The URL can be used to link to this page

274693 WH17E - CI TY CLERK � �� PINK z. - FINANCE GANqRV -DEP�,RTMENT GITY OF SAINT PAITL F1eci1NO. BLUE - MAVOR dindnce Ordinance N 0.��D�T_ Presented By Referred To Committee: Date Out of Committee By Date An Ordinance amending Chapter 60 of the St. Paul Legislative Code pertaining to zoning for the City of Saint Paul and the zoning maps thereof. WHEREAS, Pursuant to Minnesota Statutes, s�462.357 and 364.210 of the Legislative Code, Michael and Mary Franz and John and Ju�lith Heinl duly petitioned to rezone Lots 11 through 14, inclusive, Block l, Como Park Second Addition, located on the north side o� Front Avenue between Argyle and Chatsworth, from B-2 to RT-1 f�r the purpose of retaining and reinforcing the predominant resid ntial character of the sites and of the general area, the petition having been certified by the Department of Finance and Management Services on November 23, 1979 as having been consented to by at least 67$ of the owners of the area of the property to be rezoned, and further, having been consented to by at least two-thirds of the owners of the property situated within 100 feet of the total contiguous descriptions of real estate held by the same owner or any party purchasing any such contiguous` property within one year preceding the date ef the petition; and WHEREAS, The current planning committee on January 3, 1980 conducted a public hearing for the purpose of considering the re- zoning petition, and, pursuant to Section 107. 03 of the Administra- tive Code, submitted its recommendation to the Planning Commission that the petition be granted; and WHEREAS, The Planning Commission considered the rezoning petition at its meeting held on January 11, 1980 and recommended that the City Council approve the petition; and WHEREAS, Notice of a public hearing before the City Council on the said rezoning petition was duly published in the official COUIVCILMEIV Requested by Department of: Yeas Nays Butler In Favor — Hozza Hunt L.evine Against BY Maddox Showalter Tedesco Form Approv d by Ci A orn Adopted by Council: Date Certified Passed by Council Secretary BY By Approved by Mayor: Date Approved y ay f r Submission to Council By By WHITE — CITV CI.ERK ��/'* PINK � — FINANCE 1 � CANARY — DEq�RTMENT GITY OF SAINT PAiTL COl1I1C11 e�a BLUE —MAVOR File NO. Ordinance Ordinance N O. �c�C�� Presented By Referred To Committee: Date Out of Committee By Date newspaper of the City on March 8, 1980 and natices were •duly mailed to each owner of affected property and property situated wholly or partly within 350 feet of the property sought to be rezoned; and WHEREAS, A public hearing before the City Council, having been conducted on March 20, 1980 where all interested persons were heard, and the Council having considered all the facts and recom- mendations concerning the petition; now, therefore, THE COUNCIL OF THE CITY OF SAINT PAUL DOES ORDAIN: Section l. That the zoning map of the City of Saint Paul, Sheet No. 11, as incorporated by reference in Section 60. 401 of the Saint Paul Legislative Code, as amended, is hereby further amended as follows: That property located on the north side of Front Avenue -between Argyle and Chatsworth, being more particularly descrihec? as Lots 11 through l4, inclusive, Block 1, Como Park Second Addition, be and is hereby rezoned from B-2 to RT-l. Section 2. This ordinance shall take effect and be in force thirty (30) days from and after its passage, approval and publication. 2. COUIVCILME(V Requested by Department of: Yeas „ �,,,�,ON Nays � .�n _�� [n Favor Hunt Levine � Against BY Maddox Showalte Te o ppR 2 Adopt y Council: Da 4 1980 Form Approved� y ity ttor rtified P by Cou il r BY Ap o by Mayor: D Approved by r or Submission to Council BY BY �l.tS�O MAY 3 1�� .� ► � � ,� � . 3 . ..�,T,��p;�J, ------ _�r� o`'�. CITY OF SAINT PAUL� , � �� DEPARTMENT OF PLANNING AND ECONOMIC DEVELOPMENT =� n�u�um; �^ '.•. n�� Cu u o w�< ��s�� DIVISION OF PLANNING ��ltnr:.v 25 West Fourth Street, Saint Paul, Minnesota, 55102 GEORGE LATIMER 612-298-4151 MAYOR March 13, 1980 Rose Mix, City Clerk Room 386 City Hall . St. Paul , Minnesota 55102 RE: Zoning File No. 8562 - Franz/Heinl Legal Description: Lots 11 through 14, Block 1 , Como Park 2nd Addn. Northwest corner Chatsworth and Front Dear Madam: This is written in response to the petition of Michael and Mary Franz and John and Judith Heinl to rezone from B-2 (Community Business) to RT-1 (Two Family Residence) property fronting on Front Avenue at the corner of N. Chatsworth. The rezoning would affect the two adjacent properties, each consisting of two 25 ft. wide lots for a total width of 100 ft. Frontage on Chatsworth is 108.03 ft. for a total area of 10,803 sq. ft. The purpose for rezoning is to retain and reinforce the predominant residential character of the two sites and of the general area. On January 3, 1980 the Current Planning & Zoning Committee of the Planning Commission held a public hearing on the matter. There was no opposition �ither in person or in written form regarding this request. It was noted by staff during the hearing that the proposed downzoning is in keeping with the neighb9rhood character and is supported by the District 6 Land Use Task Force. The Task Force is in the process of preparing the final land use recommendations for District 6 that will be formally presented to the Planning Commission for consideration in the near future. The plan strongly recommends the retention of this area for single and two family housing. The Committee on a vote of 5 to 0, recommended approval based on staff findings 1 through 5 and the fact that the present single family use could be converted to duplexes. On January 11 , 1980 the Planning Commission considered the petition. On a vote of 13 to 0, the Commission voted to recommend approval of the down- zoning to RT-1 . This matter is scheduled to be heard by the City Council on March 20, 1980. Sincerely, ��k�t � Laurence J. J g V City Planner LJJ/mb Enc. `�-.,� O __ 1 _'"'�_t_� ��J n_1_ " "'_ '1�� _�.��J ��.��.��.�.. • ...�� '__ _'"__''_ _ _ . • � i . ' , . ' � , � r �, • • . . �.�'�+�� w . . � . � , . � . ' . . � 1 i �I• , , . . ' . . . . . . � . . , . . . . . .�. .. .. .. . . ... . . . . . ' . • - _ � . ' .' : . ' . . � . � . , � ` . I . . . � ` r _- . ' � . . / ' - . . . . .. � . .. . . .. '. - .. . � 1 � . . . `. . . � � � . . .. � .. .. - . . .. � . � , .. .. . . • •. - . ... - - , . . � . . � . . • . . . . .. . . .. . . . ' . .. 1� . . ' . . . . ' . i � � . . ' � � . . . , ' ,(` . � : _,\ . ' . . . ' . . _ .. " , . , .' � . . , . - ; , � _ j _I!�BrCh 2Q, 1980 ' , T , , l , , . � � l M�: Ed 5'tarr, � '' , , , ; City Attorttey , , � i , ,, Roc�m fi47, Ci�G�.-Ii�.].- � _ " , _ : ' ,. ' St. 'P�ul;: '�Iinn�so°ta " " , , . . , , _ , , , , , . � . % :� , ' D�sr Sir: . ` , . .f • ,.�Th�e Coun�:.l reqaesta t3iat ,you prepare aa ordinst�ae .�ar►t�t�8 . the �etitiott oF Micha�i arxl I�ry Fre►a�t''� �Jbhn atid .�udith . � ki�iril. �o re�orze roper�r at �83-q8� F�rc�p�t Avenue, etca Lota� ; 17.� 12, 13 aud I�, B`lock l, Cos�o Perk Se�o}�d Addit�oq;.. - � . . � � ' - .l . ! . ' . . ' / . . . . . - � . , .. � . � . � , . � � . .:J � " \ . \ ' � ' ' . . � �.;,��`� . ' . . . , . , • • v� �r+wii ,.��8! , �.. . . j � � . .. , . . . - . , . . . .. , . . . . � �--� , . ' . . . . . . . . - . � • . . . . ..i. . . . . . . - � . � . . . . . � � . . ' : .. \ . �.� � ' ... ' I . i . ' � •.. .. . � � � . � : ' . . ' � !. � , . , � ' . .. '.;; . . . s ' ' /�.. � . . ' . . � .. ilVa� � / , . y` ' .. � , ' ,}' ` � C:�'�r31 �.QP� , � ' , , ' . , , � - . � . '�: �:� . - . + •�� _ , - � � �, _ �At�e►�h. , ; _ • , ; �. , . .�` . . . .. � . .. . �\ .. .. , . � .. , . . � . -k` � j � : � . , � ; . . ;. � . i � , , , . � ';' _ , . � _ ��, � � ,. - _ , - . �:, . , ,,.. � � . � . ,, � , : , , � � , � ,,� . • - . � �» ; . . , . _ _ . '� `, , - � �_ ,, � 4 ' ' . ', \ . . r F> i , ; _ . � ` , '� • , \ , / � c �• , ; . {� , . � _ - � . ,`` — . . ' i �', c' , - " � � � ��'� �� "'�'"''�,. � � - ,.� �} � ,;4 �i +.� � r,. y��t� S�^ Er l L= �� ;� � .� �� , ,�:_�� ;�,,. .�,�� r ,, -�.: � ,.�.,w :,< t �,� , - . . .. - � 7 �� 9 � ��. C1TY OF ST. PAUL DEPAitTMENT OF FINANCE AND MANAGEMENT SERVICES - ASSESSMENT DIVISiON 113 CiTY HALL 57.PAUL,MINNESOTA 55102 ' February 29, 1980 � City Clerk 386 City Hall St. Paul, Minnesota 55102 File X 2421 Page 1 Zoning File 8562 The Council of the City of St. Paul will hold a public hearing in the Council Chambers of the City Hall and Court House (third floor) at 10:00 A.ri._ on March 20, 1980 on the: Petition of Michael and Mary Franz and John and Judith Heinl to rezone from a B-2 district to an RT-1 district the property at 983-987 Front Avenue. This property is located on the northwest corner of Front Avenue and North Chatsworth Street and is legally described as: Lots 11, 12, 13, and 14, Block 1, Como Park Second Addition. � • • If you would like further information about this hearing, contact the Current Planning Section of the Planning Board, Room 1202 City Hall Annex -- 298-4154. While the City Charter requires that we notify you of the hearing, we want to help you to learn fully about any improvement that could affect you or your cou�nunity. Therefore, I sincerely hope you can attend this hearing, so that . • you can make your views about it known to the City Council, whether for or against. � J. WILLIAM DONOVAN VALUATION AND �SSESSME1�iT ENGINEER � . ► �c�� ,,.��°Y o, CITY OF SAINT PAUL �� o '�� DEPARTMENT OF PLANNING AND ECONOMIC DEVELOPMENT � IIII�II„1 C �;� ^ DIVISION OF PLANNING ,,�,,�• �{��,��..°�4��est Fourth Street,Saint Paul,Minnesota,55102 GEORGE LATIMER 612-298-4151 MAYOR March 13, 1980 Rose Mix, City Clerk Room 386 City Hall St. Paul , Minnesota 55102 RE: Zoning File No. 8562 - Franz/Heinl Legal Description: Lots 11 through 14, Block 1 , Como Park 2nd Addn. Northwest corner Chatsworth and Front Dear Madam: This is written in response to the petition of Michael and Mary Franz and John and Judith Heinl to rezone from B-2 (Community Business) to RT-1 (Two Family Residence) property fronting on Front Avenue at the corner of N. Chatsworth. The rezoning would affect the two adjacent properties, each consisting of two 25 ft. wide lots for a total width of 100 ft. Frontage on Chatsworth is 108.03 ft. for a total area of 10,803 sq. ft. The purpose for rezoning is to retain and reinforce the predominant residential character of the two sites and of the general area. On January 3, 1980 the Current Planning & Zoning Committee of the Planning Commission held a public hearing on the matter. There was no opposition either in person or in written form regarding this request. It was noted by staff during the hearing that the proposed downzoning is in keeping with the neighborhood character and is supported by the District 6 Land Use Task Force. The Task Force is in the process of preparing the final land use recommendations for District 6 that will be formally presented to the Planning Commission for consideration in the near future. The plan strongly recommends the retention of this area for single and two family housing. The Committee on a vote of 5 to 0, recommended approval based on staff findings 1 through 5 and the fact that the present single family use could be converted to duplexes. On January 11 , 1980 the Planning Commission considered the petition. On a vote of 13 to 0, the Commission voted to recommend approval of the down- zoning to RT-1 . This matter is scheduled to be heard by the City Council on March 20, 1980. Sincerely, l��"'�'�'G�u( ' � Laurence J. J g V City Planner LJJ/mb Enc. O -�� ROLL CA�.L VOTE - PLA��NING COh1MISSI01� DATE _ s�- �� .5 t� �-- �/a �►-w � �,�� C 1 S � ,3, 4 5 6 � YES 0 A* YES NO A* YES NO A* YES NO A* YES 0 A* YES NO A* ANDERSON �j ARMSTEAD ' BRYAN � ✓ � " � COCHRANE * FITzGIBBON GitAIS `� HANGGI HUBER � HYDUKE KARNS • LANEGRAN � ✓ LEVY McDOiJELL _ �PIELSON ✓ NORTON `� PANGAL SCHMIDT SUt�IMERS TAYLOR '� T08LER VAN HOEF � " T�TALS �3 /3 � 7 �7 �� Moti on 1 ,C�r—U�-}�4,_ ��,:j„�� Moti on 4 l�lc 1�0��-- ��`"�� Moti on 2--�L5 ,�"� ,.-L. -- Moti on 5 ��..p� k Moti on 3�� ,�_ N„�(,e�_> � hloti on 6 . . � � . MINUTES OF THE CURRENT PLANNING AND ZONING COMP�tITTEE P1EETIP�G IN CITY COUNCIL CHAMBERS, ST. PAUL, MINNESOTA, OP� JANUARY 3, 1980 � PRESENT: Mme. Karns; Messrs. Bryan, Hanggi , Lanegran, Levy and Pangal of the Current Planning and Zoning Committee; h1r. Jerome Segal , Assistant City Attorney; Ms. Lane of the Division of Housing and Building Code Enforcement; Mme. Beseman and P4essrs. Jung and IrJarn of the Planning Division Staff. ABSENT: N6ne. Surr�ners and Messr. Armstead. The meeting was chaired by James Bryan, Chairman. FRANZ/HEINL��#8562�: A request fio rezone from B-2 (Community Business Zone) to - ing' le and Two Family Residential ) property at 983 Front (northwes�G corner of Front Avenue and Chatsworth Street). The applicant was present There was no opposition present at the hearir�cr. Mr. Jung showed slides of the site and reviewed the staff report. Staff recommends approval of the rezoning. A letter was received from District 6 in support af the rezoning. Michael Franz, 987 Front, applicant, stated that the purpose �of the reznning is to keep small businesses from expanding. Peopie in the area are making improvements on their homes and they want the Como area to stay residentfat. Mr. Lanegran asked if it was the intention of the homeowners to convert those houses into duplexes and was told by the applicant that was nct their intentian. There being no further testimony, Mr. Bryan closed the public hearing portion of the meEtirg. Mr. Pangal asked staff how they could recommend an RT-i to ti�at property when it is not contiquous to another RT-1 zone. He questioned whether this was spot zoning. He stated that the applicant wants single family homes which would be R-4. It would make mare sense to chanQe it ta R-4 which would then make it contiguous with the other R-4 immediately adjacent to it. " Mr. Jung stated that since Front and Chatsworth are major streets, the Tonq range intent would be to provide for housing that would be more than single family in nature. He also commented that the City Attorney's previaus ruling which states that if a requested chancte is in accordance with the Comprehensi�re Pian, then such rezoning is not spot zoning; conversely, if a praposed rezoning is spot zoning, then it cannot be in accordance with the Comprehensive Plan. Since the District 6 Land Use Task Force supports this contention under their planning program, it is assumed that this would fall under that category. Mr. Warn stated that staff is looking ahead a few months. The Corr�nittee of 100 and the Mayor are extremely interested in allowing two-family conversions on appropriately sized lots throughout the city. 7his revision is going to be requested formally within the near future from the Mayor's Office. Mr. Pangal stated that according to the definition given by the City Attorney, Mr. Straughn, this type of rezoning ti�ould constitute spot zoning because the District 6 Plan has not been formally adopted. FRANZ/HEINL (#8562) PAGE 2 Mr. Segal reported that the legal advice gi,ven by Mr. Straughn was general in the sense that it did not say that you could never have a different zone which is contiguous to another zone. The opinion stated that certain factors would be considered by a court in reviewing what the city does in rezoning property. Some factors which would be considered are: Is the proposed zoning in accordance with the Comprehensive R1an? Are there changing conditions in the area or mistakes in .the origi'�al zoning which warrant the change in the zoning? Is the area to be rezoned small? Tf the area is small , the courts take a very hard look at it. Also considered is whether the use to be permitted under the proposed rezoning is substantially different from the nature of the prevailing uses in the surrounding area which would mean more than just the contiguous property. Mr. Levy made a motion to recorranend approval of the rezoning to RT-t based on staff findings 1 through 5. Ms. Karns seconded the motian. The motion passed on a roll call vote of 5 to 1 with Mr. Pangal voting against the motion. Submitted by: Approved.,,by: ) � � t"-----��—��--��?''', �- M^"^�� Laurence J. Jung J es Bryan, Ch ' man ZONING STAFF REPORT 1 . APPLICANT: FRANZ/HEINL DATE OF HEARING Jan. 3, 1980 2. . . . . . . . . . . . . . . CLASSIFICATION . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . CURRENT PLANNING & ZONING COMMITTEE BOARD OF ZONING APPERLS Rezom ng �] . Variance ❑ Special Condition Use ❑ Administrative Review ❑ Determination of Similar Use ❑ Other ❑ Change of Nonconforming Use ❑ Other ❑ 3. LOCATION: Northwest corner Front and Chatsworth 983 and 987 Front Avenue 4. lEGAL DESCRIPTION: �ots 11-14, Block 1 , Como Park 2nd Addition 5. PRESENT ZONING: 6-2 ZONING CODE REFEREPJCE: 64.210 � 6. STAFF INVESTIGATION & REPORT: DATE Dec. 10, 1979 BY Edward J. Warn A. SUFFICIENCY: The applicant's request was�filed on a consent petition subscribed and sworn to before a notary public November 12, 1979; declared suffi'cient by the Finance Department on November 23, 1979. . Twenty-seven parcels were eligible, eighteen parcels were required and twenty-one parcels were signed. B. HISTORY: While there is no zoning history for these parcels, the primary reason for the rezoning petition is the zoning history on 991-97 Front Avenue which consists of a duplex and automobile rspair garage. This neighbor�ng property, also zoned B-2, has been the subject of several zoning cases including: 1 ) In June 1977, the Planning Commission determined that the existing business was not similar to an auto service station and could not expand as a cor�nercial repair garage. Since the proposal at the time was to remove the duplex, the Current Planning and Zoning Committee recomnended the applicant apply for a B-3 rezoning to make the garage a conforming use. This was done in July 1977, under the short form petition. 2) On July 22, 1977 , the Planning Comnission recomnended denial of the B-3 zoning. 3) �n October 4, 1977, the applicant withdrew the rezoning request before City Council could act on the matter. 4� On November 27, 1979, the Board of Zoning Appeals denied a variance request to subdivide the property into two saleable lots (i .e. , the duplex an�::,the automobile repair garage.} (See also Section H of this report.) C. PURPOSE: The applicants wish to rezone their property from B-2 (Corr�unfty Business Distr t) to RT-1 (Two-family residential ) . They wish to retain and reinforce the residential character of the area. D. FRONTAGE AND AREA: The four 25 ft. lots at the nor�hwest corner of Front and Chatsworth have a tota of 00 foot frontag� on Front and 108.Q3 foot frontage on Chatsworth for a total area of 10,803 sq. ft. E. SITE/AREA CONDITIONS: The site is level and slightly above street grade. Two single family detached, owner-�ccupied homes currently occupy the site. A corr�nercial auto repair garage abuts the site on the west (see History above) . A vacant lot used for parking automobiles for the cor�nercial auto repair garage abuts the site acrass the alley to the north. A gasoline station and auto repair abuts t:he site across Chatsworth to the east. (This property was also the subject of a recent rezoning to B-3 (denied) . Calvary Cemetery occupies the southeast corner of the intersection of Front and _ Chatsworth. Various mixed commercial and residential structures occupy the south side of Front across the street from the subject property. F. FINDINGS OF FACT: 1 . The 1922 Zoning Ordinance identified this site and the entire narth side of Front between Grotto and Lexington as commercial . The south side of Front between Lexington and Dale was also zoned commercial with the exception �f Calvary Cemetery. 2. The 1963 Comprehensive Land Use Plan identified this site for "one and two fiami'ty residences and town or row houses with a maximum density of 15 dwelljngs per net acre". 3. The District 6 Land Use Task Force recommends approval of the rezoning (see also Section H of this report.) ' , 4. Rezoning of the subject property wiil reinforce the residentiai cMaracter of the block bounded by Front, Argyle, Hatch and Chatsworth. ,� , . , �: . > � � . _ £� ..... ..�. . _ V. .._..._,._.,..._...�..,,,. ��..,.:_�,.,,.;:,.....�..��..,.�..,�,..�,...,.�.....�..o,�........._.._.��.�..._�,�...,..,,:,.-...,.._.,..,....,..,.,,,�,..�.-,�.-�..,.,�-"_: FRANZ/HEINL STAFF REPORT PAGE TWO F. FINDINGS OF FACT: (continued) 5. If the property were left in a 6-2 zone, construction of new conforming businesses would be detrimental to the residential character of the area. 6. Metropolitan Transit Cor�nission buses (#5 route) that connect the University of Minnesota and Como Park with downtown St. Paul travel on Chatsworth north of Front Avenue and on Front Avenue east of Chatsworth. The site has good transit service. 7. Rezoning to RT-1 will allow the internal conversion af the two existing single family homes into duplexes. G. STAFF RECOMMENDATTON: Based on Findings 1-5, Staff recomnends approual of the rezoning request. H. OTHER CONSIDERATIONS: The District 6 Land Use Task Force strongly recommends that the anning Comn�ssion consider rezoning the adjacent automobile repair garage to a residential classificatian. The City Attorney's office has stated that the Planning Comnission may not legally rezone any property other than that property that is a part of the petition. Nate: the automobile repair garage is not a part of this petition. The peti�ioners could, however, withdraw their rezoning request and resubmit a new rezoning request far the entire B-2 zoning on the north side of Front between Chatswor�h and Argyle. The two property owners, that have initiated this petition, own more than two-thirds of the total area zoned B-2 and, therefore, could legally file a petition if they also could obtain the signatures of two-thirds of the property owners within 100 feet of the properties in question. It is also the Staff's understanding that future rezoning of this site as a part of the "40 Acre Study" would be difficult due to the low number of consent petition signatures that would be required, as well as the fact that the site is not 40 acres in size. Planning staff would recorr�nend rezoning the entire north side of Front between Chatsworth and Argyle (includes the automobile repair garage) to RT-1 if the prope� petitions were filed. _ . t ; , _ t ` .... �... �„ .-.�� .� ' .. ..�?.GI J� ' �� ' ��_ ��.LLL._.L. d�. �.. , . - -`" ;o " `� " � ua ia i�u c� � � �" - �--. -s =s �}-rJ� 47 c.�F,.j,.,,y"�_� —"--�_. ;4 .J _ W ..�� # rtij..t . ,�5. 1 ' - i j"1�¢'s.aK� �y�idy��T „. a ' . - _ ?_._��. _ _ _� 4�i)t�! .»�: . � �..I .r�t �L� � >...;�,5�'"'. - � . �. , r �� { _ _ . �..V . .� , ��n�, -~' -- � . :v�. -.. . � . - �. .� q �y�s' � .�,�,yi � ,{ s . _s ��e al. z�� : w Z� zo, . . � � 33 � '^�� . ��;ro8;.��zo zs� ` =if. -� - � �-". � t - 4 w—��^ ��-, N . - �� . '� . �,� •� . s N 1� .f_ ;� . N � ; _ � � � �y, � � ti �J� . � . . . . � . ti .:�,,� ' ! -,.,_._-� � # . : : - � t t ` � E ti ,y ti t - N-�� ' � . � � < . v'� � 'Q � . � ,: - Q ��:, . .� � - � h� ti NIN � (. t ! r '� � tr,► : {� �+s � ol :�t � � ti—_ ` r�N---r—.� -� .--t-� i`� '-��q� ' . _,1�``j _ ; _ i t ,`�i . ..� � �.! 0 �� ' . •V i ~t. • h « � , �O�—{ . .t i— r �— �— �.. � �i�tri�t six �I�r�n�r� c�t��ci! s��d ; _._._, , � --. ( � ' November 6, 1979 0 ; � � . a r.•. � ��" �" �°�� ._ � , ��.� � �.� � � 4 �� = , Mr. Thomas Fitzg?bbons, Chair � r' �: � Planning Commission -; c/o Zoning Office .,� 25 W. F'ourth St. - llth Floor �' St. Paul, MN 55101 :r�: ,:� Dear Mr. Fitzgibbons: � �.; f � Y � �� Recent]Ly the District Six Land Use Task Force hacl 3n opportunity to comment , O � on a �and use issue in our district which the District Council would like the ��` � Planning Commission to evaluate. =�' i Please note on the attached map the cross hatched area. Three lots are platted � ; � witt�,::n this ar�a; two lots to the east zoned business. Presently the three lots r--- I are under one awnership with a .duplex to the west of the lots and a small two �,;� stall co�nercial oarage used for repairing automobiles an the east porti,on of :� the property. � � � The o�s�ar of the property has proposed to the Board of Zoning Appeals a varian�e r � � to split the 3 lots into tw�o salable Iots; one a 50 foot frontage on tne �aest � �,7° � portior_ of the lets for the duplex, leaving a 25 foot .frontage on Front St. for ��. � the cor„mercial s�ructure. The entire block is residentiallq used exclusi�ve of -- ,z->. { the 2 c.ar garaUe operation. The only access to the'':garage zs through the + . � all�y. The Land L'se Tas'� Force feels that the division of the aiorementioned property into 2 lots, the commercial lot having only a 25 foot frontage on - � Front St. would not be bex�eficial in the long run. - �' � "�µ-:1 4 This parti.c.ular piece of pro�erty on Front St. comes up for some kind of va.ri- t(� ia:�ce request, site pl.an additions, etc. every time the garage changes owrnership. � ;-� Th� residents in the area are tired of fighting the expansion or change of this ��; � small business operat3.on. The two property owners east of the Iand in question, �� { �•�i�o are also in a business zoned district, have submitted a request to the City � Council for a rezoning of their land to residenti.al. The obviaus intent of � � t::e neighborhood i.s to retain tne residential character of the area, � C The Land Use,Task Foree reca�nnends that the Planning Co�nission evaluate this � � situation in terms of the mast approgriate zaning so that the present business' � may operatt yet not endanger th��haracter of the neighborhood both presently ;'�� and in the future, Please ee� �f�� contact the land use task force �or �� more information. n;`,%�� ,c� ` �;'�. " . `� ;�;lti`a,� �� ,,. �L-� . ..�, Sincerely, .T2 � ! , '' :i v O � ( � � . L1ir+-�sz�.> � �� . ( Ka hy Z «n n, Chair _ � . '�!% � District Six I,and IIse Task Force Id �l -L- o+ KZ:sb . ` � cc: oar o oni g ' "r - �C :_;;. ____._ ..r._.__. . ...._...,.�,..,..____.._. _. _. ,...__, .,_ � _„_,_.__._. _.,_..,. _ _........,.m.,.,,..�,.. ..�.,.M�...-�..,..,,�,,,.,�......,..«_,,,.- ._ *, . . _. �- > » _ ..�_ . • � • � } — -- — -- --- � . . . _, 'i .: : �� t l � s .,� •, . � . , �;..,,...-i•- . '. • •. �' ' ' � • i• � ...r � � _...,_ � .._ ...__� ._ . — ._._ _ _. __.�.___._- � . . . . _ ., . . _� � - .....�..--r- .�--•.:t �._H,.M,,,r_,�.,,�....._._�.„..,__ .,�-.�,.-�.,.,,,.,..,._.„„ ., :.� .. _. .. ,. . . ... . _.__.....__.. _-.o.-..-. _. . _ .. . _ . _ .. . ' '.,. ' .. . �, �, . . � . , .; .. h.�:; .�.. . � . . v � ». '- � a� �,� . � . . . . .. .�. �,' . . . � . �- � . ., .. � '- � "• .�.. ..ry� � - F . � � � � � � �D;;.- . . . . . � .�;� `.:,�`: � . . . . � �' Y �� .4 f� .. , . . . � ' . .. ._ . �. . . . . � '~9.. 4l j-y,_:.:�•� ��gT� � ; � • � � � � � • .�".r� < < �� `tl � ° 0� _ N � �:� � � _ , • ,�. t�p �''�' ,�� .�. �".,i�:' , � .r.�. � � _ � '� !4� �.�� si � �� . ,. � � � � � �.��. • ;j � � � f► A �l :� l� • • • • • � � �_� ,� ��i � � � � �� _� � �� `r� � �� + �� ; �■ � � 1� �3i e � � � �t.�■�� \�� a • � � o • � � : �i�sa • ��■►� � • � ��3 = a �.�■�� _ � � t'� � �+� � r�.�. � r�s ,� c•�� . • � � . . � � � d �n • � �$ � � � � _ � �7 r. , . e . .''i� � � � � � � � � �' � �! W�i� C�.�► ir �d� � � �� . . . . A . � � . , l � u :'� ' _ '�I '1� �; �"'�•' ` ' �[ .�. " �i�i� � �v a o ; •� ; : � -� ° t� �s �a■r� �i�. :� ,�•� �e,� � ': �C=.� �#`,' �� :� � ��C�� ...1r!'�`:1�ir� �' ty .• �+�� 5,'�S ° �'�,�i � * ; _ �� i� ;�� • ° ■ � �, � - ; _ _ _ _ �;� �twc•� v' � � , / .�. n o � � � ' � ��-�'�� r g • �s e � �ti .• • ��r,l�JEj � �� • � O� � i, • �: � � 1l O � �., . �r �•��r.s , ., � � o �� : • • �,, . �� '' 1/ ,,"��lt/�L��rM,�� , I� ,. � ►1 ,�~ • �► • • u � ,l 8 ^ ! _ �_ �' � � � I� ��' -- _ • � s e • � � �I Nr �� o ; a �, � / / � � � � M o u o s� � � � • • . � . . --��_._.__ .�. - -- ► � . i► �► s+ w �� o �► • H �+ 4 o h � ` �/�� I. i. �il • H �r �. e �� ► o w u � �1 r . • , � . ' • : ' ► . ► ! � � : • � � - - • � - , : . %//// ' • ' . . . . . . , . � . : . , , , .:� • . � . . . ` . . � • � - . , - . . . . . • • - � . � � �� .��. ;...�,T,"o;��,, `�`�a �`�.,D ' CITY OF SAINT PAU�. _=� -,,• ;;,,� �° �= OFFICE OF THE CITY CLERK =� �uuinm ;: %,� w �uu �- �� A` BUREAU OF RECORDS �``-a,,, �... ��' �lm�"��"�r` 386 Ci[y HaII,Saint Paul,Minnesota 55102 CEORCE LATIMER 612-298-4231 MAYOR November 29, 1979 Plannin� Staff, Zoning Section llth Floor, City Ha11 Annex St. Paul, Minn. Dear Sirs: The Council referred to the Planning Commission, for recommendation, the attached petition to rezone Lots 11 thru 1�+, Block 1, Como Park Second Addition. Very truly yours, �� Rose Mix City Clerk /� . `�� A.BO:la Attach, �:� T �T � �` � t � ��n � � g�'�...�.. . � , � ,, , , ; : � . _ :, ., ,., I__.�__._R.__.. ... _ __ __ __.�.._�..__�_ _ —. 0 Telephone612/298-5241 t i .� �ity na � �, �a „� � � q� ., ,.. ..... .,__ __ _ _ r I � � � . ` ��`��. � ��°°""^�� CITY OF SAINT PAU _,,`�.t, ,,�,, -~' '-``'= OFFICE OF THE CITY CLERK ?� uium ,' �+ '� �� = BUREAU OF RECORDS ''�• _ /J � '°� �••• 386 City Hall,Saint Paul,Minnesota 55102 '^lmm��000°�``, 612-298-4231 GEORGE LATIMER MAYOR November 29, 1979 Planning Staff, Zoning Section llth Floor, City Hall Annex St. Paul, Minn. Dear Sirs: The Council referred to the Planning Commission, for recommendation, the attached petition to rezone Lots 11 thru 14, Block 1, Como Park Second Addition. Very truly yours, D'� ��' --� Rose Mi�c City Clerk /' `1 ABO:la , Attach. �%f�� tj^,�� C�► •'g�,t� � �es—" Q��.�. tx ��'� ,: � r�, ,,�;� t.� ._'.�� , , � �,_..�=:r-�._._..�`��...l..-_...._..>—_.._..e__...._.__._.._..._........._.._.._ �� . . � ��' CITY OF SAINT PAUL DEPARTMENT OF FINANCE AND MANAGEMENT SERVICES DIVISION OF ASSESSMENTS AND VALUATIONS + November 23, 1979 To the Council City of St. Paul I have rechecked the attached petition of Michael and Mary Franz and John and Judith Heinl filed in the matter of rezoning, Lots 11 thru 14, Block 1, Como Park Second Addition, from a B-2 district to an RT-1 district, and find that said petition is suff icient. Yours very truly, ��GZ�"-.,'� �� Bernard J. Carlson - Director � Re: X2421 cc: Building Department Zoning Board File Parcels eligible - 27 Parcels needed - 18 Parcels signed - 21 r, � � �.�� _� �� '� � Telephone 612/298-5241 113 City Hall, Saint Pau I, Minnesota 55102 r ` ' • � ' ��°°�^�� CITY OF SAINT PAUL ,°��tT' �•;�,, -�' =``'= OFFICE OF THE CITY CLERK �� ; ;� iii�iiini c� ,,,, _ BUREAU OF RECORDS f`'a� �••• � 386 City Hall,Saint Paul,Minnesota 55102 "�lmm.�...or�`~ 612-298-4231 CEORGE LATIMER MAYOR November 15, 1979 Mr. Bernard Caxlson Director of Finance & Management Services Room 113, City Hall St. Paul, Minnesota Dear Sir: The Council referred to you for cheek as to sufficiency, the attached resubmitted petition to rezone Lots 11 thru 14, Block l, Como Paxk Second Addition. Very truly yours, C�� , Rose Mix City Clerk < ABO:la Attach. �� $S ; �O . . . � , . '� . . i � Z�N��G �6LE g�� CITY OF SAINT PAUL, l4IN2�ESOTA PETITION TO AMENO CHAPTERS 60 thru 64 OF THE LEGISLATIVE (ZONING) GOD� Note: Before the petitioner's proposal for rezoning �i�i be considered by the City of Saint Paul, property owners must consent to the proposed change. Before signing the petition which is a statement to that effect, the signer should be aware of uses per- mitted under the new classification. For further information about the rezoning of property, call the Zoning Section of the City Planning Office, 298-4154. TO THE HONORABLE MAYOR AND CITY COUNCIL � c/o the City Clerk, Room 386 City Hall Date: City of Saint Paul, Minnesota Section 64.210 of St. Paul's Zoning Ordinance states that 677 of property owners within the area to be considered must consent to the proposed rezoning. Section 462.357(5) of Minnesota Statutes states that 2/3 of property owners within 100 feet of the land proposed for rezoning must give written consent before the City shall consider the proposal. However, when the owner of said property has owned for any tfine in the past year additional real estate contiguous to the land proposed for rezoning, 2/3 of the property owners within 100 feet of this larger package of property must give written consent. Pursuant to Section 64.210 of the St. Paul Zoning Ordinance and Section 462.357(5) of Minnesota Statutes, we, the undersigned, own property within 100 feet of the patitioner's land and hereby petition your Honorable Body to rezone the folloy�ing described property: (legal descripti & street addres�) � , , - . � / , Ql , ] �/— 7- / // _ ��U:�+ "-�..1-�, (/ � ��y��L->i.�4.� :_.l�y l�-_J //' /T -�.��" ' �i `-G-vv�..J\�[:/r /?. ,:,,.H, .� (_<<,i.: �.i!✓st i . ` ` t from_�- :2,, t�� ^,�c y�t;�k �r � �.:- District to ,�, T� f ��.;«�(�.��'1 (. Distrfct, for the purpose of installing, constructing and/or operatinq the following: (descrire briefly the proposed facility) RECORD OWNER SZGNATURE LOT BLOCK ADDITI4N Subje t Property: , � � �° •� � ��Cl�t/L� � ��-yYLCy I � � �� ' � -'��` �,,�. �� '�,� �� ^� � � � State of Minnesota) ) se County of Ramsey ) � being fir�t duly sw�orn, deposes and states that he is the person who circulated the within petition coasisting of pages; that the parties described above are the owners respectively of the lots placed immediately following each name; that each af the parties described above is the owner of propPrty which is within 1Q0 feet fram any property owned by affiant oz sold by affiant within one (1) year pr-ecedinq the date of this petition which is contiquous to the property above described; that none of the parties described above has purchased or is purchasing property from affiant contiguous to the above described property within one (1) year of the date of this petitianj that this petition�was signed by each of said owners in the presence of this affiant, and that the signatures above are the true and correct sic�natures of each ar:d all of the parties so descri.bed. Subscribed and s�+�orn to before me A ess: ' ' , b�� l��,r, �� / �_.. Te2ephon� No. this /Z day of /��,Tc.tr._j� 7 /� `� ��%� �-�c �.; Approved as to form 10-27-76 .__ Office of the City Atto:-ney � ..A S •T., a t 4 .I{!t ._� . ?`�.i.+�+Al.Aak..�S»E:1; r .."... C ..:?,_. n�;K ., Notary Publ , Ramsey County, Mir�.� ��,°;;�, ti',i�.. , �;.'. :-� '' ��;�`s. nerr��r ,�:�,^ 4+% tVL.��J � '�y commission expires � `� - k� • � r,AA�;�Y e�uNrY � �� My CAmm�sswn Expires Dec. , 197 � v�m+�vrr�r x • � � , ` � f � • • . . _ � CZTY OF SAINT PAUL, MINt1ESOTA PETITION TO AHEN� CKAPTERS 60 thru 64 OF THE LEGISLATZVE (ZO!VING) C'OD£ ;.,; �`�:�� CITY OF SAINT PAUL DEPARTMENT OF FINANCE AND MANAGEMENT SERVICES DIVISION OF ASSESSMENTS AND VALUATIONS + November 7, 1979 To the Council City of St. Paul I have checked the attached petition of Michael and Mary Franz and John and Judith Heinl filed in the matter of rezoning, Lots 11 thru 14, Block 1, Como Park Second Addition, from a B-2 district to an RT-1 district, and find that said petition is insuff icient. Yours very truly, �� .�C7�'L • %�J,� � O Bernard J. Carlson - Director Re: X2421 cc: Building Department Zoning Board File Parcels eligible 27 Parcels needed 18 Parcels signed 15 a�� "� ..��. , .�_. Tele hone 612/298-5241 113 City Hall, Saint Paul, Minnesota 55102 P s �, F.�r ..�,. F� „�. 0 , 3i�'Y1��^Y'WV'01''��'iv+�'�r•o; ,..�a::.. J , � . , ' �� CZTY OF SAINT PAUL, MIMJESOTA PETITION TO AMEN� CHAPTERS 60 thru 64 OF THE LEGISLATIVE (ZO'_VING) �'OD£ Note: Before the petitioner's proposal for rezoning ':�i�1 be considered by the City of Saint Paul. property owners must consent to the proposed change. Before signing the petition which is a s[a[ement to that effect, the signer should be aware of uses per- mi[ted under the nev classification. For further information about the rezoning of , property, call the Zoning Section of the City Planning Office, 298-4154. TO THE HONORABLE MAYOR AND CITY COUNCIL �te� c/o the City Clerk, Room 386 City Hall City uf Saint Paul, Minnesota Section 64.210 of St. Paul's Zoning Ordinance states that 677. of property 'owners within ihe area to be considered must consent to the proposed rezoning. Section 462.357(5) of Minnesota Statutes states that 2/3 of property owners within 100 feet of the land proposed for rezoning must give written consent before the City shall consider the proposal. However, when the owner of said property has owned for any time in the past year additional real estate contiguo� to the land proposed for rezoning, 2/3 of the property owners within 100 feet of this larger package of property must give written consent. Pursuant to Section 64.210 of the St. Paul Zoning Ordinance and Section 462.357(S) of Minnesota Statutes, we, the undersigned. own property within 100 feet of the petitioner's land and hereby petition your Honorable Body to rezone [he_folloWing described property: (legal descziption 6 street address) � , �, l'� M� I�� . f: ��c-< c � nl F� /-� � t� � ��o�l �'� '�` �v � ' ... _ - , � �� . � T..� /; f- i y f' lrz - k' J ;:;= 7 -r�,�,,, ,_.�- C� ( � �;� z�� .1 �� -. > � J ' �" �-rz, -� l�,,- ' S��- �,-�' �,1�'.-/.- ��-,�.,, — �,�'. � �� ,�,;; T ,�� . � /.�_ � � �. �/ ,�Ts �i ��-� /L�/ i � �- � �� } � �G,r. c��" �.�L ��,r2�'��,�,v' �— � � . � , ,� , � � `' �j�- �,;5 ,r y � ; i � I ) r ,� t. C�/ i� � `�% '��'.� � �� • � �+ �i � dt�i.� State of Minnesota) � �� ) ed - Covnty of Ramsey ) Mc e�� s l_ �.�iuZ being first duly sworn, deposes and states that he is tha person Who circulated the within petition consisting of � pages; that the parties described above are the owners respectively of the lots placed immediately following eacb naroe; that each of the parties described above is the owner of property which is within 100 feet fzom any property owned by affiant or sold by affiant within one (1) . ' year precedinq the date of this petition which is contiguous to the property above describedj that nane of the parties described above has purchased or is purchasing property from affiant contiguous to the above described property within one (1) year of the date of this petition� that this petition was signed by each of said owners in the presence of this affiant, and that the signatures above aze the true a correct 6iqnatures of eact► az�d all of the parties so described. . �� v \ . v s o Subscribed and evorn to befoze me A3dress: c��.�-,, �� 3 Telephone No. thie�_day of QcT'0f3rR /1�� ' Approved as to form 10-27-76 Office of the City Rtto_•ney � �.�.'!�t'.'.t��?ne�xa�;p„'��.:4F�:?.X otary Public, sey , o Y. ��, S. ��'��N y cortvnission expires <,�,�" KY Pif8l1C• t�tP1;�ESQTA � � `�.. rnsFr cout�rY � �.. ' My Cnmm xlon Expires D�c. 9, l979 y , �rrr rr*v�vw�w�rvv x , . . ,�y , .� � f • •, � r ' • �� 1 � CIT7l OF SAZNT PAUL, MIMIESOTA PETITION TO AMEND CHAPTERS 60 thYt� 64 OF THE LEGISLATIVE (ZONING) COD£ Note: Before the petitioner's proposal for rezoning �:�i�l be considered by the City of Saint Paul� property owners must consent to the proposed change. Before signing the petition which is a statement to that effect, the signer should be aware of uses per- mitted under the new classification. For further information about the rezoning of , property, call the Zoning Section of the City Planning Office, 298-4154. TO THE HONORABLE MAYOR AND CITY COUNCIL �te� c/o the City Clerk, Room 386 City Hall City of Saint Paul, Minnesota Section 64.210 of St. Paul's Zoning Ordinance states that 67Z of property owners within the area to be considered must consent to the proposed rezoning. Section 462.357(5) of Minnesota Statutes states that 2/3 of property ownera within 100 _feet of the land proposed for rezoning must give written consent before the City shall consider the proposal. However, when the owner of said property has owned for any time in the past year additional real estate contiguous to the land proposed for rezoning, 2/3 of the property owners within 100 feet of this larger package of property must give written consent. Pursuant to Section 64.210 of the St. Paul Zoning Ordinance and Section 462.357(S) of Minnesota Statutes, we, the undersigned, own property within 100 feet of the petitioner's land and hereby petition your Honorable Body to rezone the following described property: (legal description 6 street address) ___-----, .._.____ _., ..�.,..__.,..� __ -----..-- • � . , , :o n�� : f; ��c.- c- c: n! � � �� t.� , 77,°o�l L�� v G- , ,.. ,_ i � �, � i.5 I� f= i � � I r� �. k� � ;,� , -r�,�,,, ,_ �r - � - �� ' � - .� � � .-ti �� '�' -_ '�- �' �� l�'..�!.,, .�-� , _ �,�� ` �, ,. � �I .t � C"��Z7 (i � � � c . i' � `--•�^ �, L �_ � � /•�� ,/ ,•rs - // �,��1 1�/ / � �_ , ,�. - z �r v �.-f�r ► l K �r.✓ State of Minnesota) ) a• . County of Ramsey ) ��t^�, L � _ �n�V beinq first duly sworn, deposes and states that he is the person Who circu ated the within petition consisting of ages; that the parties described above are the owners respectively of the lots placed immediately following each �name= that each of the parties described above is the owner of property which is Within 100 feet from any property owned by affiant or sold by affiant within one (1) year precedinq the date of this petition which is contiquous to the property above describedt that none of the pazties described above has purchased or is purchasinq property from affiant contiquous to the above described property within one (1) year of the date of thia petition� that this petition was siqned by each of said owners in the presence of this affisnt, and that the signatures above are the true an correct siqnatures of each and all of the parties so described. if� � � r• �1 v S Sio3 Subscribed and aworn to before me Address: y�9 - 3 0�3 Telephone No. this��day of ��/ e�� 1 �'7,� Approved as to form 10-27-76 Office of the City Rtto:•ney ApA�AAAA�AA�..�5:!,�!�!�'��.di�4.+�,.4�!A!Z�l�1.4�.� otary Public, sey , .Mir.r�vr,;;. � .ALL�N y commission expires �=,t ;; Pt�" MtNNESOTA ,�` • '!Nl1f My�„- , r�c.9, 197 �, ��-,��. . .i. . , ,'SYN�I�IrX,