The URL can be used to link to this page

272806 WHITE - C�TV CLERK PINK - FINANCE GITY OF SAINT PALTL. Council `.�"�,��,� CANARV - DEPARTMENT • ;� BLUE - MAVOR File NO. ` Council Resolution Presented By Referred To Committee: Date Out of Committee By Date WHEREAS, The L�w Enforcement Assistance Administration (LEAA) and the Minnesota Crime Control Planning Board provide procedures wherein local planning agencies $uch as the St. Paul-Ramsey County Criminal Justice Coordinating Council may annually prepare and submit a block grant application; and WHEREAS, The St. Paul City Council authorized the Coordinating Council to apply for and administer the FY 1980 block grant in resolution No. 272961 dated March 20, 1979; and WHEREAS, The Coordinating Council has received 19 grant applications for FY 1980 funding, has reviewed them to determine consistency with local , regional and state comprehensive criminal justice plans and has approved 9 projects for funding within the FY 1980 �llocation for St. Paul/Ramsey County and approved 3 other projects to be funded outside of the allocation; and WHEREAS, It is anticipated that the City of St. Paul will provide $56,178 as local match for LEAA projects within the FY 1980 St. Paul/Ramsey County b-1-0ck gr`dnt.; and tfie Corr�nunity Arbitration project; and WHEREAS, The Coordinating Council has prepared the FY 1980 block grant applica- tion and �nnual action plan which includes funding priorities identifying all sub- grants to be funded within the projected St. Paul/Ramsey County allocation of $481,344; NOW, THEREFORE BE �T RESOLVED, That upon the recommendation of the St. Paul-Ramsey County Criminal Justice Coordinating Council the City of St. Paul agrees to act as the sponsoring unit of government for the following projects: St. Paul-Ramsey County Criminal Jus- tice Coordindting Council , Court Screening Unit, and Corrr�nnunity Arbitration (see attached chart) ; and BE IT FURTHER RESOLVED, That the St. Paul City Council approves the FY 1980 LEAA Annual Action Plan for St. Paul/Ramsey County; and BE IT FURTHER RESOLVED, That the proposed block grant award contract for the described pro- jects be presented to the St. Paul City Council for appropriate action; and BE IT FURTHER RESOLVED, That the Coordinating Council is hereby authorized to make application to the Minnesota Crime Control Planning Board for funding of the projects described COUNC[LMEN Yeas Nays � Requested by Department oE: $t. Paul - Ramsey County Butler � - * Criminal Justice Coordinating Council HQzza In Favor Hunt Levine � __ Against BY � �� K thryn Ackland �r8 Showalter Te � , ' 19� For pproved rn Ado y Council: Date _ c ertified Pas• by Council Secretary y f?�.� • App by IVlavor: Date �n ' Appr ed by Mayor for S mis on to Council By _ g �sB�rsNEO AP R 2 i 1979 • ' . _ r <�jr,-.,n�'�� 0 c� r— r � � � � � � � � � � Z � � � 0 N N � � Q • p=p M M I� CO CO � N H � .-a N M 1� �-p J E]! al Ol Ol M � O � Q F,_, w n n n n U Z O O M � �O �1-�4�- O O � d' �--� � � J C.� b4 U N O-a r Z r r Q f�r 1-..� •r F— +� 3 p=p M .-{ 00 N rO a..� � O � M 00 i U W �' l0 d1 M 00 � N Q Z � d' �--� O �G•O � N� Efl- O fl- r- � N •r Z � -� O � +� t--i -I-� I--� N J 0� lfl dl L� O r � ¢ o--{ ln � 1� CO � rt3 � � 00 � O CO i-� i. W � n w w n •r � p z c� o� � � 3 cn W O � OO N 01 N l.� C� � "� r� �69� � "O O � � U N � •r ~ � t� O N �r � � p ap .-i � � +� � h-� U N 00 I� CO O N � J �l 1� �l0 M � I- ,_., a � O N O v� � � �--1 �-i M •r N � '�' W F- O -I--� •r � �I--� � t� O � W M J .n � C'S >- Z i ''' � Q E N � a� -F-�� •r r C � � � � I O F- O �00 � � O 00 -k N z o--a 1�\ O \ 00 \ \O O� .-i \r+ � W � M \M �--�M � � O �l \N �--�N .�--1 .�--1 r-I e-I � i O C O +� •r � O •r +� U U = � QJ r � � U •r � •r � •r U � � N � � •r $.. J E cn � C Q � � r7 U N � �.._. I i- i-� r r � U •�- �— � rt3 � N � V (� � •r � a. •r � �1-� � p • •� C � O � }� � •r O U � N U 'Cf tU � ' � - � `��'�� . � , MAYOR GEORGE LATIMER S A I H T P A U L - R A M S EY C 0 U H T Y Co-Chairman . � CRIMINAL JUSTICE COORDINATING COUNCIL COMMISSIONER ROBERT ORTH � �'422 CitY HdII AtltleX Co-Chairman 25 W. Fourth Street ' St. Paul, Minnesota 55102 KATHRYN ACKLAND �6�2� 2(.�$-5(52 Coordinator April 5, 1979 T0: Saint Paul City Council FROM: Kathryn Ackland RE: Projects recommended for FY 1980 LEAA funding: Proposed Resolution of Sponsorship. Attached is the proposed resolution of sponsorship for the St. Paul sponsored subgrant projects to be funded with the FY 1980 LEAA allocation for St. Paul/Ramsey County. Two out of nine projects within the allocation are proposed as St. Paul sponsored projects. Ramsey County will act as the sponsoring unit of government for the remaining seven projects. Three additional projects are proposed but cannot be included within the allocation because of limited resources. The three projects are: Courts Space P1anagement Study (Ramsey County sponsored) Criminal Justice Informa- tion System Study (Ramsey County sponsored) and Corrannunity Arbitration. (St. Paul sponsored) . There is no assurance that these three projects will _ be funded. Using a deliberate review process, the Coordinating Council approved the nine projects for priority funding within the FY 1980 allocation. In December new project concept papers were reviewed and priorities established by the Coordinating Council . A concept paper procedure was initiated in this planning process for the first time to encourage new ideas and to direct staff efforts towards �the most promising new project concepts. All grant application (PDF's) w2��e received in January and were reviewed by Coordinating Council staff. Then the Coordinating Council subcommittees, and the Community Corrections Advisory Board where appropriate, examined the PDF's and made recommendations. On March 1, the Coordinating Council � approved the nine projects for the FY 1980 Annual Action Plan/block grant application. The FY 1980 proposed block grant contract will be presented to the St. Paul City Council for acceptance after the block grant is approved by the Minne- sota Crime Control Planning Board. At this time the anticipated local match commitment by St. Paul is estimated to be $56,178. This estimate includes $40,913 requested by the Coordinating Council for its own budget. The guidelines under proposed 1980 federal legislation will require dollar�for- . ' �^�� . z -2- dollar match on funds to planning agencies like the Coordinating Council . Other match contributions requested for the Coordinating Council budget include $40,913 from Ramsey County and $4,603 from the State of Minnesota. The LEAA contribution to the Coordinating Council budget is $82,856. RAMSEY COUNTY SPONSORED ST. PAUL SPONSORED TOTALS Projects within Adolescent Abuse Interven- St. Paul-Ramsey FY 1980 al l oca- ti on �t;9#`F 77j 3°f County Crimi nal tion Acquisition of Mobile Justice Coordina- Radio Units '�S,�oo ting Council M?nagement of Police Records and Communica- Court Screening ting Systems in Suburban Unit ,�f,— Ramsey County y3,2oo 88� �� Criminal Defense Services�,� 0 Service Restitution Adult Courts 39�,ZZ9 �2� g LEAA Program Evaluation Model Ir.►pl ementati on yS,000 Victim/Witness Assistance for Special Population , Groups 3 v � _ ��) Projects not Court Space Management within FY 1980 Study 4s,eoo Community Arbi- allocation, ap- Criminal Justice Infor- tration Zy�o�S proved in con- mation Study System qo,oea cept. �2) �1) 3 Totals 9 3 12 , � , , � , , , , � , , LEAA ANNUAL ACTION PLAN FY 1980 , , , March, 1979 Prepared By: , Saint Paul-Ramsey County Criminal Justice Coordinating Council , , , , iSAINT PAUL CITY COUNCIL , David Hozza, President Rosalie Butler , Ruby Hunt Leonard Levine � Ron P�addox �Joanne Showalter , Victor Tedesco , ` BOARD OF RAMSEY COUNTY COMMISSIONERS � Robert Orth, Chairman Diane Ahrens , Anthony Dana John Finley , Donald Salverda Warren Schaber i � � � i � � ;; ! , 1979 SAINT PAUL-RAMSEY COUNTY � CRIP�IINAL JUSTICE COORDINATING COUNCIL CO-CHAIRPERSONS , Georqe Latimer Mayor of the City of Saint Paul Robert Orth Chairman, Ramsey County Board of Commissioners , MEMBERS � Sidney Abramson • Judge of District Court Diane Ahrens Commissioner, Ramsey County Board of Commissioners, Pat Beck Citizen Robert Bonine Northwest Area Foundation David Bredemus Crime Victim Crises Center , Chris Clauson Director, Northwest S�burban Youth Service Bureau � Gary Dickson Shoreview City Manager William Falvey Chief Ramsey County Public Defender , Tom Foley County Attorney John Greavu Mayor of the City of Maplewood Gordon Griller District Court Administrator , Tom Hagen Deputy Chief, Maplewood Police Department Robert Hanson Director, Ramsey County Corranunity Corrections , Adult Services Jeanette Janacek Councilmember, New Brighton City Council � Harriet Lansing Judge of Municipal Court Spencer Lonetree St. Paul Indian Center Kwame McDonald Executive Director, Surr�nit-University Crime , Prevention Program Beryl Nord City Attorney's Office , George Petersen Judge of Municipal Court Richard kowan Chief of the Saint Paul Police Department , Joanne Showalter Councilmember, Saint Paul City Council , David Van Ness Rar�sey Action Programs Sam Verdeja West Side Defense Project , Charles Zacharias Ramsey County Sheriff William Zuber Director, Human Services Planning-Ramsey County � � iii , ! � STAFF Kathryn Ackland, Coordinator , Kim E. Bingham Judith E. Bollmann , Elizabeth E. Hinz � Nancy E. Kassover � Daniel A. Lapinsky Mark V. Lofstrom � David L. Norrgard , ADDITIONAL PARTICIPANTS � Ramsey County Comrnunity Corrections Department Ramsey County Community Corrections Advisory Board , St. Paul Police Department Ramsey County Public Defender's Office � St. Paul Attorney's Office Ramsey County Attorney's Office Ramsey County Sheriff's Department , St. Paul City Planning Department Ramsey County League of Local Governments , Metropolitan Council Ramsey County Chiefs of Police Administration , and , St. Paul and Ramsey County Cor,ununity organizations concerned with crime prevention and criminal justice , - � , , � . iv � � � St. Paul Ramsey-County , FY 1980 LEAA Annual Action Plan � ERRATA March 29, 1979 � CORRECT PAGE NUMBER ITEM CHANGED INFORMATION � Ac uisition of Mobile Radio Units 23 Sponsoring Unit of Government Ramsey County r Management of Police Records and Commu- , 28 nication Services Sponsoring Unit of Government Ramsey County � 49 Criminal Defense Services State amount requested 3.333% $� 1,707 , Local government funds 36.667q requested $18,773 , 90 Victim Witness Assistance Program Estimated budget: , total : $33,333 Personnel and pay 1 related benefits $33,333 State buy-in requested 1,667 , Local government funds requested $ 667 � Other funds requested $ 1,000 � 101 See updated p. 101 attached � � SL. Paul-Ramse� Ccunty CJCC updated 3/29/79 FY 1980 LE.-"+A P1 an � I i � , i � � � � � , i i i I � I I � �n � C O � � � � I M � �i M � O ' O ( O It� ( I � I G.� i O � O , N � �°'� i I� � N � O i O � C I O I p � � N � C ; C� � M I P� � �.^. ' �.C� I �.'� � O I � v ' � � i 1 I � � C' � CV � N � M i � I M I N . I N l N � � ''"� ! a I � i 1 j '.-' I I i I I � ' � I I � i � � � � I � I I � I ' � ' � � � I � � I I � ; i ! i I � . ! I , �n I O O I r-- ' d � p ; � I M I p� ( Q I O � � � M, i � N 1 O ( O I O O �D V ,y. N � � C' � Cl M � ^ j r- i l0 I � I � O l0 i n E: � Q' N � N � C' � r- � �--+ I N � C' � CJ N tf� :-+ � � ( �� i � � I � I i � � �• � i � i o i �. � I • i I � � I l ' � � � � ~ I � N W � - `' O O O I C I t� � �N � N i � O O O O � r M O N � G1 i O n I N � C,,,'+ O O O O t 4' r� �.c> M ' p �T O I � N �n �n O O � � � 1� C I � j CJ N I M I M I CJ I cr � C' G� M ~ w I I � �} I 1 I I I � I � i I � �I I � i N � I � � , � O� ' O O t� I O O � N O O O M �' o c� o ( o � ,- I �n c j r� � o � c ( o ,M � c E� a I q o ( o I c� � c� � a- I o o I o , o M � Q �' � G+ p t� lp r � N I N O I O O , Z � �i p �� I q u") � C' � O N �n ` c i rn �n � �n O I M L U � � U ` , i r I I � ( `, � U " ul � I I I �! + . d 3 � � � � � � � � I � c I � i i � � i C O C.� � ' � I I � v +-� +� I � N ! }� � � � j 1 I N t/1 ( N V1 N � � , �, � � , � , � i -- ; ; � � - � � ^ r � i�; � c� c� o o � o' i v, � cu c� a� a� c� � � = ;� +� � +� +� `" -� L � � +� +.� i +� � o �n v, v, �n v, � �r Q1 O O �O �6 � �O ( 'r" >l >l � - a T � � � � r 4- 4- � U U ( U ` +-� 1 c/) cn N (n IN [7 •� � � � I�� '� � �'- � U � � f � _ � W lt1 j � ( .'7 '�7 � CJ I N i N ( N N N � � � ' � � � � I � I i N I O I O O O ,,,_, > s 1'^� �� •n L O � �6 �4 ;� i� � O - ` L L L L V "� � _( ( .._I ;C� �� U U I U U � I U U Q i j i I � i , ' � � I I � � � V � I i I I I 1 � � N I 1 � � F" V V I { � I ' � V', 2 � '- r-- �- �M �M , u'� ; C: � O � O �O r- N � '�' � • � ,--� !,--. I r— � � � � N � N t11 N N J � j I � � � ( '� � W � j � � I � ' I I I ' 1 j i 1 � ( � ; , � � , � r ' ; � ; , ' i , � ', ; � ; ► I � I � � ; �- ; � ; ;� � � � � , �;� o` , � r- � ! ; o I I N ��'�, I r �y� i ,.� � U i '- �N � � � •� ! � J f � ' !� - I•r ,^ (� I � t CJ '•� I rJ ' S. CJ i� �� r- j � �:� ��n � ... O � +� � _ �.n � i � i� ' V7 � . � - .� �r U r3 �' � C.J � �1 ,V1 _ s:: � r. I� � � �r,�„ !;,� '� �.0 �� p � ;(./) �V1 r v 'O �G 1 p i � � �:_ :4_ :N t!1 �N � •r f I C.J r- Ci O V �•- I o • ; � !C 'v �:� ` ' � ! �o .:..o i c� i � , � � I � I rJ � CUiJ rJ ! L !a � - !� ,-.� ':.:.! � � � I•� �� I �� -.. � j v �C ;C � V �� ,- :n 'N O �- rJ � ^ _ �` ��' I= - i v � i ,C.� �rJ :J 'U L) � J � j n �\�"' i v1 i :J CJ C :: .- ^+.� �� J �"J i - +-� I � V I r. � .� _ • .- t� :..) _ � _ .�.J � Cil � = � �' V7 . i.-- �^ > > �� J O '� i�._ 1 '' I O 10 O O ^ •L ^J � ,'- ^ ! L - � = ' - y' �� ` �C i._ ;^ v U L; �c� v) �� C L: cv '.^� �v; c/� ;�Q Z x x * � • ,�� , , � PROJECT DESCRIPTION FORMS INDEX � - PROJECT TITLE PAGE NUMBER Adolescent Abuse 5 � Mobile Radio Units 23 Police Records and , Cor�anunication 28 - Court Screening 39 � Unit Community Arbitration 42 , Criminal Defense Services 49 � Service Restitution 56 Adult Courts , Criminal Justice Coordinating Council 68 � Program Evaluation Implementation 71 � Space Management Study 76 Information System , Study 85 Victim/Witness � Assistance 90 � , � � � , � � TABLE OF COPJTENTS rAcknowledgements ii Notice to State Crime Control � Planning Board vi Introduction 1 � Program Areas and Project Description Forms 3 , Appendix A Cross-Charge Information and � Attachment A 100 � Appendix B Ramsey County 1979 Community Corrections Plan Statement of ��eeds 102 � I � � � � � � � � � .•� � � � � Notice to State CCPB Staff: � EQUIVALENT PLAN SECTIONS � State Requirements per St. Paul-Ramsey County � FY 1980 Guidelines, Page 14 CJCC Plan 1 . Introduction Introduction , 2. Action Programs Program Areas a. Continuation Grants - Problem Statements and Goals � b. New Activities for Funding - Strategies c. Program Activity Descriptions - Relationship td State Plan and Regional Guide � - Project Monitoring - Technical Assistance � - LEAA Funding • continuation projects and PDFs � • new projects and PDFs 3. Proposed Program Areas Not Applicable 4. Cross Charge Information Cross Charge Information � 5. Attachment A Attachment A � � � � � � � vi � St. Paul-Ramsey County CJCC FY 1980 LEAA Plan � � INTRODUCTION: This FY 1980 Annual Action Plan describes LEAA funding decisions based upon planning activities during the past nine months. The foremost goals of the St. Paul-Ramsey County Criminal Justice � Coordinating Council are to improve the criminal justice system and crime control . Coordinating ' Council members and staff have been involved in � various tasks to further those goals by determining the needs of the Ramsey County criminal justice system as well as identify projects to meet those needs. � The planning process for FY 1980 formally began with collection of information from Ramsey County � criminal justice agencies about their activities during the past year (1977). This criminal justice system update is done annually for Coor- dinating Council members to better understand issues rwithin the sub-systems. A Ramsey County Crime Analysis for 1977 was also � completed based upon Uniform Crime Reports which describes criminal offenses and police arrest data as reported to the Minnesota Crime Information � System. - New Coordinating Council sub committees were formed this past year to better reflect areas of interest � and expertise. The sub-committees in the past had been organized according to sub-system areas. The new sub-committees were identified as the following: � Prevention/Apprehension, Adjudication/Diversion, Eross Systems/Management, and Corrections. These sub-committees developed problem statements � and goals for FY 1980 by reviewing those from the past year and also reviewing the 1977 Ramsey County Crime Analysis and updated criminal jsutice system � information. The full Coordinating Council reviewed sub-committee reports on problem statements and goals before adopting them as part of the FY 1980 Plan. � Ideas for projects to implement these goals were solicited from Ramsey County criminal justice a5encies and community groups. These Project � Concepts" were r•eviewed by Coordinating Council members and ranked for staff assistance to develop into project proposals coordinated with appropriate � criminal justice agencies. � � -1- St. Paul-Ramsey County CJCC � FY 1980 LEAA Plan The project proposals requiring LEAA funding were � reviewed by the sub-committees and the full Coordinating Council . Those continuation and new � projects contained in this FY 1980 Annual Action Plan are the result of this lengthy and thorough review process. � The major emphasis of this Annual Action Plan is to provide resources for increasing management capabilities of county and suburban ad�inistrators of criminal � justice activities. New service areas are also included that address St. Paul and Ramsey County needs for increased, specialized victim/witness assistance and service restitution for adult offenders= These projects were developed and identified for funding based upon the thorough and inclusive planning� process described above. � � � � � � � � � � � -2- � r St. Paul-Ramsey County CJCC � FY 1980 LEAA Plan , PROGRAM l : Community Prevention Services This program area addresses the needs of youth in the comnunity by providing � services such as education, employment, health and recreation, as well as facilitating the coordination of all agencies in the corranunity that serve youth. � PROBLEM: A high proportion of property-oriented crimes co.mmunity by youthful offenders identified the need to develop meaningful prevention strategies as a means of reducing � the incidence of crimes comnitted by juveniles. Ramsey County arrest data for 1977 shows that of all those arrested for crimes against persons (homicide, rape, j aggravated assault, and robbery) one-third (33.4�) were juveniles. Similar figures for those arrested for crimes against property (burglary, motor vehicle theft, larceny) reveal that two-thirds (66.9%) of those , arrested in Ramsey County were juveniles. Part II offense data suggests that nearly 40% of those arrested for crimes such as fraud, prostitution, nar- � cotics, vandalism also were less than eighteen years of age. Indeed, 71% of those arrested for vandalism were juveniles. � GOALS: 1 . To develop and implement workshops geared to juveniles and their parents, particularly to highlight the consequences of a criminal arrest. � 2. To develop and implement crime prevention efforts aimed at upper elementary school grades, particularly � to highlight the c�nsequences of a criminal arrest. 3. To develop and implement crime prevention efforts for the owners/managers of commercial establishments, � particularly those subject to crimes most likely to be corr�nitted by youthful offenders. � STRATEGY: The St. Paul-Ramsey County Criminal Justice Coordinating Council is strongly supportive of community prevention efforts and has recently endorsed two such projPCts, one of which is included in the FY 1980 Annual Action Plan � for LEAA funding. The Adolescent Abuse Project, a second year effort, combines Ramsey County Welfare Department and school system efforts to meet the special � needs of abused adolescents and prevent delinquent activity. Another project, to develop crime prevention curriculum for upper elementary and junior hiah students in St. Paul Public Schools, was a reco�nnendation in the � St. Paul Public Safety/Crime Prevention Plan. Coor- dinating Council staff will seek private funding for this project. � RELATIONSHIP TO STATE AND REGION: The problem statements and goals are consistent with � -3- r St. Paul-Ramsey County CJCC FY 1980 LEAA Plan � the State Crime Control Planning Board updated 1978 Plan and the Metropolitan Dev�lopment Guide's Law � and Justice Chapter. PROJECT MONITORING: Monitoring of these projects will be the responsibility of the St. Paul-Ramsey County Criminal Justice Coor- � dinating Council . A program monitoring and evaluation system will. be developed for both projects. TECHNICAL ASSISTANCE: Assistance will be provided by Coordinating Council � staff as well as school system and Welfare Depart- ment staffs. � LEAA FUNDING: Continuation Projects Project Title: Adolescent Abuse Intervention � Sponsoring Unit of Government: Ramsey County Implementing Agency: Ramsey County Welfare Department � Grant Number: 13011127279 � Project Duration: Three Years Funding Year: Second � LEAA Funds Requested: $77,309 State Buy-In Funds Requested: $4,295 � Amount and Source of Local Funds: $4,295-Ramsey County Total LEAA Funds for Continuation Projects in � Program Area #1 : $77,309 Total State Match: $ 4,295 � Total Local Match: $ 4,295 New Pro�ects - Not Applicable � � � � � -4- � CJCC-010 � r �� . ST. PAUL-RAMSEY COUNTY PROJECT DESCRIPTION FORM CRIMINAL JUSTICE COORDINATING COUNCIL FY 1980 � CONTINUATION PROJECT � PROJECT TITLE: Adolescent Abuse Intervention FUNDING YEAR: 1g80 CONTACT PERSON' Don M. Holr�auist PHONE: 2g8-5111 � SPONSORING UNIT OF GOVERNMENT: A3�e • Cvunt�.► 5 _ � IMPLEMENTING AGENCY: Ramsev Countv welfare Derartr.�ent � ESTIMATEO BUDGET: � TOTAL: $ 85,899 LEAA AMOUNT REQ�ESTED c 77,309 � PERSONNEL & PAY RELATED BENEFITS:�78,799 STATE AMOUNT REQUESTED S 4,295 5 , *�ilea_e : �2,250 LOCAL GOUERNMENT FUNDS 5 SUPPLIES: S1 800 Rent: S �� REQUESTED ° 4,295 � . Conferences: ; � 0 OTHER FUNDS REQUESTED � - OTHER: Indirect Costs 5� S __ Surtmary of Progress to Date: � � Sumnarize the project's major accomplishments to date including evidence of progress toward stated goals and work program. Provide material supporting this progress. If the project- intends to revise project goals or alter its target group or program significantly, please describe in detail . , The startin�* date of the Pro;ect vras 1-1-79, so a rro�ress renort seee±s �rerature . , , at this tir.ie. There has been no release of �unds nendin� the CCPB Evaluatien Unit's � a�proval oF procedures related to the Privae�� and Securir� P.ct and ar�roval of the evaluation desi�*.n. A ir.eet�n? is scheduled , on Januar�� 10, 1979, c•�ith the Evaluat_on Unit and the Criminal Justice CoordinatinQ Council reoresentative. = Civil Service classified the positions 1-3-79, and the �obs have been posted. The olan ?s to select staff and have them start 2-1-79, rrevided funds are released b�► that date. � ' � � � � � -5- �,��_o,o r ST. PAUL-RAMSEY COUNTY PROJECT DESCRIPTION FORM � CRIMINAL JUSTICE COORDIP�ATING COUNCIL FY 1980 CONTIP�UATION PROJECT � Surr�nary of Proqness to Date (Continued) : � � � , � � Staff and Other Resources: � List any chanqes in staffing pattern anticipated and any new co-operative agreements with other organizations, agencies or aroups necessitated by changes in program i emphasis, target group, etc. � , j Have reports of project been made to sponsoring unit of givernment? Provide details; � I i � Provide an updated five year cost projection for this project. j � i I � � � , ___ � I certify that the information given in this Project Description Form is true and � accurate, o the best of my knowledge. �/ . DATE � l�%' � r C' 'L ' , -Gt_ ;� Authorized S' , � r-6- � � St. Paul-Ramsey County CJCC FY 1980 LEAA Plan � PROGRAM 2: Diversion � This program area assists in the development of diversion criteria and .guidelines in communities whose personnel are unable to develop such procedures with only technical assistance. Projects will provide staff assistance to the areas of � juvenile courts, court services and law enforcement. PROBLEM: Police in Ramsey County need to have increased liaison � • with community alternatives to the juvenile justice system. Most juveniles' initial introduction to the criminal justice system is through a police officer. The discretion used by the police in apprehension alternatives ' may lead the child into further conta�t with the system. ' Law enforcement agencies and their communities must establish and maintain active comnunication if successful diversion is to occur. Coordinating with respec� to community resources and law enforcement's ability to � refer is crucial . Specific problems in police referral to community diversion programs are the lack of involvement by police with community agencies in the planning and operation of their agencies, and the lack of uniform refer- � ral procedures. Preliminary reports from the Team Police Project indicate that the efforts by the Police Department are being well received by corr�nunity agencies. The youth � service bureaus have also attempted to increase police participation in diversion programs. � Ramsey County currently has limited resources to implement restitution alternatives. In some cases> it may be more cost efficient to require participation in restitution/ diversion programs rather than impose the traditional � sanction required by the criminal justice system. GOALS: Police Officer Participation � 1 . to develop a uniform referral criteria for juveniles ta diversion programs to be utilized by law enforce- � ment agencies, with particular emphasis on Youth Service Bureaus 2. to help increase police participation in the planning , and operation of youth diversion programs, and 3. to improve lines of communication and confidence � between the community and the police. Restitution � 1 . to support the development and implementation of monetary and work service restitution components in existin� programs. � -7- , St. Paul-Ramsey County CJCC FY 1980 LEAA Plan � STRATEGY: Implementation of the above goals will be further identified � during 1979-1980 and directed to non-LEAA resources or to Program Area 4: Pre-Adjudication Alternatives, based upon State Crime Control Planning Board policy to eliminate � the implementation standards for this area in 1980. RELATIONSHIP TO � STATE AND REGION: See Above PROJECT MONITORING: Not Applicable TECHNICAL ASSISTANCE: Not Applicable � LEAA FUNDING: Not Applicable � , � � , � � � � � t � _8_ � � � St. Paul-Ramsey County CJCC FY 1980 LEAA Plan � PROGRAM 3: Juvenile Court � This program area addresses the needs of youth involved in the adjudication system, by implementing projects designed to provide training for defense attorneys, develop rules of procedure for juvenile court, provide defense services for youth and their � parents, and advise juveniles and their parents of their legal rights and alternatives. PROBLEM: The public at large is not aware of the ramifications � ' of the juvenile court process and procedure. In Ramsey County, there is no standard procedure for informing the public of the court process. � Ramsey County currently has limited resources to implement restitution alternatives. In some cases , it may be more cost efficient to require participation in restitution � diversion programs rather than impose the traditional sanction required by the criminal justice system. This may also impart a feeling of accountability more directly � on the juvenile offender. GOALS: Juvenile Court Procedure � 1 . to provide information on the juvenile court process to the public, especially to juveniles and their families before they enter the initial hearing. , Restitution 1 . to support the development and implementation of monetary � and service restitution components in existing programs. 2. to encourage the development and training of restitution � specialists. STRATEGY: For FY 1980 no projects ha�e been incl�aded in the Annual Action Plan. Implementation will be further identified � during 1979-1980 as part of the ongoing planning activities of the Coordinating Council . RELATIONSHIP TO � STATE AND REGION: The problem statements and goals are consistent with the State Crime Control Planning Board updated 1978 Plan and the Metropolitan Development Guide's Law and Justice � Chapter. PROJECT MONITORING: Not Applicable � TECHNICAL ASSISTANCE: Not Applicable LEAA FUNDING: Not Applicable � � -9- � St. Paul-Ramsey County CJCC FY 1980 LEAA Plan � PROGRAM 4: Pre-Adjudication Alternatives � This program area encourages projects to lower the number of youths involved in the adjudication process and detained in secure facilities. In this area , projects are funded by LEAA and the Juvenile Justice and Delinquency Prevention Act, including detention alternatives, alternatives to local jails and police lockups, and corr¢nnunity-based residential and •non-residential programs. � PROBLEM: -- There is not enough documented information �on the profile of the female who is detained or who is going through the criminal justice system. This � problem was expressed at the CJCC 1978 Goal Setting Conference. The lack of information regarding the female offender inhibits any potential treatment � that could be used to address her needs. GOAL: To research the needs of juvenile female offenders in Ramsey County. � STRATEGY: Implementation will be further identified during 1979-1980 as part of the Coordinating Council 's � continuing planning activities. RELATIONSHIP. TO � STATE AND REGION: The problem statement and goal are inherently consistent although not a�dressed in either the State Crime Control Planning Board updated 1978 Plan or the Metropolitan Development Guide's � Law and Justice Chapter. PROJECT MONITORING: Wot Applicable � TECHNICAL ASSISTANCE: Not Applicable LEAA FUNDING: Not Applicable � � � � � � -10- � � St. Paul-Ramse County CJCC Y FY 1980 LEAA Plan � � PROGRAM 5: Post-Adjudication Alternatives This program area encourages projects to assist adjudicated youths in their transition back into the corrnnunity. Projects that are implemented include � community-based residential and nonresidential treatment programs, restitution programs, probation and parole services, and volunteer and paraprofessional programs. This area includes funds awarded by the Juvenile Justice and � Delinquency Prevention Act. PROBLEM: Refer to 1979 Ramsey County Comnunity Corrections Plan, Pages 17-19, Statement of Needs, see Appendix. � GOALS: Services and Treatment. To make availabie investigative, diagnostic, case planning, and � treatment services for offenders under juris- diction of Ramsey County Courts, the Corranissioners of Corrections, or the Minnesota Corrections Board. These services are provided under the direction , of the Community Corrections Department. Institutionalization. To provide security, super- � vision, and treatment of persons committed by a court to a Ramsey County correctional institution. � Control . To limit unacceptable behavior in the corr�nunity through the accountable exercise of control over offenders under court jurisdiction. � Victims of Crimes. To insure whenever possible that the victim or the community receives reim- � bursement in either money or services from the � offender. Protection and Safety. To provide for the pro- tection and safety of the public and the offender � through effective diagnosis and treatment planning. The need to provide treatment services to offenders must be balanced with the need to provide protection � and safety to the public. Community Resources. To utilize community services to augment the services available within the i corrections network. Some of these resources are supported with community corrections funds, while others are paid for through the resources of other � agencies. Diversion. To encourage development of diversion resources as an alternative to becoming involved � in the official corrections system. STRATEGY: Implementation will be identified during � 1979-1980 as part of the ongoing planning activities of the Coordinating Council and the Ramsey County Community Corrections Department and Advisory Board. � -11- St. Paul-Ramsey County CJCC , FY 1980 LEAA Plan , RELATIONSHIPS TO STATE AND REGION: The problem statements and goals are consistent , with the State Crime Control Planning Board updated 1978 Plan and the Metropolitan Develop- ment Guide's Law and Justice Chapter. � PROJECT MONITORING: Not Applicable TECHNICAL ASSISTANCE: Not Applicable � , LEAA FUNDING: Not A�plicable � , , � � , � � � � t � � _12_ � , St. Paul-Ramsey County CJCC � FY 1980 LEAA Plan � PROGRAM 6: Juvenile Justice Training This program area includes projects that assist in-service training of law , enforcement, juvenile court, and juvenile corrections personnel who are directl.y involved with children who come into contact with the juvenile justice system. PROBLEM: Refer to 1979 Ramsey County Community Corrections , Plan, Pages 17-19, Statement of Needs, see Appendix. GOAL� To facilitate a continuous process of growth and � learning to enrich the individual as well as his work group in order to improve performance and achieve organization objectives. ! STRAGEGY: Implementation will be identified �i�ring 1979-1980 as part of the ongoing planning activities of the Coordinating Council and the Ramsey County � Corrections Department and Advisory Board. RELATIONSHIPS TO � STATE AND REGION: The problem statements and goals are consistent with the State Crime Control Planning Board updated 1978 Plan and the Metropolitan Development Guide's Law and Justice Chapter. � PROJECT MONITORING: Not Applicable � TECHNICAL ASSISTANCE: Not Applicable . LEAA FUNDING: Not Applicable � � � � � � � � -13- , St. Paul-Ramsey County CJCC FY 1980 LEAA Plan , PROGRAM 7: Police-Comnunity Cooperation and Crime Prevention � This program area addresses the need for increased communication and cooperation between law enforcement agencies and members of the general community. Projects � included in this area involve Operation Identification and other crime prevention activities, increased victim reporting, community attitude surveys, crisis inter- vention, and increased responsiveness to community needs. � PROBLEM. Interviews with Saint Paul residents as a part of the Team Police Project show that violent personal street crimes are less frequently identified as � neighborhood crime problems. More than half of the responses to a citizen survey cited reckless driving as a serious neighborhood problem with certain pro- � perty crimes (vandalism, bicycle theft, burglary) also high concerns. Much of the crime identified as being of serious concern to individual neighbor- hoods prevention efforts. Police-neighborhood efforts � and concerns need to be effectively linked together. This will require expanded joint efforts, particularly with other city agencies which offer services pertinent � to the police/neighborhood efforts. There is insufficient data on the concerns of residents elsewhere in Ramsey County. Interim evaluation reports of Saint Paul 's Team Police � Project indicate that: (1 ) police officers have become more visible within city neighborhoods, (2) the � number of citizen/police officer contacts has expanded, and (3) there has been a modest decline in the number of complaints lodged against police officers. Concomittently there has been a significant decrease � (12 percent) in Part I crimes, particularly in motor vehicle theft, robbery and corrnnercial burglary. Addition- ally, the number of arrests made since the inception of � the Team Police Project has risen. GOALS: 1 . to develop an interdepartmental approach to crime prevention, involving those city agencies which � potentially have impact upon allaying the high crime concerns of the neighborhoods, 2. to encourage community groups to implement crime � prevention programs in cooperation with police agencies and the County Sheriff, � 3. to foster and encourage experimentation in crime prevention programs and strategies, and to assess and evaluate any such efforts for improvements or , reapplication. 4. to continue to foster and encourage police efforts � which focus upon police/neighborhood involvement and mutual awareness of common interests and concerns, -14- , � St. Paul-Ramsey County CJCC � FY 1980 LEAA Plan , 5. to continue experimentation of inethods and strategies which encourage/promote reporting and relaying of information to the police by individual citizens and � neighborhood groups, 6. to seek further ways to augment positive police/ � citizen contact, and 7. to seek and encourage the cooperative efforts of cities in providing joint crime prevention service , programs where feasible. STRATEGY: For FY 1980 no projects have'been identified for funding � within the Annual Action Plan. However, the recently endorsed St. Paul Community Public Safety/Crime Prevention Plan includes recommendations that address the problem statements and goals identified here. Federal LEAA dis- , cretionary funds are being sought for a twelve month St. Paul project that would further encourage community groups and law enforcement officials to work together � to prevent crime. The Public Safety/Crime Prevention Plan also makes recommendations regarding City depart- mental policy and procedural changes that are supportive � of crime prevention. These recommendations have been adopted by �he City Council and departments (e.g. , deadbolt lock ordinance, adoption of security chapter of State Building Code, �safety check training for housing � rehabilitation counselors and safety devices declared eligible for loan and grant program, design review training for City staff, etc. ). � Additional implementation plans will be identified during 1979-1980 as part of the Coordinating Council 's ongoing planning activities. � RELATIONSHIP TO STATE AND REGION: The problem statements and goals are consistent with the � State Crime Control Planning Board updated 1978 Plan and the Metropolitan Development Guide's Law and Justice Chapter. � PROJECT MONITORING: Not Applicable TECHNICAL ASSISTANCE: Not Applicable � LEAA FUNDING: Not Applicable , � , -15- � St. Paul-Ramsey County CJCC FY 1980 LEAA Plan � PROGRAM 8: Police Officer Selection and Training , This program area seeks to develop appropriate, job-related, non-discriminatory standards for police officer personnel , to insure the hiring and training of the � most qualified candidates for law enforcement agencies. PROBLEM: More than 130 sworn police officers serve the police � agencies of suburban Ramsey County. The Sheriff's Department has a sworn complement of more than 180 personnel , and the St. Paul police department, a sworn , staff in excess of 500. Minnesota law mandates that each officer receive a minimum of 16 hours of approved training in a calendar year in order to maintain eligibility for the officer's individual license. A license is valid for three years, with the training minimum to be met each of those years. Presently these training needs are being met through separate department action. � There is little coordinated effort within Ramsey County. In Anoka, Dakota, and Washington Counties, on the other hand, county-wide, coordinated efforts are being carried out. Similar efforts are being considered in Hennepin � County. GOALS: 1 . to identify the specific training needs of individual � police officers in Ramsey County, in relation to the state mandated training/licensing requirements, and provide for a training program responsive to that assessment, and , 2. to coordinate police officer training needs with those of adjacent agencies with comparable needs. , STRATE GY: For FY 1980 no projects have been identified for funding within the Annual Action Plan. Implementation activities will be considered during 1979-1980 as part of the � Coordinating Council 's ongoing planning process. RELATIONSHIP TO , STATE AND REGION: The problem statements and goals are consistent with the State Crime Control Planning Board updated 1978 Plan and the Metropol�itan Development Guide's Law and Justice � Chapter. PROJECT MONITORING: Not Applicable TECHNICAL ASSISTANCE: Not Applicable � LEAA FUNDING: Not Applicable , � -16- � � , St. Paul-Ramsey County CJCC FY 1980 LEAA Plan , PROGRAM 9: Law Enforcement Consolidation and Management � This program area addresses the need for increased efficiency and productivity of the law enforcement sub-system. Projects are implemented that are designed to re- organize police services into more consolidated and efficient forms. � PROBLEM: Law enforcement resources and services are not equally available in all areas of Ramsey County, especially those of a supportive nature to patrol operations. , Service demands increase but budgets remain limited. Local government officials need alternative cost effective ways to strengthen and improve law enforcement services , while preserving essential elements of local control . Particularly desirable would be joint service ventures which stress the provision of police support services � such as in records and communications, criminalistics, and the like. GOALS: 1 . to research levels of police service, � 2. to evaluate and offer recommendations regarding alternative means of providing police services, ` 3. to encourage contractual agreements for coopertive � use of resources and services, , 4. to support cost effective efforts to improve law enforcement service to all areas, and , 5. to concentrate the use of LEAA Part C funds in the law enforcement area for joint service action programs in Programs 10 and 11 in FY 1980. , STRATEGIES: For FY 1980 no projects have been identified for funding funding within the Annual Action Plan. , RELATIONSHIP TO STATE ANO REGION: The problem statements and goals are consistent with the State Crime Control Planning Board updated 1978 Plan and � the Metropolitan Development Guide's Law and Justice Chapter. PROJECT MONITORING: Not Applicable � TECHNICAL ASSISTANCE: Not Applicable � LEAA FUNDING: Not Applicable � , -17- , St. Paul-Ramsey County CJCC FY 1980 LEAA Plan , PROGRAM 10: Investigation and Criminalistics � This program area addres�ses the need for the increased ability of law enforcement agencies to analyze physical evidence in the investigation of criminal offenses, � thereby increasing the number of charges that can be brought by prosecutors. PROBLEM: Most law enforcement agencies with Ramsey County are , unable to process physical evidence effectively. Only the City of St. Paul maintains a high quality, fully operational laboratory with some financial support from Ramsey County. The State of Minnesota, through the , Bureau of Criminal Apprehension, also provides such assistance, usually with excessive delays in processing materials. The City of Saint Paul has been carrying out , criminalistic work for all the police agencies within the County, on a request basis, with no services charges. Continued assistance from the City of St. Paul to other police agencies will be difficult in the future, however, , in part because of fiscal constraints which have curtailed their efforts. The medicolegal investigative system involves the discipline� of forensic pathology, criminalistics, and general investi- gation. Ramsey County presently does not operate its medicolegal investigation system using the skills, know- � ledges and resources of a forensic pathologist. Rather, the County has chosen to operate through a County Coroner system without any requirements that the Coroner or his/ , her staff be certified forensic pathologists. GOALS: 1 . to research inequities of resources, 2. to support effective cooperative efforts to jointly � use resources existing in Ramsey County, and to provide a� firm financial base for such services, , including a fee schedule for services where such is appropriate, 3. to assess Ramsey County's present approach to handling , medicolegal investigations in terms of its advantages and disadvantages, and 4. to assist in improving the medicolegal investigative � services available in Ramsey County. STRATEGY: For FY 1980 no projects have been identified for funding � within the Annual Action Plan. However, a detailed management assessment of the Ramsey County Coroner's Office was recently conducted by Coordinating Council � staff at the request of the County Board of Commissioners. This study recommended, among other things, that a Medical Examiner System be adopted. � Implementation activities will be considered during 1979- 1980 as part of the Coordinating Council 's ongoing planning activities. , -18- � St. Paul-Ramsey County CJCC � � FY 1980 LEAA Plan � RELATIONSHIP TO STATE AND REGION: Problem statements and goals are consistent with the State Crime Control Planning Board updated 1978 Plan � and the Metropolitan Development Guide's Law and Justice Chapter. , PROJECT MONITORING: Not Applicable TECHNICAL ASSISTANCE: Not Applicable � LEAA FUNDING: Not Applicable , � � , � , , , , � � , , -19- � St. Paul-Ramsey County CJCC FY 1980 LEAA Plan , PROGRAM 11 : Communication and Information Systems � This program area assists law enforcement agencies in the development and improvement of comxnunications and information systems. � PROBLEM: Police records and communication systems are not operated on a joint, coordinated basis to the , fullest extent possible, nor are the joint service programs now in operation meeting the full service needs of the participants. GOALS: 1 . to support development of 911 emergency � reporting systems 2. to encourage establishment and maintenance of a , thoroughly coordinated public safety communi- cations system 3. to monitor and assist in efforts to improve the , public safety communications system in Ramsey County � 4. to encourage establishment and maintenance of a thoroughly coordinated public safety records/ information system � STRATEGY: The St. Paul-Ramsey County Criminal Justice Coordinating Council has addressed the goals listed above by including � two projects in the Annual Action Plan for FY 1980 funding. One of the projects, Acquisition of Mobile Radio Units, will assist five suburban police agencies in making specific improvements in the quality of their , communication services. Another project, Management of Police Records Services in Suburban Ramsey County, will enable a general management assessment to be , conductea of police communications/records services in Ramsey County (excluding the City of Saint Paul ) and suggesting a means for strengthening those services. RELATIONSHIP TO , STATE AND REGION: The problem statements and goals are consistent with the State Crime Control Planning Board updated 1978 , Plan, and with the Metropolitan Development Guide's Law and Justice Chapter. PROJECT MONITORING: The Saint Paul-Ramsey County CJCC will be responsible � for monitoring this project as well as for developing a program monitoring and evaluation system. TECHNICAL ASSISTANCE: Technical assistance to the projects will be provided � by the Saint Paul-Ramsey County CJCC staff, the City/ County Purchasing Department, the Ramsey County , Sheriff's Department and the City of Maplewood Police Department. -20- , , � St. Paul-Ramsey County CJCC FY 1980 LEAA Plan , LEAA FUNOING Continuation Pro�ects - Not Applicable , New Pro�ects 1 . Project Title: Acquisition of Mobile Radio Units , Sponsoring Unit of Government: Ramsey County Implementing Agency: Ramsey County Sheriff's , Department in cooperation with City of Maplewood, et. al . , Grant Number: Not Applicable Project Duration: One Year � Funding Year: First Year LEAA Funds Requested: $45,000 � State Buy-In Funds Requested: $2,500 Amount and Source of Local Funds: $2,500 from , Ramsey County, and the Cities of New Brighton, Roseville, Maple- wood, and Mounds View on a pro , rata basis. 2. Project Title: Management of Police Records Services in Suburban Ramsey County , Sponsoring Unit of Government: Ramsey County , Implementing Agency: Ramsey County Sheriff's Department in cooperation with Maplewood, Roseville, New Brighton, and Mounds View, North St. Paul , , White Bear Lake Grant Number: Not Applicable , Project Duration: One Year , Funding Year: 1980 LEAA Funds Requested: $43,200 , State Buy-In Funds Requested: $2,400 Amount and Source of Local Funds: $2,200 , Each of the participants will con- tribute on a pro rata share , -21- , St. Paul-Ramsey County CJCC FY 1980 LEAA Plan � Total LEAA Funds for New Projects in Program , Area 11 : $ 88,200 Total Requested State Match: $ 4,900 � Total Requested Local Match: $ 4,900 , , , � , , , , � , , , , , -22- , � •• ' .. PROJECT DESCRIPTION FORM , ST. PAUL-RAMSEY COUNTY FY 1980 CRIMINAL JUSTICE COORDINATING COUNCIL NEW PROJECT , T TITLE: �'�1'� '� f`9r OJECTEO YEARS OF LEAA PROJEC �q DING REQUESTS• Acquisition of Mobile Radio Units � N ��T3 N 1 ear , CONTACT PERSON: �'�--° �PAl�,�� ^, NE: 77�_4533 Richard W. Schal r � � � , SPONSORING UNIT OF GOVERNMEt�T: �E,2 ��ti�' Cit of Ma lewood . 1 IMPLEMENTING AGENCY: City of Maplewood in cooperation with Roseville, New Brighton, � , Mounds View and Ramsey County Sheriff's Department ESTIMATED BUOGET: � , TOTAL: _ LEAA AP40UPlT REOUESTED ��s_nnn 9� PERSONNEL & PAY ELATED BENEFITS: n STATE BUY-IN REQUESTED 2_500 , � EQUIPMENT: S50 000 _ LOCAL GOVREQUESTED rlDS 2,500 5 , SUPPLIES: 0 — CONSULTANT: 0 OTHER FUNOS REQJESTED o OTHER: o , PROBLEM STATEMENT AND DOCUh1ENTATION OF NEEO Clearly describe the problem this project is expected to address. Provide supporting facts and figures to document the problem. Indicate the source of data cited (e.g. , , a specified published report, agency records , another aqency's data� . The problem statement should �e related to the target population this project will serve. In . documenting t��e problem please provide facts regarding the target population that , are related to the problem. During the past five (5) years the Governor's Commission on Crime Control has placed a high priority on a complete upgrading of law enforcement radio communications in the , State of Minnesota. Most outstate agencies had had a dire need for radio improvements. Due to this need, the outstate agencies were generally equipped first. The last two counties to receive grants for equipment were Ramsey and Hennepin Counties. In the , process of upgrading Ramsey County, instead of an all new system, it was felt that thirty-five (35) mobile units already in service could be modified. The units that were modified failed to perform in an acceptable manner. This problem , was called to the Minnesota Radio Review Board's attention. It was determined a further modification was necessary to correct the problem. The Governor's Commission on Crime Control authorized a grant to correct this malfunction. This modification was attempted on several of the radios. It developed that ten (10) mobile units in I , the service of the White Bear Lake Police Department could be modified, however, due to the other twenty-five (25) being older units, they could not be modified. , The units with the problem are in the service of the following departments: Roseville (8) Maplewood (6) , New Brighton (6) Mounds View (3) Ramsey Sheriff (2) , When these technical prohibitions to modification were discovered, it was again called to the attention of the Governor's Crime Control Board. At this point in time the , -23- LJLL-�� • • ' PROEJCT DESCRIPTION FORM , ST. PAUL-RAMSEY COUNTY FY 1980 GRIMINAL JUSTICE COORDINATING COUNCIL NEW PROJECT , Problem Statement & Documentation of Need (Continued) , time lapse taken in the grant process required a new grant application to repair these radios at the local level. In view of the original grant expiring and funds , are no longer availab�le through that means, this application is submitted. The original upgrading has been a long-standing top priority goal of the Governor's Crime Control Commission. This need for new units has been reviewed and recommended , by the Minnesota Radio Review Board. To completely make the Ramsey County communities ,involved a reliable part of law enforcement radio communications in Minnesota, this grant is essential. , , s , � , , , , , , , . , , � , , , • -24- ----- -- -- -- .. --—- __ , ,� � - CJCC O11 ST. PAUL-RAh1SEY COUNTY PROJECT DESCRIPTION FORM CRIMINAL JUSTICE COORDINATING COUNCIL FY 1980 NEW PROJECT i OBJECTIVES: , Objectives should be expressed as the effects, results, or accomplishments the project project is intended to produce. Objectives should be specific and measurable, and indicate the expected impact of the project on the problem , stated. In writing objectives, the following guidelines should be observed: , a. Ojectives should be expressed in terms of ineasurable quantities; b. Each objective should express a single idea. Brief, clear statements are helpful , and if key terms are likely to be misunderstood, explain , your definition of them. c. Define the desired improvement or proposed activity as specifically as possible. A helpful question to ask in writing an objective may be, "How will the target population's problems have changed as a , result of this project?" ' d. Indicate the target area to be affected, or target group to be served by the project. Specify the time frame in which anticipated results � or proposed activities are expected to occur. — , To complete a previously committed radio upgrading that a previous grant procedure expired before it could be accomplished. The final objective is to have a reliable � radio sy.stem for each of the communities involved. i � � � � � � � , -25- ----..._.._.. _�.�,�. '. - ' CJCC-011 � ', ST. PAUL-RAMSEY COUPJTY PROJECT DESCRIPTION FORM CRIMINAL JUSTICE COORDINATI^1G COUNCIL FY 1980 , NEW PROJECT MAJOR ACTIVITIES: List the major activities anticipated b.y the project and indicate i their relationship to the project's objectives. Also lxst major products of each ta�k and expected time period for each. , Replace and install twenty-five (25) mobile radio units that do not function properly or reliably. , , � , , � , .� i � � � STAFF S� OTHER RESOURCES: List anticipated staff positions and briefly describe , each. Also lsit other organizations, agencies, boards or groups which will be involved in the project. No staff. , Communities listed in program will participate jointly in endeavor when grant is , approved. , � , � . _ -26- , � CJ��-UIl , • . ST. PAUL-RAMSEY COUNTY PROJECT DESCRIPTION FORM � CRIMINAL JUSTICE COORDIPJATING COUNCIL FY 1980 NEW PROJECT , 1 . Briefly state the intended impact this project will have on improving the criminal justice system (i .e. corrections, courts, law enforcement and juvenile justice) or controlling crime in St. Paul-Ramsey County. , Provide adequate radio units previously committed. . , P ide a five ear cost ro 'ection for this roject. 2. rov y p J P , Total cost o�-time purchase and installation of approximately $2,000 per unit for a total of $50,000 one-time basis. , . , 3. Have alternative funding sources for this prpject been sought? If yes� provide details and outcome. , No. , 4. Identify the agency, unit of government or oraanization which will consider - funding this project after its LEAA eligibility has expired. , .. Each community involved and Ramsey County. , 5. If the project is within City or County structure: Was project included in the agency or department's annual budget request? If yes, why was it denied? If no, why was it not requested at that time? � No. It was not included in budget requests as it should have been corrected in original grant provisions. � � , . ` I certify that the information given in this Project Description Form is true and ac�urate, to the best of my knowledge. � � � i , DATE: i - � � - J �'�� -c� � � � ut orize ��na ure , -27- . ,�pN 11 1474 PROJECT DESCRIPTION FORM ST. PAUI-RAMSEY COUNTY FY 1980 CRIMINAL JUSTICE COORDINATING COUNCIL NEW PROJECT Management of Police Records PROJECTED YEARS OF LEAA PROJECT TITLE: and Corranunications Services FUNDING REQUESTS: One in Suburban Ramsey County � ONTACT p RSON•Leslie A. Sharrock, Asst. Chief of Police,�HONE: 636-5050 �ew Brigh�on; President, Ramsey County Chief of Police Assoc�ation SPONSORIN6 UNIT OF GOVERNME�dT: Maplewood, Moundsview, New Brighton, North St. Paul , Roseville, White Bear Lake, and the Ramsey County Sheriff IMPLEMENTING AGENCY: To be determined l ESTIMATED BUDGET: � TOTAL: $48,000 _ LEAA AMOUPlT REOUESTED � 43,200 90 PERSONNEL & PAY RELATED BENEFITS: N/A STATE BUY-IN REQUESTED 2,_400 5 EQUIPMENT: N/A _ LOCAL �GOVERNMENT FUP�DS SUPPLIES: N/A REQUESTED 2,400 5 � CONSULTANT: $48,000 � OTHER FUNOS REQJESTED OTHER: N/A ' PROBLEM STATEMENT AND DOCUMENTATION OF NEED � Clearly describe the problem this project is expected to address. Provide supporting facts and figures to document the problem. Indicate the source of data cited (e.g. , a specified published report, agency records, another agency's data� . The problem statement should be related to the target population this project will serve. In documenting the problem please provide facts regarding the target population that are related to the problem. Two police supportive services which serve to facilitate effective police action are the (1) communication system, and (2) the record-keeping system. • Needed is an appraisal of these two elements of the total police information processing network, particularly how they inter-relate. Specifically: A. Police co►�nunication service presently is provided by the Ramsey County Sheriff's Department to Moundsview, New Brighton, and Roseville's police agencies. A modest � fee is charged for this service. The Sheriff's Department also provides full police service to seven other suburban cities through contractual agreement. Fire, ambulance and other emergency service communications also are procured through th existing communication centers. Questions have arisen as to the level and extent of services provided, the quality of such services, and the means by which the service should be administered. A joint po��ers agreement calling for establishment of a management board to oversee this program has been signed (late 1977) but the body remains inactive, in part because cities not a part of the servi�e have a ro in its management by terms of the agreement. Maplewood and White Bear Lake provide thei�r own communication services with North Saint Paul contracting from the forme �ior some assistance. �osts of providing these services on an independent basis have been increasing, cailing attention to the need for consideration of alterna- tives. Required implementation of 911 emergency telephone service by 1982 raises additio al questions as to whether four 911 centers are appropriate in Ramsey County (as the plan currently provides) or whether fewer centers would be feasible. -28- , � CJCC-011 �� PROEJCT DESCRIPTION FORM � ST. PAUL-RAt�SEY COUNTY FY 198� CRIMINAL JUSTICE COORDINATING COUNCIL NEW PROJECT � Problem Statement & Documentation of Need (Continued) Technical questions have been addressed in earlier consulative efforts. What , is needed now is a realistic, management plan capable of implementation. � 6. Police agencies within Ramsey County share common information needs and have � common information reporting requirements to the state and other agencies. Each agency adheres to its own work procedures, uses forms of its own choosing, and the like. There is limited formal information sharing on a planned, systematic basis. Rather, information related to specific work problems is shared as � . circumstances require. Further, limited use is made of the communications center in controling and managing records informations, in part because the communi- cation centers serve, except in one instance, multiple jurisdictions. No , effective means has been developed for linking the comnunications/records systems together where such links appear both feasible and desirable. On the other hand, there is no clear agreement/understanding of what constitutes a unique "agency" record requirement and what might serve multiple agency requirements. � , Also, no analysis has been made as to how implementation of a 911 emergency telephone system will effect records management requirements. Moreover, each � agency has possible data processing needs, some or all of which could be achieved through a shared means�. Examples include administrative reporting requirements related to equipment costs, staffing patterns and the like. Needed as well is an assessment of crime analysis requirements, a service , generally not available to the suburban communities. � ' , � � , � � � � � _ -- -- -29- - - -- . CJCC 011 � ST. PAUL-RAMSEY COUNTY PROJECT DESCRIPTION FORM CRIMINAL JUSTICE COORDINATING COUNCIL FY 1980 � NEW PROJECT , OBJECTIVES: , Objectives should be expressed as the effects, results, or accomplishments the , project project is intended to produce. Objectives should be specific and �measurable, and indicate the expected impact of the project on the problem stated. � In writing objectives, the following guidelines should be observed: � a. Ojectives should be expressed in terms of ineasurable quantities; , b. Each objective should express a single idea. Brief, clear statements are helpful , and if key terms are likely to be misunderstood, explain your definition of them. , c. Define the desired improvement or proposed activity as specifically as possible. A helpful question to ask in writing an objective may be, "How will the target population`s problems have changed as a . result of this project?" , d. Indicate the target area to be affected, or target group to be served by the project. Specify the time frame in which anticipated results or proposed activities are expected to occur. — , OBJECTIVES __ __. _.__ A. Communications , 1 To review, assess and amplify the recommendations offered in earlier consul- � tant reports regarding the provision of communication services in Ramsey County. 2) To define and layout a pclice communications plan for Ramsey County (excluding , the City of Saint Paul ) , including an assessment of workload (projected to the year 2000) , staffing needs, equipment needs and related factors. 3) To prepare a recornrnended approach for the organization and management of a , joint communication service. 4) To review the approved County 911 Plan and offer suggestions for modification, if appropriate, in conjunction with the overall communication plan. 6. Records , 1 To identify, document and review records information needs and forms, parti- cularly records which are ameanable to multiple-jurisdictional uses. 2) To assess records management needs and potential record-keeping problems , associated with implementation of 911 emergency telephone service. 3) To identify those elements of the police records system amenable to data pro- cessing, and identify potential means by which such services may be attained at the lowest possible user cost. 4) To recommend a means by which record and communication services might be jointly undertaken, if feasible and appropriate. 5) To identify, assess, and suggest means by which crime analysis studies may be carried out. , -30- --�-------�-----°�--- , �. CJCC-011 ST. PAUL-RAMSEY COUNTY PROJECT DESCRIPTION FORM � CRIMINAL JUSTICE COORDINATING COUNCIL FY 1980 NEW PROJECT � MAJOR ACTIVITIES: List the major activities anticipated b.y the project and indicate their relationship to the project's objectives. Also list major products of each � task and expected time period for each. A consultant would be selected to carry out the study phases of the project, under ' the direction of a supervisory board selected through the Ramsey County City Managers � ' and the Ramsey County Chief's of Police. The Ramsey County Sheriff will serve as chairman of the supervisory board. The supervisory board will design the Request For Proposal (one month); select the consultant (one month) ; with the consultant on-site work requiring four to six months. A final written report containing all ! findings, conclusions and recommendations will be submitted by the consultant. Total time for the project, including review by the various cities affected, will be 10-12 months. , , , , � � � � � STAFF & OTHER RESOURCES: List anticipated staff positions and briefly describe each. Also lsit other organizations, agencies, boards or groups which will be invo1ved in the project. � Not Applicable. , � � � ----- ---�- - -� -31- � LJLL-UII � PROJECT DESCRIPTION FORM � ST. PAUL-RAMSEY COUNTY CRIMINAL JUSTIGE COORDIP�ATING COUPlCIL FY 1980 , NEW PROJECT 1 . Briefly state the intended impact this project will have on improving the � criminal justice system (i .e. corrections, courts, law enforcement and juvenile justice) or controlling crime in St. Paul-Ramsey County. A) Improved management control of communication services, possible cost re- , duction to city's maintaining separate services who elect to participate in an improved communication network, an improved quality control in actual � communication center operation5. � 2. �r`ovA�e�ap�ive yea�acostt�rojecta�onr�ora�afis�projectormation contained with police records. The management study is expected to suggest affirmative means of strengtheni-ng , suburban police records/communication services. Cost estimates will be pre- pared in conjunction with those alternatives by the consultant. , 3. Have alternative funding sources for this proJect been sought? If yes, provide , details and outcome. No , 4. Identify the agency, unit of government or organization which will consider � funding this project after its LEAA eligibility has expired. A service center funded by the participants is a possible outcome of the management study. , 5. If the project is within City or County structure: Was project included in the agency or department's annual budget request? If yes, why was it denied? If no, � why was it not requested at that time? No � , , � , I certify that the information given in this Project Description Form is true and , accurate, to the best of my knowledge. � . �.. � , DATE: /l /�79 � �L�� u orize igna ure -32- , , � St. Paul-Ramsey County CJCC FY 1980 LEAA Plan , PROGRAM 12: The Judiciary and Court Administration � This program area addresses the need for increased efficiency in the operation of the courts, by implementing projects designed to improve court administration. PROBLEM: An excessive amount of Ramsey County Municipal Court � time is spent addressing minor traffic and parking offenses. Currently, the volume of minor traffic and parking offenses requires the municipal court to expend , excessive person-power hours and creates scheduling backlogs. The participants at the 1978 Goal Setting Conference identified this problem and suggested that � it be addressed administratively. There currently exists an independent family court and a juvenile court. P�atters concerning family members I � are often heard by judges with different degrees of information on the background of the situation. Members of one family may be confronted with problems relating � to alcoholism, mental commitment, incest, or delinquency and never have treatment that reflects the entire pro- blem. � It is unknown whether offenders succeed or fail in pro- grams that continue to be selected as sentencing alter- natives by judges. There seems to be a minimal amount � of accountability of programs dealing with sentencing alternatives. The difficulty in not knowing which kind of ineasurements to utilize is an obvious problem. Judges may desire some type of information concerning the , efficiency of particular organizations vis-a-vis specific types of clients. This problem was identified by parti- cipants at the 1978 Goal Setting Con�erence. , Scheduling and notifying involved parties in municipal and district court cases are not always accurate and are excessively time consuming. The district and muni- , cipal courts have many cases they must schedule. In these cases, there are various people they must contact and coordinate for each case. The manual method currently , used may not always be accurate and oftentimes the schedule is congested. This problem was identified at the 1978 Goal Setting Conference. � There is no reliable way to collect pending charges against an individual client prior to sentencing to the Workhouse. There may be several actions pending � against a client that the prosecutor or judge may not be aware of. There may be some benefit to the Judge to have this type of knowledge in sertencing where � there is either a similar type of charge or a desire to sentence concurrently. The benefit to the client would be that he/she would be aware of their release date �vi�,hout bgin� charged with other counts one or two days , e ore re ea e. -33- , St. Paul-Ramsey County CJCC FY 1980 LEAA Plan , There are efforts being made to accommodate those r involved in the criminal justice s.ystem who have language barriers or physical handicaps. The con- current efforts may not be enough to meet the individual 's needs. This problem has been identified by the Adjudication/ Diversion sub-committee of CJCC and by the public at large as well . � GOALS: Traffic and Parking Offenses: 1 . to minimize necessity of municipal court time and , personnel used to address minor traffic and parking offenses, 2. to seek methods including legislative methods to i develop more cost/effective alternatives, 3. to study alternative methods which could be utilized � to insure consistency in handling minor traffic and parking offenses, and 4. to maintain the adjudication method in contested , matters. Family Services: i 1 . to explore upon request of the court the possibility of combining subject matters addressed in Family, � Juvenile, Criminal , and Probate Courts, and 2. to explore in conjunction with the Corrections , Advisory Board the possibility of a correctional- based, full-service counseling program. Alternative Sentencing Evaluation: , 1 . to support Ramsey County Corrections Advisory Boar-d's development of an information system in the area of , program evaluation. Court Scheduling: , 1 . to encourage the exploration of alternative scheduling procedures, and 2. exploration of individual judicial calendar so that , the pre-trial and trials are heard before the same judge. � Collection of Presently Pending Charges: 1 . to support efforts to collect data via an information � system. -34- � , St. Paul-Ramsey County CJCC � FY 1980 LEAA Plan Y rAssistance for Language Barriers or Physical Handicaps l . to support efforts to better coordinate assistance � for participants in court system who have language barriers or physical handicaps. � STRATEGY: For FY 1980, no projects were. identified with the Annual Action Plan. State legislation is pending to address Municipal Court management of minor traffic and parking , offenses. Cross Systems program areas further describe projects supportive of program evaluation, handicapped assistance, and information systems. � Implementation activities will be further identified during 1979-1980 as part of the ongoing planning activities of the Coordinating Council . rRELATIONSHIP TO STATE AND REGION: Problem statements and goals are consistent with the State Crime Control Planning Board updated 1979 Plan , and the Metropolitan Development Guide's Law and Justice Chapter. � PROJECT MONITORING: Not Applicable TECHNICAL ASSISTANCE: Not Applicable rLEAA FUNDING: Not Applicable , � � , � � � , -35- � St. Paul-Ramsey County CJCC FY 1980 LEAA Plan , PROGRAM 13: Pre-Trial Services and Procedures r This program area addresses the need for pre-trial services such as those providing � intervention in family violence cases and pre-trial releases. PROBLEM: Many cases are being formally proceeded through the criminal justice system even though the criminal conduct � has resulted from an underlying chemical dependency problem which might be more effectively dealt with outside the criminal justice system. It is necessary , to ease the burden on the criminal justice system by identifying cases of drug dependency for the purpose of appropriately handling these cases. This problem was identified by the 1978 Goal Setting Conference and , the Adjudication/Diversion sub-committee of CJCC. Increasingly effective chemical evaluations of criminal � justice cases leads to the need for providing treatment for those persons assessed as being dependent and who are ordered to treatment by the court. Existing State Department of Public Welfare, Title 19, Title 20, and , HEW guidelines blatantly discriminate against the criminal justice client. GOALS: Pre-Trial Diversion: ' 1 . to enhance the administration of justice for chemically dependent clients, and � 2. to support �liminating existing biases in allocating funds for corrections clients receiving � chemical dependency treatment. STRATEGIES: For FY 1980, the St. Paul-Ramsey County CrimTnal Justice � Coordinating Council identified the Court Screening Ur�it Project within the Annual Action Plan. This project will be in its second year during 1980 and is providing an important service to the Municipal Court. By � screening cases, r�anagement of the court services is improved through better preparation of cases and witnesses. The Coordinating Council has also identified a new , project in this program area for FY 1980 funding pending availability of funds in addition to the FY 1980 Ramsey County LEAA Part C allocation or availability of private resources. This project, Community Arbitration, � addresses needs in resolving neighborhood conflicts that have come to the attention of St. Paul City departments and agencies but have not been escalated to court cases. � Further implementation activities will be identified during 1979-1980 as part of the Coordinating Council 's ongoing planning activities. � RELATIONSHIP TO STATE AND REGION: Problem statements and goals are consistent with the � -36 - � St. Paul-Ramsey County CJCC � FY 1980 LEAA Plan � State Crime Control Planning Board updated 1978 Plan and the Metropolitan Development Guide's Law and Justice Chapter. � PROJECT MONITORING: Monitoring of this project is the responsibility of the St. Paul-Ramsey County Criminal Justice Coordianting � Council . Staff has also been developing a monitoring and evaluation system for the project. TECHNICAL ASSISTANCE: Assistance will be provided by Coordinating Council � staff. LEAA FUNDING: Continuation Projec�s: ' Project Title: Court Screening Unit Sponsoring Unit of Government: City of St. Paul � Implementing Agency: St. Paul City Attorney's Office � Grant Number: 3314726977 Project Duration: Three Years � Funding Year: Second LEAA Funds Requested: $88,949 � State Buy-In Funds Requested: $4,941 � Amount and Source of Local Funds: $13,927 - City of St. Paul Total LEAA Funds for Continuation Projects in Program Area #13: $ 88�949 � Total State Match: $ 4,941 � Total Local Match: $ 13,927 New Projects: Comnunity Arb�tration Project � Sponsoring Unit of Government: City of St. Paul Implementing Agency: Mayor's Office of Information � and Complaints Grant Number: Not Applicable 1 Project Duration: Three Years Funding Year: First � LEAA Funds Requested: $24,075 � -37- � St. Paul-Ramsey County CJCC FY 1980 LEAA Plan � State Buy-In Funds Requested: $1 ,338 � Amount and Source of Local Funds: $1 ,338 - City of St. Paul Total LEAA Funds for New Projects in � Program Area #13: $24,075 Total State Match: $ 1 ,338 , Total Local Match: $ 2,675 � , r � � � � I / 1 1 1 � -38- � � " CJCC-010 r n ,,,�� ,�� w ST. PAUL-RAMSEY COUNTY PROJECT DESCRIPTION FORM CRIMINAL JUSTICE COORDINATIN�G COUNCIL FY 1980 � CONTINUATION PROJECT � PROJECT TITLE: Court Screening Unit FUNDING YEAR: 1980 CONTACT PERSON: Paulette K. Flynn PHONE: 292-6010 Assistant City Attorney � SPONSORING UNIT OF GOVERNMENT: City of St. Paul , � IMPLEMENTING AGENCY: St. Paul City Attorney' s Office � ESTIMATED BUDGET: See attached " � TOTAL: $107,817 LEAA AMOUNT REQ:;ESTED $ 88,949 82.5 PERSONNEL & PAY RELATED BENEFITS: 100,353 STATE AMOUNT REQUESTED 4,941 4.583 � EQUIPMENT: LOCAL GOVERNMENT FUNDS SUPPLIES: REQUESTED 13,927 12.917 CONSULTANT: OTHER FUNDS REQUESTED � - OTHER�Rent ther irect osts , 64 Summ ra y of Progress to Date: � Surrmarize the project's major accomplishments to date including evidence of progress toward stated goals and work program. Provide material supporting this progress. If the project intends to revise project goals or alter its target group or program significantly, please describe in detail . � The Court Screening Unit has been in operation since September 1, 1978. Since October 3, 1978, the unit has reviewed all criminal cases- . actually charged by the police and those presented for prosecution by , � the various investigative units of the police department, including "walk in" complainants in the City Attorney' s Office. The unit has not started reviewing traf�ic cases as yet. � All screening has been done according to the policies set forth in the unit' s charging manual which establishes the criteria for charging a case, � According to our log book from October 3, 1978, to December 31, 1978, we have screened 848 defendants. This count is a count of complaints or arrests; the actual number of citations or charges is much greater. � Of this total approximately 200 cases have been finally disposed of, that is, there has been a determination of guilt or innocence, the case has been dismissed, or prosecution was declined. Of that 200 cases, 9 � were dismissed prior to the defendant' s first appearance in court for arraignment. Sixty of the 90 cases dismissed at this time were com- plaints where the city found insufficient evidence to prosecute. Of th 99 dismissals, only 9 cases were dismissed after a defendant had been 1 arraigned. The reasons for these dismissals included: an agreement whereby the defendant would undergo medical treatment (1) , the payment of restitution (1) , the defendant' s being diverted into Project Remand � (1) and dismissal as part of a negotiated plea agreement. Therefore, ! -39- � Summar of Pro ress to Date (cont, ) : � 5 cases at most resulted in dismissals after arraignmen.t because � of inaccurate charging. Based upon thes-e figures, it would appear that the Court Screening Unit has already reduced the number of dismissals for cases which � are incorrectly charged to less than 5�. During this same period of time the three screening attorneys have handled 20 files within the unit where a final disposition � has been reached. These cases were selected because the defendants were considered serious offenders or the cases themselves were of a serious nature. The screening attorney assigned to the case � handled it at all stages of the proceedings and personally interviewed the witnesses involved. Of these 20 files only one actually went to trial beYore a jury and in that case a conviction was obtained. Pleas of guilty were entered in 16 cases and, of the � other 3 remaining cases, one defendant was ruled incompetent to stand trial and the other was diverted into Project Remand when she agreed to cooperate with the police in the prosecution of a felony , arising out of the same incident. Only one case involving a serious offender was dismissed when it was discovered that the victim had initiated charges with an improper motive. The attorneys within the unit have been working with .the , Assignment Clerk' s Office to obtain accelerated pretrial and trial dates on all of the serious offender and serious offense cases. � Generally, following the entry of a not guilty plea, a pretrial is scheduled within 10 days (in contrast to about a 3—week delay on other cases) . Th�e clerk' s office has also been cooperating with the unit in scheduling trials as soon as possible. This � has been somewhat complicated by illnesses of two judges and the jury trial calendar during the Christmas holidays. However, with respect to the one case that was actually tried, trial was � commenced 3'7 days after the date of offense. In the 16 cases , where pleas of guilty were obtained, the time delay ranged from zero days on 2 cases to 63 days on l. The average amount of time that elapsed from date of offense to date of guilty plea was , 12095 days. Therefore, the Court Screening Unit has reduced the number of dismissals for incorrect charges to less than 5%. Cases involving � serious offenders and offenses are being identified and given priority both in trial preparation and trial date settings. � / � � -40- , r ��_o,o � ST. PAUL-RAMSEY COUNTY PROJECT DESCRIPTION FORM CRIMINAL JUSTICE COORDIP�ATING COUNCIL FY 1980 � CONTIP�UATION PROJECT Summary of Pro�r.ess to Date (Continued) : r See attached sheet � � . � � ' � � , � Staff and Other Resources: List any changes in sta�fing pattern anticipated and any new co-operative agreements with other organizations, agencies or groups necessitated by changes in program � � emphasis, target group, etc. I ' None � � � I Have reports .of project been made to sponsoring unit of givernment? Provide detail�; i i � • None � st ro'ection for this project. � � Provide an updated five year co p � � I � See attached ! � , I certify that the information given in this Project Description Form is true and accurate, to the best of my knowledge. DATE January 12, 1979 � � uthorized Si nat , -41- vVLV�V1 / ,��^;r:;.:^31 • • �c�� PROJECT DESCP,IPTION FORi�1 ST. PAUL—RAMSEY COUNTY �`•' �, FY 1980 � CRIMIPtAL JUSTICE COORDItJATIPaG�COUMCIL T ;. ;,�� .� NEt�! P�OJECT A �4;:. � ��y^ ,�� PROJECTED YEARS QF LEAA PROJECT TITLE: � ,�` FUr;oING REQUES7S: Communit� Arbitration Pro'ect�``" • CO�fTAC7 PERSON: PHO�E: A - SPONSORING UNIT OF GOVERNhtE�.lT: City of Saint Paul IM°LEt9ENTING AGENCY: Mayor`s Office of Information & Complaints ESTIhiATED BUDGET: � TQ7AL: � 26, 750 _ LEAA A��fOUPlT REOUESTED $ 24,075 90 PERSONNEL & PAY RELATEO BENEFITS: �Snnn STATE BUY-IN REQUESTED �,338 ��' EQUI PMEPJT: _ LOCAL GOVER�1t•1ENT FUPIDS SUPPLIES: 250 REQUESTEQ 1 ,338 5 CONSULTANT: OTHER FUNDS REQJESTED OTHER• . ileage 500 PROQLEt�I S7ATEtdENT AND DOCUh1EPJTATIO� OF NEED Cleariy describe the problem this project is expected to address. Provide supporting facts and figures to document the problem. Indicate the source of data cited (e.g. , a specified published report, agency records, another agency's data) . The problem statement should be related to the target population this project �,ill serve. in documenting the problem please provide facts regarding the target population that are related to the problem. The Mayor' s Comp133.nts Office has estimated that 5-7c; of its annual caseload involves neighborhood disputes not readily reducible to legal redress. The fact that they are not legally defined does not lessen their impact on individuals and neighborhoods . This rougnly produces 350-375 such disputes annually. In addition,, ieam Police, Housing Code Enforcement anu Community Organizers receive many disputes that could reaciily be resolved by voluntary arbitration. The resulta�.t diversion of complaints and disputes to arbitrators would lessen the dependence on courts, court services and the police department as well as other agencies of quasi-law enforcement, i. e. Animal Control, Health and Housing Code. A similar program in the City of �Zinneapolis involves a greater crininal� component than envisioned in this project yet t�ey �zave handled 463 cases through January 1978. The success of this program may well be amplified by the resoluzion of civil cases . _42_ � � CJCC O11 ST. P�IUL-RAf�iSEY COUPJTY PROJtCT DESCRIPTION FOR��I CRIMINAL JUSTICE COORDINATING COUNCIL FY 1930 NEW PROJECT OBJECTIVES: Objectives should be expressed as the effects, results, or accomplishments the project project is intended to produce. Objectives should be specific and measurable, and indicate the expected impact of the project on the problem stated. In �vriting objectives, the following guide7ines should be observed: a. Ojectives should be expressed in terms of ineasurable quantities; b. Each objective should express a single idea. Brief, clear statements are helpful , and if key terms are likely to be misunderstood, explain � your definition of them.� c. Define the desired improvement or proposed activity as specifically as possible. A helpful question to ask in ►��riting an objectiv2 may be, "How will the target population`s problems have changed as a result of this project?" d. Indicate the target area to be affected, or tarpet group to be served by the project. Specify the time frame in ��rhich anticipated results or proposed activities are expected ta occur. . � The project �vould seek to resolve 350-40� cases � annually without resort to courts, police, or more formal mechanisms of dispute resolution. � The project will establish a referral instrumentality whereby disputes arising in the neighborhoods and filed through the Compla�nts Office, City Attorney, Police Dept. , Neignborhood Centers among other agencies. The project will conduct training for a �inimum of twentp five volunteer arbitrators distributed throuohout � the City �/ -43- . CJCC-011 , ST. PAUL-RANLSEY COUtdTY PROJECT DESCRIPTIOPI FORP�t CRIhfINAL JUSTICE COORDINATI�JG COUNCIL FY 1980 � NE4! PP,OJECT MAJOR ACTIVITIES: List the major activities _nticipated b.y the project and indicate � their relationship to the project's objective�. l�lso list major products of each � task and expected time period for each. � A. REFERRAL. �All agencies and departments receiving calls or contact with disputants will have the opportunity to scre�n and refer those appropriate for Dispute Arbitration to the project. . � B. DIRECT CONTACT. Individuals ��ith problens may contact the project directly requesting its assistance in resolving a dispute. , C. LIASON. Work with existing agencies to identify those cases most amenable to Arbitration. . ' D. TRAINING. Volunteers will receive training in informal � dispute resolution especially arbitration. E. EDUCATION. .Conduct programs in the community as to dispute resolution, community arbitration as well as legal options available to the disputant. � F. ARBITRATION. Work with disputants to resolve conflicts by contractual arbitration. � � � � �, ST�FF & OTHER RESOURCES: List anticipated sl�ff positions and briefly describe � each. A7so lsit other organizations, agencies, boards or groups �vhich will be involved in the project. , STAFF: Director- tiJill administer the program, serve as liason with other agencies, supervise staff and supervise volunteers � Parttime Paraprofessionals- caill perform training and aid volunteers in arbitration as well as perform limited clerical work. � � Volunteers- Will perform arbitration under supervision. ADVISORY BOAP.D: Will oversee project and receive reports from the Director. Will have a representative frori various groups and � agencies , possibly including the TZayor' s Office, Attorney' s Office, -44- � CJCC-0T1 � PROJECT DESCRIPTION FORP� ST. PAUL-RAP�SEY �OUfdTY � CRIhiIWAL JUSTICE COOROIt1ATING COUNCIL FY 1980 NEtJ PROJECT � 1. Briefly state the intended impact this project ari11 have on improving the criminal justice system (i .e. corrections, courts, law enforcement and juvenile justice) or contrelling crime in St. Paul-Ramsey County. � The diversion of cases involving potential conflict is seen as a method of preventing citizens from unnecessary � involvement with the criminal system, the courts and 'public enforcement agencies. 2. Provide a five year cost projection for this project. � $ 150,000.00 � � " . � 3. Have alternative fund,ing sources for this prpject been sought? If yes, provide details and outcome. � � No � 4. Identify the agency, unit of government or organization which 4�i17 consider funding this project after its LEAA eligibility has expired. � .City of Saint Paul � 5. If the project is within City or County structure: 4Jas project included in the agency or department's annual budget request? If yes, why was it denied? If no, why was it not requested at that time? � N . . o. The project is novel and its novelty � suggests a need for experimentation before final adoption and structuring within the City government. � � , t I certify that the inforrrtation given in this Project Uescription Form is true and i accurate, to the best of my kno�vledge. � � . �� , � � DATE: January 12 , 1979 �l. ' �•� � �+,�"jL�;��.-�� r�-_ , �orize iqr�a ure, ; ' ,�� - ,�- . , � St. Paul-Ramsey County CJCC FY 1980 LEAA Plan . � PROGRAM 14: Prosecution Services � This program area seeks to implement activities designed to improve the prosecution � function. PROBLEM: The full extent of the use of plea bargaining in Ramsey County is unknown. Also unclear are the effects of plea � bargaining on the system, the defendant, and the community. This problem was identified by the Adjudication/Diversion sub-committee of CJCC. " � Many court cases are entered into the system only to be dismissed for lack of follow-through by the parties, or settled with the encouragement of the court. This � creates problems with time and financial investments being made by the court and the parties involved. This problem was identified by the Adjudication/Diversion � sub-committee of CJCC. The cost and the benefits of maintaining separate mis- demeanor prosecution offices for the various jurisdictions � within Ramsey County are unknown and need to be explored. GOALS: 1 . encourage a study defining plea bargaining and its � . effects on the court system and the corr�nunity. 2. encourage the exploration of the feasibility of a dispute mediation project functioning within the � prosecutor's offices. 3. support efforts for a study of the consolidation of � county-wide misdemeanor prosecution services. STRATEGY: For FY i980 no projects have been identified for funding _ � within the Annual Action Plan. As part of the ongoing planning activities of the Coordinating Council , implemen tation activities will be identified during 1978-1980. RELATIONSHIP TO � STATE AND REGION: The problem statements and goals are consistent with the State Crime Control Planning Board updated 1978 Plan and � the Metropolitan Development Guide's Law and Justice Chapter. PROJECT MONITORING: Not Applicable � TECHNICAL ASSISTANCE: Not Applicable LEAA FUNDING: Not Applicable , � -46- , � � St. Paul-Ramsey County CJCC FY 1980 LEAA Plan � PROGRAM 15: Defense Services � This program area seeks to implement activities designed to improve defense services. � PROBLEM: The volume of cases handled by the Ramsey County Public Defender's Office prohibits representation, under normal circumstances, of all those who wish representation. Also, a lack of resources has existed for those persons � who do not qualify for Public Defender representation and yet are financially unable to hire an attorney. ' GOAL: To continue to support efforts of providing defense counsel for those persons needing representation but do not qualify for Public De€ender services and are unable to afford a private attorney. � STRATEGY: The St. Paul-Ramsey County Criminal Justice Coordinating Council supports the approach described above by � identifying the Criminal Defense Services Project to receive FY 1980 funding. The inclusion of this project for its third year within the Annual Action Plan enables defense services to be available to the population � described above through referring specially trained private attorneys, paid by a set fee from the project. The fee is then repaid by the client in installments. � RELATIONSHIP TO STATE AND REGION: The problem statements and goals are consistent with the State Crime Control Planning Board updated 1978 Plan � and, though not directly addressed, are inherently consistent with the Metropolitan Development Guide's Law and Justice Chapter. � PROJECT MONITORING: Monitoring is the responsibility of the St. Paul- Ramsey County Criminal Justice Coordinating Council . � Council staff has been involved in developing a program monitoring and evaluation system for the project. TECHNICAL ASSISTANCE: Assistance is provided by the Coordinating Council staff. � LEAA FUNDING: New Projects: Not Applicable � Continuation Projects: Pro�ect Title: Criminal Defense Services Project � Sponsoring Unit of Government: Ramsey County Implementing Agency: Ramsey County Public Defender � Grant Number: 33151125579 Project Duration: Three Years � -47- � St. Paul-Ramsey County CJCC FY 1980 IEAA Plan � Funding Year: Third � LEAA Funds Requested: $30,720 State Buy-In Funds Requested: $1 ,105 � Amount and Source of Local Funds: $19,375 - Ramsey County � Total LEAA Funds for Continuation Projects , in Program Area #15: $30,720 Total State Match: $ 1 ,105 � Total Local Match: $19,375 � � � . � � � � � � i . � � -48- � � CJCC-010 � ST. PAUL-RAMSEY COUNTY PROJECT DESCRIPTION FORM CRIMINAL JUSTICE COORDINATING COUNCIL FY 1980 � CONTINUATION PROJECT I i � PROJECT TITLE: CRIDIINAL DEFENSE SERVICES PROJECT FUNDING YEAR: 1980 CONTACT PERSON: Cynthia T. , Daly PHONE: 298-59�g � � - SPONSORING UNIT OF GOVERNMENT: Ramsey County � IMPLEMENTING AGENCY: Ramsey County Public Defender � ESTIMATED BUDGET: q TOTAL. 51, 200 LEAA AMOUNT REQ:;ESTED30,720. -b�' PERSONNEL & PAY RELATED BENEFITS: � STATE AMOUNT REQUESTED 1,10 5. 3. 33 � EQUIPMENT: 2► 000: LOCAL GOVERNMENT FUNDS SUPPLIES: ► REQUESTED 19,375. 37.667 CONSULTANT: • � OTHER FUNDS REQUESTED � OTHER• � � • � � � Surr�nary of Progress to Date: � Surtmarize the project's major accomplishments to date including evidence of progress toward stated goals and work program. Provide material supporting this progress. If the project intends to revise project goals or alter its target group or program � significantly, please describe in detail . During Project Year 1978, Criminal Defense Services represented 193 misdemeam�r clients fallinq within our income guidelines. During � � the same time, we collected $10,924 .62 from clients, while �ayinq out $I7,979.12 for legal services. ��ihile these fiqures mav make it appear that our collection rate is noor, a�nroximately $4 .000. of the difference is not yet due under the client contract. � The number of referrals from suburban counts, narticularly the inner rin4 of suburbs, has been minimal. Theoretically, under our � income guidelines, these areas should be givinq us a areater �r000rtion of the re.ferrals. There.fore, we will be attendinq night court in the suburban courts for at least a short period of time, to try to encouraqe mere referrals. � � � � r- - _..�.... .. . _ , -49- , CJCC-010 , ST. PAUL-RAMSEY COUNTY PROJECT DESCRIPTION FORM � CRIMINAL JUSTICE COORDIPlATING COUNCIL FY 1980 ' CONTINUATION PROJECT � Summary of Proqr.ess to Date (Continued) : � � � � . � � � Staff and Other Resources: � List any changes in staffing pattern anticipated and any new co-operative agreements with other organizations, agencies or groups necessitated by changes in program emphasis, target group, etc. � None � � �Have reports of project been made to sponsoring unit of givernment? Provide details� Members of our Board of Directors receive a monthly written update on � client Aopulation and financial standina. Additionally, the Directors � have been meeting approximately once every six weeks to discuss pro- gress and problems within the program. All necessary reports have bee file� with o h the count nd the . a Provide an up�a�ed five year c�'os� pro�ectl��i �o�h' this project. � By the end of the grant funding, fiscal year 1980, legal services � provided by this project should be entirely self-sustaining. At the present income level of approximately $1, 000 per month, the revolving j � fund should be approximatel_y $30,000, which will be sufficient to � sustain the grogram for at least three years after the end of the ! grant period. Administrative costs will have to be fully assumed by the county. There should be no significant increase in the administra � tive costs (discounting inflation) , but it is anticipated _that legal �erincrea°se� �°rom i�stpresen�n 1�$dto°atmoreer°eason�blen�iWUre hnve to cert�i�fy�'�iartSthe i nformati on gi ven i n thi s Project Descri pti on Form i s true and � accurate, to the best of my knowledge. CYNTHIA DALY DATE � � Authorized Signature -50- � � St. Paul-Ramsey County CJCC � FY 1980 LEAA Plan � PROGRAM 16: Education and Training This program area addresses the need for statewide training projects for judicial � and non-judicial personnel . PROBLEM: The County Attorney, City Attorney and Public Defender � • offices need to refine their skills in presentation of scientific evidence. Litigation which involves complex scientific issues requires intensive attention by attorneys so they are familiar with the technical sub- � ject matter and the technique of cross examination of an expert witness. Attorneys have been attending the Minnesota Trial Advocacy Institute in Bemidji . iThe coroner is unable to make full and accurate deter- minations of death to the degree that is necessary for � legal litigation. At the request of Ramsey County Commissioner Schaber, staff of the Coordinating Council has completed a review of the present coroner's office capacity to meet the needs of those utilizing the � coroner's services. GOALS: 1 . to provide seminars or necessary fees and expenses � for educational opportunities for attorneys who are involved in litigation requiring presentation of scientific evidence, � 2. to investigate the possibility of continuing legal education addressing this topic, and � 3. to research need for improving medical examination skills in Ramsey County. STRATEGY: For FY 1980 no projects have been identified for � funding within the Annual Action Plan. A description of activities addressing concern for medical examiner skills is contained in Program Area 10. � RELATIONSHIP TO STATE AND REGION: The problem statements and goals are not all directly addressed but are inherently consistent with the State � Crime Control Planning Board updated 1978 Plan and the Metropolitan Development Guide's Law and Justice Chapter. � PROJECT MONITORING: Not Applicable TECHP�ICAL ASSISTANCE: Not Applicable � LEAA FUNDING: Not Applicable � � -51- St. Paul-Ramsey County CJCC � FY 1980 LEAA Plan � PROGRAM 17: Personnel Recruitment, Education, and Training � This program area addresses the need for increased recruitment, selection and training of minorities and women to enhance the knowledge, skills, and attitudes of personnel currently involved in the correction system. � PROBLEM : Refer to 1979 Ramsey County Community Corrections Plan, Pages 17-19, Statement of Needs, see Appendix. � GOAL• To facilitate a continuous process of growth and learning to enrich the individual as well as his work group in order to improve performance and � achieve organization objectives. STRATEGY: Implementation will be further identified during � 1979-1980 as part �f the ongoing planning activities of the Coordinating Council and the Ramsey County Corrections Department and Advisory Board. RELATIONSHIP TO " � STATE AND REGION: The problem statements and goals are consistent with the State Crime Control Planning Board updated , 1978 Plan and the Metropolitan Development Guide's Law and Justice Chapter . PROJECT MONITORING: Not Applicable � TECHNICAL ASSISTANCE: Not Appli�able LEAA FUNDING: ��ot Applicable � � � � � i � � -52- � � St. Paul-Ramsey County CJCC � FY 1980 LEAA Plan � , PROGRAM 18: Corrnnunity Based Rehabilitation and Re-Entry This program area addresses the need for corrnnunity based resources providing � services and placement alternatives for offenders. PROBLEM ; Refer to 1979 Ramsey County Cornrnunity Corrections Plan, � pages 17-19, Statement of Needs� see Appendix, Services and Treatment. To make available investigative, diagnostic, case planning and treatment services for � offenders under jurisdiction of Ramsey County courts, the Corranissioner of Corrections, or the Minnesota Cor- rections Board. These services are provided under the � direction of the Community Corrections Department. Control . To limit unacceptable behavior in the community through the accountable exercise of control over offenders , under court jurisdiction. Victims of Crimes. To insure whenever possible that the � victim or the conxnunity receives reimbursement in either money or services from the offender. � Protection and Safety. To provide for the protection and safety of the public and the offender through effective diaanosis and treatment planning. 'fhe need to provide treatment services to offenders must be balanced with the � need to provide protection and safety to the public. • Community Resources. To utilize community services to � augment the services available within the corrections network. Some of these resources are supported with comnunity corrections funds, while others are paid for through the resources of other agencies. �� Diversion. To encourage development of diversion resources as an .alternative to becoming involved in the official � corrections system. Efficiency and Economy. To insure that correctional and other corranunity corrections-funded services are � delivered economically and efficiently. In reviewing progress of programs and in making funding decisions, cost effectiveness is an essential factor to be considered. � Legislation. To develop and support legislative proposals that will contribute to a more effective corrections � system. Advocacy for Change. To collaborate with public and private agencies and resources to insure that necessary services � are available to corrections clients. When services are not available from these resources, responsible persons in the corrections system are expected to actively advocate � -53- � St. Paul-Ramsey County CJCC FY 1980 LEAA Plan � for the expedient delivery or development of the needed � services. STRATEGY: The St. Paul-Ramsey County Criminal Justice Coordinating � Council supports the concept of offender restitution for victims and has included a service restitution project for funding in the FY 1980 Annual Action Plan. The pro- � ject will be based in the Adult Courts Division of the Ramsey County Corr�nunity Corrections Department and will focus on service restitution through coordination with non-profit community agencies. This project will � address the strongly articulated needs of community groups for increased offender restitution. Implementation of the other problem and goal areas , identified will be further addressed during 1979-1980 as part of the ongoing planning activities of the Coordinating Council and the Ramsey County Community , Corrections Department and Advisory Board. RELATIONSHIP TO � STATE AND REGION: The problem statements and goals are consistent with State Crime Control Planning Board updated 1978 Plan and the Metropolitan Development Guide's Law and Justice Chapter. � PROJECT MONITORING: The St. Paul-Ramsey County CJCC will be responsible for monitoring this project as well as developing a program � monitoring and evaluation system. TECHNICAL ASSISTANCE: Assistance to the project will be provided by the staffs � of the St. Paul-Ramsey County CJCC and the Ramsey County Corr�nunity Corrections Department. LEAA FUNDING: Continuation Projects - Not Applicable New Projects: Pro�ect Title: Service Restitution -.Adult Courts � Sponsoring Unit of Government: Ramsey County Implementing Agency: Ramsey County Community Corrections � Unit Grant Number:- Not Applicable i Project Duration: Three Years Funding Year: First Year ` � LEAA Funds Requested: $38,229 , -54- � � , St. Paul-Ramsey County CJCC FY 1980 LEAA Plan / State Buy-In Funds Requested: $2,124 � Amount and Source of Local Funds: $2,124 - Ramsey County Total LEAA Funu� �'�r New Projects in � Program Area 18: $38,22g Total State Match: $ 2,124 � Total Local Match: $ 2,124 � � � � r � � �r � � � � � � -55- . . . _ - . . :� �A�� y 2 '� - - . . �---------� --- ------- ----- --------- ___ � � .��`�� ,� L3''� PROJECT DESCRIPTIO"� FOR�•1 . ; ... �� ,' ST. PAUL-RA�•1S�Y COUNTY FY 19�0 � ..��,• . CftI�•tI�;AL JUSTICE COORDINATIPlG COUfJCIL ��;E;,! r ROJECT PROJECT TITLE: PROJECTED YE�1RS OF LEAA Service Restitution-Adult Courts ��,DIPJG FEQUESTS: 3 COT�TACT PERSON: Robert A . Hanson PI{ONE: 29g-4791 Dir��r Adult Courts D�i�L2n___ -- SPONSORING UNIT OF G0�1ERflhlEi�T: Ramsey County IMPLEf�ENTING AGENCY: Ramsey County Community Corrections Department _ ESTIMATED BUDGET: � °; TOTAL: $42 , 477 ___________._ LEAA Ai,OUNT R(=(;UES�(ED �38 ,_229_ 90 PERSOPJP�EL & PAY RELATED k3ENEFI7S 35,193 �TAT� BUY-IP� REQUESTED $2124 __ 5� EQUI PMENT: PJ o n e LOCAL GOVERPJ�1ENT 5 SUPPLIES: 3,036 � FLiNDS REQUESTED �?1 ?4 CONSULTANT: None ____ OTtiER FUNDS REQUcSTED _��__ _ O�THER• $ 4,248 _ _.._.. PROBLEM STATEMENT Af�1D DOCUhtENTATION OF NEED Clearly describe the problem this project is expected to address. Provide supporting facts and figures to document the problem.• Indicate the source of data ci �ed (e.g. , a specified published report, agency records, another aUency' s dat� . The pr•oblem statement should be related to the target population this project �•rill serve. In documenting the problem please provide facts regarding the target population that are related to the problem. In recent years there has been a resurgence in restitution programs across the country and in our county . Much of the effort locally has gone into revamping our traditional financial restitution program, payin particular attentiqn to process with the goal in mind of repaying victims quicker and to a greater percentage of their loss . Along with this renewed interest have come new ideas entirely as to restitution .This grant request is based on such an idea . As stated above , �restitution has traditionally ( Ramsey County) meant financial restitution . This request is for funds to develop a new form of non-financial restitution . This new program will respond to the concern of Judges , diversion counselors , and probation officers that man persons coming before the courts do not have the resources to pay any significant amount to the victim of their offense . I.n these instances it has been unfa�fiP to the victim to promise them a given dollar amount of restitution and never have it paid . Also , we have some cases where the opposite situation exists . Certain offenders have so much money that to repay a few hundred dollars or less has no impact on them at all . In both cases we strongly believe that to require the offender to "work-off" the restitution will have a real impact and will give the court a realistic option at sentencing time which will result in the "equity" we are seeking in these case•s . -56- � . l,�i�,�, . _ , : �. . ' i -; __ _ --- -- - PRGEJCT DESCr2IPTI0�� FORf•1 ST. PAUL-RAt�iSEY COUNTY FY 1980 • , CRIt•1INAL JUSTICE COORDtrtATING COUPJCIL r�Et�J PROJECT � Problem Statement & Docu��;entation of Necd (Continued) It is our. intent to have offenders do work a.t private non-profit organiz- � at�ons wfth which the Aduit Division s.taff has comp.leted agreements of cooperation . The man or woman receiving such a sentence will have �be number of hours set by the court or , at the court ' s direction , by the staff person involved . The actual work site will depend upon factors � such as location of the agency, transportation , experience/skills , and agency needs . In terms of people , we believe that one restitution specialist � working with an aide could effectively manage up to two hundred and fifty to three hundred cases a year . The impact on the courts and caseloads of regular agents/diversion counselors will be one �of relieving them of � the significantly time consuming tasks of arranging and monitoring placements . Additionally, Judges will have an opt7_on for sentencing even the petty-misdemeanor offender who , by law, cannot be incarcerated but � who often has no job or money to pay the traditional fine imposed . In summary, a service or work restitution program seems to the staff � of the Adult Division to have many merits . In addition to relieving a serious burden on existing caseloads , the program allows for persons aoming in to the courts to be placed in facilities working with the mentally retarded , the mentally ill , and the physically handicapped . My � limited experience in this area has shown such an exposure to be invaluable to the program accepting our client and to the client them- selves . Further , in these economic times it is more often than not a � very desirable option for the court to have either a financial restit�tion or work equity restitution program to consider . Beyond this , the involvement of an individual by way of specific time out of their schedules and their lives seems to have an impact which is remembered . � Both the Municipal and District Courts of thi�s county will be involved with this program and are in need of this resource . � _ � . � ' � � � , � -57 • � � c�cc o> > ST. �,4UL-��iSEY COU�dTY � Pk�OJECT CFSCRIPTIO�d �ORi-i CRIi�tINAL JUSTICE COORDIf�lAi ING CO�i1CIL FY 1930 ;��bJ PROJECT OaJECTIVES: Objectives should be expressed as the effects, r�esults , or acco��plish:nents the project pro-ject is intended to produce. Objectives si�ould be specific and measurable, and indicate the expecl;ed impact of the project on the pr-oblem stated. • In �vriting objectives, the follo�•�ing guidelines should be observed: a. Ojectives should be expressed in terms of rneasurable quantities; b. Each objective should express a single idea. arief, clear statei�;ents are helpful , and if key ter-ms are likely to be misunderstood, explain your definition of �hem. c. Define the desired improvernerit or ��t•oposed a�tivity as specifically as possible. A helpful question to ask in �•�riting an objective may be, "How will the target population's problems have changed as a � result of this project?" � d. Ii�dicate th2 tai•��E�t ar�ea to be affected, or target group to be served � by the project. Specify the time frame in �•;hich anticipated results or proposed activities are expected to occur. �'. To provide a non-financial restitution program for use of District — and Municipal Court Judges as a sentencing option . •�. To provide service restitution supervision for 200 Municipal Court — cases and 25 District Court cases between 1 /1 /80 and 12/31 /80 . I �, To involve at least 10 non-profit organizations as host programs which will accept "service" restitution cases . IV . To hold at least one annual meeting for the purpose of expressing Criminal Justice System appreciation to the host programs for their vital assistance . V . To hold three training sessions for the purpose of reviewing the program, outlining the procedural components and discussing the • philosophy and need for "service restitution" . Vi . To contribute to the communities awareness of this program and its results . � VII To maintain such r-ecords and statistics which are required to effectively. evaluate the success or failure of this program in terms of re-arrest and re-conviction for the same or similar offense withi an 18 month period from the time of plea or conviction . . -58-�— -�_�.._ ...____.,_�._____ � ' , : . �J��-Oii , � ----------- -------..----- - _.____ ------ ---- - — ----- r ST. PAUL-RA�>SEY COU�dTY °��CT DESCRIPTIOi�1 FORi•1 , CRIP•11NAL JUSI'ICE COOROI�!i�TING COU�;CIL FY 1930 PlEI�! PROJECT tPtAJOR ACTIVI�fIES: List the major- activities anticipated b.y the project and indicate their relationship to the project's ob�ect�ves. Also list major prociucts of �ach � task and expected time period for each. _ OBJECTIVE ACTIVITY TIME PERIOD ACTIVITY IS RELATED TO � I . 1 /80-12;80 Develop new arganizations . Objs . T, TT II . Bi -monthly Visit participating programs Objs . TII ,—VI , IV , V — (public relations ) . � III . Ongoing Court appearances . Objs . I , II IU . Ongoing Intake interviews-background Objs . I , II , VII and interest review . V . Ongoing Court Unit referral -confirmation Objs . II , of acceptance . V� . Ongoing Case assignment to program . Objs . I , II , VII VII . Monthly, Prepare reports on progress . Objs . I , II , V , VI � � Quarterly VII VIII .As needed Office "hearings " upon poor Objs . I , II participation . � IX . As needed Re-vocation reports . Objs . I , II , X . Ongoing Termination ( successful ) reports . Objs . VII , I , II XI . Monthly Record keeping/statistics . Objs . VII , V , VI XII . Quarterly Staff ineeting/training with Objs . V , VII � Adult agents . XIII . Semi -Annually To complete criminal record checksObjs . VII , VI � each 6 months . � :• . , � � . • , STAFF & OTHER RESOURCES: List anticipated staff positions and briefly describe � each. Also lsit other organizations, agencies, boards or groups which will be involved in the project. , STAFF Civil Service : . Community Corrections Worker I ( description att . ) , "�Working Title" : Service restitution agent ( see attachm.ent ) Civil Service Title : Communitv Corrections Aide TT , (descripti�n attachedl � OTHERS 1 . Director of Community Corrections Department/Management Team � 2 . Court Services Committee 6 . Court Unit � 3 . Corrections Advisory Board 7 . Investigative Unit 4 . Adult Supervisors 5 . Staff Teams , -59- .. - ---- ------�-��--------...__»_-- ----- -. —_ ----------- -- ----.--- ----- ' �T. PAUI_-i;rli�iSEY CQui;TY I'ROJFCT DESCRIPTIO.'+ FOF.�� CRIt�1INAL JUSTICE COORDI�IATI��G CGU�JGIL FY 1930 i�Et�! PROJECT 1 . ariefly state the intended impact �i�is project �.�ill have on imp��-oving the criminal justice system (i .e. corrections, courts , lati•r e��force�7ent and juvenile justice) or cuntrolling cri�ne in St. Paul -R�:�rsey County. This program will improve the Criminal Justice System by providing a - realistic and useful sentencinq option to the Judges of the Municipal and District Courts . It will be particularly useful when a fine is unrealistic or would have no impact. but incarceration is se�►� too severe a consequence . (see below *) 2. Provide a five year cost prujection for this p►•oj��ct. The five year cost projection anticipates an 8% to 10% annual increase in all costs . * It will involve the community in a ver.y direct �wa.y because people are placed in communit.y orqanizations . 3. Have alternative funding sources for this prpject been sought? If yes, provide details and outcome. Yes . Private foundations and the CETA proqram are beinq asked to assis us durinq 1979 . This �rant requests funds as of 1 /1 /80 . 4. Identify the agency, unit of government or organization which will consider funding this project after its LEAA eligibility has expired. The onl.y realistic options are State subsid.y fundinq , county funds , and possible reassiqnment of personnel . 5. If the project is within City or County structure: LJas project included in the agency or department's annual budget request? If yes , why ��as it denied? If no why was it not requeSted at that time? No . This would be premature in that the program is experimental and reflects a basically unapproved idea . It is seen as a program which � would be appropriate for LEAA grant funding . � _ • � � � . � ; 'I certify.that the information given in this Project Description Form is true and accurate,� to the best of my knowledge. � , DATE• � � u or�ze igna ure � -60- , � St. Paul-Ramsey County CJCC FY 1980 LEAA Plan , PROGRAM 19A: Local Secure Facilities , This program area seeks to improve the provision of inmate treatment and screening programs and to assist local jails, lockups, and holding facilities in compliance with secure facility standards in 85 Minnesota Counties. This does not include , Ramsey and Hennepin Counties, which are only covered in program area 196: Institutional Treatment and Rehabilitation. � PROBLEM: Not Applicable GOAL• Not Applicable � STRATEGY: Not Applicable RELATIONSHIP TO , STATE AND REGION: Not Applicable PROJECT MONITORING: Not Applicable , TECHNICAL ASSISTANCE: Not Applicable LEAA FUNDING: Not Applicable � � , � � , , , � , -61- � St. Paul-Ramsey County CJCC FY 1980 LEAA Plan � PROGRAM 196: Institutional Treatment and Rehabilitation , This program area addresses the needs for improved prograrnrning in local correctional institutions and better coordination of community resources which offer services to � community resources which offer service to inmates. During 1979 this program area will be revised to better reflect current concerns. PROBLEM: Refer to 1979 Ramsey County Cornrnunity Corrections Plan, , . pages 17-19, Statement of Needs, see Appendix� GOAL� To provide security, supervision, and treatment of persons , corrHnitted by a court to a Ramsey County correctional institution. The 1979 Ramsey County Community Corrections Plan defines � this goal by identifying the following objectives: WORKHOUSE , 1 . Workhouse staff will insure that all inmates go through orientation and classification upon their , arrival at the Workhouse during 1979. 80% will have an appropriate plan of treatment within one day of arrival and 20� (those arriving on weekends � and holidays) within three days of arrival . 2. Workhouse staff will establish and maintain staffing patterns to adequately provide full staff coverage � on all shifts during 1979, as measured by the state inspection. 3. Workhouse staff will enable 300 inmates, through the , Work Release Program, to keep their jobs while on sentence to the Workhouse. 4. Workhouse staff will provide tutoring services to 50 , functionally illiterate inmates �o significantly im- prove their reading and writing skills. � 5. Workhouse staff will place 20 skilled and semi- skilled inmates in appropriate jobs in the Workhouse , to maintain or improve those skills. 6. Workhouse staff will prepare, through shop instructions or on-the-job training, 20 unskilled inmates for , employment upon release. STRATEGY: Implementation will be further identified during 1979-1980 , as part of the ongoing planning activities of the Coordin- ating Council and the Ramsey County Community Corrections Department and Advisory Board. RELATIONSHIP TO � STATE AND REGION: The problem statements and goals are consistent with the -62- , , St. Paul-Ramsey County CJCC , FY 1980 LEAA Plan , State Crime Control Planning Board 1978 Plan and the Metropolitan Guide's Law and Justice Chapter. , PROJECT MONITORING: Not Applicable TECHNICAL ASSISTANCE: Not Applicable , LEAA FUNDING: Not Applicable � � , , , � , , , , , , � , -63- , St. Paul-Ramsey County CJCC , FY 1980 LEAA Plan PROGRAM 20: Criminal Justice Planning, Research, and Evalution , This program area addresses the need for planning, research, and evaluation projects , that will assist public officials in decisions related to the criminal justice system. PROBLEM: System-wide planning in criminal justice has been , insufficient; various issues have reached the decision- making stage without system-wide effects being con- sidered. Issues in each criminal justice sub-system , were identified in the 1977 Problem Identification Survey as needing coordination and planning assistance. Each issue impacts on other areas of the criminal justice system. Decisions made independent of other concerns � have not always been based on accurate, timely information. Improvements and changes in St. Paul-Ramsey County criminal justice agency budgets must be made through coordinated , planning efforts, with emphasis on long-range improvements of effectiveness in crime control and due process. There has been a limited capacity to change and improve , the criminal justice system through data collection and the analysis of findings. Trained and/or available staff for research and resource activities have been , extremely limited. Knowledge of developments in the criminal justice subsystems has not been readily ac- cessible to all criminal justice personnel . , There is no ongoing evaluation tech►�ology available for criminal justice or other client-serving programs which receive city/county or federal funds. , GOALS: System-Wide Planning: 1 . to improve planning and coordination capabilities for i the St. Paul-Ramsey County criminal justice system by supporting intergovernmental planning/coordination efforts, and , 2. to support improved internal planning capabilities of criminal justice agencies in St. Paul-Ramsey County. , Research: 1 . to support applied research capabilities and interests , of criminal justice agencies, and 2. to improve communications regarding resources through- , out the criminal justice system. Project Evaluation: � 1 . to develop a formative project evaluation model for LEAA and JJDPA grant projects, and -64- , , , St. Paul-Ramsey County CJCC FY 1980 LEAA Plan , 2. to transfer model to other client-serving programs through technical training and assistance. , STRATEGY: For FY 1980, the St. Paul-Ramsey County CJCC included two projects within the Annual Action Plan. The Criminal Justice Coordinating Council is a continuation project , that addresses the goal of criminal justice system planning and coordination. Coordinating Council staff will continue to be involved in intergovernmental � planning activities and the coordination of planning efforts of criminal justice agencies. Coordinating Council staff will also provide, upon request, technical assistance to criminal justice agencies and units of government in , Ramsey County. A new project identified for FY 1980 funding in the . , Annual Action Plan is the LEAA Program Evaluation Model Implementation Project. This project addresses the goals regarding evaluation by providing resources for , technical training and assistance in applying a formative evaluation model to client-serving programs. The Coordinating Council identified a third project for , funding in this program; the project is included in the Annual Action Plan but would not be funded within the current FY 1980 Part C allocation for Ramsey County. , A Court Space Management Study is proposed to be conducted in conjunction with a management study of Ramsey County a dminis tra tive an d pr o g r a m s p a c e n e e d s. T h e p r o p o s e d study would include space management of Ramsey County � criminal justice agencies and offices. RELATIONSHIP TO , STATE AND REGION: The problem statements and goals are consistent with the State Crime Control Planning Board updated 1978 Plan and the Metropolitan Development Guide's Law and Justice , Chapter. PROJECT MONITORING: Monitoring of these projects is the responsibility of the St. Paul-Ramsey County Criminal Justice Coordinating , Council . TECHNICAL ASSISTANCE: Assistance will be provided by Coordinating Council � staff. LEAA FUNDING: Continuation Pro�ects , Pro�ect Title: St. Paul-Ramsey County Criminal Justice Coordinating Council , Sponsoring Unit of Government: St. Paul Implementing Agency: St. Paul-Ramsey County Criminal Justice Coordinating Council , -65- , St. Paul-Ramsey County CJCC FY 1980 LEAA Plan , Grant Number: 03201109879 , Project Duration: Not Applicable Funding Year: FY 1980 , LEAA Funds Requested: $82,856 , State Buy-In Funds: $8,464 Amount and Source of Local Funds: $8,464 - City of St. Paul , Ramsey County Total LEAA Funds for Continuation , in Program Area #20: $ 82,856 Total State Match: $ 8,464 Total Local Match: $ 8,464 , New Projects , Project Title: LEAA Program Evaluation Model Implementation Sponsoring Unit of Government: Ramsey Ccunty , Implementing Agencing: St. Paul-Ramsey County Criminal Justice Coordinating Council , Grant Number: Not Applicable Project Duration: Three Years ` Funding Year: First Year LEAA Funds Requested: $45,000 , State Buy-In Funds Requested: : $2,500 , Amount and Source of Local Funds: $2,500 - Ramsey County Total LEAA Funds for New Projects in , Project Area #20: $90,000 Total State Match: $ 5,000 , Total Local Match: $ 5,000 Project Title: Courts Space Management Study , Sponsoring Unit of Government: Ramsey County , Implementing Agency: Office of the Judicial District Administrator - Office of the County Executive Director , -66- , St. Paul-Ramsey County CJCC , FY 1980 LEAA Plan , Grant Number: Not Applicable Project Duration: One Year , Funding Year: First Year � LEAA Funds Requested: $45,000 State Buy-In Funds Requested: $2,500 , Amount and Source of Local Funds: $2,500 - Ramsey County Total LEAA Funds for New Projects in � Program Area #20: $90,000 Total State Match: $ 5,000 , Total Local Match: $ 5,000 , , � � , , , , , � � -67- , CJCC-010 , ST. PAUL-RAMSEY COUNTY PROJECT DESCRIPTION FORM � CRIMINAL JUSTICE COORDINATING COUNCIL FY 1980 CONTINUATION PROJECT , PROJECT TITLE: St. Paul-Ra9sey County Criminal Justice FUNDING YEAR: FY 1980 Coordinatin Council � CONTACT PERSON: Kathryn Ackland PHONE: 298-5652 SPONSORING UNIT OF GOVERNMENT: St. Paul � IMPLEMENTING AGENCY: St. Paul-Ramsey County Criminal Justice Coordinating Council , ESTIMATED BUDGET: . � � TOTAL: $ 169,285 LEAA AMOUNT REQJESTED $ 82,856 90 , PERSONNEL & PAY RELATED BENEFITS: � STATE AMOUNT REQUESTED , 03 5 EQUIPMENT: 200 LOCAL GOVERNMENT FUNDS � SUPPLIES: 2:160 REQUESTED $ 4,603 5 CONSULTANT: 2.000 OTHER: 17.880 TOTAL REQUEST $ 92,062 , Summarv of Progress to Date. Sumnarize the project's major accomplishments to date including evidence of progress , toward stated goals and work program. Provide material supporting this progress. If • the project intends to revise project goals or alter its target group or program � significantly, please describe in detail . A. Program E�aluation Model _ � An outcome oriented, formative evaluation system is being developed for all client � , serving LEAA programs in their first and second years of funding. The system will , be streamlined to develop a model tha can easily be transferred to other correc- tional and human service programs. B. FY 1980 Criminal Justice Annual Plan , The following activities were completed as part of the schedule for generating the St. Paul-Ramsey County Criminal Justice Plan for FY 1980:. - criminal justice system data was updated , - the problem statements, as defined by CJCC sub-corrQnittee, were reviewed and revised - goals were reviewed, revised, and endorsed by CJCC , - Ramsey County crime data analysis for 1977 C. Public Safety/Crime Prevention , Responding to numerous requests over the last two years from corr�unity groups in support of corianunity-based crime prevention programs, the Coordinating Council staff, in July, initiated the �lanning required to develop a comprehensive com- munity public safety/crime prevention program for St. Paul . Initial work complete, , the development of a draft plan is well under way. Early in the first quarter of 1979, the draft will be submitted to CJCC and the City Council for endorsement. Presently, the plan is being prepared for review by district councils and city , � - ------------ - — epar men - --- -68-_ � � " . CJCC-010 , PROJECT DESCRIPTION FORM � ST. PAUL-RAMSEY COUNTY , CRIMINAL JUSTICE COORDIP�ATING COUNCIL FY 1980 CONTIP�UATION PROJECT , Surtmary of Progr.ess to Date (Continued) : D. Juvenile Study Comnittee of CJCC This committee was formed to direct some efforts in dealing with juvenile justic � problems in Ramsey County to assist in providing viable alternatives to meet the problems. A consultant to CJCC will complete the study this year. E. Information System � The feasibility stage has been funded for an integrated Criminal Justice Management Information System. Copies of the grant application were sent to consultants. There has been a pre-bidders conference in December. A Request , For Proposal (RFP) was �developed by staff of CJCC to interested consultants. Proposals are due mid-February. Phase I of the feasibility study will be complete by September 30 and authority to proceed with Phase II and III will � follow. F. Law Enforcement Survey , A comprehensive law enforcement cost survey was conducted. It identified the costs and resources necessary to provide police services within Ramsey County. Specific findings and conclusions were presented to appropriate County and , City officials. Staff and Other Resources: List any changes in sta€fing pattern anticipated and any new co-operative agreements � with other organizations, agencies or groups necessitated by changes in program emphasis, target group, etc. Additions: 1) office manager/administrative assistant; 2) clerk/typist Project evaluation efforts will not be funded by the CJCC budget. � , � Have reports .of project been made to sponsoring unit of givernment? Provide detail � Special project reports are distributed to all interested groups. , Provide an updated five year cost projection for this project. � N.A. � i � . rI certify that the information given in this Project Description Form is true and accurate, to the best of my knowledge. , DATE �� ' � . tho ized S nature � -69- � SUMMARY OF PROGRESS TO DATE (Continued) , G. County Coroner's Study � A county-requested, council-authorized study of the County Coroner's Office is underway and nearly completed. The study includes an analysis of the existing Coroner's Office versus a forensic pathologist office including costs, advantages , and disadvantages, and efficiency. H. LEAA Planning and Grants Monitoring , The ongoing grants monitoring process is being further refined and is being integrated into the total procedural framework for CJCC/LEAA projects relation- ships. (Funding for staff resources is provided through contract with Metropolitan � Council for Part B LEAA funds and CETA employees. ) Future efforts will be decided as a result of a series of goal setting conferences , in the Spring of 1979. , � , � , � , � � , � -70- , • " CJCC-011 , " '. ' PROJECT DESCRIPTION FORM ' ! ST. PAUL-RAMSEY COUNTY FY 1980 — CRIMINAL JllSTICE COORDINATING COUNCIL NEW PROJECT � PROJECT TITLE: LEAA Program Evaluation PROJECTED YEARS OF LEAA � Model Implementation FUNDING REQUESTS: CONTACT PERSON: ��r arown PHONE: 293-4145 � SPONSORING UNIT OF GOVERNMEfdT: Ramsey County � IMPLEMENTING AGENCY: St, Paul-Ramsey County Criminal Justice Coordinating Counc�l � � ESTIMATED BUDGET: � TOTAL: $ 50,000 LEAA AMOUPI7 REOUESTED 45_,_000 90 PERSONNEL & PAY RELATEO BENEFITS: � � STATE BUY-IN REQUESTED 2,_500 5 � EQUIPMENT: • _ IOCAL GOVERNMENT FUP�DS _____ _-- SUPPLIES: � ,.�.,nn REQUESTED 2,500 5 : CONSULTANT. 9,�{�nn OTHER FUNDS REQUESTED OTHER: � EM STATEMENT AND DOCUMENTATION OF NEED PROBL Clearly describe the problem this project is expected to address. Provide supporting � facts and figures to document the problem. Indicate the source of data cited (e.g. , a specified published report, agency records, another agency's data� . The problem statement should be related to the target population this project will serve. In documenting the problem please provide facts regarding the target population that � � are related to the problem. � CJCC EVALUATION PROJECT . Problem Statement Relevant and timely information about client program outcomes is essential to the , planning and management of criminal justice programs, where the expectation is that client behavior will be changed, IrJithout a means to capture infor►nation about client outcomes, local officials and program managers have no valid basis for knowing if a , program is achieving its objectives. But there are barriers to establishing a process for capturing client outcome data. First, the technology is not well known in the human services. Much of the program , evaluation being done - particularly in criminal jsutice programs - is surrnnative evaluation which, while increasing knowledge about the broad impact of programs, does nto generally provide timely information which is immediately useful to program , managers. Formative evaluation, on the other hadn, is a process for monitoring program outcomes which periodically compares program performance ac�ainst a pre- established standard, or against prior performance, or both. � A second barrier to formative evaluation is the tendency to "shotgun" program services at the client or "target" population �vithout regard for program structure, or mission, or purposes. Identification of the mission, goals, objectives, and program structures � is a sweaty, labor-intensive task which requires expert guidance. , -71- � - . CJCC-011 , PROEJCT DESCRIPTION FORM ST. PAUL-RAMSEY COUNTY FY 198Q , CRIMINAL JUSTICE COORDINATING COUNCIL NEW PROJECT Probiem Statement & Documentation of Need (Continued) � A third barrier to formative evaluation - or indeed, any eyaluation - is the belief that evaluation is synonamous with external controls. Th1s belief has led program , managers to be fearful and suspicious of evaluations and evaluators� To be �ure, traditional evaluation is something that was done to program managers� who frequently did not understand the purpose, structure or outcome of the ev�luat�on� � But formative evaluation is done with and for program managers, v11th emphasis on feedback and knowledge of results which wi�help management t4 make good decision$. The more effective utilization of evaluation is a major objective of the model , Our � assumption is that the utility of evaluation data is a function of t�ming, relevance, reliability, and display. The model will fulfill each of these funct�ons. The CJCC is currently identifying an integrated model for formative evaluation which , will have the potential to be transferred to a broad array of corrections programs. • The model will be largely contained in a handbook which will facil�tate transfer to other programs. However, full transfer of the model will require technical assist- � ance from staff who are familiar with the detailed requirements of the model . Presently, no resources exist to sustain such a technical assistance effort. i . � � � . � . . � � � � � i � � � � __ ____. �_ _,2_ � � CJCC O11 , . � ST. PAUL-RA�SEY COUNTY PROJECT DESCRIPTION FORM . CRIMINAL JUSTICE COORDINATING COUNCIL FY 1980 . NEW PROJECT � � OBJECTIVES: � Objectives should be expressed as the effects, results, or accomplishments the project project is intended to produce. Objectives should be specific and measurable, and indicate the expected impact of the project on the problem � stated. In writing objectives, the following guidelines should be observed: � a. Ojectives should be expressed in terms of ineasurable quantities; b. Each objective should express a single idea. Brief, clear statements are helpful , and if key terms are likely to be misunderstood, explain , your definition of them. c. Define the desired improvement or proposed activity as specifically as possible. A helpful question to ask in writing an objective may be, "How will the target population's problems have changed as a � , result of this project?" d. Indicate the target area to be affected, or target group to be served by the project. Specify the time frame in which anticipated results � or proposed activities are expected to occur. — • �1 . A fornrati-ve-gvalu.ation- system will be fully implemented in a variety of human services programs in Ramsey County such as health, corrections, welfare, and � mental health. Transfer to criminal justice programs will be focus of this � project. , • 2. The evaluation system will be fully compatible with the now-developing Criminal Justice Mariagement Information System (CJMIS) . � 3. The evaluation system will be fully compatible with the county-wide management � � and budgeting process. � � � � � � , -73- , ... �__...-_._...�, CJCC-011 PT N FORM , ST. PAUL-RAMSEY COU�dTY PROJECT DESCRI IO CRIMINAL JUSTICE COORDINATING COUNCIL FY 1980 , NEW PROJECT MAJOR ACTIVITIES: List the major activities anticipated by the project and indicate � their relationship to the project's objectives. Also list major products of each t��k and expected time period for each. OBJECTIVE I TASKS � A. Package eval.uation model to facil�tate transfer. � B. Orient (train) staff to the principles of formative evaluation and the applications of the model C. Provide ongoing technical assistance to programs utilizing the model ln order , to ensure uniformity and �uality of data. OBJECTIVE II TASKS A. Work with CJMIS contractor to; , 1 .� identify common data elements, 2. ensure compatibility with client outcome indicators, and � 3. ensure consistency among data source documents and process � OBJECTIVE III TASKS A. Orient management and budgetary staff to the capabilities of the evaluation � system and its potential contribution to the management process B, participate with management and budgetary staff 1n the proces�s of neootiating broad policy with department staff which are consistant with the formative � evaluation model . � I . , � � • � STAFF & OTHER RESOURCES: List anticipated staff positions and briefly describe � each. Also lsit other organizations, agencies, boards or groups which will be involved in the project. (2� Evaluation system technical assistants to deliver technical asslstants to � client programs , (2) Materials production specialist/(typist) to prepare training and evaluation � design materials (1 ) Consultant - as needed � Curriculum desivn specialist and trainer to design and present staff training � material , __ _ _ -74- - � , �JG�-Ui � ,' + ST. PAUL-RAMSEY COUNTY PROJECT DESCRIPTION FORM CRIMINAL JUSTICE COORDIPIATING COUPlCIL FY 1980 , NEW PROJECT � l. Briefly state the intended impact this project will have on improving the criminal justice system (i .e. corrections, courts , law enforcement and juvenile justice) or controlling crime in St. Paul-Ramsey County. � Should enable effectiveness of programs to be accurately assessed and cause expansion of successful programs and reduction of failures. � 2. Provide a five year cost projection for this project. , All client serving programs county-wide could be eligible. The cost will be substantial for five years. , 3. Have alternative funding sources for this prpject been sought? If yest proVide , details and outcome. , . 4. Identify the agency, unit of government or organization which will, consider � funding this project after its LEAA eligibility has expired. . All municipalities will have access to model even though Rams,ey County has �. greatest need. 5. If the project is within City or County s�ructure: Was project included in the � agency or department's annual budget request? If yes, why was it denied? If no, why was it not requested at that time? , Consultant was hired to develop model this year. Success suggested requesting special funds for expansion. , � � � I certify that the information given in this Project Descri.ption Form is true and accurate, to the best of my knowledge. � , DATE• Z• 14-7 q � u or igna ure � _�5_ i . . � � ......_..... .: . .....__. �_: ___. . . . . ___�... , . .._._. __. .. .... . . . . . ..._ .... . .. .. . . .. . . . - ; +4 � T "1� LJ�.��U� � , . .�� ..,� ,4.,,�; , . � PROJECT DESCRIPTION FORM . ST. PAUL-RAMSEY COUNTY FY 1980 CRIh1INAL JUSTICE COORDINATING COUNCIL flEW PROJECT PROJECT TITLE: Courts S ace Mana ement Stud PROJECTED YEARS OF LEAA P g y FUNDING REQUESTS: 1 yr. or le � CONTACT PERSON: Gordon M. Griller PHONE: 2gg-4377 SPOPISORING UNIT OF GOVERNMEPIT: -� . - - - • �ounty of Ramse IMPLEMENTING AGENCY: Office of the Judicial District Administrator Office of the Count � Executive Director ' ESTIMATED BUDGET: �SO,OOQ ' � TOTAL: - �- �_ LEAA A�40UrlT REOUESTED 45,000 9� PERSONNEL & PAY RELATED BENEFITS: � STATE BUY-IN REQUESTED �� 5 EQUIPMENT: _= LOCAL GOVERNMFNT FUPJOS 2,500 5 SUPPLIES: REQUESTED CONSULTANTc $50 000 OTNER FUNDS REQJESTED OTHER: PROBLEM STATEh1ENT AND OOCUMENTATION OF NEED - , Clearly describe the problem this project is expected to address. Provide supporting facts and figures to document the problem. Indicate the source of data cited (e.g. , a specified published report, agency record's, another agency's dat� . The problem statement should be related to the target population this project will serve. In documenting the problem please provide facts regarding the target population that are related to the problem. . The Courts of the Second Judicial District in Ramsey County; County blunicipal , District and Probate; are currently housed in several different locations throughout the County. These include various floors in the City-County Courthouse, five suburban 1�lunicipal Court locations and a nei1, separate Juvenile Service - Center. Support services for the Courts - including corrections personnel and court clerks - alss� are at scattered locations throughout the Courthouse. Some corrections functions are housed at the America� Building, two blocks from the Courthouse itself. The County Attorneys staff, working daily zyith the District Court , is officed in the Commerce Building . These diverse l�cations complicate the movement of people and records betiveen the Court, it ' s support -f.unctions , and those various � offices and agencies ti��orking on a day-to-day basis •,�ith the judiciar.y. , � -76- �� CJCC-01] � • PROEJCT DESCRIPTIOPJ FQRM � ST. PAUL-RA��.SEY COUNTY FY 1980 CRIMINAL JUSTICE COORDI�lATING COUNCIL NEW PROJECT � ProbTem Statement & D_oc_umentation ,of Need (Continued) � Despite the current remodeling of court space on the 16th floor of the Courthouse, new� arraignment and office space for � the County Municipal Court at the Adult Detention Center, and a recently constructed Juvenile Service Center; the courts have significant additional short range and long range space needs Ioccasioned by a number of factors : Caseload increases. In many areas , case filings have � consistently increased over the past few years . Heavy caseload increases have been particularly experienced in Farnily Court matters, District Court jury cases , and misdemeanor actions in the County A4unicipal Court. In . � County Municipal Court, as an example, �nearly 51 , 500 cases were disposed of in 1977 , an 11 percent increase over the previous year. These increases in, caseloads have occasioned � � demands which can not be met by existing judicial resources ; thus, necessitating the use of vis�iting and retired judges The ability to utilize extra judges , however, is dependant on the availability of adequate court facilities. Often, � make-shift space has to be _.:arranged . as is the situation in early January, 1979 : The District Court has been for�unate enough to retain the services of Retired �Judge � Archie Gingold since mid-1978 , which have assisted greatly in reducing case backlogs . In 1979, for the month of January, it was also possible to schedule Retired Judge Rol3off to � work with the court. Since space is quite limited, Judge Rolioff must share chamber space w�.th Judge Hachey, and when that presents a problem; he must �rfice in the Judges conference room or a jury deliberation room. Additionally, ' there is no adequate space for court repoxters for either Judge Gingold or Judge Rolbff. � ' Inter- 'urisdictional use of 'ud es. The Court Reorganization Act of 1977 provides for the lexible assignment of judges within and between judicial districts. In Ramsey County, County l�iunicipal judges have been "assigned to hear Family ' and Juvenile Court matters, and, also, have been scheduled to handle both criminal and civil District Court cases. A number of constraints are placed on schedul"ing these matters � primarily due to the � limited space available for hearings and trials � ( � � ' -77- � � � Increase in space requirements for court support functions . , With the growth of caseloads, court support staff has increased to keep pace �aith the rising work volumes. New programs have been implemented over recent years in community corrections , � bailiff support, data processing, and court management (i.e. Judicial District Office) which have expanded space needs. With limited space available in the City-County � Cour.thouse, the County has often been forced to rent space in nearby private office buildings. I Space dislocations for the ublic. Space available to� the ' public when con ucting uszness with the courts is often inadequate. Public i�aitino and conference space for the Family Court is extremely meger, routinely requiring � attorney-client conferences in hallways and court reporter offices. A jury study is presently being cbndueted by the court which will include recommendations for short and long range chang�s in facilities for the juror assembly room, ' and jury deliberation rooms. Attorney conference room space is quite limited throughout the Courthouse, which effects case seheduling in criminal pretrials as well as other � matters . Another area of concern frequently mentioned by those working �vith the court is the lack of space far witnesses in both County Municipal and District Courts. � tiVith these problems in mind, it is proposed that a study be conducted addressing the short and Iong term space needs of the Courts of the District (Ramsey County) in conjunction with the ' _ County Board and the Office of the County Executive Director. It is recognized that an assessment of court space utilization ' and needs cannot be addressed in isolation from the space needs of non-court-related Ramsey County functions . It is anticipated that this study could be coordinated with the review of space needs for the County in general. ' � ' � , i � -78- , , CJCC O11 ST. PAUL-RANiSEY �COUNTY PROJECT DESCRIPTION FORM CRFMINAL JUSTICE COORDINATING COUNCIL FY 1980 NEW PROJECT OBJECTIVES: , Objectives should be expressed as the effects, results, or accomplishments the project project is intended to produce. Objectives should be specific and � measurable, and indicate the expected impact of the project on the problem stated. ( In writing objectives, the following guidelines should be observed: a. Ojectives should be expressed in terms of ineasurable quantities; b. Each objective should express a single idea. Brief, clear statements � are helpful , and if key terms are likely to be misunderstood, explain your definition of them. c. Define the desired improvement or proposed activity as specifically as possible. A helpful question to ask in vrriting an objective may be, "How will the target population`s problems have change� as a result of this project?" � �d. Indicate the target area to be affected, or target group to be served by the project. Specify the time frame in which anticipated resu�ts . or proposed activities ar•e expected to occur. � Overall Goals : � • To insure the provision of adequate space and facilities for the Courts gf Ramsey County and court-related services which axe supportive of optimum productivity and security as well as maximum operational efficiency . To provide for flexibility in the use of court space to accommodate changes in procedures, court reorganization implementation, increased case volume and the use of addi�ional judges, whether permanent full-time positions or visiting judges . Specific Objectives : � To assess the adeQuacy of existing District , County Municipal , and Probate court facilities in light of current space demands . � To analyze and identify, in detail , space problems and requiz•ements • To assess and dvcument future space needs of the Courts in Ramsey Count • 'To develop a planning model to establish space standards for the courts . •To develop recommendations relating specifically to court space needs at the City-County Courthouse , and suburban County T�unicipal locations. � -79- ._ _ . _ _ ,-�...,..�,......��_ _ � CJCC-01T _ � ST. PAUL-RAP�.SEY COU��TY • PROJECT DESCRIPTION FORM CRIMINAl. JUSTICE COORDINATING COU�iCIL FY 1980 � . MEW PROJECT MAJOR ACTIVITIES: List the major activities anticipated by the project and indicate � their relationship to the project's objectives. Also 1�st major products of each task and expected time period for each. � It is expected that the consultant will apply modern � court space management principles and analysis techniques. The analysis must not only consider facilities data, but administrative ' and management data as well . Such an approach will require : � • Current and future (five, ten and twenty year time frames) volume indicators , including projections based on such indices as anticipated changes and trends in the state ' s � court system by legislative action, population projections , crime rates , and court caseloads. • Cureent and projected manpower needs , taking into account ' anticipated legal and procedural changes. o Case processing procedures and inter-relationships among , various court and court-related functions. • Other �ariables which affect space utilization and needs � such as security procedures and anticipated data processing and information retrieval systems . � • Provision of alternative plans of action and recommendations t which are practical and feasible. The stud is antici ated to take no more than 12 months to � Y P complete. The major product of the project is a final , comprehensive report, including - at the minimum - the following : � • Documentation of the Ramsey court enviranment an d current space allocation (a .furiction and facilities inventory) . ' s Establishment of a data base for growth projections . '; ;� . 'Identification of short and long range space needs , the I, � �T--proBlems generatina those needs and specific space rec�uirement,s. • + Identification of alternative solutions to resolving current � and future space needs and final recommendations together tivith costs and benefits as justification . A planning model for the establishment of space standards for , the courts in Ramsey County. • Detailed guidelines and recommendations for further action, � including an implementation plan. � -80- � � � '� CJCC-011 ST. PAUL-RAMSEY COUPdTY PROJECT DESCRIPTION FORM � CRIMINAL JUSTICE COORDINATING COUNCIL FY 1980 �EW PROJECT , MAJOR ACTIVITIES: List the major activities anticipated by the project and indicate their relationship to the, project's objectives. Also list major products of each � task and expected time period for each. � , . � . � � \\ \ \ � � � � , \ � • � � � ;� � . List antici ated staff ositions and briefly describe STAFF & OTHER RESOURCES• p P each. Also lsit other organizations, agencies, boards or groups which will be , involved in the project. � It is envisioned that a consultant could be retained to conduct the study under the direction of the Court and the County Board. Similar consultant studies conducted in like � jurisdictions have involved a consulting team of from three to five people, with specific experts brought in to study particular areas. � � -81- . __ ---- : CJCC-011 , ST. PAUL-RAMSEY COUNTY PROJECT DESCRIPTION FORM CRIMINAL JUSTICE COORDIPIATING COUPlCIL FY 1980 , NEW PROJECT 1 . Briefly state the intended impact this project will have on improving the � criminal justice system (i.e. corrections, courts, law enforcement and juvenile justice) or controlling crime in St. Paul-Ramsey County. The project is expected to improve public and security circulat 'on� systems, allow more tlexible scheduling for court cases , and smooth the . flow of work and people moving through the court system. � 2. Provide a five year cost projection for this project. , Project is anticipated to be completed within a year or less. � � 3. Have alternative funding sources far- this prpject been sought? If yes, provide , details and outcome. . Only possible alternative funding. source would be through � - the general revenue funds appropriated by the County Board. - 4. Identify the agency, unit of qovernment or organization which will consider � funding this project after its LEAA eligibility has expired. . hio continued funding required � 5. If the project is within City or County structure: Was project included in the ' agency or department's annual budget request? If yes, why was it denied? If no, why was it not requested at that time? 'ncluded in the 1979 bud et re uest to � Pro�ect was not i g q the County Board, because operating expenses of the Courts took precedence, and the project/consultant approach was deemed more , appropriate . for LEAA funding. � � _ , � I certif that he information i n in t i i i � y t g ve h s Pro�e�escr .pt o� �'orm..,,-r5""E�e and accurate, to the best of my kno�•�l edge. � j� � ,� -.� , �' • � � � ,�� : �� :�,.� .� � :; DATE: January 12 , 1979 �, < �� ,�`� + . -��a;� �� u orize igna ur � ' � -32- � St. Paul-Ramsey County CJCC � FY 1980 LEAA Plan � PROuRAM 21 : Criminal Justice Information Systems This program area assists in the development of an integrated information , system to aid in the flow of information between sub-systems. PROBLEM: There is no central , integrated, computerized information � system for criminal justice agencies in St. Paul/Ramsey County. There is a lack of coordination of information that flows through each of the criminal justice sub- systems. This problem was confirmed in the 1977 Problem � Identification Survey and the 1978 Goal Setting Conference. The Criminal Justice Coordinating Council has organized � an integrated criminal justice information s�rstem corr�nittee which will be directing its efforts to examining the present information exchange and the options which may be available for future improvements. � GOALS: 1 . to support efforts to assess the feasibility .and desirability of a central computerized information � system involving all sub-systems of the St. Paul- Ramsey County criminal justice system, and 2. to support efforts for automated court scheduling. � STRATEGY: For FY 1980, a continuation project, St. Paul-Ramsey County Criminal Justice Management Information System � Study, is included in the Annual Action Plan. Funds for the project are not, however, included within the current FY 1980 Part C allocation for Ramsey County. Additional Part C funds and/or private funds will be , sought to continue this projec�. � RELATIONSHIP TO � STATE AND REGION: The problem statements and goals are consistent with the State Crime Control Planning Board updated 1978 Plan and the Metropolitan Development Guide's Law and � Justice Chapter. PROJECT MONITORING: Monitoring will be the responsibility of the St. Paul- Ramsey County Criminal Justice Coordinating Council . � TECHNICAL ASSISTANCE: Assistance will be provided by Coordinating Council staff and criminal justice agency participants. rLEAA FUNDING: Continuation Pro,iects Proiect Title: St. Paul-Ramsey County Criminal Justice � Information System Study Sponsoring Unit of Government: Ramsey County � Implementing Agency: To be determined Grant Number: Not Applicable � -83- � St. Paul-Ramsey County CJCC � FY 1980 LEAA Plan Project Duration: Three Years � Funding Year: Second Year ' LEAA Funds Requested: $90,000 State Buy-In Funds Requested: $5,000 � Amount and Source of Local Funds: $5,000 - Source to be determined � Other Funds Requested: $20,000 Total LEAA Funds for Continuation � Projects in Program Area #21 : $90,000 Total State Match: $13,464 Total Local Match: $13,464 j Other Funds Requested: $20,000 � New Projects: Not Applicable � � � � � , � , � -84- � � . . r ST. PAUL-RAMSEY COUNTY PROJECT OESCRIPTION FORM � CRIMINAL JUSTICE COORDINATING COUNCIL FY 1980 CONTINUATION PROJECT � P CT TITLE; T}1P. St. Paiil/Rar�sey County Crininal Jiistice FUNDING�YEAR: 2 ROJE Information System Study � CONTACT PERSON• To he deternined after Ahase I ,of the PHONE: ?_�g-5h52 � feasihilitv stuciv � SPONSORING UNIT OF GOVERNMENT: � °.amsey Coiinty � , IMPLEMENTING AGENCY: ESTIMATED BUDGET: . � — � TOTAL: ion,��n LEAA AMOUNT REQ;.;ESTED 90,000 � PERSONNEL & PAY RELATED BENEFITS: STATE AMOUNT REQUESTED 5,000 5 � EQUIPMENT: LOCAL GOVERNMENT FUNDS I SUPPLIES: REQUESTEDi 5,000_ 5 � CONSULTANT• OTHER FUNDS REQUESTED OTHER: , r Summar_v of Proqress to Date: Sumnarize the project's major accomplishments to date including evidence of progress toward stated goals and work program. Provide material supporting this progress. If � the project intends to revise project goals or alter its target group or program significantly, please describe in detail . 1. The Information Task Force }tas heen developeci. � , . , 2. There tiave heen several mec�tin�s caith 1lenn�pin �oiinty staff �oorl:in� with SIP , . to review their Pro�;ress and limitations. � . ' 3. There have been efforts to review some nationallv known information systems. Several people fr�m Ramsey ('o�inty have attendeci PR�`tIS confc�rences. 4. Grant apPlications were sent to approxiMately 15 consiiltants for their review. A pre-bidders conference �o<1s held to .�ns�aer any qiiestions the cons�iltants had. � 5. A request for Proposal �aas develoned and sent to those consiiltants interested. The Proposals will he due Pehruary 12, 197�. � � � � '�? t -�-_ __.__ _ . _ � • J , .l� PROJECT DESCRIPTION FORM � ST. PAUL-RAMSEY COUNTY � . FY 1980 CRIMINAL JUSTICE COORDIP�ATING COUNCIL CONTIP�UATION PROJECT � Summarv of Progress to Date (Continued) : � � � . � � � . , Staff and Other Resources: � List any chanqes in staffing pattern anticipated and any new co-operative agreements . with other organizations, agencies or groups necessitated by changes in program emphasis, target group, E'tC. The initial scope of tiie �rant liad to he divided � into 3 components due to monetary restraints. It is anticipated the 3 components , will be coMpatiUle with the first 3 Ptiases of the PRInI; svster�. f � Have reports of project been made to sponsoring unit of givernment? Provide detail ! � Ramsey County and City of St. Paul are c�ntintiousty kept apprise�i of. .�l.l matters re�ardin� the information system. They also tiave represPntativ�s on th� Task � Force Committee. Provide an updated five year cost projection for this project. t 1 year - h2,765 - P}iase I i ` 2 year - 100,��0 - Phase I £� II � . � ' � . � -- --- � I certify that the information given in this Project Description Form is true and � accurate, to the best of my knowledge. OATE � Authorized Signature -86- - � � � St. Paul-Ramsey County CJCC FY 1980 LEAA Plan � PROGRAM 22: Victim/Witness Programs This program area addresses the need for coordinated services offered to victims � and witnesses of crimes, including the use of r.estitution: PROBLEM: Assistance for victims and witnesses of crime is � available for residents in a� quarter of St. Paul at this tirr�. Requests for these services have come from all areas of Ramsey County. � There has been increasing interest in and concern for victims and witnesses of crimes. Two projects, which began in St. Paul during early 1978, offer � assistance to victims and witnesses in the south- western area of the city. Emergency crisis services are available as well as a follow-through � for court proceedings and crime prevention education. This type of assistance can have a significant impact on all parts of the criminal � justice system by balancing the concern for the offender with that concern for the victim. The extent of assistance should be carefully considered. � GOALS: 1 . to research program needs, � 2. to coordinate existing resources, 3. to support the current policy that newspapers - not publish the names of victims or witnesses � of crimes, 4. to support victim/witness assistance program � development, 5. to encourage 24-hour victim/witness assistance services, � 6. to moni tor and eval uate prograrr�ni ng, � 7. to train existing criminal justice personnel in methods of victim/witness assistance, 8. to ensure all victim/witness assistance services � be coordinated system-wide, and 9. to ensure that space is available in the court- � house for victims and witnesses called for proceedings in both municipal and district courts. � STRATEGY: For FY 1980, the St. Paul-Ramsey County Criminal Justice Coordinating Council has identified a new project for funding within the Annual Action Plan � -87- � St. Paul-Ramsey County CJCC FY 1980 LEAA Plan , to address the goals listed above, Victim/ � Witness Assistance for Special Population Groups involves providing victim/witness services to Suburban Ramsey County residents. The project � also includes conducting a study to better deter- mine victim/witness assistance needs by the blind and hearing impaired and providing the services necessary. � RELATIONSHIP TO STATE AND REGION: The problem statement and goals are consistent with � the State Crime Control Planning Board updated 1978 Plan and although not addressed, are inherently consistent with the Metropolitan Development Guide's Law and Justice Chapter. � PROJECT MONITORING: The St. Paul-Ramsey County Criminal Justice Coor- dinating Council will be responsible for monitoring � this project. TECHNICAL ASSISTANCE: Assistance to the project will be provided by the , staffs of the St. Paul-Ramsey County Criminal Justice Coordinating Council , City and County Attorneys' Offices. LEAA FUNDING: Continuation Projects - Not Applicable � New Projects � Project Title: Victim/Witness Assistance for Special Population Groups Sponsoring Unit of Government: Ramsey County � Implementing Agency: Crime Victim Crisis Center � Grant Number: Not Applicable Project Duration: Three Years � Funding Year: First Year LEAA Funds Requested: $30,000 � State Buy-In Funds Requested: $1 ,500 Amount and Source of Local Funds: $600 - Advocates � for the Blind $900 - Minnesota � Foundation for Better Hearing and � Speech Total LEAA Funds for fJew Projects in Area ,#22: $30,000 � -88- � St. Paul-Ramsey County CJCC � FY 1980 LEAA Plan jTotal State Match: $1 ,500 Total Local Match: $1 ,500 � � � � � � � . � � � � � � � � � -89- , . - REVISED APrLICATION PROJECT DESCRIPTION FORM ST. PAUL-RAMSEY COUNTY FY 1980 - CRIMINAL JUSTICE COORDINATING COUNCIL NEW PROJECT Victim/Witness Assistance for PROJECTED YEARS OF LEAA PROJECT TITLE: Special Population Groups FUNDING REQUESTS: CONTACT PERSON: David Bredemus PHONE: 226-1019 225-8669 SPONSORING UNIT OF GOVERNMEPIT: Ramsey County IMPLEMENTING AGENCY: Crime Victim Crisis Center � ESTIMATED BUDGET: � TOTAL: $ 33,000 LEAA RP40UflT REOUESTED $ 30,�00 3CL_ PERSONNEL & PAY RELATED BENEFITS:� 33,0�0 STATE BUY-IN REQUESTED —r��- � EQUIPMENT: _ LOCAL GOVERNMENT FUPlDS SUPPLIES: $ REQUESTED 60C1 .�� CONSULTANT: OTHER FUNDS REQ'JESTED � 900 � OTHER: $ PROBLEM STATEMENT AND DOCUMENTATION OF NEED Clearly describe the problem this project is expected to address. Provide supporting facts and figures to document the problem. Indicate the source of data cited (e.g. , a specified published report, agency records, another aqency�'s dat� . The problem � statement should be related to the target population this project will serve. In •' documenting the problem please provide facts regarding the target population that are related to the problem. The fact that many individuals are plagued by a ^fear of crime" is evidenced by recent findings of Saint Paul's Team Police Evaluation Unit• This evidence, as publish�d in their I�terim Evaluation Report, i'ssued in June, 1979, shows that 55 percent of Saint Paul's residents indicated that they "do not feel safe in their own neighborhoods at night"• A widespread fear of crime, regardless of whether that fear is warranted based upon the level and extent of actual crime, could have a pernicious impact upon success ful prosecution• That is� if witnesses are not willing to come forward, and if victim {who also may be witnesses} remain vulnerable and forgotten, prosecution resulting in � 'conviction becomes mor� tenuous- ' � The Crime Victim Crisis Center {CVCC} is a service organization designed to augment access to, and understanding of, the criminal �ustice system for victims and� witnesses-� To diminish the potential negative impact of their fear of crime, the Crime Victim Crisis Center seeks to improve attitudes towards the criminal justice system by the extension of personal services to victims and witnesses• f1oreover, it seeks to strengthen the work of the sundry police agencies and prosecutors through the extension. of these services• This program has been in operation from its Saint Paul location � since D�cember, 1977• The CVCC is organized as a unit of Correctional Services of f1innesota. The State � Department of Corrections has contracted with Correctional Services of Minnesota to carryout the activities provided by the Crime Victim Crisis Center• The Center has an operating budget of approximately $109,000� 80 percent of which stems from the State of Minnesota and the balance from United Way, the McKnight Foundation, and Northwest Foundation• Correctional Services of Minnesota s - -90- f CJCC-011 � . - . PROEJCT DESCRIPTION FORM � ' ST. PAUL-RAMSEY COUNTY FY 1980 CRIMINAL JUSTICE COOROINATING COUNCIL NEW PROJECT � Problem Statement & Documentation of Need (Continued) mately $14,DOO to reco�er overhead and related adm�n�strative expenses. � In its first 10 months of operation 1�018 separate cases have been handled by the CJCC, principally in the Uest 7th Street Community of Saint Paul, �nd through those areas served by the B-4 and 8-6 Team Police areast Twenty-one percent of the cases � �andled by the Center originated in the former area and 65 percent in the latter.. The balance of the caseload - 15 percent � originated elsewhere in Ramsey CountyR No outreach effort to Suburban Ramsey County is made, however. The caseload handled � � outside the City of Saint Paul is ^walk^in^ business, Nearly all af this caseload has focused on victim/witness assistance. Forty-five percent of the victims served by the Center made �nitial contact within three days after their victimization, about nine percent the same day• PJearly 60 � percent of the clients contact the unit on a one-time only basisz with 45 percent of the victims served suffering the consequences of a burglar�• Twenty percent were • subject to assaults, some nine percent other property crimes� and about six percent � not really the subject of a crime but requiring assistance nonethelesst An array of other crimes filled out the picture� each with small percentages. Witnesses were served in 35 specific situations, one case of which endured for nearly � a year• Provided is babysitting service, transportation, courtroom ass�stance of non-legal nature, contacts with employers, and the like• Victim assistance includes • tr.ansportation, crime scene assistance {e�g., enclosing a broken wi.ndow�� contacts , with members of the victim's family or friends, and related considerations� These services have been available for approximately one year� Principally in Saint Paul• Needed now is an extension of these services county wide� and particularly � ' their extension to special populations groups such as the handicapped. Federal. and state law now mandates the ^mainstreaming" of the handicapped whenever feasible �nta the regular society, thereby heighben�n� their ex�osure as victims andfor witnesses•. � � Already vulnerable, there is the need to _provide �reasonable assistance to these special Fopulations to facilitate achievement of the maintstreaming efforts• � Assistance for these special population �roups requires particular attention in Saint Paul/Ramsey County because this area has become a state-wide service center for the handicapped• For exarr�le, the Saint Paul Society for Blind operates a comprehensive rehabilitation center in downtown Saint Paul, one of three such centers in the state• � Of the 42,�00 individuals in the state who are blind or have significant visual impairments, a substantial percentage reside in the Twin Cities area and use the St• Paul Center• Additionally, there are a number of resources within the County � designed to service the special needs of the hearing impaired• Examples include the Petra Howard House {the only half-way house in the state which serves the deaf with a history of rt�ntal illness}, the St• Paul Rehabilitation Center {which serves the deaf with multiple handicaps}, St• Paul-Ramsey Hospital {which has the only mental � health center in the state servicing the deaf}, United Hospitals {especially at Miller which has a special center for outpatient care and oarenthood classes for the hearing impaired}, and the St• Paul TVI {which has a substantial student body of hearing impaired and is as well a training center for interpretors for/of the deaf � and likely will be designated one of 12 national training centers for interpretors}. Additionally� the St• Paul public school program has a siqnificant outreach program to children with hearing impairments, with one-half the student participation in that � program coming from outside the City� Unfortunately, no precise figures are available � -91'- PROJECT DESCRIPTION FORM = from any source as to the number of individuals with visual or hearing impairments � who reside or work within Ramsey County• Only statewide or regional estimates are available• Thus, one aspect of any outreach effort will need to develop more � precise data• This growing number of individuals in Ramsey County poses several unique problems � to the criminal justice system• As victims and.witnesses {or the parents� spouses or dependents of those who are} the hearing impaired require specialized interpretive services in order to comprehend and relate to that system. Such assistance is not readily available• Similar kinds of problems and exposures are present for the blind � as well• What is neede� now is to further develop and sustain the resources of the Crime Victim Crisis Center, and extend those services throughout the County, parti- cularly to those individuals in need of specialized attention such as the hearing � impaired and the sightless- Some individuals with significant hearing impairments have working vocabularies of between 400 to 600 words, a significant barrier to communication under any circum- � stances. If such an individual became a victim or witness, special communication skills would become essential in order to garner their information• The blind have a communication problem of a different sort; that is, how to serve as ^eye witnesses^ � and achieve credibility with police and prosecution personnel in such endeavors• This requires sensitivity on the part of criminal justice personnel to ask the proper questions to illicit the information a blind individual may possess• The CVCC, � through the funds sought here, would seek to address these and comparable problems• � � � � � � � � � -92- � �•`•� ' ' . PAUL-RAhiSEY COUNTY . PROJECT DESCRIPTION FORM ST CRIMINAL JUSTICE COORDINATING COUNCIL FY 1980 � .. � NEW PROJECT � OBJECTIVES• � Objectives•should be expressed as the effects, results, or accomplishments the project project is intended to produce. Objectives should be specific and i measurable, and indicate the expected impact of the project on the problem stated. ( � In writing objectives, the following guidelines should be observed: � I a. Ojectives should be expressed in terms of ineasurable. quant�ties; � b. Each objective should express a single idea. Brief, clear statements are helpful , and if key terms are likely to be mi'sunderstood, explain your definition of them. � c. Define the desired improvement or proposed activity as specifically I � , as possible. A helpful question to ask in writing an objective may be, "How will the target population`s problems have changed as a result of this project?" � � � d. Indicate the target area to be affected, or target group to be served � by the project. Specify the time frame in �rhich anticipated results � . or proposed activities are expected to occur. { ! � 1- Improve citizen�attitudes towards the criminal justice system by reducing their I "fear of crime"• � � ••� 2. Reduce the number of cases in which witnesses fail to appear in court• � 3• Increase the number of referrals by police agencies to the CVCC- ; 4• Distribute suitable resource mazerial describing CVCC service to all identified I � , individuals with hearing and visual impairments in Ramsey County• ,' � 5• Conduct at least one training session for each police agency in Ramsey County � • regarding sensitivity to the needs of individuals with hearing and visual im- pairments� particularly in skill building• 6• Increase the number of referrals by the City and County Attorney's Offices for � witness assistance. 7. Conduct ^outreach^ programs to groups representing individuals with physical handicaps� especially the visual and hearing impairment, regarding victim/ � . witness assistance• 8• Facilitate obtaining knowledgeable technical assistance {i,�e�� hearing inter- pretor} by offenders. with hearing impairments {or the parents, spouses or � children of such} using the resouces of St. Paul TVI. . . , � ( � � _ �_-.-�._..�..�.�..,. � -93- � . CJCC-011 � ST. PAUL-RAMSEY COUNTY PROJECT DESCRIPTION FORM CRIMINAL JUSTICE COORDINATING COUNCIL FY 1980 � NEW PROJECT MAJOR ACTIVITIES: List the major activities anticipated b.y the project and indicate � their relationship to the project's objectives. Also list major products of each task and expected time period for each. TASK I - EXTENSION�OF SERVICE TO THE VISUALLY IMPAIRED � 1. To identify and document the quantity, nature and extent of contact individuals � with visual impairments have with the criminal justice system in Ramsey County• � � � 2. To identify, plan and develop a means for providing victim/witness assistance to � individuals with visual impairments who come into contact with the criminal justice system within Ramsey County• � 3• To implement a model program based upon the information and plan developed above• 4. To prepare and distribute suitable informational materials to individuals with visual impairments within Ramsey County describing the criminal justice system and the victim/witness assistance program• � 5. To work' with individual police agencies, particularly to develop means �y which individuals with visual impairments may serve as ^eye witnesses^ in the event they may have information of assistance to police agencies• TASK II - EXTENSION OF SERVICES TO THE HEARING IMPAIRED � 1,• To identify and document the quantity, nature and extent of contact individuals with hearing impairments have with the criminal justice system in Ramsey County• � 2� Identify, plan and develop a means for providing victim/witness assistance to individuals with hearing impairments who come into contact with the criminal justice system in Ramsey County. � - 3• To implement 'a model program based upon the information and plan developed above• 4• To develop and prepare suitable materials geared to understandable language levels - {stressing high interest/low vocabulary approaches} for individuals with hearing � , impairments regarding v'ictim/witness assistance, and general information regarding . the criminal justice system• _ 5• To assist police agencies and City/County prosecution staff in developing means ' to work with and understand the needs of individuals with hearing impairments. � 6• To assist offenders with hearing impairments {or the spouses, parents or children of such} in gaining access to knowledgeable legal assistance on a timely basis• TASK III - IDENTIFICATION OF OTHERS WITH SIGNIFICANT HANDICAPS � 1- To identify and document the extent of contact individuals with other significant STA� &l�b�R�tE�OUf�ta1 Li s�ta an�i c�pa�eh��s�t��f ��i��sa'�d �'�i�l��e�r'�'e�minal each. Also lsit other organizations, agencies, boards or groups which will be � involved in the project. • This program contemplates the addition of one principal victim worker {a new position � title} to serve as a skilled worker with the hearing impaired• This individual must have skills as an interpretor of/for the deaf- This program contemplates the addition of one victim worker to participate in the � extension of regular services county-wide• ' Additional resources include c1QSe working cooperation with the Minnesota Foundation for Better Hearing and Speech, the Continuing Education for Deaf Adults unit of the � Saint Paul Technical Vocational Institute, and the United Blind of Minnesota, Inc•� all of whom participated in the development of this proposed program• � ------- - -94- i � PROJE�T DESCRIPTION FORM � Page 4.a MAJOR ACTNITIES {Continued} � 'ustice s stem in Ramse Count • J Y Y Y 2. To develop a plan responsive to any problems identified in Step 1. � TASK N - EXTENSI4N OF GENERAL SERVICES COUPJTY-WIDE , 1• To extend the regular services of the Crime Victim Crisis Center on a � cost-effective basis county-wide, including, where feasible� child care ( arrangements, transportation, crime scene assistance to victim, family contacts, and the like• � 2- To develop working relationship with the Ramse�r County Sheriff's Depart- ment and the police agencies in Mounds View, New Brighton, Maplewood, North St• Paul, Roseville, and White Bear Lake. 3. To establish a suburban Ramsey County satellite office, preferably in � a city where the Municipal Court regularly holds sessions• � � � � � � � � � � � � -95- �JCC-UII + � � � ST. PAUL-RAMSEY COUN7Y , PROJECT DESCRIPTION FORM CRIMINAL JUSTICE COORDIMATING COUPlCIL FY 1980 NEW PROJECT � 1. Briefly state the intended impact this project will have on improving the � criminal justice system (i .e. corrections, courts, law enforcement and juvenile justice) or controlling crime in St. Paul-Ramsey County. To enhance the cooperation of witnesses in criminal prosecutian through the ex- � tension of personal services, and to lessen the harmful impactS of a criminal act - upon the victim, who also may be a w.itness• Special attention will 6e given to ' individuals with handicaps• � 2. Provide a five year cost projection for this project. i It is contemplated that the proc�am will cost � in its first year, $ in its second year and $ in its third ` and final year. Contlnuation funding for the program will- depend i�n part upon the use made of the service by handicapped individuals� � 3. Have alternative funding sources for this prpject been sought? If yes, proYide details and outcome. � Funding for a major portion of services provided by the Crime Victim Crisis Center comes through the resources of the Minnesota Department of Corrections• � 4. Identify the agency, unit of government or organization which will consider funding this project after its LEAA eligibility has expired. � It is expected that Ramsey County, the City of Saint Paul and the major suburban � cities within the County will be asked to participate in funding the program, � • dependent upon the level and extent of services provided to residents in each. area served• . � 5. If the project is within City or County s�ructure: Was project included in the agency or department's annual budget request? If yes, why was it denied? If no, � why was it not requested at that time? Not applicable• � • � � � � � I certify that the information given in this Project Descri.ption Form is true and � accurate, to the best of my knowledge. � DATE: � ' � � u orize igna ure -96- �, � St. Paul-Ramsey County CJCC � FY 1980 LEAA Plan fPROGRAM 23: Crime Opportunity Reduction Systems This program area seeks to study factors related to the occurences of crime, in � order to form strategies designed to decrease opportuntiies for criminal behavior, thereby reducing crime. � PROBLEM: An awareness of crime prevention has become more evident among community groups in both suburban and St. Paul neighborhoods. New comnunity programs and increased requests for information and training are among the � indications of this concern. The St. Paul Team Police Program has prompted further citizen interest in working with the police. Similar information is not yet avail- � able from Roseville's approach to a team police effort, however. The Criminal Justice Coordinating Council Problem Identification Survey (1977) indicated that improving the public's awareness of crime prevention � responsibilities was a key element in making any signifi- � cant improvements in reducing the crime rate (72 percent of those responding). The CJCC Goals Setting Conference � concluded with a high priority emphasis on co�nunity based crime prevention programning. GOALS: 1 . to work with government and �planning officials to � develop long-range crime prevention strageties, 2. to seek information as to the concerns and interests � of neighborhood areas regarding problems of criminality in the specific neighborhoods, � 3. to encourage comnunity groups to establish crime pre- vention programs in response to specific identified problems, and � 4. to monitor and evaluate crime prevention strategies. STRATEGY: For FY 1980 no project has been included in the Annual � Action Plan. A lengthy and intensive planning effort has recently been completed which developed a St. Paul Community Public Safety/Crime Prevention Plan and a grant application for federal LEAA discretionary funds. � The program recorrunendations emphasize revision of City policies and procedures to be more supportive of public safety/crime prevention concerns and a city wide project � implemented through the Police Department to generate community based crime prevention projects in conjunction with the St. Paul District Councils. Development of crime prevention curriculum for upper elementary and � junior high students was also recommended. � � -97- � St. Paul-Ramsey County CJCC FY 1980 LEAA Plan � RELATIONSHIP TO � STATE AND REGION: The problem statements and goals are consistent with the State Crime Control Planning Board updated 1978 Plan and the Metropolitan Development Guide's Law and Justice � Chapter. PROJECT MONITORING: Monitoring will be the responsibility of St. Paul- Ramsey County CJCC. Coordinating Council staff will � also develop a program monitroing and evaluation system, TECHNICAL ASSISTANCE: Assistance will be provided by Coordinating Council � staff. LEAA FUNDING: Not Applicable � � i - � � � �t � � � � � -98- � � � , St. Paul-Ramsey County CJCC FY 1980 LEAA Plan � PROGRAM 24: Family Violence This program area seeks to promote coordination among services concerned with afamily violence; and to provide services such as training and education for families with problems. � PROBLEM: There has been lacking in Ramsey County a fully coor- dinated approach on the part of public and private agencies to serving clients from violent family � situations. Eve� the types and number of agencies or actors involved must be seen more broadly than before, to include beyond social service and welfare agencies the school systems, police departments, medical repre- � sentatives, the judiciary prosecution services, cor- rections, and community groups. As resources increase, they must be made aware of and work with existing � services. As an example, a special project within the Ramsey County Welfare Department, Adolescent Abuse Intervention, coordinates counseling services with the � school systems to provide more comprehensive attention I � to abused adolescents. GOALS: 1 . to encourage and support family violence projects � based upon coordination of existing services and improving existing services, 2. to encourage and support projects that would identify � and fill gaps in services for violent families, and 3, to encaurage services for .all family members involved � in violent situations. STRATEGY: For FY 1980 no projects have been included in the Annual Action Plan addressing this program other than the � second year Adolescent Abuse Project, further described in Program Area 1 . � RELATIONSHIP TO STATE AND REGION: The problem statements and goals are consistent with the State Crime Control Planning Board updated 1978 Plan and � inherently consistent, although not addressed, with the Metropolitan Development Guide's Law and Justice Chapter. PROJECT MONITORING: Not Applicable � TECHNICAL ASSISTANCE: Not Applicable � LEAA FUNDING: Not Applicable � � -99- � � � � � , APPENDIX A � � CROSS-CHARGE INFORMATION � and � ATTACHMENT A � , � , , � � � , � St. Paul-Ramsey County CJCC FY 1980 LEAA Plan � � Z O N N � N O N N � 3 W w w w . J � 00 d' M N O � W 64 tA � , N O C1 O� M � F- N �D Q1 00 (Y� (, w w w • � W 00 00 tD � � r— C�' M e— � � � U b4 64 i � Z 0 O ¢ �"' � (,� � Cl Cl � O O J U M 1`� � C� o--� Q Z F— i� 1� � M W N I� M e— N W C> > � r � 1-- � � � _ ¢ b9� iy4 U d N O O � , � � U � L�.. O � W F�- 7 O O� � O C� O �--� t0 Q1 � 01 � 1— t0 c'� O � � U Q1 00 00 M � � L�f'f ^ G e� r- � ''� C � d er� a4 � , a e � E +�-� C W � � �� Q +� N tn +� F- r� � rp Z � �� O� F-' a' eL v1 U �C � C_ � , -1�0- � St. Paul-Ramsey County CJCC � FY 1980 LEAA Plan � O O n 00 � � M O O O , a rn o o N M � c� o 0 0 0 � N �A �y' d1 M M r- ^ w w w w l0 �.f) L1) � O d' N N � '- Q1 N �t' N N �A � 44 � � O O � 00 �A � M O O O O i C1 O O � M O N O O O O O U W N �A �' 01 M �- �- lD � tl� O � � w w w � w � � it' N N tt '- r- N � N N ►n e- � a � O �, W H , N W o. a rn o o rn �.n o rn � o 0 0 0 � O O O d� I� N N � O O O O � � M O N 01 O 1� N 00 O O O O w w w w w w w � N w I� �n M 00 �t O 00 N �n u") O O � ^ � � 00 N M. M Op � d� p1 M H � �' 44 O � a a _ t/) F.. � O O I� O O 1� N O O O O Z q O� O O �-- � O 1� t0 O O O O a � E a E 00 O O 00 i� N d� O O O O O � � w w � w � �r s � � � O CO ^ l0 r- N N O O O �"'� CO �n �t O N � �h O� �n �n O c�'� w = � H U � � 2 � W Q 3 � � F~- �C Q O U +� .1-� N •r � C � � +"� �� 1 V1 N N N N � W � � N O O O N d � � � � �r E-� r7 C� U •� •� •� C +-� +� +� +� +� . Q � � L � �"'� � 'N O N N N N N p�„ � � 4- � U U U +� N N N N tn � •� C C •r •� ,� Z � C W W 'C 'p � � tA N N N N � > 3 3 •� n n i O O O O O f- � � � '� 'Q '� O i i. i i S. V 7 J _! ¢ Q Q U U U C.) C� C.) � Q � Q � W G�19 (�� W � �-- r- f+7 C+7 �A 00 O � ~ Q j '"' � �"' � � � N N N N N �..1 4� '� c � a � +� o c � � v1 'Q �C +� � �U c cn E ++ c � ro +� c a� •�- �o s a� � a� � •° +-� � � N C � i� N +� U O i-� C N C� � � N C •r C � �C> f0 C � � � "C C •r- � � +� � O E N �n �O a W Q O S- O C L �F N N N � �•r � � +•� ''- O•r 4J Q N N +-� � C rtS +� Q1 � � r6 � � � i-> 'O U +-� N � i. •� > rC r0 O i-�N U C �O 41 �O L � �' � U U -I-1 (n N O f0 W � C •r •�- U O C� •� N r �O N �C.� f0 C E N � R7 3�Cf r N N N C � C U U C•� �O E E E i� Q �7 r U � i-� � r•r r �1 � � L r- •� •� L � L �r- U O� i�•r 4- O � r- � � � � S. S. � r O O d rC 4- � (�cn C � O O O O O L G! GJ'O i. O i � Q C i- •e-tn � Q � d U U N Q U d �--� tn ►-�N �Q � (> jc dc �c i� -101- , � , , � � � APPENDIX B � , RAMSEY COUNTY � 1979 COMMUNITY CORRECTIONS PLAN � STATEMENT OF NEEDS � � , , � , � , � � , � , Statement of Need � The extensive review process described earlier identified many needs in the correctional system. Also used in the review was an initial needs assessment , based on the clientele of each program. Of particular importance are the needs identified for clients as they enter the mainstream of the correctional system. The juvenile and adult court divisions' assessments of needs are the only areas where all mainstream correctional clients' needs are assessed. , The charts on the following pages identify the ongoing and unmet needs to be provided for by each program recommended for £unding. These charts identify � the program, the number of clients served during 1977, and the anticipated needs to be served in 1979. These services are essentially the same as those provided during 1978. , , 1979 STe1TE:'�`T OF .\'�i:D� �:unber 19%7 Ongoine and (inma� ;:eeds Io 2a �a� p�p�,y�•; Cliancs Servad ?:ovldad For 'In LY79 , Su�porC S•�st�::�s: CCD Adeainis�ration r�. PLJVit�2 nacessary infor:nat:on co decisLUn-makera �. Cc+-�unicace ide�s for :ekislacion an1 nau pcogra�s C. E3tablish Jep�rtraii: ^,�1i�Y' D. 'lain[ain cor+r�tnicacion .in:l re:a[ionships � E. Courdin�ca ivad�d prokrams F. Przpare• and manage che budgec G. i�aep currelc on sc��e and na�ianal crand� in correc�ions. , caa �.iainiscraCive ?.. Reseacch, coordinace aad provica in:or:natioa .��Q�y_�� 3. Sacracarial sarc:cas: nia�=2=. 3ztnCas, cor:espor.- dence, mailing, Ei!in;, scnedulic:� C. '+�rite reports� L2CC2I5, scaEE •:ork foc ra1:�<<•<� Councy Board appoinced :om..-�ictaes , D. Place CAB accions on tha County Board abendas. , rou�e and �rack C.�f1 proposals chrough che Ca8 and County Board Com-.i[tee syste^�s E. RepresenC cht CaB Chair:nan, Conmi�te� Chairpersons � ac re:acad saecings and functions. �oort Divisien: Adulc Rasource a. Inforsacion and re�erral (Coordinacion) Caordinacor B. Evaluacion/�nonitor , C. Special requescs ^ D. Purchase oc sarvice conc:acCs E. S.�.V.E, teierrals Juvanile :asauree :�. accend ouc-o:-�o,e plzcer..ent scaccinys Coacdinacor B. �ollecc, record. and sand ou� pLacec.anc inEor.:aci�n , for paymaac C. Collecc and pas� un resou:ce inEo rlaciun and resourca moni�oring D. �ssisc in �el:arz or pLscemenc ?roblaRs , E. assisc in reiarral and placemenc Planning and �rogram �. ?lannin3 coordina�ion and dirzccion Developnen[ . B. PLanniag procuc:s C. ��aEfinz oE ceT�:c.ees and teams D. :��2N pragrac� da:'elopman: , E. Objeccive se:tin¢ Group Hone Prugran ?'7 cliaacs �. ?lacert:enC assistar.ce 3. ?ra:ain5 oi �arencs. P.O.s. ecc. C. Supervise azoup home paren: - P•0. ralacionsni? , p: i.acrui[ anu cerci:, 'noces � ?;e�arz pro�ram scacis[:cs, newslac�e:, anC rapor�� to ad�inisc:acioa � -1�2- . , C.?.0. Probra� �Q7 jt:CdR112 :�. :W:il: .'ri�na , cliacic3 3. r.ai� �:ich pco:�lar..a C. °:ovide clioi;:as snd 11CernaCices D. 5a_.er ralatior.,hia viCh Eani:y E. Help vitti court appearances an� legal Guastions , Training and a. .'.dr.tiniste: cne �ta�c davalopr,.ent pcogrsr.. Davelopaanc . assisc a^p:0�'225 :+i�h individual davelopaenc plans • C. ConduGC neaJs assessnent D. Co�duc: crainin5 rro3ra,r.s c. Provid� consulca:ioo co aar.agavs , r. Jevelop a resourca cencar 2esearch and a. ?tana¢��enc .epor:s •.ri[n clianc su.:r..a:� :ntar.ac:ou Evaluacion :or �iecision-�akrrs � 3. �z?orts �n cliznc-:alac�d accivicy for daparcRan; , , �upervisors and lina s�aif C. :esource �onitcrin; D. ?lannin: .�nd proe:an ada:nisc:atiun E. D�c.�iLed ciiar.c iaiot:�acioa repocts as L2QLL25C2u � or required. Juvenila Svscars: P:= C.;urc ?`»sa cs.. '�%° Cliant� Youcn Sarv.ice 3.OU3 c.iencs :1. Fa-i1: prol�iars 1,_30 Bureaus B. Sc:iool �r:'�:.rs �i0 , C. 'ecli .cob:eas =10 D. �ru� ;bcse 370 2. �-nlu�-er.t 1,0�� Ju•:zn:lc ..�:r:. _ �' _�i:r: , G�ntar ��:�CL::_:U:l) ♦i:�� ILiC:IC� .�. ."lliCd t�.scv::. �.-,-;) . �„u�;. C�O[i1:Ai a:;u 5i:eicdr i, �U l'.. ��•'i::::�I SC�'t�C25 :,_�1:) , D. 3acreac:en:,l sarvices 1,!JJ C. 5�:001 52CV1C25 037 � C,-��i: i't i52 - - � � - .� Ju�anila Sa:�;i_t 1":� :.. 5,:;:.:res co ci:a ,:.�:: � Centar (Cuurc/ B. 1::�ndanc� ac :�2a:i:i�.; Resource Cnit C. Trus�s and ninor :�arriayes , C_st-�uu:: ?ii.�5._ , Ju�:eniie Ceu:[s =�=" 1. Super:isic�!a:a„�r._abi:iCy/Ii�ics !,i��) Divi�iun i,. ::.�n�r.;l 1i•.in„ _...�:� 1,'..) �.. SC:l�ld L1V:As SI_udCLJ1 :.��= D. Educarional/voca�icnal assiscance 1,==9 E. Chenical dapendency Craac-enC +3� , Vocacional Snrvices 391 a. �'ocational Couns•=1i13 =13 3. Evaluation (in[ecesc and aoili�y) :y'- C. E^oloqr..anc 11: � J. T^sinin� - :o�a�icn.11 ��;a � c:. Hi3ii Scnool PLannia.-GEJ %9 Boys Tocem To�r 231 A. ramily :iza ecuca�ion couneeliaa %0 d. Jucac�cnal sa r:ices �� C. Sur�ieat li:_ ski:ls =�1 , D. Li.� pr��l•1�-osoi•:in� s�ilis =�: E. �Ca�Ia st:u::curcl Liviati si�uaciar.� :n.znsi:•� 7s.: :J-�J pe: ya.;r ::�:c•sra :un�c.i TreacWanc Group cior..a :'i Sea Su�oo:C 2:o�ra::s , lou[:� .�dvucacas ieJ :l. Ccunsaiins and s::ppor: ��0 � 3. cauca[ionai assis.ance -JJ C. Se[arrals [o ��propriaca a.;ancias ��Q , D. Greacar availaoi:i:� oi aduca[ional al.araacives �� F. 2art-cira voc'� _00 Ctnar Ou_-�;:- �o' �:aliara iu:�ad Hcze Pi1C2'211CS , Scaca Co,�:i�r,.an.s -5 S�zce Cvr:_..iur.s J.S.C. C.-c:: Ir.ce:- ...:;. ... :+.ora :a.�ii ir.[ar:en.:oa =u V2tIC10ft flZJ6Z3� �. L52 CC _'�.1.2 d22:;C? .25OU:•7�3 -%i C. :2'+2: ::OI:L_ fl2dC1:C�> C0: 5��2�L2�.�. ,�'LL:1--''� , -103- � , � Atult S�s�er..s °ra-Court Phasa Projact tenand o,�8» cliencs A. Sc:aeain2 91� , a, gail =valuati>ts S,�b9 C. �lcuhol and .i:ug treatzenc D. Rasic sucvival needs S� E. `tencal Healch Counselin� 19� r. Jub counseling - refarral 21� , G. �escieucion >> ' H. c�esidancial crea:-anc T.a.S.C. Pre- »i9 a. Pte-trial chemical dependancy evaluacion 4�9 • 'Irial B. Treacaenc recocrmendaciuns �79 , C. Raferrai 479 ddulc -ourts Divisi:n I,373 �. E:cpLanation abouc ?Si 6+0 (Invas�iga�iva/Cour� 9. Coms:uni�y racerrai/c r_at-enc 3g� Gnits) C. C:�ar„ica: assessren� raiarrals 19� , D. °s�chiacric evsLuacion y6 'E. Accandar,ce ac cour; sencencings h4 F. Social Service 2,w04 G. Traiain:;, enplo�nen� .��" H. Chenical de�andznc�+ Craac;r.enc = ��4 , I. ::ancal heaLch and •+e1:ar_ :ece:rals =.�� J. Infor�atio� and educa:ion Z.'�'' 5.,�.:'.g. :.a _:0 Sae SuQpor[ 2rogra.:s Rasti[ution � :1�uLc Cuurts Post Cour[ r^ha-z Division i,i:.i �. Cour,salin� =•�''� B. :1;ency reEerra: 1,30J C. Jobs 8'� , D. ia:orr..;cior. �•��' . Surveillancz 1��"� �. �•o�din::Cion �ich scaca 371 :1d��ie C.�ur�s G. n•t�rral to eo-:muni�, rzsources 3?3 , �ivisiw� l.�tl:) ii. Councy input in pacoLt procass 373 D.W.L. Progza� 1,�i6 :\. Lnior.natiun ib��:c cour� process and �roKram 1.3%`� B. C:�amicvl De2a:t�cn�y ;.�se�s,en: �� C. Driv�re Licensa Zecurn I,3�3 , D. EduCaCion 1,373 rorkhousa 1,1'_ti .�. Custodial (Eoor: 5 HJ:iLd� 1,1-6 3. Case tiack Serv.ce 1. ='� C. Laadership-Daily Schedu:ing 1,1?6 D. Pri�ac� 1.1�� E. C4�nical Lnvo:va�an: la3 :lCulc Pur-yasa _9S :\. Fesidential cre:icr„anc Oi Sarvica li% rzsidenciai) 3. Che:r:cn1 .12�c':l�_ncp :�eac^enc 50 C. CounseLing (indi�:iduai aitu group) i7 , D. Vocationsl and educacional crsining and job 24J • assiscance E. In[zgracion o[ socia::y acceptabla living skills ;i T.a.S.C. Pose- 123 .�. Cnez�ical depandenc;+ c:aac-enc 1_3 , Trial B. Surveillance 86 C. Incznsive Cuunselinq Serviee 1=3 S�aca Cut�.vit;.:ancs L'9 Stace Gor:ec[ions � OCiier: ljy Dor..ascic �alatior.s =6» a. ilaZia:ion counselia3 3. Custody iavasci5acions -6 C. Visi[:.c�or.s inces�i�ttions ��'� D. ccaiva[ion invas:i,:�tion =� , _3 c. Raiacrai , , , -104-