The URL can be used to link to this page

00-455Council File # d�• �",SS �RICINAL CITY � Green Sheet # 1 02�2� RESOLUTION J T PAUL, MINNESOTA lQ J Presented By Referred To Committee: Date 1 Whereas, Ramsey and Hennepin Counties desire to reconstruct the deck of the Ford Parkway 2 Bridge No. 3575 over the Mississippi River, State Project No. SP 62-642-03 and SP 27-646-02; 3 and 4 5 Whereas, the proposed project limits are within the City of Saint Paul; and 6 7 Whereas, the Counties have presented final plans and specifications to the City of Saint Paul for 8 approval; 9 10 Now, therefore be it 11 12 Resolved, the City Engineer is authorized to approve the construction plans and specifications. 13 14 15 16 17 18 19 20 21 22 23 24 2 5 Requested by Department of: Adopted by Council: Date �O '�G �c Adoption Certified by Council Secretary By: �'1�- � (��-�-- -- Approved by Mayor: Date ��/�l,(� � z �� B �/a�.tir �,�D� Public Works By: / � Form Approved by City Attorney By: ��i� �-�� a. a�. b 6 Approved by Mayor for Submission to Council i �� BY� � 2� ( � it/�`l/U ; oe -�155 DEPARTMENT/OFFICE/COUNCIL DATEINITIATED GREEN SHEF��O� Public Works 4/26/2000 ND• � �2g28 CANTACT PERSON & PHONE �—� � INRIAL/DATE � Kevin Nelson, Brid e Division 266-6182 ASSIGN I s i DEPARTMENTDIREGTOR n �CRVCOUNCIL MlI5iBEONCOUNQLAGENDABY{DAT� �M�NGFOH I�CITYATTORNEY �. .2.qL•DC��RyCLEHK OflDER I� ��'� DIRECTOR � FIN. & MGT. SEFVICES DIR. May 17, 2000 MAYOR ORASSISTANT) �� Leon Pearson, Bridg - i OTAL S OF SIGNATURE PAGES (CLIP ALL LOCATONS FOR SIGNATIIR� U ASSOCIATE u DEPr. ACCAU CTONRE�UESrED prove Council Resolution Authorizing the Director of Public Works to Approve the Plans and Spec'rfirations for the Ford Pa ay Bridge o. 3575 Deck Reconstruction Project. RECOMMENDAnONS: Approve (A) or Reject (R) PERSONAL SERVICE CONTRACTS MUST ANSWER THE FOLLOWING QUESTIONS: PLFNNINGCAMMISSION _CMLSERVICECOMMISSION 1. Hasthisperso�rtneverworkedunderacontrdc[forthisdeparUnent? CIBCOMMITTEE YES NO — — 2. Has this persoNfirtn ever been a city employee? A SrnFF _ YES NO oiSrRlC7 COUNaL 3. Does this persoNfirtn possess a skill not nortnaly possessed by any curten[ city employee? — YES NO SUPPORTS WHICH COUNCIL OBJECTIVE? Explain all yes answers on separate sheet antl attach to grcen sheet INRIATING PROBLEM, ISSUE, OPPORTUNITY (WHO, WHAT, WHEN, WHERE, WH�' Ramsey and Hennepin Counties have been working with MfVDOT on plans to redeck the Ford Parkway bridge. It is a$1 � million project that will take three years to complete. The counties share ownership of the bridge and are sharing the cost of the project. The Citys of Minneapolis and St. Paul have no money in the project. The project has been designed under the direction of a Task Force made up of City staff, local citizens and local businesses. By law the City must approve the project plans and specifications. Bid opening is scheduled for May 17. There are no controversial issues at this time, however, the County has applied with the City for a noise variance on construction noise . There is a public hearing scheduled for that variance. It is a separate but related issue. ADVANTAGESIFAPPROVED: Construction may begin in June and be completed in three construction seasons, Fall of 2002. DISADVANTAGES IF APPROVED: Ford Parkway will be restricted to one lane of traffic in each direction for three construction seasons. ��i�� Y �� _ . . - =-.-� � _ � �.. -- — DISADVANTAGES IF NOT APPROVED The Ford Bridge deck will continue to deteriorate. Frequent and expensive repairs will need to be conducted each year to keep the bridge open to traffic. 6e0'.s' r�,� . ��''�1 � . �� TOTALAMOUN70FTRANSAC710N$ $O COS7/REVENUEBUDGE7ED(CIRCLEONE) YES NO FUNDING SOURCE County State Aid, Fed. and State Bridge ACINfTY NUMBER N�A FlNANCIAL MFORMATION: (EXPLAIN) Council File # d�• �",SS �RICINAL CITY � Green Sheet # 1 02�2� RESOLUTION J T PAUL, MINNESOTA lQ J Presented By Referred To Committee: Date 1 Whereas, Ramsey and Hennepin Counties desire to reconstruct the deck of the Ford Parkway 2 Bridge No. 3575 over the Mississippi River, State Project No. SP 62-642-03 and SP 27-646-02; 3 and 4 5 Whereas, the proposed project limits are within the City of Saint Paul; and 6 7 Whereas, the Counties have presented final plans and specifications to the City of Saint Paul for 8 approval; 9 10 Now, therefore be it 11 12 Resolved, the City Engineer is authorized to approve the construction plans and specifications. 13 14 15 16 17 18 19 20 21 22 23 24 2 5 Requested by Department of: Adopted by Council: Date �O '�G �c Adoption Certified by Council Secretary By: �'1�- � (��-�-- -- Approved by Mayor: Date ��/�l,(� � z �� B �/a�.tir �,�D� Public Works By: / � Form Approved by City Attorney By: ��i� �-�� a. a�. b 6 Approved by Mayor for Submission to Council i �� BY� � 2� ( � it/�`l/U ; oe -�155 DEPARTMENT/OFFICE/COUNCIL DATEINITIATED GREEN SHEF��O� Public Works 4/26/2000 ND• � �2g28 CANTACT PERSON & PHONE �—� � INRIAL/DATE � Kevin Nelson, Brid e Division 266-6182 ASSIGN I s i DEPARTMENTDIREGTOR n �CRVCOUNCIL MlI5iBEONCOUNQLAGENDABY{DAT� �M�NGFOH I�CITYATTORNEY �. .2.qL•DC��RyCLEHK OflDER I� ��'� DIRECTOR � FIN. & MGT. SEFVICES DIR. May 17, 2000 MAYOR ORASSISTANT) �� Leon Pearson, Bridg - i OTAL S OF SIGNATURE PAGES (CLIP ALL LOCATONS FOR SIGNATIIR� U ASSOCIATE u DEPr. ACCAU CTONRE�UESrED prove Council Resolution Authorizing the Director of Public Works to Approve the Plans and Spec'rfirations for the Ford Pa ay Bridge o. 3575 Deck Reconstruction Project. RECOMMENDAnONS: Approve (A) or Reject (R) PERSONAL SERVICE CONTRACTS MUST ANSWER THE FOLLOWING QUESTIONS: PLFNNINGCAMMISSION _CMLSERVICECOMMISSION 1. Hasthisperso�rtneverworkedunderacontrdc[forthisdeparUnent? CIBCOMMITTEE YES NO — — 2. Has this persoNfirtn ever been a city employee? A SrnFF _ YES NO oiSrRlC7 COUNaL 3. Does this persoNfirtn possess a skill not nortnaly possessed by any curten[ city employee? — YES NO SUPPORTS WHICH COUNCIL OBJECTIVE? Explain all yes answers on separate sheet antl attach to grcen sheet INRIATING PROBLEM, ISSUE, OPPORTUNITY (WHO, WHAT, WHEN, WHERE, WH�' Ramsey and Hennepin Counties have been working with MfVDOT on plans to redeck the Ford Parkway bridge. It is a$1 � million project that will take three years to complete. The counties share ownership of the bridge and are sharing the cost of the project. The Citys of Minneapolis and St. Paul have no money in the project. The project has been designed under the direction of a Task Force made up of City staff, local citizens and local businesses. By law the City must approve the project plans and specifications. Bid opening is scheduled for May 17. There are no controversial issues at this time, however, the County has applied with the City for a noise variance on construction noise . There is a public hearing scheduled for that variance. It is a separate but related issue. ADVANTAGESIFAPPROVED: Construction may begin in June and be completed in three construction seasons, Fall of 2002. DISADVANTAGES IF APPROVED: Ford Parkway will be restricted to one lane of traffic in each direction for three construction seasons. ��i�� Y �� _ . . - =-.-� � _ � �.. -- — DISADVANTAGES IF NOT APPROVED The Ford Bridge deck will continue to deteriorate. Frequent and expensive repairs will need to be conducted each year to keep the bridge open to traffic. 6e0'.s' r�,� . ��''�1 � . �� TOTALAMOUN70FTRANSAC710N$ $O COS7/REVENUEBUDGE7ED(CIRCLEONE) YES NO FUNDING SOURCE County State Aid, Fed. and State Bridge ACINfTY NUMBER N�A FlNANCIAL MFORMATION: (EXPLAIN) Council File # d�• �",SS �RICINAL CITY � Green Sheet # 1 02�2� RESOLUTION J T PAUL, MINNESOTA lQ J Presented By Referred To Committee: Date 1 Whereas, Ramsey and Hennepin Counties desire to reconstruct the deck of the Ford Parkway 2 Bridge No. 3575 over the Mississippi River, State Project No. SP 62-642-03 and SP 27-646-02; 3 and 4 5 Whereas, the proposed project limits are within the City of Saint Paul; and 6 7 Whereas, the Counties have presented final plans and specifications to the City of Saint Paul for 8 approval; 9 10 Now, therefore be it 11 12 Resolved, the City Engineer is authorized to approve the construction plans and specifications. 13 14 15 16 17 18 19 20 21 22 23 24 2 5 Requested by Department of: Adopted by Council: Date �O '�G �c Adoption Certified by Council Secretary By: �'1�- � (��-�-- -- Approved by Mayor: Date ��/�l,(� � z �� B �/a�.tir �,�D� Public Works By: / � Form Approved by City Attorney By: ��i� �-�� a. a�. b 6 Approved by Mayor for Submission to Council i �� BY� � 2� ( � it/�`l/U ; oe -�155 DEPARTMENT/OFFICE/COUNCIL DATEINITIATED GREEN SHEF��O� Public Works 4/26/2000 ND• � �2g28 CANTACT PERSON & PHONE �—� � INRIAL/DATE � Kevin Nelson, Brid e Division 266-6182 ASSIGN I s i DEPARTMENTDIREGTOR n �CRVCOUNCIL MlI5iBEONCOUNQLAGENDABY{DAT� �M�NGFOH I�CITYATTORNEY �. .2.qL•DC��RyCLEHK OflDER I� ��'� DIRECTOR � FIN. & MGT. SEFVICES DIR. May 17, 2000 MAYOR ORASSISTANT) �� Leon Pearson, Bridg - i OTAL S OF SIGNATURE PAGES (CLIP ALL LOCATONS FOR SIGNATIIR� U ASSOCIATE u DEPr. ACCAU CTONRE�UESrED prove Council Resolution Authorizing the Director of Public Works to Approve the Plans and Spec'rfirations for the Ford Pa ay Bridge o. 3575 Deck Reconstruction Project. RECOMMENDAnONS: Approve (A) or Reject (R) PERSONAL SERVICE CONTRACTS MUST ANSWER THE FOLLOWING QUESTIONS: PLFNNINGCAMMISSION _CMLSERVICECOMMISSION 1. Hasthisperso�rtneverworkedunderacontrdc[forthisdeparUnent? CIBCOMMITTEE YES NO — — 2. Has this persoNfirtn ever been a city employee? A SrnFF _ YES NO oiSrRlC7 COUNaL 3. Does this persoNfirtn possess a skill not nortnaly possessed by any curten[ city employee? — YES NO SUPPORTS WHICH COUNCIL OBJECTIVE? Explain all yes answers on separate sheet antl attach to grcen sheet INRIATING PROBLEM, ISSUE, OPPORTUNITY (WHO, WHAT, WHEN, WHERE, WH�' Ramsey and Hennepin Counties have been working with MfVDOT on plans to redeck the Ford Parkway bridge. It is a$1 � million project that will take three years to complete. The counties share ownership of the bridge and are sharing the cost of the project. The Citys of Minneapolis and St. Paul have no money in the project. The project has been designed under the direction of a Task Force made up of City staff, local citizens and local businesses. By law the City must approve the project plans and specifications. Bid opening is scheduled for May 17. There are no controversial issues at this time, however, the County has applied with the City for a noise variance on construction noise . There is a public hearing scheduled for that variance. It is a separate but related issue. ADVANTAGESIFAPPROVED: Construction may begin in June and be completed in three construction seasons, Fall of 2002. DISADVANTAGES IF APPROVED: Ford Parkway will be restricted to one lane of traffic in each direction for three construction seasons. ��i�� Y �� _ . . - =-.-� � _ � �.. -- — DISADVANTAGES IF NOT APPROVED The Ford Bridge deck will continue to deteriorate. Frequent and expensive repairs will need to be conducted each year to keep the bridge open to traffic. 6e0'.s' r�,� . ��''�1 � . �� TOTALAMOUN70FTRANSAC710N$ $O COS7/REVENUEBUDGE7ED(CIRCLEONE) YES NO FUNDING SOURCE County State Aid, Fed. and State Bridge ACINfTY NUMBER N�A FlNANCIAL MFORMATION: (EXPLAIN)