00-588Council File # 60 � S��
O 1lt�.iit1��
Presented By
Referred To
Committee: Date
1 WHEREAS, The Saint Paul Right-of-Way management ordinances require a permit fee structure
2 which recovers city costs, degradation costs, and disruption costs, and
3
4
5
6
7
8
9
10
11
12
13
14
15
16
17
18
19
20
21
22
23
24
25
WHEREAS, in enacting the curre�t fee structure, the City Council resolved that the fee structure
should be reviewed on an annual basis, and
WHEREAS, it has been determined that portions of this fee structure can be significantly reduced,
NOW THEREFORE BE IT
RESOLVED, that the attached "EXCAVATION ! OBSTRUCTION PERMIT FEE STRUCTURE"
and its attachments are hereby approved, and be it further
RESOLVED, that this permit fee structure be reviewed on an annual basis, adjusted to recover
actual costs, and be app�oved by Council resolution.
Requested by Department of:
�
Adopted by Council: Date c� c7
_
Adoption Certified by Council Secretary
By: � ,�-��a , �"
Approved by Mayor: Date �� �+7 �Q
By:
RESOLIlTION Green Sheet # � C1S�� �y
OF SAINT PAUL, MINNESOTA
(Z
Form Approved by City Attorney
�� � � � / � ` i /
r
Approved by Mayor for Submission to Council
BY � �t/
U
� st� �
DEPAflTMEM/OFFICE/COUNqL ATE INITIATED 1 O2 4
NO. J2_-
Public Works Department -52000 GREEN ET �NRIRUDATE
PI�ACfPEH$QNSPNONE f� pp D1R R �4 CENCOUNGL
homas Kuhfeld 266-6711 ��N �inArroaNer �CITYCI.ERK
b18FR FOA
USiBEONfAUNCiLAGENDAeY(DATE) H�W�NG �gpp(�E7DIRECTOR ��N.&MC>T.SEFNICESOIR.
RDER
�MAY�R{ORASSI5TAC[T) �
OTAleOF51Cil1ATUflEPAGES 1 (CUPALLLOCASIONSFOHSIC37A7UflE) MSOCIA'(E uDEP(.ACCAUNiA G
REQUESTEO
proval of Right-of-Way management pertni[ fee strudure resolutlon.
RECAMMEIODA710N5: Approve (A) or Rejeu (F) PERSONAL SERVICE CONTRACTS MUSi ANSWER THE FOLLOWMCa pUESiIONS:
PLANNING COMMISSION _CML SEftVICE fAMMISSIQN �, Has Ihis pefSOnffiRn eVef worketl untler a contract for Nis tlepartme�ri?
� YES NO
— — 2. Has this perso�rtn ever been a ciry employee?
A 5rnFF _ YES NO
OISTRICTCOUNqL 3. Does tFns personlimm possess a skill not normally possessetl by arcy curteM city empioyee?
— — YES NO
SUPPORTS WNICH CAUNdL OBJEC(IVE? F�cplain all yes answers on separete sheet antl attach to green sheet
INI7IATNG PROBLEM, ISSUE, OPPOqTUNflY (WHO, WFIAT, WHEN, WFIERE, Wli�:
The permit fee structure is to be updated on a yearly basis. No increases are proposed. Significant reductions are
proposed for overhead utility work. There are also changes proposed in the Parking Meter Hooding Policy.
ADVANTAGESIFAPPROVED;
Implements the requirements of the Right-of-Way ManagemeM Ordinances (Chapiers 1 � 6 and 135). Recovers costs of
issuing utility cut and obstruction permits, and provides for their inspection. Reduces some costs where appropriate.
�ISA�VAPoTAGES IF APPROVEp:
Less permit fees wilf be collected.
DISADVANTAGES IF NOT APPROVEO.
The old rates will remain in effect.
f��asc�sGsnter JUN 0 u 20�!1
JU� �. � 2UU0 ClTY ATTORP���
OTAL AMOUNT OF TRANSACTON $ NOf AppIIC8bI2 � COSTBEVENUE BUUGETED (CIBC4E ONE) YES no
FUN�MGSUURCE 4 � � ACINITYNUMBEA
FINANCIAL INFORMATON: (IXPLAIN)
O o —S8'd'
EXCAVATION / OBSTRUCTION PERMIT FEE STRUCTURE
A. EXCAVAT/ON PERM/TS; Cost Components include "City cosY' (administration, inspection, and records), Pavement
Degradation, and a Disruption charge. (per Saint Paul Legislative code, chapter 135)
1) $145 per hole {includes up to 75 feet of excavation) plus $2.05 per foot of excavation over 75'.
2) For house service connections, $'145 per connection for the first six per biock, and $50 per connection for the rest in
that block.
3) Degradation: Will be calculated separately based on Public Utilities Commission Rules if proper restoration is not
proposed or completed.
4) Disruption will be based on the Grace Period Matrix, and the Disruption cost basis chaRS. For non utility
excavafion work, there is no grace period.
8. OBSTRUCTlON PERMITS; Cost Components incfude "City cosY' (administration, inspection, and records), and a
Disruption charge. {per Saint Paul Legislative code, chapter 135)
1) Various locations permits may be issued for individuai vehicles at a monthly rate of $88. Specitic conditions apply to
these. This permit may be issued for up to one year at the specified rate. This is not for utilitv work.
2j For overhead utility installation, $145 plus $0.50 per foot of installation. There will be no disruption charge for work in
any biock which does not exceed five working days. .
31 For lashinq new cable onto existinq ca61e bv the same owner, $145 plus $0.10 qer foot.
41 For replacinq existino cable with new cable in the same location verticallv and horizontally, $145 plus $0.10 per foot.
51 For placing or reolacinp cable in existina conduit where no diqqinq is necessarv, $145 plus $0.10 per foot.
36) For geoprobes or soii borings for a specific site, $145 pius $70 per hole.
#� For wireless telecommunications devices mounted on existing poles with a minimum of 12 feet clearance from the
ground, $145 plus $1Q per device.
58) For monitoring wells for a specific site, $145 plus $20 per month per well.
6� For fuf! block construction, $145 plus $30 per day per block face for sidewafk and parking lane, if any. Use of traffic
�anes would be according to the normal Disruption Cost Basis.
�10 For all non utility obstruction permits, there is no grace period.
Accompanying this are:
1) Grace period matrix
2) Disruption cost basis
3) Parking meter hooding policy
revised
5l31/00
TEK
�.a ����d
:-
c o -$1'Y
�
�
N
n
o'v� o in o� o in
Z y o] N � CV O� N W CV
� � 0. a Q O. a fl. o. O.
Z Z c0 W � 1�- C) N RJ � Q � � N W R R 6 �J ` O O
� y 'O 'O 'O 'D 'O "O a a
6
O � { { } -F -F i� i- t
f0 W � l+ C� �If M �[1
g
� � M � M � M � �
� a d d m� �, d d d
¢ ° a a a a fl. °- a °
O 2 � I�- Q f0 N V N 7 �T � � � � � � � C� N O O
r- ¢ � v . ° . v - v
U p � � ,- �- ,- •- ,- �'
...I �+ �' + '1- + '�' -{' ,�. '{'
J � 1� � c0 N V N d'
U
� O � O � O � O
J y � � � � �
L
o Q a a a Q a a, a
Z � t� vJ tfi N V N V >. � T c�'6 7 ` c T 6 >` @ W N O O
O Y � - p a - o .a a ,Q - p
K � ,�, } ^ t i, t ,�, i
� � m � N � N �
F Q Q 4 Q
W IA ln In tn In N ln � In � � � N N N � Z Z Z Z
p VI A vl A vl n VI A VI /� Vi A Vi /� Vi A
� ... .J �- ._. .-. ._.
y N . N - � N « N
d N d N m N N � N (6 N N
L L L L L S
¢ O Q O Q O a O Q O Q O Q
N U U U U U U
F r }
t } y . t � y
O� F V F V F (�
W =
R
z ,
� = N U � �
¢ a � V 3 � 2 �
� Z
W ~ Z F � � � � �
V �• V
��
C
0
.�
R
X
m
.
O
�
O
O
a
N
r
O
N
�
�
�
m
d
N
m
r
�
O
C
m
�
N
N
m
m
L
F-
O
O
9
a
m
c
.�
a
N
N
T
�
�
�
C
Y
O
3
c
a
D
N
A
�
3
a
0
m
0.
U
m
�
a
m
E
0
t
m
Q
�
O
3
0
C
N
t
N
N
�
T
�V
�
V
3
N �
� 3
� �
�a ,�.
c a
m �
T �
� O
'a
D �
s d
a�i �
a °
N �
C �
� V
U �
N Q
d O
td y
(q �
0
>. �
N N
� O
= C
� O
j� U
N �
o y
� c
m �
�
O �
> Q
3 �
X �
@ ` d
S. L
N W
a 3
� L
� V
C
N L
V �
Q O
N
a
m
�
rn
L �
�
fl ' O
Q �
o e -S�'Y
DISRUPTION COST BASiS
Parking Lane with meters: $2.00 per mefier per day plus losfi meter revenue
and a hooding charge. She hooding chorge is a labor charge for
hooding and unhooding meters. No grace period applies.
Parking Lane wilhout meters: $4.00 per calendar day for each 2� feet of fength
outside of the downtown business district. $8.00 per day wifihin the
downtown business district.
Note: lf this is in a"Rush Hour" zone, the parking lane rate would apply
only if it is not used during the "Rush Hour" period.
Driving Lanes: Basic formula — Average Daily Traffic X Number of calendar days
X Detour distance in miles X 50.31 per miie
For each direction: (one way ADT = 50% of total AD�
Loss of all traffic lanes: 100% of one woy ADT
Loss of one of two traffic lanes: 40% of one way ADi
Loss of one of three traffic lanes: 20% of one way ADT
Loss of two of three traffic lanes: bQ% of one way�ADT
NOTE: For work beSw�en 9 AM and 3 PM where lane is
opened back up to traffic, 50% of the above witl apply.
For work between b PM and 6 AM where Iana is opened
back up to trafftc, 30% of the above will apply.
Noise ordinance resfirictions wili Continue to be enforced.
Sidewatk / Boulevard A�ea: for each 20 foot increment
Closed to Pedestrian Traffic: Commercial- $8.00 per caiendar day
Closed to Pedestrian Traffic: Residential - 54.00 per calendar day
Pedestrian traffic maintained- No charge
Alleys: Use basic formula with ADT = 100, and length of ailey = detour distance.
Tuin Lanes, Bus stops: Treated as loss of through lane.
Disruption Cost begins affer 1he gtace period for ufility work.
Intersections: Treat each streefi separately.
No disruption cost for utility work in areas ciosed to troffic tor City
Construction projects.
l/21(99 TEK
.� �' �d
� 9'
(e �
00 -5��
PARKING METER HOODING POLICY
Parking meiers may be hooded at reduced cost for non-profit, community based events. The
onfy cost will be actual labor costs to hood the meiers. There witl be no charge for hooding 10 or
less meters during normal working hours. These events are listed below. Any changes to this
list must be approved by the Mayor's office. These changes will be brought before the City
Council for approval yearly. The Director of the Department of Public Works may determine
when meter hooding is not appropriate on a case by case basis.
Red Cross Bloodmobile. (other Red Cross uses are not included)
'For voting and training of voting monitors
`For tree trimming,placing holid� liqhts, and other necessary functions of the Parks Dept.
Winter Carnival only for meters necessary for the event.
'Classic Cars
Gus Macker Toumament
'St. Paul School Patrol Parade
Police DepaRment Reauests, on a case by case basis
' indicates no labor charge for hoodinq
The following are exampfes of uses and events that wifl be charged a perrnit fee which includes
lost revenue and the labor costs to hood the meters.
Construction
News media
Filming permits
Taste ot Minnesota
River Feast
For profit Special Events
6-142000
TEK
�`d'/•
�- �1-b�
Council File # 60 � S��
O 1lt�.iit1��
Presented By
Referred To
Committee: Date
1 WHEREAS, The Saint Paul Right-of-Way management ordinances require a permit fee structure
2 which recovers city costs, degradation costs, and disruption costs, and
3
4
5
6
7
8
9
10
11
12
13
14
15
16
17
18
19
20
21
22
23
24
25
WHEREAS, in enacting the curre�t fee structure, the City Council resolved that the fee structure
should be reviewed on an annual basis, and
WHEREAS, it has been determined that portions of this fee structure can be significantly reduced,
NOW THEREFORE BE IT
RESOLVED, that the attached "EXCAVATION ! OBSTRUCTION PERMIT FEE STRUCTURE"
and its attachments are hereby approved, and be it further
RESOLVED, that this permit fee structure be reviewed on an annual basis, adjusted to recover
actual costs, and be app�oved by Council resolution.
Requested by Department of:
�
Adopted by Council: Date c� c7
_
Adoption Certified by Council Secretary
By: � ,�-��a , �"
Approved by Mayor: Date �� �+7 �Q
By:
RESOLIlTION Green Sheet # � C1S�� �y
OF SAINT PAUL, MINNESOTA
(Z
Form Approved by City Attorney
�� � � � / � ` i /
r
Approved by Mayor for Submission to Council
BY � �t/
U
� st� �
DEPAflTMEM/OFFICE/COUNqL ATE INITIATED 1 O2 4
NO. J2_-
Public Works Department -52000 GREEN ET �NRIRUDATE
PI�ACfPEH$QNSPNONE f� pp D1R R �4 CENCOUNGL
homas Kuhfeld 266-6711 ��N �inArroaNer �CITYCI.ERK
b18FR FOA
USiBEONfAUNCiLAGENDAeY(DATE) H�W�NG �gpp(�E7DIRECTOR ��N.&MC>T.SEFNICESOIR.
RDER
�MAY�R{ORASSI5TAC[T) �
OTAleOF51Cil1ATUflEPAGES 1 (CUPALLLOCASIONSFOHSIC37A7UflE) MSOCIA'(E uDEP(.ACCAUNiA G
REQUESTEO
proval of Right-of-Way management pertni[ fee strudure resolutlon.
RECAMMEIODA710N5: Approve (A) or Rejeu (F) PERSONAL SERVICE CONTRACTS MUSi ANSWER THE FOLLOWMCa pUESiIONS:
PLANNING COMMISSION _CML SEftVICE fAMMISSIQN �, Has Ihis pefSOnffiRn eVef worketl untler a contract for Nis tlepartme�ri?
� YES NO
— — 2. Has this perso�rtn ever been a ciry employee?
A 5rnFF _ YES NO
OISTRICTCOUNqL 3. Does tFns personlimm possess a skill not normally possessetl by arcy curteM city empioyee?
— — YES NO
SUPPORTS WNICH CAUNdL OBJEC(IVE? F�cplain all yes answers on separete sheet antl attach to green sheet
INI7IATNG PROBLEM, ISSUE, OPPOqTUNflY (WHO, WFIAT, WHEN, WFIERE, Wli�:
The permit fee structure is to be updated on a yearly basis. No increases are proposed. Significant reductions are
proposed for overhead utility work. There are also changes proposed in the Parking Meter Hooding Policy.
ADVANTAGESIFAPPROVED;
Implements the requirements of the Right-of-Way ManagemeM Ordinances (Chapiers 1 � 6 and 135). Recovers costs of
issuing utility cut and obstruction permits, and provides for their inspection. Reduces some costs where appropriate.
�ISA�VAPoTAGES IF APPROVEp:
Less permit fees wilf be collected.
DISADVANTAGES IF NOT APPROVEO.
The old rates will remain in effect.
f��asc�sGsnter JUN 0 u 20�!1
JU� �. � 2UU0 ClTY ATTORP���
OTAL AMOUNT OF TRANSACTON $ NOf AppIIC8bI2 � COSTBEVENUE BUUGETED (CIBC4E ONE) YES no
FUN�MGSUURCE 4 � � ACINITYNUMBEA
FINANCIAL INFORMATON: (IXPLAIN)
O o —S8'd'
EXCAVATION / OBSTRUCTION PERMIT FEE STRUCTURE
A. EXCAVAT/ON PERM/TS; Cost Components include "City cosY' (administration, inspection, and records), Pavement
Degradation, and a Disruption charge. (per Saint Paul Legislative code, chapter 135)
1) $145 per hole {includes up to 75 feet of excavation) plus $2.05 per foot of excavation over 75'.
2) For house service connections, $'145 per connection for the first six per biock, and $50 per connection for the rest in
that block.
3) Degradation: Will be calculated separately based on Public Utilities Commission Rules if proper restoration is not
proposed or completed.
4) Disruption will be based on the Grace Period Matrix, and the Disruption cost basis chaRS. For non utility
excavafion work, there is no grace period.
8. OBSTRUCTlON PERMITS; Cost Components incfude "City cosY' (administration, inspection, and records), and a
Disruption charge. {per Saint Paul Legislative code, chapter 135)
1) Various locations permits may be issued for individuai vehicles at a monthly rate of $88. Specitic conditions apply to
these. This permit may be issued for up to one year at the specified rate. This is not for utilitv work.
2j For overhead utility installation, $145 plus $0.50 per foot of installation. There will be no disruption charge for work in
any biock which does not exceed five working days. .
31 For lashinq new cable onto existinq ca61e bv the same owner, $145 plus $0.10 qer foot.
41 For replacinq existino cable with new cable in the same location verticallv and horizontally, $145 plus $0.10 per foot.
51 For placing or reolacinp cable in existina conduit where no diqqinq is necessarv, $145 plus $0.10 per foot.
36) For geoprobes or soii borings for a specific site, $145 pius $70 per hole.
#� For wireless telecommunications devices mounted on existing poles with a minimum of 12 feet clearance from the
ground, $145 plus $1Q per device.
58) For monitoring wells for a specific site, $145 plus $20 per month per well.
6� For fuf! block construction, $145 plus $30 per day per block face for sidewafk and parking lane, if any. Use of traffic
�anes would be according to the normal Disruption Cost Basis.
�10 For all non utility obstruction permits, there is no grace period.
Accompanying this are:
1) Grace period matrix
2) Disruption cost basis
3) Parking meter hooding policy
revised
5l31/00
TEK
�.a ����d
:-
c o -$1'Y
�
�
N
n
o'v� o in o� o in
Z y o] N � CV O� N W CV
� � 0. a Q O. a fl. o. O.
Z Z c0 W � 1�- C) N RJ � Q � � N W R R 6 �J ` O O
� y 'O 'O 'O 'D 'O "O a a
6
O � { { } -F -F i� i- t
f0 W � l+ C� �If M �[1
g
� � M � M � M � �
� a d d m� �, d d d
¢ ° a a a a fl. °- a °
O 2 � I�- Q f0 N V N 7 �T � � � � � � � C� N O O
r- ¢ � v . ° . v - v
U p � � ,- �- ,- •- ,- �'
...I �+ �' + '1- + '�' -{' ,�. '{'
J � 1� � c0 N V N d'
U
� O � O � O � O
J y � � � � �
L
o Q a a a Q a a, a
Z � t� vJ tfi N V N V >. � T c�'6 7 ` c T 6 >` @ W N O O
O Y � - p a - o .a a ,Q - p
K � ,�, } ^ t i, t ,�, i
� � m � N � N �
F Q Q 4 Q
W IA ln In tn In N ln � In � � � N N N � Z Z Z Z
p VI A vl A vl n VI A VI /� Vi A Vi /� Vi A
� ... .J �- ._. .-. ._.
y N . N - � N « N
d N d N m N N � N (6 N N
L L L L L S
¢ O Q O Q O a O Q O Q O Q
N U U U U U U
F r }
t } y . t � y
O� F V F V F (�
W =
R
z ,
� = N U � �
¢ a � V 3 � 2 �
� Z
W ~ Z F � � � � �
V �• V
��
C
0
.�
R
X
m
.
O
�
O
O
a
N
r
O
N
�
�
�
m
d
N
m
r
�
O
C
m
�
N
N
m
m
L
F-
O
O
9
a
m
c
.�
a
N
N
T
�
�
�
C
Y
O
3
c
a
D
N
A
�
3
a
0
m
0.
U
m
�
a
m
E
0
t
m
Q
�
O
3
0
C
N
t
N
N
�
T
�V
�
V
3
N �
� 3
� �
�a ,�.
c a
m �
T �
� O
'a
D �
s d
a�i �
a °
N �
C �
� V
U �
N Q
d O
td y
(q �
0
>. �
N N
� O
= C
� O
j� U
N �
o y
� c
m �
�
O �
> Q
3 �
X �
@ ` d
S. L
N W
a 3
� L
� V
C
N L
V �
Q O
N
a
m
�
rn
L �
�
fl ' O
Q �
o e -S�'Y
DISRUPTION COST BASiS
Parking Lane with meters: $2.00 per mefier per day plus losfi meter revenue
and a hooding charge. She hooding chorge is a labor charge for
hooding and unhooding meters. No grace period applies.
Parking Lane wilhout meters: $4.00 per calendar day for each 2� feet of fength
outside of the downtown business district. $8.00 per day wifihin the
downtown business district.
Note: lf this is in a"Rush Hour" zone, the parking lane rate would apply
only if it is not used during the "Rush Hour" period.
Driving Lanes: Basic formula — Average Daily Traffic X Number of calendar days
X Detour distance in miles X 50.31 per miie
For each direction: (one way ADT = 50% of total AD�
Loss of all traffic lanes: 100% of one woy ADT
Loss of one of two traffic lanes: 40% of one way ADi
Loss of one of three traffic lanes: 20% of one way ADT
Loss of two of three traffic lanes: bQ% of one way�ADT
NOTE: For work beSw�en 9 AM and 3 PM where lane is
opened back up to traffic, 50% of the above witl apply.
For work between b PM and 6 AM where Iana is opened
back up to trafftc, 30% of the above will apply.
Noise ordinance resfirictions wili Continue to be enforced.
Sidewatk / Boulevard A�ea: for each 20 foot increment
Closed to Pedestrian Traffic: Commercial- $8.00 per caiendar day
Closed to Pedestrian Traffic: Residential - 54.00 per calendar day
Pedestrian traffic maintained- No charge
Alleys: Use basic formula with ADT = 100, and length of ailey = detour distance.
Tuin Lanes, Bus stops: Treated as loss of through lane.
Disruption Cost begins affer 1he gtace period for ufility work.
Intersections: Treat each streefi separately.
No disruption cost for utility work in areas ciosed to troffic tor City
Construction projects.
l/21(99 TEK
.� �' �d
� 9'
(e �
00 -5��
PARKING METER HOODING POLICY
Parking meiers may be hooded at reduced cost for non-profit, community based events. The
onfy cost will be actual labor costs to hood the meiers. There witl be no charge for hooding 10 or
less meters during normal working hours. These events are listed below. Any changes to this
list must be approved by the Mayor's office. These changes will be brought before the City
Council for approval yearly. The Director of the Department of Public Works may determine
when meter hooding is not appropriate on a case by case basis.
Red Cross Bloodmobile. (other Red Cross uses are not included)
'For voting and training of voting monitors
`For tree trimming,placing holid� liqhts, and other necessary functions of the Parks Dept.
Winter Carnival only for meters necessary for the event.
'Classic Cars
Gus Macker Toumament
'St. Paul School Patrol Parade
Police DepaRment Reauests, on a case by case basis
' indicates no labor charge for hoodinq
The following are exampfes of uses and events that wifl be charged a perrnit fee which includes
lost revenue and the labor costs to hood the meters.
Construction
News media
Filming permits
Taste ot Minnesota
River Feast
For profit Special Events
6-142000
TEK
�`d'/•
�- �1-b�
Council File # 60 � S��
O 1lt�.iit1��
Presented By
Referred To
Committee: Date
1 WHEREAS, The Saint Paul Right-of-Way management ordinances require a permit fee structure
2 which recovers city costs, degradation costs, and disruption costs, and
3
4
5
6
7
8
9
10
11
12
13
14
15
16
17
18
19
20
21
22
23
24
25
WHEREAS, in enacting the curre�t fee structure, the City Council resolved that the fee structure
should be reviewed on an annual basis, and
WHEREAS, it has been determined that portions of this fee structure can be significantly reduced,
NOW THEREFORE BE IT
RESOLVED, that the attached "EXCAVATION ! OBSTRUCTION PERMIT FEE STRUCTURE"
and its attachments are hereby approved, and be it further
RESOLVED, that this permit fee structure be reviewed on an annual basis, adjusted to recover
actual costs, and be app�oved by Council resolution.
Requested by Department of:
�
Adopted by Council: Date c� c7
_
Adoption Certified by Council Secretary
By: � ,�-��a , �"
Approved by Mayor: Date �� �+7 �Q
By:
RESOLIlTION Green Sheet # � C1S�� �y
OF SAINT PAUL, MINNESOTA
(Z
Form Approved by City Attorney
�� � � � / � ` i /
r
Approved by Mayor for Submission to Council
BY � �t/
U
� st� �
DEPAflTMEM/OFFICE/COUNqL ATE INITIATED 1 O2 4
NO. J2_-
Public Works Department -52000 GREEN ET �NRIRUDATE
PI�ACfPEH$QNSPNONE f� pp D1R R �4 CENCOUNGL
homas Kuhfeld 266-6711 ��N �inArroaNer �CITYCI.ERK
b18FR FOA
USiBEONfAUNCiLAGENDAeY(DATE) H�W�NG �gpp(�E7DIRECTOR ��N.&MC>T.SEFNICESOIR.
RDER
�MAY�R{ORASSI5TAC[T) �
OTAleOF51Cil1ATUflEPAGES 1 (CUPALLLOCASIONSFOHSIC37A7UflE) MSOCIA'(E uDEP(.ACCAUNiA G
REQUESTEO
proval of Right-of-Way management pertni[ fee strudure resolutlon.
RECAMMEIODA710N5: Approve (A) or Rejeu (F) PERSONAL SERVICE CONTRACTS MUSi ANSWER THE FOLLOWMCa pUESiIONS:
PLANNING COMMISSION _CML SEftVICE fAMMISSIQN �, Has Ihis pefSOnffiRn eVef worketl untler a contract for Nis tlepartme�ri?
� YES NO
— — 2. Has this perso�rtn ever been a ciry employee?
A 5rnFF _ YES NO
OISTRICTCOUNqL 3. Does tFns personlimm possess a skill not normally possessetl by arcy curteM city empioyee?
— — YES NO
SUPPORTS WNICH CAUNdL OBJEC(IVE? F�cplain all yes answers on separete sheet antl attach to green sheet
INI7IATNG PROBLEM, ISSUE, OPPOqTUNflY (WHO, WFIAT, WHEN, WFIERE, Wli�:
The permit fee structure is to be updated on a yearly basis. No increases are proposed. Significant reductions are
proposed for overhead utility work. There are also changes proposed in the Parking Meter Hooding Policy.
ADVANTAGESIFAPPROVED;
Implements the requirements of the Right-of-Way ManagemeM Ordinances (Chapiers 1 � 6 and 135). Recovers costs of
issuing utility cut and obstruction permits, and provides for their inspection. Reduces some costs where appropriate.
�ISA�VAPoTAGES IF APPROVEp:
Less permit fees wilf be collected.
DISADVANTAGES IF NOT APPROVEO.
The old rates will remain in effect.
f��asc�sGsnter JUN 0 u 20�!1
JU� �. � 2UU0 ClTY ATTORP���
OTAL AMOUNT OF TRANSACTON $ NOf AppIIC8bI2 � COSTBEVENUE BUUGETED (CIBC4E ONE) YES no
FUN�MGSUURCE 4 � � ACINITYNUMBEA
FINANCIAL INFORMATON: (IXPLAIN)
O o —S8'd'
EXCAVATION / OBSTRUCTION PERMIT FEE STRUCTURE
A. EXCAVAT/ON PERM/TS; Cost Components include "City cosY' (administration, inspection, and records), Pavement
Degradation, and a Disruption charge. (per Saint Paul Legislative code, chapter 135)
1) $145 per hole {includes up to 75 feet of excavation) plus $2.05 per foot of excavation over 75'.
2) For house service connections, $'145 per connection for the first six per biock, and $50 per connection for the rest in
that block.
3) Degradation: Will be calculated separately based on Public Utilities Commission Rules if proper restoration is not
proposed or completed.
4) Disruption will be based on the Grace Period Matrix, and the Disruption cost basis chaRS. For non utility
excavafion work, there is no grace period.
8. OBSTRUCTlON PERMITS; Cost Components incfude "City cosY' (administration, inspection, and records), and a
Disruption charge. {per Saint Paul Legislative code, chapter 135)
1) Various locations permits may be issued for individuai vehicles at a monthly rate of $88. Specitic conditions apply to
these. This permit may be issued for up to one year at the specified rate. This is not for utilitv work.
2j For overhead utility installation, $145 plus $0.50 per foot of installation. There will be no disruption charge for work in
any biock which does not exceed five working days. .
31 For lashinq new cable onto existinq ca61e bv the same owner, $145 plus $0.10 qer foot.
41 For replacinq existino cable with new cable in the same location verticallv and horizontally, $145 plus $0.10 per foot.
51 For placing or reolacinp cable in existina conduit where no diqqinq is necessarv, $145 plus $0.10 per foot.
36) For geoprobes or soii borings for a specific site, $145 pius $70 per hole.
#� For wireless telecommunications devices mounted on existing poles with a minimum of 12 feet clearance from the
ground, $145 plus $1Q per device.
58) For monitoring wells for a specific site, $145 plus $20 per month per well.
6� For fuf! block construction, $145 plus $30 per day per block face for sidewafk and parking lane, if any. Use of traffic
�anes would be according to the normal Disruption Cost Basis.
�10 For all non utility obstruction permits, there is no grace period.
Accompanying this are:
1) Grace period matrix
2) Disruption cost basis
3) Parking meter hooding policy
revised
5l31/00
TEK
�.a ����d
:-
c o -$1'Y
�
�
N
n
o'v� o in o� o in
Z y o] N � CV O� N W CV
� � 0. a Q O. a fl. o. O.
Z Z c0 W � 1�- C) N RJ � Q � � N W R R 6 �J ` O O
� y 'O 'O 'O 'D 'O "O a a
6
O � { { } -F -F i� i- t
f0 W � l+ C� �If M �[1
g
� � M � M � M � �
� a d d m� �, d d d
¢ ° a a a a fl. °- a °
O 2 � I�- Q f0 N V N 7 �T � � � � � � � C� N O O
r- ¢ � v . ° . v - v
U p � � ,- �- ,- •- ,- �'
...I �+ �' + '1- + '�' -{' ,�. '{'
J � 1� � c0 N V N d'
U
� O � O � O � O
J y � � � � �
L
o Q a a a Q a a, a
Z � t� vJ tfi N V N V >. � T c�'6 7 ` c T 6 >` @ W N O O
O Y � - p a - o .a a ,Q - p
K � ,�, } ^ t i, t ,�, i
� � m � N � N �
F Q Q 4 Q
W IA ln In tn In N ln � In � � � N N N � Z Z Z Z
p VI A vl A vl n VI A VI /� Vi A Vi /� Vi A
� ... .J �- ._. .-. ._.
y N . N - � N « N
d N d N m N N � N (6 N N
L L L L L S
¢ O Q O Q O a O Q O Q O Q
N U U U U U U
F r }
t } y . t � y
O� F V F V F (�
W =
R
z ,
� = N U � �
¢ a � V 3 � 2 �
� Z
W ~ Z F � � � � �
V �• V
��
C
0
.�
R
X
m
.
O
�
O
O
a
N
r
O
N
�
�
�
m
d
N
m
r
�
O
C
m
�
N
N
m
m
L
F-
O
O
9
a
m
c
.�
a
N
N
T
�
�
�
C
Y
O
3
c
a
D
N
A
�
3
a
0
m
0.
U
m
�
a
m
E
0
t
m
Q
�
O
3
0
C
N
t
N
N
�
T
�V
�
V
3
N �
� 3
� �
�a ,�.
c a
m �
T �
� O
'a
D �
s d
a�i �
a °
N �
C �
� V
U �
N Q
d O
td y
(q �
0
>. �
N N
� O
= C
� O
j� U
N �
o y
� c
m �
�
O �
> Q
3 �
X �
@ ` d
S. L
N W
a 3
� L
� V
C
N L
V �
Q O
N
a
m
�
rn
L �
�
fl ' O
Q �
o e -S�'Y
DISRUPTION COST BASiS
Parking Lane with meters: $2.00 per mefier per day plus losfi meter revenue
and a hooding charge. She hooding chorge is a labor charge for
hooding and unhooding meters. No grace period applies.
Parking Lane wilhout meters: $4.00 per calendar day for each 2� feet of fength
outside of the downtown business district. $8.00 per day wifihin the
downtown business district.
Note: lf this is in a"Rush Hour" zone, the parking lane rate would apply
only if it is not used during the "Rush Hour" period.
Driving Lanes: Basic formula — Average Daily Traffic X Number of calendar days
X Detour distance in miles X 50.31 per miie
For each direction: (one way ADT = 50% of total AD�
Loss of all traffic lanes: 100% of one woy ADT
Loss of one of two traffic lanes: 40% of one way ADi
Loss of one of three traffic lanes: 20% of one way ADT
Loss of two of three traffic lanes: bQ% of one way�ADT
NOTE: For work beSw�en 9 AM and 3 PM where lane is
opened back up to traffic, 50% of the above witl apply.
For work between b PM and 6 AM where Iana is opened
back up to trafftc, 30% of the above will apply.
Noise ordinance resfirictions wili Continue to be enforced.
Sidewatk / Boulevard A�ea: for each 20 foot increment
Closed to Pedestrian Traffic: Commercial- $8.00 per caiendar day
Closed to Pedestrian Traffic: Residential - 54.00 per calendar day
Pedestrian traffic maintained- No charge
Alleys: Use basic formula with ADT = 100, and length of ailey = detour distance.
Tuin Lanes, Bus stops: Treated as loss of through lane.
Disruption Cost begins affer 1he gtace period for ufility work.
Intersections: Treat each streefi separately.
No disruption cost for utility work in areas ciosed to troffic tor City
Construction projects.
l/21(99 TEK
.� �' �d
� 9'
(e �
00 -5��
PARKING METER HOODING POLICY
Parking meiers may be hooded at reduced cost for non-profit, community based events. The
onfy cost will be actual labor costs to hood the meiers. There witl be no charge for hooding 10 or
less meters during normal working hours. These events are listed below. Any changes to this
list must be approved by the Mayor's office. These changes will be brought before the City
Council for approval yearly. The Director of the Department of Public Works may determine
when meter hooding is not appropriate on a case by case basis.
Red Cross Bloodmobile. (other Red Cross uses are not included)
'For voting and training of voting monitors
`For tree trimming,placing holid� liqhts, and other necessary functions of the Parks Dept.
Winter Carnival only for meters necessary for the event.
'Classic Cars
Gus Macker Toumament
'St. Paul School Patrol Parade
Police DepaRment Reauests, on a case by case basis
' indicates no labor charge for hoodinq
The following are exampfes of uses and events that wifl be charged a perrnit fee which includes
lost revenue and the labor costs to hood the meters.
Construction
News media
Filming permits
Taste ot Minnesota
River Feast
For profit Special Events
6-142000
TEK
�`d'/•
�- �1-b�