The URL can be used to link to this page

00-334� _ ORIGINAL Presented By: Referred To: U.S. Department of CURRENT BUDGET 4 WIIEREAS, this grant will be used to enhance and ezpand the Saint Paul Police DepartmenYs technology 5 capacity to manage information more effectivel}' and provide police officers with more effective tools; and 6 7 WHEREAS, this grant awazd requires a S63,625 match from the City of Saint Paul which will be funded by S the Saint Paul Police Department's Asset Forfeiture Fund, and 9 10 WHEREAS, the Saint Paul Police Department needs to establish a financing and spending plan for 11 this grant in 2000; and 12 13 WHEREAS, The Mayor pursuant to Section 10.07.1 of the Charter of the City of Saint Paul, does certify that 14 there are available for appropriation funds of $254,500 in excess of those estimated in the 2000 budget; and 15 16 WHEREAS, The Mayor recommends that the following addition be made to the 2000 budget: 17 18 19 20 21 22 23 24 25 26 27 28 29 30 31 32 33 34 35 FINANCING PLAN: 436 - Police-Special Projects 34120 - Narcotics/Special Investigations 9830 - Use of Fund Balance 34108 - Cops More 1995 3099 - Other Federal Direct Grants in Aid 7499 - Intrafund Transfer SPENDING PLAN: 436 - Police-Special Projects 34120 - Narcotics/Special Investigations 0799 - Transfer Out-Intrafund 34108 - Cops More 1998 0219 - Professional Services OS53 - Cameras 0856 - Data Processing 5oftware 0857 - Data Processing Hardware 138,034 Council File # � 0� 33 � Green Sheet # 104589 63,625 �3 AMENDED BUDGET 201,659 - 190,875 190,875 - 63,625 63,625 , > > > 188,750 63,625 252,405 - 5,000 5,000 - 5,000 5,000 - 95,000 9�,000 - 149,500 149,500 3G , , � , 37 38 THEREFORE BE IT RESOLVED, that the City Council accept this grant award in the amount of 5190,875 39 to enhance Police Department technology and approves the changes to the 2000 budget. Requested by Department of: Police By: Approval Recommen ed by Budget DirecAr. � Adopted by Council:Date: Adoption Certitied by Council Secretary: - s • � _ Approved by ayor:Date: { By: �� CITY S INT PAUL, MINNESOTA �� Committee:Date: ut Paul Police Department has received a 5190,875 Cops More 98 Grant from for the period September 1,1998 through February 28, 2001; and By: y'_ Form Ap o ed by Ci y Attorne : B • Approve bv ayor for Sub � �o� �o�� BY� �Yv�,P i��u'UU'i'� CHANGES 34'I 08COpsMOre98G mnt cr2000 i -,� DEPAR7(r1ENTlOFFICFJCOUNCIL Police Department CONTACT PERSON 8 PHONE Chief Finnev 292-3588 MUST BE ON COUNCIL AGENDA BY (DATE) Please process ASAP TOTAL # OF SIGNATURE PAGES ACTION REQUESTED 3/10/00 7 GREEN SHEET rvo. 104589 INITIAVDATE INITIALIDAiE �� u � � � i J� �CITVATTONNEY_� ❑CIttCLERK �FYNNCIALSEAVICESMR [r/f/\ �FWINGLLSERV/ACCTG � T 3 �1MYOR(ORL595TpNT)�" � �f{��J�qK.�([5 (CLIP ALL LOCATIONS FOR SIGNATURE) � Approval of the attached council resolution accepting a Cops More 98 Grant and establishing a 2000 spending and financing plan for the grant. I ION Appfove (A) of R¢�ect (R) PERSONAL SERVIGE GONTR4CT5 MUST ANSWER THE FOLLOWING QUESTIONS. 1 Has �his personlfirm ever worked untler a con[ract for this department? PLANNING COMMISSION vES NO CI8 COMMITTEE 2. Has ihis personmrm ever been a city employee? CIVIL SERVICE COMMISSION YES NO 3 Dces this persoNfrm possess a skill not normally possessed by any cutrent city employee� YES NO � 4. Is Ihis personKrm a targeted vendoR YES NO Explain all yes answers on separate sheet antl attach lo green sheet The Saint Paul Police Department has received $190,875 Cops More 98 Grant from the U.S. Department of Justice Por the penod September 1, 1998 through February 28, 2001. (Attached is a copy of the grant ) The Saint Paul Police Department witl use funds from this grant in 2000 to enhance and expand technology IF Ability to cohance technology tl�at �vill allow police officers to manage inCormation more effectively. i�one. Loss of rant funds to enhance technolo ��`�� '° �`� r g gY. ,. r ,., �,. ,.e,::� f', dL:'(a d Fi f3 Gll�� ,',".oh�xp: - . .. , . .°�:-� s - . , . _ ,._ . _ . �. UNT OF TRANSACTION $ 2�4,�00 COST/REVENUE BUDGETED (qRCLE ONE) YES NO souRCe U S Department of 7ustice Grant ACTIVITY NUMBER 3410A & 34120 . INFORMATION (EXPLAIN) 34108CopsMore98Grant.gs 2000 --� '�. �' Office ofthe Director 1700 Yermontdrem�e. i� �cas��ro�. Dc �osio Chief William K Finney St. Paul, City of 100 East l lth Street St. Paul, I�IN » 101 U_ S. Department of Justice Office ojCommurdry Oriented Policing Services (COPS) September 9, 1999 Re: COPS MOFtE '98 Extension - Grant # 98CLWX0143 Deaz Chief Finnev: �O -�3� L'± l � _ J ,'/ .; ._� � �i �� ./ �. l�� _ �, : r:_, , � � �.0 n �� 0 lY � � � � � I am pleased to infonn you that your request for an e�ctension of your COPS MORE '98 has been approved. Your new COPS MORE '98 grant end date is 02/28/2001. As you ]mow, the funds provided under COPS MORB'98 must result in an increase in the number of full-rime-equivalent (FTE's) deployed into community policing. The level of redeployment is indicated on the awazd page of your grant and is the e:ipected result of the funding of your original applicaiion. In addiuon, achieving and maintaining the level of redeployment is a condition of your �ant. We etpect this estension will enable you to maintain the level of redeployment outlined in your orig.nal grant_ Ifyou have any questions regarding your extension, please contact the U.S. Depazttnent of JusticeResponseCenterat 1-800-421-6770orcallyourgrantadvisor. Sincerely, � ` � � � �..,$�! Man' Lou LeaiV Acting Director _ . :�:: :.. :, ��_��s: ; , t: , � . ;; � —� � a. /^ - � -`r,_• U. S. Department ofJustice �ffCG' Of COt7113110i1�' OI'I211P2lI POIIClit� Serviees COPS MORE 98 AWARD Applicant Organization's Legai \ame: St. Paul, Cin� of Gru�rt _: 93CLWX01�3 ORI'.: >1\06309 1'endur °: �1600v3! La.+ Enforcemeni E�ecuti��e \ame: dd<Iress Cttr, Starr. ZipCode: Telephuna F<cc. Covernment E�ecutive Name: .�Ct[il i'S5 Cin'. Stutc. Zip Cnc(d Tel��phu�rr Ftu Award Start Date: 9.' { J f 99S Ai�ard Amount: S 190,87�.00 Ci��ilian Personnel Award: S 0.00 Equipment/Technology Award: S (90,875.00 /"\ i .'i �Juszph E. Brann Di rectu r l'i�� `:`.'�f ✓ �. � " "., ' Datz \umber of Redeplo}�ed Officers: \umber of Redeplo}�ed Officers O o -�'S e 11 �? " B� signin�,this a��ard, the si��nawry of6cial, are as�in� to :�bidz b� the Cor.ditions of Grant . - 1�vard found un die re� erse side of this dxument ' �. � � 1 ; .. : �. �_ . ��-+----e..:� ';+ Fi['re� ot Poi�ce Sienaturo uf L2�-1 Eoforcemznt E�ecuti�e ��ith Typed\ame uid lltleof Li« EnfUn:ement G�eniei�c Uatz the aud�uritr !„ , this _ranE a��ard I �� I ' Q�f� ! �, Sormar Caie�:a�; ;I,i�; �.�� i;�_�— Siliaturc ofGu�emmznt��ecutice with the Typed �ame mid litleuf Go�zmmrnt authont} to.ccep[thisyant-award. Esecuti�e Date Chizf IViIGam h. Finnz�. 100 East I I[h Staet St. Paul. �t] ;;101 (612)39?-;>33 (bl��q�_;;.� �la�orNorman B, Colemnn I: `V2SI K2I�Ofl°_ BOUI2Vdit� Cit�' FIaII- Room 390 - St. Paul. \IN ��10? (bl'_)266-5�10 �( � � � � q ,._ �� A�+'�rd End Da[e: 8 31 1999 7.60 :\umber of Redeployed Officers YS �,... o,,� '��, o � �'°-�,,;�_.�°_ U.S. Department of Justice Office of Justice Programs Washingmn, D.G 20537 DATE: � FROhI : po - 33`� Auaust 13, 1998 Grant Award n 98-C?.-WX-01?3 Josina Talbert, Grant Moni�or, COPS Office � �i.l`/ �s°-�'.�[-t-L�' �. De amo, L., Financial Analyst, COPS Branch, Office of the Comptroller SUBJECT: Financial Clearance: Application ;', 8-3551-�-CL, for the St. Pau1, City of. A financial analysis of budgeted costs has be_n comoleted. Costs appear reasonable, allowable and consistent with existing guide- lines. Exceptions/Disallowed Costs are notec below. Cost CateQOrv Equipment: Suoplies: Contractual: Total Costs: ***Disallowed Costs: Grand Totals: Federal Share: 190,875 Local Share: 63,625 ° Tota1 Project Cost: 254,500 °auiDment 189,500 60,000 5,000 25=,500 65,000 COMMENTS: The total�project costs were recuc°d by 5'S,000 due to "programmatically disallowed" costs in tae Sau �-�:budget ($60,000) and in the Suopiies buccet $5,�000). � Prior to the obligation, e.�:ueadi�ure or drawaown ox grant funds for indeneadent consultant =ees in excess oP $250 per day, prior aporoval must be obtained =rom the COPS otfice. � JDOn ��Gnc� �� {v�/� '� �� /LDD/0 / � - _fla-�ay SECTION 1 • ��g��d [��o� Pl:�se aruuer a!I oj t'r_ jollcc�in� q�cs`�s con.yfeic!v. Ii r.!! 8« qu.^s:ion> ar: not m:>.o-_r_°d, tiL a�tirntio>•� , cc�i!/ be co>uidered fricom.plefe and mzy noi b< rrs_uK'd ort<rtded. AI! requ=sted irt;onrmiimi must 6e n/pe �. Primary App[icanf �rganizafion p315(:fifAP?LICSBTOA�:AIIS St. P2U1 Police Department ; fl; l� ra u:a:/ hs 6r.n w^gre: aa f..^•' d� �: 0,5r. alhz�ce H,a�zrs C�-= e.Giclf EIA NOM 3id l.:75:;n -: ry's r'n'�- �_• C_. rr..r Gr,:a•s= fP= r;:::ra'.ier.a.•e Se: r.z f6; siaJ? be cs•* 41 6005�21 A??LICAhT I.eESCt �al NUkBE�t;bz:;z>' °lsct!'m+:s) r�o�a�t caK�a:ssiouu oaraier ur.�aa N�N Ob � 0900 MN4 AiET0UC9h1nkC➢M6F�8LiNfXFOACEA4EhTSi&YICES?1!'rs'nm�N.��rar.z2:.��'r.ix' � NO � �_S Cc^ u/L^•e :c,l:zcf iax :ni:r.e^=nt CeY'�'��':^: �n tY f6e�:ni: ts.z;' ian_^a::e i�;r :•::a� ' Law Enforcement informafion U'N itiF�dCFH:Yi Ea:CUiIYiS M14E wi.l.lia�a K. Finney mE C of Police t6i4CT X,tki St. Pau1 Police Departnent A49�ESS 100 E. llth Street crr St. Paul iiLEiIOSE (6t71 29� 3�88 - tiAl!: 0� CGNi:Ci Pi'SOH IS T�Un ui7:nik:� Wd01$ F�.Iti�.'. n.,�.. AmvniG2i'V BT1�,°5 _ 00 E. llth S[ree[ t. Paul : env=. 612) 2°2-3507/(612) 2 76 Governmeni Informafion F7 21? 711 � 60Yi�1.l'MiXT IXECIfiIYES Mf4: P,orn B• CoLenan H:MF Of 60YE9N.v.:Ai EXT(fr City of St. Paul :?�iESs Roon 390, City H211, 1� k'• I:e11 Blvd. Cfi1 cr Panl iEtE7NUkE �- (612? 266-8510 FU (612) 266-8513 21? CUUE 551 st� MN i!S 55101 �� ;t,v�� imt itesearch(Grant Pianager./Lieutenant TmE Sectiun I— Yau must return thls page as part of your application , - -� General [nformafion TiPi OF lSN ENiOACEMiNi /EeN:7 I� hill7d1C1°AZ ❑ SikiE POtICE ❑ COUtiTY PD ❑ S�iERI; F ❑ INDIAN TRI6,L ❑ i°AMSIi ❑ SCHOOI ❑ HI,NWAY P�iRO� ❑ �NIVERSITY/CDLLEGE (0 PUBUC ❑ PRIVAi�) ❑ °UBLICHOL'SIhdG ❑ CONSORTIUt� ❑ PARK/REGR;AIIpN ❑ GiHER(pte�s2specij) tldS T�Ud JUftIS01C11pN AECENE� UiNEA COPS 69LVT5? 0 Y�S ❑ NO li'YiS; U1pER WNiCX PdO6RlbS? (CF.cce a7 �}z: a,+p�) � C�PS: PNAS� I � Cp?S AH�� ❑ COPS FASi � C�PS M�Rc'�5 � COPS MORE'9n ❑ UNIVERSAL HIRIN, PRDG?,AM ❑ iRQQPS Ta GQPS � PpCfCE CORPS ❑ PROBLM-SOLVING PARTWEBSriI?S ❑ R�GlONAL COh!MUUIiY POLIChVG I1'SIITUTE P�PULSTIOA SiRYE� dS OE L°50 P� CiNSUS S00aAE 272,235 :2R:r pnd 2.'.2Gx e aiY_-f'"¢ fj�tetf.°ACLL,.u;r 0; L^e ,ccsr.c;hra I}�Tp,{!gR03FFG3CFSfdiXntltpSOFIfiP.90r, 570 562 ] UPUY SNidi FIS�;! �I��;SS? ;1,':_; ;i:�c s: r^.r�:.v cn n�r_; zzv ,� ^."r�`kzaS: c:,•,.: rrfi �i ae [:s:g72 r+.:s w a azrr_�) ❑ YES 0 ��p WN,ii IS THF SOOAC; OF YOOn A6Eh'P.YS LOCl: C:SY. IAATCH? Citv of St_ p�„i �crt carun�tMV�� AElYG; S FlSCIl1T„i� FROt.i: 1/ 1/ 98 iG 5ignatures �� (�� Gz0.° B ior ceim8;sy lc✓uyT.altl�e iiJcrmauon prpdpy4 or, �qlar,� e:r:� araa:�rae mCe d.�ldm� L�n�Mg=! nr,A�zzMLt;7r,'orN u/9r.aftnr� C• aDGfic:n(mysltomOn y^h alf t;,Ga�an an? prpgnm rv7uirzm,na olAe PrDlr, Sahry Parye;nrD aaALaamnoryPoGlioy,(7m 1?9: u.ACCSnrry�^_mene o{f�n/6e U'NEXFOA M' S Hf .� EC q�e SS 9lNA:fG,gr,��sr,v;auredps•,wnram�onLL•'ucn;n't,^�'�.�a) �ATE l�-�. C� . �� f l� 4. P' e�n Intergovernmental Review Process d�h D0.TE SUBhfITiEO iU SiATE SIRS:E POIYi OF CO5TA^,i /ll�cr3" lzru�;� m me;,� w�nre frc ;:5i_ tr.cgrrrn. e�;d rte.�x i:. s(�a N� A,a_n6r1 0%x.s: �fii m Ne.^,z•• uo wt.n>�z a p arer� ° m: yr FwrY crGr.�:! Ir reaex) CiO4 HIIN9EA Sflli A7PIIGTIOM IDiSfir�i9 {fartaz$,�QCra'tyc�) 70.71� ❑ EOMMUNIZY POLIC�N6 TQ GOMBAi DOM€3iIC VIOLfNCE ❑ ADVAP7CIh; C�MhfU�lITY POLICC�u ❑ ANiI-�Atd61�dITIAii'/JY�UiH FIR:kR61S VIOLENCE ltllii�TIYE ..— . ... �. ...� �.✓.�c..n. a..0 Nw� ��uuY��.'��/ �/'�'i Pf C^3' Idh' L�I�JI.'PRi Zy:.:J°$ h:.Yf. Y�F*+u .a: fa::zr,c'z s`.eif's 6°..:<u-zaa++mzt xan_ Da.ar�atrms znGa_s earie:: �e 5� ='�iY+�r.:a;a�e—<::rvcz;n:sie:i's:::J�re.miuner.,zr�laxenicrc.—,:raetim,r./) 1 � Sedion f— You musf retum this page as part uf ynur 2pplication � -a� -��y AgElILy}{2m°: St. Paul Police Deoa:tment OAI �: r�r:o62o900 SEL�i1ilN f R�6�b�� Please outline below your reten�on plan for the item(s) requested in your MORE '95 applica�on. This plan should indude information on how you will continue the proposed activity and level of redeployznent aftzr Federal fvnding has ended. If this is left blank, your applicafion may not be considered for fundin�. The principle thrust of this grant is to enhance and expand the St. Paul Police IIepartment's technological capacity to manage information more effectively, thus providing officers with more effective tools for problem-solving in our community. Therefore, our ongoing support is contiugent upon our ability to maintain and upgrade our technological infrastructure and equipment. Item �I: In 1995 and 1996, the St. Paul Police Department received two COPS MORE gants to unplement an automated Records Management System (RMS) and migrate from our current radio frequency system to a CDPD (Cellulaz Digital Packet Data) system for transmitting digital information. These projects aze making ekcellent progress and we anticipate being able to piace an unprecedented amount of information in the hands of the street officer and supervisor within the immediate future. Most unportantiy, we anticipate that these tools will allow the officer to manipulate this infonnation in real tune. Most officers actually suffer from information overload. There are so many difterent programs and 'uutiatives, so many reporting sources and so many differing priorities established by various advocacy groups, it is virtually impossible for most officers to keep current with the volume of information they receive. Under our new information system they will be able to manage the flow of information into their laptop computers and query our Records system from remote locations in real time. They don't have to try to remember all this information, rather they simply have to Seam how to access and manipulate the information. Unforiunately, when we originally submitted our 199� and 1996, COPS MORE grants there were very few of these systems in the place. Costs were best guess estimates. There was a corollary belief that the price of computing was coming down and that the price of lazge systems and laptops would decrease with the passage of time. While that has been true in the general mazketplace, it has not been the case in law enforcement. While the price of laptops in the business environment have declined from $4,000 to $2,500, our uruts have increased &om $2,500 to over $5,�0� per unit. The Panasonic model, one of the eazly price leaders just increased their cost for tfie CF-25 by $1,800 per unit. The same trends can be seen in the larger softwaze and hardware instaIlations that run CDPD, RAM and EAACS systems. The result has been the need to scale back the amount of critical peripheral equipment which we can afford to add to the system. 1E Section i— You must return this page as pari of yaur application .a � � �' ,, Jn our case, we have lost the ability to purchase what are referred to as clam shell or palm . pflot type devices (PDTs, Personal Data Terminals) to our network which a CDPD infrastructure fo operate. Laptop computers add a tremendous d'unension to the ability of officers to manage information, but they are essentially tetfiered to the squad veFricle or its cIose proximity, While portable, they can not function for any duration away from a power soarce and they are not practical for an officer to carry around. The PBT device overcomes these shortcomings and is critical to the successful operations of our beat, bike and mounted ofi'icers. They can attach to a belt, a bike or a saddle and can be used for an entire shift without the need to recharge. While they cannot be used to take a report, they can be used to access the same information that is available to tfie Iaptop. They can run queries, access report information, paging, access our intranet netwark, function as a pager, support E-Mail, and support mapping programs among oYher applications. The whole emphasis in COP is to get the ofncer out of the squad and into the community. In an era that is being driven by 91 l, this is becoming increasingly difficult to accomplish. The second task is to give the offcer a set oftools that are just as effective when he/she is functioning zway from a squad. These devices accomp6sh this feat to a significant degree. They aIlow the beat, bike or mounted officer who is interacting with the communiry to bz the equiv3Ient of our entire RMS and intranet system right into the community with the off,tcer. It creates the heart of a service oriented delivery system. This same argument can also be made for other officers working in different capacities, such as vice, nazcotics and FORCE officers who work with local resident block cIubs to reduce drug sales and smoke houses. In terms of ongoing support, we have already made the commitment to support the infrastructure of the larger systems. These are pecipherat devices tfiat are merely expanding our current systems in criticat capacities, so ongoing support shouldn't be a problem. Item N2: The second item is for creating a test data link. Even within the CbPD environment, transmission speeds are an issue as we migrate toward digital images and fintrerprint scanning. TraditionaI RF frequencies operate at 4,800 or 9,600 bits per second, while CDPD operates at 19,200. However, a traditionai j-peg fiie for a pfioto can include 4.5 megabits of data. Even with the new compression formulas under NCIC 2000, muttiple images will begin fo slow the system down considerably. A vendor, Coded Commnnications, has developed a DataLink system that will allow transmission rates of 1 megabit per second. Under current compression rates, this would allow for an almost unIimited transmission capacity; multiple images, fingecprints and fe�ct almost instantaneously. The drawback ofthe system is that if is currently Iimited to a 3 mile radius. However, it would only require a squad to mornentarily drive through this radius and they could download ancUor upload their entire laptop in the space of a block. It is also expecYed that performance wiIl improve with time and they may be able to expand this radius considerably. Bven if Yhe radius doesn't expand, it would only be necessary to pIace a few towers at strategic locations to effectively canvass the entire city. We aze very interested in testing this system. Ongoing support would obviously depend upon performance, but we are assured by tfie manufacturer that Yhis is a stand alone subsysfem that will integrate with our developing CDPD wireless system. It shouid he relatively easy to support the DataLinlc system zs we could leverage our existing tower cites for tfie hardwaze and the software covld be supported by our Systeins Unit. 16 aa -��y� Item r3: We have entered into a tentative agreement with�Digit la Bi mo etrics, Inc. They have apptied for a grant to establish a demonstration project in the Tw�in Cities metropolitan area to 5eld test a fingerprint scanning/di2ital mug shot device. Pending their successful receipt of this grant, they intend to develop and test a device that will scan single digit fingerprints and take ' digital images of unidentified suspects and check their identity aeainst a regional database, and subsequently the Federal IAFIS database. As a participant in the study, Digital Biometrics will supply us with a limited number of devices (1�), and all of the local infrastructure including a server, routers, hubs, data lines, an interface to CDPD, etc.. Their contribution to the St. Paul Police Department is currently estimated at �332,526, and these items will remain in place when the project is complete as our inventory. As part of the grant, they have also agreed to either build a regional identification infrastructure to support their system or upgrade the states regional MAFIN system to support integration with their software. IIowever, the ten devices promised is insu�cient for an agency of our size and population. We wish to leverage this demonstration project, if it is successful, to add devices and enhance our digital image capability within the department. These costs are relatively sma11 in compzrison to the size of the project, but will enable us to expand on the Federal govemments initial investment in the project into a usefui tool that can be utilized throughout the department rather than a few isolated locales. In the event that the erant is unsuccessful, then we would invest ur offthe shelf equipment currentty on the market for fineerprint readers operating on our local data base. Ongoing costs for maintaiiung the devices have not been determined at this date as there is no practicat field experience with the units. Nonetheless, we expect these costs to be relatively small in comparison to the grant and our Department has both a Systems Unit and a Communications Unit that should be capable of performing routine maintenance. Actual costs, ior budgetary purposes, will be charged to the units where the devices are assiQned. We have also aereed that their will be shared learning for our systems staff as part of the training and integration in the grant, which will allow our unit to support the software applications. In terms of costs £or access to any outside databases, the grant is desiQned to eliminate such future costs in exchange for upgrading systems. In the event that strategy faIls, dollars ��ill be allocated to carry these costs for some time into the future £or the demonstration participants. Because this request is for improving technology and equipment, there are no requests to fund positions now or into the future. oa .--�� SECiION 1[ — FA�'T A . �� 1 � �� 3�� pLase Eype a[I respor.ses. Please lea�c r.o F•r.es blarzk. If 1'a.es are lej' 6?ar.k Lllf afF1I1CR�30P. J;:ll bc cor.sidered incomplete m:d rr.ay r.ot bc reaiemed or fundcd. Rgency/�rant (nforma�ion 1un�sn�cnn.rs tE6L AzxE St. Paul Police D St. Pau1, MN zrtmenc arzet h:uE Any Brown/Gary Briggs ua� a rt�o62o�00 hTlyt Pr.76: g12) 2°2-350 7((612) 292-3764 rr=[ a� s�au�sr ❑ Clvl! I°.�dS [� TECHPl�JiOGY/�QUI%41:Ni OR BdlEi U:SCAI�iIOX Oi PiQUESicO fiik. S'SiA UP. ePCIIP OF Uli fiiBS AEiidRi� 1G IX 11Ai o 6iL01� Pa1m PiloC Handheld Devices Gost E�#ectiveness Galculations LIH_ t - OF ER LINE 2- ERTRY-LEVEt FRiHGE HEHffIiS 6F SW�7P�N P9tICE �FFIGER (.s of J�:�. 1..199?J LIN= 3- d6� LIHES i kR� 2 LINE 4• h1ULTiPIY LINE 3 BY .7a LINE 5- EHTEA FI6URE OH LfBE 4 Ofl S25,000, WHICHEVEB IS LESS LIhE 6- T�iAI COST OF ITchi, SYSiEM OR GR�UP 0� 11KE l�E}tS � se.o6s S io,i3� S 46,20� S 34,6�� zs,000 S 17 � , soo (100°r6) LIHE 7- FE�EAAi AMOUNT REQUESTE� C?r o° nc ror� tr�.� l�;i �: torz%ra.s eas' (i�:�e c; S i33 ,1z5� %__�_�'�� LIHE 8• �IVIOE LINE 1 8Y LINE 5 $ 5.34 Section If, Part A— You must reiurn this page as paR of your application . _. � .� SE�Ii1)td tl — PAF€f A . � z � �� .- , piexsz tvpe a!1 rzspor.ses. Please leave r.o l:nes blank. If lines arc Icj`t blar.k, tL•e appleca:ior. u�i1( be cor.sidered incorr.ple.e ar.d rnay not bc rcaie:ucd or fVRGf4�. Agency/Grant Informafion �ua�saicnoMS �¢oxt kzx; S[. Pau1 P Sc. C�!��-�i, caeT4cr u,� �. iTPi 0* fl;@6ESI [� TECH:O�OGY/e�UiPAI:P�T OR CIVIt1ANS 6�Li OESCTIRI05 OF AEpUESi:O �ik, STSIi� DH iR00? Oi U1.F fiiYS RiiE�1RiG SG !4 41f: S SEI�'4 Data Link _. Cost Ertacfiveness Calcutatians LINE i• ENiAY-LE4EL SAtARY OF SP�ORH POIiCE OFFICER ,zs ol�a, i. 19S9J S 36, o6s LIKE 2- EYTRY-LEVEL fRIkGE BEHEFIiS �F $WORN POL!CE OFFICEn (zs ci ✓�n i. 1°9�) tlfiE 3- A�C� LIhE31 khd 2 LINE 4• MULTIPLY LINE 3 BY .15 LIBE 5- ENiER FIG�RE ON LINE 4 OA S25,00�, 4JHICHEVER IS LESS 11HF 6• TO iAL CDSi Of iitk, SYSiEM 68 6ROUP OF LIKE ITEMS S 10,137 � �6.20� S 34,654 S 25,000 S ��,000 (10�9�c? LIN�1-FE��RALaM0UN7R�QU�STE�Gz�ber,cn,o;eG'•,ani��:,r:�;,:;!it=mccst(rmso; � 5�,isd 7;��% IIHE S- Q1Vl�E LIHE I BY LINE 5 S 2.31 Section Il, Part A— You must return this page as part oi your application „ M. r � . - �a -� 3y SECTiEiP� 11— PART A i�Ei� T 3 � �� Plcase type ¢f1 respor.ses. Please Iea�e r.o iir.es blar.k. Zf tir.es cre lcft binr.k, the applica:ion :+%ill be cor.sidered inconplete ar.d may r.ot bc re�:cwed or f:<nced. A�en�y/Grant (nformation JU9:SQICi1:AS tfoAL N:lii St. Paul Police Dep2rtnent OAI � PSN�6209�� CIiL Sf:ic St. Pau1, MN C�fiiACf amy Brown/Gary Briggs 3k�z�� e�cv: (612) 2 2°2-3764 Treia�ntPUES� �. po ❑ CIVI,I�;;S � TECNSOiOuY/�QUI-b<�li BfiIEi OiSCBiFi1�N 0'r P.i�UiSSEE liik.. 51SIiM OB 6d0U? Oi l([i REeS &EicuEi010 IN I15F e oELOW Mobile Fingerprint Reader and Digital Camerzs G�st E�ec�Sveness Ga(cutatinns 0 L1hF 1- FhiRY-! fVEI SALAfiY 6'r SW09t1 POLIC; aFrfC�R (zs o: J�r, i. 1°5J) S 36 , o6s LIhE 2- EhTRY-IEUEL FAIHGE BENEFIiS Of SWOAN POLICE �FFICER (.s c Jzn. 1. lE°9) LIhE 3• d0� LINES 1 dN0 2 LINE 4• MULTIPIY LINE 3 BY.75 LIhE 5- EHTEfl fI�URE OH LINE 4 OA S2a,�0�, WHICHEVER IS tESS S 10,13i S � 6,20� $ 34,654 S 25,000 t1NE 6- i�iAl CDST OF iTEM, SYSTEM OR G84UP Of L4KE ITEh!S S 65 , o00 (�nre,�� LI4E 7- FEQEftA! AMOUIai R_QUESTE� �zr• c� nc nc;e Irzn 1�?i c� tora i?ar c"s- (iri° oi � 48 , 7 5d �.i°'�� LIhE 8- UIVI�E LINE 7 BY LINE 5 S 1.9 Secticn II, Part 11 — You must return this page as part nt yaus appticatian -�o� -33 `� Apen�yName: st. rau� ro��c .,_��...••... - - �RI,'''.�-: MN0620900 [iEM � � SEG710N II - PART B D��o��On [� T�e ��ng� Describe how this item, system or o oup of like items Krili result in officer fime savings. Please use the space provided below• For large jurisdictio �° be found in b o attach additional sheets� Samp1° redeployment sumn�ari COPS Office a sumes that you ach e e a r sul of g antection is w•hat the Information you need to include: • Irtumber of hours saved per shift per officer • The number of shifts these officers will actually wotk in a 1-year period • How many officers will realize this savings • How the time saved x�ill be used (on what community policin� acEivities) If the actual redepioyment that is calculated in this section is substantially greate: than the required amount of redeployment you must achieve for this item (line S of the CEW), please indicate below that your aoency undersEznds that it will be expected to aY�ain this higher le��el of redeployment if fi:nded for this item. Information is the key to success in any endeavor, and law enforcement is no exception. Effective, efficient and timely decisions can have a positive impact on the quality of life issues for the vict�n and th �cs�ue�o�u o�he front ge o�r the met�ro se�ction of he newspaper he next day. described in grap � P Making effective and timely decisions is usually deternuned by the amount and quality of t e information available to the decision maker. In our first series of grants, the infrastructu�e was created to expand the amount and quality of information available to supervisors and patrol officers in a real tune environment. We have, in effect, created a mobile office for the officer with most � a 1 environment, as avaitable in a normal office setting. In so far as we are worl:ing most of our communities are designed, this is an excellent addition to our problem-solving strategies. However, in a number of urban communities, either as a result of desien or weat er, many of our officers actually work in a vertical environment• In St• Paul, we have one of the longest contmuous skyways in the world. These s�.yways linl: b� h rise buiSdings.�ManY of oures and residents throughout our entire downtown area in many ., Section II, Part B— Yau must retum this Rage 2s Part uf yaur applicatinn businesses no longer look for space on the street level as a prime Iocatio� rather they look for space on the second IIoor ofbuildings adjacent to the sl.yways. The downtown area has also become the fastest growing residential azea in the city. , In this environment, the beat officer must leave their squad behind on the street level and with it the communications platform we have designed for the future. The PDTs are designed to overcome the majority of these limitations. The sazne argument can be made for our mounted patrol and our bike officers. Both of these units patrol our parks, waterways, special events and congested neighborhoods. In both cases support vehicies can be blocks or even miles away with no ready transportation to bring the party involved closer to the support vehicle and the communications pIatform. During special events the distance might not be great, but the number of people often safely preclude such a joumey. The ability to conduct important business without anduly inconveruencing the victim-witness- suspect, or callut� in additional squads, or calling undue attention to your activities often makes the diff'erence between a successful interview/'intervention and a fa�ed effort, Of course, some of tlus traffic could be handled over the RF system, but those frequencies are already overburdened and one is usually at the mercy of the efforts of third parti�s to search appropriate databases. PDTs allow the officer or supervisor fo query systems silently, efficiently and according to the parameters established during the interview. The amount of time each o�cer will save each day is estimated at 1 hour. VJithout mobile transportation, their need to access secure communications either through a remote access server or docldng station in one of our faciIities in order to query the RMS database and intranet will be much more burdensome. Multiplyin� one hour by the 45 oi'�ucers assigned to our downtown beat, our mounted patrol and our bicycIe patrols equals 45 hours, times 228 shifrs per year equaIs 10,260 hours, divided by the COP standard of 1,82? annual hours equates into 5.6 FTEs, which exceeds the 52 FTEs on the Cost Effectiveness Worksheet for this item. 24 � �.. -Oa-�3y Apenc�Name: st. Paul �olice Depzrtnent qR � r: Mvoo�o 00 SEGT10t1 Il - PAF€f B Q��i�� Sa�ng�S C[EAtI x � Describe how this item, system or group oE like items w-ill result in ofiicer time savings. Please use the space provided below. For large jurisdictions or complex p:ojects, please attach additional sheet�. Sample redeploy:nent summzries can be found in theb o°'r'run$ of this section. The actual redeploynent that you calculate in this section is what the COPS Office assumes that you K�ill achieae as a result of this grant. Information you need to include: • Number of hours saved per shiff per officer • The number of shifts these officers will actualIy work in a 1-year period • fiow many officers will realize this savin�s • Fiow the time saved will be used (on whaf community policin� activities) If the actual redeployment that is czlculated in this section is substantially greater than the required amount of redeployment you must achieve for fnis item (line S of the CEW), please indicate below that your a�ency understands thae it vaill be expected to attain this higher level of redeployment if funded fox this item. Computers today operate a speeds that were inconceivabie just a few short years ago. They can process and transmit an entire encyclopedia in a few seconds in a few of the newest computers. Unfortunately, these speeds aze currently Iimited to hazd wired systems that don't rely on madems as part of their transmission speeds. Modems often determine the rate at which computers can receive or transmit digital information, wtule their processing speeds are often much higher. This is further complicated in the wireless environment where current technology has not kept pace with hard wired or processing technology. CDPD, the current state of the art for speed, operates at 19,200 bits per second as opposed to RF, which operates at 4,800 or 9,600 bits per second. These rates are many times slower tfian the processing speeds being achieved in the average personal computer that can be purchased in any computer store. Diu,,i'tal and satellite tectuiology wiIl probably bring much faster rates, but they are yeazs away from the installation of the necessary infrastructure and redundancy necessary to mal:e these viable options. The recent failure of one satellite and the loss of ent'ue paging networks for several days across the country is a case in point. We cannot afford to lose our entire communications system for a few days without sia,,�u�ficant consequences. Section 11, Part 8— You must return this page as part nf your appiicatinn � This speed is becoming increasingfy critical because when a user is either uploading or downloading information, their system is unavailable for other information or messaging. In a law enforcement environment this type of delay could have dire consequences. A simpte itlustration should help to prove the point. The FBI has invested a great deal in digital imaging and IAFIS fingerprint technology for theu NCIC 2000 initiative. In order to send a digital iinage or fingerprint through a wireless system that is unmodified would require approsimately 4.S megabits of data. Ifyour processing speed is 4,800 on an RF systea� it would take approximately 26 minutes to load that image or fingerprint. At I9,200 (19.2}, it wilI cut the time by three quarters, but it is still over 7 minutes and fhis is provided there is no interference or the sysfem doesn't have to retry. Therefore, the FBI has developed compression technology of 25;1 That will aIlow them to transmit the image mucfi faster through a new algorithm using a vehicle that allows them not to repeat rapetitive inf'ormation. This should reduce the time to load an image to just under a minute, which is a wonderful accomplishment. However, there is a dynamic need to push these ]imits far beyond cc�rrent technology. For instance, St. Paul will process over 3,000 missing persons in 1998 alone, the vast majority being chitd�en. Now, many of the cases cleaz tfiemselves when the cfiildren come home on their ow� but many re«iaia missing. Without photos ofthese chiidren it is next to impossible to verify their ideatities because we don't expect chiidren to carry an ID in our society, and due to the shear volume, flyers and milk cartons, although laudable, aze not a very good attemative. Images aze the future in law enforcement and the demand is simply going to escalate for missing persons, gang members, vulnerable adults, efc.. tVhat appears to be fast today will seem like a crawl in a few short years. We need To develop the technology that witi make more images available to officers and that is only possible if we overcome tfie technolo,gical hurdles. The DataLink system has the capacity to transmit 1 megabit of information per second, a rate more than twenty tirrces faster than current CDPD technology. Such speeds are not critical for teact data, but they aze for images, fingerprint scanning and overly 2arge text files. The problem with the DataLink system is that it has a broadcast radius that is Iimited to 3 miles. This limits fhe effective range over which the data can be transmitted. On the positive side, the speeds are such that it would not take long to send or receive multiple images, fingetprints and long text files. In fact, driving down the fypicaI eity block would probabIy be ample time for almost any transmission. We propose to install snch a system on a triai basis to test tfie technology and deternune if it can handle the volume and reliabIlity necessary to support our information transfer loads into the future. If capable, it would be possible to locate a handful of towers at existing RF sites where we could blanket the city at key Iocations that would enable our vehicles to drive through the coverage areas as part of their routine patrol, fransferring and receiving data as they pass through. This would not only enable our ability to dramaticatly increase the volume and reliability ofinformation, it would also allow us to dramatically reduce a number ofhisYoric adm'uustrative functions, such as roII cat[, mail runs to distribute investigative pick up and hoids, Stop and ID on vehicles and people, and other related activities. This information could be loaded on the network at one central locarion with a single enYry an@ the officers would onty need to drive through their covera�e area at the beginning of their tour or anytime thereafier to upload and update their infonnation. We envision tfie test area as one of our district offices. On average we have approximately 65 officers and supervisors in a district office and we conservatively estimate that � aa-�3y we could save apptoximately .5 hours per shift with this technology. At .5 hours per shift for 65 o�cers and supervisors it equates to 32.5 hours for 22S s ft uates�o 4 06 FTEsn Thso s w�ell in V}'hen this is divided by 1,824 hours for the typical Year 4 excess of the 231 FTEs on the Cost Euectiveness VTorksheet for item r2. . � . . / ov -�a y ABencyHame: st. paul Police Devzrtnent ORI,�.�-: MN0620900 SECTION 11- PART B ��O��i Eyf ��1� �V1DgS �� .ir 3 Describe how this item, system or o oup of like items wi11 result in officer time savin$s• Please use the space provided beloti°. For large j�isdictions or complex projects, please at`ach additional shc�ts. Sa�mple redeploy�nent sumzn�ries can be found in the begiiuling of this secrion. The actual redep3oy�ent that you calculate in this section is what the COPS Ofnce assumes that you ti•ill achieve zs a result of this grant. InformaEion you need to include: • Number of hours saved per shift per officer • The number of shifEs these officers will actually work in a 1-year period • How many officers wi11 realize this sacings • How the time saced will be used (on whaY community policin� activities) If the actual redeployment that is calculated in this section is substantially �reater than the required amount of redeployment you mu;t achieve for this item (line S of the CEW), please indicate below that your agency understands tnat it will be expected to attain this higher level of redeployment if tunded £or this item. We have entered into a partnership with the Ramsey County Sheriff, the Minneapolis Police Department, the Hennepin County Sheriff and Di�ital Biometrics, Ina Digital Biometrics is developing a de�zce they call a`Squibb' which will be able to pe��t For analys's and S� the field. It will have a reader to scan and transmit a s'ingle digit fing Ip identification, a digital camera to capture and transmit images of persons, a ma�netic reader to read the magnetic strip on the back of Ivfinnesota drivers licenses an �nutes l of conver ation. and it may include an audio recording device to record up to thirty device would be able to operate remotely up to 1,�00 feet from the squad, it would capture the information and then transmit the information to a central database for a high probabiliry identification with a response guaranteed in 10 minutes or less. The fingerprint reader would access a regional database, either the state's regional MAFIN database if their system can be upgraded to interface with this system, or the organizations involved would establish their own regional database at a cost funded by Aigital Biometrics, Inc• Digital Biometrics has applied for a 3 million dollar grant to fund the demonstration project and we are told that their grant should be aw�� d�o su� I with a grrverhl0 devices for submitted. As a participant in the grant, they are g g PP Y field testing, all of the software and hardwaze to inter£ace with their system with ours, including Section ti, PaA 6- Yau must ceturn this page as part of your application the service charges for CbPD, the loca� carrier service and the frame reIay at US West. The total value of tfus contribution is $332,526, and all of the equipment, software and material wiIl stay with our department when the project is complete. We need only pick up the ongoing cost for the Iine charges and the CDPD access charges, which we would need to pay for our vehicles in any event. We ��isfi to leverage this grant and expand the number of devices that we can put into the fie1d. On any given shift, we could have in excess of 50 officers worl:ing, not including assignments such as traffic, FORCE, beat officers, mounted units and investigative ts. In an agency of our size, ten Squibbs wi11 not go very far. We wish to add an additional�nits to our patrol ar.d incestigative units. Many of the costs associated with enabling the Squibbs. are identical with instatling a CDPD platform in the vehicles, so costs would be reduced to little more than the price of the individuai units and some sofrware. We also want to enhance our abiiity to capture images and include them as part of our RMS in a Format separate from the Squibb. Several vendors have di�ital cameras and software that iviIl aIIow us to capture images and pIace them right into the report along with the text information. While this will enhance the overall value and quality of our system significantIy, it will also expand our ability to train and employ various problem-solving tactics using strategies sach as the SARA model. Wc operaYe in a very mobile sociery and a sienificanf portion of our population uses that mobility to support ongoing criminal enterprises. Often t}�ese parties purpose2y avoid any forms ofidentification or empIoy sophisticated counterfeit forms of identification in an effort to thwart local Iaw enfarcement efforfs. When these parties are stopped, officers aze leR with only one general option: to bring the party down Yo the Identification Unit to get their fingerpzints taS;en and a positive ID made. This is a very time consuming process and on most busy nights it is seldom empioyed, a factor that criminals depend upon. Officers ue also generaIly limited to mug shots or images they can beg, borrow or steal from the department's Identification Unit because the cost of reproducing such images are reIatively high, they can't be prodaced in targe quantities and because the Unit is the only location with a ready repository of such images. This also means that images currently available to patrol ofhcers are limited to a handful of ofricers and for persons already arrested. The Squibb and digital cameras would allow for the collection of images from tha field that could be stored in RMS reports. Officers could query names or reports and examine the images to help assess the veracity ofthe individual's ctaims. This wouId tremendously speed the identification process in the field, at search warrants, special events and vastty improve the quality of information by rapidly expanding the image database for future use. The digitaI cameras would also be a tremendous asset for problem-solving tactics, Digital images that can be captured in a computer can atso be projected and manipulated on a screen for other officers and investigators who aze training for or working on a specifrc problem or group of problems. These pictures capture the actuai scene and allow for strateeizing on a level of detail that diagrams can never capture. Presentations to block clubs, community groups, business owners and other community leaders can be used to generate support for a project or demonstrate accomplishments. Cameras could be provided to local residents that documents activities, support impact statements and verify the actions of suspects. The potential for use is atmost unlimited. While video taping is another optioq but it is very difficult to do so in an undercover 24 t�c-3 3y � czpacity without attracfing undue attention to oneself and the quality of producf �often must be checked after the fact. Digital cameras, on the other hand, can be used, verified and ]oaded inta a computer within a few minutes and without a�tracting unwarranted attention. :� The savings generated by these projects are very di - �ncult to determine and a specific study to measure the results might even take us well beyond the next round of grants. It is also extremely difficult to measure what ofncers are not doing because the activiry is Iabor intensive for an uncertain result. Ofncers will not generally bring some one in for identification purposes uniess they are presented with a situation that literally demands the action under the circumstances. How many people ue released because the officer didn't have the t�rne to follow up on their instincts? One measure we might examine lools at a very narrow focus of activity, but it might be representative as one of severai measures. The FORCE unit, Narcotics unit and Vice unit conduct on average 300 seazch wazrants a year. Both these devices would be used to screen people at the scene of these warrants and a great deal of time and ener,gy is always used to identify everyone at the scene. Normally only one or two persons aze acrested and the batance are released. The average seazch warrant requires eight officers (except for high risk wartants) and the execution o: the warrant from beginivng to end requires approximately four hours. Once the warrant is executeci, on average, two ofncers are assigned to interview and identify the people at the scene. ThPSe ofricers are often wholly consumed by this activity, remembering that this is an average. Some locations have few people, while smoke houses often have 15 or more. Based on these figures, the equivalent of 1 FTE is used per each search warrant sunply for identification purposes. If we multiply the three hundred events, we get 2,400 hours divided by 1,824 hours per year for an equivalent of 1.3 FTEs. It is also a conservative guess that of the thousands of contacts our officers make every week, they decline to investigate fifteen persons thoroughly. Aside from the inconvenience to the person, each such trip to HQ for a positive ID would require a minimum o£ 1.5 hours. This would represent 1170 hours of time, or .64 of an FTE. Together these total a Cost Effectiveness o£ 1.9 FT'Es, which represents only a fraction of the total potential savin�s if all potential activities were mezsure3. This figure also meets the calculation for Time Sa� under the erant - Oo-�3�► ApE4Lyh2mE: St. Pau1 Police Depz:tnenc �RI ir: MNOb10 00 S:�ilflPd 1[ - FAkT C ��tu��y �Iia�g �� a�€nary Communify Policing Acfivifies �}yj n 1 �Ffl CER AC➢VITIES M PaR B, ynu Cemansvan�Ghz dme sanngs tha!}vu u0ec! In ac+lier: fi�o°9h �' Duadase al mi� i�m ar ci�li=r,. Fiezse in9its�: which ol t�e falfoxing actiriSes yuur o�i�.°rs wil( e.�gage in as a rv.sad al �iis Om° sar,'r„s 0 LOOKING AT REPu1T CALLS FDR SERVICE TO fDEnii:Y FR09LEM�S OR HOT SPOiS � WORKItvG Yr'IiH NcIGHBORti�OG RESI��11S i� IDE��iI;Y APiD PRIGRIi12E CRIME PROBLEh!S ❑ CO�JOUCfI�J6 CITIZ_N SURYEYS � ADDRESSI�;G C��DIT101'S TriAi L�0 iC CRI�v1c 0 ASS_SSIh� TNE IM?ACT OF COh"MUNIiY POLIGINc E� ; ORTS GtJ LE�'=LS 0` CRIME Alv'D � c4R C� ATiiN91NG COIv1h1UNITY 64�EiIPI;S � 61i(= / F�Oi P�iROI L�l h�IPiNG COO�DIN;iE NEI6H30B�OOG C„iC' G°CU?S � NlO�RIMS WI�H BUSIhESS=S TG ADD"rcESS C'Ih`:c FRu.9L��:S ❑ I?41NI�G 0`r,'IC�RS / CIiIZ�NS IA CG�+iP�1USiil' �0! ICIil� ❑ CO�iDUCTiN6 GRGdE °RNENTION N'ORKS95?S I �ISS=h:I- P;,",iING INfOR�1?.i10N ON WFY3 OF PRcui.'vTlh6 C?Gd�c ❑ WORKI�+lG VJIiH LOCAI G�VcRNMENiAI / GOhi�fUh11TY ❑ EN��oltdG fi1+ STR'�TfufC PL4i:�iP7G ?�L4i�C i0 IIJ?L`t; e�ii- AGENC(�S TD A�ORESS CRIME AND DI50ROER PROB! `_M1'S IPt� C�h1MUNIiY POLICING �TH EA ACTIVITI�S BneBy d�scnDS aay aG�zr cumm�r,i.ry po(uru acori6es your c�3wr ;rr1' enga?z in zs a nsult al tl�e tlme rvin;; ,"�� Cr re�. Pie2n b.^ as de�iisC as pmsidle ir, the s�a^e amvided, using add'fiac! pa?zs il neczuz�: St. Pau1's skyway system has virtually become a city unto itself, operating above the nonnal city activities on the streets below. The system is experiencing additional problems because the metropolitan bus system (MTC) has also been levera�ed by the School District as a means of extending their transportation budget. The MTC has also modeled their routing after the airlines hub systems with the adjacent downtown districts, meaning that at the end of every school day the downtown and the skyway become inundated wiih a simificant influx of high school students. As many of these students aze latchkey chiIdren, the temptation of the downtow�n community is to great to resist and it has become a hangout. This, in tum, is all compounded by the fact that the MTC raises rates durine rush hour periods for the commuters. The students passes then become ineIi,gible until 6:00 Pb� unless they have the money for the hi2her rates. Section II, Paet C You must return this page as part ai ynur application AgE(ILyH2mC: St. Paul police Depattment ORI x�r: riN0620900 SECTION tl - PART D : . :. . ; �, I 7 ' . ' k � .�: .�� I . I • 1;�. fIEM# i Please describe in detail beloc.� and on additional pieces o: paper, if needed: 1) How is your a�ency currently using technology applications Eo improve individual and overall deparEment efficiency and to make department operztions (patrol, research and planning, bookin�, efc.) more effective? z) If funded, how would fhis COPS MORE'98 award improve/enhance your deparFment's current oPeraEions aad specific technology appIicafions? 3) How do Ehe requested resources fit in wifh your a�enc}rs lon� ran�e fech- noloay strafe�? How will fhe fufure use of this Eechnology be maintained and inte�raEed wifh oEher technology applicafions or upgrades to improve your information and technology infrastructure? 4) How will the requested resources improve your a�ency's ability fo do any of fhe following acEivities? Please explain each in detail. • Co11ecE and analyze incident-based daEa • Identify repeat crime vicEims znd/or repeaE problem locations • Offer paErol officers direcE access to incident-based aime daEa in patrol cars • Link calls for senice databases/CAD with other databases such as fhose on a.resEs, incidents, field inEercniews, efc. �) Are Ehere oEher ways the requested resources will specificalIy advance com- munity policinj in your a�ency? 2s Section 11, Part �— Ynu m¢st return tfiis page as part of your appliration � �� -: :,.. . - All of this has become a significant burden on out beat officers in the do�infown system. The addition of the PDTs will a11ow them to access information about past behaviois, network with their fellow beat of�cers and stay in constant touch through the E-Mail system with the businesses in the s�.yway system to better coordinate their efforts and identify the handful of . students who are causing problems for everyone. These units will altow the officers to main�ain shared notebooks, imaees and informal contacts ��ith these students, so responses can be measured, fair and escalate as the situation w�arrants. This would also allow the beat ofncers to network with business peop]e and local residents about problems and concems to expand the eyes and ears of the downtown community. Current radio systems cannot keep up with the demand for information and it is impossible to coordinate the activities of ati the beat officers over the radio and paging system. 0 _ .:. aa-'��+�. Cusent and Future Technolot,,ry Sfrategy Item rl Question �1. This entire proposal, as were our earlier grants, is about technology and improving our ability to move and manage information for the oC"acer, supervisor, citizen, manager and the Chief. We are cuirently investing in an automated Records Management Syster� a depar[ment networ�: and intranet, and a new wireless communication platform for the transfer of digital information. This will piace the entire database of information in our Records function into the hands of every ofncer and supervisor, and every unit within the department. It will also provide a platform that will allow a much more interactive exchange of information with other units of govemment and our citizens in a very direct way over the internet. Iviore importantly, this system will enable the o�cers to query and manipu]ate the infonnation in a manner that will allow them to apply what they learn to a whole range of problem-solving strateeies. We expect to have these systems in place by the fall of I449. Question �2). The purpose of this erant is to expand upon what we are currently building and gain significant additional efficiencies that will allow us to become more effective in the end. Data is an unportant component in solving any problem, but as our profession is focused on people and their behavior. Making sure that we marry the right data to the right people is critical to successful intervention and prevention. Images and fin�erprints are a critical piece ofthat function. The next step in this process is to make sure the information is available in ail of the various environments in which we must work (the PDTs), make sure tfie information is available 2s rapidly and comp]etely as possible to help support the best decisions possible (the I?ataLink), and then provide the tools to make effective decisions on the scene to minimize problems and the unpact on resources as much as possible (the Squibbs and digital cameras). The added benefit is that these pSatforms provide for a basis to share critical information across the entire network in an almost instantaneous environment. The primary focus ofthis thrust is in our patrol and investigative functions. Question Y3). This question has been addressed in several previous responses. Question :r4). a) The entire focus of the RMS and our SITS (Single Incident Tracking System) is designed to collect and analyze incidenf based data. We are currently working on a mapping program sunilaz to the one developed in Chicaeo that will integrate this information into maps tfiat can be designed by ofncers in the field or at meetings. b) We already hzve a prozram in place to identify and track repeat o&�nders and problem properties. These new systems witl greatIy enhance and improve the accuracy of e�sting efforts in both these areas and provide the information aimost instantly, an 00 -�3�1 effort that currentiy requires research and efforts by several people throughout tfie depar[ment. This means freeing more time to work on these problems instead of researching them. . c) Not only will the system offer officers direct access to data, it will do so in their vehicle, on their beat, on their bike or on their horse, virtually any environment in which our officers must work. d) Under our current design, any oficer will be able to query information ori CAD, arrests, incidents and in about 15 other categories. We intend to expand that capability through an Ad Hoc query capability over the course of the next few years. In terms of field interviews, we are just beginning to look at programs that will handte intelligence type infonnation, provide a scale ofits value and sunset its life cycle. This will be a project that will probably take several years to integrate. Fiowever, in the interi� the Squibb and digital cameras offer an informzl system. Both coliect information that can be loaded onco the laptoQs and stored, including iznages and fingerprints. Once loaded, these files can then be shared across the entire network through our local intranet and accessed by any officer. In the near tecm, this should su�ce for sofr data. Question �5) This is limited ocily to the imagination and creativity of the ofncers, investigators and supervisors, with appropriate Iimits established by resources. We have not attempted to offer every single scenario where these tools could be used, rather we_have tried to provide a few glimpses as to their possible uses. There is neither the tune or space available to discuss every contingency. o�-�3v � :� q : . A�en�yHame: st. Pa�i Police Departnent � - ORIr: r�NOb o 00 SEL`IION 11- PART C ' (TEf�R � z ��ir� Po�ian� ��s �mr�ary Communify Policing Activifies �EEIGEN ACTlV111ES In f3rt 8, yau den, onsa2d Ne d,ne sar,'n�s Nat you ez9e:t ro ahiew titmu9h Ne Durehase o1 U�is iem nt tin(ian. Pleasz inCiczt which o/th.<lollawing atirties}va� ohce� wrll engage in as a rsult al uYs Om,z saricg.c � LOOKING AT RE?�Ai CALIS fOR SER4ICE TG ID�NTfFY P�2�BLEh!S �R NOT SPDTS � WORKING WIiH NEIGHBQRH00� R�SID'c�VTS TO IDENTi; Y Ah�6 PRIORIiItE CRiME PROBLEMS ❑ CONDUCTItd6 CITIZ�N SURUEYS ❑ ADDRESSING COPJDIilOtiS i�Ai LAI� T6 C�161c ❑ ASSESSIN6 iHE If�PACT �� COMd�UNIi� °OLICI�1�� EF� 0°iS ON LEV�! S 0� Ct',Ihf: AFi6 FcA� � NlOP,KIi9u WIiH LOC�1L GOV�RNi1754iAL / COMh1U?ifTY P.GENCIES TO p.DD�SSS CRlt.f_ AfdD DIS�RD=R P303lEMS C� Ai IENOL"1, COMMUN(iY M:�TIN�S ❑ Bi,� / FOOi PRi°Ol G N�L°ING COOftDINAiE NEIGHBORN066 WATCH GROU?S � W�3KIPJG WIiH BUSIRESS�S TO ADDR,SS CRLNE PRGoL�MS ❑ T2�lt!lt;L �;RGrdS! Cli(?ENS IN CaMMUNiTY °ni�;,�p;r_. Q COFdDUCilfio CRIM� PRcV6�TI0N WORnS40°S / DISS=�+1!- hlAiiNu Ik�O'MAiiON 6N wAYS Of Pr'��V�Nilhl" Ct�fl��: ❑ EP7�Gi�;�� I,V STP,�tEGIC PtANNIN6 R�L�'�D i� I�NPL"uY:i;'T- 111� COhii�!UhiiY POUCIId6 OL7: fl AC i IYfIES Bne6y descnbe a,7y atnzr cammunlry policin9 ateiiczs you; u:;rx.rs r.7! zryag° ir as a�sult allne dne sarinas tor Li%s nem. `lease 6e as de;aileAas pe.�rGle in �Se s�ace p�onGeq usfig aadi,tionzl pages i/nzc„cary. The DataLink system will not be seen by the community as a pro�am directly impacting their neighborhoods. It will be transparent to their needs. However, if will facilitate an explosion in the scope and value ofinformation management for the of"�ucer working in their community. To the extent that officers no ]onger have to go to a building to download reports from their laptop, that ofiicers can reduce the time dedicated to roll ca]Is, the expanded abiiity to exchange and query information on a large scale, especially as it is related fo images of missing childte� vulnerable adults, wanted suspects, gang members and the like; then we have freed up valuable time for the officers to better evaluate and manage the problems identified in their neighborhoo@s and beats. The idea is to empower our o�cers to take responsibility for their patrol areas, give them the infoanation they need to probiem-soive and provide the time to escape at least part of the tyranny of the 911 system. This system willhelp create that ime for the offcer. Sedion tl, Part C— You must return this page as part of yaur appiiwtian ApencyName: sc. PauL Police Departnent . ' �fll �: MN062o900 ' . SF�170N I! - PART D y : _ ,; : � : : :� . . , �,` , . :�:: � T� J , i' .1� � G � Piease describe in deEail belocv and on additionai pieces of paper, if needed: I) How is your a�ency currently using technology applicaEions to improve individual and overali department efficiency and to make deparEmenf operations (pafrol, research and planning, bookin�, efc.) more effecfive? 2) If funded, how would this COPS MORE '9S award improve/enhance your deparEment's current operations and specific technology applicaEions? 3) How do the requesfed resources fit in with your a�ency's lon�-ranae Eech- nology sfraEegy? Ho�v wi11 Ehe fuEure use of Ehis technology be maintained and inEegrated cvith other Eechnology applicaEions or upgrades to improve your informafion and fechnology infrasfrucfure? ?) Hocv wiI1 Ehe requested resources improve your a�ency's ability fo do any of fhe foilowin� acEiviEies? Please explain each in detail. • Collect and analyze incident-based data • Identify repeat crime victims and/or repeaE problem locations • Offer paErol officers direct access fo incident-based crime data in pafrol cars • Link calls for sezvice daEabases/CAD with o.her daEabases such as those on arrests, incidenEs, field intexc- eEc. . �) Are there other ways fhe requesfed resources will specificaIly advance com- munity policing in your z�ency? 28 Secfion 11, Part R— You must return ihis page as Qart nf your applica:ion Current and Future Technology Strateey Item r2 �o-�ay Question �1. This entire proposal, as were our eazlier grants, is about technology and improving our ability to move and manage information for the officer, supervisor, citizen, manager and the Ctue£ We are currently investing in an automated Records Management System, a department network and intranet, and a new wireless communication platform for the trans£er of digita! information. This wil( place the entire database of information in our Records function into the hands of every officer and supervisor, znd every unit within the department. It will also provide a platform that will allow a much more interactive exchan�e of information with other units of government and our citizens in a very d'uect way over the internet. More importantly, this system will enable the officers to query and manipulate the information in a manner that will allow them to apply what they leam to a whole range of problem-solving strategies. We expect to have these systems in place by the fall of 1999. Question �2). The purpose of this erant is to expand upon ��hat we are currently building and gain si,gnificant additional efuciencies that vrill allow us to become more effective in the end. Data is an important component in solving any problem, but as our profession is focused on people and their behavior. ivlaking sure that we marry the right data to the right people is critical to successful intervention and prevention. Images and fingerprints are a critical piece of that function. The next step in this process is to make sure the information is available in all of the carious environments in which we must work (the PDTs), make sure the information is available 2s rapidly and completely as possible to help support the best decisions possible (the DataLinl:), and then provide the tools to make effective decisions on the scene to m,nimi�e problems and the impact on resources as much as possible (the Squibbs and digital cameras). The added benefit is that these platforms provide for a basis to share criti�al informacion acrass the entire network in an almost instantaneous environment. The primary focus of this thrust is in our patroi and investigative functions. Question �3). This question has been addressed in several previous responses. Question #=r4). a) The entire focus of the RMS and our SITS (Single Incident Tracking System) is designed to collect and analyze incident based data. We are currently working on a mapping program similar to the one developed in Chicago that will integrate this information into maps that can be desiened by o&'icers in the field or at meetines. b} We already have a program in place to identify and track repeat offenders and problem properties. These new systems will ereatly enhance and improve the accuracy of existing efforts in both these areas and provide the information almost instantly, an 00 -�� y ..: effort that currently requires research and e�orts by several people throughout tfie department. This means freeing more time to work on these problems instead of researching them. . c) Not only will the system offer o direct access to data, it will do so in their vehicle, on their beat, on their bi1:e or on their horse, virtually any environment in which our officers must work. d) Under our current desien, any officer will be able to query information ori CAD, arrests, incidents and in about 1� other categories. We intend to eapand that capability through an Ad Hoc query capability over the course of the nex�t few years. In terms of field interviews, we are just beginning to lool: at programs that will handle intelligence type information, provide a scale of its value and sunset its ]ife cycle. This wiil be a project that will probably take several years to integrate. However, in the interim, the Squibb and digital cameras offer an informal system. Both collect information that can be loaded onto the laptops and stored, including images and fingerprints. Once ]oaded, these files can then be shared across the entire network through our local intranet and accessed by any officer. In the near tera� this should suffice for so8 data. Question n�) This is limited only to the imagination and creativity of the of'�ncers, investigators and supervisors, with appropriate limits established by resources. We have not attempted to offei every single scenario where these too(s could be used, rather wellave tried to provide a£ew glimpses as to their possible uses. There is neither the time or space available to discuss every contingency. � � .: o� -�3 y Agen�yRam S[_ Paul Police Departnent ORI �: Pi?d0520900 � Sc�710N II - FA� C �€nr�� Po6i�ng ��i� �m��ry Communify Policing Activifies Ct�M N OFfIGEF AGiIVmES In fart B, yau dzn, onsua¢E �ie One savings GSa� you erpea tn a:hien ri�nugh tl�e puahase al �Sis icm ar trdiizn. P;ease inGrcarz rhicA aIlhe lullawing aevrti�s yau� a�ncers �ill engage in as a �°.suh alIDis 6mz sadrgs ❑ LOOKING AT REPEAi CALIS FOR SERUIGE i� lDEAiIfY PROBLtMS OR H�T SP�TS ❑ WORKING Vdiih Ir'EIGHB�RHOOD RE3IDENTS i0 IDENiIFY A1d0 FRIORIiIZE CRiME PROBLEMS ❑ GONOUCTING CITi?E� SURVEYS � ADDRESSING COPJDIi1C4S TH�i l�� i0 CRIU: ❑ ASS�SSIUG IHE IM�PACI OF C�MMUNII' °OLICIN� EFFpRiS Oh LEVELS OF GRi41� AND F�AR � kiTENDit{G COMMUNITY MEEINGS ❑ BIKE / f00i PAiROL � HELPtPlG Ca�R01NATE GEl6H8�RH��J Pl,TCH GROUPS � Nl�RKIPl� V�1iH BL'SIN�SSES i0 ADORESS CRIME P,ROBLEMS ❑ SRAINIid"c Oi � IC�°S / C4iIZt�S 1� GO'viE�UilIiY P1L4CIId^u ❑ C�NDUCTI.l6 CRIf,1� PRPJ�NTI�M 4V�°Y,�:,O?S / DISS�htl- k�i6�31UFORMAiION 0� WAYS OF PR�V�NTING Cdf�S� � WORKIPlG N11TN LOCAL GOVERNy1ENiA! / COMt�1U�'IiY ❑ u1'GAGIPlG IN STRAiEGIC PIANNi�iG R�t�'=D i01�,a�LEM_�vi- AGcNGIES TO AD�R=SS CRI'dE A�9D DI$O�DER P�03L:MS ING C�MPdLh11TY °C�Lii,ltd6 OPI EA ACTIVmES Bdzfiy desc,�ue any umz� cummurrry pPii:irg acarr0es ynur aF�z� wi!! enaa�e ir, as a �sul� al ti;e Ome savin?s Ier tiis item. Plezse be zs de¢ileG as pnsrible in �e space D�n�ed, using aOAicanz! pages ilne:�.ssary. Properly identifying and tracking disruptive individuals within our communities and holding them accountable for their behavior is the key to chan;ing behavior. This must be done on a community-wide basis ifwe aze going to be successful in the long term. This equipment will allow us to properly identify people in the field, heIping to sort out those on legitunate business from those engaged in improper or illegal activities. Ofren times, even a community at risk is concerned about zero tolerance efforts because of the appazent inconvenience to le,gtimate members of the community going about theu daily business. The ability to minimi7e any inconvenience to the persons involved is a key to maintaining community support for these very effective e�'orts. This equipment would be critical to these efforts. The fact is that many of us do not always carry an ID when we should, and our ability to screen out potential problems quickIy Sectian Il, Pari C— You must reium ihis page as part of your appiitation � .-. Apenc1Hame: sc. Paui Police Department • ORIx: MN0620400 5EC710N !! - PAf{T � � 1 t . . t . s y .L` '� . "'' ,�� . �' t. - ,'�' � �.. [TEM � 3 Please describe in detail belo�+- znd on additional pieces of paper, ii needed: 1) How is your agency currenEly using technology applicaEions to improve individual and overall deparEment efficiency and fo make department operaEions (patrol, research and planninb, bool:ing, etc.) more effecEive? ?) If funded, how would this COPS MORE'9S award improve/enh'ance your deparEment's current operaEions and specific Eechnology applicaEions? �) How do the requesEed resources fiE in wiEh your agenc�s Ion� ran�e tech- noiogy sfraEegy? Hosv will the fuEure use of this Eechnology be maintained and inEe�rated wifh oEher fechnoIo�y appliczfions or up�rades Eo improve your informafion and technology infrasErucfure? 4) How will tfie requesEed resources improve your agency's abiIify Eo do any of Ehe followin� actiuities? Please explain each in detail. • CoIlecE and analyze incident-based data • Identify repeat crime vicEims and/or repeat problem locations • Offer paErol oFficers direct access fo incidenE-bzsed crime dafa in patrol cars • Link calls for seroice daEabzses/CAD with other databzses such as those on arresEs, incidenfs, field interviews, etc. 5) Are Ehere other ways the requesfed resources will specifically adcance com- munity policin� in your a�ency? 28 Section 1I, part U— Yau muri ret¢rn this page as pari of yaur applicafion ao -� a y would be a real asset in these sweeps. The community needs to understand and believe that we aze doing everythin3 possible to minimize any potential problems for local residents. These devices will also allow our officers to preserve this information in computerized' notebooks, comp[ete with imaees; notebool that can be shared with other officers and citizens. We will no longer be Iimited to accessing certain information depending upon the work schedule or shifr of a certain ofncer or officers. Information will also he available to be shared with citizens. We have been working with the courts, for instance, to restrict I:nown prostitutes form certain neighborhoods where they have attempted to ply their trade. Digital cameras that are not dependent upon a slow development process could be used to demonstrate violations of these court orders and would aliow the immediate seizure of the violating party. Probable cause fro criminal activities, more readily documenting contraband right in the report, etc. will provide for much greater efvciencies for the officers and the citizens. Obviously, the fewer times we need to deal with a problem before achieving a solution, the more e�ectively we can manage our problems overafl. o� -�3 y Current and Future Technology Strategy m Item r3 Question : 1. This entire proposal, as were our earlier grants, is about technolo,gy and improving our ability to move and manage information for the officer, supervisor, citize� manager and the Chief. We are currently im°esting in an automated Records Management System, a department network and intranet, and a new wireless communication platform for ihe transfer of digital information. This will place the entire database of information in our Records function into the hands of every officer and supervisor, and every unit within the department. It will also provide a plat£orm that will allow a much more interactive exchange of information with other units of govemment and our citizens in a very direct way over the internet. More importantly, ttus system will enable the officers to query and manipulate the information in a manner that will aIlow them to apply what they leazn to a whole range of probler� solving strategies. We expect to have these systems in place by the fall of 1999. Question m2). The purpose of this grant is to expand upon what we are currently building and gain significant additional efficiencies that will allow us to become more effective in the end. Data is an important component in solving any problem, but as our profession is focused on people and their behavior. Mal:ing sure that we marry the right data to the right people is critical to successful intervention and prevention. Images and fingerprints are a critical piece of that function. The next step in this process is to make sure the information is available in a11 of the various environments in which we must work (the PDTs), make sure the information is available as rapidiy and completely as possibie to help support the best decisions possible (the DataLink), and then provlde the tools to make effective decisions on the scene to miniT.,;�e problems and the unpact on resources as much as possible (the Squib6s and digital cameras). The added benefit is that these platforms provide for a basis to share critical information across the entire network in an almost instantaneous environment. The primary focus o£'this thrust is in our pattol and investigative functions. Question r3). This question has been addressed in several previous responses. Question t'�.4). a) The entire focus of the RMS and our SITS (Single Incident Tracking System) is designed to collect and anaiyze incident based data. We are currently working on a mapping program simiIar to the one developed in Chicago that will inte�rate this information into maps that can be desiened by officers in the field or at meetings. b) We already have a proga.'n in place to identiiy and track repeat o�'enders and problem properties. These new systems will greatly enhance and improve the accuracy of existing efforts in both these areas and provide the information almost instantly, an � 00-�3`1 effort that cucrently requires research and efrorts by several people throughout the department. This means freeing more time to work on these problems instead of researching them. c) Not only will the system offer officers direct access to data, it will do so in their vehicle, on their beat, on their bike or on their horse, virtually any environment in which our officers must work. d) Under our current desigr� any o�cer w�ll be able to query in�`onnation on CAD, arrests, incidents and in about l� other categories. We intead to expand that capabzlit}� through an Ad Hoc query capability over the course of the next few years. In terms of field interviews, we are just beguuung to look at proerams that will handle intelIigence type information, provide a scale of its value and sunset its life cycle. This will be a project that will probably take several years to integrate. However, in the interim, the Squibb and digital cameras offer an informal systein. Both collect information that can be loaded onto the laptops and stored, including images and fingerprints. Once loaded, these files can then be shared across the entire network through our local intranet and accessed by any officer. In the near term, this should suffice for soft data. Question #5) This is limited only to the imagination and creativity of the officers, investigators and supervisors, with appropriate limits established by resources. We have not attempted to offer every single scenario where these fools could be used, rather w� have tried to provide a few gIimpses as to their possible uses. There is neither the time or space available to discuss every contingency. A . .' - ao -��} SE�ON i!1 �Q�s �� t�� °�� When you ha��e completed the Cost Etfecti��eness Worksheet(s) (CEW) for eacn i,em or group of like items that you are requestin?, transfer tne total projec: cost, Federal share and local share from each Cos; Efiecfi � eness Worksheet, sum them and list these amounts as tne COPS MOP�E'9S applica6o;, totals. If you are requesting a w•aiver, you must still complete the Local Share secaon. Please ma;� extra cnpi�s of tln's f ornt ij �iecessaru. TOidLPRQJECT C6ST � FEOERAL SHARE � LOCALSNkB: Qir,s6alCFK� (Line7alCfK� ; � `� �' GOSiEFFEG?IVEkESSWOPKSHEETrt �y�s �� ^ �, COST EFF:CTIYENESS WORKSNE:i ni �j y� �`�� / COSiEFFECTIYEHESSWORRSf.;ci€3 ' \L �'�� h � ��ti �h/t- ��. COST EFFECT1YEfiESS WORKSHEET T i COST fFfEC11VfH:SS W6�kSHfiT �5 G6ST EFEECAVEKfSS WOP,KoriiiT Tn COST EF�ECTIY:kESS W�RKSHEii =7 COST EFfECTIYEHESS WORKSHiET T9 COST E�FECTI4EH:SS'ADRKSNE7 r8 MORE'98 APPLICATION TOTALS S 177,500 ' S 133,127 75 c ' ) j S 4C,375 � 25 �`� j S 77,000 � S 65,000 �S � � I � 5 : S 57,7�0 75 �') ; S 19,250 � 25 �") I S �8,750 75 �°? ` S 10,250 � 2� �') S � ��1 i S � �,) s � ��, � s � �'a, � ( 5E) i S ( ��) � S ( 4'0) ; S ( 5c) S S S 319,500 ; S ( �:) I S ( �u) I S ( �e) ; S ( 4a) i i 5 239,625 � 75 Cu) I S 79,575 � 25 � � i ;'a� not excesG J5� af ro:al i IG�s( ba a; lzut Zi�s o! , prc;ec! cc>C i� tatz! prc/2c! cest Secfion III — Ynu must retum this pag_ as part of your appiication 3j � - oa -�3y Q� enc�Name: s t. Pau1 Police Deoartment � OAI =: ri� o SECi]Oh' N � ::I`1 :�:'�f�?� :��:`..`:ir° A Persannel List each position by title and name of employee, if zvailable. Show the znnual salary rate and tne pesentz�z of rime to be devoted to th= project. Compznsarion paid for emplo}'ees enga�ed in grant acrivities must be consistent with that paid for similar evo:k evithin tne applicant organization. Name/Position Ivone n Cost Total: n B. fringe B�n�ffs Frin�e benefits should be based on know•n aciuzl costs or an established formula. Frin�e benefits a:e for the personnel listed in budget category (.A) and only for tne p°rcenta�e of time devoted to the project. Uniforms, equipment and vehicles are unallovcable costs under tMs grant program. Pl2ase list FICA and Workers Compensation, if applicable. Name/I'osition Computation _Snnual Fringe Benefits hone 'FICA/So�ial Secu:i:y 5 H=aith Insurance S Life Insurance S Vacation S Sick Leave S Reti:ement S '4\"orker's Comp S 'linemployment Lns. 5 O:her S CasE Total: 5 � Section IV — You must return this page as part ot your appiication Apen�yName: sc. PaUI Police Department ORIr: Mxo 0 00 G. Travel Itemize trzvel expenses of project personnel by purpose (e o., staff to training, field interviews, advisory 0 oup meetings). Show the basis of computation (e.�., six people to 3-dzy training at s�X airfare, SX lod�in�, SX subsistence). In training projects, travel and meals for trzinees should be listed separa.ely. Show the number of trainees and the unit costs invoived. Identify the location of travel, if knocvn. Purpose of Travel Location Item CompuEaEion CosE \�ne ToEal: Q. Equipme:rt List nonexpendable items fihat are to be purchased. iVonexpendable equipment is tan� ble prop>rty havin� a use:ul life of more than two years and an acquisiaon cos� of 5�,000 or more per unit. Expendable items should be included either in tne "SuppIies° category or in tne "Other" cate�or}: Applicants should znalyze the cost benefits of purchasing versus leesing equipment, especially for high{ost items and those subjec: fo rapid fechnicai aclvances. Rented or Iezsed equipmene rnsG shouid be Iisfed in the "Conffacfual" czcegor}�. Explain how the equipment is necessary for the success of the project. Attach a narrative describi��g the procurement method to be used. IEem None Cost ToEal: 36 Sectian IV — You must return this page as part af your aQpiicatian :. _.r -�oa-33y St• Pau1 Police Department Agenc� Nane: ORIn: rino62o900 E. Sup�fies . r , .. ,� r2inin� mate*ials; copyi�o P�Pe �'�a e'�Pendable eeuipmer, Lise it°:ns b}' �P2 (o�nce supplies; post.. � items costing less thasi Sa,000, such zs boo}s, hand-held tape rxorders) and show the basis for comptta�ion. Generally, supplies indude any materials �2t are expendable or consumed during the course of the projecc Supply Items CompuEation Cost ' J , =7 rn�c Zj softc:are programs Z� CDPD modems 25 Docking stations/chargezs $4,000 each $ 100,000 ` ��,� � 35,000 $1,G00 each t� 37,500 $1,�00 ezch 5 5,000 /�.� �10� Total: $ 1�7 �_ 50� — Section IV — You must return this page as part of yaur appiicatinn Agen�y Q�� a t a� Y. ♦ t t.� A� ConsultanE Fees: For each consultant enEer the name (if knotim) service to be provided, hourly or daily fee (S-hour day), and estimated time on the project. Consultant fees in excess of �250 per dzy require additional written justi&cation. I�Tam of Consultant None Service Provided Compufation Cost SubtotnL S o ................................ • • •......................................... Con>ultant Expenses: List a11 expenses to be pzid from the orant to t'ree indic�id:�al consultan•`s in addi�ion to their fees (e.g., travel, meals, lodgin�). Item Location Cost Subio'ra!: ..........................................................................................•••.. Confracts: Provide a descripEion of the product or service to be procured by contract and an estimate of the cosE. Applicanfs are encouraged to promoEe free and open comperi�on in acvazding contracEs. A separaie justification must be provided for sole-source conEracis in excess of 5100,000. TEem CosE Subfofat: S Total: 5 � t. Pau1 Police Departmen[ 38 Section IV — Yuu must return this page as part ¢f yaur applira;ion , . . `- Iter.� rl a0 -�3 � Apenc1Hzme: sc. raul Police Deoartment �� ; ZfN0620900 �i. Q�IEC '�,iTS�S L.15i it2Ii'i5 �e- I2_Tlt, � :oeuctio�, telepnone ) anitorial o: 5'cCU*lC}' S27�7C25, li\�°S17�'�-t1��Z OL CO^.='.-'e^. :�l funds) by inajor type and ine basis of th= co:1psta�ion. Fo: examp!e, provide tne square foota�e and ,nz cost per square foot fo: rent, or provide a montnly rental cost and hocv many months to rent. Description Computation Cost None Total: Sec:ion IV — You mcst return this pag° as part ot your application ApencyHame: st. Pavi Police Departmenc ��j� s- MN0620900 Budget Summary YVhen you have completed the budget worksheet, transfer tne totats for each category to the spaces below. Compute the Eotal direct costs and the total projecE costs. Indica:e the amount of Federzl funds reques:ed. Bud�et Category Amounf � A. Personnel B. Fringe Beneiits C. Travel D. Equipment E. SuppIi�s F. Consultants/Contracts G. Ocher Total Di.ec� Costs To.al Project Costs Federal Request Non-Federal AmounE 133,125 S 44,375 ( 75 %) 25 or� io a S 177.500 4� Secfion IV — You must return this page as part of yaur applic�;ion Ite� -2 - . Z�o-�3y Apenc�Hane: sc. ra�1 Police DePaitment - ORI-: MN0620900 $�Q� � u � : 7; �; �'' �' '. �e . ' � � '-. *.- : � �- :] p. Persannel List eacn position by title and name of emoloyee, if a�•ailable. Show the annual salary rzte and tne pesentage of time to be devoted to the project. Compensation p�id for employees engaged in grant zchc'ities must be consistent wi.h thzt paid for sirnilar �eork Fvi+hin the applicant organiza5on. 1�;ame/PosiEion Computation None Cost To Eal: 8. Fringe 8e�efits Frin�e benefits should be bzsed on kno��'n actual costs or an establisned fo:mula. Frinje ben°fits are for the personnel listed in budget cat2gory (-A) a�d only for the peicentage of tim° de�roted to th2 project. liniforms, equipment znd vehicles z:e unalloti-able costs under tnis grant p:oo �m. Please list FIC.4 and 6lrorkers Compensarion, if applicable. \Tame/Position CompuEation Cost ?,nnual Frin�e Benefits *FICA/Social Security Health Insurance Life Insurance Vaca:ioa Sick Leave None Retiremen. � *Wo;l:er's Comp S •linemployment Ins. S pther 5 0 Total: S_ Sectian tV — You must return this page as part nf yaur applicatinn Agen�yName: st. Pau1 Police Departmen[ ORI �: rrn��o 0 00 C. iravet Itemize travel expenses of project personnel by purpose (e.g., staff to training, field interviews, advisory b oup meetin�s). Shoc.� t}1e basis of computanon (e.�., six people to 3-day trauun� at SX airfare, SX lodo -�o, SX subsistence). In training projecEs, trave] and meals for trainees should be listed separatety. Shoti� the number of frainees and the unit costs im•olved. Ideniify the locafion o: fravel, if known. of Travel Locafion Ifem faEion CosE None ToEal: Q. �LlI�7R7B[T� LisE nonexpendable items Ehat are to be purchased. �Tonexpendable equipment is iano bie property having z useful life of more than t years and an acquisition co;t o: 5�,000 or more per unit. Expendable iEems should be included either in the "Supplies" catego.y or in the "Other° cztegory. Applicants should anal5�ze the cost benefits of pccrchesing versus leasina equipment, especialIy Eor high-cost items and tnose suoject to rapid technical advances. Rentzd or lezsed equipment costs should be listed in Ehe "Contractuai" category. Explain how the equipment is necesszry for the success o; the project. Attach a narrztive describing the p:ocurement method to be used. Item Base station and server Cost $12,000 �' I�oEa1:S 12,000 36 Section IV - You must refurn this page as paR af ynur appliration 00-3��{ Agen CjN21l:: St. Pau1 Police Deaarcmenc ORI=:: Miv'0620900 E S�tppiies Li;t items by hp= (office supplies; nos.a�e; iraining matzrials; cop}'in� pzper; and expendzble equ;p,� _ iteins cosring less thzn 5�,000, such zs bool:,, hand-held tape recorder;) znd show the bzsis for compu?ation. Generally; supplies include any materials that are expendable or consumed during the course of the project Ttems taEion Cost Equip 20 vehicle wi[h soitware So:tware interface to C9D/P.!�IS $2,500 550,000 ✓ 510,000 � ToEal:$ 60,000 S=_etinn IV — Yuu must return ihis page as part of your application 3 Apenc/Name: sc. Paui Police Depar[nen[ ORI-: MN0620900 �.� r. �, i �. w Consultant Fe_<s: For each consultant enter the name (if �;nown) service to be provided, hourly or daily fee (S-hour day), and estimated time on the project. Consultant fees in excess of 5250 per da}' require additional writEen justification. ?�Tame of ConsultanE Service Provided CompvEation Cosf ' TBD Subtotal: S 5, OOC S .................................................................................................................................. Consul�ant Expenses: LisE all expenses to be paid from the grant to the individual consultants in addi7on to their fees (e.g., travel, meals, lodgin�). Ifem Location CompufaEion Cost Sub'ro:a!: .........................................................................................................•••••...........••••..... Confracts: Provide a descripEion of the product or sercice to be procured by contract and an estimate o: the cost. Applicants are encouraged to promote frez and open competition in awarding contracts. A separate justification must be provided for sole-source contracts in excess of 5100,000. Item Cost St�bfotal: 5 Total: S 5,000 3 $ SeMinn IV — You must return this page as part uf your appliration �� – (F.�lvs a..r� — ao-�3y .�geacv �me ana Si>Ye: Sa� =L 'au � �o � � c= �ev2r�-!e^[, ` si - ORI = (FBI ID Number3: )�I0620°00 � .r..�fL�'iIl�aliLSl�'a7ltifd[:S i � ��,zs�itan.r : ees =or 2�ch consaitanc enter che name, ;i'<r.own, se_*vice :o oe �rovided, ,ouriy or dayc :ee ; �c3-h011I' QdVj, nIIC 2Si1R1dCE4 RII12 OR Ehe projec�. Consuitanc i2°5 lII ZXCC°55 0I j�JO DeS QnV :2L7ll1I2 addi�onai justincaaon. Vame of ConsultanE Service Provide� Comout>tion Cost The consultar,t cor.tracted for this project wi11 be paid no more than $250 per day for maximum of 20 days. Subfotai: S 5,000 •••-••-........---••-......••• ..................................................•••.....................................••••••-••- Consiitani ,= ��e:aszs L:sc ail expeases to be paid zom the �rant to the :ndividuai consuitants m addition io their iees (e.;. :rave:, meais, lodgin�). Item Location Computation Cost �ubrotai: � ..................................•••••••..................•••.............................................••••................... =onrrr,cs: P:ovtce a desr_iption of the product or seryice to be procured bv contrac: and an e=�:maie oi I :he cosc. .�epiicants are eacouraged b promoce free and opea comoe!i'r.on in awarding cor,sacs. _� seoarate � usancadon mus� �e �rocide� for soie source consac,s in excess or 3iuQ000. ; Item C�s. �i��torr.!. � Tota1: S � ,000 `�' .. 3uc��t Wor::snze:: COPS I�tOP�c'9ti (Tnis aage musc �a re:�;ne�� :o �he COPc prr.ce.... Item �2 �° ' �3y Aqenc jH?fil°: St. Paul Police Deoartnent OBI -: riNO62o9o00 6. Qiher C�s - List i�ems (e.�., rent, producaon, telephone, j=nito:=a1 or secur:ty senices, im�esri�ative or confident;al fwlds) by major type and the basis o: the computation. For example, provide the square footaoe and tne cost per square foot for rent, or provide a monthly rzntal cost � ho�+° many months to rent. ^ ' `--- ComPu{ation Cost None Total: Sedion IV — You must return this page as pa�t ot your appiic2tion C ' �� AgencfMame: sc. Pau1 Police Departmen[ pg�T MNO62o9o00 Budgef �mmary Whem,you have compleEed the budoet ti�orksheet, trznsfer the toEals for each category to the spaces below. Co*npuEe the total direct costs and the total project costs. Indicate the amount of Federal funds requested. Bud�eE Cafegory AmounE A. Personnel B. Frin�e Eeneiits C. I'ravel D. Equipment E. Suopiies F. Consultants/Con�raccs G. Other ToEa1 Direct Costs To.zI ProjecE Cos.s Federal Request Non-FederaI Amount S 57,750 ( 75 °o) 5 19�2�0 ( 25 %) 12,000 - 60,000 S_ 5 , 000 S 77,000 n `� Section IV — You must return this page as part nf your appliratian � -� Apenc�Name: sc. Pavi Police Departmen[ ORI r: ri�o62o900 SEi�iIQ�I I!1 �: :i: 'i: ' �: � �;'. : : ;� . : . „� :.. ... . A Fe►sannel LisE each position by �tle znd name of employee, if a��zlable. Show the annual szlary rate and the pesentaoe of time to be devoted to tne project. Compenszrion pzid for employees engzged ia grant zc: vities must be consistent with that paid fo: similar work within tne zpplicant o:ganiza6on. ?`TamelPosition CompuEzEion Cost Nonz Tofel: S � B. R Bene rfs Frinoe benefit; should be based on known actual costs or zn established formula. Fringe benefits zre fo: the personnel listed in budget catego:y (A) and only fo: the percentage of time devoted to the project. Uniforms, eguipment �nd vehicles zre unallow•able costs under this grant proo zm. Please list FICA and Workers Compensation, if applicable. Name/1'osition Compufation Cost An-�ual Fringe Benefits None ;FICA/Social Security S i;ealth Insure.nce 5 Lielnsu;znce Vacation Sick Leave ReEirement '�tiorker's Conp 5 'Unemoloyment Ins. 5 O:ner 5 ' Total: S � Section IY — You must retum this page as part af your appiication Apencykzme: sc. Pau1 Police Department �fll r: riNO52o 00 C. '[r3vE1 Itemize travel expenses of project personnel by purpose (ag., staff to training, $eid interviews, advisory 0 oup meetings). Show the basis of computation (e.�., six people to 3-day training at SX airfare, SX lodo o SX subsistence). In training projecEs, travel and meals for trainees should be listed separately. Show the number of frainees and the unit costs involved. Identify the location of travel, if known. of Travel Location IEem CompuEaEion Cost Idone ToEa1: 5 � D. Equipmerrt List nonexpendable items that are to be purchased. Nonexpendable equipm=nt is tand ble propery having a usefial life of more thzr, {�eo years and an acquisirion cos, of 5�,000 or more per unit. Expendable iteins should be included either in the "Supplies" category or in tne "Other" category. Applicants should anzlyze the cost benefits of purchzsing versus leasino equipment, especially for high-cost items and those subject to rapid technical advances. Rented or lezsed equipment costs should be lisfed in t�'�e "ConEractual" caEegor�: Explain how the equipment is necessary for the success of the project. Attach a narrative desaibing the procurement method to be used. Item Cost 10 squibbs � $6,000 $60,000 � �'� � �u�` ��. Total: S 60,000 36 Sedion !V — You must raturn this page as part of your appiiration �go��N2ng; St. Pau1 Police Deoartment p��_ MNO62o 60 _� � E 5up�ties List iteris by ��pe (of;ice supplies; postaoe; trainin� mater;als; copvin� paper; and exp2ndable equipme� items cosfing less than 5�,000, such as bools, hand-held tape iecorders) and show the bzsis for compuEaton Generally, supplies include any materials that aze expendabiz or consumed durin� the course of tine project IEems :.rs Cost 7 digitzl caneras $700 each $5,000 ✓ t- i � Total: S 5,000 Section IV — You must retum fhis page as part ot ya�r application . Apen�yNam St. Paul police Department Ofl(;: b �.� ' r, �, t �. �.� CoiutilEanE Fees: For eachconsultant enter the name (if known) seroice to be provided, hourly or daiIy fee (S-hour day), and estimated time on the project. Consultant fees in excess of 5250 per day require addiEional written justification. Name of ConsultanE Ser��ice Provided ComnutaEion Cost . Sz�btotal: ...........................................•-•••••................................................................................ Consulianf Ezpenses: List all expenses to be paid from the gran: to the individual consultants in addi�ion to their fees (e.g., frzvel, meals lodging)- Item LocaEion CompuEzEion Cost Stib'ro.a!: ...............•-•..............-•--• •••._..........-••-•--....................................... ••• •.............._........._... ConfracEs: Provide a description of the product or sen�ice to be procured by confract and an esfima.e of the cost. Applicants are encouraged to promote free and open competition in a�varding contracts. A separatz justification must be provided for sole-source contracts in excess of 5100,000. Item CosE SubEota!: S Total: S � 38 Section IY — Yuu must return this page as part af ynur appiication - TrP� t3 > - - 8� �3��( AgencfHame: sc. pa�i Police Departnent •� OAl �: MN06209000 6. Qther C�s List items (e.g., rent, production, telephone, j�nitorial or security sercices, inves:igaEive or confidenF.z1 funds) by major rype and ine basis of thz computation. For ezample, pro��ide the squzre foota�z and the cost per squzre foot for rent, or pro�ide a monthly rental cos: and ho�n� inany months to reni. DescripEion Computation Cosf None Total: 5 � Sedion IV — You must retum this page as part of your application 39 p � � ' dpencyName: sc. Pzui Police Department �AI;: MN0620900 &�riget S�mmary Whert you have completed the budget w�orksheet, transfer the totals for each category to the spaces belox�. CompuEe the totzl direct costs and the total project costs. Indicate the amounE of Federal funds requested. Sud�et Cate�ory Amount A. Personnel B. Fringe Benefits C. Travel D. Equipment E. Supplies E Consulcants/Conirzcts G. Oiher Totzl Di:ect Cos�s Tota1 Project Costs Federal Request I�ron-Federal AmounE S 48,750 ( 75 °b) S 16,250 � 25 %) .• �� •�• 6 ��. 40 Sectian IV — You must refurn this page as Qart ut your apptication ; - U.S. Department of Justice Oit�ce of Community Oriented Policing Services °°-3.3y _ _'� ' ��=� .: �� s�� t� �bb�ng �t��S tnstruc�arzs fnr Cample�on of Si—ill, Di�r� nf Lo66ying A�iivP�es Ttus disclosuze forrt shall be completed by the reportin� enflty; whether subzwardee or prime Feeeral recipi- ent, ai the inifiarion or receipE of a covered Federal ac6on, or a material chan�e to a przvious filing, pursuant to tit!e 31 U.S.C. secfion 1352. The filing of z form is required for eacn pay:nent or zo eement to nake pa��_ ment to any lobbyin� entity for influencing or attemptino to influence an ofiicer or employee of zny z�z a �Iember of Con�ress, an ofiicer or employee of Congress, or an employee of a Member o_' Cono;ess in con- nection with a covered Federal action. Complete all i�ems that zpply for both the inifial filing and materiai chan�e report. Refer to the implementing o idance published by the O:fice of and Bud�et for additional inEormation. 1. Idena.`y the type of covered Federal action for which lob by'v-�� acavi'ry u and/or has b�n srZUZd to influence tne out- come oi n covered Fedzr2l action. '-- Ide�d-v the s��tus of ��e covered Federzl action. �. Iden�ry the appropriate clessi=ica7on o: t�'us report. Lf thic is a follo,n�-up repor� caused bv a mzterial change to the info*- r.tation previously reported, enter the year and quarter in ��'hicn t�ie c c�ct� Enter the date of fne ]zst pcevi- ousiy s�b:ni::ed re�ort by tius rzooctin� e�tiiy for t�1s cov- err.l Feder�l action. '-. En.°: ��e fuL name, addre=s, city, state znd zip code of the repor.-�� ena;�,�. Indude Con�r2r,ional I3�'s7ict nu_mber, i� !��owr,. Cn>ck th<?D�roprizte clzss�=ica�on o; the repotung en�ty t'r,zt desi�ate> if iE is, or expects to be, a prime or sub- a�.•ard rytpie,nt. Identi"ry tl-ie tier of tne subawardee, e.�., the n:s: suoawzrdee of the prime is the lst tier. Subzwazds i�dude but ue not limited to subcontacts, sub�.nts and con�act zw�sds unde: o ants. �. L` Lhe oroz_-uza�on fi!ing the repor. in item ? c'r,ectcs "Subawa=dee," then enter the full nzme, addiess, aty, s:ate ��d zip cede of the prime Federzl recipient L�clud= Cono e_<sonal D�'s�ict, if known. ered Federal zction (it,m 1). If 1�own, entzr tne full Catzlo� of Federal Domestic?=sistance (CFDA) n�-nber for o ant;, coopera�ve j�ements, loaru znd lo�Z commitn�nt;. S. Ent=r the mos, aopropriate Federal ide.��fy� �u,-nber avzilable fo� t�ie Fede;�i action iden�fie� in item 1(e.�., Request for Proposal(R�P) number, Invi;a�on for Bid (�) number; grant announceL�en; number, tne contract, o anF, o; loan award nu.mber, tne application/prop con�oi nu.mbe; assimed by tne Fede_�1 a�ency), In�] P,e;ixos, e.,., "RFP- DE-90-001." '" 9. For a cove:ed Federel zc5on where there nes b.�� e� awa:d or loan com.-*u�e�i by the Fedezz aoency en,�* ��e Federal amount of :ne aH•zrd/loz� com. fa ��e o u:t= ena'ry ide�t,zzd in i,em g o: �. ' 10. (a) Enter [he full n�. add.-zss, city, s�.te a�-�d zip code of t�tie lobbying entity enozged by the repoctin� regssz-�c iden�- fied in item S to i*uluence tnz covered Frleral action. (b) EnEer the full name(s) of the individu�l(s) pe..or_ni_-�� ser- vices, and include fil addrzs; if difieren; f;om 10 (a). Enter L�st Nanz, Firs, tia-ze, e.nd yliddle Iruti�1(vin. 11. The ce_�tiiying oE"nciai shall sip e,nd daEe the for,n, print hs/hername, ti;le znd telephone numbe:. o. Enter �ne r,ame of tne Federal agency m2t�� e awud or lo�-� co:.�..T��e Lnclude a, ]ea;; one or�an;.�atioral level below' a�=^c; name, ii 4�o��n. Fo: exz.-npie, Depa.*�nent of Tran;por.atior., United S.ates Coast Guard. ". [nter �ne r'rler<�l pro�ra.�n name or description fo: the co��- P��blit recorting Lzerder.`ar t7:is rollectia: of infor,r..:ior. s es:ir.m;=: tu n.rra�e 30 mir.t�t>s per ns]onsz, ir„(udins time for r��i�.:;ing instrneiau, >e:+rc'r.ing �s.ino a.a!a wur.�s, o�,'r�rino and mcir.:.:r.ir,s f{_ lis!a t:redec.', er.d c�rr.ple:irt� ar,d rt✓ir.e.'ns tit t�!(ectior, of inforrruiior.. Sa:d co^;- rr.ents rescrding th� burden estirrm:e or any otf�ernsye:: of this mlfection of iriorm�!ion, inci«1in� s�r��es;ior.s for rC�ttCinS fld5 0lvC'::;, t0 f6:O��ce o% HlannScm�r;; ar.d Biutsct. Pc�er,cnrk Rcdirction Projtc! (03:5-OC-o1. b:'sslain�ton, D.0 ?0�30. Ad�uni�rative kmvs — Ynu musi return ihis page as part ot your application 'j'f j : �.�:` �;;.`' ' � �' .T : J� 7 it: , ' s : f. j: =l: . . `L'�. Comoleie tnis form to disclose lobbyin� acti�'ities pursuant Eo 31 U.S-C.1352 (See recerse for ins�:uctions and public burden disclosure) I. Type of Eederat Action: B a. contract b. grant c. cooperztive a�reement d. loan e. loan �uzrantee f. lozninsurance Z. StaEus of Federal Action: _ a. bid/ofier/appliczHon b. initial award c. pos.-awar3 �?. Nzme and Address of Reportin� Entit}•: � �Prime � Subawzrdee Tier _� if l.�tomn: Saint Paul Police Department 100 East 1ltfi Street � St. Paul, MN SS1Q1 ' Con�r2ssional Dis::ict (number), i: knowz: � 6. Federal Departmen✓�gency: 0 S. Federzl Acfion Number, if kno�sn: Anproved by OVf� os=s-oo1� (as amended) 3. P�eport Type: _ a. initial filin� b. material change For Materia[ Change Or.iy: Year: Quarter: Date of last report _. S. If P.eporfin� EnEity in No. 4 is Subawardee, En:er ?�'ame and Address of Prime: e Conarzssional Dis:rict (nunoer), ii knocvn: _ 7. Fedezal Pro�ram I�amelDescripEion: C'rD� Numoe*, if applicaole: 16.710 9. Ax•ard AmounE, if known: S � 10. a. tvame and Address of Lobbying Re�istrant i (ij irzdiaidual, lnst n.nm_°, firsf name, MI): 11. Information requested tnrou�h this focm is authorized by TiHe SI U.S.0 Section 235Z This disdosure of tobbyin� aCi�i6es is a material reprseatafion of fac: nnon �vhich reliance K'as placed by the tie: aoove when this transaction w-as made or entered into. Tnis disclosure is required pu:- suant to 51 U.S.0 li5? Tn'ss iaformafion will be reported to Cze Con� ess semi-annualiy znd c+z12 be available tor pvbIic inspeCaon. My peaon who fails to file tne required disdo- su:e shall be subject to a ti�il penalty of nat less than S10,000 and not more than 5100,000 for each such faiture. Federal Use Onl}': 10. b. Individual5 Perfornt�ng Services (includin� address if diferenE f;om \o.10a) (last nzme, first name, MI): � Si�nature: Hilliam K. Finnep Print \�me: Chief of Police Title: Telep4one �`o.: 612-292-3588 Date: 6l12/9$ autrto, fo; Local P.eproduc[ior., S:andard � o.m - LLL y. LJ.S. Deparfinent of Justice Of ice of Community Oriented Policin� Services -� �--;,ao -a3 y . - _��__ �l�i�OiiS Regarriing Lnhirying; IIebarmerr�, �ensinn and t)ther Resgor�sihiIity Matfers; Drug-fs2� Wo la� RequiremerrLs Caardination with Affe�l Agenaes; hl�rrSapplarr[ing; and Reten'�ion. � Althouoh {he Depa�l��t of Jusfice has made eve.y eE`ort to simplify the applicafion process, other provi�ions of Federal law require us to see!c your certificarion regazding certain matteis. Applicantr should read the o�lior� citzd below az;d ['ne instructions for ceraiicztion induded iri the regulations to unde:s.and the requirementr and whether they_ apply to a partic�el2- applica_�t. Sio ta;ure of this form provides for compliznce with certificafion requirementr under 28 CFR Paz; 69, "New Rzstricaons on tobbying;' and � CFR Part 67, "Govemma�,-k�ide Debar.nent and Suspension (Nonproauement) and Gove.-nment-cvide Requimments for Drug Free Workplace (GranG);' and the coo:dination and non-supplantino req�;�ents o; Ehe Public Safety ParY�eiship and Commuruty Policin� Act of 1994. Tne ceftifications sh�11 be �eatzd as a mzterial represen_ tztion of fact upon which reliance will be placed when the Deparsnent of Justice determines to awa:d the covered o.nt. 1. Lobbying Ps reqwred by �� 1352, Title 31 of the US. Code, and imolr mented x; ZS CE72 Part 69, for peaons entering into a grant or coo� e: aHve a��e=r.;ent over S1CO,OLt�, u defined at 2S CFR Part 69, the z��lic�nt certifies tha:: A. t�'o Federal aoproprixted funds have been paid or will be pzid, by or on behalf of tne undersi�ned, to any pe:son for inflL encin�r or zt;enotin� to influence an oLicer or employee of any a�encv; a MemSe: oi Co ��s, an officer or employee of Con� e=s, or an employee of a �fembe: o: Co �oress in connr.,ion witn tne making of any Federal o ant; the entedng into o[ any coope:ative ao eenenF, and the extension, mntinuafion, 2newzl, zmenement or modiScaHon of any Federa] o nt or c000e:ative z�r2ement; B. Ii a�v iunes o�4er ci;a� Fe�'e;z1 appro�riatzd tw�ds have beer paid o: w�ili be pzid to any person fo: influencin� or aCemoh:n� to influ_nr-_ an o;3cer or enployee oF zny ager.:y; a Member o; Con�, ess, an o�icer or employee of Co o�ress, or an employee o; a M_mber o.' Cono �s in conneclion wi:h t}tic Federal grant or mop=_.ative ovreenent, the undzaio ed shall complete and suFr :nit Standard For.n — LLL, "Disclosum oE Lobbying Activities," in acco��ance wiCh its ins;ruCior�s; C. t ne undersio ed shzl! reqtire that the lan�ua�e of ths certin'- cation ce induded in ,he award documents for aIl svoaw�ards at aIl tiers (indudin� subo ants, mnhacts under granLs and toopea- rve a�.�mens, and su'.conhac5) and tnat all svb-redpien5 s4alf ce:riryand disc(ose accordingiy. Z Debarmeat, Suspension and Other Responsibility Matten (Direct Recipient) As rzqu,-=d by Exa;utive O:der I?�"9, �oarm=n; and Susoersion, and i;tpi=�ented at 2S CFR Part 67, ior prospective paficioan's i� p:irrary covered tarsac�ons, as denned at � CFR Part 67, Sn.ion 6i510 — A. Tne applicant certines tnat it and ils Prin�p2�5: (i) A:e not presently debarred, suspended, pmpcu¢d for debar.nenL dec(ared inelia ble, sentenced to a denial oi Fedeal benefits by z s:ate or Fed=ral court, or volentarilv erduded from covered traruac;ions by any Federal depa:;_ nent or agency; (ii) Have not witnin a tkueryear pe�od pr cedino this zp ca6on been tonvicted of or had a dvil jndo ent randered zgairut them for commiesion of fraud or a criminai oueruz in connection with ob;aining, attemp;ing to obtain, or perfo; m- ing public (Federal, s:ate or Ixa1) tra,lsa�tion or conCa:: unde: a pubGt hznsaction; violation of Federzl or s:ate zn6t;us; s:atutes or commission of embezzlemen:, thek, Eo o_ry, bn'oz.ry, Fetsification or des;ruc;ion of rrords, mzkin� ;a!se s:ztemenLS, or iec=iving s:olen prope.�; (iu) Are not presently indictzd for or o�.erwi� �,� o: d�illy charoed by a govemmentai entiry (Federal, s;z;e or Iocal) w9th comrtission oi any oi tne o�z�se> enu-�era:ed i� pa.a�.apn (.4)(ii) oi tns certincaHon; z.c (iv) Have not witiun z thcedyez: period prxeding t-tis appL- cafion had one or more public ransa:do, s��deral, s:a;= or loczl)terr and B. �L�nere the applicant is unable to certiiy to any of the statr menis in this cerrificafion, he or she shall aCzcn an explanafion to this appGcaSon. 3. Drv� Free Workplace (Grantees OtherThan Indio�iduals) As mquired by tne Dru� Free Workplace Act of 19SS, and i.-n�le- mented at 2S CFR Pzr; 67, SubpaY. F, fo; o.ante=s, as defin=d at?S CFR Par; 67, Se�tions 67.615 and 67.620 — A. Tne appfi�nt certifies that it wi11, or wi11 continue to, n[ovide a dru� free workplace by: (i) Pubisvno a statement nofiiying em?io}'_<s tna[ tn= unlau'iul manuficture, dis.ribu6or., dspz:s'v�g, poss2ssion o, usz of a contolled subs:ance is prohibit=d in the o zn;>= s �vo: kpiace and spedfi.ing the a:tiorts thz: will be ta.l-en zgai;u: emoioyees ior violafion o; sucn proiubition; (ii) Es:ablishing an on-goin� d;v� (ree a:.a:eness pro� zm to inforn employees about — Adnuvstr'a6++e Foms - You must return this page 2s part of your applica{io❑ sg , _. . . .� (z) Tne dangers oE drug ab�se in the workplace; fo) The o ntee s po(icy oE maintauung x druo Ece-° x'orkplace; (�) ?� �- acailable drug counseiing, �ehabilitarion and employ- e� a=sis:ance progracns: and (,�,) Tne penalties that may be imposed uoon employees Eor drs� abuse ��o�a6or5 occurrixtg in the worlcPla[e; (ui) �(a't:ing it z requi2men: that each employee to b=_ engagrl in the perforre�nce oi the g.�ant bz o ven a copy of the s�tement mquired by para�raph (i); (iv) Nociiying [he employee in the stacement required by paregraoh (i) that, as a mndi6on oE employment under tne o ,.n;, the employee will — (a) Abide by the terns of fne statement; and ('o) No:ify fne employer in wd5ng of hs or her comicdon Eor z�:olation of a mmina! dnig s3tute occurrin� in the �vork- plac_ no la:er than five calendar days aE:er such conviction; (v) tioti,4^n� the a�encV in �vrian�, wiLhin 10 c:lenda: dz}'� after rxeiving no:ice unee: suboamo aph ( iv)(b} :r�m an enpioyee ar otnerwise re=eivin$ actnal notice of such comic- tion. Employecs of convicted employe� must pco�ide no^:ce, induding posi5on fide, to: COPS O45ce,11C0 �Jermont A��e., z\�YY, Wzs:una oM �� otice shx11'vndude the iden�5- cztion number(s) of each af:eded o °�, .nt; (ci) Takin� one o: 4�e follo�ei�� ac:iors, w'ithu� �0 @lenda: cays oY mc_iving no6ce unde; subpara� aph (iv)(b), wi:� resp�: ro any enptoyee w�no is so coneic:ed — (a) i2!�y-�� appropriate pe:sonn_I action zgzu�st such an em?loye_, up to and indudL temw-�ation, coasis:ent wi:n the cequiremeats of the Renabilitation A� of 1973, as anend- ed; or (o) .Requi-in� suc4 emoloy� to pa :iapate satis:ado:iiy c. z d:t� abse asss:ance o: r_nzSilitation pr��ram app�o°'ed .`or suci� pur�oses 5y a Fe3e:zl, s:xte or local hzal:h, law e:�or.� ment o: other anpropriate agency; (vii) Malbng a good fai:h e"r"or: to con:inue to maintain a dn:� (zee workplace throu�n implementation oE para� ephs �I�. �ll�. �Ill�. �Ib'�. �V� 2(ld �CI�. g. The grantee mav inseri im[he space provided below che site(s) for che performance of work done im m�nec:ion d.•i:h the speci6c orui.`. - Place of performance (s:ieet address, city, county, s.aFe,'zip code) Chr.k � if tnem �`^•orkplaces on file tha: am no! iden'i�ed here. �etion 67.E90 oE the xea ations pco'rides that a o antee tnat is a s:ace cnay ele� to make one certification in eacn Federal fis:at year, a mp}' of which shouid be included w•itn each application for Depatment of Justice fundino S[ates and s'atz aoencies mz}' elecc to vse OjP Form 4061(7. Q�ec.F Q iffhes�tehaselededtomnpleteOJPFo.-m'=Lti1/i_ S_ Coocdination The Pub6c Safety P�neship and Community Polidng Ac: oE 199 - requires applicants to ceY3iy thzt there hzs bzzn app�opaate coores- nation v+i:h all a�°naes tt'at ma}' be �ecte3 by the aoplican:'s o.ant pr000ul if approved. AffeGed zgendes r,�zy indudz, among ofn=rs, t�e Qc�:e o: tiie linited S.ats Attoney, s:atz o: lo�al prosz'vt�rs. °r cocxec:ional zgend=s. The appliant cet.i.ies tnat there tus be_n yo propdate coocdin3hon with a1I afiected zgenda. 5. i ion-$upplanting !he app(ican: heieby cerufies that Federai funcs �'ill not be ��ed :o replace or supplant s:zte or local Eunds, or Eunds supplied bY ��e g�ueau oE Tndian Afmirs. that would, in the absence of Fede:al zid, be r,�de acailaole to or for !aw eniocczmen= purposes_ 6. FetenGOn i ne a?olicant hemby ceYUAes that it undestancs thzt i: ms: abide by i5 suSmitted pizn to xe�in Lhe addiaonat civilian pesiaors anc redeployment levek at the condusion of the grant pe;iod. St- Paul Police Department Gante: \ar,ie and Addmss: ppolicztion \o. and/or Project Name: Scfiool—Based Partnerships GRnteeii25/VendorNumber Chief William K- Finney Tvped \ame and Title of Si�a �r_: �•� o• Fnfoeeement Representative: :? s tl:e du!y aufl:or'=ed represer.!ati�e tior.s, ir.e!uding Y)�c p�n Ya mte:r.. EIe T�,,zd \ame Date: 41-600-5 4� �errzin� body, I f�ereby cer:ify thc•* tl:e I am binding the goaeming bodv to ti�e abo�e certi �nern o�czals unl! not relime tiu gonemirtg 6ody of its obligations ur.der tixis e an*-. Norm Coleman Date: �i�, �;ur=_. _ ' � _ � '°�ir ._r '_ _ �:_:.. - �;�,�.�: �SStli '�.5. Department oF Jusfice Ofiice of Community Oriented Policin� Services �v_:a1 proe�sions oi Federal law and policy appty to all o �, .nt prograzrs. We (the Oliice of Community Oriented Policin� Services) n==d ;o secL:e you: assurance tnat you (the appIicanU w•ill comnly wi.n tnese provisions. I: you would like fur.ner infor.nahon abeu: zny o_ tne mzr,e-s on which we seek you: asswa�ce, please con;act is. By your au;norized rzpxesen:a5ve's sio atuiz, you �ssuie us and ceY.ify to l:s thz, you will comply witn a!l legal znd adr,unis ; require- nen� Lia; govem the applicant ior acceptance and vse of Fede:ai g; ant funds. In particvlaL you assuie vs tnzt: I. You ha�•e been le�zlly and ofiicially autnoazed by the approp:iate goveming body (for example, mayor or dty council) to apply for tns g:ant and that the persons sio in� G`�e appiication xnd tnese assu:- ances on your behali z:e au[horized to do so and to act on your benzli wi,h mspeR to zny issues t;iat may arise during praessin� of this a�ptica:ion. ? Y�u `�:1! comply wi:n the p, of Federzl law which lir.ut cer.ain pelitica! activifies o: yoer employees whose prindpal em- ploynent is im m�nection with an acavity financed 'v� whole or in P2' ��z �'tis ��ant. Thesz res:ricrions are s2t for.n in � US.C. � I�Ol, et seq. 3. Yon wil! comply wi.n .ne minimw-n w•a�e and maximum hours pro� sio�s of the Fede:al Fair Lzbor S:andares Ad, ii they aoply to voc. ?. You tiiL zstablsh saizo�ards, if you have no; done so alrezdy, to pro'rubit e-�oloyees fcon �sin� ;hei: positions for a pw tT�a[ is, or � ves :he appearance of 6<L�g, mo6vz.ed by a desi:e for pr.cate oain for tnzr•selves or o;ne*s, particula;ly those witn whom tney ha�= •`an'i;; bi:siness or oLher tles. oender, dsability or age, unlawfully exclude a,ny pe:son ir�n pa:tic- ioafion in, deny tne benefits of o: employment to zny pe:son, o: su6 ject any person to dis., in connection wi.n any p�� ams or acfivities funded in whole or in paR with Federal fvnds. 7hecz civil ri�hs requirementr z;e found in tne non provi- sions of tne Onuuoi:s Cz�ime Contr�} and Safe Shxts pct of 1965, as amended ( US.C. § 3759(d)); Ti:le VI of the Civil Riohts p�; of 19%'-, as aznended (-1 US.C. § 2CCOd); the Indian Civil Righ� .q�; (� US.C. §§ 1301-1303); Section SG; of the Rehabilitztion Act of 1973, as amend- ed (29 US.C. § 79S); Title II, SubHtle A of the Americar�s wi;n pu2oi�_ ities Act (ADA) (�=2 U.S.C. § 12101, et seq.); tne Age Di�-i:nina;ion Act oi 1575 (=2 U.S.C. § 0101, e: seq.); and Deoartnent oE JcsSce h'on-Divimination Reo ations contzined in Title 2S, Pa.-s 35 and _Z (suopar`s C, D, E and G) of tne Code of Fede: al Re�ulations. A. In thz event �ia; any cour; or adrritis; a:i��e zo=ncy ,-.iz:es z iindin� of diseimination on orounds of race, color, re1i� on, na6or.al ori�:n, oende:, dsabiliN or z�e aozL you z�=r a du= praess he3;in�, you ��cee to fonvz.d a copy of E�e i'v�dL�� ;o tie Ot."ice oi Civil Rghts, OSce or Jistice Proo zms, S10 7:rt Stre=t, Iv'VJ. Wzs;i.�a,on. TK 20�31. J. YOL' N'}L �;ve tne Depz-;rient oi Ju.`:c= o: the Convtro!ler Gen_:a] zc:�s to z,, the ri�it :o exam; ne :e:ords znd da�v.meats relz;zd to tne o n:. 6. You �vili comoly witn all requirem=ntr imposed by the Depz:;- ment of J.s :c> as a condi5on or adrniniscz;ive eequirement of tne � ant; wi;rt �ie proe am guide!ines; witn the cequirements of O�fB Ci:cvlars,^-.-57 (ooveming mst calculz6or5} and A-12$ or A-133 (gov- eming zudis); witn the applicabte p�visions of th= Omnibus Cri.-ie Control znd Safe Strz�ts Ac; of 1968, zs amended; with 28 CFR Pzrt 60 (L'nifor.,�. Admirust;ative RequuemenLs); with tne provisions of tne cw;2n; e�ition of the appropriate COPS o ant own=r's manuzl; and �vitrt a!i other applicable laws, orde:s, iz�ula6ons or cir.vla5. 7. You KiIl, ;o the extent prac:icable and corsis:ent witn applicaole la�.; see!c, rzauit and Mre qualin"ed memSe:s of racial and ethnic r.unority o, o::ps and qualined women in order to fuCher efiective lak• enforc=-�en; by incezs'v-�� thei: rzacs wiGtin tne swom pesi- tio;s in yo�: a�enc�: S You �.i;i :.� c, on the o.o.y.d oE rac=, coio;, re!i� on, nztional origin, B. Lf you an_ applv':ng tor a�ran[ o� 5.iCO or morz and Lk�a.;- nent regulaSors (2S CrR ^-2.301 et seq.) rzquire you to su� :tit a-� Eoual O?p� :1:ni:y Enployzn=_nt Plan, you x�ill do so a; ,ne tim= oi tltis appli:afion, u you have not don= so in tne past ti you z:e zpplyin� ro: a o an: o: ]ess tnzn 5500,000 znd tne re�u;zcions reGure you to ma��tain a Plan on 41= in you: oEice, you wil( do so wiJda I20 days oi your o znt aivzru'. 9. You will insure ,hzt the fadlities under your owne�snio, le=_sz o; supervision wF.icn shall be utilized in the acmmplishmen: oi the project are not listed on the Environnental Protec;ion A�ency's (EPA) list ci �iolz:ing Faciii6es and E�a; you will nofi;y us ii vou zre advised by tn= EPA incicatina that a;acility to be used in tnis `;zn: is under co,sid_ra:ion for ]isting by EPA. 10. If your s;a:e hzs es:ablished a revi_w z�d comr:�ent prec=dure under Es=:utive Orde: 123i2 and 'nas selected this pro� am ior review, ynu hav_ made tnis apolica;ion availaSle for rz�•iew bv the s.zte Single Poin. or Con[act. ' Il. You nilf devise a plzn to retain tne increzszd hi:;ng lev_! �ci:h s:ate and Ixai ;unds ai,e: tn> cor.ciesion oi your o;an[. Adininistraiive Pomcs - You must return this page as part ot your applica(ion 67 " _ , s� . :. 12 You will comply K'iti the provisions oE Federal lz�v evhich apply to funding for the pur- cnase, maintenance or e:ihancement oi eqeipmznt (harcware or softwa:e) tnat enables an agenc}' :o receive, s.ore, excnange, anal;ze o: flisseminace c:imir,al intelli�ence information. These reeuire- ments zre set forth in 2S C.F.R. Part 23. If you: g:ant is subjed to the 2S CER. Part 23 reoui;z- �nen:s, you will crezte a s}�s:em operating manuz! to ensure that your agencq operates and main- tains such a sys:em in conformxnce with the oper x;in� p;inciples set forth in 2S C.F.R. Pzrt 23. "'Criminal Intelligence Syste:n" or "Intelligen:e Sys.em" means khe zr.an�emenis, equipneat, fzcilities, and pmce3u:e esed for the receipt, storaoe, intere�ency eschange, d�s- semination and analYSis of criminal_inteiligence � iniomation. Any informztion systen that receeced, stores and cisseminates information on individuals or or�znizations based on their " vnvolvemen: in ciminal ar.icity is a crir.unat - intelli�ence >?sfen. The de[inition includes botF svstems [ha: srore detxiied information on the criminal activities o: subjects and sy5tems that s:ore only iniormation desi� ed to identify indi- viduals or or�anizxtions that are the subject of an incuicy or analysis (e.�., a pointer sys:=m). ( L, ceri;i� canp[iancc �v�ii� il�. a�n�e assurmr_�5 [i_�' �u�rnt ti�r appii:aFio�: mui ttiC tj hed�;:ti I1utd5. Date: Sig, at�re: � _ ORIGINAL Presented By: Referred To: U.S. Department of CURRENT BUDGET 4 WIIEREAS, this grant will be used to enhance and ezpand the Saint Paul Police DepartmenYs technology 5 capacity to manage information more effectivel}' and provide police officers with more effective tools; and 6 7 WHEREAS, this grant awazd requires a S63,625 match from the City of Saint Paul which will be funded by S the Saint Paul Police Department's Asset Forfeiture Fund, and 9 10 WHEREAS, the Saint Paul Police Department needs to establish a financing and spending plan for 11 this grant in 2000; and 12 13 WHEREAS, The Mayor pursuant to Section 10.07.1 of the Charter of the City of Saint Paul, does certify that 14 there are available for appropriation funds of $254,500 in excess of those estimated in the 2000 budget; and 15 16 WHEREAS, The Mayor recommends that the following addition be made to the 2000 budget: 17 18 19 20 21 22 23 24 25 26 27 28 29 30 31 32 33 34 35 FINANCING PLAN: 436 - Police-Special Projects 34120 - Narcotics/Special Investigations 9830 - Use of Fund Balance 34108 - Cops More 1995 3099 - Other Federal Direct Grants in Aid 7499 - Intrafund Transfer SPENDING PLAN: 436 - Police-Special Projects 34120 - Narcotics/Special Investigations 0799 - Transfer Out-Intrafund 34108 - Cops More 1998 0219 - Professional Services OS53 - Cameras 0856 - Data Processing 5oftware 0857 - Data Processing Hardware 138,034 Council File # � 0� 33 � Green Sheet # 104589 63,625 �3 AMENDED BUDGET 201,659 - 190,875 190,875 - 63,625 63,625 , > > > 188,750 63,625 252,405 - 5,000 5,000 - 5,000 5,000 - 95,000 9�,000 - 149,500 149,500 3G , , � , 37 38 THEREFORE BE IT RESOLVED, that the City Council accept this grant award in the amount of 5190,875 39 to enhance Police Department technology and approves the changes to the 2000 budget. Requested by Department of: Police By: Approval Recommen ed by Budget DirecAr. � Adopted by Council:Date: Adoption Certitied by Council Secretary: - s • � _ Approved by ayor:Date: { By: �� CITY S INT PAUL, MINNESOTA �� Committee:Date: ut Paul Police Department has received a 5190,875 Cops More 98 Grant from for the period September 1,1998 through February 28, 2001; and By: y'_ Form Ap o ed by Ci y Attorne : B • Approve bv ayor for Sub � �o� �o�� BY� �Yv�,P i��u'UU'i'� CHANGES 34'I 08COpsMOre98G mnt cr2000 i -,� DEPAR7(r1ENTlOFFICFJCOUNCIL Police Department CONTACT PERSON 8 PHONE Chief Finnev 292-3588 MUST BE ON COUNCIL AGENDA BY (DATE) Please process ASAP TOTAL # OF SIGNATURE PAGES ACTION REQUESTED 3/10/00 7 GREEN SHEET rvo. 104589 INITIAVDATE INITIALIDAiE �� u � � � i J� �CITVATTONNEY_� ❑CIttCLERK �FYNNCIALSEAVICESMR [r/f/\ �FWINGLLSERV/ACCTG � T 3 �1MYOR(ORL595TpNT)�" � �f{��J�qK.�([5 (CLIP ALL LOCATIONS FOR SIGNATURE) � Approval of the attached council resolution accepting a Cops More 98 Grant and establishing a 2000 spending and financing plan for the grant. I ION Appfove (A) of R¢�ect (R) PERSONAL SERVIGE GONTR4CT5 MUST ANSWER THE FOLLOWING QUESTIONS. 1 Has �his personlfirm ever worked untler a con[ract for this department? PLANNING COMMISSION vES NO CI8 COMMITTEE 2. Has ihis personmrm ever been a city employee? CIVIL SERVICE COMMISSION YES NO 3 Dces this persoNfrm possess a skill not normally possessed by any cutrent city employee� YES NO � 4. Is Ihis personKrm a targeted vendoR YES NO Explain all yes answers on separate sheet antl attach lo green sheet The Saint Paul Police Department has received $190,875 Cops More 98 Grant from the U.S. Department of Justice Por the penod September 1, 1998 through February 28, 2001. (Attached is a copy of the grant ) The Saint Paul Police Department witl use funds from this grant in 2000 to enhance and expand technology IF Ability to cohance technology tl�at �vill allow police officers to manage inCormation more effectively. i�one. Loss of rant funds to enhance technolo ��`�� '° �`� r g gY. ,. r ,., �,. ,.e,::� f', dL:'(a d Fi f3 Gll�� ,',".oh�xp: - . .. , . .°�:-� s - . , . _ ,._ . _ . �. UNT OF TRANSACTION $ 2�4,�00 COST/REVENUE BUDGETED (qRCLE ONE) YES NO souRCe U S Department of 7ustice Grant ACTIVITY NUMBER 3410A & 34120 . INFORMATION (EXPLAIN) 34108CopsMore98Grant.gs 2000 --� '�. �' Office ofthe Director 1700 Yermontdrem�e. i� �cas��ro�. Dc �osio Chief William K Finney St. Paul, City of 100 East l lth Street St. Paul, I�IN » 101 U_ S. Department of Justice Office ojCommurdry Oriented Policing Services (COPS) September 9, 1999 Re: COPS MOFtE '98 Extension - Grant # 98CLWX0143 Deaz Chief Finnev: �O -�3� L'± l � _ J ,'/ .; ._� � �i �� ./ �. l�� _ �, : r:_, , � � �.0 n �� 0 lY � � � � � I am pleased to infonn you that your request for an e�ctension of your COPS MORE '98 has been approved. Your new COPS MORE '98 grant end date is 02/28/2001. As you ]mow, the funds provided under COPS MORB'98 must result in an increase in the number of full-rime-equivalent (FTE's) deployed into community policing. The level of redeployment is indicated on the awazd page of your grant and is the e:ipected result of the funding of your original applicaiion. In addiuon, achieving and maintaining the level of redeployment is a condition of your �ant. We etpect this estension will enable you to maintain the level of redeployment outlined in your orig.nal grant_ Ifyou have any questions regarding your extension, please contact the U.S. Depazttnent of JusticeResponseCenterat 1-800-421-6770orcallyourgrantadvisor. Sincerely, � ` � � � �..,$�! Man' Lou LeaiV Acting Director _ . :�:: :.. :, ��_��s: ; , t: , � . ;; � —� � a. /^ - � -`r,_• U. S. Department ofJustice �ffCG' Of COt7113110i1�' OI'I211P2lI POIIClit� Serviees COPS MORE 98 AWARD Applicant Organization's Legai \ame: St. Paul, Cin� of Gru�rt _: 93CLWX01�3 ORI'.: >1\06309 1'endur °: �1600v3! La.+ Enforcemeni E�ecuti��e \ame: dd<Iress Cttr, Starr. ZipCode: Telephuna F<cc. Covernment E�ecutive Name: .�Ct[il i'S5 Cin'. Stutc. Zip Cnc(d Tel��phu�rr Ftu Award Start Date: 9.' { J f 99S Ai�ard Amount: S 190,87�.00 Ci��ilian Personnel Award: S 0.00 Equipment/Technology Award: S (90,875.00 /"\ i .'i �Juszph E. Brann Di rectu r l'i�� `:`.'�f ✓ �. � " "., ' Datz \umber of Redeplo}�ed Officers: \umber of Redeplo}�ed Officers O o -�'S e 11 �? " B� signin�,this a��ard, the si��nawry of6cial, are as�in� to :�bidz b� the Cor.ditions of Grant . - 1�vard found un die re� erse side of this dxument ' �. � � 1 ; .. : �. �_ . ��-+----e..:� ';+ Fi['re� ot Poi�ce Sienaturo uf L2�-1 Eoforcemznt E�ecuti�e ��ith Typed\ame uid lltleof Li« EnfUn:ement G�eniei�c Uatz the aud�uritr !„ , this _ranE a��ard I �� I ' Q�f� ! �, Sormar Caie�:a�; ;I,i�; �.�� i;�_�— Siliaturc ofGu�emmznt��ecutice with the Typed �ame mid litleuf Go�zmmrnt authont} to.ccep[thisyant-award. Esecuti�e Date Chizf IViIGam h. Finnz�. 100 East I I[h Staet St. Paul. �t] ;;101 (612)39?-;>33 (bl��q�_;;.� �la�orNorman B, Colemnn I: `V2SI K2I�Ofl°_ BOUI2Vdit� Cit�' FIaII- Room 390 - St. Paul. \IN ��10? (bl'_)266-5�10 �( � � � � q ,._ �� A�+'�rd End Da[e: 8 31 1999 7.60 :\umber of Redeployed Officers YS �,... o,,� '��, o � �'°-�,,;�_.�°_ U.S. Department of Justice Office of Justice Programs Washingmn, D.G 20537 DATE: � FROhI : po - 33`� Auaust 13, 1998 Grant Award n 98-C?.-WX-01?3 Josina Talbert, Grant Moni�or, COPS Office � �i.l`/ �s°-�'.�[-t-L�' �. De amo, L., Financial Analyst, COPS Branch, Office of the Comptroller SUBJECT: Financial Clearance: Application ;', 8-3551-�-CL, for the St. Pau1, City of. A financial analysis of budgeted costs has be_n comoleted. Costs appear reasonable, allowable and consistent with existing guide- lines. Exceptions/Disallowed Costs are notec below. Cost CateQOrv Equipment: Suoplies: Contractual: Total Costs: ***Disallowed Costs: Grand Totals: Federal Share: 190,875 Local Share: 63,625 ° Tota1 Project Cost: 254,500 °auiDment 189,500 60,000 5,000 25=,500 65,000 COMMENTS: The total�project costs were recuc°d by 5'S,000 due to "programmatically disallowed" costs in tae Sau �-�:budget ($60,000) and in the Suopiies buccet $5,�000). � Prior to the obligation, e.�:ueadi�ure or drawaown ox grant funds for indeneadent consultant =ees in excess oP $250 per day, prior aporoval must be obtained =rom the COPS otfice. � JDOn ��Gnc� �� {v�/� '� �� /LDD/0 / � - _fla-�ay SECTION 1 • ��g��d [��o� Pl:�se aruuer a!I oj t'r_ jollcc�in� q�cs`�s con.yfeic!v. Ii r.!! 8« qu.^s:ion> ar: not m:>.o-_r_°d, tiL a�tirntio>•� , cc�i!/ be co>uidered fricom.plefe and mzy noi b< rrs_uK'd ort<rtded. AI! requ=sted irt;onrmiimi must 6e n/pe �. Primary App[icanf �rganizafion p315(:fifAP?LICSBTOA�:AIIS St. P2U1 Police Department ; fl; l� ra u:a:/ hs 6r.n w^gre: aa f..^•' d� �: 0,5r. alhz�ce H,a�zrs C�-= e.Giclf EIA NOM 3id l.:75:;n -: ry's r'n'�- �_• C_. rr..r Gr,:a•s= fP= r;:::ra'.ier.a.•e Se: r.z f6; siaJ? be cs•* 41 6005�21 A??LICAhT I.eESCt �al NUkBE�t;bz:;z>' °lsct!'m+:s) r�o�a�t caK�a:ssiouu oaraier ur.�aa N�N Ob � 0900 MN4 AiET0UC9h1nkC➢M6F�8LiNfXFOACEA4EhTSi&YICES?1!'rs'nm�N.��rar.z2:.��'r.ix' � NO � �_S Cc^ u/L^•e :c,l:zcf iax :ni:r.e^=nt CeY'�'��':^: �n tY f6e�:ni: ts.z;' ian_^a::e i�;r :•::a� ' Law Enforcement informafion U'N itiF�dCFH:Yi Ea:CUiIYiS M14E wi.l.lia�a K. Finney mE C of Police t6i4CT X,tki St. Pau1 Police Departnent A49�ESS 100 E. llth Street crr St. Paul iiLEiIOSE (6t71 29� 3�88 - tiAl!: 0� CGNi:Ci Pi'SOH IS T�Un ui7:nik:� Wd01$ F�.Iti�.'. n.,�.. AmvniG2i'V BT1�,°5 _ 00 E. llth S[ree[ t. Paul : env=. 612) 2°2-3507/(612) 2 76 Governmeni Informafion F7 21? 711 � 60Yi�1.l'MiXT IXECIfiIYES Mf4: P,orn B• CoLenan H:MF Of 60YE9N.v.:Ai EXT(fr City of St. Paul :?�iESs Roon 390, City H211, 1� k'• I:e11 Blvd. Cfi1 cr Panl iEtE7NUkE �- (612? 266-8510 FU (612) 266-8513 21? CUUE 551 st� MN i!S 55101 �� ;t,v�� imt itesearch(Grant Pianager./Lieutenant TmE Sectiun I— Yau must return thls page as part of your application , - -� General [nformafion TiPi OF lSN ENiOACEMiNi /EeN:7 I� hill7d1C1°AZ ❑ SikiE POtICE ❑ COUtiTY PD ❑ S�iERI; F ❑ INDIAN TRI6,L ❑ i°AMSIi ❑ SCHOOI ❑ HI,NWAY P�iRO� ❑ �NIVERSITY/CDLLEGE (0 PUBUC ❑ PRIVAi�) ❑ °UBLICHOL'SIhdG ❑ CONSORTIUt� ❑ PARK/REGR;AIIpN ❑ GiHER(pte�s2specij) tldS T�Ud JUftIS01C11pN AECENE� UiNEA COPS 69LVT5? 0 Y�S ❑ NO li'YiS; U1pER WNiCX PdO6RlbS? (CF.cce a7 �}z: a,+p�) � C�PS: PNAS� I � Cp?S AH�� ❑ COPS FASi � C�PS M�Rc'�5 � COPS MORE'9n ❑ UNIVERSAL HIRIN, PRDG?,AM ❑ iRQQPS Ta GQPS � PpCfCE CORPS ❑ PROBLM-SOLVING PARTWEBSriI?S ❑ R�GlONAL COh!MUUIiY POLIChVG I1'SIITUTE P�PULSTIOA SiRYE� dS OE L°50 P� CiNSUS S00aAE 272,235 :2R:r pnd 2.'.2Gx e aiY_-f'"¢ fj�tetf.°ACLL,.u;r 0; L^e ,ccsr.c;hra I}�Tp,{!gR03FFG3CFSfdiXntltpSOFIfiP.90r, 570 562 ] UPUY SNidi FIS�;! �I��;SS? ;1,':_; ;i:�c s: r^.r�:.v cn n�r_; zzv ,� ^."r�`kzaS: c:,•,.: rrfi �i ae [:s:g72 r+.:s w a azrr_�) ❑ YES 0 ��p WN,ii IS THF SOOAC; OF YOOn A6Eh'P.YS LOCl: C:SY. IAATCH? Citv of St_ p�„i �crt carun�tMV�� AElYG; S FlSCIl1T„i� FROt.i: 1/ 1/ 98 iG 5ignatures �� (�� Gz0.° B ior ceim8;sy lc✓uyT.altl�e iiJcrmauon prpdpy4 or, �qlar,� e:r:� araa:�rae mCe d.�ldm� L�n�Mg=! nr,A�zzMLt;7r,'orN u/9r.aftnr� C• aDGfic:n(mysltomOn y^h alf t;,Ga�an an? prpgnm rv7uirzm,na olAe PrDlr, Sahry Parye;nrD aaALaamnoryPoGlioy,(7m 1?9: u.ACCSnrry�^_mene o{f�n/6e U'NEXFOA M' S Hf .� EC q�e SS 9lNA:fG,gr,��sr,v;auredps•,wnram�onLL•'ucn;n't,^�'�.�a) �ATE l�-�. C� . �� f l� 4. P' e�n Intergovernmental Review Process d�h D0.TE SUBhfITiEO iU SiATE SIRS:E POIYi OF CO5TA^,i /ll�cr3" lzru�;� m me;,� w�nre frc ;:5i_ tr.cgrrrn. e�;d rte.�x i:. s(�a N� A,a_n6r1 0%x.s: �fii m Ne.^,z•• uo wt.n>�z a p arer� ° m: yr FwrY crGr.�:! Ir reaex) CiO4 HIIN9EA Sflli A7PIIGTIOM IDiSfir�i9 {fartaz$,�QCra'tyc�) 70.71� ❑ EOMMUNIZY POLIC�N6 TQ GOMBAi DOM€3iIC VIOLfNCE ❑ ADVAP7CIh; C�MhfU�lITY POLICC�u ❑ ANiI-�Atd61�dITIAii'/JY�UiH FIR:kR61S VIOLENCE ltllii�TIYE ..— . ... �. ...� �.✓.�c..n. a..0 Nw� ��uuY��.'��/ �/'�'i Pf C^3' Idh' L�I�JI.'PRi Zy:.:J°$ h:.Yf. Y�F*+u .a: fa::zr,c'z s`.eif's 6°..:<u-zaa++mzt xan_ Da.ar�atrms znGa_s earie:: �e 5� ='�iY+�r.:a;a�e—<::rvcz;n:sie:i's:::J�re.miuner.,zr�laxenicrc.—,:raetim,r./) 1 � Sedion f— You musf retum this page as part uf ynur 2pplication � -a� -��y AgElILy}{2m°: St. Paul Police Deoa:tment OAI �: r�r:o62o900 SEL�i1ilN f R�6�b�� Please outline below your reten�on plan for the item(s) requested in your MORE '95 applica�on. This plan should indude information on how you will continue the proposed activity and level of redeployznent aftzr Federal fvnding has ended. If this is left blank, your applicafion may not be considered for fundin�. The principle thrust of this grant is to enhance and expand the St. Paul Police IIepartment's technological capacity to manage information more effectively, thus providing officers with more effective tools for problem-solving in our community. Therefore, our ongoing support is contiugent upon our ability to maintain and upgrade our technological infrastructure and equipment. Item �I: In 1995 and 1996, the St. Paul Police Department received two COPS MORE gants to unplement an automated Records Management System (RMS) and migrate from our current radio frequency system to a CDPD (Cellulaz Digital Packet Data) system for transmitting digital information. These projects aze making ekcellent progress and we anticipate being able to piace an unprecedented amount of information in the hands of the street officer and supervisor within the immediate future. Most unportantiy, we anticipate that these tools will allow the officer to manipulate this infonnation in real tune. Most officers actually suffer from information overload. There are so many difterent programs and 'uutiatives, so many reporting sources and so many differing priorities established by various advocacy groups, it is virtually impossible for most officers to keep current with the volume of information they receive. Under our new information system they will be able to manage the flow of information into their laptop computers and query our Records system from remote locations in real time. They don't have to try to remember all this information, rather they simply have to Seam how to access and manipulate the information. Unforiunately, when we originally submitted our 199� and 1996, COPS MORE grants there were very few of these systems in the place. Costs were best guess estimates. There was a corollary belief that the price of computing was coming down and that the price of lazge systems and laptops would decrease with the passage of time. While that has been true in the general mazketplace, it has not been the case in law enforcement. While the price of laptops in the business environment have declined from $4,000 to $2,500, our uruts have increased &om $2,500 to over $5,�0� per unit. The Panasonic model, one of the eazly price leaders just increased their cost for tfie CF-25 by $1,800 per unit. The same trends can be seen in the larger softwaze and hardware instaIlations that run CDPD, RAM and EAACS systems. The result has been the need to scale back the amount of critical peripheral equipment which we can afford to add to the system. 1E Section i— You must return this page as pari of yaur application .a � � �' ,, Jn our case, we have lost the ability to purchase what are referred to as clam shell or palm . pflot type devices (PDTs, Personal Data Terminals) to our network which a CDPD infrastructure fo operate. Laptop computers add a tremendous d'unension to the ability of officers to manage information, but they are essentially tetfiered to the squad veFricle or its cIose proximity, While portable, they can not function for any duration away from a power soarce and they are not practical for an officer to carry around. The PBT device overcomes these shortcomings and is critical to the successful operations of our beat, bike and mounted ofi'icers. They can attach to a belt, a bike or a saddle and can be used for an entire shift without the need to recharge. While they cannot be used to take a report, they can be used to access the same information that is available to tfie Iaptop. They can run queries, access report information, paging, access our intranet netwark, function as a pager, support E-Mail, and support mapping programs among oYher applications. The whole emphasis in COP is to get the ofncer out of the squad and into the community. In an era that is being driven by 91 l, this is becoming increasingly difficult to accomplish. The second task is to give the offcer a set oftools that are just as effective when he/she is functioning zway from a squad. These devices accomp6sh this feat to a significant degree. They aIlow the beat, bike or mounted officer who is interacting with the communiry to bz the equiv3Ient of our entire RMS and intranet system right into the community with the off,tcer. It creates the heart of a service oriented delivery system. This same argument can also be made for other officers working in different capacities, such as vice, nazcotics and FORCE officers who work with local resident block cIubs to reduce drug sales and smoke houses. In terms of ongoing support, we have already made the commitment to support the infrastructure of the larger systems. These are pecipherat devices tfiat are merely expanding our current systems in criticat capacities, so ongoing support shouldn't be a problem. Item N2: The second item is for creating a test data link. Even within the CbPD environment, transmission speeds are an issue as we migrate toward digital images and fintrerprint scanning. TraditionaI RF frequencies operate at 4,800 or 9,600 bits per second, while CDPD operates at 19,200. However, a traditionai j-peg fiie for a pfioto can include 4.5 megabits of data. Even with the new compression formulas under NCIC 2000, muttiple images will begin fo slow the system down considerably. A vendor, Coded Commnnications, has developed a DataLink system that will allow transmission rates of 1 megabit per second. Under current compression rates, this would allow for an almost unIimited transmission capacity; multiple images, fingecprints and fe�ct almost instantaneously. The drawback ofthe system is that if is currently Iimited to a 3 mile radius. However, it would only require a squad to mornentarily drive through this radius and they could download ancUor upload their entire laptop in the space of a block. It is also expecYed that performance wiIl improve with time and they may be able to expand this radius considerably. Bven if Yhe radius doesn't expand, it would only be necessary to pIace a few towers at strategic locations to effectively canvass the entire city. We aze very interested in testing this system. Ongoing support would obviously depend upon performance, but we are assured by tfie manufacturer that Yhis is a stand alone subsysfem that will integrate with our developing CDPD wireless system. It shouid he relatively easy to support the DataLinlc system zs we could leverage our existing tower cites for tfie hardwaze and the software covld be supported by our Systeins Unit. 16 aa -��y� Item r3: We have entered into a tentative agreement with�Digit la Bi mo etrics, Inc. They have apptied for a grant to establish a demonstration project in the Tw�in Cities metropolitan area to 5eld test a fingerprint scanning/di2ital mug shot device. Pending their successful receipt of this grant, they intend to develop and test a device that will scan single digit fingerprints and take ' digital images of unidentified suspects and check their identity aeainst a regional database, and subsequently the Federal IAFIS database. As a participant in the study, Digital Biometrics will supply us with a limited number of devices (1�), and all of the local infrastructure including a server, routers, hubs, data lines, an interface to CDPD, etc.. Their contribution to the St. Paul Police Department is currently estimated at �332,526, and these items will remain in place when the project is complete as our inventory. As part of the grant, they have also agreed to either build a regional identification infrastructure to support their system or upgrade the states regional MAFIN system to support integration with their software. IIowever, the ten devices promised is insu�cient for an agency of our size and population. We wish to leverage this demonstration project, if it is successful, to add devices and enhance our digital image capability within the department. These costs are relatively sma11 in compzrison to the size of the project, but will enable us to expand on the Federal govemments initial investment in the project into a usefui tool that can be utilized throughout the department rather than a few isolated locales. In the event that the erant is unsuccessful, then we would invest ur offthe shelf equipment currentty on the market for fineerprint readers operating on our local data base. Ongoing costs for maintaiiung the devices have not been determined at this date as there is no practicat field experience with the units. Nonetheless, we expect these costs to be relatively small in comparison to the grant and our Department has both a Systems Unit and a Communications Unit that should be capable of performing routine maintenance. Actual costs, ior budgetary purposes, will be charged to the units where the devices are assiQned. We have also aereed that their will be shared learning for our systems staff as part of the training and integration in the grant, which will allow our unit to support the software applications. In terms of costs £or access to any outside databases, the grant is desiQned to eliminate such future costs in exchange for upgrading systems. In the event that strategy faIls, dollars ��ill be allocated to carry these costs for some time into the future £or the demonstration participants. Because this request is for improving technology and equipment, there are no requests to fund positions now or into the future. oa .--�� SECiION 1[ — FA�'T A . �� 1 � �� 3�� pLase Eype a[I respor.ses. Please lea�c r.o F•r.es blarzk. If 1'a.es are lej' 6?ar.k Lllf afF1I1CR�30P. J;:ll bc cor.sidered incomplete m:d rr.ay r.ot bc reaiemed or fundcd. Rgency/�rant (nforma�ion 1un�sn�cnn.rs tE6L AzxE St. Paul Police D St. Pau1, MN zrtmenc arzet h:uE Any Brown/Gary Briggs ua� a rt�o62o�00 hTlyt Pr.76: g12) 2°2-350 7((612) 292-3764 rr=[ a� s�au�sr ❑ Clvl! I°.�dS [� TECHPl�JiOGY/�QUI%41:Ni OR BdlEi U:SCAI�iIOX Oi PiQUESicO fiik. S'SiA UP. ePCIIP OF Uli fiiBS AEiidRi� 1G IX 11Ai o 6iL01� Pa1m PiloC Handheld Devices Gost E�#ectiveness Galculations LIH_ t - OF ER LINE 2- ERTRY-LEVEt FRiHGE HEHffIiS 6F SW�7P�N P9tICE �FFIGER (.s of J�:�. 1..199?J LIN= 3- d6� LIHES i kR� 2 LINE 4• h1ULTiPIY LINE 3 BY .7a LINE 5- EHTEA FI6URE OH LfBE 4 Ofl S25,000, WHICHEVEB IS LESS LIhE 6- T�iAI COST OF ITchi, SYSiEM OR GR�UP 0� 11KE l�E}tS � se.o6s S io,i3� S 46,20� S 34,6�� zs,000 S 17 � , soo (100°r6) LIHE 7- FE�EAAi AMOUNT REQUESTE� C?r o° nc ror� tr�.� l�;i �: torz%ra.s eas' (i�:�e c; S i33 ,1z5� %__�_�'�� LIHE 8• �IVIOE LINE 1 8Y LINE 5 $ 5.34 Section If, Part A— You must reiurn this page as paR of your application . _. � .� SE�Ii1)td tl — PAF€f A . � z � �� .- , piexsz tvpe a!1 rzspor.ses. Please leave r.o l:nes blank. If lines arc Icj`t blar.k, tL•e appleca:ior. u�i1( be cor.sidered incorr.ple.e ar.d rnay not bc rcaie:ucd or fVRGf4�. Agency/Grant Informafion �ua�saicnoMS �¢oxt kzx; S[. Pau1 P Sc. C�!��-�i, caeT4cr u,� �. iTPi 0* fl;@6ESI [� TECH:O�OGY/e�UiPAI:P�T OR CIVIt1ANS 6�Li OESCTIRI05 OF AEpUESi:O �ik, STSIi� DH iR00? Oi U1.F fiiYS RiiE�1RiG SG !4 41f: S SEI�'4 Data Link _. Cost Ertacfiveness Calcutatians LINE i• ENiAY-LE4EL SAtARY OF SP�ORH POIiCE OFFICER ,zs ol�a, i. 19S9J S 36, o6s LIKE 2- EYTRY-LEVEL fRIkGE BEHEFIiS �F $WORN POL!CE OFFICEn (zs ci ✓�n i. 1°9�) tlfiE 3- A�C� LIhE31 khd 2 LINE 4• MULTIPLY LINE 3 BY .15 LIBE 5- ENiER FIG�RE ON LINE 4 OA S25,00�, 4JHICHEVER IS LESS 11HF 6• TO iAL CDSi Of iitk, SYSiEM 68 6ROUP OF LIKE ITEMS S 10,137 � �6.20� S 34,654 S 25,000 S ��,000 (10�9�c? LIN�1-FE��RALaM0UN7R�QU�STE�Gz�ber,cn,o;eG'•,ani��:,r:�;,:;!it=mccst(rmso; � 5�,isd 7;��% IIHE S- Q1Vl�E LIHE I BY LINE 5 S 2.31 Section Il, Part A— You must return this page as part oi your application „ M. r � . - �a -� 3y SECTiEiP� 11— PART A i�Ei� T 3 � �� Plcase type ¢f1 respor.ses. Please Iea�e r.o iir.es blar.k. Zf tir.es cre lcft binr.k, the applica:ion :+%ill be cor.sidered inconplete ar.d may r.ot bc re�:cwed or f:<nced. A�en�y/Grant (nformation JU9:SQICi1:AS tfoAL N:lii St. Paul Police Dep2rtnent OAI � PSN�6209�� CIiL Sf:ic St. Pau1, MN C�fiiACf amy Brown/Gary Briggs 3k�z�� e�cv: (612) 2 2°2-3764 Treia�ntPUES� �. po ❑ CIVI,I�;;S � TECNSOiOuY/�QUI-b<�li BfiIEi OiSCBiFi1�N 0'r P.i�UiSSEE liik.. 51SIiM OB 6d0U? Oi l([i REeS &EicuEi010 IN I15F e oELOW Mobile Fingerprint Reader and Digital Camerzs G�st E�ec�Sveness Ga(cutatinns 0 L1hF 1- FhiRY-! fVEI SALAfiY 6'r SW09t1 POLIC; aFrfC�R (zs o: J�r, i. 1°5J) S 36 , o6s LIhE 2- EhTRY-IEUEL FAIHGE BENEFIiS Of SWOAN POLICE �FFICER (.s c Jzn. 1. lE°9) LIhE 3• d0� LINES 1 dN0 2 LINE 4• MULTIPIY LINE 3 BY.75 LIhE 5- EHTEfl fI�URE OH LINE 4 OA S2a,�0�, WHICHEVER IS tESS S 10,13i S � 6,20� $ 34,654 S 25,000 t1NE 6- i�iAl CDST OF iTEM, SYSTEM OR G84UP Of L4KE ITEh!S S 65 , o00 (�nre,�� LI4E 7- FEQEftA! AMOUIai R_QUESTE� �zr• c� nc nc;e Irzn 1�?i c� tora i?ar c"s- (iri° oi � 48 , 7 5d �.i°'�� LIhE 8- UIVI�E LINE 7 BY LINE 5 S 1.9 Secticn II, Part 11 — You must return this page as part nt yaus appticatian -�o� -33 `� Apen�yName: st. rau� ro��c .,_��...••... - - �RI,'''.�-: MN0620900 [iEM � � SEG710N II - PART B D��o��On [� T�e ��ng� Describe how this item, system or o oup of like items Krili result in officer fime savings. Please use the space provided below• For large jurisdictio �° be found in b o attach additional sheets� Samp1° redeployment sumn�ari COPS Office a sumes that you ach e e a r sul of g antection is w•hat the Information you need to include: • Irtumber of hours saved per shift per officer • The number of shifts these officers will actually wotk in a 1-year period • How many officers will realize this savings • How the time saved x�ill be used (on what community policin� acEivities) If the actual redepioyment that is calculated in this section is substantially greate: than the required amount of redeployment you must achieve for this item (line S of the CEW), please indicate below that your aoency undersEznds that it will be expected to aY�ain this higher le��el of redeployment if fi:nded for this item. Information is the key to success in any endeavor, and law enforcement is no exception. Effective, efficient and timely decisions can have a positive impact on the quality of life issues for the vict�n and th �cs�ue�o�u o�he front ge o�r the met�ro se�ction of he newspaper he next day. described in grap � P Making effective and timely decisions is usually deternuned by the amount and quality of t e information available to the decision maker. In our first series of grants, the infrastructu�e was created to expand the amount and quality of information available to supervisors and patrol officers in a real tune environment. We have, in effect, created a mobile office for the officer with most � a 1 environment, as avaitable in a normal office setting. In so far as we are worl:ing most of our communities are designed, this is an excellent addition to our problem-solving strategies. However, in a number of urban communities, either as a result of desien or weat er, many of our officers actually work in a vertical environment• In St• Paul, we have one of the longest contmuous skyways in the world. These s�.yways linl: b� h rise buiSdings.�ManY of oures and residents throughout our entire downtown area in many ., Section II, Part B— Yau must retum this Rage 2s Part uf yaur applicatinn businesses no longer look for space on the street level as a prime Iocatio� rather they look for space on the second IIoor ofbuildings adjacent to the sl.yways. The downtown area has also become the fastest growing residential azea in the city. , In this environment, the beat officer must leave their squad behind on the street level and with it the communications platform we have designed for the future. The PDTs are designed to overcome the majority of these limitations. The sazne argument can be made for our mounted patrol and our bike officers. Both of these units patrol our parks, waterways, special events and congested neighborhoods. In both cases support vehicies can be blocks or even miles away with no ready transportation to bring the party involved closer to the support vehicle and the communications pIatform. During special events the distance might not be great, but the number of people often safely preclude such a joumey. The ability to conduct important business without anduly inconveruencing the victim-witness- suspect, or callut� in additional squads, or calling undue attention to your activities often makes the diff'erence between a successful interview/'intervention and a fa�ed effort, Of course, some of tlus traffic could be handled over the RF system, but those frequencies are already overburdened and one is usually at the mercy of the efforts of third parti�s to search appropriate databases. PDTs allow the officer or supervisor fo query systems silently, efficiently and according to the parameters established during the interview. The amount of time each o�cer will save each day is estimated at 1 hour. VJithout mobile transportation, their need to access secure communications either through a remote access server or docldng station in one of our faciIities in order to query the RMS database and intranet will be much more burdensome. Multiplyin� one hour by the 45 oi'�ucers assigned to our downtown beat, our mounted patrol and our bicycIe patrols equals 45 hours, times 228 shifrs per year equaIs 10,260 hours, divided by the COP standard of 1,82? annual hours equates into 5.6 FTEs, which exceeds the 52 FTEs on the Cost Effectiveness Worksheet for this item. 24 � �.. -Oa-�3y Apenc�Name: st. Paul �olice Depzrtnent qR � r: Mvoo�o 00 SEGT10t1 Il - PAF€f B Q��i�� Sa�ng�S C[EAtI x � Describe how this item, system or group oE like items w-ill result in ofiicer time savings. Please use the space provided below. For large jurisdictions or complex p:ojects, please attach additional sheet�. Sample redeploy:nent summzries can be found in theb o°'r'run$ of this section. The actual redeploynent that you calculate in this section is what the COPS Office assumes that you K�ill achieae as a result of this grant. Information you need to include: • Number of hours saved per shiff per officer • The number of shifts these officers will actualIy work in a 1-year period • fiow many officers will realize this savin�s • Fiow the time saved will be used (on whaf community policin� activities) If the actual redeployment that is czlculated in this section is substantially greater than the required amount of redeployment you must achieve for fnis item (line S of the CEW), please indicate below that your a�ency understands thae it vaill be expected to attain this higher level of redeployment if funded fox this item. Computers today operate a speeds that were inconceivabie just a few short years ago. They can process and transmit an entire encyclopedia in a few seconds in a few of the newest computers. Unfortunately, these speeds aze currently Iimited to hazd wired systems that don't rely on madems as part of their transmission speeds. Modems often determine the rate at which computers can receive or transmit digital information, wtule their processing speeds are often much higher. This is further complicated in the wireless environment where current technology has not kept pace with hard wired or processing technology. CDPD, the current state of the art for speed, operates at 19,200 bits per second as opposed to RF, which operates at 4,800 or 9,600 bits per second. These rates are many times slower tfian the processing speeds being achieved in the average personal computer that can be purchased in any computer store. Diu,,i'tal and satellite tectuiology wiIl probably bring much faster rates, but they are yeazs away from the installation of the necessary infrastructure and redundancy necessary to mal:e these viable options. The recent failure of one satellite and the loss of ent'ue paging networks for several days across the country is a case in point. We cannot afford to lose our entire communications system for a few days without sia,,�u�ficant consequences. Section 11, Part 8— You must return this page as part nf your appiicatinn � This speed is becoming increasingfy critical because when a user is either uploading or downloading information, their system is unavailable for other information or messaging. In a law enforcement environment this type of delay could have dire consequences. A simpte itlustration should help to prove the point. The FBI has invested a great deal in digital imaging and IAFIS fingerprint technology for theu NCIC 2000 initiative. In order to send a digital iinage or fingerprint through a wireless system that is unmodified would require approsimately 4.S megabits of data. Ifyour processing speed is 4,800 on an RF systea� it would take approximately 26 minutes to load that image or fingerprint. At I9,200 (19.2}, it wilI cut the time by three quarters, but it is still over 7 minutes and fhis is provided there is no interference or the sysfem doesn't have to retry. Therefore, the FBI has developed compression technology of 25;1 That will aIlow them to transmit the image mucfi faster through a new algorithm using a vehicle that allows them not to repeat rapetitive inf'ormation. This should reduce the time to load an image to just under a minute, which is a wonderful accomplishment. However, there is a dynamic need to push these ]imits far beyond cc�rrent technology. For instance, St. Paul will process over 3,000 missing persons in 1998 alone, the vast majority being chitd�en. Now, many of the cases cleaz tfiemselves when the cfiildren come home on their ow� but many re«iaia missing. Without photos ofthese chiidren it is next to impossible to verify their ideatities because we don't expect chiidren to carry an ID in our society, and due to the shear volume, flyers and milk cartons, although laudable, aze not a very good attemative. Images aze the future in law enforcement and the demand is simply going to escalate for missing persons, gang members, vulnerable adults, efc.. tVhat appears to be fast today will seem like a crawl in a few short years. We need To develop the technology that witi make more images available to officers and that is only possible if we overcome tfie technolo,gical hurdles. The DataLink system has the capacity to transmit 1 megabit of information per second, a rate more than twenty tirrces faster than current CDPD technology. Such speeds are not critical for teact data, but they aze for images, fingerprint scanning and overly 2arge text files. The problem with the DataLink system is that it has a broadcast radius that is Iimited to 3 miles. This limits fhe effective range over which the data can be transmitted. On the positive side, the speeds are such that it would not take long to send or receive multiple images, fingetprints and long text files. In fact, driving down the fypicaI eity block would probabIy be ample time for almost any transmission. We propose to install snch a system on a triai basis to test tfie technology and deternune if it can handle the volume and reliabIlity necessary to support our information transfer loads into the future. If capable, it would be possible to locate a handful of towers at existing RF sites where we could blanket the city at key Iocations that would enable our vehicles to drive through the coverage areas as part of their routine patrol, fransferring and receiving data as they pass through. This would not only enable our ability to dramaticatly increase the volume and reliability ofinformation, it would also allow us to dramatically reduce a number ofhisYoric adm'uustrative functions, such as roII cat[, mail runs to distribute investigative pick up and hoids, Stop and ID on vehicles and people, and other related activities. This information could be loaded on the network at one central locarion with a single enYry an@ the officers would onty need to drive through their covera�e area at the beginning of their tour or anytime thereafier to upload and update their infonnation. We envision tfie test area as one of our district offices. On average we have approximately 65 officers and supervisors in a district office and we conservatively estimate that � aa-�3y we could save apptoximately .5 hours per shift with this technology. At .5 hours per shift for 65 o�cers and supervisors it equates to 32.5 hours for 22S s ft uates�o 4 06 FTEsn Thso s w�ell in V}'hen this is divided by 1,824 hours for the typical Year 4 excess of the 231 FTEs on the Cost Euectiveness VTorksheet for item r2. . � . . / ov -�a y ABencyHame: st. paul Police Devzrtnent ORI,�.�-: MN0620900 SECTION 11- PART B ��O��i Eyf ��1� �V1DgS �� .ir 3 Describe how this item, system or o oup of like items wi11 result in officer time savin$s• Please use the space provided beloti°. For large j�isdictions or complex projects, please at`ach additional shc�ts. Sa�mple redeploy�nent sumzn�ries can be found in the begiiuling of this secrion. The actual redep3oy�ent that you calculate in this section is what the COPS Ofnce assumes that you ti•ill achieve zs a result of this grant. InformaEion you need to include: • Number of hours saved per shift per officer • The number of shifEs these officers will actually work in a 1-year period • How many officers wi11 realize this sacings • How the time saced will be used (on whaY community policin� activities) If the actual redeployment that is calculated in this section is substantially �reater than the required amount of redeployment you mu;t achieve for this item (line S of the CEW), please indicate below that your agency understands tnat it will be expected to attain this higher level of redeployment if tunded £or this item. We have entered into a partnership with the Ramsey County Sheriff, the Minneapolis Police Department, the Hennepin County Sheriff and Di�ital Biometrics, Ina Digital Biometrics is developing a de�zce they call a`Squibb' which will be able to pe��t For analys's and S� the field. It will have a reader to scan and transmit a s'ingle digit fing Ip identification, a digital camera to capture and transmit images of persons, a ma�netic reader to read the magnetic strip on the back of Ivfinnesota drivers licenses an �nutes l of conver ation. and it may include an audio recording device to record up to thirty device would be able to operate remotely up to 1,�00 feet from the squad, it would capture the information and then transmit the information to a central database for a high probabiliry identification with a response guaranteed in 10 minutes or less. The fingerprint reader would access a regional database, either the state's regional MAFIN database if their system can be upgraded to interface with this system, or the organizations involved would establish their own regional database at a cost funded by Aigital Biometrics, Inc• Digital Biometrics has applied for a 3 million dollar grant to fund the demonstration project and we are told that their grant should be aw�� d�o su� I with a grrverhl0 devices for submitted. As a participant in the grant, they are g g PP Y field testing, all of the software and hardwaze to inter£ace with their system with ours, including Section ti, PaA 6- Yau must ceturn this page as part of your application the service charges for CbPD, the loca� carrier service and the frame reIay at US West. The total value of tfus contribution is $332,526, and all of the equipment, software and material wiIl stay with our department when the project is complete. We need only pick up the ongoing cost for the Iine charges and the CDPD access charges, which we would need to pay for our vehicles in any event. We ��isfi to leverage this grant and expand the number of devices that we can put into the fie1d. On any given shift, we could have in excess of 50 officers worl:ing, not including assignments such as traffic, FORCE, beat officers, mounted units and investigative ts. In an agency of our size, ten Squibbs wi11 not go very far. We wish to add an additional�nits to our patrol ar.d incestigative units. Many of the costs associated with enabling the Squibbs. are identical with instatling a CDPD platform in the vehicles, so costs would be reduced to little more than the price of the individuai units and some sofrware. We also want to enhance our abiiity to capture images and include them as part of our RMS in a Format separate from the Squibb. Several vendors have di�ital cameras and software that iviIl aIIow us to capture images and pIace them right into the report along with the text information. While this will enhance the overall value and quality of our system significantIy, it will also expand our ability to train and employ various problem-solving tactics using strategies sach as the SARA model. Wc operaYe in a very mobile sociery and a sienificanf portion of our population uses that mobility to support ongoing criminal enterprises. Often t}�ese parties purpose2y avoid any forms ofidentification or empIoy sophisticated counterfeit forms of identification in an effort to thwart local Iaw enfarcement efforfs. When these parties are stopped, officers aze leR with only one general option: to bring the party down Yo the Identification Unit to get their fingerpzints taS;en and a positive ID made. This is a very time consuming process and on most busy nights it is seldom empioyed, a factor that criminals depend upon. Officers ue also generaIly limited to mug shots or images they can beg, borrow or steal from the department's Identification Unit because the cost of reproducing such images are reIatively high, they can't be prodaced in targe quantities and because the Unit is the only location with a ready repository of such images. This also means that images currently available to patrol ofhcers are limited to a handful of ofricers and for persons already arrested. The Squibb and digital cameras would allow for the collection of images from tha field that could be stored in RMS reports. Officers could query names or reports and examine the images to help assess the veracity ofthe individual's ctaims. This wouId tremendously speed the identification process in the field, at search warrants, special events and vastty improve the quality of information by rapidly expanding the image database for future use. The digitaI cameras would also be a tremendous asset for problem-solving tactics, Digital images that can be captured in a computer can atso be projected and manipulated on a screen for other officers and investigators who aze training for or working on a specifrc problem or group of problems. These pictures capture the actuai scene and allow for strateeizing on a level of detail that diagrams can never capture. Presentations to block clubs, community groups, business owners and other community leaders can be used to generate support for a project or demonstrate accomplishments. Cameras could be provided to local residents that documents activities, support impact statements and verify the actions of suspects. The potential for use is atmost unlimited. While video taping is another optioq but it is very difficult to do so in an undercover 24 t�c-3 3y � czpacity without attracfing undue attention to oneself and the quality of producf �often must be checked after the fact. Digital cameras, on the other hand, can be used, verified and ]oaded inta a computer within a few minutes and without a�tracting unwarranted attention. :� The savings generated by these projects are very di - �ncult to determine and a specific study to measure the results might even take us well beyond the next round of grants. It is also extremely difficult to measure what ofncers are not doing because the activiry is Iabor intensive for an uncertain result. Ofncers will not generally bring some one in for identification purposes uniess they are presented with a situation that literally demands the action under the circumstances. How many people ue released because the officer didn't have the t�rne to follow up on their instincts? One measure we might examine lools at a very narrow focus of activity, but it might be representative as one of severai measures. The FORCE unit, Narcotics unit and Vice unit conduct on average 300 seazch wazrants a year. Both these devices would be used to screen people at the scene of these warrants and a great deal of time and ener,gy is always used to identify everyone at the scene. Normally only one or two persons aze acrested and the batance are released. The average seazch warrant requires eight officers (except for high risk wartants) and the execution o: the warrant from beginivng to end requires approximately four hours. Once the warrant is executeci, on average, two ofncers are assigned to interview and identify the people at the scene. ThPSe ofricers are often wholly consumed by this activity, remembering that this is an average. Some locations have few people, while smoke houses often have 15 or more. Based on these figures, the equivalent of 1 FTE is used per each search warrant sunply for identification purposes. If we multiply the three hundred events, we get 2,400 hours divided by 1,824 hours per year for an equivalent of 1.3 FTEs. It is also a conservative guess that of the thousands of contacts our officers make every week, they decline to investigate fifteen persons thoroughly. Aside from the inconvenience to the person, each such trip to HQ for a positive ID would require a minimum o£ 1.5 hours. This would represent 1170 hours of time, or .64 of an FTE. Together these total a Cost Effectiveness o£ 1.9 FT'Es, which represents only a fraction of the total potential savin�s if all potential activities were mezsure3. This figure also meets the calculation for Time Sa� under the erant - Oo-�3�► ApE4Lyh2mE: St. Pau1 Police Depz:tnenc �RI ir: MNOb10 00 S:�ilflPd 1[ - FAkT C ��tu��y �Iia�g �� a�€nary Communify Policing Acfivifies �}yj n 1 �Ffl CER AC➢VITIES M PaR B, ynu Cemansvan�Ghz dme sanngs tha!}vu u0ec! In ac+lier: fi�o°9h �' Duadase al mi� i�m ar ci�li=r,. Fiezse in9its�: which ol t�e falfoxing actiriSes yuur o�i�.°rs wil( e.�gage in as a rv.sad al �iis Om° sar,'r„s 0 LOOKING AT REPu1T CALLS FDR SERVICE TO fDEnii:Y FR09LEM�S OR HOT SPOiS � WORKItvG Yr'IiH NcIGHBORti�OG RESI��11S i� IDE��iI;Y APiD PRIGRIi12E CRIME PROBLEh!S ❑ CO�JOUCfI�J6 CITIZ_N SURYEYS � ADDRESSI�;G C��DIT101'S TriAi L�0 iC CRI�v1c 0 ASS_SSIh� TNE IM?ACT OF COh"MUNIiY POLIGINc E� ; ORTS GtJ LE�'=LS 0` CRIME Alv'D � c4R C� ATiiN91NG COIv1h1UNITY 64�EiIPI;S � 61i(= / F�Oi P�iROI L�l h�IPiNG COO�DIN;iE NEI6H30B�OOG C„iC' G°CU?S � NlO�RIMS WI�H BUSIhESS=S TG ADD"rcESS C'Ih`:c FRu.9L��:S ❑ I?41NI�G 0`r,'IC�RS / CIiIZ�NS IA CG�+iP�1USiil' �0! ICIil� ❑ CO�iDUCTiN6 GRGdE °RNENTION N'ORKS95?S I �ISS=h:I- P;,",iING INfOR�1?.i10N ON WFY3 OF PRcui.'vTlh6 C?Gd�c ❑ WORKI�+lG VJIiH LOCAI G�VcRNMENiAI / GOhi�fUh11TY ❑ EN��oltdG fi1+ STR'�TfufC PL4i:�iP7G ?�L4i�C i0 IIJ?L`t; e�ii- AGENC(�S TD A�ORESS CRIME AND DI50ROER PROB! `_M1'S IPt� C�h1MUNIiY POLICING �TH EA ACTIVITI�S BneBy d�scnDS aay aG�zr cumm�r,i.ry po(uru acori6es your c�3wr ;rr1' enga?z in zs a nsult al tl�e tlme rvin;; ,"�� Cr re�. Pie2n b.^ as de�iisC as pmsidle ir, the s�a^e amvided, using add'fiac! pa?zs il neczuz�: St. Pau1's skyway system has virtually become a city unto itself, operating above the nonnal city activities on the streets below. The system is experiencing additional problems because the metropolitan bus system (MTC) has also been levera�ed by the School District as a means of extending their transportation budget. The MTC has also modeled their routing after the airlines hub systems with the adjacent downtown districts, meaning that at the end of every school day the downtown and the skyway become inundated wiih a simificant influx of high school students. As many of these students aze latchkey chiIdren, the temptation of the downtow�n community is to great to resist and it has become a hangout. This, in tum, is all compounded by the fact that the MTC raises rates durine rush hour periods for the commuters. The students passes then become ineIi,gible until 6:00 Pb� unless they have the money for the hi2her rates. Section II, Paet C You must return this page as part ai ynur application AgE(ILyH2mC: St. Paul police Depattment ORI x�r: riN0620900 SECTION tl - PART D : . :. . ; �, I 7 ' . ' k � .�: .�� I . I • 1;�. fIEM# i Please describe in detail beloc.� and on additional pieces o: paper, if needed: 1) How is your a�ency currently using technology applications Eo improve individual and overall deparEment efficiency and to make department operztions (patrol, research and planning, bookin�, efc.) more effective? z) If funded, how would fhis COPS MORE'98 award improve/enhance your deparFment's current oPeraEions aad specific technology appIicafions? 3) How do Ehe requested resources fit in wifh your a�enc}rs lon� ran�e fech- noloay strafe�? How will fhe fufure use of this Eechnology be maintained and inte�raEed wifh oEher technology applicafions or upgrades to improve your information and technology infrastructure? 4) How will the requested resources improve your a�ency's ability fo do any of fhe following acEivities? Please explain each in detail. • Co11ecE and analyze incident-based daEa • Identify repeat crime vicEims znd/or repeaE problem locations • Offer paErol officers direcE access to incident-based aime daEa in patrol cars • Link calls for senice databases/CAD with other databases such as fhose on a.resEs, incidents, field inEercniews, efc. �) Are Ehere oEher ways the requested resources will specificalIy advance com- munity policinj in your a�ency? 2s Section 11, Part �— Ynu m¢st return tfiis page as part of your appliration � �� -: :,.. . - All of this has become a significant burden on out beat officers in the do�infown system. The addition of the PDTs will a11ow them to access information about past behaviois, network with their fellow beat of�cers and stay in constant touch through the E-Mail system with the businesses in the s�.yway system to better coordinate their efforts and identify the handful of . students who are causing problems for everyone. These units will altow the officers to main�ain shared notebooks, imaees and informal contacts ��ith these students, so responses can be measured, fair and escalate as the situation w�arrants. This would also allow the beat ofncers to network with business peop]e and local residents about problems and concems to expand the eyes and ears of the downtown community. Current radio systems cannot keep up with the demand for information and it is impossible to coordinate the activities of ati the beat officers over the radio and paging system. 0 _ .:. aa-'��+�. Cusent and Future Technolot,,ry Sfrategy Item rl Question �1. This entire proposal, as were our earlier grants, is about technology and improving our ability to move and manage information for the oC"acer, supervisor, citizen, manager and the Chief. We are cuirently investing in an automated Records Management Syster� a depar[ment networ�: and intranet, and a new wireless communication platform for the transfer of digital information. This will piace the entire database of information in our Records function into the hands of every ofncer and supervisor, and every unit within the department. It will also provide a platform that will allow a much more interactive exchange of information with other units of govemment and our citizens in a very direct way over the internet. Iviore importantly, this system will enable the o�cers to query and manipu]ate the infonnation in a manner that will allow them to apply what they learn to a whole range of problem-solving strateeies. We expect to have these systems in place by the fall of I449. Question �2). The purpose of this erant is to expand upon what we are currently building and gain significant additional efficiencies that will allow us to become more effective in the end. Data is an unportant component in solving any problem, but as our profession is focused on people and their behavior. Making sure that we marry the right data to the right people is critical to successful intervention and prevention. Images and fin�erprints are a critical piece ofthat function. The next step in this process is to make sure the information is available in ail of the various environments in which we must work (the PDTs), make sure tfie information is available 2s rapidly and comp]etely as possible to help support the best decisions possible (the I?ataLink), and then provide the tools to make effective decisions on the scene to minimize problems and the unpact on resources as much as possible (the Squibbs and digital cameras). The added benefit is that these pSatforms provide for a basis to share critical information across the entire network in an almost instantaneous environment. The primary focus ofthis thrust is in our patrol and investigative functions. Question Y3). This question has been addressed in several previous responses. Question :r4). a) The entire focus of the RMS and our SITS (Single Incident Tracking System) is designed to collect and analyze incidenf based data. We are currently working on a mapping program sunilaz to the one developed in Chicaeo that will integrate this information into maps tfiat can be designed by ofncers in the field or at meetings. b) We already hzve a prozram in place to identify and track repeat o&�nders and problem properties. These new systems witl greatIy enhance and improve the accuracy of e�sting efforts in both these areas and provide the information aimost instantly, an 00 -�3�1 effort that currentiy requires research and efforts by several people throughout tfie depar[ment. This means freeing more time to work on these problems instead of researching them. . c) Not only will the system offer officers direct access to data, it will do so in their vehicle, on their beat, on their bike or on their horse, virtually any environment in which our officers must work. d) Under our current design, any oficer will be able to query information ori CAD, arrests, incidents and in about 15 other categories. We intend to expand that capability through an Ad Hoc query capability over the course of the next few years. In terms of field interviews, we are just beginning to look at programs that will handte intelligence type infonnation, provide a scale ofits value and sunset its life cycle. This will be a project that will probably take several years to integrate. Fiowever, in the interi� the Squibb and digital cameras offer an informzl system. Both coliect information that can be loaded onco the laptoQs and stored, including iznages and fingerprints. Once loaded, these files can then be shared across the entire network through our local intranet and accessed by any officer. In the near tecm, this should su�ce for sofr data. Question �5) This is limited ocily to the imagination and creativity of the ofncers, investigators and supervisors, with appropriate Iimits established by resources. We have not attempted to offer every single scenario where these tools could be used, rather we_have tried to provide a few glimpses as to their possible uses. There is neither the tune or space available to discuss every contingency. o�-�3v � :� q : . A�en�yHame: st. Pa�i Police Departnent � - ORIr: r�NOb o 00 SEL`IION 11- PART C ' (TEf�R � z ��ir� Po�ian� ��s �mr�ary Communify Policing Activifies �EEIGEN ACTlV111ES In f3rt 8, yau den, onsa2d Ne d,ne sar,'n�s Nat you ez9e:t ro ahiew titmu9h Ne Durehase o1 U�is iem nt tin(ian. Pleasz inCiczt which o/th.<lollawing atirties}va� ohce� wrll engage in as a rsult al uYs Om,z saricg.c � LOOKING AT RE?�Ai CALIS fOR SER4ICE TG ID�NTfFY P�2�BLEh!S �R NOT SPDTS � WORKING WIiH NEIGHBQRH00� R�SID'c�VTS TO IDENTi; Y Ah�6 PRIORIiItE CRiME PROBLEMS ❑ CONDUCTItd6 CITIZ�N SURUEYS ❑ ADDRESSING COPJDIilOtiS i�Ai LAI� T6 C�161c ❑ ASSESSIN6 iHE If�PACT �� COMd�UNIi� °OLICI�1�� EF� 0°iS ON LEV�! S 0� Ct',Ihf: AFi6 FcA� � NlOP,KIi9u WIiH LOC�1L GOV�RNi1754iAL / COMh1U?ifTY P.GENCIES TO p.DD�SSS CRlt.f_ AfdD DIS�RD=R P303lEMS C� Ai IENOL"1, COMMUN(iY M:�TIN�S ❑ Bi,� / FOOi PRi°Ol G N�L°ING COOftDINAiE NEIGHBORN066 WATCH GROU?S � W�3KIPJG WIiH BUSIRESS�S TO ADDR,SS CRLNE PRGoL�MS ❑ T2�lt!lt;L �;RGrdS! Cli(?ENS IN CaMMUNiTY °ni�;,�p;r_. Q COFdDUCilfio CRIM� PRcV6�TI0N WORnS40°S / DISS=�+1!- hlAiiNu Ik�O'MAiiON 6N wAYS Of Pr'��V�Nilhl" Ct�fl��: ❑ EP7�Gi�;�� I,V STP,�tEGIC PtANNIN6 R�L�'�D i� I�NPL"uY:i;'T- 111� COhii�!UhiiY POUCIId6 OL7: fl AC i IYfIES Bne6y descnbe a,7y atnzr cammunlry policin9 ateiiczs you; u:;rx.rs r.7! zryag° ir as a�sult allne dne sarinas tor Li%s nem. `lease 6e as de;aileAas pe.�rGle in �Se s�ace p�onGeq usfig aadi,tionzl pages i/nzc„cary. The DataLink system will not be seen by the community as a pro�am directly impacting their neighborhoods. It will be transparent to their needs. However, if will facilitate an explosion in the scope and value ofinformation management for the of"�ucer working in their community. To the extent that officers no ]onger have to go to a building to download reports from their laptop, that ofiicers can reduce the time dedicated to roll ca]Is, the expanded abiiity to exchange and query information on a large scale, especially as it is related fo images of missing childte� vulnerable adults, wanted suspects, gang members and the like; then we have freed up valuable time for the officers to better evaluate and manage the problems identified in their neighborhoo@s and beats. The idea is to empower our o�cers to take responsibility for their patrol areas, give them the infoanation they need to probiem-soive and provide the time to escape at least part of the tyranny of the 911 system. This system willhelp create that ime for the offcer. Sedion tl, Part C— You must return this page as part of yaur appiiwtian ApencyName: sc. PauL Police Departnent . ' �fll �: MN062o900 ' . SF�170N I! - PART D y : _ ,; : � : : :� . . , �,` , . :�:: � T� J , i' .1� � G � Piease describe in deEail belocv and on additionai pieces of paper, if needed: I) How is your a�ency currently using technology applicaEions to improve individual and overali department efficiency and to make deparEmenf operations (pafrol, research and planning, bookin�, efc.) more effecfive? 2) If funded, how would this COPS MORE '9S award improve/enhance your deparEment's current operations and specific technology applicaEions? 3) How do the requesfed resources fit in with your a�ency's lon�-ranae Eech- nology sfraEegy? Ho�v wi11 Ehe fuEure use of Ehis technology be maintained and inEegrated cvith other Eechnology applicaEions or upgrades to improve your informafion and fechnology infrasfrucfure? ?) Hocv wiI1 Ehe requested resources improve your a�ency's ability fo do any of fhe foilowin� acEiviEies? Please explain each in detail. • Collect and analyze incident-based data • Identify repeat crime victims and/or repeaE problem locations • Offer paErol officers direct access fo incident-based crime data in pafrol cars • Link calls for sezvice daEabases/CAD with o.her daEabases such as those on arrests, incidenEs, field intexc- eEc. . �) Are there other ways fhe requesfed resources will specificaIly advance com- munity policing in your z�ency? 28 Secfion 11, Part R— You must return ihis page as Qart nf your applica:ion Current and Future Technology Strateey Item r2 �o-�ay Question �1. This entire proposal, as were our eazlier grants, is about technology and improving our ability to move and manage information for the officer, supervisor, citizen, manager and the Ctue£ We are currently investing in an automated Records Management System, a department network and intranet, and a new wireless communication platform for the trans£er of digita! information. This wil( place the entire database of information in our Records function into the hands of every officer and supervisor, znd every unit within the department. It will also provide a platform that will allow a much more interactive exchan�e of information with other units of government and our citizens in a very d'uect way over the internet. More importantly, this system will enable the officers to query and manipulate the information in a manner that will allow them to apply what they leam to a whole range of problem-solving strategies. We expect to have these systems in place by the fall of 1999. Question �2). The purpose of this erant is to expand upon ��hat we are currently building and gain si,gnificant additional efuciencies that vrill allow us to become more effective in the end. Data is an important component in solving any problem, but as our profession is focused on people and their behavior. ivlaking sure that we marry the right data to the right people is critical to successful intervention and prevention. Images and fingerprints are a critical piece of that function. The next step in this process is to make sure the information is available in all of the carious environments in which we must work (the PDTs), make sure the information is available 2s rapidly and completely as possible to help support the best decisions possible (the DataLinl:), and then provide the tools to make effective decisions on the scene to m,nimi�e problems and the impact on resources as much as possible (the Squibbs and digital cameras). The added benefit is that these platforms provide for a basis to share criti�al informacion acrass the entire network in an almost instantaneous environment. The primary focus of this thrust is in our patroi and investigative functions. Question �3). This question has been addressed in several previous responses. Question #=r4). a) The entire focus of the RMS and our SITS (Single Incident Tracking System) is designed to collect and analyze incident based data. We are currently working on a mapping program similar to the one developed in Chicago that will integrate this information into maps that can be desiened by o&'icers in the field or at meetines. b} We already have a program in place to identify and track repeat offenders and problem properties. These new systems will ereatly enhance and improve the accuracy of existing efforts in both these areas and provide the information almost instantly, an 00 -�� y ..: effort that currently requires research and e�orts by several people throughout tfie department. This means freeing more time to work on these problems instead of researching them. . c) Not only will the system offer o direct access to data, it will do so in their vehicle, on their beat, on their bi1:e or on their horse, virtually any environment in which our officers must work. d) Under our current desien, any officer will be able to query information ori CAD, arrests, incidents and in about 1� other categories. We intend to eapand that capability through an Ad Hoc query capability over the course of the nex�t few years. In terms of field interviews, we are just beginning to lool: at programs that will handle intelligence type information, provide a scale of its value and sunset its ]ife cycle. This wiil be a project that will probably take several years to integrate. However, in the interim, the Squibb and digital cameras offer an informal system. Both collect information that can be loaded onto the laptops and stored, including images and fingerprints. Once ]oaded, these files can then be shared across the entire network through our local intranet and accessed by any officer. In the near tera� this should suffice for so8 data. Question n�) This is limited only to the imagination and creativity of the of'�ncers, investigators and supervisors, with appropriate limits established by resources. We have not attempted to offei every single scenario where these too(s could be used, rather wellave tried to provide a£ew glimpses as to their possible uses. There is neither the time or space available to discuss every contingency. � � .: o� -�3 y Agen�yRam S[_ Paul Police Departnent ORI �: Pi?d0520900 � Sc�710N II - FA� C �€nr�� Po6i�ng ��i� �m��ry Communify Policing Activifies Ct�M N OFfIGEF AGiIVmES In fart B, yau dzn, onsua¢E �ie One savings GSa� you erpea tn a:hien ri�nugh tl�e puahase al �Sis icm ar trdiizn. P;ease inGrcarz rhicA aIlhe lullawing aevrti�s yau� a�ncers �ill engage in as a �°.suh alIDis 6mz sadrgs ❑ LOOKING AT REPEAi CALIS FOR SERUIGE i� lDEAiIfY PROBLtMS OR H�T SP�TS ❑ WORKING Vdiih Ir'EIGHB�RHOOD RE3IDENTS i0 IDENiIFY A1d0 FRIORIiIZE CRiME PROBLEMS ❑ GONOUCTING CITi?E� SURVEYS � ADDRESSING COPJDIi1C4S TH�i l�� i0 CRIU: ❑ ASS�SSIUG IHE IM�PACI OF C�MMUNII' °OLICIN� EFFpRiS Oh LEVELS OF GRi41� AND F�AR � kiTENDit{G COMMUNITY MEEINGS ❑ BIKE / f00i PAiROL � HELPtPlG Ca�R01NATE GEl6H8�RH��J Pl,TCH GROUPS � Nl�RKIPl� V�1iH BL'SIN�SSES i0 ADORESS CRIME P,ROBLEMS ❑ SRAINIid"c Oi � IC�°S / C4iIZt�S 1� GO'viE�UilIiY P1L4CIId^u ❑ C�NDUCTI.l6 CRIf,1� PRPJ�NTI�M 4V�°Y,�:,O?S / DISS�htl- k�i6�31UFORMAiION 0� WAYS OF PR�V�NTING Cdf�S� � WORKIPlG N11TN LOCAL GOVERNy1ENiA! / COMt�1U�'IiY ❑ u1'GAGIPlG IN STRAiEGIC PIANNi�iG R�t�'=D i01�,a�LEM_�vi- AGcNGIES TO AD�R=SS CRI'dE A�9D DI$O�DER P�03L:MS ING C�MPdLh11TY °C�Lii,ltd6 OPI EA ACTIVmES Bdzfiy desc,�ue any umz� cummurrry pPii:irg acarr0es ynur aF�z� wi!! enaa�e ir, as a �sul� al ti;e Ome savin?s Ier tiis item. Plezse be zs de¢ileG as pnsrible in �e space D�n�ed, using aOAicanz! pages ilne:�.ssary. Properly identifying and tracking disruptive individuals within our communities and holding them accountable for their behavior is the key to chan;ing behavior. This must be done on a community-wide basis ifwe aze going to be successful in the long term. This equipment will allow us to properly identify people in the field, heIping to sort out those on legitunate business from those engaged in improper or illegal activities. Ofren times, even a community at risk is concerned about zero tolerance efforts because of the appazent inconvenience to le,gtimate members of the community going about theu daily business. The ability to minimi7e any inconvenience to the persons involved is a key to maintaining community support for these very effective e�'orts. This equipment would be critical to these efforts. The fact is that many of us do not always carry an ID when we should, and our ability to screen out potential problems quickIy Sectian Il, Pari C— You must reium ihis page as part of your appiitation � .-. Apenc1Hame: sc. Paui Police Department • ORIx: MN0620400 5EC710N !! - PAf{T � � 1 t . . t . s y .L` '� . "'' ,�� . �' t. - ,'�' � �.. [TEM � 3 Please describe in detail belo�+- znd on additional pieces of paper, ii needed: 1) How is your agency currenEly using technology applicaEions to improve individual and overall deparEment efficiency and fo make department operaEions (patrol, research and planninb, bool:ing, etc.) more effecEive? ?) If funded, how would this COPS MORE'9S award improve/enh'ance your deparEment's current operaEions and specific Eechnology applicaEions? �) How do the requesEed resources fiE in wiEh your agenc�s Ion� ran�e tech- noiogy sfraEegy? Hosv will the fuEure use of this Eechnology be maintained and inEe�rated wifh oEher fechnoIo�y appliczfions or up�rades Eo improve your informafion and technology infrasErucfure? 4) How will tfie requesEed resources improve your agency's abiIify Eo do any of Ehe followin� actiuities? Please explain each in detail. • CoIlecE and analyze incident-based data • Identify repeat crime vicEims and/or repeat problem locations • Offer paErol oFficers direct access fo incidenE-bzsed crime dafa in patrol cars • Link calls for seroice daEabzses/CAD with other databzses such as those on arresEs, incidenfs, field interviews, etc. 5) Are Ehere other ways the requesfed resources will specifically adcance com- munity policin� in your a�ency? 28 Section 1I, part U— Yau muri ret¢rn this page as pari of yaur applicafion ao -� a y would be a real asset in these sweeps. The community needs to understand and believe that we aze doing everythin3 possible to minimize any potential problems for local residents. These devices will also allow our officers to preserve this information in computerized' notebooks, comp[ete with imaees; notebool that can be shared with other officers and citizens. We will no longer be Iimited to accessing certain information depending upon the work schedule or shifr of a certain ofncer or officers. Information will also he available to be shared with citizens. We have been working with the courts, for instance, to restrict I:nown prostitutes form certain neighborhoods where they have attempted to ply their trade. Digital cameras that are not dependent upon a slow development process could be used to demonstrate violations of these court orders and would aliow the immediate seizure of the violating party. Probable cause fro criminal activities, more readily documenting contraband right in the report, etc. will provide for much greater efvciencies for the officers and the citizens. Obviously, the fewer times we need to deal with a problem before achieving a solution, the more e�ectively we can manage our problems overafl. o� -�3 y Current and Future Technology Strategy m Item r3 Question : 1. This entire proposal, as were our earlier grants, is about technolo,gy and improving our ability to move and manage information for the officer, supervisor, citize� manager and the Chief. We are currently im°esting in an automated Records Management System, a department network and intranet, and a new wireless communication platform for ihe transfer of digital information. This will place the entire database of information in our Records function into the hands of every officer and supervisor, and every unit within the department. It will also provide a plat£orm that will allow a much more interactive exchange of information with other units of govemment and our citizens in a very direct way over the internet. More importantly, ttus system will enable the officers to query and manipulate the information in a manner that will aIlow them to apply what they leazn to a whole range of probler� solving strategies. We expect to have these systems in place by the fall of 1999. Question m2). The purpose of this grant is to expand upon what we are currently building and gain significant additional efficiencies that will allow us to become more effective in the end. Data is an important component in solving any problem, but as our profession is focused on people and their behavior. Mal:ing sure that we marry the right data to the right people is critical to successful intervention and prevention. Images and fingerprints are a critical piece of that function. The next step in this process is to make sure the information is available in a11 of the various environments in which we must work (the PDTs), make sure the information is available as rapidiy and completely as possibie to help support the best decisions possible (the DataLink), and then provlde the tools to make effective decisions on the scene to miniT.,;�e problems and the unpact on resources as much as possible (the Squib6s and digital cameras). The added benefit is that these platforms provide for a basis to share critical information across the entire network in an almost instantaneous environment. The primary focus o£'this thrust is in our pattol and investigative functions. Question r3). This question has been addressed in several previous responses. Question t'�.4). a) The entire focus of the RMS and our SITS (Single Incident Tracking System) is designed to collect and anaiyze incident based data. We are currently working on a mapping program simiIar to the one developed in Chicago that will inte�rate this information into maps that can be desiened by officers in the field or at meetings. b) We already have a proga.'n in place to identiiy and track repeat o�'enders and problem properties. These new systems will greatly enhance and improve the accuracy of existing efforts in both these areas and provide the information almost instantly, an � 00-�3`1 effort that cucrently requires research and efrorts by several people throughout the department. This means freeing more time to work on these problems instead of researching them. c) Not only will the system offer officers direct access to data, it will do so in their vehicle, on their beat, on their bike or on their horse, virtually any environment in which our officers must work. d) Under our current desigr� any o�cer w�ll be able to query in�`onnation on CAD, arrests, incidents and in about l� other categories. We intead to expand that capabzlit}� through an Ad Hoc query capability over the course of the next few years. In terms of field interviews, we are just beguuung to look at proerams that will handle intelIigence type information, provide a scale of its value and sunset its life cycle. This will be a project that will probably take several years to integrate. However, in the interim, the Squibb and digital cameras offer an informal systein. Both collect information that can be loaded onto the laptops and stored, including images and fingerprints. Once loaded, these files can then be shared across the entire network through our local intranet and accessed by any officer. In the near term, this should suffice for soft data. Question #5) This is limited only to the imagination and creativity of the officers, investigators and supervisors, with appropriate limits established by resources. We have not attempted to offer every single scenario where these fools could be used, rather w� have tried to provide a few gIimpses as to their possible uses. There is neither the time or space available to discuss every contingency. A . .' - ao -��} SE�ON i!1 �Q�s �� t�� °�� When you ha��e completed the Cost Etfecti��eness Worksheet(s) (CEW) for eacn i,em or group of like items that you are requestin?, transfer tne total projec: cost, Federal share and local share from each Cos; Efiecfi � eness Worksheet, sum them and list these amounts as tne COPS MOP�E'9S applica6o;, totals. If you are requesting a w•aiver, you must still complete the Local Share secaon. Please ma;� extra cnpi�s of tln's f ornt ij �iecessaru. TOidLPRQJECT C6ST � FEOERAL SHARE � LOCALSNkB: Qir,s6alCFK� (Line7alCfK� ; � `� �' GOSiEFFEG?IVEkESSWOPKSHEETrt �y�s �� ^ �, COST EFF:CTIYENESS WORKSNE:i ni �j y� �`�� / COSiEFFECTIYEHESSWORRSf.;ci€3 ' \L �'�� h � ��ti �h/t- ��. COST EFFECT1YEfiESS WORKSHEET T i COST fFfEC11VfH:SS W6�kSHfiT �5 G6ST EFEECAVEKfSS WOP,KoriiiT Tn COST EF�ECTIY:kESS W�RKSHEii =7 COST EFfECTIYEHESS WORKSHiET T9 COST E�FECTI4EH:SS'ADRKSNE7 r8 MORE'98 APPLICATION TOTALS S 177,500 ' S 133,127 75 c ' ) j S 4C,375 � 25 �`� j S 77,000 � S 65,000 �S � � I � 5 : S 57,7�0 75 �') ; S 19,250 � 25 �") I S �8,750 75 �°? ` S 10,250 � 2� �') S � ��1 i S � �,) s � ��, � s � �'a, � ( 5E) i S ( ��) � S ( 4'0) ; S ( 5c) S S S 319,500 ; S ( �:) I S ( �u) I S ( �e) ; S ( 4a) i i 5 239,625 � 75 Cu) I S 79,575 � 25 � � i ;'a� not excesG J5� af ro:al i IG�s( ba a; lzut Zi�s o! , prc;ec! cc>C i� tatz! prc/2c! cest Secfion III — Ynu must retum this pag_ as part of your appiication 3j � - oa -�3y Q� enc�Name: s t. Pau1 Police Deoartment � OAI =: ri� o SECi]Oh' N � ::I`1 :�:'�f�?� :��:`..`:ir° A Persannel List each position by title and name of employee, if zvailable. Show the znnual salary rate and tne pesentz�z of rime to be devoted to th= project. Compznsarion paid for emplo}'ees enga�ed in grant acrivities must be consistent with that paid for similar evo:k evithin tne applicant organization. Name/Position Ivone n Cost Total: n B. fringe B�n�ffs Frin�e benefits should be based on know•n aciuzl costs or an established formula. Frin�e benefits a:e for the personnel listed in budget category (.A) and only for tne p°rcenta�e of time devoted to the project. Uniforms, equipment and vehicles are unallovcable costs under tMs grant program. Pl2ase list FICA and Workers Compensation, if applicable. Name/I'osition Computation _Snnual Fringe Benefits hone 'FICA/So�ial Secu:i:y 5 H=aith Insurance S Life Insurance S Vacation S Sick Leave S Reti:ement S '4\"orker's Comp S 'linemployment Lns. 5 O:her S CasE Total: 5 � Section IV — You must return this page as part ot your appiication Apen�yName: sc. PaUI Police Department ORIr: Mxo 0 00 G. Travel Itemize trzvel expenses of project personnel by purpose (e o., staff to training, field interviews, advisory 0 oup meetings). Show the basis of computation (e.�., six people to 3-dzy training at s�X airfare, SX lod�in�, SX subsistence). In training projects, travel and meals for trzinees should be listed separa.ely. Show the number of trainees and the unit costs invoived. Identify the location of travel, if knocvn. Purpose of Travel Location Item CompuEaEion CosE \�ne ToEal: Q. Equipme:rt List nonexpendable items fihat are to be purchased. iVonexpendable equipment is tan� ble prop>rty havin� a use:ul life of more than two years and an acquisiaon cos� of 5�,000 or more per unit. Expendable items should be included either in tne "SuppIies° category or in tne "Other" cate�or}: Applicants should znalyze the cost benefits of purchasing versus leesing equipment, especially for high{ost items and those subjec: fo rapid fechnicai aclvances. Rented or Iezsed equipmene rnsG shouid be Iisfed in the "Conffacfual" czcegor}�. Explain how the equipment is necessary for the success of the project. Attach a narrative describi��g the procurement method to be used. IEem None Cost ToEal: 36 Sectian IV — You must return this page as part af your aQpiicatian :. _.r -�oa-33y St• Pau1 Police Department Agenc� Nane: ORIn: rino62o900 E. Sup�fies . r , .. ,� r2inin� mate*ials; copyi�o P�Pe �'�a e'�Pendable eeuipmer, Lise it°:ns b}' �P2 (o�nce supplies; post.. � items costing less thasi Sa,000, such zs boo}s, hand-held tape rxorders) and show the basis for comptta�ion. Generally, supplies indude any materials �2t are expendable or consumed during the course of the projecc Supply Items CompuEation Cost ' J , =7 rn�c Zj softc:are programs Z� CDPD modems 25 Docking stations/chargezs $4,000 each $ 100,000 ` ��,� � 35,000 $1,G00 each t� 37,500 $1,�00 ezch 5 5,000 /�.� �10� Total: $ 1�7 �_ 50� — Section IV — You must return this page as part of yaur appiicatinn Agen�y Q�� a t a� Y. ♦ t t.� A� ConsultanE Fees: For each consultant enEer the name (if knotim) service to be provided, hourly or daily fee (S-hour day), and estimated time on the project. Consultant fees in excess of �250 per dzy require additional written justi&cation. I�Tam of Consultant None Service Provided Compufation Cost SubtotnL S o ................................ • • •......................................... Con>ultant Expenses: List a11 expenses to be pzid from the orant to t'ree indic�id:�al consultan•`s in addi�ion to their fees (e.g., travel, meals, lodgin�). Item Location Cost Subio'ra!: ..........................................................................................•••.. Confracts: Provide a descripEion of the product or service to be procured by contract and an estimate of the cosE. Applicanfs are encouraged to promoEe free and open comperi�on in acvazding contracEs. A separaie justification must be provided for sole-source conEracis in excess of 5100,000. TEem CosE Subfofat: S Total: 5 � t. Pau1 Police Departmen[ 38 Section IV — Yuu must return this page as part ¢f yaur applira;ion , . . `- Iter.� rl a0 -�3 � Apenc1Hzme: sc. raul Police Deoartment �� ; ZfN0620900 �i. Q�IEC '�,iTS�S L.15i it2Ii'i5 �e- I2_Tlt, � :oeuctio�, telepnone ) anitorial o: 5'cCU*lC}' S27�7C25, li\�°S17�'�-t1��Z OL CO^.='.-'e^. :�l funds) by inajor type and ine basis of th= co:1psta�ion. Fo: examp!e, provide tne square foota�e and ,nz cost per square foot fo: rent, or provide a montnly rental cost and hocv many months to rent. Description Computation Cost None Total: Sec:ion IV — You mcst return this pag° as part ot your application ApencyHame: st. Pavi Police Departmenc ��j� s- MN0620900 Budget Summary YVhen you have completed the budget worksheet, transfer tne totats for each category to the spaces below. Compute the Eotal direct costs and the total projecE costs. Indica:e the amount of Federzl funds reques:ed. Bud�et Category Amounf � A. Personnel B. Fringe Beneiits C. Travel D. Equipment E. SuppIi�s F. Consultants/Contracts G. Ocher Total Di.ec� Costs To.al Project Costs Federal Request Non-Federal AmounE 133,125 S 44,375 ( 75 %) 25 or� io a S 177.500 4� Secfion IV — You must return this page as part of yaur applic�;ion Ite� -2 - . Z�o-�3y Apenc�Hane: sc. ra�1 Police DePaitment - ORI-: MN0620900 $�Q� � u � : 7; �; �'' �' '. �e . ' � � '-. *.- : � �- :] p. Persannel List eacn position by title and name of emoloyee, if a�•ailable. Show the annual salary rzte and tne pesentage of time to be devoted to the project. Compensation p�id for employees engaged in grant zchc'ities must be consistent wi.h thzt paid for sirnilar �eork Fvi+hin the applicant organiza5on. 1�;ame/PosiEion Computation None Cost To Eal: 8. Fringe 8e�efits Frin�e benefits should be bzsed on kno��'n actual costs or an establisned fo:mula. Frinje ben°fits are for the personnel listed in budget cat2gory (-A) a�d only for the peicentage of tim° de�roted to th2 project. liniforms, equipment znd vehicles z:e unalloti-able costs under tnis grant p:oo �m. Please list FIC.4 and 6lrorkers Compensarion, if applicable. \Tame/Position CompuEation Cost ?,nnual Frin�e Benefits *FICA/Social Security Health Insurance Life Insurance Vaca:ioa Sick Leave None Retiremen. � *Wo;l:er's Comp S •linemployment Ins. S pther 5 0 Total: S_ Sectian tV — You must return this page as part nf yaur applicatinn Agen�yName: st. Pau1 Police Departmen[ ORI �: rrn��o 0 00 C. iravet Itemize travel expenses of project personnel by purpose (e.g., staff to training, field interviews, advisory b oup meetin�s). Shoc.� t}1e basis of computanon (e.�., six people to 3-day trauun� at SX airfare, SX lodo -�o, SX subsistence). In training projecEs, trave] and meals for trainees should be listed separatety. Shoti� the number of frainees and the unit costs im•olved. Ideniify the locafion o: fravel, if known. of Travel Locafion Ifem faEion CosE None ToEal: Q. �LlI�7R7B[T� LisE nonexpendable items Ehat are to be purchased. �Tonexpendable equipment is iano bie property having z useful life of more than t years and an acquisition co;t o: 5�,000 or more per unit. Expendable iEems should be included either in the "Supplies" catego.y or in the "Other° cztegory. Applicants should anal5�ze the cost benefits of pccrchesing versus leasina equipment, especialIy Eor high-cost items and tnose suoject to rapid technical advances. Rentzd or lezsed equipment costs should be listed in Ehe "Contractuai" category. Explain how the equipment is necesszry for the success o; the project. Attach a narrztive describing the p:ocurement method to be used. Item Base station and server Cost $12,000 �' I�oEa1:S 12,000 36 Section IV - You must refurn this page as paR af ynur appliration 00-3��{ Agen CjN21l:: St. Pau1 Police Deaarcmenc ORI=:: Miv'0620900 E S�tppiies Li;t items by hp= (office supplies; nos.a�e; iraining matzrials; cop}'in� pzper; and expendzble equ;p,� _ iteins cosring less thzn 5�,000, such zs bool:,, hand-held tape recorder;) znd show the bzsis for compu?ation. Generally; supplies include any materials that are expendable or consumed during the course of the project Ttems taEion Cost Equip 20 vehicle wi[h soitware So:tware interface to C9D/P.!�IS $2,500 550,000 ✓ 510,000 � ToEal:$ 60,000 S=_etinn IV — Yuu must return ihis page as part of your application 3 Apenc/Name: sc. Paui Police Depar[nen[ ORI-: MN0620900 �.� r. �, i �. w Consultant Fe_<s: For each consultant enter the name (if �;nown) service to be provided, hourly or daily fee (S-hour day), and estimated time on the project. Consultant fees in excess of 5250 per da}' require additional writEen justification. ?�Tame of ConsultanE Service Provided CompvEation Cosf ' TBD Subtotal: S 5, OOC S .................................................................................................................................. Consul�ant Expenses: LisE all expenses to be paid from the grant to the individual consultants in addi7on to their fees (e.g., travel, meals, lodgin�). Ifem Location CompufaEion Cost Sub'ro:a!: .........................................................................................................•••••...........••••..... Confracts: Provide a descripEion of the product or sercice to be procured by contract and an estimate o: the cost. Applicants are encouraged to promote frez and open competition in awarding contracts. A separate justification must be provided for sole-source contracts in excess of 5100,000. Item Cost St�bfotal: 5 Total: S 5,000 3 $ SeMinn IV — You must return this page as part uf your appliration �� – (F.�lvs a..r� — ao-�3y .�geacv �me ana Si>Ye: Sa� =L 'au � �o � � c= �ev2r�-!e^[, ` si - ORI = (FBI ID Number3: )�I0620°00 � .r..�fL�'iIl�aliLSl�'a7ltifd[:S i � ��,zs�itan.r : ees =or 2�ch consaitanc enter che name, ;i'<r.own, se_*vice :o oe �rovided, ,ouriy or dayc :ee ; �c3-h011I' QdVj, nIIC 2Si1R1dCE4 RII12 OR Ehe projec�. Consuitanc i2°5 lII ZXCC°55 0I j�JO DeS QnV :2L7ll1I2 addi�onai justincaaon. Vame of ConsultanE Service Provide� Comout>tion Cost The consultar,t cor.tracted for this project wi11 be paid no more than $250 per day for maximum of 20 days. Subfotai: S 5,000 •••-••-........---••-......••• ..................................................•••.....................................••••••-••- Consiitani ,= ��e:aszs L:sc ail expeases to be paid zom the �rant to the :ndividuai consuitants m addition io their iees (e.;. :rave:, meais, lodgin�). Item Location Computation Cost �ubrotai: � ..................................•••••••..................•••.............................................••••................... =onrrr,cs: P:ovtce a desr_iption of the product or seryice to be procured bv contrac: and an e=�:maie oi I :he cosc. .�epiicants are eacouraged b promoce free and opea comoe!i'r.on in awarding cor,sacs. _� seoarate � usancadon mus� �e �rocide� for soie source consac,s in excess or 3iuQ000. ; Item C�s. �i��torr.!. � Tota1: S � ,000 `�' .. 3uc��t Wor::snze:: COPS I�tOP�c'9ti (Tnis aage musc �a re:�;ne�� :o �he COPc prr.ce.... Item �2 �° ' �3y Aqenc jH?fil°: St. Paul Police Deoartnent OBI -: riNO62o9o00 6. Qiher C�s - List i�ems (e.�., rent, producaon, telephone, j=nito:=a1 or secur:ty senices, im�esri�ative or confident;al fwlds) by major type and the basis o: the computation. For example, provide the square footaoe and tne cost per square foot for rent, or provide a monthly rzntal cost � ho�+° many months to rent. ^ ' `--- ComPu{ation Cost None Total: Sedion IV — You must return this page as pa�t ot your appiic2tion C ' �� AgencfMame: sc. Pau1 Police Departmen[ pg�T MNO62o9o00 Budgef �mmary Whem,you have compleEed the budoet ti�orksheet, trznsfer the toEals for each category to the spaces below. Co*npuEe the total direct costs and the total project costs. Indicate the amount of Federal funds requested. Bud�eE Cafegory AmounE A. Personnel B. Frin�e Eeneiits C. I'ravel D. Equipment E. Suopiies F. Consultants/Con�raccs G. Other ToEa1 Direct Costs To.zI ProjecE Cos.s Federal Request Non-FederaI Amount S 57,750 ( 75 °o) 5 19�2�0 ( 25 %) 12,000 - 60,000 S_ 5 , 000 S 77,000 n `� Section IV — You must return this page as part nf your appliratian Ztem fi3 � -� Apenc�Name: sc. Pavi Police Departmen[ ORI r: ri�o62o900 SEi�iIQ�I I!1 �: :i: 'i: ' �: � �;'. : : ;� . : . „� :.. ... . A Fe►sannel LisE each position by �tle znd name of employee, if a��zlable. Show the annual szlary rate and the pesentaoe of time to be devoted to tne project. Compenszrion pzid for employees engzged ia grant zc: vities must be consistent with that paid fo: similar work within tne zpplicant o:ganiza6on. ?`TamelPosition CompuEzEion Cost Nonz Tofel: S � B. R Bene rfs Frinoe benefit; should be based on known actual costs or zn established formula. Fringe benefits zre fo: the personnel listed in budget catego:y (A) and only fo: the percentage of time devoted to the project. Uniforms, eguipment �nd vehicles zre unallow•able costs under this grant proo zm. Please list FICA and Workers Compensation, if applicable. Name/1'osition Compufation Cost An-�ual Fringe Benefits None ;FICA/Social Security S i;ealth Insure.nce 5 Lielnsu;znce Vacation Sick Leave ReEirement '�tiorker's Conp 5 'Unemoloyment Ins. 5 O:ner 5 ' Total: S � Section IY — You must retum this page as part af your appiication Apencykzme: sc. Pau1 Police Department �fll r: riNO52o 00 C. '[r3vE1 Itemize travel expenses of project personnel by purpose (ag., staff to training, $eid interviews, advisory 0 oup meetings). Show the basis of computation (e.�., six people to 3-day training at SX airfare, SX lodo o SX subsistence). In training projecEs, travel and meals for trainees should be listed separately. Show the number of frainees and the unit costs involved. Identify the location of travel, if known. of Travel Location IEem CompuEaEion Cost Idone ToEa1: 5 � D. Equipmerrt List nonexpendable items that are to be purchased. Nonexpendable equipm=nt is tand ble propery having a usefial life of more thzr, {�eo years and an acquisirion cos, of 5�,000 or more per unit. Expendable iteins should be included either in the "Supplies" category or in tne "Other" category. Applicants should anzlyze the cost benefits of purchzsing versus leasino equipment, especially for high-cost items and those subject to rapid technical advances. Rented or lezsed equipment costs should be lisfed in t�'�e "ConEractual" caEegor�: Explain how the equipment is necessary for the success of the project. Attach a narrative desaibing the procurement method to be used. Item Cost 10 squibbs � $6,000 $60,000 � �'� � �u�` ��. Total: S 60,000 36 Sedion !V — You must raturn this page as part of your appiiration �go��N2ng; St. Pau1 Police Deoartment p��_ MNO62o 60 _� � E 5up�ties List iteris by ��pe (of;ice supplies; postaoe; trainin� mater;als; copvin� paper; and exp2ndable equipme� items cosfing less than 5�,000, such as bools, hand-held tape iecorders) and show the bzsis for compuEaton Generally, supplies include any materials that aze expendabiz or consumed durin� the course of tine project IEems :.rs Cost 7 digitzl caneras $700 each $5,000 ✓ t- i � Total: S 5,000 Section IV — You must retum fhis page as part ot ya�r application . Apen�yNam St. Paul police Department Ofl(;: b �.� ' r, �, t �. �.� CoiutilEanE Fees: For eachconsultant enter the name (if known) seroice to be provided, hourly or daiIy fee (S-hour day), and estimated time on the project. Consultant fees in excess of 5250 per day require addiEional written justification. Name of ConsultanE Ser��ice Provided ComnutaEion Cost . Sz�btotal: ...........................................•-•••••................................................................................ Consulianf Ezpenses: List all expenses to be paid from the gran: to the individual consultants in addi�ion to their fees (e.g., frzvel, meals lodging)- Item LocaEion CompuEzEion Cost Stib'ro.a!: ...............•-•..............-•--• •••._..........-••-•--....................................... ••• •.............._........._... ConfracEs: Provide a description of the product or sen�ice to be procured by confract and an esfima.e of the cost. Applicants are encouraged to promote free and open competition in a�varding contracts. A separatz justification must be provided for sole-source contracts in excess of 5100,000. Item CosE SubEota!: S Total: S � 38 Section IY — Yuu must return this page as part af ynur appiication - TrP� t3 > - - 8� �3��( AgencfHame: sc. pa�i Police Departnent •� OAl �: MN06209000 6. Qther C�s List items (e.g., rent, production, telephone, j�nitorial or security sercices, inves:igaEive or confidenF.z1 funds) by major rype and ine basis of thz computation. For ezample, pro��ide the squzre foota�z and the cost per squzre foot for rent, or pro�ide a monthly rental cos: and ho�n� inany months to reni. DescripEion Computation Cosf None Total: 5 � Sedion IV — You must retum this page as part of your application 39 p � � ' dpencyName: sc. Pzui Police Department �AI;: MN0620900 &�riget S�mmary Whert you have completed the budget w�orksheet, transfer the totals for each category to the spaces belox�. CompuEe the totzl direct costs and the total project costs. Indicate the amounE of Federal funds requested. Sud�et Cate�ory Amount A. Personnel B. Fringe Benefits C. Travel D. Equipment E. Supplies E Consulcants/Conirzcts G. Oiher Totzl Di:ect Cos�s Tota1 Project Costs Federal Request I�ron-Federal AmounE S 48,750 ( 75 °b) S 16,250 � 25 %) .• �� •�• 6 ��. 40 Sectian IV — You must refurn this page as Qart ut your apptication ; - U.S. Department of Justice Oit�ce of Community Oriented Policing Services °°-3.3y _ _'� ' ��=� .: �� s�� t� �bb�ng �t��S tnstruc�arzs fnr Cample�on of Si—ill, Di�r� nf Lo66ying A�iivP�es Ttus disclosuze forrt shall be completed by the reportin� enflty; whether subzwardee or prime Feeeral recipi- ent, ai the inifiarion or receipE of a covered Federal ac6on, or a material chan�e to a przvious filing, pursuant to tit!e 31 U.S.C. secfion 1352. The filing of z form is required for eacn pay:nent or zo eement to nake pa��_ ment to any lobbyin� entity for influencing or attemptino to influence an ofiicer or employee of zny z�z a �Iember of Con�ress, an ofiicer or employee of Congress, or an employee of a Member o_' Cono;ess in con- nection with a covered Federal action. Complete all i�ems that zpply for both the inifial filing and materiai chan�e report. Refer to the implementing o idance published by the O:fice of and Bud�et for additional inEormation. 1. Idena.`y the type of covered Federal action for which lob by'v-�� acavi'ry u and/or has b�n srZUZd to influence tne out- come oi n covered Fedzr2l action. '-- Ide�d-v the s��tus of ��e covered Federzl action. �. Iden�ry the appropriate clessi=ica7on o: t�'us report. Lf thic is a follo,n�-up repor� caused bv a mzterial change to the info*- r.tation previously reported, enter the year and quarter in ��'hicn t�ie c c�ct� Enter the date of fne ]zst pcevi- ousiy s�b:ni::ed re�ort by tius rzooctin� e�tiiy for t�1s cov- err.l Feder�l action. '-. En.°: ��e fuL name, addre=s, city, state znd zip code of the repor.-�� ena;�,�. Indude Con�r2r,ional I3�'s7ict nu_mber, i� !��owr,. Cn>ck th<?D�roprizte clzss�=ica�on o; the repotung en�ty t'r,zt desi�ate> if iE is, or expects to be, a prime or sub- a�.•ard rytpie,nt. Identi"ry tl-ie tier of tne subawardee, e.�., the n:s: suoawzrdee of the prime is the lst tier. Subzwazds i�dude but ue not limited to subcontacts, sub�.nts and con�act zw�sds unde: o ants. �. L` Lhe oroz_-uza�on fi!ing the repor. in item ? c'r,ectcs "Subawa=dee," then enter the full nzme, addiess, aty, s:ate ��d zip cede of the prime Federzl recipient L�clud= Cono e_<sonal D�'s�ict, if known. ered Federal zction (it,m 1). If 1�own, entzr tne full Catzlo� of Federal Domestic?=sistance (CFDA) n�-nber for o ant;, coopera�ve j�ements, loaru znd lo�Z commitn�nt;. S. Ent=r the mos, aopropriate Federal ide.��fy� �u,-nber avzilable fo� t�ie Fede;�i action iden�fie� in item 1(e.�., Request for Proposal(R�P) number, Invi;a�on for Bid (�) number; grant announceL�en; number, tne contract, o anF, o; loan award nu.mber, tne application/prop con�oi nu.mbe; assimed by tne Fede_�1 a�ency), In�] P,e;ixos, e.,., "RFP- DE-90-001." '" 9. For a cove:ed Federel zc5on where there nes b.�� e� awa:d or loan com.-*u�e�i by the Fedezz aoency en,�* ��e Federal amount of :ne aH•zrd/loz� com. fa ��e o u:t= ena'ry ide�t,zzd in i,em g o: �. ' 10. (a) Enter [he full n�. add.-zss, city, s�.te a�-�d zip code of t�tie lobbying entity enozged by the repoctin� regssz-�c iden�- fied in item S to i*uluence tnz covered Frleral action. (b) EnEer the full name(s) of the individu�l(s) pe..or_ni_-�� ser- vices, and include fil addrzs; if difieren; f;om 10 (a). Enter L�st Nanz, Firs, tia-ze, e.nd yliddle Iruti�1(vin. 11. The ce_�tiiying oE"nciai shall sip e,nd daEe the for,n, print hs/hername, ti;le znd telephone numbe:. o. Enter �ne r,ame of tne Federal agency m2t�� e awud or lo�-� co:.�..T��e Lnclude a, ]ea;; one or�an;.�atioral level below' a�=^c; name, ii 4�o��n. Fo: exz.-npie, Depa.*�nent of Tran;por.atior., United S.ates Coast Guard. ". [nter �ne r'rler<�l pro�ra.�n name or description fo: the co��- P��blit recorting Lzerder.`ar t7:is rollectia: of infor,r..:ior. s es:ir.m;=: tu n.rra�e 30 mir.t�t>s per ns]onsz, ir„(udins time for r��i�.:;ing instrneiau, >e:+rc'r.ing �s.ino a.a!a wur.�s, o�,'r�rino and mcir.:.:r.ir,s f{_ lis!a t:redec.', er.d c�rr.ple:irt� ar,d rt✓ir.e.'ns tit t�!(ectior, of inforrruiior.. Sa:d co^;- rr.ents rescrding th� burden estirrm:e or any otf�ernsye:: of this mlfection of iriorm�!ion, inci«1in� s�r��es;ior.s for rC�ttCinS fld5 0lvC'::;, t0 f6:O��ce o% HlannScm�r;; ar.d Biutsct. Pc�er,cnrk Rcdirction Projtc! (03:5-OC-o1. b:'sslain�ton, D.0 ?0�30. Ad�uni�rative kmvs — Ynu musi return ihis page as part ot your application 'j'f j : �.�:` �;;.`' ' � �' .T : J� 7 it: , ' s : f. j: =l: . . `L'�. Comoleie tnis form to disclose lobbyin� acti�'ities pursuant Eo 31 U.S-C.1352 (See recerse for ins�:uctions and public burden disclosure) I. Type of Eederat Action: B a. contract b. grant c. cooperztive a�reement d. loan e. loan �uzrantee f. lozninsurance Z. StaEus of Federal Action: _ a. bid/ofier/appliczHon b. initial award c. pos.-awar3 �?. Nzme and Address of Reportin� Entit}•: � �Prime � Subawzrdee Tier _� if l.�tomn: Saint Paul Police Department 100 East 1ltfi Street � St. Paul, MN SS1Q1 ' Con�r2ssional Dis::ict (number), i: knowz: � 6. Federal Departmen✓�gency: 0 S. Federzl Acfion Number, if kno�sn: Anproved by OVf� os=s-oo1� (as amended) 3. P�eport Type: _ a. initial filin� b. material change For Materia[ Change Or.iy: Year: Quarter: Date of last report _. S. If P.eporfin� EnEity in No. 4 is Subawardee, En:er ?�'ame and Address of Prime: e Conarzssional Dis:rict (nunoer), ii knocvn: _ 7. Fedezal Pro�ram I�amelDescripEion: C'rD� Numoe*, if applicaole: 16.710 9. Ax•ard AmounE, if known: S � 10. a. tvame and Address of Lobbying Re�istrant i (ij irzdiaidual, lnst n.nm_°, firsf name, MI): 11. Information requested tnrou�h this focm is authorized by TiHe SI U.S.0 Section 235Z This disdosure of tobbyin� aCi�i6es is a material reprseatafion of fac: nnon �vhich reliance K'as placed by the tie: aoove when this transaction w-as made or entered into. Tnis disclosure is required pu:- suant to 51 U.S.0 li5? Tn'ss iaformafion will be reported to Cze Con� ess semi-annualiy znd c+z12 be available tor pvbIic inspeCaon. My peaon who fails to file tne required disdo- su:e shall be subject to a ti�il penalty of nat less than S10,000 and not more than 5100,000 for each such faiture. Federal Use Onl}': 10. b. Individual5 Perfornt�ng Services (includin� address if diferenE f;om \o.10a) (last nzme, first name, MI): � Si�nature: Hilliam K. Finnep Print \�me: Chief of Police Title: Telep4one �`o.: 612-292-3588 Date: 6l12/9$ autrto, fo; Local P.eproduc[ior., S:andard � o.m - LLL y. LJ.S. Deparfinent of Justice Of ice of Community Oriented Policin� Services -� �--;,ao -a3 y . - _��__ �l�i�OiiS Regarriing Lnhirying; IIebarmerr�, �ensinn and t)ther Resgor�sihiIity Matfers; Drug-fs2� Wo la� RequiremerrLs Caardination with Affe�l Agenaes; hl�rrSapplarr[ing; and Reten'�ion. � Althouoh {he Depa�l��t of Jusfice has made eve.y eE`ort to simplify the applicafion process, other provi�ions of Federal law require us to see!c your certificarion regazding certain matteis. Applicantr should read the o�lior� citzd below az;d ['ne instructions for ceraiicztion induded iri the regulations to unde:s.and the requirementr and whether they_ apply to a partic�el2- applica_�t. Sio ta;ure of this form provides for compliznce with certificafion requirementr under 28 CFR Paz; 69, "New Rzstricaons on tobbying;' and � CFR Part 67, "Govemma�,-k�ide Debar.nent and Suspension (Nonproauement) and Gove.-nment-cvide Requimments for Drug Free Workplace (GranG);' and the coo:dination and non-supplantino req�;�ents o; Ehe Public Safety ParY�eiship and Commuruty Policin� Act of 1994. Tne ceftifications sh�11 be �eatzd as a mzterial represen_ tztion of fact upon which reliance will be placed when the Deparsnent of Justice determines to awa:d the covered o.nt. 1. Lobbying Ps reqwred by �� 1352, Title 31 of the US. Code, and imolr mented x; ZS CE72 Part 69, for peaons entering into a grant or coo� e: aHve a��e=r.;ent over S1CO,OLt�, u defined at 2S CFR Part 69, the z��lic�nt certifies tha:: A. t�'o Federal aoproprixted funds have been paid or will be pzid, by or on behalf of tne undersi�ned, to any pe:son for inflL encin�r or zt;enotin� to influence an oLicer or employee of any a�encv; a MemSe: oi Co ��s, an officer or employee of Con� e=s, or an employee of a �fembe: o: Co �oress in connr.,ion witn tne making of any Federal o ant; the entedng into o[ any coope:ative ao eenenF, and the extension, mntinuafion, 2newzl, zmenement or modiScaHon of any Federa] o nt or c000e:ative z�r2ement; B. Ii a�v iunes o�4er ci;a� Fe�'e;z1 appro�riatzd tw�ds have beer paid o: w�ili be pzid to any person fo: influencin� or aCemoh:n� to influ_nr-_ an o;3cer or enployee oF zny ager.:y; a Member o; Con�, ess, an o�icer or employee of Co o�ress, or an employee o; a M_mber o.' Cono �s in conneclion wi:h t}tic Federal grant or mop=_.ative ovreenent, the undzaio ed shall complete and suFr :nit Standard For.n — LLL, "Disclosum oE Lobbying Activities," in acco��ance wiCh its ins;ruCior�s; C. t ne undersio ed shzl! reqtire that the lan�ua�e of ths certin'- cation ce induded in ,he award documents for aIl svoaw�ards at aIl tiers (indudin� subo ants, mnhacts under granLs and toopea- rve a�.�mens, and su'.conhac5) and tnat all svb-redpien5 s4alf ce:riryand disc(ose accordingiy. Z Debarmeat, Suspension and Other Responsibility Matten (Direct Recipient) As rzqu,-=d by Exa;utive O:der I?�"9, �oarm=n; and Susoersion, and i;tpi=�ented at 2S CFR Part 67, ior prospective paficioan's i� p:irrary covered tarsac�ons, as denned at � CFR Part 67, Sn.ion 6i510 — A. Tne applicant certines tnat it and ils Prin�p2�5: (i) A:e not presently debarred, suspended, pmpcu¢d for debar.nenL dec(ared inelia ble, sentenced to a denial oi Fedeal benefits by z s:ate or Fed=ral court, or volentarilv erduded from covered traruac;ions by any Federal depa:;_ nent or agency; (ii) Have not witnin a tkueryear pe�od pr cedino this zp ca6on been tonvicted of or had a dvil jndo ent randered zgairut them for commiesion of fraud or a criminai oueruz in connection with ob;aining, attemp;ing to obtain, or perfo; m- ing public (Federal, s:ate or Ixa1) tra,lsa�tion or conCa:: unde: a pubGt hznsaction; violation of Federzl or s:ate zn6t;us; s:atutes or commission of embezzlemen:, thek, Eo o_ry, bn'oz.ry, Fetsification or des;ruc;ion of rrords, mzkin� ;a!se s:ztemenLS, or iec=iving s:olen prope.�; (iu) Are not presently indictzd for or o�.erwi� �,� o: d�illy charoed by a govemmentai entiry (Federal, s;z;e or Iocal) w9th comrtission oi any oi tne o�z�se> enu-�era:ed i� pa.a�.apn (.4)(ii) oi tns certincaHon; z.c (iv) Have not witiun z thcedyez: period prxeding t-tis appL- cafion had one or more public ransa:do, s��deral, s:a;= or loczl)terr and B. �L�nere the applicant is unable to certiiy to any of the statr menis in this cerrificafion, he or she shall aCzcn an explanafion to this appGcaSon. 3. Drv� Free Workplace (Grantees OtherThan Indio�iduals) As mquired by tne Dru� Free Workplace Act of 19SS, and i.-n�le- mented at 2S CFR Pzr; 67, SubpaY. F, fo; o.ante=s, as defin=d at?S CFR Par; 67, Se�tions 67.615 and 67.620 — A. Tne appfi�nt certifies that it wi11, or wi11 continue to, n[ovide a dru� free workplace by: (i) Pubisvno a statement nofiiying em?io}'_<s tna[ tn= unlau'iul manuficture, dis.ribu6or., dspz:s'v�g, poss2ssion o, usz of a contolled subs:ance is prohibit=d in the o zn;>= s �vo: kpiace and spedfi.ing the a:tiorts thz: will be ta.l-en zgai;u: emoioyees ior violafion o; sucn proiubition; (ii) Es:ablishing an on-goin� d;v� (ree a:.a:eness pro� zm to inforn employees about — Adnuvstr'a6++e Foms - You must return this page 2s part of your applica{io❑ sg , _. . . .� (z) Tne dangers oE drug ab�se in the workplace; fo) The o ntee s po(icy oE maintauung x druo Ece-° x'orkplace; (�) ?� �- acailable drug counseiing, �ehabilitarion and employ- e� a=sis:ance progracns: and (,�,) Tne penalties that may be imposed uoon employees Eor drs� abuse ��o�a6or5 occurrixtg in the worlcPla[e; (ui) �(a't:ing it z requi2men: that each employee to b=_ engagrl in the perforre�nce oi the g.�ant bz o ven a copy of the s�tement mquired by para�raph (i); (iv) Nociiying [he employee in the stacement required by paregraoh (i) that, as a mndi6on oE employment under tne o ,.n;, the employee will — (a) Abide by the terns of fne statement; and ('o) No:ify fne employer in wd5ng of hs or her comicdon Eor z�:olation of a mmina! dnig s3tute occurrin� in the �vork- plac_ no la:er than five calendar days aE:er such conviction; (v) tioti,4^n� the a�encV in �vrian�, wiLhin 10 c:lenda: dz}'� after rxeiving no:ice unee: suboamo aph ( iv)(b} :r�m an enpioyee ar otnerwise re=eivin$ actnal notice of such comic- tion. Employecs of convicted employe� must pco�ide no^:ce, induding posi5on fide, to: COPS O45ce,11C0 �Jermont A��e., z\�YY, Wzs:una oM �� otice shx11'vndude the iden�5- cztion number(s) of each af:eded o °�, .nt; (ci) Takin� one o: 4�e follo�ei�� ac:iors, w'ithu� �0 @lenda: cays oY mc_iving no6ce unde; subpara� aph (iv)(b), wi:� resp�: ro any enptoyee w�no is so coneic:ed — (a) i2!�y-�� appropriate pe:sonn_I action zgzu�st such an em?loye_, up to and indudL temw-�ation, coasis:ent wi:n the cequiremeats of the Renabilitation A� of 1973, as anend- ed; or (o) .Requi-in� suc4 emoloy� to pa :iapate satis:ado:iiy c. z d:t� abse asss:ance o: r_nzSilitation pr��ram app�o°'ed .`or suci� pur�oses 5y a Fe3e:zl, s:xte or local hzal:h, law e:�or.� ment o: other anpropriate agency; (vii) Malbng a good fai:h e"r"or: to con:inue to maintain a dn:� (zee workplace throu�n implementation oE para� ephs �I�. �ll�. �Ill�. �Ib'�. �V� 2(ld �CI�. g. The grantee mav inseri im[he space provided below che site(s) for che performance of work done im m�nec:ion d.•i:h the speci6c orui.`. - Place of performance (s:ieet address, city, county, s.aFe,'zip code) Chr.k � if tnem �`^•orkplaces on file tha: am no! iden'i�ed here. �etion 67.E90 oE the xea ations pco'rides that a o antee tnat is a s:ace cnay ele� to make one certification in eacn Federal fis:at year, a mp}' of which shouid be included w•itn each application for Depatment of Justice fundino S[ates and s'atz aoencies mz}' elecc to vse OjP Form 4061(7. Q�ec.F Q iffhes�tehaselededtomnpleteOJPFo.-m'=Lti1/i_ S_ Coocdination The Pub6c Safety P�neship and Community Polidng Ac: oE 199 - requires applicants to ceY3iy thzt there hzs bzzn app�opaate coores- nation v+i:h all a�°naes tt'at ma}' be �ecte3 by the aoplican:'s o.ant pr000ul if approved. AffeGed zgendes r,�zy indudz, among ofn=rs, t�e Qc�:e o: tiie linited S.ats Attoney, s:atz o: lo�al prosz'vt�rs. °r cocxec:ional zgend=s. The appliant cet.i.ies tnat there tus be_n yo propdate coocdin3hon with a1I afiected zgenda. 5. i ion-$upplanting !he app(ican: heieby cerufies that Federai funcs �'ill not be ��ed :o replace or supplant s:zte or local Eunds, or Eunds supplied bY ��e g�ueau oE Tndian Afmirs. that would, in the absence of Fede:al zid, be r,�de acailaole to or for !aw eniocczmen= purposes_ 6. FetenGOn i ne a?olicant hemby ceYUAes that it undestancs thzt i: ms: abide by i5 suSmitted pizn to xe�in Lhe addiaonat civilian pesiaors anc redeployment levek at the condusion of the grant pe;iod. St- Paul Police Department Gante: \ar,ie and Addmss: ppolicztion \o. and/or Project Name: Scfiool—Based Partnerships GRnteeii25/VendorNumber Chief William K- Finney Tvped \ame and Title of Si�a �r_: �•� o• Fnfoeeement Representative: :? s tl:e du!y aufl:or'=ed represer.!ati�e tior.s, ir.e!uding Y)�c p�n Ya mte:r.. EIe T�,,zd \ame Date: 41-600-5 4� �errzin� body, I f�ereby cer:ify thc•* tl:e I am binding the goaeming bodv to ti�e abo�e certi �nern o�czals unl! not relime tiu gonemirtg 6ody of its obligations ur.der tixis e an*-. Norm Coleman Date: �i�, �;ur=_. _ ' � _ � '°�ir ._r '_ _ �:_:.. - �;�,�.�: �SStli '�.5. Department oF Jusfice Ofiice of Community Oriented Policin� Services �v_:a1 proe�sions oi Federal law and policy appty to all o �, .nt prograzrs. We (the Oliice of Community Oriented Policin� Services) n==d ;o secL:e you: assurance tnat you (the appIicanU w•ill comnly wi.n tnese provisions. I: you would like fur.ner infor.nahon abeu: zny o_ tne mzr,e-s on which we seek you: asswa�ce, please con;act is. By your au;norized rzpxesen:a5ve's sio atuiz, you �ssuie us and ceY.ify to l:s thz, you will comply witn a!l legal znd adr,unis ; require- nen� Lia; govem the applicant ior acceptance and vse of Fede:ai g; ant funds. In particvlaL you assuie vs tnzt: I. You ha�•e been le�zlly and ofiicially autnoazed by the approp:iate goveming body (for example, mayor or dty council) to apply for tns g:ant and that the persons sio in� G`�e appiication xnd tnese assu:- ances on your behali z:e au[horized to do so and to act on your benzli wi,h mspeR to zny issues t;iat may arise during praessin� of this a�ptica:ion. ? Y�u `�:1! comply wi:n the p, of Federzl law which lir.ut cer.ain pelitica! activifies o: yoer employees whose prindpal em- ploynent is im m�nection with an acavity financed 'v� whole or in P2' ��z �'tis ��ant. Thesz res:ricrions are s2t for.n in � US.C. � I�Ol, et seq. 3. Yon wil! comply wi.n .ne minimw-n w•a�e and maximum hours pro� sio�s of the Fede:al Fair Lzbor S:andares Ad, ii they aoply to voc. ?. You tiiL zstablsh saizo�ards, if you have no; done so alrezdy, to pro'rubit e-�oloyees fcon �sin� ;hei: positions for a pw tT�a[ is, or � ves :he appearance of 6<L�g, mo6vz.ed by a desi:e for pr.cate oain for tnzr•selves or o;ne*s, particula;ly those witn whom tney ha�= •`an'i;; bi:siness or oLher tles. oender, dsability or age, unlawfully exclude a,ny pe:son ir�n pa:tic- ioafion in, deny tne benefits of o: employment to zny pe:son, o: su6 ject any person to dis., in connection wi.n any p�� ams or acfivities funded in whole or in paR with Federal fvnds. 7hecz civil ri�hs requirementr z;e found in tne non provi- sions of tne Onuuoi:s Cz�ime Contr�} and Safe Shxts pct of 1965, as amended ( US.C. § 3759(d)); Ti:le VI of the Civil Riohts p�; of 19%'-, as aznended (-1 US.C. § 2CCOd); the Indian Civil Righ� .q�; (� US.C. §§ 1301-1303); Section SG; of the Rehabilitztion Act of 1973, as amend- ed (29 US.C. § 79S); Title II, SubHtle A of the Americar�s wi;n pu2oi�_ ities Act (ADA) (�=2 U.S.C. § 12101, et seq.); tne Age Di�-i:nina;ion Act oi 1575 (=2 U.S.C. § 0101, e: seq.); and Deoartnent oE JcsSce h'on-Divimination Reo ations contzined in Title 2S, Pa.-s 35 and _Z (suopar`s C, D, E and G) of tne Code of Fede: al Re�ulations. A. In thz event �ia; any cour; or adrritis; a:i��e zo=ncy ,-.iz:es z iindin� of diseimination on orounds of race, color, re1i� on, na6or.al ori�:n, oende:, dsabiliN or z�e aozL you z�=r a du= praess he3;in�, you ��cee to fonvz.d a copy of E�e i'v�dL�� ;o tie Ot."ice oi Civil Rghts, OSce or Jistice Proo zms, S10 7:rt Stre=t, Iv'VJ. Wzs;i.�a,on. TK 20�31. J. YOL' N'}L �;ve tne Depz-;rient oi Ju.`:c= o: the Convtro!ler Gen_:a] zc:�s to z,, the ri�it :o exam; ne :e:ords znd da�v.meats relz;zd to tne o n:. 6. You �vili comoly witn all requirem=ntr imposed by the Depz:;- ment of J.s :c> as a condi5on or adrniniscz;ive eequirement of tne � ant; wi;rt �ie proe am guide!ines; witn the cequirements of O�fB Ci:cvlars,^-.-57 (ooveming mst calculz6or5} and A-12$ or A-133 (gov- eming zudis); witn the applicabte p�visions of th= Omnibus Cri.-ie Control znd Safe Strz�ts Ac; of 1968, zs amended; with 28 CFR Pzrt 60 (L'nifor.,�. Admirust;ative RequuemenLs); with tne provisions of tne cw;2n; e�ition of the appropriate COPS o ant own=r's manuzl; and �vitrt a!i other applicable laws, orde:s, iz�ula6ons or cir.vla5. 7. You KiIl, ;o the extent prac:icable and corsis:ent witn applicaole la�.; see!c, rzauit and Mre qualin"ed memSe:s of racial and ethnic r.unority o, o::ps and qualined women in order to fuCher efiective lak• enforc=-�en; by incezs'v-�� thei: rzacs wiGtin tne swom pesi- tio;s in yo�: a�enc�: S You �.i;i :.� c, on the o.o.y.d oE rac=, coio;, re!i� on, nztional origin, B. Lf you an_ applv':ng tor a�ran[ o� 5.iCO or morz and Lk�a.;- nent regulaSors (2S CrR ^-2.301 et seq.) rzquire you to su� :tit a-� Eoual O?p� :1:ni:y Enployzn=_nt Plan, you x�ill do so a; ,ne tim= oi tltis appli:afion, u you have not don= so in tne past ti you z:e zpplyin� ro: a o an: o: ]ess tnzn 5500,000 znd tne re�u;zcions reGure you to ma��tain a Plan on 41= in you: oEice, you wil( do so wiJda I20 days oi your o znt aivzru'. 9. You will insure ,hzt the fadlities under your owne�snio, le=_sz o; supervision wF.icn shall be utilized in the acmmplishmen: oi the project are not listed on the Environnental Protec;ion A�ency's (EPA) list ci �iolz:ing Faciii6es and E�a; you will nofi;y us ii vou zre advised by tn= EPA incicatina that a;acility to be used in tnis `;zn: is under co,sid_ra:ion for ]isting by EPA. 10. If your s;a:e hzs es:ablished a revi_w z�d comr:�ent prec=dure under Es=:utive Orde: 123i2 and 'nas selected this pro� am ior review, ynu hav_ made tnis apolica;ion availaSle for rz�•iew bv the s.zte Single Poin. or Con[act. ' Il. You nilf devise a plzn to retain tne increzszd hi:;ng lev_! �ci:h s:ate and Ixai ;unds ai,e: tn> cor.ciesion oi your o;an[. Adininistraiive Pomcs - You must return this page as part ot your applica(ion 67 " _ , s� . :. 12 You will comply K'iti the provisions oE Federal lz�v evhich apply to funding for the pur- cnase, maintenance or e:ihancement oi eqeipmznt (harcware or softwa:e) tnat enables an agenc}' :o receive, s.ore, excnange, anal;ze o: flisseminace c:imir,al intelli�ence information. These reeuire- ments zre set forth in 2S C.F.R. Part 23. If you: g:ant is subjed to the 2S CER. Part 23 reoui;z- �nen:s, you will crezte a s}�s:em operating manuz! to ensure that your agencq operates and main- tains such a sys:em in conformxnce with the oper x;in� p;inciples set forth in 2S C.F.R. Pzrt 23. "'Criminal Intelligence Syste:n" or "Intelligen:e Sys.em" means khe zr.an�emenis, equipneat, fzcilities, and pmce3u:e esed for the receipt, storaoe, intere�ency eschange, d�s- semination and analYSis of criminal_inteiligence � iniomation. Any informztion systen that receeced, stores and cisseminates information on individuals or or�znizations based on their " vnvolvemen: in ciminal ar.icity is a crir.unat - intelli�ence >?sfen. The de[inition includes botF svstems [ha: srore detxiied information on the criminal activities o: subjects and sy5tems that s:ore only iniormation desi� ed to identify indi- viduals or or�anizxtions that are the subject of an incuicy or analysis (e.�., a pointer sys:=m). ( L, ceri;i� canp[iancc �v�ii� il�. a�n�e assurmr_�5 [i_�' �u�rnt ti�r appii:aFio�: mui ttiC tj hed�;:ti I1utd5. Date: Sig, at�re: � _ ORIGINAL Presented By: Referred To: U.S. Department of CURRENT BUDGET 4 WIIEREAS, this grant will be used to enhance and ezpand the Saint Paul Police DepartmenYs technology 5 capacity to manage information more effectivel}' and provide police officers with more effective tools; and 6 7 WHEREAS, this grant awazd requires a S63,625 match from the City of Saint Paul which will be funded by S the Saint Paul Police Department's Asset Forfeiture Fund, and 9 10 WHEREAS, the Saint Paul Police Department needs to establish a financing and spending plan for 11 this grant in 2000; and 12 13 WHEREAS, The Mayor pursuant to Section 10.07.1 of the Charter of the City of Saint Paul, does certify that 14 there are available for appropriation funds of $254,500 in excess of those estimated in the 2000 budget; and 15 16 WHEREAS, The Mayor recommends that the following addition be made to the 2000 budget: 17 18 19 20 21 22 23 24 25 26 27 28 29 30 31 32 33 34 35 FINANCING PLAN: 436 - Police-Special Projects 34120 - Narcotics/Special Investigations 9830 - Use of Fund Balance 34108 - Cops More 1995 3099 - Other Federal Direct Grants in Aid 7499 - Intrafund Transfer SPENDING PLAN: 436 - Police-Special Projects 34120 - Narcotics/Special Investigations 0799 - Transfer Out-Intrafund 34108 - Cops More 1998 0219 - Professional Services OS53 - Cameras 0856 - Data Processing 5oftware 0857 - Data Processing Hardware 138,034 Council File # � 0� 33 � Green Sheet # 104589 63,625 �3 AMENDED BUDGET 201,659 - 190,875 190,875 - 63,625 63,625 , > > > 188,750 63,625 252,405 - 5,000 5,000 - 5,000 5,000 - 95,000 9�,000 - 149,500 149,500 3G , , � , 37 38 THEREFORE BE IT RESOLVED, that the City Council accept this grant award in the amount of 5190,875 39 to enhance Police Department technology and approves the changes to the 2000 budget. Requested by Department of: Police By: Approval Recommen ed by Budget DirecAr. � Adopted by Council:Date: Adoption Certitied by Council Secretary: - s • � _ Approved by ayor:Date: { By: �� CITY S INT PAUL, MINNESOTA �� Committee:Date: ut Paul Police Department has received a 5190,875 Cops More 98 Grant from for the period September 1,1998 through February 28, 2001; and By: y'_ Form Ap o ed by Ci y Attorne : B • Approve bv ayor for Sub � �o� �o�� BY� �Yv�,P i��u'UU'i'� CHANGES 34'I 08COpsMOre98G mnt cr2000 i -,� DEPAR7(r1ENTlOFFICFJCOUNCIL Police Department CONTACT PERSON 8 PHONE Chief Finnev 292-3588 MUST BE ON COUNCIL AGENDA BY (DATE) Please process ASAP TOTAL # OF SIGNATURE PAGES ACTION REQUESTED 3/10/00 7 GREEN SHEET rvo. 104589 INITIAVDATE INITIALIDAiE �� u � � � i J� �CITVATTONNEY_� ❑CIttCLERK �FYNNCIALSEAVICESMR [r/f/\ �FWINGLLSERV/ACCTG � T 3 �1MYOR(ORL595TpNT)�" � �f{��J�qK.�([5 (CLIP ALL LOCATIONS FOR SIGNATURE) � Approval of the attached council resolution accepting a Cops More 98 Grant and establishing a 2000 spending and financing plan for the grant. I ION Appfove (A) of R¢�ect (R) PERSONAL SERVIGE GONTR4CT5 MUST ANSWER THE FOLLOWING QUESTIONS. 1 Has �his personlfirm ever worked untler a con[ract for this department? PLANNING COMMISSION vES NO CI8 COMMITTEE 2. Has ihis personmrm ever been a city employee? CIVIL SERVICE COMMISSION YES NO 3 Dces this persoNfrm possess a skill not normally possessed by any cutrent city employee� YES NO � 4. Is Ihis personKrm a targeted vendoR YES NO Explain all yes answers on separate sheet antl attach lo green sheet The Saint Paul Police Department has received $190,875 Cops More 98 Grant from the U.S. Department of Justice Por the penod September 1, 1998 through February 28, 2001. (Attached is a copy of the grant ) The Saint Paul Police Department witl use funds from this grant in 2000 to enhance and expand technology IF Ability to cohance technology tl�at �vill allow police officers to manage inCormation more effectively. i�one. Loss of rant funds to enhance technolo ��`�� '° �`� r g gY. ,. r ,., �,. ,.e,::� f', dL:'(a d Fi f3 Gll�� ,',".oh�xp: - . .. , . .°�:-� s - . , . _ ,._ . _ . �. UNT OF TRANSACTION $ 2�4,�00 COST/REVENUE BUDGETED (qRCLE ONE) YES NO souRCe U S Department of 7ustice Grant ACTIVITY NUMBER 3410A & 34120 . INFORMATION (EXPLAIN) 34108CopsMore98Grant.gs 2000 --� '�. �' Office ofthe Director 1700 Yermontdrem�e. i� �cas��ro�. Dc �osio Chief William K Finney St. Paul, City of 100 East l lth Street St. Paul, I�IN » 101 U_ S. Department of Justice Office ojCommurdry Oriented Policing Services (COPS) September 9, 1999 Re: COPS MOFtE '98 Extension - Grant # 98CLWX0143 Deaz Chief Finnev: �O -�3� L'± l � _ J ,'/ .; ._� � �i �� ./ �. l�� _ �, : r:_, , � � �.0 n �� 0 lY � � � � � I am pleased to infonn you that your request for an e�ctension of your COPS MORE '98 has been approved. Your new COPS MORE '98 grant end date is 02/28/2001. As you ]mow, the funds provided under COPS MORB'98 must result in an increase in the number of full-rime-equivalent (FTE's) deployed into community policing. The level of redeployment is indicated on the awazd page of your grant and is the e:ipected result of the funding of your original applicaiion. In addiuon, achieving and maintaining the level of redeployment is a condition of your �ant. We etpect this estension will enable you to maintain the level of redeployment outlined in your orig.nal grant_ Ifyou have any questions regarding your extension, please contact the U.S. Depazttnent of JusticeResponseCenterat 1-800-421-6770orcallyourgrantadvisor. Sincerely, � ` � � � �..,$�! Man' Lou LeaiV Acting Director _ . :�:: :.. :, ��_��s: ; , t: , � . ;; � —� � a. /^ - � -`r,_• U. S. Department ofJustice �ffCG' Of COt7113110i1�' OI'I211P2lI POIIClit� Serviees COPS MORE 98 AWARD Applicant Organization's Legai \ame: St. Paul, Cin� of Gru�rt _: 93CLWX01�3 ORI'.: >1\06309 1'endur °: �1600v3! La.+ Enforcemeni E�ecuti��e \ame: dd<Iress Cttr, Starr. ZipCode: Telephuna F<cc. Covernment E�ecutive Name: .�Ct[il i'S5 Cin'. Stutc. Zip Cnc(d Tel��phu�rr Ftu Award Start Date: 9.' { J f 99S Ai�ard Amount: S 190,87�.00 Ci��ilian Personnel Award: S 0.00 Equipment/Technology Award: S (90,875.00 /"\ i .'i �Juszph E. Brann Di rectu r l'i�� `:`.'�f ✓ �. � " "., ' Datz \umber of Redeplo}�ed Officers: \umber of Redeplo}�ed Officers O o -�'S e 11 �? " B� signin�,this a��ard, the si��nawry of6cial, are as�in� to :�bidz b� the Cor.ditions of Grant . - 1�vard found un die re� erse side of this dxument ' �. � � 1 ; .. : �. �_ . ��-+----e..:� ';+ Fi['re� ot Poi�ce Sienaturo uf L2�-1 Eoforcemznt E�ecuti�e ��ith Typed\ame uid lltleof Li« EnfUn:ement G�eniei�c Uatz the aud�uritr !„ , this _ranE a��ard I �� I ' Q�f� ! �, Sormar Caie�:a�; ;I,i�; �.�� i;�_�— Siliaturc ofGu�emmznt��ecutice with the Typed �ame mid litleuf Go�zmmrnt authont} to.ccep[thisyant-award. Esecuti�e Date Chizf IViIGam h. Finnz�. 100 East I I[h Staet St. Paul. �t] ;;101 (612)39?-;>33 (bl��q�_;;.� �la�orNorman B, Colemnn I: `V2SI K2I�Ofl°_ BOUI2Vdit� Cit�' FIaII- Room 390 - St. Paul. \IN ��10? (bl'_)266-5�10 �( � � � � q ,._ �� A�+'�rd End Da[e: 8 31 1999 7.60 :\umber of Redeployed Officers YS �,... o,,� '��, o � �'°-�,,;�_.�°_ U.S. Department of Justice Office of Justice Programs Washingmn, D.G 20537 DATE: � FROhI : po - 33`� Auaust 13, 1998 Grant Award n 98-C?.-WX-01?3 Josina Talbert, Grant Moni�or, COPS Office � �i.l`/ �s°-�'.�[-t-L�' �. De amo, L., Financial Analyst, COPS Branch, Office of the Comptroller SUBJECT: Financial Clearance: Application ;', 8-3551-�-CL, for the St. Pau1, City of. A financial analysis of budgeted costs has be_n comoleted. Costs appear reasonable, allowable and consistent with existing guide- lines. Exceptions/Disallowed Costs are notec below. Cost CateQOrv Equipment: Suoplies: Contractual: Total Costs: ***Disallowed Costs: Grand Totals: Federal Share: 190,875 Local Share: 63,625 ° Tota1 Project Cost: 254,500 °auiDment 189,500 60,000 5,000 25=,500 65,000 COMMENTS: The total�project costs were recuc°d by 5'S,000 due to "programmatically disallowed" costs in tae Sau �-�:budget ($60,000) and in the Suopiies buccet $5,�000). � Prior to the obligation, e.�:ueadi�ure or drawaown ox grant funds for indeneadent consultant =ees in excess oP $250 per day, prior aporoval must be obtained =rom the COPS otfice. � JDOn ��Gnc� �� {v�/� '� �� /LDD/0 / � - _fla-�ay SECTION 1 • ��g��d [��o� Pl:�se aruuer a!I oj t'r_ jollcc�in� q�cs`�s con.yfeic!v. Ii r.!! 8« qu.^s:ion> ar: not m:>.o-_r_°d, tiL a�tirntio>•� , cc�i!/ be co>uidered fricom.plefe and mzy noi b< rrs_uK'd ort<rtded. AI! requ=sted irt;onrmiimi must 6e n/pe �. Primary App[icanf �rganizafion p315(:fifAP?LICSBTOA�:AIIS St. P2U1 Police Department ; fl; l� ra u:a:/ hs 6r.n w^gre: aa f..^•' d� �: 0,5r. alhz�ce H,a�zrs C�-= e.Giclf EIA NOM 3id l.:75:;n -: ry's r'n'�- �_• C_. rr..r Gr,:a•s= fP= r;:::ra'.ier.a.•e Se: r.z f6; siaJ? be cs•* 41 6005�21 A??LICAhT I.eESCt �al NUkBE�t;bz:;z>' °lsct!'m+:s) r�o�a�t caK�a:ssiouu oaraier ur.�aa N�N Ob � 0900 MN4 AiET0UC9h1nkC➢M6F�8LiNfXFOACEA4EhTSi&YICES?1!'rs'nm�N.��rar.z2:.��'r.ix' � NO � �_S Cc^ u/L^•e :c,l:zcf iax :ni:r.e^=nt CeY'�'��':^: �n tY f6e�:ni: ts.z;' ian_^a::e i�;r :•::a� ' Law Enforcement informafion U'N itiF�dCFH:Yi Ea:CUiIYiS M14E wi.l.lia�a K. Finney mE C of Police t6i4CT X,tki St. Pau1 Police Departnent A49�ESS 100 E. llth Street crr St. Paul iiLEiIOSE (6t71 29� 3�88 - tiAl!: 0� CGNi:Ci Pi'SOH IS T�Un ui7:nik:� Wd01$ F�.Iti�.'. n.,�.. AmvniG2i'V BT1�,°5 _ 00 E. llth S[ree[ t. Paul : env=. 612) 2°2-3507/(612) 2 76 Governmeni Informafion F7 21? 711 � 60Yi�1.l'MiXT IXECIfiIYES Mf4: P,orn B• CoLenan H:MF Of 60YE9N.v.:Ai EXT(fr City of St. Paul :?�iESs Roon 390, City H211, 1� k'• I:e11 Blvd. Cfi1 cr Panl iEtE7NUkE �- (612? 266-8510 FU (612) 266-8513 21? CUUE 551 st� MN i!S 55101 �� ;t,v�� imt itesearch(Grant Pianager./Lieutenant TmE Sectiun I— Yau must return thls page as part of your application , - -� General [nformafion TiPi OF lSN ENiOACEMiNi /EeN:7 I� hill7d1C1°AZ ❑ SikiE POtICE ❑ COUtiTY PD ❑ S�iERI; F ❑ INDIAN TRI6,L ❑ i°AMSIi ❑ SCHOOI ❑ HI,NWAY P�iRO� ❑ �NIVERSITY/CDLLEGE (0 PUBUC ❑ PRIVAi�) ❑ °UBLICHOL'SIhdG ❑ CONSORTIUt� ❑ PARK/REGR;AIIpN ❑ GiHER(pte�s2specij) tldS T�Ud JUftIS01C11pN AECENE� UiNEA COPS 69LVT5? 0 Y�S ❑ NO li'YiS; U1pER WNiCX PdO6RlbS? (CF.cce a7 �}z: a,+p�) � C�PS: PNAS� I � Cp?S AH�� ❑ COPS FASi � C�PS M�Rc'�5 � COPS MORE'9n ❑ UNIVERSAL HIRIN, PRDG?,AM ❑ iRQQPS Ta GQPS � PpCfCE CORPS ❑ PROBLM-SOLVING PARTWEBSriI?S ❑ R�GlONAL COh!MUUIiY POLIChVG I1'SIITUTE P�PULSTIOA SiRYE� dS OE L°50 P� CiNSUS S00aAE 272,235 :2R:r pnd 2.'.2Gx e aiY_-f'"¢ fj�tetf.°ACLL,.u;r 0; L^e ,ccsr.c;hra I}�Tp,{!gR03FFG3CFSfdiXntltpSOFIfiP.90r, 570 562 ] UPUY SNidi FIS�;! �I��;SS? ;1,':_; ;i:�c s: r^.r�:.v cn n�r_; zzv ,� ^."r�`kzaS: c:,•,.: rrfi �i ae [:s:g72 r+.:s w a azrr_�) ❑ YES 0 ��p WN,ii IS THF SOOAC; OF YOOn A6Eh'P.YS LOCl: C:SY. IAATCH? Citv of St_ p�„i �crt carun�tMV�� AElYG; S FlSCIl1T„i� FROt.i: 1/ 1/ 98 iG 5ignatures �� (�� Gz0.° B ior ceim8;sy lc✓uyT.altl�e iiJcrmauon prpdpy4 or, �qlar,� e:r:� araa:�rae mCe d.�ldm� L�n�Mg=! nr,A�zzMLt;7r,'orN u/9r.aftnr� C• aDGfic:n(mysltomOn y^h alf t;,Ga�an an? prpgnm rv7uirzm,na olAe PrDlr, Sahry Parye;nrD aaALaamnoryPoGlioy,(7m 1?9: u.ACCSnrry�^_mene o{f�n/6e U'NEXFOA M' S Hf .� EC q�e SS 9lNA:fG,gr,��sr,v;auredps•,wnram�onLL•'ucn;n't,^�'�.�a) �ATE l�-�. C� . �� f l� 4. P' e�n Intergovernmental Review Process d�h D0.TE SUBhfITiEO iU SiATE SIRS:E POIYi OF CO5TA^,i /ll�cr3" lzru�;� m me;,� w�nre frc ;:5i_ tr.cgrrrn. e�;d rte.�x i:. s(�a N� A,a_n6r1 0%x.s: �fii m Ne.^,z•• uo wt.n>�z a p arer� ° m: yr FwrY crGr.�:! Ir reaex) CiO4 HIIN9EA Sflli A7PIIGTIOM IDiSfir�i9 {fartaz$,�QCra'tyc�) 70.71� ❑ EOMMUNIZY POLIC�N6 TQ GOMBAi DOM€3iIC VIOLfNCE ❑ ADVAP7CIh; C�MhfU�lITY POLICC�u ❑ ANiI-�Atd61�dITIAii'/JY�UiH FIR:kR61S VIOLENCE ltllii�TIYE ..— . ... �. ...� �.✓.�c..n. a..0 Nw� ��uuY��.'��/ �/'�'i Pf C^3' Idh' L�I�JI.'PRi Zy:.:J°$ h:.Yf. Y�F*+u .a: fa::zr,c'z s`.eif's 6°..:<u-zaa++mzt xan_ Da.ar�atrms znGa_s earie:: �e 5� ='�iY+�r.:a;a�e—<::rvcz;n:sie:i's:::J�re.miuner.,zr�laxenicrc.—,:raetim,r./) 1 � Sedion f— You musf retum this page as part uf ynur 2pplication � -a� -��y AgElILy}{2m°: St. Paul Police Deoa:tment OAI �: r�r:o62o900 SEL�i1ilN f R�6�b�� Please outline below your reten�on plan for the item(s) requested in your MORE '95 applica�on. This plan should indude information on how you will continue the proposed activity and level of redeployznent aftzr Federal fvnding has ended. If this is left blank, your applicafion may not be considered for fundin�. The principle thrust of this grant is to enhance and expand the St. Paul Police IIepartment's technological capacity to manage information more effectively, thus providing officers with more effective tools for problem-solving in our community. Therefore, our ongoing support is contiugent upon our ability to maintain and upgrade our technological infrastructure and equipment. Item �I: In 1995 and 1996, the St. Paul Police Department received two COPS MORE gants to unplement an automated Records Management System (RMS) and migrate from our current radio frequency system to a CDPD (Cellulaz Digital Packet Data) system for transmitting digital information. These projects aze making ekcellent progress and we anticipate being able to piace an unprecedented amount of information in the hands of the street officer and supervisor within the immediate future. Most unportantiy, we anticipate that these tools will allow the officer to manipulate this infonnation in real tune. Most officers actually suffer from information overload. There are so many difterent programs and 'uutiatives, so many reporting sources and so many differing priorities established by various advocacy groups, it is virtually impossible for most officers to keep current with the volume of information they receive. Under our new information system they will be able to manage the flow of information into their laptop computers and query our Records system from remote locations in real time. They don't have to try to remember all this information, rather they simply have to Seam how to access and manipulate the information. Unforiunately, when we originally submitted our 199� and 1996, COPS MORE grants there were very few of these systems in the place. Costs were best guess estimates. There was a corollary belief that the price of computing was coming down and that the price of lazge systems and laptops would decrease with the passage of time. While that has been true in the general mazketplace, it has not been the case in law enforcement. While the price of laptops in the business environment have declined from $4,000 to $2,500, our uruts have increased &om $2,500 to over $5,�0� per unit. The Panasonic model, one of the eazly price leaders just increased their cost for tfie CF-25 by $1,800 per unit. The same trends can be seen in the larger softwaze and hardware instaIlations that run CDPD, RAM and EAACS systems. The result has been the need to scale back the amount of critical peripheral equipment which we can afford to add to the system. 1E Section i— You must return this page as pari of yaur application .a � � �' ,, Jn our case, we have lost the ability to purchase what are referred to as clam shell or palm . pflot type devices (PDTs, Personal Data Terminals) to our network which a CDPD infrastructure fo operate. Laptop computers add a tremendous d'unension to the ability of officers to manage information, but they are essentially tetfiered to the squad veFricle or its cIose proximity, While portable, they can not function for any duration away from a power soarce and they are not practical for an officer to carry around. The PBT device overcomes these shortcomings and is critical to the successful operations of our beat, bike and mounted ofi'icers. They can attach to a belt, a bike or a saddle and can be used for an entire shift without the need to recharge. While they cannot be used to take a report, they can be used to access the same information that is available to tfie Iaptop. They can run queries, access report information, paging, access our intranet netwark, function as a pager, support E-Mail, and support mapping programs among oYher applications. The whole emphasis in COP is to get the ofncer out of the squad and into the community. In an era that is being driven by 91 l, this is becoming increasingly difficult to accomplish. The second task is to give the offcer a set oftools that are just as effective when he/she is functioning zway from a squad. These devices accomp6sh this feat to a significant degree. They aIlow the beat, bike or mounted officer who is interacting with the communiry to bz the equiv3Ient of our entire RMS and intranet system right into the community with the off,tcer. It creates the heart of a service oriented delivery system. This same argument can also be made for other officers working in different capacities, such as vice, nazcotics and FORCE officers who work with local resident block cIubs to reduce drug sales and smoke houses. In terms of ongoing support, we have already made the commitment to support the infrastructure of the larger systems. These are pecipherat devices tfiat are merely expanding our current systems in criticat capacities, so ongoing support shouldn't be a problem. Item N2: The second item is for creating a test data link. Even within the CbPD environment, transmission speeds are an issue as we migrate toward digital images and fintrerprint scanning. TraditionaI RF frequencies operate at 4,800 or 9,600 bits per second, while CDPD operates at 19,200. However, a traditionai j-peg fiie for a pfioto can include 4.5 megabits of data. Even with the new compression formulas under NCIC 2000, muttiple images will begin fo slow the system down considerably. A vendor, Coded Commnnications, has developed a DataLink system that will allow transmission rates of 1 megabit per second. Under current compression rates, this would allow for an almost unIimited transmission capacity; multiple images, fingecprints and fe�ct almost instantaneously. The drawback ofthe system is that if is currently Iimited to a 3 mile radius. However, it would only require a squad to mornentarily drive through this radius and they could download ancUor upload their entire laptop in the space of a block. It is also expecYed that performance wiIl improve with time and they may be able to expand this radius considerably. Bven if Yhe radius doesn't expand, it would only be necessary to pIace a few towers at strategic locations to effectively canvass the entire city. We aze very interested in testing this system. Ongoing support would obviously depend upon performance, but we are assured by tfie manufacturer that Yhis is a stand alone subsysfem that will integrate with our developing CDPD wireless system. It shouid he relatively easy to support the DataLinlc system zs we could leverage our existing tower cites for tfie hardwaze and the software covld be supported by our Systeins Unit. 16 aa -��y� Item r3: We have entered into a tentative agreement with�Digit la Bi mo etrics, Inc. They have apptied for a grant to establish a demonstration project in the Tw�in Cities metropolitan area to 5eld test a fingerprint scanning/di2ital mug shot device. Pending their successful receipt of this grant, they intend to develop and test a device that will scan single digit fingerprints and take ' digital images of unidentified suspects and check their identity aeainst a regional database, and subsequently the Federal IAFIS database. As a participant in the study, Digital Biometrics will supply us with a limited number of devices (1�), and all of the local infrastructure including a server, routers, hubs, data lines, an interface to CDPD, etc.. Their contribution to the St. Paul Police Department is currently estimated at �332,526, and these items will remain in place when the project is complete as our inventory. As part of the grant, they have also agreed to either build a regional identification infrastructure to support their system or upgrade the states regional MAFIN system to support integration with their software. IIowever, the ten devices promised is insu�cient for an agency of our size and population. We wish to leverage this demonstration project, if it is successful, to add devices and enhance our digital image capability within the department. These costs are relatively sma11 in compzrison to the size of the project, but will enable us to expand on the Federal govemments initial investment in the project into a usefui tool that can be utilized throughout the department rather than a few isolated locales. In the event that the erant is unsuccessful, then we would invest ur offthe shelf equipment currentty on the market for fineerprint readers operating on our local data base. Ongoing costs for maintaiiung the devices have not been determined at this date as there is no practicat field experience with the units. Nonetheless, we expect these costs to be relatively small in comparison to the grant and our Department has both a Systems Unit and a Communications Unit that should be capable of performing routine maintenance. Actual costs, ior budgetary purposes, will be charged to the units where the devices are assiQned. We have also aereed that their will be shared learning for our systems staff as part of the training and integration in the grant, which will allow our unit to support the software applications. In terms of costs £or access to any outside databases, the grant is desiQned to eliminate such future costs in exchange for upgrading systems. In the event that strategy faIls, dollars ��ill be allocated to carry these costs for some time into the future £or the demonstration participants. Because this request is for improving technology and equipment, there are no requests to fund positions now or into the future. oa .--�� SECiION 1[ — FA�'T A . �� 1 � �� 3�� pLase Eype a[I respor.ses. Please lea�c r.o F•r.es blarzk. If 1'a.es are lej' 6?ar.k Lllf afF1I1CR�30P. J;:ll bc cor.sidered incomplete m:d rr.ay r.ot bc reaiemed or fundcd. Rgency/�rant (nforma�ion 1un�sn�cnn.rs tE6L AzxE St. Paul Police D St. Pau1, MN zrtmenc arzet h:uE Any Brown/Gary Briggs ua� a rt�o62o�00 hTlyt Pr.76: g12) 2°2-350 7((612) 292-3764 rr=[ a� s�au�sr ❑ Clvl! I°.�dS [� TECHPl�JiOGY/�QUI%41:Ni OR BdlEi U:SCAI�iIOX Oi PiQUESicO fiik. S'SiA UP. ePCIIP OF Uli fiiBS AEiidRi� 1G IX 11Ai o 6iL01� Pa1m PiloC Handheld Devices Gost E�#ectiveness Galculations LIH_ t - OF ER LINE 2- ERTRY-LEVEt FRiHGE HEHffIiS 6F SW�7P�N P9tICE �FFIGER (.s of J�:�. 1..199?J LIN= 3- d6� LIHES i kR� 2 LINE 4• h1ULTiPIY LINE 3 BY .7a LINE 5- EHTEA FI6URE OH LfBE 4 Ofl S25,000, WHICHEVEB IS LESS LIhE 6- T�iAI COST OF ITchi, SYSiEM OR GR�UP 0� 11KE l�E}tS � se.o6s S io,i3� S 46,20� S 34,6�� zs,000 S 17 � , soo (100°r6) LIHE 7- FE�EAAi AMOUNT REQUESTE� C?r o° nc ror� tr�.� l�;i �: torz%ra.s eas' (i�:�e c; S i33 ,1z5� %__�_�'�� LIHE 8• �IVIOE LINE 1 8Y LINE 5 $ 5.34 Section If, Part A— You must reiurn this page as paR of your application . _. � .� SE�Ii1)td tl — PAF€f A . � z � �� .- , piexsz tvpe a!1 rzspor.ses. Please leave r.o l:nes blank. If lines arc Icj`t blar.k, tL•e appleca:ior. u�i1( be cor.sidered incorr.ple.e ar.d rnay not bc rcaie:ucd or fVRGf4�. Agency/Grant Informafion �ua�saicnoMS �¢oxt kzx; S[. Pau1 P Sc. C�!��-�i, caeT4cr u,� �. iTPi 0* fl;@6ESI [� TECH:O�OGY/e�UiPAI:P�T OR CIVIt1ANS 6�Li OESCTIRI05 OF AEpUESi:O �ik, STSIi� DH iR00? Oi U1.F fiiYS RiiE�1RiG SG !4 41f: S SEI�'4 Data Link _. Cost Ertacfiveness Calcutatians LINE i• ENiAY-LE4EL SAtARY OF SP�ORH POIiCE OFFICER ,zs ol�a, i. 19S9J S 36, o6s LIKE 2- EYTRY-LEVEL fRIkGE BEHEFIiS �F $WORN POL!CE OFFICEn (zs ci ✓�n i. 1°9�) tlfiE 3- A�C� LIhE31 khd 2 LINE 4• MULTIPLY LINE 3 BY .15 LIBE 5- ENiER FIG�RE ON LINE 4 OA S25,00�, 4JHICHEVER IS LESS 11HF 6• TO iAL CDSi Of iitk, SYSiEM 68 6ROUP OF LIKE ITEMS S 10,137 � �6.20� S 34,654 S 25,000 S ��,000 (10�9�c? LIN�1-FE��RALaM0UN7R�QU�STE�Gz�ber,cn,o;eG'•,ani��:,r:�;,:;!it=mccst(rmso; � 5�,isd 7;��% IIHE S- Q1Vl�E LIHE I BY LINE 5 S 2.31 Section Il, Part A— You must return this page as part oi your application „ M. r � . - �a -� 3y SECTiEiP� 11— PART A i�Ei� T 3 � �� Plcase type ¢f1 respor.ses. Please Iea�e r.o iir.es blar.k. Zf tir.es cre lcft binr.k, the applica:ion :+%ill be cor.sidered inconplete ar.d may r.ot bc re�:cwed or f:<nced. A�en�y/Grant (nformation JU9:SQICi1:AS tfoAL N:lii St. Paul Police Dep2rtnent OAI � PSN�6209�� CIiL Sf:ic St. Pau1, MN C�fiiACf amy Brown/Gary Briggs 3k�z�� e�cv: (612) 2 2°2-3764 Treia�ntPUES� �. po ❑ CIVI,I�;;S � TECNSOiOuY/�QUI-b<�li BfiIEi OiSCBiFi1�N 0'r P.i�UiSSEE liik.. 51SIiM OB 6d0U? Oi l([i REeS &EicuEi010 IN I15F e oELOW Mobile Fingerprint Reader and Digital Camerzs G�st E�ec�Sveness Ga(cutatinns 0 L1hF 1- FhiRY-! fVEI SALAfiY 6'r SW09t1 POLIC; aFrfC�R (zs o: J�r, i. 1°5J) S 36 , o6s LIhE 2- EhTRY-IEUEL FAIHGE BENEFIiS Of SWOAN POLICE �FFICER (.s c Jzn. 1. lE°9) LIhE 3• d0� LINES 1 dN0 2 LINE 4• MULTIPIY LINE 3 BY.75 LIhE 5- EHTEfl fI�URE OH LINE 4 OA S2a,�0�, WHICHEVER IS tESS S 10,13i S � 6,20� $ 34,654 S 25,000 t1NE 6- i�iAl CDST OF iTEM, SYSTEM OR G84UP Of L4KE ITEh!S S 65 , o00 (�nre,�� LI4E 7- FEQEftA! AMOUIai R_QUESTE� �zr• c� nc nc;e Irzn 1�?i c� tora i?ar c"s- (iri° oi � 48 , 7 5d �.i°'�� LIhE 8- UIVI�E LINE 7 BY LINE 5 S 1.9 Secticn II, Part 11 — You must return this page as part nt yaus appticatian -�o� -33 `� Apen�yName: st. rau� ro��c .,_��...••... - - �RI,'''.�-: MN0620900 [iEM � � SEG710N II - PART B D��o��On [� T�e ��ng� Describe how this item, system or o oup of like items Krili result in officer fime savings. Please use the space provided below• For large jurisdictio �° be found in b o attach additional sheets� Samp1° redeployment sumn�ari COPS Office a sumes that you ach e e a r sul of g antection is w•hat the Information you need to include: • Irtumber of hours saved per shift per officer • The number of shifts these officers will actually wotk in a 1-year period • How many officers will realize this savings • How the time saved x�ill be used (on what community policin� acEivities) If the actual redepioyment that is calculated in this section is substantially greate: than the required amount of redeployment you must achieve for this item (line S of the CEW), please indicate below that your aoency undersEznds that it will be expected to aY�ain this higher le��el of redeployment if fi:nded for this item. Information is the key to success in any endeavor, and law enforcement is no exception. Effective, efficient and timely decisions can have a positive impact on the quality of life issues for the vict�n and th �cs�ue�o�u o�he front ge o�r the met�ro se�ction of he newspaper he next day. described in grap � P Making effective and timely decisions is usually deternuned by the amount and quality of t e information available to the decision maker. In our first series of grants, the infrastructu�e was created to expand the amount and quality of information available to supervisors and patrol officers in a real tune environment. We have, in effect, created a mobile office for the officer with most � a 1 environment, as avaitable in a normal office setting. In so far as we are worl:ing most of our communities are designed, this is an excellent addition to our problem-solving strategies. However, in a number of urban communities, either as a result of desien or weat er, many of our officers actually work in a vertical environment• In St• Paul, we have one of the longest contmuous skyways in the world. These s�.yways linl: b� h rise buiSdings.�ManY of oures and residents throughout our entire downtown area in many ., Section II, Part B— Yau must retum this Rage 2s Part uf yaur applicatinn businesses no longer look for space on the street level as a prime Iocatio� rather they look for space on the second IIoor ofbuildings adjacent to the sl.yways. The downtown area has also become the fastest growing residential azea in the city. , In this environment, the beat officer must leave their squad behind on the street level and with it the communications platform we have designed for the future. The PDTs are designed to overcome the majority of these limitations. The sazne argument can be made for our mounted patrol and our bike officers. Both of these units patrol our parks, waterways, special events and congested neighborhoods. In both cases support vehicies can be blocks or even miles away with no ready transportation to bring the party involved closer to the support vehicle and the communications pIatform. During special events the distance might not be great, but the number of people often safely preclude such a joumey. The ability to conduct important business without anduly inconveruencing the victim-witness- suspect, or callut� in additional squads, or calling undue attention to your activities often makes the diff'erence between a successful interview/'intervention and a fa�ed effort, Of course, some of tlus traffic could be handled over the RF system, but those frequencies are already overburdened and one is usually at the mercy of the efforts of third parti�s to search appropriate databases. PDTs allow the officer or supervisor fo query systems silently, efficiently and according to the parameters established during the interview. The amount of time each o�cer will save each day is estimated at 1 hour. VJithout mobile transportation, their need to access secure communications either through a remote access server or docldng station in one of our faciIities in order to query the RMS database and intranet will be much more burdensome. Multiplyin� one hour by the 45 oi'�ucers assigned to our downtown beat, our mounted patrol and our bicycIe patrols equals 45 hours, times 228 shifrs per year equaIs 10,260 hours, divided by the COP standard of 1,82? annual hours equates into 5.6 FTEs, which exceeds the 52 FTEs on the Cost Effectiveness Worksheet for this item. 24 � �.. -Oa-�3y Apenc�Name: st. Paul �olice Depzrtnent qR � r: Mvoo�o 00 SEGT10t1 Il - PAF€f B Q��i�� Sa�ng�S C[EAtI x � Describe how this item, system or group oE like items w-ill result in ofiicer time savings. Please use the space provided below. For large jurisdictions or complex p:ojects, please attach additional sheet�. Sample redeploy:nent summzries can be found in theb o°'r'run$ of this section. The actual redeploynent that you calculate in this section is what the COPS Office assumes that you K�ill achieae as a result of this grant. Information you need to include: • Number of hours saved per shiff per officer • The number of shifts these officers will actualIy work in a 1-year period • fiow many officers will realize this savin�s • Fiow the time saved will be used (on whaf community policin� activities) If the actual redeployment that is czlculated in this section is substantially greater than the required amount of redeployment you must achieve for fnis item (line S of the CEW), please indicate below that your a�ency understands thae it vaill be expected to attain this higher level of redeployment if funded fox this item. Computers today operate a speeds that were inconceivabie just a few short years ago. They can process and transmit an entire encyclopedia in a few seconds in a few of the newest computers. Unfortunately, these speeds aze currently Iimited to hazd wired systems that don't rely on madems as part of their transmission speeds. Modems often determine the rate at which computers can receive or transmit digital information, wtule their processing speeds are often much higher. This is further complicated in the wireless environment where current technology has not kept pace with hard wired or processing technology. CDPD, the current state of the art for speed, operates at 19,200 bits per second as opposed to RF, which operates at 4,800 or 9,600 bits per second. These rates are many times slower tfian the processing speeds being achieved in the average personal computer that can be purchased in any computer store. Diu,,i'tal and satellite tectuiology wiIl probably bring much faster rates, but they are yeazs away from the installation of the necessary infrastructure and redundancy necessary to mal:e these viable options. The recent failure of one satellite and the loss of ent'ue paging networks for several days across the country is a case in point. We cannot afford to lose our entire communications system for a few days without sia,,�u�ficant consequences. Section 11, Part 8— You must return this page as part nf your appiicatinn � This speed is becoming increasingfy critical because when a user is either uploading or downloading information, their system is unavailable for other information or messaging. In a law enforcement environment this type of delay could have dire consequences. A simpte itlustration should help to prove the point. The FBI has invested a great deal in digital imaging and IAFIS fingerprint technology for theu NCIC 2000 initiative. In order to send a digital iinage or fingerprint through a wireless system that is unmodified would require approsimately 4.S megabits of data. Ifyour processing speed is 4,800 on an RF systea� it would take approximately 26 minutes to load that image or fingerprint. At I9,200 (19.2}, it wilI cut the time by three quarters, but it is still over 7 minutes and fhis is provided there is no interference or the sysfem doesn't have to retry. Therefore, the FBI has developed compression technology of 25;1 That will aIlow them to transmit the image mucfi faster through a new algorithm using a vehicle that allows them not to repeat rapetitive inf'ormation. This should reduce the time to load an image to just under a minute, which is a wonderful accomplishment. However, there is a dynamic need to push these ]imits far beyond cc�rrent technology. For instance, St. Paul will process over 3,000 missing persons in 1998 alone, the vast majority being chitd�en. Now, many of the cases cleaz tfiemselves when the cfiildren come home on their ow� but many re«iaia missing. Without photos ofthese chiidren it is next to impossible to verify their ideatities because we don't expect chiidren to carry an ID in our society, and due to the shear volume, flyers and milk cartons, although laudable, aze not a very good attemative. Images aze the future in law enforcement and the demand is simply going to escalate for missing persons, gang members, vulnerable adults, efc.. tVhat appears to be fast today will seem like a crawl in a few short years. We need To develop the technology that witi make more images available to officers and that is only possible if we overcome tfie technolo,gical hurdles. The DataLink system has the capacity to transmit 1 megabit of information per second, a rate more than twenty tirrces faster than current CDPD technology. Such speeds are not critical for teact data, but they aze for images, fingerprint scanning and overly 2arge text files. The problem with the DataLink system is that it has a broadcast radius that is Iimited to 3 miles. This limits fhe effective range over which the data can be transmitted. On the positive side, the speeds are such that it would not take long to send or receive multiple images, fingetprints and long text files. In fact, driving down the fypicaI eity block would probabIy be ample time for almost any transmission. We propose to install snch a system on a triai basis to test tfie technology and deternune if it can handle the volume and reliabIlity necessary to support our information transfer loads into the future. If capable, it would be possible to locate a handful of towers at existing RF sites where we could blanket the city at key Iocations that would enable our vehicles to drive through the coverage areas as part of their routine patrol, fransferring and receiving data as they pass through. This would not only enable our ability to dramaticatly increase the volume and reliability ofinformation, it would also allow us to dramatically reduce a number ofhisYoric adm'uustrative functions, such as roII cat[, mail runs to distribute investigative pick up and hoids, Stop and ID on vehicles and people, and other related activities. This information could be loaded on the network at one central locarion with a single enYry an@ the officers would onty need to drive through their covera�e area at the beginning of their tour or anytime thereafier to upload and update their infonnation. We envision tfie test area as one of our district offices. On average we have approximately 65 officers and supervisors in a district office and we conservatively estimate that � aa-�3y we could save apptoximately .5 hours per shift with this technology. At .5 hours per shift for 65 o�cers and supervisors it equates to 32.5 hours for 22S s ft uates�o 4 06 FTEsn Thso s w�ell in V}'hen this is divided by 1,824 hours for the typical Year 4 excess of the 231 FTEs on the Cost Euectiveness VTorksheet for item r2. . � . . / ov -�a y ABencyHame: st. paul Police Devzrtnent ORI,�.�-: MN0620900 SECTION 11- PART B ��O��i Eyf ��1� �V1DgS �� .ir 3 Describe how this item, system or o oup of like items wi11 result in officer time savin$s• Please use the space provided beloti°. For large j�isdictions or complex projects, please at`ach additional shc�ts. Sa�mple redeploy�nent sumzn�ries can be found in the begiiuling of this secrion. The actual redep3oy�ent that you calculate in this section is what the COPS Ofnce assumes that you ti•ill achieve zs a result of this grant. InformaEion you need to include: • Number of hours saved per shift per officer • The number of shifEs these officers will actually work in a 1-year period • How many officers wi11 realize this sacings • How the time saced will be used (on whaY community policin� activities) If the actual redeployment that is calculated in this section is substantially �reater than the required amount of redeployment you mu;t achieve for this item (line S of the CEW), please indicate below that your agency understands tnat it will be expected to attain this higher level of redeployment if tunded £or this item. We have entered into a partnership with the Ramsey County Sheriff, the Minneapolis Police Department, the Hennepin County Sheriff and Di�ital Biometrics, Ina Digital Biometrics is developing a de�zce they call a`Squibb' which will be able to pe��t For analys's and S� the field. It will have a reader to scan and transmit a s'ingle digit fing Ip identification, a digital camera to capture and transmit images of persons, a ma�netic reader to read the magnetic strip on the back of Ivfinnesota drivers licenses an �nutes l of conver ation. and it may include an audio recording device to record up to thirty device would be able to operate remotely up to 1,�00 feet from the squad, it would capture the information and then transmit the information to a central database for a high probabiliry identification with a response guaranteed in 10 minutes or less. The fingerprint reader would access a regional database, either the state's regional MAFIN database if their system can be upgraded to interface with this system, or the organizations involved would establish their own regional database at a cost funded by Aigital Biometrics, Inc• Digital Biometrics has applied for a 3 million dollar grant to fund the demonstration project and we are told that their grant should be aw�� d�o su� I with a grrverhl0 devices for submitted. As a participant in the grant, they are g g PP Y field testing, all of the software and hardwaze to inter£ace with their system with ours, including Section ti, PaA 6- Yau must ceturn this page as part of your application the service charges for CbPD, the loca� carrier service and the frame reIay at US West. The total value of tfus contribution is $332,526, and all of the equipment, software and material wiIl stay with our department when the project is complete. We need only pick up the ongoing cost for the Iine charges and the CDPD access charges, which we would need to pay for our vehicles in any event. We ��isfi to leverage this grant and expand the number of devices that we can put into the fie1d. On any given shift, we could have in excess of 50 officers worl:ing, not including assignments such as traffic, FORCE, beat officers, mounted units and investigative ts. In an agency of our size, ten Squibbs wi11 not go very far. We wish to add an additional�nits to our patrol ar.d incestigative units. Many of the costs associated with enabling the Squibbs. are identical with instatling a CDPD platform in the vehicles, so costs would be reduced to little more than the price of the individuai units and some sofrware. We also want to enhance our abiiity to capture images and include them as part of our RMS in a Format separate from the Squibb. Several vendors have di�ital cameras and software that iviIl aIIow us to capture images and pIace them right into the report along with the text information. While this will enhance the overall value and quality of our system significantIy, it will also expand our ability to train and employ various problem-solving tactics using strategies sach as the SARA model. Wc operaYe in a very mobile sociery and a sienificanf portion of our population uses that mobility to support ongoing criminal enterprises. Often t}�ese parties purpose2y avoid any forms ofidentification or empIoy sophisticated counterfeit forms of identification in an effort to thwart local Iaw enfarcement efforfs. When these parties are stopped, officers aze leR with only one general option: to bring the party down Yo the Identification Unit to get their fingerpzints taS;en and a positive ID made. This is a very time consuming process and on most busy nights it is seldom empioyed, a factor that criminals depend upon. Officers ue also generaIly limited to mug shots or images they can beg, borrow or steal from the department's Identification Unit because the cost of reproducing such images are reIatively high, they can't be prodaced in targe quantities and because the Unit is the only location with a ready repository of such images. This also means that images currently available to patrol ofhcers are limited to a handful of ofricers and for persons already arrested. The Squibb and digital cameras would allow for the collection of images from tha field that could be stored in RMS reports. Officers could query names or reports and examine the images to help assess the veracity ofthe individual's ctaims. This wouId tremendously speed the identification process in the field, at search warrants, special events and vastty improve the quality of information by rapidly expanding the image database for future use. The digitaI cameras would also be a tremendous asset for problem-solving tactics, Digital images that can be captured in a computer can atso be projected and manipulated on a screen for other officers and investigators who aze training for or working on a specifrc problem or group of problems. These pictures capture the actuai scene and allow for strateeizing on a level of detail that diagrams can never capture. Presentations to block clubs, community groups, business owners and other community leaders can be used to generate support for a project or demonstrate accomplishments. Cameras could be provided to local residents that documents activities, support impact statements and verify the actions of suspects. The potential for use is atmost unlimited. While video taping is another optioq but it is very difficult to do so in an undercover 24 t�c-3 3y � czpacity without attracfing undue attention to oneself and the quality of producf �often must be checked after the fact. Digital cameras, on the other hand, can be used, verified and ]oaded inta a computer within a few minutes and without a�tracting unwarranted attention. :� The savings generated by these projects are very di - �ncult to determine and a specific study to measure the results might even take us well beyond the next round of grants. It is also extremely difficult to measure what ofncers are not doing because the activiry is Iabor intensive for an uncertain result. Ofncers will not generally bring some one in for identification purposes uniess they are presented with a situation that literally demands the action under the circumstances. How many people ue released because the officer didn't have the t�rne to follow up on their instincts? One measure we might examine lools at a very narrow focus of activity, but it might be representative as one of severai measures. The FORCE unit, Narcotics unit and Vice unit conduct on average 300 seazch wazrants a year. Both these devices would be used to screen people at the scene of these warrants and a great deal of time and ener,gy is always used to identify everyone at the scene. Normally only one or two persons aze acrested and the batance are released. The average seazch warrant requires eight officers (except for high risk wartants) and the execution o: the warrant from beginivng to end requires approximately four hours. Once the warrant is executeci, on average, two ofncers are assigned to interview and identify the people at the scene. ThPSe ofricers are often wholly consumed by this activity, remembering that this is an average. Some locations have few people, while smoke houses often have 15 or more. Based on these figures, the equivalent of 1 FTE is used per each search warrant sunply for identification purposes. If we multiply the three hundred events, we get 2,400 hours divided by 1,824 hours per year for an equivalent of 1.3 FTEs. It is also a conservative guess that of the thousands of contacts our officers make every week, they decline to investigate fifteen persons thoroughly. Aside from the inconvenience to the person, each such trip to HQ for a positive ID would require a minimum o£ 1.5 hours. This would represent 1170 hours of time, or .64 of an FTE. Together these total a Cost Effectiveness o£ 1.9 FT'Es, which represents only a fraction of the total potential savin�s if all potential activities were mezsure3. This figure also meets the calculation for Time Sa� under the erant - Oo-�3�► ApE4Lyh2mE: St. Pau1 Police Depz:tnenc �RI ir: MNOb10 00 S:�ilflPd 1[ - FAkT C ��tu��y �Iia�g �� a�€nary Communify Policing Acfivifies �}yj n 1 �Ffl CER AC➢VITIES M PaR B, ynu Cemansvan�Ghz dme sanngs tha!}vu u0ec! In ac+lier: fi�o°9h �' Duadase al mi� i�m ar ci�li=r,. Fiezse in9its�: which ol t�e falfoxing actiriSes yuur o�i�.°rs wil( e.�gage in as a rv.sad al �iis Om° sar,'r„s 0 LOOKING AT REPu1T CALLS FDR SERVICE TO fDEnii:Y FR09LEM�S OR HOT SPOiS � WORKItvG Yr'IiH NcIGHBORti�OG RESI��11S i� IDE��iI;Y APiD PRIGRIi12E CRIME PROBLEh!S ❑ CO�JOUCfI�J6 CITIZ_N SURYEYS � ADDRESSI�;G C��DIT101'S TriAi L�0 iC CRI�v1c 0 ASS_SSIh� TNE IM?ACT OF COh"MUNIiY POLIGINc E� ; ORTS GtJ LE�'=LS 0` CRIME Alv'D � c4R C� ATiiN91NG COIv1h1UNITY 64�EiIPI;S � 61i(= / F�Oi P�iROI L�l h�IPiNG COO�DIN;iE NEI6H30B�OOG C„iC' G°CU?S � NlO�RIMS WI�H BUSIhESS=S TG ADD"rcESS C'Ih`:c FRu.9L��:S ❑ I?41NI�G 0`r,'IC�RS / CIiIZ�NS IA CG�+iP�1USiil' �0! ICIil� ❑ CO�iDUCTiN6 GRGdE °RNENTION N'ORKS95?S I �ISS=h:I- P;,",iING INfOR�1?.i10N ON WFY3 OF PRcui.'vTlh6 C?Gd�c ❑ WORKI�+lG VJIiH LOCAI G�VcRNMENiAI / GOhi�fUh11TY ❑ EN��oltdG fi1+ STR'�TfufC PL4i:�iP7G ?�L4i�C i0 IIJ?L`t; e�ii- AGENC(�S TD A�ORESS CRIME AND DI50ROER PROB! `_M1'S IPt� C�h1MUNIiY POLICING �TH EA ACTIVITI�S BneBy d�scnDS aay aG�zr cumm�r,i.ry po(uru acori6es your c�3wr ;rr1' enga?z in zs a nsult al tl�e tlme rvin;; ,"�� Cr re�. Pie2n b.^ as de�iisC as pmsidle ir, the s�a^e amvided, using add'fiac! pa?zs il neczuz�: St. Pau1's skyway system has virtually become a city unto itself, operating above the nonnal city activities on the streets below. The system is experiencing additional problems because the metropolitan bus system (MTC) has also been levera�ed by the School District as a means of extending their transportation budget. The MTC has also modeled their routing after the airlines hub systems with the adjacent downtown districts, meaning that at the end of every school day the downtown and the skyway become inundated wiih a simificant influx of high school students. As many of these students aze latchkey chiIdren, the temptation of the downtow�n community is to great to resist and it has become a hangout. This, in tum, is all compounded by the fact that the MTC raises rates durine rush hour periods for the commuters. The students passes then become ineIi,gible until 6:00 Pb� unless they have the money for the hi2her rates. Section II, Paet C You must return this page as part ai ynur application AgE(ILyH2mC: St. Paul police Depattment ORI x�r: riN0620900 SECTION tl - PART D : . :. . ; �, I 7 ' . ' k � .�: .�� I . I • 1;�. fIEM# i Please describe in detail beloc.� and on additional pieces o: paper, if needed: 1) How is your a�ency currently using technology applications Eo improve individual and overall deparEment efficiency and to make department operztions (patrol, research and planning, bookin�, efc.) more effective? z) If funded, how would fhis COPS MORE'98 award improve/enhance your deparFment's current oPeraEions aad specific technology appIicafions? 3) How do Ehe requested resources fit in wifh your a�enc}rs lon� ran�e fech- noloay strafe�? How will fhe fufure use of this Eechnology be maintained and inte�raEed wifh oEher technology applicafions or upgrades to improve your information and technology infrastructure? 4) How will the requested resources improve your a�ency's ability fo do any of fhe following acEivities? Please explain each in detail. • Co11ecE and analyze incident-based daEa • Identify repeat crime vicEims znd/or repeaE problem locations • Offer paErol officers direcE access to incident-based aime daEa in patrol cars • Link calls for senice databases/CAD with other databases such as fhose on a.resEs, incidents, field inEercniews, efc. �) Are Ehere oEher ways the requested resources will specificalIy advance com- munity policinj in your a�ency? 2s Section 11, Part �— Ynu m¢st return tfiis page as part of your appliration � �� -: :,.. . - All of this has become a significant burden on out beat officers in the do�infown system. The addition of the PDTs will a11ow them to access information about past behaviois, network with their fellow beat of�cers and stay in constant touch through the E-Mail system with the businesses in the s�.yway system to better coordinate their efforts and identify the handful of . students who are causing problems for everyone. These units will altow the officers to main�ain shared notebooks, imaees and informal contacts ��ith these students, so responses can be measured, fair and escalate as the situation w�arrants. This would also allow the beat ofncers to network with business peop]e and local residents about problems and concems to expand the eyes and ears of the downtown community. Current radio systems cannot keep up with the demand for information and it is impossible to coordinate the activities of ati the beat officers over the radio and paging system. 0 _ .:. aa-'��+�. Cusent and Future Technolot,,ry Sfrategy Item rl Question �1. This entire proposal, as were our earlier grants, is about technology and improving our ability to move and manage information for the oC"acer, supervisor, citizen, manager and the Chief. We are cuirently investing in an automated Records Management Syster� a depar[ment networ�: and intranet, and a new wireless communication platform for the transfer of digital information. This will piace the entire database of information in our Records function into the hands of every ofncer and supervisor, and every unit within the department. It will also provide a platform that will allow a much more interactive exchange of information with other units of govemment and our citizens in a very direct way over the internet. Iviore importantly, this system will enable the o�cers to query and manipu]ate the infonnation in a manner that will allow them to apply what they learn to a whole range of problem-solving strateeies. We expect to have these systems in place by the fall of I449. Question �2). The purpose of this erant is to expand upon what we are currently building and gain significant additional efficiencies that will allow us to become more effective in the end. Data is an unportant component in solving any problem, but as our profession is focused on people and their behavior. Making sure that we marry the right data to the right people is critical to successful intervention and prevention. Images and fin�erprints are a critical piece ofthat function. The next step in this process is to make sure the information is available in ail of the various environments in which we must work (the PDTs), make sure tfie information is available 2s rapidly and comp]etely as possible to help support the best decisions possible (the I?ataLink), and then provide the tools to make effective decisions on the scene to minimize problems and the unpact on resources as much as possible (the Squibbs and digital cameras). The added benefit is that these pSatforms provide for a basis to share critical information across the entire network in an almost instantaneous environment. The primary focus ofthis thrust is in our patrol and investigative functions. Question Y3). This question has been addressed in several previous responses. Question :r4). a) The entire focus of the RMS and our SITS (Single Incident Tracking System) is designed to collect and analyze incidenf based data. We are currently working on a mapping program sunilaz to the one developed in Chicaeo that will integrate this information into maps tfiat can be designed by ofncers in the field or at meetings. b) We already hzve a prozram in place to identify and track repeat o&�nders and problem properties. These new systems witl greatIy enhance and improve the accuracy of e�sting efforts in both these areas and provide the information aimost instantly, an 00 -�3�1 effort that currentiy requires research and efforts by several people throughout tfie depar[ment. This means freeing more time to work on these problems instead of researching them. . c) Not only will the system offer officers direct access to data, it will do so in their vehicle, on their beat, on their bike or on their horse, virtually any environment in which our officers must work. d) Under our current design, any oficer will be able to query information ori CAD, arrests, incidents and in about 15 other categories. We intend to expand that capability through an Ad Hoc query capability over the course of the next few years. In terms of field interviews, we are just beginning to look at programs that will handte intelligence type infonnation, provide a scale ofits value and sunset its life cycle. This will be a project that will probably take several years to integrate. Fiowever, in the interi� the Squibb and digital cameras offer an informzl system. Both coliect information that can be loaded onco the laptoQs and stored, including iznages and fingerprints. Once loaded, these files can then be shared across the entire network through our local intranet and accessed by any officer. In the near tecm, this should su�ce for sofr data. Question �5) This is limited ocily to the imagination and creativity of the ofncers, investigators and supervisors, with appropriate Iimits established by resources. We have not attempted to offer every single scenario where these tools could be used, rather we_have tried to provide a few glimpses as to their possible uses. There is neither the tune or space available to discuss every contingency. o�-�3v � :� q : . A�en�yHame: st. Pa�i Police Departnent � - ORIr: r�NOb o 00 SEL`IION 11- PART C ' (TEf�R � z ��ir� Po�ian� ��s �mr�ary Communify Policing Activifies �EEIGEN ACTlV111ES In f3rt 8, yau den, onsa2d Ne d,ne sar,'n�s Nat you ez9e:t ro ahiew titmu9h Ne Durehase o1 U�is iem nt tin(ian. Pleasz inCiczt which o/th.<lollawing atirties}va� ohce� wrll engage in as a rsult al uYs Om,z saricg.c � LOOKING AT RE?�Ai CALIS fOR SER4ICE TG ID�NTfFY P�2�BLEh!S �R NOT SPDTS � WORKING WIiH NEIGHBQRH00� R�SID'c�VTS TO IDENTi; Y Ah�6 PRIORIiItE CRiME PROBLEMS ❑ CONDUCTItd6 CITIZ�N SURUEYS ❑ ADDRESSING COPJDIilOtiS i�Ai LAI� T6 C�161c ❑ ASSESSIN6 iHE If�PACT �� COMd�UNIi� °OLICI�1�� EF� 0°iS ON LEV�! S 0� Ct',Ihf: AFi6 FcA� � NlOP,KIi9u WIiH LOC�1L GOV�RNi1754iAL / COMh1U?ifTY P.GENCIES TO p.DD�SSS CRlt.f_ AfdD DIS�RD=R P303lEMS C� Ai IENOL"1, COMMUN(iY M:�TIN�S ❑ Bi,� / FOOi PRi°Ol G N�L°ING COOftDINAiE NEIGHBORN066 WATCH GROU?S � W�3KIPJG WIiH BUSIRESS�S TO ADDR,SS CRLNE PRGoL�MS ❑ T2�lt!lt;L �;RGrdS! Cli(?ENS IN CaMMUNiTY °ni�;,�p;r_. Q COFdDUCilfio CRIM� PRcV6�TI0N WORnS40°S / DISS=�+1!- hlAiiNu Ik�O'MAiiON 6N wAYS Of Pr'��V�Nilhl" Ct�fl��: ❑ EP7�Gi�;�� I,V STP,�tEGIC PtANNIN6 R�L�'�D i� I�NPL"uY:i;'T- 111� COhii�!UhiiY POUCIId6 OL7: fl AC i IYfIES Bne6y descnbe a,7y atnzr cammunlry policin9 ateiiczs you; u:;rx.rs r.7! zryag° ir as a�sult allne dne sarinas tor Li%s nem. `lease 6e as de;aileAas pe.�rGle in �Se s�ace p�onGeq usfig aadi,tionzl pages i/nzc„cary. The DataLink system will not be seen by the community as a pro�am directly impacting their neighborhoods. It will be transparent to their needs. However, if will facilitate an explosion in the scope and value ofinformation management for the of"�ucer working in their community. To the extent that officers no ]onger have to go to a building to download reports from their laptop, that ofiicers can reduce the time dedicated to roll ca]Is, the expanded abiiity to exchange and query information on a large scale, especially as it is related fo images of missing childte� vulnerable adults, wanted suspects, gang members and the like; then we have freed up valuable time for the officers to better evaluate and manage the problems identified in their neighborhoo@s and beats. The idea is to empower our o�cers to take responsibility for their patrol areas, give them the infoanation they need to probiem-soive and provide the time to escape at least part of the tyranny of the 911 system. This system willhelp create that ime for the offcer. Sedion tl, Part C— You must return this page as part of yaur appiiwtian ApencyName: sc. PauL Police Departnent . ' �fll �: MN062o900 ' . SF�170N I! - PART D y : _ ,; : � : : :� . . , �,` , . :�:: � T� J , i' .1� � G � Piease describe in deEail belocv and on additionai pieces of paper, if needed: I) How is your a�ency currently using technology applicaEions to improve individual and overali department efficiency and to make deparEmenf operations (pafrol, research and planning, bookin�, efc.) more effecfive? 2) If funded, how would this COPS MORE '9S award improve/enhance your deparEment's current operations and specific technology applicaEions? 3) How do the requesfed resources fit in with your a�ency's lon�-ranae Eech- nology sfraEegy? Ho�v wi11 Ehe fuEure use of Ehis technology be maintained and inEegrated cvith other Eechnology applicaEions or upgrades to improve your informafion and fechnology infrasfrucfure? ?) Hocv wiI1 Ehe requested resources improve your a�ency's ability fo do any of fhe foilowin� acEiviEies? Please explain each in detail. • Collect and analyze incident-based data • Identify repeat crime victims and/or repeaE problem locations • Offer paErol officers direct access fo incident-based crime data in pafrol cars • Link calls for sezvice daEabases/CAD with o.her daEabases such as those on arrests, incidenEs, field intexc- eEc. . �) Are there other ways fhe requesfed resources will specificaIly advance com- munity policing in your z�ency? 28 Secfion 11, Part R— You must return ihis page as Qart nf your applica:ion Current and Future Technology Strateey Item r2 �o-�ay Question �1. This entire proposal, as were our eazlier grants, is about technology and improving our ability to move and manage information for the officer, supervisor, citizen, manager and the Ctue£ We are currently investing in an automated Records Management System, a department network and intranet, and a new wireless communication platform for the trans£er of digita! information. This wil( place the entire database of information in our Records function into the hands of every officer and supervisor, znd every unit within the department. It will also provide a platform that will allow a much more interactive exchan�e of information with other units of government and our citizens in a very d'uect way over the internet. More importantly, this system will enable the officers to query and manipulate the information in a manner that will allow them to apply what they leam to a whole range of problem-solving strategies. We expect to have these systems in place by the fall of 1999. Question �2). The purpose of this erant is to expand upon ��hat we are currently building and gain si,gnificant additional efuciencies that vrill allow us to become more effective in the end. Data is an important component in solving any problem, but as our profession is focused on people and their behavior. ivlaking sure that we marry the right data to the right people is critical to successful intervention and prevention. Images and fingerprints are a critical piece of that function. The next step in this process is to make sure the information is available in all of the carious environments in which we must work (the PDTs), make sure the information is available 2s rapidly and completely as possible to help support the best decisions possible (the DataLinl:), and then provide the tools to make effective decisions on the scene to m,nimi�e problems and the impact on resources as much as possible (the Squibbs and digital cameras). The added benefit is that these platforms provide for a basis to share criti�al informacion acrass the entire network in an almost instantaneous environment. The primary focus of this thrust is in our patroi and investigative functions. Question �3). This question has been addressed in several previous responses. Question #=r4). a) The entire focus of the RMS and our SITS (Single Incident Tracking System) is designed to collect and analyze incident based data. We are currently working on a mapping program similar to the one developed in Chicago that will integrate this information into maps that can be desiened by o&'icers in the field or at meetines. b} We already have a program in place to identify and track repeat offenders and problem properties. These new systems will ereatly enhance and improve the accuracy of existing efforts in both these areas and provide the information almost instantly, an 00 -�� y ..: effort that currently requires research and e�orts by several people throughout tfie department. This means freeing more time to work on these problems instead of researching them. . c) Not only will the system offer o direct access to data, it will do so in their vehicle, on their beat, on their bi1:e or on their horse, virtually any environment in which our officers must work. d) Under our current desien, any officer will be able to query information ori CAD, arrests, incidents and in about 1� other categories. We intend to eapand that capability through an Ad Hoc query capability over the course of the nex�t few years. In terms of field interviews, we are just beginning to lool: at programs that will handle intelligence type information, provide a scale of its value and sunset its ]ife cycle. This wiil be a project that will probably take several years to integrate. However, in the interim, the Squibb and digital cameras offer an informal system. Both collect information that can be loaded onto the laptops and stored, including images and fingerprints. Once ]oaded, these files can then be shared across the entire network through our local intranet and accessed by any officer. In the near tera� this should suffice for so8 data. Question n�) This is limited only to the imagination and creativity of the of'�ncers, investigators and supervisors, with appropriate limits established by resources. We have not attempted to offei every single scenario where these too(s could be used, rather wellave tried to provide a£ew glimpses as to their possible uses. There is neither the time or space available to discuss every contingency. � � .: o� -�3 y Agen�yRam S[_ Paul Police Departnent ORI �: Pi?d0520900 � Sc�710N II - FA� C �€nr�� Po6i�ng ��i� �m��ry Communify Policing Activifies Ct�M N OFfIGEF AGiIVmES In fart B, yau dzn, onsua¢E �ie One savings GSa� you erpea tn a:hien ri�nugh tl�e puahase al �Sis icm ar trdiizn. P;ease inGrcarz rhicA aIlhe lullawing aevrti�s yau� a�ncers �ill engage in as a �°.suh alIDis 6mz sadrgs ❑ LOOKING AT REPEAi CALIS FOR SERUIGE i� lDEAiIfY PROBLtMS OR H�T SP�TS ❑ WORKING Vdiih Ir'EIGHB�RHOOD RE3IDENTS i0 IDENiIFY A1d0 FRIORIiIZE CRiME PROBLEMS ❑ GONOUCTING CITi?E� SURVEYS � ADDRESSING COPJDIi1C4S TH�i l�� i0 CRIU: ❑ ASS�SSIUG IHE IM�PACI OF C�MMUNII' °OLICIN� EFFpRiS Oh LEVELS OF GRi41� AND F�AR � kiTENDit{G COMMUNITY MEEINGS ❑ BIKE / f00i PAiROL � HELPtPlG Ca�R01NATE GEl6H8�RH��J Pl,TCH GROUPS � Nl�RKIPl� V�1iH BL'SIN�SSES i0 ADORESS CRIME P,ROBLEMS ❑ SRAINIid"c Oi � IC�°S / C4iIZt�S 1� GO'viE�UilIiY P1L4CIId^u ❑ C�NDUCTI.l6 CRIf,1� PRPJ�NTI�M 4V�°Y,�:,O?S / DISS�htl- k�i6�31UFORMAiION 0� WAYS OF PR�V�NTING Cdf�S� � WORKIPlG N11TN LOCAL GOVERNy1ENiA! / COMt�1U�'IiY ❑ u1'GAGIPlG IN STRAiEGIC PIANNi�iG R�t�'=D i01�,a�LEM_�vi- AGcNGIES TO AD�R=SS CRI'dE A�9D DI$O�DER P�03L:MS ING C�MPdLh11TY °C�Lii,ltd6 OPI EA ACTIVmES Bdzfiy desc,�ue any umz� cummurrry pPii:irg acarr0es ynur aF�z� wi!! enaa�e ir, as a �sul� al ti;e Ome savin?s Ier tiis item. Plezse be zs de¢ileG as pnsrible in �e space D�n�ed, using aOAicanz! pages ilne:�.ssary. Properly identifying and tracking disruptive individuals within our communities and holding them accountable for their behavior is the key to chan;ing behavior. This must be done on a community-wide basis ifwe aze going to be successful in the long term. This equipment will allow us to properly identify people in the field, heIping to sort out those on legitunate business from those engaged in improper or illegal activities. Ofren times, even a community at risk is concerned about zero tolerance efforts because of the appazent inconvenience to le,gtimate members of the community going about theu daily business. The ability to minimi7e any inconvenience to the persons involved is a key to maintaining community support for these very effective e�'orts. This equipment would be critical to these efforts. The fact is that many of us do not always carry an ID when we should, and our ability to screen out potential problems quickIy Sectian Il, Pari C— You must reium ihis page as part of your appiitation � .-. Apenc1Hame: sc. Paui Police Department • ORIx: MN0620400 5EC710N !! - PAf{T � � 1 t . . t . s y .L` '� . "'' ,�� . �' t. - ,'�' � �.. [TEM � 3 Please describe in detail belo�+- znd on additional pieces of paper, ii needed: 1) How is your agency currenEly using technology applicaEions to improve individual and overall deparEment efficiency and fo make department operaEions (patrol, research and planninb, bool:ing, etc.) more effecEive? ?) If funded, how would this COPS MORE'9S award improve/enh'ance your deparEment's current operaEions and specific Eechnology applicaEions? �) How do the requesEed resources fiE in wiEh your agenc�s Ion� ran�e tech- noiogy sfraEegy? Hosv will the fuEure use of this Eechnology be maintained and inEe�rated wifh oEher fechnoIo�y appliczfions or up�rades Eo improve your informafion and technology infrasErucfure? 4) How will tfie requesEed resources improve your agency's abiIify Eo do any of Ehe followin� actiuities? Please explain each in detail. • CoIlecE and analyze incident-based data • Identify repeat crime vicEims and/or repeat problem locations • Offer paErol oFficers direct access fo incidenE-bzsed crime dafa in patrol cars • Link calls for seroice daEabzses/CAD with other databzses such as those on arresEs, incidenfs, field interviews, etc. 5) Are Ehere other ways the requesfed resources will specifically adcance com- munity policin� in your a�ency? 28 Section 1I, part U— Yau muri ret¢rn this page as pari of yaur applicafion ao -� a y would be a real asset in these sweeps. The community needs to understand and believe that we aze doing everythin3 possible to minimize any potential problems for local residents. These devices will also allow our officers to preserve this information in computerized' notebooks, comp[ete with imaees; notebool that can be shared with other officers and citizens. We will no longer be Iimited to accessing certain information depending upon the work schedule or shifr of a certain ofncer or officers. Information will also he available to be shared with citizens. We have been working with the courts, for instance, to restrict I:nown prostitutes form certain neighborhoods where they have attempted to ply their trade. Digital cameras that are not dependent upon a slow development process could be used to demonstrate violations of these court orders and would aliow the immediate seizure of the violating party. Probable cause fro criminal activities, more readily documenting contraband right in the report, etc. will provide for much greater efvciencies for the officers and the citizens. Obviously, the fewer times we need to deal with a problem before achieving a solution, the more e�ectively we can manage our problems overafl. o� -�3 y Current and Future Technology Strategy m Item r3 Question : 1. This entire proposal, as were our earlier grants, is about technolo,gy and improving our ability to move and manage information for the officer, supervisor, citize� manager and the Chief. We are currently im°esting in an automated Records Management System, a department network and intranet, and a new wireless communication platform for ihe transfer of digital information. This will place the entire database of information in our Records function into the hands of every officer and supervisor, and every unit within the department. It will also provide a plat£orm that will allow a much more interactive exchange of information with other units of govemment and our citizens in a very direct way over the internet. More importantly, ttus system will enable the officers to query and manipulate the information in a manner that will aIlow them to apply what they leazn to a whole range of probler� solving strategies. We expect to have these systems in place by the fall of 1999. Question m2). The purpose of this grant is to expand upon what we are currently building and gain significant additional efficiencies that will allow us to become more effective in the end. Data is an important component in solving any problem, but as our profession is focused on people and their behavior. Mal:ing sure that we marry the right data to the right people is critical to successful intervention and prevention. Images and fingerprints are a critical piece of that function. The next step in this process is to make sure the information is available in a11 of the various environments in which we must work (the PDTs), make sure the information is available as rapidiy and completely as possibie to help support the best decisions possible (the DataLink), and then provlde the tools to make effective decisions on the scene to miniT.,;�e problems and the unpact on resources as much as possible (the Squib6s and digital cameras). The added benefit is that these platforms provide for a basis to share critical information across the entire network in an almost instantaneous environment. The primary focus o£'this thrust is in our pattol and investigative functions. Question r3). This question has been addressed in several previous responses. Question t'�.4). a) The entire focus of the RMS and our SITS (Single Incident Tracking System) is designed to collect and anaiyze incident based data. We are currently working on a mapping program simiIar to the one developed in Chicago that will inte�rate this information into maps that can be desiened by officers in the field or at meetings. b) We already have a proga.'n in place to identiiy and track repeat o�'enders and problem properties. These new systems will greatly enhance and improve the accuracy of existing efforts in both these areas and provide the information almost instantly, an � 00-�3`1 effort that cucrently requires research and efrorts by several people throughout the department. This means freeing more time to work on these problems instead of researching them. c) Not only will the system offer officers direct access to data, it will do so in their vehicle, on their beat, on their bike or on their horse, virtually any environment in which our officers must work. d) Under our current desigr� any o�cer w�ll be able to query in�`onnation on CAD, arrests, incidents and in about l� other categories. We intead to expand that capabzlit}� through an Ad Hoc query capability over the course of the next few years. In terms of field interviews, we are just beguuung to look at proerams that will handle intelIigence type information, provide a scale of its value and sunset its life cycle. This will be a project that will probably take several years to integrate. However, in the interim, the Squibb and digital cameras offer an informal systein. Both collect information that can be loaded onto the laptops and stored, including images and fingerprints. Once loaded, these files can then be shared across the entire network through our local intranet and accessed by any officer. In the near term, this should suffice for soft data. Question #5) This is limited only to the imagination and creativity of the officers, investigators and supervisors, with appropriate limits established by resources. We have not attempted to offer every single scenario where these fools could be used, rather w� have tried to provide a few gIimpses as to their possible uses. There is neither the time or space available to discuss every contingency. A . .' - ao -��} SE�ON i!1 �Q�s �� t�� °�� When you ha��e completed the Cost Etfecti��eness Worksheet(s) (CEW) for eacn i,em or group of like items that you are requestin?, transfer tne total projec: cost, Federal share and local share from each Cos; Efiecfi � eness Worksheet, sum them and list these amounts as tne COPS MOP�E'9S applica6o;, totals. If you are requesting a w•aiver, you must still complete the Local Share secaon. Please ma;� extra cnpi�s of tln's f ornt ij �iecessaru. TOidLPRQJECT C6ST � FEOERAL SHARE � LOCALSNkB: Qir,s6alCFK� (Line7alCfK� ; � `� �' GOSiEFFEG?IVEkESSWOPKSHEETrt �y�s �� ^ �, COST EFF:CTIYENESS WORKSNE:i ni �j y� �`�� / COSiEFFECTIYEHESSWORRSf.;ci€3 ' \L �'�� h � ��ti �h/t- ��. COST EFFECT1YEfiESS WORKSHEET T i COST fFfEC11VfH:SS W6�kSHfiT �5 G6ST EFEECAVEKfSS WOP,KoriiiT Tn COST EF�ECTIY:kESS W�RKSHEii =7 COST EFfECTIYEHESS WORKSHiET T9 COST E�FECTI4EH:SS'ADRKSNE7 r8 MORE'98 APPLICATION TOTALS S 177,500 ' S 133,127 75 c ' ) j S 4C,375 � 25 �`� j S 77,000 � S 65,000 �S � � I � 5 : S 57,7�0 75 �') ; S 19,250 � 25 �") I S �8,750 75 �°? ` S 10,250 � 2� �') S � ��1 i S � �,) s � ��, � s � �'a, � ( 5E) i S ( ��) � S ( 4'0) ; S ( 5c) S S S 319,500 ; S ( �:) I S ( �u) I S ( �e) ; S ( 4a) i i 5 239,625 � 75 Cu) I S 79,575 � 25 � � i ;'a� not excesG J5� af ro:al i IG�s( ba a; lzut Zi�s o! , prc;ec! cc>C i� tatz! prc/2c! cest Secfion III — Ynu must retum this pag_ as part of your appiication 3j � - oa -�3y Q� enc�Name: s t. Pau1 Police Deoartment � OAI =: ri� o SECi]Oh' N � ::I`1 :�:'�f�?� :��:`..`:ir° A Persannel List each position by title and name of employee, if zvailable. Show the znnual salary rate and tne pesentz�z of rime to be devoted to th= project. Compznsarion paid for emplo}'ees enga�ed in grant acrivities must be consistent with that paid for similar evo:k evithin tne applicant organization. Name/Position Ivone n Cost Total: n B. fringe B�n�ffs Frin�e benefits should be based on know•n aciuzl costs or an established formula. Frin�e benefits a:e for the personnel listed in budget category (.A) and only for tne p°rcenta�e of time devoted to the project. Uniforms, equipment and vehicles are unallovcable costs under tMs grant program. Pl2ase list FICA and Workers Compensation, if applicable. Name/I'osition Computation _Snnual Fringe Benefits hone 'FICA/So�ial Secu:i:y 5 H=aith Insurance S Life Insurance S Vacation S Sick Leave S Reti:ement S '4\"orker's Comp S 'linemployment Lns. 5 O:her S CasE Total: 5 � Section IV — You must return this page as part ot your appiication Apen�yName: sc. PaUI Police Department ORIr: Mxo 0 00 G. Travel Itemize trzvel expenses of project personnel by purpose (e o., staff to training, field interviews, advisory 0 oup meetings). Show the basis of computation (e.�., six people to 3-dzy training at s�X airfare, SX lod�in�, SX subsistence). In training projects, travel and meals for trzinees should be listed separa.ely. Show the number of trainees and the unit costs invoived. Identify the location of travel, if knocvn. Purpose of Travel Location Item CompuEaEion CosE \�ne ToEal: Q. Equipme:rt List nonexpendable items fihat are to be purchased. iVonexpendable equipment is tan� ble prop>rty havin� a use:ul life of more than two years and an acquisiaon cos� of 5�,000 or more per unit. Expendable items should be included either in tne "SuppIies° category or in tne "Other" cate�or}: Applicants should znalyze the cost benefits of purchasing versus leesing equipment, especially for high{ost items and those subjec: fo rapid fechnicai aclvances. Rented or Iezsed equipmene rnsG shouid be Iisfed in the "Conffacfual" czcegor}�. Explain how the equipment is necessary for the success of the project. Attach a narrative describi��g the procurement method to be used. IEem None Cost ToEal: 36 Sectian IV — You must return this page as part af your aQpiicatian :. _.r -�oa-33y St• Pau1 Police Department Agenc� Nane: ORIn: rino62o900 E. Sup�fies . r , .. ,� r2inin� mate*ials; copyi�o P�Pe �'�a e'�Pendable eeuipmer, Lise it°:ns b}' �P2 (o�nce supplies; post.. � items costing less thasi Sa,000, such zs boo}s, hand-held tape rxorders) and show the basis for comptta�ion. Generally, supplies indude any materials �2t are expendable or consumed during the course of the projecc Supply Items CompuEation Cost ' J , =7 rn�c Zj softc:are programs Z� CDPD modems 25 Docking stations/chargezs $4,000 each $ 100,000 ` ��,� � 35,000 $1,G00 each t� 37,500 $1,�00 ezch 5 5,000 /�.� �10� Total: $ 1�7 �_ 50� — Section IV — You must return this page as part of yaur appiicatinn Agen�y Q�� a t a� Y. ♦ t t.� A� ConsultanE Fees: For each consultant enEer the name (if knotim) service to be provided, hourly or daily fee (S-hour day), and estimated time on the project. Consultant fees in excess of �250 per dzy require additional written justi&cation. I�Tam of Consultant None Service Provided Compufation Cost SubtotnL S o ................................ • • •......................................... Con>ultant Expenses: List a11 expenses to be pzid from the orant to t'ree indic�id:�al consultan•`s in addi�ion to their fees (e.g., travel, meals, lodgin�). Item Location Cost Subio'ra!: ..........................................................................................•••.. Confracts: Provide a descripEion of the product or service to be procured by contract and an estimate of the cosE. Applicanfs are encouraged to promoEe free and open comperi�on in acvazding contracEs. A separaie justification must be provided for sole-source conEracis in excess of 5100,000. TEem CosE Subfofat: S Total: 5 � t. Pau1 Police Departmen[ 38 Section IV — Yuu must return this page as part ¢f yaur applira;ion , . . `- Iter.� rl a0 -�3 � Apenc1Hzme: sc. raul Police Deoartment �� ; ZfN0620900 �i. Q�IEC '�,iTS�S L.15i it2Ii'i5 �e- I2_Tlt, � :oeuctio�, telepnone ) anitorial o: 5'cCU*lC}' S27�7C25, li\�°S17�'�-t1��Z OL CO^.='.-'e^. :�l funds) by inajor type and ine basis of th= co:1psta�ion. Fo: examp!e, provide tne square foota�e and ,nz cost per square foot fo: rent, or provide a montnly rental cost and hocv many months to rent. Description Computation Cost None Total: Sec:ion IV — You mcst return this pag° as part ot your application ApencyHame: st. Pavi Police Departmenc ��j� s- MN0620900 Budget Summary YVhen you have completed the budget worksheet, transfer tne totats for each category to the spaces below. Compute the Eotal direct costs and the total projecE costs. Indica:e the amount of Federzl funds reques:ed. Bud�et Category Amounf � A. Personnel B. Fringe Beneiits C. Travel D. Equipment E. SuppIi�s F. Consultants/Contracts G. Ocher Total Di.ec� Costs To.al Project Costs Federal Request Non-Federal AmounE 133,125 S 44,375 ( 75 %) 25 or� io a S 177.500 4� Secfion IV — You must return this page as part of yaur applic�;ion Ite� -2 - . Z�o-�3y Apenc�Hane: sc. ra�1 Police DePaitment - ORI-: MN0620900 $�Q� � u � : 7; �; �'' �' '. �e . ' � � '-. *.- : � �- :] p. Persannel List eacn position by title and name of emoloyee, if a�•ailable. Show the annual salary rzte and tne pesentage of time to be devoted to the project. Compensation p�id for employees engaged in grant zchc'ities must be consistent wi.h thzt paid for sirnilar �eork Fvi+hin the applicant organiza5on. 1�;ame/PosiEion Computation None Cost To Eal: 8. Fringe 8e�efits Frin�e benefits should be bzsed on kno��'n actual costs or an establisned fo:mula. Frinje ben°fits are for the personnel listed in budget cat2gory (-A) a�d only for the peicentage of tim° de�roted to th2 project. liniforms, equipment znd vehicles z:e unalloti-able costs under tnis grant p:oo �m. Please list FIC.4 and 6lrorkers Compensarion, if applicable. \Tame/Position CompuEation Cost ?,nnual Frin�e Benefits *FICA/Social Security Health Insurance Life Insurance Vaca:ioa Sick Leave None Retiremen. � *Wo;l:er's Comp S •linemployment Ins. S pther 5 0 Total: S_ Sectian tV — You must return this page as part nf yaur applicatinn Agen�yName: st. Pau1 Police Departmen[ ORI �: rrn��o 0 00 C. iravet Itemize travel expenses of project personnel by purpose (e.g., staff to training, field interviews, advisory b oup meetin�s). Shoc.� t}1e basis of computanon (e.�., six people to 3-day trauun� at SX airfare, SX lodo -�o, SX subsistence). In training projecEs, trave] and meals for trainees should be listed separatety. Shoti� the number of frainees and the unit costs im•olved. Ideniify the locafion o: fravel, if known. of Travel Locafion Ifem faEion CosE None ToEal: Q. �LlI�7R7B[T� LisE nonexpendable items Ehat are to be purchased. �Tonexpendable equipment is iano bie property having z useful life of more than t years and an acquisition co;t o: 5�,000 or more per unit. Expendable iEems should be included either in the "Supplies" catego.y or in the "Other° cztegory. Applicants should anal5�ze the cost benefits of pccrchesing versus leasina equipment, especialIy Eor high-cost items and tnose suoject to rapid technical advances. Rentzd or lezsed equipment costs should be listed in Ehe "Contractuai" category. Explain how the equipment is necesszry for the success o; the project. Attach a narrztive describing the p:ocurement method to be used. Item Base station and server Cost $12,000 �' I�oEa1:S 12,000 36 Section IV - You must refurn this page as paR af ynur appliration 00-3��{ Agen CjN21l:: St. Pau1 Police Deaarcmenc ORI=:: Miv'0620900 E S�tppiies Li;t items by hp= (office supplies; nos.a�e; iraining matzrials; cop}'in� pzper; and expendzble equ;p,� _ iteins cosring less thzn 5�,000, such zs bool:,, hand-held tape recorder;) znd show the bzsis for compu?ation. Generally; supplies include any materials that are expendable or consumed during the course of the project Ttems taEion Cost Equip 20 vehicle wi[h soitware So:tware interface to C9D/P.!�IS $2,500 550,000 ✓ 510,000 � ToEal:$ 60,000 S=_etinn IV — Yuu must return ihis page as part of your application 3 Apenc/Name: sc. Paui Police Depar[nen[ ORI-: MN0620900 �.� r. �, i �. w Consultant Fe_<s: For each consultant enter the name (if �;nown) service to be provided, hourly or daily fee (S-hour day), and estimated time on the project. Consultant fees in excess of 5250 per da}' require additional writEen justification. ?�Tame of ConsultanE Service Provided CompvEation Cosf ' TBD Subtotal: S 5, OOC S .................................................................................................................................. Consul�ant Expenses: LisE all expenses to be paid from the grant to the individual consultants in addi7on to their fees (e.g., travel, meals, lodgin�). Ifem Location CompufaEion Cost Sub'ro:a!: .........................................................................................................•••••...........••••..... Confracts: Provide a descripEion of the product or sercice to be procured by contract and an estimate o: the cost. Applicants are encouraged to promote frez and open competition in awarding contracts. A separate justification must be provided for sole-source contracts in excess of 5100,000. Item Cost St�bfotal: 5 Total: S 5,000 3 $ SeMinn IV — You must return this page as part uf your appliration �� – (F.�lvs a..r� — ao-�3y .�geacv �me ana Si>Ye: Sa� =L 'au � �o � � c= �ev2r�-!e^[, ` si - ORI = (FBI ID Number3: )�I0620°00 � .r..�fL�'iIl�aliLSl�'a7ltifd[:S i � ��,zs�itan.r : ees =or 2�ch consaitanc enter che name, ;i'<r.own, se_*vice :o oe �rovided, ,ouriy or dayc :ee ; �c3-h011I' QdVj, nIIC 2Si1R1dCE4 RII12 OR Ehe projec�. Consuitanc i2°5 lII ZXCC°55 0I j�JO DeS QnV :2L7ll1I2 addi�onai justincaaon. Vame of ConsultanE Service Provide� Comout>tion Cost The consultar,t cor.tracted for this project wi11 be paid no more than $250 per day for maximum of 20 days. Subfotai: S 5,000 •••-••-........---••-......••• ..................................................•••.....................................••••••-••- Consiitani ,= ��e:aszs L:sc ail expeases to be paid zom the �rant to the :ndividuai consuitants m addition io their iees (e.;. :rave:, meais, lodgin�). Item Location Computation Cost �ubrotai: � ..................................•••••••..................•••.............................................••••................... =onrrr,cs: P:ovtce a desr_iption of the product or seryice to be procured bv contrac: and an e=�:maie oi I :he cosc. .�epiicants are eacouraged b promoce free and opea comoe!i'r.on in awarding cor,sacs. _� seoarate � usancadon mus� �e �rocide� for soie source consac,s in excess or 3iuQ000. ; Item C�s. �i��torr.!. � Tota1: S � ,000 `�' .. 3uc��t Wor::snze:: COPS I�tOP�c'9ti (Tnis aage musc �a re:�;ne�� :o �he COPc prr.ce.... Item �2 �° ' �3y Aqenc jH?fil°: St. Paul Police Deoartnent OBI -: riNO62o9o00 6. Qiher C�s - List i�ems (e.�., rent, producaon, telephone, j=nito:=a1 or secur:ty senices, im�esri�ative or confident;al fwlds) by major type and the basis o: the computation. For example, provide the square footaoe and tne cost per square foot for rent, or provide a monthly rzntal cost � ho�+° many months to rent. ^ ' `--- ComPu{ation Cost None Total: Sedion IV — You must return this page as pa�t ot your appiic2tion C ' �� AgencfMame: sc. Pau1 Police Departmen[ pg�T MNO62o9o00 Budgef �mmary Whem,you have compleEed the budoet ti�orksheet, trznsfer the toEals for each category to the spaces below. Co*npuEe the total direct costs and the total project costs. Indicate the amount of Federal funds requested. Bud�eE Cafegory AmounE A. Personnel B. Frin�e Eeneiits C. I'ravel D. Equipment E. Suopiies F. Consultants/Con�raccs G. Other ToEa1 Direct Costs To.zI ProjecE Cos.s Federal Request Non-FederaI Amount S 57,750 ( 75 °o) 5 19�2�0 ( 25 %) 12,000 - 60,000 S_ 5 , 000 S 77,000 n `� Section IV — You must return this page as part nf your appliratian Ztem fi3 � -� Apenc�Name: sc. Pavi Police Departmen[ ORI r: ri�o62o900 SEi�iIQ�I I!1 �: :i: 'i: ' �: � �;'. : : ;� . : . „� :.. ... . A Fe►sannel LisE each position by �tle znd name of employee, if a��zlable. Show the annual szlary rate and the pesentaoe of time to be devoted to tne project. Compenszrion pzid for employees engzged ia grant zc: vities must be consistent with that paid fo: similar work within tne zpplicant o:ganiza6on. ?`TamelPosition CompuEzEion Cost Nonz Tofel: S � B. R Bene rfs Frinoe benefit; should be based on known actual costs or zn established formula. Fringe benefits zre fo: the personnel listed in budget catego:y (A) and only fo: the percentage of time devoted to the project. Uniforms, eguipment �nd vehicles zre unallow•able costs under this grant proo zm. Please list FICA and Workers Compensation, if applicable. Name/1'osition Compufation Cost An-�ual Fringe Benefits None ;FICA/Social Security S i;ealth Insure.nce 5 Lielnsu;znce Vacation Sick Leave ReEirement '�tiorker's Conp 5 'Unemoloyment Ins. 5 O:ner 5 ' Total: S � Section IY — You must retum this page as part af your appiication Apencykzme: sc. Pau1 Police Department �fll r: riNO52o 00 C. '[r3vE1 Itemize travel expenses of project personnel by purpose (ag., staff to training, $eid interviews, advisory 0 oup meetings). Show the basis of computation (e.�., six people to 3-day training at SX airfare, SX lodo o SX subsistence). In training projecEs, travel and meals for trainees should be listed separately. Show the number of frainees and the unit costs involved. Identify the location of travel, if known. of Travel Location IEem CompuEaEion Cost Idone ToEa1: 5 � D. Equipmerrt List nonexpendable items that are to be purchased. Nonexpendable equipm=nt is tand ble propery having a usefial life of more thzr, {�eo years and an acquisirion cos, of 5�,000 or more per unit. Expendable iteins should be included either in the "Supplies" category or in tne "Other" category. Applicants should anzlyze the cost benefits of purchzsing versus leasino equipment, especially for high-cost items and those subject to rapid technical advances. Rented or lezsed equipment costs should be lisfed in t�'�e "ConEractual" caEegor�: Explain how the equipment is necessary for the success of the project. Attach a narrative desaibing the procurement method to be used. Item Cost 10 squibbs � $6,000 $60,000 � �'� � �u�` ��. Total: S 60,000 36 Sedion !V — You must raturn this page as part of your appiiration �go��N2ng; St. Pau1 Police Deoartment p��_ MNO62o 60 _� � E 5up�ties List iteris by ��pe (of;ice supplies; postaoe; trainin� mater;als; copvin� paper; and exp2ndable equipme� items cosfing less than 5�,000, such as bools, hand-held tape iecorders) and show the bzsis for compuEaton Generally, supplies include any materials that aze expendabiz or consumed durin� the course of tine project IEems :.rs Cost 7 digitzl caneras $700 each $5,000 ✓ t- i � Total: S 5,000 Section IV — You must retum fhis page as part ot ya�r application . Apen�yNam St. Paul police Department Ofl(;: b �.� ' r, �, t �. �.� CoiutilEanE Fees: For eachconsultant enter the name (if known) seroice to be provided, hourly or daiIy fee (S-hour day), and estimated time on the project. Consultant fees in excess of 5250 per day require addiEional written justification. Name of ConsultanE Ser��ice Provided ComnutaEion Cost . Sz�btotal: ...........................................•-•••••................................................................................ Consulianf Ezpenses: List all expenses to be paid from the gran: to the individual consultants in addi�ion to their fees (e.g., frzvel, meals lodging)- Item LocaEion CompuEzEion Cost Stib'ro.a!: ...............•-•..............-•--• •••._..........-••-•--....................................... ••• •.............._........._... ConfracEs: Provide a description of the product or sen�ice to be procured by confract and an esfima.e of the cost. Applicants are encouraged to promote free and open competition in a�varding contracts. A separatz justification must be provided for sole-source contracts in excess of 5100,000. Item CosE SubEota!: S Total: S � 38 Section IY — Yuu must return this page as part af ynur appiication - TrP� t3 > - - 8� �3��( AgencfHame: sc. pa�i Police Departnent •� OAl �: MN06209000 6. Qther C�s List items (e.g., rent, production, telephone, j�nitorial or security sercices, inves:igaEive or confidenF.z1 funds) by major rype and ine basis of thz computation. For ezample, pro��ide the squzre foota�z and the cost per squzre foot for rent, or pro�ide a monthly rental cos: and ho�n� inany months to reni. DescripEion Computation Cosf None Total: 5 � Sedion IV — You must retum this page as part of your application 39 p � � ' dpencyName: sc. Pzui Police Department �AI;: MN0620900 &�riget S�mmary Whert you have completed the budget w�orksheet, transfer the totals for each category to the spaces belox�. CompuEe the totzl direct costs and the total project costs. Indicate the amounE of Federal funds requested. Sud�et Cate�ory Amount A. Personnel B. Fringe Benefits C. Travel D. Equipment E. Supplies E Consulcants/Conirzcts G. Oiher Totzl Di:ect Cos�s Tota1 Project Costs Federal Request I�ron-Federal AmounE S 48,750 ( 75 °b) S 16,250 � 25 %) .• �� •�• 6 ��. 40 Sectian IV — You must refurn this page as Qart ut your apptication ; - U.S. Department of Justice Oit�ce of Community Oriented Policing Services °°-3.3y _ _'� ' ��=� .: �� s�� t� �bb�ng �t��S tnstruc�arzs fnr Cample�on of Si—ill, Di�r� nf Lo66ying A�iivP�es Ttus disclosuze forrt shall be completed by the reportin� enflty; whether subzwardee or prime Feeeral recipi- ent, ai the inifiarion or receipE of a covered Federal ac6on, or a material chan�e to a przvious filing, pursuant to tit!e 31 U.S.C. secfion 1352. The filing of z form is required for eacn pay:nent or zo eement to nake pa��_ ment to any lobbyin� entity for influencing or attemptino to influence an ofiicer or employee of zny z�z a �Iember of Con�ress, an ofiicer or employee of Congress, or an employee of a Member o_' Cono;ess in con- nection with a covered Federal action. Complete all i�ems that zpply for both the inifial filing and materiai chan�e report. Refer to the implementing o idance published by the O:fice of and Bud�et for additional inEormation. 1. Idena.`y the type of covered Federal action for which lob by'v-�� acavi'ry u and/or has b�n srZUZd to influence tne out- come oi n covered Fedzr2l action. '-- Ide�d-v the s��tus of ��e covered Federzl action. �. Iden�ry the appropriate clessi=ica7on o: t�'us report. Lf thic is a follo,n�-up repor� caused bv a mzterial change to the info*- r.tation previously reported, enter the year and quarter in ��'hicn t�ie c c�ct� Enter the date of fne ]zst pcevi- ousiy s�b:ni::ed re�ort by tius rzooctin� e�tiiy for t�1s cov- err.l Feder�l action. '-. En.°: ��e fuL name, addre=s, city, state znd zip code of the repor.-�� ena;�,�. Indude Con�r2r,ional I3�'s7ict nu_mber, i� !��owr,. Cn>ck th<?D�roprizte clzss�=ica�on o; the repotung en�ty t'r,zt desi�ate> if iE is, or expects to be, a prime or sub- a�.•ard rytpie,nt. Identi"ry tl-ie tier of tne subawardee, e.�., the n:s: suoawzrdee of the prime is the lst tier. Subzwazds i�dude but ue not limited to subcontacts, sub�.nts and con�act zw�sds unde: o ants. �. L` Lhe oroz_-uza�on fi!ing the repor. in item ? c'r,ectcs "Subawa=dee," then enter the full nzme, addiess, aty, s:ate ��d zip cede of the prime Federzl recipient L�clud= Cono e_<sonal D�'s�ict, if known. ered Federal zction (it,m 1). If 1�own, entzr tne full Catzlo� of Federal Domestic?=sistance (CFDA) n�-nber for o ant;, coopera�ve j�ements, loaru znd lo�Z commitn�nt;. S. Ent=r the mos, aopropriate Federal ide.��fy� �u,-nber avzilable fo� t�ie Fede;�i action iden�fie� in item 1(e.�., Request for Proposal(R�P) number, Invi;a�on for Bid (�) number; grant announceL�en; number, tne contract, o anF, o; loan award nu.mber, tne application/prop con�oi nu.mbe; assimed by tne Fede_�1 a�ency), In�] P,e;ixos, e.,., "RFP- DE-90-001." '" 9. For a cove:ed Federel zc5on where there nes b.�� e� awa:d or loan com.-*u�e�i by the Fedezz aoency en,�* ��e Federal amount of :ne aH•zrd/loz� com. fa ��e o u:t= ena'ry ide�t,zzd in i,em g o: �. ' 10. (a) Enter [he full n�. add.-zss, city, s�.te a�-�d zip code of t�tie lobbying entity enozged by the repoctin� regssz-�c iden�- fied in item S to i*uluence tnz covered Frleral action. (b) EnEer the full name(s) of the individu�l(s) pe..or_ni_-�� ser- vices, and include fil addrzs; if difieren; f;om 10 (a). Enter L�st Nanz, Firs, tia-ze, e.nd yliddle Iruti�1(vin. 11. The ce_�tiiying oE"nciai shall sip e,nd daEe the for,n, print hs/hername, ti;le znd telephone numbe:. o. Enter �ne r,ame of tne Federal agency m2t�� e awud or lo�-� co:.�..T��e Lnclude a, ]ea;; one or�an;.�atioral level below' a�=^c; name, ii 4�o��n. Fo: exz.-npie, Depa.*�nent of Tran;por.atior., United S.ates Coast Guard. ". [nter �ne r'rler<�l pro�ra.�n name or description fo: the co��- P��blit recorting Lzerder.`ar t7:is rollectia: of infor,r..:ior. s es:ir.m;=: tu n.rra�e 30 mir.t�t>s per ns]onsz, ir„(udins time for r��i�.:;ing instrneiau, >e:+rc'r.ing �s.ino a.a!a wur.�s, o�,'r�rino and mcir.:.:r.ir,s f{_ lis!a t:redec.', er.d c�rr.ple:irt� ar,d rt✓ir.e.'ns tit t�!(ectior, of inforrruiior.. Sa:d co^;- rr.ents rescrding th� burden estirrm:e or any otf�ernsye:: of this mlfection of iriorm�!ion, inci«1in� s�r��es;ior.s for rC�ttCinS fld5 0lvC'::;, t0 f6:O��ce o% HlannScm�r;; ar.d Biutsct. Pc�er,cnrk Rcdirction Projtc! (03:5-OC-o1. b:'sslain�ton, D.0 ?0�30. Ad�uni�rative kmvs — Ynu musi return ihis page as part ot your application 'j'f j : �.�:` �;;.`' ' � �' .T : J� 7 it: , ' s : f. j: =l: . . `L'�. Comoleie tnis form to disclose lobbyin� acti�'ities pursuant Eo 31 U.S-C.1352 (See recerse for ins�:uctions and public burden disclosure) I. Type of Eederat Action: B a. contract b. grant c. cooperztive a�reement d. loan e. loan �uzrantee f. lozninsurance Z. StaEus of Federal Action: _ a. bid/ofier/appliczHon b. initial award c. pos.-awar3 �?. Nzme and Address of Reportin� Entit}•: � �Prime � Subawzrdee Tier _� if l.�tomn: Saint Paul Police Department 100 East 1ltfi Street � St. Paul, MN SS1Q1 ' Con�r2ssional Dis::ict (number), i: knowz: � 6. Federal Departmen✓�gency: 0 S. Federzl Acfion Number, if kno�sn: Anproved by OVf� os=s-oo1� (as amended) 3. P�eport Type: _ a. initial filin� b. material change For Materia[ Change Or.iy: Year: Quarter: Date of last report _. S. If P.eporfin� EnEity in No. 4 is Subawardee, En:er ?�'ame and Address of Prime: e Conarzssional Dis:rict (nunoer), ii knocvn: _ 7. Fedezal Pro�ram I�amelDescripEion: C'rD� Numoe*, if applicaole: 16.710 9. Ax•ard AmounE, if known: S � 10. a. tvame and Address of Lobbying Re�istrant i (ij irzdiaidual, lnst n.nm_°, firsf name, MI): 11. Information requested tnrou�h this focm is authorized by TiHe SI U.S.0 Section 235Z This disdosure of tobbyin� aCi�i6es is a material reprseatafion of fac: nnon �vhich reliance K'as placed by the tie: aoove when this transaction w-as made or entered into. Tnis disclosure is required pu:- suant to 51 U.S.0 li5? Tn'ss iaformafion will be reported to Cze Con� ess semi-annualiy znd c+z12 be available tor pvbIic inspeCaon. My peaon who fails to file tne required disdo- su:e shall be subject to a ti�il penalty of nat less than S10,000 and not more than 5100,000 for each such faiture. Federal Use Onl}': 10. b. Individual5 Perfornt�ng Services (includin� address if diferenE f;om \o.10a) (last nzme, first name, MI): � Si�nature: Hilliam K. Finnep Print \�me: Chief of Police Title: Telep4one �`o.: 612-292-3588 Date: 6l12/9$ autrto, fo; Local P.eproduc[ior., S:andard � o.m - LLL y. LJ.S. Deparfinent of Justice Of ice of Community Oriented Policin� Services -� �--;,ao -a3 y . - _��__ �l�i�OiiS Regarriing Lnhirying; IIebarmerr�, �ensinn and t)ther Resgor�sihiIity Matfers; Drug-fs2� Wo la� RequiremerrLs Caardination with Affe�l Agenaes; hl�rrSapplarr[ing; and Reten'�ion. � Althouoh {he Depa�l��t of Jusfice has made eve.y eE`ort to simplify the applicafion process, other provi�ions of Federal law require us to see!c your certificarion regazding certain matteis. Applicantr should read the o�lior� citzd below az;d ['ne instructions for ceraiicztion induded iri the regulations to unde:s.and the requirementr and whether they_ apply to a partic�el2- applica_�t. Sio ta;ure of this form provides for compliznce with certificafion requirementr under 28 CFR Paz; 69, "New Rzstricaons on tobbying;' and � CFR Part 67, "Govemma�,-k�ide Debar.nent and Suspension (Nonproauement) and Gove.-nment-cvide Requimments for Drug Free Workplace (GranG);' and the coo:dination and non-supplantino req�;�ents o; Ehe Public Safety ParY�eiship and Commuruty Policin� Act of 1994. Tne ceftifications sh�11 be �eatzd as a mzterial represen_ tztion of fact upon which reliance will be placed when the Deparsnent of Justice determines to awa:d the covered o.nt. 1. Lobbying Ps reqwred by �� 1352, Title 31 of the US. Code, and imolr mented x; ZS CE72 Part 69, for peaons entering into a grant or coo� e: aHve a��e=r.;ent over S1CO,OLt�, u defined at 2S CFR Part 69, the z��lic�nt certifies tha:: A. t�'o Federal aoproprixted funds have been paid or will be pzid, by or on behalf of tne undersi�ned, to any pe:son for inflL encin�r or zt;enotin� to influence an oLicer or employee of any a�encv; a MemSe: oi Co ��s, an officer or employee of Con� e=s, or an employee of a �fembe: o: Co �oress in connr.,ion witn tne making of any Federal o ant; the entedng into o[ any coope:ative ao eenenF, and the extension, mntinuafion, 2newzl, zmenement or modiScaHon of any Federa] o nt or c000e:ative z�r2ement; B. Ii a�v iunes o�4er ci;a� Fe�'e;z1 appro�riatzd tw�ds have beer paid o: w�ili be pzid to any person fo: influencin� or aCemoh:n� to influ_nr-_ an o;3cer or enployee oF zny ager.:y; a Member o; Con�, ess, an o�icer or employee of Co o�ress, or an employee o; a M_mber o.' Cono �s in conneclion wi:h t}tic Federal grant or mop=_.ative ovreenent, the undzaio ed shall complete and suFr :nit Standard For.n — LLL, "Disclosum oE Lobbying Activities," in acco��ance wiCh its ins;ruCior�s; C. t ne undersio ed shzl! reqtire that the lan�ua�e of ths certin'- cation ce induded in ,he award documents for aIl svoaw�ards at aIl tiers (indudin� subo ants, mnhacts under granLs and toopea- rve a�.�mens, and su'.conhac5) and tnat all svb-redpien5 s4alf ce:riryand disc(ose accordingiy. Z Debarmeat, Suspension and Other Responsibility Matten (Direct Recipient) As rzqu,-=d by Exa;utive O:der I?�"9, �oarm=n; and Susoersion, and i;tpi=�ented at 2S CFR Part 67, ior prospective paficioan's i� p:irrary covered tarsac�ons, as denned at � CFR Part 67, Sn.ion 6i510 — A. Tne applicant certines tnat it and ils Prin�p2�5: (i) A:e not presently debarred, suspended, pmpcu¢d for debar.nenL dec(ared inelia ble, sentenced to a denial oi Fedeal benefits by z s:ate or Fed=ral court, or volentarilv erduded from covered traruac;ions by any Federal depa:;_ nent or agency; (ii) Have not witnin a tkueryear pe�od pr cedino this zp ca6on been tonvicted of or had a dvil jndo ent randered zgairut them for commiesion of fraud or a criminai oueruz in connection with ob;aining, attemp;ing to obtain, or perfo; m- ing public (Federal, s:ate or Ixa1) tra,lsa�tion or conCa:: unde: a pubGt hznsaction; violation of Federzl or s:ate zn6t;us; s:atutes or commission of embezzlemen:, thek, Eo o_ry, bn'oz.ry, Fetsification or des;ruc;ion of rrords, mzkin� ;a!se s:ztemenLS, or iec=iving s:olen prope.�; (iu) Are not presently indictzd for or o�.erwi� �,� o: d�illy charoed by a govemmentai entiry (Federal, s;z;e or Iocal) w9th comrtission oi any oi tne o�z�se> enu-�era:ed i� pa.a�.apn (.4)(ii) oi tns certincaHon; z.c (iv) Have not witiun z thcedyez: period prxeding t-tis appL- cafion had one or more public ransa:do, s��deral, s:a;= or loczl)terr and B. �L�nere the applicant is unable to certiiy to any of the statr menis in this cerrificafion, he or she shall aCzcn an explanafion to this appGcaSon. 3. Drv� Free Workplace (Grantees OtherThan Indio�iduals) As mquired by tne Dru� Free Workplace Act of 19SS, and i.-n�le- mented at 2S CFR Pzr; 67, SubpaY. F, fo; o.ante=s, as defin=d at?S CFR Par; 67, Se�tions 67.615 and 67.620 — A. Tne appfi�nt certifies that it wi11, or wi11 continue to, n[ovide a dru� free workplace by: (i) Pubisvno a statement nofiiying em?io}'_<s tna[ tn= unlau'iul manuficture, dis.ribu6or., dspz:s'v�g, poss2ssion o, usz of a contolled subs:ance is prohibit=d in the o zn;>= s �vo: kpiace and spedfi.ing the a:tiorts thz: will be ta.l-en zgai;u: emoioyees ior violafion o; sucn proiubition; (ii) Es:ablishing an on-goin� d;v� (ree a:.a:eness pro� zm to inforn employees about — Adnuvstr'a6++e Foms - You must return this page 2s part of your applica{io❑ sg , _. . . .� (z) Tne dangers oE drug ab�se in the workplace; fo) The o ntee s po(icy oE maintauung x druo Ece-° x'orkplace; (�) ?� �- acailable drug counseiing, �ehabilitarion and employ- e� a=sis:ance progracns: and (,�,) Tne penalties that may be imposed uoon employees Eor drs� abuse ��o�a6or5 occurrixtg in the worlcPla[e; (ui) �(a't:ing it z requi2men: that each employee to b=_ engagrl in the perforre�nce oi the g.�ant bz o ven a copy of the s�tement mquired by para�raph (i); (iv) Nociiying [he employee in the stacement required by paregraoh (i) that, as a mndi6on oE employment under tne o ,.n;, the employee will — (a) Abide by the terns of fne statement; and ('o) No:ify fne employer in wd5ng of hs or her comicdon Eor z�:olation of a mmina! dnig s3tute occurrin� in the �vork- plac_ no la:er than five calendar days aE:er such conviction; (v) tioti,4^n� the a�encV in �vrian�, wiLhin 10 c:lenda: dz}'� after rxeiving no:ice unee: suboamo aph ( iv)(b} :r�m an enpioyee ar otnerwise re=eivin$ actnal notice of such comic- tion. Employecs of convicted employe� must pco�ide no^:ce, induding posi5on fide, to: COPS O45ce,11C0 �Jermont A��e., z\�YY, Wzs:una oM �� otice shx11'vndude the iden�5- cztion number(s) of each af:eded o °�, .nt; (ci) Takin� one o: 4�e follo�ei�� ac:iors, w'ithu� �0 @lenda: cays oY mc_iving no6ce unde; subpara� aph (iv)(b), wi:� resp�: ro any enptoyee w�no is so coneic:ed — (a) i2!�y-�� appropriate pe:sonn_I action zgzu�st such an em?loye_, up to and indudL temw-�ation, coasis:ent wi:n the cequiremeats of the Renabilitation A� of 1973, as anend- ed; or (o) .Requi-in� suc4 emoloy� to pa :iapate satis:ado:iiy c. z d:t� abse asss:ance o: r_nzSilitation pr��ram app�o°'ed .`or suci� pur�oses 5y a Fe3e:zl, s:xte or local hzal:h, law e:�or.� ment o: other anpropriate agency; (vii) Malbng a good fai:h e"r"or: to con:inue to maintain a dn:� (zee workplace throu�n implementation oE para� ephs �I�. �ll�. �Ill�. �Ib'�. �V� 2(ld �CI�. g. The grantee mav inseri im[he space provided below che site(s) for che performance of work done im m�nec:ion d.•i:h the speci6c orui.`. - Place of performance (s:ieet address, city, county, s.aFe,'zip code) Chr.k � if tnem �`^•orkplaces on file tha: am no! iden'i�ed here. �etion 67.E90 oE the xea ations pco'rides that a o antee tnat is a s:ace cnay ele� to make one certification in eacn Federal fis:at year, a mp}' of which shouid be included w•itn each application for Depatment of Justice fundino S[ates and s'atz aoencies mz}' elecc to vse OjP Form 4061(7. Q�ec.F Q iffhes�tehaselededtomnpleteOJPFo.-m'=Lti1/i_ S_ Coocdination The Pub6c Safety P�neship and Community Polidng Ac: oE 199 - requires applicants to ceY3iy thzt there hzs bzzn app�opaate coores- nation v+i:h all a�°naes tt'at ma}' be �ecte3 by the aoplican:'s o.ant pr000ul if approved. AffeGed zgendes r,�zy indudz, among ofn=rs, t�e Qc�:e o: tiie linited S.ats Attoney, s:atz o: lo�al prosz'vt�rs. °r cocxec:ional zgend=s. The appliant cet.i.ies tnat there tus be_n yo propdate coocdin3hon with a1I afiected zgenda. 5. i ion-$upplanting !he app(ican: heieby cerufies that Federai funcs �'ill not be ��ed :o replace or supplant s:zte or local Eunds, or Eunds supplied bY ��e g�ueau oE Tndian Afmirs. that would, in the absence of Fede:al zid, be r,�de acailaole to or for !aw eniocczmen= purposes_ 6. FetenGOn i ne a?olicant hemby ceYUAes that it undestancs thzt i: ms: abide by i5 suSmitted pizn to xe�in Lhe addiaonat civilian pesiaors anc redeployment levek at the condusion of the grant pe;iod. St- Paul Police Department Gante: \ar,ie and Addmss: ppolicztion \o. and/or Project Name: Scfiool—Based Partnerships GRnteeii25/VendorNumber Chief William K- Finney Tvped \ame and Title of Si�a �r_: �•� o• Fnfoeeement Representative: :? s tl:e du!y aufl:or'=ed represer.!ati�e tior.s, ir.e!uding Y)�c p�n Ya mte:r.. EIe T�,,zd \ame Date: 41-600-5 4� �errzin� body, I f�ereby cer:ify thc•* tl:e I am binding the goaeming bodv to ti�e abo�e certi �nern o�czals unl! not relime tiu gonemirtg 6ody of its obligations ur.der tixis e an*-. Norm Coleman Date: �i�, �;ur=_. _ ' � _ � '°�ir ._r '_ _ �:_:.. - �;�,�.�: �SStli '�.5. Department oF Jusfice Ofiice of Community Oriented Policin� Services �v_:a1 proe�sions oi Federal law and policy appty to all o �, .nt prograzrs. We (the Oliice of Community Oriented Policin� Services) n==d ;o secL:e you: assurance tnat you (the appIicanU w•ill comnly wi.n tnese provisions. I: you would like fur.ner infor.nahon abeu: zny o_ tne mzr,e-s on which we seek you: asswa�ce, please con;act is. By your au;norized rzpxesen:a5ve's sio atuiz, you �ssuie us and ceY.ify to l:s thz, you will comply witn a!l legal znd adr,unis ; require- nen� Lia; govem the applicant ior acceptance and vse of Fede:ai g; ant funds. In particvlaL you assuie vs tnzt: I. You ha�•e been le�zlly and ofiicially autnoazed by the approp:iate goveming body (for example, mayor or dty council) to apply for tns g:ant and that the persons sio in� G`�e appiication xnd tnese assu:- ances on your behali z:e au[horized to do so and to act on your benzli wi,h mspeR to zny issues t;iat may arise during praessin� of this a�ptica:ion. ? Y�u `�:1! comply wi:n the p, of Federzl law which lir.ut cer.ain pelitica! activifies o: yoer employees whose prindpal em- ploynent is im m�nection with an acavity financed 'v� whole or in P2' ��z �'tis ��ant. Thesz res:ricrions are s2t for.n in � US.C. � I�Ol, et seq. 3. Yon wil! comply wi.n .ne minimw-n w•a�e and maximum hours pro� sio�s of the Fede:al Fair Lzbor S:andares Ad, ii they aoply to voc. ?. You tiiL zstablsh saizo�ards, if you have no; done so alrezdy, to pro'rubit e-�oloyees fcon �sin� ;hei: positions for a pw tT�a[ is, or � ves :he appearance of 6<L�g, mo6vz.ed by a desi:e for pr.cate oain for tnzr•selves or o;ne*s, particula;ly those witn whom tney ha�= •`an'i;; bi:siness or oLher tles. oender, dsability or age, unlawfully exclude a,ny pe:son ir�n pa:tic- ioafion in, deny tne benefits of o: employment to zny pe:son, o: su6 ject any person to dis., in connection wi.n any p�� ams or acfivities funded in whole or in paR with Federal fvnds. 7hecz civil ri�hs requirementr z;e found in tne non provi- sions of tne Onuuoi:s Cz�ime Contr�} and Safe Shxts pct of 1965, as amended ( US.C. § 3759(d)); Ti:le VI of the Civil Riohts p�; of 19%'-, as aznended (-1 US.C. § 2CCOd); the Indian Civil Righ� .q�; (� US.C. §§ 1301-1303); Section SG; of the Rehabilitztion Act of 1973, as amend- ed (29 US.C. § 79S); Title II, SubHtle A of the Americar�s wi;n pu2oi�_ ities Act (ADA) (�=2 U.S.C. § 12101, et seq.); tne Age Di�-i:nina;ion Act oi 1575 (=2 U.S.C. § 0101, e: seq.); and Deoartnent oE JcsSce h'on-Divimination Reo ations contzined in Title 2S, Pa.-s 35 and _Z (suopar`s C, D, E and G) of tne Code of Fede: al Re�ulations. A. In thz event �ia; any cour; or adrritis; a:i��e zo=ncy ,-.iz:es z iindin� of diseimination on orounds of race, color, re1i� on, na6or.al ori�:n, oende:, dsabiliN or z�e aozL you z�=r a du= praess he3;in�, you ��cee to fonvz.d a copy of E�e i'v�dL�� ;o tie Ot."ice oi Civil Rghts, OSce or Jistice Proo zms, S10 7:rt Stre=t, Iv'VJ. Wzs;i.�a,on. TK 20�31. J. YOL' N'}L �;ve tne Depz-;rient oi Ju.`:c= o: the Convtro!ler Gen_:a] zc:�s to z,, the ri�it :o exam; ne :e:ords znd da�v.meats relz;zd to tne o n:. 6. You �vili comoly witn all requirem=ntr imposed by the Depz:;- ment of J.s :c> as a condi5on or adrniniscz;ive eequirement of tne � ant; wi;rt �ie proe am guide!ines; witn the cequirements of O�fB Ci:cvlars,^-.-57 (ooveming mst calculz6or5} and A-12$ or A-133 (gov- eming zudis); witn the applicabte p�visions of th= Omnibus Cri.-ie Control znd Safe Strz�ts Ac; of 1968, zs amended; with 28 CFR Pzrt 60 (L'nifor.,�. Admirust;ative RequuemenLs); with tne provisions of tne cw;2n; e�ition of the appropriate COPS o ant own=r's manuzl; and �vitrt a!i other applicable laws, orde:s, iz�ula6ons or cir.vla5. 7. You KiIl, ;o the extent prac:icable and corsis:ent witn applicaole la�.; see!c, rzauit and Mre qualin"ed memSe:s of racial and ethnic r.unority o, o::ps and qualined women in order to fuCher efiective lak• enforc=-�en; by incezs'v-�� thei: rzacs wiGtin tne swom pesi- tio;s in yo�: a�enc�: S You �.i;i :.� c, on the o.o.y.d oE rac=, coio;, re!i� on, nztional origin, B. Lf you an_ applv':ng tor a�ran[ o� 5.iCO or morz and Lk�a.;- nent regulaSors (2S CrR ^-2.301 et seq.) rzquire you to su� :tit a-� Eoual O?p� :1:ni:y Enployzn=_nt Plan, you x�ill do so a; ,ne tim= oi tltis appli:afion, u you have not don= so in tne past ti you z:e zpplyin� ro: a o an: o: ]ess tnzn 5500,000 znd tne re�u;zcions reGure you to ma��tain a Plan on 41= in you: oEice, you wil( do so wiJda I20 days oi your o znt aivzru'. 9. You will insure ,hzt the fadlities under your owne�snio, le=_sz o; supervision wF.icn shall be utilized in the acmmplishmen: oi the project are not listed on the Environnental Protec;ion A�ency's (EPA) list ci �iolz:ing Faciii6es and E�a; you will nofi;y us ii vou zre advised by tn= EPA incicatina that a;acility to be used in tnis `;zn: is under co,sid_ra:ion for ]isting by EPA. 10. If your s;a:e hzs es:ablished a revi_w z�d comr:�ent prec=dure under Es=:utive Orde: 123i2 and 'nas selected this pro� am ior review, ynu hav_ made tnis apolica;ion availaSle for rz�•iew bv the s.zte Single Poin. or Con[act. ' Il. You nilf devise a plzn to retain tne increzszd hi:;ng lev_! �ci:h s:ate and Ixai ;unds ai,e: tn> cor.ciesion oi your o;an[. Adininistraiive Pomcs - You must return this page as part ot your applica(ion 67 " _ , s� . :. 12 You will comply K'iti the provisions oE Federal lz�v evhich apply to funding for the pur- cnase, maintenance or e:ihancement oi eqeipmznt (harcware or softwa:e) tnat enables an agenc}' :o receive, s.ore, excnange, anal;ze o: flisseminace c:imir,al intelli�ence information. These reeuire- ments zre set forth in 2S C.F.R. Part 23. If you: g:ant is subjed to the 2S CER. Part 23 reoui;z- �nen:s, you will crezte a s}�s:em operating manuz! to ensure that your agencq operates and main- tains such a sys:em in conformxnce with the oper x;in� p;inciples set forth in 2S C.F.R. Pzrt 23. "'Criminal Intelligence Syste:n" or "Intelligen:e Sys.em" means khe zr.an�emenis, equipneat, fzcilities, and pmce3u:e esed for the receipt, storaoe, intere�ency eschange, d�s- semination and analYSis of criminal_inteiligence � iniomation. Any informztion systen that receeced, stores and cisseminates information on individuals or or�znizations based on their " vnvolvemen: in ciminal ar.icity is a crir.unat - intelli�ence >?sfen. The de[inition includes botF svstems [ha: srore detxiied information on the criminal activities o: subjects and sy5tems that s:ore only iniormation desi� ed to identify indi- viduals or or�anizxtions that are the subject of an incuicy or analysis (e.�., a pointer sys:=m). ( L, ceri;i� canp[iancc �v�ii� il�. a�n�e assurmr_�5 [i_�' �u�rnt ti�r appii:aFio�: mui ttiC tj hed�;:ti I1utd5. Date: Sig, at�re: