The URL can be used to link to this page

274161 M�HITE - C�TV CLERK �� PINK - FINANCE COUIICIl � 8��:� =�.AYORTMENT GITY OF SAINT PAUL File NO. Co�ncil Resolution Presented By � Referred o Committee: Date Out of Committee By Date Pg. 2 Cumulative Cumulative Priority Log No. Project Name Budget CDBG VI CIB 1980 Capital Improvement Bond Funding (Appropriated = $533,000) 1 P-0201 Hoyt Avenue 172,000 172,000 2 P-1101 Simpson, Pascal, Albert 361,000, or as much 533,000 as remains + after award of P-0201 contract TOTAL CIB Funding 533,000 � � ll—z3�� - APPROVED A5 TO FUN ING: APPROVED: . . � �. v �� ;xx�g�, Ro ert W. Trudeau c ar � . Sc roeder Act� Director of Finance & Management Budget Director S r ices L�m ��z% ��Zo�'1�' �r �dZq/� � COUNCILMEN Yeas Nays Requested by Department of: �'�'��n �_ [n Favor Hozza ��rrt- Levine d __ Against BY Maddox - Showalter Tedesco pE� 2 � �g�9 Form Approved by ity Attorney Adopted by Council: Date Certified a-s d by Council cre BY � App v by :Navor. Dat `" DEC 2 1 1979 Appr v by Mayor for S �s ion�o Council BY — — BY PUBLISNED n�� 2 9 1979 . TV CLERK NANCE � GITY OF SAINT �ALTL Council �� -PARTMENT � BLU AVOR , - � File NO. � �` "� Counci Resolution Presented By Referred To Committee: Date Out of Committee By Date Pg. 1 RESOLVED, by the City Council of Saint Paul, after review by the Saint Paul Planning Commission and with the advice of the Long-Range Capital Improvement Budget Committee and the recommendation of the Mayor, that the streets identified below are approved for street paving and related improvements from the funds indicated, whose source is the appropriation to the 1980 Residential Street Paving Program in the 1980 Capital Improvement Budget (log numbers 5-6610 and S-6611 as further detailed on page 99 of tY�at budget) as adopted by this Council on SEp�Cember 27, 1979; and be it F URTHE R RES OL VE D that the Department of Public Works is authorized to begin design work immediately on the streets identified so that bids may be sought and contracts awarded in 1980 in a timely manner subsequent, a� a}�propriate, to receipt of proceeds of the 1980 Capital Improvement Bond sale and reeeipt o� authorization from the U.S. Department'of -Housing and Urban Development (HUD) to expend Community Development Block Grant (CDBG) Yea� VI funds; and be it = `� FZNALLY RESOLVED, that Capital Improvement Bond appropriation for the 1980 Residential Street Paving Program is subject to revision subsequent to receipt in January 1980 of bids on phase II of the Saint Anthony I�ill Sewer Rehabilitation project. 1980 RSPP: Approved Projects Ct�mulative Cumulative Priority Log No. Project Name Budget CDBG VI CIB S CDBG VI Funding (Appropriated = $1,075,000) # 1 P-0301 Bellows, Isabel, Morton, Page 253,050 253,050 2 P-0601 Hatch, Orchard, Churchill, Oxford 371,�700 624,750 3 P-0801 Saint Albans 202,650 827,400 4 P-0407 E. Fourt3�, E. Fifth, Fremont 191,000 1,018,400 Contingency to ensure contract award 56,600 1,075,000 TOTAL CDBG Funding 1,075,000 -more- --- COUNC[LMEN Requested by Department of: Yeas Nays Butler In Favor Hozza � Hunt Levine _ __� Against BY — Maddox Showalter Tedesco Form Approved by C ty ttorney Adopted by Council: Date Certified Yassed by Council Secretary BY sy 1 Approved by 1Aavor: Date Appro y Mayor for S b is i to Council By B ____°,, �ats,,,� ElTY OF SAINT PAUL �`' '� LONG-RANGE CAPITAL I(NPR4YEMENT BUDGET COMMITTEE : ,.m OFFtCE Of 7HE MA�OR �- BUDGET SECTION ?6• ,..• 357 City Hall,Sainc Paul,Minnesota 55102 612-296�4323 GEORGE LATIMfR � MAYOR TO: Saint Paul Loncf-Ra,aqe Capital Inprovement Budget Coam�ittee F'i�OM: Wayne Wittman, Chair, Streets & Otilities Task Force � DiATE: November 8, 1979 SiJBJECT: 19.79 Streets & Utiiities Task Force Recoannendations with Respect to 1980 Resid�ntial Street Pavinq Progrun (RSPP) Projects ' The 1979 Stxeets & Utilities Task Force respectfully reccma�ends to the Saint Paul Long-R�ge Capital Ia�rovement �3udget (CIB) Co�ittee: l. 'i'he fallowing project priorities for fundinq from the 1980 RSPP: R�ecommnended Cum. Cum. Log No. Project Name Budget CDBG CIB CDBG Funding (Available = $1,075,000) P-1102 Fry StreSt 15,000 15,000 P-0301 Bellows, Isabel, I�Sorton, Page 253,050 Z68,050 P-0601 Fiatch, Orchard, Churchill, Oxford 371,700 639,750 P-O501 Beaum�ont, B�dford, Bradley, Preble 20,000 659,750 P-0801 Saint Albans ' 202,650 862,400 P-0901 Irvine Aveaue 156,000 1,018.400 Continqency to ensure � _ contract award 56,000 11 075,000 TOTAL CDBG Recon�ended 1,U75,000 �� Capital Improvement Bond Funding (A�ailable =, $533,000) P-0201 Hoyt Avenue � 1'72,000 172,000 P-1101 Si.mpson, Pascal, Albert 361,000 533,000 TOTAL CIB Fundinq Recoa�ended 533�Q00 In establishinq these budget recom�aendations, the task force calls attention to the further specifications, following, which constitute task force recom�endativns made upon motion and majority v�te. Menmo to CIB Committee -2- Nonember 8, 1979 Motion by Seconded by outcome a. Arnold Steffes Ralph Brown Carried unanim�usly The $20,000 in Con�unity Development Block Grant funds for project P-O501 is for pZel�*�+�*+axy sewer design in the Railroad Island ITA drainaqe basi.n. This paving project received a high priority in task force rating but sewer improve�ent must precede street improvements in this instance. b. Thcauas Gameinder Arnold Steffes Carried unani.mously The $156,000 for project P-D901 is for sewer improvements in Upper and Lower Irvine Avenue. Once again, the sewer improven�ents must precede consideration of a paving pro�sal. This project is to be bid after the other recoae�ended CDBG-funded street paving projects. A�►ard af those contracts is to be secured with these funds, if necessazy. c. Th�as Gmeinder Ray Theissen Carried, with Betty McLaughli.n voting nay • The Hoyt Avenue paving, CP-0201, is recommended in the amount of $172,000, whieh inaludes $33,000 for water main �elocation. The remainder of the Cap�tal Improvement Bond fund monies is recoimnended for project P-1101, . Simpson, Pascal, Albert. iiowever, P-1101 is to be bid after P-0201. 7Av�rard af corttracts associated with P-0201 is fo be secured,with remaining CIB funds to be used for as much of P-1101 as they will implement. 2. Consideration of th� task force positions, given below, which were aclopted by niotion and majarity v�ote: Motion by Seconded by Outcome� a. Amos Rpos Ra1ph Brown Carried unani.mously Future RSPP guidelines should include the provision that no project in an amount over the guideline dollar lim:it will be considered. Ralph Bx�t � Amet�t Raos Defeated An amendment was offered to the above motion which substituted "guideline lineal. footage li.mi.t" for "guideline dollar limit." b. Thomas C�einder Amos Roos Carried unamimously Item C, "Coordinati.on with other utility i�rovements in street", should be removed from future RSPP ratiaq sheets. Instead, the task force asked that future RSPP procedure advise them of need for - or lack of - such coorclination as part of the project information. This information should be provided by the appropriate agency - probably Public Works - to proposers of projects as well as to the task force. Memo to CIB Cc�mittee -3- Nov�mber 8, 1979 Motion by Seconded by Outcome c. Betty McLaughlin. Thontias G�meinder Carried unaaimously Non-aid residential streets should ]�e included. in the RSPP guidelines on e3.igible projects. d. Tha�►ss C�meinder Richard Guriderson Carried unanimcusly Item J shotitld be ct�snqed on future ,RSPP rating �heets to make the bottom range zero to 210 c2weiling units instead of 160-�10 dvrellix�g units. e. Amos Roos A. "Ted" Tobler Garried unanimc�usly ' Future RSPP guidelines should be changed to constrain pmject submittals to no more than three per district. f. Amos Rcoe Betty McLanghlin Carried unanim�uely . 14 five-poi�nt item should be added to future RSPP rating sheets whereby the task force wr�uld award points to any and all proposals submitted on time, accurately, and complete. q. Thomas Gmeinder Ralph Bmwn Carried, with Amcs Roos voting nay The Residential Street Paving Proqram should be renamad the Residsntial Street Pavinq and Sewar Program. Resources should be provided to budget sewer construction aad paving where both are required. This concludes the report of the task forc�. You will find attached a rostex/ attenc'taiice record of task forc� members aad the arithmetic results of the ta�k . €orce rating which occurred October 30. lm attachment . STREETS AND UTILITIES TASR FORCE 1980 RESIDENTIAL STREET PAVING PROGRAM (RSPP) PRIORITIES Ratings of 10/30/79 Available: 1,075,000 533,300 �, LOG NO. PROJECT NAME M COST CUM CDBG CUM CIB 1. P-1102 Fry 80. 13 15,000 15,000 2. P-0301 Bellows, Isabel, Morton, Page 79.00 253,050 268,0�0 3. P-1101 Simpson, Pascal, Albert 73. 80 403,200 403,200 4. P-0601 Hatch, Orchard, � Churchill, Oxford 72 371,700 639,750 5. P-0201 Hoyt 70. 58 138,600 541,800 + water 6. P-0501 Beaumont, Bedford, , Bradley, Preble 67 �42,�.�0 982,050 + sewers ?. P-0801 Saint Albans 64. 87 202,650 1,184,700 8. P-1301 Ferdinand, Dewey, Howell 64.40 294,000 835,800 9. P-0408 E.Fifth, E.Fourth, Maple 63. 40 421,050 1,605,750� 10. P-0901 Irvine 63.13 277,200 1,882,950 + sewers 11. P-0407 E.Fifth, E.Fourth, Fremont 62.66 403,200 2,286,150 12. P-1501 Munster, Graham, Norfolk, Wheeler 61.67 292,950 1,128,750 13. P-0603 Stinson, Burgess, • Topping 61 414,540 2,700,690 14. P-0702 LaFond, Edmund, Avon, Grotto 58 491,000 3,191,690 (net sewer) 15. P-0701 Galtier, Edmund 52.60 138,600 3,330,290 16. P-0604 Park, Manitoba, Winnipeg 52.47 498,435 3, 828,725 .17. P-0101 Conway, Euclid, Flandrau 48 211,050 1,339,800 18. P-0202 Montana 47 131,250 1,471,050 +. sewers 19. P-0505 Cottage 46.60 65,1Q0 1,536,150 20. P-1201 �alentine, Doswell, Chilcombe 44.87 400,050 4,228,775 21. P-0602 Hatch, Orchard, Arqyle 44.20 183,750 4,412,525 22. P-0203 Winchell 41.73 105,000 1,641,150 23. P-0502 Burnquist (Magnolia) 41 I40,700 1,781,850 + sewer 24. P-0504 Arkwright 39 275,100 2,056,950 + sewer 25. P-0503 York, Sims, Whitall, Desoto 38.60 841,050 5,253,575 + sewer � 26. P-0402 Thorn 36.87 81,900 2,138,850 27. P-0401 Suburban 36.13 31,000 2,169,850 28. P-0506 Forest 36 276,150 2,446,OOQ 29. P-Q606 W. Cottage 35.67 59,850 5,313,425 . 30. P-1601 Dunlop, Goodrich, Fairmount 35.53 396,900 2,842,900 + sewer 31. P-0406 Hancock, E..Fifth 35 373,800 3,216,700 32. P-0405 McLean 34 210,000 �,426,700 33. P-0404 Clarence 31.73 193,200 „ 3,619,900 34. P-0605 Como Place 29.47 179,025 5,492,450 35. P-0403 Burns 29 34S,S00 3,966,400 - 36. P-0204 Nokomis, Magnolia, � Jessamine, Rose 27 898,800 4,865.200 37. P-0507 Ivy, Duluth 26.80 447,300 5,312,500 38. P-0607 N. Kent 21. 73 347,025 5,659,525 RBSI�NTIAL STRaE'P BAVING PAqGRAbt FROCFSS STRE$TS & ITIIISTIBS T11S1C FOHC� TOBSDi1Y�. 3z30 p.a. - 811ez� ADOm Rest@r/Atteadaacs Aecord Civic Gnter Octobsr DTO r Dist Nmoa 8aa1� Addr�ss 2 9 16* 23 30 2 CIS wayeu Wit� 1C98 FremonL (06) x x x x x x Chai.s C28 Adolf Tobl�r 915 Ed�ad (04) x x x � X � Vics Cluir CI8 tiatold Hastmia 8i7 E. F.ourth (O6) x - x X S X Alt Vics Cyair 1 Susan Portsahs 2179 Falc� (19) x x x x X x lA Tani Haicar 2989 �t. Dark (19) _ � � - - 2 8elens Hittbb�lke 1554 E'ellais (O6) 7C X - X X . X 2A Ray Tbtissan 1549 E. 7th (O6) - - R u 8 X 2A Tttsy Ttuhlen 1414 Whitt 8�as (O6) - - - - � � 3 Ral� Bsoun (mai]:) 179 8. R�i� (07 x X - X X x _ 3A - - - - - - 4 Micha�i Peimig 657 Mcl,�an (06) x x x x x x qA .. � � � � � 5 Saadra Bslt 1003 S. Niguolia (Q6) x - x x x x SA �tilfrad �tiber 461 e�awooett (Ol) - - - - " - . 6 Jacki� &isqar 1038 8. Ozlord (03) X - - - � - 611 Saott 8syaa 299 Du�pr (17) � x � � � - 6A Bsnce lcalbY 803 Galtier (17) - - - - - � 7 A1 Podqosslci 6� 9an Bastia (04) x x X X X X 7A qlillim 3o3�a�oII 673 Parsiaqtaa (04) - � � � ' - • 8 ThCOas Qariad�r BOl Salbp (04) X X x 8 x X 8A A1 Goddiag 198 N. l�nt (02) - - - - - - 9 8�xa RiChards 358 Irvint (02) - - - � ' - yA _ _ _ _ - .- l0 1►� aoo. laa7 N. Albere roa) - � x x x x ipA . - - - - - - li Dick c�dRSSaa 1632 Th�aus (04) � x x x a x � � � � � � � 12 D�b Awies 495 Cram�r�ll (14) - - - - - - 12A J�rry ni,.�w„�r 2358 Dosw�ll (08) - - - - - � 13 Bettp MCiaughlin 491 Otis (04) x S x x x x 13A - - - - - - 14 Jeff L�vy 1699 St. Clair (OS) - - � - ' ' 14A .. " _ " � � 15 Jack Adler 1311 Hilles�st (16) x x x x % � 15A - - - - � - 16 Arnold 3t�ties 791 Ltacola (OS) x x x - X x 1&A Bill 0'Coaaell 1082 Liarnln (OS) x - - HA � - 17 Tim tillger 2054 Louisiana - - - - ' - St. Lonis Park (426) � 17A xenry Schrsiber 111 E. icellogg t01) - - - - � ' * Bus Tottr Data WHITE - CITV CLERK PINK - FINANCE c COUACII /•�9 CANANY - OEP�►RTMENT (� I Ty �� ,'A I NT I��1 tT L !, HIUE - MAYOR File �0. �� -f�• '- Council �Zesolution � ' �Presented f3y � � Referred To Committee: Date Out of Committee By Date . WHEREAS, T:ie Administration published "1980 Residential Street Paving Program (RSPP) Guidelines" on July 31, 1979, and trans- mitted them through the Early Notification System for public review and comment; and WHEREAS, On September 21, 1979, the Public Works Committee of the Council of the City of Saint Paul heard public comment on the proposed Guidelines; and WHEREAS, on September 27, 1979, the Council of the City of Saint Paul adopted a 1980 Capital Improvement Budget appropriation for the 1980 Residential Street Paving Program; now be it therefore RESOLVED, by the Counci2 of the City of Saint Paul, that said Guidelines, hereto attached, are adopted for use in determining paving project priorities for the 1980 Residential Street Paving Program. 1 COUNCIL:NEN Yeas Nays Requested by Department of: X�� McMahon �� n Favor Hozza Hunt d Levine __ Against BY — ..-+�� Showalter �'tdesso �CT 9 1919 Form Approved City torne Adopted by Council: Date Cert�fied Passed by Council Secre ary By � , . �S '�, �. �9 Approved by Mayor for Submission to Council Ap ro c by 1lavor: D'' — Q B}• - - BY 1980 RESIDENTIAL STREET PAVING PROGRAM (RSPP) GUIDELINES ADOPTED BY �ITY COUNCIL OCTOBER 9, 1979 COUNCIL RESOLUTION 273852 These guidelines were developed for use in determining allocations of the adopted 1980 ' Capital Improvement Budget RSPP appropriation to candidate proposals submitted by citizen and neighborhood organizations. For further information, contact the Budget Section of the Mayror's Office, 367 City Hall, 298-4323 1980 RESIDENTIAL STREET PAVING PROGRP,M (RSPP) GUIDELINES GOAL It is the goal of the residential street paving program to improve the quality of the neighborhoods by replacing all presently oil- surfaced streets with a permanent roadway, properly graded, surfaced and curbed, and by installing sidewalks and street lights as appro- priate to each area. PROGRAM DEVELOPMENT 1. ELIGIBLE IMPROVEMENTS AND AREAS a. Only presently oil-surfaced streets shall be included in this program. These street surfaces have been built up over the years by a yearly oil and sand treatment (lately, every third year) . Some of these streets have had curbing installed on them. b. Only streets in which utilities are complete and adequate or streets in which utilities will be installed as part of the improvement will be included in the program. c. Areas shall be established to obtain maximum effect and efficient construction. Cost should generally be in the $150,000 to $400,000 range. d. No more than one area will be selected per District for 1980. Districts are encouraged to submit only their highest priority projects: 2. SELECTION CRITERIA a. District Council recommendation and district plans. The recommendations of the appropriate district council and consistency with a district plan will be given consideration. If a project is proposed for a district which has not completed a district plan, the district council will be contacted to determine the support for a paving project. b. Relationsha.p to other public improvements such as Parks, Utilities, Sewers� Lighting, etc. Concentration of improvements may significantly strengthen the total impact. Al1 public impovement needs will be Page-2- ` considered in a proposed project area. Priority will be given to area where other needed public improvements will be provided in conjunction with the street program or where public improvements already exist, c. Capital Allocation Policy: 1980 Funds for residential street improvements will be allocated in accordance with Policy B of "Capital Allocation Policy: 1980"2 New allocation of both subsidy capital and capital for service systems improvements in support of residential and neighborhood improvement should follow this distribution: � � of To�al Recommended � of � Residential Subsidy/Service Area Blocks S�rstem Capital A, B & Improvement III 30� 70-75$ Al1 Other 70$ 25-30$ d. Coordination with neighborhood improvement programs. Priority should be given to areas where residents are already involved in streng�Chening housing maintenance efforts and other neighborhood improvement projects, especially current ITA's. e. The continuity of program paving in specific areas. Continuity of paving program over several years in one large residential area is an important factor in overall impact and effectiveness. For this reason, priority should be given to project opportunities adjacent to improvements completed in a previous year. f. Condition of existing strest. Priorities should be based on the general condition, appear- ance, serviceability and extraordinary maintenance needs of the existing streets and on the possibility of unusual construction costs. g. Energy conservation. Priority should be given to paving proposals for residential streets which are public transportation routes. 3. PROJECT STANDARDS Standard street construction consists of the following: Page-3- a. A 32 ' wide street with asphalt pavement and concrete curb and gutter. b. Sidewalk reconstruction will be based on a condition inspection by the Department of Public Works. - All old tile sidewalk will be replaced with new sidewalk. - All scaled, cracked or tree-heaved sidewalk will be replaced if, in the opinion of the Department of Public Works, it constitutes a tripping hazard. - Reconstructed sidewalks will be 5' wide except spot panel replacement of 6' wide walk. c. New catch basins. d. Ornamental lighting with underground wiring will be installed with energy-efficient high pressure sodium vapor lighting (those lights with the golden hue) . In most instances, existing ornamental light standards will be refurbished and converted to high pressure sodium vapor fixtures. e. All driveways will be reconstructed between the sidewalk and curb with new concrete aprons. f. All outwalks will be reconstructed between the sidewalk and curb with new 2' wide concrete outwalks. g. Boulevards will be regraded and sodded where necessary. (Usually this is the entire boulevard. ) h. The Division of Parks and Recreation will coordinate reforesta- tion and complete tree planting in the area after other work is done. (Tree planting is done only in the spring or fall.) i. Water service. Water services will be replaced on a project basis from the main to the stop box with copper pipe, at the request of a citizen organization, where the size of the service is 5/8 inch : in diameter or less and where the average static water pressure � in the main is equal to or less than 40 pounds per square inch. (It should also be made clear that for a resident to realize an improvement at the water faucets, the remainder of the water service from the stop box, which is in the boulevard to the house, as well as the water pipes in the house,may have to �e replaced. This would be at the home owner's expense. ) It should be emphasized that a request by a citizen group for special design items (i.e. , stone curb, historic light fixtures, . textured concrete surface, etc. ) which are other than the above listed standard construction will be considered by the City Council and subject to Council approval, The Council consideration will include an analysis of the additional cost for non-standard work. Page-4- � 4. ESTIMATED COST The estimated cost of these projects during 1980 is $i05.00 per lineal foot of street (that' s $554,400 per mile) , and includes items 3a through 3g above. a. Tf the blocks are standard "long blocks" (660 ' ) and "short blocks (330' ) , estimate the length by multiplying the number of long blocks times 660 , add the short blocks times 330 and multiplying this times $105.00 for total project cost. b. Call Tom Kuhfeld, Ed Tio or Dan Dunford, and they will figure it out. (298-5311) 5. SUBMISSION OF PROJECT REQUESTS All requests for residential street paving are due in the City Budget Director's Office, Room 367 City Hall, 55102, no later than Friday, September 14, 1979. Forms for requesting funding consideration ("Request for T980 Residential Street Paving") are included in this mailing and can also be obtained by calling Public Works, 298-5311, or the Budget Section, 298-4323. Before a citizen organization submits a project request to the City, Tom Ruhfeld, Ed Tio or Dan Dunford can be called (298-5311) , and they will review the project to make sure it meets the criteria. (It is especially important to avoid conflict with future sewer construction) . Citizen groups wishing to submit paving proposals should notify their district council of their intentions and coordinate their submissions with others from the district through the district council. 6. EXCEPTIONS TO GUIDELINES Paving proposals not consistent with these guidelines should be submitted as part of the Unified Capital Improvement Program and Budget Process (UCIPBP) in spring 1980. 1979 CALENDAR OF EVENTS FOR DECISION MAItING F'OR THE 1980 RESIDENTIAL STREET PAVING PROGRAM 1. 1979 ST�S AND OTILITIES TASK FORCE IDENTIFIES PROPOSED RESIDENTIAL STREET PAVING PROGRAM EVALUATION CRITERIA SUBJEGT TO REVISION BASED ON CITY COUNCIL ADOPTED GUIDELINES FOR THE 1980 RSPP BY Tues., M�y 15• 1979 2. CIB COt�lITTEE RECOMI�NDS 1980 CAPITAL II�ROVEl�NT BQDGET TO MAYOR AND CITY COUNCIL wHICH IDENTIFIES APPROPRIATIONS FOR T� 1980 RESIDENTIAL STREET PAVING PROGRAM BY Fri., July 13 3. Pf�LIC WORIC.S, CITY PLANNING DIVISION, CO�ITY DEVEIApN�I'p DIVISIOIQ, AND T3E MAYOR'S OF£ICE: BUDGET SECTION PROPOSE NECESSARY HODIFICATIONS TO THE 1979 GOIDfiLINES FOR TFIE RESIDENTIAL STRBET PAVING PAOCR, AM FTi., July 13 4. MAYOR RECOb@�iDS P1iOP�ED CiiJIDELINES P'OR T� 1980 RESIDENTIAL STREET PAVING PRpGRAM TO CITSC COUNCIL HY Fri., July 20 5. PRESENTATION OF PPflPOSED GUIDEL2NE5 E'OR Tf� 1980 RESIDENTZAL STREET PAVINCs PRAGRAM AND 1979 CALENDAR OF EVEN75 TO PUBLZC WORKS COMMITPEE BY Fri., July 27 6. DSSTRIBUTE Pl�POSED GQIDELINES p'pR Tf� 1980 RESIDENTIAL STREET PAVING PAOGRAM, 1979 CALENDAR OA EVENT3, REQIIEST FORMS, AND TAE 1979 STREETS AND UTILITIES TASK £ORCES PPOPOSED RESIDENTIAL STREET PAVSN6 PROGRAM EVALIII►TION CRITERIA TO NEIGHBORHOOD ORGANiZATIONS Fri., Aagust 3 7. FINAL DATE �'OR REf�IVING REQDESTS TO PAVE RESIDENTIAL STREETS, IN BDDGET SEGTION, 367 CITY HALL - Fri., Sept. 14 8. PUSLIC WORRS BEGZNS TO ANALYZL PAVING REQOFSTS Wad., Sept. 19 9. PGBLiC WORKS COI+�TTEE PIIBL2C i�ARSNG: 1:30 p.m., RiDOM 707 CITY AAI.L Fr1., Snpt. 21 10. CZTY COi1NCIL ADOPTS 1980 CAPITAL Il`@ROVEMENP BIID(�T WHICH INCLIIDES APPROPRIATIONS FOR 'i'� 1980 RESIDETITIAL STItEET PAVING PROGRAM Thuzs., Sept. 27 11. CITY COUDICIL ADOPTS GOZDELINES FOR T� 1380 RESIDENTIAL STFtEET PAVING PAOGRAM Tu.s.•. Oct. 2 12. STREETS AND t1TILITIES TASK FORCE P�ETINGS TO: Hetween Oct. 3 and Nov. 7 a) Rw1ea City Covacil eldoptsd Guidelinea for ihe 1980 RsPP b) Adopt RSPP Bvaivation Critezia c) Tour Propos�d Paning Areas by Bus (optional actinity to be dacidsd by task lorce) d) Hear Citizen Organization Pzesentations e) Haar Public atorks Analysis f) Hear Planal.aq Co�issioa Re�endat3.ons q) H.ar Community Develop�nt Divisioa Eliqibility Evaluatioa h) Rate Requ�sts Ose RSPP Evaluation Criteria i) Determine Fiaal Task Force Fundinq Racoamendatioa 13. STREETS AmD tP1ILSTIES TASiC E'OR�E RECOM�DS AREAS TO BE PAVED BY Wed., Nov. 7 14. CIH QOA@lITTEE RSCOMb�NDATI�B FOR STREET PAVI1� HY Tues., Nov. 13 15. POBLIC WORKS STAFP BEGINS SITE SDRVEYS FOR t�C0�1DED PROJECTS BEFORE SNOW COVBRS GP�UND Thurs., Nov. 15 16. MAYOR'S REOOt�NDATION FOR STRELT PAVING HY Fri., Nov. 16 17. CITY COUNCIL ADOPTS 1980 RESIDENTIAL STREET PAVING PROGRAM e1ND AUTAORIZES PIIBLIC Thurs., Nov. 22 FADRRS TO COI�NCE DESIGN ACTIVITIES. 18. POHLIC WORICS COb49ENCES DET21I2. DESZGN ACTZVITIES SO TSP1T CONSTRIICTION CONTRACTS CAN BE ADVERTI3ED IN Tf� SPRING OF 1980. Fri., Non. 23 Office of ths Mayor - Budqet Section April 5, 1979 �. � ��`, j�li �'� �� _.� �ii i� {� ti �i . - ��.�� j p : �oinf °c�ui Cii� �o��cii �- �;� �} ��;j : C C3;1"3,i1 E�f�'� O il FINANCE, MANAGEMEN7 AND PERSONNEL - � RUBY HUNT �►��oifinen, m�r:es �'he �ol [c;•�ing. . . . � r�por� on C.F. � Ordinnnce - - _ . . . � R�so;:�'rivn ' - • � , � . • � 0�2:�r � • � i �1 L� : . . -_ � . The Finance Committee, at their meeting of December 17, 1979, recommended appr°ava7 of the fol l owi ng: � � . � _ _ . _--. -- - 1 . � Resolution revising specifications for Power Shovel Operator. (1U469-RH)�` 2. Resoluti�on revising specific�tion for title of Heavy Equipment Operator.{10470-RH). . 3. Resolution establishing.title .of Revotving Power Equipment Operator. (10471=RH) . � ' 4. Resolution establishing �ate of pay of $10.03 for title of Revolving -Power(10472=RH) . Equipment Operator. . .� - - . � : 5. Resolution cbanging grade and bargaining unit for Supervising Dental Hygienist . - � from Grade 34 of Technical Bargaining Unit to Grade 7 of Prof/Admin. S n' - . ��-��j. � 6. Res.olution establishing title and class specs of Affirmative •Action Recruiter in � Grade ll of Section 3.J .(Prof/Admin. Non-Supv. Group). (.10474-RH). �. � 7. Resolutaon transferz;ing funds from 1979 conting�ncy reserve to Special Elect�ons . � in amount of $7213 to fund special election in District 66 on December 18, 1979. 8. Resol�ution transferring funds from 1979 contingency reserve to Department of Public Works to provide local matching funds for federal grant for refuse-energy - � district heating in amount of $24,723. � � - `� 9. Resolution setting up•the 1980 Residentia7 Street Paving Program. 10. Resolution allocating $57,000 to fund staff for the six ITA's in 1980. � - 1T. Approval of resolution to be prepared in January, 1980, restoring positi:ott—.--- .- � • of Clerk-Typist in Police Department. . - • � ' 12. Approval of resolution to be.prepared in January, 1�980 tr.ansferring $32,266 � � • � . to prov.ide additional local funding to fully fund the:Court ScreenirLg Unit - for �1�80. ' . . - . 13. Approvdl of "resolution to be prepared in JANUARY, 1980, authorizing i/2 - . - . Full Time Employee in Treasury Division.. - . ,� t Sf:�'f�;��l�' �'l.C:)::, S:'�1:�I' I'_tCi.L, .rrt\�:�i E t S�'C- ' . i(.� . ' r �� ,� ',',� d� °!�F� ¢ E �,. �,.c, � u : C�ITY OF SAINT PAL'L OFFICE OF T��E MAYOR ��IV�� iiii°iii i NQU 3 U 19�9 34,7 CITY HAI.L OFri;E C�Co<:NCt�;;;,;,;;,;� GFOR('sE LATI�iER SAINT PALTL,MIDTNESOTA a�102 f��NE $HOYlR�TET MAYOB (g12) 298-�323 November 26, 1979 Council President Joanne Showalter and Members of the City Council 7th Floor City Hall Saint Paul, Minnesota 55102 Dear Council President Showalter and City Council Members: Re: 1980 Resider..tial Street Paving Program Attached you will find the report and recommendations of the Long- Range Capital Improvement Budget (CIB) Committee regarding the 1980 Residential Street Paving Program (RSPP) . I have also attached a copy of a resolution for your consideration which will implement the paving recommendations of the CIB Committee. The RSPP decision-making process was conducted according to the usual format of the Unified �apital Improvement Program and Budget Process (UCIPBP) . By this I mean that project proposals were solicited by the Budget Section of the Mayor' s Office; reviewed and rated by the Streets & Utilities Task Force of the CIB Committee; framed as a budget proposal by the CIB Committee and recommended by the committee to the Mayor and City Council. I have made no changes to the CIB Committee' s recommendations in the attached resolution. I do draw your attention to the last paragraph of the resolution, however, which indicates that the Capital Improvement Bond-funded portion of the RSPP is a source of financing for Phase II of the Thomas-Dale sewer in the event the low bid on that phase is more expensive than can be met with budgeted resources. I have asked the City Clerk to schedule the attached resolution for the City Council meeting of December 20, 1979. �'z' -� �:•� �f��..��_+.��. Council President Showalter -2- November 26 , 1979 I have also asked Councilwoman Ruby Hunt, chairperson of the Council' s Finance, Management and Personnel Committee to review the resolution and �ke public coi�ient on it� 'at t�e Fi�rranse Comamittee meeting of December 17. (room 70? �City Hall at lO:OD a.m. ) . Copies of this letter and its attachments are being sent to Early Notification System listees as notice of the opportunity for public comment on both the CIB Committee report and on my proposed resolution. . Sincerely, . GEO E LATIMER May GL/dj cc: ENS CIB Committee Streets & Utilities Task Force