279790 RTMENT GITY OF SAINT PAUL Council �9JsQ
��R File N0.
Council Resolution
Presented By
Referred To Committee: Date
Out of Committee By Date
A RESOLUTION EXTENDING THE PRIORITIES FOR USE OF
THE ADOPTED 1982 CAPITAL IMRROVEP�IENT BUDGET APPROPRIATION
TO THE RESIDEhTIAL STREET PAVING PROGRAM (RSPP)
WHEREAS, the Council of the City of Saint Paul established priorities for use of
$1 ,000,000 in 1982 Capital Improvement Bonds appropriated for the 1982
Residential Street Paving Program on December 28, 1981 as CF 277861 ; and
WHEREAS, the actual cost of improvements was less than estimated, leaving a fund
balance; now, therefore, be it
RESOLVED, upon the recommendation of the Mayor and with the advice of the Long-Range
Capital Improvement Budget Committee, that the following improvements be
included in the list of approved projects for use of the 1982 RSPP:
Log No• Pro 'ect Amount Recommended
SP-0701 Van Buren/Blair/Lafond Lights $ 24,250
SP-1101 Asbury/Simpson 135,000
APPROVEC AS TO FUNDING: APPROVED:
Pe er Hames, Di recto�^ ,, ;,j�� Gregor B1 es
Finance & Management Services i���� Budget Dir ctor
K��"'
COUNCILMEN Requested by Department of:
Yeas Nays
FI tc er � �
Le In Fletcher In Favor
Ma nz �
Nic sia Galles
S ibel Masanz - � __ Against BY
T de co
��s Nicosia �
Scheibe!
edesco f E8 3 1983 Form Approved y ty ttorney
Adopted by Counci�. Date
Wilson
Certified a se y Counc' e BY
s� r �
61pp by :Vlavor: Da _ r�D 4 1983 Ap o by Mayor for b i si to Council
By� - —
PUBL�SNED FEB 12 1983
� y,�
� 2'19`790
' �9�,�':;3„n C1TY O� SAINT PAUL
-R'� " lONG—RANGE CAPITAL IMPROVEMENT BUDGET COMMITTEE
00 �a
i L ������,Y' �^ .
;,+, �s OFFtCE OF THE MAYOR — BUDGET SECTiON
�``'��� '••• � 367 City Hall,Saint Paul,Minnesota 55102
612-298-4323
GEORGE LATIMER
MAYOR
�lovember 2Z. 1982
The Honorable George Latimer and
Respected Members of the Saint Paul Citv Council
Dear Mayor Latimer and Members of the Couneil:
Re: Report and Recommendations Regarding the 1982/1983 Residential
Street Pavi.ng Program (RSPP)
The Saint Pau1 Long-Range Capital Improvement Budget {CIB) Commi.ttee herewith submits
its reco�anendations and comments regarding the 1983 Residential Street Paving Psogram.
Included are recommendatians for allocating the 1982 RSPP fund balance and recoannenda-
tions for changes to the list of priorities for the 1983 RSPP, tentatively approved
on December 22, 1981 through CF277861.
When the biennial task fo�ce review of capital projects was initiated, the CTB Cammittee
recommended that review of proposals for the Residential Street Paving Progr�n also be
carried out biennially. To this end, the GIB Committee and its Streets and Utilities
Task Force reviewed proposals for street paving during the fall of 1981 and recoa�mended
budgets for both 1982 and 1983.
In 1982, $1,000,000 in Capital Improvement Bonds was budgeted for residential street
paving and five projects were seiected for improvement. Bids were extremely favorable
this past summer and all of the 1982 projects were completed in their entirety, leaving
a fund balance of $158,615. The 1983 Capital Improvement Budget includes $1,120,000
in Coamtunity Development Block Grant funds for the Residential Street Paving Program,
and the 1981 Capital Zmprovement Budget includes $100,000 in Year VII CDBG funds for
design of RSPP projects.
Based on the Committee's review of priorities, available resources and revised cost
estimates, the CIB Committee respectfully recommends the following:
1. That the $158,615 fund balance remaining in the 1982 Residential Street Paving
Program be allocated to additional projects as follows:
Estimated Amount
Priority Log No. Pro'�ct Cost Recomrnended
1 SP-0701 Van Buren/Blair/Lafond $ 15,000 $ 15,000
2 SP-1101 Asbury/Simpson 300,000 135,000
3 ------- 1982 RSPP Contingency 8,615 8,615
$323,615 $158,615 ^
��
. � . y 2`19'794
Report & Recommendations re
the 1982/83 RSPP -2- November 22, 1982
2. That the following RSPP projects be implemented in 1983:
$1,220,000 - Commnnity Development Block Grant Funds
Estimated Amc>unt
Prioritv Loq No. Pro�'ect Cost Recommended
1 SP-O501 Beaumont/Bedford/PrebleJBradley 320,000 320,000
2 SP-0603 OrchardJHatch/Argyle 250,000 250,000
3 SP-0901 Ann/Dousman/Goodhue/Banfil/
Goodrich 320,000 320,000
4 SP-1101 Asbury/Simpson 300,000 165,000
5 SP-0601 Park 165,000 165,000
1,355,OOQ 1,220,000
3. That SP-0601, Park, be reduced in scope or deleted entirely should bids for higher
priority projects be greater than estimated or should the City's Community
Development Block Grant entitlement be less than expected, requiring a decrease in
funding for the 1983 Residential Street Pavi.ng Program; and
4. That the Department of Public Works be allowed to coaungle Year VIII CDBG funds
allocated to 5-0505, Railroad Island Sewer Rehab and Year IX CDBG fvnds allocated
to SP-0501, Beaumont/Bedford/Preble/Bradley so that sewer work and street improve-
ments can be coordinated and begin bef.ore June 1, 1983 when the Year IX CDBG
entitlement becomes available.
The Committee considered eligibility for Community Development Block Grant fundina and
the rating of the Streets and Utilities Task Force in z�reparing its recommendations.
The projects recommended are those most highiy ranked by the task force.
Lighting for SP-0701, Van Buren/Blair/Lafond, in the amount of $15,000 is recommended
to supplement improvements made in this area under an e�rimental program funded as
part of the 1982 RSPP. This proqram was established as an alternative to complete
paving, curb, boulevard and liqhting construction in areas which do not require such
extensive improvements to address problems. SP-0701, Van Buren/B1airJLafond, was
one of the three projects selected for improvements under the experimental program.
Generally, the lesser improvements met the community's needs. Iiowever, a reauest
for $15,OOO ,to upgrade lighting on the improved streets was submitted and considered
appropriate by the Committee.
Both 1982 Capital Improvement Bond funds and 1983 Community Development Block Grant
funds are recommended for SP-�101, Asbury/Simpson. This project is located on the
border of a CDBG eligible area and must inciude some CIB funds if it is to be completed
in its entirety.
Finally, although SP-0601, Park Street, was given a lower priority than several other
projects by the Streets and Utilities Task Force, the Committee felt that several factors
made its funding appropriate. First, it received a rating of 72.9 compared with 5'7.1
for the next project in the priority list. Secondly, the cost of improvements is con-
sistent with the funds avaiiable while the next priority would cost over $300,000. The
Committee felt it more appropriate to recommend the more highly rated project in its
entirety rather than only half of a lower rated proposal.
R�spectfully submitted,
;''�, ; <<' ��' /�i r�`�-. �' (�
David G. McDonell, Chairsnan
DGM/lm
��
_ ��
- . �- - ------. ---
� a � CURN F 11NCItJG 6--- ---- - � �
� ro!� - � �P DES COST IDENTIFICATION �"'�
� �
'� M c� :� ni S� � H E fr H r
'� 1 W � � � y � � � tn y N � � t�i� � � fz]� O c�n �
� � �"' U�i C�I p � M�j r�j b • N • N u. �
A K � tn rr H � w `' cfDi N n � - r� r
� � r N • � � A . ~ • � � � � r,A �
N � N � �p � ~� �
w
� � A � • •
� ro �
� �'
� � z � � r b m `°
`'� � a� °"° o°o � .U'
�, . 'd .
"� � � ►', " � ►���C' ° �N" C � c�.
tn C�a w � �''
�� uq ' C'� C� N �•
� N N ro � M rt
� tD � wo w c.�,, �.., �,, ;b x o �d .
° � tn � .� 0 K
• t9 � k � u.
•• o ro . r�
0
� ° o o° �,�,, o° o° w y `t �
�
�°.. o° o° o rnoo o . �n
N 0 v o O w
A �
� �
� � r7 ,�
� ~' cn to
� �' � . °' �:
� � � � -�'
(t, � _ � Z
� � �. g ^ ^ � .. .. ., o
K
��""' � � f'' �.+ (aD
fD � .4� � ti
rt
w o 0 o r o N �
� b � o � ° ° o° � °o owo
7�C W y � 0 O at O A I
� � � N � � O v O W
� � n
N �
'� � � � � 1�+-
(D �
C7' � O
. : r, µ °o � � �, ►+
. � � � F+ F, F, ~ � �
�
A p � W :
C C7 W � 0 p p p � N.
r+ ai '� , ° o 0 0 � K
�� �" � A . ' O
� � N � � O O O � N �
O �7 v�
"' rtDe w � i
O p rt � O �
►•' x o m �
� � � � �
�
00 � ' o� :
~ v� � o
. ,. �
p, . (A df p
rt . i f0 [
a �' :
. hy
� •. f
x
. o is
� u
� c
� - � w r
' • pp
%`.:. ���`��'- �iZ�l�Y DY� ►.�1�YN�1� ��.E�.�Yi
' 2"19'790
�~ �� � �4'�` Ok�'N`ICI� OF TFIF: CITY COIINCIL
..�' �''�;'•;�;
�
����"'~ D a t e ; January 27, 1983
' -- ��
.:F .�
�;a�
��T � � CO [�l1Mt?�T � E RE PORT
TO = Sa�n� Pau t Cifiy �ou�c�l
F� � � = C o rn t�it t e e O h FINANCE, MANAGEr4ENT $ PERSONNEL
C H A(R James Scheibel
1. Approval of minutes from meetings held January I7 and 20, 1983 ' � - _� -
- 2. Resolution revising the Dlinimum Qualifications for the classificationsA�
of Loan � Grant Specialist I and Supervisor cf Loans and Grants. (personne y� �
- 3. P.esolution establishing the titles of bianagement Asst. I, Afanagement
Asst. II, and '.!anagement Asst. �III and the class specifications. (Personnei��T
4. Resolutibn repIacing the title and class specifications for Parking I�feter
Repairman with the title and s e �ification for Parking Dleter R�pair 1Vorker.
(Personnel)
5. Resolution deleting the title and specification for Senior Loan � Grant
Specialist and establishing the title and specification for Loan F Grant
Specialist II. (Personnel) �,�P�� s.
�����_��,°„...,� .
6. Resolution establishing the balance of the funding needed .for the staff
�:ork for. the Personnel Issues Task Force to alloi. that Task Force to begin
neeting. (blayor's Office - �
. ��-��: : .
7. Discussion of the policy guidelines for UDAG reinvestmen
Ys., '�'�o��'"`a.
- 3-,._ :,; :.
8. Discussion of the Eivic Center �Auditorium Feasibility- Stud . ��C `�y���
w�.� ,�ppnpvr�
.: .. . ,':3-�D�.""`-
9. Discussion of the policy for City employees for sno►�r days.
.. ' -;E. ' . .
NOT ON PREPARED AGENDA; ' ' •
Resolution establishing priorities for use of 1983 Residential Street Paving fund���D�
Resolution extending priorities for use of the adopted 1982 Capital Improvement �'
Budget Appropriation to the Residential Street Paving Program.
,
CITY HALL SEVENTH FLOOR
SAINT PAUL. Di1NNESOTA 55102
.�„
. �a � a 7�'
� Mayor - OMB DEPART(•1ENT
� Aichinger __ �ONTACT �
�
-6861 PHONE ���� �� .
1-10-83 �ATE
(Routing and Explanation Sheet)
Assign Number for Routing Order (Clip All Locations for Mayoral Signature): ,�
G_—�---�tment Director -+:-�-�F= - ---;�
�— a_,..�r� '��� �
City Attorney � !�
��. �� / �3 �/�I I 2 � iQ8
D�rector of Management/Mayor � � ��Z
� Fi nance and. Management Servi ces Di rector ��',�,��� � - -
� � .
� City Clerk I
_�-8udqet Director '�
A/�.��N4�/� �� ,
, ,�
What Will be Achieved b Takin Action on the Attached Materials? Pur ose Rational�
List of eligible projects for use of 1982 RSSP is extended.
k�
,
;,�
��
4.
� � � �,.
G.
Financial , Budgetary and Personnel Impacts Anticipated: �
N ne - fund currentl in 1982 Ca ital Im rovement Bud et. ��
o Y p p 9
';
Funding Source and Fund Activity Nurr�er Charged or Credited: �`
�
1982 Capital Improvement Bonds (92082-007 and 92082-008) . '�
,
Attachments (List and Number all Attachments) : '
,''�
�"Resolution. �
Report of Long-Range Capital Improvement Budget Corr�nittee.
CF 277861 . r
�
DEPAI2TMENT REVIEW CITY ATTORNEY REVIEW '1�
� Yes No Council Resolution Required? Resolution Required? Yes � No
Yes � No Insurance Required? Insurance Sufficient? Yes � _ No
r
Yes � No Insurance Attached? �
I�
Revision of October, 1982 ,�
�;
(See Reverse Side for �Instructior�s)
�i
H4W TO USE THE GREEtv SHEET � • �
The GItEEN SHEET has several purposes: �
1. Tp assi'st in routinq documents and in securing
required signatures
, 2, To brief the reviewers of documents an the impact's �
of approval
3. To help ensure that r.ecessary supportina materials
are prepared aad, if required, attached.
ROUTING . ,
�ost GREEV SHEET ac�icns must �e rzv:.��ae�? 5y a ^e�ar_:aent
�irec�or, �:�e City �L�oraey, ;.:�e Dirsczor oT i�tanagex.�nt, �he
Director of Finance and Management Services. Other possible
reviewers/signatures are listed.
BRIEFING •
M�ost of the GREEN SHEET headings are designed to assist in
developing a precis of the decision which the attac:unents
represent. The headinqs are offered to remind users of some
of the more critical elements of this brief. .
The Financial, Budctetarv and Personnel ImAacts heading provides
a space to explain the cost/benefit aspects of the decision.
Costs and benefits relate both to City budget (General Fund and/or
Special Funds) and to broader fina�cial impacts (cost to users,
homeowners or other groups affect�d by the action) . The personnel
impact is a description of change or shift of Full-Time Equivalent
(FTE) positions. �
SJ�PORTING MATERIALS
In the Attachments section, list all attachments. If the GREEN
SHEET is well done, no letter of transmittal need be included
(unless signing such a letter is one of the requested actions) .
Note: Actions which require City Council resolutions include:
a. Contractual relationship with another government unit.
b. Collective bargaining.
c. Purchase or sale of land, or lease of land.
d. Issuance of bonds by City.
e. Eminent domain.
f. Assum�tion of liability by City, or granting
by City of indemnitication.
g. Agreements with S�ate or Federal Gavernment
under which they are providing funding.
Note also: If an agreement requires evidence of insurance/co-
insurance, a Certificate of Insurance should be one
� • of the attachments at time of routing.
WNITE - CITV CLERK ��
PINK - FINANCE GITY OF SAINT 1 AUL COUIICII �9�
CANARV - DEPARTMENT
BLUE - MAVOR Flle NO.
oun 'l Resolution
. .
Presented By
Referred To Committee: Date
Out of Committee By Date
RESOLVED, That the Council of the City of Saint Paul does
hereby approve and authorize the proper City officers to execute
on behalf of the City of Saint Paul Supplement No. 1 to Agency
Agreement No. 59891 between the City and the State of Minnesota,
the Agreement specifying that sewer repair work will be performed
pursuant to a state contract and the City would reiznburse the
State in an amount estimated to be $27,697.55, a copy of said
agreement to be maintained in the office of the Depart�nent of
Finance and Management Services.
COU[VCILMEN Requested by Department of:
Yeas Nays �
FI t her
�e e Fletcher
nna n: In Favor
Galles / � ;
Nic �a Masan2 '
'�
s be� _ __ Against BY
ede o Nicosia �� n
ilson Scheibe# %UCk/1%
� TedesCO FEB 3 1983 Form Appr ed by ' y E,�tt ey '
Adopted by Council: Wilson Date
Certified • s b ounc� : cr a BY
By ,
� App' e by ayor fo u m sion to Council
l�ppr v :Vlavor: Da e —�—A �QR�
By B ;� , � �. ;�i1"'Y'�.�� �
PUBi��ED �EB 12 1983 ��
� ; �PQ���
� � J
Public works DEPARTt,1ENT �I
Roy Bredahl �ONTACT '�'
�19�91
292-6138 PI�ONE � e Q � ,
, Dec
ember 20 1982 DATE ��� �
(Routing and Explanation Sheet) ;''
Assign Number for Routing Order (Clip All Locations for Mayoral Signature):
�
�� ����� �
City Attorney
Di ector of Management/Mayor �(C�C l��-�gJ � �1��' �
Finance and Management Services Director � '
3 City Clerk (��,
ctor � � �y�
�.
What Will be Achieved b iakin Action on the Attached Materials? Pur ose/Rational `
Reconstruction of a defective sanitary sewer under the Kellogg Bridge. Supplement the
existing agency agreement with the State and work to be performed in conjunction wi the
Kellogg Bridge Replacement Project. ;?
�
� R� i°
Financial , Budgetary and Personnel Irr�acts Anticipated: C��VF�� �'
. "�A
oFF NI� �
Costs to be shared by State and City as follows: DEp�CF�F �� ��
Estimated State Share (32.13�) $11,722.45 'MIO A�'MF tyFD� r;
Estimated City Share (66.87�) 27,697.55 a� �'uF'ryr OF F FCTO
M �N R "
Total Estimated Cost $39,420.00 FNT$ qNCF' `
Fundin Sourc and Fund Activit Nurr�er Char ed or Credited: �IC� ;
�
� Sewer Fund 60016 -�99-ODO $27,697.55
Public Works Project No. 5-1637B1
Attachments (List and N wnber all Attachments) : i
1. Resolution !
2. Agreement (3 copies) �'
o'
�;I
i
DEPARTMENT REVIEW ' CITY ATTORNEY REVIEW �`
�
x Yes No Council Resolution Required? Resolution Required? � Yes No
Yes x No Insurance Required? Insurance Sufficient? Yes �' No
;.
Yes x No Insurance Attached? I
�
Revision of October, 1982 ;�
(See Reverse Side for 'Instructio � ) '
i