The URL can be used to link to this page

00-818QRIGINAL Preseuted Referred To CommitGee Date RESOLUTION CITY OF SAINT PAUL, MfNNESOTA Council File # 00 — �$' Green Sheet # 10362 ��, RESOLVED, that the Council of the City of Saint Paul hereby approves and ratifies the attached 2 Agreement between the City of Saint Paul (City) and the Classified Confidential Employees Association - CCEA (LTnion} for the purpose of enabling the City and the Union to extend probationary periods as the City deems appropriate. Requested by Department of: Benanav Blakey Bostrom Coleman Harris Lantry Reiter Adopted by Council: Date � '� �o �ac� � of Labor Relations Form Appro ed by Ci ttorney " BY: �r/"`�� 0 '` � �� l a� Approved� ayor for Submission to Council Adoption Certified by Council Secretary By: l,iYt,,� �� iv'�tt/�� —� BY� � — t� N _,,..`\o_,.� Approved by Mayor D ceat ��L�O�v ! By: � I� DEPARTMENT/OFFICE/CUUNCIL: DATE INITIATED GREEN SHEET No.: �10362 �O �0 I i LABOR RELATIONS August 31, 2Q�0 CONTACT PERSON & PAONE: p \ AT'E I�iTNL/DATE NLIE KRAUS 266-6513 q�IGN 1 DEPAR'iMENT DIR ?��_ A CTTY COUNCIL 736MBER 2CTTYATTORNEY CITYCLERK - MOST BE ON COUNCA. AGENDA BY (DATE) FOR B[JDGEI� DIlL f1N. & MGT. SERVICE DIR. 5;�.., RO[711NG 3 MAYOR (OR ASST.) ORDER TOTAL # 6F SIGNATIJRE PAGES I (CLIP ALL LOCATTONS FOR SIGNATURE) ncnoN �QUESrEn: Approval of resolution between the City of Saint Paul (City) and the Classified Confidential Employees Association - CCEA (Union) for the purpose of enabling the City and the Union to mutually agree to ea�tend probationary periods as the City deems appropriate. RECOMIv1ENDATIONS: Approve (A) or Rejec[ (R) PERSONAI, SERVICE CON'CRACTS MI7ST ANSWER 7'FIE FOLLOWING QUESTIONS: PLNSNSNG COMMISSION CIViL SERVICE COMMIISSION 1. Has t6u pecsodfum ever wocked under a wmract for this deparhnert? CIB COMMITTEE Yes No STAFF 2. Has this person/ficm ever been a city empbyee? DISTRICT COURT Yes No SUPPORTS WHICH WUNCIL OBJECI7 VE? 3. Does ihis persodfimi possus a skill mt normally possessed by any curtent city employee? Yes No Explain all yes answers on separate sheet aod attach to green s6eet INITIATING PROBLEM, ISSUE, OPPORTONI7'Y (Who, Wha4 µ'heo, Where, W hy): Neither Civil Service Rules nor the Collective Bazgaining Agreement in question allow for the eatension of probationary periods. ADVANTAGESIFAPPROVED: Employees who might benefit from an extended probationary period will have that opporiunity. DISADVANTAGESIFAPPROVED: None. D15ADVeiNTAGES IF NOT APPROVED: Employees who can't pass probation within the original period will have their probation ended. TOTAL AMOUNT OF TRANSACITON: COSTlREVENUE BUDGETED: FL3NDII3G SOURCE: ACfIV[TY NUMBER: FINANCIAL IIVFORMATION: (EXPLAI� Cotmc� Research Center �� 2�OQ ✓ ao -��t' MEMORAl�TnUM OF AGREEMENT BETWEEN THE CITY OF SAINT PAUL AND THE CLASSIFIED COIVFIDENTIAL EMPLOYEES ASSOCIATION (CCEA) This Agreement is entered into by and between the City of Saint Paul (City) and the Classified Confidenrial Employees Association - CCEA (Union) for the purpose of enabling the City and the Union to mutually agree to extend probationary periods as the City deems appropriate. The City and the IInion agree to amend the 1999-2000 collective bargaining agreement as follows: If the Employer decides that an employee cannot successfully complete the probauonary period as provided by the Civil Service Rules, the employee shall be released from probation. However, if the Employer believes that an extension of the probationary period could result in the employee's successful completion of the probarionary period, the Employer and the Union may mutually agree to a limited extension of the probationary period not to exceed six (6) months. Such mutual agreement shall be reduced to writing for each individual employee. It is understood that the employee may be released from probation for any reason at any time during the extended probationary period and that the employee has no more right to appeal their release from probafion than they had during the inifial probationary peziod. This Agreement shall not be incorporated in to the 2001-2002 collective bargaining agreement unless specifically agreed to by both parties. / �{ � s/s�/za�� Date Date gany Eri illems City Labor Relat s irector CCEA Vice President Approved as to form: `�-�,% Date � � (1° John McCornuck City Attorneys Office QRIGINAL Preseuted Referred To CommitGee Date RESOLUTION CITY OF SAINT PAUL, MfNNESOTA Council File # 00 — �$' Green Sheet # 10362 ��, RESOLVED, that the Council of the City of Saint Paul hereby approves and ratifies the attached 2 Agreement between the City of Saint Paul (City) and the Classified Confidential Employees Association - CCEA (LTnion} for the purpose of enabling the City and the Union to extend probationary periods as the City deems appropriate. Requested by Department of: Benanav Blakey Bostrom Coleman Harris Lantry Reiter Adopted by Council: Date � '� �o �ac� � of Labor Relations Form Appro ed by Ci ttorney " BY: �r/"`�� 0 '` � �� l a� Approved� ayor for Submission to Council Adoption Certified by Council Secretary By: l,iYt,,� �� iv'�tt/�� —� BY� � — t� N _,,..`\o_,.� Approved by Mayor D ceat ��L�O�v ! By: � I� DEPARTMENT/OFFICE/CUUNCIL: DATE INITIATED GREEN SHEET No.: �10362 �O �0 I i LABOR RELATIONS August 31, 2Q�0 CONTACT PERSON & PAONE: p \ AT'E I�iTNL/DATE NLIE KRAUS 266-6513 q�IGN 1 DEPAR'iMENT DIR ?��_ A CTTY COUNCIL 736MBER 2CTTYATTORNEY CITYCLERK - MOST BE ON COUNCA. AGENDA BY (DATE) FOR B[JDGEI� DIlL f1N. & MGT. SERVICE DIR. 5;�.., RO[711NG 3 MAYOR (OR ASST.) ORDER TOTAL # 6F SIGNATIJRE PAGES I (CLIP ALL LOCATTONS FOR SIGNATURE) ncnoN �QUESrEn: Approval of resolution between the City of Saint Paul (City) and the Classified Confidential Employees Association - CCEA (Union) for the purpose of enabling the City and the Union to mutually agree to ea�tend probationary periods as the City deems appropriate. RECOMIv1ENDATIONS: Approve (A) or Rejec[ (R) PERSONAI, SERVICE CON'CRACTS MI7ST ANSWER 7'FIE FOLLOWING QUESTIONS: PLNSNSNG COMMISSION CIViL SERVICE COMMIISSION 1. Has t6u pecsodfum ever wocked under a wmract for this deparhnert? CIB COMMITTEE Yes No STAFF 2. Has this person/ficm ever been a city empbyee? DISTRICT COURT Yes No SUPPORTS WHICH WUNCIL OBJECI7 VE? 3. Does ihis persodfimi possus a skill mt normally possessed by any curtent city employee? Yes No Explain all yes answers on separate sheet aod attach to green s6eet INITIATING PROBLEM, ISSUE, OPPORTONI7'Y (Who, Wha4 µ'heo, Where, W hy): Neither Civil Service Rules nor the Collective Bazgaining Agreement in question allow for the eatension of probationary periods. ADVANTAGESIFAPPROVED: Employees who might benefit from an extended probationary period will have that opporiunity. DISADVANTAGESIFAPPROVED: None. D15ADVeiNTAGES IF NOT APPROVED: Employees who can't pass probation within the original period will have their probation ended. TOTAL AMOUNT OF TRANSACITON: COSTlREVENUE BUDGETED: FL3NDII3G SOURCE: ACfIV[TY NUMBER: FINANCIAL IIVFORMATION: (EXPLAI� Cotmc� Research Center �� 2�OQ ✓ ao -��t' MEMORAl�TnUM OF AGREEMENT BETWEEN THE CITY OF SAINT PAUL AND THE CLASSIFIED COIVFIDENTIAL EMPLOYEES ASSOCIATION (CCEA) This Agreement is entered into by and between the City of Saint Paul (City) and the Classified Confidenrial Employees Association - CCEA (Union) for the purpose of enabling the City and the Union to mutually agree to extend probationary periods as the City deems appropriate. The City and the IInion agree to amend the 1999-2000 collective bargaining agreement as follows: If the Employer decides that an employee cannot successfully complete the probauonary period as provided by the Civil Service Rules, the employee shall be released from probation. However, if the Employer believes that an extension of the probationary period could result in the employee's successful completion of the probarionary period, the Employer and the Union may mutually agree to a limited extension of the probationary period not to exceed six (6) months. Such mutual agreement shall be reduced to writing for each individual employee. It is understood that the employee may be released from probation for any reason at any time during the extended probationary period and that the employee has no more right to appeal their release from probafion than they had during the inifial probationary peziod. This Agreement shall not be incorporated in to the 2001-2002 collective bargaining agreement unless specifically agreed to by both parties. / �{ � s/s�/za�� Date Date gany Eri illems City Labor Relat s irector CCEA Vice President Approved as to form: `�-�,% Date � � (1° John McCornuck City Attorneys Office QRIGINAL Preseuted Referred To CommitGee Date RESOLUTION CITY OF SAINT PAUL, MfNNESOTA Council File # 00 — �$' Green Sheet # 10362 ��, RESOLVED, that the Council of the City of Saint Paul hereby approves and ratifies the attached 2 Agreement between the City of Saint Paul (City) and the Classified Confidential Employees Association - CCEA (LTnion} for the purpose of enabling the City and the Union to extend probationary periods as the City deems appropriate. Requested by Department of: Benanav Blakey Bostrom Coleman Harris Lantry Reiter Adopted by Council: Date � '� �o �ac� � of Labor Relations Form Appro ed by Ci ttorney " BY: �r/"`�� 0 '` � �� l a� Approved� ayor for Submission to Council Adoption Certified by Council Secretary By: l,iYt,,� �� iv'�tt/�� —� BY� � — t� N _,,..`\o_,.� Approved by Mayor D ceat ��L�O�v ! By: � I� DEPARTMENT/OFFICE/CUUNCIL: DATE INITIATED GREEN SHEET No.: �10362 �O �0 I i LABOR RELATIONS August 31, 2Q�0 CONTACT PERSON & PAONE: p \ AT'E I�iTNL/DATE NLIE KRAUS 266-6513 q�IGN 1 DEPAR'iMENT DIR ?��_ A CTTY COUNCIL 736MBER 2CTTYATTORNEY CITYCLERK - MOST BE ON COUNCA. AGENDA BY (DATE) FOR B[JDGEI� DIlL f1N. & MGT. SERVICE DIR. 5;�.., RO[711NG 3 MAYOR (OR ASST.) ORDER TOTAL # 6F SIGNATIJRE PAGES I (CLIP ALL LOCATTONS FOR SIGNATURE) ncnoN �QUESrEn: Approval of resolution between the City of Saint Paul (City) and the Classified Confidential Employees Association - CCEA (Union) for the purpose of enabling the City and the Union to mutually agree to ea�tend probationary periods as the City deems appropriate. RECOMIv1ENDATIONS: Approve (A) or Rejec[ (R) PERSONAI, SERVICE CON'CRACTS MI7ST ANSWER 7'FIE FOLLOWING QUESTIONS: PLNSNSNG COMMISSION CIViL SERVICE COMMIISSION 1. Has t6u pecsodfum ever wocked under a wmract for this deparhnert? CIB COMMITTEE Yes No STAFF 2. Has this person/ficm ever been a city empbyee? DISTRICT COURT Yes No SUPPORTS WHICH WUNCIL OBJECI7 VE? 3. Does ihis persodfimi possus a skill mt normally possessed by any curtent city employee? Yes No Explain all yes answers on separate sheet aod attach to green s6eet INITIATING PROBLEM, ISSUE, OPPORTONI7'Y (Who, Wha4 µ'heo, Where, W hy): Neither Civil Service Rules nor the Collective Bazgaining Agreement in question allow for the eatension of probationary periods. ADVANTAGESIFAPPROVED: Employees who might benefit from an extended probationary period will have that opporiunity. DISADVANTAGESIFAPPROVED: None. D15ADVeiNTAGES IF NOT APPROVED: Employees who can't pass probation within the original period will have their probation ended. TOTAL AMOUNT OF TRANSACITON: COSTlREVENUE BUDGETED: FL3NDII3G SOURCE: ACfIV[TY NUMBER: FINANCIAL IIVFORMATION: (EXPLAI� Cotmc� Research Center �� 2�OQ ✓ ao -��t' MEMORAl�TnUM OF AGREEMENT BETWEEN THE CITY OF SAINT PAUL AND THE CLASSIFIED COIVFIDENTIAL EMPLOYEES ASSOCIATION (CCEA) This Agreement is entered into by and between the City of Saint Paul (City) and the Classified Confidenrial Employees Association - CCEA (Union) for the purpose of enabling the City and the Union to mutually agree to extend probationary periods as the City deems appropriate. The City and the IInion agree to amend the 1999-2000 collective bargaining agreement as follows: If the Employer decides that an employee cannot successfully complete the probauonary period as provided by the Civil Service Rules, the employee shall be released from probation. However, if the Employer believes that an extension of the probationary period could result in the employee's successful completion of the probarionary period, the Employer and the Union may mutually agree to a limited extension of the probationary period not to exceed six (6) months. Such mutual agreement shall be reduced to writing for each individual employee. It is understood that the employee may be released from probation for any reason at any time during the extended probationary period and that the employee has no more right to appeal their release from probafion than they had during the inifial probationary peziod. This Agreement shall not be incorporated in to the 2001-2002 collective bargaining agreement unless specifically agreed to by both parties. / �{ � s/s�/za�� Date Date gany Eri illems City Labor Relat s irector CCEA Vice President Approved as to form: `�-�,% Date � � (1° John McCornuck City Attorneys Office