Loading...
280997 1 C�TV CLERK �^ ^��W — FINANCE GI�� �� ��, IN� �ALTL Council,1 QV '� ;aRV — OEPARTMENT File 1\O. . _VE — MAVOR � . � �ou��Zl �ZesOl�t�on :'resented By -" Referred To Committee: Date Out of Committee By Date WHEREAS, the owners of the following described real properties have requested that the City acquire them for Bluff Preservation, and they were listed as number one priority on District 6 Planning Council ' s list of priorities as of April 8, 1983 , and WHEREAS , the owners of the property agree not to appeal the amount of appraisal , BE IT RESOLVED, that the Council hereby orders an appraisal of said properties, the descr.iption of the properties being as follows : Lots 4 through 13 , Bernardine Addition, and that part of Lot 29 , Cottage Home Addition lying north of the Northesn Pacific Railroad right-of-way, except the west 30 feet , and also except the north 250 feet thereof. COUNCILIIEN `i eas Nays � Requested by Department of: Fletchar ca�i� _ In Favor Masanz Nicosia � s�+� __ Against BY — Tedesco Wifson :?dopted by Council: Date �L� � ���� Form Approved by City Attocney Certified a_� d � C nc' Se et " �Y • ' � ; B� ' .�Y_�� ,3�,��: , e �pproved by Mayor for Sabmission to Council �y _ _ _ sy .. -__-..—► C�I's�.' U�+� �AINT PAUL � 9 � a��ti. oo �+ �a� � ,o +. , N4 OFFICE OF THE MAYOR ��` ��ij�3•,1t111 p*J 11!1 1�Ai1 ll c . � � � 347 CITY HALL �ea♦ SAINT PAUL, b3INNESOTA 55102 GEORGE LATIMER (612) 298-4323 MAYOR October 11, 1983 re : Appraisal of Cohansey St, properties Council President Victor Tedesco and Members of the City Council 7th Floor City Hall St . Paul , MN 55102 Dear Council Members: Attached is C.F. 280997, dated October 6 , 1983, which resolution I veto. The attached resolution orders appraisal of certain parcels. The resolution gives as the reason for ordering the appraisal the possible acquisition of the parcels for bluff preser- vation. The issue of acquiring the subject parcels has been reviewed extensively over the last seve.ral years. The responsible departments, Comr.iunity Services (Division of Parks and Recreation) and Planning and Economic Development (Planning Division) , do not find that it would be in the public interest to acquire the subject properties. Based on their analysis and recommendation, therefore, I have not presented to the City Council a request for acquisition nor have I authorized the Department of Finance and Management Services (Valuations and Enqineering Division) to undertake an appraisal for purposes of acquisition. The subject properties are not on the Wheelock Pkwy, bluff and are not needed for scenic view preservation, From my perspective, then, there is no public interest served by providing the owners of the property an appraisal of the barcels at public expense . Sincerely, « �`� � � GE E LATIMER � 'M` M r r��,�� GL:kh -- ,"�, r��� =' �� r cc: Mr . George Ostrand --�� � o J. W. Donovan y:"=-`^ --,, Edward Starr . --� John McCormick �� Gr ory Hau�t � � `�" bert Olson �46 t Y� � � �� `� q ,,��*_�, GITY OF SAINT PAUL � o�`� °; OFFICE OF THE MAYOR '' �ui�iim � . v� �� 347 CITY HALL �°`� SAINT PAUL, MINNESOTA 55102 GEORGE LATIMER (612) 298-4323 MAYOR October 11, 1983 re : Appraisal of Cohansey St . properties Council President Victor Tedesco v�'0 S usT/Q„/N�� and Members of the City Council 7th Floor City Hall � p����� St. Paul , MN 55102 De ar Counc i 1 Member s: Attached is C.F. 280997, dated October 6 , 1983 , which resolution I veto. The attached re solution orders appraisal of certain parcels. The resolution gives as the reason for ordering the appraisal the possible acquisition of the parcels for bluff preser- vation. The issue of acquiring the subject parcels has been reviewed extensively over the last several years. The responsible departments, Community Services (Division of Parks and Recreation) and Planning and Economic Development (Planning Division) , do not find that it would be in the public interest to acquire the subject properties. Based on their analysis and recommendation, therefore , I have not presented to the City Council a request for acquisition nor have I authorized the Department of Finance and Management Services (Valuations and Engineering Division) to undertake an appraisal for purposes of acquisition. The subject properties are not on the Wheelock Pkwy. bluff and are not needed for scenic view preservation. From my perspective, then, there is no public interest served by providing the owners of the property an appraisal of the parcels at public expense . Sincerely, ,--:_, _ � . __� �_ • �.�a,. GE E LATIMER , =' Z-`-._ r- M r ^c.h "'' a a,,a :z GL:kh _:;; _,.,.. cc: Mr . George Ostrand � ;,�-; �.�; J. W. Donovan `"' ��' Edward Starr John McCormick Gregory Haupt Albert Olson .�sa . � . � �;�. . _. , . � � . .. . . � � . � ' � � , ' � .. ' .. , . , � � . , . . . . � . . . ` . . . . . � _ , � . _ ` � .. . . .� . . � ' I .. � �/` , , . . . . 1. . .��\. . � � . � . . . // . � �� . . . � . . ' . � . . . . .� ' . . � ' . . � - ( �,/r ' .. . � � . � - . . .. . . .. . . . . . ./� .� . .�- � . ' , . . . ' . . .. ... . . . . ' .. ' r. . . � . . . . � . . � . � t . � , ' , . � • . . i . ' . � � , . . . J. � � . . . � . � . .. �' � � � . � � . ' • ` �� . . . � . . . . � - .. ' � � � � . . . . .'. . . . . i ' , . . � . ' �. . . .. . � � . . � . . . .�. . , . . � � . . . �. .. , . . . . . . , ,� � ' � J � . . . . � • ' . . . . . . � - .. /. .. � . . i . � . . i . � � . . ' , . . . , , ' . .... . . .. . . t .. .. . ' �,1. � � � . � � . .. � . , - � r . ' .' ' ' . . ., 1 • ' . . . . . ., . � ` . . ' � � . . . �. : ' September 1, 1983 , i , , ' l�qor Geor�e L�timer ' ° � . Rdam 347 „ , ; City Rall , i : REs Rseolution,re�uest3ng apprai�al oF propa�y on Coha�sa�t� Streat � . . ,. , . Dear Ngqox I�t3mer: . ,. - : , ` c ,�` - Z'he above�cited�.waa .�eferred l�or review by the, A�dministrati,o�n. aad , ' ' the o�fice of the -Ci�y Attarney bq� the City Counci],' at ita September 1, ; 1983 riieeti�g. , - _ � , � . �; ;, , T�te matter`wae l:aid over one week to S+eptembar' $, 1983.for �urther : Citp Council coneide�ation. � ' , , . . . Verq truZy y�aure, ,. � . � � . , ; � Albert B. �lson � � - City.Clerk � .� . rLS stlrm ; . , : / _ ` � � ccs Citq Attorney ' . � , - . � _ , � � . , .. . , - � , , , � . � � , � • , \ . , ��. . � , � . � . . �,,\ , ,; , '�t. . . ; . � ' ' , . � � . . . . '_ . � Y . . � � .. _ . ... � . , � �i, � , . .. . .. . . . . . . � .. . � � ' � . , f , .. , �` � . � �. . . f � .. . ! . - .- . . , . � .., '�5, . . . .. �. . � . � . � . � � .. .. � . .. . . . ` , �� • - �--- �, �� ��� . . . . . district sex plannsn �i����Cr�� 1021 Mar(on St., St. Paul, Mn 55117 � , September 1 , 1983 _ . , � � To: City Council From: Sharon Voyda - District 6 Planning Council C.O. August 24th the Land Use Task Force (subcomr.littee of the D6PC) again reviewed the proposed redevelopment oz property located to the east and west of the plotted street of Cohansey. Said property owner�s are Mr. Bies and T�'Ir. Ostrand. ' The committee reiterated "they are not opposed to potential re- • � development". � However, a need exists to carefully investigate the feasioility of new construction on various sections of the Wheelock Bluffs or sloped areas. � A study of the Arlington-Wheelock Slopes prepared by the P�innesota ._ Soil and Water Conservation District in 1981 indicates tnat said - property has a slope steepness in the 25/ - 30;� range. ine minimum slope steepness within the vicinity of said property is ' in t�e 19/ range. � , . - Uniform Bilding Code: Chapter 70, Excavation and Grading, adopted � � 1976 requires the city to issue Excavation and Fill Perrnits. A Site Plan Review by the City oi St. .Paul is required on any slope steepness greater than 12%. Therefore, I believe the Land Use � . Task Force would feel comfortable supportin� the Site Plan Review Process providing the com�ittee would be involved utilizing the existing channels of cor,imunication. � It is important that City Council understand that the Site Plan Review Process may reiterate the infeasibility of new construction to said property and/or enforce redevelopment restrictions that may constitute an economically infeasible redevelopment project. f 4�.-�74 ► . - - - _ . _ __ _---- • � � �jr` ���J���� d. . . . . istrict six plannin �,i���(��� 1021 Marton St., St. Paul, Mn 55117 September 1 , 1983 � To: City Council ' . Froms Sharon Voyda � ' ; page 2 � Mr. Ostrands prc��osal includes the construction of the plotted � street of Cohansey through to Ivy Street (unplotted section) and Ivy Street through to S�ester.n. These proposed public � improvements incorporate the need to acquire railroad property. � � Would the City of St. Paul assume the costs or divert the costs by increasing .property taxes? Property owner's inadvertently ! connected to the improvements would be assessed at least �120.Q0 i per foot. Property owner�s, have strongly opposed the issue of i said public improvements previously and I do not anticipate a ; � change in attitude. � ; , ____. ._ _ �� : Thank you, ` - , , . : � . , . • i . ! I : � ; � � .- . 3<�"-.�7� � 6 . � �....� . . c�- �� ��-� _ � � ' RAMSEY SO(L AND WATER CONSERVATlON DIS7RICT Mid-Amerim Eank Buildir� • 1827 North Salnt Poul P.oa� � Maplewood, Minneso!a 551;9 • ,-` . � Telephone (612� 7I7-01:7 MINNES4TA � SOIL a►vo WATER CONSE�VATIOi�1 DtS�'��CTS �ate: February 10, I�81 . To: District Six Planning Cauncil, City of St. Paul PIa*ining �epartment From: Ramsey Soil and Water Conservation IJ,�s�rict 3oard of S�pervlsors SubJeet: Arli.n�±en-Wheelock Slope S�udv. 1�6r. Stan Wendland passed his renort on the Arlin��o�-INhee.'_ock .Slone S�Ldv, to the Board of Su�iervisors for their review. Ne accept his reTr�rt. We find the report of Mr. 'Nendland particularlv thorough. He 2�as e:.�has�.zefl the severe limitatiozs to development that theae soils presPn�. Ir, some c�se� tr►ese limitatioz�s are so severe as to nake develop�ent ecor.c�r3call,y ;r•fe�sibie. In other eases �h2se lim3t�tions mi�ht be overco:�e with appropriate �rec�.utian�, which Mr. Wendland has detailed. :, __ : __ Rowever, the 3o�rd of SLpe:�visors esked that I Pr:.�h�zs�ze the po�e::tial serirus impact of the developr�ent o£ the bluffs and �he hirhly erosive nature os ;,he . - soils of the bluffs, which cauld suffer pert:�ar,ent da��*e if the,y are abused � during d�velopment. • ', I was ssked to point out the unique, aesthetjc value of these bluf�s m��h� b� . of greaLer value to the corrsnr:nity th.�n anv development that mi�ht occur. Tl�e Board of Supervisors resolved that T be instructed to enca•�a�e �?-te cit�• ta acquire.these properties, stablize these bluffs and presPrve them for t:�P eonmiunity for their unique (and now rare) aesethetic values. Sincerely, � � ;� �� � !�''�.�.�.�-t�f� �C.�s�'� . Russell S. Adams, Jro Plat 8evier�t Committee ' AN EQUAL OPPORTUNITY EMPLOYER �°�°�C� . � ^7 � �c) Arundel Street conti nued � �� �����Ll/ . . � . 4, A nonerosive means of conducting storm flows from the south and south- `�. � east arounQ the building located on the east side of the cul-de-sac �' , should b� provided. 5. A suitable means of conducting flows from the northeast corner of the cemetery over the disturbed slope face �s needed. . Whi1.e deveiopment ad�acent to the three streets discussed above, may be most likely, development of the steep slope areas is not excluded. The disturbed portions of the slopes, due to their extreme slope, would r�quire extensive regrading to provide any type ofi conventional building sites . A siynificant engineering effort would undoubtably be needed to construct structures on or in these slopes. Develop��;" of the undisturbed portion of the slopes w911 also requir�e extensive regrading to provide s�reets, utilities and build�:,� si�es. This process will liable the area to severe ero�ion problems , 7he potential sediment damage.to ad�acent storm sewers fniets and properties is great. The choice may be made to limit development in this zone ta those portions that are out of the steep slope area . If so, then a plan for reclamation of the disturbed areas should be developed and carried out. The portion of the report on existing slope conditions may serve as a first phase planning tool in determtning which probiems should receive a higher priority. � B) Bluff Zone II , _ As can_be seen on map 8, one-thirc� to one-half of this area is in c�ty owner- sfifp. The slope sections that remain eligible for development are ii , iii , part of iv, and vi . These are discussed b�low in terms o� their limitations ' to development. They are listed in their order of erosion potential with the area of highest potential first: . • vi) � Slope length and slope steepness renders this ar�a r�st pr�°�e to ' � ' di e t is fte w uld be delivered to the railroad . erosi on. Se m nt from h s o sK=>;�.��;�.,.,�; ditch. Uncontrolled erosion during developmen� could cause blockage � of the ditch, Erosion control during construction is essential . Any proposed plat should be accompanied by an erosior� control pian. The , plat should be evaluated in terms of ho+� sto �� a�er runoff wi11 be .handled after development to ensure a long ter�n erosion problem does not develop. i1i) Although slopes are shorter here• than in some o` the other areas, they are also steeper. In addition, any sedimen�t caused by er°osfon during development will result in sediment damage to the properties at the base of the hill , The part of the area draining to the Arlington storm servers may also cause sedfinent clogging of these if erosion during development is not controlled. Again, any plat plan should be accompanied by an erosion control plan. The h�ndling of storniwater runoff after development should also be evaluated prior to plat approval . -8- . .�= . , �'e��,�/ , . • ' � ���ll�� � .,�„�;,,,...� fi��/��n 7'o n A v . . �""� �� - �"�-� �r'�✓� `. _ 1 • ' !' ` ��. o • � � � . . .. � � e e nc� � � �^--� - . , � � � '' ..,� o l �,, � � 23 /o_�. �-�vi �,/atershed _ � � �—' � � '�'� ' � �) �j � bOunda�y ,.� , �� , a - � � ' ''' ' I :�� S t ee s/a e � '� . �� �'''',:' �� -_y ► �° f' � Q`� �';_ � � ,:, "�� _� I d�e ( > � � +�� f - � 1 � a /a /p) � , �,.,"�► ��� � �_—-,` l In/e fl�n d o7 rea �:; , -� — ._. —-� • '' � ..� �q f' `r * - ��� o � ! 1 o r , /U7oT� 4Jo7/Grt r ��� . , Goncen fr - \'� ' � S �. ;' o?fi�o�I i.�� _ . _ _`,c ��.5 t'v�b�� � :� � � f �� .�6 / arc as � : �: t , . �'. V j �l•�/ � � � -�` ��J : ;=:. o ; . , � i 2�� _�- - ---_ _� . .� � , � - � , ,, ; , , . . , , 4 �� � . t , '` ' I 'i . • ���� ii�'i��li�Fi ��'i i�� ����'� I� • � � � . i � a ' � � � �hGf ` �' � . ,�r, , . ' '' ,} , � � .. �..+ ` /i j� � . ; , �, , , , , ;, , o i�� .i � r h �\ , }1 Ap / n . �: O i ;: �, � ./ ;n�t . .. � r { ,�: 1 � :. � / r i g ' • J ' �` �� � z� ; , � .� � f := - f� � � _ ' ` � . � zS % ; � � � � �:� . � � � ���-- � l 9/ - ��t; i o � �� �F--�� �- � �� 3� � _r'Z".'F'�// ,;i�- %/ . . � �'�I`��'I�• � .... •- �..�...._. .._ a � . � ' " ' � � G `1" TAG �_ -;—,—r- ,.-- �:.;—,,, — --------_ — . . " . c �t'',,,r,,/ , _- . . � � �� -=� ��:t ►�� �� ��-"a���� �•-. E�' ('�j 1�'`�i� �" � ; . � :;• .• �' i �t I � . : '!��i��R���,i ��� � . � , �-. � ;:.=:;• �� ;���� ���1 1 ',,f; � � ` �,,� �. {��; � . tc,i . • .; , , �,•, � ► i};, ; if!fl�; t r ��. �fj��!��+.{ � ��111'�f�i �10 F3E + i . . 3 �'E .. _ � . '�;lj;_�ii,�+ jiijl�r�;li/ _ t1Fh'��FYFd �++ i �` � •. . � ` , b� • � t »i�`� � � � _ ! � ���1, + ' ' �l��� ,�+ ,�� `- . ••�:,���, ;�,'��ti ,,� � .�. � ► � , .. ,•.� ''�� + '� �;i �c:, � . � � i . ;• '. �' + ,�� , � �x . . � . ' �. �j ;; �! : ' (1.J � � � � � y '' -�• ����•,� rt� t�� � � � V f � ��.•, �> a:t; si} : 3 j � ; + o � ^ — ..._ ._.. _ . • - --- -�/t : !� � ` 1.�+�tti;fi'il�{}� � M : � _ � . . � , — � 3 ___ , . i ., : _. : � �-�.,��,� T `, ' , � , !', ° � �; �. ` � ��� . . � � �� �,�...._---�—�"'-- . .. �� � , ��;� � , ; i � li++�� �t;:� � � � � ; � ; i � i ; ' �,_,�. � _ a so' ' .____�1.�-- � � � � i + � , ' � � � ' � � V -4_�__ - '�I , f' '! ► ' �, j � .-- � � .. . . � , � ; ! � 1 � I , � ,� + 'i >f�;�.."" i, ';'�;i'�-�;7Th,rjj'�iA'..v^'i' �.-,—� Y ;-; � .—� � +�3 � f � : � � S � �. � �f� i i�rFlsy�i �!!�{i��i�+�$�f'��'�� t 1 } � � � i ' F _ . - � � � . + . � � � � ' ` � r •�' r , t ` T; _ . , . � • � ; . �' . S S � ? � � � � � , �,����,:�,` �" ,�r ; 1 , � ����� � � t � �i � z �; ��t ,:f � , . � � � , ����,. . , •. , . - � � r � f � ; i S .��: �� �.f� � .,�;a� � i Q� . ' . t � � � � • t� j ' 1 � f ? t � ! i I �1 � � tit'� Li' � � � . � V �' �. � t � ! t � r ' • '(;; `+ t,';� t � ' � — � . ' . j�� i# �� i � l < < � '�r #�{"j t ' ; ' � i `�'• .� � t � f } ' � �ii � •�; � � . , - z �t � �! � � � � � J � < �r (�,.r� t ' � ; i � � ( f � � . . .. . . -. , • f- . j� , ; , ', :jr-��x� ,,,,-�-�-=-t�7�i. � ; t , � .:� . . : ; � � � � . � }1 t �� � !1�f } ��f 'i 3 �'�1i I ,� } 4 ' J t � I ri'c , � • � �• . . .•+ � .. t4 _ � f � r� ��f#;f�`i,j; � �r:�,, i � J ? ; � � � j �.r.'•..' - '• ` .�.- - - � -. . .- ';- _, _ _ - �f- �� ��� �,t1;�' �1}�°+`'��; ' f . � t I i :� l ' � �,��- ..�• �• • - .: . _ ; : {. , . — .; .�., . t �� i } }� �lti ai��� 'i�i�, i � r � t tlr.�'� �. .. .•, ,: . --. . - ' � � �' y � t�#� �; , i, ����1�,�, ,��;'; � ` ' ' f � + , � . ' . • . , . • .� �• , _ �� ' . -1; ili,Ft + �� ;� , , . � � � ; ';; p � E' _ . � • • - . ' : • ' �. . . ="�M: . C� j � �'��i� ��i� i�; ; j � ' ; � ' ( ` ! , ?�jf ; ' I '• f i' . . • - • : . • '. • : � • • � - r ��., � y , ' . . . . . . . Q ' � !}! { � , � t . , � � i 1 j 1. -• r• '� • • � : • . ti.; ' . . .. � 4 �� �� � :/ � , � I � • � � v ! � � . '.,. ; � . ��� �t � f � � � 1 � j 1,/` t i = Y � � � I r , . ti �• . •• . ; � , -, •';'} �.' ''�. ' � ' • . . � � �,#i � � ! f3i�1'j � ( i � � � i ;• :. , . . . '•- _ • •. ' ;:.� i, . . � { ; 1 + , � . • • ; : �-_._.........� i , ; � � � ► f � . 3 � � , � ; � ( . �i i , � • . • . . , . . . , .� � .� .. � ' k i . ��j 1 f ' � i ,.,_ ',.� _---.--�_-__ ._�_'.. .-�:t�i i�- _�(�j 1•i � ( i ,� F� ; � �s� t� � � _ � .. . .. .,/1'�. . � � 3 � ��J. t � � �' � . -----_---�---.�� -.----- - —- --_� � �� � , ,; , j,,,;! ,,,.t � , ,• . ; : •, : • �.� r . �.—. , � � � .. :� . .• • . . •- - • � � � � � � � � � t � i: � �. :; i . , : , � . . . � ,,� t � _ � j ' ' ,� � ;',. � : , ; . . :- • •.� f ,......_...._ _.,,. t � ! � ! '� •,� . . . . •i � ' ., .. � . .'� � i f � t ,� � TD B� � { ' ' : . �. : : - � '.' • '� +� i ! ` ! + f � SuRVEYED I a �" . . . ' • ; �:•i ; � • • ( ; � 1 � � i i . � � �. . ', , . • , • • . i . i 1 � , �� - . , ( . � � , _ � , � � � � . �. . . , . . . �) , r i � + , � , . � � , � '�- - •� � ; i � t � i � � � ;• . � . �' � f� � }. t [ � � — � i S 1' • .�• •� � , ' • •- �� , � • � � 1 �� � � ! ; �� i j r ' . I ► •' •� - ' �'�, ;� � j , � , � • -. "t � ; + 1 � , i. . •. • : , � � � �. � ;� ) � � � � . . . . ., . . ', . . . . � � # 4 ! � 1 �_� � ' . � s (' ' ', . • . . . • , .-! j � � � � l �, . •.' �. .. . •. . , • ._ :� � � . •. ► ; ) Y ; , � , . • , � •� ! • - , ; . � } �f � t t � - � � _' •• , ; • ., : .. .� f + t . � � • � � . � f � ! , i ' � ' � . . • ti ,� i t _J.._.. �.. � i -- --��..'�_�- . •---.-�-�%- --_�_�...t �-- � aR-YL �. N � � � . ----� � —, � _.Y--, _-- -- � — - , ' � � ' E ' i � � � . • , ' ��-� .��''0�1� .,. • . . . . . district six plannin �i���C�� 1021 Marion St., St. Paul, Mn 55117 . , . . September 1 , 1983 . . � � - - To: City Council � ' � ' , � From: Sharon Voyda � District 6 Planning Council C.O. August 24th the Zand Use Task Force (subcommittee of the D6PC) again reviewed the proposed redevelopmsnt of' property located to the east and we�t of the plotted street of Cohansey. Said property owner's are Mr. Bies and Mr. Ostrand. The committee reiterated "they are not opposed to potential re- developmer�t". � However, a need exists to carefully investigate the feasibility of new construction on various sections of the . Wheelock Bluffs or sloped areas. � A study of the Arlington-Wheelock Slopes prepared by the P�Iinnesota _ Soil and ��later. Conservation District in 1981 indica�;es tnat said - property has a slope steepness in the 25/ - 30/ range. Tne minimum slope steepness within the vicinity of said property is � in t�e 19% range. � � , � . - Uniform Bilding Code; Chapter 70, Excavation and Grading, adopted � � 1976 requires the city to issue Excavation and Fi11 Permits. A � Site Plan Review by the City of St, .Paul is required on any slope steepness greater than 12/. Therefore, I believe -the I,and Use ' � . Task Force would feel comfortable supporting the Site Plan Review Process providing the committee would be involved utilizing the existing channels of communication. � It is important that City Council understand that the Site Plan Review Process may reiterate the infeasibility of new construction to said property and/or enforce redevelopment restrictions that may constitute an economically infeasible redevelopment project. s,^�--��s ._. ____� _ _ � � . -- ---- ---- -- -- . .' � . �� ������ d. . . - , , istrict six plannin (i��n(;�i 1021 Marlon St., St. Paul, Mn 55117 September 'I , 1983 To: City Council ' . Fromt Sharon Voyda � ti _ page 2 t Mr. Ostrands proposal includes the construction of the plotted � street of Cohansey through to Ivy Street (unplotted section) � i and Ivy Street through to Western. These proposed public � improvements incorporate the need to acquire railroad property. � Would the City of St. Paul assume the costs or divert the costs by increasing .property taxes? Property owner's inadvertently connected to the improvements would be assessed at least a120.00 per foot. Property owner's have strongly opposed the issue of � said public improvements previously and I do not anticipate a ` • change in attitude. � � . _ - '� : Thank you. � _ . , • . . � �: ' . , : ' � i � � s�—.��� � . - i��-���' �.� 7 ., " � � • RAMSEY SOIL AND WATER CONSERVA�ON DISTRiC Mid•Americn Co�� 8�:�'d�ng 1827 North Sv�nt Paul P.00d Maplewood,M:nneso'n 55� :9 . . Te;ephonc (612 777Oi:7 MINNESOYA �' SOIL aNO WATER CONSEF�VATiOi� DfS�":��CTS Date: February 10, I��81 . To: Distr3et Six Planning Council, City of St. Paul PlanninF I'iepartment From: Ramsey Soil and Water Conservatian D:s�ric.t Board of S�per�Isors Sub,�ect: Arlir�*oa-Wheelock Slope Stvdv. IuIr. Stan Wenc3land F.assed hfs ret�ort on the Arling�on-�'Vhee.'_ock Slope ��Ldv, to the Board o�' Supervisors for their review. JVe accept his reT>ort. We find the report of Mr. 'Nendland particularlv tha�ough. He has e-��as�.zed the severe limf tations to development .that the�e soils presPn�. Ir, some c�se� these Iisnitations are so severe as to make develop�er.t ecano�r,icall,y ir::'e�s�.ble. In ather cases these lim�Stations mi�ht be overco:ne with appronriete -�recc�utic�n�, which Mr. Wendland has detailed. � :: _ : _ -- However, the 3oerd of Supervisors asked that I e.r�hasize the po�e::tial ser�rus impact of the developr�ent of the �luffs and �Y:e hiChly erosive na�ure of �1-ie . sofls of the bluffs, which could suffer perr.•$r�ent damsne if t'�e;,* are ¢Dused ' during d�ve2opment. • `, I was asked to point out the unique, ees�heti.c value of these bluf�s �ig2-�t be • of �eater value to the corr�nsnity than anY developnezt that mi�h� cccur. Tl�e Board of Supervisors resolved that I be instructed to encou.Ma�e t?-,e cit�• ta acquire.these prope�ties, stablize these bluffs and preserve them for the community for their unique (and now rare) aesethetic values. Sincere]y, � � _/ f2�.�,�,��f-S,�' �Z�'-c,�.-�? �' . Russell S. Adams, Jr, � Plat $evier�r Committee " AN EOUAL OPPORTUNITY EMPLOYER . �g`�°.O . t.i � ,,��'��'C�`'L' -. � � �� ��� ���� 9� � �c) Arundel Street contf nued � ��r�`.�0 �:,� � - . � 4. A nonerosive means of conducting storm flows from the south and south- ��, � east around the building located on the east stde of the cul-de-sac should b� provided. 5. A suitable means of conducting fl ows from the northeast corner of the cemetery over the disturbed slope face is needed. , Whil.e deveiopment ad�acent to the three streets discussed above, may be most likely, development of the steep slope areas is not excluded. The disturbed portions of the slopes, due to their extreme slope, woutd require extensive regrading to provide any type of canventional building sites . A siynificant engineering effort would undoubtably be needed to construct structures on or in these slopes. Developm-;" of the undisturbed portion of the slopes wiil also require extensive regr�ading to provide streets, utilities and buildi��g sites. This process wi11 liable the area to severe era�?on prablems, 7he potential sediment damage,to ad3acent storm sewers iniets and proaerties is great. The choice may be made to limit developcnent in this zane ta those portions that are out of the steep slope area. If so, then a plan for reclamation of the disturbed areas shouid be developed and carried out. The portion of the report ort existing slope conditions may serve as a first phase planning tool in determining which problems should receive a higher priority. • B) Bluff Zone II , As can be seen on map 8, one-thir� to one-�alf of this ar�a is 1n city owner- ship. The slope sections that remain eligible for development are ii , iii , part of iv, and vi . These are discussed below in terms of their ljmitations ' to development. They are listed in their order of erosion potentiai with the area of highest potential first: , • � • vi)� Slope length and slope steepness renders this ar�a r�ost prc�e to . erosion. Sediment from this site would be delivered to the railroad =�' =s�. ,,�;�-,__�; ditch. Uncontrolled erosion during development could cause blockage • of the ditch. Erosion control during construction is essential . Any proposed plat should be accompanied by an erosion control plan. The . plat should be evaluated in terms of hoN storrrrwater runoff wi11 be .handted after development to ensure a long term eros9on problem does not develop. iii) Although slopes are shorter here� than in some of the ott�er areas, they are also steeper. In addition, any sediment caused by e�osion during development Nili result in sediment damage to th� prop2rties at the base of the hill , The part of the area draining to the Artington storm sexers may also cause sediment clogging of these if erosion during development is not controlled. Again, any plat plan should be accompanied by an erosion control plan. The h�ndling of storniwater runoff after development should also be evaluated prior to plat approval . -8- �._•_.--... . .., ._ ..___ . _ _ _ . - -- ! ��n � � 7 c..._c�:�,;� CITY OF SAINT PAUL _�e` ;;�, ""' OFFICE OF THE MAYOR '+ s� >c ,�, %� Iltill���illll � - � . %< 111! flll �? � .. � . . . � � . y+� wcs '���i�rn i����.'6 � � - - �"'° 34T CITY HALI, � GEOBGE LATIbIEE SAINT PAITL,MZNNESOTA 66108 Me,YOB (612) 298-4323 �� (� f.. o� �'O ��� September 8, 1983 ti�,'��o rp! �O � � � ' ''�Gyo � TO: VICTOR TEDESCO� COUNCIL PRESIDENT� r9�"�'�' AND MEMBERS OF THE CITY COUNCIL FR: GREGORY HAUPT, DIRECTOR OF MANAGEMENT RE: APPRAISAL OF GEORGE OSTRAND'S PROPERTY You are considering a council resolution to authorize an appraiser for the subject property. Because the property in question has no public use, and would nat be acquired by any of the City departments for their use, I question the need for an appraisal. It seems to me that an appraisal would simply render a valuable service to a private in- dividual at taxpayer ' s expense . The service in question, independent appraisal of private property, is not normally considered a public service and is not one afforded by the City to individual property owners. Also, the Valuation Engineer has made an appraisal of this property. This appraisal was done by the Valuation Engineer in response to Council ' s interest in this matter . Mr . Donovan reported those results in August, 1982 . GH:kh � cc: Peter White Mayor �O �� . � � �� � Thurs . 9/1 �. enia UnZer �isc. aran oy a o s r � wi anpear and repart c�n aenaid.erati.c�n piven bv the Land Use Task i''orQe �e o e e�r�� s ran � �nse,Y ree ev� apmPn . �� I I � �, �� ------ -i-r-- -- - -- - I � II II I �i „ �� �� ii �� �� I� . � � S� �'� �.c, /`7 i�v�r, ��� %G; FI!�p ���1t E '7� � 9 � 3 :�# j� !.� ',�.. (, .. � , � � �� � C� / T )/ C L E �Q, !�, . ,. fPES PEC,T�u�� Y R�. Q u,�s T J�ni �- P�°E/.}o��4 � � � d N T,�-t ~T�E'S,D,q. Y , T�v�v E /� -r,� C'd �J^/C/ � ��E ev O A , ��1 C ��Ca y�4N S�' Y s7; �� � //1� CERE� � l��s ,¢K�s �v�. Sr P�vc, �iiuN ss�o ,� 7 7� - � �c 7 �� � ��� � �� a • �` �� . ��� . �__///'�n_ . ��, �L�Y`-;2� - - � . i�� L�.��'''�/Y'� , : `�� . . � ����� . : �,�,��'�� ` , . ,� . ��--,� �„���'`,'`�` , � -"� �" . � ���,� -� . , �� . �. � ^ �.�'� . � / r�,�' � � � / � � -��r�' I , � .�.`, �'.�-��., ��� �r. �,�����7 . � 1 -T��� �,�,, % ��-; c; T � ��_�� K,- �'�' s��� -�-�v�� � �'e � � � .� T �'�"i�.i� ��.�- � �� a,� ca �,� �;� A � �:�, D,� -.� � ,r'�r,��r ,.� .� , i y � � i�i � '-�.� � � -� 3, ���c "c o �,�4-,w s� � s�� ,E�-� ' ' s ,,�� �-��� ,; ���� � ���; /6 Y�� � /Y E s /�v C', �r_ ���� %j�Nn�. ���a .� � � � � � �� � _':� L _��._ Y,.m ..,1 �� � r r--;sc -...N w � �O •,� '""_� � � C17j t�'1 �,r„� _ :�;,;�o:�W � � - 4 CITY OF SAINT PAUL =s'` �.`''= OFFICE OF THE CITY CLERK .'� ': ;;� "'��'���� .. ` 1� ^� ALBERT B. OLSON, CITY CLERK ' • - ,... � 386 City Hall,Saint Paui, Minnesota 55102 Ji����^1t�n����P�```� 612-298-4231 GEORGE LATIMER MAYOR MEETINGS FOR THE WEEK - - - JUiVE 20TH THRU JUNE 24TH, 1983 M0�1DAY---JWE 20th MAC Planning & Physical Development 12:45 P.M. Room 303, Terminal Bldg. , Committee Wold Chanberlain Field Metropolitan Airports Commission 1:00 P.M. Room 303, Terminal Bldg. , Wold Chamberlain Field TUESDAY---JUNE 21st City Council Meeting 10:00 A.M. Council Chambers Civil Service Commission 8:00 A.M. Room 265, City Hall Metropolitan Waste Control Comm. 2:00 P.M. Room B12, Metro Square Bldg. Port Authority 2:00 P.M. 13th Floor, City Hall Annex Human Rights Co�nission 5:30 P.M. Room 356, City Hall Mayor's Advisory Committee on 7:00 P.M. .Zellogg Room, 3rd Floor Aandicapped Kellogg Square Bldg. WEDIIESDAY---JUNE 22nd City Council Meeting 10:00 A.M. Council Chambers Housing Redevelopment Authority 9:30 A.M. Council C�ambers � City Development & Transportation Comm. 1:30 P.M. Room 707, City Hall Board of Water Commissioners 3:00 P.M. Room 356, City Hall CIB Committee 7:00 P.M. Council Chambers THURSDAY---JUNE 23rd City Council Meeting 10c00 A.M. Council Chambers Finance, Management & Personnel Comm. 1:30 P.M. Room 707, City Hall Energy, Utilities & Environment Coman. 1:30 P.M. Council Chambers Public Housing Agency 2:30 P.M. 380 Bremer Building St. Paul Charter Commission 3:00 P.M. Room 707, City Hall Metropolitan Council 4:00 P.M. Metro Square Bldg. Wold Chamberlain Field Joint Airport 4:00 P.M. 6040 28th Avenue So. Zoning Board FRIDAY---JUNE_24th Planning Commission 9:00 A.M. 15th Floor, City Hall Annex Interpreter service for the hearing impaired will be provided at public meetings upon request. Request can be made by calling 298-4747 (Voice and TTY) Monday through Friday, 8:30 A.M. to 4:30 P.M. A minimum of two days notice is required. �O