275215 N�HITE - UTV CLERK
PINK - FINANCE (jITY OF SAINT �AUL Council 2►�5215
CANARV - DEPARTMENT
BIUE - MAVOR File NO.
Cty��Ati�•/JTH • •
nczl Resolution
�
Presented By
Referred To Committee: Date
Out of Committee By Date
RESOLUTION AUTHORIZING AMENDMENT V TO JOINT POWERS
AGREEMENT FOR DOWNTOWN PEOPLE MOVER TRANSIT SYSTEM,
AMENDING THE PRELIMINARY ENGINEERING PHASE SCOPE OF
WORK AND BUDGET AND AUTHORIZING DESIGNATION OF
ALTERNATE5 BY 5TEERING CONlMITTEE MEMBERS
WHEREAS, the City of Saint Paul and the Metropolitan Transit
Commission (MTC) entered into a Joint Powers Agreement, dated
June 21, 1977, pursuant to authority of Minnesota Statutes �
Section 471.59 and Resolution CF 268932, providing for the
Preliminary Engineering Phase of the Saint Paul People Mover
system; and
WHEREAS, pursuant to City Council Authorization said agreement
has been amended on January 10, and June 22, 1978, April 4, 1979
and June 26, 1980 to expand the Scope of Work, increase the funding
and extend the time of said agreement; and
WHEREAS, the D.P.M. Steering Committee on June 25, 1980
approved an amended Scope of Work, and budget to complete the
preliminary engineering phase of the project; and recommended an
amendment to the joint powers agreement encompassing this amended
Scope and budget and which would authorize members of the Steering
Committee to designate alternates to represent them at committee
meetings; and
WHEREAS, the City of Saint Paul and the Metropolitan Transit
Commission desire to amend said agreement to complete the pre-
liminary engineering phase of the Saint Paul downtown people mover
demonstration project;
NOW THEREFORE BE IT RESOLVED, that the Saint Paul City
Council:
COU[VCILMEN Requested by Department of:
Yeas Nays
In Favor
_ __ Against BY —
Form Approved by City Attor ey ,
Adopted by Council: Date
Certified Passed by Counc.il Secretary BY �
B5.
Approved by INavor: Date _ App ed by Mayor for Submission to Council
BY - — BY
WHITE - GTV CLERK ����'�
PINK - FINANGE GITY OF SAINT � PAUL Council
CANARV - DEPARTMENT File NO.
BLUE - MAVOR �.
Cty �tt-y,LJTH . ,
Council Resolution
Presented By
Referred To Committee: Date
Out of Committee By Date
2 .
1. Approves the Phase IB Scope of Work and amended budget
and authorizes the M.T.C. to execute and submit a grant
amendment to the Urban Mass Transportation Administration
on behalf of the City/MTC Joint Powers.
2. The proper City offices are hereby authorized and directed
to execute an amendment to the joint powers agreement for
preliminary engineering and related work which includes
the Phase IB Scope of Work and the amended budget therefore,
an authorization to Steering Committee members to designate
alternates to attend meetings of the committee, amendment
of the consultant contracts, provides for the local share
of funding in connection with the grant amendment, and
provides for an extension of the term of the joint powers
agreement to July 1, 1981 or the completion of the work
whichever is earlier.
3. Agrees to provide the local share of funding of up to
but not to exceed $169,000 as a cash contribution.
4. The City Clerk is hereby directed to transmit a copy of
this resolution to the Chairman of the M.T.C.
CO�C[LMEN
Yeas Hunt Nays �� Requested by Department of:
Levine
—�xaeeex-- � In Favor
McMahon
Showaiter _�___ Against BY
Tedesco
Wilson t
JUL 3 ��O Form Approved by City Attor
Adopted by Counc 1: Date
Certified Pa5- d by uncil Se retary. BY �
/ - �`
z�—BS'� .
t#ppro e Mavor: Date _��7 �� Approved by Mayor for Submission to Council
B _ By
�iRt„tSKEt3 �U L 1 2 1980
,�
, � � � �" 'ry
��
.'d •� ' , ��'£'� �r�' ��l�r_::.�-.
' � �'Y?" �a �� �V°°`�
� ���:r�
- ... _�,a'�iw....,
PHASE IB
IMPLEMENTATION PLANNING
• SUPPLEMENTAL SCOPE OF WORK
FOR
PRELIMINARY ENGINEERING AND RELATED ACTIVITIES
ST. PAUL DOWNTOWN PEOPLE MOVER DEMONSTRATION
JUNE, 1980
METROPOLITAN TRANSIT COMMISSION
(TWIN CITIES AREA)
CITY OF SAINT PAUL
U.S. DEPARTMENT OF TRANSPORTATION
- (URBAN MASS TRANSPORTATION ADMINISTRATION)
Approved by:
DPM Steering Committee
City of Saint Paul
Metropolitan Transit Commission
����.�_�
PHASE IB
SUPPLEMENTAL SCOPE OF WORK
TABLE OF CONTENTS
A. Work Tasks
1.0 Management and Coordination
2.0 Coordination with UMTA
3.0 Community Involvement and Public Information
4.0 Ridership Estimates
6.0 Preliminary Operation Plan
7.0 Bus and DPM Intergration Plan
8.0 Fringe Parking, Street and Highway Improvements
9.0 Supplier Liaison; Vehicle and Sub-System Characteristics
10.0 System Safety and Performance Assurance
11.0 Guideways
12.0 Stations
13.0 Patron Security Plan
14.0 Advance Guideway and Station Engineering
17.0 Cost Estimates
20.0 Project Schedule
21.0 Financial Plan and Cash Flow Analysis
22.0 Enviornmental Impact P.ssessment/Statement
23.0 Implementation Plan (Preliminary Engineering Report)
B. Supplemental Budget
C. Revised Project Schedule
ATTACHMENT A: DPM Evaluation Plan Scope of Work
. ` FOREWORD ����
r:� z��.�.�
In November, 1979, an interim period of implementation planning was
undertaken for the St. Paul Downtown People Mover Demonstration. This
period was intended to follow preliminary engineering and precede project
implementation.
State Legislative approval of the St. Paul DPM did not occur during
the session in which project sponsors requested such approval; it occurred
a year later. Beyond approving the project, the Minnesota Legislature also
established a number of new requirements for the design and financing of
the system. To accommodate the delay in the project, to take into account
circumstances which have changed during that period, and to respond to the
directives of the legislature, the implementation planning phase of the
project must be extended.
It is now anticipated that Phase II of the project--system procurement,
design, and construction--can be initiated approximately on April 1, 1981.
Phase II will include the following elements:
o System supplier selection;
� � o Pre-installation baseline survey for the before and after
study;
o Detailed soil borings and analysis
o Preparation and final engineering and architectural
drawings for construction bid package;
o System construction, integration, and testing;
o Initial system operation;
o Completion of the before and after study to assess the
attainment of local and national objectives; and
o Documentation of the entire project to ensure
transferability to other cities
During the interim period between the comp.letion of the preliminary
engineering and the start of Phase II, a number of tasks have been undertaken
to further refine certain activities conducted in the preliminary engineering
in order to expedite the program, enhance its deployment, and to conduct
research and develop new information in certain technical areas for the
benefit of all cities interested or involved in the DPM program. The
additional activities occurring during this period have been referred to
as Phase IA.
The present action represents a continuation and e�pansion of the
Phase IA activities. It does not represent entirely new work tasks; rather
it is a revision of the remaining Phase IA work tasks, with specific additions
in a number of subject areas. For administrative clarity, the activities
included in this revised scope of work are designated Phase IB, and are to
be carried out during the period from June 1980 through March 1981. The
major products will include:
• Before and after studies plan
• Review of assumptions in ridership estimates
• Revised preliminary operation plan
• Revised bus DPM integration plan
• Revised fringe parking program
• Procurement plan
• Technical specifications
• Procurement bid package
� Revised system safety plan
• Utility relocation report
• Right-of-way report
• Revised station designs
� Patron security plan
' ' • DPM engineering on pending development projects
• Revised cost estimates
• Revised Project schedules
• Revised financial plan
• Funding programs for joint development
• Environmental Impact Statement/Section 106 Process
• Preliminary soils report
� - 1 -
� DOWNTOWN PEOPLE MOVER DEMONSTRATION
PART- I - PHASE IB-SUPPLEMENTAL SCOPE OF WORK �
' FOR PHASE I - PRELIMINARY ENGINEERING
A series of work tasks have been identified which will continue the efforts of Phase
IA to refine and update the preliminary engineering work tasks in the original proposal
and which will develop additional information to expedite and enhance the implementation
of the Downtown People Mover Demonstration. They have been identified by using the
same general categories of activities defined in both the original scope of work for
Phase I and the scope of work for Phase IA. Each major task is identified and followed
by a brief description of each sub-task. The principle participants from the staff/
consultant team are identified in parentheses.
The sub-tasks are numbered consistently with and as additions to the previous scopes
of work. In some cases, previous sub-tasks have been modified slightly to reflect
current needs. New sub-tasks have been numbered subsequent to previously
established sub-tasks. In some cases, the new sub-tasks must be completed before the
other tasks, so that the numerical order of sub-tasks does not necessarily
represent the chronological order of their accomplishment.
Task 1.0 MANAGEMENT AND COORDINATION
Overview
Changes in the project structure have both added new activities to this task, and made
the activities more complex. The approval of the DPM by the Minnesota Legislature
allows the City of St. Paul to establish an agreement with a contracting
agency for implementation of the DPM. That agency is anticipated to be the
non-profit St. Paul Transportation and Development Corporation. This introduces
a new partner into the project. The role and responsibility of which must be
� - defined and included in appropriate agreements and contracts.
1.11 Continue providing information to the existing and prospective developers,
identify impacts of new development plans on proposed system. (City, BRW)
1.12 Prepare draft joint powers agreement defining administrative, imple-
mentation and financial responsibilities for the City of St. Paul, the
Transportation and Development Corporation and the MTC for the conduct
of Phase II of this project. (MTC, City)
1.13 Develop proposed procedures for the Phase II system administration and
management activities to be conducted on behalf of the city. This may
include the selection of a private firm or other agency to provide the
complementary technical expertise necessary to assure the proper conduct
of Phase II, and the selection of a private firm or agency to assist
the city in assuring adequate safety and security provisions are
provided as part of Phase II. (MTC, City)
1.14 Continue project management including work with the committees as
described in Part I-C of the original Scope of Work, continue cost control
and monitoring procedures (Task 1.6) , continue to provide effective
communication with the Urban Development Committee, Community Advisory
, - 2 -
Committee and Technical Task Force and other committees as appropriate.
(Task 1.8) . (MTC, City, BRW)
1.15 Determine and define the appropriate role and responsibility of the
Transportation and Development Corporation, and its relationship to the
city of St. Paul in the conduct of Phase II of the project.
Task 2.0 COORDINATION WITH UMTA
Overview
This demonstration project is part of a controlled Capital Assistance Program by UMTA
with participation from the Office of Technology, Development and Deployment (UTD) ,
Office of Transit Assistance (UTA) , and the Office of Transportation Planning (UTP) .
During this interim period, it will be necessary to work closely with various UMTA
and other federal agencies in such areas as project organization, procurement procedures
and fiscal programming. This task closely relates to Task 9.0.
Sub-Tasks
2.8 Develop a Before and After Studies Plan, as required by UMTA, to conduct
a before and after study to evaluate the DPM system performance, and the
social, economic, transportation and environmental impacts of the DPM
on the city of St. Paul. (MTC, City, BRW) See Attachment A for a further
definition of the work to be performed.
2.14 Provide those persons responsible for developing the DPM Before and
After Studies Plan with the necessary background information regarding
pr oject plans and programs for their use in tailoring the Before and
After Studies Plan to the St. Paul DPM demonstration. (MTC, City, BRW)
, 2.15 Participate and coordinate with UMTA's Office of Technology, Development
and Deployment (UTD) in providing information, responding to requests
and preparing system selection criteria, and participate with all
team members in the review and modification process leading to
the issuance of the system procurement package. (MTC, City, Kaiser , BRW)
2.16 Continue appropriate liaison as identified in Sub-Task 2.1 to 2.12.
(MTC, City, BRW)
Task 3.0 COMMUNITY INVOLVEMENT AND PUBLIC INFORMATION
Overview
Through the balance of Phase I, additional reports on work progress will be prepared
and distributed to governmental agencies, advisory committees, business and labor
organizations, civic groups and the general public. Existing established procedures
will be used to accomplish reviews by other agencies and organizations to provide
community participation for all interested parties including groups representing
the elderly and handicapped. DPM advisory committee meetings will be held at key
points of this extended work program and will be open to the general public. Public
workshops and a public hearing will also be held during this project phase.
An effective public information program will continue including the preparation
and distribution of information materials for the several publics and the news media.
(A public information center will be established in Phase II of the project.)
. - 3 -
. �w�`'�-
Sub-Tasks �' ''��d�_�_t�
• 3.4 Prepare and conduct two public hearings: 1) based upon the Draft
Environmental Impact Statement (DEIS) and 106 Process, and 2) Phase II
grant application includinq rcute alignment and financial plan.
(MTC, City, BRW)
3.7 Update the Community Advisory Committee (CAC) and Urban Development
Committee (UDC) memberships. (City)
3.8 Continue a public workshop series by preparing and conducting a workshop
session for the advisory committees. Major topics of discussion should
include Financial Plan, EIS and 106 Process, Station and Guideway Design,
Procurement Process, and Project Scheduling and Timing of Metro Center
'85 Plan Implementation. (MTC, City, BRW)
3.9 Expand the public information program including periodic newsletters,
neighborhood meetings, informational meetings for other groups,
and other pertinent information. (MTC, City, BRW)
Task 4A RIDERSHIP ESTIMATES REVIEWED
Overview
The Preliminary Engineering and Related Studies report for the St. Paul DPM project
includes development projections, pedestrian travel documentation, station peak hour
loadings and other pertinent information which was used to determine high, medium and
low ridership characteristics for 1983 and 1990. The purpose of this task will be
to review documented development and ridership assumptions and characteristics
with respect to 1985 system start-up potential, verify the completeness and
appropriateness of all assumptions, and determine the need to update and/or alter
� • the existing documented information.
Sub-Tasks
4.11 Review development projection assumptions within the baseline, market and
opportunity levels; station impact development projects for scale, use,
timing and DPM influence; parking demand projections and DPM ridership
from fringe parking areas; skyway development and relationship to stations,
use and development projections; bus service and bus/DPM interface, and DPM
ridership created by bus/DPM transfers; and DPM ridership assumptions
of trip generation, value of time, peak loadings, induced travel, and other
factors which influence DPM ridership. (MTC, City, BRw, Kaiser)
4.12 Prepare report addressing the adequacy and appropriateness of assumptions
characteristics, and results of ridership projections based upon the
reviews carried out in task 4.11. (MTC, City, BRW)
Task 6.0 OPERATION PLAN
Overview
Modifications in the system alignment and station locations have rendered previous
operations plans obsolete, necessitating the revision of the plan.
, - 4 -
Sub-Tasks
6.14 Revise the operation plan as necessary to reflect alignment changes
� which have occurred during Phase IA and IB, and to reflect the results
of Tasks 7 and 8 as modified by Phase IA and IB. (MTC, Kaiser)
Task 7.0 BUS/DPM INTEGRATION PLAN
Overview
Delay in system opening and revision of station locations has necessitated revision
of the plan relating bus and DPM services.
Sub-Tasks
7.10 Revise DPM/Bus Integration Plan to accommodate final operations plan,
route alignment and station locations. (MTC)
Task 8.0 FRINGE PARKING
Overview
Most street and highway issues pertaining to the DPM have been resolved; the primary
remaining concern is fringe parking.
Sub-Tasks
8.10 Refine schematic design, staged construction and cost estimate for
fringe parking facilities and street improvements. (City, BRW)
8.11 Assist t�In/DOT in providing supplemental justification for FAI funding for
I,afayette and I-94 Fringe Parking Facilities. (City, BRW)
� 8.12 Develop supplemental justification for UI funding for the Smith-Kellogg
Fringe Parking facility. (City, BRW)
8.13 Identify right-of-way required for fringe parking facilities and
street improvements and describe the process for acquisition. (City)
8.14 Develop alternative financial plans to fund fringe parking. (City, BRW)
Task 9.0 SUPPLIER LIAISON; VEHICLE AND SUBSYSTEM CHARACTERISTICS
Overview
The increased responsibility of the private sector in the project must be reflected
in the procurement package. The system specifications, begun previously, must be
completed.
Sub-Tasks
9.9 Develop a new procurement plan consistent with the changes in program
participants and funding sources. Review the plan with UMTA along with
the plan for evaluation of system contractor qualifications and formal
� - 4A -
(9.9) proposals, and revise the plan as necessary. (City, MTC, BRW)
9.10 Complete the procurement bid package including the Technical and
Management Support Consultant RFP, the terms and conditions for
system supplier specifications, the right-of-way procedures, and
the utility procedure. Review with UMTA, and make necessary re-
visions. (City, MTC, BRW)
9.11 Prepare the second draft of the technical specification incorpo-
rating comments and suggested changes to the initial draft as well
as changes necessitated by alignment revisions and station changes.
Conduct a workshop, including individual interviews, with the po-
tential system contractors to receive their comments on the speci-
fications and their proposed modifications, if any, to the speci-
fications. Review the second draft with UMTA, make any final mod-
ifications and prepare final version of system specifications.
(City, MTC, Kaiser)
9.12 Re-notify all eligible system suppliers of project status, scope of
work, and project schedules. (MTC)
9.13 Continue Task 9.2 by offering eligible suppliers opportunities for
project briefings. (City, MTC)
, - 5 -
9.14 Continue Task 9.4 by providing working papers, meeting notices, and
. other relevant information to all interested parties, including
project orientation for the Transportation and Development Corporation.
(City, MTC)
Task 10.0 SYSTEM SAFETY AND PERFORMANCE ASSURANCE
Overview
Public safety and system reliability have received special emphasis throughout the
work to date. Efforts on these subjects at this stage of the project will be
directed toward assuring an adequate integration of safety and reliability
concerns with other project elements.
Sub-Tasks '
10.3 Review and refine as necessary the System Safety Program Plan. Review
the UMTA comments on the draft safety system assurance, and system
verification specifications, modify the specifications as appropriate
and prepare a second draft for inclusion in the system specifications
in Task 9. Following review by UMTA, modify as appropriate and prepare
final version of specification sections. Prepare the statement of work
sections giving the safety, assurance and verification requirements,
review with UMTA, modify and finalize. (Kaiser)
Task 11.0 GUIDEWAYS
Overview
Although primary guideway issues have been resolved, modifications to the
alignment have been made; more are possible. In addition, the utility and acquisition
, , implications of the selected guideway alignment must be documented.
Sub-Tasks
11.33 Modify the guideway alignment as required by the EIS process and by
changes in development along the route. Prepare revised plan and
profile drawings reflecting the alignment changes for use in Task 17.
(Kaiser/ABAM)
11.34 Prepare Utilities Relocation Report including a description of the process
for utility relocation, identifying permits required, etc. for all
utilities. (City, TKDA)
11.35 Prepare Right-of-Way Report including the process for property
acquisition, obtaining easements, obtaining permits, etc. as required.
(City�, TKDA)
Task 12.0 STATION SCHEMATIC DESIGNS
Overview
Refinement of station concept is necessary to assure functional adequacy of design.
In addition, changes in some station locations and changes in development
adjacent to stations requires additional development work.
' - 6 -
Sub-Tasks
" 12.24 Gather missing site information and document with plans, sections,
and elevations; collect missing utility information; collect system
information from potential suppliers and define the space require-
ments for system-oriented functions. (BRW)
12.25 Review existing schematic designs and establish preliminary construction
budget for stations; finalize conceptual designs, including functional
relationships, circulation patterns, compliance with existing standards,
three-dimensional drawings and models, and consultation and review with
structural and mechanical engineers. Review final schematic package
with project coordination team with UMTA. (City, BRW,, TKDA, W&0)
12.26 Develop architectural systems, including basic structural/design modules,
basic interior and exterior materials, massing and elevations, and
integration of structural, mechanical/electrical drawings with station
designs. (BRW, TKDA, W&0)
12.27 Prepare preliminary design development package for UMTA review,
revise as necessary, and prepare final station design package. (City,
BRW)
Task 13.0 PATRON SECURITY PLANNING
Overview
Based upon UMTA review of previous patron security planning work and the
availability of a greater level of detailed information, additional patron security
planning is necessary.
Sub-Tasks
13.10 Prepare Patron Security Plan and submit to UMTA for review and comment•
Modify as required to reflect review comments and produce final plan.
(MTC, Kaiser)
Task 14.0 ADVANCE GUIDEWAY AND STATION ENGINEERING
Overview
This task covers the integration of DPM construction with private development and
provides for special engineering tasks that are not normally associated with
preliminary engineering.
Sub-Tasks
14,3 Continue to provide necessary design engineering services as requested
and approved by the St. Paul Department of Planning and Economic
Development and the project director. (Kaiser, BRW)
14.4 Provide legal descriptions for easements through public and private
development for DPM system to protect the required envelope. (City)
14.5 Conduct preliminary soils/geologic survey of route alignment and
document results. (City , BRW)
� - � -
Task 17.0 COST ESTIMATES �
' Overview
Changes in project schedule and physical configuration require that cost estimates
and the attendant documentation be brought up to date.
Sub-Tasks
17.10 Update the capital cost estimates to reflect the route alignment
modifications, station configuration changes, and revised program
schedule. (Kaiser)
17.11 Conduct value engineering assessments of major system elements, materials
and project implementation techniques (i.e. fast-tracking) where it is
appropriate to do so for a baseline system. (MTC, City, Kaiser)
17.12 Update operating and maintenance cost estimate to reflect modifications
in operations plan resulting from alignment changes. Develop estimate
for those first year O&M costs which are reimbursable by UMTA as
unusual and one time start-up costs. (Kaiser)
17.13 Update right-of-way appraisals and obtain second appraisal to meet
UMTA requirements. (City)
Task 20.0 PROJECT SCHEDULE
Overview
Changes in approval dates for the project require that new schedules be developed
and maintained.
� � Sub-Tasks
20.5 Refine the project schedule for Phase II of the DPM demonstration based
upon local and federal reviews and approvals of the Implementation Plan,
Environmental Impact Statement, capital grant application, and the City,
MTC and legislative authorization to proceed with the demonstration.
(MTC, Kaiser, BRW)
Task 21.0 FINANCIAL PLAN AND CASH FLOW ANALYSIS
Overview
The financial plan previously developed for the project is no longer applicable
because of the action of the Minnesota Legislature. This task will allow for
' revision of the financial plan to both be consistent with the legislative action,
arui to provide for an equitable distribution of the cost burden relative to the
benefits received.
Sub-Tasks
21.11 Develop a new financial plan to reflect the legislation enacted in the
spring of 1980. The plan shall not include any capital funds, or
operating deficit funds from the MTC. The financial plan will be
approved by the private sector, the city, and UMTA. (City, BRW)
� - 8 -
21.12 Prepare implementation plans, programs and funding applications for
the station skyway connections and joint development opportunities.
� (City, BRW, HSG)
21.13 Develop draft agreements between the St. Paul Transportation and
Development Corporation and the city of St. Paul for the funding of
capital costs, the funding of operating and maintenance costs, and
the management of the project during implementation and operation.
(City, BRW, TDC)
Task 22.O�ENVIRONMENTAL IMPACT ASSESSMENT/STATEMENT
Overview
Subsequent to the preparation of the draft EIS and the results of the public
hearing, certain environmental issues may be raised, particularly during the
review by the several participating federal departments. These issues must be
addressed and responded to during this interim period.
Sub-Tasks
22.8 Monitor other activities described in this supplemental Scope of Work
and respond to any activities that would result in alterations to the
draft EIS. (City, BRW)
22.9 Update draft EIS as appropriate. (City, BRW)
22.10 Respond to suggestions provided by the several federal departments
involved in the EIS review process. (City, BRW)
22.11 Respond to any issues raised by the Minnesota Environmental Quality Board.
(City, BRW)
22.12 Respond to issues raised during the Section (4f) and Section 106 procedures.
(City, BRw)
Task 23.0 IMPLEMENTATION PLAN (Preliminary Engineering Report)
Overview
The Final Report - Preliminary Engineering Study (Implementation Plan) is the
compilation of all materials needed to initiate final design and system procurement
of the DPM. Durinq the course of preliminary engineering there has been considerable
discussion as to the development and staging of the several needed procurement
bid packages (for selection of system supplier, detailed design of stationary
facilities, etc.) . During this interim period, additional work in developing the
� most appropriate packages of work activities will expedite the program during design
an� construction and keep cost to the minimum.
Specifically, the supplemental work under this task will integrate the Phase I,
Phase IA and Phase IB tasks and will be incorporated into the following:
A. The performance design criteria
B. The preliminary plans and specifications for the stations,
maintenance and control center
C. The division of the system and civil engineering elements
into various bid packages and consultant services contracts
,� � - 9 -
D. The preliminary operations report
J. The financial plan and cash flow report
� H. An elderly and handicapped plan
A Phase II capital grant amendment will be prepared, processed through the
3(c) Planning Process and submitted to UMTA for approval upon completion of the
Phase IB activities.
' -10-
�`����� �
B. PHASE IB - SUPPLEMENTAL BUDGET
���=� N "w�_'�..�..
The original project budget for Phase I is shown in Table I; the original budget
is shown in Table II. Each table indicates an allocation of funds by various
project participants. Phase I funds have been completely expended; it is
anticipated that Phase IA funds will be expended by August 1, 1980, with
the exception of a portion of the funding for the Before and After Study.
The detailed supplemental budget necessary to carry on the tasks described
in the Phase IB Scope of Work is shown in Table III. The budget summary for
Phase IB is as follows:
Phase IB
Budget Summary (1,000's)
MTC $ 9g
City of St. Paul 157
Consultant Services 592
Consultant Contingencies 53
Total $901
Remaining Phase IA funds 58
Total new funds $843
The local share of the funding will be provided by the City of St. Paul.
��
,� - 11 - ,
. 8-5-77 RLP .
• TA3L^c I .
PHASE I DP21 BUDGET - BY PARTICIPANT
' (in thousands of dollars)
CONTRACT
MTC CITY MnDOT SERVICES TOTAL
I�IGT, ADM & REPORTS 42 37 10 154 2�3
1 Management & Ccordination 18 I5 10 60 103
2 UMTA Liaison 11 3 2 16
3 Coca*nunity Involvement 7 15 32 54
23 Implementation Flan 6 4 60 70
OPERATIODtS 13 22 97 132
4 Ridership Forecast 1 1 33 35
5 2�iarket Analysis . 2 3 22 27
6 DPM Operati.ons Plan 3 2 22 27
7 Bus Integration 5 1 1 7
8 Parking, Streets & Hiqhways 1 14 9 24
13 Personal Security 1 1 10 12 .
SYSTEM PERFOFL�lANCE 17 5 55 7?
� 9 Supplier Liaison S 3 � 20 3I
10 Safety & Reliability 9 2 35 46
' � PRELIMINARY DESIGN 25 41 636 702
11 Guideways 10 5 280 295
12 Stations 5 9 2�7 291
14 Advance Enqineering 5 5 24 34
15 Urban Development 5 22 55 82
SOCIAL-ECONOMIC & FINANCE 17 33 137 187
16 Social-Economic 2 6 25 33
17 Cost Estunates 4 4 37 45
18 Benefit-Cost 2 2 32 36
19 Value Capture 3 16 '20 39
20 Schedule 2 1 6 9
21 Financial Plan 4 4 I7 25
ENVIRiONMENTAL IMPACT 6 32 107 145
22 EIA/EIS
CONTINGENCY 14 14
TOTAL 120 170 10 1200 150Q
� - 12 -
�� 11/16/78
- TABLE II
PHASE IA
SUPPLEMENTAL BUDGET ($1,OOOs)
Contract
Task P�STC City Mn/DOT Services Total
1 17 9.5 1 12 32
2 * 17 15 1 15 48
2.8 23 19 -- 77 119
3 3 13 -- 8 24
6 1 -- -- 4 5
7 3 1.5 -- 2 6.5
8 1 4 1 18 24
9 14 5 1 11 31
10 .5 -- -- 4 4.5
11 8 4 2 14 28
12 1.5 3 -- 16 20.5
14 1 1 -- 12 14
17 4.5 4.5 -- 14 23
20 .5 .5 -- 1 2
21 4 5.5 -- 13 22.5
22 2.5 11 -- 31 44.5
23 4 4 1 6 15
TOTAL 98 100.5 7 258 463.5
Direct costs for DPM office
(secretary, supplies, rent) 27
Consultant contingencies (10�) 26
TOTAL 516.5
* Excludes Task 2.8, the development of an Evaluation Plan
(Experimental Design Plan)
DRJ/kam
11/16/78
� �
� r— �
� �
� � � �
� m � �
� - - � �-�- �
_ - �_ � o
� � � z �-r- �
� � � �.
L
Z o r '"
y (�
� � � � 4 =
� � �
Q m �
� � p � � �
� - � m
-
R � � �
-� o �,
� ➢ s
_ �
g � 3 ?� a3
� � � f �
Z � 7�0
� � � � � x
�-� �
` D �
� � - m �
�
m _
m Z
� � �1
�
� N
A �
� ; � �
� �
� � � �
_m t�
� p
� �
�i � •
� m
� - 6T - . , .
- l.i -
• SUPPLEMENTAL BUDGET
TABLE III
'; ($1,000's)
PHASE IB
Task # MTC City Contract Service Total
1.0 25 25 52 102
2.0 15 15 79 109
3.0 8 20 10 38
4.0 5 5 5 15
6.0 4 2 5 11
7.0 4 2 - 6
8.0 1 8 15 24
9.0 15 11 98 124
10.0 2 2 9 13
11.0 2 8 35 45
12.0 2 5 95 102
13.0 2 1 4 7
14.0 1 10 73 84
17.0 2 22 22 46
20.0 1 1 4 6
21.0 2 10 58 70
22.0 5 5 24 34
23.0 3 5 4 12
TOTAL 99 157 592 848
Unexpended Contract Amount 58
New Funds 99 157 534 790
Consultant Contingencies (10�) 53
- Total New Funds 843
PHB/meg
6/13/80
�•� -15- ATTACHMENT "A"
����'�
. � �;��� �
PROJECT DESCRIPTION AND SCOPE OF WORK
FOR
DESIGN OF THE BEFORE AND AFTER STUDIES PLAN
ST. PAUL DOWNTOWN PEOPLE MOVER DEMONSTRATION
METROPOLITAN TRANSIT COMMISSION
(TWIN CITIES AREA)
CITY OF ST. PAUL
U.S. DEPARTMENT OF TRANSPORTATION
URBAN MASS TRANSPORTATION ADMINISTRATION)
Approved by:
DPM Steering Committee December 11, 1978
City of St. Paul December 21, 1978
Metropolitan Transit Commission January 10, 1979
Revised:
. - 16 -
FOREWORD
The program requirements established by the Urban Mass Transportation
Administration for powntown People Mover Demonstrations include a before
and after study of each implemented system to determine its performance
and community impacts. The project described in this document is a part
of the required stady for the Saint Paul Downtown People Mover Demonstration.
Although the Design of the Before and After Studies Plan for the Saint
Paul DPM is one element of Phase IA, Implementation Planning for the
project as a whole, the discrete nature of the Before and After Studies
Plan and its role relative to the implementation of the DPM require that a
separate and more detailed scope of work be prepared.
This document provides the description of the work necessary to design
the Before and After Studies Plan. The design phase is only the first step
in a comprehensive assessment program. The actual execution of the Before
and After Studies Plan, which will include data collection and results analysis,
will be carried out as a separate activity from the design of the plan. A
separate application will be submitted for support of the execution of
the plan.
' - 17 -
TABLE OF CONTENTS
PART I PROJECT DESCRIPTION
A. Purpose
B. Evaluation Program
C. Program and Project Organization
PART II SCOPE OF WORK
A. Work Tasks
A. Management and Coordination
B. Coordination with UMTA
C. Refinement of DPM Objectives
D. Data Collection and Analysis Techniques
E. DPM Before and After Studies Plan
PART III REFERENCE DOCUNIENTS
PART IV BUDGET
. - 18 -
DOWNTOWN PEOPLE MOVER DEMONSTRATION
PART I - PROJECT DESCRIPTION
A. PURPOSE
The Downtown People Mover (DPM) Demonstration Program for St. Paul is
intended to implement those regional policies of the Metropolitan Council
adopted to help revitalize the Metropolitan Center of St. Paul and at the
same time demonstrate for national evaluation the technical, social and
economic feasibility of a simple horizontal elevator-type transit system
operating in an urban environment. The DPM Before and After Studies Program
will be a structured evaluation of the DPM Demonstration, designed to permit
the objective assessment of the performance of the DPM system and its
effects on the urban area's characteristics.
B. EVALUATION PROGRAM
The Before and After Studies will be conducted in accordance with UMTA's
"Impact Assessment Program". The Before and After Studies Program will be
divided into two phases: Design of the Before and After Studies Plan, and
Implementation of the Before and After Studies Plan.
This first phase will provide the foundation for the actual before and
after studies. The primary product will be a document which contains the
plan for assessing the St. Paul DPM. It will include the necessary
procedures, technigues, and forms for accomplishing the required evaluation,
as well as establishing the necessary level of effort and schedule.
C. PROGRAM AND PROJECT ORGANIZATION
, The Metropolitan Transit Commission (MTC) has responsibility for DPM
program administration during preliminary engineering. UMTA management
will be conducted by the Office of Planning, Management, and Demonstration
(UPM) and responsibilities will include project monitoring, review and
approval of applicable grantee activities.
The present DPM Steering Committee will provide overall direction of the
project. The MTC will be responsible for overall project management and
for the technical supervision. The city of St. Paul will provide management
and technical support.
The DPM projects present Technical Task Force, Community Advisory
Committee, and Urban Development Committee will also provide guidance
to the assessment program. Because this activity is a portion of the
Implementation Planning Phase of the DPM Demonstration, it will be
carried out by the existing consultant team.
PART II - SCOPE OF WORK
A series of work tasks has been developed by type of activity rather
than type of skill or discipline. Within each task a series of sub-
tasks is described to indicate the nature of the activity and to suggest
a sequence of events.
- - 19 -
This work program includes suggested tasks to be accomplished by the
entire team; agency staff participants and consultants. Primary and
' major responsibilities are identified for each task.
Task A. MANAGEMENT AND COORDINATION
Overview
As one element of the Implementation Planning Phase of the DPM Demonstration
Project, management of the Design of the Before and After Studies Plan will
be carried out in the same manner as for other DPM activities, by the
existing DPM Steering Committee, the city of Saint Pual, and the Metropolitan
Transit Commission.
Sub-Tasks
A-1 Obtain notice to proceed from UMTA
A-2 Adopt the existing project management and the committee organizations.
Provide overall direction to the project through the Steering
Committee to the Project Director and Deputy Director.
A-3 Establish technical activity procedures, administrative procedures,
consultant team/agency relationships and assignments; and relation-
ships with UMTA, per Task B.
A-4 Adapt the established cost control and project monitoring procedures
to this assessment project.
A-5 Provide continuous supervision and review of work program.
A-6 Assure effective communications with the Technical Task Force.
Responsibility
The MTC will have responsibility for federal grant administration and
overall project administration. BRw/Kaiser will ass�st in reporting on
work progress.
Task B. COORDINATION WITH UMTA
Overview
The Before and After Studies Program will be carried out with the cooperation
and oversight of UMTA's Office of Techbology Development and Deployment
(UTD) and Office of Planning, Management, and Demonstrations (UPM) .
Because UMTA has responsibility for developing transferable conclusions
_ from this site specific evaluation, it is imperative that adequate
communications exist between UMTA and local agencies during the design
phase of the before and after studies plan.
Sub-Tasks
B-1 Review Impact Assessment Program Plan for powntown People Mover
Demonstratio Projects with the Steering Co�nittee and technical
team.
' - 20 -
B-2 Establish appropriate liaison procedures with UTD and UPM.
' B-3 Review UMTA DPM program objectives (see Task C-1) .
B-4 Review the development of criteria and information needs based
upon objectives (see Tasks C-3 & C-4) .
B-5 Review statistical techniques (see Task D-4) .
B-6 Review general assessment procedure for compliance with UMTA's
needs (see Task E-1) .
Task C REFINEMENT OF DPM OBJECTIVES
Overview
During the development of the DPM Demonstration Program, a number of
objectives for DPM systems have been developed. Some of these have been
established at the federal level and are related to the national interest
in the DPM program; others have been developed at the local level to
guide the development of the project in Saint Paul.
Evaluation of the success of the project against these objectives will
require that the federal and local objectives be reconciled and expressed
as criteria which lend themselves to measurement.
Sub-Tasks
C-1 Compile and review DPM project objectives as established by
federal and local agencies and contained in DPM program and
project documentation.
' � C-2 Develop a complete and concise set of criteria which incorporate
the measurable aspects of those objectives, drawing upon the
"Impact Assessment Program"
C-3 Compile a comprehensive set of data and information needed to
reflect performance relative to the identified criteria.
C-4 Prepare a technical memorandum explaining presenting the identified
criteria and explaining the process used in their development.
Responsibility
BRW/Kaiser with support from both the city and the MTC.
Task D DATA COLLECTION AND ANALYSIS TECHNIQUES
Overview
Based upon the results of the preceding task and the availability of
DPM and urban area data, a plan for collection and analysis of data
will be developed. This plan will specify the data needs, data sources
and responsibilities for supplying it, and statistical techniques for
analysis of data.
,� - 21 -
Sub-Tasks •
' D-1 Review results of the DPM feasibility study, and other information
pertaining to the study area, to identify the existing data which
satisfies parts of the need for this evaluation.
D-2 Specify the additional information necessary to fulfill all data
needs, identify sources and methods of acquisition for such data,
and determine appropriate roles and responsibilities in data
acquisition.
D-3 Determine optimum statistical techniques for data reduction to
yield results in the most useful form.
D-4 Design appropriate survey instruments and data manipulation
forms.
D-5 Prepare a technical memorandum containing the results of this
task.
Responsibility
BRW/Kaiser.
Task E DPM BEFORE AND AFTER STUDIES PLAN
Overview
The elments of the preceding tasks will be integrated into a comprehensive
plan to be followed to carry out the assessment of the DPN1 system.
Sub-Tasks
E-1 Design an overall procedure for before and after studies, including
a definition of roles, responsibilities, and levels of effort by
participating organizatiqns, and a schedule related to the
implementation schedule of the DPM.
E-2 Compile a before and after studies manual which describes the
assessment plan. It will contain and relate the results of the
preceding tasks in a manner which will guide staff and contractors
in the implementation phase of the program. It will also serve
as the final product of this first phase.
Responsibilsty
BRW/Kaiser
. - 22 -
, �''��� �
.r:i ��..;':�,_ :.`��
PART III REFERENCE DOCUMENTS
Experimental Design Plan for the Downtown People Mover Demonstration
Projects UMTA-DC-06-0162-77-1
Proposal for a Downtown People Mover System, City of St. Paul, Minnesota
MTC Report 76-08, June, 1976
Project Description and Scope of Work for Preliminary Engineering and
Related Activities, St. Paul
Downtown People Mover Demonstration, MTC, St. Paul, US DOT, July 12,
1977
Project Description and Scope of Work for Preliminary Engineering and
Related Activities, St. Paul Downtown People Mover Demonstration,
March 3, 1977
Safety and Reliability Reports
Final Report, Preliminary Engineering Study for a Downtown People Mover
System in St. Paul
Impact Assessment Program, Cambridge Systematics
fi. �� 7� e,•� ' Gw�t,c.Q
� _-- �'�,��_� 1.�-,,�,r
COUNCIL RESOLUTION 2� ��" �' ��
O ' -�° �i-� •
� �IEN�/N6 7%fE
� E OLUTION AUTHORIZING AMENDMENT V TO INT POWERS AGREEMENT
R DOWNTOWN PEOPLE MOVER TRANSIT SYSTEM PRELIMINARY EPdGINEERING �H►4z�
ScoPE OF u10�K �-�'v �vdt-T �IND �y7yp,�iZi.t/6 n�-°rid�9l�aiy'or A[.,7�,P�fP�S
�y� ST�F2/�(o CP�sY9�f i�E� �'!E�/BF,�S
WHEREAS, the City of Saint Paul and the Metropolitan Transit Commission
(MTC) entered into a Joint Powers Agreement, dated June 21 , 1977, pursuant
to authority of Minnesota Statutes Section 471 .59 and Resolution CF 268932,
providing for the Preliminary Engineering Phase of the Saint Paul People Mover
system; and
WHEREAS, pursuant to City Council Authorization said agreement has been
a,nended on January l0y and June 22, 1978, April 4, 1979 an� JunE 26, j930 ta
expand the Scope of Work, increase the funding and extend the time of said
agreement; and
WHEREAS, the D.P.M. Steering Committee on June 25;�1980 approved an amended
Scope of Work, and budget to complete the preliminary engineering phase of the ,��
�atoo,a��`°�s.rq.�.�i�c�s��.
project; and recommended an amendment to the joint powerS agreement�which would ��'��`�`�
authorize members of the Steering Committee to designate alter�rrates to represent
them at committee meetings; and
WHEREAS, the City of Saint Paul and the Metropolitan Transit Commission des7re
to amend said agreement to complete the preliminary engineering phase of the
Saint Paul downtown people mover demonstration project;
NOW THEREFORE BE IT RESOLVED, that the Saint Pau1 City Council :
1 . Approves the Phase IB Scope of Work and amended budget and authorizes
the P+I.T.C. to execute and submit a grant amendment to the Urban Mass
Transportation Administration on behalf of the City/MTC Joint Powers.
��'����
-2-
2. The proper City offices are hereby authorized and directed to execute
an amendment to the joint powers agreement for preliminary engineering and
related work which includes the Phase IB Scq�e of Work and the amended
budget therefore, an authorization to Steering Committee members to
designate alternates to attend meetings of the co�an�ttee,
amendment of the consultant contracts,provides for the local share of
funding in connection with the grant _amendment, and provides for an
extension of the term of the joint powers agreement to July 1, 1981
or the completion of the wark whichever is earlier.
�
3. Agrees to provide the local share of funding c�f up to but not to exceed
$169,000 as a cash contribution.
4. The City Clerk is hereby directed to transmft 'a copy of this resolution
to the Chairman of the M.T.C. `