275577 ,.., r,
�NMITE - CITV CLERK ����w O
PINK - FINANCE � COUIICII �
CANARY - OEPA/7TMENT CITY OF SOINT PAUL
BLUE - MAVOR f/
File N�.
, ncil Re olution
Presented By
Referred To Committee: Date
Out of Committee By Date
A RESOLUTION ADOPTING GUIDELINES FOR THE 1981
RESIDENTIAL STREET PAVING PROGRAM (RSPP)
WHEREAS, the Administration published proposed "1981 Residential
Street Paving Program (RSPP) Guidelines" on July 21, 1980, transmitting
notice o� their availability through the Early Notification System
(ENS) and copies of the proposed guidelines to the addressees on the
Neighborhood Contact List; and
WHERTAS, on August 22, 1980, the Public Works Committee of the
Council Qf the City of Saint Paul heard public comment on, and
reviewed the proposed Guidelines; and
WHEREAS, on September 30, 1980 this Council will adopt the
1981 Capital Improvement Budget, including the 1981 appropriation
for the 1981 RSPP; now, therefore, be it
RE50LVED, by this Council, that said Guidelines, hereto a�tached,
are adopted for use in determining residential street paving project
prioriti�s for the 1981 Residential Street Paving Program.
t-
COU[VCILMEIV Re sted by Department of: Public Works
Yeas Nays � ��I:.K�CJ
tler � Hunt
ZZ � In Favor D ALD NYGAARD, D' or
H Levine
'ne ' nnaddox _ � __ Against BY --
a ox , McMahon
ho 1 wafter 2 1980
�e �EP Form Approved by 'ty A ney
Adopte,d'by Council: . Date
C tified Pass�d by Cou c.il ecretary BY
.
tapp d y 1+lavor: Dat EP 4 �98Q Approved b yor for ubmi sion A Council
\
By _ BY
�o S E P 1 3 1980
�
. , . . ��r���`y►�,
a
� __._ �,�o� CITY OF SAINT PAUL
�;~` ^�* 'i� LONG-RANGE CAPITAL IMPROVEMENT BUDGET COMMITTEE
�, .,:
�,v iri�i iiii �'
,,,, _ OfFiCE OF THE MAYOR — BUDGET SECTION
�'''rn„ ,.1�•��` 367 City Hall,Saint Paul,Minnesota 5510Z
612-298-4323
GEORGE LATIMER
MAYOR
TO: Neigbborhood Contact List
FROM: Gregory Haupt, Mayor's Office - Budget Section ���
DATE: July 21, 1980 ;
SUBJECT: 1981 Residential Street Paving Program (RSPP)
At its meeting of July 15, the Streets & Utilities Task Force
of the CIB Committee reviewed and revised staff-proposed
1981 RSPP guidelines. Enclosed for your information and review
are the guidelines (green) as the task force authorized them
for distribution. Change� made by �he �a�sh. bonce cvice �hawn
�.n .i.t;a,F,i.c �y}�e.
Also enclosed is the revised RSPP calendar of events (salmon) .
Please note that the Public Works Committee of City Council
will hold a public hearing on the guidelines at 8:30 a.m.
(time has changed) on Friday, August 22.
The third attachment is the proposal rating sheet adopted by
the task force for its use in November.
Please note, forms to be used for proposing street paving
projects will be distributed on or after September 2.
GH/lm
enclosures
cc: City Council
Early Notification System (no attchments)
� � ����'�
1981 RESIDENTIAL STREET PAVING PROGRAM (RSPP)
ADOPTED BY CITY COUNCIL SEPTEMBER 2� 1980
COUNCIL FILE
These guidelines were developed for use in
allocating City Council' s 1981
Capital Improvement Budget RSPP appropriation
to candidate proposals submitted by the
Department of Public Works and by citizen
and neighborhood organizations.
For further information, contact the
Budget Section of the Mayor's
Office, 367 City Hall, 298-4323
or Mr. R,obert Peterson, Assistant City Engineer - Streets,
Department of Public Works,
6th Floor City Hall Annex, 298-5070
I V-A THE RES I DEPJT i AL STREET PAV I P�r, PROi;P,AM
i. 193� RESIDE;dTIAL STREET PAVI!!� PROGRAr+ (P,SPP)
2, r,U1DELIPJES
3. G�AL
4. �t-*s The goal of the Residential Street Pavinq °rogram is to inorove t!�e
5. quality of tl�e Saint Paul neigfiborhoods by replacing a}� presentiy et}-
6. unpaved and deteriorated res i c'enti al snrfaeed streets s�i th a perr�anent
7. roadways , properly graded, surfaced and curMPd, and by installin� sideaaalks
�, and street lights as aporopriate to each area.
9. PROr,RAM DEVELOP��EFJT
10. 1. E L 1 G I BLE I MPROVEME'VTS APJD AREAS
11. a. 8rt}y-present}q Oil-surfaced streets sha�} r�� be included in this
12. program. These street sur�aces have been built u� over the years
13. by a yearl•/ oi 1 and sand treatment (latety, ever� thi rd year) .
14. Some of these streets have had curbing installPd on them. .
15. b. Paved streets in deterio�ated condition may Se is�cTudec: in this
1 E�. prog ram.
17. c. Unim roved, residentiai streets ,_which are not assessable unCer
...�. .._..,..�.�.__.._..___r_�._ ___ .�._._ ___.._.___�____._.__.�__..___
18. current policy, may be included in this nro�ram. These streets
19. are general � short blocks abuttin� the Tonq sides of corner lots ,
2�. ti•�hi ch, under Ci t�pol i cy_ are not assessed for the f i rst 125 feet
21 . of the lonc� side f rontage.
22. b- d. Only streets in �Nhich utilities are complete and ade�uate or streets
23. in which uti lities wi 11 be installed as �art of the imurovenent �vi 11
24, b� jn�luded in the prograr�. The eaax o� u,�i.e,i,#,i.e�s o�helc �h.a.n .bxlee2t,
6egp�,c. b��na�n�a�m��un�ng°n6�lcu.c�t,i.on ab cUr.a,i.nage �ac.i�i.#,i,e�s, w.�Q,� na�
Z5, e: e. Areas sha 1 be esta lished to obtain r�axinum effect and efficient
• - ' ' Paae 2
�����
up .to an aba a.ewte ma.x,�mum o�
25. construction. Cost should-�be �+�-�Nx $15�,0!10 �t�'$40Q,00�
27. range.
23. f. Any grou� or individual ma� submit�roposals to the Sud�et Section of
29. the t•layor's office for consideration. However, only the top tti,ro �ro-
3n. posals of each District Councii �vill be rated by the Streets and Util�
31 . ities Task Force of the Ct3 Committee. �.dditionall the Streets and
_._._ _._.�_._____�._._.r___.______.�_..____._____�_ _._.�.____ _
32. Uti I i ties Tas!c Force tivi 11 rate up to four proposals from the Denart i
33. ment of Pub 1 i c !Iorks.
3�. d: t�o-nere-than-one-area-rrr}}-be-se��eted-�er-B'rstr*ct-fer-}qso.---9r?-
35. trrets-are-erreonraned-t�-stlbr�rt-oR}y-thefr-h*�hest-�ri�erttp-�ro7eets.
3u. 2. SELECTIOtJ CRITERIA
37. a. f!o more than t�ro areas a�ill be selected�er District for 1?41.
3B. a: b. Di stri ct Counci 1 recorm�endati ons and di stri ct plans.
39. The recommendations of the appropriate district council and consis-
40. tency with a dist►-ict plan ���ill bP given consideration.
41. If a project is proposed for a district �vhich has not comoteted a dis-
42. trict plan, the district council i•rill 6e contacted to determine the
43• support for a paving project. '
44. b; c. Relationship to other public improvements such as parks, utilities ,
45. sewers , lighting, etc.
46. Concentration of ir�provements may sinnificantly strengthen the total
47. impact. All public capital improvements will be considered in a pro-
4a. posed project area. Rf+e�+�y Specific consideration will be aiven to
49. areas where other needed public improvements w+�� are budgeted in the
50. 19$1 Capital Inprovement 8udget be-�fev}da�-'}p_69Rf61R6��AW-wiib-�lae
51 . s�r°�t-�regre� or �yhere puhlic improvements a��ea��-ex+s�. have been
52. orovided for in a Capital improvement Budget adopted more recentty
' , p�ac�e 3 • .
53. than 1976.
54. e: d. Eaprta�-A}�oeatTOn-Peircq---�?38 If the C�_ Council ap�ro�priates both
55. Capital Improvement Bond funds and Community Developnent alock .r,rant
56. funds to the 1981 RSPP , then funds for residential street ir?�rovements
57. will be altocated in accordance with Policy B S!� of "Saint Paul Capital
58. Allocation Policy: �988": t9�1-19�5:
59. Hesv-a�}oeatton-o�-both-stlbzrdq-eapi-ta�-and-eap*ta#-fer
60. Serdree-sqstens-rmproeremertts-Tn-sappert-of-restc�entrai
61 . and-rterghborhood-*merovemcrrt-shea}d-fe}�erd-thrs-di-strrb-
62, ntron:
63. S6: BALANCED PaEIGHQQRH00D 3ETTERMEPJT
64. � In order to assure a balanced approach towarci neic�h-
65. borhood betterment, neH� altocations of capital for
bo. subsidies and service system improver�nts should fot-
67. 1ow this distribution.
b8. � of Total Recomr.�ended ; of
69. Residential Subsidy/Service
70. Area 8locks � Systen C�pital M
7l. A;-B-s-4�r�preaerneft�-+++ 3�0 �a-�5� �,'�-75�
72. Lrn•�/tSoderate Incr�me Areas
73. �•�hich are Improveme:nt i or
7f�. I I ; �111 Im�rovee�ent I 1 I Areas
75. A}�-9ther 709; �5-�9� 25-4�i
76. Al1 Conservation I and II Areas ;
77. Improvement i and 11 ArG,s which
78. a�e not Lou�/��lode ra te I n come
79. d.- e. Eoordrnatron-M*th-rte'rghbo�heod-rnprover±�ent-proere�ss
�0. °rterrtp-sf�ed�d Spec i f i c cons i de rat i on !yi 11 bz Q i ven to areas !•�he r�
. • . � Page 4
. �t��
new oppontu.v�,f�'.i.ea �an houa�,ng �on .e.aw/modena.te �.ncome pe�ar� ane
be,i,ng deveZaped an whe�r.e �
• �1. residents are already involved in strenathenina housing maintenance
�2. efforts and other neighborhood inmroverient pro.jects , especially cur-
°3• rent ITA's and iJNS areas.
�4. e: f. �he-eentTna*tp-of-program-pavrng-rn-sneerfrc-arcas:
35. Continuity of paving proaram activ� over several years in one larae
36, residential area is an important factor in overall impact and effect-
"7. iveness. For this reason , prror'ttq-shed��! sQecific consideration a�i 11
,3F. be given to project opportunities adjacent to RSPP improvernents com-
"Q pleted in a previous year.
90, fr c�. Eortd'rt'roR-ef-exrstrrrg-street.
91. Pr'ror'rt'res-shon}d-be-basee!-on Soecific consideration ��ill be niven to
92. the general condition , apoearance , serviceability and extraordinary
93. maintenance needs of tlie existing streets. and-ort-the-nossrbr}'rtp-of
g4, drtnsna�-eenstrnctTOn-eosts.
pnopoaa.ee wh,i.ch do na� ev�.ta,i.�
95. h. Specific consideration ►�i 11 be .�iven to ttne- r�sz��i-�i�rrF excessive
96. pro�ject costs due to unusual construct_ion re�uirements.
�7. g: i. Energy-eeRSereretrort:--Prrorrtq-shon}d Specific consideration �f�ill be
9f3. given to paving proposals for residential streets which are nublic
(MTC)
99. transportation/routes and/or marked bicycle routes and .2a.n.e,�.
100. � S�eci f i c cons i deration wi 1 1 be qi ven to the Publ i c !�lorks Deoartr�ent's
TO1. overall recommendation on a,particular oroposal . The ran�e of �-10
102, points to be assiqned witt be based on the Denart;nent's �ener�i ��p-
.�_.,___.__.__- - - - — -_�._._. ___._...._._r.....___.��_... _...___.__._...
103. praisal of the pro.posal .
1�4. ;. PROJECT STA�JOARDS
105. Standard street construction consists of the folloi•rin�:
106. a. A 32' a•�ide street e•�ith asohalt pavenent and concrete curb and outter.
107, b. Sidea�alk reconstructio� ar7��-be based on a condition insnection by
• Page 5 . .-
103. the Departr�ent of Publ i c ',lorl;s.
109. -- A11 otd tile sideti•�alk �iiil be replaced r�ith nei� sidetivall;.
i t!�. -- Al l scaled, crac4:ed or tree-heaved s i de��aa1G: ���i ) 1 f�e re-
111. placed if, in the o�inion of the Q��artr�ent of Qublic
11'. llor�:s , it constitutes a trinpin� hazard.
113. -- Reconstructed sideaial�:s i•�i 11 be 5' ti•ride excent s�ot nanel
1 1 It, rep 1 acenen t of C�' ��i de t�a t I<.
1i5. -- Pedestrian ram�s urill be constructed at all intersections
li'�. 4vher� sidewalk is being reconstructed.
117. c. "!et•1 catch basins.
11�. d. Ornamental linhting ��rith underground aririnc; s�'r��-hc installed t,�ith
119. energy-efficient '+*gh-pressere sodium vaa�r linhtinq Ethase-}'rnhts
12�. ta��hr=����aae�k i f requeste�� the affected ne i�hborhoo:�_ I n
121. most instances , existing ornamental light standards ti�ri 11 be refurb-
12�, ished and converted to h*gh-pressnre sodium vapor fixtures.
123. e. A�� Drivea�ays rr7}�-be constru�ted/reconstructed between the sidewallc
124. and curb with new concrete aprons.
125. f. A�� Outwalks ev*��-be constructed/reconstructed beta►een the sidewalk
126, and curb wi th new 2 ' ��i dP concrete outti��alks.
127. g. Boulevards evt��-be reqraded and sodded a�here necessary. (Usually
12�. this is the entire boulevard.)
129. h.- �he-BrdTSrort-of-Parks-artd-Recr�atron-r�r}}-ceerd'rrtate-reforestatren
130. and-eemr}ete-trae—p��lRt1RQ—tll-thc-area�af tQf—Ct�":C1'—!'!C1'�''—!'S—"�c)f'fC.-
131. {�ree-p}rnt'r-�g-*s-dorte-err}q-rn-the-s�rrrtg-or-fa�i:}
132. 7r h. ',-later service.
133. ".later services wi 11 be replaced on a project basis frc�n the main to
134. the stop box with copper pipe, at the request of a citizen oraaniza-
• ' ' p�qe �.
�5�'��
135. tion , a�here the size of the s�rvice is i/� inch in diameter or lnss
1?h, and where the average static i•�ater pressure in the main is ec±ual to
137. or less than 4� nounds per sctuare inch.
i3". (It s�ould a}so be nade clear that for a resident to realizn an im-
13". prover.�ent at the �•�ater faucets , the remainder of t"e !��ater sAn�ice
14f?. from t�e stop box, �-rhich is in the r�oulav�rd, to th� house , �s �!ell
1�s 1 . as the r�ate r n i pes i n the house, r�ay have to be re�lac^d. Th i s +rou 1 cl
1!�2, be at the horrA oamer's ex�ense.)
1'-�3. It snould be emphasized that a requPst by a citizen aroup for special de-
144. sign items (i .e. , stone curb, historic light fixtures, textureci concrete
145, surface, etc.) aihich are other than the above listed standard construct-
I�tG. ion �,�ill be considered by tlie ETtq-Eedner� CIG Conmittee anc� su5ject to
I1�7. City Council aporoval. �he City Council consideration ��aiil includA an
IL". analysis �y tl�e CIB Connitte� o` the additianal cost for non-standarci
11i�. �ror�c and the ir�act of that addi tional cost on �he other �riori tv 1 ro- .
15�. jects in the r�commen::�d RSP° bU�AP_t.
151. �!, cSTItiATED CQST
15�. The estimated cost of these �rojects durin� 1�81 is S�?5r°Q 512�.�� per
153• lineal foot of street (that's �_45k;�99 $hG0,��0 per mile) , and includes
1;4. itens 3a through 3g above� eo4� pelc .P..f,ne.a,� �oo� w.i�hou,t .e,i,gh.t,i.vtg .i,a $113.00.
155. a. If the bloc�:s are standard �'tong blocks" (ti���') and "short hloc�:s"
15�. (330') , estinate the tenat!i by multiplying the nunber of long bloc!:s
157. tir*�es b50, and the short blocks tir.ies 33� and multiplying t�''IS times
153. 5�95.-99 $125.�� for total project cost.
159. b. Call �on-i4ahfe�d;-Ed-�ro-or-Ban-Banford, tti�:e Ea�um (2�?2-71�3) or
15�. �ob Peterson (?�?3-5070) and-theq-bT�}-frRare-tt-oat:--��Q¢-53}}} if
� P�aae 7 - .
l�l. assi.stance is needed in deterninin� th� project estimate.
t�7.. 5. SUati i SS I OFJ OF PROJECT REnUESTS
ih3. All requests for residential strset paving are due in the City �udnet
1G4. Director's Office, Room 367 City Hall , 55102 , no later than 4:3!) �.M.
165, on Friday, 5epter.+be�-�4;-�9�� October 3, 1930. Forms received after
necuve �a.irr,ts a.P,e.oea,te���y '�lie S�'ii.e2#�s � ll�.i.Q,i,tLe6
166. 4:30 on October 3, wi i l not-t�-s�►t�F�t-e�d-�o-�?}e�S�ree�s--ane�-Ht�'r�i-ti-cs
Taaft Fonee �n �ime,ey �ubrn.{,aa-i.avi._ ___.._ �_ _.___��_�._ _._.�._
1b7. �ask-Fo.�ca.- �.-�a��� Forns for requesting funding consideration
160". ("Request for �9�8 i931 Residential Street Pavino") are included in
169. this mailing and can also be obtained by callina Public llorks , 2�1R-5311
17�. or the Budget Section , Z9$-4323.
171 . Before a citizen organization submits a project request to the City, the
172. or�anization �ay wish to call ftike Eggum (2Q2�7153) of the Street Division
Roge�c Puehlr:e.i�teJc (292-6004) ----_ _.. �__,__.____._ ___��
173. or-[3ar�-[����oKd-��9��-671'�'4� of the Sewer Division �on-IEnhfe�d,-Ed-�*o-er-Ban
174. �nrrford-can-be-ea}}��}-�g4$-53}}};-and-theq-aat}� to review the nroject to
175. make sure it meets these criteria oticies. (It is especially ir�oortant
any pa4d�.b.i.�i,ty o�
i75, to avoid conflict vrith�future sewer construction) . Citizen groups ��iish-
177. ing to submit ��ving �roposats shoul� notify their district council �f
173. their intentions and coordinate their submissions �aith others fror� the
17g. district councii.
130. 6. EXCEPTIOt1S TO GUIDELitlES
131. Paving proposals not consistent tivith these guidelines should be subnitted
13?, as part of the Unifiec� Capital Improvement Program and Budget Process
183. (UCIPSP) in spring �9$8 1�81.
184. 7. SCf1EDULE
135. The calender of events for the 19"1 RSPP. is attached.
STREETS & UTILZTIES TASK FORCE � ��t%
1980 RESIDENTIAL STREET PAVING PROGRAM PROPOSAL EVALUATION CRITERIA � �+ �`� �" �
� FOR SELECTING 1981 PAVING PROJECTS
EVALUATOR'S NAME LOG #
DISTRICT #
SCORE EVALUATOR'S
MAJOR CON52DERATIONS RANGE SCORE
A) District Council priority - requested area is:
1. First priority within District boundaries 5 to 10
2. Second priority within District boundaries 3 to 7
B) Visual impact through coordination with other
public improvements since 1976:
1. Serves parks, playgrounds, li.braries, fire
station, multi-service center, etc. 4 to 13
2• MSA, CA or TH road reconstruction 4 to 10
3. No ublic i rovements served p
C) Coordination with other utility improvements in
street (qas, water, sewer, telephone):
1. No utility improvements required 6 to 13
2. Required utility improvements budgeted 6 to 13
3. Utilit rovements re ired but not bud eted 0
D) Strengthens or maintains neighborhood improvement
jhousing maintenance or new developments):
1. Past and current ITA's or NHS areas 7 to 10
2. Other areas demonstrating effort or azeas of
new low/moderate income housin o rtunit 3 to 7
E) Continuity with other residential street paving
areas completed since 1970 (score zero if NA):
1. Adjacent to previous CDBG ITA paving or
previous RSPP areas 5 to 10
2. Adjacent to prior NDP or Model Cities paving
project 3 to 7
3. Com letion of ocket area 3 to 7
F) Unusual condition of street relative to annual
maintenance (Public Works determination):
1. Excessive maintenance 7 to 13
2. Averaqe maintenance • 3 to 6
3. Oiled streets ia relativ v aood co d '0 0
G) Construction costs based on unusual conditions
(Public Works determination)
1. Low 7 to 10
2. Average 4 to 6
3. Hi h Q
H) MTC bus route or bike route? y�s Ip
(if NOT, score zero)
I) Public Works overall recommendation on project
High 8 to 10
Medium 4 to 7
Low 0 to 3
J) Conformance with Comprehensive Plan Yes 8 to l0
(Planning Commi.ssion) Partial, N/A 4 to 6
Conflict 0
K) Conformance with Capital Allocation Policies Yes 8 to 10
(Planning Co�nission-appropriate policies)
Partial, N/A 4 to 6
No 0
L� Proposal submitted on time Yes 5
(if NOT, score zero)
M) Rater's general a raisal of pro osal . 0 to 15.
TOTAL tange = 0 to 155
OMBS/7/SO gjh
. . Rev. : 9/8/75
� �� ' , e �• EX?'I,a��ATIO`: C�' �D�IT`7T:�T?Z.:TI�:E O{��ERS,
� RESOLL i IJ�IS , rl:1) URDI�ir��aCr�'S -
• , ` . �'����� .
Date: August 13, ig80 . .
: . � �RE:C�EIVEp
-T0: MAYOR GEORG�` Lr'1TIi�IER AUG 1 5 198Q
FR: Robert G. Peterson, Assi.starrt City En�3neer A1�qY�•� �
�. 1981 Residential Street Paving Program Gdidelinea . . � . �
� _ . - . . _
; ACTION REQLLSmED: Approval by Mayor' for Submission to Couricil oP atteched�Resolution
. � . � . .
PURPOSE n`:D RATICi��_�LE FdR THIS �CTSON: City Council approva�l of the Gu3delinee
!or the Residential Street Paving Program is the .next �tep in the.� procesa af� d�eterrt►ining �
the residential streeta Nhich �ill receive comple�e reconstruction. . � �
� 4 � - . � . .. . . .
. �
�
_ ATT��C�L•i�ti':'S: l. Froposed Resolution � � �
2. Proposed Guidelines '
• • . . .. . . . ., .: ... ._ ... .
- , Cz�.,� o� ���.��� ��.��,
j ,
��� -
� ;' jji i �" ' OFFIC� O� T�� CIT�' COII\GTL r� ��`~fri
r �d�v � a
� ;S�;' y;._�' � �:i
' ,,.. 4���.:'�>J �,_� -
t-:'���:• := ti �a
� �,� Da t e : August 25, 1980
�. .
AT�
-. _.._...--
C � i'� l�� t � � � � � � � � � �
TO : Saint Paul Ci�y Councii -
F R O IV� � C O Ii'137i 1�7��''..° O T�i PUBLIC WORKS _
victor J. Tea.esco , choiFinan, malces the foito�r�ing
report on C.F. [� Ordinance
_ [� Resotui�ion
. � O�her .
T ���L.� : A RESOLUTION ADOPTING GUIDELINES FOR THE 1981 �
RESIDENTIAL STREET PAVING PROGRAM (RSPP)
. The Public Works Committee on August 22, 1980 recommended the Guidelines
be approved and sent to the City Council for action.
CITY 'rI�'�LL SEVENiH FLOOR S:�ItiT PAL'L, ti�ti\T`'ESJT.� SSIQ2
4' ,�
� " � t ��►�ir;
„� , .
� DEPARTMENT OF PUBLIC WORKS
CITY OF ST. PAUL, MINNESOTA P,ECE�VED
. MEMO ROUTING SLIP AUG � � �9SO
( --
' . f l (l �i�..1
Jer e . Segal INITIALS CIRCULATE
Ass s t ity A xorney DATE FILE
I Roo 47 C i a l l •
_ - � frn r J Caris , Directo/r� INFORMATION
Jh h 6 a .ag � ent er ic.� NOTE AND
i I 3 ��,y� H 1 � I
� � RETURN
VERSATION
SEE ME �
i
George Latimer . FOR SIGNATURE �
Mayor �
- 7 City Hall � �
' REMARKS:
�so�.� Note - Please schedule this Resolution
for the City Council on Tuesday, September 2nd.
This should be directed to Councilman Tedesco
as it is scheduled for the Public Works Committee
meeting on Friday, August 22nd.
FROM: DATE
Donald E. Nygaard, Dtrecto�` � �J �
f
PHONE �
4241 �
' ' FORM too9 (1-9-75)