280785 ��������
City of St.Paul COUNCIL FILE NO.
RESOLUTION APPROVING ASSESSMENT AND By
FIXING TIME OF HEARING THEREON File No. 18294
In the matter of the assessment of benefits, cost and expenses for installation of $ water m8in
in SHIELDS AVENUE from Pierce Street to 100 feet East of Pierce Street.
under Administrative Order approve�l
Preliminary Order 279753 approve� January 25, 1983
FinalOrder 2�98�4 approve� February 22, 1983
The assessment of benefits, cost and expenses for and in connection with the above improvement having been
submitted to the Council,and the Council having considered same and found the said assessment satisfactory,therefore,be it
RESOLVED, That the said assessment be and the same is hereby in all respects approved.
RESOLVED FURTHER, That a public hearing be had on said assessment on the 20th day of
September, 1983 , at the hour of ten o'clock A.M., in the Council Chamber of the
Court House and City Hall Building, in the City of St. Paul; that the Director of Finance give notice of said meetings,as
required by the Charter, stating in said notice the time and place of hearing, the nature of the improvement, and the
amount assessed against the lot or lots of the particular owner to whom the notice is directed.
COUNCILMEN Adopted by the Council: Date AUG 2 31983
Yeas����G�it?�Nays
� Certifi as d by Council Secretary
, ,�
�1�'���� In Favor B�
,�� N�easir� � � ' —
Against ��-�—'--
�''-."�'"-'��'� AUG 2 31983 Mayor
�
����a����� PUB��SNED SEP 31983
.
' �v�/�
'��?���,�Yt-'�l
{��"��.i :.J ..'�jy
Five (5) Iastallments
APPROVING A ND RATIFYING
TO COUNCIL: August 23, 1983
1)ate of Hearing Description Cost
WATER MAIN
9/20/83 In the matter of the assessment of benefits,
coats and expenses for installstion of a water
main in SHIELDS AVENUE from Pierce Street to
100 feet East of Pierce Street.
COSTS AND EXPENSBS: .
TOTAL CONSTRUCTION COSTS (Per Water Utility) $2,965.07
Valuation and Assesament Services - 88.95
TOTAL EXPENDITURES $3,054.02
Charge to Water Utility Aid $1,527.01
NET ASSESSMENT $1,527.01
Since only one property owner is affected, a per foot
cost was not required.for this project.