The URL can be used to link to this page

01-1029City of St. Paul RATIFYING ASSBSSMSNT ��' e?l��t�,� COUNCIL FILE NO. �� By � Fi e No. EE BELOW Assessment No. SEE BELOW Ah.�.�.�..�,_ o�t, a,�oo� Voting Ward In the matter of the assessment of benefits, cost and expenses for 2 JOlOSVl (0926) q.sl�wa.ssseccw�en�io � # les .ao p�,,,� .t�.e, # ys,no i�r o:av i��. ir. f,..+s�..11 au scc �ns+�et' o� J0102G1 (0927) Towing of an abandoned vehicle from private property at 376 Maryland Ave East. (LLGISLATIVE HEARING WILL BS 9-25-01) �'/Iro.O � . Grass cutting (by private contractor) at 664 Edmund Ave. (L$GISLATIV& HEARING WILL BS 10-02-01) BOTH WBRE LAID OVF3R BY COUNCIL ON 9-19-01 TO 10-03-01 4a A public hearing having been had upon the assessment for the above improvement, and said assessment having been further considered by the Council, and having been considered finally satisfactory, therefore, be it RESOLVED, That the said assessment be and the same is hereby in all respects ratified. RBSOLVED FURTASR, That the said assessment be and it is hereby determined to be payable in One equal installments_ COUNCILPERSON Yeas Nays ✓Benanav �lakey ✓�3ostrom ✓Coleman ✓fiarris ✓Lantry �Feiter Adopted by the Council: Date p.�, 3 a.p e� Certified Passes by Council Secretary By �_ � . f'� l � �In Favor �� QAgainst Mayor City of St. Paul Real Estate Division Dept. of Technology & Management Serv RSPORT OF COMPLSTION OF ASSSSSMENT COUNCIL FILE NO. File No. SEE BELOW Assessment No. SEE BELOW � � �� 0�9 Voting Ward In the matter of the assessment of benefits, cost and e�enses for 2 JOlO5V1 (0926) Towing of an abandoned vehicle from private property at 376 Maryland Ave East. (L&GISLATIVE HEARING WILL BL 9-25-01) J0102G1 (0927) Grass cutting (by private 664 Edmund Ave. (LEGISLATIVB HEARING WILL contractor) at BE 10-02-01) BOTH WERE LAID OVER BY COUNCIL ON 9-19-01 TO 10-03-01 To the Council of the City of St. Paul The Valuation and Assessment Engineer hereby reports to the Council the following as a statement of the expenditures necessarily incurred for and in connection with the making of the above improvement, viz: Total construction costs Engineering and Inspection Real Estate Service Fee Process Serving Charge Charge-Code Enforcement Abatement Service Charge TOTAL EXPENDITURES Charge To Net Assessment $322.10 $ $ $ $50.00 $40.00 $412.10 $412.10 Said Valuation and Assessment Engineer further reports that he has assessed and levied the total amount as above ascertained, to-wit: the sum of $412.10 upon each and every lot, part or parcel of land deemed benefited by the said improvement, and in the case of each lot, part or parcel of land in accordance with the benefits conferred thereon; that the said assessment has been completed, and that hereto attached, identified by the signature of the said Valuation and Assessment Engineer, and made a part hereof, is the said assessment as completed by him, and which is herewith submitted to the Council for such action thereon as may be considered proper. // /J Dated 7-�s�� •. �,-,� �luation and Assessment Engineer w � � a � 7 a W C� � N N 0 a H E � Q 5 O O h E U W O a a a 0 w E � N H p a � z /� H `{� Q w s "� 1 • z � m � O a a O � H U � H a 5 � a � � o � 0 m 0 � N t � . �m � N Q i O I H i O i I � i N i E�N a� � [i] i N a�N 0 a �o� a�N � a, i � N 1 1 (q I O O O II O 1 I ei O O II �-i 1 2 i • n • � i P ul o II N� � � C N N 11 O� � i N Lr 11 N� ; N 11 i? 1 � n a � n F � ii i O � II � Q i IIO � W II � � � i CA � 000 � H i o0o N i H i O O O T � i .i 0 0 � i 1 • 1 � rl `1 ' a �e� � � O�N E � i a� � w w�000 � � 000� i i000 i � ��,o p F � N N H i � � I O 1 I � I I 1 i r i � i iW i �a �v � i � w x w �d�>ww z �zww o� � ��d�a � a � mor� � w �C �C v, � 1 O I I ; � 0 � y � � z� o � •� � H F i � � a •• � H 1 [xj a�z F � Uio O � m��-+ z o 0 o n o W� F ti o o n� °;o � d, ��;o��N E� K W O � N+/T L} II N a� aN � � n� a�Emam � ii a � m « x i n L1H� II a �W� 3 � ii � � n � n � n i n �� " o �� o � W n � c o i a n � O W io I M II a�a nmo� x wn � � N -. � >ww ii a i rL�u�i4]O � 2wG7 ii a � a q�n2 � O U II r.� � a 2 4C �n � Gl 7i � II [� E i 7Q2.7Q � 2i-a> n O C� ON�CC7 � 0.�1A W il E o��naa�qz� aamnH i H ] H 1 II U a u a o� aaanw w�� a io z� RL RC �¢ n ri 3� nHMa� OOOiia O w rvi ul +« i F E E ii a � � a m U a a F a � w x w 0 � a W � a N n� -1Oa9 N � a a � h a w Q £ N A 0 a H E � � � .a 0 N O . � � N � N 1 O I Q 1 N H I O 1 1 1 F � �� a�� w n � a�N � � a�m a�N � �� n i �� o 0 o n o� i000no� z � . n .^� ��n ui o n o i O� n rv N n c� � £ mvrvr n ti i F� i n +� i i i fL' � II o �� F � n V n � i n w n i i m o0o i Hi000 H i O O O I z�000 i � � � N.-1.I i a�� o � F � U Q i i W � i i Wi000 E�000 i FC � o00 � F4 � � �+ino i E � N N H I z ' I � � ' I 1 I I I I I I I I I W F w i rC W i �d�aww z w � �>.ww x�a u o��z� E i+ 9 V � E EPS FC � D Ll W � W � Cn�Cm � � � i i �z � �o � z�F � O�H H 1 [a E-1 1 Q 1 a�� H I [i] a�N H � U � O m i z WiOti i A�z w xm � ?� � W arlo i a � �` � W � U<v!L o a � H ,� ,� o �ra :� x�zH• a�ro o � �ma 3 � � � � ; ; ti i oi i r� i � ti � 0 i ui �o i CC � C7 ,� o � W i a i a � [�Q' N�i� 1 ��ooz�a� o�a�aAZ� � Of]] W i-+ i a�awa A� z � wc � a � w�oF�oa � o � >+ �o cn x + i 000no 0 0 o II o • ii • 1 n N O I I O f� N N I I N +ir ur vl n ti nm W E 5C W r�W W N �4 (� �H'� � 000 F F N � F O E E U w h ° x a � a � u 4 a H a £ k W O � .7 W a a .. 0�-��}9 To Legislative Hearing Officer - 9-25-01 and 10-02-01 Public HearinQ Date -10-3-01 T.M.S./REAL ESTATE DIVISION ontac[ Person and Phone Number: Roganna Flink 266-8859 Date: 9/25/Ol �� o�.�oaq Green Sheet Number: DIItF.CfOR CTTY COUIVCII. AITORNEY 111596 CLERK �st be on Council Agenda by: UDGEi DIRECTOR � .& MGi. SVC. DIR. ist be in Council Research Oflice yOR(ORASSIST ANT) 1 COUNCII.RESEARCH noon on Friday public hearing is 10-03-01 DTAL # OF SIGNATURE PAGES 1 (CLIP ALL LOCATIONS FOR SIGNATURE) CTION REQUESTED: At council's request on 9-19-01 to 10.03-01 Towing of an abandoned vehicle at 376 Maryland Ave. E. (Leg Hearing 9-25-01) and Grass cutting at 664 Edmund Ave. (Leg Hearing 10-02-01) were laid over for further discussion. JOlO5V1 and J0102G1 PI.ANNING COMMISSION CIVD. SERVICE COMMISSION CB COMh(ITTEE r[s whidh Council Objective Neighborhoods A STAFF 1. Aas [he persoN�rm ever worked under a conVaM for this departmeot? YES NO A Public Health . Has this persoNfirm ever beeu a City employee? YES NO A . Does this persoNfirm possess a sldll not normally possessed by any YES NO _ current City employee? Explain all YES answers on a separate sheet and attach. Ward 2 NG PROBLEM, ISSUE, OPPORTUNITY (Who, What, W6en, Where, Why?): "SEE ORIGINAL GREEN SHEET NUMBER 111577" IFAPPROVED: I I7►\ 77:Z�Y/ �I �A IF NOT APPROVED: nmouNT oF �ranivsncTioN: $412.10 : souxce: Assessments only AL WFORMATION: (EXPLAIN) 2 property. owners wili be notified of the public hea COST/REVENUE BUDGETED (CIRCLE ONE) ACTIVTCY NUMBER: and YES NO '� 1-1�9 REPORT Date: September 25, 2001 Time: 10:00 a.m. Place: Room 330 City Hall 15 West Kellogg Boulevazd LEGISLATIVE HEARING Gerry Strathman Legislafive Hearing Officer 1. Summary Abatement Order Appeal for 1598 Hazel Street North. (Laid over from 9-4-01) Legislative Hearing Officer recommends denying the appeal. 2. Resolution ordering the owner to remove or repair the property at 2257 Hillside Avenue. If the owner fails to comply, Code Enforcement is ordered to remove the building. (Laid over from 4-17-01) Legislative Hearing Officer recommends granting the owner six months to complete the rehabilitation of the property on condition that a$2,000 bond is posted by noon of Wednesday, October 3, 2001. 3. Laid Over Summary Abatement: JOl O5V Towing of abandoned vehicle at 376 Marvland Avenue East. Legislative Hearing Officer recommends reducing the assessment to $105 plus the $45 service fee for a total assessment of $150. 4. Summary Abatement Order appeal for 697 Surrev Avenue. Legislative Hearing Officer recommends denying the appeal. 5. Resolution ordering the owner to remove or repair the property at 850 Sims Avenue. If the owner fails to comply, Code Enforcement is ordered to remove the building. Legislative Hearing Officer recommends laying over to the October 16, 2001, Legislative Heatsag. 6. Resolution ordering the owner to remove or repair the properry at 715 Preble Street. If the owner fails to comply, Code Enforcement is ordered to remove the building. Legislative Hearing Officer recommends granring the owner six months to complete the rehabilitation of the properly on condition that the following is done by noon of Wednesday, October 3, 2001: 1) Pay the vacant building fee, 2) Get a code compliance inspection, 3) Post a$2,000 bond. a1-►� LEGISLATIVE HEARING REPORT OF SEPTEMBER 25, 2001 page 2 Resolution ordering the owner to remove or repair the property at 397 Aldine Street. If the owner fails to comply, Code Enforcement is ordered to remove the buiiding. (Case is closed.) 8. Resolution ordering the owner to remove or repair the properry at 473 Hatch Avenue. If the owner fails to comply, Code Enforcement is ordered to remove the building. Legislative Hearing Officer recommends approval. -�,.,-i To Legislative Hearing Officer - 9-4-01 Public Hearine Date - 9-19-01 T.M.S./REAL ESTATE DIVISION � Date: 8/2/Ol act Person and Phone Number: Roxanna Flink�� at be on Council Agenda by: �st be in Councii Research Office noon on Fridav �266-8859 8-29-01 g-17-01 fl�.�oay Green Sheet Number: 111577 .RTbiEhT DIRECTOR ATfOR�'EY :ET D[RECfOR DR (OR ASSISTAN7) CLERK & MGT-SVC. DIR RESE.U2CH # OF SIGNATURE PAGES 1 (CLIP ALL LOCATIONS FOR SIGNA' REQUESTED: Set date of public hearing and approve assmts for Grass cutting during June & part of July 2001., Summ Abate during June & part of July 2001., Boarding-up during June & part of July 2001., Demolition during June & part of July 2001 and Aband vehicles during June & part of Jul 2001. File No.'s J0102G, JOlOSA, J0104B, J0104C and JOlOSV. d�lEhDATIONS:APPROVE(A)ORREJECT(R) ERSONALSERVICECOViRACTSh(USTA�YSWER7HEFOLLOWt\G: PLANYINC COMSfISS(ON A SiAFF 1. Has the person/firm ever worked under a contract for [his department? YES \O CML SERVICE COJ1bIIS$IOY CIB CO�iS1ITTEE rts whidh Councii Objettive Neighborhoods A Public Health A vacantbidg Wa�d 2 Explain all YES answers on a separate sheet and attach. YES Pi0 YES NO i IATING PROBLE�I, ISSU£, OPPORTUNITY (Who, Whaq When, Where, Why?): Property owners or renters create a health hazard at various times throughout the City of Saint Paul when their propertv is not kept up. AGES IF APPROVED: Cost recovery programs to recover expenses for Grass cutting, Summary Abatements, Boarding- up, Demolitions and Abandoned vehicles. This includes cutting tall grass and weeds, hauling away all garbage, debris, refuse and tires. Also, ail household items such as refrigerators, stoves, sofas, chairs and all other items. In winter this includes the removal of snow and ice from sidewatk aod cross walks. IF APPROVED: If Council does not approve these charges, General Fund would be required to pay the assessment. Assessments are payable over 1 year and collected with the property taxes if not IF NOT APPROVED: Neighborhoods would be left to deteriorate and property values would decline. Nobody would take care of their property, especially vacant or rental properties. Rodents, filth, garbage and trash would accumuiate everywhere. Disease and pests could become a problem. A�IOUYT OF TRANSACTIO,�': $11S�GOH.O2 COSYlREVENUE BUDGETED (C[RCLE OYE) YES 1�0 .iDl\GSOURCE: ASSCSSMfIltS Has this person/firm ever been a City empioyee? Does [his person/Orm possess a skill not normally possessed by any current City emptoyee? ACf[VITY NUbiBER: �LI\FOASIATIO\:(EXPLAIN) 204 property owners will be notified of the public hearing and a\-�oZ� �Z. MINiITES OF TI� LEGISLATIVE HEARING Tuesday, September 25, 2001 Gerry Strathman, Legislative Hearing Officer Room 330 Courthouse The meeting was called to order at 10:04 a.m. STAFF PRESENT: Roxanna Flink, Real Estate; Steve Magner, Code Enforcement; Harold Robinson, Code Enforcement; Summary Abatement Order Appeal for 1598 Hazel Street North. (Laid over from 9-4-01) Gerry Strathman stated thax the appellant was going to consult with City staff and others as to whether the garden was consistent with the City's ordinance with respect to natural gazdens, prairie growth, etc. He asked did the owner have time to do that. Walt Montpetit, owner, appeared and stated a City representative called him last Friday and le8 a voice mail. He was out of town and just returned Sunday evening. He has not had a chance to have a conversarion with City inspectors as faz as what was a landscape design versus weeds and tall grass. Harold Robinson reported he could not find a specific ordinance to cover these things. The ordinance does read grass and weeds over 8 inches high must be cut. There are some specific plants and landscape designs that aze excluded from this. It is not composting because it is not a contained azea. It is not covered under the grass and weed ordinance because it is tall grass that has been allowed to grow. He cannot exempt it. Mr. Strathman asked is there someone in the City that knows plants well enough to make a determination as to if these plants are accepted under state law. Mr. Robinson responded he has been on the properry, and it is basically tall grass and weeds. Mr. Strathman asked what makes the owner think it is something other than tall grass and weeds. Mr. Montpetit responded the area is set aside from the rest of the yard. He looks at it as part of his landscape scheme. It is a wooded lot adjacent to the rest of the lot that is groomed, even though it is a small area. He does not know anyone who cuts weeds and tall grass out of a wooded lot. He asked is his yazd designated as a yard or as a wooded lot. Mr. Robinson responded that specifically a wooded lot has to have a tree, and this backyazd does not have a tree. Mr. Montpefit responded there are trees back in the corner. Mr. Robinson stated this properiy is definitely not a wooded lot. From the description he included with his appeal, stated Mr. Strathman, there is a map that shows the nature garden is behind the gazage and surrounded by a six foot privacy fence. He asked how this came to the City's attention. Mr. Robinson responded it was a complaint based inspection. Mr. Montpetit stated he belongs to the yacht club and a member complained to the City about weeds and tall grass on Harriet Island. This member was told it was part of the landscape scene. C� \-\oZcj LEGISLATNE HEARING MINUTES FOR SEPTEMBER 25, 2001 Page 2 It is no different than his weeds and tall grass, said Mr. Montpefit. He does not know what species needs to be cut and which species he can plant to conform. (Mr. Robinson gave Mr. Montpetit documents about a company that specializes in this subject.) Gerry 5trathman recommends denying the appeal. It does not appear that what Mr. Montpetit wants to do is provided for under the City ordinance. Resolution ordering the owner to remove or repair the property at 2257 Hillside Avenue. If the owner fails to comply, Code Enforcement is ordered to remove the building. (Laid over from 4-17-01) The following appeazed: Kim McCalluxn, 929 Selby Avenue, and Steve Gibbs, Western National, 41 12th Avenue North, Hopkins. Steve Magner reported this building has been vacant since December 3, 1999. There have been five summary abatement notices to secure the dwelling, cut tall grass, remove refuse, remove snow andlor ice. On October 19, 2000, an inspection of the building was conducted, a list of deficiencies which constitute a nuisance condition was developed, and photographs were taken. An order to abate a nuisance building was issued on October 24, 2000, with a compliance date of November 27. As of this date, the properry remains in a condition which comprises a nuisance as defined by the legisiative code. The real estates taYes aze unpaid of $6,333. Taxation has placed an estimated market value of $56,600 on the land, and $5,000 on the building. On July 25, 2001, a code compliance inspection was done. A$2,000 bond has not been posted. Estimated cost to repair is $100,000 to $150,000; estimated cost to demolish, $12,000 to $15,000. This was originally before the Legislative Hearing Officer in March, said Mr. Magner. It was laid over because the second mortgage company was going through a foreclosure process, wanted to cleaz the fitle, pay off the insurance company, and then sell it. The second mortgage company has been paid off and is no longer involved with this properiy. The original owner has physical control of the building, but there is still an issue with the insurance company for the fust mortgage company. Mr. McCalluxn stated he plans to take the next week and decide to sell the properry, rehabilitate it, or tear it down and rebuild. As of yesterday, there was a settlement. Mr. Gibbs stated Western Nafional wili be sarisfied with the agreement. They are now in the middle of foreclosure on the property. They will be out of the picture when that happens and the McCallums can take whatever action they would like. Mr. Strathman asked is he prepared to post the $2,000 bond. Mr. McCallum responded he is. Gerry Strathman recommends granting the owner six months to complete the rehabilitation of the property on condition that a$2,000 bond is posted by noon of Wednesday, October 3, 2001. v � �o�� LEGTSLATIVE HEARING MINUTES FOR SEPTEMBER 25, 2001 Page 3 � Laid Over Summary Abatement: J0105V Towing of abandoned vehicle at 376 Maryland Avenue East. Franciso Jazamillo, owner, appeared and stated this is about a vehicle he pazked on the side of his gazage. He received an order to remove it. He called a towing company, and was told they would not remove it until April. The City removed it in Mazch. He called the Impound Lot. He was toid that he would not haue to pay anything and he could sign over the title. The vehicle was left there. Haroid Robinson reported the vehicle was abated on January 25 and towed in Mazch. It had no current license plates. It was a proper tow. In answer to questions, Mr. Jaramillo responded the vehicle was a 1981 Honda Civic, and it did not run. Gerry Strathman recommends reducing the assessment to $105 plus the $45 service fee for a total assessment of $150. The owner should have taken care of the matter as soon as he got the notice. The City towed the vehicle, stored it, and sold it when they got the title. There aze costs involved. Summary Abatement Order appeal for 697 Surrev Avenue. (Shazon Anderson, appellant, sent Gerry Strathman an e-mail saying that she is unable to attend today's meeting.) Gerry Strathman recommends denying the appeal. Resolution ordering the owner to remove or repair the property at 850 Sims Avenue. If the owner faffs to comply, Code Enforcement is ordered to remove the building. (Steve Magner presented photographs. They were later retumed.) Steve Magner reported the property was condemned May 2000. It has been a vacant building since August 21, 2000. Two summary abatement notices have been issued to remove refuse. On Mazch 7, 2001, an inspection of the building was conducted, a list of deficiencies which constitute a nuisance condition was developed, and photographs were taken. An order to abate a nuisance building was issued on Mazch 19, 2001, with a compliance date of April 18. As of this date, the property remains in a condition that comprises a nuisance as defined by the legislative code. The vacant building fees aze due. Esrimated market value of property is $36,700; estimated cost to repair, $80,000 to $100,000, estimated cost to demolish, $7,500 to $8,000. A code compliance inspection was done on August 30, 2000. On April 13, 2001, stated Mr. Magner, a third party posted a$2,000 bond. His reasoning was that he was in expectation of obtaining title after the original owners--Michael and Becky Ramstad--cancelled the contract with Samantha Mathews. That bond eapires by October 15. � \-\oZ�j LEGISLATTVE HEt1RING MINIJTES FOR SEPT'EMBER 25, 2001 Page 4 Mr. Strathman asked what happened with the citation that was issued for failure to pay the vacant building fee. Mr. Magner responded he does not have the file with him, but he assumes the citation was never settled. The owner is no longer in Minnesota. In September, Ms. Mathews paid the vacant building fee. Code Enforcement made an agreement with Ms. Mathews to give her six months to rehabilitate the properiy and she would not have to post the bond, but would haue to obtain a code compliance inspecfion. She obtained the code compliance inspection, but failed to act in a timely manner to rehabilitate the structure. Code Enforcement continually receives complaints of illegal activities and occupancy at the dwelling. There have been nuxnerous inspections. Mr. Magner had a conversation with Don Wagner (License, Inspecfions, Environmental Protection) who said he has not been called to inspect the property. There aze still outstanding pernuts that need to be puiled before a code compliance can be signed off. Samantha Mathews, owner, appeared and stated she had a code compliance inspection. The six months were up, and Rich Singerhouse (Code Enforcement) and another inspector came out on Mazch 7. She received an order to abate dated Mazch 19 and was given unril April 18 to clear the deficiencies. This is a different list than the original that she had six months to do. Shortly thereafter, a$2,000 bond was posted. The man who posted the $2,000 bond was under the assumption that he was going to get the house, and Mr. Ramstad had agreed to sell it to him after the foreclosure proceedings against her. Ms. Mathews also came up with $5,000, took the matter to district court, and saved her house. Three hours after she won the court case, there was a legislative heazing notice from Mr. Magner. Throughout this whole time, she has left several messages and has never had her calls returned. On her last visit with Mr. Magner, he said he was finished with this matter and would put Mike Morehead (Code Enforcement) in charge of it. Her house is more than 50% done. Ms. Mathews has photographs and affidavits from her neighbors. One of the people complaining would be a neighbor right next door to her who would like to obtain her property. Ms. Mathews received two summary abatement notices: one was for a dog and one to clean up the properry. The bond expires on October 13. Don Wagner would like to inspect the property to see what has been done. Gerry Strathman recommends laying over to the October 16, 2001, Legislative Hearing. He does not think the City should move on this property while the current bond is still in effect, but that is only for approximately two more weeks. There needs to be an inspection of the property before the bond is expired to determine if it can be extended another six months. Resolution ordering the owner to remove or repair the property at 715 Preble Street. If the owner fails to comply, Code Enforcement is ordered to remove the building. (Steve Magner submitted photographs.) Catherine Dauis, 1453 Arkwright Avenue #301, owner's daughter, appeazed. Gerry Strathxnan stated the document in front of him has Gilbert Castilla as tl�e fee owner, Long Beach Mortgage Company as the mortgagee, and Katherin and Michael Davis as interested parties. Ms. Dauis responded she is not sure how her name got onto the paperwork other than the fact that Giibert is her dad. He purchased the house in August. He is disabled and Ms. Davis O\ \c7Z�j LEGISLATIVE HEARING MIN [JTES FOR SEP"I'EMBER 25, 2001 Page 5 handles most of his business. They had done the work on the house and moved in unaware that it was a vacant house. Steve Magner reported this building has been vacant since June 10, 1999. There have been seven summary abatement notices issued to remove refuse, cut tall grass, secure structure. On August 1, 2001, an inspection of the building was conducted, a list of deficiencies which constitute a nuisance condition was developed, and photographs were taken. An order to abate a nuisance building was issued on August 6, 2001, with a compliance date of August 21, 2001. As of this date, this properry remains in a condition which comprises a nuisance as defined by the legislative code. The vacant building fees are due. Real estate t�es aze unpaid in the amount of $1,073.99. Prior to the fire, Tasation had placed an estimated market value of $11,000 on the land and $38,400 on the building. The estimated cost to repair this structure is $50,000 to $60,000; estimated cost to demolish, $7,000 to $8,000. On August 3, 2000, a code compliance inspection was done. No bond has been posted. Mr. Magner stated this was a registered vacant building, and vacant building placards were on it. The owner was put on notice not to occupy this building. There were two citations issued for illegal occupancy. They were occupying a registered vacant building when the fire occurred. Mr. Strathman stated the photographs do not indicate a fire. Mr. Magner responded the fire was contained in the interior of the dwelling. There was heauy smoke damage throughout. There was no burn through to the outside; it is a stucco exterior. Mr. Strathman asked was the extent of the damage cosmetic ar struetural. Mr. Magner responded there was heavy smoke and water damage throughout. The building has been abandoned since that time. There may have been more extensive water damage since then. Ms. Davis stated she takes caze of her father; he is not well. He purchased the properiy on August 9, 2000, from the previous owner. She does not have legal control over his decisions. Ms. Davis was not aware the property was a registered vacant house. It was obvious there were things that needed to be done to the property. Every pipe in the basement was busted. There was no ivmiing water nor electricity. She knew it had to meet certain codes before it could be legally occupied. She hired a company to replace the plumbing in the basement, and an outside spigot that leaked. The connection to the water heater had to be replaced. They laid carpet and painted. After she did the work, she moved in and was unaware that she couldn't. In September, a man came to the house and explained to her husband that they could not live there because the property was registered as being legally vacant. When she found this out, she had just given birth to her daughter. When she was able to, she contacted various people in the City. The fire that occurred on June 12 has rendered the condition of the house worse. Long Beach Mortgage holds $30,000 of insurance settlement on the fire to have it repaired. Ms. Davis went on to say she came into possession of a code compliance inspection dated August 3. After talking to Mr. Magner, he explained their contractor could walk through the house with the list, and he would know if it has been done. They could obtain a permit for the code compliance issues and a permit for the fire damage. Her contractor did a walk through. She c� `-��Z� LEGISLATIVE HEARING MINLJTES FOR SEPTEMBER 25, 2001 Page 6 cannot get the code compliance issues done until the fire damage is cleaned up to see what she is left with, but she cannot get the fire damage taken caze of until she gets the code compliance issues taken caze of. Mr. Strathman asked was she awaze that the repair cost may be beriveen $50,000 to $60,000. Ms. Dauis responded over half the list has been fixed. With the fire damage, there is additional work to be done. The mortgage company is holding $30,000. Mr. Strathman asked is the August 3, 2000, code compliance inspection an accurate representation of what needs to be done. Mr. Magner responded Don Wagner (License, Inspections, Environmental Protection) would have to go through the building and malce a determination as to what has to be compieted, was it done under permit, and can it be signed off. If not, it has to be done under permit. Most likely, Mr. Wagner will not give a code compliance certificate without including the fire damage items. Another code compliance inspection is needed, asked Mr. Strathman. Mr. Magner responded vacant building fees need to be paid, a code compliance inspection completed, and a bond needs to be posted. Aiso, the building should be unoccupied and secured. Gerry Strathman recommends granting the owner six months to complete the rehabilitation of the property on condition that the following is done by noon of Wednesday, October 3, 2001: 1) Pay the vacant building fee, 2) Get a code compliance inspection, 3) Post a$2,000 bond. Resolution ordering the owner to remove or repair the properly at 397 Aldine Street. If the owner faits to comply, Code Enforcement is ordered to remove the buiiding. Steve Magner reported the house has been moved to another location. (Case is closed.) Resolution ordering the owner to remove or repair the property at 473 Hatch Avenue. If the owner fails to comply, Code Enforcement is ordered to remove the building. (Steve Magner submitted photographs.) Steve Magner reported this property has been condemned and vacant since November 2000. Five sununary abatement notices have been issued to cuY ta11 grass and remove refuse. On August 1, 2001, an inspection of the building was conducted, a list of deficiencies which constitute a nuisance condition was developed, and photographs were taken. An order to abate a nuisance condition was issued on August 6 with a compliance date of August 21. As of this date, this properry remains in a condition which comprises a nuisance as defined by the legislative code. The City has boazded the building against trespass. The vacant building fees are due. Real estate taxes are unpaid of $209038. Taxation has placed an estimated market value of $6,500 on the land. Before the fire, the estimated market value of the building was $34,800. As c� � ��Z� LEGISLATIVE HEARING REPORT OF SEPTEMBER 25, 2001 Page 7 of today, a code compliance inspection has not been applied for and a bond has not been posted. The estimated cost to repair is $40,000 to $50,000; estimated cost to demolish, $6,000 to $7,000. Mr. Magner stated the owner has tried to sell the properry with no luck due to the small size of the structure, low ceilings, and numerous problems with the building. About a month ago, the owner asked Mr. Magner what would happen if the City demolished the structure. Mr. Magner explained the lot would remain his properry, and the cost of the demolition would be assessed on the ta��es. Gerry Strathman recomxnends approval. The meeting was adjourned at 11:02 a.m. --�+.,� City of St. Paul RATIFYING ASSBSSMSNT ��' e?l��t�,� COUNCIL FILE NO. �� By � Fi e No. EE BELOW Assessment No. SEE BELOW Ah.�.�.�..�,_ o�t, a,�oo� Voting Ward In the matter of the assessment of benefits, cost and expenses for 2 JOlOSVl (0926) q.sl�wa.ssseccw�en�io � # les .ao p�,,,� .t�.e, # ys,no i�r o:av i��. ir. f,..+s�..11 au scc �ns+�et' o� J0102G1 (0927) Towing of an abandoned vehicle from private property at 376 Maryland Ave East. (LLGISLATIVE HEARING WILL BS 9-25-01) �'/Iro.O � . Grass cutting (by private contractor) at 664 Edmund Ave. (L$GISLATIV& HEARING WILL BS 10-02-01) BOTH WBRE LAID OVF3R BY COUNCIL ON 9-19-01 TO 10-03-01 4a A public hearing having been had upon the assessment for the above improvement, and said assessment having been further considered by the Council, and having been considered finally satisfactory, therefore, be it RESOLVED, That the said assessment be and the same is hereby in all respects ratified. RBSOLVED FURTASR, That the said assessment be and it is hereby determined to be payable in One equal installments_ COUNCILPERSON Yeas Nays ✓Benanav �lakey ✓�3ostrom ✓Coleman ✓fiarris ✓Lantry �Feiter Adopted by the Council: Date p.�, 3 a.p e� Certified Passes by Council Secretary By �_ � . f'� l � �In Favor �� QAgainst Mayor City of St. Paul Real Estate Division Dept. of Technology & Management Serv RSPORT OF COMPLSTION OF ASSSSSMENT COUNCIL FILE NO. File No. SEE BELOW Assessment No. SEE BELOW � � �� 0�9 Voting Ward In the matter of the assessment of benefits, cost and e�enses for 2 JOlO5V1 (0926) Towing of an abandoned vehicle from private property at 376 Maryland Ave East. (L&GISLATIVE HEARING WILL BL 9-25-01) J0102G1 (0927) Grass cutting (by private 664 Edmund Ave. (LEGISLATIVB HEARING WILL contractor) at BE 10-02-01) BOTH WERE LAID OVER BY COUNCIL ON 9-19-01 TO 10-03-01 To the Council of the City of St. Paul The Valuation and Assessment Engineer hereby reports to the Council the following as a statement of the expenditures necessarily incurred for and in connection with the making of the above improvement, viz: Total construction costs Engineering and Inspection Real Estate Service Fee Process Serving Charge Charge-Code Enforcement Abatement Service Charge TOTAL EXPENDITURES Charge To Net Assessment $322.10 $ $ $ $50.00 $40.00 $412.10 $412.10 Said Valuation and Assessment Engineer further reports that he has assessed and levied the total amount as above ascertained, to-wit: the sum of $412.10 upon each and every lot, part or parcel of land deemed benefited by the said improvement, and in the case of each lot, part or parcel of land in accordance with the benefits conferred thereon; that the said assessment has been completed, and that hereto attached, identified by the signature of the said Valuation and Assessment Engineer, and made a part hereof, is the said assessment as completed by him, and which is herewith submitted to the Council for such action thereon as may be considered proper. // /J Dated 7-�s�� •. �,-,� �luation and Assessment Engineer w � � a � 7 a W C� � N N 0 a H E � Q 5 O O h E U W O a a a 0 w E � N H p a � z /� H `{� Q w s "� 1 • z � m � O a a O � H U � H a 5 � a � � o � 0 m 0 � N t � . �m � N Q i O I H i O i I � i N i E�N a� � [i] i N a�N 0 a �o� a�N � a, i � N 1 1 (q I O O O II O 1 I ei O O II �-i 1 2 i • n • � i P ul o II N� � � C N N 11 O� � i N Lr 11 N� ; N 11 i? 1 � n a � n F � ii i O � II � Q i IIO � W II � � � i CA � 000 � H i o0o N i H i O O O T � i .i 0 0 � i 1 • 1 � rl `1 ' a �e� � � O�N E � i a� � w w�000 � � 000� i i000 i � ��,o p F � N N H i � � I O 1 I � I I 1 i r i � i iW i �a �v � i � w x w �d�>ww z �zww o� � ��d�a � a � mor� � w �C �C v, � 1 O I I ; � 0 � y � � z� o � •� � H F i � � a •• � H 1 [xj a�z F � Uio O � m��-+ z o 0 o n o W� F ti o o n� °;o � d, ��;o��N E� K W O � N+/T L} II N a� aN � � n� a�Emam � ii a � m « x i n L1H� II a �W� 3 � ii � � n � n � n i n �� " o �� o � W n � c o i a n � O W io I M II a�a nmo� x wn � � N -. � >ww ii a i rL�u�i4]O � 2wG7 ii a � a q�n2 � O U II r.� � a 2 4C �n � Gl 7i � II [� E i 7Q2.7Q � 2i-a> n O C� ON�CC7 � 0.�1A W il E o��naa�qz� aamnH i H ] H 1 II U a u a o� aaanw w�� a io z� RL RC �¢ n ri 3� nHMa� OOOiia O w rvi ul +« i F E E ii a � � a m U a a F a � w x w 0 � a W � a N n� -1Oa9 N � a a � h a w Q £ N A 0 a H E � � � .a 0 N O . � � N � N 1 O I Q 1 N H I O 1 1 1 F � �� a�� w n � a�N � � a�m a�N � �� n i �� o 0 o n o� i000no� z � . n .^� ��n ui o n o i O� n rv N n c� � £ mvrvr n ti i F� i n +� i i i fL' � II o �� F � n V n � i n w n i i m o0o i Hi000 H i O O O I z�000 i � � � N.-1.I i a�� o � F � U Q i i W � i i Wi000 E�000 i FC � o00 � F4 � � �+ino i E � N N H I z ' I � � ' I 1 I I I I I I I I I W F w i rC W i �d�aww z w � �>.ww x�a u o��z� E i+ 9 V � E EPS FC � D Ll W � W � Cn�Cm � � � i i �z � �o � z�F � O�H H 1 [a E-1 1 Q 1 a�� H I [i] a�N H � U � O m i z WiOti i A�z w xm � ?� � W arlo i a � �` � W � U<v!L o a � H ,� ,� o �ra :� x�zH• a�ro o � �ma 3 � � � � ; ; ti i oi i r� i � ti � 0 i ui �o i CC � C7 ,� o � W i a i a � [�Q' N�i� 1 ��ooz�a� o�a�aAZ� � Of]] W i-+ i a�awa A� z � wc � a � w�oF�oa � o � >+ �o cn x + i 000no 0 0 o II o • ii • 1 n N O I I O f� N N I I N +ir ur vl n ti nm W E 5C W r�W W N �4 (� �H'� � 000 F F N � F O E E U w h ° x a � a � u 4 a H a £ k W O � .7 W a a .. 0�-��}9 To Legislative Hearing Officer - 9-25-01 and 10-02-01 Public HearinQ Date -10-3-01 T.M.S./REAL ESTATE DIVISION ontac[ Person and Phone Number: Roganna Flink 266-8859 Date: 9/25/Ol �� o�.�oaq Green Sheet Number: DIItF.CfOR CTTY COUIVCII. AITORNEY 111596 CLERK �st be on Council Agenda by: UDGEi DIRECTOR � .& MGi. SVC. DIR. ist be in Council Research Oflice yOR(ORASSIST ANT) 1 COUNCII.RESEARCH noon on Friday public hearing is 10-03-01 DTAL # OF SIGNATURE PAGES 1 (CLIP ALL LOCATIONS FOR SIGNATURE) CTION REQUESTED: At council's request on 9-19-01 to 10.03-01 Towing of an abandoned vehicle at 376 Maryland Ave. E. (Leg Hearing 9-25-01) and Grass cutting at 664 Edmund Ave. (Leg Hearing 10-02-01) were laid over for further discussion. JOlO5V1 and J0102G1 PI.ANNING COMMISSION CIVD. SERVICE COMMISSION CB COMh(ITTEE r[s whidh Council Objective Neighborhoods A STAFF 1. Aas [he persoN�rm ever worked under a conVaM for this departmeot? YES NO A Public Health . Has this persoNfirm ever beeu a City employee? YES NO A . Does this persoNfirm possess a sldll not normally possessed by any YES NO _ current City employee? Explain all YES answers on a separate sheet and attach. Ward 2 NG PROBLEM, ISSUE, OPPORTUNITY (Who, What, W6en, Where, Why?): "SEE ORIGINAL GREEN SHEET NUMBER 111577" IFAPPROVED: I I7►\ 77:Z�Y/ �I �A IF NOT APPROVED: nmouNT oF �ranivsncTioN: $412.10 : souxce: Assessments only AL WFORMATION: (EXPLAIN) 2 property. owners wili be notified of the public hea COST/REVENUE BUDGETED (CIRCLE ONE) ACTIVTCY NUMBER: and YES NO '� 1-1�9 REPORT Date: September 25, 2001 Time: 10:00 a.m. Place: Room 330 City Hall 15 West Kellogg Boulevazd LEGISLATIVE HEARING Gerry Strathman Legislafive Hearing Officer 1. Summary Abatement Order Appeal for 1598 Hazel Street North. (Laid over from 9-4-01) Legislative Hearing Officer recommends denying the appeal. 2. Resolution ordering the owner to remove or repair the property at 2257 Hillside Avenue. If the owner fails to comply, Code Enforcement is ordered to remove the building. (Laid over from 4-17-01) Legislative Hearing Officer recommends granting the owner six months to complete the rehabilitation of the property on condition that a$2,000 bond is posted by noon of Wednesday, October 3, 2001. 3. Laid Over Summary Abatement: JOl O5V Towing of abandoned vehicle at 376 Marvland Avenue East. Legislative Hearing Officer recommends reducing the assessment to $105 plus the $45 service fee for a total assessment of $150. 4. Summary Abatement Order appeal for 697 Surrev Avenue. Legislative Hearing Officer recommends denying the appeal. 5. Resolution ordering the owner to remove or repair the property at 850 Sims Avenue. If the owner fails to comply, Code Enforcement is ordered to remove the building. Legislative Hearing Officer recommends laying over to the October 16, 2001, Legislative Heatsag. 6. Resolution ordering the owner to remove or repair the properry at 715 Preble Street. If the owner fails to comply, Code Enforcement is ordered to remove the building. Legislative Hearing Officer recommends granring the owner six months to complete the rehabilitation of the properly on condition that the following is done by noon of Wednesday, October 3, 2001: 1) Pay the vacant building fee, 2) Get a code compliance inspection, 3) Post a$2,000 bond. a1-►� LEGISLATIVE HEARING REPORT OF SEPTEMBER 25, 2001 page 2 Resolution ordering the owner to remove or repair the property at 397 Aldine Street. If the owner fails to comply, Code Enforcement is ordered to remove the buiiding. (Case is closed.) 8. Resolution ordering the owner to remove or repair the properry at 473 Hatch Avenue. If the owner fails to comply, Code Enforcement is ordered to remove the building. Legislative Hearing Officer recommends approval. -�,.,-i To Legislative Hearing Officer - 9-4-01 Public Hearine Date - 9-19-01 T.M.S./REAL ESTATE DIVISION � Date: 8/2/Ol act Person and Phone Number: Roxanna Flink�� at be on Council Agenda by: �st be in Councii Research Office noon on Fridav �266-8859 8-29-01 g-17-01 fl�.�oay Green Sheet Number: 111577 .RTbiEhT DIRECTOR ATfOR�'EY :ET D[RECfOR DR (OR ASSISTAN7) CLERK & MGT-SVC. DIR RESE.U2CH # OF SIGNATURE PAGES 1 (CLIP ALL LOCATIONS FOR SIGNA' REQUESTED: Set date of public hearing and approve assmts for Grass cutting during June & part of July 2001., Summ Abate during June & part of July 2001., Boarding-up during June & part of July 2001., Demolition during June & part of July 2001 and Aband vehicles during June & part of Jul 2001. File No.'s J0102G, JOlOSA, J0104B, J0104C and JOlOSV. d�lEhDATIONS:APPROVE(A)ORREJECT(R) ERSONALSERVICECOViRACTSh(USTA�YSWER7HEFOLLOWt\G: PLANYINC COMSfISS(ON A SiAFF 1. Has the person/firm ever worked under a contract for [his department? YES \O CML SERVICE COJ1bIIS$IOY CIB CO�iS1ITTEE rts whidh Councii Objettive Neighborhoods A Public Health A vacantbidg Wa�d 2 Explain all YES answers on a separate sheet and attach. YES Pi0 YES NO i IATING PROBLE�I, ISSU£, OPPORTUNITY (Who, Whaq When, Where, Why?): Property owners or renters create a health hazard at various times throughout the City of Saint Paul when their propertv is not kept up. AGES IF APPROVED: Cost recovery programs to recover expenses for Grass cutting, Summary Abatements, Boarding- up, Demolitions and Abandoned vehicles. This includes cutting tall grass and weeds, hauling away all garbage, debris, refuse and tires. Also, ail household items such as refrigerators, stoves, sofas, chairs and all other items. In winter this includes the removal of snow and ice from sidewatk aod cross walks. IF APPROVED: If Council does not approve these charges, General Fund would be required to pay the assessment. Assessments are payable over 1 year and collected with the property taxes if not IF NOT APPROVED: Neighborhoods would be left to deteriorate and property values would decline. Nobody would take care of their property, especially vacant or rental properties. Rodents, filth, garbage and trash would accumuiate everywhere. Disease and pests could become a problem. A�IOUYT OF TRANSACTIO,�': $11S�GOH.O2 COSYlREVENUE BUDGETED (C[RCLE OYE) YES 1�0 .iDl\GSOURCE: ASSCSSMfIltS Has this person/firm ever been a City empioyee? Does [his person/Orm possess a skill not normally possessed by any current City emptoyee? ACf[VITY NUbiBER: �LI\FOASIATIO\:(EXPLAIN) 204 property owners will be notified of the public hearing and a\-�oZ� �Z. MINiITES OF TI� LEGISLATIVE HEARING Tuesday, September 25, 2001 Gerry Strathman, Legislative Hearing Officer Room 330 Courthouse The meeting was called to order at 10:04 a.m. STAFF PRESENT: Roxanna Flink, Real Estate; Steve Magner, Code Enforcement; Harold Robinson, Code Enforcement; Summary Abatement Order Appeal for 1598 Hazel Street North. (Laid over from 9-4-01) Gerry Strathman stated thax the appellant was going to consult with City staff and others as to whether the garden was consistent with the City's ordinance with respect to natural gazdens, prairie growth, etc. He asked did the owner have time to do that. Walt Montpetit, owner, appeared and stated a City representative called him last Friday and le8 a voice mail. He was out of town and just returned Sunday evening. He has not had a chance to have a conversarion with City inspectors as faz as what was a landscape design versus weeds and tall grass. Harold Robinson reported he could not find a specific ordinance to cover these things. The ordinance does read grass and weeds over 8 inches high must be cut. There are some specific plants and landscape designs that aze excluded from this. It is not composting because it is not a contained azea. It is not covered under the grass and weed ordinance because it is tall grass that has been allowed to grow. He cannot exempt it. Mr. Strathman asked is there someone in the City that knows plants well enough to make a determination as to if these plants are accepted under state law. Mr. Robinson responded he has been on the properry, and it is basically tall grass and weeds. Mr. Strathman asked what makes the owner think it is something other than tall grass and weeds. Mr. Montpetit responded the area is set aside from the rest of the yard. He looks at it as part of his landscape scheme. It is a wooded lot adjacent to the rest of the lot that is groomed, even though it is a small area. He does not know anyone who cuts weeds and tall grass out of a wooded lot. He asked is his yazd designated as a yard or as a wooded lot. Mr. Robinson responded that specifically a wooded lot has to have a tree, and this backyazd does not have a tree. Mr. Montpefit responded there are trees back in the corner. Mr. Robinson stated this properiy is definitely not a wooded lot. From the description he included with his appeal, stated Mr. Strathman, there is a map that shows the nature garden is behind the gazage and surrounded by a six foot privacy fence. He asked how this came to the City's attention. Mr. Robinson responded it was a complaint based inspection. Mr. Montpetit stated he belongs to the yacht club and a member complained to the City about weeds and tall grass on Harriet Island. This member was told it was part of the landscape scene. C� \-\oZcj LEGISLATNE HEARING MINUTES FOR SEPTEMBER 25, 2001 Page 2 It is no different than his weeds and tall grass, said Mr. Montpefit. He does not know what species needs to be cut and which species he can plant to conform. (Mr. Robinson gave Mr. Montpetit documents about a company that specializes in this subject.) Gerry 5trathman recommends denying the appeal. It does not appear that what Mr. Montpetit wants to do is provided for under the City ordinance. Resolution ordering the owner to remove or repair the property at 2257 Hillside Avenue. If the owner fails to comply, Code Enforcement is ordered to remove the building. (Laid over from 4-17-01) The following appeazed: Kim McCalluxn, 929 Selby Avenue, and Steve Gibbs, Western National, 41 12th Avenue North, Hopkins. Steve Magner reported this building has been vacant since December 3, 1999. There have been five summary abatement notices to secure the dwelling, cut tall grass, remove refuse, remove snow andlor ice. On October 19, 2000, an inspection of the building was conducted, a list of deficiencies which constitute a nuisance condition was developed, and photographs were taken. An order to abate a nuisance building was issued on October 24, 2000, with a compliance date of November 27. As of this date, the properry remains in a condition which comprises a nuisance as defined by the legisiative code. The real estates taYes aze unpaid of $6,333. Taxation has placed an estimated market value of $56,600 on the land, and $5,000 on the building. On July 25, 2001, a code compliance inspection was done. A$2,000 bond has not been posted. Estimated cost to repair is $100,000 to $150,000; estimated cost to demolish, $12,000 to $15,000. This was originally before the Legislative Hearing Officer in March, said Mr. Magner. It was laid over because the second mortgage company was going through a foreclosure process, wanted to cleaz the fitle, pay off the insurance company, and then sell it. The second mortgage company has been paid off and is no longer involved with this properiy. The original owner has physical control of the building, but there is still an issue with the insurance company for the fust mortgage company. Mr. McCalluxn stated he plans to take the next week and decide to sell the properry, rehabilitate it, or tear it down and rebuild. As of yesterday, there was a settlement. Mr. Gibbs stated Western Nafional wili be sarisfied with the agreement. They are now in the middle of foreclosure on the property. They will be out of the picture when that happens and the McCallums can take whatever action they would like. Mr. Strathman asked is he prepared to post the $2,000 bond. Mr. McCallum responded he is. Gerry Strathman recommends granting the owner six months to complete the rehabilitation of the property on condition that a$2,000 bond is posted by noon of Wednesday, October 3, 2001. v � �o�� LEGTSLATIVE HEARING MINUTES FOR SEPTEMBER 25, 2001 Page 3 � Laid Over Summary Abatement: J0105V Towing of abandoned vehicle at 376 Maryland Avenue East. Franciso Jazamillo, owner, appeared and stated this is about a vehicle he pazked on the side of his gazage. He received an order to remove it. He called a towing company, and was told they would not remove it until April. The City removed it in Mazch. He called the Impound Lot. He was toid that he would not haue to pay anything and he could sign over the title. The vehicle was left there. Haroid Robinson reported the vehicle was abated on January 25 and towed in Mazch. It had no current license plates. It was a proper tow. In answer to questions, Mr. Jaramillo responded the vehicle was a 1981 Honda Civic, and it did not run. Gerry Strathman recommends reducing the assessment to $105 plus the $45 service fee for a total assessment of $150. The owner should have taken care of the matter as soon as he got the notice. The City towed the vehicle, stored it, and sold it when they got the title. There aze costs involved. Summary Abatement Order appeal for 697 Surrev Avenue. (Shazon Anderson, appellant, sent Gerry Strathman an e-mail saying that she is unable to attend today's meeting.) Gerry Strathman recommends denying the appeal. Resolution ordering the owner to remove or repair the property at 850 Sims Avenue. If the owner faffs to comply, Code Enforcement is ordered to remove the building. (Steve Magner presented photographs. They were later retumed.) Steve Magner reported the property was condemned May 2000. It has been a vacant building since August 21, 2000. Two summary abatement notices have been issued to remove refuse. On Mazch 7, 2001, an inspection of the building was conducted, a list of deficiencies which constitute a nuisance condition was developed, and photographs were taken. An order to abate a nuisance building was issued on Mazch 19, 2001, with a compliance date of April 18. As of this date, the property remains in a condition that comprises a nuisance as defined by the legislative code. The vacant building fees aze due. Esrimated market value of property is $36,700; estimated cost to repair, $80,000 to $100,000, estimated cost to demolish, $7,500 to $8,000. A code compliance inspection was done on August 30, 2000. On April 13, 2001, stated Mr. Magner, a third party posted a$2,000 bond. His reasoning was that he was in expectation of obtaining title after the original owners--Michael and Becky Ramstad--cancelled the contract with Samantha Mathews. That bond eapires by October 15. � \-\oZ�j LEGISLATTVE HEt1RING MINIJTES FOR SEPT'EMBER 25, 2001 Page 4 Mr. Strathman asked what happened with the citation that was issued for failure to pay the vacant building fee. Mr. Magner responded he does not have the file with him, but he assumes the citation was never settled. The owner is no longer in Minnesota. In September, Ms. Mathews paid the vacant building fee. Code Enforcement made an agreement with Ms. Mathews to give her six months to rehabilitate the properiy and she would not have to post the bond, but would haue to obtain a code compliance inspecfion. She obtained the code compliance inspection, but failed to act in a timely manner to rehabilitate the structure. Code Enforcement continually receives complaints of illegal activities and occupancy at the dwelling. There have been nuxnerous inspections. Mr. Magner had a conversation with Don Wagner (License, Inspecfions, Environmental Protection) who said he has not been called to inspect the property. There aze still outstanding pernuts that need to be puiled before a code compliance can be signed off. Samantha Mathews, owner, appeared and stated she had a code compliance inspection. The six months were up, and Rich Singerhouse (Code Enforcement) and another inspector came out on Mazch 7. She received an order to abate dated Mazch 19 and was given unril April 18 to clear the deficiencies. This is a different list than the original that she had six months to do. Shortly thereafter, a$2,000 bond was posted. The man who posted the $2,000 bond was under the assumption that he was going to get the house, and Mr. Ramstad had agreed to sell it to him after the foreclosure proceedings against her. Ms. Mathews also came up with $5,000, took the matter to district court, and saved her house. Three hours after she won the court case, there was a legislative heazing notice from Mr. Magner. Throughout this whole time, she has left several messages and has never had her calls returned. On her last visit with Mr. Magner, he said he was finished with this matter and would put Mike Morehead (Code Enforcement) in charge of it. Her house is more than 50% done. Ms. Mathews has photographs and affidavits from her neighbors. One of the people complaining would be a neighbor right next door to her who would like to obtain her property. Ms. Mathews received two summary abatement notices: one was for a dog and one to clean up the properry. The bond expires on October 13. Don Wagner would like to inspect the property to see what has been done. Gerry Strathman recommends laying over to the October 16, 2001, Legislative Hearing. He does not think the City should move on this property while the current bond is still in effect, but that is only for approximately two more weeks. There needs to be an inspection of the property before the bond is expired to determine if it can be extended another six months. Resolution ordering the owner to remove or repair the property at 715 Preble Street. If the owner fails to comply, Code Enforcement is ordered to remove the building. (Steve Magner submitted photographs.) Catherine Dauis, 1453 Arkwright Avenue #301, owner's daughter, appeazed. Gerry Strathxnan stated the document in front of him has Gilbert Castilla as tl�e fee owner, Long Beach Mortgage Company as the mortgagee, and Katherin and Michael Davis as interested parties. Ms. Dauis responded she is not sure how her name got onto the paperwork other than the fact that Giibert is her dad. He purchased the house in August. He is disabled and Ms. Davis O\ \c7Z�j LEGISLATIVE HEARING MIN [JTES FOR SEP"I'EMBER 25, 2001 Page 5 handles most of his business. They had done the work on the house and moved in unaware that it was a vacant house. Steve Magner reported this building has been vacant since June 10, 1999. There have been seven summary abatement notices issued to remove refuse, cut tall grass, secure structure. On August 1, 2001, an inspection of the building was conducted, a list of deficiencies which constitute a nuisance condition was developed, and photographs were taken. An order to abate a nuisance building was issued on August 6, 2001, with a compliance date of August 21, 2001. As of this date, this properry remains in a condition which comprises a nuisance as defined by the legislative code. The vacant building fees are due. Real estate t�es aze unpaid in the amount of $1,073.99. Prior to the fire, Tasation had placed an estimated market value of $11,000 on the land and $38,400 on the building. The estimated cost to repair this structure is $50,000 to $60,000; estimated cost to demolish, $7,000 to $8,000. On August 3, 2000, a code compliance inspection was done. No bond has been posted. Mr. Magner stated this was a registered vacant building, and vacant building placards were on it. The owner was put on notice not to occupy this building. There were two citations issued for illegal occupancy. They were occupying a registered vacant building when the fire occurred. Mr. Strathman stated the photographs do not indicate a fire. Mr. Magner responded the fire was contained in the interior of the dwelling. There was heauy smoke damage throughout. There was no burn through to the outside; it is a stucco exterior. Mr. Strathman asked was the extent of the damage cosmetic ar struetural. Mr. Magner responded there was heavy smoke and water damage throughout. The building has been abandoned since that time. There may have been more extensive water damage since then. Ms. Davis stated she takes caze of her father; he is not well. He purchased the properiy on August 9, 2000, from the previous owner. She does not have legal control over his decisions. Ms. Davis was not aware the property was a registered vacant house. It was obvious there were things that needed to be done to the property. Every pipe in the basement was busted. There was no ivmiing water nor electricity. She knew it had to meet certain codes before it could be legally occupied. She hired a company to replace the plumbing in the basement, and an outside spigot that leaked. The connection to the water heater had to be replaced. They laid carpet and painted. After she did the work, she moved in and was unaware that she couldn't. In September, a man came to the house and explained to her husband that they could not live there because the property was registered as being legally vacant. When she found this out, she had just given birth to her daughter. When she was able to, she contacted various people in the City. The fire that occurred on June 12 has rendered the condition of the house worse. Long Beach Mortgage holds $30,000 of insurance settlement on the fire to have it repaired. Ms. Davis went on to say she came into possession of a code compliance inspection dated August 3. After talking to Mr. Magner, he explained their contractor could walk through the house with the list, and he would know if it has been done. They could obtain a permit for the code compliance issues and a permit for the fire damage. Her contractor did a walk through. She c� `-��Z� LEGISLATIVE HEARING MINLJTES FOR SEPTEMBER 25, 2001 Page 6 cannot get the code compliance issues done until the fire damage is cleaned up to see what she is left with, but she cannot get the fire damage taken caze of until she gets the code compliance issues taken caze of. Mr. Strathman asked was she awaze that the repair cost may be beriveen $50,000 to $60,000. Ms. Dauis responded over half the list has been fixed. With the fire damage, there is additional work to be done. The mortgage company is holding $30,000. Mr. Strathman asked is the August 3, 2000, code compliance inspection an accurate representation of what needs to be done. Mr. Magner responded Don Wagner (License, Inspections, Environmental Protection) would have to go through the building and malce a determination as to what has to be compieted, was it done under permit, and can it be signed off. If not, it has to be done under permit. Most likely, Mr. Wagner will not give a code compliance certificate without including the fire damage items. Another code compliance inspection is needed, asked Mr. Strathman. Mr. Magner responded vacant building fees need to be paid, a code compliance inspection completed, and a bond needs to be posted. Aiso, the building should be unoccupied and secured. Gerry Strathman recommends granting the owner six months to complete the rehabilitation of the property on condition that the following is done by noon of Wednesday, October 3, 2001: 1) Pay the vacant building fee, 2) Get a code compliance inspection, 3) Post a$2,000 bond. Resolution ordering the owner to remove or repair the properly at 397 Aldine Street. If the owner faits to comply, Code Enforcement is ordered to remove the buiiding. Steve Magner reported the house has been moved to another location. (Case is closed.) Resolution ordering the owner to remove or repair the property at 473 Hatch Avenue. If the owner fails to comply, Code Enforcement is ordered to remove the building. (Steve Magner submitted photographs.) Steve Magner reported this property has been condemned and vacant since November 2000. Five sununary abatement notices have been issued to cuY ta11 grass and remove refuse. On August 1, 2001, an inspection of the building was conducted, a list of deficiencies which constitute a nuisance condition was developed, and photographs were taken. An order to abate a nuisance condition was issued on August 6 with a compliance date of August 21. As of this date, this properry remains in a condition which comprises a nuisance as defined by the legislative code. The City has boazded the building against trespass. The vacant building fees are due. Real estate taxes are unpaid of $209038. Taxation has placed an estimated market value of $6,500 on the land. Before the fire, the estimated market value of the building was $34,800. As c� � ��Z� LEGISLATIVE HEARING REPORT OF SEPTEMBER 25, 2001 Page 7 of today, a code compliance inspection has not been applied for and a bond has not been posted. The estimated cost to repair is $40,000 to $50,000; estimated cost to demolish, $6,000 to $7,000. Mr. Magner stated the owner has tried to sell the properry with no luck due to the small size of the structure, low ceilings, and numerous problems with the building. About a month ago, the owner asked Mr. Magner what would happen if the City demolished the structure. Mr. Magner explained the lot would remain his properry, and the cost of the demolition would be assessed on the ta��es. Gerry Strathman recomxnends approval. The meeting was adjourned at 11:02 a.m. --�+.,� City of St. Paul RATIFYING ASSBSSMSNT ��' e?l��t�,� COUNCIL FILE NO. �� By � Fi e No. EE BELOW Assessment No. SEE BELOW Ah.�.�.�..�,_ o�t, a,�oo� Voting Ward In the matter of the assessment of benefits, cost and expenses for 2 JOlOSVl (0926) q.sl�wa.ssseccw�en�io � # les .ao p�,,,� .t�.e, # ys,no i�r o:av i��. ir. f,..+s�..11 au scc �ns+�et' o� J0102G1 (0927) Towing of an abandoned vehicle from private property at 376 Maryland Ave East. (LLGISLATIVE HEARING WILL BS 9-25-01) �'/Iro.O � . Grass cutting (by private contractor) at 664 Edmund Ave. (L$GISLATIV& HEARING WILL BS 10-02-01) BOTH WBRE LAID OVF3R BY COUNCIL ON 9-19-01 TO 10-03-01 4a A public hearing having been had upon the assessment for the above improvement, and said assessment having been further considered by the Council, and having been considered finally satisfactory, therefore, be it RESOLVED, That the said assessment be and the same is hereby in all respects ratified. RBSOLVED FURTASR, That the said assessment be and it is hereby determined to be payable in One equal installments_ COUNCILPERSON Yeas Nays ✓Benanav �lakey ✓�3ostrom ✓Coleman ✓fiarris ✓Lantry �Feiter Adopted by the Council: Date p.�, 3 a.p e� Certified Passes by Council Secretary By �_ � . f'� l � �In Favor �� QAgainst Mayor City of St. Paul Real Estate Division Dept. of Technology & Management Serv RSPORT OF COMPLSTION OF ASSSSSMENT COUNCIL FILE NO. File No. SEE BELOW Assessment No. SEE BELOW � � �� 0�9 Voting Ward In the matter of the assessment of benefits, cost and e�enses for 2 JOlO5V1 (0926) Towing of an abandoned vehicle from private property at 376 Maryland Ave East. (L&GISLATIVE HEARING WILL BL 9-25-01) J0102G1 (0927) Grass cutting (by private 664 Edmund Ave. (LEGISLATIVB HEARING WILL contractor) at BE 10-02-01) BOTH WERE LAID OVER BY COUNCIL ON 9-19-01 TO 10-03-01 To the Council of the City of St. Paul The Valuation and Assessment Engineer hereby reports to the Council the following as a statement of the expenditures necessarily incurred for and in connection with the making of the above improvement, viz: Total construction costs Engineering and Inspection Real Estate Service Fee Process Serving Charge Charge-Code Enforcement Abatement Service Charge TOTAL EXPENDITURES Charge To Net Assessment $322.10 $ $ $ $50.00 $40.00 $412.10 $412.10 Said Valuation and Assessment Engineer further reports that he has assessed and levied the total amount as above ascertained, to-wit: the sum of $412.10 upon each and every lot, part or parcel of land deemed benefited by the said improvement, and in the case of each lot, part or parcel of land in accordance with the benefits conferred thereon; that the said assessment has been completed, and that hereto attached, identified by the signature of the said Valuation and Assessment Engineer, and made a part hereof, is the said assessment as completed by him, and which is herewith submitted to the Council for such action thereon as may be considered proper. // /J Dated 7-�s�� •. �,-,� �luation and Assessment Engineer w � � a � 7 a W C� � N N 0 a H E � Q 5 O O h E U W O a a a 0 w E � N H p a � z /� H `{� Q w s "� 1 • z � m � O a a O � H U � H a 5 � a � � o � 0 m 0 � N t � . �m � N Q i O I H i O i I � i N i E�N a� � [i] i N a�N 0 a �o� a�N � a, i � N 1 1 (q I O O O II O 1 I ei O O II �-i 1 2 i • n • � i P ul o II N� � � C N N 11 O� � i N Lr 11 N� ; N 11 i? 1 � n a � n F � ii i O � II � Q i IIO � W II � � � i CA � 000 � H i o0o N i H i O O O T � i .i 0 0 � i 1 • 1 � rl `1 ' a �e� � � O�N E � i a� � w w�000 � � 000� i i000 i � ��,o p F � N N H i � � I O 1 I � I I 1 i r i � i iW i �a �v � i � w x w �d�>ww z �zww o� � ��d�a � a � mor� � w �C �C v, � 1 O I I ; � 0 � y � � z� o � •� � H F i � � a •• � H 1 [xj a�z F � Uio O � m��-+ z o 0 o n o W� F ti o o n� °;o � d, ��;o��N E� K W O � N+/T L} II N a� aN � � n� a�Emam � ii a � m « x i n L1H� II a �W� 3 � ii � � n � n � n i n �� " o �� o � W n � c o i a n � O W io I M II a�a nmo� x wn � � N -. � >ww ii a i rL�u�i4]O � 2wG7 ii a � a q�n2 � O U II r.� � a 2 4C �n � Gl 7i � II [� E i 7Q2.7Q � 2i-a> n O C� ON�CC7 � 0.�1A W il E o��naa�qz� aamnH i H ] H 1 II U a u a o� aaanw w�� a io z� RL RC �¢ n ri 3� nHMa� OOOiia O w rvi ul +« i F E E ii a � � a m U a a F a � w x w 0 � a W � a N n� -1Oa9 N � a a � h a w Q £ N A 0 a H E � � � .a 0 N O . � � N � N 1 O I Q 1 N H I O 1 1 1 F � �� a�� w n � a�N � � a�m a�N � �� n i �� o 0 o n o� i000no� z � . n .^� ��n ui o n o i O� n rv N n c� � £ mvrvr n ti i F� i n +� i i i fL' � II o �� F � n V n � i n w n i i m o0o i Hi000 H i O O O I z�000 i � � � N.-1.I i a�� o � F � U Q i i W � i i Wi000 E�000 i FC � o00 � F4 � � �+ino i E � N N H I z ' I � � ' I 1 I I I I I I I I I W F w i rC W i �d�aww z w � �>.ww x�a u o��z� E i+ 9 V � E EPS FC � D Ll W � W � Cn�Cm � � � i i �z � �o � z�F � O�H H 1 [a E-1 1 Q 1 a�� H I [i] a�N H � U � O m i z WiOti i A�z w xm � ?� � W arlo i a � �` � W � U<v!L o a � H ,� ,� o �ra :� x�zH• a�ro o � �ma 3 � � � � ; ; ti i oi i r� i � ti � 0 i ui �o i CC � C7 ,� o � W i a i a � [�Q' N�i� 1 ��ooz�a� o�a�aAZ� � Of]] W i-+ i a�awa A� z � wc � a � w�oF�oa � o � >+ �o cn x + i 000no 0 0 o II o • ii • 1 n N O I I O f� N N I I N +ir ur vl n ti nm W E 5C W r�W W N �4 (� �H'� � 000 F F N � F O E E U w h ° x a � a � u 4 a H a £ k W O � .7 W a a .. 0�-��}9 To Legislative Hearing Officer - 9-25-01 and 10-02-01 Public HearinQ Date -10-3-01 T.M.S./REAL ESTATE DIVISION ontac[ Person and Phone Number: Roganna Flink 266-8859 Date: 9/25/Ol �� o�.�oaq Green Sheet Number: DIItF.CfOR CTTY COUIVCII. AITORNEY 111596 CLERK �st be on Council Agenda by: UDGEi DIRECTOR � .& MGi. SVC. DIR. ist be in Council Research Oflice yOR(ORASSIST ANT) 1 COUNCII.RESEARCH noon on Friday public hearing is 10-03-01 DTAL # OF SIGNATURE PAGES 1 (CLIP ALL LOCATIONS FOR SIGNATURE) CTION REQUESTED: At council's request on 9-19-01 to 10.03-01 Towing of an abandoned vehicle at 376 Maryland Ave. E. (Leg Hearing 9-25-01) and Grass cutting at 664 Edmund Ave. (Leg Hearing 10-02-01) were laid over for further discussion. JOlO5V1 and J0102G1 PI.ANNING COMMISSION CIVD. SERVICE COMMISSION CB COMh(ITTEE r[s whidh Council Objective Neighborhoods A STAFF 1. Aas [he persoN�rm ever worked under a conVaM for this departmeot? YES NO A Public Health . Has this persoNfirm ever beeu a City employee? YES NO A . Does this persoNfirm possess a sldll not normally possessed by any YES NO _ current City employee? Explain all YES answers on a separate sheet and attach. Ward 2 NG PROBLEM, ISSUE, OPPORTUNITY (Who, What, W6en, Where, Why?): "SEE ORIGINAL GREEN SHEET NUMBER 111577" IFAPPROVED: I I7►\ 77:Z�Y/ �I �A IF NOT APPROVED: nmouNT oF �ranivsncTioN: $412.10 : souxce: Assessments only AL WFORMATION: (EXPLAIN) 2 property. owners wili be notified of the public hea COST/REVENUE BUDGETED (CIRCLE ONE) ACTIVTCY NUMBER: and YES NO '� 1-1�9 REPORT Date: September 25, 2001 Time: 10:00 a.m. Place: Room 330 City Hall 15 West Kellogg Boulevazd LEGISLATIVE HEARING Gerry Strathman Legislafive Hearing Officer 1. Summary Abatement Order Appeal for 1598 Hazel Street North. (Laid over from 9-4-01) Legislative Hearing Officer recommends denying the appeal. 2. Resolution ordering the owner to remove or repair the property at 2257 Hillside Avenue. If the owner fails to comply, Code Enforcement is ordered to remove the building. (Laid over from 4-17-01) Legislative Hearing Officer recommends granting the owner six months to complete the rehabilitation of the property on condition that a$2,000 bond is posted by noon of Wednesday, October 3, 2001. 3. Laid Over Summary Abatement: JOl O5V Towing of abandoned vehicle at 376 Marvland Avenue East. Legislative Hearing Officer recommends reducing the assessment to $105 plus the $45 service fee for a total assessment of $150. 4. Summary Abatement Order appeal for 697 Surrev Avenue. Legislative Hearing Officer recommends denying the appeal. 5. Resolution ordering the owner to remove or repair the property at 850 Sims Avenue. If the owner fails to comply, Code Enforcement is ordered to remove the building. Legislative Hearing Officer recommends laying over to the October 16, 2001, Legislative Heatsag. 6. Resolution ordering the owner to remove or repair the properry at 715 Preble Street. If the owner fails to comply, Code Enforcement is ordered to remove the building. Legislative Hearing Officer recommends granring the owner six months to complete the rehabilitation of the properly on condition that the following is done by noon of Wednesday, October 3, 2001: 1) Pay the vacant building fee, 2) Get a code compliance inspection, 3) Post a$2,000 bond. a1-►� LEGISLATIVE HEARING REPORT OF SEPTEMBER 25, 2001 page 2 Resolution ordering the owner to remove or repair the property at 397 Aldine Street. If the owner fails to comply, Code Enforcement is ordered to remove the buiiding. (Case is closed.) 8. Resolution ordering the owner to remove or repair the properry at 473 Hatch Avenue. If the owner fails to comply, Code Enforcement is ordered to remove the building. Legislative Hearing Officer recommends approval. -�,.,-i To Legislative Hearing Officer - 9-4-01 Public Hearine Date - 9-19-01 T.M.S./REAL ESTATE DIVISION � Date: 8/2/Ol act Person and Phone Number: Roxanna Flink�� at be on Council Agenda by: �st be in Councii Research Office noon on Fridav �266-8859 8-29-01 g-17-01 fl�.�oay Green Sheet Number: 111577 .RTbiEhT DIRECTOR ATfOR�'EY :ET D[RECfOR DR (OR ASSISTAN7) CLERK & MGT-SVC. DIR RESE.U2CH # OF SIGNATURE PAGES 1 (CLIP ALL LOCATIONS FOR SIGNA' REQUESTED: Set date of public hearing and approve assmts for Grass cutting during June & part of July 2001., Summ Abate during June & part of July 2001., Boarding-up during June & part of July 2001., Demolition during June & part of July 2001 and Aband vehicles during June & part of Jul 2001. File No.'s J0102G, JOlOSA, J0104B, J0104C and JOlOSV. d�lEhDATIONS:APPROVE(A)ORREJECT(R) ERSONALSERVICECOViRACTSh(USTA�YSWER7HEFOLLOWt\G: PLANYINC COMSfISS(ON A SiAFF 1. Has the person/firm ever worked under a contract for [his department? YES \O CML SERVICE COJ1bIIS$IOY CIB CO�iS1ITTEE rts whidh Councii Objettive Neighborhoods A Public Health A vacantbidg Wa�d 2 Explain all YES answers on a separate sheet and attach. YES Pi0 YES NO i IATING PROBLE�I, ISSU£, OPPORTUNITY (Who, Whaq When, Where, Why?): Property owners or renters create a health hazard at various times throughout the City of Saint Paul when their propertv is not kept up. AGES IF APPROVED: Cost recovery programs to recover expenses for Grass cutting, Summary Abatements, Boarding- up, Demolitions and Abandoned vehicles. This includes cutting tall grass and weeds, hauling away all garbage, debris, refuse and tires. Also, ail household items such as refrigerators, stoves, sofas, chairs and all other items. In winter this includes the removal of snow and ice from sidewatk aod cross walks. IF APPROVED: If Council does not approve these charges, General Fund would be required to pay the assessment. Assessments are payable over 1 year and collected with the property taxes if not IF NOT APPROVED: Neighborhoods would be left to deteriorate and property values would decline. Nobody would take care of their property, especially vacant or rental properties. Rodents, filth, garbage and trash would accumuiate everywhere. Disease and pests could become a problem. A�IOUYT OF TRANSACTIO,�': $11S�GOH.O2 COSYlREVENUE BUDGETED (C[RCLE OYE) YES 1�0 .iDl\GSOURCE: ASSCSSMfIltS Has this person/firm ever been a City empioyee? Does [his person/Orm possess a skill not normally possessed by any current City emptoyee? ACf[VITY NUbiBER: �LI\FOASIATIO\:(EXPLAIN) 204 property owners will be notified of the public hearing and a\-�oZ� �Z. MINiITES OF TI� LEGISLATIVE HEARING Tuesday, September 25, 2001 Gerry Strathman, Legislative Hearing Officer Room 330 Courthouse The meeting was called to order at 10:04 a.m. STAFF PRESENT: Roxanna Flink, Real Estate; Steve Magner, Code Enforcement; Harold Robinson, Code Enforcement; Summary Abatement Order Appeal for 1598 Hazel Street North. (Laid over from 9-4-01) Gerry Strathman stated thax the appellant was going to consult with City staff and others as to whether the garden was consistent with the City's ordinance with respect to natural gazdens, prairie growth, etc. He asked did the owner have time to do that. Walt Montpetit, owner, appeared and stated a City representative called him last Friday and le8 a voice mail. He was out of town and just returned Sunday evening. He has not had a chance to have a conversarion with City inspectors as faz as what was a landscape design versus weeds and tall grass. Harold Robinson reported he could not find a specific ordinance to cover these things. The ordinance does read grass and weeds over 8 inches high must be cut. There are some specific plants and landscape designs that aze excluded from this. It is not composting because it is not a contained azea. It is not covered under the grass and weed ordinance because it is tall grass that has been allowed to grow. He cannot exempt it. Mr. Strathman asked is there someone in the City that knows plants well enough to make a determination as to if these plants are accepted under state law. Mr. Robinson responded he has been on the properry, and it is basically tall grass and weeds. Mr. Strathman asked what makes the owner think it is something other than tall grass and weeds. Mr. Montpetit responded the area is set aside from the rest of the yard. He looks at it as part of his landscape scheme. It is a wooded lot adjacent to the rest of the lot that is groomed, even though it is a small area. He does not know anyone who cuts weeds and tall grass out of a wooded lot. He asked is his yazd designated as a yard or as a wooded lot. Mr. Robinson responded that specifically a wooded lot has to have a tree, and this backyazd does not have a tree. Mr. Montpefit responded there are trees back in the corner. Mr. Robinson stated this properiy is definitely not a wooded lot. From the description he included with his appeal, stated Mr. Strathman, there is a map that shows the nature garden is behind the gazage and surrounded by a six foot privacy fence. He asked how this came to the City's attention. Mr. Robinson responded it was a complaint based inspection. Mr. Montpetit stated he belongs to the yacht club and a member complained to the City about weeds and tall grass on Harriet Island. This member was told it was part of the landscape scene. C� \-\oZcj LEGISLATNE HEARING MINUTES FOR SEPTEMBER 25, 2001 Page 2 It is no different than his weeds and tall grass, said Mr. Montpefit. He does not know what species needs to be cut and which species he can plant to conform. (Mr. Robinson gave Mr. Montpetit documents about a company that specializes in this subject.) Gerry 5trathman recommends denying the appeal. It does not appear that what Mr. Montpetit wants to do is provided for under the City ordinance. Resolution ordering the owner to remove or repair the property at 2257 Hillside Avenue. If the owner fails to comply, Code Enforcement is ordered to remove the building. (Laid over from 4-17-01) The following appeazed: Kim McCalluxn, 929 Selby Avenue, and Steve Gibbs, Western National, 41 12th Avenue North, Hopkins. Steve Magner reported this building has been vacant since December 3, 1999. There have been five summary abatement notices to secure the dwelling, cut tall grass, remove refuse, remove snow andlor ice. On October 19, 2000, an inspection of the building was conducted, a list of deficiencies which constitute a nuisance condition was developed, and photographs were taken. An order to abate a nuisance building was issued on October 24, 2000, with a compliance date of November 27. As of this date, the properry remains in a condition which comprises a nuisance as defined by the legisiative code. The real estates taYes aze unpaid of $6,333. Taxation has placed an estimated market value of $56,600 on the land, and $5,000 on the building. On July 25, 2001, a code compliance inspection was done. A$2,000 bond has not been posted. Estimated cost to repair is $100,000 to $150,000; estimated cost to demolish, $12,000 to $15,000. This was originally before the Legislative Hearing Officer in March, said Mr. Magner. It was laid over because the second mortgage company was going through a foreclosure process, wanted to cleaz the fitle, pay off the insurance company, and then sell it. The second mortgage company has been paid off and is no longer involved with this properiy. The original owner has physical control of the building, but there is still an issue with the insurance company for the fust mortgage company. Mr. McCalluxn stated he plans to take the next week and decide to sell the properry, rehabilitate it, or tear it down and rebuild. As of yesterday, there was a settlement. Mr. Gibbs stated Western Nafional wili be sarisfied with the agreement. They are now in the middle of foreclosure on the property. They will be out of the picture when that happens and the McCallums can take whatever action they would like. Mr. Strathman asked is he prepared to post the $2,000 bond. Mr. McCallum responded he is. Gerry Strathman recommends granting the owner six months to complete the rehabilitation of the property on condition that a$2,000 bond is posted by noon of Wednesday, October 3, 2001. v � �o�� LEGTSLATIVE HEARING MINUTES FOR SEPTEMBER 25, 2001 Page 3 � Laid Over Summary Abatement: J0105V Towing of abandoned vehicle at 376 Maryland Avenue East. Franciso Jazamillo, owner, appeared and stated this is about a vehicle he pazked on the side of his gazage. He received an order to remove it. He called a towing company, and was told they would not remove it until April. The City removed it in Mazch. He called the Impound Lot. He was toid that he would not haue to pay anything and he could sign over the title. The vehicle was left there. Haroid Robinson reported the vehicle was abated on January 25 and towed in Mazch. It had no current license plates. It was a proper tow. In answer to questions, Mr. Jaramillo responded the vehicle was a 1981 Honda Civic, and it did not run. Gerry Strathman recommends reducing the assessment to $105 plus the $45 service fee for a total assessment of $150. The owner should have taken care of the matter as soon as he got the notice. The City towed the vehicle, stored it, and sold it when they got the title. There aze costs involved. Summary Abatement Order appeal for 697 Surrev Avenue. (Shazon Anderson, appellant, sent Gerry Strathman an e-mail saying that she is unable to attend today's meeting.) Gerry Strathman recommends denying the appeal. Resolution ordering the owner to remove or repair the property at 850 Sims Avenue. If the owner faffs to comply, Code Enforcement is ordered to remove the building. (Steve Magner presented photographs. They were later retumed.) Steve Magner reported the property was condemned May 2000. It has been a vacant building since August 21, 2000. Two summary abatement notices have been issued to remove refuse. On Mazch 7, 2001, an inspection of the building was conducted, a list of deficiencies which constitute a nuisance condition was developed, and photographs were taken. An order to abate a nuisance building was issued on Mazch 19, 2001, with a compliance date of April 18. As of this date, the property remains in a condition that comprises a nuisance as defined by the legislative code. The vacant building fees aze due. Esrimated market value of property is $36,700; estimated cost to repair, $80,000 to $100,000, estimated cost to demolish, $7,500 to $8,000. A code compliance inspection was done on August 30, 2000. On April 13, 2001, stated Mr. Magner, a third party posted a$2,000 bond. His reasoning was that he was in expectation of obtaining title after the original owners--Michael and Becky Ramstad--cancelled the contract with Samantha Mathews. That bond eapires by October 15. � \-\oZ�j LEGISLATTVE HEt1RING MINIJTES FOR SEPT'EMBER 25, 2001 Page 4 Mr. Strathman asked what happened with the citation that was issued for failure to pay the vacant building fee. Mr. Magner responded he does not have the file with him, but he assumes the citation was never settled. The owner is no longer in Minnesota. In September, Ms. Mathews paid the vacant building fee. Code Enforcement made an agreement with Ms. Mathews to give her six months to rehabilitate the properiy and she would not have to post the bond, but would haue to obtain a code compliance inspecfion. She obtained the code compliance inspection, but failed to act in a timely manner to rehabilitate the structure. Code Enforcement continually receives complaints of illegal activities and occupancy at the dwelling. There have been nuxnerous inspections. Mr. Magner had a conversation with Don Wagner (License, Inspecfions, Environmental Protection) who said he has not been called to inspect the property. There aze still outstanding pernuts that need to be puiled before a code compliance can be signed off. Samantha Mathews, owner, appeared and stated she had a code compliance inspection. The six months were up, and Rich Singerhouse (Code Enforcement) and another inspector came out on Mazch 7. She received an order to abate dated Mazch 19 and was given unril April 18 to clear the deficiencies. This is a different list than the original that she had six months to do. Shortly thereafter, a$2,000 bond was posted. The man who posted the $2,000 bond was under the assumption that he was going to get the house, and Mr. Ramstad had agreed to sell it to him after the foreclosure proceedings against her. Ms. Mathews also came up with $5,000, took the matter to district court, and saved her house. Three hours after she won the court case, there was a legislative heazing notice from Mr. Magner. Throughout this whole time, she has left several messages and has never had her calls returned. On her last visit with Mr. Magner, he said he was finished with this matter and would put Mike Morehead (Code Enforcement) in charge of it. Her house is more than 50% done. Ms. Mathews has photographs and affidavits from her neighbors. One of the people complaining would be a neighbor right next door to her who would like to obtain her property. Ms. Mathews received two summary abatement notices: one was for a dog and one to clean up the properry. The bond expires on October 13. Don Wagner would like to inspect the property to see what has been done. Gerry Strathman recommends laying over to the October 16, 2001, Legislative Hearing. He does not think the City should move on this property while the current bond is still in effect, but that is only for approximately two more weeks. There needs to be an inspection of the property before the bond is expired to determine if it can be extended another six months. Resolution ordering the owner to remove or repair the property at 715 Preble Street. If the owner fails to comply, Code Enforcement is ordered to remove the building. (Steve Magner submitted photographs.) Catherine Dauis, 1453 Arkwright Avenue #301, owner's daughter, appeazed. Gerry Strathxnan stated the document in front of him has Gilbert Castilla as tl�e fee owner, Long Beach Mortgage Company as the mortgagee, and Katherin and Michael Davis as interested parties. Ms. Dauis responded she is not sure how her name got onto the paperwork other than the fact that Giibert is her dad. He purchased the house in August. He is disabled and Ms. Davis O\ \c7Z�j LEGISLATIVE HEARING MIN [JTES FOR SEP"I'EMBER 25, 2001 Page 5 handles most of his business. They had done the work on the house and moved in unaware that it was a vacant house. Steve Magner reported this building has been vacant since June 10, 1999. There have been seven summary abatement notices issued to remove refuse, cut tall grass, secure structure. On August 1, 2001, an inspection of the building was conducted, a list of deficiencies which constitute a nuisance condition was developed, and photographs were taken. An order to abate a nuisance building was issued on August 6, 2001, with a compliance date of August 21, 2001. As of this date, this properry remains in a condition which comprises a nuisance as defined by the legislative code. The vacant building fees are due. Real estate t�es aze unpaid in the amount of $1,073.99. Prior to the fire, Tasation had placed an estimated market value of $11,000 on the land and $38,400 on the building. The estimated cost to repair this structure is $50,000 to $60,000; estimated cost to demolish, $7,000 to $8,000. On August 3, 2000, a code compliance inspection was done. No bond has been posted. Mr. Magner stated this was a registered vacant building, and vacant building placards were on it. The owner was put on notice not to occupy this building. There were two citations issued for illegal occupancy. They were occupying a registered vacant building when the fire occurred. Mr. Strathman stated the photographs do not indicate a fire. Mr. Magner responded the fire was contained in the interior of the dwelling. There was heauy smoke damage throughout. There was no burn through to the outside; it is a stucco exterior. Mr. Strathman asked was the extent of the damage cosmetic ar struetural. Mr. Magner responded there was heavy smoke and water damage throughout. The building has been abandoned since that time. There may have been more extensive water damage since then. Ms. Davis stated she takes caze of her father; he is not well. He purchased the properiy on August 9, 2000, from the previous owner. She does not have legal control over his decisions. Ms. Davis was not aware the property was a registered vacant house. It was obvious there were things that needed to be done to the property. Every pipe in the basement was busted. There was no ivmiing water nor electricity. She knew it had to meet certain codes before it could be legally occupied. She hired a company to replace the plumbing in the basement, and an outside spigot that leaked. The connection to the water heater had to be replaced. They laid carpet and painted. After she did the work, she moved in and was unaware that she couldn't. In September, a man came to the house and explained to her husband that they could not live there because the property was registered as being legally vacant. When she found this out, she had just given birth to her daughter. When she was able to, she contacted various people in the City. The fire that occurred on June 12 has rendered the condition of the house worse. Long Beach Mortgage holds $30,000 of insurance settlement on the fire to have it repaired. Ms. Davis went on to say she came into possession of a code compliance inspection dated August 3. After talking to Mr. Magner, he explained their contractor could walk through the house with the list, and he would know if it has been done. They could obtain a permit for the code compliance issues and a permit for the fire damage. Her contractor did a walk through. She c� `-��Z� LEGISLATIVE HEARING MINLJTES FOR SEPTEMBER 25, 2001 Page 6 cannot get the code compliance issues done until the fire damage is cleaned up to see what she is left with, but she cannot get the fire damage taken caze of until she gets the code compliance issues taken caze of. Mr. Strathman asked was she awaze that the repair cost may be beriveen $50,000 to $60,000. Ms. Dauis responded over half the list has been fixed. With the fire damage, there is additional work to be done. The mortgage company is holding $30,000. Mr. Strathman asked is the August 3, 2000, code compliance inspection an accurate representation of what needs to be done. Mr. Magner responded Don Wagner (License, Inspections, Environmental Protection) would have to go through the building and malce a determination as to what has to be compieted, was it done under permit, and can it be signed off. If not, it has to be done under permit. Most likely, Mr. Wagner will not give a code compliance certificate without including the fire damage items. Another code compliance inspection is needed, asked Mr. Strathman. Mr. Magner responded vacant building fees need to be paid, a code compliance inspection completed, and a bond needs to be posted. Aiso, the building should be unoccupied and secured. Gerry Strathman recommends granting the owner six months to complete the rehabilitation of the property on condition that the following is done by noon of Wednesday, October 3, 2001: 1) Pay the vacant building fee, 2) Get a code compliance inspection, 3) Post a$2,000 bond. Resolution ordering the owner to remove or repair the properly at 397 Aldine Street. If the owner faits to comply, Code Enforcement is ordered to remove the buiiding. Steve Magner reported the house has been moved to another location. (Case is closed.) Resolution ordering the owner to remove or repair the property at 473 Hatch Avenue. If the owner fails to comply, Code Enforcement is ordered to remove the building. (Steve Magner submitted photographs.) Steve Magner reported this property has been condemned and vacant since November 2000. Five sununary abatement notices have been issued to cuY ta11 grass and remove refuse. On August 1, 2001, an inspection of the building was conducted, a list of deficiencies which constitute a nuisance condition was developed, and photographs were taken. An order to abate a nuisance condition was issued on August 6 with a compliance date of August 21. As of this date, this properry remains in a condition which comprises a nuisance as defined by the legislative code. The City has boazded the building against trespass. The vacant building fees are due. Real estate taxes are unpaid of $209038. Taxation has placed an estimated market value of $6,500 on the land. Before the fire, the estimated market value of the building was $34,800. As c� � ��Z� LEGISLATIVE HEARING REPORT OF SEPTEMBER 25, 2001 Page 7 of today, a code compliance inspection has not been applied for and a bond has not been posted. The estimated cost to repair is $40,000 to $50,000; estimated cost to demolish, $6,000 to $7,000. Mr. Magner stated the owner has tried to sell the properry with no luck due to the small size of the structure, low ceilings, and numerous problems with the building. About a month ago, the owner asked Mr. Magner what would happen if the City demolished the structure. Mr. Magner explained the lot would remain his properry, and the cost of the demolition would be assessed on the ta��es. Gerry Strathman recomxnends approval. The meeting was adjourned at 11:02 a.m. --�+.,�