The URL can be used to link to this page

00-934City of St. Paul 0 R( G I N A L AMENDED RESOLUTION RATIFYING ASSESSMBNT COUN FILE NO. pp� T, Q�L� "� 3 S Fi1e No. 18892d Assessment No._0686 Voting Wazd In the matter of the assessment of benefits, cost and expenses for the grading and paving of alleys for 3 the alley in Block 3,Sylvan Park Addition and Block 2, Vemon's RE.(Bounded by Brixnhall, St. Clair, Saratoga, and Standford with the Pascal-Jefferson Project: Preliminary Order Final Order for the following parcels only: 99-0054 Approved 99-0209 Approved 1. 274 Brimhall Street (1 02823220 1 1 9) 2. 280 Brimhall Street (102823220120). 1/13/1999 3 /3/1999 A public hearing hauing been had upon the assessment for the above improvement, and said assessment having been furtlier considered by the Council, and having been considered finally satisfactory, therefore, be it RESOLVED, That the said assessment be and the same is hereby in all respects ratified. RESOLVED FURTHER, That the said assessment be and it is hereby determined to be payable in One thru Twentv equal installment. COUNCILPERSON Yeas Nays �/ Benanaw � Blakey � Bosirom � Coleman � Harris �/ Lantry � Reiter Adopted by the Council: Date: �.� . y �, � a �t Certified Passes by Council Secretary *'� In Favor By Q Against Public Hearine: October 4_ 2000 T.M.S./REAL ESTATE DIVISION � Date: �atact Per�oa �µd Phoae Number: �'Z 7 � Glenn Picha 266-8862 "'�'°" ust be on Council.A,geuda by: September 13, 20000 3/27/00 Green Sheet Number: SfaxTnffilx nIIteCi'�x Z C1'1'Y COU irvnrro�Er rrrae rromecrox mceoen 104745 is[ be in Couucil Research 011ice September S� 2000 I I �+u V�R��'��ST�"�1 I 1�Cau�m.uswecx noon on Friday I I �TAL f# OF SIGNATURE PAGES 2 (CLIP ALL LOCATIONS FOR SIGNATURE) TION REQLiESTED: tting date of approval of assessments for the grading and paving of alleys in Pascal defferson Project for 18892D in 99 for a public hearing with following parcels only: 1. 274 Brimhall Street (102823220119) 2. 280 Brimhall Street (102823220120). APPBOVE (A) OR REJEC'f (6) PLANNING C041MISSION CML SERVICE COMhDSSIOP CIB COMMITfEE A stwee A e�nu�xeaian ,� v.�.��e�a�. RSONAL SERVICE CONTRACTS MU5TANSWERTHE FOLLOWING: Has the person74rm ever worked under a con[ract for this department? YES NO Has this person/firm ever been a Ciry employee? Does this person/firm possess a skill not normally possessed by any current City employee? YES NO YES NO Explain all YES answers on a separate sheet and attach. PBOBLEM, ISSUE, OPPORTIJNII'Y (Who, What, When, Where, Why?): m is necessary in order to begin collecting assessments to help pay for the project. TAGES IF APPROVED: as above. �ANTAGES IF APPROVED: OIIC +DVANTAGES IF NOT APPROVED: not assess these benefits would be inconsistent with AMOUNT OF TRANSACTTON: $j ,022.36 COST/REVENUE BUDGETED (CIRCLE ONE) iG SOURCE: N�A ACTIVITY NUMBER: 'IAL INFORMATTON: (EXPLAIN) Propertv owners will be notified of the nublic hearinQ and charges. YES NO � z J J L�t z � I J J Q S � � n � � 0 < 4 � Y U � � � � ORIG�IAL C'] � < w � �o�43y Q J ��ST. CLAfR _ BERKELtY _STANFORD 0.1. -WELLESLEY •• � � U � < � 2 0.3 0.4 MILES PASCAL/JEFFERSON ALLEYS �JErFERSON C JULIET C PALACE C JAMES C RANDOLPH � 0.5 � STREET PAVING - PROPOSED ALLEY PAVING � � �� _. Presented By Referred To WHEREAS, on August 23, 2000, the Saint Paul City Council held a public hearing regarding Counci] File No. 00-776, a resolution ratifying assessments for grading and paving alleys as part ofthe City's 1999 Pascal-Jefferson Project; and 1 2 3 4 5 6 � 8 9 10 11 12 13 14 15 16 17 18 19 20 21 22 23 24 - 25� 26 27 WHEREAS, several property owners were present for the pubiic hearing but, through no fault of their own, were unable to appear before the Council; and WHEREAS, the City Council adopted Council File No. 00-776 and duly adjourned the Council session unaware that these property owners desired to be heard on the matter of ratifying the said grading and paving assessments; and VP#IEREAS, the City Council, pursuant to Minnesota Statutes Chapter 429, desires to hold a public hearing so that these property owners may be heazd; NOW, THEREFORE, BE IT RESOLVED, that the Saint Paul City Council, hereby amends Council File No. 00-776 by striking the rafification of the subject assessments therein � with respect to the following properties: 1. 274 Brimhall Street (Pazcel ID No. 102823220119) ORIGINAL � ,, � RESOLUTION OF SAINT PAUL, MINNESOTA �oe-q3y Committee: Date 2. 280 Brimhall Street (Pazcel ID No. 102823220120) AND, BE IT FURTHER RESOLVED, with the consent of the property owners above specified, the Saint Paul City Council will take testimony from the said property owners regazding the ratification of assessments for grading and paving alleys as part of the City's 1999 Pascal-Je�'ferson Project at the City Council session on�e�e�er�, 2000. o�t. �}, i CouncilFile# p0—Sy5 Green Sheet # ()� � � ORIGINAL AND, BE IT FTNALLY RESOLVED, that Council File No. 00-776 shall in all other � respects remain in full force and effect. 00 -!��{5 00 -13y Requested by Department of: aY: 1�3� Form Approved by Cit Attox BY: 1.��6I ` V er � � 2- . � 0 , _� Approved by Mayor: Date Byc Approved by Mayor f�or� Submission to Couacil $Y ��/b.( _✓ / �ZY//�C'�--- Adopted by Couacil : Date �, �}- _ Z.fy a � � Adoption Certified by Council Secretary oePartm�„uom�,�o��i�: �s�aea,ES�� na�a �mt�eted Green Sheet No 104850 � u Contact PePeon 8� P ne: tlalld e/ IMtialldateo O r 4 Peter 4Vhite _.. ` y 2 Department Dir. � Ciry Council Must Be on Councll Apenda by (Date) �Sien 1 City Attorney s c;ry ci�k -93 , Numbar Financial Serv Dir. _ Financiai Serv/acct Ga a.v� pp� 3 Mayor (Or Ass[.) _ Civil Seivice Commission Routing Order Total f! of SlBnature Pages 1 (Clfp All Locations for Signature) ' Action Requested: Aliow for a public hearing for two properties assessed for alley improvement. Recommendadans: Approve (A) or ReJect (R) Pereonal Serv(ce Contracts Must Mswer the Foliowing Questfons: - • 1. Has ihis person/firtn ever worked untler a contract for this departrnent? Planning Commisslon Yes No CIB Committee 2. Has this person/firm ever been a Gty employee? Civll Service Commission Yes No � 3. Does this person/firtn possess a skill not normally possessed by any current Gty employee? Yes No . . _ Explaln all yes answers on separate sheet and attach to green sheet _. . __ Initfating problem, Issue, Opportunity (Who, What, When, Whare, Why): � Two property owners attended a public hearing for an assessment for the construction of the alley adjacent to their properiy. Due to confusion they missed the public hearing and the City Council adjourned before the properiy owners identified their desire to testify. This will give the property owners a chance to testify to the City Council regarding the alley assessment. . Advantages if Approved: Property owners given a chance to present their opinion to the City Council. Disadvantagea If Approved: None Disadvantages If Not Approved: Property owners not given a chance to present their opinion to the City Council. ToUT Amount oi Transactlon: S 1,022.36 CosURevenue Budgeted: Funding Source: Assessments Activity Numbar: Ptnanclal Information: (Explaln) ' G.\USERS\Whiu\WPDATA\WPDATA�alleynvml,NPD City of St. Paul 0 R( G I N A L AMENDED RESOLUTION RATIFYING ASSESSMBNT COUN FILE NO. pp� T, Q�L� "� 3 S Fi1e No. 18892d Assessment No._0686 Voting Wazd In the matter of the assessment of benefits, cost and expenses for the grading and paving of alleys for 3 the alley in Block 3,Sylvan Park Addition and Block 2, Vemon's RE.(Bounded by Brixnhall, St. Clair, Saratoga, and Standford with the Pascal-Jefferson Project: Preliminary Order Final Order for the following parcels only: 99-0054 Approved 99-0209 Approved 1. 274 Brimhall Street (1 02823220 1 1 9) 2. 280 Brimhall Street (102823220120). 1/13/1999 3 /3/1999 A public hearing hauing been had upon the assessment for the above improvement, and said assessment having been furtlier considered by the Council, and having been considered finally satisfactory, therefore, be it RESOLVED, That the said assessment be and the same is hereby in all respects ratified. RESOLVED FURTHER, That the said assessment be and it is hereby determined to be payable in One thru Twentv equal installment. COUNCILPERSON Yeas Nays �/ Benanaw � Blakey � Bosirom � Coleman � Harris �/ Lantry � Reiter Adopted by the Council: Date: �.� . y �, � a �t Certified Passes by Council Secretary *'� In Favor By Q Against Public Hearine: October 4_ 2000 T.M.S./REAL ESTATE DIVISION � Date: �atact Per�oa �µd Phoae Number: �'Z 7 � Glenn Picha 266-8862 "'�'°" ust be on Council.A,geuda by: September 13, 20000 3/27/00 Green Sheet Number: SfaxTnffilx nIIteCi'�x Z C1'1'Y COU irvnrro�Er rrrae rromecrox mceoen 104745 is[ be in Couucil Research 011ice September S� 2000 I I �+u V�R��'��ST�"�1 I 1�Cau�m.uswecx noon on Friday I I �TAL f# OF SIGNATURE PAGES 2 (CLIP ALL LOCATIONS FOR SIGNATURE) TION REQLiESTED: tting date of approval of assessments for the grading and paving of alleys in Pascal defferson Project for 18892D in 99 for a public hearing with following parcels only: 1. 274 Brimhall Street (102823220119) 2. 280 Brimhall Street (102823220120). APPBOVE (A) OR REJEC'f (6) PLANNING C041MISSION CML SERVICE COMhDSSIOP CIB COMMITfEE A stwee A e�nu�xeaian ,� v.�.��e�a�. RSONAL SERVICE CONTRACTS MU5TANSWERTHE FOLLOWING: Has the person74rm ever worked under a con[ract for this department? YES NO Has this person/firm ever been a Ciry employee? Does this person/firm possess a skill not normally possessed by any current City employee? YES NO YES NO Explain all YES answers on a separate sheet and attach. PBOBLEM, ISSUE, OPPORTIJNII'Y (Who, What, When, Where, Why?): m is necessary in order to begin collecting assessments to help pay for the project. TAGES IF APPROVED: as above. �ANTAGES IF APPROVED: OIIC +DVANTAGES IF NOT APPROVED: not assess these benefits would be inconsistent with AMOUNT OF TRANSACTTON: $j ,022.36 COST/REVENUE BUDGETED (CIRCLE ONE) iG SOURCE: N�A ACTIVITY NUMBER: 'IAL INFORMATTON: (EXPLAIN) Propertv owners will be notified of the nublic hearinQ and charges. YES NO � z J J L�t z � I J J Q S � � n � � 0 < 4 � Y U � � � � ORIG�IAL C'] � < w � �o�43y Q J ��ST. CLAfR _ BERKELtY _STANFORD 0.1. -WELLESLEY •• � � U � < � 2 0.3 0.4 MILES PASCAL/JEFFERSON ALLEYS �JErFERSON C JULIET C PALACE C JAMES C RANDOLPH � 0.5 � STREET PAVING - PROPOSED ALLEY PAVING � � �� _. Presented By Referred To WHEREAS, on August 23, 2000, the Saint Paul City Council held a public hearing regarding Counci] File No. 00-776, a resolution ratifying assessments for grading and paving alleys as part ofthe City's 1999 Pascal-Jefferson Project; and 1 2 3 4 5 6 � 8 9 10 11 12 13 14 15 16 17 18 19 20 21 22 23 24 - 25� 26 27 WHEREAS, several property owners were present for the pubiic hearing but, through no fault of their own, were unable to appear before the Council; and WHEREAS, the City Council adopted Council File No. 00-776 and duly adjourned the Council session unaware that these property owners desired to be heard on the matter of ratifying the said grading and paving assessments; and VP#IEREAS, the City Council, pursuant to Minnesota Statutes Chapter 429, desires to hold a public hearing so that these property owners may be heazd; NOW, THEREFORE, BE IT RESOLVED, that the Saint Paul City Council, hereby amends Council File No. 00-776 by striking the rafification of the subject assessments therein � with respect to the following properties: 1. 274 Brimhall Street (Pazcel ID No. 102823220119) ORIGINAL � ,, � RESOLUTION OF SAINT PAUL, MINNESOTA �oe-q3y Committee: Date 2. 280 Brimhall Street (Pazcel ID No. 102823220120) AND, BE IT FURTHER RESOLVED, with the consent of the property owners above specified, the Saint Paul City Council will take testimony from the said property owners regazding the ratification of assessments for grading and paving alleys as part of the City's 1999 Pascal-Je�'ferson Project at the City Council session on�e�e�er�, 2000. o�t. �}, i CouncilFile# p0—Sy5 Green Sheet # ()� � � ORIGINAL AND, BE IT FTNALLY RESOLVED, that Council File No. 00-776 shall in all other � respects remain in full force and effect. 00 -!��{5 00 -13y Requested by Department of: aY: 1�3� Form Approved by Cit Attox BY: 1.��6I ` V er � � 2- . � 0 , _� Approved by Mayor: Date Byc Approved by Mayor f�or� Submission to Couacil $Y ��/b.( _✓ / �ZY//�C'�--- Adopted by Couacil : Date �, �}- _ Z.fy a � � Adoption Certified by Council Secretary oePartm�„uom�,�o��i�: �s�aea,ES�� na�a �mt�eted Green Sheet No 104850 � u Contact PePeon 8� P ne: tlalld e/ IMtialldateo O r 4 Peter 4Vhite _.. ` y 2 Department Dir. � Ciry Council Must Be on Councll Apenda by (Date) �Sien 1 City Attorney s c;ry ci�k -93 , Numbar Financial Serv Dir. _ Financiai Serv/acct Ga a.v� pp� 3 Mayor (Or Ass[.) _ Civil Seivice Commission Routing Order Total f! of SlBnature Pages 1 (Clfp All Locations for Signature) ' Action Requested: Aliow for a public hearing for two properties assessed for alley improvement. Recommendadans: Approve (A) or ReJect (R) Pereonal Serv(ce Contracts Must Mswer the Foliowing Questfons: - • 1. Has ihis person/firtn ever worked untler a contract for this departrnent? Planning Commisslon Yes No CIB Committee 2. Has this person/firm ever been a Gty employee? Civll Service Commission Yes No � 3. Does this person/firtn possess a skill not normally possessed by any current Gty employee? Yes No . . _ Explaln all yes answers on separate sheet and attach to green sheet _. . __ Initfating problem, Issue, Opportunity (Who, What, When, Whare, Why): � Two property owners attended a public hearing for an assessment for the construction of the alley adjacent to their properiy. Due to confusion they missed the public hearing and the City Council adjourned before the properiy owners identified their desire to testify. This will give the property owners a chance to testify to the City Council regarding the alley assessment. . Advantages if Approved: Property owners given a chance to present their opinion to the City Council. Disadvantagea If Approved: None Disadvantages If Not Approved: Property owners not given a chance to present their opinion to the City Council. ToUT Amount oi Transactlon: S 1,022.36 CosURevenue Budgeted: Funding Source: Assessments Activity Numbar: Ptnanclal Information: (Explaln) ' G.\USERS\Whiu\WPDATA\WPDATA�alleynvml,NPD City of St. Paul 0 R( G I N A L AMENDED RESOLUTION RATIFYING ASSESSMBNT COUN FILE NO. pp� T, Q�L� "� 3 S Fi1e No. 18892d Assessment No._0686 Voting Wazd In the matter of the assessment of benefits, cost and expenses for the grading and paving of alleys for 3 the alley in Block 3,Sylvan Park Addition and Block 2, Vemon's RE.(Bounded by Brixnhall, St. Clair, Saratoga, and Standford with the Pascal-Jefferson Project: Preliminary Order Final Order for the following parcels only: 99-0054 Approved 99-0209 Approved 1. 274 Brimhall Street (1 02823220 1 1 9) 2. 280 Brimhall Street (102823220120). 1/13/1999 3 /3/1999 A public hearing hauing been had upon the assessment for the above improvement, and said assessment having been furtlier considered by the Council, and having been considered finally satisfactory, therefore, be it RESOLVED, That the said assessment be and the same is hereby in all respects ratified. RESOLVED FURTHER, That the said assessment be and it is hereby determined to be payable in One thru Twentv equal installment. COUNCILPERSON Yeas Nays �/ Benanaw � Blakey � Bosirom � Coleman � Harris �/ Lantry � Reiter Adopted by the Council: Date: �.� . y �, � a �t Certified Passes by Council Secretary *'� In Favor By Q Against Public Hearine: October 4_ 2000 T.M.S./REAL ESTATE DIVISION � Date: �atact Per�oa �µd Phoae Number: �'Z 7 � Glenn Picha 266-8862 "'�'°" ust be on Council.A,geuda by: September 13, 20000 3/27/00 Green Sheet Number: SfaxTnffilx nIIteCi'�x Z C1'1'Y COU irvnrro�Er rrrae rromecrox mceoen 104745 is[ be in Couucil Research 011ice September S� 2000 I I �+u V�R��'��ST�"�1 I 1�Cau�m.uswecx noon on Friday I I �TAL f# OF SIGNATURE PAGES 2 (CLIP ALL LOCATIONS FOR SIGNATURE) TION REQLiESTED: tting date of approval of assessments for the grading and paving of alleys in Pascal defferson Project for 18892D in 99 for a public hearing with following parcels only: 1. 274 Brimhall Street (102823220119) 2. 280 Brimhall Street (102823220120). APPBOVE (A) OR REJEC'f (6) PLANNING C041MISSION CML SERVICE COMhDSSIOP CIB COMMITfEE A stwee A e�nu�xeaian ,� v.�.��e�a�. RSONAL SERVICE CONTRACTS MU5TANSWERTHE FOLLOWING: Has the person74rm ever worked under a con[ract for this department? YES NO Has this person/firm ever been a Ciry employee? Does this person/firm possess a skill not normally possessed by any current City employee? YES NO YES NO Explain all YES answers on a separate sheet and attach. PBOBLEM, ISSUE, OPPORTIJNII'Y (Who, What, When, Where, Why?): m is necessary in order to begin collecting assessments to help pay for the project. TAGES IF APPROVED: as above. �ANTAGES IF APPROVED: OIIC +DVANTAGES IF NOT APPROVED: not assess these benefits would be inconsistent with AMOUNT OF TRANSACTTON: $j ,022.36 COST/REVENUE BUDGETED (CIRCLE ONE) iG SOURCE: N�A ACTIVITY NUMBER: 'IAL INFORMATTON: (EXPLAIN) Propertv owners will be notified of the nublic hearinQ and charges. YES NO � z J J L�t z � I J J Q S � � n � � 0 < 4 � Y U � � � � ORIG�IAL C'] � < w � �o�43y Q J ��ST. CLAfR _ BERKELtY _STANFORD 0.1. -WELLESLEY •• � � U � < � 2 0.3 0.4 MILES PASCAL/JEFFERSON ALLEYS �JErFERSON C JULIET C PALACE C JAMES C RANDOLPH � 0.5 � STREET PAVING - PROPOSED ALLEY PAVING � � �� _. Presented By Referred To WHEREAS, on August 23, 2000, the Saint Paul City Council held a public hearing regarding Counci] File No. 00-776, a resolution ratifying assessments for grading and paving alleys as part ofthe City's 1999 Pascal-Jefferson Project; and 1 2 3 4 5 6 � 8 9 10 11 12 13 14 15 16 17 18 19 20 21 22 23 24 - 25� 26 27 WHEREAS, several property owners were present for the pubiic hearing but, through no fault of their own, were unable to appear before the Council; and WHEREAS, the City Council adopted Council File No. 00-776 and duly adjourned the Council session unaware that these property owners desired to be heard on the matter of ratifying the said grading and paving assessments; and VP#IEREAS, the City Council, pursuant to Minnesota Statutes Chapter 429, desires to hold a public hearing so that these property owners may be heazd; NOW, THEREFORE, BE IT RESOLVED, that the Saint Paul City Council, hereby amends Council File No. 00-776 by striking the rafification of the subject assessments therein � with respect to the following properties: 1. 274 Brimhall Street (Pazcel ID No. 102823220119) ORIGINAL � ,, � RESOLUTION OF SAINT PAUL, MINNESOTA �oe-q3y Committee: Date 2. 280 Brimhall Street (Pazcel ID No. 102823220120) AND, BE IT FURTHER RESOLVED, with the consent of the property owners above specified, the Saint Paul City Council will take testimony from the said property owners regazding the ratification of assessments for grading and paving alleys as part of the City's 1999 Pascal-Je�'ferson Project at the City Council session on�e�e�er�, 2000. o�t. �}, i CouncilFile# p0—Sy5 Green Sheet # ()� � � ORIGINAL AND, BE IT FTNALLY RESOLVED, that Council File No. 00-776 shall in all other � respects remain in full force and effect. 00 -!��{5 00 -13y Requested by Department of: aY: 1�3� Form Approved by Cit Attox BY: 1.��6I ` V er � � 2- . � 0 , _� Approved by Mayor: Date Byc Approved by Mayor f�or� Submission to Couacil $Y ��/b.( _✓ / �ZY//�C'�--- Adopted by Couacil : Date �, �}- _ Z.fy a � � Adoption Certified by Council Secretary oePartm�„uom�,�o��i�: �s�aea,ES�� na�a �mt�eted Green Sheet No 104850 � u Contact PePeon 8� P ne: tlalld e/ IMtialldateo O r 4 Peter 4Vhite _.. ` y 2 Department Dir. � Ciry Council Must Be on Councll Apenda by (Date) �Sien 1 City Attorney s c;ry ci�k -93 , Numbar Financial Serv Dir. _ Financiai Serv/acct Ga a.v� pp� 3 Mayor (Or Ass[.) _ Civil Seivice Commission Routing Order Total f! of SlBnature Pages 1 (Clfp All Locations for Signature) ' Action Requested: Aliow for a public hearing for two properties assessed for alley improvement. Recommendadans: Approve (A) or ReJect (R) Pereonal Serv(ce Contracts Must Mswer the Foliowing Questfons: - • 1. Has ihis person/firtn ever worked untler a contract for this departrnent? Planning Commisslon Yes No CIB Committee 2. Has this person/firm ever been a Gty employee? Civll Service Commission Yes No � 3. Does this person/firtn possess a skill not normally possessed by any current Gty employee? Yes No . . _ Explaln all yes answers on separate sheet and attach to green sheet _. . __ Initfating problem, Issue, Opportunity (Who, What, When, Whare, Why): � Two property owners attended a public hearing for an assessment for the construction of the alley adjacent to their properiy. Due to confusion they missed the public hearing and the City Council adjourned before the properiy owners identified their desire to testify. This will give the property owners a chance to testify to the City Council regarding the alley assessment. . Advantages if Approved: Property owners given a chance to present their opinion to the City Council. Disadvantagea If Approved: None Disadvantages If Not Approved: Property owners not given a chance to present their opinion to the City Council. ToUT Amount oi Transactlon: S 1,022.36 CosURevenue Budgeted: Funding Source: Assessments Activity Numbar: Ptnanclal Information: (Explaln) ' G.\USERS\Whiu\WPDATA\WPDATA�alleynvml,NPD