The URL can be used to link to this page

01-1033City of St. Paul COUNCIL FI NO. a�� 0 �3 RESOLUTION RATIFYING ASSESSMEN'P B �b 0 R I G I�I A L Fil No. 00WALKS2A Assessment No._0735 _ Voting Ward In the matter of the assessment of bene£its, cost and expenses for Sidewalk Reconstruction (Work already completed). 4 At 1860 Chelton Street (Laid over from September 19, 2001) Preliminary Order: 00-260 Final Order 00-351 approved: _March 22, 2000 approved: _April 12, 2001 A public hearing havinq been had upon the assessment for the above improvement, and said assessment having been further considered by the Council, and having been considered finally satisfactory, therefore, be it RESOLVED, That the said assessment be and the same is hereby in all respects ratified. RESOLVED FURTHER, That the said assessment be and it is hereby determined to be payable in One thru Twentv (20)equal installments. COUNCILPERSON Yeas Nays ✓�3enanav �lakey ✓Bostrom �/Coleman ✓Farris ✓Lantry f/�.e i ter Adopted by the Council: Date �.�. 3� p� Certified Passes by Council Secretary B�' � � � ^� ��s��s � In Favor O Against Mayor o�_ � e „ T.M.SJREAL ESTATE DIVISION Date: March 22,2001 Green Sheet Number: 1 � � � � 4 . ntac[ Person and Phone Num6er: EPARTMEN7' DIItECTOR CiTY COUNCII. Peter White 266-8850 `�� `�� UDGETDIRECI'OR OFFICEOFFINANCIAI,SVCS us[ be On Council Agenda by: YOR (OR ASSISfANT) 1 OUNCII, RESEARCH OTAL # OF SIGNATLTRE PAGES 1 (CLIP ALL LOCATIONS FOR SIGNATURE) CTION REQUESTED: blic hearing for the ratification of assessments for sidewalk improvements at 1860 Chelton Street �?` (Laid over from September 19, 2001.) �. ile No. OOWALKS2A ASSESSMENT NO. 0735 �� COMMENDATIONS: APPROVE (A) OR RR,TECT (R) ERSONAL SERVICE CON7'RACTS MUST ANSWER TIIE FOLLOWING: ' . Has the persodfum ever worked under a contract for this deparhnen[? YES NO . PLANNING COMMISSION A STAFF . Has this person/firm ever been a City employee? YES NO CIVR. SER V[CE COMhI65IO�Y � Y(? � . � /� . Does this person/firm possess a slNl not normaily possessed by any '� YES NO � current City employee? � , CIBCOMMITfEE j � . , Ex lain all YES aoswers on a se azate sheet and attach. [mrox�wFUCx comvcn, os,�cT�z Nei borhoods ' COUNCII. WARD(S) d DISTRICT PLANNING COUNCII, � � , TIATING PROBLEM, ISSUE, OPPORI'UNITY (Who, What, When, Where, Why?): � Project is complete. Ratification is necessary to begin to collect assessments to help pay for the project. �� ,$et DVANTAGES IF APPROVED: � � Same as above. '�� ISADVANTAGESIFAPPROVED: �- Benefitted property owners have assessments payable via property tai�es,, _�,,., °' ` ISADVANTAGES IF NOT APPROVED: , To not assess the benefits would be inconsistent with City policy. •�• � OTAL AMOSJNT OF TRANSACTION: COST/REVENUE BUDGETED (CIILCLE ONE) YES NO ACTIVITY N[JMBER: ING SOURCE: l INANCIAL IlVFORMATION: (EXPLAIl� - City of St. Paul COUNCIL FI NO. a�� 0 �3 RESOLUTION RATIFYING ASSESSMEN'P B �b 0 R I G I�I A L Fil No. 00WALKS2A Assessment No._0735 _ Voting Ward In the matter of the assessment of bene£its, cost and expenses for Sidewalk Reconstruction (Work already completed). 4 At 1860 Chelton Street (Laid over from September 19, 2001) Preliminary Order: 00-260 Final Order 00-351 approved: _March 22, 2000 approved: _April 12, 2001 A public hearing havinq been had upon the assessment for the above improvement, and said assessment having been further considered by the Council, and having been considered finally satisfactory, therefore, be it RESOLVED, That the said assessment be and the same is hereby in all respects ratified. RESOLVED FURTHER, That the said assessment be and it is hereby determined to be payable in One thru Twentv (20)equal installments. COUNCILPERSON Yeas Nays ✓�3enanav �lakey ✓Bostrom �/Coleman ✓Farris ✓Lantry f/�.e i ter Adopted by the Council: Date �.�. 3� p� Certified Passes by Council Secretary B�' � � � ^� ��s��s � In Favor O Against Mayor o�_ � e „ T.M.SJREAL ESTATE DIVISION Date: March 22,2001 Green Sheet Number: 1 � � � � 4 . ntac[ Person and Phone Num6er: EPARTMEN7' DIItECTOR CiTY COUNCII. Peter White 266-8850 `�� `�� UDGETDIRECI'OR OFFICEOFFINANCIAI,SVCS us[ be On Council Agenda by: YOR (OR ASSISfANT) 1 OUNCII, RESEARCH OTAL # OF SIGNATLTRE PAGES 1 (CLIP ALL LOCATIONS FOR SIGNATURE) CTION REQUESTED: blic hearing for the ratification of assessments for sidewalk improvements at 1860 Chelton Street �?` (Laid over from September 19, 2001.) �. ile No. OOWALKS2A ASSESSMENT NO. 0735 �� COMMENDATIONS: APPROVE (A) OR RR,TECT (R) ERSONAL SERVICE CON7'RACTS MUST ANSWER TIIE FOLLOWING: ' . Has the persodfum ever worked under a contract for this deparhnen[? YES NO . PLANNING COMMISSION A STAFF . Has this person/firm ever been a City employee? YES NO CIVR. SER V[CE COMhI65IO�Y � Y(? � . � /� . Does this person/firm possess a slNl not normaily possessed by any '� YES NO � current City employee? � , CIBCOMMITfEE j � . , Ex lain all YES aoswers on a se azate sheet and attach. [mrox�wFUCx comvcn, os,�cT�z Nei borhoods ' COUNCII. WARD(S) d DISTRICT PLANNING COUNCII, � � , TIATING PROBLEM, ISSUE, OPPORI'UNITY (Who, What, When, Where, Why?): � Project is complete. Ratification is necessary to begin to collect assessments to help pay for the project. �� ,$et DVANTAGES IF APPROVED: � � Same as above. '�� ISADVANTAGESIFAPPROVED: �- Benefitted property owners have assessments payable via property tai�es,, _�,,., °' ` ISADVANTAGES IF NOT APPROVED: , To not assess the benefits would be inconsistent with City policy. •�• � OTAL AMOSJNT OF TRANSACTION: COST/REVENUE BUDGETED (CIILCLE ONE) YES NO ACTIVITY N[JMBER: ING SOURCE: l INANCIAL IlVFORMATION: (EXPLAIl� - City of St. Paul COUNCIL FI NO. a�� 0 �3 RESOLUTION RATIFYING ASSESSMEN'P B �b 0 R I G I�I A L Fil No. 00WALKS2A Assessment No._0735 _ Voting Ward In the matter of the assessment of bene£its, cost and expenses for Sidewalk Reconstruction (Work already completed). 4 At 1860 Chelton Street (Laid over from September 19, 2001) Preliminary Order: 00-260 Final Order 00-351 approved: _March 22, 2000 approved: _April 12, 2001 A public hearing havinq been had upon the assessment for the above improvement, and said assessment having been further considered by the Council, and having been considered finally satisfactory, therefore, be it RESOLVED, That the said assessment be and the same is hereby in all respects ratified. RESOLVED FURTHER, That the said assessment be and it is hereby determined to be payable in One thru Twentv (20)equal installments. COUNCILPERSON Yeas Nays ✓�3enanav �lakey ✓Bostrom �/Coleman ✓Farris ✓Lantry f/�.e i ter Adopted by the Council: Date �.�. 3� p� Certified Passes by Council Secretary B�' � � � ^� ��s��s � In Favor O Against Mayor o�_ � e „ T.M.SJREAL ESTATE DIVISION Date: March 22,2001 Green Sheet Number: 1 � � � � 4 . ntac[ Person and Phone Num6er: EPARTMEN7' DIItECTOR CiTY COUNCII. Peter White 266-8850 `�� `�� UDGETDIRECI'OR OFFICEOFFINANCIAI,SVCS us[ be On Council Agenda by: YOR (OR ASSISfANT) 1 OUNCII, RESEARCH OTAL # OF SIGNATLTRE PAGES 1 (CLIP ALL LOCATIONS FOR SIGNATURE) CTION REQUESTED: blic hearing for the ratification of assessments for sidewalk improvements at 1860 Chelton Street �?` (Laid over from September 19, 2001.) �. ile No. OOWALKS2A ASSESSMENT NO. 0735 �� COMMENDATIONS: APPROVE (A) OR RR,TECT (R) ERSONAL SERVICE CON7'RACTS MUST ANSWER TIIE FOLLOWING: ' . Has the persodfum ever worked under a contract for this deparhnen[? YES NO . PLANNING COMMISSION A STAFF . Has this person/firm ever been a City employee? YES NO CIVR. SER V[CE COMhI65IO�Y � Y(? � . � /� . Does this person/firm possess a slNl not normaily possessed by any '� YES NO � current City employee? � , CIBCOMMITfEE j � . , Ex lain all YES aoswers on a se azate sheet and attach. [mrox�wFUCx comvcn, os,�cT�z Nei borhoods ' COUNCII. WARD(S) d DISTRICT PLANNING COUNCII, � � , TIATING PROBLEM, ISSUE, OPPORI'UNITY (Who, What, When, Where, Why?): � Project is complete. Ratification is necessary to begin to collect assessments to help pay for the project. �� ,$et DVANTAGES IF APPROVED: � � Same as above. '�� ISADVANTAGESIFAPPROVED: �- Benefitted property owners have assessments payable via property tai�es,, _�,,., °' ` ISADVANTAGES IF NOT APPROVED: , To not assess the benefits would be inconsistent with City policy. •�• � OTAL AMOSJNT OF TRANSACTION: COST/REVENUE BUDGETED (CIILCLE ONE) YES NO ACTIVITY N[JMBER: ING SOURCE: l INANCIAL IlVFORMATION: (EXPLAIl� -