Loading...
00-620�R1GINAL Presented By Referred To 1 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 9 10 11 12 13 14 15 16 17 18 19 20 21 22 RESOLUTION CITY OF SAINT PAiIL, NIINNESOTA � Council File # 00 + G ap Csreen Sheet # ���{'3 t� 3 a°t WHEREAS, it appears to the Council from the report of code enforcement office that no work is being done on the properry at 681 Edmund Avenue d that the owners do not have fiznding for the work; now, therefore, be it RESOLVED, that lines 7 and 8 on page 2 of Co cil File No. 00-129, a resolution relating to 681 Edmund Avenue in Saint Paul, are her y amended to read as follows: "The rehabilitation or demolition of the s cture to be completed within si���er�ks fifteen (15� days after the date of the C ncil Hearing and passaee and approval of this Resolution; ���A9� and" and, be it FURTHER RESOLVED, at lines 50 and 51 on page 2 of Council File No. 00-129, a resolution relating to 681 Edm d Avenue in Saint Paul, aze hereby amended to read as follows: "The rehabilitarion demolition and removal of the structure must be completed within fifteen�l5) davs ' after the date of the Council Hearing and passage and � Requested by Depastment of: ay: Adopted by Council: Date Adoption Certified by Council Secretary ay: Approved by Mayor: Date Form Approved by City Attorney Ey: � � L '� Approved by tayor for Submission to Council By: By: BE ON CQLINCILAGQ�/1 B' i June � 2000 � -� rw.�et wrt ROtiT91G OFD9t TOTAL # OF SIGNATURE PAGES oo—ta.o GREEN SHEET No 1 C� �' � 43 � � oF...,�rowccraie rnrca� ❑ arcwnowEr ❑ crtrawc ❑ wuwu��amvcFaow. ❑ quMO��ua�vv�ccra ❑ YYORI�YRlNm ❑ (CL1P ALL LOCATIONS FOR SIGNATUR� Resolution amending Council File 00-129 relating to 681 Edmmmd Avenue. r �u� ���� May 26, 2000 a i.. :, f PLANNING CAMMISSION CIB CAMMITTEE CIVIL SERVICE CAMMISSION Has mis aareorclRim ever wo�tl unOer a mMraa r« u,is ae�M�nn YES NO Has Mis P�rm ever heen a ary empbyee9 , YES NO Dces thic percoNfirm Pocseas 8 sidll not normalHPOCSeccetl bY anY curtmt city emPbyee7 YES NO b ihia Pe'+soMrm a tarpeted veiMoR - " YES NO �lain all yec answEra m aeparate sheet and attach to Oreen,sheet / s � , �^ i ,� IF APPROVED AOUNT OF TRANSACTION S COST/REVENl/E BUGfiETED (C�RCLE ON� VES NO SOURCE � ACTMTY NMIBER INFORMATON(Ef�WN) c � -- - -- - - -- - Nancy Anderson 681 Edmund � _ .� . ._. _ __ ._�. _ . _�.. . _ _ _ _ ,_ - T�__.,_. . _ ___.... , __ . _ Pa9e_ �O —f.a0 From: Phil Byrne To: Magner, Steve; RileyM Date: 5J17/00 5:44PM Subject: 681 Edmund Steve and Meghan, Gerry Strathman pointed out to me that the resolution on 681 Edmund was not on the agenda, but rather it was a report of code enforcement. Since the resolution on 681 Edmund was not before the councii today, what i will do (with Meghan) is prepare a resolution which rescinds the previously-amended version, putting back in the 15 days. I believe that you will have to give notice of the council action and the fact that this will be on the agenda in the future to the property owners and others required to get notice. Then when it next goes on the council agenda, there will be at least the possibility of the owners talking to CM Blakey and perhaps speaking to the issue of how they intend to proceed. So as of this moment the old resolution is stiff in force, subject to the council vote to make the change, which will be done in a new resolution to be submitted as soon as I can prepare it. Meghan, we can talk tomorrow about this. Phil CC: Blakey, Jerry; Mclnerney, Gerry; Strathman, Gerry ��-� a � J,�e i, a000 681 Edmund Avenue Per a conversation with Steve Magner, Property Code Enfarcement, he responded that the following standard process was being handled by their office regarding this public hearing: 1, The principal owner/fee owner were served personally with the public hearing notice. 2. Other interested parties were contacted - IRS and Thadeus Wilerson, D'uector/ParenVChildren Developmenf 3. Published in the Legal Ledger 4. Building posted of public hearing notice (both front and back doors) (Neighbors and District Council not formally norified, but they do haue conversations with District Councils periodically regarding properkies in neigl�borhoods). (Maxine is to contact me regarding placement of letter on future Council Agenda announcing public hearing). IAA.�'^-� / NA S'� �� �' i •.,p J��� �,�f'� ` \y 'v' CITf7_ENSERVICEOEF[CE d�--� �x ai�<J Fred Owusu Ciry C1erk DMSiON OF PROPERTY CODE EYFORCEPdENT MichaelRMorehead Proqram.bfanager___ CTTY OF SAIN'f PAUL Norm Coleman, Mayar �.++. May 26, 2000 Nuisance Buildittg Code Enforcement 1i W. KellaggBtvd Rm. 190 Tel: 651-266-89-00 SaintPa:d,MN55102 F¢r:651-266-8426 XAMENDED CITY,COUNCIL DATEx FOR NOTICE OF PUSLIC HEARINGS Council President and Members of the City Council Citizen Service Office, VacantlNuisance Buildings Enfarcement Division has requested the City Council schedule public hearings to consider a resolution ordering the repair or removal of the nuisance building(s) located at: :< 681 Edmund Avenue The City Council has scheduled the date of this hearing as follows: City CounciI Hearing -*Wednesday, June 28, 2000 The owners and responsible parties of record are: Name and Last Known Address Parent Child Development Institute Attn: Linda Coleman 914 Thomas Avenue St. Paul, MN �5104-2600 Ritter & Fenske, Ltd Attomey 7effrey Fenske 461 University Avenue West St. Paul, MN>jI03 Thad Wilderson 463 University Avenue West St. Paul, MN 55103 WesYem State Bank � Interest Fee Owner Attorney for Parent Child Dev. Inst. Interested Pazty Mortga�ee 653 University Avenue �,'est St. Paul, MN 55104 �br�aa 681 Edmund Avenue May 26, 2000 Page 2 Name and Last Known Address Interest Internal Revenue Service Interest - Federal Ta�c Lien 316 North Robert Street, Stop 5700 Attn: Monry Luhmann St. Paul, NIl� 55101-1040 The legal description of this properly is: „ Chute Brothers Division No. 6 Addition To The City of St. Paul, Mitui. Lot 30 Division of Code Enforcement has deciared this buildin�{s) to constitute a"nuisance" as defined by Legislative Code, Chapter 45. Division of Code Enforcement has issued an oxder to the then known responsibie parties to eliminate this nuisance condition by correcting the deficiencies or by razing and removing this building(s). Inasmuch as this Order to Abate has not been complied with the nuisance condition remains unabated, the community continues to suffer the blighYing influence of this properly. It is the recommendation of the Division of Code Enforce�nent that the City Council pass a resolution ordering the responsible parties to either repair, or demolish and remove this building in a timely manner, and failing that, authorize the Division of Code Enforcement to proceed to demolition and removal, and to assess the costs incurred against the real estate as a special assessment to be collected in the same manner as taxes. 5incerely, Steve Jf�lagner Steve Ma�er Vacant Buildin�s Supervisor Division of Code Enforcement Citizen Serc�ice Office SNL•ml cc: Fran1� Berg, Building Inspection and Desi� Me�han Kiley, City Attomeys Office Nancy Anderson, Assistant Secretary to the Council Pau1 Mordorski PED-Housin� Division ccnph �R1GINAL Presented By Referred To 1 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 9 10 11 12 13 14 15 16 17 18 19 20 21 22 RESOLUTION CITY OF SAINT PAiIL, NIINNESOTA � Council File # 00 + G ap Csreen Sheet # ���{'3 t� 3 a°t WHEREAS, it appears to the Council from the report of code enforcement office that no work is being done on the properry at 681 Edmund Avenue d that the owners do not have fiznding for the work; now, therefore, be it RESOLVED, that lines 7 and 8 on page 2 of Co cil File No. 00-129, a resolution relating to 681 Edmund Avenue in Saint Paul, are her y amended to read as follows: "The rehabilitation or demolition of the s cture to be completed within si���er�ks fifteen (15� days after the date of the C ncil Hearing and passaee and approval of this Resolution; ���A9� and" and, be it FURTHER RESOLVED, at lines 50 and 51 on page 2 of Council File No. 00-129, a resolution relating to 681 Edm d Avenue in Saint Paul, aze hereby amended to read as follows: "The rehabilitarion demolition and removal of the structure must be completed within fifteen�l5) davs ' after the date of the Council Hearing and passage and � Requested by Depastment of: ay: Adopted by Council: Date Adoption Certified by Council Secretary ay: Approved by Mayor: Date Form Approved by City Attorney Ey: � � L '� Approved by tayor for Submission to Council By: By: BE ON CQLINCILAGQ�/1 B' i June � 2000 � -� rw.�et wrt ROtiT91G OFD9t TOTAL # OF SIGNATURE PAGES oo—ta.o GREEN SHEET No 1 C� �' � 43 � � oF...,�rowccraie rnrca� ❑ arcwnowEr ❑ crtrawc ❑ wuwu��amvcFaow. ❑ quMO��ua�vv�ccra ❑ YYORI�YRlNm ❑ (CL1P ALL LOCATIONS FOR SIGNATUR� Resolution amending Council File 00-129 relating to 681 Edmmmd Avenue. r �u� ���� May 26, 2000 a i.. :, f PLANNING CAMMISSION CIB CAMMITTEE CIVIL SERVICE CAMMISSION Has mis aareorclRim ever wo�tl unOer a mMraa r« u,is ae�M�nn YES NO Has Mis P�rm ever heen a ary empbyee9 , YES NO Dces thic percoNfirm Pocseas 8 sidll not normalHPOCSeccetl bY anY curtmt city emPbyee7 YES NO b ihia Pe'+soMrm a tarpeted veiMoR - " YES NO �lain all yec answEra m aeparate sheet and attach to Oreen,sheet / s � , �^ i ,� IF APPROVED AOUNT OF TRANSACTION S COST/REVENl/E BUGfiETED (C�RCLE ON� VES NO SOURCE � ACTMTY NMIBER INFORMATON(Ef�WN) c � -- - -- - - -- - Nancy Anderson 681 Edmund � _ .� . ._. _ __ ._�. _ . _�.. . _ _ _ _ ,_ - T�__.,_. . _ ___.... , __ . _ Pa9e_ �O —f.a0 From: Phil Byrne To: Magner, Steve; RileyM Date: 5J17/00 5:44PM Subject: 681 Edmund Steve and Meghan, Gerry Strathman pointed out to me that the resolution on 681 Edmund was not on the agenda, but rather it was a report of code enforcement. Since the resolution on 681 Edmund was not before the councii today, what i will do (with Meghan) is prepare a resolution which rescinds the previously-amended version, putting back in the 15 days. I believe that you will have to give notice of the council action and the fact that this will be on the agenda in the future to the property owners and others required to get notice. Then when it next goes on the council agenda, there will be at least the possibility of the owners talking to CM Blakey and perhaps speaking to the issue of how they intend to proceed. So as of this moment the old resolution is stiff in force, subject to the council vote to make the change, which will be done in a new resolution to be submitted as soon as I can prepare it. Meghan, we can talk tomorrow about this. Phil CC: Blakey, Jerry; Mclnerney, Gerry; Strathman, Gerry ��-� a � J,�e i, a000 681 Edmund Avenue Per a conversation with Steve Magner, Property Code Enfarcement, he responded that the following standard process was being handled by their office regarding this public hearing: 1, The principal owner/fee owner were served personally with the public hearing notice. 2. Other interested parties were contacted - IRS and Thadeus Wilerson, D'uector/ParenVChildren Developmenf 3. Published in the Legal Ledger 4. Building posted of public hearing notice (both front and back doors) (Neighbors and District Council not formally norified, but they do haue conversations with District Councils periodically regarding properkies in neigl�borhoods). (Maxine is to contact me regarding placement of letter on future Council Agenda announcing public hearing). IAA.�'^-� / NA S'� �� �' i •.,p J��� �,�f'� ` \y 'v' CITf7_ENSERVICEOEF[CE d�--� �x ai�<J Fred Owusu Ciry C1erk DMSiON OF PROPERTY CODE EYFORCEPdENT MichaelRMorehead Proqram.bfanager___ CTTY OF SAIN'f PAUL Norm Coleman, Mayar �.++. May 26, 2000 Nuisance Buildittg Code Enforcement 1i W. KellaggBtvd Rm. 190 Tel: 651-266-89-00 SaintPa:d,MN55102 F¢r:651-266-8426 XAMENDED CITY,COUNCIL DATEx FOR NOTICE OF PUSLIC HEARINGS Council President and Members of the City Council Citizen Service Office, VacantlNuisance Buildings Enfarcement Division has requested the City Council schedule public hearings to consider a resolution ordering the repair or removal of the nuisance building(s) located at: :< 681 Edmund Avenue The City Council has scheduled the date of this hearing as follows: City CounciI Hearing -*Wednesday, June 28, 2000 The owners and responsible parties of record are: Name and Last Known Address Parent Child Development Institute Attn: Linda Coleman 914 Thomas Avenue St. Paul, MN �5104-2600 Ritter & Fenske, Ltd Attomey 7effrey Fenske 461 University Avenue West St. Paul, MN>jI03 Thad Wilderson 463 University Avenue West St. Paul, MN 55103 WesYem State Bank � Interest Fee Owner Attorney for Parent Child Dev. Inst. Interested Pazty Mortga�ee 653 University Avenue �,'est St. Paul, MN 55104 �br�aa 681 Edmund Avenue May 26, 2000 Page 2 Name and Last Known Address Interest Internal Revenue Service Interest - Federal Ta�c Lien 316 North Robert Street, Stop 5700 Attn: Monry Luhmann St. Paul, NIl� 55101-1040 The legal description of this properly is: „ Chute Brothers Division No. 6 Addition To The City of St. Paul, Mitui. Lot 30 Division of Code Enforcement has deciared this buildin�{s) to constitute a"nuisance" as defined by Legislative Code, Chapter 45. Division of Code Enforcement has issued an oxder to the then known responsibie parties to eliminate this nuisance condition by correcting the deficiencies or by razing and removing this building(s). Inasmuch as this Order to Abate has not been complied with the nuisance condition remains unabated, the community continues to suffer the blighYing influence of this properly. It is the recommendation of the Division of Code Enforce�nent that the City Council pass a resolution ordering the responsible parties to either repair, or demolish and remove this building in a timely manner, and failing that, authorize the Division of Code Enforcement to proceed to demolition and removal, and to assess the costs incurred against the real estate as a special assessment to be collected in the same manner as taxes. 5incerely, Steve Jf�lagner Steve Ma�er Vacant Buildin�s Supervisor Division of Code Enforcement Citizen Serc�ice Office SNL•ml cc: Fran1� Berg, Building Inspection and Desi� Me�han Kiley, City Attomeys Office Nancy Anderson, Assistant Secretary to the Council Pau1 Mordorski PED-Housin� Division ccnph �R1GINAL Presented By Referred To 1 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 9 10 11 12 13 14 15 16 17 18 19 20 21 22 RESOLUTION CITY OF SAINT PAiIL, NIINNESOTA � Council File # 00 + G ap Csreen Sheet # ���{'3 t� 3 a°t WHEREAS, it appears to the Council from the report of code enforcement office that no work is being done on the properry at 681 Edmund Avenue d that the owners do not have fiznding for the work; now, therefore, be it RESOLVED, that lines 7 and 8 on page 2 of Co cil File No. 00-129, a resolution relating to 681 Edmund Avenue in Saint Paul, are her y amended to read as follows: "The rehabilitation or demolition of the s cture to be completed within si���er�ks fifteen (15� days after the date of the C ncil Hearing and passaee and approval of this Resolution; ���A9� and" and, be it FURTHER RESOLVED, at lines 50 and 51 on page 2 of Council File No. 00-129, a resolution relating to 681 Edm d Avenue in Saint Paul, aze hereby amended to read as follows: "The rehabilitarion demolition and removal of the structure must be completed within fifteen�l5) davs ' after the date of the Council Hearing and passage and � Requested by Depastment of: ay: Adopted by Council: Date Adoption Certified by Council Secretary ay: Approved by Mayor: Date Form Approved by City Attorney Ey: � � L '� Approved by tayor for Submission to Council By: By: BE ON CQLINCILAGQ�/1 B' i June � 2000 � -� rw.�et wrt ROtiT91G OFD9t TOTAL # OF SIGNATURE PAGES oo—ta.o GREEN SHEET No 1 C� �' � 43 � � oF...,�rowccraie rnrca� ❑ arcwnowEr ❑ crtrawc ❑ wuwu��amvcFaow. ❑ quMO��ua�vv�ccra ❑ YYORI�YRlNm ❑ (CL1P ALL LOCATIONS FOR SIGNATUR� Resolution amending Council File 00-129 relating to 681 Edmmmd Avenue. r �u� ���� May 26, 2000 a i.. :, f PLANNING CAMMISSION CIB CAMMITTEE CIVIL SERVICE CAMMISSION Has mis aareorclRim ever wo�tl unOer a mMraa r« u,is ae�M�nn YES NO Has Mis P�rm ever heen a ary empbyee9 , YES NO Dces thic percoNfirm Pocseas 8 sidll not normalHPOCSeccetl bY anY curtmt city emPbyee7 YES NO b ihia Pe'+soMrm a tarpeted veiMoR - " YES NO �lain all yec answEra m aeparate sheet and attach to Oreen,sheet / s � , �^ i ,� IF APPROVED AOUNT OF TRANSACTION S COST/REVENl/E BUGfiETED (C�RCLE ON� VES NO SOURCE � ACTMTY NMIBER INFORMATON(Ef�WN) c � -- - -- - - -- - Nancy Anderson 681 Edmund � _ .� . ._. _ __ ._�. _ . _�.. . _ _ _ _ ,_ - T�__.,_. . _ ___.... , __ . _ Pa9e_ �O —f.a0 From: Phil Byrne To: Magner, Steve; RileyM Date: 5J17/00 5:44PM Subject: 681 Edmund Steve and Meghan, Gerry Strathman pointed out to me that the resolution on 681 Edmund was not on the agenda, but rather it was a report of code enforcement. Since the resolution on 681 Edmund was not before the councii today, what i will do (with Meghan) is prepare a resolution which rescinds the previously-amended version, putting back in the 15 days. I believe that you will have to give notice of the council action and the fact that this will be on the agenda in the future to the property owners and others required to get notice. Then when it next goes on the council agenda, there will be at least the possibility of the owners talking to CM Blakey and perhaps speaking to the issue of how they intend to proceed. So as of this moment the old resolution is stiff in force, subject to the council vote to make the change, which will be done in a new resolution to be submitted as soon as I can prepare it. Meghan, we can talk tomorrow about this. Phil CC: Blakey, Jerry; Mclnerney, Gerry; Strathman, Gerry ��-� a � J,�e i, a000 681 Edmund Avenue Per a conversation with Steve Magner, Property Code Enfarcement, he responded that the following standard process was being handled by their office regarding this public hearing: 1, The principal owner/fee owner were served personally with the public hearing notice. 2. Other interested parties were contacted - IRS and Thadeus Wilerson, D'uector/ParenVChildren Developmenf 3. Published in the Legal Ledger 4. Building posted of public hearing notice (both front and back doors) (Neighbors and District Council not formally norified, but they do haue conversations with District Councils periodically regarding properkies in neigl�borhoods). (Maxine is to contact me regarding placement of letter on future Council Agenda announcing public hearing). IAA.�'^-� / NA S'� �� �' i •.,p J��� �,�f'� ` \y 'v' CITf7_ENSERVICEOEF[CE d�--� �x ai�<J Fred Owusu Ciry C1erk DMSiON OF PROPERTY CODE EYFORCEPdENT MichaelRMorehead Proqram.bfanager___ CTTY OF SAIN'f PAUL Norm Coleman, Mayar �.++. May 26, 2000 Nuisance Buildittg Code Enforcement 1i W. KellaggBtvd Rm. 190 Tel: 651-266-89-00 SaintPa:d,MN55102 F¢r:651-266-8426 XAMENDED CITY,COUNCIL DATEx FOR NOTICE OF PUSLIC HEARINGS Council President and Members of the City Council Citizen Service Office, VacantlNuisance Buildings Enfarcement Division has requested the City Council schedule public hearings to consider a resolution ordering the repair or removal of the nuisance building(s) located at: :< 681 Edmund Avenue The City Council has scheduled the date of this hearing as follows: City CounciI Hearing -*Wednesday, June 28, 2000 The owners and responsible parties of record are: Name and Last Known Address Parent Child Development Institute Attn: Linda Coleman 914 Thomas Avenue St. Paul, MN �5104-2600 Ritter & Fenske, Ltd Attomey 7effrey Fenske 461 University Avenue West St. Paul, MN>jI03 Thad Wilderson 463 University Avenue West St. Paul, MN 55103 WesYem State Bank � Interest Fee Owner Attorney for Parent Child Dev. Inst. Interested Pazty Mortga�ee 653 University Avenue �,'est St. Paul, MN 55104 �br�aa 681 Edmund Avenue May 26, 2000 Page 2 Name and Last Known Address Interest Internal Revenue Service Interest - Federal Ta�c Lien 316 North Robert Street, Stop 5700 Attn: Monry Luhmann St. Paul, NIl� 55101-1040 The legal description of this properly is: „ Chute Brothers Division No. 6 Addition To The City of St. Paul, Mitui. Lot 30 Division of Code Enforcement has deciared this buildin�{s) to constitute a"nuisance" as defined by Legislative Code, Chapter 45. Division of Code Enforcement has issued an oxder to the then known responsibie parties to eliminate this nuisance condition by correcting the deficiencies or by razing and removing this building(s). Inasmuch as this Order to Abate has not been complied with the nuisance condition remains unabated, the community continues to suffer the blighYing influence of this properly. It is the recommendation of the Division of Code Enforce�nent that the City Council pass a resolution ordering the responsible parties to either repair, or demolish and remove this building in a timely manner, and failing that, authorize the Division of Code Enforcement to proceed to demolition and removal, and to assess the costs incurred against the real estate as a special assessment to be collected in the same manner as taxes. 5incerely, Steve Jf�lagner Steve Ma�er Vacant Buildin�s Supervisor Division of Code Enforcement Citizen Serc�ice Office SNL•ml cc: Fran1� Berg, Building Inspection and Desi� Me�han Kiley, City Attomeys Office Nancy Anderson, Assistant Secretary to the Council Pau1 Mordorski PED-Housin� Division ccnph