Loading...
273284+ WHITE - CITV CLERK � �,���^� PINK - FINANCE � � �� CANARV - DEPARTMENT G I TY OF SA I NT PAIT L COIZTICIl BLUE - MAVOR File NO• Council Resolution Presented By Referred To Committee: Date Out of Committee By Date WHEREAS, The St. Paul City Council approved submission of the St. Paul Neighborhood Team Policing grant application in Resolution #270797 on March 28, 1978; and WHEREAS, St. Paul has applied to the Minnesota Crime Control Planning Board for an LEAA grant for the project known as St. Paul Neighborhood Team Policing to be implemented by the St. Paul Police Department from July 1 , 1979 through December 31 , 1979; and ' WHEREAS, The St. Paul Neighborhood Team Policing project decentralizes the St. Paul Police De�artment and improves police relations with the St. Paul citizenry; and t�lHE�tEAS, The Minnesota Crime Control Planning Board has approved an LEAA grant in the amount of $192,182 for this proj�ct, to be match by $10,677 in State (LAC) funds and $117,808 local funds; Now, Therefore, Be It RESOLVED, That the St. Paul City Council hereby accepts the grant award for the project entitled St. Paul Neighborhood Team Policing; and Be It Further RESOLVED, That the proper City Officials are hereby authorized to execute such agreements as are necessary to accept the grant award and to implement the project; and Be It Further - � RESOLVED, That the twenty (20) page grant agreement is made a part hereof by reference and is on file in the office of the St. Paul Finance Department; and Be It Further RESOLVED, That authorization is hereby granted to provide $117,808 as local match funds for the purpose of operating this project from account number 34100, Police Consolidation and Management. `"��; COUNCILMEN Yeas Nays Requested by Department of: ST. PAUL-RAMSEY COUNTY ��' In Favor CRIMINAL JUSTICE COORDINATING COUNCIL Hozza Hunt I.evine __ Against BY -��X athryn Ack nd, Coord nator Showalter �� �� 5 �7� Form p�ove Git r Adopted by Council: Date � Certified a:- Council cre ry BY v p d by (4lavor. — JU� 6 1979 APP ved by Mayor for Su is on to Council s _ BY . �t.tS1tED J U L 1 4 1979 �'�4���� ~ MAYOR GEORGE LATIMER SAIHT PAUL -- RAMSEY COUNTY Co-Chairman • CRIMINAL JUSTICE COORDINATING COUNCIL COMMISSIONER WARREN SCHABER �4Z2 Clty HaII AflflE.'X Co•Chairman 25 W. Fourth Street � St. Paul, Minnesota 55102 KATHRYN ACKLAND Coordinotor (612) 298-5652 �O� MEMORANDUM Jru �y fC` t� / T0: St. °aul City Council Members a� e���- FROM: Mark Lofstrom 'lrl� SUBJECT: �lcceptance of LEAA Grant Aa�ard, Team Policing, grant period July 1, 1979 to December 31, 1979. The Minnesota Crime Control Planninq Board has forwarded a proposed grant award contract to St. Paul for this 1979 project. St. Paul must agree to the proposed contract before the grant funds are disbursed. This memorandum is designed to assist you in making an informed decision on whether to accept the grant award. A. St. Paul-Ramsey County Criminal Justice Coordinating Council staff, in its review, recommends that the St. Paul City Council accept this grant award. B. Program summary: See attached paqes from grant application C. Staff Review: 1. Anticipated source of future support (other than LEAA) City of St. Paul 2. Projected client load Population of St. Paul 3. What is overall system impact? See Interim Evaluation Report, Part I : Nine months of Team Police Implementation, pp 31 - 32 , 40, 62 issued by Team Police Evaluation Unit, 6-30-78* 4. What are lonq ranqe budoet implications if pro4ram is part of a city/county agency? $30 - 50,000/ yr. for operation of six Team Unit office sites. The on-going costs of 18 police officers also could be a factor. *Copies of the report have been distributed to City Council members by the Mayor' s Office. �O -2- 5. What is nature/extent of intraqovernmental support? Not applicable 6. What is nature/extent of intergovernmental support? Not applicable i. What is proqram relationship to private agencies? Team Units cooperate fully with neighborhood programs such as the Crime Uictim Crisis Center and the Summit-University Crime Preven- tion Project. 8. Is the project coordinated with other relevant resources? Yes, extensive contact with neighborhood groups to establish more effective working relationships (see pp. 41 = 44 of Team Police Interim Evaluation Report) . 9. Does the project avoid duplication with any currently availa6le services? Yes 10. Are project goals consistent with S�. Paul- Ramsey County CJCC . og al s? Yes 11. Is the implementing agency for this project an appropriate agency, given the goals of the project? Yes 12. (CONTINUATION GRANT) Based upon the summary of proqress, monitoring reports, evaluation or other materials, has the pro�ect demonstrated reasonable progress toward the goals and ob�ectives that were agreed upon? Yes 13. CONTINUATION GRANT) Are any intended revisions justifiable based upon information above? Not applicable 14. Does the budget appear comparable to similar projects or activities? Yes 15. Is the selected approach an appropriate alternative for resolving the identified problem? Yes -3- 16. Does this project represent a new approach for the area? Yes D. Grant application financial information STATE CITY PRIVATE LEAA MATCH (LAC)� MATCH MATCH TOTAL Original Request 192,182 10,667 117,808 -0- 320,667 CJCC Approved 192,182 10,667 117,808 -0- 320,667 County Approved 192,182 10,667 117,808 -0- 320,667 CCPB Award 192,182 10,667 117,808 -0- 320,667 E. Changes in program design since last approved by the St. Paul City Council : None �:. � Council _ ��T� CLERK �A I NT �AII L File N�• WH�TE �� I'I Y OF �IANARY - D'EPAR MENT • BLUE - MA�OR Council Reso ution Presented Qy Committee: Date Refecred To Date 0 u t o f Comm i ttee F3y----------- 't Council approved submission of the St. Paul Neighborhoo WHEREAS, The St. Paul Ci y lication in Resolution #270797 on March 28, 1978; and or an ! Team Policing grant app goard f ' to be implemented r lied to the Minnesota Crime Control Plann�ng WHEREAS, St. Paul has app h December 31 , 1979; and for the project known as St. Pau11Ne�979°th°Y,ougTeam Polic�ng LEAA grant artment from July � py the St. Paul Police Dep 6JHEREAS, The St. Paul Neighborho od Team Policing project decentralizes the St. Paul olice relations with the St. Paul citizenr.y; and '!, Police Department and improves p goard has approved an LEAA grant in � 10,677 in State (LAC) funds and � WHEREAS, The Minnesota Cr oeeC�ntto� belmatchgby $ � the amount of $192,182 for Therefore, Be It Now, rant award �or the $117,808 local funds; Council hereby accepts the g '1 .� and Be It Further RESOLVED, That the St. Paul City P roject entitled St. Paul Neighborhood Team Policing� b authorized to execute suchd ro er City Officials are here Y implement the project; an RESOLVED, That the pto accept the grant award and to agreements as are neCessary ge It Further reement is made a part hereof by � RESOLVED, That the twenty (20) page grant ag reference and is on file in th e office of the St. Paul Finance Department; and Be It Further police is hereby granted to provide �� umbe�r834100,Ca1 RESOLVED, Thauraose�ofZ perating this project from account n ; �� match funds for the p p Consolidation and Management. *� ;.- � ,,. ;• ,.��� �.: ;�' �*a,� '� ------------ Requested by Department of: ST pqUL-RAMSEY C —_-- COUNC'ILti4EN N�, .s CRIMINAL JUSTICE C ORDINATING OU CIL .G.;�.�, y Y eas � `•°w=a��' Butler �_ In Favor ,, , Hozza gy – � Hunt __._.___ Against Coord nator Levine athryn Ackl� nd, Maddox Cit t r Showalter Form prove G Tedesco ____---- – •_..� - Date — — BY pd�pted by Council: i �����'�h, •.� r R;.:�� Certified Yassed by, Council Secretary - ; ,� „�f fn� SubmiSSion to Council �•. _ ----- , ._ _. _ ._.�.___------- ------ -- -- -----__ _ � - ------_,.��_.._._.r_._� -----�. ___-- _. ._ I ` �._ _ ` �' s�rn�E o�� riz��,_�::s�_��, F�r.o���,c�� ���;cr:z�TZC:�r �.o:.�i ' ;, ' cKrr�:t. co::7�:;c,, F�r..r��:_ai::�; :�o�-�r� � ��ct; 2 �-.�_������4 ` ---__- ---__-=- ------ ---_-_-_�__.___-_—__-__—.,-___�---____ '• `'�.t�pA�. �i'r OJFCT Sl'i•ii�1ARY (Conti r�uecl; � ��a���� �'d4(' y.� A i:hird, and overriding, ohj�ctive �;:a, that �� c,-;;-eful asses�mei�t a��c1 e��aluaticn be made af t�dC�? $tE.'}:1 tdK°fl 111 (�1'OQt'dt11 1lii���c'I'�!?Ili u�.1C};l dllU' Cfii.i, f11'(ii C0;"i'�.`_'Clt`.$ F)° OffE'7'::Ci 7"L-�gaY'GIIIC� SUCiI St:��S. T�115 1tl�f:E'�yf'�t�_tC! 4?1"0�1'�lil E'.'Jd i l;3':;10?l Ct;;'1DOt�Eit1� 4•r;i`; JU I � t 1 f,�.0 I;r,� �!r'0;,�2i,t tU EiISUf'� �EIdL prud�n�; judye���c(itS COU'i� �2 1"E�.:C'i�i{ i�j� C"iL� OF'i 1C1���5 Y'egard�n� procir'GCfI et701"tS Ofl d t1.Tilc^_.ly basis. PFtOGRESS i 0 �,'�7E � �- All six 6) tea,���; dY'E' T101•l in t.f�eir r��p��ct;v�� tenm h��ad��.iarters anr; orerating. - E ighteen po? i ce offi cei,s have b,�n hi r•c:d fr�om t'r,e gr�eit a��d have gone �:flrou�f� tne pol i ce acade;ny and ar�e rot�r �:�or��i r�g cn ��:e streei. - Feedback r�ceiveu fro.n our acte�,�,�ts at �ncr�ea>eci �ro:�ucti�,�ity, co^;��:��!rity �ilTOY'Ce- n�Pr�t needs and r�so�,rce u i 1 oca�i,:,i� ha� b�en verv ��os i tive. - A noticeab',� lac� o-� cemplaii�±, ;_;airst �er,`�ice �nd irdivicu�l orf����ers , a drop of 50;�; i n SGr;i� �reas. v - The crime ratU for P�rt I ofren�es ror lhe fi r�': f�al r of 1973 i s �13.7`� 1 oti•;er tnar . f0Y' t;hC' f 1;^St i�al T� of 1 .-�.%7. i�l l S i S COfiS 1 S�°_!l'"i, �•(1 L�'I yi.Fl�? �1�.t'�,l Cr�ii� �1'�nG d^C Cd11110t: be ascribed solely to t�ain pc1 �cir:g. Januai�,-�?ur,^ Januar��-June Percent 19?7 197� Ciianqe Homic�iue 14 10 - 2�.� �apz �'s ��3 + 2u.8 Robbery 3�-'� 23° - 27.0 Aggra���ated A�suul� 402 339 - i 5.7 � uurclar•y �='i i 29��� - 13.7 7heft 43?_7 3897 - 9.9 P��otor Vehi cl e Tf�eft 10°5 707 - 29.:� TOTf;L 9v��? e?o5 - 13.7 ��r� r � `�' — � ;r: � i- ' ' �» - �i!`1 7t�i01'iil�i S�il o�y OT ��,iti �� Ui`"i 1C�1'', i�:J �.,;.�t� �. ��1Qfi G�Cj} r_� Of :,%.li..15fGCCi�n ��rith the team po i ice pregrar� ai��,o��g ti-�e offi cer�. ,� ;. �i _ �-n_ _, Y (, �y.., ^ � • ;.4nr� -� ' 'r '"�_ f - !fl_ �,1G7 1�... ,,1 � c .5 1•:�_. , � J._. , . . �G. t: ;,�1t�� „ �n ii _ r . i.i l�`' li;`� ,.i�2 �_: �:IC!_1f11��i2S lf-I 1•�iliC�l i;1i:?� d,".. 1�-�.. ,=';. " , �� 1 ., ��� ,l..i, , i:�1J�i . IICI l,t. , .,'i.:,:, I'1�'v'�. . ::4:i1 V�.'i'� �iU�ltl:�F'. - For a more deta.i 1 e� rev�i e�: of pr��?r�es, �o dat�� see the att�,c�;e:? ye�rly progress reports frora the s i x (6) �ea;r ccn���,:�rd��rs. ST�1r F �ee Attacfi!���ent G��r (`�n,��r n„ . . r\L _�Ul. .;�,r�,l . 7ne Geii�ral yo��l of Team Policing is to ir�ipt,ove the qualii;y of police services by ir,creasit�_r; tfil? i nter'dCi:1 C�fl b?t:;�G�l �?p� i C� �:nd ti�f.? C:vf1?::iU'1 i Ly ��Y'V�:G�. Tfli S Q''�?E'1'u� y0d; l•J'1 1� �� t'Gd�1 Z�?� i?;i �aC111t�V1tly ti�iCl„ {�1C +;jOdl.. I?i 1,;�.� fl,;iiC�.'liliij lU;;l� i.?�'-'C��i.�i�,� : �. ��C?..f?1 ;'�Itl(?Il�� l:!�c��� � . ` �Q i;1L'1't[��� �CiilliiilS�l'�ir��1� ii�,C��iillj,�?L�t ili,:'. �.�,.���� fd�i�J"l� Sl�i���'ARY (COntiilu�d� � �� - Pane 2.1 2. To increa.se participaticn ar,d r�,sE�c„>ibi� ity i�; decision making at lo:•ier con?mand levels. 3. 1'o ir��prove in terral cor;;��un�ca�i o,�s . • 4. To i;»prove job satis`action. I I. Co�r�murii ty In��olveT`nt Go�l s � 5. �0 inc.reasc� lt1t��t'�Ci:70t1 ��Jl tll Cl�17?!'.� �i;?G CO°".�1'•Uilli;�! �Jl"0!InS. 6. l�o i ncre��e the E:rio�;rl edge a;;oui; te�:��: at�eas by the pol i ce orfi ce�•s as s i 5ned to each team. 7. To increase police o�`ficer identification �ti �:h the people and reighborhoods in each team area. III . Police Perfor�,ance Gaals B. To im,�rove the effec�iveness of tr��:Jicional la�:: enforc�.r,;ei�� anG a;�prehension activitie�. 9. To increase the ari�ount of prouctiti�� (Cri�>?e preve�i±ive) patrol acii�rities. 10. Ta shii-t patrol aci:iv i ti�s -c.o fi ,. j:�:-� pi�iori ti es of qi I�f erent nei c;'r�borhoods and tear,s. IV. Citiz�n Resporse Goals 11 . To impro��e perceptions of yuality o� police service ard attitudes tc��:ard police. 12. To increase cooperatien of ci�ize��s ��ri�h police.