The URL can be used to link to this page

00-387��i�� Presented Refetred To Council File # O � ? Green Sheet # 100412 Committee Date 1 BE TT RESOLVED, that the Council of the City of Saint Paul hereby certifies and approves the April 18, 2000, 2 decision of tlxe Legislative Hearing Off'icer on Property Code Enforcement Appeals for the following addresses: 3 Propertv Aronealed Ap eln lant 4 73 Leech Street (Laid over from 1-4-00) Laurie Colbeck far Women of Nations 5 Decision: Laid over to the June 20, 2000, Properiy Code Enfarcement meeting. 795 Sixth Street East Ed Reyes for Pagasa L.L.P. Decision: Laid over to the May 16, 2000, Property Code Enforcement meeting. 1223 Selb,�Avenue Beth Fischer Decision: Laid over to the May 2, 2000, Property Code Enforcement meeting. 10 11 12 13 14 15 16 17 Yeas Nays Absent Blakey � Coleman �/' Hazris � Benanav Reiter v Bostrom � L�aa� ,j � c5 r 18 19 20 21 22 23 Adopted by Council: Date � � c�—C_ ` a-C7 � c� Adoprion C rtified by Council Secretary B �� p �_--� Approved by Mayor: D �� <`F�FS`� By: RESOLUTION CITY, OF SAINT PAUL, MINNESOTA �S Requested by Department of: � Form Approved by City Attorney � Approved by Mayor for Submission to Council � GREEN SHEET TOTAL $ OF SIGNATURE PAGES Co -3�"t �� ' V�J:� f � u�� u��— ❑ �,.,.� ❑ �.� ❑.,�.�,��.. ❑..�,�o ❑..�,�...�..,, ❑ (CUP ALL LOCATIONS FOR SIGNATUR� Approving the decisions of the Legislafive Hearing Officer on Property Code Enforcement Appeals far the following addresses: 73 Leech Street, 795 Si�h Street East, and 1223 Selby Avenue. IUAI IVN A�(OVE (!U M KBJett PLANNING CAMMISSION CIB COMMI7TEE CML SERVICE CAMMISSION Itn'::i�Piy�] AMOUNT OF 7RANSACTION Fiasfhis D�� eaerxw�md urds a wArxttorttus deparirtieM'i YES NO Flas Mis D�eauArm e�sr been a dlY empbyee? YES ti0 Does fhi6 P��fm P�a sW�p Iqt �ypoaaesaeA M�Y wrtcrR d[y empbyee? YES bl6 Is Mis PMeaJfirtn a tarpEted ventla? YES NO Gc�n�� ges�a�ch G�ni�r ..:��1� ;s.�ra��;�rr�ni.raa��.irai:r?.3.�:ia� ACTIVI7Y Nt11�ER res xo (��M �o -3�`1 NOTES OF T'F� PROPERTY CODE ENFORCEMENT MEETING Tuesday, April 18, 2000 Room 330 courthouse Gerry Strathman, Legislative Hearing Officer The meeting was called to order at 1:32 p.m. STAFF PRESENT: Pat Fish, Fire Prevention; Paula Seeley, Code Enforcement; Mike Urmann, Fire Prevention 73 Leech Street (I,aid over from 1-4-00) Ellie Fazell and Laurie Colbeck, representing Women of Nations, appeared. Mr. Strathxnan stated the last tnne this was heazd in January, the properiy was being remodeled and was suppose to be finished by now. Ms. Fazell responded it is stili under construction and estimated to be completed in four to six weeks or less. Mike Urmann reported he would not have a problem with laying this over. The business is acting in good faith and they have had problems with hunover of employees and contractors. Gerry Strathman laid over to the June 20, 2000, Properiy Code Enforcement meeting. 795 Sixth Street East The following appeared for Pagasa L.L.P.: Ed Reyes, owner, and Kallin Morrow, 38 Lowrey Avenue NE. Mr. Reyes stated his appeal is in regards to a certificate of revocation. Mr. Reyes stated there were other things that he has done in the building, such as install a roof for $24,000, install a chain link fence, fertilize three times a year, and install egress lights. When he met Ms. Fish she told him that the building needed a lot of maintenance and there were a lot of complaints. Generally, Mr. Reyes stated, he will respond if it is jusrifiable and in a fair manner. On March 28, Mr. Reyes had a flat tire on his trailer and missed his appoinhnent with Ms. Fish. 5he left a message at his office. Ms. Fish made her rounds with the caretaker that did not know much about this situation. Mr. Reyes went over the items on the deficiency/conection list as follows: (Item 1 reads the certificate of occupancy was revoked for lack of maintenance.) Item 2- Retaining wall not repaired - When it was mortazed, it cracked more, stated Mr. Reyes. There is a probability that people pick up the pieces and break the glass door. What he did was adhere it using high tech adhesive, which made it stronger. When kicked it did not move. Item 3- Scrape and paint decks and trim - He could not paint outside during the winter. Item 4- Clean up broken glass and trash in parking lot and on grounds - Mr. Reyes stated he has a camera with him all the time. (He showed N1r. Strathman photographs of the property grounds and surrounding area. Ms. Fish was shown these photographs also.) oc� -3�1 PROPERTY CODE ENFORCEMENT NOTES OF 4-18-00 Page 2 Item 5- Hallway dirty and needs painting - Kids aze present in the building, and there aze dirt spots. Ae used a high quality semi-gloss paint on the walls, and it can be cleaned. Item 6- Carpeting in hall is a trip hazard, restretch where buckled- Mr. Reyes stated he stretched the carpet on each floor, but Ms. Fish saw one in the basement that was crinkled. He has stretched it as fat as he could, but he will stretch it again. It cannot be stapled because there is cement underneath. Item 7- Aallway emergency lighting not working, replacelrepair - Batteries haue been installed. This item is done. Item 8- Door latches on first and second floor fire doors broken, prevent egiting from building - This has been fixed. Item 9- Remove storage from under steps, repair door and closure north east stairwell - Mr. Reyes stated he does not use it for storage. He could be liable for children hiding in there; therefore, it is padlocked. The only thing there is the vacuum system. Item 10 - Replace all torn or missing screens on building - He will do this when winter is over. Item 11 - Tuckpoint/replace missing brick that is deteriorating and has falien from window ledges - He will do this when winter is over. Item 12 - Secure all deck railings, replace rotted deck boards, scrape and paint atl exposed wood on decks and trim - He will do this when winter is over. Item 13 - Replace missing air condifioners covers - Two or three need to be replaced. Item 14 - Patch holes in parking lot - Water creeps up in the winter. Item 15 - Provide one footcandle of light in ezit corridors and stairs - NIr. Reyes asked was there a test method to measure light. He has been in light systems for 20 years, and he does not know what light she is measuring. Alsq he wonders if the light meter she is using is calibrated to intemational systems ISO standazds. Mr. Reyes stated that none of this is cause for revocation. He forgot the key in haste for Unit 1 �9; it leaked $om the second floor when Ms. Fish has been there. He told the tenant on the second floor to be more careful about showering. Pat Fish reported there were several complaints on the property going back to December. She mailed a letter to Mr. Reyes indicating there were problems in Room 109 with the water, extermination problems, and water in a light fixture. Ms. Fish spoke to the tenants who indicated the repairs had not been made. At the appointment that day, Mr. Reyes did not indicate a willingness to do any of these things; there was indication that if the things he did were not good enough, then too bad. He did not show up on the appointment on fime. Prior to that, Ms. Fish called him and left a message. Also, he did not bring keys to the unit. Ms. Fish went over the items on the list as follows: Item 2- The retaining wall is glued together. Mr. Reyes will haue to trust that it stays that way. Ms. Fish cannot say it is unsafe, but it is not in a professional state of repair. Item 3- She can understand the painting not being done because of the season. Item 4- There was trash in the yard, stated Ms. Fish, and she has never seen the grounds look like they do in the photographs provided by Mr. Reyes. She did the inspection on the 23` Mr Strathman responded the photographs are dated the 28�'. 00 -3Fs� PROPERTY CODE ENFORCEMENT NOTES OF 4-18-00 Page 3 Item 6- Ms. Fish stated the cazpet in the entry way was buckled and is a trip hazard. It did not look like there was room for a lot of conections, but Mr. Reyes thought it was fine. Item 7- When the test buttons were pushed, the emergency lighting in the hallways would not work because of dead batteries. Mr. Reyes azgued about having to replace the emergency lighting in the hallways, sta#ed Ms. Fish. He azgued there was no indication which units did not work; however, test buttons aze at eye level and there were so many that did not work that she did not bother to write down the location because they ail have to be tested. Item 8- The latch on the fire doors were protruding into the fraxne of the door. It prohibited someone from getting out of the building. Item 9- The padlocks had been smashed off the storage under the stairs. VJhen Ms. Fish re- inspected, it had not been repaired. The owner azgued considerably about repaixing it. Item 11- Tuckpointing can be done this time of year. Item 12 - The decks are in bad shape and the railings aze in question. There was some concern about the stability of the deck railings. Item 15 - Ms. Fish stated the owner did not agree with the testing of the light level. She met with the caretaker and his son on the 13�'. (Ms. Fish showed Mr. Strathman the new light meter that is used in the electrical department to measure the light levels in new construction. She also showed Mr. Strathman the readings from the building.) The fire, building, and property maintenance codes all require the minimum light levels in the hallway. Mr. Strathman asked what is her position with respect to this properry. Ms. Fish responded the entire building should be inspected and Mr. Reyes should have time to do the exterior work. The items inside the units need to be addressed. Complaints were generated from a variety of sources. Because of the condirion of the building, she does need to get into the units. It is due for a certificate of occupancy on June 1. Mr. Reyes stated the letter he received says that his tenants should vacate after Apri123. He does not feel there is justice in that. There are 30 families in the building. He works on priorities that are life threatening, liabiliries, and safety. When Ms. Fish became adamant about things, the issue became personal and that is why he responded the way he did. Ms. Fish is not the correct person to check on the building because she is biased. One foot candle should be provided with a test method. NIr. Strathmau responded the measurements aze not close to what they should be. He understands there may be issues of calibrations and measurements, but some of these are zero and there does not seem to be a calibration problem. Mr. Reyes asked was the meter at eye level. The code specifically says one foot candle of light at grade, responded Ms. Fish. Mr. Strathman stated he is convinced that there aze matters that need attention. He is also persuaded that some items aze fixed, and Mr. Reyes is working on getting the remaining items repaired. As for Ms. Fish being the inspector, there is nothing Mr. Strathman can do about that because the assignment of inspectors is under the purview of the Fire Marshal. Giving the owner's willingness to address these problems, the revocation of occupancy on Apri123 may not be necessary. This issue can be handled in one of two ways: 1) Ms. Fish can withdraw the revocation of the certificate of occupancy based on what she heard here today, 2) this item can be laid over to allow time to finish this job and allow time for Ms. Fish to make a reinspection. �U -3�`J PROPERTY CODE ENFORCEMENT NOTES OF 4-18-00 Page 4 Ms. Fish responded she would like to arrange another inspection with Mr. Reyes and give him a list to work. He will need some time to get the list completed. Particularly, she would like to get into Unit 109. Gerry Strathman laid over this matter to the May 16, 2000, Property Code Enforcement meeting. If there are still matters under dispute, they will be discussed again at that time. (Photographs were returned.) (Note: there are two appeals regarding 1223 Selby Avenue. One involves a summary abatement notice and the other involves a notice of condemnation.) Summary Abatement Ap�eal for 1223 Selby Avenue The following appeared: Beth Fischer, owner, and Vernon Hutchinson, co-worker. Ms. Fischer stated she went through six months of trying to get the tenants out of the house. The six months ended November 14 to 15 of last year. This family had four children and a foster caze license for 9 more children. When they had to leave, they were not prepared. The materials were put in a roll-off, but not within the two days that Ms. Seeley gave her. (Ms. Fischer presented photographs of the debris that was left behind.) Mr. Strathman asked how long did it take before she got the roll-off. Ms. Fischer responded it was shortly after she was suppose to get rid of the debris. Mr. Strathman stated it does appear it was more than two days: the order was issued on March 27 and she was given to Apri13 to comply. Ms. Fischer responded that Ms. Seeley knew that another eviction had been filed. Ms. Fischer had another tenant live at the house with the understanding that he had to show her $300 a month in receipts for materials to repair the house. He was there a month in a half when she was told there were other people staying there so she had to file another eviction notice. The tenant would let Ms. Seeley in but not Ms. Fischer. Mr. Strathman asked is the property clean now. Ms. Fischer responded the �terior has been cleaned up now. Ms. Seeley responded there is a roll-off there. Mr. Hutchinson stated he went to the property on numerous occasions. The last tenant she went to court with did extensive damage to the basement, kitchen, living room, and upper level. Ms. Fischer stated they need the other roll-off to stay there because of other items being put into it. Mr. Strathman stated there aze rivo issues: 1) the original issue with the trash went into the first roll-off, which is gone, 2) a second roll-off being used to put in damaged household interiors is still on the properiy. He asked is the issue with respect to this clean up resoived. For the most parC, responded Ms. Seeley. �C'-3� PROPERTY CODE ENFORCEMENT NOTES OF 4-18-00 Mr. Strathman denied the appeal citing this order is resolved. 1223 Selbv Avenue (Also, see above appeal.) Page 5 Ms. Fischer stated she could not get into ttris property. Santino Madison was staying there under the condition that he repair the property. Regazding the two smoke detectors, one was still in the upper level and the 9 volt battery just needed to be replaced. The other detector was found in the debris. Mr. Strathxnan asked is it her position that the house is currently suitable for occupancy. Ms. Fischer responded she would move into it tomorrow if she could. The fuses aze checked, the walls have been cleaned in the basement from a bad repair job, some tucking has been done, the kitchen floor has been removed so that it can be replaced. Mr. Strathman stated he is concerned about the electrical and some of the light fixtures hanging by the wires. Ms. Fischer responded the tenant puiled a11 the light fixtures. They have been fixed. Two plug ins were changed into three prong outlets. Mr. Strathxnan asked the last time she saw the inside. Ms. Seeley responded Apri13. Referring back to Ms. Fischer's previous statement, Ms. Seeley stated she condemned the building before she knew there was eviction action. Mr. Strathman suggested Ms. Fischer and Ms. Seeley go through the house. Perhaps items will be found that need to be corrected, but they may not be of such a nature that the property needs to be condemned. Ms. Seeley responded in agreement. Ms. Fischer responded the barrel of water cited on the order is just a wash basin from her youth. The piping in the ceiling was reattached. (Ms. Fischer showed photographs to Mr. Strathman. They were later returned.) Ms. Seeley stated it looks like someone is living at the property now. Ms. Fischer responded that the properiy is being warked on at night because everyone has jobs. Gerry Strathman laid over this matter to the May 2, 2000, Property Code Enforcement meeting. In the meantnne, Ms. Seeley and Ms. Fischer should make arrangements for another inspection. If Ms. Seeley is satisfied that it no longer needs to be condemned, that wiil be the end of it. If she is convinced condemnation is still in under, this matter will be discussed again. The meeting was adjourned at 2:28 p.m. rtn ��i�� Presented Refetred To Council File # O � ? Green Sheet # 100412 Committee Date 1 BE TT RESOLVED, that the Council of the City of Saint Paul hereby certifies and approves the April 18, 2000, 2 decision of tlxe Legislative Hearing Off'icer on Property Code Enforcement Appeals for the following addresses: 3 Propertv Aronealed Ap eln lant 4 73 Leech Street (Laid over from 1-4-00) Laurie Colbeck far Women of Nations 5 Decision: Laid over to the June 20, 2000, Properiy Code Enfarcement meeting. 795 Sixth Street East Ed Reyes for Pagasa L.L.P. Decision: Laid over to the May 16, 2000, Property Code Enforcement meeting. 1223 Selb,�Avenue Beth Fischer Decision: Laid over to the May 2, 2000, Property Code Enforcement meeting. 10 11 12 13 14 15 16 17 Yeas Nays Absent Blakey � Coleman �/' Hazris � Benanav Reiter v Bostrom � L�aa� ,j � c5 r 18 19 20 21 22 23 Adopted by Council: Date � � c�—C_ ` a-C7 � c� Adoprion C rtified by Council Secretary B �� p �_--� Approved by Mayor: D �� <`F�FS`� By: RESOLUTION CITY, OF SAINT PAUL, MINNESOTA �S Requested by Department of: � Form Approved by City Attorney � Approved by Mayor for Submission to Council � GREEN SHEET TOTAL $ OF SIGNATURE PAGES Co -3�"t �� ' V�J:� f � u�� u��— ❑ �,.,.� ❑ �.� ❑.,�.�,��.. ❑..�,�o ❑..�,�...�..,, ❑ (CUP ALL LOCATIONS FOR SIGNATUR� Approving the decisions of the Legislafive Hearing Officer on Property Code Enforcement Appeals far the following addresses: 73 Leech Street, 795 Si�h Street East, and 1223 Selby Avenue. IUAI IVN A�(OVE (!U M KBJett PLANNING CAMMISSION CIB COMMI7TEE CML SERVICE CAMMISSION Itn'::i�Piy�] AMOUNT OF 7RANSACTION Fiasfhis D�� eaerxw�md urds a wArxttorttus deparirtieM'i YES NO Flas Mis D�eauArm e�sr been a dlY empbyee? YES ti0 Does fhi6 P��fm P�a sW�p Iqt �ypoaaesaeA M�Y wrtcrR d[y empbyee? YES bl6 Is Mis PMeaJfirtn a tarpEted ventla? YES NO Gc�n�� ges�a�ch G�ni�r ..:��1� ;s.�ra��;�rr�ni.raa��.irai:r?.3.�:ia� ACTIVI7Y Nt11�ER res xo (��M �o -3�`1 NOTES OF T'F� PROPERTY CODE ENFORCEMENT MEETING Tuesday, April 18, 2000 Room 330 courthouse Gerry Strathman, Legislative Hearing Officer The meeting was called to order at 1:32 p.m. STAFF PRESENT: Pat Fish, Fire Prevention; Paula Seeley, Code Enforcement; Mike Urmann, Fire Prevention 73 Leech Street (I,aid over from 1-4-00) Ellie Fazell and Laurie Colbeck, representing Women of Nations, appeared. Mr. Strathxnan stated the last tnne this was heazd in January, the properiy was being remodeled and was suppose to be finished by now. Ms. Fazell responded it is stili under construction and estimated to be completed in four to six weeks or less. Mike Urmann reported he would not have a problem with laying this over. The business is acting in good faith and they have had problems with hunover of employees and contractors. Gerry Strathman laid over to the June 20, 2000, Properiy Code Enforcement meeting. 795 Sixth Street East The following appeared for Pagasa L.L.P.: Ed Reyes, owner, and Kallin Morrow, 38 Lowrey Avenue NE. Mr. Reyes stated his appeal is in regards to a certificate of revocation. Mr. Reyes stated there were other things that he has done in the building, such as install a roof for $24,000, install a chain link fence, fertilize three times a year, and install egress lights. When he met Ms. Fish she told him that the building needed a lot of maintenance and there were a lot of complaints. Generally, Mr. Reyes stated, he will respond if it is jusrifiable and in a fair manner. On March 28, Mr. Reyes had a flat tire on his trailer and missed his appoinhnent with Ms. Fish. 5he left a message at his office. Ms. Fish made her rounds with the caretaker that did not know much about this situation. Mr. Reyes went over the items on the deficiency/conection list as follows: (Item 1 reads the certificate of occupancy was revoked for lack of maintenance.) Item 2- Retaining wall not repaired - When it was mortazed, it cracked more, stated Mr. Reyes. There is a probability that people pick up the pieces and break the glass door. What he did was adhere it using high tech adhesive, which made it stronger. When kicked it did not move. Item 3- Scrape and paint decks and trim - He could not paint outside during the winter. Item 4- Clean up broken glass and trash in parking lot and on grounds - Mr. Reyes stated he has a camera with him all the time. (He showed N1r. Strathman photographs of the property grounds and surrounding area. Ms. Fish was shown these photographs also.) oc� -3�1 PROPERTY CODE ENFORCEMENT NOTES OF 4-18-00 Page 2 Item 5- Hallway dirty and needs painting - Kids aze present in the building, and there aze dirt spots. Ae used a high quality semi-gloss paint on the walls, and it can be cleaned. Item 6- Carpeting in hall is a trip hazard, restretch where buckled- Mr. Reyes stated he stretched the carpet on each floor, but Ms. Fish saw one in the basement that was crinkled. He has stretched it as fat as he could, but he will stretch it again. It cannot be stapled because there is cement underneath. Item 7- Aallway emergency lighting not working, replacelrepair - Batteries haue been installed. This item is done. Item 8- Door latches on first and second floor fire doors broken, prevent egiting from building - This has been fixed. Item 9- Remove storage from under steps, repair door and closure north east stairwell - Mr. Reyes stated he does not use it for storage. He could be liable for children hiding in there; therefore, it is padlocked. The only thing there is the vacuum system. Item 10 - Replace all torn or missing screens on building - He will do this when winter is over. Item 11 - Tuckpoint/replace missing brick that is deteriorating and has falien from window ledges - He will do this when winter is over. Item 12 - Secure all deck railings, replace rotted deck boards, scrape and paint atl exposed wood on decks and trim - He will do this when winter is over. Item 13 - Replace missing air condifioners covers - Two or three need to be replaced. Item 14 - Patch holes in parking lot - Water creeps up in the winter. Item 15 - Provide one footcandle of light in ezit corridors and stairs - NIr. Reyes asked was there a test method to measure light. He has been in light systems for 20 years, and he does not know what light she is measuring. Alsq he wonders if the light meter she is using is calibrated to intemational systems ISO standazds. Mr. Reyes stated that none of this is cause for revocation. He forgot the key in haste for Unit 1 �9; it leaked $om the second floor when Ms. Fish has been there. He told the tenant on the second floor to be more careful about showering. Pat Fish reported there were several complaints on the property going back to December. She mailed a letter to Mr. Reyes indicating there were problems in Room 109 with the water, extermination problems, and water in a light fixture. Ms. Fish spoke to the tenants who indicated the repairs had not been made. At the appointment that day, Mr. Reyes did not indicate a willingness to do any of these things; there was indication that if the things he did were not good enough, then too bad. He did not show up on the appointment on fime. Prior to that, Ms. Fish called him and left a message. Also, he did not bring keys to the unit. Ms. Fish went over the items on the list as follows: Item 2- The retaining wall is glued together. Mr. Reyes will haue to trust that it stays that way. Ms. Fish cannot say it is unsafe, but it is not in a professional state of repair. Item 3- She can understand the painting not being done because of the season. Item 4- There was trash in the yard, stated Ms. Fish, and she has never seen the grounds look like they do in the photographs provided by Mr. Reyes. She did the inspection on the 23` Mr Strathman responded the photographs are dated the 28�'. 00 -3Fs� PROPERTY CODE ENFORCEMENT NOTES OF 4-18-00 Page 3 Item 6- Ms. Fish stated the cazpet in the entry way was buckled and is a trip hazard. It did not look like there was room for a lot of conections, but Mr. Reyes thought it was fine. Item 7- When the test buttons were pushed, the emergency lighting in the hallways would not work because of dead batteries. Mr. Reyes azgued about having to replace the emergency lighting in the hallways, sta#ed Ms. Fish. He azgued there was no indication which units did not work; however, test buttons aze at eye level and there were so many that did not work that she did not bother to write down the location because they ail have to be tested. Item 8- The latch on the fire doors were protruding into the fraxne of the door. It prohibited someone from getting out of the building. Item 9- The padlocks had been smashed off the storage under the stairs. VJhen Ms. Fish re- inspected, it had not been repaired. The owner azgued considerably about repaixing it. Item 11- Tuckpointing can be done this time of year. Item 12 - The decks are in bad shape and the railings aze in question. There was some concern about the stability of the deck railings. Item 15 - Ms. Fish stated the owner did not agree with the testing of the light level. She met with the caretaker and his son on the 13�'. (Ms. Fish showed Mr. Strathman the new light meter that is used in the electrical department to measure the light levels in new construction. She also showed Mr. Strathman the readings from the building.) The fire, building, and property maintenance codes all require the minimum light levels in the hallway. Mr. Strathman asked what is her position with respect to this properry. Ms. Fish responded the entire building should be inspected and Mr. Reyes should have time to do the exterior work. The items inside the units need to be addressed. Complaints were generated from a variety of sources. Because of the condirion of the building, she does need to get into the units. It is due for a certificate of occupancy on June 1. Mr. Reyes stated the letter he received says that his tenants should vacate after Apri123. He does not feel there is justice in that. There are 30 families in the building. He works on priorities that are life threatening, liabiliries, and safety. When Ms. Fish became adamant about things, the issue became personal and that is why he responded the way he did. Ms. Fish is not the correct person to check on the building because she is biased. One foot candle should be provided with a test method. NIr. Strathmau responded the measurements aze not close to what they should be. He understands there may be issues of calibrations and measurements, but some of these are zero and there does not seem to be a calibration problem. Mr. Reyes asked was the meter at eye level. The code specifically says one foot candle of light at grade, responded Ms. Fish. Mr. Strathman stated he is convinced that there aze matters that need attention. He is also persuaded that some items aze fixed, and Mr. Reyes is working on getting the remaining items repaired. As for Ms. Fish being the inspector, there is nothing Mr. Strathman can do about that because the assignment of inspectors is under the purview of the Fire Marshal. Giving the owner's willingness to address these problems, the revocation of occupancy on Apri123 may not be necessary. This issue can be handled in one of two ways: 1) Ms. Fish can withdraw the revocation of the certificate of occupancy based on what she heard here today, 2) this item can be laid over to allow time to finish this job and allow time for Ms. Fish to make a reinspection. �U -3�`J PROPERTY CODE ENFORCEMENT NOTES OF 4-18-00 Page 4 Ms. Fish responded she would like to arrange another inspection with Mr. Reyes and give him a list to work. He will need some time to get the list completed. Particularly, she would like to get into Unit 109. Gerry Strathman laid over this matter to the May 16, 2000, Property Code Enforcement meeting. If there are still matters under dispute, they will be discussed again at that time. (Photographs were returned.) (Note: there are two appeals regarding 1223 Selby Avenue. One involves a summary abatement notice and the other involves a notice of condemnation.) Summary Abatement Ap�eal for 1223 Selby Avenue The following appeared: Beth Fischer, owner, and Vernon Hutchinson, co-worker. Ms. Fischer stated she went through six months of trying to get the tenants out of the house. The six months ended November 14 to 15 of last year. This family had four children and a foster caze license for 9 more children. When they had to leave, they were not prepared. The materials were put in a roll-off, but not within the two days that Ms. Seeley gave her. (Ms. Fischer presented photographs of the debris that was left behind.) Mr. Strathman asked how long did it take before she got the roll-off. Ms. Fischer responded it was shortly after she was suppose to get rid of the debris. Mr. Strathman stated it does appear it was more than two days: the order was issued on March 27 and she was given to Apri13 to comply. Ms. Fischer responded that Ms. Seeley knew that another eviction had been filed. Ms. Fischer had another tenant live at the house with the understanding that he had to show her $300 a month in receipts for materials to repair the house. He was there a month in a half when she was told there were other people staying there so she had to file another eviction notice. The tenant would let Ms. Seeley in but not Ms. Fischer. Mr. Strathman asked is the property clean now. Ms. Fischer responded the �terior has been cleaned up now. Ms. Seeley responded there is a roll-off there. Mr. Hutchinson stated he went to the property on numerous occasions. The last tenant she went to court with did extensive damage to the basement, kitchen, living room, and upper level. Ms. Fischer stated they need the other roll-off to stay there because of other items being put into it. Mr. Strathman stated there aze rivo issues: 1) the original issue with the trash went into the first roll-off, which is gone, 2) a second roll-off being used to put in damaged household interiors is still on the properiy. He asked is the issue with respect to this clean up resoived. For the most parC, responded Ms. Seeley. �C'-3� PROPERTY CODE ENFORCEMENT NOTES OF 4-18-00 Mr. Strathman denied the appeal citing this order is resolved. 1223 Selbv Avenue (Also, see above appeal.) Page 5 Ms. Fischer stated she could not get into ttris property. Santino Madison was staying there under the condition that he repair the property. Regazding the two smoke detectors, one was still in the upper level and the 9 volt battery just needed to be replaced. The other detector was found in the debris. Mr. Strathxnan asked is it her position that the house is currently suitable for occupancy. Ms. Fischer responded she would move into it tomorrow if she could. The fuses aze checked, the walls have been cleaned in the basement from a bad repair job, some tucking has been done, the kitchen floor has been removed so that it can be replaced. Mr. Strathman stated he is concerned about the electrical and some of the light fixtures hanging by the wires. Ms. Fischer responded the tenant puiled a11 the light fixtures. They have been fixed. Two plug ins were changed into three prong outlets. Mr. Strathxnan asked the last time she saw the inside. Ms. Seeley responded Apri13. Referring back to Ms. Fischer's previous statement, Ms. Seeley stated she condemned the building before she knew there was eviction action. Mr. Strathman suggested Ms. Fischer and Ms. Seeley go through the house. Perhaps items will be found that need to be corrected, but they may not be of such a nature that the property needs to be condemned. Ms. Seeley responded in agreement. Ms. Fischer responded the barrel of water cited on the order is just a wash basin from her youth. The piping in the ceiling was reattached. (Ms. Fischer showed photographs to Mr. Strathman. They were later returned.) Ms. Seeley stated it looks like someone is living at the property now. Ms. Fischer responded that the properiy is being warked on at night because everyone has jobs. Gerry Strathman laid over this matter to the May 2, 2000, Property Code Enforcement meeting. In the meantnne, Ms. Seeley and Ms. Fischer should make arrangements for another inspection. If Ms. Seeley is satisfied that it no longer needs to be condemned, that wiil be the end of it. If she is convinced condemnation is still in under, this matter will be discussed again. The meeting was adjourned at 2:28 p.m. rtn ��i�� Presented Refetred To Council File # O � ? Green Sheet # 100412 Committee Date 1 BE TT RESOLVED, that the Council of the City of Saint Paul hereby certifies and approves the April 18, 2000, 2 decision of tlxe Legislative Hearing Off'icer on Property Code Enforcement Appeals for the following addresses: 3 Propertv Aronealed Ap eln lant 4 73 Leech Street (Laid over from 1-4-00) Laurie Colbeck far Women of Nations 5 Decision: Laid over to the June 20, 2000, Properiy Code Enfarcement meeting. 795 Sixth Street East Ed Reyes for Pagasa L.L.P. Decision: Laid over to the May 16, 2000, Property Code Enforcement meeting. 1223 Selb,�Avenue Beth Fischer Decision: Laid over to the May 2, 2000, Property Code Enforcement meeting. 10 11 12 13 14 15 16 17 Yeas Nays Absent Blakey � Coleman �/' Hazris � Benanav Reiter v Bostrom � L�aa� ,j � c5 r 18 19 20 21 22 23 Adopted by Council: Date � � c�—C_ ` a-C7 � c� Adoprion C rtified by Council Secretary B �� p �_--� Approved by Mayor: D �� <`F�FS`� By: RESOLUTION CITY, OF SAINT PAUL, MINNESOTA �S Requested by Department of: � Form Approved by City Attorney � Approved by Mayor for Submission to Council � GREEN SHEET TOTAL $ OF SIGNATURE PAGES Co -3�"t �� ' V�J:� f � u�� u��— ❑ �,.,.� ❑ �.� ❑.,�.�,��.. ❑..�,�o ❑..�,�...�..,, ❑ (CUP ALL LOCATIONS FOR SIGNATUR� Approving the decisions of the Legislafive Hearing Officer on Property Code Enforcement Appeals far the following addresses: 73 Leech Street, 795 Si�h Street East, and 1223 Selby Avenue. IUAI IVN A�(OVE (!U M KBJett PLANNING CAMMISSION CIB COMMI7TEE CML SERVICE CAMMISSION Itn'::i�Piy�] AMOUNT OF 7RANSACTION Fiasfhis D�� eaerxw�md urds a wArxttorttus deparirtieM'i YES NO Flas Mis D�eauArm e�sr been a dlY empbyee? YES ti0 Does fhi6 P��fm P�a sW�p Iqt �ypoaaesaeA M�Y wrtcrR d[y empbyee? YES bl6 Is Mis PMeaJfirtn a tarpEted ventla? YES NO Gc�n�� ges�a�ch G�ni�r ..:��1� ;s.�ra��;�rr�ni.raa��.irai:r?.3.�:ia� ACTIVI7Y Nt11�ER res xo (��M �o -3�`1 NOTES OF T'F� PROPERTY CODE ENFORCEMENT MEETING Tuesday, April 18, 2000 Room 330 courthouse Gerry Strathman, Legislative Hearing Officer The meeting was called to order at 1:32 p.m. STAFF PRESENT: Pat Fish, Fire Prevention; Paula Seeley, Code Enforcement; Mike Urmann, Fire Prevention 73 Leech Street (I,aid over from 1-4-00) Ellie Fazell and Laurie Colbeck, representing Women of Nations, appeared. Mr. Strathxnan stated the last tnne this was heazd in January, the properiy was being remodeled and was suppose to be finished by now. Ms. Fazell responded it is stili under construction and estimated to be completed in four to six weeks or less. Mike Urmann reported he would not have a problem with laying this over. The business is acting in good faith and they have had problems with hunover of employees and contractors. Gerry Strathman laid over to the June 20, 2000, Properiy Code Enforcement meeting. 795 Sixth Street East The following appeared for Pagasa L.L.P.: Ed Reyes, owner, and Kallin Morrow, 38 Lowrey Avenue NE. Mr. Reyes stated his appeal is in regards to a certificate of revocation. Mr. Reyes stated there were other things that he has done in the building, such as install a roof for $24,000, install a chain link fence, fertilize three times a year, and install egress lights. When he met Ms. Fish she told him that the building needed a lot of maintenance and there were a lot of complaints. Generally, Mr. Reyes stated, he will respond if it is jusrifiable and in a fair manner. On March 28, Mr. Reyes had a flat tire on his trailer and missed his appoinhnent with Ms. Fish. 5he left a message at his office. Ms. Fish made her rounds with the caretaker that did not know much about this situation. Mr. Reyes went over the items on the deficiency/conection list as follows: (Item 1 reads the certificate of occupancy was revoked for lack of maintenance.) Item 2- Retaining wall not repaired - When it was mortazed, it cracked more, stated Mr. Reyes. There is a probability that people pick up the pieces and break the glass door. What he did was adhere it using high tech adhesive, which made it stronger. When kicked it did not move. Item 3- Scrape and paint decks and trim - He could not paint outside during the winter. Item 4- Clean up broken glass and trash in parking lot and on grounds - Mr. Reyes stated he has a camera with him all the time. (He showed N1r. Strathman photographs of the property grounds and surrounding area. Ms. Fish was shown these photographs also.) oc� -3�1 PROPERTY CODE ENFORCEMENT NOTES OF 4-18-00 Page 2 Item 5- Hallway dirty and needs painting - Kids aze present in the building, and there aze dirt spots. Ae used a high quality semi-gloss paint on the walls, and it can be cleaned. Item 6- Carpeting in hall is a trip hazard, restretch where buckled- Mr. Reyes stated he stretched the carpet on each floor, but Ms. Fish saw one in the basement that was crinkled. He has stretched it as fat as he could, but he will stretch it again. It cannot be stapled because there is cement underneath. Item 7- Aallway emergency lighting not working, replacelrepair - Batteries haue been installed. This item is done. Item 8- Door latches on first and second floor fire doors broken, prevent egiting from building - This has been fixed. Item 9- Remove storage from under steps, repair door and closure north east stairwell - Mr. Reyes stated he does not use it for storage. He could be liable for children hiding in there; therefore, it is padlocked. The only thing there is the vacuum system. Item 10 - Replace all torn or missing screens on building - He will do this when winter is over. Item 11 - Tuckpoint/replace missing brick that is deteriorating and has falien from window ledges - He will do this when winter is over. Item 12 - Secure all deck railings, replace rotted deck boards, scrape and paint atl exposed wood on decks and trim - He will do this when winter is over. Item 13 - Replace missing air condifioners covers - Two or three need to be replaced. Item 14 - Patch holes in parking lot - Water creeps up in the winter. Item 15 - Provide one footcandle of light in ezit corridors and stairs - NIr. Reyes asked was there a test method to measure light. He has been in light systems for 20 years, and he does not know what light she is measuring. Alsq he wonders if the light meter she is using is calibrated to intemational systems ISO standazds. Mr. Reyes stated that none of this is cause for revocation. He forgot the key in haste for Unit 1 �9; it leaked $om the second floor when Ms. Fish has been there. He told the tenant on the second floor to be more careful about showering. Pat Fish reported there were several complaints on the property going back to December. She mailed a letter to Mr. Reyes indicating there were problems in Room 109 with the water, extermination problems, and water in a light fixture. Ms. Fish spoke to the tenants who indicated the repairs had not been made. At the appointment that day, Mr. Reyes did not indicate a willingness to do any of these things; there was indication that if the things he did were not good enough, then too bad. He did not show up on the appointment on fime. Prior to that, Ms. Fish called him and left a message. Also, he did not bring keys to the unit. Ms. Fish went over the items on the list as follows: Item 2- The retaining wall is glued together. Mr. Reyes will haue to trust that it stays that way. Ms. Fish cannot say it is unsafe, but it is not in a professional state of repair. Item 3- She can understand the painting not being done because of the season. Item 4- There was trash in the yard, stated Ms. Fish, and she has never seen the grounds look like they do in the photographs provided by Mr. Reyes. She did the inspection on the 23` Mr Strathman responded the photographs are dated the 28�'. 00 -3Fs� PROPERTY CODE ENFORCEMENT NOTES OF 4-18-00 Page 3 Item 6- Ms. Fish stated the cazpet in the entry way was buckled and is a trip hazard. It did not look like there was room for a lot of conections, but Mr. Reyes thought it was fine. Item 7- When the test buttons were pushed, the emergency lighting in the hallways would not work because of dead batteries. Mr. Reyes azgued about having to replace the emergency lighting in the hallways, sta#ed Ms. Fish. He azgued there was no indication which units did not work; however, test buttons aze at eye level and there were so many that did not work that she did not bother to write down the location because they ail have to be tested. Item 8- The latch on the fire doors were protruding into the fraxne of the door. It prohibited someone from getting out of the building. Item 9- The padlocks had been smashed off the storage under the stairs. VJhen Ms. Fish re- inspected, it had not been repaired. The owner azgued considerably about repaixing it. Item 11- Tuckpointing can be done this time of year. Item 12 - The decks are in bad shape and the railings aze in question. There was some concern about the stability of the deck railings. Item 15 - Ms. Fish stated the owner did not agree with the testing of the light level. She met with the caretaker and his son on the 13�'. (Ms. Fish showed Mr. Strathman the new light meter that is used in the electrical department to measure the light levels in new construction. She also showed Mr. Strathman the readings from the building.) The fire, building, and property maintenance codes all require the minimum light levels in the hallway. Mr. Strathman asked what is her position with respect to this properry. Ms. Fish responded the entire building should be inspected and Mr. Reyes should have time to do the exterior work. The items inside the units need to be addressed. Complaints were generated from a variety of sources. Because of the condirion of the building, she does need to get into the units. It is due for a certificate of occupancy on June 1. Mr. Reyes stated the letter he received says that his tenants should vacate after Apri123. He does not feel there is justice in that. There are 30 families in the building. He works on priorities that are life threatening, liabiliries, and safety. When Ms. Fish became adamant about things, the issue became personal and that is why he responded the way he did. Ms. Fish is not the correct person to check on the building because she is biased. One foot candle should be provided with a test method. NIr. Strathmau responded the measurements aze not close to what they should be. He understands there may be issues of calibrations and measurements, but some of these are zero and there does not seem to be a calibration problem. Mr. Reyes asked was the meter at eye level. The code specifically says one foot candle of light at grade, responded Ms. Fish. Mr. Strathman stated he is convinced that there aze matters that need attention. He is also persuaded that some items aze fixed, and Mr. Reyes is working on getting the remaining items repaired. As for Ms. Fish being the inspector, there is nothing Mr. Strathman can do about that because the assignment of inspectors is under the purview of the Fire Marshal. Giving the owner's willingness to address these problems, the revocation of occupancy on Apri123 may not be necessary. This issue can be handled in one of two ways: 1) Ms. Fish can withdraw the revocation of the certificate of occupancy based on what she heard here today, 2) this item can be laid over to allow time to finish this job and allow time for Ms. Fish to make a reinspection. �U -3�`J PROPERTY CODE ENFORCEMENT NOTES OF 4-18-00 Page 4 Ms. Fish responded she would like to arrange another inspection with Mr. Reyes and give him a list to work. He will need some time to get the list completed. Particularly, she would like to get into Unit 109. Gerry Strathman laid over this matter to the May 16, 2000, Property Code Enforcement meeting. If there are still matters under dispute, they will be discussed again at that time. (Photographs were returned.) (Note: there are two appeals regarding 1223 Selby Avenue. One involves a summary abatement notice and the other involves a notice of condemnation.) Summary Abatement Ap�eal for 1223 Selby Avenue The following appeared: Beth Fischer, owner, and Vernon Hutchinson, co-worker. Ms. Fischer stated she went through six months of trying to get the tenants out of the house. The six months ended November 14 to 15 of last year. This family had four children and a foster caze license for 9 more children. When they had to leave, they were not prepared. The materials were put in a roll-off, but not within the two days that Ms. Seeley gave her. (Ms. Fischer presented photographs of the debris that was left behind.) Mr. Strathman asked how long did it take before she got the roll-off. Ms. Fischer responded it was shortly after she was suppose to get rid of the debris. Mr. Strathman stated it does appear it was more than two days: the order was issued on March 27 and she was given to Apri13 to comply. Ms. Fischer responded that Ms. Seeley knew that another eviction had been filed. Ms. Fischer had another tenant live at the house with the understanding that he had to show her $300 a month in receipts for materials to repair the house. He was there a month in a half when she was told there were other people staying there so she had to file another eviction notice. The tenant would let Ms. Seeley in but not Ms. Fischer. Mr. Strathman asked is the property clean now. Ms. Fischer responded the �terior has been cleaned up now. Ms. Seeley responded there is a roll-off there. Mr. Hutchinson stated he went to the property on numerous occasions. The last tenant she went to court with did extensive damage to the basement, kitchen, living room, and upper level. Ms. Fischer stated they need the other roll-off to stay there because of other items being put into it. Mr. Strathman stated there aze rivo issues: 1) the original issue with the trash went into the first roll-off, which is gone, 2) a second roll-off being used to put in damaged household interiors is still on the properiy. He asked is the issue with respect to this clean up resoived. For the most parC, responded Ms. Seeley. �C'-3� PROPERTY CODE ENFORCEMENT NOTES OF 4-18-00 Mr. Strathman denied the appeal citing this order is resolved. 1223 Selbv Avenue (Also, see above appeal.) Page 5 Ms. Fischer stated she could not get into ttris property. Santino Madison was staying there under the condition that he repair the property. Regazding the two smoke detectors, one was still in the upper level and the 9 volt battery just needed to be replaced. The other detector was found in the debris. Mr. Strathxnan asked is it her position that the house is currently suitable for occupancy. Ms. Fischer responded she would move into it tomorrow if she could. The fuses aze checked, the walls have been cleaned in the basement from a bad repair job, some tucking has been done, the kitchen floor has been removed so that it can be replaced. Mr. Strathman stated he is concerned about the electrical and some of the light fixtures hanging by the wires. Ms. Fischer responded the tenant puiled a11 the light fixtures. They have been fixed. Two plug ins were changed into three prong outlets. Mr. Strathxnan asked the last time she saw the inside. Ms. Seeley responded Apri13. Referring back to Ms. Fischer's previous statement, Ms. Seeley stated she condemned the building before she knew there was eviction action. Mr. Strathman suggested Ms. Fischer and Ms. Seeley go through the house. Perhaps items will be found that need to be corrected, but they may not be of such a nature that the property needs to be condemned. Ms. Seeley responded in agreement. Ms. Fischer responded the barrel of water cited on the order is just a wash basin from her youth. The piping in the ceiling was reattached. (Ms. Fischer showed photographs to Mr. Strathman. They were later returned.) Ms. Seeley stated it looks like someone is living at the property now. Ms. Fischer responded that the properiy is being warked on at night because everyone has jobs. Gerry Strathman laid over this matter to the May 2, 2000, Property Code Enforcement meeting. In the meantnne, Ms. Seeley and Ms. Fischer should make arrangements for another inspection. If Ms. Seeley is satisfied that it no longer needs to be condemned, that wiil be the end of it. If she is convinced condemnation is still in under, this matter will be discussed again. The meeting was adjourned at 2:28 p.m. rtn