The URL can be used to link to this page

278075 WHITE - CITY CLERK . ��Q! C�� PINK - FINANCE TT COURCII .,�! v��F f CANARY - DEPARTMENT G I T Y O F S A I N T �� lJ L BLUE - dYIAYOR File N O. ' Council Resolution Presented By Referred To Committee: Date Out of Committee By Date a) The request for variance is based on the exceptional size of the property and the location of the existing buildings. The area on Chestnut is small and totally within the front yard setback. b) Without the variances the owner would, based on the physical characteristics, incur exceptional practical difficulties in constructing the detached garages to service� the 16 candominiums. Since this is an existing structure, no garages or off-street parking is required' and it is an amenity which the applicant proposes. c) Granting of the variances will not impair the intent of the ordinance and can be granted without substantial detriment to the community. d) The variances requested are not based primarily on a desire for economic gain. FURTHER RESOLVED, That the City Clerk shall mail a copy of this resolution to Panama Flats Corporation, the Zoning Administrator, Planning Commission and the Board of Zoning Appeals. 2 . " COU[VC[LMEN Requestgd by Department of: Yeas Nays Hunt �e�r;�,s [n Favor .--Meelelex McMahon � B showa�ter __ Against Y Tedesco Wilson Adopted by Council: Date �AN 21 i982 Form Approved�ity orn Certified a_ -e Council , etary BY � By /� �, Approved by or: Date ~ Approved by Mayor for Submission to Council. By - O _ gy / �,;�. ' ,��7�u JAi� 3 19 2 • � � . � �� a7 �" � : � , , . � . ; . . � - , , . , . . . „ . . _ , .R . . .. � . � � �. � . , , � . . , ' . ' . . � i . .. ' . " � � � .. I ' . . . � . . . . � .. , , 1 , . .'� . ,. , i . / , . . i . . . . . . .. .� . . . I , . . r . Juruary 25� f982 � , r i _ . - � _ � . . ; , , � � • � , , � _ . i , , �- Ij ' _ • � � � . - � . �. � . . � � . . . ' . . + , � , . . ' . k! . � �Psnama �'late . , , �:� ` � � 237 B.�6� St. . �,:; ' � i � 3t. .P�tul, Mi:me�otia 55i01 ; ; ' . , Dear 31ra s i ' � �. , _ , � , . �.. ; ' . , On Janw�sy 21, 1982: tbe 'St. Paul. City Eoar�il �dopte�T a.r �ution . ' � gr�tiag yrour. �PPeul to a d�isian of th� �o�stl of ;Zo7ning peals; for � ,, � �' PrnPart9 loc�ted at Lats 1 aad Z, Block 32. lice �s�od:Irvin� �A�ddiEYoa.. ' �clo�ad ior �our infas�.tiots if a copy o� 'C.F. Na. 27$075. ' ' . . , . , ve� t�! ��, � � . , ; . i� A ,i � � � '. , � � � � �!� 1J i � � ., „ ,v.,,/'�._�"•��_, �-- 1 ,- ` • , ' , , A1be7Ct $. Olsqn ,� �+/ 'I • . �` � . � � City•Cl�rk �. ; Ehcio�ure , � . � i , , , •. � • �c�a �aaing Admiiti,atrator` , , ; � `�►'1.snning Comaisaian, , . ;�Doard of Zoning' Ap�u+ais , ! , ` _ � � ' � � � � � + � � � - � I , �, , , ��; - . , , ; , . � ; � : , ; ' ; . � , , -. ;� =, , „ , � _ �, - �` � . , , � , ., � ' ' _ , , , ; r i , , , , . � _ �i � ' � � , r : ; , � , . , ; i { . . <; r;; • , `� . � . � ; � � , . +: . .: � , ,, . , � � � ., 1 s �� , , ' ��. � . . . ' . . � . �� ., . . t f .. . f 7Y` � � � � , . . . ' �� l��.. 1 �r., *}: �? � '' i a , ' ' � ... :, c . . . .. ' , . . � _ q. .; . .� . . � . . � . � : .. .7. � ._ ' , �'� � � � i. .. � � � � . ' ' � �� .. � �� ' �: • . .. ,. -. ,•' .•. . •- � �' r�r , ! . . . ' . 1 ' ' � ..f .�1 y�� . . .`/ �/ . ' j� h t�� . . .. .. � ...... . . . � . . . .. � .. . . . . . .. . �1.. _ .� , ,. ., � . �.. '�, ,...._,�i_ �a a, .. ! 1.�+._. ,: i _ . � . , ._ �. . . 3�..s . x!.�. t....� - . . , . � � � �. . � � ' � . � � 1 . . � I ' � � � �. � � ��'�� +`I . . . . . , . . . ... j �. � , � . ..7 , . . . . � . . .. . . . � �1 ..� . . . .. � . - . ' . . - ,��. � . . . _p � � . . � . � � � . ' � � . � � ' !. .1'.� ��: . . . . . � . � . . ' . . . � . �\�. . . . . � . � ' . . � , • ' . ' .. �. . t �_. . . j � � . ' ' , . � . ' • ' . ! . DlCaabar 10� 1981 ` i ' ` _, , , ; � �,� � '��t . - - , . � �? , , Pla�aaiu� Stsit� Zoning S�ct� � �` �' tlth Fioor • . : , City 8a11 /ma� : , . , � � r ty Dsar Sir�t Tb�t C�ty C�cil today laid ov�r to D�c�b�r 31� I-981 ��s �aanio� ou t�; • app�al. o� Pnaaoa FYats Co�orstion to a deciaion `b� t'!» Ha�trd og T►o�ti�g ' App�ai� !or prop�rtq st cbs Gosa�r ot, l�ocbaq�� ,poet G'h+�tnut S�rs�ts. . , . ; Var� tsKil.y �roWcs. , : � _ � !1]�i�xt B. 01�n . , , � City C1�rk , � ce s Fft�an�e Departmaat � ' ., l�ou�iag 6r Build#�ag Ckidi:Bn!lorc�nt�Olt�cs . . ' AB�/�ch . - 1 ; . ' , . . �; . . - . � . _ ; , . � . � . � � , . , , ; . � , . , . � , � , � . , . , ; . , _ � ,, - , . � , . . , . - , ; , � - � . ,� . . , , 1'.. ' � , • � , , , ., , . . � , Z ��'�`� , � _,.��_`o, CITY OF SAI NT PAUL ��0y 7 �e � DEPARTMENT OF PLANNING AND ECONOMIC DEVELOPMENT r �it�ll��i o .,,;° " DIVISION OF PLANNING +ss• 25 West Fourth Street,Saint Paul,Minnesota,55102 GEORGE LATIMER 612-298-4151 MAYOR December 2, 1981 Mr. Albert Olson Room 386 City Hall St. Paul , Minnesota 55102 RE: Zoning File #9002 - Panama Flats Corporation City Council Hearing: December 10, 1981 Dear Sir: This letter is written in response to the appeal of Panama Flats Corporation to a decision of the Board of Zoning Appeals denying setback variances to the applicant to construct a double garage with access directly onto Chestnut Street. On September 22, 1981 , the Board of Zoning Appeals conducted a public hearing. The Panama Flats Corporation requested setback variances to construct two garages : (1 ) a 14-stall garage to run parallel to the existing old Panama Flats, and (2) a 2-stall garage to front on Chestnut Street in an area in front of t�h:e new Panama Flats. The Board voted 5 to 0 to grant variances for the 14-stall garage and voted 4 to 2 to deny variances for the 2-stall garage. The denial was based on findin�s that (1 ) the variances would impair the intent of the Ordinance to provide open front yard setbacks and (2) the variances would create a safety hazard b,y permitting a garage with access directly on to Chestnut, a minor arterial and heavil,y traveled truck route. A letter from the Panama Flats Condominium Association was received in opposition. This appeal is scheduled to be heard by the City Council on December 10, 1981 . Please notify me by December 9 if any member of the Council wishes to have slides of the site presented at the public hearing. Sincerely, ��a �`��i Donna F. �icNeally Planner - Zoning DFM/mb attachments �O . � , � � � ��.�'�� October 1, 1981 , �,., Board of Zoning Appeals ' �� - 25 West 4th Street �.. ,,.- . llth Floor, City Hall Annex ` • � � - � St. Paul Minnesota 55102 . . � �� ... ,.. Attention: Mrs. Donna McNeally: � A special meeting was held by the members of Panama Flats South Condominium Association to review the variances requested by Panama Flats Corporation, zoning file #9002. As a result of this meeting our association requests that all variances requested per file #9002 be rejected by the Board of Zoning Appeals. . We would like to state that in no way are we attempting to impede the process of restoration on the old brick Panama Flats building. We agree that Mr. Lilyholm is a reputable, quality, builder and we are pleased_that his firm is the contractor for Irvine Park's final stages of complete restoration. Two explanations relative to our opposition follow: I. We are opposed to the 2 foot setback on Chestnut and the 0 setback on the West because these relate directly to the request for one double garage fronting Chestnut Street. Our concern is over the potential traffic hazzards . that would be created if variances are granted that would allow a double garage fronting on Chestnut Street. The only access to the proposed double garage would be via a curb cut directly off Chestnut. (Our Association is not willing to grant an easement through our property to allow alternate access.) The potential traffic hazzards that would be created by cars entering the garage directly from Chestnut and exiting by backing directly into Chestnut traffic are clearly obvious for all who travel this busy route. II. The requested one foot six inch setback south would create a drainage � problem on our property due to runoff that would be caused by the roofline of planned garages which would parallel our property line. If their variance is granted, our association requests assurance that the garage rooflines be prop- erly pitched and guttered thereby directing drainage away from our property. Thank you for your consideration. Members of Panama Flat South Condominium Association �'��-� Bill Dobbins President BD/mes v . ' ' � � ��"!�'�� , � � �� EXCHA:�'GE STRBET . ' �. � . :.,:.�<� M � • I I R�m n4ww►iu+ts� . � • c tL: .� .. . . � g ��,� , ; ' � "�.'. I ss �L��%', ..L�' �: � .� � .� p►� '.,:- � .� , .,.. � � � - . . ' ,� .�. � , . .. . . •�� /' � . _ ��S. ,,,_. S. .. - U . t. �ya, �� I ! �� t � -�� . � : l�Vtrr A�. � :, p �. . . - ':�� :y*: � �� .�.,. � � � %"�'� ` .< . '� ~� '�+_ . = .. � � �� r. _J �i• . ' '' v - ��. � • ' RYAr AVEI`UE . . , ` ' city of sai nt pau I board of zoning appeals resolution zoning fiie number g�02 cb� date October 27. 1981 WHEREAS, PANAMA FLATS CORPORATION has applied for a :variance from the strict application of the provisions of Sections 61 .101(d��and 62.106(2) of the Saint Paul Legislative Code pertaining to setbacks for accessory structures in an RM-3 zoning district; and WHEREAS, the Saint Paul Board of Zoning Appeals��conducted a public hearing on October 13, 1981 , pursuant to said-appeal in''�cc�dance with the require- ments of Section 64.203(.a�� of the Legislative Code�;;;;t nd ; . WHEREAS, the Saint Paul Board of Zoning Appeals bas�ed upon evidence presented at the public hearing, as substantially reflected fin the minutes attached � hereto, made the following findings of fact relative to a two-stall garage � fronting on Chestnut: ` 1 . That the variances would impair the intent of the 4rdinance; 2. That the variances would result in a safety and traffic hazard. . PJOW, THEREFORE, BE IT RESOLVED, by the Saint Paul Board of Zoning Appeals that the variance of the provisions of Sections 61 .101 (dl and 62.106�2� to allow construction of a two-stall garage with a front setback of 2 feet from Chestnut and a rear setback of 0 fe�t on the south be denied. m oved by Mr. Kirk Decisions of the Board of Zoning seconded by Appeals are final subject to appeai Mr. Woods to the City Council within 30 days in favor 5 by anyone affected by the decision. - against � � ' ' MINUTES OF THE MEETING OF THE BOARD OF ZONING APPEALS IN CITY COUNCIL CHAMBERS, ST. PAUL, MINNESOTA, OCTOBER 13, 1981 PRESENT: N4nes. Morton and Summers; Messrs. Grais, Kirk, Osborn, and Peterson of the Board of Zoning Appeals; Mr. Segal , Assistant City Attorney; P1s. Lane of the Division of Housinq and Building Code Enforcement; Ms. Beseman, Ms. McP�eally, and Ms. Von Mosch ' of the Planning Division Staff. ' ABSEP�T: Messr. Woods. The meeting was chaired by Gladys Morton, Chairman. . PANAMA FLATS CORPORATION (#9002): Variance request to construct 16 detached aarages for renovate Panama �ts on the southwest corner of Exchanc;e and Chestnut. . The appellant was present. There was opposition present at the hearing. Ms. McNeally showed slides of the site and reviewed the staff report with a recomnendation for approval of !!ariance 1 for interior lot line setback variance and denial of Variances 2 and 3 for the qaraqe frontina on . Chestnut. A letter was received from the President of the Panama Flats South Condominium Association requesting that the Board deny all variances because of the traffic hazard created by the qarage off of Chestnut and drainaqe problems which might be created by the side lot line setback variance. - . Leonard Lilyholm, 496 Portland, developer and owner of the Panama Flats Corp. , stated that he requested that the matter be laid over at the last meeting because at that time the Panama Flats South Condominium Association indicated that they would be in support of the curb cut and entrance of a garage as oppose to entering the double garage from their property. He explained that there is no parking on Exchanqe, no parking on Chestnut in the morning or at rush hour in the afternoon, and par.kinq is restricted around Irvine Park. There is virtually no place to park a car near a buildina unless it is on �_ private property. In the condominium market, especially this close to downtown, � . 1 off-street parking place per unit is not just an amenity but a necessity. �They are not requesting parkinq in excess of what is needed; there are 16 units and the property in question can accorr�odate 16 garages with the variances. If any of the variances are denied, they will lose 4 garages. He also co�renented that the existing structure on the corner has a 0' setback and the parkinq does relate to the existino building. James Lyngren, attorney representing Mr. Lilyholm, testified th�t there are very definite physical characteristics of the land which mil.itates in favor of granting the variances. There is provision in the Zoning_Code which states ' that setbacks can comply with existi�ng structures and there are numerous examples throughout the City where there are multi-family structures which abut intersections particularly in the Hill area. fara�e structures to the rear are being allowed to be constructed to the setback that is observed by the existing structure. He stated that the garaaes will also enhance the st�eetscape. , �� . �� .PANAMA FLATS CORPORATION (9002) Page 2 Mr. Grais asked the applicant if there would be a problem with drainage? Mr. Lilyholm explained that the existing gradinq slopes away from the buildinq and they would not build a garage that would slope the land to the structure so there would be no water problem created. t4r. Osborn asked the applicant if an easement could� be qranted? Mr. Lilyholm � commented that Mr. Dobbins indicated that it would cause a congested problem in the existing parking lot and he definitely would ;not allow an easement. Ms. McNeally reported that in talking with the Traffic Engineer his primary concern with the double garage is that a person pullino into the garage will have to either stop on the sidewalk or on the street in order to open the garage doors to go in and will have to follow the same practice when exiting from the garage. Whereas;� from a 14-s-tall gara��e �a � erson will always be pulling into the lot and '.pulling out of the lot and �he maneuverinq space will be on site. .. �'� . Mr. Lilyholm commented that all the garages will have automoatic garage door � openers allowing a person not to get out of the car::unless the power is off. � Without the varainces, he would have to market 4 url:ats without off-street parking and with the parking situation in the area, it would be very difficult. Bill Dobbins, President of Panama Flats South Association, reiterated the Association's position as indicated in his letter af October 1 , 1981 . . Nearing no further testimony, Ms. Morton closed the public hearing portion of the meeting. Ms. McNeally reported that staff would have no objection to the setback for the 14-stall garage on Chestnut;the only concern is with the double garage which would have its access directly onto Chestnut. Mr. Dobbins stated that they have no problem with the 2 garages. The problem they have is with the curb cut that relates to the garages. � ��4r. Osborn made a motion to approve Variance 1 based on findings 1 through 5 of the staff report. Mr. Peterson seconded the motion. The mation passed on a roll call vote of 6 to 0. Mr. Osborn then made a motion to deny V�riance 2 and 3 based on findings 3 and 4 of the staff report. Mr. Peterson seconded the �motion, The motion passed on a roll call vote of 4 to 2 .with Mr. Grais and Mr. Kirk voting against the motion. Submitted by: Approved by: ' � C� �� -�-r-�i � ��l�s� ��'� 1 ' � � �� Donna F. McNeally Gladys Morton, Ctiairman � ZONING STAFF REPORT ��,� � � , ' . �� . . � • 1 .' APPtIGANT: PANAP1A FLATS CORPORATION DATE OF HEARING 9/22/81 2. . . . . . . . . . . . . . . CLASSIFICATION . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . CURRENT PLANNING & ZONING COMMITTEE BOARD OF ZONING APPEALS Rezon�ng ❑ Var�ance � Special Condition Use ❑ Administrative Review ❑ Determination of Similar Use ❑ Other ' ❑ Change of Nonconforming Use ❑ ; Other ❑ 3. LOCATION: Southwest corner of Exch.ange and Chestnut. 4. LEGAL DESCRIPTION: Lots 1 & 2, Block 32, Rice and Irvines Addition. �� 5. PRESENT ZONING: RM-3 ZONING CODE REFERENCE: Section 61 .101 (d) & 62.106�2) 6. STAFF INVESTIGATION & REPORT: �• DATE 9/14/81 BY Donna F. McNeally -------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------- -------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------- A. PURPOSE: Construct 16 detached garages for renovated Panama Flats (14 garages in one um�t p��us 1 double garage). B. PARCEL SIZE: 136' on Exchange x 109' on Chestnut = 14,824 square feet. C. EXISTING LAND USE: Panama Flats (existing) and vacant land to the south; landscaped area in ront set ack of new Panama Flats structure (location of double qaraqe on Chestnut). D. SURROUNDING LAND USE: North - Single family & corr�nercial (B-5) South - New Panama Flats (RM-3) East - Single family & commercial (B-5) West - New Panama Flats; Irvine Park (RM-3) E. ORDINANCE CITIITION: Section 61 .101 (d) requires tliat accessory structures be 3' from . interior lot lines; the applicant nroposes 1 '6" on the east property line (Variance #1 ) and D" on the south (yariance #�) from the Chestnut garage. Section 62.102(2) requires accessory buildings meet the front setback when abutting residential use; in this case, the required front yard is 25' on Chestnut; the applicant proposes 2 feet. F. FINDINGS: 1 . The request for variance is based on the exceptional size of the property and the location of the existing building. The garages (Variance 1 ) must be located parallel to the building with access from Chestnut; the available area is long and narrow. The area on Chestnut (Variances 2 & 3) is small and totally within the front yard setback. � 2. Without variances the owner would, based on the physical characteristics, incur exceptional practical difficulties in constructing detached garages to service the 16 condominiums. • Since this is an existing structure, no garages or off-street parking is required; it is an amenity the applicant proposes. � 3. Variance 1 for the interior lot line setback can be granted without substantial detriment to the community and would not impair the intent and purpose of the Ordinance. � The 1 '6" side yard on the east should afford room for maintenance and adjoins the side yard of the next unit. • . Variance 2 and 3 would impair the intent of the Ordinance to provide open front yard setbacks. The proposed garage would appear to be within the yard of the adjacent unit. . �� . • , � � (��jt� �....., PANAMA FLATS CORPORATION (_�90021 STAFF REPORT Page 2 F. FINDINGS CONT'D. 4. The variance for interior lot line setbacks (Variance .l ) can be granted without substantial detriment to the nei hbors (e.g. , supply of liqht and air, safety, health, property values�. , Variances 2 and 3 would result in a safety and traffic hazard. Cars using � the garage would back directly onto Chestnut; this curb cut would be within several feet of two other driveways to parking areas. Additionally, the busy intersection of Chestnut and Exchange is only � block away. y�:\ �,\� 5. The request for variances is not based primaril:y�on a desire for economic gain. ;a� �, G. STAFF RECOMMENDATION: Based on findings 1 through �, staff recortunends approval . of ariance for �nterior lot line setback variance.; based on findings 3 and 4, . staff recomnends denial of Variance 2 and 3 for the.front yard setback on Chestnut. i . ; =� , � ' y ? j i . -- . . .. ! �� ZONING BOARD ' � ; APPLICATION FOR. ZONING ORDINANC� �AE�1�C�E � , CITY OF SAINT PAUL A VARIANCE OF ZONING CODE CHAPTER�,SECTIONI�_PARAGRAPH ' � IS REQUESTED IN CONFORMITY WITH THE POWERS VESTED IN�E BOARD OF 20� � PEALS TO PERMIT THE��1S�L f �'i l�✓1 Cf� f lrYL/�r ll,�� ON PROPERTY DESCRIBEO BELOW. `'� - , A. Applicant; NAME: Panar,ia Flats Cor�oration � � i ADDRESS 237 E. Sixth Street, St. Paul DAYTIME TELEPHONE NO. 225-�O5� ZIP CODE 5�J�O� t. Property interest of applicant: (owner,contract purchase�,etc.) ; Owner • 2. Name of owne� (if different) B. Property Description: AODRESS � 46-53 Ri ce & �. Legal description: LOT � & Z B�ocK 26-41 Aop. I1^Y�I'1e5 2. �ot:ize: 136' X 109' � x�s �ng g. . .. _ . � 3. Pre�ent Use & Vacant Land present Zoninp Dist.��'�-� c. Reasons for Requat: 16 rarages on vacant 1 and for use by future �. Proposed use owners of the 16 condami ni ums i n exi stt ng bl dg. 2. What physical charocteristics of the property prevent itt being used for any of the permitted use� in your zone7 Itopography,soi�conditions,sixe and shape of lot,ete.) ��Z e cY �2 O� �U'1�' State the specific variation re�es giving distancea where appropriate.� . � 1 'G" Setback fror�P�erty Lihe-3' r �i�e !.S`vo r�wx� � i,.�i c . �, ��- �etbac{. fro� er,�y Li ne_3r Y��,,�� va r��:v.ce 2'0" Se�back from��5idewalk _ _ rP �;,�� r►�anc . 4 Explain how your case conforms to each of the�d�ny:� � � � a. That the strict application of the provisions��2oning Ordian wo�u�id result in peculisr � or exceptionat precticel diHiculties,or exceptional undue hardthips. �� Due to site formation it is imgossible to provide each unit with a yarage without approval af variance � � �.CASHIF,RS I�SE QyCY•� b. Thst the prentinp of a veriance wili �.�- ,C,.,,_ _!: ,�ti� ° not be a subctential detriment to �'"�r•�-"='`=- �'`'` . � . �r.��ti -�'� !�!?�� . �� public pood or s substantial impeir- +_��'-�- •=�� .ti_,-.,. c.�, r;r � ment of the intent and purpose of . :i:., . _�:,,�. theZoning0►dinance. : '�r:�_ ,�t�;t:; "�{i ,: : . . . �'-� Garages ti•ri 11 front only on drivew.ay of nearby • build�ng � NOTE: THIS WILL NOT BE PROCESSED IT OUT A COMP�ETE SITE PLAN . �._, . �, Signsture `> G ��- J Dete Received .... --- -__...�.._._ _. _... _..._ _. _ f . . � � . � �;� �' � �� . ; . � � ' . � � � �- � `'_ �� ,, , � �� ,. : . , , • . � � '� . . ' � �+ �. � `� � :. . �� . '� -- -- - - - �� , . � • . �' � � � . � •� _ � . � � 1 � �_ � � � � . ' : . � � 1 . -� ,��a;\�-R t _ ,`r �a_a ,� . _ J r ... • _._ .�.•-. . �.•• _.T�'.- --7�/� � . , �,' � . `\ �j � �� n � � { 8 � � � �r.1� �� . � O ' . I � � ��. { � V� , -� . - l`� � _ _, �� . �� + ; � � �, . � � � •�j �� 1` . g , j ; � � ; . . .�► �"_j� ; " ' � I � -- - �� • R '�"J . : '' � , . � � , . ..� S' . � �' ' . � � �� . ' � '� . � . � � _ , ..�.�. .—^-�� '`�-recr�^' � � ! at • � -;� � � tk� � --- -- -- - -=-{ . � � },,�,� .� -� c�'� � �. � < ��-�c �� , ��:. , Ca . �. .F. .. �• ' � � �. . . m :�:•. . ; �� .._._--- - - -� . _ � , .�. t9'-0" -�� --- — — ' 4-�e ' �� T _ � � � � �� r � �'P`�'�' E � ' : � �,� �: �_ � c�` �_�'� �' � � ' � •,., C�. .---- –� -— – =• � �, 7� �w � N � w� —� SI D �cLl(,, � � � • � --'— � -- — ; � � , � — -- -- ! � � c .. � . � . �, � � v � C t1 EST h uT STR,EET � $ . � � • � f' . L . � . �: .,.�. . � .. 'v�'�,'"�...y�,r.� ^i ..:. ..... .*.' ."��. : .. . . ,...'. � �..,s"�;;�i . ..wi.� h�C- _• . , . "�,so+?_z .-`t°.:if.,� _..�,_�'"' .xt•�.-��'^*�,'.,,;��. . s., , . . _ . . . � . . . . . . - / � v?.'�. P Q `v��' Q �� \ __ ---- �" . � • � �� p� . � . ��. C` C� • � � � Cr vi �"� L� � �'� ` � CENTER r � ' � � S �� w• � L � PARAC/HC RAMP !• '\' �� / � j ,�I � � . . , .. •` � � ,, J � � . � �� . � , �� • ` `� v• •�l� s� � � � � � � � �. � � � ' p Q , J `. � , , O , J ' � , . . / � . I ` � � � ,� �. ,� �' 'e - . � , . • � ; � � � `•�. / i �� • � ' �/ �- / s � ` � �\ ��`'(�// �\ "� \``�\ /. / / � � � �� ♦ , / � J � � \/ � � .\ \��,� ,�CsTa�p . � �Q- J �Q . �'` �'� �� ` �`•— ::a � -s=\ � - " '� .�� .. ♦ ♦ ♦ � J .�,� '�:�'� :. ` ��,` �•f. .�� 00 .;� �,� .� ;� � � ,, ;>:;: 'j;�''� � � � ,;:,� ,� , o .:::::r::::;*� � ` ' � �� M� ;� ``'� � .:;�.::�:. .. P �: e �` .�::,:::.,:r�, .� � � � J , .> • ;" ! �� -+ � �,�• _ r' �:: �• :;:';� � ♦ �s � �% � . .. ` �� r, .� � ♦\ � . . .;:. �:.� o� � .f;:�: >:,::. `'� .� � � � '3 ;� ; `~ � ��::-:::�� ` ��, � .. �::�:�:��:: , ,. :,6 s ,., , ' , � �..... �, � �� '��,✓4c� � : �� -b— �:�:� :;.r :.. .:;. �- '��J � �� ` .: �� • ' "� P ;�V � .\, .�., `,i � a` . ,, , J '�♦ ��O '�. ; v. ~�O .:�� ..�V� ,, . � � `� . . � �' n`4t:�� y •t � ,, . .� t S.:�:.• � �� . J. . 4�.i►;.:.::.,.;::.� . , � , ,..�.::. , �:r � .. � . . . �J �, r, , , � � .: ,: � � . ' � � �� . � . .• � . J � . �Q. J . O. ..�: �::�::;:�':.. f ,r�� ... . " ��. .� . -O�: , J ::�;::: :�y � . i� . . ` �� / . � J �r�: >�►:�� , ...,� . �. r; ..:�. ,y OQ. � . , � -.. .`�� :� y . � % . ��, .,;:: . i`. �` � '. ., - . .. � "/ . • . � . . ' �� .. � ' . // ' •�.`.::' r . �� `'. ♦ � •'.•:•..:. :: •'•� . ��. � . � � . � 'a' :��,:.' ' �/> ; � •. �t,► . , .l�,�.::� i�"�, , :`�. . , '� . .• � a . - --��.�,/ '; :'��:��` �- , //. '- �`. ;.. � �.� �� , ; .,�,,. , ::��• ,/ f,�,�,�+.,�...�. . � . /„ . . }. . ... . . s�:..��' . ..... . .. ..... ... ...:�:�� `. �` . .- .,, . .�� . . '. • • . � AREA MAP �n n�rna ��i�'S Co�� . LEGEND APPLICANT ----� ' ZONING DISTRICT BOUNOARY � , . � SUBJECT PROPERTY PURPOSE a�� Q ONE FAMILY PLANNING � �� DISTRIST 0o Two FAMILY � FILE N0. MULTIPLE FAMILY S� �-. ao q - �-�- O DATE � .r --- • ♦ n COMMERCtAI. SCaLE� i��= 200� NORTH � "'� ° �NOUSTRIAL MAP h0. ��tNT PAUL PLANNING BOARD V VACANT � � � ST. PAl1L CITY COUNCiL PU6LIC HEARING NOTICE ZONIIVt� APF'EAL District Plannin Council ��9 F I L E N 0. x9oo2 IDear Property Owner: PA G E i P U R P 0 S E Appeal to the City Council to request variance denied by Board of Zoning Appeals to construct double garage with 2' setback from Chestnut Street right-of-way. L0 C A T I 0 N SW corner of Exchange and Chestnut and is legally described as: Lots 1 and 2, Block 32, Rice and Irvine's Addition. P E T I T 10 N E R Panama Flats Corporation H E A R I N G ThursdaL, December 10, 1981, 10:00 A.M. Citv Council Chambers, 3rd Floor Citv Hall - Court House QU E STI ON S Zoning 298-4154 Contact the Zoning Section of the Planning and Economic Development Department, Room 1101, City Hall Annex, 25 W. 4th Street, St. Paul, MinnesoLa 55102 Notice sent November�25, 1981, hy the Valuation and Assessment Division Department of Finance and Management Services Room 218 City Hall - Court Aouse .. St. Paul, Minnesota 55102 . � . . ^ . . . \ . . , � . � � ~..�e ♦ . . . . , . . . _ ., . � . � � � � �8{�'S : � - ; , ; _ . . � � � : � � . 8ovember 12, 1981 � . . , Mr, Paul Deach ' . . , Finance Department , Room 218, .City Hall Dear 'Sir s " . ` . . � The Citv Council set a flate of hea�ri.ag for Dece�er lOth, 1981 ' to cons.�dsr the appes.l� oP Pan�ma Flgts Ro�►houee ta a deciaion of the Board of Zflning Appqals aF£ecti�ag property at the corner of • Rxchange eund Chestnut as set out in Zoning File #9002 (b). Will you please send notices to property owners aa required b� law? . , Very truly yours, , ' � Albert B. Olso� , City Clerk . ABO:la ' � . ' , ec: P�.snning Statf, Zoning Section ' � Housing b BLdg. Code $nf. Div. � ; � \ . . , \ , , , . � . \ , , - . :. _ � � ' , � . , ; j � � . . fz �-;�� y�� t . �",: ;. a � .�SO.O l� �� /�% Pcanamca flats Corporation November 5, 1981 1�,� � � r City Clerk's Office � Room 386 � .r Ci ty Hal l �" � St. Paul , Mn. 55102 Subject: Request for Appellate Hearing with the City Council of St. Paul This request relates to the Panama Flats Rowhouse on the corner of Exchange and Chestnut in St. Paul and to a decision by the St. Paul Board of Zoning Appeals, specifically to Zoning File No. 9002(b). We would appreciate a scheduled date for the hearing as soon as possible. Time is of the essence in this particular situation. The reasons for this request are valid and very important from a construction scheduling perspective. I would appreciate a resAOnse from you as to the date of the hearing as soon as possible. Thank you very much for your efforts on our behalf. Sincerely, Bill Christensen BC/mw Condominium Development and Construction Q37 E. Sixth Street Saint Paul/Minnesoto 55101 Telephone:61 Q.QQ5.1051 � iiI ^ ° 1 , . ; - �'��""'�.�"� city of saint paul board of zoning appeais resolution zoning file number 9002 �b>__ dale _�_October 27, 1981_------_-�----- WHEREAS, PANAMA FLATS CORPORATION has applied for a variance from the strict application of the provisions of Sections 61 .101 (d) and 62.106(2) of the Saint Paul Legislative Code pertaining to setbacks for accessory structures in an RM-3 zoning district; and WHEREAS, the Saint Paul Board of Zoning Appeals conducted a public hearing on October 13, 1981 , pursuant to said appeal in accordance with the require- i��ci�� v� �2C�i�ii �-�t.�G��d} "vr i�+c L�y'1 3 i at i fE �vuc� ard WHEREAS, the Saint Paul Board of Zoning Appeals based upon evidence presented at the public hearing, as substantially reflected in the minutes attached hereto, made the following findings of fact relative to a two-stall garage fronting on Chestnut: 1 . That the variances would impair the intent of the Ordinance; 2. That the variances would result in a safety and traffic hazard. M06J, +�'HEREFORE, BE IT RESOLVED, by the Saint Paul Board of Zoning Appeals that the variance of the provisions of Sections 61 .101 (d) and 62.106(2) to allow construction of a two-stall garage with a front setback of 2 feet from Chestnut and a rear setback of 0 feet on the south be denied. . ' m oved by Mr. Kirk Decisions of the Board of Zoning seconded by _ Appea,s are final subject to appeal Mr. Woods to the City Council within 30 days In fC�VOr 5 by anyone affected by the decision. . against � � _