The URL can be used to link to this page

276099 CITY CLERK - FINANCE � � � - DEPARTMENT G I TY O F SA I NT PA U L COURCII �� li� �E - MAYOR File N O. v City Attny/JTH Cil Resolution Presented By Referred To Committee: Date Out of Committee By Date WHEREAS, A municipality may, pursuant to Minnesota Statutes, Section 462.353, carry on comprehensive municipal planning activi- ties for guiding the future development and improvement of the municipality; and WHEREAS, The Council of the City of Saint Paul may, pursuant to Minnesota Statutes, Section 462.355, Subdivision 3, adopt or amend a comprehensive plan or portion thereof after a recommen- dation by the Planning Commission; and WHEREAS, The Planning Commission has in substantial part recommended adoption of a plan for District 10 as a part of the City comprehensive plan; and WHEREAS, The Planning Commission's Certification of the District 10 Plan (1) recommended that Section 4 .7 of the Social Development Plan component of the District 10 Plan be recognized as the position of Como Community regarding the Job Corps Center, but that Section 4.7 not be adopted as part of the Comprehensive Plan, and (2) withheld approval of Section 5.1.4 Recommendations 1� and 17, and Section 5.2.4 Recommendation 3, of the Economic Development Plan Component; and WHEREAS, the policy of the City o� Saint Paul regarding the Job Corps Center is set forth in C�,ty Council Resolution CF 272989, adopted May 22, 1979, and Section 4.7 of the District 10 Plan is expressly noted to be a statement of the Como Community 's concern regard.ing the Center which does not propose any action on the part of the City; and COUNCILMEN Yeas Nays Requestgd by Department of: Hunt Levine In Favor Maddox McMahon B snoweiter __ Against Y Tedesco Wilson Form Approved by City Attorney Adop4�d by Council: Date — Certified Passed by Council Secretary BY gy _ Approved by :Navor: Date _ Approve� ►�•� Mayor for Subm��sie� to Cot�ncil BY - BY — � ,-- - ' �- CITY CLERK M .�. - FINANCE COUIICll ��ts��g RY - DEPARTMENT G I T Y O F S A I N T PA U L B B - MAYOR File N O. � Council Resolution Presented By r Referred To Committee: Date Out of Committee By Date -2- WHEREAS, the following action by the Council of the City of Saint Paul is not an implicit adoption of the Comprehensive Plan of 1963 , or any portion thereof heretofore recommended by the Planning Commission nor does it affect Resolution CF 272989 which remains in force; now, therefore, be it RESOLVED That the Council of the City of Saint Paul, does hereby adopt the District 10 Plan including, notwithstanding the contrary recommendation of the Planning Commission, Section 4.7 and 4.7 .1 as the statement of position and recommendations of the Como Community District Council regarding the Job Corps Center, but excluding, as recommended by the Planning Commission, recommendations 15 and 17 of Section 5.1.4 and recommendation 3 of Section 5.2.4, which Plan adoption is subject to such review by the Metropolitan Council as may be required by law; and be it FURTHER RESOLVED that the comments of the Planning Commission respecting Sections 5.1.4 and 5.2.4 of the Plan be subject to such further discu�sa.ons between the District Council, the Commi�sion and the City Council as may be appropriate. COUNCILMEN Yeas Nays Requestgd by Department of: Hunt Levine In Favoc Maddox McMahon B Showalter � Against Y - Tedesco wlson DEC 2 3 1980 Form Approve ity Attorney Adopted b oun 1: Date Cert� � d Y• - ed by Council Secre�ry BY ' A o d by :Vlayor: Dat' C 2 9 1980 App v by Mayor for bm' si` to Council By �'�f`s'��`rr:i:.�? �,; i;'J t _ ,� - � �6��9 . . - �,..�.,,,,,��,::" (`� ��' CITY OF SA1NT PAUL ,,� pirr a ... I Y�/, s�e� ,�., . ""' ' ' OFFICE OF THE CITY ATTORNEY �t , i.; ;o .l� �, • '' Itl111111i1, �- �<.� `�"�� _' EDWARD P. STARR, CITY ATTORNEY '••� 647 City Hall,Saint Paul,Minnesota 55102 GEORGE LATIMER 612-298-5121 MAYOR November 20, 1980 Councilwoman Joanne Showalter 713 City Hall Saint Paul, Minnesota 55102 Dear Councilwoman Showalterz You requested further response to your inquiry at the November 18 , 1980 public hearing on the Como Community District 10 Plan re- specting the nature of the City Council action on the Plan and the effect of approval of Section 4.7 of the Plan. Of specific concern to you is the effect, if any, of adoption of Section 4.7 .1 Recommendation 2 on the Job Corps Ad Hoe Citizen Comm�ttee hereto- fore created by the City Council. (Resolutions CF 272733 adopted March 29, 1979; CF 272989 adopted May 22 , 1979) pursuant to agreement between the Governor of Minnesota and the National Job Corps Director, Department of Labor. Section 4 .7 of the Plan is a statement of the Como Community 's opposition to a Job Corps Center program undertaking by the Department of Labor (DOL) at the Bethel College site and the reasons therefor. Section 4 .7 .1 is a series of eight recommen- dations of Como Community should DOL choose to implement the program over the Committee 's objection. Each of these recommen- elations is prefaced by the language, "The Department of Labor should" . The Planning Commission certification of the District 10 Plan tb the City Council recommended that Section 4 .7 be recognized as the community's position respecting Job Corps Center without adopting the Section as part of the Saint Paul Comprehensive Plan, noting that DOL, not the City, would be responsible for implementing the recommendation proposals . • The Section 4.7.1 recommendations, intended by the Community to have effect in the event the Job Corps program is implemented by DOL and then to the extent they might be accepted by DOL, identify a number of specific actions directed at particulars of operation of the Job Corps Center, viz : DOL and the State renegotiate a Job Corps Center agreement; DOL consent to an enrollment limit with a Minnesota residency and a Minnesota school attendance eligibility requirement; DOL recognize a Community Advisory Committee elected from District 10 and Falcon Heights; DOL delegate to this Committee responsibility to screen applicants, impose disciplinary actions , "screen, monitor, and consult with" the program operator, and evaluate the proqram "in terms of how and where it may not be in compliance with Public Law 94-142" authorizing the program. �,�-�J . .-- _ . . C_ � - . �� Councilwoman Joanne Showalter Page 2 November 20, 1980 The District 10 Plan was considered by the City Council for adoption as a component of the Saint Paul Comprehensive Plan. "The comprehensive plan shall contain objectives, policies , standards and programs to guide public and private land use, development, redevelopment and preservation of all lands and waters within the jurisdiction of" the City. Minn. Stat. Section 473.859, Subd. l. A comprehensive plan, once adopted , is to be subsequently implemented by separate adoption of zoning and building codes, subdivision regulation, public facilities, capital improvment plans and other controls within the capability of the City to enact and enforce. Minn. Stat. Section 473.859, Subd. 4. Sections 4.7 and 4.7 . 1 of the District 10 Plan are in the nature of specific recommendations affecting the operation of the Federal Job Corps Program. They are not a program to guide land use, development, redevelopment or preservation. As an implementation and operational program these Sections are entirely dependent upon the acquiescence and agreement of the Department of Labor which agreement the City cannot compel as the specifics do not relate to authorized land use or physical development regulation. Because Sections 4 .7 and 4 .7 .1 are not the stuff of comprehen- sive planning within the statutory definition or scheme, their inclusion in the District Plan and incorporation into the Comprehensive Plan is but a statement of position and request addressed to the Department of Labor by the Community, which can have force and effect only in the event and to the extent DOL accedes to the request. Accordingly, the existence and functioning af the Job Corps Ad Hoc Citizen Committee is not affected by City Council adoption of the District 10 Plan as part of the Saint Paul Comprehensive . Plan. Should DOL recognize a commu nity advisory committee as requested by Recommendation 2 , the continued existence of the Committee would not be affected, although its function could be affected by the particulars of the DOL response. Sincerely, Edward P. Starr City Attorney / " ames T. Hart Assistant City Attorney cc: Mayor Latimer City Council members ,�"h-''-:i� �� CITY OF SAINT PAUL �;,��;y,�'� -�.:.m.�. OFFICE OF THE CITY COIINCIL ■mseeuane s m��r�a .�►��.It r��i` ��.. DEC 1119� RON MADDOX �� KARL NEID, JR. Councilman Legislative Aide December 11, 1980 TO: ✓1�layor Georg Latimer City Counci leznbers FROM: Ron Maddox `-'�'�t��'" Council Pre ident RE: District 10 Plan Attached please find a resolution adopting the District 10 Plan as per the Council action at the public hearing. It clearly eleminates the green sheet comments of the Planning Commission relative to Job Corps. It also incor- porates the Planning Commission Green Sheet comments on Energy Park. For adequate notice I sincerely request that this item be placed on the Council agenda of December 23, 1980. RM:das cc: Mike Fritz A1 Olson CITY HALL SEVENTH FLOOR SAINT PAUI_, MINNFSOTA 55102 612/298-4475 �OO s� .t: ? � �, ^"� ,,.....,,,, . ��.`a.Y:� �g°�T' � ' CITY OF SAINT PAUL _�s 'o ' OFFICE OF THE CITY ATTORNEY :, �`� �"� i°° EDWARD P. STARR, CITY ATTORNEY s �•s• 647 City Hall, Saint Paul,Minnesota 55102 ��.,•.,,•:,,,, GEORGE LATIMER 612-298-5121 MAYOR December 5, 1980 Council President Ron Maddox 719 City Hall Saint Paul, NIN 55102 Dear Mr. Ma.ddox: Pursuant to City Council action on November 18, 1980, approving the Como Community District 10 Plan and directing this office to prepare the necessary resolution, the resolution is enclosed. The resolution adopts the Plan incorporating Planning Commission green sheet comment on three Energy Park recommendations, but rejects the Commission' s green sheet on the Job Corps Center in accordance with the City Council motion. Si rely, � .. WARD P. T City Attorney EPS:jr Enc. cc: Mike Fritz, Chairman District 10 Council C�) ' ' _ . _ , �/� �� , : . ,r _ . � - , - � ' , � ' . �, , • r � � j : � . " � , , - ', ; , _ 1 - . , `.�a�ber 2J, 1� . , j . . . , - ltr. �d :8tarr . _ � , , C'ity Attern�}► ' . , " � , Roo� �Ts City B�l]. - � �, ' . Dsar 83rs - . • . . - , { . After r publia heari�g oa l�ov�saber 18� 1980, ^the Cit�r Cauncil. - �� a��pt,wd s moLion raqwsting f.t�t t�a pi�opeir resolu�i�on b,e , , � ; _ parepared adopting the DisLrict,�10 Y'lan Mith tbs d�tletiau of : � a� of tbe gi-een sheet iaserta �ich coatFs#n�d t�l�! co�r+sot ot , '� t�he Pl+�nning Co�mmissian pertaining to�t2�s Job t7o�1. Tbe _ � sot�,on al�o provide� t�at�three additiaaaY grsen.�ta, ._ E aon#.ainipg"cosments of t1��e Plaaniag Co�missic�, be Ystt fn . ttye plaa ��b�ct to f'ur�4`her� na�oti,ations be#,�n tbe City 't�wncil, the Planniag Oo�iaaion a�d t.he Dirtrict Couseil, - - r� � � . . . � . . . ' . , .. � � � � � '... - . ' . . ,� Veryc trg13► 7►ours, : , , � . � , � . Rose Mix , � - City Clerk . - ' - - �. - , _ I . _ _ � . . . . . � ,4 . . � . � \ �- . . � � • . ' .. - . �� . . , . , . . . . __ . . � .. .. . ' . 1 . . . . / ' . � . . , . � . . �. . .. . . . - . . ` ..r .. � . .. � . '_\. � .. . . - •" . . . \ . � . . , . : . . . .. . � ' .. < - � � . . � . . ' . ' . � . , . . . � . k ' - . . . . . ' .- . ' . ` , � .. � " . .. . ' " ' , ' /r . ' , . . � . .i.- � . � l �� . r �`�5�� November 7, 1980 Rose Mix, City Clerk 3� City Hall St. Paul, Minnesota Dear Rose: � Please be notified that I have called a special meeting of the City Council for Tuesday, November 18 1980, at 7:30 P.M. at Chelsea Heights Recreation Center, Ha.mline an Hoyt to consider the District 10 Plan. Council Pres dent We, the undersigned Councilmen, do hereby waive written notice requirements for a special meeting of the City Council on Tuesday, November 18, 1980, at 7:30 P.M. at Chel a ei�hts Recreation Center, Hamline and Hoyt, for reasons stated abo . � • . r �� i�` i�• , , , , _ _ � . � , , , r _ ' - <,�; ' � �r , �, . _ . .� . . � ��. � � . . . ` -_ ,. �� ., � � .. ( ... . � . . 11�� `+ 1 i �; . .. . � . � � . . � .. � , . .. . . . �` . � . . . , . .. ��:! , . w . , , , ,,:, `� , ,; , ; - , � , .. .. . ,; . � _ , , , ,. . _ , \ � � . � � � _ ; . , _ ; � � , ; , . . . . . � . ; , 9� , . , , _ �kttob�r Stl.�, ],� � . . , , , � � , ' � , . - Pl.e�iming Sta.ft - Ct,t,� At3]. 1lunes� � . . , � St.:.PaL�l.� Nn. - . �. , A#�'�tiit#�i l�r.. i�'r�tic H��flsr . � _ . . , , . , � aesr:�rt . . . - Tlr-�S�ty t:�cil �pda�r;�d a a�t�o� �ttti�g a da�e ot �#sta . . t'or �1+�►t lT �brr 18th,, �.980 a� �`:t� P.�i. ati t� .t�elaea, ' �. � _ ' , Rear�itian,1��, ,8u�ia� snd BarE Avrmies! '�o �si,�qr� ti� ` ; � Dl.�riet IO glan. ilill yc�n pleaas l�lce aarf o! !�e � aatioa !'or -�i.a t�earie�t ,1�'°I�r ewtiti• - �` � , . . _ �►'� Y�'�s . � i - � l[!s_ , ' . , . ' , , . . -Cl.t,► Cterk - � _� ' � . JtBO t� _ _ � ; _ • , . • � .:� _ , . , , � . , : i ; k � ,. � , • ; ,� , _ , � , . • , , . , ._ , ; � . , , , . , � � , � • � � , ` � , ��. �� ` ,� � � ��u�L�� q� •,! � COMO COMMUNITY COUNCIL DZSTRICT �10 ea� �� 1339 North Pascal Avenue St. Paul, Mn. 55108 ��'� l r �,�,, CGt�!`:C��?.�,'-t^! �i:i�;�i r�iH��:� October 9, 1980 TO: RON MADDOX and Members of City Council '� FROM: MIKE FRITZ ;�i�� RE: REQUEST FOR PUBLIC HEARING We are requesting a public hearing for the Como Community Plan. A Open Public Meeting has been set for the community for TUESDAY, NOVEMBER 18, 1980 at 7:00 P.M. at the Chelsea Recreation Center, Hamline and Hoyt Avenues. We also invite the Mayor to attend this hearing. Please set aside this evening to attend our meeting. MF/md • � ;�� -.. �� .� �; ��.��.�� Dktrlcs 10 Plao. ,; Te.ca�aormep4ase.,r;,,'��,:�:r L►t+be Db#iM lo�e,wiJeh b.+ie�Af �� ;C�it�r.if Xbe� �� t ade�pE tLe yiili; " ' P�dve Pt�n. . - , ! 1a��f ab .�i�`jp��l avaliabte e{`�e piaan{� ��,�� Depaortinmt 'oi �lan�it��`ifQ��ic Devsiapmeot locateN at�X�F�sp��;' Dated(ktober 8�i lObO `"r ,� �1fDL ' �.;:,.�Clerk _ fNwsm6er 1,!Y@D)- . . .. - . � �f�� NOTICE OF PUBLIC HEARING The Council of the City of St. Paul has fixed the 18th day of November at 7 :30 P.M. at Chelsea Heights Recreation Center, Hamline at Hoyt to conduct a r public hearing on the District 10 Plan. The Council of the City of St. Paul is reviewing the District 10 Plan, which is a general district plan for the Como Community. If the review is favor- able, the City Council will adopt the plan as part of the City's Comprehensive Plan. Information about the District 10 Plan is available at the Planning Division of the Department of Planning and Economic Development located a� 25 West Fourth Street. Datnd �ctober 2Q, 19�0 '"•' " �ose Mix . Y' �ity �lerk _ �"Tovember 1 , 1980) � � i . � . � 3i ��:?: CI�'Y OF SAINT PAUL ``�'�'`"� �;+ �� . :� OFFICE OF THE MAYOR o .,, � iiii'� � � ` � 9;� ��1-L ^ � ��I�� • _ . r� �� 347 CITY HALL •� �'`"^.�-WS`� SAIIVT PAUL, MINNESOTA 55102 � GEORGE LA�'IMER . . (612) 298-4323 ` . ' _ . MAYOR October 28, 1980 Council President Ron Maddox and Members of the City Council Seventh Floor, City Hall St. Paul , Minnesota 55102 _ RE: Transmittal. of the District 10 P1an to the. City Counci:l . _ • ., . Dear Council President Maddox and Members of the City Council : On October 24, 1980, after holding a public hearing, the Planning Commission certified the District 10 Plan except for the following recommendations: 1 ) Retaining Midway Stadium in the district; 2) Establishing restrictive cov- enants, limiting building height for Energy Park land in the district; 3) Developing a 300 foot wide linear park along the west side of Lexington Parkway from Pierce �utler to Rosen Road; and 4) Recommendations pertaining to the Humphrey/BeL�ei Job Corps. District plans are proposed amendments to the � Comprehensive Plan, and must be adopted by the City Council before they come into legal e;�ect. "Certification" by the Planning Commission represents their recorur;er,�ation to the Mayor and the City Council that the plan should be adopted. I am distributing to you copies of the plan for review preparatory to your public hearing in the District. The District 10 Plan has already undergone an extensive review process. It was approved by the District 10 Communi�ty Council . It was circulated by the Planning Commission to City departments and agencies, both as a preliminary plan and in its present form. It was also circulated to all adjacent districts. I am impressed by the understanding of city issues and the dedication of the residents toward their own communities. I am pleased to transmit their District 10 Plan to you. Sincerely, I S� c� • George Latimer Mayor ENC GL:dmm cc: Peggy Reichert • � } �r'�� : ��STATUS OF DISTRICT PLANS AS PART OF THE COMPREHENSIVE PLAN Adopted By Saint Paul Planning Coimnission 2-9-79 � ' �he Planning Corrtm.iss3on followed a systematic City's role in implementatior., the °lann�ng process in revfewing and adopting district plans. Commission does insert boxed comments to make it Th.is prxess is described in the statement below. explicit that recommendations beyond the City's The planning Commission prepared the statement to . jurisdiCtlon are not certified by the Planning clarify its intent in adopting district plans, and� COIIm15S10t1. In all CdS2S, the Planning i,011NtI1S51011 to reauce the risx of confvsion on the part of will forward recommendations to the appropriate users of district plans. implementing authority. A district plan becomes an element of the City's The Planning Comnissi�n's review of the district Comprehensive Plan after being approved by the plan consists of evaluating comments from elected district, certified by the Planning Corr�nission, officials, city departments and agencies, adjacent and adopted by the City Council. To develop a districts, and a team of citywide planners. district plan, the district forms a planning Potential areas of conflict are identified and comnittee. It meets with residents, businesses, brought to the attention of the district council city departments, and other agencies. The district so that it may consider changing its plan. The planning comnittee prepares a preliminary plan for Planning Commission holds a public hearing and review by the public and the City. After revisions acts on the plan. are made, the district council approves the plan and submits it to the Planning Commission. The City Counci7 then reviews the plan and evaluates both Planning Corr�nission and district The Planning Commission reviews and "certifies" recommendations where they conflict. The City the district alan--that is, recommends its adoptior Counc�il holds a public hearing and may adopt a11 by the Gity Counci7 as an element of the (:ompre- or parts of the plan. As with all parts of the �'hensive Plan. The Planning Comnission may certify Comprehensive Plan, the City Council has the final 'all or part of the district plan. The Planning decision on adoption by the City. - Commission withholds certification from distr�ct Upon adoption, the district plan influences city plan recommendations only in cases of major policy and coordinates actions within the district. recommendations which: (1) conflict with city policy; (2) re}ate-tQ-policies ander review; or The district plan may be revised periodically by ° f3j are beyond,the jurisdTCtion° of�the cTty the district, subject. to review by the City. As government. new citywide policies or plans are adopted, the Planning Commission may recomnend changes in the The Planning Cortmission does not modify or delete status of portions of the district �lan to main- any wording from district plans. All wording tain consistency among elements of the Compre- approved by district councils is sent to the City hensive Plan. Council. Where the Planning Commission recommends Adopted comprehensive plan elements have a legal � that a district plan item be rejected or modified, effect. The Metropolitan Land Planning Act it does so by inserting additions into the plan. These additions are put in boxes to set them off (Minnesota Statutes 1976) states: "Each loca� from the original text. They explain the Planning 9overnmental unit shall adopt official contr��s Commission's position. The Planning Commission as described in its comprehensive plan"and further may also insert boxes with co�nents from city shall not adopt any official control or fiscal departments and notes that update material in the devise which is an conflict with its comprehensive plan. plan" The law's basic effect is to prevent the City from taking actions contradictory to its In each district plan there are recommendations adopted plans, but it does not require that every � which are not certified because they are beyond item in adopted plans be implemented. � the 3urisdiction of the city government. Although such recommendations are appropriate content for District planning has resulted in closer working district plans, their implementation is determined relationships between the City and its neighbor- by other governmental units such as the Boar•d of hoods. It has given official status to neighbor- Education, the Metropolitan Transit Commission, hood planning efforts. More importantly, it has and Ramsey County. Where the district plan word- resulted in successful implementation of plans in �ing makes it cTear that the City is not expected St. Paul's neighborhoods. District plans should to implement the recommenJation, the Planning become part of a continuing process for making C�nrnission dces not insert any comments. But the relationship between the City and its neighbor- where the district plan wording is unclear on the hoods work. A �;' 2-9-79 _ ;�� _ ... , . _ , .,_.. . _. , . , _ .__ , .., _ __.. _�.---, _ _..._.w � ._� _ �.. ._ � . `- • ��V�� ; Recommendations HUMAN SERVICES - 1.The We1Fa."re Department should decentralize food GOaI stamp and other service distribution sites into neighborhood locations that are accessible to Meet the human service needs of all segments of users. the corrmunity, in order to maintain the diversity of population. 2.The Welfare Department should extend the operating hours of functions which require pablic access so that they can be used by working people. �bj9CtiVeS a.Counseling services should be provided to the 3.rubiic information programs st�ovla be .tnitiatea community in at least the followina areas: Family by the welfare nepartment in oraer to increase the relations; chemical dependency (including alcohol 1eve1 of participation in public assistance and drug treatment); juvenile delinquency; and prayrams. medical assistance. 4.The DBGC should coordinate commvnity social b.Neighborhood services that are affordable to service programs with pvblic assistance programs. residents should be provided 111 at least the following areas: Legal aid, crime prevention, day 5.TI,e WeZfare Department should provide an aavo- care, employment placement, consumer protection, cacy program within the social service system for services for the elderly, services for the handi- persons needing help in obtaining speciazizea capped, services for teenagers, foster care, services. mental retardation, child abuse protection, comnunity-wide corrrnunication, and comnunity organizations.. . ... � �� : � �� _. ,�. ,d.,�»=- . •=�...� .. � �'-_ ��,� Issues � � . „ .� , �� "' ' `��%'��'�°°- �=��" a.District 4 has a o ulation in need of man ��..: �-�.,.�x P P Y ��_�'. � ��,,.„„�„ social service programs. Some are currently „��,..�',;��„ +r'\ �,,;,;�,� avai 1 abl e wi thi n the nei ghborhood. Others, � �, � � �-� although outside of Dayton's Bluff, are accessible _. . � ��'�'�`� °°r � . . . � - . ,___,, �� -=,, to resid nt . owever, there are needs for e s !i �;�..�.�-:�.�:i:,°-,�,, "" -�`"'�` - services in the comnunity which simply are not ' � 9 .;; � being met. �,�'*,�,�,,,,�'�'�'-�,;� ,.�_;:::,..�,� 'V � Y � �,�....•� , '`" � ,�r t_.,,,�� b.Accessibility is the major factor in the � � w delivery of services. This includes location, ,. r�°= £ �=�5 S°xr-= •� -. hours, cost, eligibility requirements, and �� knowledge about the services. c.These are the priority human service needs. �;� �- " " � Background information and proposals are given for > ��""'�" �`' �` ¢ each. Planning and prograr�ning should emphasize �� these, although other needs as identified should .� .9 ... �,.-: .._ ` also be addressed. �; � �� :.� �� Services for the Elderly � Ij 9 � � , � � � ��j� � r "�� ;�� r�,�� ;� '�� a.Approximately 12% of the district's popu�lation - �� '' _ � �� "Y * � ��' is over 65. This is not above the city's figure, �� _ �� f �� ''�� ;° ,��; but it is significantly hi9h (about 3,200 people). � , �� a� ��;� � � � � � �, M � ,� �� r�`�� b.Local service programs for Dayton's B1 uff's �- -,w �� ..�� '� -,��'�`,��,� ��, elderly include: Ramsey Action Program s Congre- y�,, �� , �, � gate Dining Program; CONCERN (Citizens Organized 14�,T' z��g�� for Nutri ti onal Concerns of East Si de Resi dents i n � � �� ' Need) (home delivered meals); East Area Home � � ' 1 �V..,��: Delivered Meals, and many homes for the aged. �1 12-4-79 18 ��