The URL can be used to link to this page

274986 WHITE - C�TV CIERK COl1RC11 h/ 47 �9�js PINK - FINANCE G I TY O F SA I NT PA LT L � CANARV - D��PARTMENT BLU'E - MAVOR File NO. Counci R sol ' . Presented By Leonard W. Levine Referred To Committee: Date Out of Committee By Date WHEREAS, Richard Miller applied to the Board of Zoning Appeals for a variance from the Mississippi River Corridor Critical Area Interim Development Regulations in order to construct a single family residence with a business outlet on the premises , which Regulati�ons require a 40-foot setback from bluff lines for property located at 257 Ohio Street and described as Lot 6, Block 198 , Irvines Addition to Saint Paul; and WHEREAS, Foilowing a public hearing with notice to affected property owners, the Board of Zoning Appeals, by its resolution 8546, adopted March 11, 1980, granted a variance to allow con- struction of the single family home with related wholesale business with the house being no closer than 7 feet from the top of the edge of the slope and the northwest corner of the garage at least S feet from the slope edge, and further subject to the engineering report submitted and the site plan; and WHEREAS, Pursuant to the provisions of Section 64 . 204 of the Zoning Ordinances, the West Side Citizens ' Organization duly filed with the City Clerk its appeal from the determination made by the Board of Zoning Appeals, requesting that �a hearing be held before the City Council for the purpose of considering the actions taken by the Board; and WHEREAS, Acting pursuant to Sections 64 . 204 through 64 . 207 and upon notice to appellant and other affected property owners, a public hearing was duly conducted by the City, Council on May 7, 1980 �rhere all interested persons were given an opportunity to be heard; and COUNCILMEN Requested by Department of: Yeas Nays Butler [n Favor Hozza Hunt Levine _ __ Against BY — Maddox Showalter TedesCO Form Approved by i y rney Adopted by Council: Date Certified Yassed by Council Secretary BY By Approved by 1�lavor: Date _ Approved by Mayor for Submission to Council av _ - — BY _ _ _.._ _ ____ _ _—� . WMITE - C�TV CIERK 'J��j�/6■�■ PINK - FINANCE COIIIICIl Pii � VF�ly . � . � CANARV - DEPARTMENT G I TY OF SA I NT PAU L File NO. � Bl_UE - Mp.VOR � Council Resolution Presented By Referred To , Committee: Date Out of Committee By Date Page 2 . WHEREAS, The Council , having heard the statements made, and having considered the variance application, the report of staff, the minutes and findings of the Board of Zoning Appeals , does hereby RESOLVE, That the Council of the City of Saint Paul does here- by grant the appeal of the West Side Citizens ' Or.ganization, and does hereby deny the request of Richard Miller for the varianee of the se�back requirements imposed by the Mississippi River Corridor Critical Area Interim Development Regulations based on the City Council 's determination that to vary the 40-foot bluff line setback would allow a use of the property that is not a compatible use in the land use district in which the property is located, the di- mension uariance would be contrary to the intent of the Critical Area Order, the proposed structure would alter in a negative way the essentiaT character of the site and the general locality, the proposed off-street parking for business use is potentially danger- ous because maneuvering space is inadequate and backing of automobiles onto a street is expressly prohibited by Section 62 . 104 (c) of the Zoning Ordinance, the past history of illegally parked cars on tr.e street �which created a public safety problem, the safety hazards created by allowing development of the property on the hill and related traffic hazards created by the proposed development, and � • the fact that the proposed development is not consistent with the neighborhood development plans or city plans ; and, be it FURTHER RESOLVED, That the City Clerk shall mail a copy of this resolution to Richard Miller, the West Side Citizens ' Organi- zation, the Zoning Administrator, Planning Commission and the Board of Zoning Appeals . COUNCILMEN Yeas Nays Requested by Department of: �/��'h 0 n [n Favor Hozza Hunt I.�vine _�_ Against BY — �' Maddox Showalter 2 19�4 Tede �Y 2, Form Approved by C ty t rney Adopted � Council� Date C ified Pass by ou Se retary BY ,�pprove b Mavo : Dat —��Y� 7 �gBO Approved by May for Submission to Council B � _ __ By �u� Ma� 3 � �sao � o , : . ; . ,- �,-. . . . � � �=��$� r} y , _ , �; , � � ��t � � � , , ; . - ,. , � . , . . - � . , .� ;,, ' � ' . � ' 1 1 I . , . . _ _"; - .. - . � . � � . � - ' . - . � i.: '� �. .. � � - . . . . ' . . �� . �, � � . � . .. . - . . . � : ��..:- -�. , . �': . . , . � . . . . . . . . , � � . . . ../: . , May_ 30, 198A � _ 1 ' � , ; , � � . Weat-Side Citizens Organiaation , 179 E. Rob�e St. ' - �.� � St.. Paui, `s#,nneaoea 55107 ' , . Dear S ir�: x ( - ' ,�_ ; ' Enclose ig s copq of a St. Paul City. Cuunci� R�s+�olutiaa, C.F. Nc�. ' - 274986, ulopted by the Council ,on May 22, ].'984 g#antiag your . appeal to a deeii�ion of the Board nf Zaning App�a7.o fou p��p►ert�r- �. � , - . at 25'7 Ohio St. : � _ , � ,. , � Very t�uly qours, , . � ,h : ' ; � � , . � » ' , RoSe ,Mix ' � . _ � i , - City�Clerk , � Attach.� : , , . � , dC= � . � , � p ccs �,icha;d Mixler � _ , Zoaing .Adminietrator � , ; , - • Plaabing Coaasi�eioa � ,� + � � Bpa�� of Zaning ApFleals �` , r . • . , , , - . i � . . . . .1 , ... , .� . ' . . . - . . . . ' . � . � � . � ., I . .. . � .. � . . , . , . � . . � � . i '' ., . ' , . �. ' - ' � . . , . r . ' . ' r . . ; ' . .. . . .. � � . . . ' . � ' .. ' . . � � � � � ; . . � . . , . . . . ./ .:�i .. . . ��u��6 -��T �. CITY OF SAINT PAUL � 6 SR� ; �o � DEPARTMENT OF PLANNING AND ECONOMIC DEVELOPMENT � �uu��iu� , r nu �� u o '�° " DIVISION OF PLANNING ''�,, �ea• 25 West Fourth Street,Saint Paul,Minnesota,55102 GEORGE LATIMER 612-298-4151 MAYOR May 1 , 1980 Rose Mix, City Clerk Room 386 City Hall St. Paul , Minnesota 55102 RE: Administrative Review of Richard Miller - Zoning File No. 8546 Dear Madam: This is written in response to the appeal for Administrative Review filed ' by the West Side Citizens ' Organization and West Side ITA to a decision of the St. Paul Board of Zoning Appeals affecting property owned by Richard Miller. The subject site is located at 257 Ohio Street which is on the north side of Ohio halfway between the upper and lower levels of the West Side. The property is described as Lot 6, Block 198, Irvines Addition and includes vacated Belle Street. The matter was first heard b,y the Board of Zoning Appeals on December 11 , 1979 to consider variances under the Mississippi River Corridor Critical Area Interim Development Regulations in order to reestablish a single family residence with a small business outlet on the premises. The site formerly contained the residence of Mr. Miller until it was destroyed by fire in January, 1979. This is zoned I-1 under the City's Zoning Ordinance but lies within the State's Critical Area designated "Urban Diversified" district. Under the dimension variance section of the Interim Development Regulations (I-3-b) , a 40 foot setback from blufflines is required of all new structures. Due to obvious physical limitations of the site and the fact that it formerly contained a single-family dwelling, Mr. Miller appealed for a waiver of these requirements so that he could rebuild 5 feet from the edge of the bluff. The variance requested was for 35 feet. Staff recommendation was for denial . The Board of Zoning Appeals, on December 11 , 1979, decided to lay the matter over since a 3 to 3 vote to approve was made so that soil testing results regarding the site could be obtained. This delay was also due in part to concerns expressed by the Minnesota EQB in a letter dated November 6, 1979 as well as concerns by the Ramsey Soil and Water Conservation District. Some neighborhood opposition was also present to indicate that this partic- ular site is not suitable for even a single family house and that the area has been identified as a "gateway" to the longer range River Corridor Linear Park concept connecting Cherokee Park with Harriet Island Park. _ O �� May 1 , 1970 Page 2 On February 26, 1980, the results of the soil tests were presented to the Board which indicated the site could support a structure contingent to certain conditions being met. On a vote of 4 to 1 , the Board granted the requested variance based on the hardship factor to the applicant, the proposed development would not alter the essential character of the area, the use is a permitted use in the River Corridor Plan and that the cleaning of debris that has accumulated would enhance the site. On March 12, 1980, the West Side Citizens ' Organization District 3 Council unanimously opposed the granting of these variances and filed an appeal with the City Clerk for a hearing before City Council . This matter is scheduled to be heard bv Cit_v Council at 7:30 p.m. on Mav 7, 1980. Sincerely, . Laurence J. ng City Planner LJJ/mb Enc. � +. �,,,�,.. �y,,: ; ,. CIT�' OF SAI'vT �,aUL • � - � � � '�'' ��' OFFiCE OF THE CITY CLERK ' ,� i � t `. "!�� '- ..-�'" BUREAU OF RECORDS - �` � � s � : � ;� _ -:.- �. ,� � .- .,. ' . s8E Gtv Hal�. S:3int Paul. 1 �rn�=,�:•� 551Q? ._._ `r.°'.. 61_�,98-4231 �:�RGE �--;��,��; ,-*`.�-r �1A10R � � � � �L�� April 1, 1980 :!.r. Bernard Caslson D�rector o° Finance & bt.anagement Services �oon 23�+, City xall St, Paul, �.inn. Dear Sir: ?"ne City Council set a date of hearing for t�ay 7th, 1980, at 7:30 P.M, in the City Council CnG.�bers to cc:�ider the appeal o: the West Side Citizer.s 4r�anization and tre ��est Side ITA �o a decision of the Board of 7onin� �.��?s a`�ectin� property at 257 Ohio, Richard ;�Iiller, ap�ellant. t•+ill you please sznd notices to property owners as required by lax? Very truly yours, �OSP �1X City Clerk :_��:i2 - • �,=��--�:� .�~..�Sf''� ?U::i;�� .�?C�_'_.CP. . >`=r,�� i�3; . . Ci;s' ��:� ST. PAU! DEi'Ai�i�t�?�(T OF Fi'��.��c r�!'�i�i3 !l�4A�ti,�Gc�`�1`iV i SE��/IC�S ASSE�cMfNT DlY751QN • � 2 1 H �ITY Fi4LL 5T.PAUL,N{N�lE50T�;;iQ'? � April � 18, 19�30 City Planning 11O1 City Hall Annex St. Paul 1rL^I 55102 File X 2423 Page Zor.ir.g File 8546 1 The �ouncil of the City of St. Paul will hold a public hearing ir the Counczl C::a-,bers of the City F.all and Court House (third floor) at 7:30 P.I1. �,n �tay 7, 1980 ort the: Appeal of the West Side Citizens' Organization and the West Side ITA to a decision of the Board of Zoning �ppeals affecting property at 257 Ohio Street. This property is located or. the west side of Ohio Street between Isabel and Plato Streets and zs legally described as: Vacated strpets accruing and Lot 6, Block 198, Ir�ine's Addition to West St. Paul. If ;ou would like further informat�.an about this hearing, contact the Current D�ar:zing Section of the Pl�nr.ing Board, �oom 1202 City Hali Annex -- 29p-4154. '.�t:ile the City Charter requires that we notify you e` the hearing, we want tc i�e�� vou [o learn fully about any i:�pr��ement that ceuld aFfec� �>ou �� :�aur ._.,.._._,..^.1L�%. Therefore, T sincerei.y hope y011 C311 2rtE^C; t!1�S Ct�3Yi�l�s SC i:l�� ' .�'1 ._,... '�,3�C° VOUT' `J1�WS about 1t �CiZ�WT'� i.0 t!1? �1`V CC)':;1C�� `.v!1£'�k3�r t��r ,-.r ?�Z::_�t, J. WILLi�i DONOV�'V �,'AiU�TION AND ASSESSMENT EtiGINEER. , „i ,,,a ST�� ,�`�n�- ____ _.�_.. �� . , : ��r.� �`�� __- � � APPLICANT: RICHARU MILLER DATE OF HEARING 12/11/79 _. . . . . . . .. . . . . . . CLASSIFICATION . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . CURRENT PLANNING & ZONING COMMITTEE BOARD OF ZONING APPEALS Rezoning ❑ Variance ❑ Snecial Condition Use ' ❑ Administrative Review ❑ , n Other Mississippi River Corridor� �..f..„��.., . _ �-: ��.,, ,� � _ __ �.�;.,��+ � � �_ � � `-t �� s� � .� w� - ��3 � y�'� � , � `� ..�� ;R `�� `,^ ��q� ��.��'�� .:'�ai ��.. � Z79 :. ROOfr St• Paul, Minncsota 5�I07 "arc� �2, 19�0 Joa^r.e Showalter �-��=.-�n:;± City Counc�l � Ci`,y ::al� St• �'�l, Minneyo�ta 551(}4 Dear ?�s, Shoaalter, �'}:� '�fest Side Citiza�'s pr�3nization Distric;, �es33f, ?�`arch 4, vot�ci unanimously to ODDJSC th�Cou�`cil, inra-� action taken �ic;��3 *�,�lt�r for his p_operty �t 2r �rantir.; o:. a �rarfa:�ce to cit. �s R P� �7 Ohio. This var�a�:c�-, ��.r.te� by tt�� ,� oard of Zonin� A eals on Feb. 25 aft�r a deadlocke� vot� ar,d thzee carry_ overs, is op�os-d bp K��p and the 'vlcst Sidc ITA for the follow?n� rcasons: This property is xithin the protected Rive� Corri�?or ard should be protecte3 froa any ty_oe of buildin� raquirin� a variar:ce fron s�t-�ck auideifr:�a� Gran�in� a varia:ace of this extent (to xzthin five ic�t o:" tne b].ufzline} on �he first casa to come up uithin the Riv-r Corridor ne�3t�s the xell . thou.ght oe.� p1a.n developed to protect that area ar:d ma,y set a precedent. T`his pzoperty Has mentior.ed in the original irlest Side ITA proposal for possible acq�s'si-tion and se2ectivs cleazr,nce (��le the struciur� xas still stan�in>. ) T�is is no lor. � possibl the structure�by fira. The Wast�Sida e duA to ±ne destructi.o;� of �resentin� IT�, in con,,unction �rith SISCfl�is sr,3�e and�aalinearSparkxay3linkSthrou�hftheCC Bcprocessc�� Or open '� s t �ror ±v, t^o�:�:� cer.i`'i�.. bu'_��,L� m j . ..,,'. "li J�'��t..i r 1 :J .,.� � ��i �� :�7. .�:._'�a J1G.a' i�?' . � _ - � O;� 01 3t;�� '?Q.t +.'!�` �JZ'_... , �_ _ - - _GT] fl� 3 .'IC!^ �•..�3•✓al�a � ..., �-- t �-". �S :�o. c. C�?�'.��-_� � ___��?� �,-, Y,. �� r� ��-�� - :� � _ �-' - . _... .. � ; � � � - ��lei�S SiQa �_ t:'° Si .... „ ., � �;.' r� { . _ . � �' _.,��n �.ODilCS. 1118 ...�, �Or t}�� rl- _-�� r.��a .�.. .. . �7�'�:1 � � �'1 ? �'�: f.'('1� Otl°St.�C^, O 9.�ti'°'rJ t,, ��. 5 i.l � � , � ,7�� f C a"� ..-o �.a �.:.ir'- i1a l ' .�:: '.:i , . ,ie O�!� ? avs_ b_e, other t�a:� Mr. Mi11e�'s lot �`i 12e� has, in the St r 1 ,, , 1 s ov�r ��1 feat a:r�y• Mx. " t� � o� �en use.. his :r.�:.�,-.:.�r fror.�� y�y-,� as a pa.r:;in� are�_. This is unsi�htly ar:d dangerous. T�� River CO?"�i!�OZ' and LaTd Us:� p1:�,=, ra�o-n.��:nd?ti.ons for a "continuous 1� 1-." for thc Chezo<ea-I�ly��1.°-;:�,r:-iet IsI�^d a�ea xoul b al J= �,. ��ace at �hi� junctu,-e ,�a d � w.._�, sezv� by - In a..�.itio�, th�- Dfstri�t � pla.:� reco�an��a, a "�=�a�:ay entrance" at Chio to tne �tast �ide at it's i�grovi:�� I..� a,-�a, This gatexay conce�t concurred xith lon�-ran�e River Corridor, N�g�i�a`e.3 Invest�ent Stra.ta�y� park and Recreation, Bike�ay and ia,nd Use plar.s. I* is dependent� hos�ev�r, on a safe, uninterruptcd curve ar�d ped-strian Walkx�q alon� Ohfo. :a1 �s �t1. �uz�.�, __ � ';HARD �MiLLER (=8546) PAGE 2 (2) there are exceptional circumstances unique to the property that were not created by a landowner after April 25, 1975; (3) the dimension variance does not allow any use that is no� a compatible use in the land use district in which the property is located; (4) the dimension variance does not alter the essential character of the locality as established by these Interim Developr^ent °egulations; (5) the dimension variance would not be contrary to the intent of the Order. R�LE'�!ANT PLANS: The existing Interim Development Regulations of tne State are temporary and will be replaced by amended provisions of the St. Paul Zoning Ordinance which have been developed in compliance with State mandated guidelines. These amended provisi�ns are expected to become E,�fective in early 1980 as the outgro�•�th or the approved i�ississippi River Corridor Plan. The subject site is shown to be ti�iithin the edge or margin area between the developed upper levels , which are residential in nature, and . the lower levels identified as the proposed Harriet Island Develepment area. This lotiver area is planned to contain a mixture of open space uses , marinas , theme commercial/ entertainment and liqht industrial uses besides a certain a�rount o� hausing intermixed. ,�long with these proposals, Cherokee Park would be linked �4�ritn Harriei Island. FINDINGS RELATING TO INTERIM DEVELOPMENT RErULATIONS: 1 . Strict interpretation of the Interim Development Regulations �;�ould prahibit any con- struction on this site, therefore, the applicant is presented t�rith a hardship. 2. The applicant (landowner) previously occupied a single fa�nily home on this site prior to April 25, 1975. 3. If granted, the proposed use would be allowed in the I-1 zoning district (the Zoning Administrator has certified the proposed Health Food and residence as a permitted use in the I-1 zone) . 4. If a dimension variance is granted to allow the proposed construction on this property, that structure would alter, in a negative way, the essential character of the site and the general locality. This site is part of the gateway to the upper West Side Community and open space area. 5. Granting the variance would not be in keeping with the intent of both the Interim Development Regulations and the Mississippi River Corridor Plan. OTHER FINDINGS: . The va,�,iance request is based on the unique physical aspe��s �r tne sire, its topoer�aphic limitations , its configuration, ane+ }he r:.ct �haT �^e �ite �,vas occu��e� b� a s �ngle ramily house less th�n one year ago. 2. The Z�:1,�ing Administrator has certiried that the praposed off-�1r2ei parkinc� of 2 �pa�-�s for the Mail Order business and 2 spaces for the resi�ence is surficient. 3. The variance, in this instance, can be granted without any impairment to the supply of light and air to the community or to adjacent properties. . The request for variance is not based primarily on a desire for economic gain. �. Some ::�roblems foreseen with the development of this site include: (a) The upper site is extremely small to contain both a dwelling and a business and off-street parking. (b) Off-street parking for the business use (oroposed 2 spaces) is considerably limited and potentially dangerous in that it appears inadequate ►�aneuvering space is available. Backing directly onta a street is exoressly prohibited under Section 62.104(c) . !r`. ,-r�m a r�Y'dCtl Cd� V12u1D0111t , 1 t �'l01J�d q2Y'hd�> �%E' �^?`t2c' 1 r ±�� }J11S�f�PSS hclC; ; ��' n� �1 �ue ie. e s�para �ed -- �i th the bus�ness use ^r �r� i��:�rer i evel ? t; ;, � o t � ' _ On �u�r l p.. •3� . - . " ' ,r , .CHARD MILLER (r8546) PAGE 3 (d) Ohio Street possesses characteristics considered potentially dangerous for traffic and for providinq service to abutting properties . Its primary function in this short stretch is to carry traffic betti�reen the upper and lo�der levels. Other uses of the street should be considered secondary. E. The findings of the Ramsey Soil and Water Conservation District substantiates the site to be buildable since the site was formerly developed and the presence of bedrock would appear to be adequate to suppart normal constr�ction contingent upon the following safeguards : (a; Draingage of the site should be directed a��ay from any areas of exposed sandstone and therefore should be directed tou�ards Chio Street. (bj The proposed structure appears too close to tne edge of the bluff. � qualified soils engineer should be consulted regarding the particulars af support for the structure. 7. In order to comply with the I-1 zoning, any reuse of the property would require a mcre intensive activity level . STAFF RECOMMENDATION: Staff recommends denial of the variance based on findings 4 and 5 of Section G relating to the Interim Development Regulations) and on findings 5 and 7 of Section H (Other Findings) . h1INUTES OF TFiE MEETIidG OF� THE �3(��1��1�(? �F ZOfd'�';'; �`�':��r;�S i,r, � CITY COUNCIL CHAMBERS , ST. PtiUL , h?I'dN�ESOTt� DEC�E'-'i;�R. ; ; , 1�79 �R�S�'��i : P�in�e. Morton ; MesSrs. Grais , Kirk , �'arrish , Petcr�son anu �;J�ods o�"r � the Board of Zoning Ap�eals ; Nir. Je��rne Segal , �ssistant �ity Attorney; f+is . Lane of tne Division �f Housiny and Building Code Enforcement; Ms. Beseman , Mr. Jung arid �ir. l�lar�n �f the Planning Staff. �B��iT• f•tme. Summers Tne ��eeti ng was cha i red by Ms . Gl adys Morton, Chai rrnar�. R:CHARD MILLER (#8546) : An appeal for variance af setback reyuirements fraFn b�!�aff line to build a single family house and lausiness in an I-1 Industrial 7_one located at 257 Ohio. The site is located �n the t�rban Diversified District of the River Corridor Critical Area. The appellant was present. There was opposition present at the hearing. P-1r. Jung showed slides of the subject site and reviewed his staff report with a recommendation for denial of the variance request. Letters were received from Jane Nelson, adjacent property owner, and Nancy West, District 3 Planner, in opposition to the variance. A letter was also received from Shetka Iron Works in which they stated they have no objectian to the proposal . Joe Pangal , 1049 Hudson Road, reported that he was asked by Mr. Miller to te�tify on this matter. A picture was presen�ed to the Board showing the house �hat existed on the site prior to January 3, 1979. He stated that hr would like to address himself to the 5 basis for the possible granting of a variance ir �he s�aff re�ort, E(b) , 1 through 5 ��nd F;ndings G, 1 through 5. Of the five requirements , he wouid consider tF�ree of them substantive because *hey can be ansvaered in fact, and two of thern subjeetive because they requ? t�e or.;nion . � �ie said there� is a hardship that �� far beyon�� rhdt th�s partic�;lar � ..:;"�r'�tdr1011 Of the �Y'1t1Cd� hY'2d Study 1C1C�i�d�P_�. '''., . i�l � � �'� �,u,�i �t rl,�i,�� ;�,r; � ��a` �,,.�pe��ty for l. l years where he lived wir�� ;��. �a�� ; y .r�r � , �. :-� ,_ -:��;y��: - - _ . �ince January they have had to live a�ut•t. `ney are a tarnily tt��. �� , _ . _ �:�� d because o�t b�areaucrati c bungl i ng. ".tr. �t� ? i rr i s fi�� ;�� t+�at he r.< <•;�o' - - _ � ti�ecause there are more ,�es �ri cti ons �r�� r�o�r•e �bs�:r�,��i i ar5 �,�,r��i c%� i�� ` -- � c:,nT r��rted ��di tn. The appel 1 ant occupi ed a horne� o►� ihi�s s; te unti i !ast yea:�•_, � n,�� <:, stated prior, to April 25, 1975. A check wirfi r_ne State Li,.�er�se De�art- ment �;till indicate that he has previously operated a rnail order business ou� o- �his home. The obje�tive questions which require o�inion is , if the variance i , granted it will alter in a negative way the essenti�? character of .*_he site a��o :��c general loca� i ty. If you ar�e go�rg t� look at r.he si te since �anuar�y , ��.; :re rr��ng to al ter the charact��r of the si te be€��r.��e ��oH� i t is open sp�ce, � . � : ° you are going to look at the character• �� the site pri�r to January , ti,er; you are not yoing to alter the character Qfi the s� �e. Tt�e answer of stafF �o this particular question is arbitrary and reasonable people could draw a uifferent conclusion. He also questioned staff as to their use of the term t��a� �Jn?o Street i s a Ga teway to the West Si de Co�runurti ty. He checked wi th � � ��i,�,�� RICHRRU MILLER (#8546) � F'��'�F � the Tr•affic Department and a gateway is determined� b�� ho�� niuch tr��ffi� v�o�11d travel over a street to go from one point to another. They in�ica�ed that Robert Street has a daily traffic count of 17 ,000 ver�icles , ;J7ba�i�a � 3,5UC vehicles , Smith 7,600 vehicles and Ohio 250 vehicles . He �uestion�d ��;hether Ohio Street is a gateway or a private'driveway for a fe« peopl�,� w��o u�e it as a short cut to the loop, and ifi this ��ere the case, he did nr�t feel that i�ir. "filler should be penalized because he elects to rebuild his home on a site �hat has been destroyed. � In the staft report under "Ot�er ��ndings � 5(a) , Mr. Pangal commented that the Zoning Admir�istrator, has Shc:� tnat tt�e lot is large enough to contain both a dwelling and a business and ofr-street parking. (b) As far as backing out onto the street, he said tne city wou'� have to close up most of the businesses in the city if ti��e say they ean' t back out into a street. Also the type of business he has , 2 parking �paces is more than sufficient. He vlould be lucky if he had 3 cars in the course ofi a year parking there. (c) He felt it was up to �•1r. Miller whether he bui �t on the upper site and a business on the lower site as long as he meets the requirements of the I-1 zone which permits a combination. (d) He felt the pur�ose of a street was to carry traffic from one point to another, and if this were going to be used as a reason , this also is arbitrar•y. �'�s to the Ramsey County Water and Soil Conservation Districts , Mr. hiilier has indicated to the staff that drainage of the site would be directed to��ards the street. He said Mr. Miller would be building a home which is substantially smaller than the home that was currently there and it would be built in the same spot. He did not feel that Mr. Miller should be denied this right. Richard Miller, appellant, stated that all he wanted to do was build his home. with or without his business , and move his family back on h�s propert,y. He said the rubbish that is on the site at the present is not from .�is housp; he paid $2,900 to have his house torn do��n and �veryth�,�� was ha�led away. He has been fined by the city once because of the trash that is there and n�� they are calling him again on this . The longer he ��aits to �•ebuild his � ��ou�� , tpe hi�her the cost i s . Ne sai d he i s p�y i s�q !:ax�� :�'ec�' of 'and �'�� : ne cannot use other than to maintain it. ��angal sai d that i f Mr. �li 11 er i s deni ed the ri gh t �o re�ui 1�� or� �r�� r�0i: • '��, Whdt W�I � � hd�pell t0 1 t? Wl � l rhe C1 rV the�,, ��;y �r� }ir'' ��;':� � f��'r:rr?T � '.-. 'i l i er°? '�'�e commented that there i s no proposal tha t he L +-�:-n�r ,��f ;ha+ nas c��me through the CIQ pr�ocess for t��e purchas� oi� this pr�op�r��f. 'Ytr. ��rn reported that he had just called the T��affic Departrnent and tne *raf*ic volume for Ohio Street is 2,000 vehicles per day not ?00 which was sta�_ed by Mr. Pangal . �;o�.�� !u ��adulell , 420 Ohio Street, stated that since tne new road r�as bui 1 t, �he�:��: is more traffic per minute during rush hour it;an t.hey ::�r�,vious? ; !��i per r�ours. . ;a�,e r�aelson said she was appearing before the Qoard as an adjacent property o�t-,er, as a member of the West Side Citizen 's Organization of District 3, an :nit;ator of ±he West Side IT,� and a St. Paul Plannina �omn�issionpr. She . ��;��ry�:� �� .� �:� :�ri:-.4'u 'r1I LLER (�854b) PAGt= � rea�; ��er letter of December 6, 1979 to the Board of Zoning Appeals in ��ahich �ne �rated her concerns . Some of the concerns r��cntioned we��e �.hat i��is s� te i � at a critical transportation junction and will have r� �;iyrllficant 1fIlDaC� 0►1 ongoing stabilization and revitalization efforts nc�� ur�derway in ti�G area. It is located on a very hazardous curv�, park.ing is a problern a�� is critical to maintain and improve pedestrian access anc! use of �i�;iu ��t��ee*. The visual impact of the future use o� this ��:��;t!�t�� is ��o� �ant. She urged the Qoard to consider �vha� the bes� .ong-r�ur�ye use of .n� .,arce' should be -- residential , industrial , open spact�. 5ii� fe1 � t'r,a: -�e �.urrent I-i , diversified open space designation is ari e�,ror. It has �:�irtually no appropriate industrial access and visually fits �n better with the adjacent RT residential and R-4 open space. She asked tnat before any variance is granted t�at at least appropriate erosion stabi ? iza*�on measur�es be d2monstrated and that ar�y proposed site and bui':ding plans be certified by a surveyor. Mr. Pangal reported that as the Uice-Chairman of the CIB Committee and as the Chairman of the Community Facilities Task Force, he would like to ooint out tnat they have been very restrictive and ar�y monies being �sed to acquire �.�roperty have been denied in the CI8 Committee. To speculate at this point in time, it would probably be 10 to 12 years before there will be money to start acquiring these kinds of sites. There being no further testimony, Ms. Morton closed the public hearing portion of the meeting. '�1r. ��+oods made a motion to deny the �iar�ance reguest based on Section G, Fincings 4 and 5 of the Staff Report. Mr. Peterson seconded the motion. The i�c*ion -�ailed on a roll call vote of 3 to 3. ''here was discussion among the Board members as to the extreme hardship on the sppe? lant. "'!". at'r-i5il �t12Y1 111dCj2 d fllOtlUf1 t0 d�7j�Y`OV@ till' 'v'dt"ld!1i:� ;'_°.�:�U-L'�� L��SC'C1 s7r! �(lf�' �.�:;r . i�± �ne appellant is presented �vith a har�dsnip , t,�e si �e �•,_;, pr��.vi��,��y .�c_ e,� �f1 i th a s i nc�l e fami 1y home, the propo5ed use wot,1 d `�e a i �k��ci i ri F�e `-' �':;!le , �yt� proposed construction On the pr•oper'�y 1�10u1�! nC�� -?' ':?Y' "� ? ��zya :ive way, the �ssAntial character of zhe 5ite ar�ci �thai: �� = ��ou'd� b� in � {a�:;:` n� wi±;� the intent of both the Interim Developrnent Regular��ns and �he '�1i ss;�s i ppi Ri ver Corri dor PJ an. The rnoti on was seconded by "?r. Ki rk. +he �:c;*_ion failed on a roll call vote of 3 to 3. '��r. ��uai reported that the Zoning Jrdinance r•equires 4 affirmative vo+es �n .��dE:� for a mo�tion to pass . � � ,�1r. arais made a motion to table this matter until January 8, 1980. ��ir. Parrish seconded the motion. The motion passed on a roli call vote of 6 to 0. �ubmit+:ed by: Ap�roved by; , ,' � � l `- c'�c,,'. ?w( �''��--� ,- t ��',_ ,C ,, �,-j l � ' � L 7'�._ _ , . . _ : �''.!- f � Glac,�:, ^'-„��r �hairman , �� _ . � � � MINUTES OF THE P�IEETT"dG OF iHE [30�+RG ��F Z'�';Ii��;!� r�PPE�LS IN CITY COUNCIL CH�!MBERS , ST. PAUL , ��'IP,��`:�<<T ` .'�'�', !;�,RY ��, 1�80 � PR�SEP�lT: Mme. �1ort�,�; Messrs . Grais , k,irk , Pa��rish anci ':loa-'� of the Board � of Zoning Appeals ; P1r. Jerome Sec�al , Nssistar�t City f1tt��rney; Ms . Lane and Ms . Bijjani of; the Division af i±ou�in�_a and t�uildinc� Code Enforcement; his . Beseman and ��!r. J�_�nq af the �=�1 anni nc� �)i v i s i on Staff. ;SS�NT: h1me. Summers and Messr. Peterson. The meeting was chaired by P1s. Gladys Morton , Chair�nan. RICHARD MILLER (#8546) : An appeal for variance ofi setback requirements from bluff line to build a single family house and business in an I-1 Inaustrial Zone located at 257 Ohio. The site is located in the Urban Diversified District of the River Corridor Critical Area . The appellant was present. There was no opposition present at the hearinq. P�r. Jung reported this matter had been laid over fron� th� pr�evious meetinq and that there has been no further documentation or testimony received. Ms. Morton reminded the Board that the public hearinq portion of the meetinci had been closed but recognized Mr. Pangal , representinq the applicant. Mr. Pangal testified that Twin City Testin� has been asked to make the borinqs and they have been out to the site to look at it but tk,��i a��e ooir�ci to c;c back and make the actual test borin�s . He asked that tk�is rr�atter b� laid over until the next meetinc� at which time they ti�ill have the results of the test borings . ��1},. Kirk asked the City Attorney about time li�>>it� .?r1 �� :,t�:e��s befbrt the Qflar�d ar�c it �,vas expla�ned that the ordinance requires t��t � rie��,?n�� E�� `��1<� ��,�ith�n � �-, � �--., : ,;�� _� �.ays ard �hat a decision be made G-�ithin a ��.a5�� . : � ',�� ,.,.<3 �l�e appel 1 ant i s reque��i nq the conti nua>;cc � :_. _ _, . :;; i�� ;:.f ��:_:hl �,i, . '�?r,, �arais commented that this was one of the �cricerns � �:�� :.�', ty�e iast met��:� ng a� to whether the land is suitable fo� �u�ii:_lir�� an�; ��t�ce t=.ez ��{�ell�a�;t � has contracted N�i th the company to do the tes t bof�i nc�s �,;a�'e a irEOti orl to 1 ay this matter over until January 22, 1980. P1r�. Parrish secorl�ed the �;autian. The motion passed by a unanimous voice vote. Submi tt�d by : I-1pF�r°oveci by: � �� z:vr-G�c.� � Laurence J . Jung �� Gladys Morton, Chairman ��`�� _ MINUTES OF THE MEETING OF THE QOAR�� F ZO�JIfdG APPEl�LS IN CITY COUPJCIL CNAMBERS, ST. PAUL , MIfdNESOTA J�NUAP,Y 22, 1980 �R�SE°JT: Mrne. Morton ; Messrs. Grais , Kirk , Parrish , Peterson and '�loods of the Board of Zoning Appeals ; Mr. Jer�om:. Segal , Assistant City Attorney; Ms. Lane of the Division of Housing and Building Code Enforcement; Ms. Beseman , Ms. McNeally and Mr. Jung of the Planning Division Staff. hGSE";T: Mme. Su��mers . The meeting was chaired by Ms . Gladys Morton, Chairman. P..CH�=,RD h1ILLER (#8546) : An appeal for varianc� of setback requirements from bluff line to build a single family house and business in an I-1 Ir�dustrial Zone located at 257 Ohio. The site is located in the Urban Diversified Disrict of the River Corridor Critical Area. Ms . 1•lorton reported that the appellant has asked that this matter be laid over indefinitely. Mr. Grais made a motion to table this matter indefinitely. Mr. Peterson seconded the motion and the motion passed by a unanimous voice vote. The pr�operty owners within 350 feet will have to be� renotified. Submitted by: Approved by : � , ;,T�i^,,�-� -�' 1 ' ' n� i��t�-z-�a-YC.-- �' � �-��- ; � �aurence J . Jung al 3dy�s Morton , Chai Y�man MINUTES OF THE P�EETI��U OF THE BOARD OF ZOP�ING AP�?EALS IN CITY COUNCIL CHAh1BtRS, ST. PAUL,, MINNESOTA FEBRUAR'✓ 26, 1980 PRESENT: Mme. Morton and Summers ; Messrs. Grais , Kirk , and Parrish of the Board of Zoning Appeals; Mr. Jerome Segal , Assistant City Attorney; Ms . Lane of the Division of Housing and Building Code Enforcement; Nls. Beseman, Mr. Torstenson, Mr. Jung and Mr. ��Jarn of the Planning Division Staff. ABSENT: P�lessrs. Peterson and Woods. The meeting was chaired by Ms . Gladys Morton, Chairman. RICHARD MILLER (�8546) : An appeal for variance of setback requirements from bluff line to bu� a single family house and business in an I-1 Industrial Zone located at 257 Ohio. The site is located in the Urban Diversified District of the River Corridor Critir.al Area. The appellant was present. Ms. Morton stated that this matter had been laid over frorn the meeting on January 8, 1980 in order to allow time for the applicant to have borings done � on the property. She reminded the Board that the public hearing portion of the meeting was closed. Mr. Pangal , representing the appl �cant, reported they have received the results from the Subter.ranean Engineering Inc. in Minneapolis . It is recommended that the new house walls should be kept at least 7 f2et from the top edge of the slope, and that the northwesterly corner of the garage should be at least 5 feet from the slope edge. The house and garage footings should be based directly on undisturbed �t. Pete�• sandst�ne. Fill shoulu be imported as necessary, and tf7e yard graded in such a manner that the front and side yards drain down toward Ohio S*reet. This will minimize any tendency for �f�eathering and erosic�r� of the slope. ,�lso, the existing vegetation on the dowr;h�l ? s',�k�ti sho��l�! r:ot r�� disiur�bU�!. Debris that may be existing on the slepe s%�oui�J oe c� earr�� .�� "��T1Ud� � . i�A SdiCj lt r1dS b2°!l ? 3i� f11G11thS S1flCt' '''`C, !`�1t "; ?!�'' S 1?0',I>e _I!'T?: :�.;',�!;"; 3 he wo�.�' ,: li�e to rebuild and asl:ed the Buard to qrant *he �;ariance. Mr. Pa��r•ish made a motion to grant the variance based on �ne ta:.t that t'�� applica.rt is presented with a hardship, the site was previously occupied with a single ramily home, the proposed use would be allowed in the I-1 zone, the propo�� construction on the property would not alt_er in a negative way the essential character of the site and it is in keeping with the intent of both interirn development regulations and the Mississippi River Corridor Plan. He also auc.'ed that the stipulations in the soils repr�rt be observed. ��!r. Grais second�� the motion. The motion passed on a roll call vote of 4 ±0 1 with '�'s . ,�'�r��or voting against the motion. � Submitted by: Approved by: �' " � .f" �t_.� ��,�c�t,�c�,� �-�� c=�_ -� ,i��c�1i Laurence J . Jung� Gladys Mor� , Chairman �Y/� �`s. /- � , /� ` ' �3 'k i�`� � \;��.`� \� . - �� O, l �� i � ��J �\ \ ` � �, � ' � � ' � � ' ° � �� L �. '1��`� •; � o L9�• r ' � ��4- � - ' � '6 ��' ;.� / . .�1\\\\�� .� �\ � � ,i., y � :. • � • � '�, �' � ��.�\� � \ ,�t .i�.,..j� ��r� �y ' �� • .\� �\�\\� �� ` . • � . \�\��. �\ � '_J J�j�', � '' � _ � - ✓t� � • �, � '� ��`\l��•��\ �v � 1 ' �, / � � �� ..\ % �!� � J'J�� ,�N � � � .:..\* � • , �:�� .�� \, �r "o /� (/ � �,�. .,� J+p �� ty � `\ o ` � � �,� � � \ �� • _ �� .V,.f�'.L�tA Ot � w 1,� I `.��•' •'\ � �4 � ` ��.��\. `•/ ��: � '1` � � U� �.'}.�V x � ' �,, d y �:\ . _ � ` / 4 J.y 0, '�� .�.� �� • ;j t 4 � .� . � ',�\\\\.�..�. 'J, — F � '�^ `��o '��'�1 � •��i� � � �� ^ y � ~� 0 �,.� �!= � :.�'�-�\ . .� � `_ ,J .� r; ,. `.��` := / ,,�' � �,�� ' ,.\ �. � ,\\�v�� . , . � �t J � �//^'S �`' � . p• ��..y \�� <`�'�� 4. � �� . ' y � \� �` �/� /� P �y�� \\ti' CT .-�. � \ �, .� � `'� /1 1 �� J� � '� `\. � \� , . � ` ;;� ' \�ti e"��i, / '�'� � ` ` s- � ____— '�7� '� '� �,i�`� '1 l �''1� �"� ,�� ` '�.� ,�� , � '..� �� . f` ,� ��/`�f. � , ''�� ,.,� Q o� j � • __ - r � E s: � � . . ' ,. r"._� f y_� Q Ir ; '�`',�� r � � ``� } : � �- � � a� � , �o � �1��3'�� :�� . . . - . ��=.tl1P ._ ._._.._.. . _ � � .� ' .. '=�oar�� o� Zoning A�peals -;::�st Fourtr Street "� . �'aul, r°inr.�sota 55102 _:_ , R:.cnard :'�til�er Zoning Fiie :�o. 85�n �v..-12m�n , I� regards to the above na�~;ed ap�'��a:�- , ��, �'��r�, �,eo. S:�.etka & Sons , zncorporated, rc� ` ��-� ��:-: '- has _�� _� �_.,_ _ �_o ^�r. ?�iiiler's purpose to build a single _�-�:�il:� ��:zs� an� `��asiress. Sincer2ly, , � ,� �' � � ;�� ----. � �-� ,i° , �- _ - . �,`�-� r!� ;::r-i�� `netka " rresident � ; � f ; ;, + . � F t S R t � E S 3 � ..., ` . ; � ��`�� UNITED STATES DEPARTMENT OF AGRICULTURE SOIL CONSERVATION SERVICE _ � __ _.:� �:1 J- . ., al,._ �::i"'..�'.i.� .lu�.� °;ti'�':.,.. i''f�� -- - . .� � � _. .r�..._ �r 30 , 1�j: �� ' � ��^ n; �.ric` _ _. . Supervivo,°s , Ra:�:.�e�- So_L _ x ..� _� . ;;�_. _ ._r� , . - , _:� ._ . _�� "�. R�V�2;a �^,i_ ?nd �_Va_� Co..d� _Cnti . -.- ��- � of St . Pa� , D�par�men� of '�_�nni_ �._.; �co_,.:o_m_ _ �-�y�...=��:�ent , Zoning�Section is consid��°in a ��_._, - ;,-�� ; �r,; , ^::uu�s � . The reques� is for a varian�^e cf . :_ _,?�� °y � _ ,��I l _ �_-.-�^ Corri�or Cri.,icwi Area In�erim Dese� �� y �n -' .. _` , �,Li�.c.. ._C, � r 1 i=2 .��cifi.c reguiat�on beir.g addressed i _ c � uf.f � _ne ��. ^ac�:. ylr , Craio Johnston cf the Minnesot ___v_^��:�:��a� �;�a1�` �, � �j,�ar; 'ias advised (see nis le��er, Novembe_ c, �979 ) ±-ne ;;; . � Pa�al D�partment of Pianning and Economic De�e�o�^�en; �rat ��e � �ro_os�d structure under consideration dCe; ".;��`� *_.?Ze criteria t i or �.�^�;ension variance iror� b�uff se�bac��" w�,- "; a p�rm_r��u ' �_ti.>e" �� he loca��on proposed for ,� -` _._� _.. � � �n° s ru� �^� :IQ�rev�r T�Tr. Johnston poses severa� questions re,ardin� �ne cond_�ion of tne si�e and the sui�abili�y �i _� for a bui�ding si�e . In order to exp?ore ansUrers to these au�stions , �he Ci�y of St . Paul has requested the Ramsey Soi� an� :;a�er Conservation � D�.�`�r�� to inves�iga�e the si�e . The p�_r�c��e �_ �_:is ,�epc.� �� -1 �.ddreas ��-�ese �u�s��ons ?:ld p-roviu� ,., � ,� ; � , • ��;er ^~:e any adversa impacts on tile site _�,:' .1yi � =� _ � . �- � caas�e � �,- � � -�� -^� on �he sir,e . I� sho�.�,d be no�ed ,=� > �i�.� � .. � �i�P information is general in nature . Fo_ ;� ��i'i;: �e�or�^��4�- � - �= �i�a�i�_.; on soils or foundation en�ineer�r ;� - : P_e� ,� -;, _ _ , _ ,,,- ,,-.�,, „:�� , �' _ - � � , , , _ ��....,_d �?� � �_. _�C1. , - . _, _,� r _, , � , _.� _�., -� - :_ -, � , , ., , _ _ � � �.,.; � ... h_t . ,.... _ . _ _ _ ., � , . - - , • . , � _ . .. _ . _ . . . _ . _ _ _ . _. ...�� . .. ��. ., 'i.� ' '..�-.. p -. _. . . ._ .. _ .. ... .�.. , v�...� �. � �� . ..� �.�.wJ .. ._.�. ' �. .��_ _ _.�' ... :__ . . . -_ ., „.' . ,.� ..� ..;�.. a '. . . .. _._ .. J�. v ._ . .l__�A�... �Q.�_ .� . • �� :,r . .. � _ __�� . -..Ar .__ . ,_.. . . .., . ,. . .. . .. _ .� "'. _ _ . . _. . .... 1 .. �.:� n��„r . . . _ _. _ , _. , , ,.. ._ _ a _ _ __� �. _. _ _. _.. _ �. ,. �1..�.i� w � _.._� . _� u�_:� _ -� �. _�e . -� - -"' .�'.t',i11L17_=:� �.:° :�...�i -o'.,1? `?�.. .lOii JI `.�":L: ._ , .._ :y�n'. ':`T�: Cw11i1C'.Ull`. �•�� _'�e ar:loun� o� debris �', ; �� ;�t on �_e s_�e. i .. �.r ,x r. ..�, some __ _ Of' ��'r18 �3C__��CI? Oi -!"i�� S1`:2 11�?� �u '<'_. '? _ ��':,it�_ =?� . Tti. , - ,. , _ � .��en 1or_ �_-. _ �.;an-1�r ':,a-. ap.��a�� . _�� -� - � � � � -�- •- � ._ � ,a�le . ::_ �. :^a_. se:�::e, __� . _ .._ �__ _ ...a , " . , n,a '- -,,a� .. _�, _ � ' . _ _._., , ., a� C'_i^�' J3,r'� O` .,� .�ar��i 1 � -. �;:)�1 ,a� ' � � - _y aY�coss Ohio S`,r af- f �ic.i :is se�n # - e• rom ` .Ze ��e � .� . S.).�C�' Vda' �'� • r t�3'�� jj'j z � ��'° ^ �.�pa�en�1Y cre�ted ir. � � �� .�� reet �i�roug:� �YZe bluff . -� _ _��_,,,� of cu�:. r.ing � ► , � � i E. � ¢, X . . . _ _ . _., _ �� _ � .,_.�:i -r:�, __ : - - - . . • . . „ , _ _ ., , � -•� rl ., _ �. ., �. �- - - - - - - , . , - ^ - - - � - - - �- � � _ - -- .._. <: , _:.:� �� .?'�,C'xC� ,-I'?t i�O___Ji�._. _ � .'.._. .�.. , :__ , _. �.� , :?_��. . _ , . . ,_ _ _ „ . . . - - > - � ,. ,- ;,i- � � � -� ��.__ . � � �.. � CI�_„-��,'r' �''-'�`-�'' ' - --.- .. _ _ �_ _ ..--- "'� .. . .- - , . ' - -�'-'" _ _.:_ __ � - - ; �_ ,. �'t7 i,_='.'. S�� .. :. .� ;. _ �''� � c.. ��_ _ ....� _ _ _ '_'? _ -- . . _ . � _.__ � „--?'X d�r?.;y' ! ��i?� 3i'_y �a,.�'�:�.,. OI �_- � :. _-- , --:? • - -- -- � .� _.__� _:: , .=C� .}`i� a��Ori�u �i:� f'1��:, ��I't _i�' .. �...__ _ .. . .: � . __� �� __ . - �_ - -� � _� , �� approac:� _� �c direc� al_ i� . --u-- __ .. � __� ., -� c�::- _ ,_:�� .:� _ �_� . If trle ranoii �� _n - t,.� .0 � _ _ -� � � �� J�_ � .. _ � - . ) .� �. �_,. .� :� _. _'_..-. -. . .�._ . , .. !1'l�!, ' ' , ' � _-� �_ _ .� _ __� U�_.�� . �.�L �nat .vo��_a �oi�.� t�.,�� z� _ __. . _� �_ _. .. _ _... _-.�^-� . - �nv'_��: c= �he plan revealed or�e pos�.�.;� __ _�. _., :.� ,._.�^�c�.:.�:�:� .,: z_.._er .�� an or tne exis��n� in�o^:�a�_c�. c�: : � . . �� - { _ _ �� s�r�.,�u�e 3pp°a�'s to b� �co fa?' -o -- ._� r�--- �- - -� :�i'�� € � � _- vup��r��a oy b2drock. For t�e p�'o;�� -_�� ,� __ __-� �rd � ., _., C.:_^_2I'; �Z'C_."`,°�`'�'.125 3:1�. 1'1V°StTi12Yl�j � ? �UB. '�_«c�., "0=_:i c','� �::E�: x � � ^� �� __" _ � uZ �O�S'•.,1!�2C� regarding t�12 p3T''1C1,1!a.T'U Oi J�:;.^ ^;` r CT' t:�c , ��^� c-u:° _.�u ��e configura�ion of the sands� on� unuerlyir?g rhe � ��.�..�Li�° . ,_- = _^ �- =a�? plann_;.ng ar:d bood cor�;� ��.� .,� .. _ vc��:u�es th' � �_- '� -� ��^�-��de a good buildino ��c�a��:��^ . ' � ' f f �inC��^°i�' . �Yi D /�� . .- . . ^ � �� . . , _ . f '�I j1� C� .w:: ..�?1�".�3:^.,,. r - - - ^- . �_; __ _.. . .,__::�� '•i 1,i.�0:1Si. :_ _ _�::��u �'=��.. J"fice � � I` ! � E � � E � i � ' � ��rb�� Phone:546•6933 `I�'9 -�'.. i� ��:±�� tl��a Dete 'l,; i�i5 `v�Jayz7ta i;;�u., �� .. ; I I ��. �L- I CU��.(,��L � 1�.tinne�poi�;, i�t�rne�c'a ��4;?0 Jr,h�dema � � � •" � —=�J�rtit�_�_�_1�'_ilLy,DD1�LC�,��,�L.d��b Na. -- _" Job Locofion J�,�� ! � �z�� 4�,�R�,!�'�'_5__ � � 1� • 2� ��,� ra�,hWO��-- —�4_�._�. U S7, �i; P�}-�,�±,.��:r� Con�ro—^'-- - ---- ---- _.,__ �:lien! ��! \ 1 +��1� qrriveJob _..1� t� ,��/1M�leeqe . ��__�i.L_. — ----� -- — �-- -- �'u , ` � . , _ �� Tota� � � !1 � no�err�ob __�.��` _ �r�val Time r. iT ! —_. __. _—_ _---- ---___. ..hargeabie ; � Houn j � � � Lab.Time `_ � i atol Houn � _ � On Job 2, � �---� soort Time��__ Summary of 7echnical and/or Engineering Services performed, including Field Test Data*. Locations, Elevetions, and Depths are estimated: _ Th� s Rronerty is located on the southerl� sidesl�e of fhP 1�d; S�; ss; ��; River va�,l.�y A house with_.attached garage f4rmerly occu�ieci +h� � lo , b�± +he ho��P ��d down and the d br. ,jt�nvin� � �,s i�_as been removed,._,_ only some por inn� nf the fpundatiQn . The �ner now desires_�_ build a�ew b- °y e t— °—r g-�1 n S` +F,�• .,1 � o n e _ WP wgr� r ni ��•rl hy ►u1r _ R; c-hnrd Millrr� Own r� tc� intnPrt t �. Rr�nr,�+rfy� _4Y.�.1{1 dt i r�ilnr Q{ E.�t i nn �p the Stab� � � t Of the 5.�0 Y 2�.Q#._the rear or nartherlv side of the lot . We were to_�repa:� a report of aur f�rtdines , ��h recomme��n+ � ��s for the new house constru��ion_,.____ T�.__Q_�sist__�_�j � o r � ;<tk_ ��°_. �:v?t_.� r�rovided wi _ �_�'L_9._ s u F v e v__�,],g.n o f _��]�---;1�;:�2�°L�-X.,�S7.i1�__�L_.�2�.�.I1�2�_.��2� :_�.;:��k�;�_��._�.i1�a.�_- --- ,� � �,�� ;�,��a��,�1i� :_--- � T��e property was inspected by the undersigned, in the company of Mr . ".liller . `;i RIBUTIOti p� � ., _��i��'�.. ._t(C�AR�_I��Ll,�--- BY-- _ � _ ��.,,�_1_,_�_�E� � U ERRAN N ENG� 'EERING INC.' C C, �� —�- - F�eld Test Dets is estimeted psndiag finel leboretory fest results. --___..--- __--------- � , --`_______.-- ----- �'c,��!j?YllTIpIL fJL�. p �� , 2 �_�,�.�� Approximate meosurements of the adjacent uphill and � downhill slopes were made , using a fiand level ond optic�l type � measure , The slope materials were sQmpled and identified . ! � OBSERVATIONS : � Since the house 'was razed, several truckloads of l � building bedris have been dumped on the property . TP�is include � large blocks of concrete and mosonry, and oId building lumber . The dawnhill slope is approximately 28 ' to 30 ' high, and consists of Sto Peter sandstoneo There is some vegetation �nd small tree growth on this slope , There is a limestone and masonry retaining wall on the westerly foce of the slope, which serves to protect it from erosian . A series of corrugated metal arches similar to culvert sections have been applied as a facing around the entire top o the slope . These are rock-bolted or tied back into the sand- stone below, and also serves as o detexrent to slope erosion . The atta�hed sketch p1.an shows the results of our survey � of the entire slope cross-section at the proposed house locat'i n , AThere are absolutely no evider,ces af roc!�f�'�!s or � ' instability of either t.he uphill �r �«ti�+n��il.� s�or�es , t�� F chere ! 3 is normal weathering of the s-'�c��e faces . � � RECOMMENDATIONS AND CONCLJSIONS : � i ' The slope is presently not in its natural condition . It � � � � has actually been cut and shaped to its present profile . The � construction of the Ohio Stre�� ` roadway, vr��ich creates a leve ; , terrace half way up the slope, is actual very beneficial to th overall slope stability � , ��;��.,�.Y _ SLTBTERRANEAN .- -,.,._,-�-,- E ?�I G[N E E�t�N G '�t�_ - �- _.. .,. "�'._ ' J • '1�`:j '_V'�J Y'ei F'()�;. .'.S. '1�'_[ 1� ti. '�� , F� � ... � It is our considered opinion thot the slope is stable ; Qs is, and no remedial measures are rAquired . � ' It is recommended that the ne�v house �•�alls should be ; kept at least 7 feet from the tap edge of the slope, onJ tha , � ! the northwesterly� corner of the garage should be at lenst i i 5 feet from the slope edge .. � ; � i The house and garage faatings should be based directl on undisturbed St . Peter sandstone , i Fill should be imported as necessary, and the yard � graded in such a manner that the front and s:.de yards drain i. down toward Ohio Street � This is very important, and will minimize any tendency for weothering and erosion of the slopeo The existing vegetation on the downhill slope should not be disturbed „ Debris that may be existing on the slope should be cleoned up manually , �(i ,(j�� 1n�r t � ' �/JI, f � , rr � j � � F f � � 4 f f � l 1 � i i j � ( � . ��,�;:�� ., SU�TERRANEAN . . -' . �: NGtIVEEH!',VCG INC. ,�_ . _ - F� ��fy�� N N.�'J�:':J f...``�. � : iv �, . . � �� \� ��i,�rn ��'{ 'd �� . . , � `�- lu��,� l :��rv! . . � -�- �..-�—.___.__....,.�___.._...Gy . ( � i � �"'�-- -__ ._-�... .�_,_. � ! 4y _ I �� i$., � -z � V � 1 V� . i.� � � � v . .3do�s N� .-�,�'- � j �l ? i . ; � M � � , ;,_ �. � N1m rt��") 3��L '�' � -�. , �: ,.y---_. .:. __.. , �` �.�~-;-�::��_.��-✓ , � r-: — __ . ,._, �,, �. �o . � ` . . � i � � ' i ; . o � � �� , 0 o r" � GL-.�Q� ��v' +� Q. �� I � . , � . .yJ k; �, �/ , ! C1 _.! __ _ � , O i ' 4. � a • . S �N�� /�.ti 3do21�, Ir+v�� . , o � • ;,x- �., � :� �dM �a�5 � s .� . �-- � _� o . . , � � 0 .�, . , � � '�")r � . U N �y('nQN0�4 a- ' Q� N ; (n . - .1S G I�}p � . � . . v� .+-' �. . � v'� �) . � � � .- � :'� c �' �i `� 1v"� � , .__— , . -r . _ �:t _� a O I�. . . �_, c- � _ �S ' .1 . '-1 i\5 :, i - � � .."'_ .. ... . � 'j., c+� .� _ .... � ' �SI;Sr -_ �.3I >7 , o / / , r . Q :�t�/1,/)��J � � _ ' " '. . ' Q _ - ✓ ( � , 3 ti � � �- �--c � �� , ? � �, . 1\1 � j � \ ,� ; N �N � Z � ' . � � —f � � � " ca � 4� �_ � ,� ,� a ` � � ,� � . --/ � F- u j � sc J w � �� i 'J 2 (�-1 � .� tn J �1 �� V i 7 a ; 7� � � � ' v'1 � t11 N i� � � ' � � � � V r � 1��,�1� 1.� i Q y � � W � � . � 1 = ��" � 1 �'" � � � _i , . �; � rP o � � (� z � __ �j RA�`�`:��Y SJIL ->N� WaTcR ;ONSERYA-10;v ?�i:.��,J"�7 ` �,!;d�.�m ,,., _. R �. . � � aa� - - . _„�,��► �. , —�.�`�a�...-� ! '`•,...�"""� ;��-.� !__ - �`-� ,�'.n;;�� " i .��:�1�... a�.� V�IAT�t-� �tJl�IS�c�\/��"�t�9�1 �;;� � =',a�..�� ,.� � .� :�ece.�ber 4, 1979 T0: Supervisors of the �...�e�� Soil .��ri�:� T�Tater t'�nse�>>aticm T_r stric� :",�:�i: �ne Zc.riers SL`�JG'Ci: Review Soil and Blufi Conc:itions :•�. Stan ��lendl�td, Ilistric* Canservationzs�, transmitted his revi.ew of the above proposed develor�r�ent to the ?',�ey Soil �d T•'ater Con- servation I}istrict Board for their anproval. [:e an�rove nis repo� �d en�hasize t�-zat the Board has no reQula�.o�,� �;y�ction and caz� o�ly make recar�r,enc3ations. ?'e find the proposed site poses no serious threa` to water and or soil resources in the area, if ;fr. Wendl�d's reccm�nendations are follawed. Sincerely, _, - , „ i`_,, ��/'• = ��-t=�"2.,�% L,y�'� '� :�/ �. P�I. Zwiers ?�a� _Tzevi.ecv Corr�.ittee A�.' =QI;AL O�OORTUNITY ��vt}�;_;�YE�-� =.,-��;.:: ,�_ ..._.--—� � � � i 1Vlinnesata , �., � � � �nv�ronm��T�! �u� ;�� r�.�� '�� '� . ` �.'�� 100 Cap�toi �y�are ouil�ing �` � ' � 550 Cedar Str��t �'�`� ; F �. � St. Paui, l�linr,e,ota 5�10! �o- :�;.� � ' Phone 296-85 42 November 6 , 1979 � "�r. Rick 4Jiederhorn Department of Planning and Economic Development 25 �•lest Fourth Street St. Pau1 , P1N 55102 Dear Rick: I have looked at Rick Miller's site plans for rebuilding his home at 257 Ohio Street. Under Critical Area Regulations the project is a permitted use in the Urban Dive rsified Distr�ct and meets the criteria for dimension variance from bluff setback (Sec. I .3.b.) . However, the applicant indicates in the site plan that he intends to rebuild on an existing foundation located ��rithin a few feet of the bluff iine. I am concerned that this r►ay not be safe . No information has bee n provided on the condition of the 51uff. Is it eroding or slipping? I think that soil and bluff condittions should be scrutinized by Mr. h9iller and the Zoning Board of Appeals befare rebuilding begins . Possibly a knowledgeable outside source should be consulted, like the Ramsey County SCS . I feel that a deterr�ination must be made regarding the safety of re- buildinq so close to the bluff. This bJOU�(� E�� in the spirit of the Critical Areas Act u�ith re�ard to bluff setback and in thQ inter�st o� t'^= City of St. Paul an.d P-1r. f�liller. ..��erely, Craig Johnston _ � Critical Areas Pro ram - � �:---:�._ b a �-�� .�l , � �' cc: Rick Miller Donna i�1cNeally " FQU.�� .r `;}i i:ilY � n::='•-_'� .__'i . - _ :t CITY �F SAINT PAUL _>�-° , -_i ��,..,= DEPAR f�ti1ENT OF PLAi��i�G A'�D ECON0,�i1C DEVEL{JP��,IENT , _� ;-,;,-,„ - � , - �;�,,,� . ';� j��' DIVIS{ON �F Plr',titil�tiG 25 bVest Fourth Street, Saint Paui, tvlinneso:a, 55102 -_� .�� _a'i�tcR 612-298-a151 tita'-O� Octo��er 30, 1979 ��['`1'' f`.,I J :a 0.s l.e� ��'r. C1 i ff Ai chi nger State Planning Agency 100 Capitol Square Bui]ding Saint Pauls P^irnesota 551Q1 Dear Cliff: Please note that on December 11 , 1979 , the St. Paul 8oard of 7_anir�g Appeals will hear an appeal for varia�ce of thQ ��iississippi P,ivQr Corridor Crit�cas Ar2a Interim Development Regulations relating to bluffline setbacks. The ap,�iicant, a Mr. Richard i�iiller of 257 Ohio Street, St. Pau1 , tivishes to rebuild a home and business that recently was destroyed b,� fire at that lccation. The si�e is in an Urban Diversified district o` �he Critical Area. Enclased is a copy of the proposed site plan. Please cer�?nt on the proposal by Dece?b2r 5, 1979. I'm available to review the proposal at your convenience. _ Sincerzly , � � „ , ,�� R�chard J. '�lied2rhorn �Pla�ner-in-Charge St. Paul i�ississippi River Corridor P1an RJ'�!/cc cc : R;�r�ard M,i 1 `i er !arry Jurg � . �� ,-,�;•. CiiY OF SAINT PAUL . _ , �r,��= DLPART:UIENT OF PLANNING .AND ECONC�,"vllC D�VELOPMENT - ��E�;,��;; ii�=�=tq�� /> �` � D11'iSION OF PLANNING , 25�1e�t ru:�rn Street, Saint Pau(. Minn�sota, 55102 � �EORG> �_ .-;�t�R � 61Z-298-4151 �t�IOR December 10, 1979 T0: P1embers of Board of Zonina Appeals �P,O"�1: fdancy ldest, Di stri ct 3 Pl anner R�: RICHARD MILLER-257 OHIO - uARIArdCE REQUEST "-ir. Miller's request for a variance of the setback provisions under the Interim Development Regulations of the 1974 S�ate River Corridor Critical Area Act forces a difficult decision about the balance of individual rights and public benefits. As the district planner for the Ulest Side, I feel it's impartant for you to consider your decision in light of how P�Ir. f�iller's parcel relates to the existing and planned land uses of this area. 1 . The parcel is part of the !�Jest Side ITA. The ITA plan propases acquisition of the property for part of the River Corridor park system, a 2. Ohio Street is the most direct and most scenic connector between the upper and lower bTuffs, District 3 P1an recommendations for a "gateway entrance" at Ohio and Isabel and a bike path connecting Che•rokee Park with Harriet Island depend on a safe, uninterrupted curve along Ohio. 3. The City' s Parks and Rec Plan acknowledges the need to get ail the bl��ff land into public o�inership and to provide a better p�destrian l :�,k between Cherokee BoulPVard and ��later Strzet. Tne �ik� Plan �a' ls for a pr�ma�ry bike route,the Cherok��-L?�ydale 1 ;�t, alo��G^ Ch�rokeA to Ohio to Plato. � �� r�;uest for a variance to alloui construc�z�n �* ; b��,�;-,ess ..��± r�� -�;�,ce--considering the questions raised about oft-stree� �;arki!��, ��raT{ic and drainage--would work against a sensitiue, thought-thr�ugn clan ror the bluf` area. In 1974, the River Corridor Critical Areas Act received a grea� deal of a�±�ntion for its bold mandate to cooridinate land uses along the river. -�,is �ast year, St. Paul ' s Ri�ier Corridor Plan was acclaimed far its �rision of how the resources of the river could be put to their hignest �-' ' .':.�� use. �ut the hoopla , tne headiines and press conferences, the bi� sr;iles and glorious moments following a plan well-done «11 fade away. ?he hard decisions--the ones that affect individual property owners, the ones that can make our River Corridor Plan come to life just for this monent, along this stretch of land--are left to others like your Board of Zoning Appeals. =:��:, . , Members of Board of -2- December 10, 1979 Zoninq Appeals 4�Jhat can make this part of the West Side special to both residents and visitors is the unobstructed viE� and the potential for paths and walkways. The construction--and operation--of a business and residence on P1r. ��iller's parcel will significantly, negatively change the open space character which the 6dest Side neighborhood needs here. Thank you. CC: Ross !�Jilliams, District 3 Community Organizer James J. Bellus, Planning Administrator _'L'�:''"1 v,C'' I�� t )I:: :o: ^_'ne Board ot ?or.in� A^:��a�.; 25 tJ. �tn �treet 3t. Pa.ul, ;'inr.esota S51!�� ---ardin7 s `Jariance, 25? 0'r,io, �i le �# 854F�� I�liller Dz3: °oard t�embers� � I write to you about my concerns re�-ar�iin�- tne future use of tha property at 25i Ohio Street. I am an adjaeent tiomeowner� a member of t^e iiestside Citizens Or�anization (Distrzct 3)� initiator of the �iestsic?e. ITA, and a St. Paul Plannin? Commissioner. Z believe the future use of the 257 Ghio �treet property� pa.rticula,rly tha.t portion on top of the bluff ?ine, is at a critical transportation junction and will also r�,ve a si�nificant imt>act on on�oing sta.ba.lization and revita.�ization efforts now u�:derway in this area. The upper lot is very small, on the ec��e of the bluf'f, or� a very hazardous curve, and on a street which is a pricea.ry direct lir.�c between the upper bluff and pa,rkr+ay and Harriet Is7..a.nd floodplain below. The only sidewalk down Qhio runs infront of thi� pro�erty. There is no other pedestrian access on the other side of the street. There is no on-street ga,rkin� on this �tretc'r� of Ohio. '"::e ~:earest pa.rkin:� for additional family� business�visitors �:: �ver j'�^ feet axay, arour.d tpe �urve� or. zsabel. Yarkin� for the r�iller f�mily, in the pa.st, Y�a:� :�f..�:: a �':��"!. i'.�.Y"� O FLEY Wc.-'T3 T��3.�"r.��r�{ l��E: ''3.�l,f OV@r t�'?r? C1.2:"'^.� i)tl "_"i':d;:: r)rpnPZ'ty OT c1.Cr0;�S �:�P L�-?(�@S+2'Icl?-1 WdZ�(Wc9.`/ 1@3��i'.1;; - - . �':c .'? 7� y.},, ' �: . . _ : `7`E>f' JtO7�S� 02" O;�CP.1-n.�• l.11t' f']i.sif? �ili��W_�l ��W � ' _i — � - - _.°a,.zer±lti� �_n t"a fr�r.t ��a�l . �'.r1g pr�,�rJc�r'ty r':35 I�2?Cl C1tCi� , nre'JlOti•.; �G •`,i`."r' �lY't'.� 'i.i ?. _._.. _;2"!�O� ' P.'✓?SOZ'B 3.I1�i C�.t�:�� f'VY' T�OSSI.t!:.k-! 3C;"s�il`;i=�7v:;� ±r� _.".�,2";f T@c3,�(Ji"1S }�@1!^:=f C3T.S ::'i:"!tl!'ll31.i'r :Ilti€:�C171-- !Ri)' E?(1c:'_`.� i,'ic: _..��^i�hed, tarpapered �ara�e and � 11_e�al vat�ralk� cars arid t��c:!s in tt'ie front ya,r�: . 'I'he ITA proposal desi;rnaied tt,e area o�' the property alon� the bluffii.ne leadin:�T into the �lestside as a "�a texay" area and pla,ns were drafted for pa.rkway and pedestrian �.:��r.�±i�s such as tree and shrub pla.ntin�s, bi�:e pati� ci�si.�;tlat�cr,� . . �^i:^ overlooks. This ".-ateway" concept cc�nc�srre�l with lon��- _,. __ �iver Corridor, 'de roti.a��i Investm?:�t Strat��+-y, Pa.r'-: anci ��reation, and 3ikeway ':om*arericnsive iqL3r:� for t't;e ci�y wi��c:�i cal� �'�r a ;�,rr.way-like link between Cherokee 6�.ivd. and the iiarriet F�� . � ��`�� Zs3.a.�d�Lil�da:e �-e:�-�c-;a1 Par<. �,hio _�treEL wi.�_ ? =�i ,� i;��1� i�� d`!SO�'�% RIU(:�i c3.j�±i t1011�.� tL'3i�fli' �ti r!tC t1t�3T' .�1]`t,L1L'!� (?�iri r - }r:,v �l.l?"3�j.Ot1 Of tilE? i;1�T:1 `!2'l.r:%'g rR?::OP:�a',Y'UCt.lOCl. � It is critical to not cnly m�,;-�t�in� at tris �;o;nt, ;,_,± t,, -T:�rove pP?estri�� a_c��e�s an�i use of i)hio ';tr:.�t. I �;:� ;i�t ��i�,•a � ��:?isiness de•rE-�o;�ment and wai ver;n - of setl�ac'rs at tr:i� bo�t�e:leck will assist in the ef r ort to i mpro��e mo�.;er�ent. ;do curo ��ts st:ould �e allowed near the treacherous c�ir�:�e. i:m root� I ;:ave to listen Tor oncomina tr3ffic before cr�ssin? the street. — The visua,l impact of the future u�e of this pr-:�.;�.rt;; i� al�i; ;.�nporta,nt. � I question the propose�� use - a riom��:�eaitYi outl�t. i•ir. � � ?�iller has spoken to neivhbors previously of riis desire to s�ll repa,ired ears� to Mr. Aney about a motorcycle repair spot, ard to other nei�hbors of his �lesire to "just rebui�d my i�ome. " He also +ried for several months prior to the fire, to sell trle property. I urPe you to consider wrat the best lon�-ran;-e use of tizis pa.rce7. should he - residential�industrial.�openspa,ce. I believe the current I-1� diversified open space desi�nation is an error. This parcel is sepa,rated by a �ully from the adjacent iridustrial park. It ha,s virtually no appropriate industrial acces5 and �risua.11y "fits in" better with the adjacent Rt residential and R� open spa,ce. I reco�nize this ma.n's ri�;ht to use his existin�; property to its hi�hest zoned use. I am also sympathetic with his lo�.�s to the fire Hhich I understa.nd sta.rted in the nara;�e. 3��t I also reco�nize there are �reater public nneds too, and that or:e small parce� can have a very bie� impa.ct on everythin�r aro�wnd it. T_ really think i� tt�e �?esire is to reF�uild a tio::.�, ti.e c��.a_�;;,;;, wi,; t_; accomnli� i� i:�:i..,, and o�a wl:ic;: woulcl p�-o�iic� , �,a1:t-�_.;=n �.� ''�, „� ��-,?�. . _ � ��,st fooa re>ta�.ra�it) would i,c: to c�:zorie t:. . u�.:��; � ..��idential. � � � . . A _� ~ ; . . . ,._ �.+_ ,1 :� �.Yl� UTlE: W�11Cf7 f t,E.' ��ri� �;',{I111f,�±; . L,?_, .'c... � _ :�1U;',.t@C� c3 Ti@t;d t0 ;'X'�.lUr't'� 1S tt1�� pO:�i::I�J�-LA _i _S' ;�liir: t -1c� ,,r -�can* lar�d as a_ pedest.rian� .. .�iic way � '.._, �r , . '..i. st;.. ..-� "'-� :r�;. � via :.io �� :�.rrie± Is�iar�:i . `;o fu:: ;: � ._ _ �:��..��_:i; . � � _...- - }t?f.-'S �?% Ci�^ra°Z' ;-3: trlj t].:'l@. , .. H� • • , , . .y:� O t.i� PC:. �r'J:^:[1�':1tc71. liTti)9.Ct Ot L�.,ti��l�`�' _.. , r :>� .,.. t,�,_, � . =u*'_' line w:itiiin the proteeteci river c;orridor: I a;n :;ur� ii:c , �:.*e could suoport a structure, out erosion is contir.�..�a� ai_on;? ttie 'oiafi. I have expe.rience contimi�cj prohl�m., with my own :-ara;re which �;ow is within ZO feFt of the bluff, and �ituated un oedrock. �� .� '+�-foot sethaci; ��as als�> ir��titut��e' <�.; a vi��.a� � .�-a._:n7�e. . .::very ' _ -.rty on tt�e �1�t1f� is now su pposec� to adner t_� tti i^, ;ru i�?el�:i�� and ��i'_"1$t1C2 _ti;0!.11-7 ;�P `y�r7.:i t @� VPr�r •(�.T'r:f'U�.�V. ;? .` . . � ?.� r ��n-,,r±y nas a, :_tron � potenti.al for. ;ettin7 the tone 3nr� ;,;i;-..> ''cr tt:c; �rt:�1:� area - t�e I'�A undertakin� ex.tensive pri.vate a^c� puclic r- •�itali2,ation, tf�:e ;�roposed `iI.� r�ousin� and ma,rina or: iiarriet Island, . . . � L` . `x� �� f � `� ,�Y .. � ^�^ `y . . -., _� � V?�,� .. . �� , � .�—. ' ;ry+' l `` " .v' �,� ' �h�� ` „� >� �' ,� f 'i� 1l /'.�. .i�� '' / a. �'�� ` ,1:. /` � \ ...� '� �-� , \ . -. , / \ �r� �y ,� .1 �."1 �.:.;;. ♦` / � �'\` � �� .� ,\. � �� .� .� � .nti��' �"'� " •.<�, � � � �� :` �` . , �� V � `� �. `� . f�� E.,.� �' • . L.� `� E�� `✓ �. � � � �� ;�� f::.� ' ' Q r `� v � i . �ti' ' �� „"� � ,�, ,::+ �� h `� �.�' *� � � � � �� 1� � ' `^� ' � t" ..., �` / ./ `� � � ,1`y � ��, r/� �+r �' •* � / .� '`T t.r� �.., �� ` .1 � � \�� .�� ..� *', �� lc+� ,�i � � � � ,,,,_,_i _,;' ' � �� ' , � . _ + +� �} �,^ � �•. ►.ti .�� l ' , /� j i I � r �: , '� � X ....I / � . . �` y ( — ' / ' '� `�,I \`\ \ / /� � � `,\ �Za! �� I � ,/ \�/f \\ � �/ //I I � ,�. . l � � .h i.'3 � �,��. ` � ! . � / � i i � ; � ' 'yc . ; � �i � E•s �,��' . r � � , ,'� , � t " . J � ` � ' ',� �•�� `.' i � i . `' � �.. � � � � �� / , ! i 1., ` � '� '� � ;` i r f �i � ' � ti � �, � i � . `� . i � . � '� i i �.� �( � � � � / � � � ' � t I '� � ! . � � , J , � �. , ; �� ,, �•, , •. • , , , � .;� ,�� , � , . , , , � �ry � � �� y � � y �� '� `\ / `� � \ � ` / �� 1 i T � � ) I \ � � � F , •� . � � _ ��♦ �♦ � / � � \ i • � � I d � ..�� {,. . .4• ' ' i _,,� �\ y / \ \i 'y ' \��I } i ` \ / 1 ` ' ..\\ \ �- , ' , . � ♦` , ,� ��`�� . / . � \`. �� 4�` � , , � Y` � a�� " � � \ � �/ � If �i ' � ' � t . ��.0 � \ \ 7 \ � .� : � � � ` / � �.�� t 1 � : �\ � ��` . � ��—�( � � Q . ��. � . J .� � '�1/ \`\ ` ��• /'^j` + 1 � � � � t - �. � �` � � O � � ��<: � .. , ` � /� � i�„�� , � � � ! \ � � � �� i � (�c� ; �' � ' • �' ; ► �t*�` i � L� , � �` Ga _ � � � ._... y___t__..._. � � _ _--�" `, + 1 i �� • ��.,r� � � \� � . � � ; '' , �,o.a � ; 1ti : �V�.s� I i . '� ! � Q Q ' o ; ` �Q ''`\ „r-�� -•.A't �,✓ t '' i t.� � j� � � l � 1 ; 1 f _ �r� .`J s • `' � � �; 1 � � � � � � ,—,r-- .�-", .�:1 �� `' ' �,.,• �,�' � � � � � , •� . I '�f 1 � , - .-. ',�y ". � •;' ; ' � I I O � 1 ' ' ' � I � ��«} { '-� � �' ' ; � � ' ' i O ' ; � 'Q "� � �.: �� {�� p�p O O � � � , s -� , �� _ � ' � �,�� , TS...�... t.. /.' - _ , _ . , � T;•,_ `� i .. .� .�'.��'�� ;,�G t y . � a-`a�0��•,`.��f�� '"��.':��'' i U _ Q` �fl O� C� a { ' �.•! , I '�.. �, � � � � � , � , �� r� +� � '►►r �.�" �� . � , � ; ; � "'�, ' ,� �. �, i ' � .- `� i� �,� � � a d 1,,� �i—L.e _._I�_��.i_-- :,�'' _° �`� F .�''� ►�_ � _�'1 +�'"'=�1 • ` _'''�C'.-- � k� � i �� ; E `€.: � , -� �, � �'3 � , � i �; �, � I �i �� `;� �� ,� Q �:C3 � :� � O U O ��: � , ��, i ,...._..�._,...._.....�.�. . . � \ �r. , � � ' a. ; .....�.,....+.d.....-, � --i r s t�e +",. }3` r�s� t � �+� � M��7I-��,��1r��i��i ,�5,*� -•rd w.�..� +�GY �r°�F�� :� � 1 �.��Y�� ` � . �!,�,�t��'��' ,� ,� t� r, .� : ''\' , � �,� ,�a:,.. � �. ` ��. �`�.� �, , ' ',{p. �' �; ,=.� �, ��, '� �;� ";�'; G'; � '�. � ;� •c - ' � ' °- � ��T �. � p i , ��' � : �'; �'�' ? ; ' � '.A ; �� i 'I 1i i '• ' 1 ', � � � '' ` ' �'_�;., � '`� �� , ; ` ,� i � i � � j '' '�---- � .�_ �, �� – , �� j ,I j i � ; � ,I - .�� i�� o I I � _,�.....-M.�z..4....�._,_.{ �._..._�....-_...b..tl... ...._. – ._ _�. ._ ,_, �1�, ,...,i�s �� "��_...,.... ___ ----.._d. ' � — �,.�.�.,,�..,�,..� . .._.,..__. �;.t�i� _ !G r��__)��' ; *-- � �:F�'�IC;�:"JT ��' � -- � , jRi�3' BJUtvDARY � �--- —�- ZG�!�a� �'� � '/ 5►'�:1!�CT' t=;�r��.r�F Y ' � _:_._.�:.'.�;c%� l�ur� �� a s��ss �=��P�;� =. ��_��_�_ � v^y� s=�;w►L,� Fc_N�s�v�rv� �� .) � � ,�+,5?R�CT � � `� ��w'{� ;-:.`,�i{`�` � . ��--___ _____,.__ i. � , a �i � , , ; _ _. - , :., � h . j ;Lj ." '. .Y . .... . -a. .". , �� .., i; +i , � � . ;, . — �D�' I�� ` � _. _�_.___ , ,-- -__.__. _. __._ Y----- _ r. � .. ', _____:� , � a _ a . _.,� .. . . . _ ..- ._ �.,: . , , . , , , .�; ;. ,_. ; , _ �� .,j�,._ . .... : .'_ ... . v �.. .. .. : . � . ; t y. \��..:-�iU t ,_ - ,�� , ^ - ,..�.._ ., r _ ` � PETITION �' ��; � �'�� , � WE THE UNDERSIGNED, RESIDENTS oF THE CITY oF SAINT PAUL, ARE� IN TOTAL SUPPORT oF MR, RicHaRn MILLER�S PETITION TO Bc PERMITTED TO REBUILD HIS HOME, DESTROYED BY FIRE, A-r 257 OHIO STREET, AND CALL UPON THE SAIP�T PAUL CITY COUNCIL To u�HO�n -rHE VARIAPlCE GRANTED aY THE SAINT PAUL BOARD OF ZONING �PPEALS, WE WOULD ADVISE THE CITY COUNCIL THAT THE WEST SIDE CITIZEPJS ORGANIZATION (WSCO) DOES NOT NOR HAVE THEY BEEN AUTHORIZED TO REPRESENT US, PRINT NAME HERE STREET ADDRESS YOUR SIGNATURE 1 � � ' ' �/� . ; �, � ��'_s� - ,•s-- - , _ - Z �� `�� a. � � � � � � ��, PrgU� , � ��C �/fl�� ,�'�� / ��E,�5 �7`` �, ' 4 �Q � , �' 5 .� � �� .�..� �� `�' , 6 .S �-� �e`� `� 0 V.l �c, . � : f � � S � h � <� s �... .:s �� a a a� �8�. (�. 4 . � 1/�r � a o�9 � � Io : (��,� v�, � iJ��,,� � ��-�'� �� 11 � 73Co �'. �ran .Pa�.� �,�,r��'"�, J�t/�d�5' � 1.2 - ��- .� �-� 13 �� ; � � � �'�'L'►-� � l I%� �'�.- - ` �-�E �C� 1.4 ' /�`,!��)� J . ,l,�)r��/� �� •_._ y ��,c��-,�,�,�i•�U'� �'�� .,� �l✓...��?�- r � � • ' � • PETITION WE THE UNDERSIGNED, RESIDENTS oF rHE CITY oF SAINT PAUL� ARE rN TOTAL SUPPORT oF h1R , Rict�Rn MILLER'S PETITION TO BE PERMITTED TO REBUILD HIS HOME, DESTROYED BY FIRE, A-r 257 OHIO STREET, AND CALL UPON THE SAINT PAUL C ITY COU NC I L To uPHO�n -rHE VAR IAPJCE G RANTED BY -rHE SA I NT PAUL BOARD OF ZON I NG APPEALS, WE wou�n ,anvisE -rHE CITY COUNCIL THar rHE WEST SIDE CITIZEP�S ORGANIZATION (WSCO) DOES NOT NoR HavE rHEY BEEN AUTHORIZED ro REPRESENT US. PRINT NAME HERE STREET ADDRESS YOUR SIGNATURE . : _� 1 ��H�� . ��l� 0�, 1 r��s � j �J�� SI� �� ',�� 2 � �/2 L C .1� ��er S,Paf=,�aah � � ' ��.(v ,�► ��f', �'"3 ' 4 .�� _ ti� ��/� �� ,, _ � � - o� � � 6 �,y,� y s - � 7 � � ►�� r � � W �� 8 c- c � l �,, � S, 9 C 6v1 €. S s �,� : �'� � lo �o , C� 3 � , 11 �i�//G %c� �tJ�Y �6� Gl,o • . _ _ 12 � � �� D ��u, � • 13 � , �e.�s � � �o �o u � �,� �,� r � � -�.a.� 14 �i✓�� / � — �J ��cc-�, �/ . � . ...-��.�. � . ' • • ' � PETITION WE THE UNDERSIGNED, RESIDENTS oF -rHE CITY oF SAINT PAUL, a�E� IN TOTAL SUPPORT oF M�, R�cHARn MILLER'S PETITION TO BE PERMITTED TO REBUILD HIS HOME, DESTROYED BY FIRE, AT 257 OHIO STREET, AND CALL UPON THE SAINT PAUL CITY COUNCIL To uPHO�n THE VARIAPJCE GRANTED aY THE SAINT PAUL BOARD OF ZONiNG APPEALS, WE wou�n aDVisE rHE CITY COUNCIL THaT -rHE WEST SIDE CITIZEP�S ORGANIZATION (WSCO) noES PJOT NoR HavE THEY BEEN AUTHORIZED ro REPRESENT US, PRINT NAME HERE STREET ADDRESS YOUR SIGNATURE 1 �/�; � � �,� -. !�l n n , � : , r �7� �C C.? � � u�.� �t � ^ c . : 2 ; . ; J .�, _ '� '� ' .7 � 3 =� ,� � �� 4 �'��/7 �'u�,,�-� . ��' i��r� �,--�- ,. 5 � � tid es�-- e.6r �� .� �c�^� 6 ��.��✓i��so,ti �.sP�' --�-r�. is�r-.�lonr�, ��. ,�.'i� �ic��..ao-�o�- 7 l� � � � � 0 8 / . . � �V/�r� V � ��`/l�(i�IC,�Ci� , � -� � � ,�.��.- 9 � �h � ` fI'e � � �171 Sel6yl��t � � � �-�" 1� �� : �t r� � j � ,� � 4 4 �� ..:` � � � � �� /�rl-�1 Q � ��<.�c.,�� e� , . -� ,.,� ,.. � ` 11 � ,� a ,� a 12 ` .�� - G��' �.�'' '.�� '.�,�,�.` 13 .'�,� 1� i �- � ` � `/� Z � �(/� �tl / �4 -, 1� �� s � �/ , c , • • PETITION • WE THE UNDERSIGNED, RESIDENTS oF rHE CITY oF SAINT PAUL, ARE tN TOTAL SUPPORT oF h1� , RicHa►Rn MILLER'S PETITION TO BE PERMITTED TO REBUILD HIS HOME, DESTROYED BY FIRE, A-r 257 OHIO STREET, AND CALL UPON THE SAIP�T PAUL CITY COUNCIL To uPHO�n THE VARIAPJCE GRANTED sY rHE SAINT PAUL BOAR� OF ZONING APPEALS, WE wout� anvtsE THE CITY COUNCIL rH�-r rHE WEST SIDE CITIZEP�S ORGANIZATION (WSCO) noES PJOT NoR HAVE rHEY BEEN AUTHORIZED ro REPRESENT US, PRINT NAME HERf STREET ADDRE5S YOUR SIGNATURE 1 � ,� � S3 � _ ► �- S �- , 2 �� . s 4 I� ��` I•�� ,' � �� S� �� 5 � a ��v�-N�� d� 6 � 13 � ,, _ � �� Z J, -�-� 7 . ` �1� /0 l�l+ � �� e 8 �j ° f � � � � 9 4" � dI � � 10 �� --_ - � � � �?,�,� �(,t,t��c:, `� , �,1/t C('� 11 �--� ---_ . _..._ .__ - _ .__ ___._._..._ , ,� ._. - �� S� �� r=�� --- . 12 /�19TFi� � /�f - yL�N O /ro 7'�/ �S'TiL L !u�}T��2 �ut„ �3 C� �.�RR �. �r . � o � 9 so+� 14 �� Z o� �-�o� , [ � • PETITION . WE THE UNDERSIGNED, RESIDENTS oF TwE CITY oF SAINT PAUL� ARE tN TOTAL SUPPORT oF �1R, RicHARn MILLER'S PETITION TO BE PERMITTED TO REBUILD HIS HOME, DESTROYED BY FIRE, AT 257 OHIO STREET, AND CALL UPON THE SAINT PAUL CITY COUNCIL To uPHO�n THE VARIA�JCE GRANTED aY THE SAINT PAUL BOARD OF ZONiNG APPEALS, WE wou�n anvisE THE CITY COUNCIL rHAT rHE WEST SIDE CITIZEP�S ORGANIZATION (WSCO) DOES NOT NOR HAVE THEY BEEN AUTHORIZED TO REPRESENT US, PRINT NAME HERE STREET ADDRESS YOUR SIGNATURE 1 �� ' �� '�,, ��, ��►� �� ,�� Z H�Grt r?" �/o v L G JS I `3 y(o 5/��¢� v�it/C �� 3 _ �° ��-s�_ �-� �-� �..�_ �'_P, �?�� — 4 � : � � -, ,� � �.-. � ,�, 5 EN i s � , I,�� /�f(� �t � S j S F� o �a�q- c.�n�E �,�w� - . 6 L L r ,. _ .:� �v �- s s 5 s ,�� ,��y 7 " �A►�►c ��I� � �1 � w �„v o✓� � �� g � � , � ?� � '7 � -�'_y�,� - .-' ,�"- 9 ��9G�/(�� ✓�P11��f�` �7�d STL°I�A-t� /¢� � , Io �.�. �t ��.L�KS s �� _ � � -�,.�� .2 C� �T �� Do�v oe�� 4 � 11 • • _ � 12 � � ��/� f. 13 �� L � � , , _ 14 � / n c� U f`d -�� G�!,�,' C , - • • ✓ � PETITION WE THE uninE�st�r��n, RESIDENTS oF rHE CITY oF SAINT PAUL, ARE IN TOTAL SUPPORT oF MR, RicHaRn MILLER'S PETITION TO BE PERMITTED T0 REBUILD HIS HOME, DESTROYED BY FIRE, ,aT 257 OHIO STREET, AND CALL UPON THE SAIPdT PAUL CITY COUNCIL To uPHO�n THE VARIAPJCE GRANTED BY THE SAINT PAUL BOARD OF ZONING APPEALS. WE wou�n anvtsE THE CITY COUNCIL THar -rHE WEST SIDE CITIZEF�S ORGANIZATION CWSCO) D4ES NOT NoR HavE THEY BEEN AUTHORIZED -ro REPRESENT US, PRINT N ME HERE STREET ADDRE S YOUR SIGNATURE 1 ' � � �{ 2 C c � _ � . 3 -�- � - ni � �v�i �.2 3 4� ,�� 1 : I� � � Z ��, � � � ' � 2�, ; . �. �1�� 5 �� ts r�a�� - � '�' �o�.► (�i� � '�' 1,.;...� q. � 6 :� �' �. �_ S — � ' `� � � � � �� : �c�l �� !'� ��-� ��. �.�' _ ; � �� s �,, _ � �, � - �, ��Sc� �� ; z'��,:�— ��i� � � _ ,� ��- 9 �� „ C �I i r: � I0 � n , ��; �lf�L c�,�' 7 �� ,c,�� y � �� .�; �/ 11 l �i2 c� l� C�.� n�. � 12 , 2 � f , J �� c c �-�-� � � � z/ 13 ` . /' �2�..�s -�'�' 1 /Y /�Y`��t e-t!u „ �4 �' .c ��/f� �� ,��. , � • • ��,��-1� � PETITION " U �'�.`' � WE THE � UNDERSIGNED, RESIDENTS oF rHE CITY oF SAINT PAUL, ARE iN TOTAL SUPPORT oF �1R, Rtcw4Rn MILLER�S PETITION TO BE PERMITTED TO REBUILD HIS HOME, DESTROYED BY F I RE, a-r 257 OH IO STREET, AND CALL UPON THE SA I��IT PAUL CITY COUNCIL To uPHO�n THE VARIAPJCE GRANTED av rHE SAINT PAUL BOAR� OF ZONING aPPEALS, WE WOULD ADVISE THE CITY COUNCIL rHAr THE WEST SIDE CITIZENS ORGANIZATION (WSCO) DOES NOT NoR HavE THEY BEEN AUTNORIZm To REPRESENT US. PRINT NAME HERE STREET .ADDRESS YOUR SIGNATURE � 1 � S� l�� u sd 2 �- ��/� /�� - 3 �— S ,.� -- � � � � 4 �: �Q — �_ � � 5 l � S � � . � 3r� S �. 6 �- � � '` �. a � � � �;� , L- �� , , � $ f��s �,v �l .� G � � �i,� ,� 9 � �� 1 S� 3f� Si /�A�� L as,� i��o lo ! _ � _ -�. �------ 1 �-----_ o�� • ly 3 7 w 7 ,(� H,�r /� ✓,4 � ;�� ,/' / � � , .�_ .� -- -- _ ._._ � , n � � G t � �G '� �. �, � � --� .�` '�i�- � �� C��.^.J%'G� 13 ,�� - �� " -� � 7 G'' oCC �5E :S�' 14 6 r /33 �ve,�'r - . , • � PETITION WE THE UNDERSIGNED, RESIDENTS oF rHE CITY oF SAINT PAUL, ARE iN TOTAL SUPPORT oF P9R� RICHARD MILLER'S PETITION TO BE PERMITTED TO REBUILD HIS HOME, DESTROYED BY FIRE, aT 257 OHIO STREET, AND CALL UPON THE SAINT PAUL CITY COUNCIL To uPHO�n -rHE VARIANCE GRANTED sY rHE SAINT PAUL BOAR� OF ZONING APPEALS, � WE WOULD ADVISE THE CITY COUNCIL rHAT rHE WEST SIDE CITIZErJS ORGANIZATION (WSCO) DOES NOT NoR HavE -rHEY BEEN AUTHORIZED To REPRESENT US, PRINT NAME HERE STREET ADDRESS UR SIGNATURE 1 � � --- .- � `� � �� /n�t� ,�� - � 2 � � c ` - ' � � n, �V.�ie �,.� `..�1 �lS r�j� ��.=-��. ��: � 3 ��n'�' �� =.�'�-Y� y�� - �v ad �-�ic 4 �' , � � � _ __ � .� �t ,� :� �.1 � , � ; � � � �- � , � 5 . �x�-�. � � � �(�� 6 r . ' ' . � � � � �L�� C�l r�' 1 j �� '�s l�r� ' i � �v A� r � f�Z �z�Z,Cr� � Z �6 t.c�c;c�a� �� g A vE .�. .�Rc � 15s� /110, G'Ji,tt��r�e 9 � �� 7" ~ ' l�/c.��Ni7� �// �c 10 �5 `�1 �'-'� ��-l'� ) � �� ✓ 11 � _ ,� � c � ,�� : , - 12 ,�u e�% � ��- � (�µ � �7 3 6,-�� C� ! � 13 �� j �7�'S � . M �- � d � ,Z3 �'a�� 14 : 1� �� l J� c � � �� i�� /� / Q'�� ,�c�� 1� s l :�� . • PETITION WE THE UNDERSI�NED, RESIDENTS oF THE CITY oF SAINT PAUL, ARE iN TOTAL SUPPORT oF MR, RicHaRn MILLER�S PETITION TO BE PERMITTED TO REBUILD HIS HOME, DESTROYED BY FIRE, aT 257 OHIO STREET, AND CAL� UPON THE SAINT PAUL CITY COUNCIL To uPHO�n THE VARIA�JCE GRANTED aY TNE SAINT PAUL BOARD OF ZONING APPEALS, WE wou�n AnvrsE THE CITY COUNCIL THAr rHE WEST SIDE CITIZEP�S ORGANIZATION (WSCO) DOES NOT NoR HavE THEY BEEN AUTHORIZED To REPRESENT US, � PRINT NAME HERE STREET ADDRESS YOUR SIGNATURE 1 s r — ' a � ,,,�.�.�� 2 ' ,� �� .� `�,� � �, , .�:.�;:;.�, �wr t. -,� � � �-s J �� a i a-e y� � ss�ss< < 4 ,� �/U �L�/��c/�T 3 3 � - �Lf�/�P f� //�' ,8'� 5 v �� / � �� ' ,�Gl/:��- '' / �� -��J . � � 6 � � � s p /- � � � _ �. - ,� , - . $ �,, 9 � �U � � � � ;�" � C� 10 � , � 1 � L,J�fy�, ��-� �r � _ C�.� c�- ..� . �-, �� 12 — �o�c �: �.c �� a /�� y_— _� /0�.30 �v, .C�:x�� 7� t�kw - , . _ . � 13 �- ,,,, . , , „ � . � -., ,� _ /��/y ,rV�� S.� c-� � Is , �� V I f��r �� S% , - - --�� ; . Y� �� U �� o � � ` � P o � ETITI N WE THE• UNDERSIGNED, RESIDENTS oF rHE CITY oF SAINT PAUL, ARE IN TOTAL SUPPORT oF �1R , RicHaRn MILLER'S PETITION TO BE PERMITTED TO REBUILD HIS HOME, DESTROYED BY FIRE, aT 257 OHIO STREET, AND CALL UPON THE SAIIUT PAUL CITY COUNCIL To uPHO�n THE VARIAP�CE GRANTED sv rHE SAINT PAUL BOARD OF ZONING APPEALS, WE wou�n anvtsE THE CITY COUNCIL THa-r THE WEST SIDE CITIZE��S ORGANIZATION (WSCO) DOES P�OT NOR HAVE THEY BEEN AUTHORIZED TO REPRESENT US, PRINT NAME HERE STREET ADDRESS YOUR SIGNATURE � �r �� 1 � \ � � � � t- '" �i I 2 , , -� �� , �-�.. G ,�^ r '� � r� � ' �/, / `�✓' G' �J };f . .f.¢..� �....+' r�,.'�;n r, ��! ,'.,tK%�'Y°'4O '� S.,f.(^'f;4�',�."r,,�rf K� 3 .� � ,� � �� y , 4 � � ' C' l�Lr L. l�-T�ti' � �% E. ,u Poc� � � 5 ��cJ� ��/� � �3-� � O�A � C�v- . 6U' � � � 6�-, 6 � r � A , r.ov�'1 C^.n. � I-�-'� � r �, � ' �,�� 3 �/�' ��r��.� �e �� 8 - F ` � -�-�.= � ��- ��-�� 9 ' �- � � l C�� -� , �'_ � j oc> S � lO � V , � � , 11 � �`�� ,�f� �l� � M ��z �; � � 12 r � � C �. 13 �,� oS'h� 6S fJ ti �/Z �� J s?£S �U� . �/ 14 ^ ., . ��a r J Qr �� $'��" � S�'� cj �' . ' � � PET • ITION WE THE UNDERSIGNED, RESIDENTS oF THE CITY oF SAINT PAUL� ARE iN TOTAL SUPPORT oF MR , RtcHaRn MILLER�S PETITION TO BE PfRMITTED TO REBUILD HIS HOME, DESTROYED BY FIRE, aT 257 OHIO STREET, AND CALL UPON THE SAINT PAUL CITY COUNCIL To uPHO�n THE VARIA�JCE GRANTED BY THE SAINT PAUL BOARD OF ZONING APPEALS, . WE WOULD ADVISE THE CITY COUNCIL rHar rHE WEST SIDE CITIZEP�S ORGANIZATION (WSCO) DOES NOT NoR HavE -rHEY BEEN AUTHORIZED ro REPRESENT US, PRINT NAME HERE STREET ADDRESS YOUR SIGNATURE 1 � / � � /� ` /� ,�/ � /, �`'�' �� L�"j ��.�.dcy ,u,y:,rl�' L-� !4 � , 2 - � � OJ/ �'��V��j� � ' �e c � /:�, E S S �2. 3 - ` � , S�f �' s� � � _ � 4 — � �_ �`"._._� � , � -.� - 5 , C�� . �/ � �/�9 � : , � , �. 6 � � d �' t�� , a / �'Pr�/ � ' � � V (/ + , R , � _ � $ ��-�. L. �"o�l�v�o�� o� ��C� s�=b l ./%�,� � g ' � �,�.,�,o� �' �`�`dC� , . 1 Qi 10 0� /o w A 11 � ` � y yth � ��.r� � D l � 12 , � �^ . . D �S �Ga , , /�r� ��,c�, , � 13 � � 14� � � �� 0 s , � ✓• • PETITION WE THE UNDERSIGNED, RESIDENTS oF -rHE CITY oF SAINT PAUL, ARE IN TOTAL SUPPORT oF MR , RicHARn MILLER�S PETITION TO BE PERMITTED TO REBUILD HIS HOME, DESTROYED BY FIRE, ar 257 OHIO STREET, AND CALL UPON THE SAI��T PAUL CITY COUNCIL -ro uPHO�n rHE VARIAP�CE GRANTED sY THE SAINT PAUL BOAR� OF ZONING APPEALS, WE wou�n anvtsE THE CITY COUNCIL rHaT rH� WEST SIDE CITIZE��S ORGANIZATION (WSCO) DOES NOT NoR HAVE T�EY BEEN AUTHORIZm To REPRESENT US. PRINT NAME HERE STREET ADDRESS YOUR SIGNATURE 1 � � —�� 1 I�i i/Z Ia'7/ No/3Tur� �f`/ ` ��,-,�.✓ 2 C��R�I. �l,vA�c1 I�'7 l ��9r>� �.570(� � 3 L.A►�(A ��r�lson( lo a �A►�� ,��D 55 0� a�.- 4 1 � � .�✓� S�-yi // � �:.3 / � �w' c�✓oo �✓ � 5 � '� �� 7 �=c-c � � L � 6 � A��a y � � . `` �� o �� . � ��/C�r� ��L/ �� . � � Z � �'�r.vz.az'�. C�, Lc. .�'�'t ' C)� g .v �.? Z-�/ 7 �GGeo� i� �.u. 9 ��a y /�'- � yG��- �I � �, �, �=- _ � �' � ,, ' �, �f� I .� f .. 10 11 u c��3 �' L` - , � G� 12 �. ^ � � G(- � ,L�(i en. � 5 (lU S �7 � ,f�'. ;/1� f��"v'`z- �;� � ' , � 13 � � ��/,� ��- .P 14, � � _ � ;� -- j: - -� � � � �! , � . . � � � PETIT � ION WE THE UNDERSIGNED, RESIDENTS oF -rHE CITY oF SAINT PAUL, ARE tN TOTAL SUPPORT oF h9R, Ric�Rn MILLER�� PETITION TO BE PERMITTED TO REBUILD HIS HOME, DESTROYED BY FIRE, aT 257 OHI� STREET, AND CALL UPON THE SAI��T PAUL CITY COUNCIL To uPHO�n THE VARIAP�CE GRANTED aY THE SAINT PAUL BOARD OF ZONING APPEALS. WE WOULD ADVISE THE CITY COU�ICIL -rHar rHE WEST SIDE CITIZE��S ORGANIZATION (WSCO) DOES NOT NOR HAVE THEY BEEIV AUTHORIZED TO REPRESENT US, PRINT NAME HERE STREET ADDRESS YOUR IGNAT 1 � � ' ' �c�o s �'7`i��J�-y,�E�� D 2 ��: � � �� 3 � ^r E _ 4 � �� d 5 �!�-cJL �c�A� l� � ��i JuCi�� 6 ��, u� 61 � � 2- ud �v� . � �d �c=� LA l�,r� L �c= 79� �?�i , � (,�/ Q 8 ' . � ; ,� � r� �r /� 9 �� - L �� S�' � �' �E� � � . � � �.,� o�� 1 -�., � � . �' ,� a ,� ,C�F�6E� 11 �os—� �� ,\ 12 IL L.��- G 3 �o .�C � 13 �� ,� ' � o y�, ,�.�,.�-_.�� '�xu��, � ,'� � `, �� , �� -�� PETITION WE THE UNDERSIGNED, RESIDENTS oF THE CITY oF SAINT. PAUL, ARE tN TOTAL SUPPORT oF P�R , RtcHaRn MILLER'S PETITION TO BE PERMITTED TO REBUILD HIS HOME, DESTROYED BY FIRE, AT 257 OHIO STREET, AND CALL UPON THE SAIP�T PAUL CITY COUNCIL To uPHO�n THE VARIAP�CE GRANTED av TH� SAINT PAUL BOARD OF ZONING APPEALS, WE wouu� anvisE -rHE CITY COUNCIL THaT THE WEST SIDE CITIZE�,S ORGANIZATION (WSCO) noES PJOT NoR HavE THEY BEEN AUTHORIZED To REPRESENT US, PRINT NAME HERE STREET ADDRESS YOUR SIGNATURE 1 � ^ ' e� er � � `- �ell 2 -( ` . - . � 3 c �,�` �� a o �t ' . � 4 � _ � � e►� l� ' ei/�e � ��a � � � � I � - E�� 6 � �I D�,��' ;��s.� G�'�,�' ,��c �-�"��, T � s c . g �U.�� ,5� �� . ,�,-e- . c-: , 9 , f�'`�.-�� q a� v �v � v e rs �t �' t�o�� nl C�,��`o ��. lo N � . , , � � �,� � l�� e � ' � 11 ;� �h �' � s � l� % g �. �� ; �� _ .� �� ;� 12 - � , �- � Y ; , G� � � ` L 13 ,,�F�i�7� fl��i-r�/s ` �c.t, s �T 14 � r — c c - �' t� U /5 � � ��l/3 < <% ;-�.z. PETITION WE THE UNDERSIGNED, RESIDENTS oF THE CITY oF SAINT PAUL, ARE iN TOTAL SUPPORT oF �1R, RtcHARn MILLER'S PETITION TO BE PERMITTED TO REBUILD HIS HOME, DESTROYED BY FIRE, aT 257 OHIO STREET, AND CALL UPON THE SAINT PAUL CITY COUNCIL To uPHO�n THE VARIAPJCE GRANTED BY THE SAINT PAUL BOAR� OF ZONING APPEALS, . WE WOULD ADVISE THE CITY COUNCIL rHA-r rHE WEST SIDE CITIZE��S ORGANIZATION (WSCO) DOES NOT NoR HAVE -rHEY BEEN AUTHORIZED ro REPRESENT US, PRINT NAME HERE STREET ADDRESS YOUR SIGNATURE . �. ,_,)�1 VM�S �1< {�l� j L L�� J � � W i v1l�atl�} �- ~ 2 � ��t-� Y� �� F . - i��t� �� , �� 3 � ze�� 4 .,� -�� -� �✓�;,ss �� L��.� � �� . ` � l . ��— 5 �tc ld�C�6J �, �awC �17�o I_-t�rc� 5� ; � . �� 6 .�v�� - � o � �'o. � e / �iv . � , � ,� -7� �/ �S� .�f,t � ��/'�Q�I r � � � ��. g i't/r� �'LAL�c� .✓ ��" -T/l'-�,�`-a�.,�.f'f . _ 9 �� r;1�� 1 c:.. � � �r�� J�,,'cm�� f �� .._-._ � , �-''� _ 10 , � 0 5� jm . C`Ec�Et�A�IJ � � 1]�, � � � - � , � � �� ; �� 12 1�1i�� ?c �i� �/ �� ' ,� -- - �___.._-;- 1 � l (� f� /L � : �OC ( 'J ,•�� . -� . ,,� � 13 bh E/f'7' �a�.fl"� �5�y S� �I/Ir� �,�� . 14 . �q 7 c� r c /�l��r � c� ,u 1 �--- PETITION WE THE llNDERSIGNED, RESIDENTS oF THE CITY oF SAINT PAUL, ARE iN TOTAL SUPPORT oF P1R , RtcHaRn MILLER'S PETITION TO BE PERMITTED TO REBUILD HIS HOME, DESTROYED BY FIRE, aT 257 OHIO STREET, AND CALL UPON THE SAIP�T PAUL CITY COUNCIL ro uPHO�n THE VARIAPtCE GRANTED sY THE SAINT PAUL BOAR� OF ZONING APPEALS, WE WOULD ADVISE THE CITY COUNCIL THaT THE WEST SIDE CITIZEPJS ORGANIZATION (WSCO) DOES NOT NoR HavE rHEY BEEN AUTHORIZED To REPRESENT US, . PRINT NAME HERE STREET ADDRESS YOUR SIGNATURE : , . . 1 i I�o�� / �rz � C-e, - ��9-- � r 5�-7`= ��'.�., � 2 ' `-�' S � �1 �- �� - � ��, � �' _ � � � 4 � . � � . � _ _ _ a � I C� �� r� , �sc�� 5 �� —. � c� T ��— l�vi�,�, � �� ` . � 5 � � � � - , . � ' - " . �� 8 � � �l �� - � �� ec � �-, 10 ^ ' s• � �- C � C . 11 �� . �, � o � 13 � �.� ��,s ,�c 9� �AR��s �� ' ' PETITION WE THE UNDERSIGNED, RESIDENTS o� rHE CITY oF SAINT PAUL, aR�� tN TOTAL � SUPPORT oF �1R, RicHARn MILLER�S PETITION TO BE PERMITTED TO REBUILD HIS HOME, DESTROYED BY FIRE, AT 257 OHIO �TREET, AND CALL UPON THE SAIP�T PAUL CITY COUNCIL To uPHO�n THE VARIAPJCE GRANTED BY THE SAINT PAUL BOARIJ OF ZONING APPEALS, � � WE wou�n anvtsE THE CITY COUNCIL rNAT THE WEST SIDE CITIZE��S ORGANIZATIOPI� (WSCO) DOES NOT NoR HavE rH�Y BEEN AUTHORIZED ro REPRESENT US, PRINT NAME HERE STREET ADDRESS YOUR SIGNATURE � 1 C t° L- i� �� " � � �� 2 �-, , � � ' , � , � � , ,��_ � , � � �� ,. � � �_ �.- �� .� 4 �4r �!s �i ��t„i� : �` � '��"�i- U{�,L L ,,.e, ��Q,� C,J� . 5 �� ,�a� `��1 . �i�N /�'�a� I�/'� 6 �.r, Q1h 1`'I � � IE,r 3� � �- �e � �'larc� ,�� ` ' � d:�' ` �"� � v � - C Z �y�,� / `s Z c� g �� 1�� " �-� , � �' � f��i�z�u�C�� h E S �' �/-��cv� (,/(S � ��,� �10 ��-G' , �T , � lo �, �.. � �T� t.�/�G-/��4� � �. ,� (,� , �1 � y � �, �,� ,�C,� I-�y� � ��,� ST ;� � � � � �� r 13 ' �� 14 �� .�r ' ��' S '� � (.� . � �'�� `Z,�ca,�1��'�-��2 'J�P_.Cr, j PETITiON WE THE UNDERSIGNED, RESIDENTS oF rHE CITY oF SAINT PAUL, ARE IN TOTAL SUPPORT oF P�R, RtcHARn MILLER�S PETITION TO BE PERMITTED TO REBUILD HIS HOME, DESTROYED BY FIRE, AT 257 OHIO STREET, AND CALL UPON THE SAINT PAUL CITY COUNCIL To uPHO�n THE VARIAPJCE GRANTED BY THE SAINT PAUL BOARD OF ZONING APPEALS, WE WOULD ADVISE THE CITY COUNCIL i�A-r THE WEST SIDE CITIZE��S ORGANIZATION (WSCO) DOES NOT NOR HAVE THEY BEEN AUTHORIZED TO REPRESENT US. PRINT NAME HERE STREET ADDRESS YOUR SIGNATURE 1 ' ,�-X;IL'�-�� - (�.�� -�..� � Q.�, � ,4�,,� �o �m� 2 �Z • ,., � /� G/_ c�/ � �'t� ��,�2.�r 3 � , , . �, , 4 � fi�a r 1 � ��S '�J� 5 �� , �. � � " c� l-. -, �3 s ; - 6 � sV�. N � �t�-�� Z � l� �I�r nr'o n� �,v' -�� A � D � � y ��/ Li5'l4� � $ (,�� e� c�r �u � � 3 � /� � i�s �� ` 9 � � . s�'� � ��/Q/ S��fs lo � � . 11 �� ' ✓ r r 12 �� /� � ;,`; '�rf c�� ( J`�� ',U' �(� iZ � �vu� � �r - < <' (��'�`- 13 � - ' � ` � �/0 14 �f�� , s' � ,-a l�,� � 5�� l � J{ ��c��'�t► � �� ;� ' ' PETITION j WE THE UNDERSIGNED, RESIDENI'S oF THE CITY oF SAINT PAUL, ARE tN TOTAL SUPPORT oF MR, RicHaRn MILLER'S PETITION TO BE PERMITTED TO REBUILD HIS HOME, DESTROYED BY FIRE, aT 257 OHIO STREET, AND CALL UPON THE SAINT PAUL CITY -�OUNCIL ro uPHO�n THE VARIA�JCE GRANTED sY THE SAINT PAUL BOARD OF ZONING APPEALS, WE wou�n anvisE -rHE CITY COUNCIL THAT rHE WEST SIDE CITIZEPJS ORGANIZATION (WSCO) no�s NOT NoR HavE rHEY BEEN AUTHORIZED To REPRESENT US, PRINT NAME HERE STREET ADDRESS YOUR SIGNATURE , : 1 ' � � c � _7� . . . � � � � l �. �- ,� �'� =,�'--�. � 7 �� , � � . 2 ' . _ .�.�� - - ._ ' _ ._ � .._ , _._� ,. , , , ., � , ;. , --� �, . , �� " ,;%� ,�, � � �: , ., � . ;_ ; , �c- ` ; ��-" ' ;G -----� � � , :, �� 1 �.1 ,��% .x, . , , ,� , 4,- �. ; 4 � .� : �. . ; � % " C. � ' ?;',.� ��' ,c�'j � � l .��.� , ,� ; , � :. ✓� ,!� fE, 5 � (,�,, ��l�:,..��,i��y'� :� '�_ �,,; �-`( �-. 'E t � ` �_ )�c_ ��,p 1�r -�r 6 � .l �__ .�G, 1�� ^��( �� .`.�`� �� ?� 7 - � � � �Q � ° t�. ��, r � � " .Z , 8 � ' � `��-�V�l,� '� , , � , .--, . . r,, � ; � , , �� , _� i� t . � � � � J. 10 �_ � ' _ " /'� --, .. i�C :�-� C'.J'L 4•"''' � � � / C I � /f �' .: t;> �� ' 11 ` '� �� ` . � � � � ` ;. ,� ,, � , � ,�L , � y „ �,, . C.:�, ✓ � ^ r 1 � , � r 12 ;„ -�--� ' � ��, r ��. � �-' ��=- � � , x ., �. � � fi � / j > 13 , � V � � ' ►�c�� C� . `�;,�,1 i ��. '��. I. � < <�, , ��, 1'T !U \ '' ��i/ �� i J ��`"_, /^C-��>i �� I�� / �� .,. � PETITION WE THE UNDERSIGNED, RESIDENTS oF -rHE CITY oF SAINT PAUL, ARE tN TOTAL SUPPORT oF �1R , RtcHaRn MILLER�S PETITION TO BE PERMITTED TO REBUILD HIS HOME, DESTROYED BY FIRE, aT 257 OHIO STREET, AND CALL UPON THE SAIP�T PAUL CITY COUNCIL To uPHO�n rHE VARIANCE GRANT BY THE SAINT PAUL BOARD OF ZONING `� � ' . APPEALS� - c� �1 Cj� � �� l� �'' I,�C-�� _ � � �� jd� WE wou�n anvtsF rHE CITY COUNCIL THaT THE WEST SIDE IZEP�S ORGANIZATION (WSCO) noES NOT NoR HavE -rHEV BEEN AUTHORIZED ro REPRESENT US, PRINT NAME HERE STREET ADDRESS YOUR SIGNATURE 1 �d� f�� I o . � 2 a � ;; �d�> > ' ' ' >,�` '.> _,,>'� � � D�e Q L' � C��f,, A ,. �. 3 � > . � �� ` '. � � � �_' �� ' Z-' �i,�� l � i ( ,. � � , � f +n - � , " { �. � r!� 3 � � �:� '�. � x�f r `�,�' r�� 5 � G-1, , �, _ , �-------- i , , _ . . , �. � , r , , .- , ,,��,� � , :�, ...,�-.__ ,. . 6 >� , ___�----- �_ � 6 f,.�'j i - ; , ., .. - .., J � " , . , �, , , . . , ; , 4 �.A_ � C° t'f �'�� <. � r - ��:s . K�� °�-, � t � � °r`� `� � ' ��'!� " '! " :,. �...m�� , ,.�,..t`. .: .,.='�..r� "%"�,..� i �. _� b j ' �/�y �* `�!� � f 8 ��l:. ��1� �i� �� '� t l l CI"� .1�C.,.�,J'.r . ,( `t � n `��J!1�.�! �1 ° �� " � ! .s -t � � �M `� . .��..k: �� ...�u�� __., , 1 9 �� c � j � �� _ , � 2 10 � � � C�1 ► � , .�" - �� 11 � ' ; � .-� �y �� ` -� � � �r�� ' �� ` � ;� _ �� ',�� .__,,, � J , � I2 � � -- _ ,... � - � . t� c�'Y''� ,...�}�.;,� �►_�°�- ��. �- __, � , �,-, ��_ , � ��°° _� � . �.3 � ' � ` � C 1 • ____ 5 _ �r'�!; � �, ., � ` �! � . � �- - � ' < 1 - � � , , . � �. 1_ /� � ; �, � � 6 �`t � -i � �, � `\, � � ,.. � �'� ,� L L. ` \ � �"�i � ��' � ;.J✓�'�. ) r�� i� J .. ... . - L� � � . ��L�(�J (� .G��) / -�' ..�/ J �,�✓ II�� f w C. f ) � _ . ��'�G:C�' � �re� , �� _ - i� yy $ /� C��,�c� ..��e. ,q � �3 � �� , `��. , � �. � � � l�� t�k�`��.- .� , 9 f`� J � — _ . U ' � i �� U �"_ � � � > U � �� f:�5..� �,��,�L� /� Io `� �,�� ; `�-�q---.�, c -- � �� ,,� �� , �- �� E' �- �� . - ' 11 � �"��-,� Z . � ll� �� .�� , � �G�G�P,J ;� / /�'�. � , , �12 - ' f��' ' , ; � - �'L � � 13 � , � (�� 14 ' � � �� y �o� � � � ` �� _ PETITION �� WE THE UNDERSIGNED, RESIDENTS oF rHE CITY o� SAINT PAUL, ARE IN OTAL � SUPPORT oF MR, RicHaRn MILLER�S PETITION TO BE PERMITTE��° TO REBIlILD HIS ? HOME, DESTROYED BY FIRE, AT 257 OHIO STREET, AND CALL UPON THE SAINT PAUL � CITY COUNCIL To uPHO�n rH� VARIA�JCE GRANTED aY THE SAINT PAUL BOARD OF ZONING APPEALS, � WE wou�n AnvtsE THE CITY COUNCIL rHA-r rHE WEST SIDE CITIZE��S ORGANIZATION (WSCO) DOES NOT NoR HavE -rHEY BEEN AUTHORIZED To REPRESENT US, PRINT NAME HERE STREET ADDRESS YOUR SIGNATURE 1 � � � � � � � 2 �'�� I�1 C� (�� N T �� 1 �� '��u � u�� . 1 f � �,�,,�C � '` ,��r C f'�� w � � " � ^ �� , � 4 /��l�i ��rTscf#�ll� �� S� L3L� ��z 5 �� .. .� ,�� 1_=�i� �� r �'�'�1�L �S �. ` �. 6 _ � : �� _ � �r t u.�"zjv ►��/f s `` l D �u r('�iv g ��v �� ,� r� �33s Cv��t� �a� �� ;� - �C�a��_ 9 � � � d � �� ?6 ��co� �t��. � . �.' lo � ��s �d � � � � U b 11 ` � �a 6ss� l � 12 � � � � �� /��1��,�'T v � [ �i�� , � ' PETITION WE THE UNDERSIGNED, RESIDENTS oF rHE CITY oF SAINT PAUL, ARE trv TOTAL SUPPORT oF MR, RicHaRn MILLER'S PETITION TO BE PERMITTED TO REBUILD HIS HOME, DESTROYED BY FIRE, ar 257 OHIO STREET, AND CALL UPON THE SAIP�T PAUL CITY COUNCIL To uPHO�n THE VARIAPJCE GRANTED BY THE SAINT PAUL BOAR� OF ZONING APPEALS, WE WOULD ADVISE THE CITY COUNCIL rHaT rHE WEST SIDE CITIZE�JS ORGANIZATION (WSCO) DOES NOT NoR HavE THEY BEEN AUTHORIZm ro REPRESENT US, PRINT NAME HERE STREET ADDRESS YOUR SIGNATUR� 1 '� �-, ' � , , " �� _� , = � %�.-�- ; � 2 �� , ,�, -�, � , � � ; 3 ,� , �� v�, �5 e„ �c > .��; . �� ` . �. �/ �. �,`. . 4 �l'T�- �i�'L,�C'i3i� : < ' K�j ;1`�'c�tic,e /-� � �,� „ -L �,G'U,rv►�t�,� 5 �� '�� ° ' � , � , ��% ,� � ,. _ %i : � ,� ,,�'� -2 ��` � � l`, ��. `::1�� , ,�`�� `.� 6 . , � � G�" � �� .i�' i .. /,"�},c � , � / l � � � . - � �L � �/ � � r � $ � �� 1 1�l -- `� � �.t.;� �`�� J c 9 , r / � .,,�� ,��,�_. '� � � ✓�� O � e � , �y � �,e � ,e --�_ � ,-� 11 12 1� . 14 "�� . • ' � PETITION WE THE UNDERSIGNED, RESIDENTS oF TH� CITY oF SAINT PAUL., ARE tN TOTAL SUPPORT oF MR, RicHaRn MILLER'S PETITION TO BE PERMITTED TO REBUILD HIS NOME, DESTROYED BY FIRE, aT 257 OHIO STREET, AND CALL UPON THE SAIP�T PAUL CITY COUNCIL To uPHO�D -rHE VARIAPlCE GRANTED BY THE SAINT PAUL BOARD OF ZONING APPEALS, WE wou�n anvisE rHE CITY COUNCIL rHaT rHE WEST SIDE CITIZE�JS ORGANIZATION (WSCO) DOES NOT NoR HnvE -rHEY BEEN AUTHORIZF� To REPRESENT US, PRINT NAME HERE STREET ADDRESS YOUR SIGNATURE 1 � 1 N�s � . G��it�6� .�� ,�i�� '�� . ` ' '� �� . � , ,, c j I �t' �i � l ly � �'�� , -+ ;,. . 3 � 1� � �� - s� � , � , : ��. �� 4 � �' .� � �/� 1 � � ✓�� w �—�r ,�C� . �n � .0 C�-�` -��' � �� 5 • . , . 6 � 8 9 10 � 11 1Z 13 14 , _ ; ✓ � PETITIOfV WE THE UNDERSIGNED, RESIDENTS oF THE CITY oF SAI(VT PAUL, ARE �N TOTAL SUPPORT o� �1R , RicHaRn MILLER'S PETITION TO BE PERMITTED TO REBUILD HIS HOME, DESTROYED BY FIRE, ar 257 OHIO STREET, AND CALL UPON THE SAII�T PAUL CITY COUNCIL To uPHO�n rHE VARIAPJCE GRANTED aY THE SAINT PAUL BOARD OF ZONiNG APPEALS, WE wou�n anvisE THE CITY COUNCIL rHA-r rHE WEST SIDE CITIZE�JS ORGANIZATION (WSCO) DOES NOT NoR HavE -rHEY BEEN AUTHORIZED -ro REPRESENT US. PRINT NAME HERE STREET ADDRESS YOUR SIGNATURE 1 ;M�S �I� � � ��,�, . � ,� . . � � . . / . . I , l .�� L-` �—L�-i...e_� ` , ��..,"�i 2 ,,� '� -- , ' :..� �-- �j , � �� 3 — , __ , _ ti 4 � : � . � d = r2.- c.� L� -� < � L�L. 5 � . � . , , � �: � {, � „ , � �� /�� r" /� 1 r� 6 c�� _�v � .� , � , n �� ,�. � 7 � IS� i w. l � .� 8 9 10 11 lz 13 : 14 . - � , PETITION � WE THE UNDERSIGNED, RESIDENTS oF rHE CITY oF SAINT PAUL, ARE iN TOTAL SUPPORT oF �1R , Rrct�►Rn MILLER�S PETITION TO BE PERMITTED TO REBUILD HIS HOME, DESTROYED BY FIRE, A-r 257 OHIO STREET, AND CALL UPON THE SAIP�T PAUL CITY COUNCIL To u�HO�n THE VARIAPJCE GRANTED BY THE SAINT PAUL BOARD OF ZONING APPEALS, WE WOULD ADVISE THE CITY COUNCIL THAT THE WEST SIDE CITIZE��S ORGANIZATION (WSCO) noES ��OT NoR HnvE -rHEV BEEN AUTHORIZED To REPRESENT US. PRINT NAME HERE STREET ADDRESS YOUR SIGNATURE 1 �- , a��, � � Q 1�� j / . = 2 � � � v � � 1� f b��= ��; �Z 3 r' _ " /p � cc� / � {�"'' �v�V ��cZ_ C�{ n N ' •` ` �-�Z-�-�2.�. - 4 Ca r o / �G / �l L - � . 5 � ! - � �J 6 : 7 8 9 10 11 _ 12 13 14 ✓ . • PETITION WE THE UNDERSIGNED, RESIDENTS OF THE CITY OF SAINT PAUL, ARE iN TOTAL SUPPORT oF P��R, RtcHaRn MILLER�S PETITION TO BE PERMITTED TO REBUILD HIS HOME, DESTROYED BY FIRE, a-r 257 OHIO STREET, AND CALL UPON THE SAIP�T PAUL C ITY COU NC I L -ro uPHO�n rHE VAR I AP�CE G RANTED BY -rHE SA I NT PAU L BOARD OF ZON I NG APPEALS. WE WOULD ADVISE THE CITY COUNCIL rHar rHE WEST SIDE CITIZE��S ORGANIZATION (WSCO) noES PJOT NoR HavE THEY BEEN AUTHORIZED ro REPRESENT US. PRINT NAME HERE STREET ADDRESS YOUR SiGNATURE 1 �J' 01 � c�. � 3:3 ��c \C. .,s�. ,j�-��7 � :� � 1'�'1 Y�'�o.5;�� 2 �"' , . �S"1°, .C� O/ ,14 / ..�/� ' -� �/� �" 5 T �,.�,.�. ��„� �;;.�/ 3 � � ' S �/� d -�� -�-� _ � 4 , e � r GkpT wor 5 �///Q�� 3— D � / L°//A r� .S'��a L 6 - � .� ��9 � - �' .� � lTkGrL��AN/�.' ��/�N� � �� v �/1�1�' � ��' c � / � � l,Z .��- -� 8 9 10 11 12 13 14 � � r• . ,. * � � • � . P E T I T I 0 N ��:��'�� WE THE 11NDERSIGNED, RESIDENTS oF THE CITY oF SAINT PAUL, ARE tN TOTAL SUPPORT oF P�R, RtcHaRn MILLER'S PETITION TO BE PERMITTED TO REBUILD HIS HOME, DESTROYED BY FIRE, aT 257 OHIO STREET, AND CALL UPON THE SAINT PAUL CITY COUNCIL -ro uPHO�n rHE VARIANCE GRANTED aY THE SAINT PAUL BOAR� OF ZONING APPEALS, WE wou�n AnvtsE THE CITY COUNCIL rHAr rHE WEST SIDE CITIZEPJS QRGANIZATION (WSCO) noES �JOT NoR HavE THEY BEEN AUTHORIZED To REPRESENT US, ' PRINT NAME HERE STREET ADDRESS YOUR SIGNATURE 1 % 5 � 3�o�w � �>� � 2 � �, � ,� (� � � 3 J A� ��,�- , i�o4z ��.�� - �, �Uv�,��,�--�-� � . ,� � 4 ^ > . �� -�''�"�', " J� ' u...�� , (2 �Yl e u r � 1 , 5 L-L�-�G� '�;'C�L�-c-rE � `> • ' _ �< <� �"'�1.'.�'-'`- J,�_ 6 rl �� i � c �° ' , � / � �� S�< C�. �(,�/ � F nl�'r z- >'� /� S�% 8 ,�,� t� ,� ` . 'I 9 —�"� / , ' �r'� � L i�v�t Ji��-/Gi i�, v � ie=��r lO �ORlTTq �T'�RoyiL LO` PoRTLq�up A�t�vw�. e�t3Gr�a� 11 12 13 14 � CITY OF ST. PAUL DEPARTMENT OF FINANCE AND MANAGEMEN7 SERVICES f�o��,�� ASSESSMENT DIVISION "` Z 1 H CRY HALL ST.PAUL,MINNESOTA 55102 April 18, 1980 City Clerk 386 City Hall St. Paul MN 55102 File X 2423 Page 1 Zoning File 8546 The Council of the City of St. Paul will hold a public hearing in the Council Chambers of the City Hall and Court House (third floor) at 7:30 -P.i4. on May 7, 1980 on the: i Appeal of the West Side Citizens' Organization and the West Side ITA to a decision of the Board of Zoning Appeals affecting property at 257 ; Ohio Street. This property is located on the west side of Ohio Street � between Isabel and Plato Streets and is legally described as: Vacated streets accruing and Lot 6, Block 198, Irvine's Addition to West St. � Paul. ` � If you would like further information about this hearing, contact the Current . Planning Section of the Planning Board, Room 1202 City Hall Annex -- 298-4154. While the City Charter requires that we notify you of the hearing, we want to � help you to learn fully about any improvement that could affect you or your community. Therefore, I sincerely hope you can attend this hearing, so that you can make your views about it known to the City Council, whether for or against. J. WILLIAM DONOVAN VALUATION AND ASSESSMENT ENGINEER � I �, .: , �; .. . r , _ � ' ; . , . ;r _ - � : , , � • . . . . � .. . . � . ' . / . � , - � , �, , � � ;. •• :: r, : , `- ,, • ' ' , . `. . - • � ,. _ . : ;� , . � - - , , � � • - � ,. - � . � s . _ _ - . - , .. . � . . . -' . . ' . � . " .. � �. -. � . . , . ' � � . . � . - � � . � , . � . . - . . l , , ' ' ' . �F A�„� �j �� , � � � . . . . , . , - 1, ' . ' —. �� , 11r. BertYSrd,Csr2�8cII � _ , . �ir�ctor pf F3nence ;b �e�g+ertnt 3eirvi�ta ' � ` Aoom'234, Ci,.y Hetll .,. .. . �. F�aul, 1�inn. ', - . � . _ ,� ,� . , �_ � Daar $ir s '- � � � ' _ , ,. - , � . - , ':, ;; _ � ° � City Cotmcil eet a r�ate of bearit=g �'or l�y �Tt�, l�(>, st ` - '�� ; Ti34',P.1�. in the C"i�6�y Council, Cbs�ers to �d�r the'a�ee1 _ ` . ` ` , : of the i�lest �ide C#.tia�ene� t�rgeai�atinn and t.b� .iiast:��;ct+e' � ^ , 1�f3>:s daQia#.on ot' the BosYd of Zonitag A�peala i!!'��i�ag , . p�operty a4 2�7 Obio, Rtchsrd Mill�r� a�Ilaat. 1I#�. Ypu � ' " p,Iaasa -ee� no�icar� tti D:'�pertY o�►e�r� aa 'r�� '!�y la�T ,, � .� � �. , , , _ . , . . , �' _ Yi�Y;� �"�, �- , �. ; + � • , , ,,, r RO� •�� .. � s . ', . . . . . . . . , .. . ' ' i � � � - � . .. � ��. ��: � . �M - . � .. - _ . . . . . . . , . . . . . . . I , , — ,1 - r,: �,� , - � � �. , . ' . � , . ;. ^ , _ . � ABOilt - , , , , , _ � � , ac a P3,anning Stat'�, ZonSng seac�Soa ' _, - . , - � , . . ; , . ; , `t _ , . `; . . . . . . . . . . . .' . . . .. . . . . . . . � . . � �. � :'F � ._ . . � . . � . � ' . � � � . �., _ . . . . : , � � i � , . . . �. . . . . . ' . . . . . . . . � � � .. . . . . . . , , . - q.-. � .i � . � . . . . . . . . , . . . . . . . i�. i ' . .. . �- � . �� , , . � . , . . - . . _ � . �. _ . . . .� � � � ' . .. � .r 1� . . . . � . . .. � . . � . C . , . �. . . � . . '. . . � , . . .� . - . . . � . .��'_ ,'. .. • _ _. .. . . . . . , .. . ' . ' ' , ' � � . . �'.l . � . . '. .. y;� � . . .. �. - . � .. . � � � � . . . � . . � ,..'.i. . . , . . ' . . . . _ � .. E . � . . ' . ' . � ' . . ' . � � t . , . . . . . . .. . � . � � � . �1 ' � . .� . . � ' -�. . . . , - ... . � . . . , . . . . Y . � / .. . ,' .. � �. ' ; `j� � � d�. � � . . � � . .. . : . .. . .. 7 `\ . . . . � � ' .. , i . . � � 1 . ' .. - . . . . , i , � �j. . � . ' � . � ' � . . / . � � .- . � .. •. ' . � .4, . . . � � . , � � _ ' , ( , �1'" l , a , � . " � , : . .?�� ; � _ b,-'. � � 1 ' ��w�'II"°``� C I TY O F SA I N T PA U L _�.`�1T� 0' S �• • DEPARTMENT OF PLANNING AND ECONOMIC DEVELOPMENT � ��i n� � , ?,�� °e DIVISION OF PLANNING �'6�nn. ,... s� '�°��'4� 25 West Fourth Street,Saint Paul,Minnesota, 55102 GEORGE LATIMER 612-298-4151 MAYOR MEMORANDUM DATE: March 27 , 1980 T0: Joanne Showalter Council President FROM: Ed Warn Principal Planner, PED SUBJECT: Zoning File #8546, 257 Ohio The purpose of this memo is to advise you of the agreed upon council hearing date on the above referenced zoning appeal . Ms. Chris Park, representing WSCO, the appellant, and Mr. Joe Pangal , representing the applicant, Mr. Miller, have both agreed, by telephone conversation with me, to waive the 30 day hearing requirement as specified in Section 64.204 of the Zoning Ordinance. Ms . Park agreed to this waiver subject to the condition that the Council hold an evening hearing, preferably on May 7 or May 14. Ms. Jean McGinley has contacted all of the council members except Councilman Levine and has advised me that an evening meeting in the Council Chambers on May 7 poses no conflict with the other council members ' schedules. I, therefore, recommend that the City Council hearing on the referenced zoning appeal be held in the City Council Chambers on the evening of May 7, 1980. EW/cc cc: Rose Mix, City Clerk ✓ Chris Park, WSCO Richard Miller, Applicant Joe Pangal , Applicant's Representative �� `� -, � � ° � �� _ , 5� � �� __ --- - _ -- — _ . = - � �-� . ��< � � �►�T °`�,r v . `"'�-�'- �/9 SIDE CI7CIZENS OAG ION i79 E. Robie � St. Pa.ul, Minnesota 55107 March 12, 19�0 Joanne ShoKalter President� City Council City Hall St. Pa.ul, Minnesota, 55�d+ Dear Ms. ShoWaZter, The west Side Citizen's Qrganization� District 3 Council� in an action taken �esday� Ma.rch 4� voted. unanimousl, to oppose the grantin� of a variance to Richard P'tiller for hi� property at_ 7 Ohio. This variance� granted by the city•s Board of Zoning Appeals on Feb. after a, deadlocked vote and three carry- overs� is opposed by WSCO and the West Side ITA for the following reasons: This property is within the protected River Corridor and should be protected fro� anq type of building requiring a va.riance from set-back guidelines. Granting a variance of this extent (to xithin five feet of the bluffline) on the first case to come up within the River Corridor ne��,tes the �ell thought oit pla.n developed to protect that area and may set a precedent. This property was mentioned in the ori�inal West Side ITA proposal for possible acquisition and selective clea.r�.nce (xhile the structure xas • still sta.nding. ) This is no longer possible due to the destruction of the structure by fire. The iTest Side ITA� in con3unction xith WSCO�is presenting a proposal for acquisition of the vacant parcel for open space and a linear parkxay link through the CIB process. This property, though certified buildable, is of questiona.ble size for adequa.te protection of and from the bluff. �rthermore, it is at a, critical location on a much traveled� haza.rdous curve. Pedestrian travel is only ava.ilable on Mr. Miller's side of the street and the sidexalk has often been blocked by automobiles. The use of this property, xhether for home, business or both, leaves the question of where to park still unanswered? The only parking available, other than Mr. Miller's lot, is over 500 feet aKay. Mr. �ti.11er has� in the past. often used his mea.�er front yazd as a parking area. This is unsightly and dangerous. The River Corridor and Iand Use plan• recommendations for a "continuous link" for the Cherokee-Lilydale-Harriet Island area xould be well served by open space at this �uncture. In addition� the District 3 plan recomnends a "ga.texay entrance" at Ohio to the West Side at it•s improving ITA area. This gatexay concept concnrrcd with long-range River Corridor� Negotiated Investment Strategy, Pa.rk and Recreation, BikeWay and Iand Use plans. It is dependent, hoWever, on a safe� uninterrupted curve and pedestrian xalkxay along OhYo. .,�;�.,, r . +. ' � Page 2 Miller 257 Ohio The ITA committee believes this property could ha,ve a aignificant impa,ct on ongoing sta,bilization and reinvestment efforts nox under�ray in this area. The existing indnstrial zoning and setba.ck variance � allo�+s anytype of building accepta.b� � ' ' Qnning xhich xould a11oW aay industrial use. This lea '- �4 to the � future use of this property. Mr. Miller ha.s been represented as � by the ina,bility to rebuild a nonc `�, property. It should be pointed o� v H, �'' �,, H unsuccessfully to sell his reside � � g � �' c� � Miller was axarded an insurance F �`� O �� .� ,� � �� n � \A, �`D n.�� .r;L , WSCO feels strongly that this is not �� o� �.�y � or business. �e City staff•s and tt � � �� c r� N, �'� � N. opposition to this variance. The St � o� o ,� � � ,� �'' are also opposed to Mr. Miller rebui � � � ,� �� µ� � pending CIB proposal and the aaount (� ,y� ;� ,��*, � `*� o our hope that you will reconsider, ; � � �*cr � � ~'�" �, � � � � ' � n � �� TMa.nk you. � '� � �" v � �� ►-` `� � J � �� `'D O µ•`r :A �'' � p +y � :U t-.� Pe ster N �;n �`�,. �� •� � WSCO President ..� � Y � � � �µ `r� `� � '`"^,� , � �.7 J3 �c� . (1 / � � �i;lq ' �c-r �j � �. 3.�, w ;� ° ► �� ' � '� r� Joyce Kerwin a, ,� ,w �� ,� �'' ITA Chairperson �,,� ,�,j�� a� � `' �;a ° '7' m �� O n cr � . w � (D � �9 �c � w � �' ; � H C y y C=] �. Cy�i � � C H � N [�] v w O .'�C Czr1 '� � �p � z o r y _� . � � � �� . �eeJ d � �: � �;i+�� s �i `• .��o�� ,i� !I �. Y/r. ' "r ` � ' ` � � ` ' o � Y � �. ,�� _ . , .� �� ! ,, �� 31 � O � Q� ,. .�+ ' .� � � ,p 4 °� .\ <� \ y � • .' j�� .a �' ..� ��2� �� z � ^ '�' �r,-�`;A M1 �� `' � (� - _ \ � . �`,� �� (�� R y. . V �� '�a f, -. : , o� �� 6�.' c � �.� �+ �, /�' t• ,61 `�� ♦ . , � � �- _ ,.5�,,� � � �� . . l� � � � � t� � �: - . � , . � ; , . . . . ° � � � � _ �: -.-,�,,.y s � .:,. , �� :� �!:�r, . �.��j}�`.� . ., •_ : : ' • ,'.. ,�sa,, f� "'�R'4'�'�• ' �L+/ "�• ��' , �. . • '+rQ ,•.�;, "';� •.si � + �. ' '��j :�� 1/% ��// ' �p � . � „1• %i�� / //i i �� .. . • S.• ' • ��i /. II//� '� , � � • ' �/ . �/ � '��j �� • . / 't �/;�i + ry.. �v� �t �'� j .`f e • ? . ^7.� w.*a ii i ii' i1�1�/ip� '!�' � • .- . .�, • ` ..t� � . C�� qiri� � .r ♦ ,� • \ � �. �7�1 �L'� . .', ��. _:.. • �. f . •' ' �� ilw�.Nllq{�'�'�4i i�'�� „ � �r�� J .i Il. i f ��i� : w � .�� ; , . •: ''. . �7 .:. +. .:,; • .• • � ,. .�y . �� ;}, 'Y,� f. ,,� � z,�� .�, � , .. � .� :�~ � -s. � � • '�/,�3, :[ ��I �� . . • � • � , . p � . : �, �r. �, •. � p ., '`'s �� : C' �i• �. •• � N :: . : --� �` . . . � 4 .� . w � • . ' t �. �' 3 0 � ' �1► .� a ' . O . ' _ ��'_ r�,. � ,� +p�` .. . * w . �` � �.• �+' � L�• '•� • � �� • . • r . �• • ' �iv`�+�'�� ".i.S%� r�.�. •f . � ti : � . . : ;;..�;.�;a,�, ��,:..., � . • , ;- L .J 0 �:..'�nq1i`��• _i• :♦' s � • � , i . 'r�.4%��.. �.� ��•\ ,� � � `�'.�t'' �� . . ' ~ .` � � x– ;'�::'�:�_ t;��,��,•,� •�,�� r ��`�.... ,e '•, . � ..�� J + � . � ��:x�.. `t \\'�•- . '� '� ` �I` '�� ' �+�. � • Q '� .r . . • �O� �.. . :i,,,;�.;,,:• � . •� / � � � , i! � - '�V' d : .�r �. � `� '��.�.� ti�•t .�A •• �� • a.. � � � � �1J -`� . •''l�• ~�.d v �II� � . � � �,i.� •� 1 � � � • � � ' .r • � o� f I • •�.I �f'iJ i _. A `jt'Z� i'��', ��J�;'i�'" � :.7!'� . . • 4 . i `� ' ' �� Lt N DE t�E �. .:�;- �.;��-:�Nl,,,i . ;:�� . . . v �: ;% • :;� �--, �° . :. � , . � :'',� N � •-,► i��„� . . ' .N �u . . • .s . . . • ? • p � _ • • I�� . Z '� �i •. , . � •� � , � �. .. . '- t� .-. t `� T • � • ♦ •� • ��' t � • � . - . . � . � 01� ��Y .' • �� _ �� I I�� c....`,.� � 'O� � �,4a0 t �� y ; �� - ' • � .; . '�i, � _ b �� . �� \a � y�' � 2. , • ,QI�`+�/ �\ . �V �• • � �j� • •� � � �. N 'p°� �� .� � :`''T. ,?i" .` : . W. ,�t` �':�`.., '.+L�� .� � � � ' �p 'fy � n' , m � �; ��1 tl' v •�•. '� �� 7� � A - � , `(V . --,� �4 �`�' � ` , � r� �'T ,� .. ' . .' •,�y. . ,v � � .�� _�` � �. . �, . �-�c, � t _,. - . � „� 1 • .. .. .-�aer�--� � ' , ' r • � "-_ _ . _ � — �L► J � . � . ''. A��1� � � - �A }� ; R .r,,,= � rrh_� '. : . ��,---�,�L�LOd��'�- . � -•'• .•.�x .. . . , . � %% P� \ `_" � � � � S� - O Sign ' --- � Si n . !08 10 7 / Q X � Si9n �!»at4 ��(�� '�n Sigi :. Sign " � �^ � _� t, . ! ` , , . Q ' � ign ,.. � i 34.0 J � `'� Porking i ; � 35.2 �' I Porkinq , X t2. � � . \ \ . , r � � •\ � \ \ � �� ti � ^_ �, \ � =�°`r � � � � � / Sign � � � � . � � �' � =�� `'� — � • \ � ., . ��1 �i' �`� � ia�- � / ` � � ± � , `-, X 1.8 37.0 ` - •,�� . . � \ � I �/ ' f+'��'`• � ;�� 1 /�� . � �, � . dl' ^� f ! � �� _ . � P �- �;;%/� ✓�.- �,_�� - � - -- � orking �/ � _ � � � � O / ��:i�� , ��__ `,° ____-� -� .� o �.I� ( 7. • 43.0 ' �' � 31.6 �`, �C��, ,� �.�,'" X �' 1� � � , .�, .. ! `\� � � +/. /�/' '�.�...-� ' X � � ; �� t i .``j; /� -- _ -.3� � /�� ' ',;' r l�7.6 ! - + �1 X : 1 � r�0l�LS��',' '; . y ';�-' =S ign �r-�o � ! ; ;� � . , f � , - i � �_ � ; I - � �,� l� -_ � I � /, ,ti . � �/ ;�8" !, �� .� • -- --. ,,—�p� . �. ,� ��r�a,3�0.34% ��/"� � � , ` " c 34 126.30 , . / p/.- �\ �� r X 117 + !i , \ � •j � \ �'1- - i � \\'.✓� ,. j� i . � �� - �'�.� '�� : ' �--�_ - � �•'.,\� � � �` `..._�, .--�� , `\\ � � _� �. \ `� -�i 4 �� '� � 1 ' 1 ! �� I� X ��'� �_;.'J j ,�,; � � � �� '�1 � _:�_._ _�_ �,,;; ° ;;' i�7o ��,. �`� - _._._./ ��1, X ,, ,ya,i- -� % o`I :� ,�;� ��;--- _�._�%: �� ' �i9.2 � � ��:�/� ► I��,k1 _ .�__�.�;,___-,_,.�-_:�i,,/ � � � - _ ,..,-`'�,�COCt.w�> ✓ � \'�� t�•:.�� (i�i +1. 4?1._ ....a. .:i� ��-w-. _ . _ �.1... __._. <.._ . ..�-"'�; .,,, -'�7:-jr-C-'— ---'-- , {� � ..! ? • :s t t � � y � % / ; �} �. . � � �` J �A� � � ♦� � � � � L�� r +<.', � � �'�l. 4:� '�!� .•�. �`•e�:' �� ,�� ..� ' 'N w• {ir �v .:t:��' �� ` \ � � \ {:•, ♦ 'J• >>�, ;j� •.,.�� ._.I!tr::.x::'' \ \� .:1 �.1`''�� !� �'! ,.�-:" '� ;;a"' ��;_<.:' ,. �'` i � � � ,•;:;:� •� • "`. .-. '' :,� u1 � pt�� Q.� `y '•.,� •J::.�:::-':� �, �, � . • � ' ' �, " \ r .•'3`i`"" �` . -� v� � , �. 1 , '�` ��'�y.�� ... •.:t:t!:ii;:'•. �� `, � `,i ��`` `��.•: ' r A , � � .� �.� �i r:•.`.:. � . . • i i � ^�^�:.t.. „�,. P f,,, ,. i i` � ' � � � �t Y Y `x:;;i;�;`: � ' ::r� y� �;,� � � �� ,�:?t� ` L �'0�81.1�0 D• � ; ,. �. i, P �! r..<:::. � � , � . � �'� f `��:..,;;; � : J L• . ::.,v':: . � �' a j ` f ' ', '' ' . ., � � 1.+ � t �4'i''..�"��'�. � I � . .� fr.• ,••. ` `�` � 7 �� I / �1 1 I 1 � r.. . 2 �. •;1{'.? � . M. ' — ,y5'. e`iii;;;�:�;� ��`�, ♦ �,� �� v /, i � � � I 1 ,�v;;." . .. � I � {'�� :;:;'�r:�' , ^�. ,,�/ � �, i�l � 1 � I . . i / ' \ i � I I I ' � " 4� � .ij�,:::��...�/. � K b. /` ♦` .� 1 I •+ t�- e:!:Slt,..., i ,� • � � � � � � � � , � :> �, :�;;> �. \ � � , a �..:•� ; � ;� �', ,� � I I � � � C. '•:M'ti; ` � i . "�� ;� . �i �� _� `. . � i I I �I � I +�:•'. � ••:,:•"•"`1 . i > •� i � a t: '::.:,::%� .. ` � ��`. . • ' � � ' � � �; �� , •. . . J , .. • , ,, �. :� • •. � � i '� •. � � � `� �� :� •. :;'• '�� ;:� `. �•� ` � . '•.,i .. v •°��: . � �� , � ,�� I ":.!('s,,:�:t:..� •..�� i.�` .�v� '�� \ ��` �� , '� `` �`\; . ;...-•'� � I , �y.;'4t'";;'�'��• �� `.�� •.�� - :'�:: ,�� I I ,;., � � � � ♦ Y � �� %� ' `�� `� ' � � ,{ i ♦ ` � � `� � � lY � � � . J � ' ,, ' �` � ' p i ' i �.�` `.� `. �• ; ,•� I y � `. �j ,' , � � � � .,� . � '� f :..� . ,� • r I I '... \ ` � '� ''� '' '� G' I I i � � � � L . '� --,--- ' -1 �- - W ��.� ��\ � .. ` �. t ;. t I � ,�� '� .,E.�Q� i �. •;. � O O OoO;O'( ` ,.. A� .. � � 1. � 1 I o . T�. �' e;r ; '� � ! ; i � r_r_�. :1 ;j r`•` �w✓ i � � � �. •:• , � I ( � , •� . � �• ; ' '�� i• ' O ( . ',:� r,-',"' : '� �. � � , ' I O� ¢ 0�� ' � ,,� ,.:,'�� ,,� t� � ;p� O O Q� � `L�( r c.. k'.:a:: . -- �p . - • ,�F� � '�.r � .�� XN� � '��.TT+1 G7� (/! � :+��',Ra��` � '�rts`� � _ .( � /� �j � �� , o��I a ��' '' �,� ,;'�) at '�1�..'�'.��r � tir ,=.. i- %t, '!!�'�y"t,�.n"� T — y , � • � �� ' j 1 p00000 � 0000�0!O� �o �, � QQ � QQ4 � � �� •��\•. ' ,., : p . �l///�/'�//�� C�i��ES��'��ri�.+:� /� ,�',,�'��; , , , . � \� / c� '' ` �� a 1�r o � Q ooQ � s� 4000 ° ;� o $ ��. � _ \:�� •. �. I � . � i � � � � ..0 �� Q� I " . ;< i o; + . ; AREA tv�AP � , APPLICANT �� /��L�r LEGEND � —' ZONING DiSTRiCT 80UNDARY / � SUBJECT PROPERTY ` PURPOSE ��41�� Of�S�L Q►7d �f1l1lSS 1 O ONE FAMILY PLANNiNG I � OISTRICT TWO FAMILY 3 FILE N0. �� ,I, J„�-�-� MULTIPLE FAMILY OATE �ec. I/. 1979 . ,, n C0�lMERCIAL SCALE�I'�=200� NORTH � �� NDUSTRIAL MAP N0. SAINT PAUL PIANNiNG BOAR� V VACANT �� ^ �� ' � -��:i�a � ` � :. �� H CUSTOMER . . . , , . 1 ,�, �,. a. . T Hw..�. zrL,.. o!as � SALESMAN Lis�- Q{.,ri+ I'..A:'S.� �� -� Fl(XIS6: NAMi; .3 � `� tZTCNE?! CABINL'1' PACKAGE :'AX HO�I:;E ?f'TC"r.' � ` �10 ADAITIONAL MpTER7AI; T ' ; �1 ,. S . , � i . � i --— � 7- TaTAL -•• ' � ' � � 1 T�S �STD. HPATINC TAX � �o � c ✓ ,� i ! , � j � � - � _, j � 1Y7rAL � 'T/S STD. PLUMBU� TAX � i i � � L..� � � I ; � — Y�I.:��, -7 � +� — 3 �� ..�i L{. � J i I � t -- � � � � $Z1�Td1'/1I. �. -----.-� a .',.^.ITS TAX - - ar.u, �-D t Z . ; T S .v .ax 'G, • • 1 %�� 7~ 1 �. I !' .J � `Q 1__.___.'__ . • �I - � , ' � ' I � ; Z.I'IE FIXTORES �+ I . TOTAL TQPAL CREDI:S f � �PPLIAI�� „/I'I I✓� T.UC �?ICC oF' HOUSE ? a � 2 . ':43IilET PACKACis � � r'EnTIt:C PAi KAGE �� !l�e�L -+ - 'LI�MBI;JC PAi'.K6CE ' ��"'� .�C:l i-t/(', !'�:'.t l.4� � w �� 1 S�.�- L�F_ :A:tiC F;;��— Z.t � �_?_��"� -- — � � � _._' � _S'-—— ".'AX �� • ;JNDATIGA! .i'. TOTAL I �ltr:.�,P�, °c71'A.'. PRICE —— � � • � ` , - � � � � ' � � I. � � � / ; j i ' l � . � � I I . j I � � � 1 p - � ' s os • . p : o ' � nfw � Mn� . ' n�i � � . S A1� M �M O � O v 3 3 i e N � . ! `— � N I �� rt�w w��. += , ;,� �♦ _ � w � ^ � O ' O = x f � �o � � O � a • � � � ` 3 � ' ' ~ �� ' �� ~ 1 p VtNTt1 �i � ' � i u � e�r,M � � O = � � , o O o ; � =� o0 F' j, o O , i � r 0� � j :e }� n W .. � �' i x P ,�.. � = g �^ N . M' M � s� w Z 4 N . }^Z v ; ' N 1n � ° - 0 M � E . e,� o n .. . , . � O °• � � 3 � "„i � � , � : z � � ' � � � = i i s � _ � . d-44 s�/sr G•44 s./pr � � � � � . � � � _•�-�� '.� -� — � o � � . c �. � W Lt1tM�TON T}{. �,CO. ` U � . 'N' s r'•O' QA/L��1�l9� . . 671J Vd.N ; _ R, S�. PAl•iL., MW. �� , 2e�-o° � zz�•o" �•.o� ; � { � � �a•,�� o�n. oR. � a ' , � i ' , , � � � L-- — — — -- — ----1 A. p' N j � � 1 � � �t i y� > j a � � K N� �' N • g�" � � " . �� N o � . � -_1 a � a ♦ i � 2� O � N O I � < < • �r 3-2 x 10 1,�v►.Wow Atwr�� p � � �- � —L• . � =w O � _ f • . : � � , ' i . �IO M i' � � N , � y ~� � � w" e 7� as C i � � �_ � . W ;� �' • �1 i � � N C �°''� ' m x �o � N o � � � N � � £ 3 } N � °� ~ Z � �,N 2 -1 £ o N � � _ ' � N r� p � � � 1 � p 3 � � � ^ E - 1 � a t j � e.u. e.0 ro j A 28'-O" ' W!L'a.lNGTON T� �CD ,,� , �.��.. FY4�J��331 i '' = ' ST. PAUL, MN. 1 r sussE� THE SUSSEL COMPANY, INC.�GARAGE DIVISION�ROOM DIVISION�NEAR-BIITT'"�'HOME DIVISION April 18, 1979 Mr. Richard Miller � 257 Ohio Street St. Paul, Minnesota. 55107 Dear Mr. Miller: � w'e are pleased to inform you that your construction financing on your Sussel Near-Bilt home has been approved for $ �_ on the home package and for $ on the ca—�ance. This . financing approval is subject to the following: 1. proof of income (request for verification has been sen� to employer) 2• all outstanding loans being paid off 3, obtain a plot drawing or survey of your lot 4. 5. Please obtain as soon as possible from the seller of your lot an uadated ABSTRACT OF TITLE if the 1ot is abstract property, or a REGISTERED PROPERTY REPORT if your property is Torrens. The title as to be examined efore you close on your house. Upon the completion of your home plan review with our construction supervisor, returning of the plans signed by the local building inspector, 3nd the examination of the title, we will call you for a finance closing on your home. . Please obtain a builder's risk fire insurance binder to bring in to your closing, covering your new home for it's replacement value (less the cost of the lot) against fire. If it is available from your agent, theft coverage for about $3,000 would provide you with additional protection. ' If you have any questions regarding this approval , please contact our ciosing department at 645-0331 . This approval is valid for 90 days . 'Jery truly yours, r=inance Department The Sussel Company, Inc. 1 i 1 ^�.+ 1^'' {'+� (��( {/'��` / �'`F /��( i Y�..� w L��i�{�1.., �.�� r,��L��. ��..1 i\l T 1 i�lJ�. ^��1! ��1 ��.J�T.""�. ��J 1 L�.�. ��\/t Y C ��v �L i F V_i��V� To; �`[-� ,�•� � . . � � THE SUSSEL CO. CHANGE ORDER DETAIL SHEET �sso coMO AvE. sT. PAUC CAII: 6�5-0331 AI L a DO NOT MAI L BREAKDOWN OF CHANGE ORDER DESCRIPTION UNIT UNIT STANDARD STANDARD PRICE SELLING PRICE COST J\Jl�_ �a �-22- � -� O �L b REASON FOR CHARGE OR CREDIT WHEN OTHER THAN STANDARD TOTAL CHARGE $ � � TOTAL CREDIT , $ � ZS VARIATION $ � APPROVAL: OPERATION�-- � � �� MANAGER SALES � MANAGER ACCOUNT GUSTOMER SALESMAN NUMBER CHARGES SEL�ING COST ACTUA� + _ MATERIAI. L'ABOR CEMENT SUBS DATE CREDIT � �� LL-�-v�— DEPT. APPROVED DATECUSTOMER � i 1 �06 � = � � ~ �9- � ��g�9d�~ ~� APPROVEDC/O MI ��ER • RICi�ARO - cio G�, 2 s t C H I e DATE ��2..�—� / �- C— „ ' , ST FAUl . �fii 55f0# ' . .. . ,,. c�o _ 33316 `� sT Fau� t °-`. -- � ii C M E 2 9 2 - 5 1 3 6 =.� -'� ` NR S4� - 1 r' ; 1 $�' , ,. :� . ` � :M,.: I ; ✓ - � (1 1�'�.' :�� . r . ,:��.. �„'� CZTY OP SAZNT P1WL, MIMlESOTA PSTIT20N R�O 11t��liD CH7IPTERB 60 thsts 64 OP TIiE LDGZSLATIVE (ZO�IINGI CODE Note: Before the petitiones's proposal for resoning ;ai�1 be coneiderad by thn City of Saint Paul� property ownars nust conasnt to the proposed change. Hefore signiag the petition vhich is a atstament to that effect, tha signer ahould be avare of uaea per- mitted under the nev claasification. For further informatian about tha rezoning of proparty� call the Zoning Section of the City Planning 0£fice, 298-4154. : TO T� HONORABLE MAYOR AND CITY COIINCIL �=�'February 8, 1979 c/o the City Clsrk, Room 386 City FIall + City of Saint Paul, Mimusots � Sectioa 64.210 of St. Yaul'a Zoning Ordinance atates that 67Z oE property oimars within the - � araa to be considared must conaeat to the proposed razoning. Section 462.357(5) of Minaesots i Statatea atates that 2!3 of property ovnera vithin 100 feet of the land proposad for rezoniag must gine aritten consent beEora tha City shall conaider the proposal. Hmrever, xhen the waer of said propertq hss owned for anq time in the past yeaz additional real estate contiguous . to the land proposed for raaoning, 2/3 of the property o�mers eithin 100 feet of this larger package of property mist givo trrittan consent. Pursuant to Seetion 64.210 oE the St. Paul Zoniag Ordinance and Section 462.357(5) of Mianeaota Statntes, w. the undersigaed, oWn proparty withia 100 feet of the petitionar's land and herebq petition your Honorabla Body to rezone tha follovi.ng described property: (legal description & atreet addresa)Subject to ST & all of vac Belle St lying sly of CL of vac Fairfield and Lots 5 & 6 of Block 198 of Irvines Addition of Blocks 188 to 199 (aka 257 Ohio Street) lrast I-1 Di�trict to R-4 District, tor th� purpose oS installiaq, conatructing and/or operatinq the followiaqsSingle family residence (dascribe brisflp tht propoaed facility) , � RECqRD 09PNER SIGNATVRE LOT BIACK ADDZTION Subjact Propertys Durex Products, Inc. X �ilP./•` National Wire Cloth �j k Company �c�.��y�r�c°.� ��;., ,�� Y,.�� , � State o! Mi:saesota) ) u Couaty of Ramsey ) baiaq first duly swora, deposes and states that ha is tha p�son wbo eirculated the aithin petition consistinq of Z pagea= that th� partias _ d�scsi,b�d abov� ara ths ownera respectively of the lota placed i.u�ediately followinq saeh namer Lhat each o! the parties deseribed above 3s wha osrner of property which is withirt 100 fe�t lrom aay praperty o�+ned by affiant or aold by affiant withiss one (1) ysar precedfnq the date ot this petition rvhich is contiquous to the property above dsscrib�d: tlsat non� of the parties described above has purchaa�!d or is piarchasing - proparty from attiaat contiquous to the above described prooerty with3n oae S1) yesr of '.iu data of thi� pstitioni that this petition�wae siqned by each of said oL+nera ia the presence of this affi.a�t, and thnt the siqnatures above are the true and cozrect sic�naturea ot each and all af the parties so deacribed. ` �� .1, Svb�ar and sMOrst to befors me Address: /�-` y,� s�,y Telephons No. r/ ehi• 'S day of 1/ �� J�/34 Approved as to form 10-27 76 x OF£ice of the City Attorney .;;}�.�, ';' "IE 4. :;X j NOta=y Pub11c• Ra��futfty flrM�r.ii'."u:��ESCIa '> �,ati�SE" ;-0uyrv s °4y caronission QICjJ�@�:!„�y gomm�uion Esares�art.23.;981 � x � � : CITY OT SAINT Y11UL� MINtiESCtA ?ETITION TO 11118N0 CliAPTERS 60 tlfru 64 O! THS LEGISLATIVE (7A�ttNG) CODE Note: Before the patitioner's proposal for rezoning :ri�1 be considered by the Citq of Saint Paul, property ownera muat consent to the proposed change. Bafore signing the ; petition ahich is a statement to that effect. the signar should be aware of uaes per- , mitted uader the new claesification. ror furthar information about the resoniag of � propertq, call the Zoniag Section of the City Planning Offics, 298-4154. _ TO THS AONORABLE MAYOB AND CITY COOI�ICIL ' c/o tha Citq Cisrk, Room 386 City Hall Date. February 8, 1979 � City of Saint Paul, Mianesota i j Section 64.210 of St. Pavl's Zoning Ordinanca statas that 67x of propesty oWners vithin the , uea to ba consldered must consent to tha proposed reaoaing. Saction 462.357(5) of Minnesots : Ststutes statea that 2/3 of property ovness vithin 100 feet of tha land proposed for rezoning � must give vrittm consant before the Citp shall coasider the proposal. Homevar, whea the - owaer of said property+ has owned for aay time in the past yaar additional real aatate contiguous to the land proposed for rezoniag, 2/3 of the property owners within 100 feet of this larger package of proparty must give writtea conseat. Pursuaat to Section 64.210 of the St. Paul Zoniag Ordiaance and Section 462.357(5) of Minnesota 5tatutes, ue, the underaigned, oan property withia 100 feet of the petitioner's land snd hereby petition your Bonorable Body to rezone che folloving described propertq: (legal description & atreet address) Subject to St & � all of vac Belle St lying sly of CL of vac Fairfield and LoTs 5 & 6 of Block 198 of ' Irvines Addition of Blocks 188 to 199 (aka 257 Ohio Street) lraat r_i Diitrict to R-4 Diatrict, tor th� pnrposs o_* installing, constructing and/or eperatiag the followiaga single family residen� (d�scrib� bri�lly the propoaed facility) � � �R SIGNIITURE LOT HLOCK ADDITION ! subject Pro�ertys ' C``� _�� .ri c j `/�� o �'twr �G j w_,•G'-�-�..R. �L�_ Lt.�t i �t_�-�`.vY' ,z+�• St.ate of Miiutesota) � ) �� Count7/ o! Rams�y ) baing first duly a�wra, deposes a:ed states that he is thn . pessa� who cizculated the aiihin petitioa consiating of 2 paqea; that the parties described abova ar� tha own�re respectively of tha lots placed immediately followinq �aah s+ame: that each o! tha parties deacribed above is the owaer of pzoperty uhich ia �rithia 100 fest from any property owned by a!liant or sold by affiant within oae (i) Year precedtng the date of this peiition which is contiquous to the property above describedi Ghat naaa of �4e partiea described aSova has purchased or is purchasinq property from atliaat contiquoua to the above described property within oae (1? yeer of tha dtte of thi� petition� that this patition�h+as signed by each of safd oaners in the presence o! this affiaat, an8 that the siqnaturas above are the true and correct si�natnres o! each aad all o! iha parties so described. • �i �t�fl1GJ'�� Snbscrl.b�d and swrn to belore me Address: �,f` w /,� S�y Te2ephons No. 9�t 9� lhis � 8a af �� t • Approned as to form 10-27-76 � � Office of the City Attorney iAA�1d � AAM! liOtt� PI1b1�.Cr F�018�I �t11 a. cr�X . '�CI��L(C :,:If7t1ESOTA � - =!Y commissioa expir�,';i�ii�: ,�a�s�v co�!vrr � � ��'��y cumm�ssien Exorres S>ct._3.19S( > . . X?77YY�l��Y1NwwC'Y+1�11mMyWyy yr y y1l X . 1 4 ZOjVING BOARD . APPIICATiON FOR ZONING ORDINANCE �4�I�CE � � �}L��'`'� _ .��♦ CITY OF SAINT PAUI - �,��7'��t. ,��tl�.t:. C.r�,��'tJr�� ,�/T�.�°H--j,PF�-riG,grr�,� A VARlANCE OF ZONING CODE CHAPTER_T ,SECTION�_PARAGRAPH�� `..... IS REQUESTED IN CONFORMITY WITH TNE POWERS VESTED IN THE BOARD OF 20NING AP— PEALS TO PERMIT THE 1 i��l,�?.,�? /b�'�"!.^. °�_�,6�.1�'4��-` '�''-� ON PROPERTY ;f ��"'ri'7 3 . 1'i s '�''��S +c��' /t;f��.�.�.�.�^�."- • "��G��'�� DESCRIBED BELOW. i `"""` i�;��` i t�� .•e ' � �� /�',�'�/��/ �f{��-'� �� R. Applicent; NAME• � __ �' ��R��." ' ` r 'Tr Ti3��. x .r, .'� +1.��'' i „�"}�f d �, i L� r; ' �. _.. ADDRES$._r�_�� c� Ef t: }f*s�ti� • OAXLME TELEPHON `i Y��/; 21P CODE �� .`-'�, �. .. � � t. -Propsrty int�rest of applicant. (owne ,contract purchaser,etc.) ��'l U� _. :� , .-,: �Ff%� Z,:. N�ms of ownar (if differont) �/f�t� B. Propsrty Oesaiption: AODRES$ �r�?r�"�G 1. Legal description: LOT BLOCK ADD. 2. Lot sizr. /�.,��,�j1- )f �'�,lT-�-- 3. Pre»nt Uas ��„�t`T � Present Zoning DisL ,��"�I C. Rea�ons for Requeat• / �. P/OPOSeff UfQ )"�'�j�/..��-7 �"'�t�� /�`i/,..,"'JSC� r�_ � ' � j ! ,�/,C1�"'JG�� . ' � . YVhat phyaical characteriatics of the property prevent its be�' used forecs�c-e�-shuperaritted+rses ` in your zone? (topography,soil conditiona,size and shapebi tot,etc.) � ��CJ v !�M t T f i � � f�' =�" ��'.�- /t,i�� G • . . • ; t.�. cState the spacific verixtion requested,giving distanceswhere ap�upriate. , . . , , „, ,.1� , -7-c ��J �'.0 ��l.�`,=� .�% �,tJ-� , _.-a _'-� 4. Explain how your case confortns to each of the following: ,;� �,... � s.�,�'/'�'"�G%,e�.C,. , f 1J��- �...=:-:�%''��7;�%,�,� � . a. Thst the strict.application of the provisions of ths•2�qR'1pp,(k[�jance would result in peculiar� � or exeeptionai practicai difficulties^or exceptional undue hardsyh�ips.wl,r �C,�''(�,t� ,:�� • � ,H�lt� �,�� %rrJ i��..v ��TcJ'.fi�/f�/!f✓v iI/r'�j'C,,� ,ia J Q. �-+ ) ,/ �Ir•• 7 �I"� ��_�:.J�j„-7J !�{ /�/A�...�:� �V V �'c+ 1✓r T {Z; j� rl � - ,�: � f 6 �� :�?�'�� I'�{j'p F1 ^� _ � ��,. -r"��A F HIERS USE ONLY � .}' , b. That the granting of a variance wilt � _�;�k not be a substsntial detriment to � ` � �r a � ; �- public good or s substsntia{impsir- n . "' "' ! y.:.t{.4�j'. msnt of ttu intent and purposeof ; � � ' • ths Zoninp Ordlnance. ; (J,l�.L �a � �C I�L/'3C,c'� +i� �/`t%..t�'i.rJt� � (��-f!��XlS�0 ��-� �� ..� � ��NOTE�fTHIS W�L NOT BE��EO WITHOUT A COMPLETE SITE PLAN,t F t � S'ignatu►e : t Date Received � �� ! � - � -_ _ . . _. _. . . , � .; , . , _ _ . _, ._..._. ,. : �: -----'--� .. . ,— �,._.., _:.._ ,_=._ ...: �- _ , ______--..�:,::: ;,.� . /L/��.�9 ZONING STAFF REPORT . � � �� ' l. APPLICANT: RICHARO MILLER DATE OF HEARIN6 12/11/79 2. . . . . . . . . . . . . . . CLASSIFICATION . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . CURRENT PLANNING & ZONIN6 CON�IITTEE BOARD OF 20NING APPEALS ezon ng g ar ance ❑ Special Condition Use LJ Administrative Review ❑ Determination of Similar Use ❑ Other i sissi i Ri C ridor� Change of Nonconforming Use ❑ Lritica rea Inter�m Other ❑ Development Regulations 3. LOCATION: 257 Ohio (Ws Ohio between Isabel and Plato Blvd). 4. LEGAL OESCRIPTION: Lot 6, Block 198, Irvines Addition. 5. PRESENT ZONING: I-1 ZONING CODE REFERENCE: I-3-b Minn. Critical Area Interim Development Regulatiais 6. STAFF INVESTI6ATION & REPORT: DATE 12/4/79 BY Laurence 1. Jung -----------------------------------------------------------------------------=-------------- -------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------- A. PURPOSE: Applicant wishes to obtain a variance of the setback provisions under the Interim ev�6 eTpment Regulations imposed by the tate ver orr or�ritical Area Act of 1974 in order to build a sin 1 famil h use wi h a small business use on the remises at 257 Ohio Street. The orouos con orms to the I-1 zon � a business se wou��e est ��s ed The State authorizes the C ty to grant var�ancv s� re u at ons accor ng to ocal proce ures. s propose , in violation o e standards pertaining to setback requirements of structures from blufflines. B. FRONTAGE & AREA: This irregular shaped parcel has frontage on Ohio Street of about 140' inc u es vacated Be11e Street) and has a depth of about 160' (including portions of vacated Fairfield Street) for a total area of approximately 21,000 sq. ft. . C. SITE CONDITIONS: The arcel occu ies two d s i t nd ar buildabl e ufi�i pper site adjacent to io Street is now vacant and abo.ut level with the street. This half-moon shaped site is somewhat less than 4,000 sq. ft. in area based on the plot plan provided. 'ed his location for man ears until it w s destro ed b fire last Januar . This site is perche on top o a very s eep s ope some to ee a ove e ower level. Presently, there is a large amount of }�rubbish and debris strewn over the edge and held in place on the slope by trees and brush. The lower levet of the parcel (about 7-8,000 sq. ft.) is also vacant although a large industrial type building Q�occupied the site. No develo ment is bein ro osed for this 1 wer sit t r en Staff has requeste assistance rom t�e amsey oi and Water Conservation District to assess the upper site's condition for development. Their report is part of this packet. ' D. AREA CONDITIONS: This parcel occupies a unique h sical location and setting in that it lies m d-way between the upper residen ia y eve ope es ty and the lower Riverview Industrial Park area managed b,y the St. Pau] Port Authority. Ohio '� Street, in this area, is the � means of vehicular access between the two levels. � It is a fairly steep (in excess of 8%) and winding, 2-lane street that has recently been upgraded. "No Parkinq" si ns are osted on either sides since it is a stee narrow and windin s ree an ere ore po en ia y angerous. eve opmen w� in t e ower sec ors incTu�e various inaus r�a u ��c i a L`ff€Geo. Shetka & Sons iron works, a wholesale use and the National Wire Cloth Co. The easternmost edge of Cherokee Park property abuts the site on the west. Very steep slopes (nearly vertical) are directly across the street to the south. Differences in elevation are in excess of 50 ft. between the top and Ohio Street. E. VARIANCE: The site is located in the sector of the Critical Area designated as "Urban � Div�fied" Under the dimension variance section of the Interim Development .� Regulations (I-3-b), a 40 ft. setback from blufflines is required for all structures. � Due to obvious physical limitations of the uppe—r si�e, the applicant is requesting j these restrictions ived to permit rebuilding a single family hosue with a busines� � use attached about � tf from the nearest edge of the bluffline. The requested ; variance is for 35 feet. s� ' b. A dimension variance may be granted only when the following findings are made�, i (1) the strict enforcement of the setback or height restrictions, or lot size ! � or line of siqht will result in unnecessar�� hard�hio. "Hardship" as ussd � in the consideration of a dimension variance means that the property in , ` ,� question cannot be out to a reasonable use under the dimension provisions y' ��'y of these Interim Development Regulations; --._ . . ,_._._ .� - --_ . _. _ _ � _ . _ _ � __ _ .— _ __.. -- _ ,�..._ � � � RICHARD MILLER (#8546) PAGE 2 _ `9' ' (2) there are ' i t es uni ue to the ro ert that were n.ot created bv a landowner after pri , ; (3) the dimension variance does not a11ow an use that is not a com atible use in the land use district �n w c t e proper y is oca e ; 3� (4) the dimension variance �oes-�no��t-- alter the essential character of the locality as established � tTiese Interim Development Regulations�,y�'r�,� (5) the dimension variance would not be contrary to the intent of the Order. � F. RELEVANT PLANS: The existing Interim Development Regulations of the State are ternporary and wi e replaced by amended provisions of the St. Paul Zoning Ordinance which have been developed in compliance with State mandated guidelines. These amended provisions are expected to � effective in earl 1980 as the outgrowth of the approved � Mississippi River Corridor an, e su ec site is shown to be within the edge or margin area between the devetoped upper levels, which are residential in nature, and the lower levels identified as the �ro�sed Harriet Island Development Area. This lower area is planned to contain a m xi ture of open space uses, marinas, th�ne coimiercial/ entertainment and light industrial uses besides a certain amount of housing intermixed. * Along with these proposals, Cherokee Park would be linked with Harrie�tsland. G. �INDINGS RELATING TO INTERIM DEVELOPMENT RE6ULATIONS�� 1. Strict interpretation of the Interim Development Regulations would prohibit any con- struction on this site, therefore, the a�alicant is nresented with a hardshiu. M r Q The applicant (landowner) previously occupied a single family home on this site • ` prior to April 25, 1975. 3. If granted, the .proposed use would be allowed in the I-1 zoning district (�,g Znnina Administrator has certified the proposed Health Food and residence as a aermitted use in t e - zone . 4. If a dimension variance is granted to allow the proposed construction on this property, tt►at structure would alter, in a negative way, the essential character of the site and the general— ocT�aTi�y. This site is part of the a� tew� to the upper West Side Community and open space area. 1 5. Granting the variance e i wi th i n �of both the Interim �� • Development� Regu�stions and�•the Mississiapi River Corr or P an.: ,� � H. OTHER FINDINGS: a�K� 1. The� variance request is based on the unique physical aspects of the site, its topographic limitations, its configuration�, and the fact that the site was occupied b�a sinale family house less than one year ago. 2. The Zoning Administrator has certified that the proposed off-street parking of • 2 spaces for the Mail Order business and 2 spaces for the residence is sufficient. 3. The variance, in this instance, can be granted without an im airment to the supply of light and air to the community or to adjacent proper ies. 4. The request for variance is not based primarily on a desire for economic gain. . j5` �Some problems foreseen with the develo�nent of this site include: I ��,�� j �() The upper site is extremely small to contain both a dwelling and a business and off-street parking. � • � ; '� �:``� . � H��c o�a.�. b�.s.a�.� . (b) Off-street parking for the business use (proposed 2 spaces) is considerably limited and potentially dangerous in �!!at it aonears inadequate maneuvering space is available. �ackina directly onto a street is expressly prohibited �nder Section 62.104(c . 4 (�} Fro,�p_actical view oint,�it wuuld erha s be better if the business and residentia use were separated -- wit t e usiness use on the lower level � and the residential use on the upper level. However, there is no public access to the lower level. 1 . . . . . . . ' � . .� ._ -. _. . .., ...:� , _.:_.. . � . . . ._ . ,..,... . . � - . : - ,.�."""_"-- _ __-. �----� _ - . .__..___�.�._-_.._�.,._-----"- .. _ � , --_---._ .._._. -_.__ ... _ .. „__- � � , � I i' RICiiARD MILLER (#8546) PAGE 3 f , � (d) Ohio Street possesses characteristics cno si.dered noten i�?1v danoerous_for � traffic and for providing service to a u�ing properties. Its primary i function in this short stretch is to carr � j �nw?M�2VP�5. Other uses of the stree s o�ld hP rnncidaro�i eornnilar� 6. The findings of the Ramse Soil and Water Conservation District substantiates the site to b builda e since t e s te was or�r y eve ope and the presence of bedrock woul appear to be adequate to support normal construction contingent upon the foTlowing safeguards: „ (a) Draingage of the site should be directed away from any areas of exposed sandstone and therefore should be directed towards Ohio Street. 6q�.•. 0 (b) The proposed structure appears too close to the edge of the bluff. A qualified sails engineer should be consulted regarding the particulars of support for the structure. 7. In order to comply with the I-1 zoning, an� r�of the property would require a �re intensive activitv 1eve1. ��y,,J �;,,.,r � i"� I. STAFF RECOh�IENDATION: Staff recomnends denial of the variance based on findings 4 and o ect on re ating to the Interim Development Regulations) and on findings 5 and 7 of Sectfion H (Other Findings). Gt.d d.�..a. cG...�..,.,..:� • . . �''{� G��v.H.�w�...T.�t 6?k� JS.a.1 L r•► � �v«► i- 79 I � � � 1 , i , _.i��t* ;:�:::;., . \..I ! [ v� Jn�l� � rnvE. :4+ w� �+i �; <�! a.: DEPARTMENT OF PLANNING AND ECONOMtC DEVELOPMENT ��. nii�tu�ii. �' �� °- �IVISlON OF PLANNING :, �< '-.�._.'y-�� 2S West Fourth Street,Saint Paul,Minnesota.55102 612-298-4151 GEORGE tATIMER ---- MAYOR October 30, 1979 � Mr. Cliff Aichinger State Planning Agency � 100 Capitol Square Building Saint Paul , Minnesota 55101 Dear Cliff: Please note that on December 11 , 1979, the St. Paul Board of Zoning Appeals wiil hear an appea� for variance of the Mississippi River Corridor Critical Area Interim Development Regulations relating to bluffline setbacks. The applicant, a Mr. Richard Miller of 257 Ohia Street, St. Paul , wishes to rebuild a home and business that recently was destroyed by fire at that locatian. The site is in an Urban Diversified district of the Critical Area. Enclosed is a copy of the proposed site plan. Please corr:rent on the proposal by December 5, 1979. I'm available to review the proposal at your convenience. _ � Sincerely, � .� ; ,��- �ichard J. Wiederhorn Planner-in-Charge St. Paul Mississippi River Corridor Plan RJW/cc � . cc: Rachard Miller Larry Jung �._ �� I �. . . ,,o � � � � . � . N _ � � � . �n � ' m i �� Q. z � . . � � Q Q � � - - 4 0 � o ,....� - -� � . b �.�.,. _ � � J � � I 6� ,� � Ii ■.as �� ' . V � . ,. �¢�'--�� `� �: ` � - -. -- -- � , z 1 � Z � � W YJ � r d � p uai j 4 � J ' � ,N c ac t� ' � Q a �� Yr � � � � � ., ! V � � �S9• � � � .� / ♦ i./ W ...� t"' a ;; W� . 1 � � uuM � , �,w• . �^- cn a ; I /�� : � � i�(//{/ _ � L �( � � I ' Q , I Q � � � � � ' � ' � f/i � , {.Li a3 4 , f p M � . . . . . � ._ _ � Y °° � � � � a � \ �Y � � \ z � � 1 • , W � z ' � � Z o ' 1 e� 'Q o - ' �� _1 a o • I O " � : ' a - .. W j W � J Q W f ]� . i- N af ^V, '/� � � � � • - � , ✓ Minnesota Environmental Quaiity Board , � 100 Capitol Square Building 550 Cedar Street St. Paul, Minnesota 55101 = � � Phone 296-8542 November 6, 1979 � Mr. Rick Wiederhorn � Department of Planning and Economic Develo�nent 25 West Fourth Street St. Paul , h1N 55102 Dear Rick: I have looked at Rick Miller's site plans for rebuilding his home at 257 Ohio Street. tlnder Critical Area Reaulations the proiect is a permitted use in the Urban Diversified District and meets t e criteria for dimension variance from bluff setback (Sec. I .3.b.) . However, the applicant indicates in the site plan that he intends to f a ' n located within a fe ` bluff� line. I am c ncerned th�t this r� not e sa e . No information as bee n provi ed on the condition of the bluff. Is it eroding or slipping? I think that soil and bluff conditions should be scrutinized by Mr. Miller and the Zoning Board of Appeals before rebuilding begins. Possibly a knowledgeable outside source should be consulted, like the Ramsey County SCS. I feel that a determination must be made regarding the safety of re- building so close to the bluff. This would be in the spirit of the Critical Areas Act with regard to bluff setback and in the interest of the City o t. au and Mr. htiller. Sincerely, . .��..� , i ; . Craig Johnston �_�� '' Critical Areas Pro ram - � � ba ��(/ ''F. ' � cc: Ri ck Mi l ler '� b Donna McNeally AN EQUAL OPPORTUN)TY EMPLOYER ��O UNITED STATES DEPARTMENT OF AGRICULTURE SOIL CONSERVATION SERWCE 1827 North St. Paul Road, Maplewood, MN 55109 November 30 , 1979 _ , � T0: Supervisors , Ramsey Soil & Water Conservz�ion District SUBJECT: Review Soil and Bluff Conditions . The City of St . Paul, Department of Planning and Economic • Development, Zoning Section is considering a zoning variance request. The request is for a variance of the Mississippi River Corridor Critical Area Interim Development Regulations . The specific regulation being addressed is the bluff line set back. Mr. Crai Johnston of the nnesota nv'ronm� t u it Board has advised see his letter, November , 1979) the St . Pau epartment of Planning and Ecor�omic Developmen� that the ro osed structure under consideration does "meet t:ze criteria _for dimension variance from bluff setback" and "is a permitte use" in the location pronosed for �he structure . �_ However Mr. Johnston poses several questions re�ar�_ng the condition of the site and the suitabili�y of i;, T'o� a building site . In order to explore answers to these questions , the City E of St . Paul has requested the Ramsey Soil 3nd :la�er �onservatio:� District to investigate the site. The ur ose o� L:is report - is to address these questions and provide recqT�;.znaG��ons o overcome an� a verse lmpac s on si e �n ... .� y v bu_,ilding on the s te. t s ou_ pe no e na L:ze solis and site information��s' general in nature. For specific recomme�- dations on soils or foundation engineering, a qualified profes- sional shculd be contacted. � On site revieTa, conducted November 2g, 1979 , revealed the fol- lowing aspects of the site ' s existing condition : i) The site is underlain by St. Peter sandstone bedrock. This material is capsb_e of providin� a suitable building sitet ii) Determiiii:�� the configuration of this bedrock U�as difficult due to the aMOUnt of debris on the site. It appeared that some sho ring of the backside of the site had been a�tempted. This had not been done in a manner that appeared pernanent or stable. In a general sense, this bedrock forma.tion is a "nose" of material that was once part of the larger formation :tihich is seen directly arcoss Ohio Street from the site . The bench that com- poses the site was apparently created in the process of cutting Ohio Street tnrough the bluff. � Page 2 - 11/30/79 On reviewing the site plan and considering some of the properties of the sand stone bedrock, the following recomr.ien�ations are ma.de : i) As sandstone is quickly eroded by runnino water drainage. from the structure on the site and the paved surface of the site should be directed away from any areas of exposed sandstone. Runoff shoul no e a lowed to flow off the back side of the site . Perhaps the best approach is to direct all runoff from the site onto Ohio Str�et . If the runoff is not handled properly, it may erode the sandstone that would form the foundatior. of the structure. Q,q,�,�y 4 ii) Review of the plan revealed one gossible ser�ous shortc�ming of either the plan or the existing information on the site. The proposed structure appears to be too far to the r.ear of the site to be supported by bedrock. For the protection of the site and the owners properties and investments , a qualified soils engineer should be consulted regarding the particulars of support for the structure and the configuration of the sandstone u�derlying the structure . � �eT�� ritn appropriate planning and good constructior. proceedures , the site should provide a good building loca�ion. Sincer�ly, .� 1 ��l•,� ;%� - '� ::l.•�% r-�" f�� il ., � .E ' Stan Wendland District Conservationist Maplewood Field Office ' •. %� � RAMSEY SOiI AND WATER CONSERVATt4N DISTRtCT Mid,Amerka Bonk Building 1827 North Soint Paul Road Maplewood.Minrrosoto 551�9 Telephone(612)777-0127 , , MINNESOTA � SQ1L aNO WATER CONSERVATION DISTRICTS . ; . Dece�nber 4, 1979 � 1�0: Supezvisors of the Ramsey Soil and Water CvnseYVation District b12�1: llu�e Zwiers � SIUBJEGT: Review Soil �nd Bluff Conditians Mr. Stan 4Jendland, District ConseYVationist, tr�tted his revi.ew of the above proposed develapment to the Ramsey Soil and [,Tater Con- � servatian District Board for their approval. �J� a�nrove his renort and er�hasize that the Board tia.s no reg;ulatory fimctian and can anly make recmnnendations. , We find t.ze pr�pposed site poses no seriovs threat to water and or � soil resaurces in the area, if ;1r. [•1endland's recar.mendatians are follo�aed. � Sincerely, ��i��J.�u,�,c�� ; ��- D. M. Zwiers Plat Review Connattee AN EQUAL OPPORTUNITY EMPLOYER � O �:. �:e MINUTES OF THE MEETING OF THE BOARD OF ZONING APPEALS IN CITY COUNCIL CHAMBERS, ST. PAUL, MINNESOTA DECEMSER 11 , 1979 PRESENT; Mme. Morton; Messrs. Grais , Kirk, Parrish, Peterson and Woods of � the 6oard of Zoning Appeals; Mr. Jerome Segal , Assistant City Attorney; Ms. Lane of the Division of Housing and Building Code Enforcement; Ms. Beseman, Mr. Jung and Mr. Warn of the Planning Staff. ABSENT: Ntne. Summers The meeting was chaired by Ms. Gladys Morton, Chairman. RICHARD MILLER �#8�546.�: An appeal for variance of. setback requirements from b u ne to ui�d a single family house and business in an I-1 Industrial Zone located at 257 Ohio. The site is located in the Urban Diversified Oistri�t of the Riyer Corridor Critical Area. The app�lldnt was present. There was opposition present at the hearing. Mr. Junq showed slides of the subject site and reviewed his staff report with a recommenddtion for denial of the variance request. Letters were received from Jan� Nelson, adjacent property owner, and Nancy West, District 3 Planner, in oppo�ition to the variance. A letter was also received from Shetka Iron WorkS in which they stated they have no ob��ction to the proposal . Joe Pa��al , 1049 Hudson Road, reported that he was asked b,y Mr. Miller to testify on this matter. A picture was presented to the Board showing the house that existed on the site prior to January 3. 1979. He stated that he would like to address himself to the 5 basis for the possible granting of a varian�� in the staff report, E(b) , 1 through 5 and Findings G, 1 through 5. Of the five requirements, he would consider three of them substantive because they can be answered in fact, and two of them subjective because they require opinion. He said there is a hardship that goes far beyond what this particular interpretation of the Critical Area Study indicates. Mr. Miller had a home on that property for 11 years where he lived with his family until it was destroyed by fi�^e, Since January they have had to live apart. They are a family that is separated beCause of bureaucratic bungling. Mr. Miller is told that he cannot rebuild because there are more restrictions and more obstructions which he is canfronted wi�h. The appellant occupied a home on this site until last year, not aS 5tated prior to April 25, 1975. A check With the State License Depart- � ment wi11 indiCate that he has previously operated a mail order business out of thi� home. The objective questions which require opinion is, if the variance i$ granted 1t will alter in a negative way the essential character of the site and the general locality. If you are going to look at the site since January, you are going to alter the character of the site because now it is open space, but 1f you dre going to look at the character of the site prior to January, then ypu are not going to alter the character of the site. The answer of staff to thts particu1ar question is arbitrary and reasonable people could draw a different conCiusion. He also questioned staff as to their use of the term tha� Ohio Street is a Gateway to the West Side Cpmnunity. He checked with ,�-'t..� . ` �'; RICHARO MIILER (#8546) PAGE 2 the Traffic Department and a gateway is determined by how much traffic would travel over a street to go from one point to another. They indicated that Robert Street has a daily traffic count of 17,000 vehicles , Wabasha 13,500 vehicles, Smith 1,600 vehicles and Ohio 250 vehicles. He questioned whether Ohio Street is a gateway or a private driveway for a few people who use it as a short cut to the loop, and if this were the case, he did not feel that Mr. Miller should be penalized because he elects to rebuild his home on a site that has been destroyed. In the staff report under "Other Findings 5(a), Mr. Pangal commented that the Zoninq Administrator has said that the lot is large enough to contain both a dwelling and a business and off-street parking. (b) As far as backing out onto the street, he said the city would haYe to close up �rost of the businesses in the city if we say they can't back out into d street. Also the type of business he has, 2 parking spaces is more than suffiicient. He would be lucky if he had 3 cars in the course Of d y�ar parking there. (c) He felt it was up to Mr. Miller whether he built on the upper Site and a business on the lower site as lon as he meets the requirer�nts of the I-1 zane which permits a combination. �d} He felt the purpose of a street was to carry traffic from one point to another, and if this were going to be used as a reason, this also is arbitrary. As to the Ratnsey County Water and Soil Conservation Districts, Mr. Miller has indiGated �p the staff that drainage of the site would be directed towards the str�et. He s�id Mr. Miller wauld be building a home which is substantially smaller than the home that wa� currently there and it would be built in the Same Spat. He did not feel that Mr. Miller should be denied this right. Richar� Miller, appellant, stated that all he wanted to do was build his home, With qr Without his business, and mave his family back on his property. He said th� rubbish that is on the site at the present is not from his house; he paid $2,900 to have his house torn down and everything was hauled away. He has been fined by the city once because of the trash that is there and now they are calling him again on this. The longer he waits to rebuild his house, the hiqher the cost is. He said he is paying taxes on a piece of land �hat h� cannot use other than to maintain it. Mr. Pangdl said that if Mr. Miller is denied the right to rebuild on the prOperty, whdt will happen to it? Will the city then buy the property from Mr. Miller? He commented that there is no proposal that he knows of that hd5 Come through the CI6 process for the purchase of this property. Mr. Warn reported that he had ,�ust called the Traffic Department and the traffic volume for �hio Street is 2,000 vehicles per day not 200 which was stated �y Mr. Pangal . Donald Cadwell , 420 Ohio Street, stated that since the new road was built, there is more traffic per minute during rush hour than they previously had per hours. Jane Nelson said she was appearing before the Board as an adjacent property owner, as a rr�mber of the West Side Citizen's Organization of District 3, an Initiator of the West Side ITA and a St. Paul Planning Commissioner. She � . . �,,, RICNARD MILLER (#8546) PA6E 3 read her letter of December 6, 1979 to the Board of Zoning Appeals in which she Stated her concerns. Some of the concerns mentioned were that this site is at a critical transportation junction and will have a significant � impact on ongoing stabilization and revitalization efforts now underway in the drea. It is located on a very hazardous curve, parking is a problem and it is critical fio maintain and improve pedestrian access and use of Ohio Street. The visual impact of the future use of this property is tmpprtant. She urged the Board to consider what the best long-range use of th� parcel should be -- residential , industrial , open space. She felt that the �urrent I•1 , diversified open space designation is an error. It has virtuall� nQ appropriate indus•trial access and visually fits in better with the ad�aFent RT residential and R-4 open space. She asked that before any Variance iS grdnted that at least appropriate erosion stabilization measures be d�n�trated atnd that any proposed site an¢ building plans be certified aY � surV�yor. � Mr. Pangal reported that as the Vice-Chairman of the CIB Comnittee and as the Ghairnwn of the Community Facilities Task Force, he would like to point out �hat they have been very restrictive and any monies being used to acquire property have been denied in the CYB Comnittee. To speculate at this point in tin�, it would probably be 10 to 12 years before there will be money to star� �cquiring these kinds of SiteS. There b�ing no further testimony, Ms. Morton closed the public hearing portion of the m�etiny. Mr. WoodS made a motion to deny the variance request based on Section G, Fin�ings 4 and 5 of the Staff Report. Mr. Peterson seconded the motion. The mQtion f�il�d on a ro11 call vote of 3 to 3. There wds discussion among the Board membelrs as to the extreme hardship on the a�pe�lant, Mr. Parrish then made a motion to approve the variance request based on the fact that the appellant is presented with a hardship, the site was previously occupled with a singie family hame, the proposed use would be allowed in the I•1 zon�, the proposed construction on the property would not alter in a negative way, the essentia] character of thg site and that it would be in keeping with the intent of both the Interim Development Regulations and the MissisSippi River Curridor Plan. The motion Was seconded by Mr. Kirk. The motion failed on a roll call vote of 3 to 3. Mr. Segal reported that the Zoning �rdinance requires 4 affirmative votes in order for a motion to pass. Mr. Grais made a motion tp table this matter until January 8, 1980. Mr. Parrish Seconded ths mqtion. The motion passed on a roll ca]1 vote of 6 to 0. . Submitted by: A�proved by• ,� ,• , � . � � ��L��2 � �n�'�-'—� .�-��_ =/y Ldur�n�g �, � ,a ' Gladys MorL`on, Chairman MINUTES OF THE MEETING OF THE BOARO OF ZONING APPEALS IN CITY CO�NCIL CHAMBERS, ST. PAUL, MINNESOTA JAP�UARY B, 1980 PRE�SENT_: Ntine. Morton; Messrs. Grais, Kirk, Parrish and Woods of the Buard of Zoning Appeals; Mr, Jerome Segal , Assistant City Attorney; Ms. Lane and Ms. 6ijjani of the Oivision of Housing and 6uildinq Code Enforcement; Ms. Beseman and Mr. Jung of the Planning Division St�ff. AB_,_,_,SEN,�T: N1ne. Summers �nd Messr. Peterson. The m�etin� w�S Ghaired by Ms. Gladys Morton, Chairman. RICHARO MILLER (#8545); An appeal for variance of setback requirements from bTu��;ne�u�T'cT a single family house and business in an I-1 Industrial Zone laC�ted a�' 257 Ohio. The site is located in the Urban Diversified pi;txi�t pf�the R1ys� Gorridor Critical Rrea. � The ap�ellant wd�� pr�sent. There was no oppos�tion present at the hearing. Mr. Jtlnq, report�d this matter had heen iaid over from the previous meetinq and thd� th�r� �� been no further documentation or testimony received. Ms. Mprtprt r�nindeQ the 8aard that the public hearinq portion of the meeting had �een' clOsQd .but: recognized Mr. Pangal , representinq the applicant. Mr. Pang,al testi�ied that Twin City Testing has been asked to make the borings and they have been aut to the site to look at it but they are going to qo back and make the- actual test borinqs. He asked that this matter be laid ov�r until th� next meeting at which time they wi11 have the results of the tes� borings. Mr, Kirk dSked the City Attorney about ti�e limits on matters before the Board and it WdS explained thdt the ordinance requires that a hearing be held within 30 days and that a decisioM be made within a reasonable time. Ne said that sinc� �he appell�nt 1s requesting� the continuance, there should be no problem. Mr, Grdis commented that this was one of the concerns raised at the last me�ting as to whether the land is suitable for building and since the appellant has contraCt�d With the company to do the test borinqs made a motion to lay this matt�r over until January 22, 1980. Mr: Parrish seconded the motion. Th� motiqn Rassed b�c a unanimous vaice vote. ' Submitt�d b�: Approved b,y: j ,�r�r�C+��' /� ` �� ' :�� '+��. l�� i�- ' � � � .,.�,.E �• �L, ,' � La�r�r1C� J, aung Gladys Morton, Chairman MINUTES� OF THE MEETING OF THE BOARD OF ZONiNG APPEALS IN CITY COUNCIL CHAMBERS, ST. PAUL, MINNES4TA JANUARY 22, lggp PRESENT: Mne. Morton; Messrs. Grais, Kirk, Parrish , Peterson and Woods of the 8oard of Zoning Appeals; Mr. Jerome Segal , Assistant City Attorney; Ms. Lane of the Division of Housing and Building Code Enforcement; Ms. Beseman, Ms. McNeally and Mr. Jung of the Planning Division Staff. ABSENT: Mme. Sumners. The meeting was chaired by Ms. Gladys Morton, Chairman. RICHARD MILLER (�8546): An appeal for variance of setback requirements from bluff ne to ui'T�a singie family house and business in an I-1 Industrial Zone located at 257 Ohio. The site is located in the Urban Diversified pfSrict of the River Corridor Critical Area. Ms. Morton reported that the appellant has asked that this matter be laid over indefinitely. Mr. Grais made a motion to table this matter indefinitely. Mr. Peterson seconded �he .motion and the motion passed by a unanimous voice vote. Thg prop�rty owners within 350 feet will have to be renotified. $ubmitted by: Approved by: of '� � �r�� '� i�� Laurenc� J. Jung' � Gladys Morton, Chairman , , ... *�-- . �;�':'"'"""',. ;. � ;•M�ii�,'.: :o.� Cf�Y �F SAINT PAUL INTERDEPARTMENTAL MEMORANDUM DATE: January 23, 1980 T0: Mike Eggum, Valuations Division FROM: Ed Warn, Planning Division RE: Richard Miller Property, 257 Ohio, Zoning File #8546 Per our telephone conversation this morning, would you please give me a ballpark estimate of what it would cost to purchase the referenced property for park land. The property is located in an I-1 zone and is also subject to the River Corridor Plan and State Critical Area interim development regulatio�s which strictly interpreted prohibit any develop- •ment on the s�te. The legal description is Lot 6, B1ock 198, Irvine's Addltfon. The flgure that you will be giving us, in accordance with this request, wi11 be used in the development of tentative CI6 project requests. Thank you. EW/cc cc: Nancy West _ - �::�:� �•oO;=� ,,,,,;::,,.�,, CITY OF SAINT PAUL . INTERDEPARTMENTAL MEMORANDUM � .� f�� To: Ed Warn ., Planaing Division l�am: Mike Eggum ,�y�/ Valuations and Assessments 0 Date; F'sbru�ry 5, 1980 9ub�ect: Acquisition Estim�te - Lot 6, Block 196, Irvine's Additioa As requested ia yaur memo ot' �miaxy 23, 1980 we have done a p�e- liminary estim�►te oP the acquisitioa coBt of the above-referenced. Pr��Y- The fi.gure, which i� inter�d�d far budgeting purposes only, is �9s000.00. This Yigure may be higher the�n you antic�ated. Lot 6 i$ a lsrge lot th�t eacamp�sses not only the building site at the gr�de of Ohio 3t., but alao the supporting slopes and a sizable piece of praperty on the "flats". Also vacated partions o% W. Fairfield St. and Be11e Street he�ve appexently accrued to Lot 6. ��,TE:dm �c� .� h.�►�y ��- . ✓ Sub-Contract Agreement �s rr,.m.a.rm. � �� —� ��.n.s$ 4Xv . �r�a�.e�.� � � ' �.r��u.a�. co�aac�o�, �aa .�Y � �� th� Sub-oo�ractor . Fce d» oo�dd�tatian hereiaafba� aamad� �ur sdd Sub-contraatae cavfnaab and a�e�s wi�s�id C�o�traclor,as Lo�lowae PSv� Z9� Sub-aamlr�ebae a�t�w �o fmaiah aIl mstitial aod p�o�m ail wo�1�nrow�ry tio eo�ebe y�e � , for tbe abov�e namrd � aomordin� to tl� pLns and speeifica�aOS (details the�oE to M furnid�sd � s�d�d) o� Asehit�c� and to t�e tnll �s�c�a a�a�id �ir�at. Ssoaws�. T!�Snb•coat:aceae s�w to pi+am�ly bRin :sid wosle as soa�as aotidd bq e�id C�tracboe, aad to oompiaq t6e worl�ar follow� • , Tt�m. Tlf� Sub-�ontraetior shall talu out and pay fa� Worbnen's Campe�satiam md PuWia l3abilit�► lmura�s. ai�o �Y�and all other�►insurano� as re�,luired bY the Own�s, Ca�traat�ce by th�e Stsbe in wLich t6is woelc � p.�1�m.a. Fotta�sa. Th�Sub-oaotraabor ai�all pay all 3alas Ta� Old Age Be�$t aad Un�ployment Compe�atio�Taaes upon t� a�sLl md Lbae fivaishad vad�t t6is a�ntsact, as raquirsd by tls� IInitad 3tat�s Governmeat and th� Stst� ia �rhich tbis �vock is p�6oem�d. _ . Pbsa. No e�ctta wark a� e}�n� undez t1�is e�traet will b�raoo�imd or paid�, unlw a�+ead to in writtag befa�e th�work b�ae tht cba�es ma�L. S�s Zbis ao�tract ait�ll not b� asai�d b9 th� Sub-contracb�r witbaut &st obdiai� P�miadoa ia writiag fe+o� th�� C.o�saetae II�i CONS�ID�RATiON W�OF� thR s�id Contra�ct,a�aQt+�as tbat l�t wfII pay to tta s�id Snb-000�aeto�, ia_._.�r. f�`'! pa7m�ts, tl1�svm ei =�iL�G�lGI'> Dollars for aaid mat�rLis md w�rjc,said amouat to b� gaid a�follawe__�� Pa'�eeat �,� °�O) ai all lsboe aad matari�l whiclt ha�bam pLood ia podtioa b7 a�d 3ub-cantraebor�to be paid on oe abou!th�.—��iub-e6� o�f t6� montl�► excePt � � WY�k which � add Contracbor sball p�y to th� aa�d tracto� witLin C�� th��actae sball l�w compl�bed his wo�tk t�the tull�ctfoa at th�aid As�i�ict oe Owner. Th�Caatsacbor aad tlx Sub-ca�ntra¢bo�tor th�mwlv�,their suoceaozs,�eu�rs,administratozs a�asd��SebY gS� to th�fnII per�a�nm�no�a�tbt o�v�nb a�this a�t II�i WPPNF.43 �V�REOF, t3� hsw euecutsd tbL a�eeemrat th�day md date writt�abow. Wita� Su craccor � By > ?,-' .o�ew �as Br Mip.IN U.A A rRANIf R.w/WCL�Cp.MrR1MIp1s,p�ICA�p . .. � r� ` SUB?EBBAHEA�i �'°".:�° �� ... �6�6` j�C, a�. - * �E8, 12 u� 7415 Weyzate Blvd., Suite I i I P�1'i��•��,,. �( blinneepotis, Minnesota 55426 Job Nem� Job Na �. ,o�� ' • � ST Sz � � c�+�s�r�� "'� C1t.er � ArriWJob �ll�� A.�MiI!s9�� y�� u Totd (j o.o.rt�ob �� : T�r�,. 1 �T - �..�. 2 1 � l.b.rn�. � � Totd Howa ' On Jeb Rsoort T'un� �°f Tie�nea� �/°r �9 Swviea� pwform�d, fneluding R�Id Ti�! Data�'. L.oesFias, 8wation�. �nd D�p�C a� Th; � ernoertv is 1.,,-�+. on t(�e southe*1 y sidesl p�__of the �; «i «; en� R;ver vall�v A heuse with attach�d g°r°9� formerlY accun�•cl �h; � 1 n 6 �+ the hauee 6 �*�.r1 dewn and th� debri � h.,t 6ee•+ r e.�,...e�� l.n..�g ,� enl X �eme enr+i.+ns af th fa�•+�•++;,,., The owner now d �i rE.t + ,a ir� h i n n�w � heu�� +n r elase the ald nn tY with enr i ��.1.+� attent;nn tn th ste6i 1 ; +�Qf the slnp� at th� r -er or n°rtherlv e�d ef thr lnt W wer� ta DlQCare a renort ef o�r f. .+�; �.+�` w1 ��1 r��nmm nrintj.ans for t�'ie nCW E1n �e� Corfetr��in.� To assi�+ us w{th e �r werk w� were orovided with a ��r .��t�,� of t�e °rQ�`�Y� a�d a olan nf the pr°aes d n _rr 6 �t ia;.,a PR�CEDI�R • . The property was inspected by the undersigned, in the company of t�r . Miller. . oisn�iaunoN , < 3 c,e. I��1R_ ��AR� ��r��r� �, �f C C. �I L� � RAN N ENGI E�RING INC. � Fi�id T�:t Oets is utim�t�d p�nd�eq finel isbontory t�st nwlh. �GIS7�el�7roN �o. 8�35 .. 2 ,, Approximate measurements of the adjccent uphill and downhill slopes were mode, using a hand level and optical typ� measure. The slope materials were sampled cnd identifiad. OBSERVATIONS : Since the house was rozed, several truckloads of building bedris have been dumped on the property. This include large blocks of concrete and mosonry, a�d old building lumber . The downMill slope is approximately 28 ' to 30' high, ond consists of St. Peter sandstone. There is some vegetation . cnd smoll tree growth on this slope. . There is a limestone ond masonry retainfng woll on the westerly face of the slope, which serves to protect it from erosion. , A series of corrugated metal arches similar to culvert ' sections have been op�lied as a facing around the entire top o the slope. These ar� rock-bolted or tied beck into the send- stone below, and also serves as a deterr�ent to slope erosio�. The attached sketch plan shows the results of our survey of the entire slope_ cross-section at the proposed house loca�i n. There er� absolutely no evidences of rocicf alls or i�stcbility of either the uphill or downhill slopes, but there is. normol weothering of the slope faces. . RECO�IMENDATIONS AN� CONCLUSIONS: The slope is presently not in its natural conditio�. It has actuolly been cut and shaped to its present profile. The construction of the Ohio Street roadway, which creates a leve .� terrace half way up the slope, is actual very beneficial to th ; overoll slope stability� ,�:�_�:;.�Y SUBTERRANEAN ENGINEERING INC. ;� : - � 3 -,�� r It is our considered opinion that the slope is stable cs is, and no remedial measures are required. It is recommended that the new house walls should bt kept at least 7 feet from the top edge of the slope, and tha the northwesterly� corner of the garage should be at least 5 feet from the slopa edge. The house and garage footings should be bosed direatl . on undisturbed St . Peter sandstone. Fill should be imported as� necessary, and the yard graded in such a man�er that the front and side yards droin down toward Ohio Street. This is very importont, and will minimize eny tendency for weathering and erosion of the , '� slope. , .� The existing vegetation� on the downhill slope should not be disturbed'o Debris that may be existing o� the slope should be cleaned up manually. � ` � ` . : � . ,=:��a:;. $UBTERRANEAN ENGINEERING INC. ' x x MINNEAPOLIS. MINN. � • . / �,� ` �NrQ��ra ��` � ' . . � � rrirlsnaN� • • , , -�` , l�► , ' r�£ -�SZ 4 � ��, ' . . I— . �(''�� h r--i�.J1 '� A • t / 3do-►s No �� ' � � . M HLro02t�1 33�1 `� �-- . , � � � , --�- , : ' , . •; � , . ; i ' v - j ' W�� . ��`� �� • � a. 0 , �°�r - � � �+ , �I � v , a _ �._ . � � ., w .•, ! • .,� I • ao 3,�r-r �titi 3dob�, �a�3� . + , � . ° � • w • �l dM 3a ls :s i � . !-r� . � ''_'�_, , O a . M • • � 1 , ,�,� .pr 'M � . V N /�YA�Q VO� � �' , � �y N � 'jS• O i}�O • 1 . • . ' 1l) r+ ' • N N . . � � • Ir O ;� � � . , V S » • ' � Z e � J � ,p► � • . � +°�i� < < • Q l� . � �• m � � E �+1 . ' S �r � • M cr }- d � X � �Fl;51 • • i8 2-,SZ , , , , , ' � I `V . ' • • a i r .' . , � , a I � 3 ti, �°, � . . . , 9G � � W W � � _ ` Q '+ T� N N � � ' . J � � 3 � W' , ' L41 � v J = a. � • • • , ,� � Z P4 � N � �► V� lj w � � � „�j ' ' � ' � ` _V � 1 � 1- a �' ' , :P� � , � P� W � � 1 ' 7 � O � � , � � � � S. �r �� . � � � � I � . � ' ri �r 1-'.-".;;r�. „� � ' `�.,� �� •�,c;. � � � , o � � .�� • � /' y.�. ��j ,= ,�� . � ��'�i • � t .Y� •�♦ +iiI i- �. i �• il I I. . � �itil �'��yl� �I�� s ill. . ' w._ ,,�, ��_ ��.s;:�r.,�,,�., �� r ,�„��,��; ��, � F � �,�� , [�` �� _�� . �--_�: �, � � e-_ ; ;`,`�:` ��ri' Ic. !. 6: ' +i j_ . ,i f :��:,. �," , ��Y � .��h�• 111 . �� + . , � ..�1� i IU 1t+, � � i Il� ! .� �� 'Y�� - ' �! .. .� � ♦ 1 �n:f,. �'.�4�5 � ' 7 ,'ti1�i —�'+i � �. .��;a,.iz ��4 • �� .� • i. . .��. . �.�i�: t ...z, :� . = ..� ,,,�.��; � ,�: �::� �_, �� ...�. ; _'�:� �-4u��'�'�� . ,.j'..I`• at� •�... ? .�i,�.' �`.� ��I r^� sw-.. ♦' :s� �y ,� I � �1s• 1�� •�• 7 �.... .�1 i�,.�* `��f:`-s+y�.s' -�zi'tl'� — �' t '1��•*��r :.�� ^m-t.S.R_' • - . .v'� '..,�,# �"`��• ��: ..��s�•� - , ,�.* _ `� �j � .�� `'�(;j� ' �i��{.!�/• • �� `�_ �� . ` �� •., ��„�a .`� ,'µ �� :� �' y�� d+r�i �� • `',;,� _)._ v i!i• �y ��i�.%_ �� . :�� ` `Q �� .� :�:�j *,.�i:.►'��'�.� �.��'•�;� � • •�� :iil• .°il' •i�,: . .�i��,� �� ..�.�� •� �j�`-,�� .�.. � I i _. 't,��.� '� • •♦ ��-� �I`� �s��'j � �.� �� ✓ • � , � �. .� • �•��w�� ' : .' �� ii��`�i, �i �fi� , ' ,�• t I� ,�� .. \1 . • . � � � - ' ,_ ��, . .'�• <� � ,` � '.," -- ' � , � �` ' � 7 - i t ..� � �. �•'�.'` � •�. ..� ;��. ,_ � L • • �' •. � .'• � , '� � � �`�>` ��j�• '� / � x' 1�r � � �j�� ';.�ti�• iw.��:�� • \•.� '� !�. �'� w� � y�� •,' . .� ��f ••��f 1< � �,��.� ��A � �ir` �-��,..� �� i� � ♦ ��• �� J � �� , �� ►y �Y �1 � �r a \ _ ��f "��' ��i �: �y �.� . .... •.'+:. •, ;. �� t�1�� ,� •� \ � ,... �'=i '. �; ... � . �.�r ,►��,��1�� : �,��~^� �� !. ' �"i : ' � � • � � /�. •�N�� .i, • ��'�� J/ µ •��w��.. ♦� �� j�.��, � '� ��^"""`"""t �. �, �j`�j � -4�t�� b � •� �♦ .�:- ��.��i, ♦ �si. � �� i .� '• ' 'I� •,� r'� � � ^' •~� ��' i�i �'�f�4. �. .� � i;` � : : {� • �, � ..� ,, , t, � v , w ,.� r,�,. . � � � �,, � �� ( I � � ��•;. �, �� a 1. �i.• ,.'� i �i � � • �� -�r i � �� i � � 1 •�L ..T . �I ' •� � • • ,/J��WI:W�� . .., ll� � ,�� 4 ��, i n��R• - � . , n � �i . �; �� i R.��.te� •a�'\ .:i�..�- �.t ` '_ `' y i � � � .� . -k w'`•. „r,�� ,:• ' 1 M � ��i� � K�..•r �� ♦ �+ �'!�'. \ . I .�� ' �• r :.' + . ., ��,:.. � �i• .�.��.- . .� . �.1`:\j�� , � �1F��L��'��. �/ ' : �Z�� •�,�� .,,�. �;��,� . •'� '" ��• ••,�`� ��'-_....,� � � ,�:,.��.y.- �I�?' ��. - i,a ��`:'�l►��'��'';I`=�'L� 1�� c,��t t��t...'. • M �. ��jt��, �' r •�r.�,�i�� J /. � �y�i1 ..�� - a `�� . . �. � �� .��;: v-. • ', `�-:.�-�� '�' . ` , <�f M � / ; J' � 't � i MINUTES OF THE MEETING OF THE BOARO OF ZONING APPEALS IN CITY COUNCIL CHAMBERS, ST. PAUL, MINNfSOTA FEBRUARY 26, 1980 PRE,� SENT: Mme. Morton and Sumners; Messrs. Grais, Kirk, and Parrish of the Board of Zoning Appeals; Mr. Jerome Segal , Assistant City Attorney; Ms. Lane of the Division of Housing and Building Code Enforcement; Ms. Beseman, Mr. Torstenson, Mr. Jung and Mr. �Jarn of the Planning Division Staff. ABSENT: Messrs. Peterson and Woods. The meetin4 was chaired by Ms. Gladys Morton, Chairman. RICHARD MILLE�#854�: An appeal for variance of setback requirements from bTy�t"T�ne�to u TcT a single family house and business in an I-1 Industrial Zone located at 257 Ohio. The site is loca�ed in the Urban Diversified District of the Rive�r Corridor Critical Area. The a�ppellant was present. Ms. Mprton stated that this matter had� been laid over from the meeting on January $, 1980 1n order to allow time for the applicant to have borings done o� the property. She reminded the Board that the public hearing portion of the me��ing was clo�e�. Mr, P�angal , representing the applicant, reported they have received the results from th� Subterranean Engineering Inc. in Minneapolis. It is recommended that the new house walls should be kept at least 7 feet from the top edge of the slope, and th�� h� northwesterly corner of the garage should be at least 5 feet from �he �lop� edge. The house and garage footings should be based directly on undisturbed St. Peter sandstone, Fill should be imported as necessary, and the yard gr�ded �n such a n�anner that the front and side yards drain down toward Qhio S�reet. ThiS will minimize any tendency for weathering and erosion of the slope. A.lso, the ezisting vegetation on the downhill slope should not be distur�ed, Oebrfs that may be existing on the slope should be cleaned up manually, He said it has been 13� months since Mr. Miller's house burned down, he Wpul� like tQ rebuild and asked the Board to grant the variance. Mr. Parrish made a motion to grant the variance based on the fact that the �ppliGant is presented with a hardship, the site was previously occupied with a Single fami,ly home, the proposed use would be allowed in the I•1 zone, the prOposed Construction an the property would not alter in a negative way the essential Character of the site and it is in keeping with the intent of both int�rim deYeiQ�nent regulations and the Mississippi River Corridor Plan. He a1SO added that th� stipulations in the soils report be observed. Mr. Grais seGpnded the motion. The motion passed an a roll call vote of 4 to 1 with M$. Mor�pn voting against the motion. � Submittgd b,y: Appraved by: - �� / i �� ' � r�� . ,�� ✓ „ , ' L.ayr�nCe J. �un � Glad s Morton, Chairman 9 y _«:.� �:y<_.��a.w.•:.r_ � . � . ....._ .:� ..• ..a�». � . .. �� -- � Iq�/�—AMdavN o(S��vlc�� Mdl. (R��Ipd i�72) -- � � �ta�tc of �i�nc�cora� .�AOY-MA�YUL15 CO. fT.�4{iL,NINN. �� • fs� County of---....Rdl11SEy...--.- . ._ ..- - --- ....._--��- - -•- --..._ .-- . au.r.�nce...J.._._,lun.g---------------------- . , being first duly sworn, deposes and tay that on .._Mdl"Ch.,.12-----..--.. -- _...-----�---...._._.......... .......... ...�--.........-------�---. ._._..------- ---�------.... . , 19.8Q--•-, ........._he reraed the attached..-----�$.�4( •---•--•-•--------------•--•----••--._.......................----...... i chard Mi 1]er "��- ..... . .......................................................... ...... -- ..upon.._...-----...------ ...-� - .... ........ .......� --......-•--•--....__...--•--.........._. attornr -•-•-•--.....•.....................•-----........ Y-�-. or..-�............ .. . - . . - -�---�-- ... .__.... . ------ .....-�---- ------- -- --�'y Placing a tra� _ ......-�-�---- ...--- �....................•-•--••--•--•-------•---•-•-- aa co�sect copy thereaf in an envelope addressed a.s follows: �� Miller Maine, Harriet Island, Slip 13, St. Paul , MN 55107 (which u the lost known address oJ said attorney) cnd depositing ehe same, wit/t postage p�epaid, in t/ts Unittd States maiL �r._........St-.---Paul. _ , Minnesota . .. ................. ... ...... .....--�--..._-.--...-- Su6scnbed n�d ,ru�vrn to be/ore �ne this....12th._._._.., dayoj._....March....t ,�M� ��tmrn� c��:��s.r.�.. .+ ......................•--•-•-••-•---••--•- •-�� ..._.._. ............................_. tt��'��•. �/OUR�i'J�'.�L••I•�...k:JiA � �' ��`� khhl:,.Y �� ..''f�l � MY�'u'wu•s O�c.li. 1985 .i�F��!�!!�v�-.....(.. ....�. .1.__.,.�.............................................. ••-••..c ..NO�Qt'� .-.----....�. — ._____�___.. ... _ .1 , . _ - . _._. _ _ ,, : , ;. . i city of saint paul board of zoning appeals resolution zoning file number 8546 _.. date �...�s$�____ WHEREAS, RICNARD MIILER has applied for a variance from the strict application of the provisions of the Mississippi River Corridor Critical Area Interim Regulations pertaining ta rebuilding a single family dwetling with a business use in an I-1 zoning district; and WHEREAS. the Saint Paul Board of Zoning Appeals conducted a publlc hearing on December 11, 1979 pursuant to said appeal in accordance with the requir�ents of Section 64.203(a) of the Legislative Code; and WHERfAS. the Saint Paul Board of Zoning Appeals. based upon evidence presented dt the public hearing, as substantially reflected in the minutes attached. made the following findings of fact: 1. That the applicant would incur a substantial hardship if reconstruction of �he site c0uld not occur as�proposed. 2. That the site was previously occupied for many years as a single family hcme. 3. Thet the prnposed business use of the'property is not in conflict with tho zoning district in which it is located. 4. That the proposed development would not alter in a negative way the essentlal character of the site. 5. That the proposed reuse of the property would be in conformance with the intent and purpose of the Interim Development Regulations and the Mississippi River Corridor Ptan. NOW. THEREFORE. BE IT RESOLVEO, by the Saint Paul Board of Zoning Appeals that the proyisions of the M9ssissippi River Corridor Critical Area Interim Regulations be hereb,y waived to allow construction of a single family dwelling wlth a whotesale business and that the house be no closer than 7 feet from the top of the edge of the slope and that the northwest corner of the garage be at least 5 feet from the slope edge and other recomnendations in the engineering report in accordance with the application for variance and the site plan attached hereto. , � � �Q�/�?d b�/ Mr. Kirk Decisions of the Board of 2oMng � seconded b Mr. Woods APPeals are final sub�ect to appeal �/ to the City Council within 30 days in favor �_ by anyone affected by the decision. � aga�nst � GTY OF ST. PAUL • DEPARTMENT OF FINANCE AND MANAGEMEN? SFRVICES , ASSESSMENT DIY1510N 2 1 S CITY MAII ST.PAU4�NNfSOTA 5510I . April 18, 1980 City Planning 1101 City Hall Annex St. Paul MN 55102 File X 2423 Page Zoning File 8546 1 The Council of the City of St. Paui will hold a public hearing in the Council Chambers of the City Hall and Court House (third floor) at 7c30 P.2d. on May 7, 1980 on the: Appeal of the �est Side Citizens' Organization and the West Side ITA to a decision of the Board of Zoning Appeals affecting property at 257 Ohio Street. This property is located on the west side of Ohio Street between Isabel and Plato Streets and is legally described as: Vacated � streets accruiag and Lot 6, Block 198, Irvine's Addition to West St. Paul.. If you would like further information about this hearing, contact the Current Planning Section of the Planning Board, Room 1202 City Hall Annex -- 298-4154. While the City Charter reQuires that we notify you of the hearing, we want to help you to learn fully about any improvement that could affect you or qour community. Therefore, I sincerely hope you can attend this -hearing, so that you can make pour views about it known to the City Council, whether for or against. J. WILLIAM DONOVAN VALUATION AND ASSESSMF•NT ENGINEER . �� ii1! r� M�N •rN�N I�IIt : �1s�N� ~� � !�� t�NM��t " -. � � � < _ ; �t. , � ' .. �� ; 1�►ww a��r ; I . �` '"1�� ; � : �. ,: . � *��+� ' }. , , , _ „, < ��. � r► � sr,,w w�w+r�� ,� ' �n � Mw► : ��.ww� ,.. � • � � ,,� ; w� w�w. � �,�w.r► • •SN!=M s��M1 ;, ' ,» -a�:: y.,�. .a i.�,�, ',��,�, �,� . .. � v:� i�� ++' '0 �':�''�r� _�;,:�� ,J�. �>�rr '�+ ^��L�+s�.�ae F �.,��'r' '*"_ y�" r . .. . . .. . . �,�a . �; . _.. ' " _ F � m'4 � ' xf �' � � ' ,,,, aexE�� ,� � i • ^ � - .�`�,��. � ; '�y,��.w1aW�',r .a . . . �. � . . . . y� '1�/. J: ,:r �IFNE ��.�. i .� ; � . ..�� . . . . .. �� :.� S- .,,. - � .,..: , .. . �.�. `` ;.... ' ` .:Y �,-, � . . . . : �.. . "' . s � • �.�.. . � � ' ' , '. . .`,. ��R��. � .. . .. , � • �s � . � � ��'�� . . . � � . . _ ��A 7N- .. � .. .. . � � . �� . . .. � � .. �. �� w��K��.��:. � � � � . �. � � � .' � _ . � .' . ' � �i/W',.. • . . � �. �" � � �� ' � ��{�� . � � � p � �f A�7'N w�w � ��p�N p 1{T� �' fii.� f��t��Yt M wC � �� '~ � � • ��. �. ��1i� � � � � � � � 1�7 �v lf�R•!� � U!� � p � w�i�w M +..'"` � a �.: � �• • ''i''�. �O ai �s+�.n+• ...►: i �' '� '� 'M � � � • N t � � N � � )i!. �. It��ff ! Ii 7�N � N ��, �� 1wf 1�ON � �ilr � M . •0� ii �wrf�N rwnfw � .�i.:ii p �i �as Nf N tM . �, t!�! 1dM / ♦ �i ��Nr �, Nb � .N � 1. )1. �e N� 1 • A '1�1 1 � �� : .�..�... �. . ' �w Mt M►;:► t�:in � � �:� • , N � wt � � I � l � �,�w;a cs� w�� "v.� ' �.�� ' .�u � •� pp � ts,�SS usa.E e t->> OD N .00 � f3,�S i-11 ,00 _ Nt- M�t• ' Fl IIN.N �NNN�N�N��N��N�H��N��N��N�HN�N�NN�NN��N1��1N1N��N�N�NN�N��jN1�N��HN��• •��1��•.•�.• l�a1�1�00/•i?�♦!�1 � TM NMIM Ni� �• (� OMlrO+�r .► �� at �w�►w . �n��+v a� � Y n awrr �. ��Ilii�M� l�t � .� = I]I�� , �;.� l� r, �.N �1`HIt• ��1 Y rtrt/� K�H K�A 11 ft �wl A� ft w► �I�w f/�Ot . ' ' �:' �ewt ; ,,,,,��,« ; ;��a �� • ��rt t�n e� wt �� i: pt�i f17»t�► M�p�f/-10 �.�l; riw +�n M � � � : � ; :� YN/t t �11 �q: M�� Mit` � tt • 21�.M �MMNNN�NNN�NM1��N�NH�NNN��N�N�NNN��NNN�� HN�� M �� {�A�'��„ �� . . " �A � �M��A t! « i .� ,lh I�N�l7f flt 10 Att'� 7�11� tli T�R .� N K. ��r�w t �� !�� 113 r r1Min fT►Mlt �I�I �11[N��`1N1� 3 �f ri��sEft1�1 N,L� T�2 rMt �ta1RM�{ 1M 1111t ; 1� S3f TOTAL 1,�1• 1� RY' 1 *A p?��`� Y{AII f•11 .� IK� NlN� �� 1= .� ...»....... �NMe� N1• ■ 1S M N » T�t �[RAT �NM N I�Oi��N h 11�rtt O �MI�l I�Q A 1 lT�IrT VA�� Cl �ft'�Y�Ly� ?At �[K. O�/M A t N' �ll�i Z .� l r�4Y� CI �� 2�,Wf Eli 5��1�.12 lC' 11tM11M M E '� • 10,5�1 I� 7i� I� �.10 � 1N��lYi� ��mca ss»o � �� . s�-us s'��s~c., ttM s �,o��r► vt- tmres �w� �� t,�u:» n.w �u� ro . n�un� st.wi. � :�t.» �o us ror� w,�� u s,vot.0 { 3,902.�2 tfT wcf �AL ►-11 tt2.7� �� .� l 2i,60� usAit c t-11 00 ~ �� T 70�t�S i�11 112.7� �OC- N1T[• ' /2 1,01S.W �N�MMf�N�NN�MNNf�NH�N�M��M��NN�N�M��M'NN��HMH �� 2�M��♦ » T11� �1l�LAr 197i •• i�Oh7�010 M� 0� T�t� 01�IE� 01 IM1�i1pE pplq 00 IIK 1 .� LT�I�tT Y�t Cl i AIt'P VALy� TAt M1SC. R=�� J � 2f2 iAqii��[r 2 .� l 2�,2i2 CI 1) 12,250 fti �.SN.1� lt• �lulEtlw ft I�1�IU Sf/07 �0.-Nif � i� 31� F� 7�.1� � 20S Y v(�IN M![#1IfIA 3 .00 St►wl Mir �su: �r�i�i°� s ui:i �-ets im.ES a�: f�1 tp sT t YK s►s � N�.]` rtw �c� ro . �� 7 tOp.l3 2� 222 TOTK 12�SK t0 1,125.92 • 1,�25.92 EIT MtT �� ►-11 151.20 iA .� l 2�,22s YtAi[ C i-11 .� q� .� • T•11 151.20 . T 2�,22t 12 1,777.12 ' ..•......... �•��• M T� �I11LA� IV ••~ �•~N•~�'�••••••s••r IO Oh36010 I��!'M-� �1�a TA1/1t OM�ER d IM�/�NllCit 1K 1 1,5/0.10 CL = Aff'0 vALilE TAIf 11ISC. �� ` �~ j ,� � �}� � 6Q 11,67A Eli 1,510.10 Lh 20��LMIfRE � �ElifII1i011 S~Sj j�• .� � n•7l2 � fT ►q0. � �� ANI�OD � 3M.� SO-62S I�viME��e� �R tN �O�M S i21.'t YT� Ro� TO MI T� f►�KL 0/ VK • 6W.5� 'IlV' 197! ��{. 7 •1.5� N � TOTAL 11,636 10 1,510.10 • 1,510.10 EfT MfT �µ, ►-11 52.70 111 .00 l 3��7� UiKE A I-11 .� 9� .� • 7��3V T-11 S • T �t,N� �ATt' 1t 1,562.l0 ��NrN`� N�N�N��tNf�N�� f��• •��M�� • I��♦ ,. T� io �-Tt0�0 0� �?�R7� OwE� 6 YM! A�J� ��ELlOM 1 1�StA.K 61►M(T Y CL t A{E'p VAl{►� T1Nf M15C. ��'" � � 231 Y Il� iT E 2 725.� L 11�� N IZ 3,�00 El6 1,516.�! 1C�0661 ouT fT IMI� � SS107 �- ! 30,�At E 36 l,2N MC 325.00 M 2�: E YTII ST � �tlptltI� ` 'Y.� SO-d2S �tSCR ��. yT_ IRVINfS �00 � YlV- 19I7 ilK 200 TO 1�1q»��f ' � 7 61.�1 ♦1 tN TOtA� tt,bl� 10 t,tit.lA �o� • • 1,St�.p [IT IRT � h11 l6.l� iA pp l 11,� YfAiE A 1�11 � v� 3tS:00 i si'7s� r-tt 7e:q pC• �ATE- � 12 1,2N.7t �MNMrNM�NNNNN�NN��M�NN�M�NN�N�N��N��I��N��f��N��NH�'1�l�f��N��Mf�ffr�� 1`� „ , �� t�M��N�N� « T�t �ifrlA� 11� •• I le Oh�iO�d /��M fArMtl :�R J [�� t V�1.O2 lT� IR? VA� C� i Af1'� VKtI[ TAt MISC . k�T � � /MM t M�tMOM A t IQS.� l �,�a � �t �,uro El6 91t.p2 lt-0��1 2t� � r[�It � t �' • 11,7W E 3A ),�51 NC 32S.Q0 D9 it ry� w �1 Illlll � SS10f ) .00 rt� �ESt� �[tU11►tf0� � t�0.� So-�15 t• �r� IM7�Nf tp�til� e t3M.1• VT- Kc '� TO 1LV� 1J71 2�\h� �j� l J�.SS 2� i5t �Orµ 7,151 �0 e16.02 � 041.lu ESt N(T �K o-�t tS.50 •� .00 � �,�M uf�cE � t->> .00 � '=S•� T 3��15♦ t-11 15,50 wi.. n�tt� � 17 Att.Si � ►1�� 1 cl w�i-• rw■ w��. ��t :ii � .�.�. fs i� '�;�� `1 ',�ii;q • . • ,r,"�i `1�'�r�' t. /�1 � 4� , �'�� M �I� '� �� . � � �n M� r � � :' - ,� �; �� t�""'�.«� "� �; ��:,_ ��:-� � . �: ^y, .. ; y[.� �.�Z.` . . �i.c i� .. . .. � . � ,t 4.,. ��.• �� . . . . . ' . . �.� � � ��- ` ' - . . � . . n.� �� .,." `��, � - ..�.....«, . - , � +!�►�� .� _ �I�� :��"�'t� '� � »� . n. . a . .. �., . � ., . . ly y',s �5'. .. �. _. . ' �1Y� x. . _.i s,y.� . vs. . H. ... . 3:.,.c. i�, � . � .�� . , �� " �s�� « ` - S�� . �, ��-�� l�I� . , ,,: , — , . .. . , . . . . . . �,�_ �. . � > „ : . ., .,�j_,. -- s r . .�`�+' . _ :. _. ; -_ ' " �+Mw� �i . 6� . .y -,{.`� _ �ly {�� '+d"��'e� .. f`�y �', .. � -0, ' . .. . . � »:��.. .. .. ., � � 'q `A� �, 5 . 3 . .. . � " Kt. - v1F .'51`.: .�A' � :.G'. . � . . . . .. . .. � � ) � �� "c�'�.�, �`��l.;c. �w .`_�'' � ,.,'' � s� �3��,' . .. . � .I .� � .� ��'� , ' ,; � ? ':��'"�ir "'"` '�" �a`' ��, � ,. . � ... ... . ,.�.� - . � , �� '.� ��. , - ... �.: - � � "'.� �. '�,,, :' s..t,�. wr- �i,.. s� .tii/M11i 1!i!� • t� �� 'iM 1t: f .N� wMw.�� _ . � ` !'�•'�"� ,, _ ... � M.: � . � �. � �r '��.�.w..�; � ...;� �. �' It ' �� . � ' � r � . �, � . �. � w �Mf�IF 1M�? �� ' �M.��t w�[c �ii .. �. � �t �s.u- ......«.• • � �!1 �f �l�� lt� � �� N. �r . ��: Ms ti�s�s.�s �' . �� s � � ��!!s r ��'w� � �� »r� ��.�s ai� t�.� n�- �as � ,�r � f, .._N� � ` . � �. t 11 1� M�� MA!• 1.S7�.N ........� • �+�+t r�a ust nM � • a�ona�. ��.�« � �'�"�►�` � i�M•�• � '�t t.. �� . �!!':�: .� .«. . �: �t��li M 1� ��t� ,� �t0i i � K t;� �+sr r� � t ~�� ;:� T1�K t�� 1 � �• f). � ��NN��ii��iii�i��NN��• w'�'«�� N 9 • � �d w �- -� -• � C!i Y OF SAINT PAUL :�• � " � �.;�. DEPARTMENT OF PLANhING ,\NG ECU,v0��11C DEVELOPMENT . :: �. i�ii';i�ii : ' . L_1 ' a�v�s�ov oF P��tiihc ,... _".'i:'� ,; F��.�:'F �tre�Cl. Sdinl N2ul. ;�1�r.nc+Gtd. 551�2 GEORGE ;ATi��ER 61_•?98-4151 .ti�.��OR ;•'ay 1 , 1980 �ose Mix, City Clerk Room 3$6 C i ty. Fia 11 St. Pa�i , Minnesata 55102 . RE: Administrative Review of Richard Miller - Zoning File No. 8546 Oear M�dam: This is wr�tterr in response to the appeal for Administrative Review filed by the 41est Side Citizens' Organization and West Side ITA to a decision of the St. Paul 6oard of Zoning Appeals affecting property owned by Richard Miller. The subject site is located at 257 Ohio Street which is � on the north side of flhio halfway between the upper and lower levels of the West Side. The property is described as Lot 6, Block 198, Irvines �dditiort and includes vacated Belle Street. The matter was first heard by the Board of Zoninq Appeals on December 11 ,. 1979 to consider variances under the Mississippi River Corridor Critical Area Interim Development Regulations in order to reestablish a single fa�ily residence with a small business outlet on the premises. The site formerly Contained the residence of Mr. Miller until it was d�stroyed by fire in January, 1979. This is zoned I-1 under the City's Zoning Ordinance but lies within the State's Critical Area desiqnated "Urban Diversified" district. Under the dimension •variance sectian of the lnterim Development Regulations (I-3-b) , a 40 foot setback from blufflines is required of all nev� structures. Due to obvious physical limitations of the site and the � fac*. that it formerly contained a single-family dwelling, t•?r. Miller ?;�p2aled for a :•�aiver of these requirements so that he c��_�?d r�ebuil � 5 feet from the edge of the bluff. The variance reyuested ti�;a, `ar- 3� r<�e�. ��ar� recommendation was for denial . The Soard of Zoning Appeals , on December 11 , 1979, decided to lay tne matter over since a 3 to 3 vote to approve was made so that soil testing results regarding the site could be obtained. This delay was also due in part to concerns expressed by the Minnesota EQB in a letter dated November 6, 1979 as well as concerns by the Ramsey Soil and Water Conservation District. Sor�e neighborhood opposition was also present to indicate that this partic- ular site is not suitable for even a single family house and that the area has 5een identified as a "gateway" to the longer range River Corridor Linear Park concept connecting Cherokee Park with Harriet Island Park. May 1 , 1970 Page 2 On February 26, 1980, the results of the soiT tests ►�rere presented to the � Board which indicated the site could support a structure contingent to certain conditions being met. On a vote of 4 to l , the Board granted the requested variance based on the hardship factor to the applicant, the p•roposed development would not alter the essential character of the area, the use is a permitted use in the River Corridor Plan and that the cleaning of debris that has accumula�ed would enhance the site. On March 12, 1980, the West Side Citizens ' Organization Oistrict 3 Council unanimously opposed the granting of these variances and filed an appeal with the City Clerk for a hearing before City Council . This matt�r is scheduled to be heard bX City Council at 7:30,p.m. on Mav 7. 1980. Sincerely, .� pl�lz�a�'s1t� - Laurence J. ng� v City Planner � LJJ/mb Enc. � , _ _JOSEPH A, PANGA� 612-776-7535 1049 HUDSON ROAD, SA I NT. PAU L, M I NPIESOTA, 551�fi ��'� . April 30, I980 t�il�ifun McCutcheon, Chief of �o2ice •Saint Paul �o2ice Uepartr�ent 101 East lOth Street Saint paul, Minnesota 55101 RE: Property at 257 Ohio Street. Dear Cli�ef DZcCutcheon, On May 7, 1980 , the Saint Paul City Council will hear the appeal of the West Side Citizens Organizatian (ZVSCO) from that decision of the Saint Paul Board of Zoning Appeals which affects the property of Richard Miller at 257 Ohio Street. Information available to Mr . Miller and his representative, indicates your departments intention to testify in oppositian to the granting of a variance, at 257 Ohio Street, of the setback provisions under the Mississippi_River Corridor Crifi ical Area � Interim Development Regulations . To insure that Mr. Miller is afforded a fair opportunity to respond to your arguments in opposition, it is requested that he be advised in writing , by no later than tuesday, May 6 , I980 , of the basis for your opposing the granting of this variance. In addition to the information above requested, Mr. Miller also requests in writing, your answers to the questions on page two , and the fortvarding to him of all infarmation contained in your files relating to either himself of his property at 257 Ohio Street. With warmest regards Sincerely yours , JOSEPH A. PANGAL JP/rjk Representative of Richard Mil�er INCL PAGE T4�0 DEPARTMENT OF POLICE 1) The number and nature of a13 calls requiring police response to 257 Qhio Street for the three (3) years prior to January 3, 1979. 2) The number and nature of all calls requiring police response to 257 Ohio Street for the period subsequeNt to Jan- uary 3, 1979. 3) Has this location been considered a troub�e spot by the Police Department ? If yes , please explain fully. JOSEPH A, PANGAL 612-776-7535 . 1049 HUDSON ROAD, SA I NT PAU L, M I NP�lESOTA, 55106 � April 3U, I980 Mr. Thomas I�elley, D�rector •Department of Community Services Room 545 -- City Hall . , Saint Pau1, Minnesota 551�1 RE: Property at 257 Ohio Street. . • �..-L Dear Air Kelley, On May 7, 1980 , the Saint Paul City Council will hear the appeal of the West Side Citizens Organization (WSGO� from that � decision of the Saint Paul Board of Zoning Appeals which affects the property of Richard Miller at 257 Ohio Street. Information available to Mr . Miller and his representative , indicates your departments intention to testify in opposition to the granting of a variance, at 257 Ohio Street , of the setback provisions under the Mississippi River Corridor Critical Area Interim Development Regulations . � To insure that Mr. Mil.ler is afforded a fair opportunity to respond to your arguments in opposition, it is requested that he be advised in writing , by no later than tuesday, May 6 , 1980 , of the basis for your opposing the granting of this variance. In addition to the information above requested, Mr. Miller also requests in writing, your answers to the questions on page two , and the forwarding tQ him of all information contained in your files relating to either himself of his property at 257 Ohio. Street. With warmest regards _ Sincerely yours , JOSEPH A. PANGAL JP/rjk Representative of Richard Mi11er INCL . f PAGE T'�JO � DEPARTM�NT OF CONLtiiLA1ITY SERVICES Division of Buildin�Code Enforcement 1) The year (according to your records) this building ivas erected ? 2) tiThat was the zaning of th3s specific parcel (25?. Ohio Street) prior to the adoption of the current zoning code ? 3) �1�ter the January 3, 1979 fire, was hir. Richard Mi2ler instructed by the D�.vision of Building Code Enforc�ment to ttear down' alI standing structures at 257 Ohio Street ? - a) Where these znstructions given orally or in writing 7 . b) Was this demolition required by city regulations ? , , . �} In the opinion of the Division of Building �Code Enforce- . ment, is this site buildable ? 5) Does the Division of Building Code Enforcement have any objections to Tir. Miller rebuilding his home at 2S7 Ohio Street ? = Pleaso explsin fully. 6) Has ANY building permits been granted in this general area since January 3, 1979 ? Please list �LL per�its. 7) �9i11 I�r. Richard Am�y be mada available at th�s hearing ? • PLEASF FO:tV�ARD ALL ?�,ET�RIAL TO A4r. Ric2.ai si Miller $ P�Ir. J�serh A. Panoa]. 1049 Hudson Road Saint Paul, biinnesota 55I06 , PAGE T��10 DEPART�ENT OF C;Ob�A1UNITY SERVICES bivision of Building Code Enforcement 1) The year (according to your records) this building was erected ? 2) What was the zoning of this specific parcel (257 Ohio Street) prior to the adopti��lie curreh�uzsohing�cod� ? 3) After the January 3, 1979 fire, was Mr. Richard Miller instructe� by the Division of Building Code Enforcement to ' tear down' all tanding structures at 257 Ohio Street ? �'/�D� a) Where these instructions given orally or in writing ? �� w ° (��Gr�� v `� � b) Z�Vas this demolition required by city regulations ? !'GO r 4) In the opinion of the Division of Building Code Enforce- , , ment , is this site buildable ? �J'� � ��c-c�Zrl S) Does the Division of Building Code Enforcement have any � objections to Mr. Miller rebuilding his home at 257 Ohio Street ? Please explain fully. �GA=e'l.�iG�'e? �� 6) Has ANY building permits been granted in this gen �1 � �G� ��:��Z� � area since January 3, 1979 ? Please list ALL permits. 7) Will N�r. Richard Amey be made available at this hearing ? � , .�' NDM� COUL4 �3$ �!/L�' `,y T�jS �t!!S Tj�,��T �.t1D6rC> �jeDd[S/O�v S 4�• '�"�� /��} Z�a.t� �.t./6 CO�Oe�.� PLE�SE FORWARD ALL METERIAL TO Mr. Richard Miller $ Mr. Joseph A. Pangal 1049 Hudson Road Saint Paul , Minnesota 55106 "��"' CITY OF SAINT PAUL o�� o�Ra �� •��a . � DEPARTMENT OF COMMUNITY SERVICES � . �� ....,:,.� a�• ''�, �•• :>�' D►VISION OF HOUStNG AND BUILDING CODE ENFORCEMENT "'+h�,�.,.�� M5 City Halt,St.Paul,Minnesota 55102 George Latime� Mayor 612-298-4T12 Date: March 20, 1979 . -�1 Mr. Richard A. Miller a� 150 W. Page St. Paul, MN 55107 RE: 257 Ohio Street File #3440 Dear�•Sir: ` Upon inspection of the above property on March 19, 1979 our inspector reports the garage door is open. This letter will serve as an order to you to remedy this matter by securing this door and any other opening that is not secure. You will be allowed ten days from the date of this letter to complete this remedial action. You may appeal this order and obtain a public hearing before the City Council by filing a written request for a public hearing with the City Clerk not more than seven days from the date of this order. Unless the corrective action required by this order is taken or a request for a public hearing filed with the City Clerk within the seven days specified, the Division of Housing and Building Code En- forcement will remove this nuisance and charge all costs therein against the real estate as a special assessment to be collected in the same manner as taxes against the said real estate. Yours truly, � � . �.d.y� . Glenn A. Erickson Supervisor of Code Enforcement -• GAE:SRR:bmf cc: City Clerk � . . •, . , ✓ t �:�ril 25, 1979 .�ir. Ricliar�l A. ��iil��r 150 h. Pag� St. Faul, .dN 55107 RE: ZS7 t%32io Street Fil� t�44U Dear Sir or hiadam: ._.._ . Opon inspection of the above property on ,� ;rii ��t 1 ��L� our inspector reports the .iousa is not secured a:icl debris arouud tn� iiousQ. G3rab� is also o��en. 'l�i;is l�tter will serve as ati oriler to }�ou to rcmc�ly ti�is matter t,y se�curin� all windows anu doors oii thc house nnd �arage arid a:�y ot�ier oPenii3�;s that tre not secure and by re�ovin� $11 c:ebris a� k�epi�i� tlie yard areas free of dcLris. You will be al.lowed ten (10) days from the date of this letter to complete - this remedial action. You may appeal this order and obtain a public he�ring before the City Council by filing a written request for a public hearing with the City Clerk not more than seven (7) days from the date of this order. Unless the corrective action required by this order is taken or a request for a public hearing filed with the City Clerk within the seven days specified, the Division of Housing and Bui2ding Code Enforcement will remove this nuisance and charge all costs therein against the real estate as a special assessment to be coll�cted in the same manner as taxes against the said real estate. Yours truly, Glenn A. Erickson Supervisor of Code Enforcement GAE:TS:bntf ' cc: City Clerk 3 Q1N�PSilM��Ra s�► n�o�er��► 1��ieo'uNOS�rw rYR.�a��io�'�� . {�_ �� - �' �� y � . 5 . � t' '�% ��„ �'. � `a„ � ,��t$ t''G� 3�+,�. ,!r �,.+ 4. . ,� +.- '. t` ..-. � , +�; �. , ,�� F ' . y = �t � � .4 :MSIT ` r1NAl1R t p� la r wn �: � �. . . ,,,.».,:.-�z� ,�.,....� ;: . w ,:,: ,dl� ► i. .,,�..; '��..�"�I�qf �RIGINAL" -CONSTRUCTtON pER lTS� '�_-. °, '�' . ,: , �. � :`�`'`'� .�%.Y.'*�• .... '� . ,.. , ., ..�s ., o+�n+ . *�* ..�.. .�._._s . . . � � ��,. . � �.� ,� .r.- - a. 1�R M' ..TY�N -�. . �.c:{ �.+ ' TYri`OR.. aen P�ItMIT` „�•tAMTRACZ+flI! lRIMA7m� Rla�:. '. aow. ';._ o�. � -' t ••y �- /<!lMIT __ NUM6ER . <.�,..<_.. . ..COlT `t r71N1lc.. . �� ,' .r ��'` r .' . i, v BUIL�QING. - Y•t �::}N!� ' tktn;r x� i�0 , .. . Mo.oI s'i0111p•w�O�N. . '_- �.� �� .� ��; ��;#p :��'��'� �� __�'�'' IIDO F:. _ .1-2G =3 " �;,.�. �< ��. �: ^ Y� �,u., .:. ��; ,t,�, ��s �pntw urw, aers�ow.raesrra ocrauMr ur�rs-: ING �V: . G`.,� F-�',d�'�'. � L�;-'� in,�`. q:�: �. Yi� y,,,,+ _—(/�W�v . ��//y c`�'�r i �� +-.� �. :, �3 �� V+'°' d*` r'�"�' .� -'�' 1�`.�' �4 i•:� �� //(/(/ •.V �l� .�'�r.; x, x 4,.�.,.,- _ � �,A -i.� . . ,.. � .... . :.:......-�. �. . � . _ ,� " �� ;:. y �W.x ....'�� T e.w::;[ h��..',� ';y ` . .�._ .+i.�_, K�/'�IC'.C�lNIt J�.;..:'��.,�i`; . COOt- pO. OODt p0,. �COOf� MOI: OOa 1�106 OOOt EIiGTIl/C • _ __• - _ - _ �i. .. 1rt;. ..:.�; �.�y . a .�vr�-- ' . .' , .. { ."'v �`�. �d�,' ,. ._•� � ,�$ � �.y ;�. � ..- : �-... �. _,: . . . . . ... - �- � � ..:�. + j..�� :� 'n1 ... � .. . . . ,, . �'q" . . �. � _ _ . . .... ... . _ ^ .. � .y4'-?'. ' . . ..: . .. .!:.� .. � . . ' . .,...:. :, :^.� .L �.: HBATING $TtAMFtTTIN3 � � - . ' � . �� .. . _ ... t . ' . . � WARMAIR ^ . � . . , . : ' s, �r; . . . . . .� . �- ' �_ n. rR:. , �'s , . .. . ' _ . . . . , : -,.;� _�. .. . . . ; .�� . ' . _ . . OOOL �N4 LO. C�Ot� LO OOOt MO • COO< �.LO a , �� - .n. l, i^ ., .� ;i ti�ti s' � � �{.UMtiNO . : � � y�� r,' ..a,i? �.1. ' � k /L r .. .. �,�„ .f j ;:k � .. � . pY•.. • c' xµ Y• " -'�'" �h � ��-� �s' '�'�-'� :-: - . :,y� a r-�,.. � �� 3 �, � �' �'r: . . . . . r . . .+�. � � . �.., � �r� i T �> 1EVATOR _ ,,si. tnK . rerra� e� O� . . .. . . '�.. _ -� 4.�.,� . .,�-s�+��: � � . . iG[ OR SUILDING Ai Or ` TiDTK{iTiMAT[O , • �, "$'S- x_'�� J�NUARV 1 1!]� . I101 ' - _ q� ,.. ,l�...,..�„ .f . .•3 � ��" 8/l•S:f Y t��_ ,� :�. ! '< '-�: . � . i .X,�..{ .:y s��t 'v.,� ��4 S�'.+.akl �hEYk �wf''`+� � ,K��'y.(� d�`-+'._ ,-'��, �,.:. .- :' �..... Sy s71" � �QiC�• �, . 3U ING tERMI'i' INDS7t CARl�--ctrlror.�rrw{.oQ��rrwsKr or��rc�.rura�u�os�NO wwdc�u . - ^ Y Mr.w��wear«sa�.srw wrwM „ w, "�'; �; «�'�`' � '�'+�; t' f�� ' �i/ � .� � .� - . � , ;� �' r. ,�:: r � �� ..�r+. �' . � t.'� ' . .:'YS ��/1 � �� 1 .. �Yef_ �� a7ry�'{� ' ,h ,�wAl�n � l!f'*�r.OQ . 3TRiR �....�� .*t� �. + ,,,�y,� . 7RIGlNAL-CONSTRUCTION PERMITS owNCR � � `'L��*� " f3 �y. o.,,.e�-a.� � T�►�. .� � �.� , _ 7YR OI 1YIR Or . . . :� - � r.•,�' • Y, t 'M te TYrE OF o�7t riRM1T uar fbNTR�C.T01! pTIMATLO rrnu6 asN. . ., n. • s r:.;.. , PERMIT �fwtn NUMetI! ` �T � ,csr� T � �.. a...e�u ..�o.�..� �o.N.. •u�i.o�NCS 8•z 7` _ 3 vo �i o o , / 2 ti" _ Z $'• > ,_ .. .. 9�r 3 7/9 3 'G� � ,._ n�rcMOw uTM sxr�mow'u*rsw dcts�uaw.u�w� . ��: r�u►sTa.. S3r 38s zy - �%r'�� r p�.SX — p�:.:./. • ' - . �; iwcs � ':_ TYr� OF WORK DON[ ' r • cooe No. coot �w. eoo[ No. eoo� ra. eoo� No. ELEGTRICA -�j „� `h/. S'1�� ' �Oj•s� �00 /EA � � CO S^D� ,' 3y 379 s� ' �i yo Q,t S t �,�a �"'8 �' �D��3 - a'�• � • . H HtATtNG $T�'A4IRITTIN6 W ARMAIR � .'t' ' .� T� ! . � ]�"'�� T�O OODt NO. 1.�. COO[ No.LO. COO[ No.to. COOt MO.Lo �yVG{�� . /7 3y 3.74�2 � � 3 i i � � / P6 ; _ rl.UMe1NG .� �, � ""�' , — ,-� -�' P� �. I ��0 I � - . . . ... , . . . . I'JS. . . TY►t tOWM N0.0wCA1HU10.ML.D��. j:f.. , aLL.NATOR �E . � ' . : _ .. ;: , . ..._ AOE OF NJII.DIN� AS OR _ ; . TOTAt��iTIMATfa � .. � . CO�T 0/tU1LDIN . s� .. . ..... JANUARY 1 1f . �_ . - �- . . . .. „'�_ . . . ... ;AM.4. .Y�`-" . _ . . . .. . . _ . . . .. � ... + . , -.t�}_�_p. . .�, ,;. " .-G:-5:�..�- •�ti'��C% �K''� � �•' t f' `h�:S�K •� •i'f': t�1 .iij: s 'f.. .y• :4.''S -'�G. :f�w::•'.•:=:�: `K-.�' �'sY' :�Yf.- �y� '1.� :w�4•. `: .F f: ��$�:�:� �i�O�','��.titi�.��'�:r�.~ '••�'':�ti' �•�� :�w�� y��-!i��:�� 5.:�j�� .}y �yt1'1 .!C�.� '1 '�. ' v;::..:.: { .�'i:'''fj3 .�"� .�;. •'+A.G1� ' ' � .K;. .�4 :�7`S'."��:.' :�:Gt.�: :.f'.`-i�'!T(+" �v.lt:_ A'�.�'' :r1%'r:�':I.;y�^• .:j:ti �ti'�::; ' :f,.� '- ''"- �'" ;:✓. _ ,•y�� . ' -�.} •['�°•t .�"�`rt.;. -:=C�:_:%�:=:r::.�:��ti - -� . _ - � . � . ._=;.ci _ . _. _ . ' . . . . . . . . .. . . .. . . ... ..:T.^. , ^k-.r. . ._ ... .-. '�''r.. . . _ . . . . ... . . ... - . � di `�.�C.�� PAG E T��O DEPARTMENT OF COMMUNITY SERVICES - Division of Parks � Recreatiofl 1) . Has the Saint Paul City Council adopted a Harriet Island Plan or Development Concept as part of the Comprehensive Plan ? If not, what is the exact current status of the Harriet Island Development Concept ? • 2) Has other specific properties in this general area been ' identified by the Department of Community Services for acquisition � in accordance with and for implementation of the Harriet Island. Development Concept, the Parks and Recreation Plan, or the River Corridor Plan ? 3) What effect would NON-ACQUISITION of 257 �hio Street have ontthe Harriet Island Plan, the Parks and Recreation Plan, or the River Corridor Plan ? , 4) If 25y Ohio Street is ac�utired, does the Department of Community Services have a specific detailed proposal for develop- ment ? Please explain fully. . . ��'tY °•,,, � CITY OF SAI NT PAUL ; � DEPARTMENT OF COMMUNITY SERVICES �• . �° THOMAS ). KELLEY — DIRECTQR ... 545 City Hall,Saint Paul,Minnesota 55102 George Latir�r 612-298-4431 Mayor May 6, 1980 Joseph A. Pangal 1049 Hudson Road Saint Paul, Minnesota 55106 Dear Mr. Pangal: Attached is a listing of answers to the questions you posQd con- cerning the property owned by Richard Miller at 257 Ohie Street. These answers are the official position of the Department of Community Services in this matter. We support the appeal of the West Side Citizen's Organizations and the West Side ITA �oncerning the variance. ,Since ely, ,-� !/ ;' /��u �� .� / `� j /�``'*>^,.2t.d�.�1--' i � / / `�� ' Thomas J. Kelley cc: Robert P. Piram Nancy West, City Planning Timothy M. Agness :cm �� Question 1: Has the Saint Paul City Council adopted a Harriet Island Plan or Development Concept as part of the Comprehensive Plan? If not, what is the exact current status of the Harriet Island Development Concept? Answer: A Plan for Parks and Recreation (9/18/79) ; St. Paul Mississippi River Corridor Plan (12/20/78) ; A Plan for Bicycles (8/22/78) ; are all complete plans prepared by the Department of Planning and Economic Development which specifically mention this area and which have been adopted by the Saint Paul City Cauncil on the dates listed �bove. Question 2-: Has other specific properties in this general area been identified by the Department of Community Services for • acquisition in accordance with and for implementation of the Harriet Island Development Concept, the Parks .an8 Recreation Plan, or the River Corridor P1an? Answer: Specific properties have not been acquired by the City of Saint Paul Department of Community Services. However, the following should be noted: The St. Paul Mississippi River Corridor Plan recommends: "Cherokee Park, to be expanded to include bluff lands which extend from the High Bridge to Wabasha Street." (Page 46) The Plan for Parks and Recreation r�commends: "Cherokee Park and Lilydale/Harriet Island could be essentially one park. The former is on the top of the bluff and the latter on the bottom. . Because Cherokee Park is adjacent to a residential area, it will continue to serve both neighborhood and regional passive open space needs. Nearly all of the bluff from I-35E to Wabasha is already in public ownership. However, a few small parcels at t�e base of the bluff remain in private ownership. These should be acquired. There should be a better peaestrian access between Cherokee Boulevard and Water Street. Such a connection would make Harriet Island/ Lilydale more accessible to .the West Side residents." (Page 12) �he Plan for .Bicvcles recommends: "Providing links to Cherokee Park and the future Lilydale Park will complete the primary bicycle system for St. Paul. The Cherokee link will take the form of bike route signs along Cherokee Boulevard to Ohio,to Plato, to Water, to Wabasha,• and into the downtown." (Page 9) The Department of Community Services supports these recommendations. _�_ � Question 3: What effect would NON-ACQUISITION of 257 Ohio Street have on the Harriet Island Plan, the Parks and Recreation Plan or the River Corridor Plan? Answer: No specific Harriet Island redevelopment plan has been completed. The plans referenced above recognize one con- tiguous Regional Park requiring continuous vehicular/ pedestrian and bicycle connection between the top and bottom of the bluff. As the only existing bluff access between Cherokee and Harriet Island any NON-ACQUISITION of property a8jacent to Ohio Street resulting in private construction would prob- ably delay or complicate any recommended development for public use. ' Question 4: If 257 Ohio Street is acquired, does the Department of Community Services have a specific detailed proposal for � development? Please explain fully. As of this date there are no specific detailed praposals for development; however in ord�r to be consistent with the recommendations of the previously identified glans, this department recommends' that any vacant properties on - or adjacent to Ohio Street should remain open and avail- able for public recreational use. TMA:cm 5/6/80 3 -2- . • � - • '�JOSEPH, A, PA��GAL 612-776-7535 1049 NUDSON ROAD, SAINT PAUL, �1INPlESOTa, 55106 April 30, 1980 .Director, Department of Public Works City Hall Annex - 2S West 4th Street Saint Paul, �iinnesota 55101. RE: Property at 257 4hio Street. Dear Mr. Nygaard, . On May ?, 1980 , the Saint Paul City Council will hear the appeal of the West Side Citizens Organization (WSC.0) from that decision of the Saint Paul Board of Zoning Appeals which affects the property of Richard Miller at 257 Ohio Street. Information available to Mr. Miller and his representative , indicates your departments intention to testify in opposition to the granting of a variance, at 257 Ohio Street, of the setback provisions under the Mississippi River Corridor Critical Area Interim Development Regulations . To insure that Mr. Miller is afforded a fair opportunity to respond to your arguments in opposition, it is requested that he be advised in writing , by no Iater than tuesday, May 6, I980 , of the basis for your opposing the granting of this variance. In addition to the information above requested, i�ir. MiZler also requests in writing, your answers to the questions on page two , and the forwarding to him of all information contained in your files relating to either himself of his property at 257 Ohio Street. With warmest regards Sincerely yours , JOSEPH A. PANGAL � JP/rjk Representative of Richard Mi11er INCL P�G E �r'i� DEPARThiENT OF PUBLIC WORKS: � 1) The date of and the recorded count from the mast recent traffic survey taken on SMITH AVENUE, WABASHA STREET, ROBERT STREET, and OHIO STREET. $) The reason for and the date of installation vf the "NO PARKING" signs on that part of Ohio Street which borders 257 Ohio Street. 3) The reason for and the date of installation of the sidewalk bordering 257 Ohio Street. 4) In your opinion, couZd parking be permitted (at least - . on one side) on that part of Ohio Street bordering 257 Ohio Street?? IF NOT, WHY NOT ? • ';.�. ='�``*'°• CITY O� SAINT PAUL '�� 'i� DEPARTMENT OF PUBLIC WORKS �e a� 3., � i ,, � �� " DONALD E. NYGAARD, DIRECTOR :�+� �� "�km;�.'�o��_ 600 City Hall Annex, Saint Paul,Minnesota 55102 GEORGE LATIMER 612-29&4241 MAYOR May 6, 1980 Mr. Richard Miller c/o Mr. Joseph A. Pangal 104g Hudson Road St. Paul , MN 55106 Dear Mr. Miller: Late Friday, May 2, your representative, Mr. Pangat , requested information concerning your property at 257 Ohio Street. Our response to the request is below. The numbers refer to your numbering. 1. Location Vehicles Per Day Date of Count Smith Ave. S. of High Bridge 13,300 8/78 Wabasha Street S, of Plato 12,350 11/77 Robert Street S. of Plato 10,800 /¢�Z� 10/77 SD Ohio Street S. of P�ato 3,200 7/79 2. The "No Parking" signs on that part of Ohto Street wh�ch borders on your property were installed following Trafflc Coordinating Unit (TCU) number 3258 issued October 23, 1970. The reasons for "No Parking" are the narrow roadway -- width and the sharp curves in the vicinity. � 3. The sidewalk bordering 257 Ohio Street was constructed in 1942, to allow safe pedestrian travel atong Ohio Street. 4. in my opinion parking can oot be permitted on that part of Ohio Street bordering 257 Ohio because of the narrow roadway wldth and the vicinity of the curves as 1 mentioned above. If you would care to look at our maps or records concerning your property or property in the vicinity please feel free to do so (copies of these records are available at nominal cost�. Your cover letter indtcates that Public Works intends to testify in opposition to the variance. We have taken no offtcial position for or against the variance for your property, although, we have had some trouble in the past that we would like to see avoided in the future. We have no� records tn our files that you ever obtatned a permit to construct your driveway onto Ohio Street. Also, auto- mobiles f�ave often been parked over the sidewalk causing a dangerous situation for pedestrtans. Both of these are unacceptable. I hope i 've provided you with �� Mr. Richard Miller -2- May� 80 � ��°�� enough information; hawever, if you need more information don't hesitate to call on us. Yours very truly, C` ��i.c'.�'!�- /�ti£�1 l na 1 d E. Nyg � rd � ` Director of Public Works � DEN/ek cc: Ed Warn . JOSEPH A, PANGAL 61�Z-776-753� 1049 HUDSO� ROAD, SAINT PAUL, MINPJESOTA, 55I06 April 30, 198Q Mr. Gary Stout, Director ' Department of Planning and Economic Development City Hall Annex --- 25 WP�t 4th Street Saint Paul, Minnesota SSI01 � RE: Property at 257 Ohio Street. Dear Mr. Stout, On May 7, 1980 , the Saint Paul City Council will hear the appeal of the West Side Citizens Organization (WSCO) from that � decision of the Saint Paul Board of Zoning Appeals which affects the property of Richard Miller at 257 Ohio Street. Information available to Mr. Miller and his representative, indicates your departments intention to tes�ify in opposition to the granting of a variance, at 257 Ohio Street , of the setback � - provisions under the Mississippi River Corridor Critical Area Interim Development Regulations . To insure that Mr. Miller is afforded _a fair opportunity � to respond. to your arguments in opposition, it is requested that. he be advised in writing, by no later than tuesday, May 6 , 198Q , of the basis for your opposing the granting of this variance. in addition to the information above requested, Mr. Miller also requests in writing, your answers to the questions on gage two , and the forwarding ta him of all information contained in your files relating to either himself of his property at 257 Ohio Street. . With warmest regards Sincerely yours , JOSEPH A. PANGAL JP/rjk Representative of Richard Miller INCL . ✓ . PAG E TWO DEPARTMENT OF PLANNING AND ECONOMIC DEVELOPI�iENT 1) Has the Saint Paul . City Council adogted the .District 3 Pian as part of the Aistrict Plan Section of the Saint Paul Comprehensive Plan ? If not, what is the exact eurrent status of the District 3 Plan 2 2) Has the West Side ITA Plan been approved by the Saint Paul City Couwcil , the Saint Paul Planning �ommission, or by any other approval granting body of city government ? If so WHEN ? If not, what is the exact current status of the West Side YTA Plan ? � 3� Please identiF.y that plan which suggests and give the reason for acquisition of 257 Ohio Street. 4) Given question 3 and your response, has other properties in this specific' area been identifzed for acquisition ? If not�, why not ? ' S� Does PED, District 3, or the West Side ITA Cor.umi�Ctee . have a spe�ific detailed proposal for development of this parcel Z b) The sxact nember of west side residents present at the last annual meeting (the last meeting when off�cers were elected) of the iYest Side Citizens Organization (t�tS�O? . 7) The exact number of west side ITA residents present at the last annual meeting (t�e last meeting wfien officers were elected� of the j�est Side ITA Committee. 8) From PED' s perspective, how critical to �he City of Saint Paul as a whole is the �cquisition of 257 C�hio Street 4 Please explain fully. 9) Fram PED's perspective, how critical to the devel�pment and or other considerations of the Wes� Side is the acc{uisitian of 257 Ohio SRreet ? Pl+ease explain fully. � ��**�. CITY OF SAINT PAUL . j 4� 7 �e y DEPARTMENT OF PLANNING AND ECONOMIC DEVELOPMENT ; �, o °' " DIVISION Of PLANNING ��4 � +u• 25 West Fourth Street,Saint Paul,Minnesota,55702 GEORGE UTIMER 612-298-4151 MAYOR May 6, 1980 Mr. Richard Miller c/o Mr. Joseph A. Pangal 1049 Hudson Road St. Paul , Minnesota 55106 RE: Request for information regarding property at 257 Ohio Street Dear Mr. Miller: As per your request, dated April 30, 1980, received in rr�y office May 5, I have prepared the following information: A. Department of Planning and Economic Development's basis for opposing the granti ng o�t�Fii s vari anCe. As stated in the December 4, 1979 staff recommendation and report to the Board of Zoning Appeals, staff recommended denial of the variance based on findings 4 and 5 of Section G (relating to Interim Devevelopment Regulations) and on findings 5 and 7 of Section H (Other Findings). For your reference, these findings are: G. FINDINGS RELATING TO INTERIM DEVELOPMENT REGULATIONS: 4. If a dimension variance is granted to allow the proposed construction on this property, that structure would alter, in a negative way, the essential character of the site and the general locality. This site is part of the gateway to the upper West Side Community and open space area. 5. Granting the variance would not be in keeping with the intent of both the Interim Development Regulations and the Mississippi River Corridor Plan. H. OTHER FINDINGS: 5. Some problems foreseen with the development of this site include: (a) The upper site is extremely small to contain both a dwelling and a business and off-street parking. (b) Off-street parking for the business use (proposed 2 spaces) is considerably limited and potentially dangerous in that it appears inadequate maneuvering space is availabe. Backing directly onto a street is expressly prohibited under Section 62.104(c). e � . "�'��'6 Mr. Richard Miller -2- May 6, 1980 (c) From a practical viewpoint, it would perhaps be better if the business and residential use were separated -- with the business use on the lower level and the residential use on the upper level. However, there is no public access to the lower level. (d) Ohio Street possess characteristics considered potentially dangerous for traffic and for providing service to abutting properties. Its primary function in this short stretch is to carry traffic between the upper and lower levels. Other uses of the street should be considered secondary. 7. In order to comply with the I-1 zoning, any reuse of the property would require a more intensive activity level. 6. Page Two Questions: 1. The St. Paul City Council has not adopted the District 3 Plan as of this date. The plan was adopted by the West Side Cit zens rganization in October 1977 and has been used by District 3 and city operating departments as a guide to planning since then. WSCO has formed a Plan Revasion Committee to update the plan prior to su�nission to the City Planning Commission. 2. Individual ITA Proposals are used by the City Planning Conmission to determine the appropriateness of ITA designations in specific areas as they relate to the adopted guidelines for the ITA Program, to judge the level of conformance with the Comprehensive Plan and the Capital Allocation Policies and to consider inclusion of specific ITA areas in the Planning Comnission's recornmended Capital Improvement Program. At their October 27, 1978 meeting, the Planning Commission approved the report, entitled "Saint Paul City Planning Commission Evaluation of UCIPBP Proposals: Octover 1978". This report included recomnendations regarding the Identified Treatment Area Proposals. The West Side ITA Proposal was approved as written by the West Side Citizens Organization. On January 9, 1979, the St. Paul City Council approved the establish- ments of six ITA's (including the West Side ITA) as part of the 1980 and 1981 portion of the Comnunity Development Block Grant Program Three-Year Plan. 3. The West Side ITA Proposal (dated September 29, 1978) identified the property at 257 Ohio Street for acquisition. This was tiefore the structure was destroyed by fire in January 1979. The �Proposal states: "This property is �situated within the River Corridor park system is on a practically unbuildable lot, is poorly maintained, has no garage access and no on-street parking, has an attachment that has not been completed for several years due to the inability of the owner to secure proper building permits, and is a general eyesore." Mr. �ichard Miller -3- May 6, 1980 4. The West Side ITA Proposal (Section 3.1.1 and 3.1.2 ACTIVITIES: Clearance, Demolition, and Acquisition) states: "We anticipate the clearance and/or acquisition and/or demolition of five substandard structures during the duration of this program. At this time we have i�entified 2 substandard structures within the ITA, as well as a number of homes on 25 foot lots. To date, however, from the windshield surveys that were taken,none seem to be impossible to rehabilitate. If rehabilitation is possible, it is our perfered recourse. However, from past experience, we anticipate that more thorough interior inspections will necessitate the acquisition and clearance of a few structures:" 5. PED feels that the site should become park space. We would defer to the expertise of the Parks and Recreation D3vision staff with respect to specific detailed designs. 6. The last annual meeting of the West Side Citizens Organization was October 27, 1979. PED does not keep a record of numbers of residents in attendance at district council meetings. � 7. PED does not keep attendance records of ITA Comnittee meetings. 8.�<& 9. PED's perspective on the acquisition of 257 Ohio Street `for the City's b�nefit and for the West Side neighborhood's benefit is that, from a planning sta�dpoint, the property is part of the open space area and a gateway to the upper West Side. It is PED"s position that the open space character of this site and the surrounding bluff area should be maintained and that the site should be acquired for future park use by pedestrians and bicyclists. The building and operation of a residence-business would alter, in a negative way, the character of the general locality. Sincerely, J J. Bellus . Planning Administrator CC: Gary Stout , . . . ., . R-1 td'est Side ITA, District 3 Remarks COLU��'� 5: Co�prehensive Plan Bic cle Plan The proposed route from Cherokee Park to Plato Blvd, is id�ntical to the Bicycle Plan. Further, the remainder along 8ellows and � � Praspect is consistent with Plan policy to develap local routes to connect � � with the citywide system. � Residential Improvement Strategy - Part of the ITA is Improvement I and part is Conservation II. While both are eligib]e, neither is first priorfty. Note that the Conservation II area has not generated much interest in ITA-partici'pation. Emphasis on maintenance of bluff view areas and geteway concept capitalize on some of area's most attractive features in enhancing positive neighbarhoad ir!�age. District Plan identifies area high priority for street paving, but area may be too large. , COLUFiN 7: Recor�nended CIP for 3 Years Citize� ParticiQation - WSCO sepms to have a solid care of interested people and has been well documented. Nowever, 19� of the population is elderly whe do noL, �sually, participate. No strategy has been targeted for the elderly in this proposal . They have a very complete survey. Housing Stock - Deterioration tends to be scattered and manageable. No concentrations or extrert�e deterioration would be unsolvable within the ITA program scope. . COgG Eligibility - By the 1977 estimates the area is below 80� of the SMSA median fami3y income. However, the Improvement I and Conservation II areas - are not considered top priority. Boundaries - They seem to be very good given the scattered nature of deterioration in the propoSed area. � ��'2,4,2 Conformance with cit_y�ide p ans. We fin� that the propose acttv ties contained with�n our ITa p�an ar� �n confar�ante with ail general citywid2 plans. _ Specifically, our proposals for ITA boundaries and housing inprovements are consistent with the general citywide survey of neighborhood housing conditions and improvement strateg�es as outlined in the "Resident�al Improvement Strategy." Our proposals for general street improvements do not in anyway conflict - with the city Street and Highway Plan. Our porposals for park and bikeway and boulevard improvements actually begin� � i mpl ementati on some of the speci fi c proposal s as outl i ned �t n the ci ty's Parks and Recrea tion P lan and htississi p pi River Corridar Praposal Pian. The fon�er specifically notes that Prospect Park is in � mile of any recreation space. The city's small Parks Plan delineatss suggested improvements for Terrace Park. Finally the River Corridor pro�sal outiines a river overlook in the vicinity of Praspect Park, suggests a bikeway/boulevard link between Cherokee Park and Wabasha Streets, as we11 as general bikerrays and traffic irnprovements which would bring the neigh— - borhoods above the bluff dowm to proposed improvements at HarrieL/iJavy ?slands via P]ato Blvd. and Ohio Street. � _{, • ; . . . , � . -.._ .. - ------ _ .._ . _ _. � _ .._.___ _ _ __---- - —__,_..�..._..,. . \ 3.1.1 and 3.1.2 continued Neivhborhood Identity and Communications continued Bike Paths We propose that bikdp�ths, u�ilizing signs, be designated from Cherokee Park, along Cherokee Blvd. , down Ohio to Plato 81vd., as well as along Isabel , up Bellows to Prospect Blvd. We estimate i��'_ signs would cost �b00. . Billboard Removal We proQose that the billboards at the base of tr'abasha/ ato B vd. bluffline be removed and the natural contour af - the bluff be exposed. An alternative suggestion is to allow iocal artists to develop murals about the area on the billboard space. Communications The follawing is our general .EStimate of the necessary supp ies, postage, paper, etc., that �ve wi11 need for one year to carmunicate to the residents of the area about the programs we have available. Total yearly cost is estimated at $I,230. �e will need this budgeted each of the five years. This includes a number of general mailings throughout the year for the various • programs, specific mailings on specific topics, such as the refiab � program to apartment owners, general planning meeting mailings on specific improvement efforts, smali ads in tne joca� comm�nTty paper which encompasses not just the ITA, but the entire planning District, funds for a quarterly, twa page newsletter with�n the IT� to 1et folks know about each other, progress bein�� ade, special programs or problems, etc. , and the money to operate a telephone. '�e wil� also use the local paper The k�est Side Voice) for news releases. . Educationa] Workshops During the duration of the ITA we intend to sponsor a number of workshops to assist property owners with hoc�e repairs and maintenanc?. We will inlist whatever speakers and staff is available to conduct information sessioas in the following areas: 1: Insultaian, Weatherstripping--Other energy-saving fmprovemen±s. 2. Arch�tecture and Hone Rehab--How can we do substantial , maintenance-free rehab and sti11 maintain the identity, character and style of our structures. 3. landscapping--Utilizing Minnesota Landscape Arboretum, .. discuss urban abd early-period landscape styles, and tio►r fio identify and maintain the plant materials we have. ADJR'e:SS OF B'JILDII�G IZEIDS CODE CHE�K 'NE�DS I�gIF.DZATE QiEC'K �hT.� �LLUJ: P��.lV� SouCh side of street 4b, 48, 50, & 52 Delos �X x 54 �Delos � North side of street � . 9 Delos , � 61 Delos x g South side of street ; . 180 Delos x HALL AVENUE: � • East side of street �. 480 & 482 Hall � West side of street . _ ��91 � 493 Iiall � 395 Hall STRY�:ER AVENUE: E�t side of street 448 & 450 Stryker X � R 436 b 43F3 Stryker West side of street � � 491 Stryker R ' % WIhSIAW STkEET: . East side of street 498 & 500 Winslow � � � 404 Winslow 382 & 384 Winslow � . West side of street ' 359 Wiaslaw BIJWELL STREET: - West side of street 429,431,433,435,437 & 439 Bidwell X x OHI O STREET: w'est side of street 247 Ohio x - . ' � ' ' 3.l.l.and 3.1.2 continued Clearance_____de�nclition and ac uisition s�� ._..__ ��., ��?� ��.. ., ti'e anticipate the clearance and/or acquisition and/or da:wlition of five su5standard structures during the duration of this program.. At this time we have identified 2 substandard structures within the I7A, -`. as well as a number of homes �on ZS foot 1ots. To date, however. from the windshield surveys that were taken, none se�n to b� imposstble to � rehabi 1 i tate. I f rehabi i i tation i s possi bl e, i t i s aur perfe�ed � recourse. Nowever, fran past experience, we anticipate that mare thorough interior inspections will necessitate the acquisition and cle�rance of a few structures. . - One property, t.hat at 257 Ohia, we do note far a�qu�sition. This prop�rty is situated within the River Corrtdor park sxst�n, fs atr a ' practically unbu�dable �at, is poorly nrairttained, has no garage �ccess and �na onstreet .parking, has an .attachment that has not been uuap�e#.�d for severaT years due to the inabflity of the owner to secure proper buiiding permits, and is a general eyesore. We believe the �rner �uid be willing - to se17. We wish to explore the acquis�ti�on of this property for removal . ' - .... _ ' . . . . . . � �,..j� . . .,._ . ._.... . ' • • ' � y � � � .. � . . . • .'.