The URL can be used to link to this page

00-875ORIGINAL Presented By Referred To 12 13 14 15 16 17 18 19 Committee: Date �� WFIEREAS, in 2000 the assessment rate for street paving, including curb and gutter in connection with the Residential Street Virality Program (RSVP) was $25.50 per assessable foot; and WHEREAS, in 200Q the assessment rate for the modified lantem styte liahting was $4.50 per assessable foot, and the altemarive bent shaw lighring was $2.82 per assessable foot; and 7 WHEREAS, i� 2000 the assessment rate for sidewaik reconstrucuon of five foot wide and six foot wide sidewalks for 1, 2, and 3 8 family dwellings was $9.65 and $11.58, respectively, per assessable foot; and 9 1� WHERF.AS, the Saint Paul City Council, 6y resolution, has d'uected that these assessment cates be adjusted yeazly, based on the 11 Minneapolis-Saint Paul Urban Consumer Price Index; and WHEREAS, [he most recent Minnesota-Saint Paul Urban Consumer Price Index showed an increase of 4.2% from the fust half of 1999 (161.4) to the fust half of 2000 (168.1); now therefore, be it RESQLVED, that in order for the assessment rate to reflect the increased construction costs and benefit to the pcoperty owneLS, the assessment rate for sireet paving in connecrion with RSVP is increased 42% from $25.50 to $26.57 per assessable foot for all such RSVP projects apgroved by Final Ocder aftex October 1, 2000, to be conshvcted in 2001; and 20 BE LT F'[TRTf�R RESOLVED, that the assessmeni rate for the modified lantern style tighting is increased 4.2% from $4.50 to 21 $4.69 per assessable foot, and the alternative bent straw lighung increased 4.2% from $2.82 to $2.94 per assessable foot for all such 22 projects approved by Final Order after OctAber 1, 20Q0, to be constructed in 2�01; and 23 24 BE IT FIlVALLY RESOLVED, the assessment rate for teconstruction of five foot wide and six foot wide sidewalks is increased 25 4.2% from $9.65 to $10.06 and from $ll.58 to $12.07 respecdvely per assessable foot for 1, 2, and 3 family proper[ies for all such 26 projects approved by Final Order after October 1, 2000, to be constructed in 2001. Yeas II Nays II Absent � Requestecl by Department of: Public Works Coleman Harris �- �— Lantry �— BY: �� Reiter 5 o a Adopted by Council: Date ��Ti �c°�a Form Approved by City Attorney _�_� -_ Adoption Certified by Council Secretary g�, �L[f�•�s� ?• �� /.8. 60 r �, _ �.. . - _ . �_ - _/� �� 'i/ � ��" � � F `7 � i Council File # �b � � RESOLUTION Green Sheet # 102767 CITY OF SAINT PAUL, MINNESOTA Approved by Mayor for Submission to Council BY: �� i I DEPARTMENT/OFFICc°/CAUNQL ATEINfTIATED vv � � Y Public Works 9/5/2000 EN SHEET r,o. 10 2767 CONTACT PERSON & PHONE �N ATE INITIAUOATE — ECTOR 5O C(iYCAU1�1C7L PauISt.Martin 266-6118 P� �"� � qRpRNEV�/,� �CITVCLERK MUS76EONCOUNqLA6EN�ABY(DA"fE) ROUiPIG 3❑BUDGEfDIFECTO • � � FlNANCEACCOUMING ASAP �� 4�MAYOR(ORASSIS � � TOTAL�OFSIGNATUREPAGES (CLIPALLIOCATONSFOR5IGNATURE) ❑$EµpRMGR �DEPAP7MENTACCOUNT gL ACTION REQUESTED Approval of resolution establishing the yeaz 2001 Residential Street Visality Program assessment rates. eECOMMENDAnONSAppmva (n) or Reject (fiJ PERSONAL SERVICE COMRACTS MUST ANSWER THE FOLLOWING QUESTIONS: PLANNINGCOMAMSSION ��ISERVICECqMMiSS{ON 1- HasthispersoNfirmeverworkeduntleracoMrac[Forihisdeparimerit? CIBCOMMf17EE YES NO A — 2. Has this person/flrtn ever been a city employee? STAFF _ YES NO _ DISrRiCi coUNa� _ 3. Does this perso�rm possess a skill not nortnally possessed by any curtent ciry employee? SUPPOFTSWHICHCOUNCILOBJECT7VE? YES NO F�cplain ail yes answers on separe[e sheet and attach to green shee[ INRIATING PROBLEM, ISSUE, OPPORTUNITV (WHO, WHAT. WHEN, WHEFE, WH1�: In 1990, the City Council adopted a resolution calling for the assessments for CSSP projects to be adjusted each yeaz accozding to the previous yeaz's change in Minneapolis-Saint Paul Urban Consumer Price Index (90-1459). In addition, in 1992, the City Council adopted a similar resolution dealing with reconstruction of sidewalks (92-146). In 1995, the City Council adopted a similaz resolution for the Residential Street Paving Program (95-1127). We aze proposing to increase assessmen[ rates for 2001 by 4.2% as per past practice. r— --- ADVANTAGES7FAPPROVED: I Assessment will keep place with inflation. � � Research C�nter � � �� SEP 1 � 2000 SEP 0 8 20Q41 DISADVAMAGESIFAPPROVE�: _ �Y V A f i ! Assessments will be 4.2% higher for residents foc Street Paving and Lighting. �f DISADVANTAGES IF NOTAPPROVEO: We will be able to do less paving of oiled streeu and older paved streets and less sidewalk reconstruction. OTAL AMOUN70P TRANSACTION $ N/A CQSLREVENUE BUDGETED (CIRCLE ON� YES No FUNDMG SOURCE ACTIVITY NUMBER FINANCIAL INFOPMATI�M (EXPLAIN) .. � ORIGINAL Presented By Referred To 12 13 14 15 16 17 18 19 Committee: Date �� WFIEREAS, in 2000 the assessment rate for street paving, including curb and gutter in connection with the Residential Street Virality Program (RSVP) was $25.50 per assessable foot; and WHEREAS, in 200Q the assessment rate for the modified lantem styte liahting was $4.50 per assessable foot, and the altemarive bent shaw lighring was $2.82 per assessable foot; and 7 WHEREAS, i� 2000 the assessment rate for sidewaik reconstrucuon of five foot wide and six foot wide sidewalks for 1, 2, and 3 8 family dwellings was $9.65 and $11.58, respectively, per assessable foot; and 9 1� WHERF.AS, the Saint Paul City Council, 6y resolution, has d'uected that these assessment cates be adjusted yeazly, based on the 11 Minneapolis-Saint Paul Urban Consumer Price Index; and WHEREAS, [he most recent Minnesota-Saint Paul Urban Consumer Price Index showed an increase of 4.2% from the fust half of 1999 (161.4) to the fust half of 2000 (168.1); now therefore, be it RESQLVED, that in order for the assessment rate to reflect the increased construction costs and benefit to the pcoperty owneLS, the assessment rate for sireet paving in connecrion with RSVP is increased 42% from $25.50 to $26.57 per assessable foot for all such RSVP projects apgroved by Final Ocder aftex October 1, 2000, to be conshvcted in 2001; and 20 BE LT F'[TRTf�R RESOLVED, that the assessmeni rate for the modified lantern style tighting is increased 4.2% from $4.50 to 21 $4.69 per assessable foot, and the alternative bent straw lighung increased 4.2% from $2.82 to $2.94 per assessable foot for all such 22 projects approved by Final Order after OctAber 1, 20Q0, to be constructed in 2�01; and 23 24 BE IT FIlVALLY RESOLVED, the assessment rate for teconstruction of five foot wide and six foot wide sidewalks is increased 25 4.2% from $9.65 to $10.06 and from $ll.58 to $12.07 respecdvely per assessable foot for 1, 2, and 3 family proper[ies for all such 26 projects approved by Final Order after October 1, 2000, to be constructed in 2001. Yeas II Nays II Absent � Requestecl by Department of: Public Works Coleman Harris �- �— Lantry �— BY: �� Reiter 5 o a Adopted by Council: Date ��Ti �c°�a Form Approved by City Attorney _�_� -_ Adoption Certified by Council Secretary g�, �L[f�•�s� ?• �� /.8. 60 r �, _ �.. . - _ . �_ - _/� �� 'i/ � ��" � � F `7 � i Council File # �b � � RESOLUTION Green Sheet # 102767 CITY OF SAINT PAUL, MINNESOTA Approved by Mayor for Submission to Council BY: �� i I DEPARTMENT/OFFICc°/CAUNQL ATEINfTIATED vv � � Y Public Works 9/5/2000 EN SHEET r,o. 10 2767 CONTACT PERSON & PHONE �N ATE INITIAUOATE — ECTOR 5O C(iYCAU1�1C7L PauISt.Martin 266-6118 P� �"� � qRpRNEV�/,� �CITVCLERK MUS76EONCOUNqLA6EN�ABY(DA"fE) ROUiPIG 3❑BUDGEfDIFECTO • � � FlNANCEACCOUMING ASAP �� 4�MAYOR(ORASSIS � � TOTAL�OFSIGNATUREPAGES (CLIPALLIOCATONSFOR5IGNATURE) ❑$EµpRMGR �DEPAP7MENTACCOUNT gL ACTION REQUESTED Approval of resolution establishing the yeaz 2001 Residential Street Visality Program assessment rates. eECOMMENDAnONSAppmva (n) or Reject (fiJ PERSONAL SERVICE COMRACTS MUST ANSWER THE FOLLOWING QUESTIONS: PLANNINGCOMAMSSION ��ISERVICECqMMiSS{ON 1- HasthispersoNfirmeverworkeduntleracoMrac[Forihisdeparimerit? CIBCOMMf17EE YES NO A — 2. Has this person/flrtn ever been a city employee? STAFF _ YES NO _ DISrRiCi coUNa� _ 3. Does this perso�rm possess a skill not nortnally possessed by any curtent ciry employee? SUPPOFTSWHICHCOUNCILOBJECT7VE? YES NO F�cplain ail yes answers on separe[e sheet and attach to green shee[ INRIATING PROBLEM, ISSUE, OPPORTUNITV (WHO, WHAT. WHEN, WHEFE, WH1�: In 1990, the City Council adopted a resolution calling for the assessments for CSSP projects to be adjusted each yeaz accozding to the previous yeaz's change in Minneapolis-Saint Paul Urban Consumer Price Index (90-1459). In addition, in 1992, the City Council adopted a similar resolution dealing with reconstruction of sidewalks (92-146). In 1995, the City Council adopted a similaz resolution for the Residential Street Paving Program (95-1127). We aze proposing to increase assessmen[ rates for 2001 by 4.2% as per past practice. r— --- ADVANTAGES7FAPPROVED: I Assessment will keep place with inflation. � � Research C�nter � � �� SEP 1 � 2000 SEP 0 8 20Q41 DISADVAMAGESIFAPPROVE�: _ �Y V A f i ! Assessments will be 4.2% higher for residents foc Street Paving and Lighting. �f DISADVANTAGES IF NOTAPPROVEO: We will be able to do less paving of oiled streeu and older paved streets and less sidewalk reconstruction. OTAL AMOUN70P TRANSACTION $ N/A CQSLREVENUE BUDGETED (CIRCLE ON� YES No FUNDMG SOURCE ACTIVITY NUMBER FINANCIAL INFOPMATI�M (EXPLAIN) .. � ORIGINAL Presented By Referred To 12 13 14 15 16 17 18 19 Committee: Date �� WFIEREAS, in 2000 the assessment rate for street paving, including curb and gutter in connection with the Residential Street Virality Program (RSVP) was $25.50 per assessable foot; and WHEREAS, in 200Q the assessment rate for the modified lantem styte liahting was $4.50 per assessable foot, and the altemarive bent shaw lighring was $2.82 per assessable foot; and 7 WHEREAS, i� 2000 the assessment rate for sidewaik reconstrucuon of five foot wide and six foot wide sidewalks for 1, 2, and 3 8 family dwellings was $9.65 and $11.58, respectively, per assessable foot; and 9 1� WHERF.AS, the Saint Paul City Council, 6y resolution, has d'uected that these assessment cates be adjusted yeazly, based on the 11 Minneapolis-Saint Paul Urban Consumer Price Index; and WHEREAS, [he most recent Minnesota-Saint Paul Urban Consumer Price Index showed an increase of 4.2% from the fust half of 1999 (161.4) to the fust half of 2000 (168.1); now therefore, be it RESQLVED, that in order for the assessment rate to reflect the increased construction costs and benefit to the pcoperty owneLS, the assessment rate for sireet paving in connecrion with RSVP is increased 42% from $25.50 to $26.57 per assessable foot for all such RSVP projects apgroved by Final Ocder aftex October 1, 2000, to be conshvcted in 2001; and 20 BE LT F'[TRTf�R RESOLVED, that the assessmeni rate for the modified lantern style tighting is increased 4.2% from $4.50 to 21 $4.69 per assessable foot, and the alternative bent straw lighung increased 4.2% from $2.82 to $2.94 per assessable foot for all such 22 projects approved by Final Order after OctAber 1, 20Q0, to be constructed in 2�01; and 23 24 BE IT FIlVALLY RESOLVED, the assessment rate for teconstruction of five foot wide and six foot wide sidewalks is increased 25 4.2% from $9.65 to $10.06 and from $ll.58 to $12.07 respecdvely per assessable foot for 1, 2, and 3 family proper[ies for all such 26 projects approved by Final Order after October 1, 2000, to be constructed in 2001. Yeas II Nays II Absent � Requestecl by Department of: Public Works Coleman Harris �- �— Lantry �— BY: �� Reiter 5 o a Adopted by Council: Date ��Ti �c°�a Form Approved by City Attorney _�_� -_ Adoption Certified by Council Secretary g�, �L[f�•�s� ?• �� /.8. 60 r �, _ �.. . - _ . �_ - _/� �� 'i/ � ��" � � F `7 � i Council File # �b � � RESOLUTION Green Sheet # 102767 CITY OF SAINT PAUL, MINNESOTA Approved by Mayor for Submission to Council BY: �� i I DEPARTMENT/OFFICc°/CAUNQL ATEINfTIATED vv � � Y Public Works 9/5/2000 EN SHEET r,o. 10 2767 CONTACT PERSON & PHONE �N ATE INITIAUOATE — ECTOR 5O C(iYCAU1�1C7L PauISt.Martin 266-6118 P� �"� � qRpRNEV�/,� �CITVCLERK MUS76EONCOUNqLA6EN�ABY(DA"fE) ROUiPIG 3❑BUDGEfDIFECTO • � � FlNANCEACCOUMING ASAP �� 4�MAYOR(ORASSIS � � TOTAL�OFSIGNATUREPAGES (CLIPALLIOCATONSFOR5IGNATURE) ❑$EµpRMGR �DEPAP7MENTACCOUNT gL ACTION REQUESTED Approval of resolution establishing the yeaz 2001 Residential Street Visality Program assessment rates. eECOMMENDAnONSAppmva (n) or Reject (fiJ PERSONAL SERVICE COMRACTS MUST ANSWER THE FOLLOWING QUESTIONS: PLANNINGCOMAMSSION ��ISERVICECqMMiSS{ON 1- HasthispersoNfirmeverworkeduntleracoMrac[Forihisdeparimerit? CIBCOMMf17EE YES NO A — 2. Has this person/flrtn ever been a city employee? STAFF _ YES NO _ DISrRiCi coUNa� _ 3. Does this perso�rm possess a skill not nortnally possessed by any curtent ciry employee? SUPPOFTSWHICHCOUNCILOBJECT7VE? YES NO F�cplain ail yes answers on separe[e sheet and attach to green shee[ INRIATING PROBLEM, ISSUE, OPPORTUNITV (WHO, WHAT. WHEN, WHEFE, WH1�: In 1990, the City Council adopted a resolution calling for the assessments for CSSP projects to be adjusted each yeaz accozding to the previous yeaz's change in Minneapolis-Saint Paul Urban Consumer Price Index (90-1459). In addition, in 1992, the City Council adopted a similar resolution dealing with reconstruction of sidewalks (92-146). In 1995, the City Council adopted a similaz resolution for the Residential Street Paving Program (95-1127). We aze proposing to increase assessmen[ rates for 2001 by 4.2% as per past practice. r— --- ADVANTAGES7FAPPROVED: I Assessment will keep place with inflation. � � Research C�nter � � �� SEP 1 � 2000 SEP 0 8 20Q41 DISADVAMAGESIFAPPROVE�: _ �Y V A f i ! Assessments will be 4.2% higher for residents foc Street Paving and Lighting. �f DISADVANTAGES IF NOTAPPROVEO: We will be able to do less paving of oiled streeu and older paved streets and less sidewalk reconstruction. OTAL AMOUN70P TRANSACTION $ N/A CQSLREVENUE BUDGETED (CIRCLE ON� YES No FUNDMG SOURCE ACTIVITY NUMBER FINANCIAL INFOPMATI�M (EXPLAIN) .. �