's original notice was sent.
There were a number of parties that haue to be notified for this process; Code Enfarcement has
now done the proper notification, and they aze prepazed to move forwazd on this matter today.
Mr. Magner reported this was formerly a Laundromat. It has been vacant since October 16,
1998. The current owner is State of Minnesota Trust Exempt. There have been nine summary
abatement notices issued to remove refuse, cut tall grass, secure properiy, and abatement
vehicles. On July 11, 2001, an inspection of the building was conducted, a list of deficiencies
which constitute a nuisance condition was developed, and photographs were taken. An order to
abate a nuisance building was issued on July 23, 2001, with a compliance date of August 22,
2001. As of this date, the property remains in a condition which comprises a nuisance as defined
v�-��v
LEGISLATIVE F3EARING MINiJTES OF NOVEMBER 6, 2001 Page 3
by the legislative code. The vacant building fees aze due. Tasation has placed an estimated
market vaiue of $11,300 on the land and $72,300 on the building. As of today, no one has
applied for the code compliance inspection and a bond has not been posted. The estimated cost
to repair is $100,000; estimated cost to demolish, $13,000 to $14,000.
Because it was used as a Laundromat and dry cleaning facility, stated Mr. Magner, there may be
possible contaminants on the site. Code Enforcement would not remove any of those
contaminants; they would leave that up to the State. Ramsey County dces not haue immediate
plans to sell this properry and they haue no plans to stop the resolution at this time.
Theodore Kvasnik, 2190 Marshall Avenue, Sew What Corporation, appeazed and stated his
company does laundry and dry cleaning services. He has not been in the building to examine it
for possible purchase. Mr. Strathman responded they need to contact Ramsey County Trust
Exempt Property Division.
Mr. Kvasnik stated he was not aware that dry cleaniug was done in that building. He had done
business with them for a number of yeazs. He was aware of the boilers. Mr. Magner responded
he and Ramsey County have had no ability to contact the previous owner to identify what
happened at the site. Based on hearsay evidence, they feel there is pollution on the site. There is
already evidence of other pollutants. Also, there was automobile repair in the back of the
building. There are auto parts, motors, large oil spills, and antifreeze in the back.
Mr. Kvasnik asked about the $100,000 to repair. Mr. Magner responded the roof is bad and the
first floor is possibly falling through.
Gerry Strathman recommends approval of the resolution.
Resolution ordering the owner to remove or repair the property at 847 Lexington Parkwav
South. If the owner fails to comply, Code Enforcement is ordered to remove the building.
(Laid over from 9-4-01)
(Steve Magner submitted photographs.)
(No one appeazed to represent the properly.)
Steve Magner stated the owner asked for a layover to identify his plans. He has purchased the
adjoining properry and has obtained a wrecking pernrit to remove the structure. Code
Enforcement will give the owner time to demolish the properiy, but they recommend approval of
the resolution.
Gerry Strathman recommends approval of the resolution.
o� �ZC�O
LEGISLA'TIVE HEARING MINLJTES OF NOVEMBER 6, 2001 Page 4
Resolution ordering the owner to remove or repair the property at 1619 Seventh Street
Easx If the owner fails to comply, Code Enforcement is ordered to remove the building.
(Steve Magner submitted photographs.)
(No one appeazed to represent the property.)
Mr. Magner reported this property has been vacant since December 7, 2000. It suffered a severe
fire at that time. There have been five summary abatement notices issued to remove refuse,
secure front door, cut tall grass, and abate vehicles. On August 30, 2001, an inspection of the
building was conducted, a list of deficiencies which constitute a nuisance condition was
developed, and photographs were taken. An order to abate a nuisance building was issued on
September 10, 2001, with a compliance date of September 25, 2001. As of this date, the properiy
remains in a condition which comprises a nuisance as defined by the legislative code. The vacant
building fees are paid. The real estate taYes aze unpaid of $3,282. Estimated mazket value is
$13,200 on the land; estimated market value of the building prior to the fire, $49,600. As of
today a code compliance inspection has not been applied for and a$2,000 bond has not been
posted. Estimated cost to repair is $100,000; estimated cost to demolish, $13,000 to $15,000.
Gerry Strathman recommends approval.
Appeai of summary abatement order for 1539 Blair Avenue.
Gerry Strathman stated the gazage has been removed per Joe Yannazelly (Code Enforcement). .
(Case closed.)
Appeal of summary abatement order and vehicle abatement order for 1323 Bush Avenue.
(No one appeazed to represent the property.)
Gerry Strathman recommends denying the appeal.
Appeal of summary abatement order and vehicle abatement order for 1327 Bush Avenue.
(No one appeazed to represent the property.)
Gerry Strathman recommends denying the appeal.
The meeting was adjourned at 1037 a.m.
rrn
s
5�.+' i _ 'w� i , , . i.�
Presented By
Referred To
Committee: Date
�a
4
5
6
7
8
9
10
11
12
13
14
15
16
17
18
19
20
21
22
23
24
25
26
27
28
29
30
31
32
33
34
35
36
37
38
WHEREAS, Citizen Service Office, Division of Code Enforcement has requested the City Council
to hold public hearings to consider the advisability and necessity of ordering the repair or wrecking and
removal of a two-story, wood frame, single family dwelling located on property hereinafter referred to as
the "Subject Property" and commonly known as 531 Ohio Street. This property is legally described as
follows, to wit:
Lot 3, Block 8, Dawson's Addition to Saint Paul.
WHEREAS, based upon the records in the Ramsey County Recorder's Offlce and informarion
obtained by Division of Code Enfarcement on or before May 18, 2001, the following are the now lrnown
interested or responsible parties far the Subj ect: State of MN Trust Exempt, 50 West Kellogg Blvd., Ste.
620B, St. Paul, MN 55102; Margaret Bischel, 5544 12�' Avenue South, Mpls., MN 55417; Curt Potts,
981 Payne Avenue, St. Pau1, MN 55101; Legal Ledger Inc., 322 Minnesota Street Ste. E-1432,
St. Paul, MN 55101; Attorney Doug Rainbow, 250 Second Avenue South, Mpls., MN 55401,
Re: Thomas Kirkland; Attomey Keith Simmons, 18830 Eastwood Drive, Excelisor, MN 55331,
Re: Metro Contracting
WHEREAS, Division of Code Enforcement has served in accordance with the provisions of
Chapter 45 of the Saint Paul Legislative Code an order identified as an"Order to Abate Nuisance
Building(s)" dated September 17 2001; and
WHEREAS, this order informed the then known interested or responsible parties that the shucture
located on the Subject Property is a nuisance building(s) pursuant to Chapter 45; and
WHEREAS, this order informed the interested or responsible parties that they must repair or
demolish the struchxre located on the Subject Property by August 22, 2001; and
WHEREAS, the enforcement officer has posted a placard on the Subject Property declaring this
building(s) to constitute a nuisance condition; subject to demolition; and
WIIEREAS, this nuisance condition has not been corrected and Division of Code Enforcement
requested that the City Clerk schedule public hearings before the Legislative Hearing Officer of the City
Council and the Saint Paul City Council; and
WHEREAS, the interested and responsible parties have been served notice in accordance with the
provisions of Chapter 45 of the Saint Paul Legislative Code, of the tixne, date, place and purpose of the
public hearings; and
Council File # 0 � —\�oo
Green Sheet # � UZ3 �J�"{
RESOLUTION
CITY S T PAUL, MINNE
�
3q
ot-\aoo
1 WF3EREAS, a hearing was held before the Legislative Hearing Officer of the Saint Paul City
2 Council on Tuesday, November 6, 2001 to hear testnnony and evidence, and after receiving testimony and
3 evidence, made the recommendation to approve the request to order the interested or responsible parties to
4 make the Subject Property safe and not detrimental to the public peace, health, safety and welfare and
5 remove its blighting influence on the community by rehabilitating this structure in accordance with all
6 applicable codes and ordinances, or in the alternafive by demolishing and removing the structure in
7 accordance with all applicable codes and ordinances. The rehabilitation or demolition of the structure to be
8 completed within fifteen (15) days after the date of the Council Hearing; and
9
10
11
12
13
14
15
16
17
18
19
20
21
22
23
24
25
26
27
28
29
30
31
32
33
34
35
36
37
38
39
40
41
42
43
44
45
46
47
48
49
50
51
52
53
54
WHEREAS, a hearing was held before the Saint Paul City Council on Wednesday, November 28,
2001 and the testimony and evidence including the action taken by the Legislative Hearing Officer was
considered by the Council; now therefare
BE IT RESOLVED, that based upon the testimony and evidence presented at the above referenced
public hearings, the Saint Paul City Council hereby adopts the following Findings and Order concerning
the Subject Property at 531 Ohio Street:
That the Subject Property comprises a nuisance condition as defined in Saint Paul
Legislative Code, Chapter 45.
2.
3.
4.
5.
6.
7.
8.
That the costs of demolition and removal of this building(s) is estimated to exceed three
thousand dollars ($3,000.00).
That there now exists and has existed multiple Housing or Building code violations at the
Subj ect Property.
That an Order to Abate Nuisance Building(s) was sent to the then known responsible parties
to correct the deficiencies or to demolish and remove the building(s).
That the deficiencies causing this nuisance condition have not been conected.
That Division of Code Enforcement has posted a placard on the Subject Property which
declares it to be a nuisance condition subject to demolition.
That this building has been routinely monitored by the Citizen Service Offices, Division of
Code Enforcement, Vacant/Nuisance Buildings.
That the known interested parties and owners are as previously stated in this resolution and
that the notification requirements of Chapter 45 have been fulfilled.
ORDER
The Saint Paul City Council hereby makes the following order:
1. The above referenced interested or responsible parties shall make the Subject Property safe and not
detrimental to the public peace, health, safety and welfare and remove its blighting influence on the
community by rehabilitating this structure and correcting all deficiencies as prescribed in the above
referenced Order to Abate Nuisance Building(s) in accordance with all applicable codes and
ordinances, or in the altemative by demolishing and removing the stnxcture in accordance with all
applicable codes and ordinances. The rehabilitation or demolition and removal of the shucture
must be completed within fifteen (15) days after the date of the Council Hearing.
2. If the above corrective action is not completed within this period of tune the Citizen Service Office,
Division of Code Enforcement is hereby authorized to take whatever steps are necessary to
demolish and remove this structure, fill the site and charge the costs incurred against the Subject
0�-\�
Property pursuant to the provisions of Chapter 45 of the Saint Paul Legislative Code.
2
3 3. In the event the building is to be demolished and removed by the City of Saint Paul, all personal
4 property or fistures of any kind which interfere with the demolition and removal shall be removed
5 from the property by the responsible parties by the end of this tune period. If all personal property
6 is not removed, it shall be considered to be abandoned and the City of Saint Paul shall remove and
7 dispose of such property as provided by law.
9 4. It is fi�.rther ordered, that a copy of this resolution be mailed to the owners and interested parties in
accordance with Chapter 45 of the Saint Paul Legislative Code.
Requested by Deparhnent of:
Adopted by Council: Date 7. �ilp �
Adoption Certified by Councii Secretary
BY� �.� '� . \� .,.. -
Approved by Mayor: Date� � ��/ �
By:
Citizen Service Office• Code Enforcement
By: �� —
� �
Form Approved by City Attorney
By: cX _
Approved by Mayor for Submission to Council
By: <-� (l. ��7/�
J. ., n.. ,. . . . . , .
"`°"� � Division ofCode Eiiforcement
266-8439
IUST BE ON COUNGL AGHmA BY (DA7q
Wednesday, November 28, 2001
owrewnurm
10/12%Ol � "
nou��+c
TOTAL # OF SIGNATURf PAGES
SHEET
Y
0\-1�}00
No102359
� an�TrouEr � ❑ arcuFwc _
�..�.�.��:�. �..���
� MYORPRAi9S�AM�1 , ❑
(CLIP ALL LOCATIONS FOR SIGNATURE)
r , City Council to pass this resolution which will order the owner(s) to remove or repair the referenced building(s). If
: the owner fails to comply with the resolution, the Citizen Service Office, Division of Code Enforcement is ordered
, to remove the building. The subject property is located at 531 Ohio Street.
PLANNING CAMMISSION
CIB COMMIT'fEE
CML SERVICE COMMISSION
RSONAL SERVICE CONTRACIS MUST ANSWER T/lf FOLLOWIN6 QUES7ION5:
Hac this persorJfinn everxorlced under a cmtract torthie deoerlmenl?
YES NO
Fks 1MS peBaJfirm e�er been a Wy emqoyce9 , .
YES NO
Dces thia peisawJfinn P� a sldll not namal�YP�aesseU M enY current city emd%'eea
YES NO
Ic this P�e�rin a targeted VendoY! �
YES NO '
the Saint Paul Legislative Code. The owners, interested parties and responsible parties laiown to the Enforcement
Officer were given an order to repair or remove the building at 531 Ohio Street by August 22, 1001, and have
failed to comply with those orders.
The City wiil eliminate a nuisance. e ��� 6 ` ° ' �`� ��.���C�� ��S��rCh �
OCT 19 26�� 0£T 3� 20�1
� � � ClI�Y a4�'�O�I�EY �
�� DVMJJAGES IFJ)PPROVEQ '
e l:ity �nll spena fixnds to wreck and remove this building(s). These costs will be assessed to the property,
collected as a speciai assessment,against the property taxes.
�nmsan�ce�c"o °� ' � tY• S� ) g� tY•
��it�ion �nll remain unabated in the Ci This buildin s will continue tq bli t the cominuni
OF TRANSACTION S
sourtce Nuisance Housing Abatement
�� '�.-:%�a�
cosrmev�ue suoiaereo t��R�� a+t7 O
�cr�vmNw�e� 33261
NO
�
REPORT
Date: November 6, 2001
Time: 10:00 am.
Place: Room 330 City Hall
� 15 West Kellogg Boulevazd
LEGISLATIVE HEARING
Gerry Strathman
Legislafive Hearing Officer
1. Resolution ordering the owner to remove or repair the property at 705 Sims Avenue. If
the owner fails to comply, Code Enforcement is ordered to remove the building.
Legislative Hearing Officer recommends granting the owner six months to complete the
rehabilitation of this properry on condition that the vacant building fee is paid by noon of
November 28, 2001.
2. Resolution ordering the owner to remove or repair the properry at 531 Ohio Street. If the
owner fails to comply, Code Enforcement is ordered to remove the building.
(Laid over from 10-2-01)
Legislative Hearing Officer recommends approval.
3. Resolution ordering the owner to remove or repair the property at 847 Lexin2ton Pazkway
South. If the owner fails to comply, Code Enforcement is ordered to remove the building.
(Laid over from 9-4-01)
Legislative Hearing Officer recommends approval.
4. Resolution ordering the owner to remnove or repair the property at 1619 Seventh Street
East. If the owner fails to comply, Code Enforcement is ordered to remove the building.
Legislative Hearing Officer recommends approval.
5. Appeal of summary abatement order for 1539 Blair Avenue.
(Case closed.)
6. Appeal of summary abatement order and velricle abatement order for 1323 Bush Avenue
Legislative Hearing Officer recommends d�nping the appeai.
Appeal of sumxnary abatement order and vehicle abatement order for 1327 Bush Avenue
Legislarive Hearing Officer recommends denying the appeal.
�1
0�-\�
REPORT
Date: October 2, 2001
Time: 10:00 a.m.
Place: Room 330 City Hall
15 West Kellogg Boulevazd
LEGISLATIVE HEARING
Gerry Strathman
Legislaflve Hearing Officer
Laid over sununary abatement appeal:
J0102G1 Grass Cutting (by private contractor) at 664 Edmund Avenue.
Legislative Hearing Officer recommends approval of the assessment.
(Note: The City Council approved this assessment at their October 2 meeting.)
2. Resolution ordering the owner to remove or repair the property at 393 Sidnev Street East.
If the owner fails to comply, Code Enforcement is ordered to remove the building.
(Laid over from 9-4-01)
Legislative Hearing Officer recommends laying over to the October 16, 2001, Legislative
Hearing.
Resolution ardering the owner to remove or repair the property at 1104 Rice Street. If the
owner fails to comply, Code Enfarcement is ordered to remove the building.
Legislative Hearing Officer recommends the owner be given six months to complete the
rehabilitation of the property on condition that the following is done by noon of October
24, 2001: 1) Get a code compliance inspection, 2) Post a$2000 bond.
4. Suzmnary abatement arder appeal for 2043 Manitou Avenue.
Legislative Hearing Officer recommends denying the appeal, but amending the
compliance date to October 15, 2001.
� 5. Resolution ordering the owner to remove or repair the property at 531 Ohio Street. If the
owner fails to comply, Code Enforcement is ordered to remove the building.
Legislative Hearing Officer recommends laying over to the November 6, 2001,
Legislative Hearing.
f�Yil
MINUTES OF THE LEGISLATIVE HEARING
Tuesday, October 2, 2001
Room 330 City Hall
Gerry Strathman, Legislative Hearing Officer
STAFF PRESENT: Fong Lor, License, Inspections, Environmental Protection; Steve Magner,
Code Enforcement
The meeting was called to order at 10:00 a.m.
Laid Over Summary Abatement Appeal:
J0102G1 Grass Cutting (by private contractor) at 664 Edmund Avenue.
(Fong Lor provided interpreting services for this address.)
The following owners appeazed: Lee Lor and Tong Vang, 305 Aurora Avenue.
Gerry Strathman had Fong Lor e�lain to the owner that he is here as a translator and not as a
representative on the owner's behalf.
0�-taoo
(Steve Magner presented photographs to Mr. Sirathman. They were also shown to Lee Lor. The
photographs were later returned.)
Mr. Strathman stated this has to do with cleaning up of refuse and cutting tall weeds and grass at
664 Edmund in the amount of $120.
Mr. Lor asked when the woxk was done. Mr. Strathman responded June 1, 2001.
Ms. Vang stated the house was on fire at one time, and they no longer live in that house. She
asked why no one informed her that the grass was going to be cut. Mr. Strathman responded
notice was sent to 664 Edmund Avenue. It should have been forwazded to them if there was a
forwazding address.
Ms. Vang stated when they moved to a different location, they sent a form to the post o�ce to
inform them of the new address. She never received a notice of this assessment. Mr. Strathman
responded it was mailed to that address. It appears the City has met the legal requirement. As
long as they are the owner, they are responsible far keeping the grass cut and the yard clear.
Mr. Lor stated he believes that if the properry was damaged and he no longer lives there, his
insurance should take care of some of the issues. Mr. Strathxnan responded that may be possible,
but that is between him and the insurance company. As far as the City is concerned, the cleanup
was done and the proper procedures were followed. It is a proper charge, and the City will be
expecting him to pay it.
p�_`�.ao
LEGISLATIVE HEARING MINi JTES OF OCTOBER 2, 2001 Page 2
Mr. Lor stated the City should be required to send two to three notices before the work is done.
Mr. Strathman responded the City is required to send one and that notice was sent.
Not only does their properry have tall weeds, Ms. Vang stated, the neighbors have the same
problem. She asked can the City tell the neighbors to do the same thing. Generally, responded
Mr. Stratl�man, the City responds to complaints; someone must have complained about this
property and an inspector was sent out.
Ms. Vang stated they should be excused for one time because they never received the notice. Mr.
Strathman responded he cannot do that. Steve Magner responded he received a vacant building
registration form on September 17, 2001, signed by Yee Lor. The form has 664 Edmund Avenue
as their address. It would be advantageous for them to give Code Enforcement their new address
to minimize any future summary abatement. Eventually the post office will stop forwarding mail
because there is an expiration on forwarding mail from a previous address. Mr. Lor responded
his insurance agent told him he cannot notify us about his new address.
Gerry Strathman recommended approval of the assessment. It would be in the owner's interest to
give Code Enfarcement his current address.
Resolution ordering the owner to remove or repair the property at 393 Sidney Street East.
If the owner fails to comply, Code Enforcement is ordered to remove the building.
(Laid over from 9-4-01)
George Borer, 386 Wabasha StreetNorth, #1200, representing Lutheran Social Services,
appeared and stated there has been a delay with the court appointed appraisers. They have not
finished their appraisals of the property. Yesterday, one of them thought it should be valued
more than the proposed sale price. Mr. Borer sent him various documents, and the appraiser has
finally concluded the value of the property is less than the sale price. That should be the last
obstacle.
Gerry Strathman asked when this will close. Mr. Barer responded the court will not approve the
sale until the appraisals are in. Both appraisers indicate they will have them in within a week.
His understanding is the neighborhood alliance is willing to close immediately upon the filing of
the appraisals.
Mr. Strathman asked can the matter be done by October 16. Mr. Borer responded he hopes so.
He will tell the Alliance that it is imperative that the matter is closed by that date. Mr. Magner
suggested this matter be laid over to October 16, and if there is a closing on ar approxunately on
that date, the matter can go straight to City Council on October 24, and the resolution could be
amended. It would just be a matter of posting a bond.
Gerry Strathman laid over to October 16, 2001, for the property to go through closing. Mr.
Magner stated the Alliance will need to post a bond before noon of October 24.
v�-\�o
LEGISLATIVE HEARING MINLJT'ES OF OCTOBER 2, 2001 Page 3
Resolution ordering the owner to remove or repair the property at 1104 Rice Street. If the
owner fails to comply, Code Enforcement is ordered to remove the building.
(Photogaphs were submitted by Mr. Magner.)
Steve Magner reported this is a steeUmasonry frame commercial structure. The building was
condemned in October 2000 and has been vacant since then. There have been four sununary
abatement notices to remove refuse and abate inoperable vehicles. On July 31, 2001, an
inspection of the building was conducted, a list of deficiencies which constitute a nuisance
condition was developed, and photograplvs were taken. An order to abate a nuisance building
was issued on August 6, 2001, with a compliance date of August 21. As of this date, this
property remains in a condition which comprises a nuisance as defined by the legislative code.
The vacant building fees are paid. Reai estate taxes are unpaid of $2,745.93. Taxation has
placed an estimated market value of $14,400 on the land and $57,100 on the building. The
estimated cost to repair is $100,000; estimated cost to demolish, $10,000 to $12,000. Mr.
Magner has not had good feedback from the owner. There aze numerous complaints regarding
cats in the building. There is an excessive amount of storage. The roof structure is allowing
moisture to enter the building.
Cheryl Hilyar, 8961 37th Street North, Lake Elmo, owner, appeared and stated she plans to wark
closely with the inspector and remove everythiug from the back of the building. There are
outside tools which will be removed or a storage shed built for them. All the storage from the
inside of the building needs to be removed. She needs to get a new water heater installed. The
furnace went out The water meter exploded. She needs to make water repairs. She needs to
power wash the inside of the building. She needs to paint the trim, doors, and caulking around
the doors and make the outside look presentable. The neighbor next door, who built this
building, is supporting her in fixing it.
Mr. Strathman asked is she aware of the roof problems. Ms. Hilyar responded she has not been
up there, but someone told her it is strong. She has estimates on the repairs. She also has
support from the hazdwaze store next door.
Gerry Strathman recommended that the owner be given six months to complete the rehabilitation
of the property on condifion that the following is done by noon of October 24, 2001: 1) Get a
code compliance inspection done, 2) post a$2000 bond.
Summary Abatement Order Appeal for 2043 Manitou Avenue.
Mazlene A. Campbell, owner, appeared and stated this 1972 vehicle was brought back to its
original state. She told her son he could store it alongside the garage. She did not know it had to
haue something underneath it. The vehicle does not leak anything, so she thought it was safe
enough to store on the ground. She was told she could put gravel underneath it ar move the
bt�lyoa
LEGISLATIVE HEARING MIN CJTES OF OCTOBER 2, 2001 Page 4
vehicle. She has someone that can store the vehicle for her, but she cannot get it to that location
untii October 13. It has new tabs.
Gerry Strathman denied the appeal, but amended the compliance date on the Vehicle Abatement
Order to October 15, 2001. The inspector will not order it towed unfil after that date.
� Resolution ordering the owner to remove or repair the property at 531 Ohio Street. If the
owner fails to comply, Code Enforcement is ordered to remove the building.
Steve Magner reported that this properry has gone tax forfeit to the State of Minnesota. It was
originally suppose to forfeit on August 1. The reason it did not was because they had a
notification problem of serving the individuals with this properiy. Since then, they held it over
for up to two months. As of September 11, Mr. Magner found out that Ramsey County did take
possession of the building. This enters into a problem far Code Enforcement doing properry
notification. He recommends laying over to the November 6 Legjslative Hearing for re-
no6fication. Chris Kujala (Ramsey County Tax Forfeited Lands) does not plan to oppose any
action taken with this property at this time.
Gerry Strathman laid over to the November 6, 2001, Legislative Hearing.
The meeting was adjourned at 10:38 a.m.
rrn
.
CITIZEN SERVICE OFFICE
Fred Ow,au, Ciry Clerk
DIVISIONOFPROPER7YCODEENFORCEMENT �� �,}OO
Michae[RMarehead,ProgramManager � �
CITY OF SA1NT PAUL
Norm Coleman, Mayor
October 12, 2001
Nuisance Bui7ding Code Enforcemerst
ISH!KeQoggBlvd.Rm.190 Tal.• 651d66-8440
SaintPaul,MN55702 Faz:651-266-8426--
�
.l
OCT i 5 2��1
�i��� 1����!��EY
NOTICE OF PUBLIC HEARINGS
Council President and
Members of the City Council
Citizen Service Office, Vacant/Nuisance Buildings Enforcement Division has requested the City
Council schedule public hearings to consider a resolution ardering the repair or removal of the
nuisance building(s) located at:
531 Ohio Street
The City Council has scheduled the date of these hearings as follows:
Legislative Hearing - Tuesday, November 6, 2001
City Council Hearing - Wednesday, November 28, 2001
The owners and responsible parties of record are:
Name and Last Known Address
State of MN Trust Exempt
50 West Kellogg Blvd., Ste. 620B
St. Paul, MN 55102
Mugaret Bischei
5544 12�` Avenue South
Mpls., MN 55417
Curt Potts
981 Payne Avenue
St. Paul, MN 55101
Interest
Fee Owner
7udgment Creditor
Jud�nent Creditor .
531 Ohio Street
October 12, 2001
Page 2
Name and Last Known Address
Interest
O1 —\i� �O
Legal Ledger Inc.
322 Minnesota Street Ste. E-1432
St. Paul, MN 55101
Attomey Doug Rainbow
250 Second Avenue South
Mpls., MN 55401
Re: Thomas Kirkland
Attomey Keith Simmons
18830 Eastwood Drive
Excelisor, MN 55331
Re: Metro Contracting
The legal description of this property is:
Lot 3, Block 8, Dawson's Addition to Saint Paul.
Jud�nent Creditor
Jud�ment Creditor
Jud�ment Creditor
- Division of Code Enforcement has declared this building(s) to constitute a"nuisance" as defined
by Legislative Code, Chapter 45. Division of Code Enfarcement has issued an order to the then
known responsible parties to eliminate this nuisance condition by correcting the deficiencies or
by razing and removing this buildina(s).
Inasmuch as this Order to Abate has not been complied with the nuisance condition remains
unabated, the community continues to suffer the blighting influence of this property. It is the
recommendation of the Division of Code Enforcement that the City Council pass a resolution
ordering the responsible parties to either repair, or demolish and remove this buiiding in a timely
manner, and failing that, authorize the Division of Code Enforcement to proceed to demolition
and removal, and to assess the costs incurred against the real estate as a special assessment to be
collected in the same manner as tases.
Sincerely,
�teve �a�rcer
Steve Magner
Vacant Buildings Supervisor
Division of Code Enforcement
Citizen Service Office
SM:mI
cc: Frank Berg, Building Inspection and Desigi
Meghan Riley, City Attomeys Office
Nancy Anderson, Assistant Secretary to the Council
Laurie Kaplan, PED-Housing Division
o� ��o
3� .
MINUTES OF THE LEGISLATIVE HEARING
Tuesday, November 6, 2001
Gerry Strathman, Legislative Hear'sng Officer
Room 330 Courthouse
The meeting was called to order at 10:10 a.m.
STAFF PRESENT: Steve Magner, Code Enforcement
Resolution ordering the owner to remove or repair the property at 705 Sims Avenue. If the
owner fails to comply, Code Enforcement is ordered to remove the building.
(Steve Magner submitted photographs.)
Mike Haus, 2357 Rogers, Mendota Heights, appeared and stated he does not own the property
now. He purchased the property in 1994 and sold it on a contract for deed. It was owner
occupied. The new owner was given $2,000 to do garage work at the time. They did not do the
work, they stopped making payment, and stopped doing repairs on the home. Mr. Haus became
the owner again after four nonpayments. He obtained a list for the repair work to be done, and
paid the $2,000 bond to ensure the work would be done. The new buyer is purchasing the
property on a contract for deed; he should be at this meeting shortly. Mr. Haus is funding 100%
of whatever he needs to do to bring it up to code. The work has already been started, siding has
already been removed, and other siding has been purchased.
Gerry Strathman asked are they intending to rehabilitate this property and post the bond. Mr.
Haus responded the bond has been posted, and a permit has been taken out with the City. The
work has been started. This has all been done within 30 days of gaining back ownership of the
property.
Steve Magner reported that Code Enforcement condemned the properry October 9, 2000. At that
time, Sherri Beth Fonest was the occupant and was purchasing it on a contract for deed. Since
that time, Code Enforcement has performed about 100 inspections, including night inspections.
They haue issued numerous citations for illegal occupancy. On about three occasions, the Police
Department has removed people from the house. Code Enforcement has spent thousands of
dollars of sunmiary abatement money in boazding up the property, cleaning the yazd, removing
junk vehicles, etc. The property is no longer in the FoaesYs hands, and the property has gone
back to the contract holder. There is a new contract with a second par[y. Mr. Magner would like
the City to be assured that the rehabilitation would occur in a timely manner and the contract
purchaser follows a11 the guidelines. The vacant building fee needs to be paid.
Gerry Strathman asked about the other parties on the notice of public hearing: Jason Max Clark,
Eric Scott Peterson, Randi Rae-Ann Linderman. Mr. Magner responded those aze parties that
were removed for unlawful occupancy of the dwelling and issued citations. They are associates
or blood relatives of Ms. Forrest.
Warren Abel, 701 Sims Avenue, appeazed and stated this properiy has been a problem for a
number of yeazs for debris in the yazd, cars left on the street, people coming and going, and
v�-�Zoc�
LEGISLATIVE HEARING MINUTES OF NOVEMBER 6, 2001 Page 2
possible illegal activities. When it became vacant about seven years ago, Mr. Abel was on the
boazd of ESNDC (East Side Neighborhood Development Company), which looked at the
property for rehabilitation. There were structural problems with the properry. They were unable
to come to an agreement with the heirs about the price. It went out onto the common mazket for
sale, and the structural problems were covered over. Mr. Abel would be concemed that the work
presently being done would continue to leave the problems covered over. The asbestos siding
was removed over the weekend. Mr. Abel was told on Friday, that the owner was not going to
get a state permit to remove the asbestos because he and his friends were going to do it. Last
night, they were at the house until 10:45 hammering and n,nn;ng saws. Mr. Abel would like to
see the property rehuaed to a state in which they will not cause a problem. Several million
dollars have been put into this neighborhood. He would like to see this property raised to that
level.
Mr. Magner stated he had a frank conversation with the new contract purchaser, who is
supposedly coming today. He esplained the work would have to be done to code by a licensed
person. Also, he explained the property cannot be legally occupied until Don Wagner (License,
Inspections, Environmental Protection) or one of his designees issues a code compliance
certificate. He indicated he wanted to have people in the properry guazding it and working at the
property all day and night. The City's main concern is that the dwelling is rehabilitated in a
timely fashion.
Gerry Strathman recommends the owner be granted six months to rehabilitate this building on
the condirion that the vacant building fee is paid by noon of November 28, 2001. Don Wagner
said he will accept the current code inspection, stated Mr. Magner.
� Resolution ordering the owner to remove or repair the property at 531 Ohio Street. If the
owner fails to compiy, Code Enforcement is ordered to remove the building.
(Laid over from 10-2-01)
(Steve Magner submitted photographs.)
(No one appeared to represent the property.)
Gerry Strathman stated this properry was in the process of going tax forfeit. Steve Magner
responded the property did go tax forfeit after Code Enforcement's original notice was sent.
There were a number of parties that haue to be notified for this process; Code Enfarcement has
now done the proper notification, and they aze prepazed to move forwazd on this matter today.
Mr. Magner reported this was formerly a Laundromat. It has been vacant since October 16,
1998. The current owner is State of Minnesota Trust Exempt. There have been nine summary
abatement notices issued to remove refuse, cut tall grass, secure properiy, and abatement
vehicles. On July 11, 2001, an inspection of the building was conducted, a list of deficiencies
which constitute a nuisance condition was developed, and photographs were taken. An order to
abate a nuisance building was issued on July 23, 2001, with a compliance date of August 22,
2001. As of this date, the property remains in a condition which comprises a nuisance as defined
v�-��v
LEGISLATIVE F3EARING MINiJTES OF NOVEMBER 6, 2001 Page 3
by the legislative code. The vacant building fees aze due. Tasation has placed an estimated
market vaiue of $11,300 on the land and $72,300 on the building. As of today, no one has
applied for the code compliance inspection and a bond has not been posted. The estimated cost
to repair is $100,000; estimated cost to demolish, $13,000 to $14,000.
Because it was used as a Laundromat and dry cleaning facility, stated Mr. Magner, there may be
possible contaminants on the site. Code Enforcement would not remove any of those
contaminants; they would leave that up to the State. Ramsey County dces not haue immediate
plans to sell this properry and they haue no plans to stop the resolution at this time.
Theodore Kvasnik, 2190 Marshall Avenue, Sew What Corporation, appeazed and stated his
company does laundry and dry cleaning services. He has not been in the building to examine it
for possible purchase. Mr. Strathman responded they need to contact Ramsey County Trust
Exempt Property Division.
Mr. Kvasnik stated he was not aware that dry cleaniug was done in that building. He had done
business with them for a number of yeazs. He was aware of the boilers. Mr. Magner responded
he and Ramsey County have had no ability to contact the previous owner to identify what
happened at the site. Based on hearsay evidence, they feel there is pollution on the site. There is
already evidence of other pollutants. Also, there was automobile repair in the back of the
building. There are auto parts, motors, large oil spills, and antifreeze in the back.
Mr. Kvasnik asked about the $100,000 to repair. Mr. Magner responded the roof is bad and the
first floor is possibly falling through.
Gerry Strathman recommends approval of the resolution.
Resolution ordering the owner to remove or repair the property at 847 Lexington Parkwav
South. If the owner fails to comply, Code Enforcement is ordered to remove the building.
(Laid over from 9-4-01)
(Steve Magner submitted photographs.)
(No one appeazed to represent the properly.)
Steve Magner stated the owner asked for a layover to identify his plans. He has purchased the
adjoining properry and has obtained a wrecking pernrit to remove the structure. Code
Enforcement will give the owner time to demolish the properiy, but they recommend approval of
the resolution.
Gerry Strathman recommends approval of the resolution.
o� �ZC�O
LEGISLA'TIVE HEARING MINLJTES OF NOVEMBER 6, 2001 Page 4
Resolution ordering the owner to remove or repair the property at 1619 Seventh Street
Easx If the owner fails to comply, Code Enforcement is ordered to remove the building.
(Steve Magner submitted photographs.)
(No one appeazed to represent the property.)
Mr. Magner reported this property has been vacant since December 7, 2000. It suffered a severe
fire at that time. There have been five summary abatement notices issued to remove refuse,
secure front door, cut tall grass, and abate vehicles. On August 30, 2001, an inspection of the
building was conducted, a list of deficiencies which constitute a nuisance condition was
developed, and photographs were taken. An order to abate a nuisance building was issued on
September 10, 2001, with a compliance date of September 25, 2001. As of this date, the properiy
remains in a condition which comprises a nuisance as defined by the legislative code. The vacant
building fees are paid. The real estate taYes aze unpaid of $3,282. Estimated mazket value is
$13,200 on the land; estimated market value of the building prior to the fire, $49,600. As of
today a code compliance inspection has not been applied for and a$2,000 bond has not been
posted. Estimated cost to repair is $100,000; estimated cost to demolish, $13,000 to $15,000.
Gerry Strathman recommends approval.
Appeai of summary abatement order for 1539 Blair Avenue.
Gerry Strathman stated the gazage has been removed per Joe Yannazelly (Code Enforcement). .
(Case closed.)
Appeal of summary abatement order and vehicle abatement order for 1323 Bush Avenue.
(No one appeazed to represent the property.)
Gerry Strathman recommends denying the appeal.
Appeal of summary abatement order and vehicle abatement order for 1327 Bush Avenue.
(No one appeazed to represent the property.)
Gerry Strathman recommends denying the appeal.
The meeting was adjourned at 1037 a.m.
rrn
s
5�.+' i _ 'w� i , , . i.�
Presented By
Referred To
Committee: Date
�a
4
5
6
7
8
9
10
11
12
13
14
15
16
17
18
19
20
21
22
23
24
25
26
27
28
29
30
31
32
33
34
35
36
37
38
WHEREAS, Citizen Service Office, Division of Code Enforcement has requested the City Council
to hold public hearings to consider the advisability and necessity of ordering the repair or wrecking and
removal of a two-story, wood frame, single family dwelling located on property hereinafter referred to as
the "Subject Property" and commonly known as 531 Ohio Street. This property is legally described as
follows, to wit:
Lot 3, Block 8, Dawson's Addition to Saint Paul.
WHEREAS, based upon the records in the Ramsey County Recorder's Offlce and informarion
obtained by Division of Code Enfarcement on or before May 18, 2001, the following are the now lrnown
interested or responsible parties far the Subj ect: State of MN Trust Exempt, 50 West Kellogg Blvd., Ste.
620B, St. Paul, MN 55102; Margaret Bischel, 5544 12�' Avenue South, Mpls., MN 55417; Curt Potts,
981 Payne Avenue, St. Pau1, MN 55101; Legal Ledger Inc., 322 Minnesota Street Ste. E-1432,
St. Paul, MN 55101; Attorney Doug Rainbow, 250 Second Avenue South, Mpls., MN 55401,
Re: Thomas Kirkland; Attomey Keith Simmons, 18830 Eastwood Drive, Excelisor, MN 55331,
Re: Metro Contracting
WHEREAS, Division of Code Enforcement has served in accordance with the provisions of
Chapter 45 of the Saint Paul Legislative Code an order identified as an"Order to Abate Nuisance
Building(s)" dated September 17 2001; and
WHEREAS, this order informed the then known interested or responsible parties that the shucture
located on the Subject Property is a nuisance building(s) pursuant to Chapter 45; and
WHEREAS, this order informed the interested or responsible parties that they must repair or
demolish the struchxre located on the Subject Property by August 22, 2001; and
WHEREAS, the enforcement officer has posted a placard on the Subject Property declaring this
building(s) to constitute a nuisance condition; subject to demolition; and
WIIEREAS, this nuisance condition has not been corrected and Division of Code Enforcement
requested that the City Clerk schedule public hearings before the Legislative Hearing Officer of the City
Council and the Saint Paul City Council; and
WHEREAS, the interested and responsible parties have been served notice in accordance with the
provisions of Chapter 45 of the Saint Paul Legislative Code, of the tixne, date, place and purpose of the
public hearings; and
Council File # 0 � —\�oo
Green Sheet # � UZ3 �J�"{
RESOLUTION
CITY S T PAUL, MINNE
�
3q
ot-\aoo
1 WF3EREAS, a hearing was held before the Legislative Hearing Officer of the Saint Paul City
2 Council on Tuesday, November 6, 2001 to hear testnnony and evidence, and after receiving testimony and
3 evidence, made the recommendation to approve the request to order the interested or responsible parties to
4 make the Subject Property safe and not detrimental to the public peace, health, safety and welfare and
5 remove its blighting influence on the community by rehabilitating this structure in accordance with all
6 applicable codes and ordinances, or in the alternafive by demolishing and removing the structure in
7 accordance with all applicable codes and ordinances. The rehabilitation or demolition of the structure to be
8 completed within fifteen (15) days after the date of the Council Hearing; and
9
10
11
12
13
14
15
16
17
18
19
20
21
22
23
24
25
26
27
28
29
30
31
32
33
34
35
36
37
38
39
40
41
42
43
44
45
46
47
48
49
50
51
52
53
54
WHEREAS, a hearing was held before the Saint Paul City Council on Wednesday, November 28,
2001 and the testimony and evidence including the action taken by the Legislative Hearing Officer was
considered by the Council; now therefare
BE IT RESOLVED, that based upon the testimony and evidence presented at the above referenced
public hearings, the Saint Paul City Council hereby adopts the following Findings and Order concerning
the Subject Property at 531 Ohio Street:
That the Subject Property comprises a nuisance condition as defined in Saint Paul
Legislative Code, Chapter 45.
2.
3.
4.
5.
6.
7.
8.
That the costs of demolition and removal of this building(s) is estimated to exceed three
thousand dollars ($3,000.00).
That there now exists and has existed multiple Housing or Building code violations at the
Subj ect Property.
That an Order to Abate Nuisance Building(s) was sent to the then known responsible parties
to correct the deficiencies or to demolish and remove the building(s).
That the deficiencies causing this nuisance condition have not been conected.
That Division of Code Enforcement has posted a placard on the Subject Property which
declares it to be a nuisance condition subject to demolition.
That this building has been routinely monitored by the Citizen Service Offices, Division of
Code Enforcement, Vacant/Nuisance Buildings.
That the known interested parties and owners are as previously stated in this resolution and
that the notification requirements of Chapter 45 have been fulfilled.
ORDER
The Saint Paul City Council hereby makes the following order:
1. The above referenced interested or responsible parties shall make the Subject Property safe and not
detrimental to the public peace, health, safety and welfare and remove its blighting influence on the
community by rehabilitating this structure and correcting all deficiencies as prescribed in the above
referenced Order to Abate Nuisance Building(s) in accordance with all applicable codes and
ordinances, or in the altemative by demolishing and removing the stnxcture in accordance with all
applicable codes and ordinances. The rehabilitation or demolition and removal of the shucture
must be completed within fifteen (15) days after the date of the Council Hearing.
2. If the above corrective action is not completed within this period of tune the Citizen Service Office,
Division of Code Enforcement is hereby authorized to take whatever steps are necessary to
demolish and remove this structure, fill the site and charge the costs incurred against the Subject
0�-\�
Property pursuant to the provisions of Chapter 45 of the Saint Paul Legislative Code.
2
3 3. In the event the building is to be demolished and removed by the City of Saint Paul, all personal
4 property or fistures of any kind which interfere with the demolition and removal shall be removed
5 from the property by the responsible parties by the end of this tune period. If all personal property
6 is not removed, it shall be considered to be abandoned and the City of Saint Paul shall remove and
7 dispose of such property as provided by law.
9 4. It is fi�.rther ordered, that a copy of this resolution be mailed to the owners and interested parties in
accordance with Chapter 45 of the Saint Paul Legislative Code.
Requested by Deparhnent of:
Adopted by Council: Date 7. �ilp �
Adoption Certified by Councii Secretary
BY� �.� '� . \� .,.. -
Approved by Mayor: Date� � ��/ �
By:
Citizen Service Office• Code Enforcement
By: �� —
� �
Form Approved by City Attorney
By: cX _
Approved by Mayor for Submission to Council
By: <-� (l. ��7/�
J. ., n.. ,. . . . . , .
"`°"� � Division ofCode Eiiforcement
266-8439
IUST BE ON COUNGL AGHmA BY (DA7q
Wednesday, November 28, 2001
owrewnurm
10/12%Ol � "
nou��+c
TOTAL # OF SIGNATURf PAGES
SHEET
Y
0\-1�}00
No102359
� an�TrouEr � ❑ arcuFwc _
�..�.�.��:�. �..���
� MYORPRAi9S�AM�1 , ❑
(CLIP ALL LOCATIONS FOR SIGNATURE)
r , City Council to pass this resolution which will order the owner(s) to remove or repair the referenced building(s). If
: the owner fails to comply with the resolution, the Citizen Service Office, Division of Code Enforcement is ordered
, to remove the building. The subject property is located at 531 Ohio Street.
PLANNING CAMMISSION
CIB COMMIT'fEE
CML SERVICE COMMISSION
RSONAL SERVICE CONTRACIS MUST ANSWER T/lf FOLLOWIN6 QUES7ION5:
Hac this persorJfinn everxorlced under a cmtract torthie deoerlmenl?
YES NO
Fks 1MS peBaJfirm e�er been a Wy emqoyce9 , .
YES NO
Dces thia peisawJfinn P� a sldll not namal�YP�aesseU M enY current city emd%'eea
YES NO
Ic this P�e�rin a targeted VendoY! �
YES NO '
the Saint Paul Legislative Code. The owners, interested parties and responsible parties laiown to the Enforcement
Officer were given an order to repair or remove the building at 531 Ohio Street by August 22, 1001, and have
failed to comply with those orders.
The City wiil eliminate a nuisance. e ��� 6 ` ° ' �`� ��.���C�� ��S��rCh �
OCT 19 26�� 0£T 3� 20�1
� � � ClI�Y a4�'�O�I�EY �
�� DVMJJAGES IFJ)PPROVEQ '
e l:ity �nll spena fixnds to wreck and remove this building(s). These costs will be assessed to the property,
collected as a speciai assessment,against the property taxes.
�nmsan�ce�c"o °� ' � tY• S� ) g� tY•
��it�ion �nll remain unabated in the Ci This buildin s will continue tq bli t the cominuni
OF TRANSACTION S
sourtce Nuisance Housing Abatement
�� '�.-:%�a�
cosrmev�ue suoiaereo t��R�� a+t7 O
�cr�vmNw�e� 33261
NO
�
REPORT
Date: November 6, 2001
Time: 10:00 am.
Place: Room 330 City Hall
� 15 West Kellogg Boulevazd
LEGISLATIVE HEARING
Gerry Strathman
Legislafive Hearing Officer
1. Resolution ordering the owner to remove or repair the property at 705 Sims Avenue. If
the owner fails to comply, Code Enforcement is ordered to remove the building.
Legislative Hearing Officer recommends granting the owner six months to complete the
rehabilitation of this properry on condition that the vacant building fee is paid by noon of
November 28, 2001.
2. Resolution ordering the owner to remove or repair the properry at 531 Ohio Street. If the
owner fails to comply, Code Enforcement is ordered to remove the building.
(Laid over from 10-2-01)
Legislative Hearing Officer recommends approval.
3. Resolution ordering the owner to remove or repair the property at 847 Lexin2ton Pazkway
South. If the owner fails to comply, Code Enforcement is ordered to remove the building.
(Laid over from 9-4-01)
Legislative Hearing Officer recommends approval.
4. Resolution ordering the owner to remnove or repair the property at 1619 Seventh Street
East. If the owner fails to comply, Code Enforcement is ordered to remove the building.
Legislative Hearing Officer recommends approval.
5. Appeal of summary abatement order for 1539 Blair Avenue.
(Case closed.)
6. Appeal of summary abatement order and velricle abatement order for 1323 Bush Avenue
Legislative Hearing Officer recommends d�nping the appeai.
Appeal of sumxnary abatement order and vehicle abatement order for 1327 Bush Avenue
Legislarive Hearing Officer recommends denying the appeal.
�1
0�-\�
REPORT
Date: October 2, 2001
Time: 10:00 a.m.
Place: Room 330 City Hall
15 West Kellogg Boulevazd
LEGISLATIVE HEARING
Gerry Strathman
Legislaflve Hearing Officer
Laid over sununary abatement appeal:
J0102G1 Grass Cutting (by private contractor) at 664 Edmund Avenue.
Legislative Hearing Officer recommends approval of the assessment.
(Note: The City Council approved this assessment at their October 2 meeting.)
2. Resolution ordering the owner to remove or repair the property at 393 Sidnev Street East.
If the owner fails to comply, Code Enforcement is ordered to remove the building.
(Laid over from 9-4-01)
Legislative Hearing Officer recommends laying over to the October 16, 2001, Legislative
Hearing.
Resolution ardering the owner to remove or repair the property at 1104 Rice Street. If the
owner fails to comply, Code Enfarcement is ordered to remove the building.
Legislative Hearing Officer recommends the owner be given six months to complete the
rehabilitation of the property on condition that the following is done by noon of October
24, 2001: 1) Get a code compliance inspection, 2) Post a$2000 bond.
4. Suzmnary abatement arder appeal for 2043 Manitou Avenue.
Legislative Hearing Officer recommends denying the appeal, but amending the
compliance date to October 15, 2001.
� 5. Resolution ordering the owner to remove or repair the property at 531 Ohio Street. If the
owner fails to comply, Code Enforcement is ordered to remove the building.
Legislative Hearing Officer recommends laying over to the November 6, 2001,
Legislative Hearing.
f�Yil
MINUTES OF THE LEGISLATIVE HEARING
Tuesday, October 2, 2001
Room 330 City Hall
Gerry Strathman, Legislative Hearing Officer
STAFF PRESENT: Fong Lor, License, Inspections, Environmental Protection; Steve Magner,
Code Enforcement
The meeting was called to order at 10:00 a.m.
Laid Over Summary Abatement Appeal:
J0102G1 Grass Cutting (by private contractor) at 664 Edmund Avenue.
(Fong Lor provided interpreting services for this address.)
The following owners appeazed: Lee Lor and Tong Vang, 305 Aurora Avenue.
Gerry Strathman had Fong Lor e�lain to the owner that he is here as a translator and not as a
representative on the owner's behalf.
0�-taoo
(Steve Magner presented photographs to Mr. Sirathman. They were also shown to Lee Lor. The
photographs were later returned.)
Mr. Strathman stated this has to do with cleaning up of refuse and cutting tall weeds and grass at
664 Edmund in the amount of $120.
Mr. Lor asked when the woxk was done. Mr. Strathman responded June 1, 2001.
Ms. Vang stated the house was on fire at one time, and they no longer live in that house. She
asked why no one informed her that the grass was going to be cut. Mr. Strathman responded
notice was sent to 664 Edmund Avenue. It should have been forwazded to them if there was a
forwazding address.
Ms. Vang stated when they moved to a different location, they sent a form to the post o�ce to
inform them of the new address. She never received a notice of this assessment. Mr. Strathman
responded it was mailed to that address. It appears the City has met the legal requirement. As
long as they are the owner, they are responsible far keeping the grass cut and the yard clear.
Mr. Lor stated he believes that if the properry was damaged and he no longer lives there, his
insurance should take care of some of the issues. Mr. Strathxnan responded that may be possible,
but that is between him and the insurance company. As far as the City is concerned, the cleanup
was done and the proper procedures were followed. It is a proper charge, and the City will be
expecting him to pay it.
p�_`�.ao
LEGISLATIVE HEARING MINi JTES OF OCTOBER 2, 2001 Page 2
Mr. Lor stated the City should be required to send two to three notices before the work is done.
Mr. Strathman responded the City is required to send one and that notice was sent.
Not only does their properry have tall weeds, Ms. Vang stated, the neighbors have the same
problem. She asked can the City tell the neighbors to do the same thing. Generally, responded
Mr. Stratl�man, the City responds to complaints; someone must have complained about this
property and an inspector was sent out.
Ms. Vang stated they should be excused for one time because they never received the notice. Mr.
Strathman responded he cannot do that. Steve Magner responded he received a vacant building
registration form on September 17, 2001, signed by Yee Lor. The form has 664 Edmund Avenue
as their address. It would be advantageous for them to give Code Enforcement their new address
to minimize any future summary abatement. Eventually the post office will stop forwarding mail
because there is an expiration on forwarding mail from a previous address. Mr. Lor responded
his insurance agent told him he cannot notify us about his new address.
Gerry Strathman recommended approval of the assessment. It would be in the owner's interest to
give Code Enfarcement his current address.
Resolution ordering the owner to remove or repair the property at 393 Sidney Street East.
If the owner fails to comply, Code Enforcement is ordered to remove the building.
(Laid over from 9-4-01)
George Borer, 386 Wabasha StreetNorth, #1200, representing Lutheran Social Services,
appeared and stated there has been a delay with the court appointed appraisers. They have not
finished their appraisals of the property. Yesterday, one of them thought it should be valued
more than the proposed sale price. Mr. Borer sent him various documents, and the appraiser has
finally concluded the value of the property is less than the sale price. That should be the last
obstacle.
Gerry Strathman asked when this will close. Mr. Barer responded the court will not approve the
sale until the appraisals are in. Both appraisers indicate they will have them in within a week.
His understanding is the neighborhood alliance is willing to close immediately upon the filing of
the appraisals.
Mr. Strathman asked can the matter be done by October 16. Mr. Borer responded he hopes so.
He will tell the Alliance that it is imperative that the matter is closed by that date. Mr. Magner
suggested this matter be laid over to October 16, and if there is a closing on ar approxunately on
that date, the matter can go straight to City Council on October 24, and the resolution could be
amended. It would just be a matter of posting a bond.
Gerry Strathman laid over to October 16, 2001, for the property to go through closing. Mr.
Magner stated the Alliance will need to post a bond before noon of October 24.
v�-\�o
LEGISLATIVE HEARING MINLJT'ES OF OCTOBER 2, 2001 Page 3
Resolution ordering the owner to remove or repair the property at 1104 Rice Street. If the
owner fails to comply, Code Enforcement is ordered to remove the building.
(Photogaphs were submitted by Mr. Magner.)
Steve Magner reported this is a steeUmasonry frame commercial structure. The building was
condemned in October 2000 and has been vacant since then. There have been four sununary
abatement notices to remove refuse and abate inoperable vehicles. On July 31, 2001, an
inspection of the building was conducted, a list of deficiencies which constitute a nuisance
condition was developed, and photograplvs were taken. An order to abate a nuisance building
was issued on August 6, 2001, with a compliance date of August 21. As of this date, this
property remains in a condition which comprises a nuisance as defined by the legislative code.
The vacant building fees are paid. Reai estate taxes are unpaid of $2,745.93. Taxation has
placed an estimated market value of $14,400 on the land and $57,100 on the building. The
estimated cost to repair is $100,000; estimated cost to demolish, $10,000 to $12,000. Mr.
Magner has not had good feedback from the owner. There aze numerous complaints regarding
cats in the building. There is an excessive amount of storage. The roof structure is allowing
moisture to enter the building.
Cheryl Hilyar, 8961 37th Street North, Lake Elmo, owner, appeared and stated she plans to wark
closely with the inspector and remove everythiug from the back of the building. There are
outside tools which will be removed or a storage shed built for them. All the storage from the
inside of the building needs to be removed. She needs to get a new water heater installed. The
furnace went out The water meter exploded. She needs to make water repairs. She needs to
power wash the inside of the building. She needs to paint the trim, doors, and caulking around
the doors and make the outside look presentable. The neighbor next door, who built this
building, is supporting her in fixing it.
Mr. Strathman asked is she aware of the roof problems. Ms. Hilyar responded she has not been
up there, but someone told her it is strong. She has estimates on the repairs. She also has
support from the hazdwaze store next door.
Gerry Strathman recommended that the owner be given six months to complete the rehabilitation
of the property on condifion that the following is done by noon of October 24, 2001: 1) Get a
code compliance inspection done, 2) post a$2000 bond.
Summary Abatement Order Appeal for 2043 Manitou Avenue.
Mazlene A. Campbell, owner, appeared and stated this 1972 vehicle was brought back to its
original state. She told her son he could store it alongside the garage. She did not know it had to
haue something underneath it. The vehicle does not leak anything, so she thought it was safe
enough to store on the ground. She was told she could put gravel underneath it ar move the
bt�lyoa
LEGISLATIVE HEARING MIN CJTES OF OCTOBER 2, 2001 Page 4
vehicle. She has someone that can store the vehicle for her, but she cannot get it to that location
untii October 13. It has new tabs.
Gerry Strathman denied the appeal, but amended the compliance date on the Vehicle Abatement
Order to October 15, 2001. The inspector will not order it towed unfil after that date.
� Resolution ordering the owner to remove or repair the property at 531 Ohio Street. If the
owner fails to comply, Code Enforcement is ordered to remove the building.
Steve Magner reported that this properry has gone tax forfeit to the State of Minnesota. It was
originally suppose to forfeit on August 1. The reason it did not was because they had a
notification problem of serving the individuals with this properiy. Since then, they held it over
for up to two months. As of September 11, Mr. Magner found out that Ramsey County did take
possession of the building. This enters into a problem far Code Enforcement doing properry
notification. He recommends laying over to the November 6 Legjslative Hearing for re-
no6fication. Chris Kujala (Ramsey County Tax Forfeited Lands) does not plan to oppose any
action taken with this property at this time.
Gerry Strathman laid over to the November 6, 2001, Legislative Hearing.
The meeting was adjourned at 10:38 a.m.
rrn
.
CITIZEN SERVICE OFFICE
Fred Ow,au, Ciry Clerk
DIVISIONOFPROPER7YCODEENFORCEMENT �� �,}OO
Michae[RMarehead,ProgramManager � �
CITY OF SA1NT PAUL
Norm Coleman, Mayor
October 12, 2001
Nuisance Bui7ding Code Enforcemerst
ISH!KeQoggBlvd.Rm.190 Tal.• 651d66-8440
SaintPaul,MN55702 Faz:651-266-8426--
�
.l
OCT i 5 2��1
�i��� 1����!��EY
NOTICE OF PUBLIC HEARINGS
Council President and
Members of the City Council
Citizen Service Office, Vacant/Nuisance Buildings Enforcement Division has requested the City
Council schedule public hearings to consider a resolution ardering the repair or removal of the
nuisance building(s) located at:
531 Ohio Street
The City Council has scheduled the date of these hearings as follows:
Legislative Hearing - Tuesday, November 6, 2001
City Council Hearing - Wednesday, November 28, 2001
The owners and responsible parties of record are:
Name and Last Known Address
State of MN Trust Exempt
50 West Kellogg Blvd., Ste. 620B
St. Paul, MN 55102
Mugaret Bischei
5544 12�` Avenue South
Mpls., MN 55417
Curt Potts
981 Payne Avenue
St. Paul, MN 55101
Interest
Fee Owner
7udgment Creditor
Jud�nent Creditor .
531 Ohio Street
October 12, 2001
Page 2
Name and Last Known Address
Interest
O1 —\i� �O
Legal Ledger Inc.
322 Minnesota Street Ste. E-1432
St. Paul, MN 55101
Attomey Doug Rainbow
250 Second Avenue South
Mpls., MN 55401
Re: Thomas Kirkland
Attomey Keith Simmons
18830 Eastwood Drive
Excelisor, MN 55331
Re: Metro Contracting
The legal description of this property is:
Lot 3, Block 8, Dawson's Addition to Saint Paul.
Jud�nent Creditor
Jud�ment Creditor
Jud�ment Creditor
- Division of Code Enforcement has declared this building(s) to constitute a"nuisance" as defined
by Legislative Code, Chapter 45. Division of Code Enfarcement has issued an order to the then
known responsible parties to eliminate this nuisance condition by correcting the deficiencies or
by razing and removing this buildina(s).
Inasmuch as this Order to Abate has not been complied with the nuisance condition remains
unabated, the community continues to suffer the blighting influence of this property. It is the
recommendation of the Division of Code Enforcement that the City Council pass a resolution
ordering the responsible parties to either repair, or demolish and remove this buiiding in a timely
manner, and failing that, authorize the Division of Code Enforcement to proceed to demolition
and removal, and to assess the costs incurred against the real estate as a special assessment to be
collected in the same manner as tases.
Sincerely,
�teve �a�rcer
Steve Magner
Vacant Buildings Supervisor
Division of Code Enforcement
Citizen Service Office
SM:mI
cc: Frank Berg, Building Inspection and Desigi
Meghan Riley, City Attomeys Office
Nancy Anderson, Assistant Secretary to the Council
Laurie Kaplan, PED-Housing Division
o� ��o
3� .
MINUTES OF THE LEGISLATIVE HEARING
Tuesday, November 6, 2001
Gerry Strathman, Legislative Hear'sng Officer
Room 330 Courthouse
The meeting was called to order at 10:10 a.m.
STAFF PRESENT: Steve Magner, Code Enforcement
Resolution ordering the owner to remove or repair the property at 705 Sims Avenue. If the
owner fails to comply, Code Enforcement is ordered to remove the building.
(Steve Magner submitted photographs.)
Mike Haus, 2357 Rogers, Mendota Heights, appeared and stated he does not own the property
now. He purchased the property in 1994 and sold it on a contract for deed. It was owner
occupied. The new owner was given $2,000 to do garage work at the time. They did not do the
work, they stopped making payment, and stopped doing repairs on the home. Mr. Haus became
the owner again after four nonpayments. He obtained a list for the repair work to be done, and
paid the $2,000 bond to ensure the work would be done. The new buyer is purchasing the
property on a contract for deed; he should be at this meeting shortly. Mr. Haus is funding 100%
of whatever he needs to do to bring it up to code. The work has already been started, siding has
already been removed, and other siding has been purchased.
Gerry Strathman asked are they intending to rehabilitate this property and post the bond. Mr.
Haus responded the bond has been posted, and a permit has been taken out with the City. The
work has been started. This has all been done within 30 days of gaining back ownership of the
property.
Steve Magner reported that Code Enforcement condemned the properry October 9, 2000. At that
time, Sherri Beth Fonest was the occupant and was purchasing it on a contract for deed. Since
that time, Code Enforcement has performed about 100 inspections, including night inspections.
They haue issued numerous citations for illegal occupancy. On about three occasions, the Police
Department has removed people from the house. Code Enforcement has spent thousands of
dollars of sunmiary abatement money in boazding up the property, cleaning the yazd, removing
junk vehicles, etc. The property is no longer in the FoaesYs hands, and the property has gone
back to the contract holder. There is a new contract with a second par[y. Mr. Magner would like
the City to be assured that the rehabilitation would occur in a timely manner and the contract
purchaser follows a11 the guidelines. The vacant building fee needs to be paid.
Gerry Strathman asked about the other parties on the notice of public hearing: Jason Max Clark,
Eric Scott Peterson, Randi Rae-Ann Linderman. Mr. Magner responded those aze parties that
were removed for unlawful occupancy of the dwelling and issued citations. They are associates
or blood relatives of Ms. Forrest.
Warren Abel, 701 Sims Avenue, appeazed and stated this properiy has been a problem for a
number of yeazs for debris in the yazd, cars left on the street, people coming and going, and
v�-�Zoc�
LEGISLATIVE HEARING MINUTES OF NOVEMBER 6, 2001 Page 2
possible illegal activities. When it became vacant about seven years ago, Mr. Abel was on the
boazd of ESNDC (East Side Neighborhood Development Company), which looked at the
property for rehabilitation. There were structural problems with the properry. They were unable
to come to an agreement with the heirs about the price. It went out onto the common mazket for
sale, and the structural problems were covered over. Mr. Abel would be concemed that the work
presently being done would continue to leave the problems covered over. The asbestos siding
was removed over the weekend. Mr. Abel was told on Friday, that the owner was not going to
get a state permit to remove the asbestos because he and his friends were going to do it. Last
night, they were at the house until 10:45 hammering and n,nn;ng saws. Mr. Abel would like to
see the property rehuaed to a state in which they will not cause a problem. Several million
dollars have been put into this neighborhood. He would like to see this property raised to that
level.
Mr. Magner stated he had a frank conversation with the new contract purchaser, who is
supposedly coming today. He esplained the work would have to be done to code by a licensed
person. Also, he explained the property cannot be legally occupied until Don Wagner (License,
Inspections, Environmental Protection) or one of his designees issues a code compliance
certificate. He indicated he wanted to have people in the properry guazding it and working at the
property all day and night. The City's main concern is that the dwelling is rehabilitated in a
timely fashion.
Gerry Strathman recommends the owner be granted six months to rehabilitate this building on
the condirion that the vacant building fee is paid by noon of November 28, 2001. Don Wagner
said he will accept the current code inspection, stated Mr. Magner.
� Resolution ordering the owner to remove or repair the property at 531 Ohio Street. If the
owner fails to compiy, Code Enforcement is ordered to remove the building.
(Laid over from 10-2-01)
(Steve Magner submitted photographs.)
(No one appeared to represent the property.)
Gerry Strathman stated this properry was in the process of going tax forfeit. Steve Magner
responded the property did go tax forfeit after Code Enforcement's original notice was sent.
There were a number of parties that haue to be notified for this process; Code Enfarcement has
now done the proper notification, and they aze prepazed to move forwazd on this matter today.
Mr. Magner reported this was formerly a Laundromat. It has been vacant since October 16,
1998. The current owner is State of Minnesota Trust Exempt. There have been nine summary
abatement notices issued to remove refuse, cut tall grass, secure properiy, and abatement
vehicles. On July 11, 2001, an inspection of the building was conducted, a list of deficiencies
which constitute a nuisance condition was developed, and photographs were taken. An order to
abate a nuisance building was issued on July 23, 2001, with a compliance date of August 22,
2001. As of this date, the property remains in a condition which comprises a nuisance as defined
v�-��v
LEGISLATIVE F3EARING MINiJTES OF NOVEMBER 6, 2001 Page 3
by the legislative code. The vacant building fees aze due. Tasation has placed an estimated
market vaiue of $11,300 on the land and $72,300 on the building. As of today, no one has
applied for the code compliance inspection and a bond has not been posted. The estimated cost
to repair is $100,000; estimated cost to demolish, $13,000 to $14,000.
Because it was used as a Laundromat and dry cleaning facility, stated Mr. Magner, there may be
possible contaminants on the site. Code Enforcement would not remove any of those
contaminants; they would leave that up to the State. Ramsey County dces not haue immediate
plans to sell this properry and they haue no plans to stop the resolution at this time.
Theodore Kvasnik, 2190 Marshall Avenue, Sew What Corporation, appeazed and stated his
company does laundry and dry cleaning services. He has not been in the building to examine it
for possible purchase. Mr. Strathman responded they need to contact Ramsey County Trust
Exempt Property Division.
Mr. Kvasnik stated he was not aware that dry cleaniug was done in that building. He had done
business with them for a number of yeazs. He was aware of the boilers. Mr. Magner responded
he and Ramsey County have had no ability to contact the previous owner to identify what
happened at the site. Based on hearsay evidence, they feel there is pollution on the site. There is
already evidence of other pollutants. Also, there was automobile repair in the back of the
building. There are auto parts, motors, large oil spills, and antifreeze in the back.
Mr. Kvasnik asked about the $100,000 to repair. Mr. Magner responded the roof is bad and the
first floor is possibly falling through.
Gerry Strathman recommends approval of the resolution.
Resolution ordering the owner to remove or repair the property at 847 Lexington Parkwav
South. If the owner fails to comply, Code Enforcement is ordered to remove the building.
(Laid over from 9-4-01)
(Steve Magner submitted photographs.)
(No one appeazed to represent the properly.)
Steve Magner stated the owner asked for a layover to identify his plans. He has purchased the
adjoining properry and has obtained a wrecking pernrit to remove the structure. Code
Enforcement will give the owner time to demolish the properiy, but they recommend approval of
the resolution.
Gerry Strathman recommends approval of the resolution.
o� �ZC�O
LEGISLA'TIVE HEARING MINLJTES OF NOVEMBER 6, 2001 Page 4
Resolution ordering the owner to remove or repair the property at 1619 Seventh Street
Easx If the owner fails to comply, Code Enforcement is ordered to remove the building.
(Steve Magner submitted photographs.)
(No one appeazed to represent the property.)
Mr. Magner reported this property has been vacant since December 7, 2000. It suffered a severe
fire at that time. There have been five summary abatement notices issued to remove refuse,
secure front door, cut tall grass, and abate vehicles. On August 30, 2001, an inspection of the
building was conducted, a list of deficiencies which constitute a nuisance condition was
developed, and photographs were taken. An order to abate a nuisance building was issued on
September 10, 2001, with a compliance date of September 25, 2001. As of this date, the properiy
remains in a condition which comprises a nuisance as defined by the legislative code. The vacant
building fees are paid. The real estate taYes aze unpaid of $3,282. Estimated mazket value is
$13,200 on the land; estimated market value of the building prior to the fire, $49,600. As of
today a code compliance inspection has not been applied for and a$2,000 bond has not been
posted. Estimated cost to repair is $100,000; estimated cost to demolish, $13,000 to $15,000.
Gerry Strathman recommends approval.
Appeai of summary abatement order for 1539 Blair Avenue.
Gerry Strathman stated the gazage has been removed per Joe Yannazelly (Code Enforcement). .
(Case closed.)
Appeal of summary abatement order and vehicle abatement order for 1323 Bush Avenue.
(No one appeazed to represent the property.)
Gerry Strathman recommends denying the appeal.
Appeal of summary abatement order and vehicle abatement order for 1327 Bush Avenue.
(No one appeazed to represent the property.)
Gerry Strathman recommends denying the appeal.
The meeting was adjourned at 1037 a.m.
rrn