The URL can be used to link to this page

280705 WHI7E - GTV CLERK y+y) � PINK - FINANCE �� x�`; CANARV - DEPARTMENT GITY OF SAINT PALTL COUIIC11 �� r � BLUE - MAVOR File NO. � - � � ncil Resolution Presented By Referred To Committee: Date Out of Committee By Date WHEREAS, on February 24, 1983 the St. Paul City Couneil approved the Neighborhood Partnership Program (NPP) , C.F. 270893; and WHEREAS, the purpose of the NPP is to improve the econo�nic, physical, and environmental conditions in St. Paul' s neighborhoods by allowing neighborhood residents, businesses, and property owners to define needs and develop neighborhood programs to meet their needs; and WHEREAS, the Department of Planning and Economic Development (PED) has received thirteen NPP applications for the first cycle of the NPP; and WHEREAS, PED, the Planning Commission, Capital Improvement Budget Committee, and the Mayor have evaluated the thirteen appli- cations and forwarded their recommendations to the City Council; and WHEREAS, approval of projects at this point means the projects have five months to work with PED to develop detailed agreements about what each partner will da; now, therefore, be it RESOLVED, that the Saint Paul City Council approves the funding priorities and budgets for eight projects as shown on attachment A (dated 7/25/83) and, be it Fl3RThEt� RESOLVED, that in regard io the Resident Controlled Affordable ' Fi�using project, the City will make available $70,000. of fUPP funds for the purc"ase of the seven structures fron the Public Housing Agency. This amount is based c�r. t�e assu�ption t�a�c iili� will waive both their repayment for t�e houses as well as !�aaiving i��e ap�raised value. If NUD does not waive these iterrs then tr�en the entire re��aining amoun�c Gf �Jeighbori�ood Partnershi� Program funds available from the firsl: cycle (�48,450.) will oe rnade available ��o the project for the acquisition of the houses. FURTHER RESOLVED, that ihe Saint Paul City Council wis��es to extend its apprecia�ion to all the applicants for their tirre and effort in developing proposals for t��e first cycle of the �Veig�borhood Partnership Program. COUNCILMEN Requested by Department of: Na s Yeas Fletcher Y �en� In F avor Masanz Nicosia A ainst By scheibet -- g Tedesco W ilson Adopted by Council: Date AUG 4 �� Form Approv by �t Attor y By Certified ssed b Co 'I Se eta,ry By � AUCj g ��3 1Approved by Mayor for Submission to Counci �P by iNavor: te — An J , _ �y�i j y � By 13 1983 pUBl.ISNED AU G WMITE - CtTV CLERK � PINK - FINANCE � �� CANARV - 17E.PAi7TMENT G I TY OF SA I NT PALT L Council ,, ; !�� BL/I��E -MAVOR File N0. r'`� � � ncil Resolutio� Presented By Referred To Committee: Date Out of Committee By Date WHEREAS, on February 24, 1983 the St. Paul City Council approved the Neighborhood Partnership Program (NPP) , C.F. 270893; and � WHEREAS, the purpos� of the NPP is to improve the economic, physical, and environmental conditians in St. Paul '� neighborhoods by allowing neighborhood residents, busiriesses, and property owners ta define needs and develop neighborhood programs to meet their needs; and WHEREAS, the Department o� Planning and Economic Development (PED) has received thirteen NPP applications for the first cycle of the NPP; and WHEREAS, PED, the Planning Commission, Capital Improvement Budget Committee, and the Mayor have evaluated the thirteen appli- cations and forwarded their recommendations to the City Counci.l; and WHEREAS, approval of projects at this point means the projects have five months to work with PED to develop detailed agreements about what each partner will do; now, therefore, be it �" RESOLVED, that� the Saint Paul City Council approves the funding priorities and budgets for eight projects as shown on attachment A (dated 7/25/83) and, be it FURTHER RESOLVED, that in regard to the Resident-_Cantrolled Affordable Housing project y i p nr;�P• anct;_j�w-.�t-- ' FURTHER RESOLVED, that the Saint Paul City Council wi�hes to extend its appreciation to all the applicants for their time and effort in developing proposals for the first cycle of the Neighborhood Partnershi Pro ram. COUNCILMEN Requested by Department of: Yeas Fletcher Nays Galles In Favor Masanz Nicosia • scneibet _ Against BY Tedesco Wilson Form Approv by rt Attor y Adopted hy Council: Date Certified Yassed by Council Secretary BY , B}� blpproved by :�tavor: Date _ Approved by Mayor for Submission to Council BY - BY r' h—� r r—' �D W Ol Ul CT� +� w �v -- W N !m* O �--1 -i � .� =k D D --i z � '� � m D �C �--� 0 3 m x � C -n c'� D v c+ � � � n1 � � d Q! � � � J. J. � 0 � 0 � •�'C � � � -r� O� fi J. J. d �D 3 N 't7 —� �D V1 L1 (D C {/1 � O (D �S � n [D C �.�. N Ci Q� < N c't "'S � 'S fi � "S N �. fD W Oi O tn � _.+ � �' N ni (D v� O -�• O 'f N 00 -�• Q --� c-r � �S � _ �. o, a R� ou a- � � �t -�• o+ m < �• � � � c� o, o . c � � m d(D Q' —� o �' ct d C� (D n QU � £ Z7 cr : fJ fl.. J C7 lD -S O -+• S (D S.O 3 c+ "� W c-f �l7 � \C/'� �y � m -s � o o �. • �o a -� -s -n �+ z r* v- a -v o —� � -� -n v � -� -s o c� o v �• - � D _ -� o -s w �* .a �r n o �• �. c D r� a� o -zv c-�r -��s n. s c� o o -s � x- � � ---�tn W -p in Jr O O C� a CD O "D Q fD cf' c� �.. 'D � �' G� '� C C �i "S f 'S O "S C7 'S c+ fD c-f Vi-�• •• -r� n --+ N � �• C� w 7 O C V► --� O �' cr -n c o a � � 3 0 � c�• � �- .c � o "S ct > > �G -'' �D O Z fD tD -+• � J � f� -+. ti► Q. N Q� -+ 'i7 fD f) < �O fD �G f�1 � CI7 J. J. "'s -�• C't Gv '� 0- c+00 O � 0'Q O • 0� 'S 'O 'S �D O W � C 3' d 'S O D 17 Z 3 � Q" O c.,. -i� .�' • r� 'v O ---� cD Gt O Qo fo -� � G � O N � "S 'S n O � � C� •� c-r ci- . O � � a O Gq ►-a f7 -p . O W 'S Q7 c� -f ' Q � - O C� c� O O'-y C7 .� C.�. (D O G7 C ►-+ f0 lD �' G7� W •• n . Q •• c-h -fi N � . � � -h 34 -'. [Z O N �-i J J �f �J .�t {/1 N "'S Vl �..fl Q� \� Q� V7 .C� �P —� W W � \� CA Ct 0 � " � J. O n O � O N y.� �► c+ l!� -' f V .__. ...a . tD � ---' �1 • �--� OD Ol CT1 N Ql 1! -1 N N W Cn V1 O Cn a CI'1 O U1 .7 Za► O � C3� Ol ( Q� W O ' , Q� O O O --� O C.7 �7. � --� ' � � O �1 tv O V O O O O O � �-+ D r vo � o 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 � r- � -o� •• ."'j :J. . � � O� ,,. � � . N � � v rn � v� :� cn �+ cD a o O 6�1 ia'► d -�C .. � v -- - _ N W N � O _ � _. G71 -P � n � �J J. � `J � � L� � � � � � � � � � � � !-� y � cn o o cn o p c+'D 0 0 0 0 , o � v - y� �r 3 'o C�,O W :+ -S �-t .�. (D < N _, -+ N W O� � O� n < Q W '� -� W --� -` V CT N OD �1 W CJt �" !L CT� N N W 01 Q� O� A � 00 --� CIi -� N ci' , � � ' ' � ' � � lp -'� O rn �! Q1 --' Cn O N �J ? O �! ? v � -� O O C� O� O" O cn �P Cn O Cn O 00 fi --� O O O O O O O O O O O O -� � J N � Z � � '� l'1 A� � S fD 'S Z N N W W W ? A .P .P. A � CJ1 O c+ 'Q O+ < O � �1 � W -P lD O O --� N 4t Cn O "1 �- •• N fD b � (7i 7 � _, 0 N 09 O N �`► C'�'0 Ai O y � J � � � H fi t.J'i {�► {y " ' � � � � N �a � O W ...+ � rn V O N tn O Gn Cri O O O V Oo 0 � O O O � I 1 1 I I I O O O O O W 's O O O O O O O O +� C Q O O O O O O O � T � C+ � � 3 � .� � , � `►' � � �► A " � I��-+ � CI7 ? � � i � 1 1 1 O � I 1 1 1 �. 1 p Q \ tJ� Cn O O Cn O j W O O O O O O b4 N . � � � � ��..e :� �� - ' _' . w � - ' T4:-eF� Council ��9 "r'�: � . _.: ' _ �;?�q7^^EN7 GITY OF SAINT �AUL File NO. _ , J e�.�-- - � uncil Resolution � �� , °resented By � - Referred To Committee: Date Out of Committee y Date WHEREAS, o February 24, 1983 the St. Paul C ' y Council approved the Neighborhood artnership Program (NPP) , C.F. 70893; and WHEREAS, the p rpose of the NPP is to im ove the economic, physical, and enviro ental conditions in St Paul ' s neighborhoods by allowing neighborh d residents, busine es, and property owners to define needs and de lop neighborhood ograms to meet their needs; and 6VHEREAS, the Departme t of Plann ' g and Economic Development (PED) has received thirteen PP appl ' ations for the first cycle of the NPP; and WHEREAS, PED, the Planning C mmission, Capital Improvement Budget Committee, and the Mayor ave evaluated the thirteen appli- cations and forwarded their rec ndations to the City Council; and WHEREAS, approval of pr ects this point means the projects have five months to work wi PED to evelop detailed agreements about what each partner wi do; now, herefore, be it RESOLVED, that the S int Paul City ouncil approves the funding priorities and budgets r eight projects s shown on attachment A (dated 7/25/83) and, b it FURTHER RESOLVED that in regard to the esident-�Controlled Affordable Housing p oject, �if the Saint Paul ublic Housing Agency is unwilling to sel the seven structures for $ ,000, it is the City Council' s int ntion to negotiate further fo the purchase price; and; be it � FURTHER RE LVED, that the Saint Paul City Coun il wishe5 to extend its appr ciation to all the applicants for the time and effort in developing roposals for the first cycle of the Nei borhood Partnershi P o ram. COUNCILMEN Yeas Nays Requested by Department of: Fletcher � °a11ei [n Favor Masanz Nicosia Scheibel A gai n s t By Tsdesco Wilson AUG 4 1� Form Approv by t Attor y Adopted by Council: Date Certifie•d ssed b Co '1 Se et�y BY g . � y � QU�7 g ��3 Approved by Mayor Eor Submission to Council h,. Vlavor: te �----� � A F' �.i i B _ Lu�`• Y 1 � `/� � -'��' c C/�� -- y � ' , � .;;, ., . . +��'MI1�1E �C'f7Y CIERK - � � � � ��h� . � ,�'QlfiK •-.RINI�N�CE � � - � . � !J� CANARV -DEPARTMENT . G�I�TY � OF SA I NT PAU L COUOCII ,_ BLUE - MAVOR.�� FIIe N�O.�� , ,,,��.� , ncil Resolution ��r .� � {� t Presented By Referred To Committee: Date w.. Out of Committee By , Date tl�, oe lasb�swsr ��, 1l�J #1N it. Pa�l CitY Cv�l ap�s+�d t� xii�}Lb�os�d lss�s�a�iP ts�s�t �Pa . C.�. 2?0�l3t a�d �, #� p�rpos� o! lt�s � ia #�e i�t #�t �ea�ira, p�sioal, aad e�o�dit3+o�s is st. ta�i r s a�tiqlaboari�ooda b� allari�q Ni9tibo�rhood s��i�tfs, �ia�s, a�l pane�st�► ara�ars tro 8�lias a�� adl � ��iq�oz��ewd par�o�siiir bo""�E �is �a�ds t +u� - 1�sis, !lM �rtr�t ef �ls�it� i�d ZOOOO�■tia ■�t , tP�) has r�wii�d thirtMa �!! �rplivatf�+�s i'e�r t�a lis�t a;�vl� e!` tb� �t: aeQ �� 1ri'D, th� llaeei'q Cxt■■iiNl�Oa� Ci,pila2 11�pa�wu+r�ot �d�rt Co�itl,�, asa t1w �r �t�r+� �tlo�t�d !lM thist� �pli— oati�as as�l11 la��as+� thsis r�oa�!latfarur bs !� Cit� t�s�o�ii� afd 1�1s, a�pro�a,i o! p�+a►��cts at t1�is paii:t �s ti� p�+oj�orta � . , I�atr� ti�+a analha #+s Mma�lc vith �!D !+s 8n�lap ditai3+�d aqs+�rts . �e�rt � � p��s trill� d�� mo�'. tlrrr+�lb�, 1� iL �YSD, l.La! tl� aaiat Paul Citr Go�f l �s � l�1aq �f�'it1M �id b�s l�O�' +�i�L pl��iOta aas ��1# f� �tt�Mat 1 ta.e+� T/=s/s33 araa, b. tt !� �, that 3�. s�qu�lE b !LS �ati� C�o�fil.s+�ll�d �11'!'�►s��li i�r��ia� p�j�vt, it t.� asist �aoal 1h�lio �lsq i� , is �arilli�r4 t� a�ll #A� s�l+�r sts� l+s�_:�Yl,000„ i� is tD�r CitT Ceo�il f s t�i�ti� ts a�goYt3rat� !arl3�r l�oac tIM p�a�a p�iv�i aod f b� i! �'0� �.l�, tLst t� �siit Panl Citt Co�soil viatia t�► �net�ad ita �a�Lr�tio� to all �t ap�plis��ta f+�s t�ir ti�1� �d �flerlt _� is i�lagi�rsf pae�pe�al� �os t� tirs! arvl,* ot ttM �i�b�t�ar�rsod lauta�c�ip �ro�. COUNCILMEN Requested by Department of: Yeas Nays / FletCher � '; . Masanz In Favor � ` -�, o s s Nicosla �.'� ' ' � �,. scnstbst �-' Against By � - `"..� -�� Tedesco '� Wllson ,' . �°`•--� AUG 4 ��v3 Form Approv�d by;�ty,;Attorney Adopted by Council: Date � , �' �¢Y , �Certi€ied Nass�td knt Council Se�t�r�r " BY ' `_'r� f = � . r �, . . �� J� .. $�' � �X - - �. A►pproved by Mavor: Date Approved� bv Mavor for Submission to Council � �,.- ,.� BY r �71y —�l�/��/ l.,-�/`�.�..�— � F�lt?NER RESOI�D, that fa r�rd �e #� �sfdwt Ca�trsli�d Atforr�ble t�tleg p�M:t, tl� Clt�► �rtii � arallmie �7�i,�. �rf 11Pt i�ads ter tMt p�ts •t t� sa� s� t� t�t �bltc l�sfe� A�p►. 7b1s iowtt !s ba�i a� the assrptlai l�at � rill wtMe botb t�e�r ra�at fer t� b�s � r�s'�1 � �aiY#a9 tbt a�tlsed �alwe. It 1� aa�es �at wt�rs #�est !�s �a t� tA� u�t1r� tnwat�t�g �t st 11�1�bor�o�d P�rt�sdlp lhrog�ras t�ls a�ratltl►1� t�vr t� first �1t ��.�50.� r�ll b� �ade a�ratl+�le #� d� �e�s�t fir� tl� se�uisttio� o� tlr� I�ersa. fU1C!'ME� �tK.�EO, t�L #�t Salttt Parl �i�l C�cfl ttislr�rt to t�ct,M� tts ` �atie� to all ti�e ap�lteats ter the4� ti�e �d �fort in d�taptig pe�a'�s � ,�#+� tAe tfrst qrc1� o�t t�e Mei�boe�hood t�rt�raAip Mgrat. � � COUNCILMEN Yeas Nays Requested by Department of: Fletcher • °eu°s � In Favor Masanz � NiCOSIa scnetee� Against e�� Tedssco Wilson F'aKm Approved by City Attorney ,,.,; Adopted by Council: Date ��Ce�rt�fied-'I�assed.by Cou�cii Sec`reKary' : BY _ , By A►pproved by 1Aavor: Date Approved by Mayor for Submission to Council By BY . - , ' __ ' . �- - � : . , ��'V f� .� ,' , � 1 ' � ,. . ., I.� ^. � u. � , • 1 , . ` - ' - � i' _ � : � ; , i� , . , � _ , - � _ , ' ' _ , _ , , � � � . , . . . '�i . . , . � � , , .� � _� � � . . � . . _ . . . . . .. . . - . . . . . . - - / . � . , ,. �� " , . � � � .. �- . . . . , . � � �. . � ' . ' � . . . . .,. �� , Juiy 26, �198.3 � 't , , � " � , s , , . • . - . . ` �outycilman Aabert Fl:lt�h�r, , r ' i Chairrnan r t _ _ City Developmeat &�Transportatias .Co�n��:t�e.� , , � : i�oom 722 -` Cftq Hall : . � , . , �„- � ;. Dear Councilman F1�et�lsers , . \ � , , ' • ' • � • , : The`City Co�4ctcil i:odaq �'e�erred to. the City�Deve�opment. and , ' ;. � , Tra�iepoxtatic�c} Comm�itL�� f�r cansideratio�i.an,d recom�aendatton � ! . a 2etter of the� Mayor transmittiug the 3J,eigbLtor�d Pastnership ;, P'�ogram funding reccm�nenda�ions. , _ � � ` : • , . . . . . ; � ; ,� ,� ' � Verp tiMu7.y gour�. � , ° ;� , : , , � � , . � . � , ._ . _ , ., . , , , , A],}�e�t B. 0tson _ , � � Citg Clerk, , ' : , , , , ,; AnOtdx'm . , .. _ . . ,F �c t: 8latming St�f " , . . f ; w� `� ' _ � - . , . , _ - � � � � _ . � - . _ � . ,_ . , - ,. . , , , _ �; , � ' '_ , ' • i- -�t / � ' , . . \�'� . . � . . .. . . . . � / . .. i _ � � - . . . � �� . . . . . � . . . . . . � _ . - ' ' .. . . . � ' � . ' . . . . } . .. . . . . ., . ' - i t�' . � . -( _ . . ; � .. .. . . �. . � . .'� - . . 1 5 t ' ( . � . . - .. . � � . � . . . ` � t . . . . ' . . . . /. . i � . .. .- . . . . . � � .. . . . ,.�f / '(. " . . . . . .. .. ' � ... . . ' . . . - . � • ,�� ' � - ' � . -. � .. � ;�,\ .. . .� � . .. . . .. . . .. _. ..�_ . I , . . . ' i � . .. � . . ._ . . . . �l� � � . . ' . . .. � . . . � . :�� . - �- � .. . . � � � . . . . . , � . . , ' . -v ♦ � �. �� .. . . . . . � . . . . . . �� ' � '. � .. . . . � . , .. . . . . . ., � � � . .. / � . . . . � , . , ` . . . ' . • . . _' , . .. , . . . .. . . - - .. . . N;� . ) . , , ' �� ,;t'< -, . . ' . ; , _ , � a 1`�, j> q � r .. ... - . .. , . , � , ' . . . . . . . , ' � � � { ��'•;�.� J,� .,. _ ,... . . . . ' . . - ' � . . � .. . .. �..: � � � ._ .. , . �.� � � . � . . i I - ��7:� �� =� � � �,��**�.s GITY OF SAINT PAUL o� �y OFFICE OF THE MAYOR �� '' i��i�i�i��ii � �� a 347 CITY HALL ,... SAINT PAUL, MINNESOTA 35102 GEORGE LATIMER (612) 298-4323 MAYOR July �3� 1983 Council President Victor Tedesco and Members of the City Council 719 City Hall St. Paul , Minnesota 55102 RE: Neighborhood Partnership Program Funding Recommendatians Dear President Tedesco and Members of the City Council : On Jun� 24, 19839 the St. Paul Planning Commission reviewed the thirteen applica- � tions for Neighborhood Partnership Program (NPP) funds, and decided to recorr�nend funding seven of the projects. I am transmitting the Planning Comnission's recom- mendations to you now. The CIB Committee is discussing the applications on July 14, and around July 19 I will send you both the CIB Cor�nittee comnents and any recom- mendations I decide to make. Councilman Fletcher intends to schedule NPP project selection for discussion by the City Development and Transportation Committee on July 27. I would like to see the � City Council seleet NPP projects in early August. Then, we wi11 get on with making the partnership concept for neighborhood improvement work. The seven projects recommended by the Planning Commission are: 1 . Aurora�St. Anthony Nieghborhood Clean-up-Fix-up 2. Frogtown Pride 3. Vomela Project 4. Resident-Controlled Affordable Housing 5. District 14 Boulevard Improvement 6. Hallie Qo Brown Neighborhood Approach Program 7. Triangle Park These recommendations are based on a rating sys�em that followed the criteria established in the original program description. The ratings, budgets, and fund sources are shown on the chart attached to the Planning Commission resolution. The PED staff recorrrrnnended funding only six projects, not seven. PED staff did not recorarnend the Resident-Controlled Affordable Housing project submitted by the Lexington-Hamline Community Councile Although the staff likes the proposal (and several of the other proposals not recommended for funding), they don't think the amount of CDBG money spent in the first cycle should be increased from the $500,000 that has always been announced as the amount of CDBG funding available - for each cycle, �� -2 �� :��. � �� To fund the Resident-Controlled Affordable Housing proposal , the Planning Comnis- sion recornrnends switching $150,000 of CDBG funds from the second cycle to the first cycle. (Cycles are six months apart. ) This would reduce the CDBG funding for the second cycle from $500,000 to $350,000. The Planning Commission based this recommendation on: (1 ) urgency of the Lexington-Hamline proposal since PHA wants to dispose of the houses in question soon; (2} closeness of the ratings and the rating system didn't have an "innovation" cate ory, which would have helped Resident-Controlled Affordable Housin ; and (3� lack of applications for the $250,000 of CIB funds available so that �178,00� of the CIB money will be carried forward to the second cycle and off-set (in actual dollars, if not in flexibility) the cost of adding the project. The PED staff does not agree with switching CDBG funds from the second cycle to the first cycle because: (1 ) All neighborhoods have been told $500,000 of CDBG money will be available each cycle; (2) Several neighborhoods bypassed the first cycle to prepare better applications for the second cycle; (3) Demand is clearly ' greater for CDBG funds, but $350,000 would only fund two large CDBG-type projects in the second cycle. Almost all of the thirteen proposals submitted for the first cycle appear to be good and workableo It is tough to make decisions, with a limited budget. Still , I am very encouraged by the neighborhoods' response an d the quality of the appli- cationso I will send you more information in about ten days. If you have questions about the details of projects, you can call Lar.ry Soderholm (7494, ext. 325) or Jim Zdon (7494, ext. 302} of the PED staffv Sincere y ° . ai May r GL/bq Attachments: 1 . Planning Corr�nission resolution 2. PED recommendation 3. Applications and rating sheets r�M1I� .. ��'�� h. �^ city of saint paui � planning commission resolution ��e number 83-2, date June 24, 19a3 � NEIGHBORHOOD PARTNERSHIP PROGRAM WHEREAS, the Neighborhood Partnership Program (NPP) stipulates that the Saint Paul Planning Commission will evaluate NPP applications and transmit its recommendations to the Ca pital Improvement Budget Committee, h1ayor and City Council ; and b�HEREAS, the Department of Planning and Economic Development has received thirteen NPP a pplications for the first pragram cycle; and WHEREAS, the Planning Commission has evaluated the thirteen applications in terms of the Comprehensive Citywide and District Plans, Capital Allocation � Policies and NPP program selection criteria; NOW, THEREFORE, BE IT RESOLVED, the Planning Commission recommends the funding priorities identified in Attachment A; and BE IT FURTHER RESOLVED, that the Planning Commission's Recommendation be transmitted to the Capital Improvement Budget Committee, the �layor and City Council for thei.r consideration and action. m�Ve,d by Brown � ��ed �/ � McDonell in favor �5 � against- W N f-+ O t0 00 � � tJ1 � W N F-' D D —i z � 'v � m D = � 0 3 m x � � � c� D 'n < -s � m m � a o+ -a a � .�. �. � o ro o ^s -�c -s A y �-r -�. -+.G. (D � H � � � tn a fD � tn � O fD 'S O �' �. N SL lG' < N tt � -' 'S c'F $ '� N -+. fD cG Ar O y J � �' N fD (D N O -+• O � iu tG -�• a --� ct � 'S (D n �. a+ c� < �• �c � � ro a o c sv c� � � �' t°� o�- ��-r� a. c� c� c� cc � f v c+ � '� � � �,°o o x cfl �-.o •� �-+ � a� �'' � � �� z � � � � O+ Z7 O -' � -+ T � � � �-+ "S O C� O 'O .�. • p+ e-r C� Z --h �+ O -+ O 'S W rt � th C� O v v rr -s o. x c-� o o -s � �- � m' �. c a cc n W � N 7r O O C") G. t� O � W fD c+ f'1 d 'l7 � � "G C C "S 'S f Z O 'S C") � ct fD ct '�1 C'� �N � -'• f� fL � O C N � � � C O �-+• � �' C 64 � � �C � �•t3D p � Z fD fD �• Q -+ � �F CJ7 G. N tG -� 'G tD f� < 'II fD �G p ..+. .�. -S .�. �} Oi 'O C. N O � � O Z � .� �G � � �' G. � `� � �� Q' O � O �--� N a. O ta N -fi �' �G � e-h � �S 'S n O O 3 � G. O n, ' � � p SL "S � n n O � � � r-� � C.i. � � O W fD fD pp .. .. n � c'h ,,,h E,sy O � t�+ t-+ 1-r t-� � y G� 2 O CT'f O� V CO CT� 00 � r-+ W W V V 00 � � N � � O "'r• �. ^ O � � t� O � � Z <aA � O —I tG ~+ N �--� r "� p p lG ? �--+ O� �-+ 00 Q1 cJ� N Q1 V . O —{ —1 N N W tl1 Cst O C79 O tJt O C71 n �� v 1 v � v 1 1 v v v � r � �� W p O� O O O �-+ O W � O y' � •• � G� O V N O V O O O O O L� � r vo v o 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 � N �. � o o a� bs. cn � � � tll ~.. -. � N 'T7 N O � �. �,.., � O+ O ? E+4 w � � fl- � p �-+' tv-+ Gl � � � O �� V n n �� n V (n 1 l0 1 1 1 O V 1 1 1 1 tC 1 �-+ iL VI O � � � W n, � c+ O O O O � fp � �. p„ {,q � O W �.... r N W 0o A Oo 3 'o �. O N ? �--� W ►-� f-+ V Q1 N CO V W Cl1 O+ � �„p "S W N N W G1 01 00 � F�+ 0� �+ CJ1 1--� N e/-1h -/'• �. �V/�� 1 V/� V VI^ V Y VA V V �I V �• /\�� V V� � V/y�• �/� V• 0 N v T 0 � � �ry� � Yyi � S O O O W V� O C Cn �A CTi C CTi O W {� �• -1 i--� O O O O O O O O O O O O �-+ [D �+ O � � 'C O� � � O �,, � a fD � ?f0 � Z N N W W W .P �A �A .P J� .P CT1 O c+ C) 'p i1+ < O � V tG W �P �O O O �-+ N W CT1 O � � ct .. tn fD � • . N cG fD —+O O N EP:• f7'a �+ v O 3 � N �n fD � � � v N �"F C7'1 � �-' N ..H+ �+ fD O v1 �-+ . O O v 0�0 � � O � � I I I I I I I I I V Y V Y , � 'p � O O O O G� fD ��,, 'p p O O O O Q � cn o' a. �r � T rn t� c � v v iv w � � c+ r r-� C� � � I n d ~ (� .. t l0 1 t 1 � 1 1 1 1 � 1 �-+ �• � � � � �p pG CvJt p W � � O O 0 � ' � • w 4A O1 W � . � ' T � � ' .. - � ,fi e^^', t i/O�o,a p��,uv7�j„/ 7/o/S fIG�/k/4� u/4 l/4/� . ��1�� . / �i � W N 1--� O l0 O� � � Ul p W N ►� D D —� z � -v � m D = ►-+ 0 3 m x � c � c'� a � < -s -s c� � � sv a� � Q+ g ..,. �. � o m o � -�c -s a � �. �. a ro 3 v� v --� v v� a �o c v� 3 0 � -s o �. �n � t� < tn c+ "S" —' -S c+ � � tn J• fD ta iv O -� � � N !D (D N O -�. p � Ci tG �• �- —+ c+ � 'T fD� .r. A� fD < �• �G �G � fD O� O C G+ f� � � � O S c+� [1 n fD f'f t� � f 'O c+ —+ C� fD "S O �• _ (D �".O � c+ � W c'h 'C � 'T7 c+ Z J � �7 � � O � �� • � �� Q n Q � �. • � � O �T � Ct �A C'f [� O. v "S X � O "� c+ 'S C1= C'� O O -5 � 7�" � fD -+- C D lD W "p tn 7r O O C� C1 t� O '� W fD e-h f7 C1 � � f,� �� . n � � O � N _J � h (D 3 •• C O O+ fD C� � O � c�. � �- C � O 6R � � �`G -'•!D O Z fD fD -'• Q —' � C71 G. Vf t0 -+ "0 (D f� < '� fD �G p .r. �. -T ...�. r} pi 'fl Q Z � � � C ��" i1' � v. ...nh [D p � � Q' O �. O i--� tD Q O ta fD -F� c0 p N � � -� ^S C1 O � c+ c+ 0 3 � Q. o C7 � O iv 'S �G 'S n- n n O � O �--� ..� C.�. lD n W fD fD .. .. n c-h � � v N �� (� F-+ F--+ 1--� M-� t-� 1--� N '0 o cri rn v oo cn oo -t� � w w v v oo c+ m -s c� O J� O n � � � Z � � � � � --I l0 ►� N t-+ ►-� � "�D J. O lC �A � 01 h-� 00 �l (T� N 01 �! CD � --� —) N N W Cn Csl O tJ7 O tJl O CT1 C'7 �ca r � cn O� � O� W O � � 00 O O O ►-� O W fD O S2� •• � Q� O V N O V O O O O O G') N r vo � o 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 � o � � c�s c. w � � � � a � (/� J. � � � � �� p � v ' � N W � c+ � p ►-� r-. a1 -P � n c'� n . � v CT7 1 l0 1 1 1 O V 1 I 1 t l0 1 ►--� O Cn O O CTi O DO C� � O o O O 0 � � 6q � W tff �-+ r-� N w OD -P O� 3 � sv N -P �--+ W ►-+ F-+ V �l N OD V W U'1 A� "S ct W N N W al Ol OO -P r 00 �--� CT 1-+ N c+ -+. -�. (n� .. .. v .. � �. � .� v u �r n < O Q� V Q� F-+ cJ� C� N V -A O V -P V 3 fl+ � O O O 00 O1 O G CI'i � (Tt O CTi O 00 c+ cn —i ►--� O O O O O O O O O O O O �--� (D O � e-f � J N � Z � 0 '� l� iv 'O S tD "S Z N N W W W � �P ? �P -P �A Ul O t-t � N fD 'C7 •� V lD W ? l� O O 1-+ N W VI O � �• �p .� p N t� O N i�A C")'a Ai CJ1 O 3 � V N (D 1-�+ l"h � � fn c-h 6�f .'O C77 ty4 (J� tn � N t-+ ►-+ [D O O �+ 00 O N CTt C) o v, cn o v oo v � V V � � � � � � � � � � V r V � � �� 0 Q Q C � � � � • � � � N3 V V N W � � . e-f 1-� 1--� Q� �P t� I C� s- � C1 I l0 1 1 t v 1 1 1 1 1 ►-� -�• � �' CTt cli O O V O 00 � • CJt C7'1 O O cJ7 O O O O O O 64 N ' v N . � � ��'t:,F��'�� S °° '; � �� a�d . °� �_ � �o.,� +�,o w�t,vo»� . � • NEIGHBORHOOQ PARTNERSHIP PROGRAM[ �^�, � '� C Pro3ect Rating Shaet . �� '� Fro ect Rame: � i�2 / o ' COO Date: ��o�R , • • .I. El tqibil�ty Crtterta r ' � - . 1. Required �everaging Ratio � Pro�ect Leveragin9 Ratio/�,Pro�ect meets required ratio: Yes ✓� No 2. Pro�ect is eligible program activity: Yes 1/� No 3. Project ail;l be completed or self-sustatning�n 24 mont�is: Yes_� tio � • 4. If public service P►ro3ect� xill tt dupllcate existing services or be rep-Tacement funding: Ye; No /Y� e ect on r�ter�a We ht S[ori A. Ftnancial Feasibility: Pro�ect can be --- Feastbie ' --- � Infeasibie 1 z . realistically completed rrith available funds. ��} , - B. FSanagement-Feasibility: Managing organization --- Organization r�anlzatio Infensibie 1 1 has the abilfty to manaqe and complete the has skills has skills (1} profect xithin the glven time restraints. and proven . track reccrd C, Neighborhood Contributiqns ' � { � , 1. Percentage neighborhood contributtons /Q� 100Y or 26-99x 5-25X Less than Z � exceed required leveraging ratio. �re 'x 2. Number of separate resident or business- /.s0 25 or more 15-24 5-14 0-4 2 6 person contributions. 3. Yariety of contributions, e.q, residential s 4 or more 3 2 � 2 � or commercial improvements, inkind services� categories categories categories category volunteer labor, sweat equity, cash donations, foundation support, etc. • • . 0, Adequscy of Citizen Partieipe.tion: Involvement of --- Established Establfshed No 1 Z neighborhood residents and businesspersons in ths Program Program pro9ram development and planning of the pro3ect. . Committee. Committee Committee including ef E. Neighborhood Impact: Extent to which tt,� pro3ect fected neigh provides measurable tnprovement in the• following borhood rep- a reas: rese�tatives l . Physical : New development or improvements High (2) N1��+. (3) Low (4) f�one 1 � to private or public property. ' . • __ 2: 'cnvironmental: Creating a more safe, healthy High (2} Med. (3) Low (4) Hone 1 � and socially attractive neighborhood. ��3. Economic: Increased taz base, stronger High (2) Med. (3) Low (4) None ?�5) z neighborhood and city economy. and increased t DIS employment opportunities. � F. Benefits to low and moderate income households. Direct bene- Direct bene- Indirect None 1 . fits only to fits to•low� Benefits • tow and mod- moderate and erate income other house- . househol ds hol ds G. Pro�ect consists of ineasurable ob�ectives. --- Yes --- No 1 z N. Pro�ect is self-sustaining and will have --- Yes --- No 1 Z . long-term benefits. ' I. Project is in confornance with: ' 1 . Comprehensive Plan --- Yes Partially Ho 1 � z. 2. District Plan --- Yes Partially No 1 Z. 3, Capital Allocation Policies --- Yes Partiatly � No 1 . J. Profect wi11 result in the --- Yes --- No i D recycling of Neighborhood Partnership funds. K, Pro�ect will be coordinated with existing tity --- Yes --- No 1 C departments, programs and other service providers, but wi11 not Quplicate services. III. District Council Priority First Second 7hird Other 1 Z ota ; (1j infeaslble Pro�ects r►111 not be recommended for funding. - Score �� (2) Impacts needs identified w�ihtn both district and cityrride aQopted plans. (3� Impacts needs iden+�fi�d�wiAh{n Qais pYc��*rictynrdcitvwidedadoated plans. _ _ , „ � --� ---..__.. . NEIGHBORNOOD PARTNERSHIP PR06RAH , �'rl��°,'� • n Profe Rating Sh2et r�'�- � �J Pro ect Name: � ' d tt l � D f � Date: G /d $3 .1. E1 igibil�y•Criteria ° /v0 /'Q 7f'/h q 'bCCci�t S e o �4CK D7' T/� /1C/4 � //l rU�ma7`/a�j . , t/ - 1. Required Leveragtng Rat10 Profect Leveraging Ratio .Pro�ect meets required ratio: Yes No 2. Pro3ect is eli9ible program activity: Yes Na � 3. Pro�ect r+il,l be completed or self-sustalnin'�n 2Q ma�t'—f"is: Yes No . • 4. If public servlce P�1ect. witl it dupticate existing services or be rep acement funding: Yes !b e ect on r ter e Ne t Score A. Financial Feasibility: Pro3ect can be --- Feasible ' --- Infeasibte 1 . realistically completed with available funds. �� • B. Kanagement-Feasibility: Managing organizatfon --- Organtzation Organtzntion Infeastble 1 has the abilfty to manage and complete the ' , has skills has skills (1) prnfect rrithin the given time restraints., and proven � .. , . track record C. Neighborhood Contributions ' , . . 1. Percentage neighborhood contributions 100X or �26-99x 5-25x Less than 2 exceed requtred leveraging ratio. more 5x 2, Number of separate resident or business- 25 cr more 15-24 5-14 0-4 2 person contributions. 3. Variety of contributions� e,g, residential 4 or more 3 Z � 2 or corunercial improvements, inkind services� categories categories categories category volunteer labor, sweat equity. cash donations, foundation support� etc. • • D. Adequacy o.° Citizer. Partfcipation: Involvement of --- Established Fstablished No 1 neighborhood residents and businesspersons in the Program Program program development and planning of the pro3ect. . Committee, Committee Lorunittee . including ef E. Neiyhborhood Impact: Extent to which the pro�ect fected neigh provides neasurable improvement in the�following borhooG rep- areas: resentatives . 1. Physical : Nerr development or 4mprovements High (2) Med. (3) Low (4) �aone 1 to private or public property. 2: Environnental: Creating a rrbre Safe, healthy High (2) Med. {3) : Low (4) None 1 and socially attractive neighborhood, 3. Economic: Increased tax base� stronger High (2) Med. (3) Low (4) None 1. (5) neighborhood and city economy, and increased • employment opportunities. F. Benefits to low and moderate income households. Direct bene-�Direct bene- Indirect None 1 fits only to fits to•low, 5enefits • tow and mod- moderate and erate income other house- . � households holds G. Pro�ect consists of ineasurable ob,jectives. --- Yes --- No 1 H. Profect is self-sustaining and will have ••- Yes --- No 1 . long-term benefits. I, Project ts in conformance with: � �. Comprehensive Plan --- Yes Partially ho 1 p. District Plan --- Yes Partially No 1 3, Capttal Allocation Poticies --- Yes Partially No 1 J. Pro�ect will result in the --- Yes --- No 1 recycling of Neighborhood Partnership funds. K. ProJect• will be coordinated with existi�g city --- Yes . --- No 1 departments, programs and other service provSders, but will not duplicate services. III. District Countil Priority First Second 7hird Other 1 ota (1) Infeasible Pro�ects will not be recommended for funding. - Score _ (2) Impa�ts needs identified w�Lhin both district and cltywide adopted plans. r�� tm�a�tc needs identified xithin aistrict or cltywide_adopted plans. , _ , HEIGNBORH000 PARTNERSHIP PROGRAf! al�]�� . . Project Rating Sh2et �'�� Pro ect Name: Date• • I. EttgiciTir�y�Criteria '� ' � . ' - f / z.z . 1. Required teveragtng Ratio � Prof ect Levera ing Ratio �.Pro�ect meets required ratio; Yes � No 2. Pro3ect ts eligible program activity: Yes � Ho 3. Profett r+il,l be completed or self-sustaining�n 24 monLhs: Yes ✓ No N� � • 4. If public service ProJect, Kill it duplicate ex{sting services or be repTement funding: Ye� e ect on rtter a Ne� ht Scorf A. Flnancial Feasibility: Project can be --- Feasibte � --- Infeasible 1 Z . reatisticatly completed xith available funds. �� • B. lianagement-Feasibflity: Hanaging organitatton --- Organizatlon Organization Irtfeasible 1 Z has the abittty to manage and complete the has skills has skills (1) profect rrithin the given time restraints. and proven � -- . � . track recor C. Neighborhood Contributions ' � , 1. Percentage neighborhood contributions a G� 100X or 26-995 5-25X Less than Z -7 exceed required leveraging ratio. more SX 2. Number of separate resident or business- 3,S 25 or more 15-24 5-14 0-4 2 G person contributions. 3. Yarieiy of contributions. e.g, residential y 4 or more 3 2 � 2 � or commercial improvements. inkind services, categories categories categories categ�ry volunteer labor, sweat equity, cash donations� foundation support, etc. • • � D. A9equacy of Citizen Par:icipation; Involvement of --- Established stablished No 1 � neighborho,od residents and businesspersons in the Program rogram program development and pianning of the pro�ect. . Committee, Lommittee Committee including ef E. Nei9hborhood Inpact: Extent to which the project fected neigfi provides neasurable tmprovement in the�following borhood rep- areas: resentatives � Physical: Ne►+ development or improvenents Hi h 2 Hed, (3) Low (4) None 1 3 to private or public property. . G A Gi7 ._. ..__. t/Zo-2! 2: Environmental: Lreating a more safe, healthy High (2) Med. (3j Low:(4) None 1 � and Socialty attractive neighbarhood. � Economic: Increased tax base, stronger Hi h (2) Ffed. (3) Low (4) None 1. (5) 3 neighborhood and city economy, and tnc�eased �p �y � emptoyment oDPo►'tunities. D P 1G F. Benefits to lo++ and moderate income households. Direct be�e- Direct bene- Indirect Nene 1 � • fits only to fits to•low, Benefits • l�w and mod- moderate and erate incom other house- . households holds 6. Project consists of ineasurable objectives. --- Yes --- No 1 z H, Project is self-sustaining and will have --- Yes --- �. � Z . long-term benefits. . I, Profect is in conformance with: 1 . Lomprehenstve Plan --- Yes Partially No ' 1 • 2 p. District Plan --- Yes Partially No 1 z 3, Capttat Allocation Policies --- Yes Partially � No 1 2- J. ProJect will result in the --- Yes --- No 1 a recycling of heighborhood Partnership funds. K. Pro,ject will be coordinated with existing tity --- Yes --- No 1 z departments, programs and other servtce providers. but wi11 not dupticate services. III. District Council Priority First Second Third Other 1 � ota s,I (1) Infeasi�le Dro�ects w111 not be recommended for funding. � . f Score /_� (2) Impacts neeGs tdentified rr;thi� both district and citywide adopted plans. ��ci�4ft C r�� Tn�artc nnrds identlfied within aistrict or citywide adopted plans: � _ •,�, NEIGHBORHOOD PARTNERSHIP PROGRAH �;�,� � �/ ro�QCt R ing h2et ��/ � � �� ' Oate: O Pro ect Name: !7 ' / ••I. El iqibil i�cy,Criterta '� ' � ' � • - 1. Requtred leveraging Rat10 � Pro3ect Leveraging Ratio ' / .Prof ect meets required ratlo: Yes �/' No 2. Pro�ect fs eligible program activity: Yes ✓ No 3. Pro�ect wil,l be comFleted or self-sustaining�n 24 mont�is: Yes �I No • 4, If public service Droject. will i.t duplicate existing services or be rep acement funding: Ye;�j[,� No e ect on rtter a ue t Score A. Financial Feasibiltty: Project u n be -- Feaslble � --- Infeasible 1 z . reatisttcally completed xith available fund.s. �>> - B. Kanagement-Feasibtlity: Managing organization . .-- Organization rg�nizntion Infeasibie 1 1 has the abiltty to manage and complete the � has sk111s has skills (1) project aithin the given time restraints., and proven . , track record C. Neighborhood tontrlbutions ' _ , 1. Percentage neighborhood contributions 0� 700Y or �26-99X 5-25x less than 2 Q exceed required leveraging ratio, more SX 2. Number of separate resident or business- /,S� 25 0� more 15-24 5-14 0-4 2 y person contributions. 3, Yariety of contributions� e.g. residential y 4 or more 3 Z � 2 G or commercial improvements, inkind services� cate orie cate9ories categories category �- volunteer labor, sweat equity, cash donations, foundation support, etc. • • 0. Adeq��acy of Citizen Participation: Jnvolvement of --- Established Established No 1 1 neighborhood residents and businesspersons in the Program Program program development and planning of the pro�ect. . Committee, Carrnittee Committee . includ9ng ef E. Neighborhood Impact: Extent to which the project fected neigh provides neasurable imprro vement in the�following borhood rep- areas: resentatives . �1 Physical : New development or improvemertts Nigh (Z) Med. (3) Low (4) None 1 � to private or pub}ic property. �2 �nvironmental: Creating a more safe, healthy High (2) Hed. (3) : Low (4) None 1 l and socially attractive neighborhood. 3. Economic: Increased tax base. stronger High (2) Hed. (3) Low (4) None 1. (5) d neighborhood and city economy, and increased • � empluyment oDPOrtunities, / F. Benefits to low and moderate income households. Direct bene- Direct bene- Indirect None 1 � fits only to fitt to•low, Benefits • tow and mod- moderate and erate �ncome other house- . househal ds boi ds G. Project consists of ineasurable ob3ectives. --- Yes --- No 1 � H. Project is self-sustaining and rrill have --- Yes --- No 1 Z. . long-term benefits, I. Project is in conformance with; 1 . Lomprehensive Plan --- Yes Partially No 1 • Z 2. District Plan --- Ye Partially No 1 2. 3. Capital A1location Policies --- Ye Part�ally � No 1 2- J. Profect will result in the --- Yes --- No 1 G recycling of Neighborhood Partnership funds. ' K. Profect• wiil be coordinated with existing city --- Yes --- No 1 � departments� programs and other service � providers. but ►+ill not duplicate services. III. Oistrict Council Priority First Second � Third Other 1 z _ ota a! (1) Infensible pro�ects witt not be recommended for funding. . Score (2) Impacts needs identified within both district and city►+ide adopted plans. � Ant��patC � �zt 1mea�ts needs ldentlfied rrithin a�s rict or citywide adopted plans. �___ � , NEIGHBORHOOD PARTNERSHIP PROGRAA! '��, ��'��2� ' _ Pro e Rat ng S 2et � .�,1 � Pro ect Name: (,[� e U Datt• O .i. Eligl6il�,ty.Criteria r ' • ' - - 1. Required Leveragtng Ratio 3 / Profect Leveraging Ratio �.Prof ect meets required ratio: Yes !� No 2. Profect is eligible program activity: Yes t� No 3. Project wil,t be completed or self-sustainin�n 24 mont�is: Yes r� No � � . 4,. If public servlce P�Sect. xitl it duplicate exisiing services or be rep�acement funding: Ye;�/ e ect on riter a Nei t Score A. Financial Feasibllity: Profect can de --- Feasible --- Infeasible 1 Z . realtsticaliy completed with available funds. �� - B. Kanagement-Feaslbiliiy: Hanaging organization --- Organizatton rganizatio Infeasible 1 � has the abiltty to manage and comptete the has skills has skilts (1) project within the given time restraints. and proven -- . � tr.ack record C. Neighborhood Contrlbuttons ' � . 1. Percentage neighborhood contributions 0� 100i or � 26-99X 5-25x Less than 2 � exceed required leveraging ratio, more 5X . 2. Number of separate resident or business- ,�(, 25 or more 15-24 5-14 ' 0-4 2 6 person contributions. 3. Yariety of contributions, e.g, residential J!" 4 or more 3 2 1 2 6 or comr�ercial improyements. i�kind services� cate orie categories categories category volunteer labor, sweat equity, cash donations� foundation support� etc. • • ' D. Adequacy of fitizen Participation: Involvement of --- Establfshed Established No 1 � neighborhood residents and businesspersons in the Program Program program developr,�ent and plannfng of the project. . Committee, Com�nittee Committee including ef E. Neighborhood Impact: Extent to which the project fected neigh provides neasurable improvement in the� following borhood rep- areas: resentatives 1, Physical: Ne►+ develop�nent or improvenents �g.h� Med. (3) Low (4) None 1 3 to private or public property. H;�tB PpI _ _.._ 2; Environmental: Lreating a more safe, healthy Hi Med, (3) Low (4) None 1 3 and socially attractive neighborhood. � �p ,Q P/ 3. Economic: Increased tax base, stronger High (2) Med. (3) Low (4) Hone 1. (5) � neighborhood and city economy, and increased . • empioyment opDOrtunities. / F. Benefits to low and moderate income households. Direct bene- Direct bene- Indirect No�e 1 � . fits onty to fits to�low, Benefits • low and mod- moderate and erate income other house- . hcuseholds holds G. Pro�ect consists of ineasurable ob3ectives, --- Yes --- �o � Z H. Profect is self-sustaining and wiil have --- Yes --- No � 1 2,. . long-tecm benefits. I. ProjecL is in conformance with; 1 . Comprehensive Plan --- es Partially No � 1 � Z 2. Distritt Plan --- Ye Partially No 1 Z 3, Capital A1location Policies --- [7t� Partiatly � No 1 2- J. Pro3ect witl result in the --- YeS --- ��. 1 � recycling of Neighborhood Partnership funds. K. Pro�ect will be coordinated with existing city --- es --- No 1 Z departments, programs anQ other service � providers. but Kill not duplicate services. III. . District Council Priority First Second Third Other 1 3 ota G (1) Infeasible profects xill not be recortunended for funding. � Score � ! (2) Impacts needs identifled a�thin both district and citywide adopted plans. f�1 Imoa�ts needs identified ++ithin �rict or citywide adopted plans. � _ . • , HEI6HBORHOOD PARTNERSHIP PROGRAM ' ��j��`':� 1 .Project atin S et • J patt: O Pro ect Hame• /! o� ' .I. Eliqibll�iy Crtterta ~ ' - � 1. Re uired Leve�a9in Ratio , Prof ect Leveragln9 Ratio y 9 .ProJect meets required ratlo: Yes ✓ Fb 9 9 � 2. Prof ect 1s eligible program activity: Yes ✓ No_ 3. Profect wit,l be completed or selt-sustaining�n 24 mont�Fis: Yes � No . 4. If public servtce Prosect. will it duplicate existing services or be rep acement funding: Ye; /V/� No e ect on r�ter a Ne ht Scor=. A. Financial Feasibllity: Project can be --- Feasible ' --- Infeastble 1 �, . realistically completed ►rith available funds. �� • B. Fianagement-Feasibility: Hanaging organtzation � --- Organtzatlon Organizatton Infeasible ? � has the abiltty to manage and complete the has skills has skills (1) project wlthin the gtven time restraints.. and proven � , , track record C. Neighborhood Contributions ' _ . 1. Percentage neighborhood contributions 3 8�'� 100X or 26-995 5-25X Lesss�han 2 � exceed required leveraging ratio, more 2. Number of separate resident or business- f,Z 25 or more 15-24 5-14 0-4 2 6 person contributions. 3. Yariety of contributions� e.g, residential 7 4 or more 3 2 � 2 G or commercial improvements, inkind services� categories categories categories catego ry volunteer labor, sweat equity, cash donations, foundation support� etc. . • 0. Adequacy of Citizen Participztion; Involver�ent of --- EstablishQd E�tablished No 1 � neighborhood residents and businesspersons in the Program Program program development and planning of the project. . Comm�ttee, Committee Committee � inclvding ef E. Neighborhood Impact: Extent to which the project fected neigh provides measurable improvement in the�following borhood rep- areas: resentatives . 1� Physical: New development or tmprovements Hi h (2 Med, (3) Low (4) hone 1 3 to private or publ ic property. pP/��/ f-! z0 �2 �nviro�nental: Lreattng a more safe, healthy High (2) Med. (3) . Low (4} None • 1 a and sociaTly attractive neighborhood. J�ZJ�/S z �3 Ecorromic; Increased tax base, stronger High (2) hfed. (3) Low (4) None .�(5) � neighborhood and city economy� and increased p �� Q! 5� employment oDD�rtunities. F. Benefits to tow and moderate income households. Direct bene- Direct bene- Indirect fi�ne 1 � fits only to fits to�low, Benefits • low and mod- moderate tn erate incom other house . househol ds hol ds G. Project consists of ineasurable ob�ectives, --- Yes --- H� � Z H. Project is self-sustaining and wi11 have --- Ye --- No 1 . long-term benefits. i � I. ProJect is in conformance with: 1 . Comprehensive P1an --- Yes Partially No 1 � Z p. District Ptan --- Yes Partially Ho 1 Z 3. Capital Attocation Policies --- Yes Partially � No 1 2. J. Profect will result in the --- Yes --- x0 � O recyclTng of Neighborhood Partnership funds. � K. Project• r+ill be coord{�ated with existS.ng city --- Yes --- �fl � Z. departments� programs and other service provSders. but Nill not duplicate services. III. District Council Priority First Second Third Other 1 z ota — {�) Infeasible D��ects will not be recommended for funding. � Score S� (2) Impa�ts needs tdentitted w�thSn both district and cttywide adopted plans. �,� f_.,�..� .,oe�� t�pnttfied within �district or citywide adopted plans. _ NEIGH80RHOOD PARTNERSHIP PROGRAH � - � , � Q Pro�ect Ra ng Shzet . ��!�`� Pro ect Hame: / /'�V� /�d 0 Date• _6 /D 8? .I. Eligibil 'riy.Criterta ~ ' � � � - a.� 1. Required Leveraging Ratio l�q Profect Leveraging Ratio .Pro�ect meets required �atio: Yes t� tio 2. Pro�ect Ss eligible program activity: Yes_��_� Ho 3. Pro�ect ail,1 be completed or self-sustaining �n 24 mont�Fis: Yes_�/ No • 4,. If public service Project. will it duplicate existing services or be rep acec�ent funding: Yes No_� e ect on r ter a ttei t Score A. Flnancial Feasibiltty: Project can be --- Feasibl --- Infeasible 1 z reali�stica�ly completed with available funds. � �� - B. Kanagement-Feasibllity; Hanaging organization --- Organizatton OrganSzation lnfeasible 1 � 1 has the abiltty to manage and complete the has skills has skills (1) profect wlthin the given time restraints, anQ proven . tr.ack record C. Neighborhood Contributions ' � . 1. Percentage neighborhood contributions $� 100: or �26-99x 5-25: Less than 2 z exceed required leveraging ratio, more SX 2. Number of separate resident or business- ,�,s� 25 or more 15-24 5-14 Q-4 2 _6 person contributions. 3. Yariety of contributions, e.g. residential 3 4 or more r 3 — 2 � 2 '�j or commercial improvements� inkind services� cate9ories (categor�es categories category volunteer labor, sweat equity, cash donations, foundation support� etc. • • ' D. Adequacy of Citizen Pariicipation: Involvement of --- Established �stablished No 1 � neighborho,od residents and businesspersons in the Program Program program development and planning of the pro3ect. . Committee, Committee Committee including ef E. Neighborhood Impact: Extent to which the pro�ect fected neigh provides neasurable improvement in the�foilowing borhood rep- areas: resentatives 1 . Physical : New development or improvements High (2} Med. (3) Low (4) None 1 U to private or publtc property. , . . . _- Q Environmental: Creating a more safe, healthy High (2) Hed. (3) Low (4) Hone 1 z and socially attractive neighborhood. D P Z 1 3, Economic: Increased tax base, stronger High (2) Med. (3) Low (4) hone 1. (5) Q neighborhood and city economy� and increased • employment oDPOrtunities, r F. Benefits to loa and moderate income households. Direct bene- Oirect bene- ndirect Hone 1 j � fits only to fits to�low, Benefits • low and m�d- moderate and erate income other huuse- . � households holds G. Profect consists of ineasurable ob�ectives. --- Yes --- H0 � � H. Project is self-sustaining and will have --' YeS . "�� N0 � Z . long-term benefits. I. Project is in conformance with: 1 . Comprehensive Plan --- Ye Partially No � 1 • Z 2. District P1an --- Yes Partially No , 1 z. 3, Capitat Allocation Policies --- Yes Partially � No 1 2 J. Pro3ect wi]1 result in the --- Yes --- N0 � � recycling of Neighborhood Partnership funds. K. Pro�ect will be coordinated with ezisting city --- Yes --- No 1 z departments� programs and other service providers, but will not duplicate services. III. District Council Prtority First Second Third Other 1 1 � ota � (1) Infeasible Dro�ects wi11 not be recommended for funding. �' Score 3_ (2) Impacts needs tde�tified within both district and clty+ride adopted plans. �z1 tmoa�ts needs identlfied within a�irict or citywide adopted plans, — - .. . . - —._� _,._. NEIGHBORHOOD ?ARTNERSHIP PROGRAH � � � ' Pro��t Ratiny ShPet • '��'� Pro ect Kame• � j'� /"/'D /�D "°'ti � Datt: �' •J. Eiiqibil�i`ty.Criterf� ~ ' � ' � • - 1. Requtred Leveraging Ratio � Pro�ect Leveragi�g Ratio �.Pro3ect meets required ratio: Yes �/ No 2. Pro3ect ts eligible program activity: 1'es c/ No 3. Pro�ect Kil,l be completed or self-sustaining�n 24 months: Yes � No • 4. If publit servlce Pro�ect. Kill it duplicate existing services or be rep acemertt funding: Yes� No e ect on r�terta ue� t Scor� A. Financial Feasibility: Profect can be --- Feasible ' --- lnfeasible 1 Z realistically completed xith avatlable funds. �� • B. Ftanagemertt-Feas{bility: Managing organization --- Organtzatian Organization Infeasible 1 ,� has the abil�ty to manage and complete the has skills has skills (1) profect rrithin the given time restraints., and proven � . . � track recor � C. Neighborho�d Cont�ibutions ' _ , 1. Percentage neighborhood contributions 0� 100z or �26-99x 5-25x tess than 2 a exceed required leveraging ratio. � more Sx 2. Number of separate resident or basiness- y3� 25 or m�r 15-24 5-14 0-4 2 G person contributions. 3. Varie:y of contributions, e.g. residential 8 4 or more 3 2 � 2 � or ccmmercial improvements, inkind services, categor�es categories categories cate9ory volunteer labor, sWeat equity� cash donntions� foundation support� etc. • • ' 0. Adequacy of Citizen Participatior: Involver�ent of --- Established Established f10 1 z neighborhood residents and businesspersons fn the Program Program program development and planning of the project. . Committee, Comnittee Committee - including ef E. Neighborhood Impact; Extent to which the project fected neigh provides neasurable improve:nent in the'following borhood rep- areas: resentatives . � Physical: Nerr development or {mprovements High (2) Med. (3) Low (4) None 1 '3 to privaLe or public property. APzO�J,J 8 2�. Environmental; Creating a more safe; healthy High (2) Med, (3) Lorr (4) � None 1 Z and socially attractive neighborhood. Lu�V � 3. Economic; Increased tax base, stronger High (2) Med, (3) Low (4) None 1. (5} (� neighborhood and city economy. and increased • employment oDDortunities. F. Benefits to low and moderate tncome households. Direct bene- Direct bene- Jndirect None 1 � fits only to fits to•low, Benefits • low and mod- moderate and erate fncom other house • � househol ds ho1 ds G. Project consists of ineasurable objecttves. --- Yes --- No � Z' H. Pro�ect is self-sustaining and �ri11 have --- Yes _ "-' N° � Z . long-term benefits, 1, Pro�ect is in conformance with: � . Comprehensive Plan --- Yes Partially Ho 1 - '2 2. District Ptan --- Yes Partially No 1 � � 3, Capital Allocation Policies --- Ye Partially No 1 _ J, Project ►rill result in the --- Yes --- No 1 � recycling of Neighborhood Partnership funds. � K. P�ofect will be coordinated with existing city � --- Yes --- No 1 � departments, pro9rams and other service � providers, but will not duplicate services. III. District Council Priorlty First Second Third Other 1 '� .. ota �/C (1) Infehsible Dro�ects wi11 not �e recommended for funding. ` . Score /_ (2) Impacts needs identitied wtiihin both district and cltywide adopted ptans. (z1 tmoacts needs identified xithin a�s rict or cityw{de adopted plans. _�__, . NEIGNBORHOOD PARTNERSHIP PR06RAH ��!j��'?� - .� � . P 3 tt Rating Sh2et . . '�� - Pro ect Name: Date: G/O�$� .J. E1lgibil�y•Lriteria r ' � � � • 1. Required tevera9ing Ratio�� Prof zct Leveraging Ratio�.Pro3ect meets required ratic: Yes � No � 2. Pro�ect is eligible program activity: Yes No 3. ProJect wSl.l be completed or self-sustaining n 24 months: Yes t/ No • 4, If public service Drofect� Will it duplicate existing services or be repTcement funding; Yes� No e ect on riter a Hei ht core A. financiat Feasibility: Project can be --- Feasibie ' --- lnfe`;;ble 1 2 . �ealisticaily completed with available funds. • B. Hanagement-Feastbility: Mana9ing orqanization --- Organization OrQanization Infeasible 1 � Z has the nbilfty to manage and complete the has skills fins skills (1) project within the gtven time restraints. and proven . , track recor C. Neighborhood Cantributions ' . 1. Percentage neighborhood contributions a�q 100: or 26-99� 5-25x Less than 2 y exceed required leveraging ratio, more SX 2. Kumber of separate resident or business- SD� 25 or more 15-24 5-14 0-4 2 �j person contributions. 3. Variety of contributions, e.g, residential (� 4 or more 3 2 1 2 G or commercial improvements, inki�d services� categories categories categories category volunteer labor, sweat equity. cash donations. foundation support� etc. • • D. AdeSuacy af Citizen Participation: Involver�ent of --- Established Established No 1 Z neighborhop d residents and businesspersons in the Program Program program developnent and planning of the proJect. . Committee� Committee Committee including ef . . E, Neighborhood Impact: Extent to wfiich the project fected neigh provides measurable improvement in the'following borhaod rep- areas: resentattves 1� Physical: New devetopment or improvements High (2) Med. (3) Low {4) None 1 Z to private or public property. N �Y 2: Environnental: Creating a more safe. healthy High (2) Med, (3) ; Low (4) None 1 d and sociaily attractive neighborhood. . 3. Economic: Increased tax base� stronger High (2) Med, (3) Low (4) None 1 (5) (3 neighborhood and city economy� and increased • employment opDOrtunities. F. Benefits to low and moderate income households. Direct bene- Direct bene- Indirect None 1 Z . fits only to fits to•tow Benefits • low and mod- moderate an erate income other house . househol ds hol ds G. Project consists of ineasurable ob�ectives. --- eS "" �0 � L H. Project is self-sustaining anQ will have --- e5 --- N0 � Z . long-term benefits. � I, Project is in conformance with; ) . Lomprehensive Plan --- Yes Partially No ` 1 ' Z Z. District Plan --- Yes Partially No 1 2 3. Capital Allocation Policies --- Yes Partially No 1 Z J. Profect will result in the --- Yes --- ko 1 Q recycling of Neighborhood Partnership funds. K. Pro�ect will be coordinated w.ith existing city --- Ye --- No 1 Z departments. programs and other service providers. but will not duplicate services. III. . District Councit Prto�ity Firs Second Third Other 1 3 . ota ,/ , (1) Infeasible P�Jects will not be recommended for funding. Score '�[ (Z) Impacts needs tdentified within both district and cltywide adopted plans. (31 Im�atts needs i�dentified within a�s rict or citywide adopted plans. --- - ,� _,�- -�--._• ..�...� . • , NEIGNB4RNOOD PARTNERSHIP PROGRAN ��1"��.� , Prolect Name• n�5/�Cl� T �Qi� f'I'D�/Cro�ct �tt�n/'da b�� Date: O •I. Eltq16t1 iniy•Criterta '~ ' � � ' - - �.s� - 1. Requlred Leveraging Ratio 2� Pro�ect levera ing Raiio .ProJect meets required ratio: Yes J/ No 2. Pro3ect is eligible pro9ram activity: Yes� No � 3. Pro�ect +ri,l.l be completed or self-sustaining��n 24 mont—F'is: Yes t/ Ro • 4. If publit service Pro�ect. Wtil it dupltcate ex{sting servtces or be rep acement funding: Te;� No e ect on r ter a e t Scor� A. Financial Feasibility: Projett can be --- Feasible ' --- InfeasibTe 1 2 . �ealtstically completed with available funds. - �1? . • B. Hanagement-Feasibllity: Hannging organizatton --- Organization Organization Infeasible 1 � has the abilfty to rn3nage and complete the has skills has skills (1) proJect within the given time restraints.. and proven . . , track record C.' Neighborhood Contrlbutions ' _ , 1. Percentage neighborhood contributions a f� 100x or 26-99� 5-25x Less than 2 y exceed required leveraging ratio. ° more 5X 2, Number of separate resident or business- 'y 7 25 or more 15-24 5-14 0-4 2 � person contributions. 3. Variety of contributions, e.g, residential 6 4 or more 3 2 � 2 � or commercial improvements. fnkind services, categorie categories categories category volunteer labor� sweat equity� cash donations, foundation support, etc. • • ' D, Adeqiacy of Citizen Participation: Involve►�ent of --•• Esteblished Established No 1 neighborhood residents and businesspersons in the Program Program program development and planning of the pro�ect. . Co►nnittee, Committee Committee Z fncluding ef E, Neighborhood Impact; Extent to which the pro�ect fected neigh provides measurable improvement in the�following borhood rep- areas: �esentatives . l� Physical: New development or improvements High (2) Med. (3) Low (4) None 1 � to private or public property. Dprs,17 �/Q 2; Environmental: Lreating a more safe, healthy High (2) Med. (3) ; Low (4) Hone 1 d and socially nttractive neighborhood. 3. Economic: Increased tax base. stronger High (Z) FSed. (3) Low (4) None 1 (5] Q neighborhood and city economy� and tncreased • employment opportunities. F. Benefits to low and moderate income households. Direct bene- Direct bene- Indirect None 1 Z fits only to fits to•loa, Benefits • low and mod- moderate an erate income other house . � househol ds hol ds G. ProJect consists of ineasurable objectives. --- Yes --- N� � Z H. Project is self-sustaining and xill have •-- Yes --- � � 2 . long-term benefits. I, Project is in conformance with: 1 . Comprehensive Plan --- Yes Partially No 1 � � 2. District Plan --- Ye Partially tio 1 Z 3, Capital Allocation Policies --- Yes Partially � No 1 2 J. Project wi11 result in the --- Yes --- N� � Z recycling of Neighborhood Pa�tnership funds, K. Prosect• will be coordinated with existing city --- YeS --' N0 � 2 departments� programs and other service � providers. Dut will not duplicate services. III. Distrtct Council Prtority First Second ?hird Other 1 2 cta �(1) Infeasible Drojects will not be recommended for funding. - Score y (2) Impacts needs identified w�thtn both district and city►+ide adopted plans. r�� rm�a�ts needs identified within a sfrict or citywide adopted ptans. - . . , -•--- � NEIGH80RHOOD PARTHERSHIP PROGRArt . � � ` rofe t Rating Sh2et � ��,�`��,�.patr• . ProJect Name: • /S�'f � Du.�V4l' A'1�� 0 7 .i. Eligibil�iy Criteria - 1. Required levera9ing Ratio � Pro�ect Leveraging Ratio �.ProJect meets requlred ratio: Yes_� Ho . 2. Profect is eligible program activity: Yes t/ No_ 3. Pro,�ect Ki1.1 be completed or self-sustainin�n 24 rtnnihs: Yes �/' No . 4. If public servlce p►tif ect. ai11 it duplicate existing services or be rep acement fundi�g: Yeg�� Nc E ht SCOrE e ect on riter a A. Ffnancial Feasibillty: Project can be --- Feasibte ' --- Irtfe`;;ble 1 2 . realisttca11y completed xith available funds. • B. t3anagement-Feasibiitty: 1�lanaging organization •-- Organization Organizatton Infeasible 1 z has the abilfty to manage and complete the has skilts has skills (1) pro�ect xithin the given time restraints. and proven -- , � tr,ack recor C. Hetghborhood Contributtons ' � . 1, Percentage neighborhood contributions 0� 100X or 26-99X 5-25X Less than 2 6 exceed required leveraging ratio, more S 2. Humber of separate resident or business- 1/.s� 25 or more 15-24 5-14 0-4 2 6 person contritrutions. 3, Yariety of contributions, e.g, residential ( 4 or more 3 2 � I 2 6 or coR�nercial improvements, inkind services, categories categories categories category volunteer labor, sNeat equity, cash donations, foundation support� etc. • • ' D. Adequacy of Citizen Participrtion: Involvcment of --- Establtshed Established No 1 2 neighborhood residents and businesspersons tn the Program � Program program development and planning of the pro3ect. . Committee, Comnittee Committee inctuding ef E. ��eighborhood Impact: Eztent to r+hich the project fected neigh provides neasurable improvement in the� following borhood rep- areas: resentatives � Physical: New development or lmprovements High (2) Med. (3) Low (4) tione 1 3 to private or publit property. �;jJ�O pP! -� - �Z Environmental: Creating a more safe. healthy Ftigh (2) Med. (3j Low (4) None 1 3 and soeially attractive neighborhood. . L��opp�/ 3. Economic: Increased tax base, stronger High (2) Med, (3) Low (4) None 1. (5) � neighborhood and city economy, and increased • � employment oDPOrtunities. / F. Benefits to low and moderate income households. Oirect bene- Direct bene- Indirect hone 1 � . fits only to fits to+low, 8enefits • low and mod- moderate and erate income other h�use- . households holds G. Project consists of ineasurable ob3ecttves, --- Yes --- No 1 2 H. Project is self-sustaining and xi11 have --- Yes --- No 1 Z . long-term benefits. I. Project is in conformance With: ' � . Comprehensive Plan --- lfes Partially No - 1 • � 2, District Plan --- Yes Partially Ho 1 Z 3, Capital Altocation Policies --- Yes Partially � No 1 Z- J. Pro,ject will result in the • --- Yes --- No 1 recycling of Neighborhood Partnership funds. K. Project will be coordinated yith existing city --- Yes . --- No 1 Z departments. programs and other service provTders. but xitl not duplicate services. First Second Third Other 1 � III. . District Council Priority `� ota G (1) Infeasible Drolects wi11 not be recommended for funding. � Score � 42) Impacts needs identified w�ithtn both district and citywide adopted pla�s. f3) Impatts needs identlfied xithin aistrict,or citywidejadoDAed�pla*s�A rylans_ . �,� NEIGHBORHOOD PARTNERSHIP PROGRAM � Pro,�ect Rating Sh2et ��`��_1 patt• Pro ed Nam�: � /� � � .I. Eliqloili�cy•Criterta � � ' . � 1. Required Leveraging Ratio � Pro�ect Leveraging Ratic �.Pro�ect meets required ratio: Yes�G No 2. ProJect ts eligible program activity; Yes i/ Ho 3. Project wi1,1 be completed or self-sustaintng�n 24 mont�Fis; Yes�_ No . 4, If public service Prof ect, wi11 it duplicate exisLing services or be rep�acement funding: 11e;� No e ect on n ter a ue� bt Score A. Financial Feasibility: Pwject can be --- Feasibie � --- Infeasible 1 2. . realistically wmpleted With available funds. � �Z� - B, ttanagement-Feasibility; Managing organlzation --- Organizatloa Organfzation Infeasible 1 j has the abiltty to manage and complete the has skills has skills (1) pro,�ect within the given time restraints., and proven . .. trnck record t, Heighborhood Contributiens ' . l. Pe�centage neighborhood�contributions Q� 100Y or 26-99x S-25X Less than 2 d exceed requfred leveraging ratio. � more 5x 2. Number of separate resident or business- /S 25 or more 15-24 5-14 0-4 2 'rj� person contributions. 3. Yariety of contributions� e.g. residential 4 or more 3 � � 2 Z or co�r.mercial improvements, inkind services, z- categories categories cate or�es category volunteer tabor� sweat equity. cash donations, foundation support� etc. � • D. Adequacy of Citizen FarticSpntior.: Involvenent of --- Established Established No 1 � neighborhood residents and businesspersons Sn the Program Program program development and planning of the project. . Committee, Cormittee Committee including ef E. Neighborhood Impact: Extent to which the Pro�ect fected neigh provides neasurable improvement in the'following borhood rep- areas: resentatives 1� Physical: ��eM development or improvements High (2) Med. (3) Low (4) None t � to private or public property. • 2� Environmental: Creating a more safe, healthy High (2) hfed. (3) Low (4) None 1 � and socially attractive neighborhood. 3. Economic: Increased tax base. stronger High (2) Med. (3) Law (4) None 1 (5) � neighborhood and city economy, and increased - employment opportunities. F. BenefitS to low and moderate income households. Direct bene- Direct bene- Indirect hone 1 1 • fits only to fits to•low, Benefits • low and mod- moderate and • erate income other house- ' . households holds G. Pro�ect consists of ineasurable ob3ectives. --- Yes --- No 1 � H. Pro3ect is self-sustaining and will have --- Ye --- N0 � Z . long-term benefits. I. Project is tn conformance with: 1 . Comprehensive Plan --- � Partially �o � ' 2. 2. District Ptan --- 1les Partially No 1 �. 3. Capital Allocation Policies --- � Partially � No i Z J. Project will result in the --- Yes --- No 1 Q recycling of Neighborhood Partnership funds. K. Profect• will be coordinated with existing city --- Yes --- No � � departments� programs and other service � providers, but will not duplicate services. fII. District Council PriorSty First Second 7hird Other 1 3 ota �J (1) lnfeasible D��eCts wi11 not he recommended for funding. - Score �! (2) Impacts needs identified rn thSn both district and citywide adopted plans. (st Imuatts needs identified rrlthin a�s rict or citywide adopted plans. ___ . _ .. ,- -�--._. _,..,� .� NEiGNe0RH000 PARTNERSHIP FROGP.AM � Pro�ect Rating Sheet . '��.�'� Pro ect.Nnme; D I'0 �G ��- Datt: ( d .i. Eligt6tl�iy•Crtterta �' ' � � - . 3.9 1. Requtred �everaging Ratio � Pro�ect leveragin9 Ratio .Pro�ect meets required ratio: Yes �/ No 2. ProJect is eligib]e program activity: Yes� No 3, Prosect wil.l be completed or self-sustalntng n 24 mont�is: Yes t� No • 4,, lf public se�vtce Pro,�ect� will it dupiicate ezisting services or be rep�Tacement funding: Ye; /� No e ect on riter a ltei t ScorE A. Financial Feastbillty: ProJect can be --- feas ble --- Infeasible 1 z realisticatly completed with available funds. �� - 6. tSanagement-Feasibility: Mana9ing organtzatlon --• Organlzation rganizatio Infeasibl.e 1 I has the abiltty to manage and complete the has skills has sktlis (1) profect within the given time restraints, and proven � :- , � tr.ack record C. keighborhood Contributions ' � . 1. Percentage neighborhood contributions a Q 7� 100x or 26-99X 5-25X Less than 2 Y exceed required leveraging ratio, more SX 2. Number of separate resident or business- 7Y 25 or more 15-24 5-14 0-4 2 � person contributions. 3. Yarieiy of contributions, e.g. residential �j/ 4 or more 3 Z � 2 � or commercial improvements, inkind services� cate categories categories tategory volunteer labor� sweat equity, cash donations, foundation support� etc. • • ' D. Adequacy of Citizen Participatio�: Involvement of --- Established Established No 1 Z neighborhqod residents and businesspersons in the Program Program program development and planning of the pro3ect. . Committee, Committee Committee including e E. Neighborhood Impact: Extent to which the pro�ect fected neigh provides measurabie improvement in the� following borhood rep- areas: resentative 1�. Physical: ��e►+ development or improvements Hiyh (2) Med. (3) Low (4) �2one 1 3 to private or public property. A.P:3� l,fl1 /Z - - 2: Environmental: Creating a more safe, healthy Fiigh (2) Med. (3) low (4) None 1 Q and socially attractive neighborhood. 3. Economic: Increased tax base, stronger High (2} Med. (3) Low (4) None 1. (5) Q neighborhood and city economy. and increased - • employment oPVOrtunities. F. 8enefits to lorr and rtaderate income households. Direct bene- Oirect bene- Jndirect N�ne 1 � • fits on�y to fits to•low, Benefits • low and mod- moderate and erate income other house- . households holds G. Project consists of ineasurable obfectives. --- Yes --- No 1 Z„ H. Project is self-sustaining and will have --- Yes --- � � . long-term benefits. I. Profect is Sn conformance with: � , Comprehensive Plan --- Yes Partialty Ho ` 1 � 2 2. District Plan --- Yes Partially No 1 � 3, Capital Allocation Policies --- Yes Partially � No 1 Z J. Pro�ect will result in the --- Yes --- N0 � a recycling of Neighborhood Partnership 4unds. K. ?roject wilt be coordinated aith existing city --- Yes --- No 1 � departments. programs and other service provtders. but will not duplicate services, IIi. _ Dtstrfct Louncil Priority First Second 7hird Other 1 3 ota ,�/i (ly Infeasible D*�lects wi11 not be recommended for funding. �� Score !,= (2) Impacts needs identified w;thtn both district and citywide adopted plans. �>> r�,�a�rs needs identified rritMn ais rict or citywiQe_adopted plans. — - - • - -•--- -� , • . r " � .' ' . .� . • � . � � � ..: ��?��. . .. ` � �� . . . � � � � � RECEiVED >>iN - 1 f?83� ��.�.: �: : .' t�eighborhood Partnership Pr:ogram D U NL . . , . Dept. Planning & Economic Development � ,��nning District Code No. Z5 W. 4th Street � : P]anner-in-Charge . St. Paul, tdinn. 55102 �� Technica] SuPport _� ._ (612)292-1577 �. �� .. CD Non CD �her . . . _.. . . ". . : l G`�i . . . . • . . . . .. . . . ' �v . NPP APFLICATION � � � � • � LfASE RIHT OR TYPE . . � •� PR03ECT isAAtE Neighborhood clean up/fix up � ' " • GROUP OR 02GAHIZATION SUBMITTING REQUEST • +;A}f�: Aurora/Saint Anthony Area Block Club Inc. ��Q�ESS:749 Aurora Avenue St. Paul, *�Sinnesota 55104 STREET C ITY S7ATE ZIP TcLEPHONE: 612-222-0349 . . COt�'TACT PERSON FOR THIS REQUEST: DAYTIME TELEPHONE: 612-222-0399� � . i . WHAT .IS THE PROJECT PROPOSAL? SEE ATTACHED ' ._ . 2. HOW MUCH �,P FUI�D MOf1EY IS BEING REQUESTED? S 175,000.00 __ � 3. WHAT IS THE TOTAL DECLARATION OF NEIGHBORH000 CONTRIBUTIOt�S? - 5 852,780.85 fConplete Neighborhood Contributions Declaration form, page 4) 4. WFiAT PROBLQdS/HEEDS ARE BEItV+� ADDRESSED? WFtAT EVTIESCEETC.�VAILABLE TO DOCUhiENT THE NEED, l .e., CENSUS DATA, DISTRIC7 _PLAN PRIORI : . SEE ATTACHED , � : • . ' •. . . ��. . � PP APPLICATION, Page 2. . . PROJECT NAME ' � �� 3 . IF PROJECT ACTIVITIES-•ARE TARGETED 70WARD A SPECIFIC GEOGRAPHICAL AREA OR SITE, ATTACH �- A MAP SHOWING TNE PROJECT BOUNDARIES. IF PR03ECT ACTIVITIES ARE CONCENTRATEO OK A . SPECIFIC SUBJECT OR PROBLEM, EXPLAIN WHY THIS SUBJECT CONCENTRATION WAS CHOSEN, � MAP ATTACHED . . . _ � . � . WHAT IMPACT WILL THE PROJECT HAVE IN THE NEIGHBORNOOD? • � SEE ATTACHED . '�►HO WILL NANAGE THE PROJECT? WHAT EXPERIENCE DOES THE MANAGING ENTITY HAVE IN THIS TYPE OF PROJECT? Aurora/Saint Anthony Block Club Inc. We have several members of the Block Club that have been active in the local district council, experience in rehabili*_ation of dwelliags, land scaping, and many have organizational and nanagement skills as a result of private business and public agencies. . WILL THE PROPOSED PROJECT BE TIEO OR COORDINATED WITH A�Y OTHER PROJEC7 OR PROGRAM ' (PUBLIC OR PRIVATE)? YES X NO IF YES, IDENTIFY. N. A. 0. Program -- St. Paul Police Departmeat � Annual Caraival and Landscapes - � Maxfield School Y. T. 0:'� . Annual Clean up - City of St. Paul Public work Ongoing code enforcement - City of St. Paul community services Residents rehabilitation - Pride in Living Inc. . ►dHAT IS THE PROJECT SCNEDULE? Private reinvestment activities have started'acquisition of 450-454 Grotto Street, to take place in fall of 1983 and all ren�vation comp�eted in one year. Acquisition of 634 University Avenue from P. E. D. in fall of 1983 and Beautification of parking lot completed in spring of 1984. Beautif ication of adjacent property to Sho Biz Pizz� completed in fall of 1983'. The beautification of parking lot and development of open space at G. T. Auto Part"s will begin in fall of 1984. The Young People Assistance program will begin ia fall of 1983. Annual clean up in May of each year. , , . . � .��.��."� ' . � . , � � � . � . PP APPLICATION, Page 3� � � PROJECT NAME ' 0. WILL THIS PROJECT BE.COMPLETED IN 2 YRS. YES � NO .. IF NOT, EXPLAIH HOW IT WILL BECOME SELF-SUSTAINING WITNOUT FURTHER NPP FUNQING? , , . . - . . , •, ; , , - . . . 1 . WILL THIS PROJECT RESUST EXPLAINEHOWDTHEIPROJECTEWILL� PRIVATELY PAYTFOR THOSE COSTS. YES NO �. IF YE , � . NOW WILL THE PROJECT BEt�EFIT LOW A1dD MODERATE IhCOME HOUSEHOLDS? k'ill grovide (6) rental units to low and moderate income people. Provide.p�rt-ti.me employment and some full-time jobs. �, �{O�r' WILL tJEIGHBORH00D CITIZEN PARTICIPRTIO� BE FOSTERED DURIh6 PROJECT DEVELOPMcNT ANO IMPLEMENTATION? SEE ATTACHED � . CON�PLETE PROGRAM FUNDING AND EXPEtiSE FORMS PAGES 5 AN[� 7. : 5. AT7ACH LETTERS QF SUPPORT FROM ALL INTERESTED AND AFFECTED GROUPS/OR OR6ANIZATIONS. SEE ATTACIiED S GNATURE OF ND V DUAL � TYPED NAME. TITLE R ROLE D T COMPLE7ING APPLIC TION . :�� ./ � �� Coordinator June • G TUR 0 C EF FFICER R� 7YPED NA E 1 TI LE ROL� DAT �� w�wr��T � . . . ( � PP APPLICATION, Page 4 PROJECT NAM.E . ° NEIGHBORHOOD CO�TRIBUTIOKS DECLARATION . ESTIMATED COMMERCIAL PROPERTY FIXED CAPITAL � IMPROVEMEMTS: Pledge . � �� .. (3) Participants . �514,000.00 ' HUM3ER OF PARTICIPANTS � (5) �� - � - � � AVERAGE INVESTMEHT 10.000.00 $ 50,000.00 . . „ . : . TOTAL INVESTMENT EQUALS � � 564,000.00 . ESTIMATED RESIDENTIAL PROPERTY FIXEO CAPITAL , IMPROVEMENTS: Pledge (7) Participants �$ 32,009.67 NUMBER OF PARTICIPANTS (50) � AVERAGE INVESTMENT 3 000 00 � 150.000.00 TOTAL INVESTMENT EQUALS S 182.009.67 . �t�W COMMtRCIAL DEVELOPMENT: SITE (a) -ESTIhSATED MARKET VALUE � SITE (b) � ESTIMATED MARKET YALUE � TOTAL NiARKET VALUE S . NEW ftESIDEHTIAL DEVELOPMENT: SITE (a) ESTIMATED MARKET VALUE � SITE (b) ESTIMATED MARKET VALUE � � TOTAL MARKET VALUE � _ . ESTIN,4TED IN-KIND-SERYICES (OFFICE SPACE, EQUIPMENT, SERVICES) : � � � � � ��no_no SOURCE AND TYPE 1 .' Office Svace - � 5�� 2• Office Eouiw pnr nnnated 3. C1Pa„ �» S ?,��_nn . ESTIMATED VOLUNTEER LABOR: hUNi6ER OF VOLUNTEERS SFF pTTer�tFD AVERAGE HOURS/VOLUNTEER TOTAL HOURS x 510/hr. EQUALS � � Ron_no . ESTIMATE� SWEAT EQUITY; . Pledg e 2 x 1225 — 24.50 hour x $10.00 S24,500.00 NUMSER OF PARTICI PANTS , � AVERAGE HOURS/PARTICIPANT �Qo - � 70TAL HOURS ��o - . ' �. TOTAL HOURS x �10/hr. EQUALS 512,000.00 " . . . ��,�� , NPP APPLICATION, Page 5 PROJECT NAME - � 8. ESTI�MATED CASfi DONATIONS: . � � � SOURCE ] . . SEE ATTACHED _ � ' 23.344.18 � 2. � 3. � . 9, ANTICIPATED FOUNDATION GRANTS: � � , FOUNDATION(5) 1 . Minneavolis Foundation � �.O.OQ0.00 � • ,. 2 . . . , , . - 0. OTHER: EXPLAIN ESTIMATED VALUE $ �3,34�.18 TOTAL NEIGHBORHOOD � CONTRIBUTIOhS DECLARfiTION $ 852,780.85 ' . W!�AT EVIDENCE IS THERE THAT THE F,50VE DECLARATIOt�S ARE REALISTIC? ' NPP APPLICATION, .Page 6 PROJECT HA�tE _ : • � . • . ' � ESTIMATEO PROGRAM FUNDING* .,- � , . � � � SOURCE .• . $ AMOUNT 1 .� N P. P. - ="-- . . . � • 175,000.00 2• ' Commercial Business _Rehabilitation � 564,000.00 3• Residential Rehabilitation 182,009.67 . 4• In-Kind Services _ 10,037.00 _ 5• Volunteer Labor 6,890.00 6• Sweat Eauitv 36,500.00 �. Gash Donation _ 23.344.18 8. Foundation Grants = 30.000.00 9. 10. 11 . . 12, 13, i, 14. 15. 16. � 17. � 18. 19. 20. TOTAL � 1 .027.780.85 * INCLUDE NEIGH60RN000 PARTNERSHIP FUND AHD SPECIFIC GATEGORIES OF NEIGHBORHOOD � CON7RIBUTIOHS. � � . , . . ,. ,�,��,�� NPP APPLICATION,_, Paqe 1 PROJECT NAP1E � ESTIMATED PROGRAF'i EXPENSES . PROGRAM EXPENSES . FUND SOURCE* $ I�MOUNT � , , 1• �p1Px Acn��icitinn NPP 5�,000_00 '�• . 2. �� ',�� • ASA 11 ,400.00 3. Commercial Rehabilitation ASA 564.000.00 4• Commercial Fix Up ProQram � NPP 22.000.00 5. Residential Rehabilitation ASA 218.504.62 6. Street Address Numbers NPP 2.976.72 7. �� ASA 749.� 3 8. Youth Jobs Pro4ram EQUipment NPP 3.080.00 9. �� " " Superviso r NPP 9.200.00 10. Proiect Coordinato r ( full time) NPP 32.200_00 11. Secretary (�art time) NPP � 1�,100__00 12. Rehabilitation Consultation NPP 3_000_00 13. Office Equipment (Tvpewriter) NPP 1 .448_28 14. Insurance (Proqram Liabilitv) �PP 500.00 15. Telephone - . NPP 1 ,500.00 �f, Co py Machine ASA 1 ,200.00 17, Duplicator (paper, ink) NPP 1 ,500.00 18, Office Supplies Npp 800.00 �' �g, Postage NPP 700.00 20, Office Space ASA 7,200.00 � TOTAL EXPEMSES $ * INCLUDE NEIGHBORHOOD PARTNERSHIP FUND AND NEIGHBORHO(1D C�NTRIBUyIONS. NPP APPLICATION,.. Paqe 7 PRQJECT NAME ESTIMATED PROGRAM EXPENSES PR�RAM EXPENSES . . FUND SOURCE* $ M10UNT , � , Office Equipment ASA 500.00 2, Neighborhood Patrol � kSA 4,160.00 3. Neighborhood Cleanup Drives ASA 5,067.00 4, Neighborhood Watch Force ASA/Foundation 30,000.00 5, ASA Ptembership Program ASA 10,000.00 6. 7. 8. 9. 10. � • 11 . 12. 13. 14. 15. � . - lf. 17. 18. � 19. 20. � � TOTAL EXPEPlSES $1 ,027,78Q,$5 * INCLUDE NEIGHBORHOOD PARTNERSHIP FUND AND NEIGHBORHOOD C�N7RIBUyIONS. • ' • . ��^��.��.� � THE AURORA SAINT �NTHON'Y ARE� BLOGK GLUBS I�TG. Attachment #1 . The Aurora/St. Anthony Area Block Club Neighborhood •clean-up/fix-up project would combine several phases of private and commercial rehabflitation and beautification of area. A. We will �urchase, rehab, and manage and offer for sale a six plex. , , - B. �+'e will supply address numbers and logos on rear of properties. Logos 5ee Attached. C. We will have a training program for youth to beautify the � landscapes of senior citizens home. Manicuring landscapes in the summer. Snow removal in the winter. We will supply the youth with the equipment and the senior citizens will pay the youth for their services. (purpose being to bridge the communication gaps and cultivate recognition of our senior citizens.) D. Aelp beautify an existing parking lot and create a neighborhood control open space to enhance the aesthetics of the neighborhood. E. Providing additional parking for business on University Avenue. F. Aid in the beautiff'cation of Show-Biz Pizza exterior and parking lot to enhance the aesthetics of the neighborhood "shrubbery, planters, trees." G. Encourage property owners to fill property to street grade so as to eliminate harbor for vzgrants and dumping sights, adjacent to Show-Biz Pizz2. . . _ .. . _ � _ �_��_.,c..,.�...,I T��E AURORA SAI�'T ��THO�TY ARE� BLOCK CLUBS ING. : � Attachment �4 kfiat Problems/Needs are being addressed? What evidence is available to document the aeed i.e. census data. district plan priorities. From the District 8 Plan ' Major Recommendations . �4a (page 1) "maintain and monitor new and stable areas (mainly around the perimeter of Summit - University} . Through priority for code enforcement, housing maintenance assistance, and public facilities maintenance." ��3 (page 1) "Reoccupy vacant land and buildings". 4�63 (page 18) "The District 8 Council should participate in the annual St. Paul clean-up week in late April by distributing information and , special assistance to Summit - University residents. Block Clubs can play an fmportant role in heavy trash pick up several times z year." - �f110 (page 27) "The District Council should seek to establish better communication and a �.�orking relationship with University businesses through the University Avenue Development Council." � _ _ • •• _ - 1_ "_ �.rL��r�AA� . �,�� r.�`. .� E ..�. Question 4 � In 1981 , 42% of census tract 335 one and two family homes needed . rehabilitation. In 1981 , 63% of District 8's apartments needed rehabilitation. (There are no figures fo r apartments for any , census tracts . ) This project will help return housing to a � ' sound condition.' , _ For February, �1983, unemployment is estimated to be 9.7r in census tract 335 and 10.5� in District 8, This project will help put area residents to work. The commercial fix-up program will help meet the objectives of District 8's Plan for University Avenue to : 1 ) create new job oppo rtunities ; 2) create incentives to encourage the rehabilitation of existing commercial structures ; 3) encourage area residents to establish businesses in the area ; and 4) impro ve the street 's commercial viability. TnE At,'RORA .SAIi�T A�V'THOtiY �REA BLOGK GL�'BS I�iC. . .� A'ttachment �6 The Aurora/St. Anthonq area Black Club clean-up/fix-up pro�ect will: I. Create �obs, remove blight and debris; 2. Briag youth and senior citizens together in a working relationship; , 3. Provide decent housing for low and moderate income families; 4. Create a working relationship between businesses and neighborhood residents; � 5. Provide a safe place for neighborhood children to play; 6. Help provide ample parking space for businesses in our area. , � ' T ' ' h GLUBS ItiTG��`� THE AUROR� S�I�T A�THON� AREA BLOG Attachment �13 Project Coma►ittee will consist of 14 people - 5 business persons - 1 banker - 1 attorney - 2 residents from the local District Council - 5 residents and members of Aurora/St. Anthony Black Club. All project committee meetings • will be announced in the Aurora/St. Anthony Black Club new letter aad flyers will be passed to every resident in the area. � All meetings will be open to all residents and businessmen in our area. . 1 ' ' � ' , . , — • . . . . . _ - - --- - �_ _�� .,.......,,�+� no�nhF,nrhnnr,l ' I ♦ PROGRAM CO1�iITTEE � Bob Palmer K. D. Steward Ronald Pauline Jeff Hassan - attorney Mr. Weddington Carla Messman Mr. Douglas Mr. Smith (S) 1�in City Appliance St. Paul Stamp Works Show Biz Pizza Western State Bank G. T. Auto Parts . . . �,��,1 ESTIMATED CASA DONATION � � ' .� • , � . - �8) ' 1. Membership 500 homes x $10.00 a vear = 5,000.00 y x 2 10,000.00 2. 12% Discount of (6) Plex Apartment 11,400.00 3. Copy Machine Discount 1,200.00 3,000.00 Cost 8,000.00 Payed Price 4. St. Paul Stamping 20% Discount 744. 18 3,720.90 Cost x .20 - 744.18 TOTAL $23,344. 18 • Youth Program Activities � � - 1 . t4anicure Lawns 2. Edge Lawn 3. Manicure Hedges . ' 4. Rake Lawn 5. Vacuum Flower Beds , Lawns , Walkways , S�idewalks , Garage Pad, etc. 6, Plant Gardens or Flowers 7. Fertilize lawns and Gardens 8. Water Lawns , Gardens and Flowers 9. Dispose of Debris 1 . Shovel sn�w from: a. Steps b. Sidewalks c. Garage entrance �;�„�� - , ,. GOALS 2 Lawa Mower � 4 Edgers • � 5 Lawn Rakes . ' 2 Spade Shovels 2 Hoes 4 Sprinklers 4 Garden Hose 1 Gasoline edger 2 Manual Hedge Clips 1 Gasoline Hedge Clip 1 Gasoline Vacuum 2 Dandilion Pullers 2 Ferterlize Spreader 2 Heavy Duty Push Brooms _ 4 Heavy Duty Straight Brooms 2 Wheelbarrows 2000 Plastic Bags 2 Snow Blowers 6 Snow Shovels 4 Ice Cutters TOTAL $3,080.00 � . CLEAN UP � 1) Cash and Food Donated $ 500.00 2) 4� x 866 Copies 64.00 3) 1� hour printing (10.00/hour) 15.00 4) 14� x 5 hours = 70 x $10.00/hour 700.00 5) Trucks 200.00 6) Flyers Passing out (866) 210.00 7 people x 3 hours 21 hours 1,689.00 21 hours x $10.00 $210.00 x 3 1�r. 5,067.00 Volunteer Labor 3 Year = 14 People at 15 hours = 210 hours 3 year = 7 People at 9 hours = 63 hours � 273 hours x 10.00 = $2,730.00 In-Kind Services = $2,337.00 . . . , ��.�� NEIGHBORHOOD CONTRIBUTIONS DECLARATION . �� ' .� (6) '' • _ Volunteer Labor Neighborhood Clean up 14 people x 15 hours = 210 hours 7 people x 9 hours = 63 hours 273 hours 273 hours x $10.00/hour = $2,730.00 (1) N. A. 0. Person � 4 hours per week x 52 weeks = 208 hours �: 2 yrs. = 416 x 10.00 = $4, 160.00 2,730.00 4,160.00 $ 6,890.00 TOTAL � • - '••a.1�1.�.L i. �7 ' ...d �.�J i�.'� �.� ' � ..d 1J�.....�� • : ��- �l � � • , i • . . ' • . . ; � . , f , • . . . .►�«N L�►�� e�cG � � � - _ �-:..: �,--�-�: �• . : —: - ., . . , . ..t. , < � �.�`..� ,i r : � ,•! . . . : ' '. . � � ? . -'C � . . . ---� .-- .--- . :. : : .__. : ; .._ : _ :. _.. .: ;-- -:-: _____; , -.- ; . : _ . . _. —._.-- . __. : J _ :=- i -� • � • --- •---•�---- ------�--..__ ' ,... .._ +_. _',�._ .•..-,-- 1 ._.._.._ -•-- .._..____ ._-. • -_ t� .-_.. . � . ' � .� �. '� _�_�- - il... __.�.__..� _ _.- •^ . . .. . . �Q\C.ts1C+. QlZrt�.b►_ . . . • : . : i � . ;-- . _ ... � ___._.. .._..__ 1. ._ ._ _.:..__.:.. i_�:�""LN •.;. .. .. . . _ ... ! .-..__�_• � .�. . : .r------ --. - ' .. . .. . ; �l`. --- • . . �=-�XL�Z1NGi�U1L�C .. . -_. . .. . . ._. . _ r. i � �-. - ...--�-----...----��- ; •--- , ._ .- - -,-..- ---} . . . :. ;_ : .._._ _ . ._.--..._ _ , r ' r --�:------•---_...._ ; ._. ----- --�---• � . . . : ; . . . . . . . . : . . . . ._ :J : 1� .' •. :_: �_.:_ : : : .�._� ' �_-_;._. :.-_:.::_._►�_. : __ �_ : � �: ��.,}.- : --.-- ... -� : : - - � -. .-- ..._ i,.�..� �. . . : : � .:- : : : !_�. . . . . . .. _ .. ...-- -.----- -_�''ti-.� ,.• . . . .�. �� :• � . � •.,��:.;, . .�;,,�: _ . _---. _ : .--------- � ---- ..--��,� ti1�N T,_ _�r`;--._.-'` . +-�-� -.,.{- ; � : • -- •-- --• --�----• __. __. .. ..._.__: .-- � --- - �-- .. T : �: ,�y .,�i�— �_ ; - . . . - ::. R f1. i • •. f ----- : ^ -- :---:..: --•- - ..:.._--: ."... . .__--_. .. _. `• _�~. . ..- . .K- - • . .. . . .._ .�. �C L�-1� --- - - _--� . ..- --._....__ ..__. .. '��'C . I.,O� ,�11�c1� _. .. . :.• � � ' ' � . - - - . -. ._ . _ . . . � -+-- "'� � ` � . - . .. - __ _ . . . . . :. . . . -- � - - - - j : � _ ._ ._ . - -��`� , - - . �. i-- ^5- = � - - _ . .. -•--- _ ._•._ � . _ ._ . � ,�.► �` j; � •- - � Wt-r� � i � -- -- •-•�---- . �_=,��'3 � �-- �X1STE�.1�'G2. �. � , .� --- - - ._...__=. :-- '--; ......-. • -----y - ~ 'i . . . _ -".�.��'-��: :fi� �� _ . . . . i.. . �. � :..- --'�- . -• �,.... --- ' .---... - -._�----�--•- • ' • •. •--- - - �a,.�-►-. �Tj�'��'t Y�±� , -. _ .. . . . #. �. . • _ _ __ �_ . . � . . .- - . ^- - . �� - .�. .... -�-'° -. ._.. .... . . - '- '--...._..i+�=�� ta--; _ ... _ •- '� q'. :� �- -: .- � .-.�_ - _.-:-_---.'::. ._ ..---- -- -.---.-- - .__.. . ---.-_ -.. :__ �--_- . _. _ . � - -- - ._ --,- --- :--�-";- '�_. -__. --,:: �-:<.,�.'. ..._-'. - --._ ------- ------- :. :-.- . ------._ ;. r � �. _.. -�-- �- -- .----:-;• _._.- --="-= -_�_.-;_..�_ ._ ' . .- - -- -- --_-- _ .�,� :�-. f._ �� ►�..� --�-- : y .-~ :`:--_------�_ _^ . , �,-.--= ---: - ; . �._� •:. � - �i �<��c'-'� �. ,��,�! . � �, t � �J"' h ,.. __ ,_ .-. ..-•— --•----• ••-- - -•-- --- -----• ._'-.. . , � � ' ��-- --. ._ _ �.�- - ---._ -�'---- -- _. ... --- -•- � -�-- -.. _. ._. . _ _ .. .. . __ 1 . ti! . .. 1 �.. -- . ' � - --- -..._ • , - . -- - . . . . _ . .. ._- - . ._.._ . _.. . . .. _ _ . �- I - - - -- - --. _. _ . ' _ .__ ...___ . ._.. _ - . - . - • '_ ; 1 ' - -----• - --•- -._., ___. . -.- --- - -- --- 1 T ��,�'_�'. _��_��_� _i____.. . _�,�!�I��V �l��ii�. _ _ __ ._ _ � ..__ .. _=�..i.� t ' � '�t�''�'�' _ ��.��.��"�— ...��". .. �' "_'.. .�.�._ . . ' '_" '. - . .. . _ �: . t . �__..��.�� -- -.- �.�� . +��. �_��- � _ . ..'..:. . -.�' ' •• �._ � ._ .' ..+.. ' - "_ .' _ � ' " j. � . _. .� . ._"...-._ _ _.y'l. �..'_"r_ _' _" " �J �,� � /� ,• • • _ :.' \`10 /y __ ... __..._.�. _. . ._.^--'-�--•- '- '. ' _ ' __�_"_._ • •� •• �� . -�� ♦ +�_ �r�•.'' __�".�_� .. __' .'_'_.• ".� ._ _ . _ ' . '�� ' -. �... .. __' - --r:-'�-�-r— �� .s �._ ___� �►.1 , ir,�� .__�_'-" � -� . . -. . . '� • _� -�--� ..�- • ! _��, _ ��'v .. _. .. -- - -• � -... ' E- � ... � *�°s � �" !' �. �L�SC.'� ' �-�' � '' �--'.'- � �� }"''�_ -� r�y�e��• `.•• ��...�� . . . . _ .. . _ . . . 't �'� � . ._. �" � ...!.�"�..,...,1J'�.. •r 1 `-^ ' '•"�/w�� 4�Yr' � . . _ . �, •7L�•.; �i�""�'Y.L .�� {,•/'��..--_y 1' �� '.�'T.j' 'i �,; ��I �� ` '-.--" -_.__�_-' '_�'-'._'_.' .. .. ' _.--�'r- � �;� ��.! - �' �� _��`.�� lt '�,�`�. . .. .._ . .-. .. . . ._.. . ._ . . . . _ . . _ _ .. "i��`��\ -� _ µ i • j �_..L.. _ �.. ...__ .----•. ' --. - ._. .- - •-- . __ . .. - . J '�' r� �_'1� P �� ._ .... . . _ . . . _ . _ . . . . . . . '� °:,� .�. � � - +? �1%: ,,-�� - - - - -� -� . - --- - . . .. . - --`.;•_.,��`.��.��'f`�•' r'�� _r-l�� •t:��--- -- . . . . L� �- � ., � � <'. � '{' � __. . . . _ . . - - � ' . . .�- 'i=� t, ..,-. -.� •Y- _ f . . . . ��.y� y�� L .._ `�f " �1 �_ ` .___-.�___ 5��-�K'? '_ _ '_. ____.�__�_'.'_ ------- ---+.� .t-- vr -�—'�T� � vGHJ.►►,: r.�wi4t r�:r.:c.�. � . . : •�- -._ ,... ..'�1r ?��,-- : : -. '4 � . / . _ . ._ _.�. . ._. t.��z��u �. _..__.,.. ___.:--�---- -... -_S . . 4 - � . . .-- - .- - - . -_._. . -- . ..- ----. —.._ --�- y- -±-� - „ - F -Ta't �--v�- , � :. . . _ _ _;- _- _. 1 . ..(�- - . _ �r/ �� " . �tC.NI C.. �e+a► _� - � �� F�. " � �' � * �_ .► ��___� . �4• • . ��.n � � _�_ � '�-_ — ��... "! *' ;�_•��' .r ��..�1{r-�• 1�'��:�j.l.i}��,i�:��i.j�_, '!/ : 1 �� . •t' • �. �•. .{:. .��i. �.i Y, � i ..I .a'�� '- �- . . . . �!��.��5 � � ;�-AL. �STA i� �.�...r....��- . . - O � �v10R7��S , �.� ��,. ��RAL li`�lSURANCE �=;: 2z7-7o,s :` � � :� � �:� . . � :'�.�y 31, �9�3 _ �:• . '::^.e ��rora 5�• �:nthcn� =.rea Flock Cl;:�s, I�c. � 7!�� Lr:.*a �venue :�. ?�a1, :±i�r:esc�a ��1�� :�.��*.:.: =onald �'. p��_�*�s �er.t1=�°r.: :'_ ;:ere'�� =ive an o e�ion ta Furch asa the CI'07E T'�;* a� ��50 �or�h ��o�to u:�til C�c�c�er 1, 19p3. �:h2 Qr10E ��ou13 be at t'-e °i�.:re o`' '�9�,^'Y-'•�✓�s �25,�"�c.^0 dok�n and �'1�:,71.�� carrie�3. on 2 COCiii.2'2C� rOL' a22a at ��7 �::'r:LZl 1^1�8T'85 L� �OL' a �er�od cf t.�enty-:ive {25) ;�e3rs. ?i:a firs t .��;�°_�� er. �ne ccr.tract _"C:' C°8� S�':211 COT:+�:°.^.C8 SLY :�0:1�k:5 ci�°_T ttii2 Ef_°PC�li%c !'��2 Of aL+� C"O+2' �.^�Cv :G� �eed at :�"ich tine LilE cCCT'1°'� _:.t.ei85� '•'O•1J.!' C•8 r'6:i1CL2fi , � - , iI'0,�� 2IlJ �8y.^:2['it.5 L`:lli.7.�. s�v 15 C3ll�f:�'i L•� iiA .^•2�@� 2t. :•:f'i7.C�': L1+T.E `t.i:8 prir.cical *.�ill start to be deducte�. � �z *he event this 2SSOC22L10.] is able to oa;� the cont�act off c•r�t'r.�n or.e �rear of the effecti�;e date of the �oat^?ct, a ciscount of 12"� on th� re- �:i.n�r.g bala.�ce of t�e contract *,ou'd be �ive.Z. T�zre h.as ceen no r�oaey p:i3 on this oot�on. �=:�.ce:et;•, ��=� ::.:�•" �.,C��'�:.;:Y i ; ` ,, ��/ ��i �,.�. -� , �• .• J�^yQ F_Q 1 ' • _....: �g ,� . . � . . � , s,�,� � � .,� � � � PROJECT FOR PRIDE IN LIVING, INC. V A � � � ::.; �y. .: �`'� '•• ��'i -� 2516 CHICAGO AVENUE•MINNFAPOUS, MN 55404•(612)874•8511 �• �':�,;::< ,��;:��_ ' E ,�.�.��'�e i J. . �� I • �� 1 � t w � �`L x .�.� ' '" ,� � . `- L`'- May 26, 1983 ---�:_-- _ __.�-""�__� BO�R�OF DIRECTORS ROA81d W. Pauline �•�'•�= �_-�� The Aurora St. Anthony '�"'��R'''�" Area Block Clubs, Inc. +.:R C.�rl>�.r+.4rr.•b+r; -�...�,.:,. 749 Aurora Ave. • • °��•�� St. Paul, :�T 554104 � .. .. .�4...•�n. .. .r•�Fr.tn.;•�� .. , �:.,�;�� Dear Ron: � � ,.:r ;:r,...n::r.i �;:��,, ,., We looked at the building at 454 Grotto Ave. It's certa:nly :.'�.r ir•.�+n+y ST1 attractive building and location with a strong structure '''•"_�"r� �"'"'' and worth all the care that we can give to it. i+..• , i;o��imnn -��,•,!\e0�.Cil �...,�,�:�+�D��u�d My construction foreman and I would sua�arize our estimate -:.:.•.�,c�►:.v��c►�� of the situat ion as follows: ,,.n��!,\nm�ra 'r.i F .�i�ni i'.:ir F.:+:a.CF�t+•tner, $ 60,000 for rehab (mostly exterior work) ^�•�^"� "L'•'r 70,000 for acquisition costs (to PPL or the par�nership) .;.c::��,��rnh P:e.�dsni E�ecuii�e Director $130+00� Sale Price t0 PPL OI Ct1E partnership - K �.�.a jg�o �..ocia�r Direc�or PPL (or the partnership) would be willing to put down $30,000 :+•T••• �:��•� if we could mortgage the remaining $100,000. This aortgage � would need to be in place during construction and borrowed AD�'ISOKS upon for the rehabilitation costs. 8.+•Bre.m�r.y!um !_"'C:"'°" A $100,000 mortgage would permit affordable rents, that-.is., ?= Cc.nrn • a�,p;,:��o� rents within the neighborhood of $304 to $400 per month per :..,.�..�•�.�. unit. �_.. , ^'•..�.��i'.urn Ft s':�rd.:eard �•-,:��t � �„s.Fh Let me know if we can be of further assistance to you. _... .. . ,.,�.:� ^ Y"```�'''�°" Cordially, ...-,�,,.:,,::�� h': ". l.nl(+1..�iw1 / _' • t:.t^C�.1'�h i r,,..-<o �kGrn�h :�' r_^�n.�n0 • r!:. ".f!!IIfM{ . .. �s .'. '••�••��N� ' Joseph K. Selvaggio • `' �`'^`'' Executive Director `.�.. '.��•�,n �.• , :�.nr..n JKS:kak . E,1C . � � � � ��'��5 .�. ''1� '1' _ ` `'=� ` � � PROJECT FOR PRIDE IN LIVING, INC. r � . � . �• •, ..�:��:�� ``� • ; j• 2516 CHICAGO AVENUE•MfNNEAPOLIS, MN 55404•(612)874•8511 , _ . i.��_��_ � s ,,- ,•�-s � , ^, j� �i'�'�;.� ., ��/ _ f � ��•7��'��xY: . / .4f' ..,., �.:,-��.Y� . ,r,..� � � , . ,�.:i�: ,, , .. � , _ � � �'. � ' • � ',; ; ' "`='�� May 26, 1983 �..r� _l+s.... . - � .. �'" _"� � � �.�.�C�L=��:-r_ _ � � , , FiUaRD OF DIKECTORS ..•:. . 'r,..:.,,�; ... ., ,.. .. Renald W. Pauline . ..... . :,:,.,.... The Aurora St. Anthony � rrea Block Clu�s , Inc. ; ;,� � . , 749 Aurora Ave. . � .. ��.�•'� �� St. Paul, ri:i 55104 . �:, .. � � ��. ��, Dear Ron: � � It wasa pleasure �eeting with you this week to look over , , . �, the building at 454 Grotto Ave. � i. . .... .,. . � . ` �' �� ''''''"`' We would be happy to look at some kind of j oint venture .• �7.1•,•K.�'�.r Ctwcrmen •.�,�.,..,,:,, with you to save this building. It appears to be a very � � �' attractive building in a good location. The structure '' ' •�'�'� L�''�'�"'�� looks sound and certainly worth the care that we could �: .. . _�.,• , � � .. ��:.�.,. give to it. }�,".;`',•�, f�•`��•° �""1Of Let me know what kind of role you would like Pro�ect for . . , �..�,�„ Pride in Living to play in this venture. �..�,,.,�e n,.P��o� � - � Cordially, � l� • 4U��?01t� --'7,..- [+, .. • �:iid�n I..� .L, .�.t: f�' L:-.. F••� _..- ... Joseph K. Selvaggio . . , .,• i� Executive Director . . � . ,�. . �'. . � � ....'� . . . . � � .r•� ,TKS:kak ,. ,. .�. ;,. . . . .. . . : . ..c��.,;�, . _ ....•�� ., . .,,�: E• . .. . �, t .. .., . � � �� Minnesota - . �,. . - Fred C. No�ton . r��: House af � � Chairman . Govemme�tal Operations Committee � -'��--�;.::j� Represenfatives . ��;� 222 state•trc.fui��ing - - State Capitol �� • Hsrry A.SieDen,J�..SDesksr . St. Paul, Minnesota 55155 � • � May 26, 1983 - , . - Mr. James J.� Bellus, Director � Planning and Economic Development City of St. Paul City fiall Annex 25 West Fourth Street St. Pau1 , MN 55102 Dear Mr. Bellus: Re: Aurora Block Club Application for Neighborhood Partnership Program I am writing to support the application which the Aurora Block C7ub is making to your department to participate in the Neighborhood Partnership Program whereby they plan to work with business partners in pursuance of their grant proposal . As I understand their grant proposal , it is for $175,000 which would be used for housing rehabilitation, placement of identification numbers on residences in their area, and to supplement their patrol efforts against prostitution in that part of St. Paul . The Aurora Block Club is an outstanding example of responsible neighborhood activism dealing with their most serious problems. As you undoubtedly know, their efforts to control prostitution in that area have met with considerable success. I kriow the individuals involved in this organization and their abilities to get things done. This impresses me that they will be able to make good use of these funds for the purposes intended. I hope that you will see fit to make this grant. Yours very truiy, ,. �,�. � C. , Fred C. Norton State Representative Distritt 65A � FCN:na -�- . . . . . ��.�'�� DO`ALD M. �tOE ' RiK+m 309 Swte C�puoi . St. P•rul,�tinnesou SSISS lb l:)2%-3264 Senate � State of Nlinnesota May 26, 1983 ' . - .' James Bellus, Director Planning � Economic Developmen� � City of St . Paul � City Hall Annex 25 West r^ourth Street � St . Paul , Minnesota 75102 � Dear Mr . Bellus : I a;n writing in support of the application of the Aurora Block Club for a grant of �175, 000 thro�gh the I�eiahbor- hood Partnership Program. I understand the Aurora Block Club has secured private matching funds exceeding the amount of the application. Tney plan to undertake an extensive and badly needed neighborhood revitalization. This project would be a good use of Neighborhood Partner- � ship Program funds. ' Sinc y, � � Donald M. Moe � State Senator DMM: cr CO!�t�lITTEES • Governmental Operations. Chairman • Taxes and Tax Laws • Rules and � Administration • Hcalth and Human Scrvices • � � G. T. PaRTS C4MPANY 4. �r�ikoccicE 1000 Univeroity Avenue • St. Paul. Minnesota 55104 PHONE 645-0481 . TUESDAY,MAY 31 , 1983 AURORA SAINT AN7HONY AREA BLOCK CLUBS INC. � . 749 AURORA AVENUE ' ST,PAUL,MINN. 55104 ATTN: RONALD PAULINE, COORDINATOR DEAR MR. PAULINE: � I currently own the home at 997 Aurora Avenue as well as the two lots to the west of this location. All of this is adjacent to the parking lot for the building which faces(1000)University Avenue. Revitalizing the area would involve removal of the house, foundation, caping the sewer,filling the hole, and generally dressing up the area. My total commitment involves over 540,000 to $50,000 figuring the cost of the house when it was purchased - from Mrs. Carrfe Peoples. Rather than make the entire area into a parking lot, I would welcome support from the Aurora-St.Anthony Block Club in a beautification effort to put in the necessary trees, shrubs, planters, tables,benches and any other sugg- ested items to maimated at�aboutt510t000.00a Useful to the neighborhood. Cost could be est I support the Aurora-St.Anthony Block Club efforts to upgrade the neigh- borhood and if t his can help fit in any plans you may have,please contact me. Thank you for your attention in this matter. �-, - � Yours truly, r_ \ �-� � � George�obY, t. . President GT/as G T Parts Co. � - - i- -• - •• - - .. . . . / � �� . . � � c5 � ND Eou1tMENT , , �►y�� TWIN CfTY USED APPLIANCES, INC. 654 UNIVERSITY AVENUE,WEST- S7. PAU� MINKESOTA 55104 • (612) 291•1699 ►yay 31, 1983 '� � To Whom It May Concern, �, � � • ` We, at � this tirr+e are certainly interested in the lot next to ours on University Ave. We feel that the additional space. would benefit present and future ,r.erchants surrounding the parking lot. Off street parking f or sar.:e and custou�ers, has al�+ays been a problem. Our plans to decorate the area with some type of hedge would become more of a reality than at present. Because of more parking and a visually more appealing area, this would be in concert uith our goals and Aurora/St. Anthony area Block Clubs as uell. kith the birth of "the Aurora/St. Anthony area Block Club," and the presence of a passive positive �r,erchant attitude, it is f elt the future looks positive. The area for the longest time needed some agressive leadership to give it direction and hope for a brighter and better future. I can see Khen the efforts of this club Will bring back the di gnity� and lost tradition the area possessed in the past. We are ful�ly sspportive and hope to assume a roll to aid in the strength and realities this organization has been originated f or. Respectfully ours � C'�� ' _ Douglas" F. HoWe > „ � . . ^`^ -- - �-�-- � , Mw�••�yepu�pT�ms�nr�id70 ST. PAUL STAMP WQRKS, INC. (612)646'9661 946 UNfVfRSITY AVE.. ST. ►AUI.MtNM. SS�O� May 21, 1983 , Au�caut S t., An.thony . An.ea 8�o ck Ceuba 749 Aunonrt Avenue , Sz. Pau.�, I�f.inne6o�n 55104 To Glhom I� May Concehn: T(u,d .�e.ttelc .i.a 6e,ing wn.i,t,ten zo .ind�i.cate owc bu.ppo�r,t o� �h.e Auno� St. An,thony An.ea B�oc�Z Ce.ub. . � I n panx.t.cu.�an. we ar�e haPpy �o a ee .i.t.� e��on,ta a,t .i.mpe.emenx,ing and en�onc.i,ng �he c.i,ty o�nce.a aa neguandb hou.�e numbe�c,a v.i,�a.6.�e �nom �h.e a.2,�eywa.ya. S.�.nc e.'c2e y, �!�,�i �'' � ; .:�� . �� dmund M. M¢,P.egnen, I T I ST. PALIL STAMP WOiZKS, INC. �MM:dL6 � 4�?9ER ;Ta.►rP5- STEEI STnMPS AND C�ES-� BRA55 D�ES-MET�►l EOUtPMENT IDENTIFICATr^N P�A'ES-- MrL�R EOUIPME!JT l�?�ELS - 8R�S5 ih�ECKS �ti:�'�GS-NANE PINS-COR?ORATE SEplS�N�RECO�aD�OOKS-STOCK CERTIFICA!ES- �MIPo�NG pN7 1.;•RKING S�ENCtlS �\D 5':P�L�ci- E�.:.ROVED �t-f t C S�GNS Rti0 DESK PLATES—BRPSS I�ND 9RON2E MEYORInI PLt0UE5 • DJG '.-GS. 9iCrCLE L�CENSE PLnTES.SiEE�S��NS- �OvERTI1�NG S�'v�S - . ____ ___._._ ._.� ........�s....� ..w�...�.ce TuwC STtA1PS --SP£U.1L PURVOSE �NRS. 1NK PL�S-�7UB8ER TraE , • '. Q . � � ��.��f?,� ��1 � �!� � � • 1�?/�.,�.��VIMI�1�'.K!il(�C 5�. PAUL STAMP WORKS� '��• (61216�6•9681 9t6 UNtYERS1TY AI%E.. Sf. PAUI.MINN. 53�0� May 21, 1983 � Au��ca S�. A►tithony ' Anea BCock Ceu6a 749 J1�.vc.o�r.a Avenue � � S�. PaL,�, f�Lulneao�a 55104 Gen.t�ernen: � . r� ,��,�te� ,�,b b u,ng w�,i,t�en zo c o n�.tnm m y co nv ena a,t.i.o n w,i,t'h K.�. S�ewa.�d. G!e cr�.e p�ea.6 ed zo qcco�e a pn,i,ce o� 1 .29 e�ch �on �h.e 6" ne�.�ec,ti..ve hou,ae numbe�ca. The p�u,.ce on 500 �tched .a�a,i��esb b�ee.2 3" x 3" �ogo'a �h 2 ho.�e,a .i.a i .65 ea.ch. In addi,t,i.on we a.2e w,i.�.in9 zo donu.t2 20$ o� zhe �o�a,e cobz �o �he Awwntt Sz. A►tithony Ane�r. B.�o ck C�.cb. Man.cc�ac,tune o� zhe exc.hed p�azea neqwih.ea abou.t 5 �o b weeFr,�. rhanha �on yoWr. .utit¢nea� and i hope yocc �.ind eveJc.y�h,in9 6cLt,ia�a.c,tony. S.i.nc�c¢.ey, C lc . ��i' %� ��. ��, / _ � . Edmund M. ti{e.P,egnen, III ST. PAUL STAMP GIORKS, INC. �ti1M:deb q�ipoEp STqMOS �- S1EEl STAMPS pN�`�`S ` �RECO O 600K5`-LSTOCK CERTIF�Cf+NES�'CSH�PP�NG �*10 M RK��iC• E C.'�dICILS Fti0 SUPPI'ES R EHGRP�F; a�vO T=vS- �v=MF P�NS —CORPOR�TE _E l5 7oG5.B�CYCtE I�CEHSE �LaTES. S7E£� S�GvS kDVEraTt:ING S�GhC a� r.c- r v:�.5 aYD OESK PL�TE'a• Bp�15 d�+'.� BRCN2E NE�aOR1Al PL40UES`.��uc[�TVwE STA.'l��S—S�EC�RI CUQPOSE +�1K5. INK PADS Rl'6�iER sv�' . . WESTERN STATE BANK : . , � . ; �. . � �,� . . '-�:.. ��:.... --`-; . May 27, 1983 � Mr. James Bellus City of St. Paul . City Hall Annex 25 k'est Fourth Street St. Paul, MN 55102 RE: Aurora - St. Anthony Block Club NPP Gzant Request . Western State Bank is interested in participating with the financing � of the project at 450-454 Grotto. We support the objective of reno- vating a sub-standard building and bringing it up to code; thus p:oviding good rental housing. This letter is not a commitment on behalf of the bank. We will need further information in order to process the loan. If. you have any questions, please contact me at 224-6376. Sincerely, �, �..�C�� _.C� Steve Erdall Vice President � SCE/pe • !.,."�1aF�c^•r � ; � , , � � � ��:��. �,, �,, � 5 WESTERN STATE BANK - :� , -� > .:'�. .y . _ ��t .,�w;( .. �� s May 27, 1983 . , . . ; . - Mr. James Bellus � City of St. Paul City Nall Anr.ex . 25 West Fourth Street � St. Paul, 2� 551�2 DE: HRA Lot - Located at ECO B?ock of t;n:versity .�venue *_`ear Mr. Bellus: ::estern S�3te Bank supports the pro?osal of Twin Citv Used Appliar►ce and Aurara-St. �nt;�ony B:ock �lub in acquiri�g and develop:r.g *_'�e ��o�e lot. Cus:or.:er narking ior r.:erchants is a problem on I)niversity Avenue. �n identified par�ing lot would provide greater access to our :etai: merchants. T�e plan could �rovide employment fot one or nore people for .��ainter.ance of the lot. Inclnded in the plan �:oulA also be the upgrading ar►d beautifica:ion of the proposed area. This joint venture would facilitate the future beautificati�n plaas fot University E.venue. I siacerely h�pe they are granted tre fu:�ds aad the lo�. Sincerely, . - �� teve Erdall Vice President SCE/pe , • � .'��*�`... . _;•' :'��., CITY OF SAINT PAUI . � . :. _: :`: ' �a ��',,,, �3 DEPARTMENT OF PLANNING AND ECONOMIC DEVEIOPMENT ' DlVISION OF PLANNIhG �•:� � �t �C 2S West fouAh Slreet,Saint hu�Mirmcwota SS102 ��:•;. �••• �+ • 61b292-iS77 .��.a.s�;,:�' • GEORGE l�ITiMER M/►YOR May 20, 1983 . � K. 0. Stewart . 971 Aurora Avenue St. Paul , Minnesota 55104 � Dear Mr. Stewart: As per your request, the following is the number of structures in the area between University Avenue and Interstate 94, and between Dale Street and Lexington Parkway. Single Single 3 or 4 5 or More Tract Block Detached Attached Duplex Units Units Total 335 1 191 26 70 21 32 340 335 3 218 6 25 38 11 298 33� 4 146 9 61 5 7 228 Total 555 41 156 64 50 866 I hope that this information is helpful to you. If you have any more ques- tions, please call me at 292-1577. Sincerely, �/;C'/'�, ��,/v�;.i�°� � Chuck McGuire Principal Planner - Planning Division CMcG/KL/bq . w . _ �� ? � . , . . . �! ��:�� ... � - . � . ..: _ � � _ _ � � � RECElVED JUN - 1 .1983 � _ tJeighborhood Partnership Program EO U E. NL Dept. Planning & Economic Development � � Planning District � Gode No. . 25 W. 4th Street . � Planner-in-Charge � St. Paul, t�tin�. 55102 Technical Support (6i 2)292-1577 Other Cp Non CO � .. . � NPP APPLICATION . PLEASE RINT OR �TYPE . PROJECT NAME FFd�GICxnTt�i PRIDE GROUP OR ORGANIZATION SUBMITTING REQUEST� � . . • Nq�:��• Tr�s-D�,le O�:tarwli�!y Develo�.�.nt O�r.wany, Thcanas-Dale District 7 Planning Cbuncil ADDr�ESS: 1010 University Ave. St. Paul, Minnesota 55104 STREET CITY STATE ZIP TELEPNONE: 298-5068 � . . CQNTACT PERSON FOR THIS REQUEST: Sandra P�brris . s DAYTIME TELEPHONE: 298-5068 �• ] . WNAT IS THE PROJECT PROPOSAL? . � �is residential and co�nercial property imorovement project wi1.1 oo�nbine the rehabilitation of 22 residential structures and �uo to 15 �rcial builcli.ngs. ' -- � Property o�+mers will be eno�uraged ta utili.ze laa interest loans available through the City Rehab Departrn�nt, �ergy Resource Center ar�d grants-frce� RAP. Incentives for code oo�a�liance, safety equipm�nt installation, energy "ar.a�rrn�ements will oome in�.:the fonn of minor public impivve�nts, neigYiborhood clean u�, exterior grants, safety match r�nnies, enen�y grants for those abovz '"��- �.�;;�^ -< < • � P.AP guidelines. : - .. � _ . . : . . . , 2. HOW MUCH NP FUND MONEY. IS BEING REQUESTED? $ 200,000 3. WH.4T IS THE TOTAL DECLARATION Or NEIGHSORHQOD CONTRIBUTIONS? �43f�,400 . (Conplete Neighborhood Contributions Declaration Form, page 4) �. 4JNAT PROBLEt�IS/NEEDS ARE BEIh'G ADDRESSED? WHAT EVIDENCE IS AYAILABLE TO DOCUMENT TNE NEED, i .e., CENSUS DATA, DISTRICT PLAN PRI�tITIES, ETC,? : 1) Z'he General District Plan identifies this area for ir.u�rovement. 2) The L'niversi�y Avenue Developmer�t Council ooncurrs that the vor:�rci.al and res identi.al buildings �in tti�s area should be tarqeted for imorovem�nt_ . NPP APPLICATION, Page 2 PROJECT NAME F�GnOwN pRIDE � 5. IF PROJECT ACTIVITIES �ARE TARGETED TOWARD A SPECIFIC GEOGRAPHICAL AREA OR SITE, ATTACIi A MAP SHOWING THE PROJECT BOUNDARIES, IF PROJECT ACTIVITIES ARE �CONCENTRATED ON A . . SPECIFIC SUBJECT OR PROBLEM, EXPLAIN WNY THIS SUBJECT CONCENTRATION WAS CHOSEN. The boundries are University Avenue on the south, Victoria on the caest, Thanas Ave. on the north and the eastern boundary is Anmdel St. . _ 6. WHAT IMPACT WILL THE PROJECT HAVE IN THE NEIGN84RHOOD? A. Living conditions will be ir�roved along with the annearance of residential stnictures. � B. Cca�r�rcial rehabilitation will strengthen a declini,,Q business strip. C. The servi.ce area will be improved. 7. �,fHO WILL MANAGE THE PROJECT? WHAT EXPERIENCE DOES THE MANAGING ENTITY HAVE IN THIS TYPE OF PROJECT? . The Zhoinas Dale offices will hire a staff nerson to w�ork.half tir.ie.. �This organizer's qualificati.ons will reflect the need.s of t*�e positinn. District 7 has imnlemented three I'i'A's in the past ar�d int�s to continu� working with t'�e University Avenue . Developnent douncil reaarding �rcial strip activities. � . 8. WILL THE PROPOSED PROJECT BE TIEO OR COORDINATED WITH ANY OTHER PROJECT OR PROGRAM (PUBLIC OR PRIVATE)? YES X NO . IF YES, IDENTIFY. �e Thomas-Dale Oce:munity Develo�nent Cbmpanv intends':to�-focu.s'its rehabili.tati.on efforts in this area to o�mplete two housing �rojects. The Conmunity Develou:�rnt O�n�any also intends to seek and obtain State Venture (Yant �ronies to aid a business activity and will seek the : 000neration of other developers for im�rov�^ient of n:iysical oonditions �n this area. . 9. WHAT IS THE PROJECT SCHEDULE? It is expected that same rehabilitation activi.ty will begin within a month, while � oonmitrnents ase; abtained fram ofher:ProPerty. c�mers. Activities are targeted for curu�letion within a two year period. . �; . � . � � . .. ��,:;"�`�� ,. . . NPP APPLICATION, Page 3�� : .. pROJECT NAME �'a'�N PRIDE •� � . �� 10. WILL THIS PROJECT BE COMPLETED IN 2 YRS. YES X� NO . IF NOT, EXPLAIN HOW IT WILL BECOME SELF-SUSTAINING WITNOUT FURTHER NPP FUNQING? �. 11 . WILL THIS PROJECT RESULT �IN INCREASED�MAINTENANCE AND OPERATING COSTS FOR THE CITY? � YES NO �. IF YES, EXPLAI�� HOW TNE PROJECT 1JIlL PRiVATELY PAY FOR THOSE COSTS. 12, HOW WILL THE� PROJECT BENEFIT LOW AND MODERATE INCOME HOUSEHOLDS? � � A. Living canditi.ons will be imomved. • • . B. �e:�service areas will be more attractive, accessible and offer a broader � � range of goods. . C. � (boperative reirrvest�nt (pa.rt�ershin) will iricrease the nositive asoects � of life in Frogt�own. . _ 13, � NOW WILL NEIGHBORHOOD CITIZEN PARTICIPATION 8E FQSTERED DURING PROJECT DEVELOPMENT AND IMPLEMENTATION? - ' �e �omas-Dale dantrn�n.ity Developme�it Go�ariy and Planning Council wi)1 work �rifi�t a oomnittee of representatives frrsn the residentiaa. and vicermercial oammunity � While the Planning Council has supported the activities of the.University Avenue Dev�lo�it O�urbcil in the past, the Dale St. area has rr�t been included and the'r8 has not been any program utilized involving a working coop�sation of this magnitude. � , _ ', . � . . • . . � .� . . . . . - .. . . , � • -.,.' � .. �- � 14. COMPLE7E PROGRAM FUNDING ANp EXPENSE FORMS PAGES �S AN[� 7. - : . 15. ATTACH LETTERS OF SUPPORT FROM ALL INTERESTED AND AFFECTED GROUPS/OR ORGANIZATIONS. � �• � • . Sarx3ra Nbrri� ' SIGNATURE F NDIVIDUAL TYPED NAh1E ITLE 0 ROLE. DA E � 0 PLE G APPLI TION � _ . . ' Uale Busacker Pres.xCDC � M3 k �T rrli_nQ . . S G RE .OF C ' FFICER TYPED NAME' TIT E OR ROL A E OR PRE.SI NT � � � � . . ,. NPP APPLICATION, Page 4� . PROJECT. NAN:E F'ROG'in?�vr� PRIDE . . NEIGHBORHOOD CONTRIBUTIONS DECLARATIOIY 1 . ESTIMATED COMMERCIAL PROPERTY FIXED CAPITAL � IMPROVEMENTS: . - - . NUMBER OF PARTICIPANTS . �13 � � $ � AVERAGE INVESTMENT $13,615 $ � ` �� TOTAL INVESTMENT EQUALS -- � � 149,000 2. ESTIMATED RESIDENTIAL PROPERTY FIXED CAPITAL � IMPROVEMENTS: � � NUMBER OF PARTICIPANTS ` 22,^ � . : � � AVERAGE INVESTt�tENT $8;000 . $ , � � TOTAL INVESTMENT EQU�+LS $ 2�6,000 3. NEW COMMERCIAL DEVELOPMEN7; SITE (a) � ESTIMATED MARKET YALUE $ � � �SITE (b) � ESTIMATED MARKET VALUE . � . � � � � .. � TOTAL MARKET �VALUE $ � . . . . 4. NEW RESIDENTIAL DEVELOPMENT; - ' . � � � � - SITE (a) ._ . - - ESTItdATED MARKET VALUE � . � � � � � � � - ._ SITE (b) . . ESTIMATED MARKET VALUE $ � ' . TOTAL MARKET. VALUE $ 5. ESTIMATED IN-KIND-SERVICES {OFFICE SPACE, EQUIPMENT, SERYICES): . SOURCE AND TYPE 1 . 'District ? office and .?�hone� ' � $2,�00 : - 2. Coordination � �� $4,000 � 3. . - . . . _ $ . o. ESTIMATED VOLUNTEER LABOR: � . . . . . � NUt�l3ER OF VOLUNTEERS � � � �- � � � AVERAGE HOURS/VOLUNTEER � � ' ' � � � � � - � ' TOTAL HOURS x $10/hr. EQUALS $ 7. ESTIMATED SWEAT EQUITY: .� . � NUMBER OF PARTICIPANTS � � - � - AVERAGE HOURS/PARTICIPANT � . _ TOTAL HOURS � � •. TOTAL HOURS x $10/hr. EQUALS $ , • . . : , . ' • � - ` NPP APPLICATION, Page 5 _ �... � _ . . PROJECT NAME F�,�� PRm� � ��'��5 8. ESTIMATED CASH DONATIONS: . � � . ` : . _ SOURCE 1 . , _ . ... . - . - . . � .-�� 2• . $.• 3. . . � 9. ANTICIPATED fOUNDATION GRANTS:.. � . � . . FOUNDATION(s) 1 . State Venture Capital , � . - ' � 30,000 . �- - . ., - 2. . . . . . . - - $ __ , ... . _ .- • . 10. OTHER: EXPLAIN : _ . . . � . : . _ � . � � .. -� ESTIMATEO VALUE � . $ ` . . . . � TOTAL NEIGH80RHOOD � - � - - �CONTRIBUTIONS DECLARATION $ 431,400 11 . WHAT EVIDENCE IS THERE THAT THE A80VE DECLARATIONS ARE REALISTIC? � ` - __ � � . � � �, �_ �� • /'1•j.t.t�� i��'g01.C��► L�.vb� . . � ' � ,o�� .�, �� . . . . . . a�� . : . - . � w� _ . . . , _. r��„�. s�t�, ��,.�. - -� �.�. � . . _ _ - . � : � � � �•t�+ti8.� o� ' � - A.� a-,�. � ,� 'a.:QJ, �5 . . : _ 0 . . , . . _ : - 0�� .SLC�►�.w . . . �.. : , , _ . . _ . � . . ' NPP APPLICATION, Page 6 �� -PROJECT NAME F��'� p�� . ESTIMATED PROGRAM FUNDING* . . • SOURCE � - � . - ' � $ AMOUNT 1 . I1PP funds � - "_ '� . ; $200,000 . 2, Reisdenti.al Rehabiliati..on loans - �� - � 100,000 3. Bank/Private investment � 96.000 .e�i s:•.::._i�' :Y3:'�::.��_':.....:c:. l,-:.: 4. �itY Developm�nt Cb�any rehabilitatioon 50,000 5. G�nmer�cial Rahabilitation 1'�,ons 107,000. ' L.:..__�iY:.�__.... �i."�;._, 6, �rr.�zrcial private irivestrrent . 42,OO�J 7. C,a�au�ity Develop�nr.nt Gce�g�any Uenture Grant 30,000 g, �D CDC and Planni;ig Council 6,400 . 9. � . . 10. � 11 .. . , . - . 12. . . . 13. - � 14. � . - . . 15. . . • . 16.. . . . . _ � _ _ - 17. : . • . � . � . . : � � 18. � - - 19. � . � 20. _ TOTAL $ 631.400 * INCLUDE NEIGHBORHOOD PARTNERSHIP FUND ANO SPECIFIC CATEGORIES� OF NEIGNBORHOOD � CONTRIBUTIONS. . � . s � .. . � , . . NPP APPLICATION, Paqe 7 ' . PROJECT NA�`1E �'a"�t PxIDE ��,��i•� ESTIMATED PROGRAM EXPENSES PROGRAM EXPENSES � FUND SQURCE* $ lIMOUNT .� � . � � , Part time Organizer , � NPP -� $18,000 . 2, �ergy Grants (R�ideritial) riax $2000 NPP 43,100 3; Ir�ck match func�s (Residential. Max S50 � 2,000 : rati.o i�p 20,000 4, F�terior (�ants (Rsid�ntial) Max $1500 � 5. Mi�or Public Imp�vements 1�LpP 39,900 6. Nlaintenanoe Crews (27 Parttime Fmployees) IZPP � 25,000 7. University Ave. Business Pramtion 1�P 2,000 : ra io �P 50,000 • g, . Canmercial E�cterior Grants Max $5000 . g, Residenti.al Rehabilitation Program . 246,000 10. ��-�- R��ilitation 179,000 11. Office - Phones Thamas-Dale 6,400 12. � - _ • 13. . 14. . . 15. 1 F. , . . 17. 18. . 19. . 2Q. . . . ' � ^ TOTAL EXPEMSES $631,400 � * INCLUDE P�EIGHBORHOOD PARTNERSHIP FUND AND NEIGHBORHOOD C�NTRIBUyIONS. � � RECEIVED ,iUt� - 1 1983 , � � � � , � � � . � �� _ ; Neighborhood Partnership Program � D U E NL ' Dept. Pianning & Economic D evelopment� � Planning District Code No. y Z5 W.• 4th Street Pianner-in-Charge St. Paul, t•1inn. 55102. � � Technical Support (612)292-1577 � � " � Other - � CD Non CD . . � � NPP APPLICATION � ; LEASE R INT OR TY E � �� ' PROJECT JVAME Vomela Project � � - � .� � - , � . � � GROUP OR ORGANIlATION SUBMITTING REQUEST � ' . NAME: . Saint Paul Art Collective � • ' � ADDRESS: 300 East Fourth Street, St. Paul MN 55101 STREET C ITY STATE ZIP TELEP HONE: 291-1487 � � . . . COiV'fACT PERSON FOR THIS REQUEST: Cathy Inqebretsen � . DAYTIME TELEPHONE: 224-1783 �� . - 1 . _. WHAT_ IS .THE _PROJECT PROPOSAL?-----.._ . . .. :;.. . . . . -.. -- -- --- _. ..___.. . The Collective proposes to redevelop a warehouse at 178 East Ninth Street for artist studio/housing. The goal of the project is to address the problems of unsafe and unstable artist housing and the threat of displacement of. artist residents from the Lowertown neighborhood. The Collective specifically proposes to purchase the Vomela Buiiding and redevelop it into 16 artist studio/housing units. Of the 16 units, 75% 12 units woul be available to low-modera.te income artist households. The majority of the artists in the Lowertown area are below the very ow income category (less than $11 ,050). The Collective requests NPP support through a long term, low interest or equity loan to assist aquisition and to leverage additional private capitol needed to fully fund the purchase and renovation of the building. * Project is consistent with the Comprehensive Plan and/or organizational missions of the City of St. Paul, Lowertown Redevlopment Corporation, Downtown Community Development Council, and the Lowertown Community Council. * Project relates to PED' s New Works/St. Paul Project to maintain and increase arts activities in Lowertown by incrQasing the awareness, of Lowertown's art activity and identifying opportunities for developing art spaces. * Project introduces an amenity to invite residential development into the North Quadrant of the Lowertown area. . -_ .------ � -�- --- -�-- -- 2. � NOW MUCH t�P FUND t�10NEY IS BEING� REQUESTEO? � �$ � 225,000. 3. WHAT IS THE TOTAL DECLARATION OF NEIGHSORHOOD CONTRIBUTIONS? S 875,750.00 (Conplete Neighborhood Contributions Declaration Form, page 4) � 4. WHr1T PROBLQdS/NEEQS, ARE BEING ADDRESSED? WHAT EVTIESCEETC.?yAILABLE TO DOCUMENT THE NEED, i .e., C ENSUS DATA, DISTRICT PLAN PRIORI , 7he problems are the unsafe and� unstable housing situations and .the fear of displacement due to the intensive redevelopment efforts. Lowertown has acheived an identity through its artist-residents. The community is concerned that this important . amenity not be lost. , . � NPP APPLICATION, .Page 2 . � PROJECT NAME Volema Project � � � 5. IF PROJECT� ACTIYITIES ARE TARGETED TOWARD A SPECIFIC� GEOGRAPHICAL AREA OR SI7E, ATTACH � �� A MAP SHOWING THE PRO,IECT BOUNDARIES. IF PROJECT ACTIVITIES ARE CONCENTRATED ON A _. � SPECIFIC SUBJECT OR PROBLEM, EXPLAIN WNY THIS SUBJECT CONCEKTRATION WAS CHOSEN. . � . . � .� __ � . � . ____ � �. The Saint Paul Art Collective is composed�of a neighborhood group of artists� �whe� lfve�� and work in warehouse spaces in Lowertown.� These residents, already an integral part of Lowertown, wish to participate in the development of their neighborhood. The actions of the Lowertown Community Council and Downtown Community Development Council � reflect a similar commitment to this participation and to keeping the present spirit of . the neighborhood al ive.._.__._..__--- ------•-_. _ .. _. _ _...__ _ ' ----- ..._.. " --- -• . ..__. . . . . . . ....., :._ . .. ..__._.. ._.- .._ _s. .. .... . - .-=-.y----• . -�• . . 6. WHAT IMPACT WILL THE_.PROJECT HAVE IN THE NEIGHBORHOOD? ^� "� _..:_:. ` � :'._=�._ .. . .-. .� ---.----- * �Creat'ion��of a neighborhood landmark that: clearly iden-tifies Lowertown as a place � where approximately 200 artists live and work, and permanently establishes the artists` position in the neighborhood. * Creation of a "landmark" for the arts community introducing opportunities for special programing tQ service the building's and Lowertown's artist residents and a physical focal point for organizing artist residents. « „ * Improve the cultural environment of downtown and St. Paul by creating a foothold for the estimated 200 artists to continue to be residents and workers in the neighborhood that they pioneered. __._ ._ � �'° .—"�""� 7. ��JHO WILL h1ANAGE� THE PROJECT? WHAT EXPERIENCE DQES� THE MANAGING ENTITY `HAVE IN THIS � - TYPE OF PROJECT? � � _ ._....._ ._ .. __. . .._...--- -- �----.�.__ _.. . ___ ..___.___. The St. Paul Art Collective Housing Cooperative, a newly formed non-profit subsidiary, � of the Art Collective will have a project coordinator and monitor of the project. A review committee of representatives from the Collective, LRC, LCC, and PED will advise the Cooperatives' hiring. A manager experienced in artspace development projects will be hired. . Please see appendix for detailed job description. 8. WILL THE PROPOSED PROJEC7 BE TIEO OR COORDINATED WITH ANY OTHER PROJECT OR PROGRAM (PUBLIC OR PRIVATE)? YES XX NO . • IF YES, IDENTIFY. _.____. _ . . ,_.__.__ The Collective intends to use a low interest loan from NPP to leverage the participation of a private, for-profit developer, as a limited partner. A request for a low-interest loan and a secure guarentee for the.entire construction loan package is also being submitted to the Lowertown Redevlopment Corporation. Additional funding sources may include the Minneapolis Foundation MNSIiIP.proqrarn ��d the National Endo��ment for the Arts.. �and No►�thwest krea Foundation. 9.� WHAT IS THE PROJECT SCHEDULE? � . � - � . See Attachment #1. . . �� . . �. : � . , � _ . ' � . . • . . . t . _ � ��►��_►� P�PP APPLICATION, Page 3 . ' � PROJECT NAME Vomela Building � • 10. WILL THIS PROJECT BE COMPLETED IN 2 YRS. YES XX NO . IF NOT, EXPLAIN .HOW IT WILL BECOME SELF-SUSTAINING WITHOUT FURTHER NPP FUNQING? � . , � . . ; � : • . . . � . • - - . , , ; . • - . � .. 11 . WILL THIS PROJECT RESULT IN INCREASED�MAINTENANCE�ILL PRIVATELY PAYTFOR�THOSE COSTS., YES NO XX . IF YES, EXPLAIH HOW TNE PROJECT 12. HOW WILL THE �PROJECT BEt�EFIT LOW AND MODERATE I�NCOME HOUSEH4LDS? . The �potencial residents of the project are considered �to �have 'very low' to �'low'�� incomes as determined by the median income levels of the metro area. For this reason artist housing needs to be affordable. The building will� offer safe affordable housing at a fixe� or near fixed rate for the period of indebtedness which otherwise would not be availble through conventional means. Of, the 16 units, at least 75� (or 12 units) would be designated for low to moderate incom2 level households. 13. HOW WILL NEIGHBORH000 CITIZEN PARTICIPATION BE FOSTERED DURING PROJECT DEVELOPMENT AND IMPLEMENTATION? . ,. . . . � • . __. .._._.r_ . � __._.__-�------_ _.. . __... _ ._. .�_ .. ...:..... . _.. : . ... ._ ._. _.._-- -----. .-- -. . The St. Paul Art Collective Housing Co-op (a subset of the St. Paul Art Collective) has a two staged plan for organizing and implementing the proposed project. Stage I includes the present formation of the Space Committee, financing assembly, planned development, management, and marketing execution. Stage II will include membership, assumption of mortgage responsibilities, construction�of personal spaces, assumption of management responsibilities with plan changes, and full management (turn over/marketing) of the finished building. : .• :.�• - � . . . . . . . _ . . .. ---- � . _.__ ._ ... .. . _. . _ .. . . .:. . 14. COMPLETE PROGRAM FUNDING AND EXPENSE FORMS PAGES �S AND 7. 15. ATTACH LETTERS OF SUPPORT FROM ALL INTERESTED AND AFFECTEO GROUPS/OR ORGANIZATIONS. , � Cath InQebretsen .�TIjLE OR ROLE � DAT 3 � NATUR OF NDIVIDUAL YPED NAME I f MPLFT G .DPPL CATION �_. . . w._ _. .- --... • �i . ► Vincen� Valenti ; Treasurer SIGNATURE OF CNlEF Uti-ll:ttt � YYtu NHMt I E 0 ROLE A7E � wn nnrNtn�A�T , - ; - - fJPP APPLICATION, �Page 4 � . PROJECT NAN:E Vomela Project t • � � NEIGHB4RHOOD CONTRIBUTIONS DECLARA7ION 1 . ES7I�MTED COMMERCIAL �pROPERTY FIXED CAPITAL � � , �, � - _ � . IMPROVEMENTS: � � . - ' . : . � . NUMBER OF PARTICIPANTS '�'t�' - • � � • � • • ' � . $ � ` N/A � ' � �� • AVERAGE INVESTMENT ' ' $ �A . � . � � � �� TOTAL INVESTMENT EQUALS : ` .�' � � N/A ' � • � . - . � � � . . �� _ . 2: ESTIMATED RESIDENTIAL PROPERTY FIXED CAPITAL • . � . . � � �. IMPRQVEMENTS: . . .. ' . . . � NUMBER OF PARTICI PANTS � . _ . . . - ' : � .. . . � .' , - $ - �'N�q .' . AVERAGE INVESTMENT � � � N A � TOTAL INVESTMENT EQUALS $ N/A 3. NEW COMMERCIAL DEVELOPMENT: : � . � . . ' SITE (a) . . � - ESTIN'�ATED MARKET VALUE - � � � SITE (b) � � � ' ESTIMATED MARKET VALUE , . � . _. . � TOT�+L M�ARKET VALUE $ N/A � 4. NEW RESIDENTIAL DEVELOPMEN7: . . SI7E {a) 178 East Ninth � � � � . ESTIMATED MARKET VALUE � $ 950,000.00 ' : - SITE (b) � � ESTIMATED MARKET VALUE $ � � . . �' � � � TOTAL MARKET VALUE � � 950,000.00• 5. � ESTIMATED IN-KIND-SERVICES (OFFICE SPACE, EQUIPMEIYT� SERVICES) : � � . � . - SOURCE AND TYPE 1 .� . Arts ace Inc. Consultant at' 25 fir � - $ 1.250.00 2, parks Productions Word� rocessin 1 r x 100$ 1 .200.00 3, ine Script, writinqltvainQ �25/hr x 16Q_ � 4.000.00 6. ESTIMATED VOLUNTEER LABOR: , . - � . ' NUMBER OF VOLUNTEERS 74 volunteers � � � AVEP.AGE HOURS/VOLUNTEER 195 hours per volunteer � " � TOTAL HOURS x �10/hr. EQUALS � $ �144,300.00 7. ESTIM�ATED SWEAT EQUITY: � . . NUMBER OF PARTICIPANTS AVERAGE HOURS/PARTICIPANT •• . . TOTAt HOURS � . . , . � • TOTAL HOURS x $10/hr. EQUALS � N/A � • . ` � � . • � ��a�''�� . NPP APPLICATION, Page 5 � . PROJECT NAME Vomela Project ��•' `' � °` � . • . . , • 8. ESTIMATED CASH DONATIONS: � � � � • � . . SOURCE 2. � • . � � . .. . � . . � � . N�A . �. 3. • ' . . 9. ANTICIPATED F�UNOATION GRANTS: � � . . � • � � � � . � . � . . . . . . . . �, . FOUNDATION(s) 1 . Northwest P.rea Foundation � � 30,040.00 . � . ' • 2• . � _ .. ... . . . .. . - _ . � {.� - � 225,000.00 ]0. � 07HER: EXPLAIN Hayberq Development Co., private equity _ � . ' ' Lowerto�rn Redevopment Corporation and 'other � 470,000.00 � �� sources (see attachment Z� � - � � . . � � ESTIMATED YALUE � $ 725,000.00 � . . TOTAL NEIGHBORHOOD 875 750.00 � . CONTRIBUTIONS DECLARATION $ ' 11 . WHAT EVIOENCE IS THERE THAT THE ABOVE DECLARATIONS ARE REAtISTIC? , See letter of commitment from Hayberg D2velopment in addendum. � � See art i sts pet i ti on of i ntent. i n addendum. . . .. . -. .... � See St. Paul Art Collective membership list� in addendum. .� Cost estimates prepard by Owen J. Beatty, P.E., Toltz, King, . Duvall, Anderson, and Associates, Engineering, Architecture and Planning Firm. . _ _ __. . � � � .. . .. . _ _ . • ' NPP APPLICATION, Page 6 � PROJECT NAME _ Volmela Project � � � ' � ESTIMATED PROGRAM fUNDIN�G* .. . ' SOURCE • � � ' . . � . $ AMOUNT� - . . 1 , Neighborhood Partnership Fund . � � 225,000. � � � �� 2.�' Mortgage (Lowertown Redevelopment and other sources) � 470,000. � . . ... .. . .. .. .. . � . _ � 3. Grant for design fees and coordinator/manager � 30,000. � . 4. Private Equity � _ . . ` 225,000. � . . � . ; - 5. � � . 6. 7. . 8. . . 9; 10. ll . ' - 12. � � 13. , . . , 14. . . . . . . 15. 16. . . . , 17. � • . 18. � . 19. 20. TOTAL � . $ 950,000. * INCLUDE NEIGHBORFt000 PARTNERSHIP FUND AND SPECIFIC CATEGORIES OF NEIGHBORHOOD - CONTRIBUTIO�IS. � � r i . • ('�'�( ' / . , �, �1�� / �� Vomela Pro ect � `l R 4•� NPP APPLICATION,� Paqe 7 �PRQJECT Na'�E J ' � � ESTIMATED PROGRAM EXPENSES • � PROGRAM EXPENSES � . � : � FUNO SOURCE* $ /1MOUNT � � � � . 1�. Land cost � - Private Equitv � � � 200,000. . , � � . . .�_ 2, Development cost � � Private EQUitv � ! 25,000. � 3. Development costs (design fees) qrant��orthwest Area) ` 24�004� � �� 4. Develo�ment costs • � � LRC* . � � 3.000. � 5. Finance costs LRC* � 20.000. � 6. Elevator repair LRC* 11 .000. • 7, Ir�sulation LRC* 25.000. � 8. . t;indows LRC* 108,000. . 9, Stairways and doors LRC* 20.000. 10. a.a11s �'��LRC* --- -- � 56.000. 11. Baths LRC* 18.000-- 12, Painting ceilings . LRC* 5.000 . � 13. Electrical NPP . 124.000. 14. Plumbing NPP 100.000. 15. Neating � NPP .f$i000), LRC* (49,000 Z. 50.000. � ��, Closing costs � LRC* � � 5:000. � 17, Project manager Grant (Northwest Areal �10,00�. LRC 150.00Q.. }g, Contingency � . � . 19. . 20. TOTAL EXPE�ISES S 950.000. * Other sources include Program Related Investments (PRI) �'s tU � to be arranged through local foundation support. See attachmentl.I,TandIV. * INCLUDE P�EIGHBORHOOD PARTNERSHIP FUND AP�D NEIGHBORI-IOOD CONTRIBU�IONS. . � . ., � • . Attachment I...........schedule of grant period Attachment II..........job description for project coordinator Attachment III.........financial analysis Attachment IV..........list of other financial� sources At�achment V...........supporting letter of interest Attachment VI..........letter from Hayberg Development Attachment VII.........Saint Paul Art Collective membership list . Attachment VIII........letter of endorsement (DCOC) , , , r . . . . ��5 Saint Paul Art Collective Vomela Building NPP Proposal� Timeline June� 1983 through July 1984 - . - June Continue to assemble financing � � Establfsh g�idelines for hiring praject coordinator Establish Co-op .� , � , � . August � Hire pro�2ct coorch nator for September. through June .Purchase Vomela Building � September Coordinator works with Co-op and PED to plan de��elopment, � :�management and marketing . � October Implement marketing Fall Complete design phase � January 1984 Construction process begins Changeover of Space Committe� membership to Co-op to reflect. future building occupants plus one member of the Collective January-June Coordinator � works with Co-op and PED to plan artd assist �,rith transfer of management, nortgage and turnover/marketing �responsibilities July 1984 Building available for occupancy � • �n . , ' , • Proj�ct Coodinator Job Description • � Work with the space committee and PED to: � - assemble financing � � � • . - plan development � ' � - plan management .. . . key elements will be the artist ownership arrangement, co-op management, and' writing of the bylaws - plan and execute marketing - be the group's representative to the contruction contractor - assist in the changeover of the Space Committee membership to reflect the future building occupants plus one member of the Collective � - plan and assist with the transfer of management, mortgage, and marketing� responsiblities � . . � , � . ,��:►� �5 � � Y� .J �.J�. Attachment III � VOMEl.A BUILDING FINANCING ANALYSIS �Total financing of $695,000. is necessary. for the Vomela Artist Stud�i�o/ � Living Development. , � Financing sources requested are as follows: . Lowertown Redevelopment Corporation � ' . . � � � and other sources* � $470,000 City of St. Paul NPP Program 225,000 $695,000 Interest rates and terms are based upon the effective gross income of the � Vomela Building at a rent schedule affordable by members of the Artist Co-op who will occupy the space. � Debt Service Projection based on a 30 year amortization with interest - rates as indicated. � Source Amount Term Rate Annual D/S LRC and others $470,000. 30 years 4.78�** $29,520.** City 225,000. 30 years 2�** 9,980.** TOTAL $39,500.** **Collective is negotiating with Lowertown Redevelopment Corporation. The request is such as to achieve an annual debt/service of $39,500. t � � Solicited Sources of Financing Hayberq Development Company, Howard Bergerud. Met with Mr. Bergerud on May 24 to discuss arrangements for private equity. � Lowertown Redevelo ment Cor oration, Weiming !u. Met with Mr. Lu on May -24 to discuss proposa which has to be reviewe by the LRC Board of Directors. First National Bank, Met with Mr. John Drenshaw and Ms. Pam Zegaria on May 25 to discuss mortgage possibilites. Neighborhood Partnership Program. Worked with City staff to develop application and iscuss possi i it�es o inancing package. . Foundatians noted for funding to the arts: . � � Jerom� Foundation, Cindy Gehrig. To be approach2d June 7983. Northti��est Area Foundation, John Taylor. To be� approached for grant request. � Bush Foundation, Humphrey Ooerrman and Linda Nyvall. To be approached for Pragram Related Investment and/or grant. Dayton-Hudson Foundation, Margaret Wurtele. To be approaced for a grant. General Mills Foundation, Linda �deda. To be approached far a grant. General Mills, David Nasby. To be approached for Program Related Investment or a grant. Deluxe Check Printers, Jane Stansted. To be approached for grant. � � 26 � . .� � � � ' .��"�� , , . � �� f.4 � D '�° ` � � . . � �.�,�� . w�u.t SrxEETGALtERf� • �oe i w�s��ttT . vWwrNa.w sa�w • ' �an•w+ , � � SUPPORTIlVG IETTER OF INTEREST _ . , . In addressir�g the problems of unsafe and unstable artist�housing, the St. Paul Art Collective proposes to redevelop the Vrarzhouse at 178 East Ninth Street into 16 studio/living spaces. We, the undersignzd, are seriously interested in studio/].ivir�g space within this buildir�. Signir�g this sheet in no �.�y binds us to, ' - or guarantees us spaces in this buildir�g. . � . . ; � • . j ,i��/`� � � �J//�r . /�••_��y��, f j . Lr�� ''"• ,r,�;j/�� !•'3 �`..� ''� f� f �• E 1/,Q4,,.•. .. . + l�/l�//�- !��l� ��''� .--� ,� i ~'•"�; �r'i f� � � ',�,y� �;��1`�i�:w"�.. Fa..�� '� �r��.?'�' .� � L" 6: �a �LOG�s4:;, � •� f �� : � �� - � '� / � -� �� , ,i � � ) � � , . �� °�,� S�� - �i t . � .�' �' �' : � . � ` , . �� l_ � . �� \ � , , � �,� � . \ `, � --- --- -�----- - -------- -- ... . . -_.--- --- �� ' �`/ �-c�t-c�� /!�`-� 'J i z-�y�. !'1 >s� . � .� � � > � �/� ��. • �� _/ �L� .C�� V � .� 7y / /// •-,'�� i� l. ��L� ��''/"< <'J � /�,�C/%' v - � -P�� t GK-5 �� _ � ��.. ._ t,� �(s� � � . � � t � D �� . . . �..'J�� eoo w��n�a na.s�ae�o3 �rv�e�ois,M�me.�on ssao� ��s �339�372 . •. May 27, I983 ` . � . • � . . - Davi d ��ladson � � 1 Cathy Ingebretsen : � ' � ', � • ' � Vincent Valenti � � St. Paul Art Collective � � . � 300 E. 4th Street . St. Paul , ��'L'� 55101 , . � � . . � � � Dear Alembers of the Space Committee: � � � - � � Ttiis letter is to support your efforts and to validate previous � � infornation regarding the market for studio�living space as we have di scussed i n pri or rreet.i nas. • . �. - �� Of the 100 r�ost recent requests.'for�studi�d'Jliving :space, the fol�lowing needs were expressed: . Price Range: . ' � . � Less than $200 :� 15% � " $2J0=250 :� 22� 530�-35�J : 4�J� $400-450 : 18% �500-500 : 5� . Square Foofiage:� ' � . � � � � 600-1,000 sf: 30� � 1,000-I,300 sf: 39� 1,400-1,7Q0 sf: 15� � . _ � ' 1,8�0-2,100 sf: 8� 2,000 sf'-(+): ti� " � The requests represent only a fracti on of tf�e number of i noui ri es N.re • . have had for studio/living use over the years. The above numbers represent an acknowledgement that less space is currently available at hinher rates . than previous surveys f�ave shovrn. The nature and qual�ity of open .studio/livina types of spaces nonetheless holds a great deal of r�arket appeal . t•1e encourage and support your efforts to devel op the Vomei a 'Bui Tdirrg .for studi o/7.i vi ng use. Every effort raus� be made to i ncrease the nur�ber � of code cor�pliant artists housing units in order that the arts comr.:unity may retain a presence in Lowerto�rn. f.ew neighborhoods off'e'r '.the':kind of' appropriate space needed to create a "c'ritical mass" of arts activity ivhich is so ir:iportant to':the vitality of the individual arts corrrnunity. I hope a�e t,rill be able to continue to assist this exciting project. . � Sincerely, ��r✓ ' . . . Cheryl Kartes � . � . �. � � � ��'�� Financial Plan The Saint Paul Art Collective proposes to create a partnersh�p between its to=6e-fc,rmed St. Pa�l Art Collective Housing Co-op and a private developer. The private developer will bring to the partnership equity and development expertise. � After seven to ten years, the general partnership shall be dissolved and the Co-op - � shall receive title to the project. . � Seventy-five percent, or twelve units will be occupied on an on-going basis by low income individuals or households. For the purposes of, comparison, Bob Odmond, Director of Management for the Minnesota Housing Finance Agency, said that a similar development receiving Federal Section Eight subsidy would require at least � $1 ,045,000. in Federal Budget Authority money over the life of 20 year Section Eight contracts to accomplish the same housing objective. By contrast, the St. Paul Art Collective calls for a LOAN of �225,000. which shall be repaid to the City to provide the same opportunity for the useful life of the. facility. (These numbers are based on the currently priced fair market rent schedule of $363. x 12 months x 20 years x 12 . units.} � � The Collective has approa.ched Lowertown Redevelopment Corporation (tRC) for one of ttro �options: (1) a direct loan or (2) guaranteeing conventional financing. The Collective will also be applying for a grant to pay for the design fees and the project coordinator. � . , r i • V0�•1ELA BUILDING� � � , • Income and Expense Schedule ' , . 1985 1986 1987 . Rental Rate (Net) � 2.50 . 2.50 . 2.54 @ 15,800 net rentable Vacancy AlZo�vance ; � 8� 5� �b Gross Income � � Studio/Housing � 39,500 39,500 39,50U Parking � 3,300 3,300 3,300 42,800 42,800 42,800 less Vacancy 3,160 1,975 1,975 Effective Gross I�icome 39,640 40,825 . 40�,825 Less Debt Service LRC 29,520 29.520 29,520 City 9,980 . 9,980 9,98U � TOTAL D/S 39,500 39,500 . 39,500 � Cash Flow 140 1,325 1,325 Expense Schedule (paid by Co-op tenants) � 7axes 16,000 17,000 18,000 Insurance 3,200 3,425 3,660 Utilities 9,600 10,250 11,OOQ Ptaintenance/Repairs 5,200 5,560 5,950 Miscellaneous 1,000 ].,070 1,150 TOT�IL 35,000 37,305 39,760 Typical Studio Monthly Expense Schedule 750 Sq. Ft. Studio � ' Net Rent . 156.25 156.25 256.25 Total Expenses � 136.75 145.75 � 155.30 Monthly Cost 293.00 302.00 31].55 1',000 Sq. Ft. Studio Net Rent 208.35 208.35 20�.35 Total Expenses 182.30 194.30 207.10 Monthly Cost 390.65 402.65 415.45 . . .,.. . �� . , . DOWi�lTOWN COMMUNITY D�1/ELOPAAENT COUNClL • � 490 Midwest Building St Paut, MN 55101 : �6�2� 22�-0488 May 26, 1983 � � � i • Jim Zdon � . : - Planning and Economic Development � � 25 W. 4th Street St. Paul, My 55102 � Dear Mr. Zdon, I am writing you about the St. Paul Art Collective`s Neighborhood Partnership Program � application. I �rould like to relay the District 17 endorsement and support for the proposal. . The maintenance of a stable artist's community in Lowertown is a goal of many, as acknowledged in both of Downto�,rn District and Lowerto�rn plans. Success of this goal has depended on the involvenent and commit�inerrt of the artist community. We are pieased that the St. Paul Art Collective is now expressing their commitmen�� to downtown St. Paul by seriously addressing the issue of housing. Since their reorganization last fall, the Collective achieved much. Their list of accomplishments has been impressive--active recruitment and participation by a large proportion of the Lowertown artists, the opening of the Wall Street Gallery, the well- attended Beaux Arts Ball, the successful application for funding to the Metro Arts � Council. Their recent record strongly supports their belief that they can make a artist i�ous i ng pro j ect wc,rk, and we beI i eve the pro j ec�: tivou 1 d benef it downtown i n rr�any ways: * The rehabilitation of the Vomela � building will bring vitality to a depressed section of Lowertown; * The project will improve the physical attraction and potencial for economic development of the area; * The involvement of the artists as developers and property owners will . increase their participation and voice in downtown; * The project will be a unique downtown attraction and will enforce the - developing image of St. Paul as a cultural center. 4lith all this in mind, we encourage the City to fund this a�orthwhile project. Thank you for your consideration. Si cerely, _ � � �� ohn E. Mannillo, Chair Downtown Conununity Development Council � District 17 Planning Council � , • � , . . . IX. _St. Paul Art Collective Membership List Executive Corrniittee: � • � President David.Madsen � Treasurer Yincer�t Valenti � . Secretary Donna Miller _ � Board Members: . . - " � • . � � Wendy O1son�Bernel Bayliss Gallery Committee Co-Chairs Cathy Ingebretsen/Vincent Valenti Space Committee Ca-Chairs � . Steve Woodward New Gallery Space Cfiair Amy Sparks Membership Committee Chair Julie Lemon At Larqe � Victor Prokopov At Large Gus Gustafson Official Conscience G�nQral Membership: . ! . - David Amdir � Ann hiarsde� � ; Jerry Bell Ruth Mordy Patti Boekhoff Jack Myers - David Bohnsak Jerry Noel Re t � Paul Churchill Shann 0'�Brien James Col leran Chauncy��Peterson -- .- �-. - � James Crnkovich � David Rich Bill Dobbs Jim Sanders� Janel Foss Jim Schiller � • Sharon Gilbert Louis Schnellann Nancy Gipple Grant Scholen Ruth Ann Godollei Sandy Smolen � � Gail Grabow Amy Sparks Lynn Hambrick NJark Stanley . Eunice Haugen Carla Stetson Don Holzschuh � � Joe Truax Deb Huff • Thea Tulloss David Johnson Bonita Wahl Rick Laudon Willm Wilcox Robert Lloyd � ,, . . � • 27 `�:'��k'��5 � � � RECEIVED ,1UN - �' 1�$� . _a,,,,; . ' ''• r ��i �K y ' . �� _ Y I�I~ �� ,�. .� y . � '� � .�; • �— - �.�� ( *- . . ." r �w. �.t,r'��{ �� ' Y ~ % . � . �w�..�� `j. .i � '�' "�� 3 Yt'�w'� '% Yku3 � �J L'.. .�AI�'i_ ,� • W < .y� •M ,�y.4 '�t�° < i. � �s . -•�� •+r L��` ' �- ' .++''��t F ."`•. ,}..� �� +,�� j+,r y�"s.`°'sr ,�,s 't M ;,�+ . �i.. ..rY? .M? � ., �i� .�< , :. - , i., ,s� � � '8, `�.� � r 'o!� '�.. -y '�'Y w�� ^�'� � ' ,. ��'` ��., �; x � � _�+1�'yt .� : ,w ;a. ��b: � . ° � � s , ��,� �i y�{ �� '�C -w�.+'� @� � �.x . A ♦ ' ,�: * � ": � 'qy' ',�` : '� Cr' � b r`A � '':� � ��fi„'`�i``� ,�� r �, �,.,,,.>,..' , �nR R � t�"'3i'p,°.x` '4 ��a� :�� ,'Y eJ�t�1x� `'-+"'y� �r �'� � ��.x �� <7�� );�`Y s�;.`�r.[�"�od� x.'� �� +Srr�`g�y�¢l�cd�". - d. k. �. ai .. : ar�-� 'a�,-> *. � "` �,.�' •.@�.i �� s.rs •� ...a�"�"° ,��' : �" • 'Y��.'�''t�`�-�ti` �. � .. � �. �.y. a `A o4 �. : a � pqNlj. . . `-t � w-.� ._ .. K . ��...d'' t ::..�L t..,�,¢- '" ��•,�� .,."i#�°°r: �� ,,+ � .ai.+,..� ;$y�,. . ��. ��,,,�._' �" • �.�r".t t9�^�r+a . .-'� ft,�'�a'�. �,�+��c � � � ,• �7�.� � . !" � s . �� .,.��sk.'��°`� ,t,+ � H' � � � wy : ..s�+ �Y3 .'s:� .♦ !+� � : � ae+. �t�:-Y' Z� ._ ,:,��, "A,�.'�" < �,�'w"? �,��" �„y".. .nsma��`sx �,:'Y� �.'��. �. .� � •_ i:'. +±�:. d � ��x 3. � �, • +�.c � '�' r�++, �. s. "SW 4�5; �' �'� �!�'��:.t '"R.,. �� itwL'. .�.� `�'*m�'ti�S��*�.. .�'�"` �,:�y�r,� •��,"�c �,,:�,,,, n ,'e: fipi'�;a•`� °�.' ..'.�!" :J.i�• :�� . .W-:� #�'`X:.'r ��.w Y-�.,k.:'+_�.�� ' r��>. �.., ,r�.. _.�` ..;sg rws.'"� .Y.,n�+kag'��i" � , y,�c'` �,.�t: ,��j*''�., v_+�,y:�'�j :,'t�<:�� . ?d' �'? ��a•� � .a��gAK��E<� ��"` �^�`�'��,�, � ��1�� - �'y�`•��w at�� ':.+?��_ %+Y'� �.' � '�y � .., � r�. �' uc 3�� .';.0 . _J2''�F` • � �4�� t� �f��. �4�t : "�� _ �{ �e,�:�.� .a�+7,�,�.a.e�.�� .. �"'' . w¢'. r � 7��Cr .�1 .p�.. '� `cy;i ��, � �e.. Si, � YfY ..�� . „ • � ,�cRa �. a �... a�'S� . � � , � n .... �r � � .. . r• � � � 75�firs.�k {.y� �q�' �"'� °�v�'+S��L� � �..- '"ti [. '�,��*+�ii.,� Y.ei' �".�"„G't «r q. . ,� �� ' �. �"''-� 3r�c� ... .»,:y<a ;,, ..r... .^,�.iw.,^.'. —�...,;..:. „`•'' w' ""�wac S.'+'"S�.�1,��s�+eA -a3ts�,-�.��1 �' H,��i,�Lt� ,�$„s�"�'T��'� n r ��a^ , . . . . �� .. �.. .. y �� _ . {;. ' �}� e�'��.�' ;� . � : �� .��.. 4:�' y� .. � S ., fu"�y�� aw' 3" �4�y'�.L:S Y .�" � . � S'LT � .� `t' . . �� ;� � �� _ ��._� �� .- u°�. �� _`� �.�� ' �. -�' �` �;� ; � � � ,�.`�. ��✓, ,u�,�'..'• .: ` X �' .�'�siTSr 3. � x� . �a. s�-�• � - '.1�° �' v �� nTw'• �.'�-,a �.as,: �-s;� �'' �� r.. � �"�^ .t.� �.s� �y; . �'C,lr � ?k� � _�� . �� t.� �, �s� }{..' /�/� as �� xT �'J�- x^ - a ; �� .C"� .i..� a"�"7�'f�i�� . �j�jj{jF�� e Y y .),,j;' � � �� rxw�.fYr3N4rd�.1y1i��y�A�'.• /' � .�.�� t'�jC��i L 1 . iF� ,�} : �.: �;, ' .1;7.�` s. : '`` £L��' "cs�` � t;�, �A',yI� ..s+'.3q ��.�.�,,,�F�.` ��'r . <.x..a�+�a.� `� •wa.': N� ( � i .�,i�w�.a'�ta�`� �#a �. �,,,:..f.�. ��-�`$.�'Y�u,�;"� .s W� �. . � ... . ' �'.�S'�! �,;e��"�� '�„ t..,� z `" ��..'��'� � ;� +'' � � ,. ..,.--r---- t�.' �, �.:.. �.�.:: �� :�'� 't- ��,'q .t.� '.r^�'trt"' � ...�._ SF . �*a'iv+" 9a�a y y .. r�.'W',�.`.,�'�""...++�F,ry,r.�,�{S��%-."�' .�� r 4 .-.' y �., t a�� ..�.� �i ,�7.��5 �„u+�;�" ��r � ie�.7�i4°.��pha,: ""��,%,.� x,� s� L �£ ^�..,a�;,;„-�'�' '��i�Si��'?...- t x s�i��Si.iN. '} y .'� b R r ,�'..";�!�,��n,�y _� .�� 5 �' .y, �_r.s ' ..�,�. .,� `sYt v �� .:�•. �. `iY .Y ' �'kl'ns44 ��i.� S✓��. � ; �' �..} ?{4��:��^��{ jt.Ay/l"�yy+�n�t�:4� 4'�} N"3 n' �':�' � 4b-�4 �a �;� �M�� .. �.�IIM``�.'iN^0.'fi.i... .��w �f.r 'Y.. .� x • .,.. ,. . . ...r � . '.. ....;.. '.' . _ ... . , �-�. ■ s � A��is�� s��o / ��i�� n� �. Saint Paul Art Coliective � . 1 � . O � � � . - D ` ° . . ST.PAUL ART OOILECTIVE WALL STAEE7GALLERY aoo t�wm�[n . . � awwr rwia.�ra�s�a . - � (NTIlfbN�► � . � . . { . i ' Vomela Building Artist/Housing Development Table of Contents I. Project Summary........................................... Page i . II. Introduction to the Saint Paul Art Collective............. Page 1 III. Lowertown--The Artist's Neighborhood.............•�.••••••• Page 3 � Figure 1. Map of Lowertown Neighborhood................. Page 4 IV. The Need for Artist Housing in Lowertown.................. Page 5 Figure 2. Vomela Building Project: Goals andObjectives.......................................... Page 6 V. Vomela Building Development Description................... Page 7 Figure 3. Propoer.ty Proposed for Option.............. ... Page 9 Figure 4. Proposed Basement Layout...................... Page 10 Figure 5. Proposed First Level Layout................... Page 11 Figure 6. Proposed Second Level Layout.................. Page 12 VI. Market Analysis........................................... Page 13 Figure 7. Supporting Letter of Interest............. .... Page 15 VII. Management Plan........................................... Page 16 Figure 8. Job Description of Project Manager......... . .. Page 17 Figure 9. Timeline...................................... Page 18 VIII.Financing Plan................. ....................... .... Page 21 Volema Building Development Pro Forma................... Page 22 Uolema Building Income and Expense Sched�le............. Page 23 � Volema �Building Source of Funds Schedule.............. . . Page 24 Solicited Sources of Financing.......................... Page 25 Financing Analysis. . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . .. . . . . . . . . . . . Page 26 - IX. Art Collective Board and �9embership. . . . . . . . . . . . . . .. . . .. . . Page 27 � . � `�� . . ''+ -� . � . o � . . D �� ' °.� . . ST,►AU�ART OOLlECT1VE WALL STREEiGALLERI' . aoo e.ssr�ur s�wr ww.ria»+a �s�»m.w� .� I � � June 1, 1983 . � � The St. Paul Art Collective invites your participation in a redevelopment project for the Vomela Building. The Volmela Building is located in the northern part of downtown St. Paul 's Lowertown. The Collective proposed to redevelop this warehouse into 16 studio/housing units for artists at a cost of $950,000. The critical need for artist housing in Lowertown has been widely recog�ized. Of the . 200 some artists living and working in Lowertown, almost half live and work in their studios. Most of the existing artist studio/housing spaces are unsafe. The artists living in these spaces are faced with unstable lease arrangements and the imminent threat of displacement due to major redevelopment in towertown. . The displacement of artists from Lowertown would disrupt the grow�h of what has become an emerging center of important, "home grown" �rt activity in the Twin Cities. It would ironically remove from the Lowertown neighborhood one of its primary sources of identity. It would displace the amenity that cultivated an interestin lowertown as a place to live and that attracted redevelopment interests. The Art Collective i$ investing the leadership, time and personal energies to make the Vomela Building Artist/Housing Development project happen.. The Collective has determined that it will take $950;000 . to zcquire and redevelop the V�mela Building into artists �housing. It will also require an unusual degree of cooperation and commitment by a number of parties. The Art Collective views the difficulty of acquiring and.redeveloping the Vomela � Building as being surpassed only by the difficulties of the conditions of artists studio/hous'ing in Lowertown today, and the uncertainties of what those conditions will be tomorrow. The Vomela Building Artist/Housing Development project will not solve Lowertown's artist housing problems completely. However, it will: . 1) Provide safe, stable and affordable studio housing to at least 16 artists (including 12 low to moderate income artist households) most of whom currently live under substandard conditions and the threat of displacement from their current housing, as well as the Lowertown neighborhood; 2) Improve the cultural environment of downtown and St. Paul by creating a "foothold" for artists to continue to be residents and workers in Lowertown; the neighborhood that they pioneered and that today owes a vital part of its identity to their presence; and 3) Provide a model to influence the development of additional studio/housing units in Lowertown. . . . The� St. Paul Art Collective proposes to demonstrate the type of leadership role artists can play in improving their neighborhood and their living condition. On behalf of the St. Paul Art Collective, we welcome you to join with us in our effort to take the initiative and make some important progress toward developing stable ' � artist/housing in Lowertown. Sincerely, , � � . � , . � '� � . � David Madson, President St. Paul Art Collective �°� Cathy Ingebretsen, Co-Chair • S�ace Committee . - � . Vincent Valenti, Co-Chair � Space Committee ii . , � .� . ��:�� Introduction ta the Saint Paul Art Collective The Saint Paul Art Collective is a tax exempt, Minnesota non-profit corporation established in 1977. It is composed of over 50 active artists, most of whom l�ve and work in warehouse spaces in Lowertown. . . � � Through the Collective, Lowertown artists have organized to develop services to meet , cnmmon needs and to coordinate discussion and action which addresses issues related to promoting, maintaining and developing art activity in Lowertown., The Collective's current program of activities represents a comprehensive reorganization of the group that took place in late 1982. Since reorganizing, the Collective has posted a number of major achievements: * THE WALL STREET GALLERY. The Collective developed and currentIy manages a gallery in a warehouse at 300 East Fourth Street at the south end of the Farmers • Market. Tt�� Wall Street Gallery features the work �f Lowertown artists. Beginning June 1, 1583, the Collective will be rehabilitating store front space in the same building for a new, larger gallery to replace its current space. * $10,000 IN GRANTS. The Collective has been awarded nearly $10,000 in grants � � during April and May, 1y83. The grant funds will be used to produce a major exhibition series for presentation at the Wall Street Gallery between August, 1983 and August, 1984. These grants were awarded by the Metropolitan Regional Arts Council and the St. Paul Department of Planning and Economic Development's New Works/St. Paul project. * THE ARTIST'S VOICE. The Collective has established itself as the voice for the artists of Lowertown. The City and community organizations, such as the Downtown Community Development Council and the Lowertown Redevelopment Corporation, commonly confer with the Art Collective on arts and neighborhood issues * BEAUX ARTS BALL. The Collective produced the Beaux Arts Sall in December, 1982. The Ball attracted 500 attendees from throughout the Twin Cities art commun�ty. The Ball increased the visiblity of the Collective and of. Lowertown as a center of "homegrown" art activity. It was also a very successful fundraiser. A second event is under production for June 25. The Collective plans to make both annual events. , * SPACE COMMITTEE. A committee of Collec�ive members has been actively working to develop a plan for creating more safe, affordable and stable artist studio/housing. The committee's work began in January with a statement of needs. The City's Neighborhood Partnership Program (NPP) has served as a catalyst to organize and train the committee so that it is now a proactive agent capable of assuming a primary role in affecting the development of art spaces in Lowertown. . . 1 . . ' � Introduction to the St. Paul Art Collective • (Continued) � ' � Lowertown is a unique place for artists to live and work. It is highly unusual to have so many people working as artists and �living in such close proximity. This is the special strength of the Lowertown art "scene". It is through the St. Paul Art Collective that the artists of Lowertown are working to retain what is special and essential to their work, and to reach beyond, to bring the Twin Cities' appreciative . art audiences into Lowertown's art community. . r � � �, . , 2 . . J . . ��"��5 Lowertown--The Artists's Neighborhood , . Lowertown is a neighborhood within downtown St. Paul. The area is bounded by Robert Street on the west, I-94 on the north, the Mississippi River on the south, and the . Layfayette Bridge on the west. This is St. Paul's old warehouse district. (See Figure � 1.) - ' The people who make up �he neighborhood include the tenants of Mears Park Place (conventional apartments including low income and handicapped), artists who live and work in the old warehouse buildings (most under conditions that are barely code compliant) and businesses and maunfacturers. � Lowertown is not unlike the typical neighborhood. It is made up of a mix of residential, commercial and recreational uses, and the people who live and work there share concerns for developing the neighborhood into a secure and livable community. What makes Lowertowr� a different neighborhood is that commercial land use outweighs . residential uses, many of the residents live in unconve�tional housing units in highly urb�nized surrourdings (for example artists living in warehouses) and there are very few family households. Lowertown was St. Paul 's first residential neighborhood. It's name comes from the adjacent Mississippi River "lower" levee landing. There were many fir� homes and churches in the area. As St. Paul grew, the economics of transportativn made Lowertown a convenient site for businesses to Iocate. The residents moved out and industrial and retail warehouses were built. The warehouses of Lowertown were designed for specific uses and as the nature of industry and commerce changed, the buildings were vacated. In the 1970's, artists in St. Paul, like the "urban Pioneer" artists around the country, started to move into these old warehouses, thus, making the attractiveness of reusing this neightofhuod and its buldings more apparent. An interest in Loweriown as a place to live was renewed. This interest was marked and heightened by the McKnight Foundation's $10 million grant to stimulate and coordinate redevelopment of the area through the formation of Lowertown Redevelopment Corporation (LRC). Today, Lowertown is a neighborhood positioned for dramatic changes. This 180 acre chunk of downtown St. Paul real estate is some of the hottest investment property in the Twin Cities. Fueling this surge of redevelopment are the rich stock of historic buildings, the highly urbanized yet neighborhood feeling of its residential life and the cultural appeal of the many producing artists and independent art organizations that call Lowertown home. These amenities are the heart of what has made Lowertown work as a neighborhood. They are the qualities that need to be protected and nurtured in order to maintain its strength as a neighborhood--a secure and enjoyable place to live and work. 3 _ _ _ _ _ _ __ -.�,� i : �_ � ■ ■ ■ ■ �►. ;� ■ �': _ ► ;�.�. : � i ■ =��:= �� -� - = i ■ _=■ = -�- - ■-: -=� �-�=■ i � o � ' �� = � � % -- - .� / ,.,.,. s � � � � � �� , � � � . ■ � �^� ;� � , " � � � � 1_ '� , i. ' �� ■ � -- E, � .�� '�� '�. � � , . � � � y � - =- - � - ��A�e��i�% `�► �� ,� �-��'�� . � ♦ ..�� e � - � �,� ,�� ;�: � �. � _ ��,��_�,� ♦�� `�, �� _ ,i♦ � � , . � �-�� ,� _��.'� , • :��e ` � `� - ' � � � �� , �� ♦ � >� �� ' �r �� `�i��' ''� �► �, �. � � ' �� ` .► . .■� ■ ■ �� ,� � 1► � ♦ ' �� : . � �► � . � . •�� ,� � �► � �(� n- ��1� :1 �� = .t �� , `'r ♦ �� a �`' , �.. n r��: ` � � *� • � �� :. � �/ 1��,�� : .`. � - � . � , � � � • ♦ . _, �� - ► � / � � _ � � � . . - � � .� : . . _ ��'�� - ♦ � ` � -- �y , � �, �. ' �" - - - =.. `� ��i � ,►�c �� 11 1 1 ' � .-..�.■■:��.��.��.� is �:�_`, .s�t;` �r;�:�C��°,a' � 2 - i.� <" '} -r " _ � ^':YI i,: a,.� '.=�`�'. .� ��C�. `s}A:c�il '�. � �1 - �ti i „ .�; �H`M1 �� ` �' � "WC:'a-- �M�..J�:. "�'�f•" � � . . ��;"�� . . . . .; The Need for Artists Housing in Lowertown The most pressing problems facing Lowertown artist residents are the unsafe, substandard and unstable housing situation and the fear of displacement due to the intensive redevelopment in the neighborhood. Currently, there are six buildings used for housing or studios by an estimated 200 to 250�artists in Lowertown. (See figure 1, Page 4). 7hey are: . ' * 300 Building at. 300 East Fourth Street * Milton Building at 250 East Fifth Street , . * 262 Building at 262 East Fourth Street � * Rossmor Building at 500 North Robert ' * Jax Building at 253 East Fourth * Roberts-Hamilton Building at 33Q East Ninth Street Not all of of these buildings are occupied by artists who both live and work in their studios. However, the two buildings that have the highest studio/living occupancies also happen to be two of the buildings in Lowertown with the most complicated ownership � arrangements and speculation prosFects. At the pace Lowertown is being developed, it is expected that almost all of the buildings currently accupied by artists will change .use in the next three to five years. Relocating to conventional housing will not help Lowertown artist/residents who are threatened with displacement. They have unusual studio/housing needs. Most artists do not generate enought income to support separate sudio and living spaces. High ceilings, open space, lots of daylight, and ur.carpeted floors are a few of the specialized needs of most artists. The working space cannot be finished or it inhibits one's work. The underutilized warehouse space in many inner cities attracts artists because the rent is inexpensive compared to market rates. Although many of these building provide substandard living situations, they are what most artist can afford. These building offer the wide oaen unfinished space with the necesssry working conditions for artis�s. The economics of the future redevelopment planned for these buildings will make them unaffordable for artists. The Saint Paul Art Collective wants to make the working/living situation for Lowertown artists more safe and stable. One of the most important components of a successful solution must be a price that takes into account the low incomes of the artists. . 5 � . � ' G011Lf TO I!lPROVL THL CULTURAL fNYIRONtiEttT Ot DOHMIOYtI AND SA1N? PAUL BY CREA?1lIC A "BOOY7lOLD" FOR AATISTS TO CONTINllE 'IO OE RESIDENZS AND WORICERS IN 1.OWE6TOM1; 7StE NEIQIBORH000 THAT TkIEY P10MEERED AND TNAT TODAY ONFS A VITAL PAR2 OY ITS ' IDtNT11T i0 YFlEIB PRESENCL . EYALUATION . POPULASIOH lFABLYII SIAiEMEtl! OBJECIIYES ME[NUD OU?00l� lBOCFSS Artist� 1. Nsed Spaes that isi 1. Reduee thseat of 1. Develop 14 to 1. Aeduce Y 1. Co�stsuct: . of L2 a.'�uitsbla to= displaeeaeat by 16 studio/living arcist� proeess Nelghborl►ood �tudio/i�ousiu� faereaaing f of safe i/or •tudio unics lfvio6 !a D. saf• for ; stabl�� affordable i )SX avaiLble to wosuitabl� • • studio/howin� ' suitable units lov/ood Lneome for -uneafs c. �tabl� and owner oceupaacy -unat.able affordabl� unit� in L? 2. Need to demoaruat� 2. Iacreaoe ♦ of �afe. 2. Arto Colleecive 2. O�her 2. �uecess-' . leaderehip; aelf- stable� afEordable 6 assume lead developer development� fully help initiative sui[able ualte by_ tole and document take hold 1 o�anage 6 • i capabilit� dmonetratioo i psocess and survey Art• Collective produe� � influence acatus of artisu' ge[s eoosulted maawl . • apace needr 1r , Figure 2. � Vomela Building Project: Goals and Objectives � . � 6 • � . VOMELA BUILDING , ��'� � � ' DEVELOPMENT DESCRIPTION The Vomela Bui]ding is located at 178 East Ninth Street in downtown � St. Paul . The building is situated on the corner of P�inth and Temperance Streets in the "north quadrant" area of downtown St. Paul 's Lowertown district. The building is currently owned by Farm Credit Banks and , managed by Towle Co. A small part of the building is used for light warehousing. . Conversion into 16 artist studio/housing units is proposed for the Vomela Building. Seventy-five percent of the units (12 of the�16) will be available to �ow or moderate incame households. � , � � The studio/housing units will be located in the basement and on the first and second floors of this two story building with above grade basement. Four units will be located in the basement, six on the first floor and six on the third floor (see attachments in this section). The units will range from 630 sq. ft. to 1 ,500 sq. ft. with the average size being � approximately 900 sq. ft. The variable-sized units will make it possible to subscribe units for households of equally-varied incomes. Each unit will be code-compliant with complete baths, kitchen sink and • appliance hook-ups. The level of finish in the units wili remain relatively "raw" to assure that they are suitable for both studio and living uses. The building has a number of attractive features that make it particularly . suitable for art reuse: * wide open floor space (as is characteristic of warehouses) * very few interior walls thus minimizing preparation and demolition costs--the building is in very tidy condition * openings on the first and second floor as well as the basement level on three sides for full-size bay windows * reinforced concrete and brick construction with concrete floors throughout and two concrete stairways--both a real plus for meeting fire c�de � � * electrical capacity is very large with outlets already well distributed throughout the building � * basic plumbing and drainage systems are located at two opposite ends of the building which will ease installation of expanded residential systems . * freight elevator serves the center core of the building with freight access available through basement--some repairs are needed but it is useable. Beyond its physical appropriateness, the purchase and renovation of the �Vomela Building offers several other attractive features: * management control and eventual sole ownership by and equity for the artists living in the building � � 7 � - . , •. s�� {� ; ;e f�',� x�.�.,* z�°"��?�#•+� ro�a '� ��.�� "5:.�� '�.� '� tsc�� .°�'�" '�yFw�` �°'' �� '�'sR;;b�-. �,. ' !�r' .,32' s.� ^e�"Xrr^^y ' - .� 4§..y� �{ -!f�,u„ .. .�,x� s . �k.x M.. �',�� Y"'��jyw4 �w f� � , _� � �� „ � 3�''F'� F . �.�''�S.:�.} `sJ'.a 'i °�.�i�°` ��' '�"Zr � �ir�;"^� .'� ^'"�` �rr °' K��`.".�'"✓ �✓'1�,��+� � e n �,}�„..�`�%„ F�"� ..� `� K�.. ��k�i�� . � � �C x'��,g`��'"�. --ty;�:r�y� �; %F ��S �'�"�� '% �� z'��'Ei A^d'„�.fz�Y",�s 7f K�' p 7,�� . .,��'^'4'.y ^IS" .. ...w'�. :�'�,"�' � . ,° at��.,Y"��$ � .� y � &` � �, � � , �`��'� 'fi��r,. s� „s . ..:.5,3*° ,�. .�FY� ,r.. ... .:. ,�,• •s� s,� L ,� � � "L. :r > � �yN�„a�'��.-r`P'i `�''��I ��' if '�°z� ' �v '" �� _ �X'''M 7'�ij'+e��"n '�'�`. r s,�4 K . k�f�a ti;"�. � „w. � ; �.-,",�s°� ,�3r 1 ' �,r`°;��'�=' �'� '``'T+'* -�� *:.. '� "'�.qii_ �� ;y�'":y"��''�"�, ,..: s,�..(t2�� .. . r,.;,�. ..+*v . ��.� � k ,y, . < 7,fi�€i'ay- .,i '' � �o[ .`��"e'��6 :�ryf L �� .tb ��.; " 4 .s K 3�t � S�� 'ax ,.�� M,�*" � � -. f y �s . t�,j,.•� Y�r s■.?�'� �%� �� ,,,,�.-�'. '" •.�y s^� n "�h.� � n�� "' «:��.�` v '�� 4"�;, .. ' �,�,�:3� ��y..x� a ✓''s � t'i, ,�:i. •�+ .: ,� a.. �F .;y; ,r..• f°;'�'�}"� h�"` �'� "� � ' �S ��t! .r �' w"�y,tay�+" '�..�x � a ��y,^�. n�� .�. �o��s�"x , K 3 �iC" ��.�� ' �.� *,�,, �r x #�ara�.� �'7�,��s�3� � �1:"`�# .��""'" .,.,�.�,'� � � ��:: h �+;�"c.^` �1:. � r4 �e5 s3 M"+Sss'�5,. ;9°� Je,e"'q,(�.c�,q��,�� 't? a�+"�.;�.�.`! t�. �� :'�r� ; � �+`�'.. r 'Y'�e;��"�^�' '�"y��dy�.^�-�, •'tS �,,�F'.� � �.�s'r#w,� � �..� -�,� � �'u,""' � sa a'"�.n.f�' ..d�-a�'�.�*� �`'� . . � ;� b�� _ �.�-.. .~ �p.',� a "�'J�',� 'S. .r rfi � : � . �� 1 �,� „e".�'"�: � �.rwx.,RA�� A�� - :•�h.�.. � ai_�.3Fa ,s...axfc,......w:u ::a�� :# a t..:+'�.C��.,�� - � ��, . �+��k;j�'t .... �"�'� � -.;r at 4 . ' . Y � � l"trrt":,�af�•r..:r ....�1`x�/::w�Tli�i�''j, '� +�t�7 �s �.�'� � e7yc�?z �g; �:�4� ( .>.a� i.�� n I�i``V��.�"K��^ E$ �+ �a»�r„+.tr•;.+.+�^r-� ' � y^(y ' y Y ' � �� ` 4„S :.��' � ^l�YA' �sS�Yft 'H "fl� � .Y' . fi C v'yn(� �. ti e ��. a� x. p.� �s '°rw..� ��Nr , �.��.+�...qF+� � �� .�5'ya'r t�. s�„� x�,,, �^. ,� r y ^�� ,; _ ?,� y�,.z,,;S.. _ �� s�:. .�1'� .r�"` �a�i,�. „a s>-. � �..�� - '°'`._ w'.t+'JrS.o..._n+t•„Nti.G.., a+ar�.«.�k:r ;:� �%� t.,e;w ��,.5 }-� �„z u � � I�fl�ir`- �' '' . '�T'+�'�'��'i`1f�+.¢s��,Ax�36,ff, �•°$!�. �., x iryF o,^� , '' �C+_`�..• . "F� . _: ..� ��,�,�l��G�4..� L �+tr . •"'�` .. •.�5�°1 . ,C�y n��v�f,t^' ...'�'X''"t ?y�"m' a�.�, '�t':.` � �,.., � � A::�id' a '�i "��' x r �-"".��x^ .s'a� �- q,..3,��,�,F�. ..�+� !s�t v«.�^x�a r Fj?� y'?r.:"..�»Tt.r�»�+.4r»-, -r .>. a�ts�^�,,� -wan...,'� �`- . r ��,��-, �y. ��,� °.�,��_.*�,,:y -�rX,,.: � ' -/ .:it, y.. �v ;�.,;,�rps,t" , 'v -, '.7 X r,�k'� �''� F� s K'�"a`a'4�^ Y?�� !� s� �x . £� e � "Z:�x�rs,r '� ,c� l�rx a-�. s y � „ �'A'�� ,c.. >,.w�z�a,�y.�'�r' > � t�a.� �s Sa�.••-C'� �v "^ �«,y�+i'��3�1't '� �`�'�•^�a�'�i n.h#� . t�a'"��„✓ ea� r � r" w � ,, 'z h,� s+��•'� ..�zN 3s� �r�; ..�,� � . � �,�, �. �i.�' ��.�. �,:` � ..;,� •+ i . ^ s;: �q .*_...t p'' � ♦ �si sn ,�.'Y•"3.�^YS» �'F -.. �� '"�'r �i a'�Y,� r � �G{ tiy5 ti . ��" �e,�ew � f�`'r �� '�`w�` ,.r s� ' � ' » rw�z t r� �a�y '.f�� ,rx � � ��.+t,.�yy��` '+��.��.a"�aE�'��," yr,s�r�'�,��"`,a�y'�"•��,�"'�"�"''�;��y"�s: �i m^€� '��-^r, �';�.x5 a �r: �Y y 1F« ,r,n. �s. , ;� �°. ,e� ; �'P.,X .y..ti��a..�rz�`�t �:x� "d:��aM,a �.``KSa z� :.�°t`y,a�„r�"k "�,�'a� -�''ae'u� 'ws'�? �x< °�f:�r"n�� `�� g.5'�' . 9� i7 w .�ri' "��.�°" .��'z rlr �,+-, .Ut(,�y c,�T*k. �..�'y' �^-.: �f t'q�� 3��.'�'�'g { : ,g 'S � � . t ,z f ,� �i �a ¢. � �. � Y !3 . ��v +�i- �� 'i� i Z �'�,-µ; s«p.H,Fr��'%��'�,.��,��s'��w��;,� �,s ;; l;�'�v'� i��'`��g�: , . ,x r � .,tl ...Y '"'� +t '°r �,�+�x' s,�,�` r �: ��`"`x"'.�� , .� � x'�i�A .-�' h v_. �-,M�' Ly��T �._ � �T�.`""•'•:�• '�' �.,�,,.�a.'n"'T�r'�Z'.6'��'n.�� £`"r's;`` �".r?��*"�;,�""�`"��,�.,��.�''�,�t��,�"^"�,"�`��s �''#�,.�,'r' ,7x� _ . `�` ^/`,�s' �'-`: w .e` :w �;.s�- �,�d,; � F �y�t,s�"`:s�+'rr• ., �' ��.,�� z ti-s, . k 1��,�7'�'f,{��Ep.,,. �. � . ��y;��sk�' �R�'�•. � ��,t"+n �, '£; . ,� w .�,� �� . ` �k:.�$e''°'� }# w.• � .st.s< ,�.�R ,,p 5�w�,'Ra�� , ,� !'�',�'.��""!!�'�"�, ��y b3� " ti"�� LtaW.�r_!S�-.. z �5 . ��C"'��;:�'k�Y7� X3� y�.! k ... .y.+t �!1'� k � A �4�: Y% �".� ,�+��4.�!y�Y�Z� `''y'�.� ,�g.13L`�rii,��i : �'' °�� '� �� A'^"p. �k '. ar� ��z'$�.... •i S.,�„_"+�'h' •a �",� x �, a �.r.....� ,.€� �`�"'sz�'x;�°�u��'� �x.�t�, ;�° ye,;y '� �+•!,r.� n �Np � ,^ � £�� r s ��: 7 e,�� swAN'�;e��_ . ,.�!7�t yy�� 1��Mi.��R�; �.��y't��[��.��`w;f��M 1! ��y'�,��5 6 A'n' G, �,{��'71'f�'bk �' . Y/ = 0 "4,�-.Y!`� .9e'�k�A�' g 4(+u�4�qp':�d"�YT�3...8"R+. 8�r .., ¢t� "�fyi"^.y�I^ 4' ..,. ��+.�'�,� y �i ''� S F T,a`�<�'",yf W+r+�'',�i?�� '�+asa„3 ..� 7' ^" .: '"� �w � � �' .ta�� t. � �",.t,�s � .��9 �� Y �r'�„''s� -ry�t� ...z.,� u.« d� x n x ��. F �:,�.� s a;.� a i4 �..,4-c;�� '�� , �i h4`.�' ��„xs��"�� s��'��..�[�� s r�i � ,� �% '�.�' t _ '9'a7'��, r�� 3 p ��"'�ta!�.�.�4.'"`a§..."�%� '�+� '`°'`^:��s,•�,��:. ��y'.,,"�s'�'R.. "x'�'dxs � . � �i . '�'��:��, '�^`"y �«�r„�,r,x �a, s '�p � �.. � ' �' h.*�.rryr� v,�s�y x�� hs'"'"'�;�. ��y""' '�t } �., £•• ..+cr..�-�,:. �'i'� �, _ � . w .x✓ u .0 ':� a a '�� w .�^'; r �:� P. c' ��.-F�t 9r,�'z�`"*.y`�",,�,,� �s",M��` '� "�'.� �° .",Y1�".�" ..,,..�..�s j+'R �..�,'?:r,,s '�^� :,.,f'*�«�, x � � �y"'a"C"+J�k �k°'�' s r 3;^��w�'�i"��ti' T�-.�."�'�a.,..s',.`"�°,'�•L'" �.�. +� 1F. . y. - � :7 ��,� ,�,-x,+.w' i.�^,�'" :s� i r s 1' -t'� i s �'��°„a� a,r '�` r� t z � ' a�r�.,,ry-�. ,�"'t ..K,�.:�.�,:. * i `"� .;�f�,g�vt:�'rs'�"^. �4 .F ....: ,-��..s��tii"yr "�'�Y.2».��F# .+ �' i�;°�.r.�''N N'-.�� -w ' 0.5*'�: y '`•� "��,� �� . �..�fy�s�s., �'�`=�Y "'1 � . _ „ � �w:!�'...' r�:e'. .1 y. �& .:�. ,...... '>1� ' ,s, � .y' ��. - : : F,��.�,y � .�,�� . t�`u+��.r.ve�s ~�; � ..: ��.y�,r ,wa�. ei K.�4'+ �� . ,� :t�.e • �F ri�i � y.c :.,�. 2 _-`�' t r �.xz^r s ti'f'k' 7 ' � ..,�". �'��t {': �r . "k�" a. ..it3,�, d a,��t',}• •a .k '�` s� A�G iF, � ��xX�:,a� ��'�"�''!°e�-'e�{.�v` s.d'K ?" 3S s '�, fr��, q' r•."'ti S'" y�y ��'":�. ��°d.r.+di -!�'�i-.ky t x it�y , ,�.. �� :� � ::� �:,�`�. ,. � ,�„ ".. u �v,,..-� ,-r,.. .�� "� Y- * creation of a neighborhood landmark that clearly identifies Lowertown as a place where artists live and work and permanently establishes the artists' position in the neighborhood * creation of a landmark for the arts comr�unity, introducing opportunities for special programing to service the building's and Lowertown's artist residents and a physical focal point for organizing artist residents. � . g ' . • . ��i ��i��c �J � F�—ND'—� 80� `-' �' � _____ � � Vomela Building Artiats Studio/Ftousinq Davelopmeet EXKTiNG —"'—--- . � STRtPtN4 FoR 11 -------- . ' PR��Ei� PK�S�D CARs -------- - TOR OPTION � (APP?.oXIMqT6 DIMENSIOI�S} . ------ � FIGUR�"3 � �I, VOMELA , ------ i �� ButLCtNC, � IOD' �RAMP -----• 1 UP � -- --- 1 l 1 iE-26 •r�..��r• � ' DRWINb - -- � . ! � LAN� � �OME�A � — —--M; MECHANiCAL i . �! ----- � z�t. � L�M��' .. {f-14�� f«� IOta—'''� . �EASEMa1T�R pPFNING CF EMERhE�1GY DC1T G�SOFC , . q , t � . . � 825 SQ.FT. 850 Sq.FT. . . � � � � i � f . i � . � •! i � �' I � ' + REYATOR � ! I + i � i� i � i � � so � _ _ . �� 0 965 SQ.FT. 1,055 sQ.FT. Bas�rn- ��,rE� Vomela Building � ' �}j]r{�5 Artists Studio/Housiny Developm�rK 3,695 HE7 5GZ FG (R�rtra.spAC� . FIGURE �} � ' 10 � � : ��,� . ' � � . . . . 1,�75 SQ.F� 635 SQ.FT. 1,250 SQ.FT. . • � . 0 � . � � � �I � � � � ` � EIEVATOR � � � Q � � '725 SC,�.Ff. 7D0 SQ.FI: I�N'65 SQ.FT F„�-r�� v� Vomela Building ' b UNII� Artists stud'a/Housinp Devebvmem 5�850 NET SQ FT (RENTAL SPACE� . . Fi�u�e 5 . �� . . , . t,i�fs sQ.Ft . 625 sc��r s8o sc�.�r. � , ; 0 . - '� I� � �� \ I ELEVATO� � I/ � � � J,��O SQ.�T 96D SQ.FT. I,IbS S4.FT. s�conA �ooR �EV�� Vomela Building b UN�T� Artists5tuda/HousinyDeveloprn�nt 6,255 N£T sq.FT (REr►rA�S�aCF) . F14uRE 6 � �2 • ��'�� - Market Analysis Around the country, artists in city after city have been displaced� from cheap warehouse studio/housing due to redevelopment. This is an immediate problem for artists in St.. Pau�l's Lowertown. Many Lowertown artists live in unsafe, substandard and unstable housing situations and are expecting displacement due to the area's intensive redevelopment. � � � . , The Vomela Building is ,an opportunity to provide studio/housing for Lowertown artists who wish to make a permanent commitment to living and working in Lowertown. _ * Currently, there are six buildings occupied by an estimated 200 to 250 artists in Lowertown. About half of these are studio live-in situations.. The two buildings with the highest occupancies also happen to be two of the buildings with the most complicated ownership arrangements and speculation prospects, and consequently the least productive landlord tenant relationships. At the pace Lowertown is being developed, it is expected that almost all of the buildings currently occupied by artists will change use in the next three to . five years. So being, a large portion of the artist tenants are interested in more stable studio/housing situations. - * The Vomela building meets the specialized conditions necessary for artists to work and live in. It has a clean wide open space, large windows, high ceilings, and elevators that are large enough to move artwork. * A survey of Art Collective members indicated that they are now paying an average of $240 per month for spaces aver•aging 1546 square feet. They indicated a willingness and ability to pay �300 per month for smaller spaces varying in size from 650 square feet to 1500 square feet. * Artspace Projects Inc, a non-profit organization that works with artists to place them in studio/housing or studio spaces has stated that $350 is the high end of what artists are paying and $400 represents a definite cut off point for what most artists t�ere can afford. Rental for �the Vomela Suilding studios will range between $293 and $390 depending on the size. * Artists have varying space needs and abilities to pay, suggesting that spaces need to be developed with different sizes and prices. The Vomela Building offers the opportunity to develop a �variety of spaces. * Artist studio/housing is an unusual and attractive working/living situation. The consensus is that these spaces should be code-compliant but relatively • raw. Raw space is good because it allows for flexibility. The artists. are able to develop marketable, personal living spaces out of raw space. Their spaces have been models for more conventionally designed loft-style hausing. * For many artists, a move into the Vomela Building would represent a conscious trade off from temporarily low rents for large poor quality space in exchange for higher., but more stable rents and smaller but more comfortable space. The results of the Art Collective survey indicates that there is a willingness to make this tradeoff by enough artists to fully market the Vomela Building. . 13 � . . . ' � . Market Analysis � � (Continued) * According to Artspace Projects, the Vomela Building studio/housing units would be competitively priced with similar units in Minneapolis. This suggests that . part of the Minneapolis artists market could be attracted should the 16 units � not be fully subscribed by Lowertown artists. . � � � Therefore, the Art Collective, �the St. Paul Department of Economic Development, and the Hayberg Development Co. are confident that the project will be successfully marketed with relative ease. _ � � � ' in � . , . . �� , . . r��"� `'� J� • l • _ ° ° P�.�� . . P�.�JEC:TS � . . � � ��.�� , I� . �,� � , May 27, 1983 � � . � � • _ . . . , , _ David Madson � Cathy Ingebretsen : ' � �. • � � Vincent Valenti St. Paul Art Collective � 300 E. 4th Street . St. Paul , P1iV 55101 , . � � � Dear Alembers of the Space Committee: � Tliis letter is to support your efforts and to validate previous � information regarding the market for studio/living space as we have discussed in prior meetings. - � � �� Of the 100 r�ost recent requests.�for�stuc�'r.b�l ivi ng sspace, the fol�l owi ng needs were expressed: . Price Range: � � - � Less than $200 :• 15� � ' $20�=250 : 2?� �300-350 : 40� $400-450 : 18� �500-5�0 : 5� . Square Footage: . � 600-1,000 sf: 30� 1,000-1,300 sf: 39� 1,400-1,700 sf: 15� � � ' 1,800-2,100 sf: 8b 2,000 sf=-(+) : 8q � � The requests represent only a fraction of the number of inauiries we have had for studio/living use over the years. The above numbers represent an a�knowledgement that less space �is currently available at hic�her rates . than previous surveys have shown. The nature and qual�ity of open .studio/livinc� types of spaces nonetheless holds a great deal of r.�arket appeal . 4Je encourage and support your efforts to develop the �Vomela BuiTdir�g .for studio/living use. Every effort r�1us� be made to increase the number of code cor�pJiant artists housing units in order that the arts comrnunity � may retain a presence in Lowerto�m. Few neighborhoods offe'r '.the:�.kind of appropriate space needed to create a "c'ritical mass" of arts activity which is so important to:'the vitality of the individual arts community. I hope we will be able to continue to assist this exciting project. Sincerely, �� CMeryl Kartes� � . . FYpr��tiva flirPCtor . .. � . ` . 04 . . D ' ° ST.PAU��tR'f�ILEGTIVE WntL STRfETCiALCERY �oo e«�s+Ker � �*rr�w►saa • � ' NRNN•W1 . . . . • SIJPPORTING LETTER OF INITEREST In addressing the problems of w�safe and �mstable artist housing, the St. Paul Art Collective proposes to redevelop the warehouse at 178 East Ninth Street into 16 studio/living spaces. We, the undersigned, are seriously interested in studio/livin4g space within this building. Signing this sheet in no �•,ray binds us to, . - or guarantees us spaces in this buildic�g. � . � % 1 i��G� _ �-�� i�::j ' �'? - , � r„ !- . ��j,�- � j/ �,;• .� '---� � � . � r � , >-,. � . _ �r,�.;. .� . �lt I�- lU� �:��g-�-- � ..��,` ,� . � -.;�' � ,�,.s._.:,�..... _ ��.="�.^� � . � . �� . �: . .� : � ��Qp� � � �� ,� . �� -�- '��'n`�' � . ' 12,�,. � ! � j , , . ��f ( ;��{ s .� .� �- � . �� -.. _� � � � � �..�!Vl/�---- �- -- - . •'--•- - _---- �/�"�� / � � , � ' "' �� ' 1 J � /� �IZ�Tti. '' • >S� , �� , / i ,i �� z�✓ �,� � � .�- � , � C ��,/ � G I,��JIJ� �/t l C,K-� . � � / �� . ` �^ ' ��- �'�5� , 1 ) n .. .' .�1 !' 1 A �. C�e-� 1� _ F i n i i rP 7 . . , � . . . ��►��e;5 � Management Plan 1) The Space Committee The St. Paul Art Collective Space Committee was formed to address the ar�ists' needs for safe, stable and affordable studio/living space. With assistance from the Department of Planning and Economic Development and the Neighborhood Partnership Program (NPP) staff the committee has actively been working on the Vomela Building ' project since March; 1983. Co-chairs Vincent Valenti and Cathy Ingebretsen have used the guidelines of the NPP application in developing th� timeline and financial package. Yh2 NPP loan possibility has been the basis of our �leverage in� negotiating other financing. The Committee will continue to adhere to the NPP guidelines if funding is approved. � 2) Hiring a Project Coordinator A review committee of representatives from the Collective, LRC, LCC, and PED will advise the hiring. A manager experienced in housing development projects wi.11 be hired. Duties will include coordinating and directing the work of th� Space Committee as listed below and being the groups' representative to the construction .contractor. - 3) St. Paul Art Collective Housing Co-op . . The St. Paul Art Collective Housing Co-op, a newly formed non-profit subsidiary of the St. Paul Art Collective will be formed in August, 1983. Stage I (August through December 1983) � 1. Membership will consist of the Space Committee 2. Duties will include working with the project coordinator and PED to: - assemble financing - plan development . - plan management key elements will be the artist ownership arrangement, co-op management, and writing of the bylaws - plan and execute marketing Stage 2 (January through July 1984) - 1. Membership of the Space Committee will change to reflect the future building occupants plus one member of the Collective 2. Duties will include working with the project coordinantor, PED and the general contractor to: - rehabilate the building . - constuct personal spaces - assume management responsiblities - manage turnover/marketing - assume mortgage responsibilities � � 16 . � • • Project Coodinator Job Description � Work with the .space committee and PED to: ' - assemble financing � � � - plan development � ' - plan management . key elements�will be the artist ownership arrangement, co-op management, and writing of the bylaws , - - plan and execute marketing - be the group's representative to the contruction contractor - assist in the changeover of the Space Committee membership to reflect the future building occupants plus one member of the Collective � - plan and assist with the transfer of management, mortgage, and marketing� responsiblities ' 17 � . . . ?��;'�r� . � . � � � SAINT PAUL ART COLLECTIVE � VOMELIA PROJECT NPP PROPOSAL � � TIMELINE � March 24 Members of Collective's Space Committee tour � Vomelia Building - Tour arranged by DCDC staff and � � � � PED staff� . March 31 , Collective Executive Commi�tee meets with DCDC and . � PED staff and decides to submit NPP pre-application for loan to seed Vomelia Building project � April 2-3 Collective Executive Committee develops pre-application � . proposal in cooperation with DCDC and PED staft April 4 Pre-application submitted in concurrance with Executive Cossnittee recommendation April 17 Monthly Art Collective meeting, Executive Committee . reports on its action and directs Space Committee to organize effort to develop a recommendation on whether or not to submit a final application, general timeline for developing application is developed April 27 5pace Committee cc-chair meetings with city's NPP staff April 24 Space Cocnmittee distr.ibutes posters to announce April . . 29 tour and meeting April 29 Space Committee conducts tour of Vomelia Building inviting intereste�l Lowertown artists and Collective memb:.rs, PED Development. staff, several architects and engineering consultant; tour followed by general meeting to identify perceived advantages and disadvantages .of redeveloping the � building and to organize leadership and tasks to develop the final application May 4,6 & 8 Co-chairs and steering group meetings to prepare for � May 8 Space Committee meeting (poster announcements up . May 3) � May 8 General Space Committee meeting to develop consensus about goals and objectives and implementation strategy for Vomelia Building project, survey space needs of comntittee members and organize more people to help produce the final . application May 8 - 19 Task group develops final application; meets with financial people and businesses to secure letters of interest May 11 Co-chairs meet with �ED Development staff to receive cost estimate report from engineers and_discuss options for • . project financing. _ . ,. „ . TIMELINE - page two � • . May 15 - 19 Review draft with PED NPP staff . May 19 Review draft with DCDC, request endorsement May 21 Space Couanittee meeting ta review final. proposal and decide whether or not to recommend full Collective endorsement � � May 22 ' Collective review Space Couu�nittee's recommendations • May 23 - 31 Space Committee incorporate revisions, as directed � by Collective and assemble final application and supplementary materials � May 31 Review final draft with Collective president for signiture, other Executive Committee members as feasible � • � June 1 Submit final application June/3uly Review Process - city NPP staff recommendations to Planning Comm. & City C. - Planning Commission review for compliance with Comp. Plan - CIB Committee review for compliance with Cap. Alloc. Policies - Mayor present recommendations of Planning Co�ission and CIB Committee to City Council for authorization - City Council act upon Mayor's recommendations � August Decisions Announced � � _ Atigust - Final development of the program December (NPP will pay some cost for this stage) January, 1984 Begin implementation/complete within 18 to 24 months � (our target is 12 months) . � . 19 �. ,� . . . '��'��'S . Saint Paul Art Collective Vomela Building NPP Proposal� Timeline June 1983 through July 1984 . June Continue to assemble financing � Establish guidelines for hiring project coordinator , � Establish Co-op August , Hire pro�ect coordinator for September. through June .Purchase Vomela Building • September Coordinator works with Co-op and PED to plan development, � � : management and marketing October Implement marketing Fall Complete design phase � January 1984 Construction process begins Changeover of Space Committe� membership to Co-op to reflect future building occupants plus one member of the Collective January-June Coordinator works with Co-op and PED to plan and assist with transfer of management, mortgage and turnover/marketing responsibilities July 1984 Building available for occupancy � . 20 , � G� J � Financial Plan The Saint Paul Art Collective proposes to create a partnership between its to-be-formed St. Paul Art Collective Housing Co-op and a private developer. The private developer will bring to the partnership equity and development expertise. After seven to ten years, the general partnership shall be dissolved and the Co-op shall receive title to the project. . S2venty-five percent, or .tweive units will be occupied on an on-going basis by low income individuals or households. For the purposes of comparison, Bob Odmond, Director of Management� for the Minnesota Housing Finance Agency, said tha� a similar development receiving Federal Section Eight subsidy would require at least $1 ,045,000. in Federal Budget Authority money over the life of 20 year Section Eight contracts to accomplish the same housing objective. By contrast, the St. Paul Art Collective calls for a LOAN of $225,000. which shall be repaid to the City to provide the same opportunity for the useful life of the facility. (These numbers are based on th� currently priced fair market rent schedule of $363. x 12 months x 20 years x 12 units.) � � T�e Collective has approached Lowertown Redevelopment Corporation (LRC) for one of two options: (1 ) a direct loan or (2) guaranteeing conventional financing. The Collective will also be applying for a grant to pay for the design fees and the project coordinator. � � ' � • 21 � . ' ��j�'�(y�(' + ( r •1 ' ,t+"...�"J��,� C.,� VOMELA BUILDING " DEVELOPMENT PROFORMA Land: Total Land Cost . 200,000 200,000 Development Costs: � , , . Pe rmi ts � � Ti tl e' Ins . . ' Liability Ins. Taxes During Development Legal Inspection Fees Design Fees Total Development Cost 48,000 48,000 - Financing Cost: � Total Finance Cost 20,000 20,000 Construction Cost: � Elevator Repair 11 ,000 Insulation 25,000 Windows 108,000 Stai rways & Doors � 20,000 Wal l s & D�o rs 56,OOQ Baths 18,000 Paint Ceilings 5,000 Electrical 124,000 Plumbing 100,000 Heating 50,000 Total Construction Cost 517,000 517,000 Miscellaneous Cost: Closing 5,000 Project Manager 1Ox000 ' Total Miscellaneous Cost 15,000 15,000 Contingency 150,000 150,000 TOTAL DEVELOPMENT COST 950,000 . _ 22 _ ( . ' . - �. i � � � • VOMELA BUILDING . • Income and Expense Schedule ' 1985 1986 1987 - Rental Rate (Net) � 2.�50 2.50 2.50 @ 15,800 net rentable Vacancy A1Towance ; 8� 5% 5� . ., . Gross Income Studio/Housing 39,500 39,500 39,500 Parking 3,300 3,300 3,300 42,800 42,800 42,800 Less Vacancy 3,160 1,975 1,975 E�ffective Gross I��come 39,640 40,825 . 40,825 Less Debt Service LRC 29,520 29.520 29,520 City 9,980 . 9,980 9,980 TOTAL D/S 39,500 39,500 . 39,500 � Cash Flow 140 1,325 1,325 Expense Schedule (paid by Co-op tenants) � Taxes 16,000 17,000 18,000 Insurance 3,200 3,425 3,660 Utilities 9,600 10,250 11,000 Maintenance/Repairs 5,200 5,560 5,950 Miscellaneous 1,000 1,070 1,150 TOTAL 35,000 37,305 39,760 Typical Studio Monthly Expense Schedule 750 Sq.� Ft. Studio � Net Rent 156.25 156.25 156.25 Total Expenses 136.75 145.75 155.30 Monthly Cost 293.00 302.00 311.55 1,000 Sq. Ft. Studio Net Rent 208.35 208.35 208.35 Total Expenses 182.30 194.30 207.10 Monthly Cost 390.65 402.65 415,45 ' . 23 . . � . � . �� ...r._ ..� � c. � z � .+ ^ Vomela Building . Source of Funds Schedule . � 15,800 net rental square feet . - 16 Artist Studia/Living Units � ; , ' . � Sources of funds: City Loan 225,000 hlortgage/Lowertown Redevelopment Corporation 470,000 � and other sources* Grant 30,000 � Private Equity 225,000 Total 950,000 Application of Funds: Total Development Costs 950,000 * Other sources include Program Related Investments sPfor Soliciteded through local foundation support. (See attachment Sources of Financing. ) . 24 � 26 � � ., l � .� � VOMELA BUILDIN6 FINANCING ANALYSIS � , . . , IX. St. Paul Art Collective Membership List Executive Committee: � President David.Madsen . Treasurer Vincer�t Valenti , Secretary Donna Miller � . Board Members: _ ; . , � Wendy Olson/Bernel Bayliss Gallery Committee Co-Chairs _ Cathy Ingebretsen/Vincent Valenti Space Committee Co-Chairs Steve Woodward New Gallery Space Chair . Amy Sparks Membership Committee Chair Jul ie Lemon At l.arge Victor Prokopov At Large Gus Gustafson � Official Conscience � General Membership: , I ` David Amdir � Ann t�iarsde� ! Jerry Bell Ruth Mordy Patti Boekhoff Jack Myers � David Bohnsak Jerry Noel Re Paul Churchill Shann 0'Brien . James Colleran Chauncy -Peterson _ _ _ James Crnkovich David Rich Bill Dobbs Jim Sanders � Janel Foss Jim Schiller � Sharon Gilbert Louis Schnellann Nancy Gipple Grant Scholen Ruth Ann Godollei Sandy Smolen � . Gail Grabow Amy Sparks Lynn Hambrick NJark Stanley . Eunice Haugen Carla Stetson � Don Holzschuh Joe Truax Deb Huff • Thea Tulloss David Johnson Bonita Wahl Rick Laudon Willm Wilcox Robert Lloyd . , . . � 27 ; .,•�. ' : . • . � RECEIVED ;�UN.� 1 19��?��'��5� '. r,f.,• J ' Ne�ghborhood Partnership Program • 0 U E PjL �. �'f�pt. Planning b Economic Development P]anning Ristrict Code No. 25 W. 4 t� Street • Pl anner=i n-Charge � � � • � , t. Paul, rrinn. 55102 • • . �. • Technical Support B • _ t612?Z92-I 577 .. . ' • . '• . . . : • � .. Other' ' • � � • � : CD Nan CD ' • • • - - , � -. � : • . : : . . • . .,• . .. 'f_ • �, : M . — . . . • . : . .. . •• . � • � � • � PaPP APPLICATION • � � � • •. " . •• • • PLEASE INT OR TY . , . � •� � . PROJECT NAME �sID�T ' CONTROLLED AFFORDABLE HOUSING�'PROJECT � - . . � � - C�ltOUP OR ORGANIZATION SUBMITTING REQUEST . . . . . ' . • _ .t... � • • � . • . � jQq�E: � LE�CINCy GTON-'HAMLINE COt�Il�JUNITY COUNCIL • ' � . • .. � y . . � . . . . ADDRESS: 1I72� SELBY AVEN�IE • • � � ' - ST. PAUL • • • ' MN , �• . 55104 ' • •STR ET .� . . . CITY � STAfE . � ZIP TELEPHONE: 645-320'7 . : . . � . � � • • . � : CONTACT PERSOH FOR THIS REQUEST: . ' ''�NAN'SWIFT �� ' • � � • � OAYTIME TELEPMO�lE: ' 645-3207 � � 7 . WHAT IS THE PROJECT PRO?OSAL? As federal policies change concerning �support' for- �gvb�i�c housing, �ublic housinp,. authorities .are being encouraged to sell "excess" �ropert'ies:�•'��he � •�sale of .homes.�in Lexingtoa-Hamline owned by. the PHA has beea an issue. affecting nine.f'aiai- lies lives' since•'l�ast. �spring. An application iaas made• to• HUD to s�ll 20 scattered-site single .family dwell.ia�s �ia Lexing�on-Hamline &. Summ�t-University to a ��rivate• developer to ease anticipated�.bu8get cuts. ' Even though the 20�home's never were sold last spYing,: � seven in Lexington-Hamline have naw-been reinspected to' be. sold. Without significant ' � resident and coicanunity .input; this• process of selYing housiag .that has• been fed'erally � supported since �1968 would `have very► negative consequences for the families directly • . affected by the loss.of their homes anQ the neighborhood at large if the- ho:nes are'�acquir� by an irresponsi�le� developer or buyer. Due to xesidents interest in staying in their homes and in the neighborhood, cur.rently models. 'of how. this• housing 'can�be'preserved '�s . an al teraative to.:'di$glacement:of� current resi�dents. and the removal o�f��these home�;Pe�8� . ly from tYie��affordabl�' housing stock�in the neighborhood are being proposed through, bIPP.- . , �.:� � • •. .... . ' � ,,This project intend�s to �give current� residents �of scattered=site� housiing;an�opportunity.'. to gain more control. over their housing arid to creatively utilize neighborhood resources, '�city, state, or federal 'resources' and private capital •to preserve these homes to ensure - . their continued benefit to .the coc�anunity and future affordability to low-income families. � . . . � . 2. NOW t•tUCH NP FUND MOP3EY IS BEING REQUESTED? � ,150 000 '� 3. Wl�AT IS THE T07AL DECLARATION OF (�EIGHBORHOOD CONZRIBUTIONS? � 487,200 � (Conplete Neighborhood Contributions Declaration Form, page 4) 4. 4tHAT PROBLQ�lS/NEEDS ARE BEING ADDRESSED? 41HAT EVIDENCE IS AVAILABLE TO DOCUh1E(�T THE NEED, i .e., CENSUS DATA, DISTRICT PLAN PRIORITIES, ETC.? This project addresses � many housing issues that have beea fdentified by the City of St. Paul as part of an overall strategy to preserve and upgrade housing and opportunities of home ownership for •low-income families. � A. (Pro�lem) Disp_lacement of long tenn residents •(average length or residence is _, 10 vears) of the ,neighborhood and dispersal of black families who do not want �to � ., . , . • . . : � , . . ' ,PROJECT NAME RESIDENT. CONTROLLED AFFORDABLE + NPP,APPLICATION, Page 2 . � . . . . . � :• �� • . ' HOUSING PROJECT • • r'�. : ' ' . ' - . ' , . • . . _ �" . ' :� ' _ : • .. ' ,. . . . .. . '� . , , , . . . , . . � � � S R� TARGETED 70WARD A SPECIFIC GEOGRAANICAL AREA OR SITE, AT.TACH '.� 5. IF PROJEC7 ACTIYITIE A A MAP SHOWING TNEORRPROBLEM�uEXPLAIN�WHYFTHISJSUBJE TICOHCENTRATIONxWAS7CNOSEN�N A . . , ... SPECIFIC SU6JECT . , . Target'blocks for concentration (See map) - The sale of PHA homes are .the primary subject concentratioa•due to the.potential negative affect for.current residents and long term physical af fect on•tiomes ad j acent �to and near PHA homes and the neighborhood at large�:••••- --- � The sale ��of these homes fs� eminent and in a few months the opportunity may be gone. • , � �. .. �; . � �. �. . . . , ., . . . �... . . .. . . .... . . ,. . � . � ' . � . '.. � • • - 6. WNAT IMPACT WILL TNE PROJECT HAVE IN THE NEIGHBORHOOD? How these properties would be - developed could seriously affect the neighborhood now and in the future. Negative: :.if properti�s• are sold to highest bidder, there is a loss of present affordable housing and no assurance that properties �will be adequately rehabilitated. PHA property that c�as sold last spring, is an example of how these properties would impact the neighborhood.. The buildings at' 245 and 251 N. Oxford have been vacant since February, 1983.-• The tit}.e has not� actually been transferred to the approved buyer. TYie PHA has had to hire a 'se- curity agent to watch the buildings. How long will these properties stand vacant? Should properties that have received assistance for 15 years be lost perrnanently? The houses coul be a serious blight on the neighborhood. (See Attached) C NTI 7, iJHO WILL MkHAGE THE PROJECT? WNAT EXPERIENCE DOES THE 1�IANAG�NG �Y�TY HAVE IN TNIS TYPE OF PROJECT? A land trust Board of Directors would be created to start up and main- tain the project. .�This �trust would utilize�management services oX trainfng through Co� � space or the Archdiocese�of St. Paul CDC to oversee the project. Lexington-Hamline Co�mnuni Council' which would be instrumental in settiag up the trust Y:as managed over $120,000 in foundation grants in the last three �years and operates a budget of over $100,000 annually. Lexington-Hamline Housing Development Corporation has already acquired one PHA property two years ago. (Refer to above �66 paragraph for details). • . 8, WILL THE PROPOSED PROJECT BE TIED OR COORDINATED WITH ANY OTHER PROJECT OR PROGRAM • (PUBLIC OR PRIYATE)? YES X NO . IF YES, IDENTIFY.. City wide rental rehab would be �developed on City-State in targeted blocks, an energy conservation improvements would also be encouraged in ,particu7.ar, r.ental property and iavolvement. of tenants. City-wide . rental rehabilitation program would be encouraged in target blocks and continued neigh- borhood participation in energy improvements. Particularly with renters and absentee landlords would be the primary people who the project would do outreach to. 9, WkAT IS THE PROJECT SCHEDULE? Phase I - Acquisition of properties - Developmert of land trust corporation Board of Directors. � ' Fall of 1983 , Acquisition of seven homes � � :Tuly = Oct. 1983 Training of land trust/coop Board of Directors and residentr Rehabilitation specs. finalized ` • . _ Rental rehab of identified properties • ' _ . � , Agreements signed . � � • ' . Energy education b� training around super-insulation and - � . � � : _ : � . . - �� , . � . . _ . . .. . . . . . . . . � �: � � . . . .-.. � . . . . .�� . � .� - . . � . . . � . . . . . . - . _ � _ �. � _ � _ � : �.._._.�:_ . �: . �.. . . : . . . . .... � !�.f r �,.Kry� �t. •�l.�.Y.�p:.'..''`• !"'�.L1. i:.�.sry _ - ' �'.:: � ." ; . t..wr cb KD�p , . =.,�.. .:�.. � .i .. . '.�fj��, , . , , t � ... . � . �. �•1�,•i�•'�f;�,,, � ;}.'?F.+. .� �. ; ; : • f . . • . . . ; . .,..,5:;: . ' ' ATTACfII�tE . '• , . � . • . �. _ ..��.-:.• :, . � •�5 NT Cor+CoRWI� f. � . ;� ��. �' . . _ `.;• : C��L'G6� • • �._�_ . . . .`.�. .. • 1 • •� • . 'j ' • • � ' ' •• • , � , • � • t •r • . ,•, • . ' . ' : . � ' • , � puw►.ut=,.;. .�e�,.q.�;, . . , . � •3 , : � ;, . . : �t . . 2 • • . � � � � ' � • � � : � . . ' Q MA+�9k�F1.+. ��s�"C� r� �i . . . � 2. . �' 1 • � �" � .'. _ - � ' ;i ' ' h ,Cw!"TaN � � ' . _ . ' . . � F '��. *' • , • ' e�Y � ' •� . ? . . �� : . - _ ll� ��"� sc�er � . '• • -- ` : i . . . , . :. :� • �: .. '� . . I , .� . . �?rr}: ' p c,�.r ' ' . � � t r j�{�� `~y � � ' ,f, -� ' ,'' .. � : ; �. . , r �LA�Y.tOL � s _ � .. � . yo�X .y� , � ' . . . • ` ', ��G� . .. : - • _ ;� ' �+s►�e.J►,�w _ . . . ... . .. ' �\ � ,�. • ' • • • —. •-.-• `' �'"�!' . , � • � ' . . • , t . "4" � . � �.._ . " '�'o� � ' wrtrua+p • r ' . . . .. - } •� • , 4 . ! � •: . • � f.�,ro.�,r. S�' . . . ��: . . . �� j�� • . '•s� .. . . , � '� S61P� r� - r�.. . .... 2tpljl�, '•• � . .. t�� i _- , _, . ' . � � ST•CL(i+� ' G P.fi►� .__ ^ Rr�� , `� � . .. .�-..�' �_'-- _ _._.,�----_._ __----- --�---��-__.. _�__.�.._..._ �_._... , � . C � � � . � , � . ' , 4. CONTINUED...... . B. .(Problem) Disposition of Federally Subsidized Housing = Who will respond to the sale�of property that has received federal support since 1958? How do cities and communities accept this shifti.g responsibility to subsidized housing? (Attachm�{'� "B" letter from Assistant Secretary of HUD, Phf,llip Abrams) - • � C. (Need) . Future Availability of Affordable Decent Housing for Iow-income families needing 3� 4, � 5 bedrooms. Consistent with goals in lower-income housing strategy adopted by Planning Commissio�n. (See page 3 of Lower-Income Housing Strategy). - "Sale of public housing (except one bedroom nnits), for private ownership and man- agement or conversion .to• limited equity cooperatives should only be �considered if � such a sale will resu�t in the units continning to serve 1•ower-income families. � (See page 34, Availability of Very Low-Incoine Rental Units for Large Families is Crucial). Current PHA waiting list as of 4/30/83 3 bedroom 206, 4 bedroom 132, 5 bedroom 42. D. (Need) Maintenance of Housing� Stock in Lexington-Hamline - These efforts extend three phases of ITA Improvements and other housing issues Lexington-Hamline Co�uni� Council has addressed in its 15 year history. This project addresses rental housin� and tenants which has been identified as a problem area but has not beea addressed with a specific program. � E. (Need) Preservation of unique character of racial and ecoaomic mix in the Lexingtor. . Hamline community. � F. (Problem) Energy conservation - By insulating these hor.es, benefi.ts of less fuel consumption and less expensive fuel bills will benefit the residents and neighborhoc G. Consistent with District 13 Housing "Issues Identification. (See attachment page� 101 of District 13 Plan). . `. , ' . •��`��e�� • . ...� � ;+ • . � . : � housing _ , . : . . - • . . . � ' . . . . . � � i • � � ' 0 PRIYAT SECT R ROLE . � . . . � • . . ; � The confidence or lack of confidence whicR lenders and ' ' : realtors have in a ne�ghborhood has a profound effect on • � � � � the neighborhood's future. When prospective homebuyers : � • are� discouraged from buying a house or refused financing . . .• for it, the property becomes an easy target for specula- _ . � � tive rental use. The buyer may be more interested in the : property for its monthly cash f7ow and its speculat�ve . land value than its equity as a stable long-range � investment. In order to strengthen confidence, the following measures are suggested. 1 .Work toward obtaining a funding source for advertising all older neighborhoods in the city. Yirtually all advertis- ing on housing is paid for by private developers of new � . housing in the suburbs and se11s the lifestyle of suburbia. ' The many attractive features of older homes in established neighborhoods (e�.g. , larger houses, less commuting, public transit, parks , services, diversity in. population and � buildings) ought to be sold in a manner which counter- balances existing advertising. Keighbarhood edvertising � could be sponsored by the Association of St. Paul Com- munities and could feature a different neighborhood in . each Sunday's newspaper. The costs might be paid with � federal grants , tity appropriations, foundation grants � and maybe even with support from the St. Paul Board of Realtors or the local Savings and Loans. 2.Get the same sort of coverage in the St. Paul papers, but , • free of charge, through a reguiar �eighborhood news column. 3."Take a realtor to l�nch." The corr�nunity councils should ; cultivate relations witi� reattors. Realtors should be ; - invited to meetings to share �deas. Realtors who agree � � to cooperate with the comrrwnity could be rewarded with � , . � preference in getting "for sale" listings and with free � advertising in the eavesdropper and the Co�uter. { . • 4.Work with and solicit help from private corporations for ' neighborhood improvement projects. ; � S.Reiterate the role of private individuals in improving � ,� ' their neighborho�ds: becoming active in community organi- . zations, group maintenance projects, private home upkeep, � lobbying, etc. . . • ' � h�using ^ . � . • • .. � • 3.Qrgani2e ways to get renta7 property into the hands �of � . ' � responsible owners. . In Lexington-Hamline, encourage home- • � owners to buy rental property in the neighborhood. This � ', approach will work best if several purchasers work together to�acquire property on a particular block so that each � � responsible perrchaser has the assurance that other respon- : � � � � sible purchasers will control neighboring properties. � ' � � Perhaps purchasers will find it desirable to join together � � formally in a neighborhood corporation, a limited partner- + � ship, or as simple business partners; or perhaps they ' ► will find it easiest to work separately �hile maintaining � � communicatiuns and cooperation infornially. Some degree � of cooperation might help in securing mortgage cammitments and in reducing maintenance costs through joint contract- � ing. «eighborhood purchasers may be able to take � advaritage of the new city rehab progran for absentee owners. ' 4.t�7oni±or properties adequately to prevent the illegal con- t version of bu�ldir�c�s into more units .than ttie city's � zoning allovrs. See page 49. � 5.Spread awareness that legal conversions ef single-family houses inta multi-unit rental properties should be done � in a reversible manner wherever possible. Elderly people � for example, may rent out part of their house for good � reasons. But if the house, upon sale, has been made permanently ir�te a duplex, the character of the neigh- �. �borhood is affected. � 6.Encourage absentee landlord participatior� in neighborhood planning. � .4.9 PU6LIC SECTOR HOtlSING TOOLS � � :COr�1MEt�DATION • The city should publish a single brochure that gives � brief descriptions cf the.mhborhoodsams and regulations ( . intended to help older neig � t Even active neinhborhood organizations have trQUble � knowing about all of the available housing programs. At ' least the follo�ring programs should be describe.d: City loan and grant pragram, State rehab program, 312 proqram, absentee-owner rehab loan program, code enforcement, certificate of occupancy, house recycling, urban home- steading, ITAs, tenant's rights, and historic preservation . g rants. � , � �. - . i . . � . � ' `��'��f'-�� housi ng ,� � ' , . . �• � . . � � . � . Some of the proposals the planning committees discussed ' � . • � . are:. . � � . � ! . . 't:Publicize available education programs on home mainten- ' ' . � ance. Some course have been arranged in Merriam Park and ,. � • ; � more could be. Toptcs could include: basic Wiring, � � plumbing, roofs, foundations, etc. ; reference materials : ' � • � , ;and sources for maintenance tasks; house buy�ng and seliing;, � � . property taxes; rehab loans and grants; preserving archi-. � tectural character. �Courses have been given by the HRA � � � and NSF, by Knox Lumber, and by the Community Design Center. 2.Encourage block "tool pooling" among residents. 3.Publicize availability of tool rentals and consumer � information about renting tools. 4.In the lortger run, see if tF�e NHS can set up a "lending library" of specialiZed tools. ; � � . 5.Develop a "skills bank" and "labor exchange"--for example, heavy maintenance tasks could be exchanged for baby-sit- ting time. A small amount of staff time wauld be necessary � to collect and, maintain a file and to make referrals. � � • 6.Making�the shops at Central High and/or Concordia avail- ' able to Lexington-Hamline residents (or to the entire � Central High attendance district) on a regular evening . • schedule. The time of a supervisor and any�insurance costs could be paid far from CD funds , a special purpose grant, or even through some user charges. � . .8 ABSEN EE-OWNED PROPERfY � The owners of rental property ought to show responsibility to the needs of the neighborhood. The neigf�borhoods in �� district 13 should be a place� where renters as well as homeowners can live, but the owners of rental property � should maintain it just as carefully as the homeowners � do. In the majority of cases, rental property does � � appear to be cared for in a responsible manner. For dealing with problem rental properties, the following � actions are suggested: 1.Support the citywide rehab loan program for absentee-owner . properties by helping make the program guidelines attrac- • • tiNe and warkable. � C 2.Promote a�areness of tenants rights as a means of requir- ing landlards to maintain their� property at the levels specified in city and state codes. .�F 6 ATTACHMENT � . . . : � � housing , . 5.4.6 FUTUR� OF �LEXINGTQN-HAMLINE`S NOUSING REHABILITATION � PROGRAM • ;COMMENDATION The Lexington-Hamline Community Council and the City should . � � define what cont��uing role the City will play in the . � neighborhood after the third ITA is completed. ; . ' � Of the six Priority Rehabilitation Areas designated by the ' � . City in 1974, Lexington-Namline was the smallest. It has , also proven to be one of the most successful . khen the third ITA is completed, Lexington-Hamline will be tt�e � ' first neighborhood to nave "graduated" frem the program. As many as a quarter of the houses will have had major improvements--clearly enaugh to affect the neighborhood's future. But there will remain a large number of houses still in . need of improvement, or in need of improvements not covered by the existing rehabilitation program. Lexington- fiamline will have the opportunity to set a precedent for the other Priority Rehabilitation Areas as to any con- ' tinuing role the City should play after ITAs have accomplished their goals. The Lexington-Hamline Community Council should continue to �� • stress �home improvemerrt financing programs that focus on � electrical , plumbing and heating systems. A program � should be developed with the City of voluntary,advisory . � code inspections. In addition, the eavesdropper and other information sources should be used to expTain home mechanical systems and to Point out possible hazards and danger signals. The f�ousing Committee will continue organizing group maintenance projects for both interior and exterior work. ; � ; RESIDENTS AWAREHESS, SKILLS, AND ABILI IES . � The�planning committees discussed an assortment of prob- � � lems people have in doing maintenance and rehabilitation work. Some residents don't know how to do basic main- ; tenance tasks on their homes, apartments , and yards. � t�lanytimes homeowners could save on maintenance -3obs if 1 major, specia�lized tools were more readily available. i Elderly and handicapped people may need help with main- tenance work. There is a lack of awareness of architectural style and its importance to neighborhood character and � future property values. � ��, .� . � . . . ��►�� 6. CONTINUED............................ . . CPositive: (Short term) - If such a model is develcped, it could be used Iocally and • throughout the country as a solutioa to keeping subsidized housing affordable and providing an ownership opportunity to families who have an investment in their homes and their neighborhood. Benefits would be physical and to the families currently residing in the bouse's. For example, a vacant house owned by PHA was� acquired two : years ago - rehabilitated and sold to a moderate-income fami2y. This was doae by the Lexington-Hamline Housing Developmeat Corporation ia order to preserve the house and reverse the blfghting influence on the neighborbood. ' � (Long term) - Rehabilitation;of these properties and preservation of the goal of � keeping them affordable, would impact this community,favorably in several ways: 1. Continue to serve housiag needs of low-income families. 2. Assurance properties would be available on a long term basis & adequately maintaine 3. Energy improvements would be examples of how some of the excessive heating costs of older homes can be rechanneled to go toward building equity in a home. 4. Overall investment in properties enhances property values aad stability in a neighborhood. �. . . --- . �. � 9. CONTINUED.............................. . . on-going contacts: . � - . Manager - management .seYVices retained . i_. ` Sweat equity contracts finalized March 1984 - July 1984 Rehabilitation and super-insulation work on land trust homes will be done. • • • • • • ' ' � • Rental rehab � energy work on other homes ' Phase II - On-going maintenance of land trust. • � • , • . .. �-- - � . � • � � � '. . . � . �� . . . ::� . . . . , . . . P AAPIICATION, Page 3 ' : ' � PROJECT NAME ttES�nEx�r. cot�rKbLLEn �FORnaRT.F . � . HOUSING PROJECT �. D IN 2 YRS, YES ` HO X . IF NOT, EXPLAIN HOW�IT WILL ; 10. WILl. THIS PROJECT BE COMPLETE BECOME SELF-SUSTAINING WITHOUT FlIRTHER NPP. FUNDING? �. . . • . Phase I would be completed by Fall 1984: Phase II would .still rely oa the _- ' NPP monies, but only the� initial request in the first fundiag cycle. ' , • ; • - . . • . � . �. _ . � .. . . • . - . ' � , . � , � � . _ ' . • • ; • _ . 11 . WILL. THIS PROJECT RESULT IN INCREASED�MAINTENANCE AND OPERATING COSTS FOR THE CITY? YES NO X . IF YES, EXPLAIN HOW THE PROJECT WILL PRIVATELY PAY FOR THOSE COSTS. Reduce overall federal and city money used to operate and maintain low-income� housing. 12. HOW WILL THE PROJECT BENEFIT LQW AND M�n�QA''� IyCOME HOUSEHOL�S?. - - - _. -._ ' �� ' , . . . _ . . . � . . � . � This pro�ect most directlX. affects low-ir3cv.m�_families that cnrrently reside in PHA � property and targeted"btocks'�ahcre most residents fall into 507. of inedian income.�' It . will prb�vide:a_j�aay £v'�.Zhese families-to build equity that will b�enefit' the neighborhood at large.; ,This�hot�.sing would• be �preserved ..�.in�the ,f�ture of �low-income families. � . .� .. ._:i�--:, ,._ - ...;�:_::.�.�� . . • :-•• - . .. . . . .. . . : 13. NOW WILL NEIGHBORHOOD CITIZEt� PARTICIPATION BE FOSTERED DURING PROJECT DEVELOPMENT AND IMPLEMENTATION? , . . . . , . . - - . . . . . . . .. . . .. . . . _ . This project.will' encourage participation �o�f renters and low-income families that do •not traditiona11.3�'be'eome involved ia community issues. It will also be a moder of'1�dw�when=: neighbors=work.together and 'see"t'heir mutual"'goal's"'are" compatible,�� it is po$sible to .positively tura around what.could be a very'negative iafluence ia the neighborhood. -� . •, • y . . . . � . ,. . . . .. • . . , , . . ... . . • , . . . .. .. . . ..:. � . 14. COMPLETE PROGRAM FUNDING ANA EXPENSE FORMS PAGES �S ANP 7. _ 15. ATTACH LETTERS OF SUPPORT FROM ALL INTERESTED AND AFFECTED GROUPS/OR ORGANIZATIONS. �/� NAN SWIFT PROGRAM CAORDINATOR 6/1I83 C S GNATUR F IV DUAL • TYPED NAME T LE OR ROLE DA��— COMPLETING APPLICATION ' � - - � 7 � . RONALD J. HICK COI�A'NNITY COORDINATOR 6/1/83 � S G UR£ 0 F FFICER . YP D HAME I LE OR ROL DAT . ' • . r �P AP.PIICATION, Page 4 � PRQJECT NAME RESIDEb'T CONTROLLED AFFORDABLE " � NEIGH80Rtt00D CONTRIBUTIONS DEGI.A��I�ROJECT - . � . .; , .� " • . - - : �- . ESTIMATED COMMERCIAt, PROPERTY FIXEO CAPITAL . • .. : • - . IMPROVEMENTS: . • •. � . . . . � - . , . _. • NUM6ER OF PARTICIPANTS . . , , �. _ • . . AVERAGE INYESTMEHT -� . � . � � �. � TOTAL INVESTMENT EQUALS� ' �' $ � , . . . . . ESTIMATED RESIDENTIAL, PROPERTY�FIXED CAPTTAL � , . � - � � . . . . IMPROVEMENTS: PHA Houses (7) Rehab � Super-insulation $ 176,400 NUMBER OF PARTICI PAN7S Houses (6) '�8ental Rehab ' � - � � $ 90�,0'00 � • . AVERA�c It�VESTMENT � 15,000 � � • � . ' --� , - � TQ7AL INVESTt�iEKT EQUALS $ 90,000 _ , NEW COMMERCIAL DEVELOPMEKT: . . � • � • � : SITE (a) � : . � . � - . ESTII��4TED MARKEi YALl1E � . � . � � -� � . . � SITE (b) � � � ' � � - ESTIMATED MARKET VALUE . , � . � • , � __ : . . -� : • . . •��; ;: ,•. . . . . . � . TOTAL t�RKET �VALtJE � . � ' . .. � � - ----_ " ' - . . � �, NEW RESIDENTIAL DEYELOPMENT: . . � : � . , � : � �� SITE (a) � 7 �� • � � • . . ' � � • � . ESTItdATED MARKET VALUE . , . � � �� . ' SITE {b) � � � FSTIMAiED MARKET VALUE � . � . . . . . . ,,, . . � . � .. � • . . . � ' • TOTAL MRRKET.VAIUE -. .� � . � . . . . . _ . • � . - . - _ .. .:•� . . i, ' ESTIMATED �N-KIND-SERVICES {OFFICE SPACE, EQUIPhiEI�T, SERVICES) : . ', .. • � � - . . . . •. � ..� . .; , .�- :.. . . SOURCE AND TYPE 1 . Staff•'suppoYt� & Fjrogram.related exnensPS '— - � ._.�.i��= ._=.—_ 2� associated with statt u costs. Le a . � ' � • 3. •Arc itect Accountant . � � ^ • 5. ESTIMATEO VOIUNTEER LABOR; . • . . , � : . . ' ". _ NUMSER OF VOLUNTEERS 10 X Time of land trust $oard - Lexington-Ham]:i�ne.Community Coun _��.. AVERAGE HOURS/VOLUNTEER ' � . TOTAL NOURS x a10/hr. EQUAIS $ 4LSOo 7, ESTIMATED SWEAT EQUITY:' • . • � ' � . • : NUtdBER OF PARTICIPANTS • __� _`.•' . � AVEP.AGE HOURS/PARTICIPANT �__,1,00 heurs s �P�r p��,;r.• . � tO7Al HOURS • � " . � � tOTAL NOURS x �10/hr: EQUAI.S � � � �,000 ' � �::PPLICATION, Page,5 • � . r►cu�t�� rf+�cnL�y��i.• WLRLi\VLLLL 11CCVLIL/1HLL , . • . �. , . • � •. � . HOUSING PROJECT ��'�"��c•) , ;. . . .s. ESTIMATED CASH DOI�ATIONS; • � � . . � �' � � � .- . . . . . � . • . _ . SOURCE 1�. � • � $ - � ' z. . . � . 3. � � � 9. ANTICI PATED FOUNQATION GRANTS; . . . . . - . • :� .� . .. . . . FOUNDATION(s) 1 . McKni�ht Family Housin� Fund � _' _ , � $ ��,.�� , �. . ' � 2. Bush Foundation _ _ , ' S 10. �� OTHER: EXPLAIN . ' ' ' . ; . . . . .... _ ._ _. - : . - . A tax-exempt mortgage. or�mortgage with favorable .terchs �(11� 30� • - • -� - ��.� • � years), or smaller mortgage and investors cash. � � ' � ESTIMATED VALUE � $ 175,000 � ' � TOTAL NEIGHBORNOOD '�� " ' �� . . . � .487 200 • � � CONTRIBUTIONS DECLARATION $ ' ll . WHAT EVIDENCE IS THERE THAT THE ABOVE DECLARATIQNS ARE REALISTIC? Non-profit development of housing locally and nationally has successfully combined : • . . � neighborhood, city, and private resources to obtain- goal of providing affordable • Chousiag. . � • . . ..' . . . .. . . . .__ ... _ . . ^ •• :. . _ . . . ,� . . . . . . •. • - • . . . . . .. . . .: . .. ._._._ , �� .._...: � .� � � ....� ..� . . .. . . ... �. .:...__.�_.. . _. .� .-.- _-_ -•• �� ' � .. C . . � � . " N_P�pPLI�A710M,_�age_6 _. ='�:;: pRUJECr rIA�1E� RESIDENf CONTR9LI��c,AFt��$�F1Q4. • � . . , , , . . ' • _ (See attachment land trust optioa 1)' . . ;�rrj;T�;jpa }{Z;� r��:v,jjZ3 '. � ' • • � ESTIMATED PROGRAM FUNDIIYG* � � - , . . . 4 . _ . . . •- . _' 2 �. . t 3�fii?0�- • � • • • S _ . . .� . � _ : 2 : SOt1RCE ��^~ AMOUNT .E � , 1 . .. . . . . . , .•'_'":t'.�� ;'^.:i,A�'�!�'C; �3 i;'=I3i i r1� - ��. 2 . . . , . .. • �:� (a}YJli�flinJ�J? ' ' � . • • , � � . .__ - - � , 3. � • ' � . . ' � '�'f�/',s3�3 ;R3iiifl . 4, . _ ., . . _ . 5•.. � . 6. � . . �. . ,.� . . � . . V sil.i:e•! 'v�:.::i•�: �G� .' . $. . , ; . . • • u�::ilr�!:i�ti;i].: �h41•i • • • ' --9' ' 't•^r-lr•. •..., yn- �f^r :�.,1 . ' • L� . ::s .r�:iJv:� Gi.�.::iu: :�ii:�:J �V • ' . • S'►_ T�t�_Q ;�r,. +�' ��.•.�1 �1 7s ( 1 — r 1 . ' 'T =' 3J "aI1�? '3 . • d 1 .�:►1 +:��. r�:.,d.'.� .:+lULrt �1�: . .�:� .�}�._i:i �1 i'� j?i;7'•N � 11 . �PP � � ' 150,000 • j2� Energy Grant (Deferred loans to low-�income households). � 3Q,000 , � � 13_ Tax-exempt Mortgage or Mortgage & Investors Cash ,: � 175,000 . . ' • . . �. , yn ica ion . . � � 14• �thPr F.nP v ImRrovements in Targeted Blocks 32,000 . . 15• � Foun�ation Sup��t - Pro�ra;� Related Exnenses Staff 33,100 Support . . . • 16. •� Rental Rehab ' 90,000 . 17. . Sweat' Eauitv � � � � � . � ' ' . � .' _ 7,000 � � .. , . 18. � ' ' :Volunteer'�5upport' ' • .• _ � . . � • 4,500 . _.._.� • �. . . . . • • . • .. . 19. � . . . . 20. . • . . TOTAL � � 439,039 . * INCLUDE NEIGHBORFl00D PARTNERSHIP FUND AWD SPECIFIC CATEGORIES OF NEIGNBORHOOD C. CQNTRIBUTIONS. � . � � ' _� � . a. Z . , . � ' � r`-,*.,. '.J :f._ � . � � `PROJECT Na`1E RESIDENT CONTBOLLED AFFORDABLE � � '� • NPP APPLICATION, Paqe 7 . - �- . ' � HOUSING PROJECT • ' - . . • . . . . • . '- : � • � . : ESTIMATED PROCRAM EXPENSES . . ' �: . • .. _ . . , . . � . � � ' • • . � - � � • , . . . .» . . . � • PROGRAM EXPENSES .. •. FUND St�URCE* . . � �,� • . ••- . : . . . . ' 1. Acauisition of 7_.�t:��.s • ' ^ �v --�4�5?9�----- . � . . . . . �� 2, Rebabilitation�& �Supei-insulation Mort�a�e � 176.40Q ,� , ' , ' . . • . - . .� . �. 3; Contingency'� • . 8.000 . . . . .• . 4. Fees Attorney, Architect, bookkee ing, � Foundation ' 33.100 � .syndication; salary'for project � ' .: :Start up Cost • , • ' ' , " � 5. � . . 6 �Operating�Expenses � MonthZy Rents _ 1'�•22� � . . .. .. . . .,.. . . . . 7. • • ' � . • 8. � � . . - 9. ' .. , ' - . . � �o. � - � ' � . � • .• �,. - � . . �. . ,Z. . � . . . .. . , � 13. .__ . . : . . .. 14. � . . • . . � . �. • • • � � . 15. .. . . : • . � •. , . . . . , . . , , . . . . . _ � . � � 1 F. �' . . . .. . .. . . : . :.; , . ' 17. � . � � , : • .� • . � 18. � � � -- • � . 19. ' ^ . � 20. � � Phase I of Pro j ect Expenses Reduced in Phase II. TOTAL EXPEr15ES �S 38s,740 _ C_ . * INCLUDE PaEIGHBORH00D PARTNERSHIP fU11D AND NEI6HBOWi000 CONTRIBUYIOI�S. :c'. Trust • �'"� , . �. ;tion 1 , � • =;`� . . A�quisition and rehabilitation of scattered-site p ublic housing units. � : n scattered-site houses and rehabilitateo�dablelcostsper- _ proposal: Acquire seve to current residents at aff insulation, and provide the housing - �tion 1 � �: oY the city with a tax exempt mortgage and NPP based as an Acquire unizs from PHA ($450/►nonth)• �� n 0 erate as a land trust and stYUCtuYen�eons(2SU its)d�ble Z230 ti° ' equity loa . P • un'its) and higher Y a e secured ; ' current residents primarily �5 g to these units so ,that amount of mortg g � Best option would be attach ec. ua=anteed source of iacome to � could be reduced aad would also be looked at as g k urin rivate capital. Program related expenses would be covered by assist in sec g P uired and a one year wait was necessary tO ort. � foundation support. If houses were acq 000 would be covered by foundation supp ; obtain Sec. 8, losses of approximately $20� i Npp used as an equity loan to be repayed after the first mortgage. � � ' � • • . ';�� f� � CY OF T�E C�N �F SAINT PAUL • � • . pUBLIC HOUSING AGEN , . 380 B�ert►er 8uilding�419 North Robert Street,Saint Paul,Minnesota 55101 �Phone I612y 2983668 PHA . . . . A'fTACHIdENT "A.� � - : _ : _ . � � , •� . . . M,ay ?5, 1983 . . . � , � Ms. Elizabeth Jeffre�unityeCouncil airperson Lexington flamline C Housing Committee 117 2 Selby Aveaue - Saint Paul, Minnesota 55104 • Re: Neighborhood Partnership Program Application for Scattered Site Some Acquisition and Repa r •Dear Elizabeth, our council' s concern about retaining our scattered site homes The pHA shares y AS you kaow, we are also fas affordable housing for low income families. and ue `� concerned about t�e condition offs�he��o determine the levels�and cost af recently conducted inspections o necessary repairs• Since a number of these homes eSted by HUD, we aree extensive repair exceediag tt�e cost guideline sugg selling some of them. Seven of tbe dwellings which may seriously considering ou serve• have to be sold are in the neighborhood y influence and As the PHA examines options which will eliminate the aligosengwe wi11 continue the potential hazards which these several dwellings p pS De artment of our d is c u s s i o n s �i t h y o ur or ganization �d �w e n e e d t oy e m p h size that because Ylaaniag and Ecoaomic Develepment. However, ion of man9 of tlnese buildings warrants immediate at aesolutione It the condit ossible course in arriving will need to follow the fa�ha�ttbe PSA and any potential developer of the . is imperative, t�erefcre, ties be able to act quickly so that further deterioratio�uracounciler ca proper revious discussions with y be prevented. As we indicated in P rimary concern• � correcting the deficiencies is our p � ou have hat a neighborhood group has taken the interest that y We are pleased t ia wishing to retain housing for low income fa.milies. C � . . . . , , Continued • . , ' P�e �2— • � Perhaps through a �oint effort, the City and your council c�uld develop a . solution ahich would serve the need both for expedience and preservatioa of housing for loW income families. � . " � ncerely, , � . . .t _ . , . Ma. shall D. Aaderson . . _ Executive Director " . � _.. .. ._ � � c � . . � ��;s5 LEXINGTON - HAMLINE CON1MUNtTY COUNCIL �' . . 1172 Selby Avenue � S� Paui. MN 55104 • Phone: 645-3207 -� , � A�rra�r�F�rr ��A�� May 31, 1983 � • � � • . .� , , . . , � , , . ' . - To Whom It May Concern: We the residents of scattered-site PHA homes in Lexington-Hamline, feel every effort should be made to preserve these homes for low-income families, and would work with the Lexington-Hamline Community Council and any other governmental or private party to develop a way to save our homes. We would like an opportunity to contribute to a form of ownership that would give us a more control in our living situation and prevent displacement of our families. We have a strong desire to stay in our homes � and in the Lexington-Hamline community. .- • - - - - Sincerely, c � \ ! � �.�• 1t� ;[,Ctrl � ~ . , !��'�� s��;/%/ f / H � �� 9 j --•� \ �� =�-C, J (�t,� u � � . � �� _ .�.'_- _� • u.J.utr�an�mcrr� vr.�v...,.. .---- - - •� r��1 '� WASHINGTON.O.C.2W 10 ' � „ s . �'• � � ' t ,. '••� � �¢' A'f'TACHMENT ��8�� . � - ti'.,..ra , OfFICEOFT�EASSLSTA►ffSEG1tTAF1'YIrCA � ' � . � . MOtx3+�rOC�+tSS� . • J A N 3 �t� �983 � : � � � . - , . . � Dear Executive Director: . . • � � � ' • I am Hriting to, you about a problem that, �to varying degrees, is shared by all of us. On the ane fiand, you are faced �rith the need for curtailing � expenditures, tightening operations,. and genec-a11y having to make do with tim�ted �esources from the Eederal ��Yede antadequaten esourceeofhstandard very mindful of the obligation to pr housing to families who ar-e unable to effectively campete on the private market. The demand for low incane housing is particularly acute in our larger cities , and yet these tend to be �h;fP�ui�su�iization�ofdthese of . the hous�ng requires major rehabtlitat resources is ta be realized. In many areas, because of poor locat�on or design of the housing, even rehabilit�tion may not vffer any long-term prospect for restoring its viability. Alternative uses for such housing _ nepd to be fu11y explor2d. I think it is clear that local pubtic housing agencies and the - Department are facing irnpoctant challan�e��o��okubeyond traditional , approach of the past. We need to exp -� relationsh�ps in dealing with thcalr�ubt"ic andPPrivate groups ta assist �nvolve on a mean'ingful bas1s lo P erational rob1ems. Many i� the process of i denti fyi ng and cac-recti ng op P ' of the problems w�th Hhich you arevesc o huick�fixtsolut�ons;ainesame �� many years and do not lend themseZ q Sim i cannot be realisti- cases they may be of such a nagn i t�de that they P Y c a l l y d e a l t with in a public housing environment. Just as correc�ive actions•must be gear e d t o t h e p a r ticula� set o f circum s t a n c e s i z z v o t v e d,� the process of exami ni ng your operati ons and devel opi ng speci-fic recanmen- dations must take into account such consider�in�s athehcharacteristics Authority, the age and desi gn of your devel op , of your tenancy, your fi nanci a1 condR��o1s on�expendi turesnandei nv�ntori es, related producti v1 tY, adequacy of co ' need for capital improvements and de�h�rr'�G��udicsa7 ystem�elnssfiort, your relati�nship with the city and roaches and greater � � cocnplex problems tend to call foc- canprehensive app ; invotvement by outside resources. . __ � . � � � � , In address'Ing these issues�N�O�a��ea a'jyz�ng9theaproblemsnofdyour I explo��ng an alternat�ve approa � Authot-ity and devel opi ng a mechanis� for resolvi ng them. As you knaw, 1 . � .- . . - �. �� . � . . ��'�r��. � � . , ,:. � . . . . . � . � �•� . • . . �. 2 . r under the Comprehensive Impro�ement Assistance Pr-ogram (CIAP) an assess- • m�nt of the Housing Autho rity s management capability is required and may be an eligible CIAP expense. We are suggesting that you consider . . an approach to this review whict� is nat o�ly �fiepaccomslish ent ofsa is : . capable of achi evi ng a dual purpose; namely, t P ' thoragh revier+, as well as promotion af the city's interest and irivolve- ment with respect to the�public housing program. This involvement could , be achi eved by the Mayor s appoi ntment of a team bf qual i fi ed 1 ocal peopl e able� to contribute their expertise to the review of such diverse areas . as automated data processing systems, energy conservation, engineering, financial systems , and other key aspects of the public housing operation. The team coul d then provi de i ts experti se, expe ri encThi snwoul d�gi ve youy participating in the actual conduct of the review. valuable assistance in assessing you� operations, and in addition would serve to strengthen your relationship rrith the city and to improve your . �hances of securi ng more di rect focros of Yas�s�s�heCteam woul dsunderscore� a representati ve(s) frort the c�ty to ser e - your ccmmitnznt ta follo►,r thra�gh on the results of �he review and would be an excellent vehicle for alerting the Mayor should occasions arise where additional assistance is needed in successfully accomplishing • agreed-upon tasks. � � C' . Some of th�e ma�y inportant side benefits of this effort would be� th� probable developmznt af� alternative means for dealing Hith large-scale pubiic housing management, impraved economic development within the public housing ' canmunity, and hopefully, posslble use of private capital in various Ways to supplement incane frorn rents and ope�ating �ubsidies. The broader concern, • of course, is to foster a partnership between the Housing Authority and the 1 ocal gove rni ng body a nd the canmu�i ty at 1 a rge. � We are prepared to fielp you. in this important effort. The actual cost of carryi ng out the�revi ew by a designated consultan't or capable` staff, including preliminary work to organize the effort (e.g. , securing local support and establishing the team) and of implementing needed improvements resulting from the review may be�CbeStheroversight�andXassistanceeofttheC�AP. Noweve r, key to the process woul _ team. � � Should you be eligibie for comprehensive modernization and sh.ould yau '. feet this approach is one which you wish to pursue,re��geas�well asnanyer it. Please let me know of your activit�es �n th�s ., � other ideas you may have in furthering this undertaking_ . � Sincerely, � C� � P il Abrams � � . � As istant Secretary, H . • . . . � :: . . ��;� �' . : RECE�VED Jllh - f 193 � � . . . . 3 . f�eighborhobd Partnership Program ED U E N Dept. Planning & Economic Development Planning District Code No. z5 W. 4th Street � Planner-in-Charge St. Paul, Minn. 55102 Technical Support (612)292-1577 - : � � Other CD Non CD � NPP APPLICATION - LEASE PRINT OR TYPE PROJECT NAh1E Energy Block Club Project GROUP OR ORGANIZATION SUBMITTING REQUEST � tderriam Park Corrsnunity__Council and ��E:Neighbcrhood Energy Project, Snelling/Hamline Corununity Council ADDRESS: 113 2'orth Saratoga Avenue, St. Paul, t�linnesota 55104 _ STREET CITY STATE ZIP TELEPHONE: 644-8894 CONTACT PER SON FOR THIS REQUEST: Julie �lose DAYTIME TELEPHONE: 644-8894 1 . L�1HAT IS THE PROJECT PROPOSAL? 2. HOW MUCH NP FUND MONEY IS BEING REQUESTED? $ 65,000 ,�as' � 3. WHAT IS THE TOTAL DECLARA7ION OF NEIGHBORHOOD CONTRIBUTIONS? $ ;�;.�� C� (Complete Neighborhood Contributions Declaration Form, page 4) 4. WHAT PROBLQ�IS/NEEDS ARE BEING ADDRESSED? WHAT EVIQENCE IS AVAILABLE TO DOCUMENT THE NEED, i .e., CENSUS DATA, DISTRICT PLAN PRIORITIES, ETC.? 1., WHAT IS THE PROJECT PROPOSAL? � The Neighborhood Energy Project (NEP) , in cooperation with the Snelling/Hamline � Community Council (SHCC) , and the Merriam Park Co:nmunity Council (tiPCC) , will • � implement an EnerqY Block Club Pzoject to enable residents to rehabilitate energy � inefficient homes and apartments. This program will help elderly, disabled and low income renters and homeowners save money and stay in their homes. It will also stimulate the economy by creating jobs. The project is primarily a rehabilitation program. The goals are to improve the quality of the housing in Merriam Park and Snelling/Aamline, to make housing more affordable through improved energy efficiency and to encourage additional general improvements through participation in existing low-interest loan and grant programs. � � , The project will: � 1) promote and demonstrate energy conservation techniques, especially low cost/no cost methods, at Block Club neetings, and during energy audit, anc 2) arrange financing for costly energy improvenents, i.e. , furnace replacements and insulation, and 3) leverage private investments by providing participants with $50 worth of free materials (caulking, insulation, weatherstripping) which they will install to reduce heat loss. Elderly, disabled, and other residents who are unable to install the materials themselves will receive help from neighborhood volunteers, kilder Chore Service, and Ra�sey Action ?rograms (RAP) • This project, which is based on NEP's one and one-half year's of experience, and a similar Minneapolis project, encourages energy rehabilitation (retrofit) � with low cost materials, sweat equity, and energy audits. Minneapolis has shown that the Block Club approach dramatically increases the participation in energy audits. Northern States Power (NSP) has a response rate of 5� to their audit offer. NEP has generated an additional 5€. The response rate in �he t•;inneapolis program is 50�. NEP is seeking the NPP funds to begin a Block Club project in District 13. NEP's existing budget ($26,000 per year) is not sufficient to finance a full scale Block Club project and meet other program objectives. Therefore, tY,e Board of Directors decided to seek additional funds to expand NEP's services. This summer NEP will conduct a denonstration of the Block Club project �.�ith special funds. t��e will use the exaerience to further develbY_ t!�e proara:r, �nd to sec :. �unding to expand it to non CDBG eligible areas of the neiohborhoo,:s, and possibly to other District Councils. 2. HOW MUCH NP FUND MONEY IS BEING REQUESTED? $65,000.00 3. WHAT IS TF?� TOTAL DECLARATION OF NEIGHBORFi00D CONTRIBUTZONS? 4. ��'HAT PROBLEMS/NEEDS ARE BEING ADDR:SSED? t�iAT EVIDENCE IS AVAILABLE TO DOCUMENT THE NEED, I.E. , CENSUS DATA, DISTRICT PLAN PRIORITIES, ETC.? Rapidly rising energy prices have a negative effect on the residents of Snel�.ing/ Hamline and Merriam Park. Most residents spend a greater portion of their income on energy than they did in 1974. In 1974, it cost only 5196 to heat the average Diinnesota home w•ith natural ga�i� By 1982, the cost had risen to to 5730, and in 1990 it will cost 51,790. The cost of heating Merriam Park and Snelling/Hamline's large, uninsulated Victorian homes will be even higher. Low and moderate income homeowners and renters, a large portion of the neigh- borhoods' population, are hard hit by these price increases. Accozding to the 1980 Census, one third of the households in Snelling/F3amline and Merriam Park have incomes below 80$ of the SMSA income. Approximately 600 are in the CDBG-eligible area, the remaining 26U0 households are scattered throughout the rest• of the neighborhood. _Senior citizens head 1500 households, half own . ��;� , � � � ' their homes. Approximately one third (2300) of the low and moderate income househclds rent. Minority families have increased in r�t��nber from 123 in 1970 • - to 328 in 1980; most live in the CDBG-eligible area. ' . � Low income homeowners, especially the elderly, cannot afford to retrofit . their homes. As a result, they must choase between having adeq��te heat, giving up other necessities to pay for heat, or selling their homes. � Renters have special problems. Because energy is often included in rent, renters have little incentive to conserve or make energy-saving improvements. Landlords who believe energy improvements are a pooz investment raise the rent to cover increasing energy costis. Most of the rental property. in Snelling/Hamline and Merriam Park was built before 1940 and have less than nine units. A Metropolitan Council repox�.�found that this type of rental property is the least energy efficient. � , St. Paul neighborhoods must continue to provide low and moderate income householc= with affordable housing. The City's Comprehensive Plan states: "Energy will increasingly be a major consideration for any household seeking a place to live. The progress St. Paul makes in improving energy efficiency k�ill largely determine the decree to which city housing serves the negd�s of St, Paul residents aaQ re;r�ins attractive to new households." � As a result of rising energy costs, more money has left riinnesota. According to the State's Energy Division, this dollar drain reduced Minnesota's gross state product by about �1.5 billion ir�61980. This resulted in the loss of 31,500 - .. - 56,000 new job opportunities. � Nany would have been in St. Paul. 5. IF PROJECT ACTIVITIES A?� TfiRGETED TOWARD A SP=,CIFIC G�OG?2�:P'r.ICfiL F,nEA OR SITE, FTTACH A MFiP SHO'v:ING T'r'.� F�OJECT BOJNDARIES. IF PRO��CT ACTIVZTIES AR.; CONCENT?.i:^�' ON A SP.*^,CIFIC SUBJECT OR ?RG3Lt'�?, T'S;?LAII� i•;:Y '�=:iS 5::.:J:C1 CO'.dCE�'I'�LT1O:: �ti'AS C'r.'L== Tne project is designed to aodress the energy conservation needs primarily of ' low and moderate income households in Merrian Park and Snelling/Ham].ine. There will be three phases. During the first, the project will be offered to all households in the CDBG-eligible area (see Map) . During the second phase, the project will be expanded to all income-eligible households in the non-CDBG areas beginning with blocks with high concentration of income-eligible households. tJEP and the Co:nmunity Councils will seek additional f��nds tc cover :ae cest of providing the project to all other residents of tr►e n�icnbornood (aor.-inco:ne eligible households in non-CD3G a�eas) . During �he t'r.�iro p:-:ase NE� will approac�� other District Councils about offering the project to their residents. An energy rehabilitation project was chosen for the following reasons: 1) Neighborhood residents have expressed a desire to reduce theiz energy costs. Over 60� of those responding to the Energy Mobilization Survey stated that they wanted to join with their neighborhood group to lower their energy costs � 2) The Community Councils have placed a high priority on maintaining t�gir abilities to respond to the housing needs of their r.eig'r.borboo�s. � The Councils would also like t$�help the City achieve its goal of weatherizing 85€ of the homes by 1990 � 3) rEP has found th�t in order to achieve a high participation rate fro;� the low income and e;derly, an intense marketing ca-npaign is needed. £nergy Block Clubs are the ideal approach because they: *provide a personal and syste:natic way of "selling" the benefits of . enezgy conservation to every household on every block in the neighborhood, � *assure a high response rate due to the endorse:nent and gentle peer pressure from block volunteers and other neighbozs, � �offer residents a positive experience in working with neighbors to , minimize a shared problem and � *build a network of energy experts on each block. ' In a survey of Snelling/Hamline residents conducted in April, about 50$ were eager to participate in an Energy Block Club project. (� WHAT IMPACT WILL THE PROJECT HAVE IN THE NEIGHBORHOOD? This project will help maintain integrity by easing the long term burden of rising energy costs on the residents, It will reduce the number of residents who move from the neighborhood because they cannot afford to heat their homes. Care will be taken to preserve the existing architectural and residential flavor of the neighborhood., The benefits to the neighborhood include: ' � , a) More jobs. Investments in energy conservation generate jobs. A study conducted by the Council on Economic Priorities found that $1 million spent on energy conservation generated 45.4 labor years - of local employment, compared tq1�5.2 years of the money was used to pay gas and elictricity bills. � b) Increased property value. In addition to energy i�r�provenents, residents will also make non-energy repairs which will improve the appearance of the neighborhood and extend the life of the homes, thereby increasing the property values. c)cleaner environment. Reduced consumption means less pollution (Residential consumption will be reduced 5-20�s depending upon the participation rate.) � d)healthier business district. A strong, stable residential neighborhood . attracts and is able to support more businesses. 7. I�'HO t'ILL 2�',ANAGE T�E PROJECT� t9hat ex�erience does the managiro e:�tity :;:.ve in this type of project? � All three organizations will be responsible for implementing the project, while NEP will handle day-to-day operations. Merriam Park's and Snelling/Hamline's Community Councils will appoint representatives to serve on the NEP Board of Directors. The Board will oversee the project, establish priorities, and approve t1EP's activities. The Board's activities will be reviewed by both Community Councils. I�:�? grew out of concern about the negative ir,.pac� ri=i�g enercy p_ices u:o�ld have on residents of Snelling/Hamline. In 1980, the Council submitted a prcposGl for an energy conservation project to the St. Paul Energy Office. The project was one of five St. Paul projects funded under HUD's Innovative Energy Grant Program. Initially, NEP served the 800 households in Snelling/Ha-nline. Last winter NEP expanded its services to residents of iderriam Park and District 14. NEP's goal is to help neiahborhood residents use energy more efficiently. To that end, NEP has conducted 200 RCS energy audits, written newspaper articles promoting energy conservation, sponsored 14 workshops on various energy topics, conducted solar porch and basement insulation demonstrations, and initiated a group purchasing project. To date, NEP has soid over $8,000 worth of hich quality energy saving products at discount prices to neighborhood residents and other community energy •projects. NEP staff currently consists of:l)a Coordinator (Julie Close) , who has nine years of experience in the field of energy conservation. Prior to N�P, she worked for the St. Paul Energy Office and the Minnesota Energy Agency, 2) a full time Auditor/Program Assistant (t•]ary T'Kach) who, in addition to cc�d.ucting energy audits, was responsible for organizing the "energy store", 3) a part- time Energy Auditor (2dike Doran) who conducted over 600 energy audits for RAP and - r:�r��-� ��7 , • � Minnegasco, prior to being hired by NEP. We anticipate hiring an Organizer, several additional auditors, and possibly some Intezns. • The.Merriam Park Community Council was incorporated as a grass roots citizen �• participation organization in 1968 to inform and educate area residents, to foster policies �ahich help retain the residential quality of the neighborhoods and to promote a strong community spirit and pride. The Merriam Park Community Council represents the area bounded by the Mississippi River/City Limits, Summit Avenue, SnelZing Avenue, and University Avenue to Prior, where it runs south to I-94 and again east to the City Limits. Major projects that the Community Council has worked on in the past few years include: • Assisting in the securing of funding for the Merriam Park Neighborhood Housing Service, and their High Rise Revolving Fund. Formulating ar Energy _Conservation Program in t�erriam Park. Organizing Crime Prevention Block Clubs. Organizing a Stump Renoval, Tree Planting, and Fall Clean Up Projects. Designing and Installing a Tot Lot through neighborhood sweat equity and local corporate donations. Operation of the rierriam Park POST tdewspaper. Securing funding for upgrading Iris Park. . . Securing funding for reconstruction of area streets. Securing funding for Merriam Park library repairs. Studying improper land usage of residential areaa, traffic flow and parking problems, parkway and building designs, city and stste legislation and program proposals, etc. These are just a few of the many activities the Merriam Park Community Council has tackled. The Organization has accomplished these activities through the participation of many volunteers and the funding of two part-time staff persons. Funding of our operating budget has been secured from the City of St. Paul, the Merriam Park Community Center (which is a United t��ay Agency) , and various co.:�munity fundraising events. Snelling/Hamline is one of the youngest of St. Paul's Community Councils. It was formed in 1976 and began receiving funding from the City soon after. It, too, has a strong interest in maintaining the neighborhood's housing stock. In 1980 the Council made an unsuccessful request for the Merriam Park NHS to move into Snelling/Hamline. One of the Council's main areas of concern has been energy. It was the first community to be visited by the Energy Office's Caulkmobile; it organized neighborhood residents and volunteers from the Xerox Corporation to caulk and weatherstrip homes of seven disabled and elderly families; and it oversees the operation of NEP. The Council operates a community garden, established a green space on Summit Avenue, and received a AiNShip grant to increase its half-time Organizer to full time. $. WILL THE PROPOSED PROJECT BE TIED OR COORDINATED k'ITH ANY OTHER PROJECT OR PROGRAM (PUBLIC OR PRIVATE)? IF YES, IDENTIFY. � YES X •� NO ' aj Northern States Power 's RCS audit program. In July 1982, NEP entered into a contract with rSP to conduct "community-bssed audits". NEP will bill NSP for audits conducted as part of this project at the rate of $45 per hour. . _ b) Wilder Chore Service. They will help senior citizens install the free ` materials. The service will be free of charge. NEP staff will train - - Wilder's staff to install the materials properly. c) Ramsey Action Programs (RAP) . NEP will assist qualifying residents apply for the Weatberization and Fuel Assistance Programs. d) Energy Resource Center (ERC) . St. Paul's HRA and banks who participate . in NgiFA's Loan Programs. NEP auditors will assist qualifying homeowners and landlords to apply fo= loans and grants to finance additional energy and non-energy improvements. e) Liberty State Bank's Home Inspection Service. Liberty Bank -offers ,� neighborhood residents a f=ee home inspection. Residents who have non-energy related problems will be referred to Liberty's housing expert. f) Snelling/Hamline and rierriam Park Communi�y Councils (see question 7) . g) Employment and Training Programs. NEP will investigate, providing training and job opportunities to the unemployed neighborhood residents by working with the Manpower Office or obtaining funds from the new JOBS PROGRAM. 9. WFiAT IS TEiE PROJECT SCHEDULE? JASONDJFDfAMJJASOND 2 block demonstration *-* P�PP contract awarded * Seek funding for program expansion *-----* to non-CDBG-eligible areas Program development � *----* Blocks �1 &�2 *°'-* -recruit & train inviters & hosts -conduct meetings -perform energy audits -assist with financing & con- tractors Blocks �3 & �4 '`-'` Blocks *5 - �35 *--------------------* Evaluation & program revisions *----------------'-"---""-""'* 10: WILL THIS PROJECT BE COMPLETED IN 2 YRS? YES X Z1. �4ILL THIS RP OJECT R£SULT IN INCRERSED MP,INTENANCE AI�D OPERATING COSTS FOR THE CITY? NO X 12. HOW �4ILL THE PROJECT BET£FIT LOW A27D A50DERATE INCOI�SE HOUSEHOLDS? The major benefit will be reduced energy consumption. a) Installation of the free energy-saving products, and implementation of energy management practices will result in savings of up to 35�. b) Reducing energy costs will free up money for other necessities. c) Participation in RAP's Weatherization Program, and in other loan and grant programs will result in even greater savings and may allow homeowners to make other needed home repairs. ` : � � �:��,� � d) Landlords will learn about new financing options which make energy - improvements a wise investment. ' � e)� Homes will be more comfortable due to elimination of cold drafts. 13. HOW WILL NEIGHBORfi00D CITIZEN PARTICIPATION BE FOSTERED DURING PROJECT DEVELOPMENT AND IMPLEMENTATION? Community Councils and NEP's Board, and residents of the neighborhood were actively involved througliont.the process in defining the need, developing goals and objectives and in• writing the application. The three groups will continue to be involved throughout the project (see Question 7) . In order to succeed this pxoject must have a high level of citizen� partici- pation: 50$ participation of all households on block must evaluate, attend meetings, install products,invest income. volunteers will be needed to invite neighbors, host neetings, distribute products, help elderly 3nd disabled install products. neighborhood residents, through the Community Councils or members of NEP Board of Directors, will oversee the project. Participation in Community Council activities will be promoted at the Block Club meetings. � ��.�Lc.c �.��.'� �J�t�i� �l�;sc: ��i�dfo��/�'= �//j�3 � �` ( � /� .� (�'� I /� d G I'^�� /'�r �.�� 1�V�� w��JC� ��JiJti�V• ��!✓�111'J�' i � ✓1 �.[��/l!� I { � - �'�,1��t�.�t�1't� S("�.:,�►;'/1- �-�,;;n�f�,�i�lk ��L,� (1) Energy Division of the Minnesota Department of Energy, Planning " � and Development. � (2) 1980 Census of Population and Housing, U.S. Census Bureau. (3) Energy Policy and The Elderly. Minnesota State Planning Agency - March 1981 - p.14 (Q) Residential Energy Use in the T�ain Cities Metropolitan Area, � � � Metropolitan Council - June 1981 - p.19 � F (5) A Plan for Housing - Comprehensive Plan - City of St. Paul - 1980 - p.l (6) 1982 Energy & Policy Conservation Report, Energy Division of the Minnesota Department of Energy Planning and Development - Dec. 1982 - p.4 (7) St. Paul Energy r4obilization - City-�4ide Survey Results St. Paul Energy Offi ce - May 1980 (81 District 13 Plan - Division of Planning. p.93 �g� A Plan for Housing - Comprehensive Plan - City of St. Paul - 1980 - p.24 (10) Jobs and Energy - Council on Economic Priorities - p.72 � -: � . ��'�� ' � (��Q�Q�� . , t '� , i 8��B�B�B � � �[ID�DBE��B �` 1 �l f�BJ[�(FJ[B�C�BB� E� .� - .�r` �� . -�''� [� , � i; � �� ':;� / ' ��} A - -�-�' --, -� �� .; �. �, �1 � � --i .� . � �� \\ �lS�'t>.s. '+�"' � � - .1 �... ��' `� ��;�`' � �.�.; � � �-- -, �\� ....... _ ll, � �� _ � ��--�- - 1, w C�' �;V�_ "�-_ �-: - "�-��- -.=�_ f .... ��r ` * . \ T f �� T.. � �I� Z >�_ �.� �-,� ��tr'I' .... .. ��E��dE-3��--��t_. ' � - `� ..L.-�r , ��8�8�`�-C�� E�� '� ' - ,-�-��- , � �'`y��, ' - �-�3�7B�E�E�, _P_.B .� - - �� ;ruc��L� ; � 1'�_ ' "�.� , �� .Y�70f� L��,� ��'� �-_ �� ..,�—J .�3 ..�. ...... F {F� _ -=--�?��` -�i� �.�-- l�fL Jl._�: �� L__ �� Y-�--�; � Y ' �� `�� B�B�� '!—' - c�,._.� _..1 , ......, ,� � � t_' : �• _ � . _-- � �BE��`r��r��B�B��?�?��'.-� ��..� _ . � r---�--1 r� r— - _--,�,--,. •—,�—_ MERRIAM PK.-LEXINGTON HAMLINE DISTRICT 13 O '°° °°° '°°° �'� � �yj M AREA A - CDBG-eligible Area . `� _ AREA B - Non-CDBG Eligible Area � h ��=�,:,;. , :- ��=�'-'°'_ � . NPP APPLICATION, Page 4 PROJECT NAME Energy Block club project _ . � NEIGNBORHOOD CONTRIBUTIONS DECLARATION 1 . ESTIMATED COMMERCIAL PROPERTY FIXED CAPITAL IMPROVEMENTS: � � . . - - NUMBER OF PARTICIPANTS $ AVERAGE INVESTMENT � . � ; ' TOTAL INVESTMENT EQUALS $ 2. ESTIMATED RESIDENTIAL� PROPERTY FIXED CAPITAL - IMPROVEMENTS: purchase of -additional weatherizing prod ucts, loans for general rehab. & energy improvements. NUMBER OF PARTICIPANTS �nn r,�„�o►,��G � AVERAGE INVESTMENT ��ih�hia_ � TOTAL INVESTMENT EQUALS $ 30,000 3. NEW COMMERCIAL DEVELOPMENT: SITE (a) - ESTIM64TED MARKET VALUE $ SITE (b) � ESTIMATED MARKET VALUE $ TOTAL MARKET VALUE S 4. NEW RESIDENTIAL DEVELOPMENT: SITE (a) ESTIMATED MARKET VALUE $ , SITE (b) ESTIMATED MARKET VALUE $ � TOTAL MARKET VALUE $ 5, ESTIM4TE0 IN-KIND-SERVICES (OFFICE SPACE, EQUIPMENT, SERVICES) : SOURCE AND TYPE {; SHCC & MPCC - Se�vices of Organizers _ $ 4�.88g �1SP at�di t- mana[�pmant ��ul=mpry} 2. Libertv Bank - Home InspectionG - � 1,500 3. R��sev Action Proqrams - Weather;zation $ 3.750 4. �9ilder Chore Service - Labor 1,500 6. ESTIMATED VOLUNTEER LABOR: hosts, inviters, helpers for elderly & disabled, crew to distribute weatherization products. NUMBER OF VOLUNTEERS 130 AVERAGE HOURS/VOLUNTEER � TOTAL NOURS x $10/hr. EQUALS $ e,�oo 7. ESTIMATED SWEAT EQUITY: installation of the energy-saving products � received during workshop. . � NUMBER OF PARTICIPANTS 470 AVERAGE NOURS/PARTICIPANT 20 � TOTAL HOURS 8460 - TOTAL HOURS x $10/hr. EQUALS � 94,000 � • - "'tR��r�`7�� -. ��'.._ '.= f �[_ �. . ' � , NPP APPLICATION, Page .S PROJECT NAME Enerav Block Club Project • . 8. ESTIMATED CASH DONATIONS: SOURCE 1 . NSP - $45 per audit � � $ 22,500 2. Partici ants - $10 audit fee, paid to NSP $ 5,000 * 3. Discounts from contractors & suppliers $ 5,000 9, ANTICIPAT D FOUNDATION GR�1NT� will be� us�ed t$ �over c�st� of �r�v}di�g �ie°��igor�°oo�°con�r°�ution�sl 7e resi en s, o inclu e in o a o FOUNDATION(s) 1 . NID1Ship, High Winds, St. Paul Foundation $ 270,000 2. St. Paul Companies, H.B. Fuller, NSP $ 10. OTHER: EXPLAIN Discounts on additional products purchasEB from group purchasing project ESTIMATED VALUE $ 5,000 . TOTAL NEIGHBORHOOD CONTRIBUTIONS DECLARATION $ 228.450 11 . WHAT EVIDENCE IS THERE THAT THE ABOVE DECLARATIONS ARE REALISTIC? The amounts are based upon increases over current levels. For instance, the 500 audits are the increase in number of audits which residents of the neighborhood request as a direct result of the energy block club project. The rate of funding from NSP is based upon an existing contract between NSP and NEP. There is a strong possibility that the rate paid per audit w�ll increase. If that happens, we will use the additional money to expand the project to more homes. Other contributions (4,6,7) are conservative estimates based upon personal experience of the members of NEP's Board of Directors & the staff. . , � ' NPP APPLICATION, Page 6 PROJECT NAP1E _ Energy slock Club Project ESTIMATED PROGRAM FUNDING* � SOURCE � $ AMOUNT 1 . ._..�itP?Grasst S_6 5,O�n n 2. TnvPStmPntc h,�sc�r�oratic�ne• � �6��i00 3• a. NSP a �di rPimh_ (R_1� �C72,Snn 4• b. NSP a�dit mana9Pmpnt �S_i� a�,snn 5• C. Liberty State Bank insc�act-i�nc 1 �5(1� 6• d. Contractor discounts (R_�) s,onn �• Investments bv oraanizations: id��Sn • _ �. a. RAP Weatherization 15.� 3,750 9• b Wilder Chore Service (,5.41 1,500 ��. C MPCC & SHCC (5.5) 4�000 11 , c7. Group purchase 8discounts (10) 5.000 ' 12. Investments bv Citizens: �3'j,,700 13, a. Private financinQ of additional 14, energy improvements 30.000 15, b. Volunteer labor 8.700 16, c. Sweat equitv 94.000 � 17, d. Audit fee paid to NSP � 5000 18. 19. 20. TOTAL $293,450 * INCLUDE NEIGHBORH000 PARTNERSHIP FUND AND SPECIFIC CATEGORIES OF NEIGHBORHOOD � CONTRIBUTIONS. ' :;��•�� s • . � . . . � . , � . , - NPP APPLICATION, Paqe 7 PROJECT NAME Energy Block Club Project ESTIMATED PROGRAM EXPENSES PROGRAM EXPENSES . FUND SOURCE* . $ AMOUNT � • C`nnrAinater - 1 �r„y a�,[� ti,no NPP & NSP (8.1) S 1�75� 2. Orqanizer - 18 mo. . 3/4/time � NPP ' 2'��.895 3. 2 - 18 mo. , 1/7 time riPCC & sxc`c d,,nno 4. Enerqv Auditors - 18 mo. NSP �3.500 5. Secretarv - 18 mo. , 1/4 time t�PP �•20s 6. Accountant - 12 mo. NPP & N�P 900 7. Worksho Assistants NPP 2.500 g, Volunteers f6) 8.700 9. Energy Saving Products NPP 20.000 10. Cash donations f8.31 5.000 . 11 . Printing & Communications NPP 20.000 �2. Rent NPP 2.700 13, Insurance NPP . 250 14. Equipment & Supplies NPP 2.100 15, Audit Management & Equipment NSP 47,500 �(�, Audit Fee - Paid to NSP Participants (8.2) 5.000 17, Installation of Energy-saving Products In-kind (5.2,5.3,& 5.4) 6,750 . 18. Sweat Equity (7) 94,000 19. Private Investments (4) 30,000 20. Discounts on Products ; 5,000 � TOTAL EXPEMSES �.'93,450 * INCLUDE NEIGHBORHOOD PARTNERSHIP FUND AND NEIGHBORHOOD C(1NTRIBUyIONS. . . `��'�'�� i ._ � . . , , . . !?ECElVED J►,t� - i 198 . 3 Neighborhood Partnership Program D U E NL Dept. Planning & Economic Development Planning District Code No. Z5 W. 4th Street - . � � Planner-9n-Charge St. Paul, Minn. 55102 � Technicai Support (612)292-1517 Other CD Non CD �, � - - NPP APPLICATION PLEASE PRINT OR TYPE PROJECT NAME � MIDWAY PARTNERSHIP PROGRAM _ GROUP OR ORGANI7ATION SUBMITTING REQUEST � NAME: Midway District 11 Coalition �DDRESS: 1761 University Ave. , St. Paul, MN 55104 STREET CITY STATE ZIP TELEPHONE: 646-1986 CONTACT PERSON FOR THIS REQUEST: Kiki Sonnen DAYTIME TELEPHONE: 646-1986� 1 . WHAT IS THE PROJECT PROPOSAL? _ � - - Midway Partnership Program brings physical improvements to a concentrated area between Aldine and Sim so through: � 1) storefront improv�c�en�s and aesthetic streetscapes and renovated_playground on Snelling Ave. - 2) tree planting and composting for both commercial and residential properties 3) energy conservation measures for 'botii commercial, residential and city properties. MPP ties residents, schools, churches, Hamline University and Snelling Ave. businesses together in a joint project to upgrade the community. _ � . . 2. HOW MUC H NP FUND MONEY IS BEING REQUESTED? $ 80,870 3. WHAT IS THE TOTAL DECLARATIQN OF NEIGHBORHOOD CONTRIBUTIONS? $ 1b1,740 (Complete Neighborhood Contributions Declaration Form, page 4) 4. WHAT PROBLQ�lS/NEEDS ARE BEING ADDRESSED? WHAT EVIDENCE IS AVAILABLE TO DOCUMENT THE NEED, i .e., CENSUS DATA, DISTRICT PLAN PRI�tITIES, ETC.? MPP addresses the problems of deteriorated commercial strip and surrounding neighborhood. Census data shows Tract ��321 is CDBG eligible. MPP conforms with goals of both District 11 Plan, and St, Paul Comprehensive Plan (including Economic Developmeat, Housing & Neighborhoods, Land Use, Parks & Recreation, and Youniversity Ave. Plans). ' ♦ - . � NPP APPLICATION, Page 2 PROJECT NAME Midway Partnership Program 5. IF PROJECT ACTIVITIES ARE TARGETED TOWARD A SPECIFIC GEOGRAPHICAL AREA OR SITE, ATTACH A MAP SHOWING THE� PROJECT BOUNDARIES, IF PROJECT ACTIVITIES ARE CONCENTRATED ON A SPECIFIC SUBJECT OR PROBLEM, EXPLAIN WNY THIS SUBJECT CONCENTRATION WAS CHOSEN. See attached map showing specific geographical area. 6. WHAT IMPACT WILL THE PROJECT HAVE IN THE NEIGHBORHOOD? . MPP's physical improvements will attract more consumers to area businesses, increase property values, conserve energy in homes/businesses/city buildings, beautify the neighborhood and build connections between various neighborhood elements. 7. WHO WILL MANAGE THE PROJECT? WHAT EXPERIENCE DOES THE MANAGING ENTITY HAVE IN THIS TYPE OF PROJECT? MPP will be managed by the Midway District 11 Coalition. Our President .will appoint a Board member as direct project mana.ger. A MPP director will be hired to coordinate the program. � District 11 has prior experience in carrying out similar projects including the 1977 Midway tree planting program, the 1978 Blair ITA, and the current, ongoing Midway Neighborhood Network Program and Midway F.U.E.Le 8. WILL THE PROPOSED PROJECT BE TIED OR COORDINATED WITH ANY OTHER PROJECT OR PROGRAM (PUBLIC OR PRIVATE)? YES x NO . IF YES, IDENTIFY. MPP will be tied to 1) District 11's Midway Neighborhood Network Program and Midway F.U.E.L. , 2) City programs, including Commercial Rehab Loan program, SB�A 503 Leverage Fund, Commercial Energy Audits, Energy Retrofit for City Buildings, and 3) other programs including the Minnesota Energy Agency's Residential Conservation Service Program and Ramsey County's Compost Program. 9. WHAT IS THE PROJECT SCHEDULE? See attached project schedule � . .��,��J� �► � � � � � . . NPP APPLICATION, Page 3 ' , „ - PROJECT NAME Midway Partners�ip Program ' 10. WILL THIS PROJECT BE COMPLETED IN 2 YRS. YES X NO . IF NOT, EXPLAIN HOW IT WILL BECOME SELF-SUSTAINING WITHOUT FURTHER NPP FUNQING? � Certain elements:;of the.:project .will continue .beyond the two years (i.e. actual con- struction,on storefronts and �plaq,ground, residential energy sudits, and composting� _ but cost's of completing or continuing the work will come either from income generated during the NPP funding cycle or from non-NPP public program funds. 11 . WILL THIS PROJECT RESULT IN INCREASED �MAINTENANCE AND OPERATING COSTS FOR THE CITY? YES NO X . IF YES, EXPLAIN HOW THE PROJECT WILL ;PRIVATELY PAY FOR THOSE COSTS. MPP will REDUCE City's maintenance/operation cost� because of energy conservation improvements to public buildings (playground and library). i . , -- _ • . . � ' - �- - • . . . . r, .. . . . . . .. . � . . . • i ' . � i. � _�.� 12. HOW�WILL THE PROJECT BENEFIT LOW AND MODERATE INCOME HOWSEHOLDS? � MPP's concentrated area is located in a CDBG-eligible census tract. Families qualifying. by low to moderate income and living outside the concentrated area will receive discounts on residential tree plantings. � 13. HOW WILL NEIGHBORNOOD CITIZEN, PARTICIPATION BE FOSTERED DURING PROJECT DEVELOPMENT AND IMPLEMfN�ATION? � During project' development and implementation, citizen participation will be recruited from block clubs, church congregations, PTA's, student bodies, local businesses. Participants can get involved in planning, publicizing and actu8l physical labor. 14 . COMPLETE PROGRAM FUNDING AND EXPENSE FORMS PAGES 5 AND 7. 15. ATTACH LETTERS OF SUPPORT FROM ALL INTERESTED AND AFFECTED GROUPS/OR ORGANIZATIONS. t Kiki Sonnen Community Organizer June 1, 1983 SIGNATUR OF ND V DUAL • TYPED NAME TITLE R ROLE DAT COMPLETING APPLICATION . Maryellen Swedenborg, President ��-� • S ATURE OF C IEF FF CER TYPED NAME I LE OL DATE � OR PRESIDENT . . • � NPP APPLICATION, Page 4 . . PRO�ECT NAME Midway Partnership Program * . , . .:� �. � . . NEIGHBORHOOD CONTRIBUTIONS DECLARATION l . ESTIMATED COMMERCIAL PROPERTY FIXED CAPITAL - � IMPROVEMENTS: � � � _ NUMBER OF PARTICIPANTS.� 2�store improvements) �+ 10 �(eriergy improvement�s� ° ' 12 AVERAGE` INVESTMENT � ' . $ • ' , �. . . . _ . . - . . ' � " � TOTAL INVESTMENT fQUALS $ 20,500 2, ESTIMATED RESIDENTIAL PROPERTY FIXED CAPITAL _ IMPROVEMENTS: NUMBER OF PARTICIPANTS 3(res. Furnaces) + 50 (energy improvements) $ 53 AVERAGE INVESTMENT � , - par icipan s $ . TOTAL INVESTMENT EQUALS $ 8,500 3. NEW COMMERCIAL DEVELOPMENT; SITE (a) ESTIN'�ATED MF,RKE7 VALUE $ SITE (b) ESTIMATED MARKET VALUE � TOTAL MARKET VALUE $ NA 4. NEW RESIDENTIAL DEVELOPMENT: SITE (a) ESTIMATED MARKET VALUE $ SITE (b) ESTIMATED MARKET VALUE $ � TOTAL MARKET VALUE $ � 5. ESTIM4TED IN-KIND-SERVICES (OFFICE SPACE, EQUIPMENT, SERVICES) : SOURCE AND TYPE 1 . Office supplies,� equipment � $ 500 2. Mar eting consu tant services $ ; 3, Arc itectura services $ ' , 6. ESTIMATED VOLUNTEER LABOR: Composting, energy conservation work on library, tree. planfing on public property. NUNiBER OF VOIUNTEERS 150 AVERAGE HOURS/VOLUNTEER 5 TOTAL HOURS x $10/hr. EQUALS $ 7,500 1. ESTIMATED SWEAT EQUITY: Tree planting, energy conservation work on private property NUMBER OF PARTICIPANTS 224 AVERAGE HOURS/PARTICIPANT 6.25 � TOTAL HOURS 1 400 y TOTAL HOURS x $10/hr. EQUALS $ 14,000 � �� NPP APPLICATION Pa e 5 PROJECT NAME Midway Partnership Program . . ' 9 � , . , � - • 8. ES-TIMATED CASH DONATIONS: � SOURCE 1 . Purchases of trees and planting materials $ 11,500 3, . � 9. ANTICIPATED FOUNDATION GRANTS: , ., . _ . i;,� . . . - ---- . . - •� • ,. _ . . . _. _ - . FOUNDATION(s) 1 . Private foundation for playground landscaping $ 60,000 , 2� � .. $ 10. OTHER; EXPLAIN � � Corporate giving for energy conservation materials for library ($2,000) Fees for residential energy audits ($540) Fees for commercial energy sudits ($200) _ ESTIMATED VALUE $ 2,740 TOTAL NEIGHBORHOOD CONTRIBUTIONS DECLARATION $ 161,740 11 . WHAT EVIDENCE IS THERE THAT THE ABOVE DECLARATIONS ARE REALISTIC? District 11 has spent considerable time and effort on making sure program estimates are realistic because our primary consideration was to not get in over our heads. Therefore, we have already done the following: � 1) In Feb. we established a Neighborhood Partnership Program Task Force of four Board members to develop the proposal. 2) In March-April the Task Force developed and implemented mail and phone surveys. An analysis of survey results led to our projections for tree planting. 3) We analyzed our past experience on residential energy audits on which we based our audit and energy conservation improvements figures. 4) We interviewed business, community leaders and City staff on trends for our commercial strip and used this to base our forecasts on storefront improvements. 5) We tn ve spent time at our committees and Board meetings to not only discuss program concepts but go over in detail the list and amount of neighborhood contri- butions. Because of our research we built in conservative estimates on storefront improvement, volunteer labor and sweat equity to compensate for possible foul-ups in getting the private foundation grant and architectural service-in-kind. For these reasons, we believe the declarations are realistic. • . � � � ' NPP APPLICATION, . Page 6 ' PROJECT NAP1E _Midway Partnership Program - � ESTIMATED PROGRAM FUNOING*, - SOURCE $ AMOUNT 1 . Neighborhood Partnership Pro�ram 80,870 2• Private foundation �trant � 60,000 3• Dona_ted architectural services 35�000 4• �ommercial propertv capital imvrovements 20,500 5• —Sweat equity 14�000 6• PurchaGP of tees ant' mater�alG 11�500 �• R cid n ia p,7-��ert�capi al imerovementc 8�500 $• __Volunteer labor 7�500 9• Cor�orate�3ving 2,000 10, Donated cnarketin�consultant services _k,500 � �� • Residential ener,gv audit fees � 540 ' 12• Donated office su�vlies and e�auinment 500 - 13. Commercial energ.v audit fees 200 14. ' � 15. ' � 16. ' _ 17. . -. . 18. 19. . 20. TOTAL � 242,610 (Numbers 2 through 13•above are neighborhood contributions) � * INCLUDE NEIGHBORHOOD PARTNERSHIP FUND AND SPECIFIC CATEGORIES OF NEIGHBORHOOD � CQNTRIBUTIONS. � • • ��'��4� � NPP .APPLICATION, Paqe 1 "PRQJECT NAME �dway Partnership Program , � ESTIMATED PROGRAM EXPENSES PRQGRAM EXPENSES . FUND SOURCE* $ AMQUNT � . Playground landscaping NC-Foundation grant 60.000 2. 1.S MPP S�taff � NPP 37.350 3. Architectural services NC-Donated ia-kind-service 35.000 � 4. 2 Storefront improvements NC-Small business loans 20�000 5. Purchase of trees/planting materials NC-11,SOO+NPP-3,500 15.000 an ing composting energy conserva- 6. tion labor on pra.vateproperty NC- sweat equity 14�000 �. Employee benefits NPP 13�650 g. Printing/mailing NPP 12,,,900 an ing composting energy conser- 9, vation labor on public property NC- volunteer labor Z,,, 50� 10. 3 residential furnaces NC-private nurchase/loan �i.,�� 11. Meeting/work crew expenses NPP F,�nnn 12, Marketing consultant NC-1 500 + NPP-3�170 C��n 13. Office supplies/equipment NC-500 + NPP-4'000 [��nn 14. 50 residential energy improvements NC- private nurchsses �,.,5t1� 15. Energy conservation materials/librarv NC- Corvorate Qivine 2 DOff 1�. MPP Phone NPP L,.2�� ]. 10 Commercial energy improvements NC-private vurchases 5�� g. Residential/Cona�aercial energy audits NC- audit fees 74� 19. 20. TOTAL EXPENSES � �42r��n NPP = Neighborhood �artnership Program funds NC = Neighborhood Contributions * INCLUDE NEIGHBORHOOD PARTNERSHIP FUND AND NEIGHBORHOOD CONTRIBU7IONS. . ' � . � �x� z��roxa ' �� Y��O?Id dIHS2I�1�LZ2�5'd ��'MQIY1 �� 000. 0 3c N� ��S oo, oos �N ll 1�I2l1SI0 A�'/MQIW-3NIlW�lH � u u� .� ' � � .� � � � L-.�. �( � � � ��{+'�.��1,�L``• i �� I�.._ _ l `��` , �_.'� — �� \V�\ ,^—��ul r—� I 1 ` \ s�� 11 �� f�� 11 i i 1 .-� ��'�'�, ��.�a� ( I I• I`` �'7 �,^�,��' --- ?--�:7 .•?•__If�^ � � \ , � =; ,_�,��---�° ��08C �� i` :��''. �� C��C18� ... � �,� : �� -..,� '�,.� s^ L"��C_�7� � �, � � t �"' � J ...��-�� ' �� ' _ �� ' �� :� ��-'��i�� ' � _ �--1� �0�� B ...� :� �.i��'� ��^0 ,:::;. ...; ,_,��,_.� _ l.�J� I/f AIM/1 • if�a I ♦ '� I ' ,��J 7M/ IM t� �.� Z =�b� �, i � ' �=-�±-� �� ... � � � � �oC�D .... � ; ; � �.�-�� _ ^ y�' ��__ __ __ �� 19�} ,. y � � �� Y / __�� V ' 111 ' � ��r wI)rtl0�► MOl/N17Y/II � � �i \ L � � ..... �, �. . . •w n i e r I t = \�\ . Q � � I ---„-__�_ \ . �T-^' D// l 7 N/ f��__.__J� �:I �1 w�w .Mw..a� L__�__�� i, j 1\ r �'�� i , ��'� :�� .a � � �7 H h] tz! y 9 � O � �-r ►i ~ M co W � �d � � O � 9 �� fD fD fD � n n f� � O O • O T�r O n �'i r� hd R A � C� fD +'t �'i G. G ? C 'O C �'t Oq fD 00 G fD 00 fD G � R 7C ' r� \ pq pQ N ly ' 1+ t'S O W fD K ►� r'i M a' M r't ri W ri V� M �. �C A �D R fD � G. P'h A� � fD tD N l7 C fD A F+ •• K r C� fD rr fD �t � W � n O � �O r7 n fD O 'c,' A �O rr A A� W O t� w O !n K G. � 'Cf fD rf 'L7 f,' O O r+ W rt K � fD p 'C M M a' w K ►-+ �D � O fD ri J � � - (� 00 p rt C f9 ri M M O D rt fD hd H K 7� � 00 Q. ' � � fD C C fD w O 00 � a. fi t1i �r � ru m o r; n r; r w �v � a c� oo t� w C O ri E A K r► OQ � w r O lD K � � �D � < O A� 7r cD �C �c7 � C ►i n w � M �'i OQ 0� ►i 'b tA A rt r+ A� rt fD O �' � �D • r rr 7r r+� rt su o n � u, .e � r� rn n r+� r� � O C < �C w c r* 'v Oo r+ o �+o v� o 00 � a m � o rr w M � � ro� � � oo b n � � � ° g � n � � p ri r� ►i r �n � ►i �d tD G O0 � O. ►R+ � 'C � � � f�D C � r�- � � W � ►i R N R 0 A r, ' � �. . .� �A r! � � � � a �n � - a � `� x x �e �e x �s � � H x � � � x '� x x x � � � � � a � � � � � � � � � � � � � � � ► i � i i � x � ocn � � ► � � x � � � � • b � � � i � � � � � r-� � 9 i � � � >S X � t � � �+ 1 '�, '�( I t 1 '�G 1 1 1 1 N `1,"` 1 t 1 • ,�C 1 i 1 1 1 'n W . LTJ 1 i 1 1 1 1 � 1 1 /�"7. � 1 1 1 1 I 1 1 1 � Cn 1 1 1 1 1 �' 1 t 1 tJf H --- i . k �C � X X �S i i �C o� ►ti � . _. _ 1 �C � - i i i v � i i i i i x i i oc � i i � � � � i � x � k � � i �t � i �c x � � � � � � � � � i � i � � � r . 1 � � 1 I 1 ! t O � 1 1 I I 1 1 1 t � � � � � � � � � ro � � � � i � x � � r� � - - i . i i i i i i x X � � �'' O t 1 I 1 t 1 1 1 _ � � 1 N r! '� t 1 1 ( 1 I 1 � . . � � . .. . .. _ n ' 1 1 1 1 1 1 1 t 1 �"� y 1 1 1 t 1 1 1 1 1 W 1 I I 5C 1 1 1 � � � � i � i � i � i r c� i i � � i � X � � � -.._ DC � � � t t i � C; -- , x , � x x � � � d � � � � � � � , � � � � r , � � � � � r � � � i � o• � � , � � � i i >C � t v � � � � x i � i � � � � � x � � � � x � � � � � � � � � � � � � x � � � � � � � � � � x � � � � � � � � � � � � � � � � � � 1 1 t 1 1 1 1 N 1 1 1 1 1 �C I ' O x � x � � � �` .�C 1 1 N � x � � � � � ►r � � i t � � � � � i � � i � i �C i � N 1 1 1 I 1 1 1 1 N 1 x � 1 � 1 1 1 1 1 � 1 1 1 1 1 I � 1 1 N 1 1 1 I 1 1 1 ',� 1 1 W I �S 1 1 t 1 1 9C ; X N I 1 1 1 1 1 � 1 I 1 t 1 1 1 � 1 1 9C 1 t 1 N � 1 1 � � � I 1 1 1 1 � � 1 1 k � � � N 1 1 1 � � t t t � � �( ,k . 1 1 � � N k k x v r«- ;r;�r�q a- , �a i� � ,,,�, .� � yr� . �r � ' � � . . R�GElVED ,1UN -_Z 198� �� . . � . . � � . : . ._ � Neighborhood Partnership Program � D U E t�l Dept. Planning & Economic Development Planning District� Code No. 25 W. 4th Street � � Planner-ia-Charge - St. Paul, hlinn. 55102 � . .� � Technical Support ' . (612)292-1571 . . Other CD ,___. Nan CO . . . . . . . . . . .. ._ . . . . � . • � , � . � ._ . • .. � �. NPP APPL ICATION � .. . ... .. .. � LEASE PRINT OR TYPE . ,, � , DISTRICT 14 BOULEVARD IMPROVEMENT PROJECT PROJECT NAME GROUP OR ORGANI7ATION SUBMITTIt�G REQUEST . � . � ' � NAME' . District .14 Co�unity Council � ADDRESS: 1523 Fairmount Avenue St. Paul Minnesota 55105 . STREET C ITY STATE ZIP TELEPHONE: �oQ_�o�� . . _ �_ . . . � . � , , , . . CO�I7ACT PERSON FOR THIS REQUEST: Karhie Ta�wski community ort�anizer __ DAYTIME TELEPHONE: �9�-�9�3 .. � � 1 . WHAT IS THE PROJECT PROPOSAL? , . _ • .. . �� - � • . � The District 14 Boulevard Improvement Project is specifically for removal of stumps and planting of trees on public boulevards�and on and near visible public �property in District 14. Tfie neighborhood cantribution will include cost of stump �removal and purchase of trees for boulevards, volunteer time in promoting these programs, volunteer time in actual" tree planting, and 'volunteer tir�e in watering the new trees. NP Fund money will be used for stump removal and tree planting on arterial streets and on and around visible public property, particularly schools and playground, . where citizen efforts 'have not occured and seem unlikely . to�otherwise occur: : . _. . _,�; . • ' .. .. . .- . • . . .. :l. . .. . .... . . . . �� . . .� �,4 . « . ' . .... • - � , .� . . . . ,. . � . .. . ' . ' . .. . . . � . . . ' . . � .� . ... . _ . � .. . . . . _ . . _ . . . � . � . ' . . . . .• " .. , - � . . . ' . • � . � . ' , � . � � . . . ' . . 2. HOW MUC H N ', P FUND MONEY IS BEING REQUESTED? $ �-`� 7� — IS THE TOTAL DECLARATION OF NEIGHBORH000 CONTRIBUTIONS? � �7'a� - 3. WHAT . (Con�lete Neighborhood Contributions Declaration Form, page 4) . ��- 4. WHAT PROBLE3riS/NEEDS ARE BEItVG.ADDRESSED? NW�IORITIESCEETC.?vAILABLE TO DOCUMENT THE NEED, i .e., CENSUS DATA, DISTRICT PLA District 14 is where Dutch Elm beatles were firkerfwormsiwhich defoliatedithenelms, for sevexal years the area was plagued with can causing the trees to be under stress_and more vulnerable to Dutch Elm Disease. , Thousa ..,,a �,.,,�. n;�trict 14 boulevards. The city . ' ' , �.� , � NPP APPLICATION, Page 2� � PROJECT NAME District I4 Boulevard ImprQvement�� • . 5. IF PR03ECT RCTIVITIES ARE TARGETED TOWARD A SPECIFIC GEOGRAPHICAL,AREA OR SI.TE, ATTACH . A MAP SHOWING THE PROJECT BOUNQARIES. IF PROJECT ACTIVITIES ARE CONCENTRATED ON A SPECIFIC SUBJECT OR PROBLEM, EXPLAIN WHY THIS SUBJECT COt�CENTRATION WAS CHOSEN. •' . The project area fs bounded by Summit Avenue on the north, the Mississippi River Boulevard on the west, Randolph on the south and the Short .Line on the east. , . . . . .. . ' , . . . .. . . . . . 6, WHAT IMPACT WILL THE PROJECT NAVE IN TNE NEIGHBORHOOD? � • ` � Both the District 14 Plan and the Grand Avenue West Study note the importance of ' boulevard trees in the area and particularly on highly traveled, visible streets. The Grand Avenue West Study pinpoints the importance of trees on Grand Avenue. The image of .these streets , an the image of its schools and playgrounds, affect the '• . image of the entire area. Improvements to these streets and areas enhance the public image and social and economic value of the entire district. Stump removal and tree planting along arterial streets as well as residential streets contributes to the - overall appearance of the district and heZps to maintain resident confidence in their. ar. 7. '�JHO WILL MANAGE TNE PROJECT? WHAT EXPERIENCE DOES 7HE MANAGING ENTITY HAVE IN THIS TYPE OF PROJECT? ' This project will be managed by the District 14 Co�munity Council. The council � � ' has put together and managed successful citizen initiative tree planting and stump �•removal projects for the past two years. �.These projects have been very. successful on residential streets but have had little success alorig arterial streets where: .there are fewer owner occupants and around schools and playground. ...�.: 8, WILL THE PROPOSEO PROJECT BE TIED ORfC00RDINATED�WITH ANY OTHER� PROJECT OR PROGRAM. (PUBLIC OR PRIVATE)? YES � NO . IF YES, IDENTIFY. The project will possibly be tied to a program to subsidize the cost of trees plan�in;•, and/or stump removal. This has been the case in previous projects. The subsidy would be used to make the program more affordable and to f oster a higher degree of participation�fn the project. If public funds are use�d to subsidize the� cost of tree planting through another neighborhood partnership tree planting program similar to � the one funded� by CIB funds in 1983, these funds would not count as part of the neighborhood contribution. All tree planting will be coordinated with the city's 9. WHAT IS THE PROJECT SCNEDULE? . . Neighborhood contributions will begin immediately with all pledges being completed in two years. Stumg removal will begin in' the• summer and fall of 1983 and wi11 also be offered in the summer and fall of 1984. It is possible that there will be a final stump removal project in the summer of 1985. Tree planting will occur in the spring of 1984 and 1985. At this time we are planning to plant with.bare root stock which is most safely planted in the spring. . . •,; . . . ��i��'''s°� � � . , _a � . � . • � District 14 Boulevard�Improvement Proj�• NPP APPLIC�4TION, Page 3 � ' �. PROJEC7 NAME 10. WILL THIS PROJ�CT BE COMPLETED IN 2 YRS. YES - NO . IF NO�, EXPLAIN HOW IT WILL BECOME SELF-SUSTAINING WITHOUT F(1RTHER NPP FUNDIN6? . • . The project will terminate because a goal .has been met. : . � " : • .. ,, . . � . . ; . . . . ', ,� � . . . .. . , � - . • 11 . WILL THIS PROJECT RESULT IN INCREASED�MAINTENANCEWINL PRIATELY PRYTFOR�THOSE COSTS. YES x NO . IF YES, EXPLAIN HOW TNE PROJECT L . In a way, but minimally: there would be extra trees to trim once every four or five years. No extra costs for stump removal aspect of pro3ect. . - � - 12. HOW WILL THE PROJECT BENEFIT LOW AND MODERATE INCOME HOUSEHOLDS? � ' ' � 13. HOW WILL NEIGNBORHOOD CITIZEN PARTICIPATION BE FOSTERED OIiRING PROJECT DEVELOPMENT AND IMPLEMEHTATION? . . . � . . �The project will make�possible a low cost, tax deductible way for people to make�improve- to the pubZic property in their neighborhood, increasing the value of their property anc� property value in the area as a whole. This citizen initiative improvment will result in the leverage of public funds to finish the job'and pay for these improvemnts on publi: . . property where there are fewer owner occupants wflling- to pay for them.• The neighborhoo: ' will be notified of these activities. by flyering, �neighborhood newspaper advertising, � �. . ••:. � � � � 14. COMPLETE PROGRAM FUNDING AND EXPENSE FORMS PAGES �S AN[� 7. � . 15. ATTACH LETTERS OF SUPPORT FROM ALL INTERESTED AND AFFECTED GROUPS/OR ORGANIZATIONS. � �' � ' Katherine Tarnowski Community Or anizer 5-31-83 S GNAT OF NDIVIDUAL TYPED NAME TITLE R ROIE DATE COMPLETIN APPLICATION . . ' � • � ' � President 5-31-83 � ITIE OR ROL� DATE S GNAT E 0 . F FFICER � - . n� caccTnFNT � � � • . . • . �` . NPP APPLICATION, Page 4 PROJECT HAN:E � . . = NEIGHBORHOOD CONTRIBUTIONS DECLARATION 1 . ''ESTIb1ATED COMMERCIAL PROPERTY fIXED CAPITAL . �. �� ' � � . . IMPROVEMENTS: � . � � ' - ' � NUMBER OF PARTICIPANTS estimate no more thare 50 _ � _ " � � _��` ' '_ '" �� AVERAGE INYES7MENT � . � � � . � � ' . TOTAL I NVESTMENT EQUALS ' $ ,T;��, � �• . . .; � . . . � � , . • 2. ESTIMATED RESIDENTIAL PROPERTY FIXED CAPITAL � , : . • . � IMPROVEMENTS: . � � � • � NUMBER OF PARTICIPANTS 1,000 trees � � 1,000 stumps • � $ _ ' - AVERAGE INYESTMENT , , " • TOTAL IHUESTMENT EQUALS $ 60,000 � . . . 3. NEW COMMERCIAL DEVELOPME(�[T: � . � SITE (a) � � � � � . � ESTIMATED MARKET VALUE $ SI7E (b) � ESTIMATED MARKE7 VALtJE $ � T4TAL MARKET VALUE � � � � 4. NEW RESIDENTIAL DEVELOPMENT: � � SITE {a) . � � � . , . ESTIMATED RKET VALUE � $ _ •. � - ' SITE (b) � �� ' ESTIt�{ATED MARKET VALUE • . $ . . . • . � ' . . . .. TOTAL MARKET VALUE $ � � � . ._. . 5. : ESTIh1ATED IN-KIND-SERYICES (OFFICE SPACE, EQUIPMENT, SERVICES) ; � . � . � • : � � SOURCE AND TYPE 1 .' .. Advertising� � '� ' � � _ � ' � 1,500'. ' � - . 2 . . . . $ �• -�^,�-- . . . . � 3. . 6. � ESTIMATED VOLUNTEER LABOR:.�: •. . .�, . . � . . � - . : � • � NUMBER OF VOLUNTEERS . 100 ' � . � . � - AVERAGE HOURS/VOLUNTEER 7 � � � � • . � .� • � TOTAL HOURS x $10/hr. �EQUALS � 7,000 � � r .. . 7, . ESTIMATED SWEAT EQUITY: � . . NUMBER OF PARTICIPANTS � . � AVERAGE HOURS/PARTICIPANT � ,' ' � TOTAL HOURS � . . - � . TOTAL HOURS x $10/hr. EQUALS S � � • - A � . '��;� -'NPP APPLICATION, Page 5 �• PROJECT NAMEDistrict 14 Boulevard �mprovemen Pro�;:- - -.,+. • . 8. ESTIMA�'ED CASH DONATIONS; � � SOURCE 1 . Area businesses, corporations ' � •• • ._ � � �•� ' ` � • 2;000 2. - � 3. � 9, ANTICIPATED F�UNDATION GRAI�ITS: . � • �. . FOUNDATION(s) 1 � In past,�High Winds Fund of Macalester College � � . • � �' 2. —�ras—��e�--e�e—�e—e�e e��te� €�� . � 2,000 . � � • 10. , OTHER: EXPLAIN � � • � . � ESTIMATED VALUE � � TOTAL NEIGHBORHOOD - CONTRIBUTIONS DECLARATION � 74,250 il . WHAT EVIDENCE IS THERE THAT THE ABOVE DECLARATIONS ARE REALISTIC? These numbers are projections based on tree planting and stump removal . projects that the District 14 Community Council has managed in 1982 and��1983. . . � ^r . ' NPP APPLICATION, Page 6 PROJECT NAP1E District 14 Boulevard Improvement Yr.o; • • ESTIMATED PROGRAM FUMDING* , , . - •- � ' SOURCE . . . . . . . � . : $ AMOUNT �. 1 . NPP . $ 24,750 . 2. Volunteer I.abor � � � 7,000 , . 3. In-Kind-Services ' 1.750 4• ,�th�r pon�is,i�s 4.000 5, � .,.,. T.,,,e�«. ent , 61,500 � 6. 7• . 8, � 9. 10. 11 . � ' • 12. .. � . . - . � 13. 14. -- . 15. � 16. . � � _ . 17. � � . 18. . . 19. . 24. � TOTAL $ 99,000__,_,_,_ , , , , � � � � : -- . ' ' ' ��./ti��p.� 71� 3� -'NPP APPLICATION, Page 5 �� PROJECT NAMEDistr�ct 14 Boulevard Xmprovemen� Pro�.- 8. ESTIMA�ED CASH DONATIONS; � � SOURCE 1 . Area businesses, corporations ' � •• • • � ••� ' ` $ • 2;000 Z. � 3. � — 9. ANTICIPATED FOUNDATION GRANTS: � � �. . �. FOUNDATION(s) 1 � In past,`High Winds Fund of Macale^s��College � � � .� • � . , 2 �as—�t�e�—��e e�e e��te��-�� . $ 2,000 • . . 1Q.,� OTHER: EXPLAIN � � • � . . � ESTIMATED YALUE � � TOTAL NEIGFlBORHOOD - CONTRIBUTIONS DECLARATION � 74,250 il . WHAT EVIDENCE IS THERE THAT TNE ABOVE DECIARATIONS ARE REALISTIC? These numbers are projections based on tree planting and stump removal . projects that the District 14 Community� Counctl has managed in 1982 and��1983. . . � ^r . ' NPP APPLICATION, Page 6 PROJECT NAPiE District 14 Boulevard Improvement P.ro: • , • ESTIMATED PROGRAM FUNDING* , , . � . . •- � � SOURCE . . . . . • � .' $ AMOUNT �, 1 . NPP . $ 24,750 . , 2• Volunteer Labor � _�_ ____ __ - 7,000 . 3• In-Kind-Services ' � 1,750 4, 4.000 � 5. PriVat2 �nvestmenr 61,500 � 6, 7. . 8. � 9. 10. � 11 . � ' • 12. � . . - � � 13, . 14. -- . 15. � 16. � � . . 17. � � . 18. . 19. . 20. � TOTAL $ 99.000 * INCl.UDE NEIGHBORHOOD PARTNERSHIP FUNO AND SPEGIFIC CATEGORIES OF NEIGHBORNOOD - CONTRIBUTIONS. . ". ' � -� � ,. �� ~ ,. N�P APPLICA7ION, Paqe 7 PROJECT Nl��1E District 14 Blvd. Improvement Pro3ect 1 . ; . ' _ i . � � ESTIMATED PRQGRAM EXPENSES � � � . - - � . . � PROGRAM EXPENSES . FUND SOURCE* � AMOUNT � . � 1. � v,.� �-.4� �'��a��g------ nnn " � �� Priva[e Financing 25,500 � 2. Stump Removal Project ' 3; Tree Planting Project NPP 15,750 . Q Stump Removal Project NPP 9,000 • . i Vo2unteer time 2 000 � � 5� Promotion, tree planting projec*_ � : 6. Tree Watering , planting Volunteer time • 3_000 �_ � Z,oao 7. Promotion, stump. removal �� . Volunteer time g. . Advertisiag In-Kind-Service 1,500 ' In-Kind-Service 250 g, Graphics, printing 10. � Donations 11 . Donations • 2�000 12. Advertising, printing of flyers Donations 1,500 13. - . � _ _ - . . .." ,... . � . . . . 14. � 15. . . . . . . . lf. � ' � 17. � � 18. . . . 19. . 20. TOTAL EXPEPJSES $ � 99,000 � * INCLUDE NEIGHBORHOOD PARTNERSNIP FUND AND NEIGHBORH000 CONTRIBU�IONS. • • . ., � � ' •- . . . ,y ✓•� . � • . � . • 4. co�t'd. • - � - .. ' '. � �. . . . . . : . . . . . forester's office predicts that another 1,000 to I,600 elms wi11 be removed : ti. from city boulevards this summer and that the bulk of these wi11 be in . � District 14. Most of the remaining elms are likely to be lost in the next = - . few years. , .. . : � . � . :,.. ,_ . ::,:.., . . �`..._ Both tfie District 14 Plan and the Grand Avenue West Study point out the � - ' importance of boulevard .trees, particularly on the more visible streets, to the ' ' ' image of the, area and �ts property values. ` � •_ , . , �- . . . . • . � i '�: . 8. cont'd. - ' tree planting program and trees will be planted according to the city's Street Tree Master Plan. . 9. cont'd. . � . and pasters. Boy. Scout troups, Girl Scout troups, District 14 Community Council board members will help with inventorying, flyering, promotion. Scout and other _:.::.� civic groups will help'with watering. This project has been devel.oped in • cooperating with civic organizations, business associations and businesses, and � educational institutions in the district. It has been the number one priortity � � of the District 14 Community Council in the past (83-84 goals not yet determined� � because of the obvious need for and support for _these activities. . _ .�y_.. 4. ' . . . ' ' . . ' . . . . ' _" .. .- . , . . . ��'- - • • , . -- v v 11 • 7 4 • � 'c� � ��'�''y�' . � � � .�,�,..3',a r� �:� eigl�borhood Partnership Program ED U E i1L • Dept. Plar�ning & Economic Developr;�ent Planning District Code No. . 7_5 ld. 4th Street Pl anner-i n-Charge St. Pdu 1 , t�1i nn. 55) 02 Technical Support B (b�2)292-1577 . ' � Other CD Non CD ' � • . . . . . � � . . • , .. . ' . " NPP APPL ICATI ON .. _ . _ � . .._ . . .�� . ) _ " � • ' PLEASE PR INT OR TYPE � �� . ... ' • PROJECT tdAt�tE ��llie Q. .Bro:^= *1°i�ti'�OT�':C�Od �.n??TO�c��Frco*� - - {�} , , , . . . . GROUP OR Cr.ZGANIZATION SUBt�fITTING REQUEST ' � � � � �� • � t�l;t�1E' '��llie Q. Brov� Co*�,�unit�� Ce^ter ?rTeigrbor'^oo3 �rpro�c� Co*�ittes • • ' � � ADCRESS• 581 Igleh=.rt Ave�ue St. Pa�.�l �'�' • 55703�- = � STREET C ITY STATE ZIP ' T�L�PFiONE: 2-91-7902 . . . ._ - - - - - _ . . . CONTaCT PERSON FOR THIS REQUEST: ==• �c::-�P Price� ?roject L':Pnager ' DAYTIt�fE TELEPHONE: 3¢8-3118 '� " � . � l . k:N�AT IS TNE PROJECT P�OPOSAL? � � � . Trie prooT� :�ill unite the resources of residents (on .Igleaprt betPpPTI �le and Kent} �vith t�^�- oY Co�trol I'z�a Corp. , u�3CC, .:SP ��d t�e City to pro�ide li�:^_ti_n�,. l�.hd-. sc?ni��; and ot�er �entities on t�e or_e bleck a�proach to the Cem��:�ity Center p:d en +,�e grou.n�s of this Cit��-oa��ne3 f�cilit�. Th� �ri��ry.ob3ective is to i.�p:rove the. ,_ everell gublic sa2et� �.^d ees�'_:etic �nviro^*^ent o� thL' BDDTOflC�. ?i rill iiclud�e the indivi3ual exterior imp=ovemeats made by the residents �*�d do the follo�ig: s. Secure tizcompensated eervices ef reoistered la.ndscepe'architects. b. CoordiTa�e the City's sodit;� stree� lig�ting canversion probram to secure priorit� ccnversioT o� I�lehart �..^_�i Ke^t/1Larsh�ll a.nd i*�:rrove ligh�ino o�!:±��.L�er�grotzras•. c� Remove boulevard o�structio�s (stu�gs �zd other�. . • �--- •�'�� ' =�� d. Pl�nt 16 boulevard treesl 2�" die. in zccord •^ith the citv ala.n �d proceediz:as��,. . e. Pl�nt e sezeoaall� verioatsd es�ortment of ?o�r-l;i�o shrubs on �uilic ric�i-of-r,a�� and in froat of the 2.ode1 Cities� ?:ealt� Cliric and Day Care wall`�_along �ent.`5'�':= _ . .��---.= f. Complete so�dino of �ot�� bo�.�levards on th�two si�e� c� �ne oae olocx of I�leh�xt» ` .6. Coordi_n�te ot�er fro�t� rear �e si�e 3-ard a�d �c+t_^_er i�provements �� re�ifients .Rit:i � those of tne City� CDC an� tze E��/1�prtin iut�er Kiag Center. . _ �:., . . . • 2. HUW MUCN JJP FU�lD t�ONEY IS BEIt�G REQUESTED? 5 6000 . . . � ._ 3. 1��1T IS 7HE TOTAL DECLARATIOPJ OF" t�EIGHBORH00D COf1TRI6UTI0NS? 5 ��000 _ (Conplete Neighborhood Contributions Declaration Form, page 4) Q . WN�T P�OBLQdS/NEEDS ARE SEIf� AODRESSED? WFiAT FYIDENCE IS AVAILABLE TO DOCUTIENT _: T�F k F�t .i.:.� - <<S!!�-D�Ia!�I ST_R I�T PL.Ai�I__�._R I OR i1.I ES TC � _ � d�—'�,::=---'��,...,, PubZic i�rove:nents aade on surrounding blocks are not on this Iglehart block. The pro€ c�-ill dispell some of these inequities, take adva.ntage of ongoing private contributions the public good, decrease crime tl�.at poor lighting allows, support district priority fc quality residential development in this area, znd help re�ove the inconcistency betc�er, recent high quality constnlction and lo� quality overall appearance of the approach. ?� tir�LICATIO<<, Page 2 •, PROJECT NAME �*�a tTF� o��,o•-�o�� ±rrp7Cj? Progr�� ' • . � . IF PROJECT ACTIVITIES ARE TARGETED TOWARD A SPECIFIC GE06RAPF{ICAL AREA OR SITE, ATTACH A t�AR SHOI,tING THE PROJECT BOUtJDARIES. IF PROJECT ACTIVITIES ARE CO��CENTRATED ON A SPECIFIC SUBJECT OR PROBLEM, EXPLAIN WHY THIS SUBJECT COP�CENTRATION WAS CHOSEN. � � rro,�,'ect ectivities are co::centra�ed on the t^se bloc'r.s to do �!:ese t�i*!os: (a� Take adv�nt�ge of the ent�•ssi�sa for a re�v nei�hbor?�o�d �eith resideats of similar dur: (I�ost �arrou.*�ding homes e.*�$ resi�encies e.re older �*�d lo:�ger te�.� (b� Overcose del��s in public imr=ovements ��+ic'� �i��e been hards?�ins on ne�r o�ers with le- irvestme�ts and whieh �ave been excused b� veried constrizcti�� schedules, but cp.n no lonoer b� justified with �ece*:ti co��letior. of bo�es on all bu� o�� of pvailzble site�. (c� Protect the najer pub].ic i^.vestment i_n the ?:2rtin I,ut�er K_in� C�nter hy cevel�rment �-. aaintena.�ce of the only direct apnro�ch for t�e l��oer part of t�e Se�mit—IIniversity co;��.�nit;/, for vrhic� it serves a� a Center, fl^.d ior other t'etro area Center u�ers, . k'HaT IhtiPACT WILL THE PROJECT HAVE IN THE t�EIGH60RH000? • Tn� liohiing ��d ger_ersl up�.�?'t is exLected to hPlp build a sense �f security, redvice cr�-: ^c.IlC� ree�C? �PP�^ p1' �rLmo, �?:° D��°Ct !^.1�.�. h.°ZT� �.'nn_Pi •-m tY+m s,.SJ1T8�10.^_S Of ti,^C C.'_^.t1.1"e CC�'- u.nit,ti,� for its Ceater �d will increese incentive fer �he u�nradi.^g of o�:er surroa.�ding resident�e.l, i*:dustrial �n3 co�ercial pro:er;.ies. Tne pro ject �i?1 �.�ite t'r.e involved resi�ents �sith the broader cor��-�ity� �d it �ill help build pride ir tre �L��'r.boraood �d ��e Cit3•. � , :�'�tD k�ILL MANAGE THE PROJECT? wFiAT EXPERIENCE DOES �TNE MANAGII�G ENTITY HAVE IN THIS TYPF 0� PROJECT? Project �rin�er: Dr. CerTie Price, over 20 ye�rs supervisory ex�erience, � e�*'r�nt responsi` '. in Her.aepin Co�ty pla.*ir:i:�� d develop�ent. - •• �avisorv Co�.ttee: u�CC ::ou�e C��mitt�e wit�•a eraed r�nge of �rogerty a,an�o ent ar_d � aeinten2nce experience. . �� ' Staff: H�sdy Wrioht� 25 yes.rs ca�•.;aity developnent ezperience. � .� � o . . . . .� 1 � � ' � � , 4�'ILL TtiE PROPOSED PROJECT BE TIED OR COORDINATED WI7H AKY OiNER PROJECT OR PROGRAM (PUBLIC OR PP.IVATE)? YES � NO . IF YES, IDENTIFY. � Coo2'di+l2tioa with the City is presently thro�� Do�i�a Drum.�ond, Pl�ru:er, Pr�; Fd 01son, P�rka & Ree. �ores�ry Division� and 1t`:ichael Y.?osson, Publie E`�orks. . � —The vrogrr.m is coordj.r.ztcd with currently av�ilzble r,SP/City funds �or so�3iu� street lig'r:- —Cont=ol DatE Corp. site i*r.grove�en�s are ��Z�TPQ. /conversien, R�..=se3• �.ill pric_ —The i?�3/2,�X Inprovpmer.t Proor� ��s zlready con�ributed an ex�anc�ed �eal�h eer.tery sir cc- tioning� louno� �d cla�°TOGII i�provenen�s. E43 st�f �ill be ��king f�.zrtY:er site�i�prc�•- • �-'' /�p=- 4�HAT IS TNE PROJECT SCHEDULE? . - . To cut overall exper_sc, re t��+:ld elect to proceed a�ter �y work by :�e Cit�• on underoro�:.:. csbles �*�d lioht instzllztions h�ve been completed. a. Lighti.n„g — Su,�er �83• � . b. Tree �^.d shrubbery �Flanting — �'all �83 c. Sod — �'all '83 • -- . . .. . ' _ . . : . . . . `� �1.. � � . � .. . � .. . J. • • , ' I . • .. . . _ • . . • . ' - . . . J . � � . �.J . . . . . . . � .• ,� . . r�...��•9 :��.c.� �� APPLICATION, .Page 3 PftOJECT NAi•1E r�� iei6:^.�or^ood�Aprreac� Pro�ren 0. WILL TNIS PROJECT BE COMPIETED IN 2 YRS. YES x NO . IF 1�OT, EY,PLAIN HOW IT WILL BECOt��c SELF-SUSTAI�ItJG WITHOUT FURTHER NPP FUNC►IWG? . . � . � (per.disfl pria*ity set�in.,g on . '. • Iglehart�Su�,�it - St. Alt�s/:�arion � ' , • . • .. Sodium Lighting Conver�ion Prngran� ' � , .\ . . . , , _ . 1 , uILL THIS PROJECi' RESUIT IN IHCP.tASED h'�AIf�TE«AP2CE AND OPERATIt�G COSTS FOR THE CITY? YES t�0 X . IF YES, EXPLAIP; HOW TNE PROJECT �lILL PRIVATELY PAY FOR THOSE COSTS. �� I,i�htirg �2inten�nee needs r;ill b� recuced. Other i�grove�er.ts would be I72131�2?�°d 'c3► pz ticipznts.� . • . .` � • 2. NOW '�IILL THE PROJ�CT BEt�EFIT LOI� AHD MODERATE INCOME HOUSEHOLDS? " Bec�use o2 ;,�e predoain�ce of low �nd �odera�e incose f�.:�ili�s served by .t�+e Center� th=_ public s�'et;�� encour�pgp�V� confidence in urr•ard _obilit�� inte�ration �sit�+ tre broaa�_ co�unity s.nd _ennzncement o� ca,::m�aity pride dtscribed �bo�e would greatly benefit these ir_come groups. � � ' i3. HOk' WILL NEIGHBORH000 CITIZEN PARTICIPATION BE FOSTERED DURI�G PROJECT DEVELOPMcNT t,�D IMPLENET�TATION? . • . � . . The involvement of the Diatric� 8 Pl�nning Cou*scil� ��ic� rzo larlv me�ts at the Center, . t�e appli�a�ion revieR and �or_itori�g of t�e �roj�ct �ill help.�=ovide incentir�e for t�+e srork, er_cour2gen�t for its co�pletiont �d_croad co��.uzity aRaren�ss of tbe fu.nc�ion �..�� value oi the co�unity cea�er �d its appro�ch. . . . . Our resro�s�s to questions 5 thro�.�� 8 a=d 12 aoove incicatt other wzys i.n �'nic� citize:: participatio^ �ill be fostered. �rt'�er dire�t i^•volve�e_^_t ef citizens 'in t�e progr� i 1)Ll vPd by Llle S�eC181. �►lli'�`O°e Of t:1C DTOoTc� Z.1' �• 8^eC-21 n�°-CS ��S� 1t eddresses. 14 . CO;;PLETE �ROGP.AM FUh'Dit;G At'{� EXPEIr'SE FORh1S PA6ES 5 At�L� 7. 1 �. ATT�CH LETTERS �F SUPPOR7 FROM AtL It�TERESTED A11D AFFECTED GROUPS/OR 4RGANIZATIOtJS. •�✓4,L�, G"��..=i/t�� °=�� y;=ioht Coorci�atoT 5-2?-�3 '`z'''`1 S GNATURE�F r�Dt IDUAL TYPED �tAME TITLE OR ROLE DATE ' COyPLETI�G APPLICAIIOH ��;�,�� ' Dr. Con.�ie Priee I��nager 5-27-83 S GN i Ur�.E OF CNIcF FFICER TYrED NAN�E TITLE OR ROLE DATE OR PRESIDENT ;. . �P tiPPLICATIO«, Page 4 � PROJ_ECT tr'AME �::� 1'ei�::bo:noo3 !.pF=eace Proor�a f � . • NEIGHBORNOOD COI�TRI8UTI0��15 D�CLARATIO�� . ESTI��fATED COt•f14ERCIAL PROPERTY FIXED CAPITAL ' IMPROVEMENTS: � � NUffBER OF PARTICI PANTS � � AVERAGE INVESTMENT � � � � TOTAL I NY�STMENT EQUALS " $ ��/� �• � � _ . ESTT�`►�7ED RESIDEn7IAL PROPERTY FIXED CAPITAL : � IMFROVEMENTS: � . . . _ NUNBER OF PARTICIPANTS � � " AVER�GE I t�VESTMEHT � � � TOTAL I NVESTN�ENT- EQUALS $ h'/i . f�cW COI�NERCIAL DEYELOPMENT; . . . SITE (a) � EST.h`�ATED h'�AP.KET VALUE $ � SITE (b) . cSTIMATFD M�ARKET VALUE � � � TOTAL MARKET YALUE � N/A � . HE�t ZESIDENTIAI DEVELOPhSENT: . ., . . �-. ..� . � . . . . ... ,_� SITE (a) -- . � � • - - �STIt?ATcD t�iAR�ET VALUE � - � SITE (b) � � ESTIf•;ATED PL�RY.ET V�LUE . � � . � � � � TOTAL MARKET VALUE $ N/A _ � . ESTIMATED IN-KI�ID-SERVICES (OFFICE SPACE, EQUIPMEKT, SERVICES) : � SOURCE AND TYPE 1 . H�9C� eff�ce ez�e�s- (5;� of S3,000) . � 4� 2. ResinP^�s� �uzclies, tool ee^Tec.i stor��e � 360 3. CDC .`lC=1S�e�'O� -a_�scace .�^cr.i;,ect �e^v:ees � 900 ^o�al In-r:ind 1650 . ESTIMATED VOLUNTEER LABOR: ' �� NUt�ER OF VOLUNTEERS � 21 . � � AYERAGE liOURS/V�LUNTEER. 21 � TOTAL HOURS x S10/hr. EQUALS � 4410 . ESTIMATED S�IEAT EQUITY: . - - � � - � . NUMBER OF PARTICI PANTS _ � ' 2g AYERAGE NOURS/PARTICIPANT '� • " TOTAL HOURS '��-� � � TOTAL HOURS x S10/hr. EQUALS � 4430 _, t . �. � t�PP APPLICATIO�t, Page 5 � . PROJECT NAN�E I?�3 ?�ei��r^ood An�roach Pro�r� - � .. �� . P. ESTIMATED CASN DOI�ATIOPIS: � SOURCE 1 . *?ei�-�borhood Pertnershin ProPr� (CI3) _ � � ��?�� 3. . . � 9, At�TICIPATED FOUNDATION GRANTS: � � .� ' . . . - , _.. _ .. _, � :J. _ . ' . . . � • ' . : . .. .. FOUNDATION(s) 1 . � � ' � � 2. . . . _. .. • . _ . . . . . - - . . . . ... . . � . . . .. . , . � . . 10. OTH�R: EXPLAIN Contrected sErvices end other swPat eq.�?tv � �� . ExterioT residentiel LLT�TOVpTE~ts bv 7 resident� ��nril �83 - "ar. �85� � � 7000 . Co*�trol D2�a nlz�tino of 3arb°T'�"y 'rP��e. ^orth rro�pct bocs2��v v 500 ESTIMATED VALUE $ 2�000 � ' � TOTAL NEIGH80RHOOD • ' CONTRI BUT IOf�S DECLARATION $ 18000 � . 11 . WHAT EVIDENCE IS THERE THAT TNE A60VE DECLARATIONS ARE REALISTIC? : �sti�atea z.re baaed on thr•ee c�ds per cztegory of goods �d services to be �coatraeted. �perience oS direct participants in home ovraership� inprove�:ent, beautification and maintenaace totals over 100 years. � • L'all�e �. �ro� Coz�u�ity Center hes 12 years ezperience in the �zintenence �d • i.�provem-nt of �he hartin Tutrer �:ing Center a^d Park �hich is o�cd 'oy the City. All bins were obtained Yrom reputzble eontr�cters� �somt �f waom bave Rorked �ith p�rticip�^_ts before� �d are dociamented. �11 are �uzrznteed throu�n �9a3• .� . .• . . . � . . . ! ' t�PP APPLICATIOf�, Page 6 PROJEC7 tsAf•1E _F:�3 1�:e�Fhoor�oo� A�uro2cb Pro�ram � � ESTIMATED PP,OGRA.14 FUNDItdG* � SOURCE . $ ANOUNT �at,.�..:.��y.�;:..:,''.. . ��.�;. '.�v4�''•j�l4,T•.,-�•.�••�� . - ��a�.'i:{ � . privat� •contracts/laaor f��c ex�e*_�nzl--resid�:;ti�l ! ?OCO �Y� �..d... • ....,._, --...,.<--a -.. _. 2. ..e 1��P �TP q;��..:;;��goa�: �s�;,^�i'e3�, �'�e j-,; - 6000 3. RPCi ra r+ntq t i�k�ne� volunteer lebor end sPe�t ,eouity 5440 4. �?a�� ;r—kj nn� vol�^.±eer iz�c+r 2_*id s�ve�t eouity 4154 . . . ., . _ . . 5• CT�C hPC�Fr� ri fl�tir��-,., stafP ��r3�c?r.e cor.sultation 1�00 _� 6. 7• . ..._. . •$, - _� ., 9: 10. 71�..- _� . . . . . . . . . _ a._. . _ . . , ._ � . ..� ... 12. . �_ � . . . _ _ . . . . _ .� . . . _ . _. - . -- - � 13. 14, - . . . .:� _ . . -- . — _,J . 15. .. � . .. . . . 16, ' 17. � � 18. 19. - ZO. . ' TOTAL 5 2�.�Co * INCLUDE hlEIGHBORHOQD PARTNERSHIP FUt�D AND SPECIFIC CATEGORIES OF NEIGHBORHOOD CONTRIBUTIONS. � . � . � f1PP APPLICA7IOf�, PaQe 1 PRQJECT �JAP1E N� j;pl��r�oo�? �rjr�flc�± Progre� _ �� ..�,.,. � � :r.) � ESTIh1ATED PRQGRAM EXPENSES PROGRW�{ EXPENSES . FUND SL�URCE* $ AflOUNT :'LIES 7 . Stunv �rindin�. 51.�0 rcr a.n. dia. I��PP T�5 • ,, � 2• Rent eo�.�ir�e:r� �sulchin;_ s�rezdir.�� *?PP 60 , . - 3• To� �oil, 3n c�ent�. blv��. . 72 �u.vds. ' �'FP `z�.� 4. riCl'tl��r;CT' rOr c��^�j�'?��' r7 �C1a *� �� 5• �011 ev _rd t�e��,.r 1E � �22�J � '�520 6. ��, 4��r2�1^� S�2/�a. �'�P �oRo . 7. �s„�, �c�o �� So��/�.'� . ��p E�o � 8. /��,-;�,;�•,�1 ��p^i+ies ��s '��`i��`. �:Fp 175 �6000 �- ,, � 'ItiD 9. H�BCC of_*ice ex�ense (5� of �8000) _ I?�3CC �00 10. Su��lies. tool deareciation & stor�e F.^siden�s 360 11 . ReFisterPd Tard�ca�e Arcaitect �30 � 3�2�'..�... �D�-- q�� 6fi0 ,I��E4312. Office staff & coeTd. . 3 for total 200 hrs HO�CC 2�� . 13. h;ain�en�.nce s�aff, 3 for 50 hrs. AQ3CC 500 14. Or��nizin�. 3 for 100 hrs. p23CC/RPside^ts 100� 15. Coasultin , 12' for 9� �rs• HQ3CC/Resider_�s 910 ��i0 �T lFi. Pr�p�rat��n � �l�^�in�,, 3 for� 90 hrs. Et�JC _ °�0 CTY 17. Pr��aration & rlantin�, 2j �or 373 hrs. Reaidents 3530 d430 :� 18. �cterior re�identie.l i.*��rove�ents Residents 3�� : 19. NPdsP o� nortn rroiect r�u�aar.v CDC 500 7500 20. " TOTAL FX�E�ISES S 2'000 . * INCL�DE HEIGHBOP.HOOD PkRTr�ERSHIP FUhD At�D iJEiGNRORNOOD COr�7RI6UiI0NS. � . � � _�. . • ' ,��"�. :j ._._:... . � ... ^ �. . � : : _ . :��....: � � . ..: �. RECEIVED .111N - 1 1983 �. � •. Neighborho�od Partnership Program • U E NL Dept. Planning & Economic Development: :-: -: . Planning ,District� Code No. ZS W. 4th Street : : •. . ' � - -� `- = � . � Pl anner-i n-Charge � . St. Paul, Minn. 55102 . � Technical Support � (612y292-1577 � - . • .- . . � - _ • . _ • _ . . . . •. Qther � �; � .�: �F •a -_� �� ,_.��.�, r �CD _Non .CD - :�� . - '�� "�"= - -�s- = j"� . . _ r: _ . . �c•�� +r,�.- r"tL�C'�.: r.._-Lr;n--n�C�_ -i� F ..- �.► r �. .�. ili� . •a r ��:. , � � �.j,,c- F.irG.' C � �__�T_t� ,� �t- _ . . .��:. � _ - �� _ •.,` �'• -,.;.;,- + .,�.:;: � � "NPP�AFPLICATI ON r :., ~r •r ' � PLEASE PRINT OR TY E ' ' • . �.. : ��. _ :`f�� .•"": _..':` •(: �' ;. : . :.-•� .�;- •=: : . �. _.. _ :�7=.. .. � ��: ... . . .'. : . - . � _ . - � . � -- • PROJECT'NAME ' Eastside� �Food Co-op �= - - ' - - '' =•� ` '_ �. - - _ -rrr��- f•. � • • . _. . . :_ . -_,_- , , . t _ .. GROUP OR ORGANI7ATION SUBMITTING REQUEST . NAME: .� = -Neighborhood Self-Help Committee/District 5 Planning Council ' ADDRESS:^. �1075 Arcade� Street •- - St.. Pau]:-� � - - 1►Il�T � 55106 � -• . . . . . STREET� }.. . . : C ITY cc _.. . . ° �� . STATE_ - . . .: . ZIP . . . . TELEPHONE: 774=5234 -- - { ---_ : - -r • � r- . . :... : .r .. . --- •r:- :, - - _ .. . . CONTAC7-PER SON FOR^THI S�REQUEST:� ' `Pat ~Sulliva��r` ' ��&�� Bill Za `�icek' �776=�1577 - -. _ , - . . _ . . . .. .. _ _ ..-- _.. . ..,. . _ . ' DAYTIME TELEPHONE: 774-5234'• - ".. _: . � � 1. WNAT IS�7HE PROJECT PRDPOSAL?•. -�� .-� _ _.. _ -f:•:-f _- - :-�. � -'-- � -�- .._ __. . r, . _. . . 't^ . "': : r. �,r. . . ... . � . • '*. ... .�.. ,. ��....• �' TY;e�project. entails organ.izing 'and`�financing.�a Food��Co-op on��the.. Eastside:�'�The _co=op;es�sentially would �be� a. member owned ,and operated. 'grocery, store:. � :It �would �p'r_ ov.ide a� aiscount on.�.food prices and, allow�. -•, r: - members .control as':vote'rs in., decisions, .con.cerriirig� the operation of��the � store. Membership �wbuld be open to anyone�and �would consist of� purchasing shares� af stock with each'member� then being entitled to one`vote. Use of the co-op would be open to anyone .- member or non-member. Profits would be used for future development' or rebated to the members in accordance with what the by-laws specify. The'proc3uct line - in terms of the types of food the store would carry - would be determined by � the membership and r.eflect� the ..results of a market analysis conducted in the area. Paid coordinator and volunteers would carry out the day to day operation of the store. The facility will be a rented storefront - location as yet undetermined. . _ _. . : . , . _ , .. . 2. HOW MUC H NP FUND MONEY IS BEI NG REQUESTED?`��'� $ 15,000.00 � ��'::.�.;;:.. :. � ...,;_ � _ ,,,. -_.. .. . �, �.�. . ., �. : .•. _.. . 3. WHAT IS THE TOTAL DECLARATION OF. :NE�IGHBORHOOD CONTRIBUTIONS?: ..$ -_•�15•,000..00 (Complete.Neighborhood Contributions•,Declaration�Form, page�4). - � � . �� . � . -. ,_ .:,. _- .._ �:;, , 4. WI-IAT PROBLFJ�iS/NEEDS ARE BEING ADDRESSED? WHAT EVIDENCE.IS AVAILABLE TO DOCUMENT �� THE NEED, i.e., CENSUS DATA,: DISTRICT PLAN PRIORITIES, �ETC.? � . . . . . ;-:�� .. . . . .. . , , . The project would address the need and desire -for �economically priced food in an area where access to supermarket/discount food stores are more 7.imited and currently a co-op does not exist. � • ' . .,�►' NPP APPLICATION, Page 2 . �� - � PROJECT NAME Eastside Food Co=op . 5. IF PROJECT ACTIYITIES ARE TARGETED TOWARD A SPECIFIC GEOGRAPHICAL AREA OR�SITE, ATTACH A MAP SHOWING THE PROJECT BOUNDARIES. IF� PROJECT ACTIYITIES ARE CONCENTRATED ON A SPECIFIC SUBJECT OR PROBLEM, EXPLAIN WHY THIS SUBJECT CONCENTRATION WAS CHOSEN.. , � � . � It is anticipated that ,the co-op_ will be located in the near Eastside. The location will�.be-=selected on the� basis of information from a market . analysis done in the area as well as the availability of a suitable � ' building '�condition of bldg. , previous use, square footage, rent/utility � costs etc. ) The store would .draw catstomers from well beyond the immediate area and could include a mct.jor portion of the Eastside. At this stage • locations on Payne and Arcade Street have been surveyed. . 6, WHAT IMPACT WILL THE PROJECT HAVE IN TNE NEIGHBORH000? ; Provide more. control over the' price and the choices of food ' available� in the store. This would be tailored to the interests and priorities 'of the members and residents in the surroundi'rig area. Opportunity for ' education in nutrition and awareness of food related �issues. Possibilitp of setting up a direct marketing arrangement with farmers. The substantial organization and membersh ip/volunteer support to initiate and sustain this - project would�.build �more neighborhood� cohesiveness 7. WHO WILL MANAGE THE PROJECT? WHAT EXPERIENCE DOES THE MANAGING ENTITY HAVE IN THIS TYPE OF PROJECT? . . A manager/coordinator or management team will be hired for the . day. ,to day management of the .store. Manger. would be hired b�sed. on � previous experience and s]ci11s. .. � The� board_.of_d irectors elected . from . the membership .wou].d be working ..with the._hired coordinator on the more ..�'T'. long.�_range plans/priorities._ _Will .cont=act with another co=op in the twin cities for management ,train�ng � for staff initially. that is tailored � - to. �the , �unique�circumstances. .of a co=op business _ : . _. � � . _ .. _ _ : _ : ,-: , . � ._ . .. . - - 8. WILL-�THE PROPOSED "PROJECT BE TIED OR COORDINATED WITH ANY OSHER PROJECT OR PROGRAM � (PUBLIC .OR PRIVATE).? � YES -�� N0 X .� IF YES. IDENTIFY. _ �*•_`- :.-• '� - . .._ - . .• -. r *. _`:-,r� . ; : .: . . . . . . _ . ,.... _ -- � - . . �� . . � ..� . . .t . ». . � '�. • -_ �. • � . . , r .• _ . -.' _ :' . . . . ' .. . :•_ .f:_'f' ' �. . . �.�. - . ' . . '. � . . . : . . - . :' ' .. . . .. . � .. _ - ., :,t, t .. .. . �, - _•� �• - '-' . . . . .. . . • ' , • . . . : � . _. .* r - -- . . - • i � :- ;.� .. :. • � 9. WHAT IS THE PROJECT SCHEDULE? ( .As of June lst) , , . Incorporation of co-op / Draft of By-laws - 4 months Membership Dr.ive - 6-8 months and ongoing � Development of a Business Plan - market/aemographic analysis-5-9 �months Location of and preparing store for occupancy - 6-9 months � Fundraising - 9 months to a year . � . � Store Opening - 6-9months. � _ . • ' , - . . r . . ... . . ' . . - - �.,. : , : • � . ` ' ' . . .._ .._ , , . .�.�.. . _ � : . �. .�:•:ert. . . • . . . : ' - ,�•`' . :' . ."" !: � - . f-•i- • " . . . - ` . � � � . . � �� . PitOJECT NAME Eastside Food� Co-op ' NPP APPLICATION, Page 3 . � � • _ �� ' . . 10. WILL TNIS PROJECT BE COMPLETED IN 2 YRS. � YES X NO . IF KOT, EXPIQIN HOW IT WILL_ BECOME SELF-SUSTAINING WITHOUT FURTHER NPP FUNQING? � . - . . , { . . . . , _. 11 . WILL THIS PROJECT RESULT IN INCREASED�MAINTENANCE AND OPERATING COSTS FOR THE CITY? '� YES NO X . IF YES, EXPLAIN HOW THE PROJECT WILL PRIYATELY PAY FOR TNOSE COSTS. 12. HOW WILL THE PROJECT BENEFIT LOW AND NIODERATE INCOME HOUSEHOLDS? � - Provide nutritious, lower cost food with wic7e range of selection. ' - .Educate people on nutrition and food issues as well as democratic economic principles of co-ops . - Provide local control of a business owned by its members � : - Create visible entity in the neighborhood for spin- ' off projects ' or information exchanges. . � . 13. HOW WILL NEIGHBORHOOD CITIZEN PARTICIPATION BE FOSTERED DURING PROJECT DEVELOPMENT AND IMPLEMENTATION? . . A broad organizational base will be built up in order to initiate and sustain ..this .project. A variety of volunteer work will be used in t�e� organizing _stage - from the committee/research�� work to individual contri- butions and sweat equity. Co-op management -'is based on a democratic decision mak ing process that encourages participation and, inv�olvement of � individuals in those �decisior�s.. :OngoiAg: A c.ertain amoun�� of reciprocity will occur with people volunteering time.'and receiving tangible benefits. 14. COMPLETE PROGRAM FUNDING ANp EXPENSE FORMS PAGES 5 ANL� ,7. 15. ATTACN,LETT�RS OF SUPPORT FROM ALL IHTERESTED AND AFFECTED GROUPS/OR QRGANIZATIONS. � • � Pat Sullivan Commun itv Orqanizer 5 31 83 S GNATU E OF ND V DUAI TYPED NAME TITLE R ROLE D COMPLETING APPLICATION . .• R 0 C EF FICER YP D NAME ��E � DAT ' . � � OR� PRE.SIDENT : . , �. : 4. ' ' . . . . - ' - � � � . . . i . . , • . . . , . . . ' NPP_APPLICATION, Page. 4-..,... .:_.,. . :�.:�.;. �_ PROJECT NAME � . : - NEIGHBORHOOD COHTRIBUTIONS DECLARATION ;,. - . . . 1 . "ESTIMATED COMMERCIAL PROPERTY FIXEO CAPITAL � ' . � ' " � - IMPROVEMENTS: . .. . � . - . . . . ' ` �� NUMBER OF PARTICI PANTS �� •.� :. • � : . . � . � - . : . AVERAGE INVESTMENT� . �� ' � � . � ., � � �. TOTAL INVESTMENT EQUALS ' $ � � 2. � ESTIMATED RESIDENTIAL PROPERTY FIXED CAPITAL � . � . ~ �_ . IMPROVEMENTS: . � . NUMBER OF PARTICIPANTS � � � � � AYERAGE INVESTMENT � � $ � � : . TOTAL INVESTMENT EQUALS $ : 3. NEW COMMERCIAL DEVELOPMENT; � . SITE (a) . . . � ESTIMATED MARKET YALUE � SITE (b) � � ESTIMATED MARKET VALUE . _ $ . . � . _ �. ... , _ - �. .... . . _. .. TOTAL MARKET.VALUE . , : . .$ .. . . _ . .: T,. .. . _ . ,. �.. . _ �., .... ,. : 4, NEW RESIDENTIAL DEVELOPMENT: ` " " � � _� _ ` _ . � SITE (a) - • . .�. ,. . . ST � _�r_�=•. . � . . . ►. . .... .. _ .. - _ . . .. ... -- ESTIMATED MARKET VAL-UE . . - $'. :. ;.' t� � ..:�: r-.` --� . . . . _: ..- .. - SITE (b) . _ � . , � --. r� .-.- ._._ �.. _ . ESTIMATED MARKET VALUE $ . . � : - -� TOTAL MARKET VALIlE � $ � � : _ �. � ESTIM4TED IN-KIND-SERVICES (OFFICE $PACE; .EQUIPMENT, SERVICES) : . , . . . ('. _ . _ .'. fi. ' . • -. .. C_. . 'J.r _. , . != . . . .�_ _ , . .. .� . . . _ _. . .. . SOURCE�'AND TYPE 1 .= -� ,. .�. . ��:._ ., . :; . _ _ . . � . - • $ .' 200.�00 . r�� Leqal •' � ...�.,-: . .�. .. � ,Z. . -Accountina . .. . •- � $ 200.00 . -� -- 3.,•• Ectuipmerit donations - - - :� � 600.00 � � _ _. _ ' �.� . . , �. .. - . .. .. . �. ' ', ' � ' . . . . . � . .. �� - � � . 6. : ESTIMATED VOLUNTEER �ABOR: .. _ � - � ,,.._. � . . . �- .• . : . . • .' ,.. � . . . ,.i _ .. • � NUMBER OF VOCUNTEERS� �'.• 100� - �- . � � -�,., . . . . � . . . AYERAGE HOURS/VOLUNTEER � � � � � � � � . � = • TOTAL HOURS x $10/hr. EQUALS $ 3,000.00 �- , � . � . 7. ESTIMATED SWEAT EQUITYt � � ' � , � `, • .;+ . . r'r: � • �.. -.. ^ ' _.,: :' ''. • . � NUMBER OF PARTICIPANTS 50 � � AVERAGE HOURS/PARTICIPANT —� � . • � � . TOTAL HOURS � __ � � . ..� TOTAL HOURS x $10/hr. EQUALS� � 1.5 00.00 • . •'• ' • ��',� � 'f ' NPP APPLICATION, Page b .. . PROJECT NAME Eastside Food Co-op . 8_ ESTIMATED CASH DONATIONS: � . � �. • � SOURCE 1 . Individual donations/loans � � � $ � 2.000.00 2. Cprporate donations � 1.000.00 3. . .. 9. ANTICIPATED FOUNDATION GRANTS: . r .rr .,_._ .�. � . .. ,.�. � r.,:j �..,. . - •' �. .. • � . -• . - - . • •� t> . . , ._. . . . ,FOUNDATION(s) 1 ... . _~. . - ' . � . 2: � . . . _ .._�. . . .. , . . r..�.. , -- . . , . 10. OTHER: EXPLAIN� Member purchase of shares� of stock at $5-10/share - Each person buying one or more shares. � 3, 000.00 Loan -• 'sought fr�n the North Country Development Fund � � 4,000.00 Small Ftiindraisers " � , � 1,000.00 � ESTIMATED VALUE $ 8,000.00 _ . TOTAL NEIGHBORHOOD 16,5�00.00 CONTRIBUTIONS DECLARATION $ 11 . WHAT EVIDENCE IS THERE THAT THE A60VE DECLARATIONS ARE REALISTIC? . Information and advice sought from other� co-ops in the twin cities indicate that the membership, volunteer, sweat equity and. donations for this project are realistic. : The preliminary work and organization of this project started in March. There have been two commun�ty meetings and quite a bit of interest and involvement from this minimal amount of .publicity., has been � generated amoung residents of the Eastside. Committees have been formed and the volunteer _ efforts are already being put. into a Membership Committee, Marke�t Analysis, Finance and Legal and Store . . Com�nittees. A core committee• of 8-10 people have been identified ' � to coordinate the project and individual committes and make critical decisions. . It should also be pointed �out that the membersh ip ana stoCk purchases . will be kept low to encourage many people to become members. . ' Additionally, the co-op members have a choice of sta�ting the store on a more• part time basis and building up as the membership and business of the store increases. � . The North Country Development E�nd is a special loan fund for co-ops that is supported and managed by the contributing co-ops from the twin cities. This group (Eastside Co-Dp�: has contacted representatives of the NCDF and will very likely use them as a loan source. : � • . •..y � , , � . - . . . . • . . ' NPP APPLICATION,: Page 6 � � ' � PROJECT NA�tE • � ' ESTIMATED PROGRAM FUNDING* . - . . . ,- ,: _ . , . . _ � ........ . _ . �. ,. . . . . . ... . � � : . �_.._ -- . .. ._._. ._ . '�'_ '. . : .. -�_ • . ... . _ . : � SOURCE�-. . � . :.... _ . � $ AMOUNT , , � .� Membership - Stock purchases $3,000.00 � . , 2. Individual loans/contributions 2,000.00 3. Loan - North Country Development Fund. . 4,000.00 � . . 4, Corporate Donations . ,. 1,000.00 � 5.. Fundraisers � � �� 1, 000.00 �. 6.. NPP Funds ' 15,000.00 � 1• . 8. - . , . 9. 10. � 11 . � . � "t ' , r• , ' _ . ,. .. . . , . ... ,- . ' � . . . .. � . � 12... � _.� � _ • . , .. . . ' •- " • ' . .. .. ' , . 13. . . . . . , . . . . _ , 14. ��• - -�. ' - " • - , - ; - • . . .- _ . . .: 15. , - . .. • ,. . .,.. _. , . . .' : : . . . . �. _ � : :.. . . ._ _ . .. . . � . . 16, � . ' ..,. . - . �_ . . . . .. .. . , .T. . . ,. . . ._. . .�.. . r �' � .'� . i� � ..� _ . , , .. - , . � � .' - . ��. . . ' _ . 1 0� • .. _.. �; ` : . . , .. '- . . :. � ' . :� 19. _ _ .� ., . :. .. : � : . . - . . ' . 20. . . • ' . ' r •- . • _ .. ,.. . ... � - , . � . � � , � �. . ; TOTAL � . $ 26,000.00 . , �. �. • . ,., . , . .. . . . .. . :. . . f. ...,, • •, � � . � • . . , . . * INCLUDE NEIGHBORHOOD .PARTNERSHIP FUND AND=SPECIFI'C CATEGORIES OF NEIGHBORHOOD :' � CONTRIBUTIONSl� _ . _� r :::.. . .. ,. • . . . .. , .. . . ;` . "�1��r�w��`,�j . � NPP APPLICATION, Paqe 7 , � -PROJECT NAME Eastside Food Co-op • . � . � ESTIMATED PROGRAM EXPENSES through lst 6 months � ,: . . . . . . , - PROGRAM EXPENSES . �: �: FUND SOURCE* $ AMOUNT . 1. Start up Inventory � NPP/Neicthborhood � $10,000.00 2, Repa ir arrd remodel ing o t Bldg. NPP 5,000.00 3; Rent/ Month - $450.00 2,700.00/6 Mo, Utilities - heat electricity (200/Mo.) Neighborhood 1,200.00/6 Mo, 4. . 5. Telephone $50/Mo. " 300.00/6Mo. 6, Equipment Purchases " 4,000.00 7. Salarv of Coordinator 5800/Mo` �P & Neighborhood 4, 800.00/6Mo. Payroll Taxes $65/Mo. 390.00/6M0. 8. . 9. Management Training NPP 500.00 Office Supplies $50/Mo. Neiqhborhood 300.00 � 10. • 11. Advertising �� 500.00/6Mo. 12. Insurance 60/Mo. " 360,00/6Nlc 13. Interest on loan �� 150.00/6Ma 14. 15. 1�f. . ._ . ..... . 17. 18. � 19. . .+ 20. 70TAL EXPE�lSES $ 30.200.OQ Note: The$10,000.00 start up inventory would be bringing in roughly 20 per cent above .that amount in sales. * INCLUDE NEIGHBORHOOD PARTNERSHIP FUND AND NEIGHBOR!-10�D CONTRIBUyIONS. ' ; ; ' ._ � i ; . . ' . �� RECEIVED ,1UN �. `• ....� ... . � . : . . . .... ._ � . - - - �� ' . . . . ' ,,.y�'�J i �I� . - : . . _ ' . . , , ' . . Neighborhood Partnership Program � NL Dept._.Planning & Economic Development - �_ Planning �District. Code No. . 25 W. 4th Street.:-.-.._:: ..:: ..: . _ � -- �� Pl anner-�I n-Charge. � � � - , St. Paul, Minn.- 55a 02 � - � � Technical Support . . tfi12)292-1577 . . . . ;' �. Other � ', . _. : . ., .:c _ . ,t _. . �D �--1�Non CD - . _ . . . _.. . . � J�J-�t.T`:��S J .ST;- `�_ 1r.�Z. r( _C�.L'L]� ..i �� t.. . � . _ .. _ (' .. . �.0 . !.�.......t... _ .� _.. . .. �. . ' -_.�1,,` `c . .'�T; a t•'.': . �_ ._•: . , _.. _ � .. .. �•�r�'�" .�?�•.��- - !� .-Fr� �.= '�'r . . �.• �...�., .�. :_ .. t. r . ` t: " _. � - +'�� _ .. . C _ ' . _ � � :NPP .APPLICATION � -r r . . � __..� - '. . . . LEASE PR INT OR T ^E --.. _ .. _: _. _ . . . . . . - , • PROJECT I�lAME REA Crime Prevention Program � ' , . •r c::�:_�-�;:::-;;, GROUP OR ORGANIIATION SUBMITTING REQUEST. . ._. . . . . - , NAME: -Ramsey Hil1 Association� :- . . . , .. � . . ... , . . • . ADORESS: 307 Laurel Avenue St. Paul ' " � �!N 55102 - ' - - � � . STREET . � . C ITY � � � STATE -- ZIP � -� . , TELEPHONE: DaY� 332-5360 �e: 227-1+193 • � � . - � � - - � � CONTACT'PER SON �OR TNI S REQUEST: '� ' ''Lois Steveris, Chairperson` � ' � � - � � - � �� . ' - r_ .�. . - '. .� ' -" " ` - ' ' - . � r�r i�. . _ . .-. � . . �� - .. ...._ . . _ .._ ' -. _ .DAYTIME�TELEPHONE:�� 332-5360�� ' . . . . . . _ . . . 1: `°WHAT� IS THE PROJECT PROPOSAL? " . � . , . -- ` - - __-- ."=. .-. . : .. . . . ._ _ . ��..... -. � . � ��'�. . . - ..� ... " . �•• . _.. . �. .._.. ' �.. .. .._.. _ _... ._ _ .. . . . .. _.. . .. .. .. � . � ��.�... .' " ' " . The Ramsey'Hill. Association seeks�func`1s �to staff and"coordinate its expanding. �. ' crime prevention'program�that 'has three,basic ��components: " "1: ) .To`develop a �"Neighborhood Crime S�atistics�!odel"'to�accurate�y�d'e2'ine��a.nd measure crime as it`relates 'to�the`__ ,.. ' ` neighborhord population`and`circ�mmstsnces. � �2. )` �To'�organize 90� of the "blocks as crime � B1ock Clubs for education, information sharing and�developing local active involvemeat in the crime program, and 3• ) To schedule and coordinate a Citizea's Observation Patrol wbose three teams. of: two persons each will patrol tbe neighborhood during evenings of high cri.me ,.;,t . incidence. (See attached program narrative for a more detailed description- of the pro�ect. ) _ . ..:.. . ..-. . �� -•�. _.:.. _.. .. . , ._.�.. 4 .::.. . ' : :. . . ..._.. . _ . .. . .. . .:c . _ "�1" .•.�, . ... •-• . . • � . � _ . - . _:: ._ . . _. - :r _- - _ . �. r_....�..C.r i_� . • .. • : - . . � : �' _ ,�_. � _ _ .. . • _, .._ . . . . _. .. . _; . _ . _ . ._.. : . . - ` ' " ... ."`.I:�'". . � _. . . � ,.,.. -.-- .. _ . _ . . � • . , ..� ' • - -- - ' '-� •- ' -- � . .. . - - ' . . _ .(`! . . .. .-. . _ .. , . . : - . . . 2. . ,HOW MUCH NP FUND.MONEY IS_BEING REQUESTED? . .$ 65�320 3. WHAT .IS�THE _TOTAL DECLARATION OF. NEIGHBORNOOD�CONTRIBUTIONS? $ 136,160 (Complete, Neighborhood Contributions�Declaration form, page 4) : . : , 4. WHAT PROBLEMS%NEEDS.ARE BEING ADDRESSED? WHAT EVIDENCE IS AVAILABLE TO DOCUMENT . THE NEED, i ,e.; CENSUS_DATA, DISTRICT. PLAN PRIORITIES, ETC.? � . - Data provided•by�the �Cr�.me Analysis. ,i�hit�-:of the St. Pav1 Police Department cleaxly sbows that the Ramsey Hill neighborhood'.is the second highest crime area in St. Paul. And • . things are getting worse. While the city-wide crime rate for total offenses decreased . 0.2Z, Ramsey Hill's six data grids increased an average of 13.�� in total offenses over, 198�. - �; . , � _ . � , NPP�APPIICATION, Page 2 ' PROJECT NAME RAA Crime Prevention Program � . � ._ - . . _ . .. _ ..... --�� . � � . . � - . -::, . . . . . . - - . 5. IF PROJECT ACTI1(ITIES ARE TARGETED TOWARD A SPECIFIC� GEOGRAPHICAL AREA�DR SITE,-14TTACH,. -=�� A MAP SHOWING THE� PROJECT BOUNOARIES�. �IF. PROJECT ACTIYITIES ARE CDNCENTRATED ON A-..�.:' ' SPECIFIC SUBJECT� OR PROBLEM, EXPLAIN WNY THIS SUBJECT CONCENTRATION WAS CNOSE�1. � :=�•:.. �_` � . .�:., In sanuary the Ramsey Hill Board of.Direc`tors established a Cripae Committee in.response- to the rising resident concern aboiit'. crime.� Over the past severe��weeks thst Cammittee . � .has initiated•a=Block-Captain-program and�a Citizens' Observation Patrol,bcth of �rhfch: � � have growa because of the concern and willingness -oY resideats to actively participate : ia a problem that is retaxding the continued development of the neighborhood. � Crime,-in - : � short, is viewed as a top priority by both the Board and membership o� the Ramsey Hill:. Association. _ . � ... . . • ��.:;�:�--. ; - . . _ �,• . ._ . . ._ . 6. WHAT IMPACT WILL THE PROJECT HAVE IN THE NEIGHBORHOOD? ' � ' � , ' • - � � � Our goal is to stop the increasing crime rate and to reduce cri.me over the� next two yeaxs by 20�. We pro�ect that this�will reverse the adverse impact of crime on business :; development on Selby Avenue and thereby increase the investment and employment oppo'rtunitie: in Ramsey Hill. The� i.mage and realigy of Ramsey Hill must be changed if our community ., is to coatinue tc grow and develop. . � -- • �. � • � � . __.� '_-.:-- • ' -� -" �' Reduce crime by 20� � � �' Reinforce the positive impact of $20 million of:.cammerciel investment- at Selby/Western * Help to� generate �+00 to 500 �obs in�neighborhood, ma�y of which require entry level skil' �* S imulate a se se of nei hborhood ride and coannon oals amon residents and businesses. 7, �JHO W�LL MANAGE TH� PROJECT� WHAT EXP�ERIENCE DOES��THE �'IANAGING E�TITY HAVE IN THIS TYPE OF PROJECT? ' � ' Overall pro�ect responsibility will lie with the Ramsey Hill Association Board of Directors, but dail,y mana.gement responsibilities will reside with the Crime Preventian'.�lanagement Committee .composed,of.both_residents, and,business.:.owne'rs. in the neighborhood. ;,��.. (See.,attachment 2`3.f,the apperidix of_.the�narrative section;.and attacbmient 3 for;...< ::. ;_•, �._-=. ,: , the �ob description,of.pro�ect'.mariager.� .Ae elso directyouur:attention to page 8 of the. narrative for. a more .detailed description of the .3ines :of management:responsibility.) �__ : , . . _ . L.. .. . � . .-.• . . . .. _ . •, , . . ..' ' `C' ' . • 'r--• ,: .. . _. . . �.. _ ,_.t. .. ". . .. _ . . _ •-. . ' � - - . � " . ^ ^_ . ; _ •F ' _ .�, . .. . .. : .... . ::". _ _.' .. . r. • . - _. _..�.?'- - 8. WILL THE��PROPOSED`�PROJECT�BE TIED OR COORDINATED WITH ANY OTHER PROJECT OR PROGRAM: ' :": -" (PU6LIC OR PRIVATE)? �YES X NO .` '=IF YES, IDENTIFY. . The program will coordinate: its efforts with : The St. Paul Police Department, the : Department of Housing and Building .Inspections, the Depaxtment of Public Works, the District 8 Planning Council, the S�mit-t�iversity Crime Frevention Covncil, the Aurora-St. Anthox�y Block Club,the West 7th St. Crime �ctims/Witness Center, the State Depaxtment of Public Safety and the Selby/Western Business Association. _ . 9. WHAT IS THE PROJECT SCHEDULE? - . , � .� 0 to 60 days: Hire staff and secure office space, equipment� and establish office record systems. Sblunteers research and develop educational packets 'and programs for Block . Clubs. 60 to 120 days: � i) secure input from Block Clubs on environmental factors they think enhances crime. 2) begin collection of demographic and crime data for the Neighborhood Crime Statistics M odel, and model design. . 3) Staff ass�es responsibility for scheduling and coordiaating �Citizens'..Observation Patrol. 120 to 180 iiays: 1) staff and program evslua.tions. '2) delivery of Neighborhood Crime Statistics �iodel, 3) begin planning '•continued 'crime prevention efforts and determine need Yor flind raising events. , ,. � . . .. . . . . • .... ' • ., . ; . .. . • - , .,. . : . . . � , '��"��'� � . . � . . . . _ . . . � � ��.� •� .:. _..:.�-.�: �.: - : _ . NPP APPLICATION, Page 3 � �:'°� � "" � � . .� " PROJECT NAM� RAA Crime Preverition Coma�ttee - . � . ,.. � _ . • . 10. WILL TNIS PROJECT BE COMPLETED IN 2 YRS. YES . :� NO X � .. IF NOT-, EXPLAIN HOW IT WILL: BECOME SELF-SUSTAINING WITNOUT FURTHER NPP FUNDING? . � .� �.; . :. � _ i�htil the program great]y..exceeds� its present'program�goals; .'tbe.need`.for' so�e program°,'� � . components��ma�y-�continue.--•:'Scyme.rof�'these''services .'may"be"continued on the.;basis oS,,�_:;' �•'�' � �membership-�ees—for_ resident's''arid''btiisinesses;�servi"ces'to:`ro�mercial concerns for�Yee�,�"�� or co�unity fwid�.raisiag .events. . : , � � � � - • �. � - . % . . . �.;,- . �� -:`� : . - ,_ . . . :, . c ..:. .- .._. � �. . .., __ ..: -. ._.. , • - � f� , , . . ` . . � . � • .� •� . A_r�.. . . _ . � • _ _ �+ .. ' . � � - . . .� . 11 .� WILL THIS PROJECT RESULT� IN INCREASED �MAINTENANCE ANO OPERATING COSTS FOR THE CITY? . .;.� . YES NO X . IF YES, EXPLAIN NOW THE PROJECT WILL PRIVATELY PAY FOR THOSE COSTS.�.' 12. HOW WILL TNE �PROJECT BENEFIT LOW AND MODERATE INCOME HOUSEHOLDS? � " �. � In addition to reducing residents' anxiety about crime,'-s.nother important effect of = reducing crime will be a.n improved commercisl cli.mate and the resulting �obs that�will occur from the continued development of Selby Avenue. , � 13. HOW WILL NEIGHBORHOOD CITIZEN PARTICIPATION BE FOSTERED DURING PROJECT DEVELOPMENT , AND IMPLEMENTATION? � . . . : By organizing- 90� of the �blocks ia the Ramsey Hill neighborhood, we hope to secure � �� • participation from 75� oP the residents in the co�unity.. '��.Our Citizens'' Observation� � ' Patrol, which;without solicitation�, has alreac�y secured the involvement oP 60 people, we experct wi11-�gxow to at least 200 volunteers. - - - . , , . , . . '. , . . . . . . .. . . .. , , , . , .,; 14. COMPLETE PROGRAM FUNDING AN� EXPENSE FORMS PAGES 5 AND 7. � . �� - � � . . 15. ATTACH LETTERS OF. SUPPORT FROM ALL INTERESTED AND AFFECTED GROUPS/OR ORGANIZATIONS. . . --_ . Cha i r� CH►'+�+� ' � - Loi 5 StEU��15 P e,UP,rt 'on �►��t, 5 3i 3 GNATURE 0 D VIDUAL , . YP D NAME T TLE R ROLE DAT COMPLETING APPLICAT ON � . , .. . � �. . � . �ReS+��J� 5(3� 183 � . � AM E I - S G TU 0 F FIC R-- TYPED N E . I L OL � DATE 0 PRE.S DENT � . � , � < RHA Crime Prevention Program' + NPP APPLICATION, �Page 4 � . ' PROJECT _NAME . , . • . ... � . -.t...- . .. • . . . . . . � � .. NEIGHBORNOOD CONTRIBUTIONS DECLARATION , . � - • 1 . ' ESTIMATED COMMERCI�IL .PROPERTY FIXED �CAPITAL� . ��. . . �. � ' �, � . � IMPROYEMENTS; , ; _: � � ... �.� . . . � . ; . :- . . . . . � . .. , _ : ., . .: : .: • - � - - � . „• � ��NUMBER OF PARTIC'IPANTS-� ::Related'�.coatributions ..~ta'thi�s pro�ect '.' �' $ ' ��- �= � `--�` ��=3 � ' _�' . AVERAGE"'INYESTMENT=-1s: e. su s an i inves en s presen • --'� �� ••� �L�•-••- "��' � -� , �-rr ....r�...•�n _ . �occurring s e y es ern-�. . .._ .- _ .. - ••° '=. � . • � � � � . TOTAL I NYESTMENT �EQUALS '' �� .:' $ $20,000,000 �� ;-'=� � ' While we �feel� that our pro�ect is directly linked with this inves.tmen , we are no includin 2. ESTIMATEO RESIDENTIAL PROPERTY FIXED CAPITAL - it s �a dire t M tc we h ver� simpl, . .. _ � wan�ed to zn�dica�e �e ma�ni�de o�, IMPROYEMENTS: • . • � � � the commercial investment which wi13 be successful only i� the presence of�,crime NUMBER OF PARTICI PANTS � � � � � � ;� r��,;..�a�_ � � AVERAGE INVESTMENT - � � � � $ ' � � - TOTAL INVESTMENT EQUALS $ � ' 3. NEW COMMERCIAL DEVELOPMENT: . . . - , . � � SITE (a) " �� - ESTIMATED MARKET YALUE • _ $ � SITE (b) � ESTIMATED MARKET VALUE . . , . � , . . � � � . � . . . � _ • . . TOTAL MARKET VALUE $ . . ' � ' . . .�. . ,. . - . . ._ .c:. . � .. . . - . :_-_- . �. ... ..: •. .. . . _.._ . . . 4. NEW "RESIDENTIAL' DEVELOPMENT:='1 Z=-... ` ' �: ." --- :=�� -. - ` - : . � . . �.. ..-:•.,: �_ - , _ . _ . .,. .. � .. ._.� .... . : ___ .; � . . ._. . . . __. . � SITE (a) : . " . � � . - - . � ESTIMATED MARKET VALUE _. �� S � . _ • SITE (b) .. � . ESTIMATED MARKET VALUE $ - � _ : : . . - ... .. . ; . • : . . TOTAL MP►RKET VALUE - � $ . . _ "� 5. � ESTIMATED IN-KIND-SERVICES (,OFFICE SPACE, EQUIPMENT, SERVICES) : TOTAL: 23.�g60 . :.� . . . . � .., . i r� c�:�; L. ..- �.nn••� „�•r%. .. ...�, .:.. . . �.. . �.' ' _.. '... i.. .. � � ..... _ . . .. . SOURCE AND'TYPE " ��1:-�:Clericsl/bookkeeping =$2,k00�, Pro rammer� and S`"" � � • - . . -� - •� 2. • omputer = 1, •�, Public' Relations - 300, $ � � � 3, ommercial Patrol -. 1�,000, Office S ace $ an equipment 0 7,000, Patrol Mileage-$2,560 6. ESTIMATED VOLUNTEER LABOR:�, � . . . � � � ' NUMBER OF VOLUNTEER�atrol �blunteers (200 peo le @ 36 hr�s. ea. ) $72,000 � AVERAGE HOURS/VOLUNTEER Block Captains 50 people @ 8 hrs ea� 2�+,000 � : � . '. Neighborhood Clean=ups a.nd lighti.ng (50@ �+ hrs) $2,100 � � • � � � �� T4TAL HOURS x $10/hr. EQUALS� $ 98,100 7. ESTIMATED SWEAT EQUITY: ' ' . . NUMBER OF PARTICIPANTS � -" � AVERAGE HOURS/PARTICIPANT . .• �' TOTAL NOURS . . �. • � ' � :� TOTAL HOURS x $10/hr. EQUALS $ � .�, _ � . . - . � '`��;�� 4 NPP _APPLICATION, Pa,ge 5,.�. : , . . ,:.,: . PROJECT NAME RHA Crime Prevention Frogram . : . -,_ _.._ 1� . . . . . _ . 8. ESTIMATED CASH DONATIONS: � � � - � .� . _ , . . _ . SOURCE 1 . Commercial - .`_•�- . ... . - � ._ .. . - � - - � • 3:000 2. Resideats . � .1.600 : 3;: .. . . . . - . . _ a . � ' . . -_•=�' . . _ . ---_. _. . ; 9. ANTICI PATED FOUNDAT,ION GRANTS: �' _ ,: •.;,� , `• - • � � ... ... . . • � ^1:4a:..Z:{�.a- .., .4'"✓ . S�, _ . f._ ELG•i'u'_c 1._.�i't7 r�t."-� •,~ . . ' ,.. . _ . . .. � . - . - . ._.� . •—' "' ._�s.._ . , . � . - FOUNDATION(s)�1 . �^ � _ . � � . ._ ._ ._ 2.-=-- _ __ .._ .._. . .. .. �- - -. . . ..--- - - --. , .. :� .. . .._ ' ,, . _ _._ � .-_�_ - . 10. OTHER: EXPLAIN �"�8ht L�i Ramsey'Hill" According to NSP, if 100 - • ��-� ' � ; residents left t eir ron a.n ac yar ights on all night the � cost to the homeowner would be appro�cimately ��.00 ger month: • � -� •--� � , � - , : - _.... c .. .._ • _ � • . ..- : . _ __... .----.. .__. -�--._. . ._ _. _ ES�IMATED-VALUE : S ..9�600 . . . _. �.._ - TOTAL NEIGHBORHOOD 136,160 CONTRIBUTIONS DECLARATION $ 11 . WHAT EVIDENCE IS THERE THAT TNE ABOVE DECLARATIONS ARE REALISTIC? - M ar�y of.the .pledges .to serve as a patrol or block captain volunteer have already . � been secured. As stated earlier there is tremendous neighborhood support to . solve the problems related to crime in- our neigh�iorhood. - People have wiliingly come forward to do their fair share. � � . H uch of the cash donations have also slready been collected . The remainder has • every _indication. of being collectable as the business oxners bave pledged their support of our efforts to reduce crime. -Sblunteers have alreac�y been identified to develop the Crime Statistics Model . and we have secured pledges from�a neighbor w�o-is a computer progra�er and - � another neighbor who owns a micro cbmputer. � � � We axe confident that the interest and enthusiasm generated by this pro�ect will insure that the pledges made will be kept. � ' ' NPP APPLICATtON, Page 6 ' = � � � PROJECT NAPiE _ REA Crime Prevention Program � , � � � • . - ESTIMATED PROGRAM FUMDING* , , � � � . . , - - . -: �_ r � . �SOURCE�� : _ . _. _ _... _ .. _ � - $ AMOUNT _. � .-� _ � �.,: . . � ': . - �k;600'. � ±- ,. . . .�.� Cash Contributions� , 2, . �blunteer Labor . . � - • � 98,100 3. . In-Kind Services - . . , 23,860 . " . . ' q. Other- "Light L� Ramsey Hill" • 9,600 �� : 5. Neighborhood Partnership Program G raat , 65,320 .� 6. ,• . 8. � 9. � 10. . � � , . 11 . � , ' " - � . 12. • � � : -. . - . . . . � : . . _: • . � . �-: • . ._ _ - --� - _ _- _ 13. 14. ' • . � �.. _. . . - _:- 15. . ' 16. - � . : � � _ � . _.- . . . 17. • . . . _.. � - 18, . . . � - : : 19. 20. TOTAL $ 201,�80 * INCLUDE NEIGHBORHOOD PARTNERSHIP FUND AND SPECIFIC CATEGORIES OF NEIGHBORHOOD • CONTRIBUTIONS. � , . �� ,�"y . ' ..r. J �'� 4 NPP APPLICATION; Paqe 7 � � PROJECT NAME RHA Cz'ime Prevention Program ' � � ~ ESTIMATED PROGRAM EXPENSES ' ' � � • . . ._ �. _. . . � . .. . . - _ . � . . . .� _ .: . _ .,.... � - :.- PROGRAM EXPENSES. :_ , .: � ,� FUND SOURCE*_ ' . ��AMOUNT � , ..,,-'- � . . _ . .- - . . . � � . - . � . . �. Please.:attached pages.:titled "�xpenses" for more detailed descr�,R+ion o �rn,�nses. 2. . . 3. 4. . .� 5. . . 6. _ . _ . _ . �• . 8. � . 9. � 10. • 11. 12. � 13. . 14. . . 15. � � lf. � � 17. 18. . 19. 20. . � TOTAL EXPEMSES $ * INCLUDE NEIGHBORHOOD PARTNERSHIP FUND AND NEIGHBORH000 CONTRIBU�IONS. � Expenses , NPP 'K ATCH TOTAL Neighborhood Crime Watch !�aterials (brochures, educa- $ 1�,250 $ 1,750 $ 6,000 � tional and related expenses) � � Co�nunications(newsletter) 5,000 300 5,300 Citizens' Observation Patrol , �1-HF Transceivers 730 1,100 1,830 �Iileage expense for Patrol -0- 2,560 2,560 Commercial Patrol -0- 10,000 10,000 Neighborhood Crime Analysis �Iodel Progra�er and Computer time -0- 1,600 1,600 Safer Environment Ruid Neighborhood Clean-up and 1,820 11,600 13,�+20 Improved Lighting K anagement/Operations Personnel (1.25) and related 40,620 2,�00 �+3,020 expenses Office Rent 5,000 5,000 10,000 Telephone 1,500 -0- 1,500 Supplies & Stationary 1,000 -0- 1,000 Postage 1,500 -0- 1,500 Liability Insurance 500 -0- 500 Duplication Expense 2,�+00 -0- 2,�+00 Furniture & Equipment 1,000 2,000 3,000 '�Iiscellaneous -0- 1,500 1,500 Wlunteers � -0- 96,000 96,000 TOTALS $ 65,320 $�36,160 $2ol,u8o _ 8_•_ ' . - �.:��4�AJ � 'll..� � ��:�+:� . .�,.� .,, � TABLE 0 F CONTENTS Page Neighborhood Partnership Program Application. . . . . . . . . . .. . . . . .. . .. . . 1 Letters of Support. . . . . . . .. . .. .. . . .�.•. .. . .. . . . . .. . . . . .. . . . . . . .. . . . . . 9 Detailed Naxrative Proposal for Crime Prevention Program. . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . .. . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . Iallows Support Executive Summary. . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . , . , . . .. , . . . .Lettersl . . . . . . . . . . . Chapter 1 -Crime in Ramsey Hill. . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 2 l.l The Problem of Crime. . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 2 1.2 A focus for Citizen Action. . . . . . . . .. . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . .. . . . . 5 � 1.3 Ramsey Hill's History of Success. .. . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . .. . . .. 7 l.k What Ramsey Hill will do to Reduce Crime. . . . . . . . . . . .. . . . . 9 1.�.1 Pro�ected Impact. . . . . . . . . . . . .. . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 10 Chapter 2 - Program G oals and Ob�ectives. . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 12 Chapter 3 - Budget. . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 15 Appendix. . . . . . . . . . .. . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 17 LETTERS 0 F S iPPORT Additional Letters of Support forthcoming Prom: � , ' Representative E�ed Norton , St. John the Evangelist Church '�ichael Petrocelli, Crime Prevention Office, St. Paul Police Department . _ 9 _ � r . � - .,��'��'µ� . . . , . DONALD M. MOE . ' . , Room 309 State Capito� • • St. P•rul, '�tinnc.uta 55�55 l6 I?1296-426d � . Senate State of Minnesota May 26, 1983 Neighborhood Partnership Program . City of St. Paul City Hall Annex St , Paul, Minnesota 55102 Dear Sir or Madam: I am writing in support of the Ramsey Hill Crime Prevention Com- � mittee 's application for a grant to support their efforts over the next two years. You are aware, I 'm sure, of the increasing crime rate in the Ram- sey Hill neighborhood. In light of the slightly declining overall city crime rate, help in the form of a neighborhood crime preven- tion committee is clearly needed. The group is requesting a grant of approximately $72,000 . In view of the large capital investment and improvement funds i$19-20 mil- lion) now being dedicated to the Selby-Western area, this would seem to be a proposal which would be supportive of those major investments . In order to encourage businesses to commit them- selves to this redevelopment area, an effective, realistic crime prevention program is essential. As I understand the proposal, the crime prevention committee will use the funds to develop a neighborhood crime statistics model as well as a block organization structure, and to organize a citizens ' observation patrol. This group is industrious and their goals are valuable to the well-being of a historic St . Paul neighborhood, as well as t�o a major city redevelopment effort . I enthusiastically support their efforts and believe this grant proposal deserves city support . Sinc ly, � � Donald M. Moe State Senator � DMM:cr C`[1MMiTTFFS • (;nvemmencal Onerations. Chairman • Taxes and Tax Laws • Rules and . :��:. .,� CITY OF SAINT PAUL � €�• "'„ •-,�� DEPARTMENT OF POLICE �, �� Q� Wm W McCutcheon. Chief of Police 4�• _ �,:,�� 101 East Tenth Street Saint Paul,Mi�nesota 55101 GEORGE UITIMER 6�2'29�-�� MAYOR May 27, 1983 � . ' ' . Mr. KTm Ch�istfanson Ramsey Hill Assoc. Foot Patrol 524 Setby St. Paul , MN 55102 Dear Mr. Christianson: As a St. Paul Poltce Officer, I have worked with the Ramsey H111. Association since 1978. In that time, the members of your organization have demonstrated not only a concerned interest Pn their neighborhood but a willingness to in- _ vest the time and energy necessary to make improvements. Your plans for a neighborhood foot patrol , again, reflect the willingness of Ramsey Hitl citizens to do more than discuss neighborhood probiems. The time and energy you've already lnvested make a clear statement to the City's government. as well as to the local criminal .element, on how things should, and wi]1 be in Ramsey Hill . _ I wish you much success in your program. Sincerely� William W. McCutcheon CHIEF OF POLICE � �,��%--� Thomas Walsh, SERGEANT Patrol Staff TW:np �� - ��'��5 , «�: ��', � CITY OF iSAINT PAIIL � �\�ii i�i:i"if OFFICE OF THE CITY COIINOIL \ r WILLIAM L. WILSON MARTHA N. COBB �,u,�� May 31, 1983 r�Yi.ua.. �sa. Mrs. Lois Stevens, Chairperson . Ramsey Hill Association's Crime Prevention Committee 307 Laurei Avenue - St. Paul , MN 55102 � Dear Mrs. Stevens: I am pleased to write a letter in support of the Ramse.y Hill Association's Crime Prevention Program. As one who lives in the general area and has worked with your organization, I can confidently say that this program will greatly benefit the neighborhood. ' The Association has over the years demonstrated its value to the neighborhood and securing financial support of this proposal would greatly enhance RHA's effort. An enhanced program will allow residents to more effectively participate in activities geared toward the overall reduction of crime in the area. This in turn, will not only provide opportunities for a more effective and responsive relationship between the comrnunity and city government; but, also serves to remove the barrier that the accelerating crime rate has posed to the continued economic redevelopment of this neighborhood. As a member of the St. Paul City Council , and one with a long standing record in support of citizen participation, I see this program as a means for creating a more self-reliant corr�nunit,y. I believe further that the skiils imparted to residents through this crime prevention block club program will prove to be the tools for maintaining a strong and cohesive neighborhood. I commend the Ramsey Hill Association's Crime Prevention Corr�nittee for the fine work it has done and unequivocally support their funding request for this program. R�spectfully, i i � �� William L. IJilson Councilman WLW/jbm CTTY HALL SEVENTH FLOOR SAINT PAUL, MINNESOTA 55102 612/298-4646 • �� . . � Ti��.D��, O� S�'. P.�t.t�., . . �,�► 2,39 cSr.�e� °�"c. c�E. �ae,.� cJb(inn. 55�02 ' ' ' ' May 23 , 1983 To Whom It May Concern, This letter is written in strong support of the Ramsey Hill Association's request for funds to assist in its efforts of - fighting crime in the area. We have been members of the Ramsey Hill Association since 1972 and know from first hand knowledge that it has a large neighborhood representation in its membership and that �its . leadership has always acted responsibly and with good sense. Their effort already through its block membership program _ has proved very effective in alerting all of us to crime prevention. We endorse the work of the Ramsey Hill Association and give it our strongest support in its request for funding. Sincerely, C�C ;.(/ Rev. Msgr. rose V. Hayden Pastor ✓ . . :� '�� . r�.� .� .� ;, � � CRIME VICTIM C�NTERS � Mailing Address: 1447 Washington Ave.So.,Min�eapotis,MN 55454 � . � �612� 340-5400 WEST METRO AREA ��m Smith,�oordinator Eqy-T METRO AREA COMMUNITY OFFICES: COMMUNITY OFFICES: 3801 Nicollet Ave. So., Mpls. 900 Albion, S� Paul 2400 Plymouth Ave.No., Mpts. 1021 Marion St.,S� Paul � 985 Ruth S�, S� Paut . May 24, �1983 _ Kay Wagers Ramsey Hill Association 412 Holly Avenue St. Paul, Minnesota 55102 , � Dear Ms. Wagers: I would like to commend you and the other members of the Ramsey Hill Association. Since the beginning of your organization in 1972, you and the other members of your organization have made tremendous strides in improving the neighborhood. The aspect that especially interests me and our organization is your crime prevention program. You have organized your blocks to be almost self-sufficient in stopping crime in your area, and your weekend patrol is a great idea and seems to be working effectively. I only wish that the whole of St. Paul was as well organized and had the enthusiasm that Ramsey Hill Association has. Keep up the excellent work. If we can be of any assistance, please feel free to call upon us. Sincerely, ,. . Jo s � � rus Victim Assistance Worker St. Paul Crime Victim Center A Program of Minnesota Cttizens Councit on Crime a�d Justice . formeriy Correctional Service of Minnesota , , , . PROPOSAL for a Crime Prevention Program Ra.msey Hill Association June 1983 . . . ��,,5 GX�CU'I'IVL SUMMARY The coatinued redevelopmeat oi th� Ramseq HfII n�fqhborhood f � threaten�d bp :n increasfnq crfm� rat� . Tha Ramsep }i311 Assocfation reco9nfs�s that th� presenc� oi crim� in th� neiqhborhood has so scrioaslp damay�d the imaqe oi our zr�a that ` ft has become a 6arrter to the conttnued economic redev�Iopment . of the communf tp . While crime is c�rtainly a concern to iIl St . L'avl residents , the Ramsey Hf1I nefqhborhood has eaperienced three times as much crime as the average St . P:ul neiqhborhood . The number oi crimes in the area ir►creased I3 . 4'!. from I98I to 1982 . In addition , according to 1982 crime statistics complied bq the City of St . Paul ' s Crime Analys3s Unit , the Rimsep Hill neiqhborhood Experienced the second hiqhest number of crimes in the entire cfty . . This fact of fncreasfnq crime can not help but hurt the mtior e�onomic development , eaceedfnq2d mfil3on dollars now in proqresa :t the corner of Selbp and Western avenues . The success of thes� investinents will mean 400 to 500 new iobs in our neiqhhorhood , �any of the Iobs created wilI be eatry Ievel positfons . Because ot its concern, the Ramsep }{iIl Association , workinq w: th nefghborhaod residents , has alreadq bequn to organize a Tleighborhood Crime Witch effort . Block clubs are being orqanized throaqh a network of Block Captains in order to gromote crime awareaess and prevention techniqves among residents . The Ass�ciation has also established a Citizen' s Observation Patrol that patrols the neiqhborhood to observe and report to the St . Pavl Police aIl suspiclovs or crfminal activity . The Ramseq l�ill Assoctation now seeks the assistance of the rteiqhborhood Partnerhsip Proqram to eYpand its crime prevention program. Fundinq of the proiect would insure the continaed deve:o�ment and success of the Associatfon' s efforts to reduce crime and to improve the fmaqe and reality of the neighborhood as s safe and positive place Eo visit , work and Iive . - 1 - Ch:pter 1 ' ' CRIME II�I RAMSEY HILL 1 , 1 T;[E ?ROBLEM OF CRIM� ' The available crime statfstics provide onlp a qeneril picture of crime in St . Paul . W:�iie there are a Iots of statistics , theq do r►ot always provide a very meaninqful pictvre of neiqhborhood crime . ';he recent elimination of 6 police districts and the division of the citq into two districts ; east and west , has rESnited in a disainished ability to understand neighborhood crime and its local and unique coniigvration. Ia what tollows we will be talkinq about ' grids ' , the basic unit of crime reportinq for the Citp of St . Paal . 1 Those statfstics , indicate that the Ramsep HiI2 neiqhborhood IEads the city in major crimes of a: I types . Two of the sis ' grids ' in the Ramsep Hill neighborhood are totally within its b�v�daries . These two qrids ( M ' s I29 and I3d ) , ran;c 2nd and Sth in total number of offenses reported in 1962 . They esperienced a 21"f. an3 a I5 . 8'!. incre�se , respe�tively in total offenses from I981 to I982 . Tyings are bad and qettinq worse irt Ramsep Hill . Mnch of the ra� ident ' s fear is related to bnrqlaries . The core neighborhood tgrid # I29 ) ranks third in the city for residential bvrglaries ; 2 :7 in I982 . Now does this compare with the rest oi the citp? To compare �n� Rams2y F{iIl grid with the rest of the city , consider that if each of St . Paul ' s 197 qrids had the same number of bnrglaries , es�h grid would account for 35 . 7 b�rqlaries each year . Ramsep l�ill ' s core grids I29 aad 130 had 294 burglarfes in 1982 , or four � imes as high as. the city ' s� ' averzqe ' for two grids . The followinq table demonstrates that burqlaries are only part of tha crime picture : - 2 - � � � �!��;�5 RATIK OF RAMS�Y N1LL CRIDS AI�iONG ST. PAUL ' S 197 GRIDS R�{J1 GR I DS ; 129 130 109 110 230 149 CRIME�: R�S . DU1tGLARY 3 19 19 26 131 S1 C QY:M . 3URGLARY 19 32 9 10 30 50 TFiEFT 5 32 11 3 11 84 CAR THEPT 3 S2 19 11 52 86 ti'A?dDALISM ? 59 13 15 52 126 Not listed above are the crimes of robberq , aqqravated isszvlt hamocide and rape . Present erime reports do not provide this fnformation on the basis of rankinq . �ut b:sed on simple numbers - tthese ma�or crfines are , thankfullq , Iess frequent ) , the sfs qrids in or surronndinq the Ramsep Hill neiqhborhood have mnch more Ehan their share of these maior crimes . -Ramsep Hill grids accoant for I3Y. of all the cit�' s robberies in I982 . -Ramsey Hill grids accounted for 8 . 9Y. oi all aqqravated assaults in I982 . -Ramsey }{ilI qrfds accounted for 10 . 7X of alI the rapes r�ported in I982 in St . Paul . All this with only 3�i of the ' qrids ' in the City of St . Paal . :n Ramsey Iiill Crime and the fear of crime are very real . It effects all residents . ?he elderly fear to qo outside . The FrGGI , most often its victim, are :east Ifkely to seek help , Ieast able to afford protection or the loss ot work tfine , health or property . T'hose seekfng empioyment mnst go elsewhere as job creatinq investment is slowed or merchaats are relnctant to Iocate here because of the neighborhood image created by crime . Crime also undermines the communfty spirft . The feas it _ 3 _ qenerates encourages inter-racial and inter-qenerational fears . A sgirit ef fear tao easfIy replaces the spirit af �caeperation . To combat these destructive etfect5 of crime , a focused � partnership �ffort amonq rrsidents and bvsinesse� is requir�d . , ------- ; / . 1. Offense Summary Report, 1975-1982, Crime Analysis L�it, St. Paul Police Department, and 1982 Year-End Summary, Crime Analysis Znit, St. Paul Police Department. _ 4. _ � ��?�� y�' _ ,+..;r ✓�';,t� 1 2 A POCUS I'OR CITIZEAi 11CTIOT� � Becaus� Crime effects all seqments oi th� communftp , member� of the Ramsey Hill Associatfon have been di�cussfnq waps to r�duce crfine that can invoiv� alI seqments of the communitq . First , members have been esaminfng the probiem of crime itself . What types ot crfine occur in our specific communitq and w5en and w:�ere do they occur most often. The first problem we encovntered was that there is not enovgh specific informatfon about crime nor i � the available tnformation communicated to , members ot the commnnftp . There ts presentlp no aecur:te c�r►ffguratfon for crime fn our commvnftp . Stittstfcs on when and where crime occurs are onlp kept on a citq-wide basis ( see1982 YEAR-EI�I� SUMMARY) . For example , fiqures for burlarie5 tn the west sector of St . Paul are brokcn down fnto qarage bJZqlaries ( 27 • 5'l.) , non-apartment resfdential burqlaries <50'�) , and apartment burqlarfes ( 2I . 9�/.) . There is no attempt to corre�ate a qrids ' crime data with the percentaqe of residentfil or apartment units . The result is that , bssed on present crim• statisties � neighborhood residents do not have quidznce on where to focus thefr efiorts , becavice aothinq is related to the specific facts of their netqhborhood . Members of the Ramseq l�fll Crime Preventfon Commfttee han� attempted to analyze crime accordinq to the days and times ot their occurrence The results were di �appointing because , usinq ctty wide fiqvres , there are only nominal differences between hiqh and low crime daqs . Committee members believe that this is due to the use of citp-wide ffgures thit iqnore or bury unfqve neighborhood difterences . In the cas� oi bu`96i�Y�; , fob�{saleist they tend to occur most trequently on �iday frequently on Sunday ( 12 . 3�/.) , the diiference be3nq minor . The frustration of the Crime Prevention Co.mmittee led to the establishment of the Cttizen' s Observation Patrols and the cor�tinved orqantzation of Block Clvbs focused on crime . Becavse of the response we have received to these two strateqfes , we believe that we are tagping stronq sentiments amonq the residents , the kind that has motivated them to osqanise and spend substantial amoants of time , at inconvenieat hours of the eveninq patrollinq their neiqhborhood . As a measvre of that seatiment , 6y word-of-mouth alor►e , 60 people have aqreed to serve with the Citizen' s Observation _ 5 _ Patrols . Each weekend pitrol reqvires no less than 18 7� :��ntc=[5 . ThVS f3I , there has been �� *.� ? 2� � I : a �nQ ��B schedule . Dett�r thaa on� hsli oi the neiyhboshood blocks hav• s coamitted 6lock ciptafn, willinq to contact his or her aeiQhbors � and host meetinqs to discuss block problems . These meet �nqs can n� t Se completeip ' proqrammed ' , as nefghbors may wfsh d3scuss aew ' or unique bIo'ck problems fn addttfon to crime . We :re tsppinq :hese natur,al tendencies amonq neiqhbors bq providfnq a "environmental fnnd" made up ot both KPP iunds , volvnteer l:bor and cash contributions , to cover costs incvrred in such activities as alley and neighborhood clean-nps , improved aliep and par� iiqhtinq . Thus , the Ramsep Hilll Association Crime Committee has focused 1�on :h;ee inter-related stratiqies ; ��r� a=curate data , communication amonq neiqhhors focvsed on th� common problem oi crime , and , finallp , an active attempt to patrol our neiqhborhood with the intent of reporttnq any criminal or �vspicious hehavior ta the Pclice DeparEment . _ 6 _ r. ��'��'�l . ., _ ,s ` . 1 . 3 RAMSEY HILL ' S HISTORY OF SUCCESS Since I972� the Ramsey Ht1I Associition has plzq�d a Ieadinp role fn the renftilizatfon of its neiqhborhood . Over the pears it has taken resident ' s concerns and dev�Ioped and implemented selvtions . The Ramsep Hill Association was :ctive in the fi9ht to retafn WeE= ter Schoal as an integrated , active and desirabie inner-city school wfth a creative , attrictive curriculum. . 'I'he Ramsey Hfll Association played the Ieadinq role tn the development of the Historieal Hill District Ordfnsnce , ttrst at tt-ae state Ievel and then workfnq with St . Paul ' s citp councii and administration .The achienement ot thfs ordinance encourages impr�rer�ent and revitalization , while insuriny that improvements comformed with the eaisting chiracter o! the neiqhborhood . In the process of developing the ordtnance and subsequentlp , Ramsey }Iill has worked closelp with developers , butlder� and horaeowners to helg them accomplish thefr goals while dofng so in a manner that enhances the nefghborhood and its character . The Ramsey :�iII Associatioa has also been actfvely involved fn helping homeowners secure financinq and fnsurance for their hcraes . In the past , " red lininQ" of the Ramsey HiII neiqhborhood was standards practice smonq banks , savings and loan associations , praperty and casvalty insurance companies . T'hrovqh research, meetinqs and occislonal public ridicule , these illeqal practfces have been stopped . The Ramsey Hill Associ:tion was also cooperative with the �272 : ��pment oE the Old Town Restoratioa Corporation which dfd much to rehabfiitate older homes ia the nefghborhood and to find snd move into the neiqhborhood mar�y older homes that fit the character of the area . Old Town worked closely with Ramsey HiII in s c�operative spirit that represented a felt ' division of responsibilitp ' between the two corpor�tions . TI-.e Ramsey :-IiII Association also spoasors a house tour every other pear that helps thovsands oi people to vnderstznd what 3s hap�en:ng ia the nefgh6orhood and encourages them to consider moving into Ramseq Hill . The tour hss aiso constitated the Asscc :atians' r�ajor source of fneome to support its modest on-goinq activites oi a monthlp newsletter and legal _ 7 _ fnvolvement . Th• leqal battles oi the Ramsep Hf1I Association h� ..t� T1ga!1 �1n�er � �Trnn �.) �rssg�r�t� _rir� _ L? a �_a at'12 '�Z: �T�c �tai3�� 2r of the neiqhborhood and its continued viability . In persuinq our Ieqal remedies, the Ramsp HiII Assocfatton has paid out a considerable amovnt ot money as well as secured top-quslity . vol�nteer Ieqal assistance . That sense oi via6ilitp is now threatened 6p a feelfng that th� ' risinq tfde o�f crime fs slowlp destroyfr►q the Ramsep HfII neighborhood, :a a communitq . , ' For the purposes of this project , the Ramsep HiII Board of Directors has established a Crime Prevention Nantqement Commfttee . This committee wfll be responsible to the Board of Directors for the management of the proiect ' s on-9oinq cperation . This includes the establishment of the necessary and appropriate policies , procedures and priorities to insure the profect ' s success and fiscal inteqritp . The Crime Preventioa Management Committe� wf1l recoanmend z Proiect Manaqer to the Board of Directors, to coordinate the components of the groqram and to act as i commnnitp orqanizer . The Profect Manaqer will b• u: timately accountable to the Board ot Directors , but wili recelve day-to-dap direction and supervision from the Mangement Cemmittee . The Crime Prevention Management Committee fs composed of �tamsey Hi : : Assocfation members , neiqhborhood residents and business owners . Because the crfine problem touches aIl aspects of our neiqhborhood and represents a major barrier to the coatinued r@vitslization of the communitp , the Ramsep Hill Board has determined that the active participation of both business owners and residents wovld be a critical factor in the pro�ect ' s s�ccess . The composition of the Management Committee , therefore accvrately reflects the diverse interests , concerns and skills within our community and reflects our unique ' IZeighborhood F'artnership ' . The eaperience ind background amonq the member� oi the cammlttee insure the sound and carefal manaqement of the p r o 3 e c t . (S e e Attachment 2). _ S _ � ��, . , r��r�y ) � :� �. 4 WHA'T AAMSEY HILL WILL DO TO R�DUCE CRIME The ftrst facet of th• proiect will ba to dtvelop an adequat� model for the coll�ctfon znd interpretatioa of crfine statt�tfcs . ' Called a �Ie�iahborhood Crtme Statfsttes Model , it will provide t clear picture oi the r.:msey Hill neiqhborhood ' s pattern of crim� , and help the residents ;cnow where and how to focns their efforts . To develop a ' Crfine Model ' , the Ramsep Hill Crime PLGJEGt will work with the St . Pavl Polfce Degartment ' s Crfine AnaIysis Unit to : . 1 . Pin-�oint :ocal patterns of c: ime . . 2 . Correlate demoqraphfc information with crime statistfcs to �evelop a scaie of ' relative fmportance ' among the crfines , victims and the population < i . e . crimes per I , 000 , for ea:mpl�) 3 . De�elap Zorr� : ations with enviromental factors ( schools , parkinq Iots , parks and recreatfon areas--or their ab�ence--problem buildinqs , street and alley Iiqhtanq , etc , 3 . 9 . The result shall be a "PIeighborhood Crime Anaylsis Model" umaab :e bq Ramsey Hill and other St . Paul neiqhborhoods . S . The statistfcal inodel developed will then provide a ba�is for evaluatfon of the Crime Freventfoa Project as it proceeds . It will allow us to measure changes , treads and effects of the proyram. The second focus of the project will be to create awareness of the problem of crim� by continued expansion and development of the esisting block elvbs . At the present tfine R::nseq HiII h:s 3Q of 60 blocks in Ramsep HiII orqanfz�d to iocus on crim� prevention . These clubs will be use for the following functfons : I . Provide t forum for commvnicatfnq basic information abovt crime and how to prevent it . Workfng wfth the police department , szveral sessions will be devoted to basic measures of preventioa, caIling police , what can be expected from the police dep:rtment and what their neighbors can do to help each other . 2 . �:ch block clvb wili be improving its own communication bp vevelopinq a )� a list of names and phone numbers of thefr neiqhbor� , b ) a list of the local block problems that mfqht be can: ributiny to the problesa, such as : fqhtinq , messy alleps , _ 9 _ unseevred garages , poor door locks , unlocked windows or unbarr�d L. ac_Ta�} -�*i�{:.�*- . pr�blem b*sildill�� f resid�nts . � 'i'his information wiil be relayed to the TIeighborhood Critue Statistics Ya3eI developsnent qroup as well as the Cftizen' s Obs�rvatton patrols . . 3�. �ach block club will zlso be asked to indeatity voluateers :or the Citizen' s Observation Patrol . The substantial support services reqvired by our eapanded effort is ar� important reason for the needed staff and related espenses . Third , and most active component of the Crime proqram will b� tha Citizen ' s Obersevation Patrols . The patrol has been in ,terati�a since April. As presently operated , each Fridap ind • Saturday evening , three teams of two persons each , pitrol the z2 ; 3;��,�;��d . Tae ?atr� is ha�e four puposes : I . To create s ' presence ' in the neighborhood by patrolfnq the are3 durfnq t:ae times most Iikely to have crimtnal acttvitq . 2 . To observe suspicious persons or vehtcles . 3 . Ta re�ort to and fo ; Iow-vp with the police department any criminal behavior observed . There is no attempt to intervene , �ut c+�Iy to obser�e and report . 4 . To retafn s record of thefr observatfoas . ':h� Citizen ' s Patrol remain in constant communicatfon with each other bp means of hand-held , S-watt , VHF transceivers . This pE:�uf ; ; �ne team to continc�e to observe susgicfovs behanior while another team phones the golice , reports the problem and gvides ' p� : ite te the appropriate Iocation . The Program commfttee is ` now esplorfnq the possibility of a nursinq home ' s front desk servfng a� a base station for the relayinq of inessages from the roving teims . 1 � . 1 PROJECTED IMPACT : 7 Wa g2 ; ie�e that tnese combined strat�Ji �s can : * Redvice Crime bv 20�ir. over the next two vears . * Aeinforce the ostive fm act of 20 millfon dollars of commercial� investment at the Selbv-Western intersection . * }Iel enerate 900 to S00 ' obs �n the immediate • - ! 0 - �. . , �� neiahborho•od manv oi which reavire onlv entrv Ievel sk311s * Stimvlate a sense of AIeiahborhood cride and common aoals amona the neiahborhood restdents . _ il _ , ' . �haoter 2 � � PROGRAM GOALS ATID OF3JECTIVES � _ � , , . V�RALL GOAL : To reverse the increasin crime rate ( 13 . 4H.) and redvice it bv 20Y. over the next two vears . OBJ�CTIVE : _ ACTIVITY ; - 1 Develoa accurate neiahborhood crime statistical model 1 1 Secure democraehic and crime ' statistics for the Ramsev Ht1I — neiahborhood . 1 2 Develoo reus:ble comouter model of Crime in Rainsev }{ill ._ esaecfallv wtth reference to noflulations ( offer►ses ner 1 . d00 for esamcle � to helo dev_eloe priorities . 1 . 3 Secvre in ut from Block clubs as to Iikel envfronmental factors that covld be related to crime ( schools tecreatfon areas � unliahted allevs , etc . ) 1 4 F.evfew Ioas of Citizen ' s Observation Patrols for information abovt roblems within the nei hborhood . 1 . 5 Pvblish re ort and model . 1 . 6 Su est re-evalvation of neiahborhood crime eriorities . 1 . 7 Issue monthl evalvations thereafter • to measvre ro ram effectiveness . - 12 - '� . � `��'�� . � � . 2 . Increase �the awareness and invoIvemeat of Ramsev .Hill residents and businesses in redv� ina crime bv :_ 2 . 1 Oraanize 90'b ot th• blocks in Rama�p_ Hill into Block clubs tS01� ilreadr have indenttfied block ca�tains) . 2 . 2 Develoe an educatfor►aI nroaram, • • usino all avaflable resovrces to helo residents and bvsfr►esses deter crime in their homes , busfnesses and 6locks . 2 . 3 Heln each block club to deffne their block ' s environmental eroblems . Their ' oroblems ' mav not be limited to crime , but mav address . svch thinas :s stoc siaas , Iiahttna . ' earkfna and nroblem bviidinas . 2 . 4 Insnre that the dfscussfons oi block oroblems can be reIaved to the ne £ahborhood crime statfstic5 model arov� and_ 2 . S }{eIe the block club deneIoe solutions to their block ' s environmentaI oroblems ind seek c000eration wtth other block clvbs or nvblic_ or �rivate aoencies to resolve them. . 2 . 6 �ach block club , will be eaoected to_ help secvre voivnteers to staff the_ Citizens Observation Patrol . 3 Mafntain and ooerate a Citizen ' s Observatfon Patrol to �rovide an ictfve deterrent to crime in Ramsev HiII : 3 . I 32 weeks eer vear (concentr: ted dvrina the warm months and randomlv dvrine the winter months) , on Fridav and Saturdav niahts , three eatroIs , of at least two person each , will natrol the Ramsev Hill neiahborhood to 3 2 Observe and report to the St . Paul Police Deeartmeat criminal or susoiciovs hehavior . 3 . 3 1do aetine intervention fs esQected the ouroose is onlv to observe . Thev will onlv hel� - 13 - . � colice locate the �roblem. 3 . 4 Maintafn a written record of the eatrol activitv and successes . , , • — lk — • . � � ��'�� .J r . . � Chapter 3 • � . B IDG ET " 3.1 Income: Cash Contributions: - Commercial Donations $3,000 Residents Donations 1,600 $ �,600 \blunteer Labor: Patrol tiblunteers (200 people) 72,000 Block Captains (50 people) 24,000 ' . Neighborhood Clea.n-ups 2,100 98,100 In-Kind Services: Clerical/bookkeeping 2,�+00 Programmer & computer 1,600 Public Relations firm 300 Commercial Patrol 10,000 Office space & equipment 7,000 Patrol mileage 2,560 23,860 Other: "Light t� Ramsey Hill" 9,600 9,600 Neighborhood Partnership G rant 65,320 65�320 TpT�,I, $201,480 - 15 - . . _ 3.2 Expenses • � . NPP 'K ATCH TOTAL Neighborhood Cri.me Watch � �?2aterials (brochures, educa- $ �,250 $ 1,750 $ 6,000 tional and related expenses) � , Communications(newsletter) 5,000 , 300 5,300 Citizens' Observation Patrol V H F Transceivers 730 1,100 1,830 �Iileage expense for Patrol -0- 2,560 2,560 Commercial Patrol -0- 10,000 10,000 Neighborhood Crime Analysis �iodel Programmer and Computer time -0- 1,600 1,600 Safer Environment Rind N�ighborhood Clea.n-up and 1,820 11,600 13,�+20 Improved Lighting K anagement/Operations Personnel (1.25) and related 1+0,620 2,�+00 �+3,020 expenses Office Rent 5,000 5,000 10,000 Telephone 1,500 . -0- 1,500 Supplies & Stationary 1,000 -0- 1,000 Postage 1,500 -0- 1,500 Liability Insurance 500 -0- 500 Duplication Expense � 2,�+00 -0- 2,k00 Rirniture & Equipment 1,000 2,000 3,000 'd iscellaneous . -0- 1,500 1,500 `blunteers -0- 96,000 96,000 TOTAIS $ 65,320 $136,160 $201,�80 � - �6- � • _ � � . ..ti ��'��5 . • . APPENDIX A.1 Ramsey Hill Board of Directors. . .. . . . . . . . . . . . .18 A.2 Crime Prevention�ianagement Committee. . . . . . . . .19 A.3 Pro,ject �Ianager Job Description. . . . . . . . . . . . . . .20 . _ 17 _ . , . A.1 Ramsey Hill Board of Directors � � Alma Joseph, President 365 Summit Avenue � Charles Skrief, Pice President � 552 Portland Avenue John�iercer; Treasurer ' 596 Holly Avenue Jean �lleu, Secretary 550 Holly Avenue Burt Bigelow Becky Copeland 530 G rand Hill 603 Holly Avenue • Peggy �ricy Charles s irsch 458 Holly Avenue 459 Portland Avenue '�ichael Hofflnan Christopher Huck �05 Portland Avenue 235 Summit Avenue James Lynden �I ichael K onaha.n 55�+ Dayton Avenue �+75 G rand Hill . Larry Nyman Lois Stevens 589 Portland Avenue 307 Laurel Avenue Kay Wagers 412 Holly Avenue - 18 - r . _ �� , � ��r� A.2 Crime P'revention H anagement Committee • � Lois Stevens, Chairperson: '�Is. Stevens, resident oY the neighborhood for six years is employed by �IedCenters Health Care, Inc. as the Director of Administration. She has had experience managing the financisl and admiaistra-. tive structure of a Health Maintenance Organization and has served as Administrative Director oP the Community-�iversity Health Care Center. Kim Christianson: Is a resident of 13 Years in the Ramsey Hill area, as well as, the owner of Singer-Benson Electric located at 524 Selby Avenue. :�ir. Christia.naon has served as co-coordiaator of the Citizens' Observation Patrol. '�iark Christensen: M r. Christensen is a real estate broker and developer and property owner in Ramsey Hill. He has been a resident in the neighborhood since 1977 and is currently serving as co-coordinator of the Citizens' • Observation Patrol. James Lynden: Is a.n attorney in private practice with the Stringer Law Firm. As legal architect of the Historical Hill District Ord.inance and frequent legal adviser to the Ramsey Hill Board of Directors, he will provide legal counsel a.nd guidance to the pro�ect management:�r. Iynden has lived in the neighborhood for over 15 years. � John �IcQuillan: Is the owner of �2cQuillan Bros. Plumbing and Heating of 415 Selby Avenue. The company has been in business in Ramsey Hill since 189�+ s.nd at its present location since 1914. '�r. K cQuillan is a member of the Selby District Commercial Club and the Selby-Western Business Association. He is presently expa.nding his office by building a ma,jor new building with 18,000 square feet of space. John Rupp: �Ir. Rupp is a partner in Dacotah and Woodland Park Companies and is an active developer in the Selby-Western area. He has been a resident of the Ramsey Hill neighborhood since 1972. Chaxles Skrief: A resident of the Ramsey Hill area Por 5 years, �ir. Skrief is e.n attorney with the :4inneapolis Society of Fine Arts and is currently the �bce President of the Ramsey Hill Board of Directors. John Whitmore: �Ir. Whitmore has been a resident of the Ramsey Hill neighborhood for three years. He works for local title insurance companies. He has recently performed much of the crime statistical analysis developed by the comm.ittee. Kay Wagers: As a member of. the Ramsey Hill Board,'�s. Wagers has been active in coordinating the mafor Ramsey Hill Block Captain effort and other community events of the Association. She has been a resident since 197�+. - 19 - �, , � . � . . - A.3 Pro3ect '�ana�er Job Descripticn . • Reportiag to: Ramsey Hill Associatioa Board of Directors �ionthly) Crime Preventioa M anagement Co�ittee (Daily) � Qualifications: College degree or four years of related commuaity orqeaization ' experience. � Ability to manage volunteers and complex scheduliag. Ability• or experi�nce in developing neighborhood cxime prevention and educational programs. � Duties: l. With volunteer assistance and guiclan�e', establish office and all program aad financiel record keeping systems. 2. Hire clerical/bookkeeping person(50� time) and arra.nge for volunteers to supplement. � 3. Work with the Crime Prevention'�a.nagement Committee to develop � educational materials for distribution to the Block Clubs. , �+. In cooperation with the M anagement Committee establ�sh communication network for Block Clubs. Assist in scheduling meetings of same. - 5. As soon as possible, assume responsibility for scheduling the volunteers of the Citizens' Observation Patrols. 6. Develop feed-back system from Block Clubs to group of volunteers developing the Neighborhood Crime Statistics M odel. 7. Provide support services to the Neighborhood Crime Statistics M odel group. 8. Provide M anagement Committee a.nd the Ramsey Hill Association �rith monthly reports on program and progress. 9. Report to funding sources as required and solicit new fina.ncia]. sources as directed by the '�anage�ent Co�ittee. 10. Perform tasks as assigned by the '�2anagement Committee. Sslary range: $15,000-16,500 annual salary. Six month performance review in the first year, annual thereafter. Benefits to be defined by the '�anagement Committee. - 20 - �; �;��i5 ' � � � RECEIVED ,1U� - 1 1983 * . ' �•�: . � - . . Neighborhood Partnership Program � � D NL ( :pt. Planning & Economic Development Planning District Code No. '15 W. 4th Street � � Planner-in-Charge St. Paul, Minn. 55102 � . Technical Support i612)292-1577 . 4ther . . - . � � . CD Non CD �. . . . = � . - � � � � NPP APPLICATION � � . . � • " . � � � LEASE PR INT .OR. T P ' . PROJECT NAME Red School House I�eighborhood Playground ' Improvement GROUP OR ORGANI7�ITION SUBMITTING REQUEST -_ ' NAN{E: Red School House, Inc. ADDRESS: " g r• • - r4N 55103 STRE T CITY STATE ZIP TELEPHONE: 488-6626 . � CONTACT PERSON FOft THIS REQUEST: Rov Tavlor ' . DAYTIME TELEPHONE: same as above � . . WHAT IS THE PROJECT PROPOSAL? � The pro�ect is an effort by neighborhood residents to improve the existing �layground area surrounding and� adjacent to the Red School House. . This will involve physical improvements to pr.ivately . �owned property by the:.erection of several pieces'� of playground equipment, asphalt resurf acing for additional playground space, and repair of. boundary fence to insure safety for childTen . It is also an effort on the part of the students, parents , and �'staff of the school to secure the cooperation of area residents in attempting to meet a perceived need which affects all the neighborhood children. � . , . 2. HOW MUCH NP FUND MONEY IS BEING REQUESTED? $ 13 ,677 3. WHAT IS THE TOTAL DECLARATION OF NEIGHBORHOOD CONTRIBUTIOHS? $ � '� 68 0 (Complete Neighborhood Contributions Declaration Form, page 4) � 4. WFWT PROBLQdS/NEEDS ARE BEING ADDRESSED�NW�I�ITIESCEETC,�YAILASLE TO DOCUMENT THE NEED, i .e., CENSUS DATA, DISTRICT . There is significant need for repair and improvement to the playground area. This is evidenced by the existing structures� which: • many neighborhood children utilize now. .It is in poor condition through ., __.,.,.,,,,+ „�e .�f+orcrhnn2 _ III talkin� with• our afterschoo�. program i► � . t�PP APPLICATION, Page 2 . � PROJECT NAME ` - the school grounds from the hours of 3 :30-?:OOpm. They range 'in age f 6-18 yrs. 'of age. Younger children in the earlier hours and older chi in the later hours. This trend is expected to increase tbis summer 5. IF PROJECT ACTiVITIES ARE TARGETED TOWARD A SPECIFIC GEOGRAPHICAL AREA OR SITE, A� �� A MAP SHOWING THE PROJECT BOUNDARIES. IF PROJECT ACTIVITIES ARE CONCENTRATED ON A SPECIFIC SUBJECT OR PROBLEM, EXPLAIN WHY THIS SUBJECT CONCENTRATION WAS CHOSEN. • The specific� concentration Was chosen because of it importance to the neighborhood: The Bed School` House is l�ocated in an older part of St. Paul which is very close to ;the` main thoroughfare, University Ave. In addition�, several� adult� entertainment centers are only 9 bloc � ' away. In, order to provide a positive healthy alternative to these influences many members of the school board of directars and concernea neighborhood residents have indicated � the need for something such as �. �play�ground. 6. WHAT IMPACT WILL THE PROJECT HAVE IN THE NEIGHBORHOOD? • The project will not have any adverse affects in terms of physic� economic or environmental concerns. In fact , it will provide a place for children of all ages and races to come and recreate. The planni^� for this project has considered the needs for all ages. There «�ill be manual dexterity types of equipment for the younger children,re- surfacing of the parking lot and painting of stripes for games �ill meet the needs and interests of the intermediate aged children, and, . replacement of the basketball goals and erection of vollec bal� ��t� meet the ne�ds o e� 1. ;dHO WILL MANAGE THE PROJECT? WNAT EXPERIENCE DOES THE M�NAGING ENTITY HAVE IN THIS TYPE OF PROJECT? The Red School House will be responsibZe for management of thE project �rom beginning to end. This wi11 inc2ude purchase of mater�a: actual work on the project, and any administrati.ve tasks associated with the project . Tbe Red School House has over 10 years� experience in the man�gement of grants programs. They have ranged in dollar va1L from �45, OG0 to �500 , 000, This type of project will not require grea� Maintenance on the part of the school other than «�hat the school alre: provides. �. +��LL TH� PROPOSEO P?OJtCT BE TIED OR COO�DIr�ATED WITH A��Y OTHER P�OJECT G� ?ROGRAM ( PUBLIC OR PRIVATE)? YcS �,� NO . IF YES, IDENTIFY. This project will be coordinated with the physical education pro� of the Red School House. In' addition, the school will seek active pa� ticipation from the City Parks and Recreation Department in schedulinr related events and activities as they can accomadated. 9. WHAT IS THE PROJECT SCHEDULE? The project implementation will take place over the period of lOweeks. First week will be .to firm up volunteer committments. The second week will be to place �orders and secure any addi�tional volun- teers. Third through siath weeks will be atvaiting arriva'1 of equiF ment and preparation of area for placement of anchoring holes , dis- assembly of existing equipment, and other assorted tasks. Seventh through ninth weeks will� be �or actual assembly of equi:pment aad placement on the property. This allows for a one-week overun that is anticipated because of relative inexperience of the volunteers. Final week is for any clean-up`.tasks and administrative tasks assoc- ! _ i _ 1 ___J i L -___..�1 �� r�r�r�w - � . �. ��►.�`,� � � � . . Red School Neighborhon� �' ` �' ' Playgrnund Improvement „�� APPLICATION, Page 3 . PROJECT NAME - • . � . . 10. WILL TNIS PROJECT BE COMPLETED IN 2 YRS. YES XX NO . IF NOT, EXPLAIN HOW IT WIIL BECOME SELF-SUSTAINING WITHOUT FURTHER t�PP FUNDING? ' , . �� . � �� 11 . WILL THIS PROJECT RESULT IN INCREASED �MAINTENANCE AND OPERATING COSTS FOR THE CITY? YES �� NO xX. IF YES, EXPLAIN HOW THE PROJECT WILL PRIVATELY PAY FOR THOSE COSTS. 12. HOW WILL THE PROJECT BENEFIT LOW AND MODERATE INCOME HOUSEHOLDS? The project will benefit thos.e households considered low and moderate income by improving the appearance of the neighborhood itself. It will provide possible incentive for homeowners and renters to take part in manp of the afterschool programs tfiat the Red School House operates. But, most important it will provide a place where the the chiltiren of such households can congregate to engage in more positive and useful pursuits such as games and recreation. 13. HOW WILL NEIGHBORHOOD CITIZEN PARTICIPATION BE FOSTERED DURIN� PROJECT DEVELOPMENT AND IMPLEMENTATION? � � Neighborhood citizen participation has ��alreadp begun with the concerns of residents being �voiced at previous board meetings of the Aed School House. As to project . implementation, there will space available � to. assist on the labor crews which will actually be� tbe backbone of this effort. Finally , residents are free and encouraged to voice their concerns as to how the restored plapground .area; will� be uti'lized in the future. . , . � ' 14 . COMPLETE PROGRAM FUNDING AN� EXPENSE FORMS PAGES 5 AND 7. 15. ATTACH LETTERS OF SUPPORT FROM ALL INTERESTED AND AFFECTED GROUPS/OR ORGANIZATIONS. �� ,`� Roy '�aylor Planner, RSH. June 1, 19.83 NA ./�9 D V DUAL TYPED NAME T TLE R ROLE D 7 CO P ING A LICATION . � . � � air e son � •��v�r �� • Dawn Sutten- �$. •o� �irectors June 1, 19.83 N TUR . OF C EF FFIC R YPED NAME I LE ROL DAT OR PRESIDENT • � . � �gd Schoo� �ouse Nei��borhood� - NPP APPLICATION, Page�4 PROJECT NAN!E aygroun mproveme � � NEIGHBORHOOD CONTRIBUTIONS DECLARATION " l . ESTIMATED COMMERCIAL PROPERTY FIXED CAPITAL . ( IMPROVEMENTS: NUMBER OF PARTICIPANTS $ AVERAGE INVES7MENT � � - � TOTAL INVESTMENT EQUALS � $ . � 2. �FSTIMATED RESIDENTIAL PROPERTY FIXED CAPITAL . IMPROVEMENTS; � � � NUMBER OF PARTICIPANTS ' � AVERAGE INVESTMENT � TOTAL INVESTMENT EQUALS $ 3. NEW COMMERCIAL DEVELOPMENT: SITE (a) ESTIM�ATED MARKET VALUE g SITE (b) ESTIMATED MARKET VALUE $ TOTAL MARKET VALUE S 4. NEW RESIDENTIAL DEVELOPMENT: SITE (a) � � � ESTIMATED MARKET VALUE $ � SITE (b) ESTIMATED MiARKET VALUE $ � TOTAL t��ARKET VALUE 5 _ 5, ESTIN',ATED IN-KIND-SERVICES (OFFICE SPACE, EQUIPMENT, SERVICES) : SOURCE AND TYPE i . Services � � � � � $ 350 2. Soace Phone and Ec�uipment � 3. 6. ESTIMATED UOLUNTEER LABOR: NUMBER OF VOLUNTEERS 8 AVERAGE HOURS/VOLUNTEER Total hours 380 TOTAL HOURS x $10/hr. EQUALS $ 3, 800�; 7. ESTIMATED SWEAT EQUITY: . � NUMBER OF PARTICIPANTS AVERAGE HOURS/PARTICIPANT � T07AL HOURS � . TOTAI HOURS x $10/hr. EQUALS � �� .� � . . , �,�ti ��,��..) � „ . . . � Red School House Neighborhood � NPP APPLICATIOSV, Page 5 � . PROJECT NAME Playground Improvement ! ESTIMATED CASH DONATi0N5: SOURCE 1 . � Guild of Catholic Women . ' . � $ - 100 • 2. • Ontimist Club of St. Paul $ 100 3• St. �aul American Indian Council _ . $ 100 9. ANTICIPATED FOUNDATION GRANTS: . - � � � � . FOUNDATIQN(s) 1 . St.: Paul. Foundation $ 3280 2. Northwest Area Foundation � 3280 10, OTHER: EXPLAIN Reduced equipment costs for playground � ' equipment from II. S . Games; -Me:].bourne, .Florida. Also, the contractor for the ashphalt resurfacing has agreed to provide the school with a �1200 below market con- tribution on the total price of his work . ESTIMATED VALUE � 1520 TOTAL NEIGHBORHOOD CONTRIBUTIONS DECLARATION $ 13,680 1 ' WHAT EVIDENCE IS THERE THAT THE ABOVE DECLARATIONS ARE REALISTIC? Red School House Board of Directors have already contacted the three organizations for cash donations with positive responses from all three. Such donations are very likely since they are so small. There will be a community meeting. this summer to determine interest � in the project as it relates to volunteer labor. It is estimated that five individuals� will beneeded for the tasks requiring labor. Finally , foundations have been contacted about the possibility of their assistance in such a project. They have been chose � . • fted School House Neighborho$d Playground Improvement � ' NPP APPLICATION, Page 6 PROJECT NAP1E _ . " • � ESTIMATED PROGRAM FUNDING* ' SOURCE . $ AMOUNT � , Community Volunteer Labor 3800 � 2, Administrative Costs-Red Sch.00l Hnuse � 1500 , . � . , 3. Guild of� Catholic V�omen 100 4. Optimist Club of St . Paul 100 5, St . Paul American Indian Council 100 6, �.�S . Games 3�Q 7, Fred Keller Asphalt and Paving 12UQ 8. Northwest l�rea Foundation 3280 9. St . Paul Foundation 3280 10. Neighborhood Partnership Program 13, 677 ll . ' 12. � 13. . . . 14. 15. 16. - - 17. � 18. 19. 20. TOTAL 5 27� 3�� * INCLUDE NEIGHBORHOOD PARTNERSHIP FUND AND SPECIFIC CATEGORIES OF NEIGHBORHOOD COMTRIBUTIONS. - . � ' , , . �i�� '�� ,,r.,,S J. . i�. ' . . , , • . Red � School House Neighborhood, NPP APPLICATION, Paqe 7 PRQJECT NAME Playground Improvement . ESTIMATED PROGRAM EXPENSES PROGRAM EXPENSES FUND SOURCE* $ AMOUNT � .� � , Playground equipment' `.' Guiid of Catholid S4omen'- 100 2. Optimist Club 100 3. St . .Paul Amer. Ind. Cncl. 100 4, � Volunteer Labor 38�0 5. U.S . Games 320 6. Northwest Area Found. 3280 7, Resurfacing St. Paul Foundation 3280 g, Fencing Fred Keller Asphalt and Paving 1200 9. � 10. • 11 . 12. 13. 14. 15. � � 1F. 17. 18. 19. 20. � TOTAL EXPEMSES $ 13 , 67? * INCLUDE NEIGHBORHOOD PARTNERSHIP FUND AND NEIGHBORHOOD CONTRIBUyI0N5. �� '.;` '�.• . . . � . . �� RECEtVED J U N - 1 i983 . . . . �'��?�� '' . r.�-�. .�`� � Neighborhood Partnership Program . N Dept. Plan�ing & Economic Development , planner9tniCharge - Code No. 25 W. 4th Street � •� • � . Technical Support � St. Paul; M�nn. , 55102 �� • Other (612)292-1517 . �p No� CD - . , _... . NPP APPtICATION � . y � LEASE PRINT OR TY E . � PROJECT NAME � Trian le Park ' GROUP OR ORGANIZATION SUBMITTING REQUEST � � � NAM E: SLc✓�'f � �//[��- A z�n c � Pr-n n r� D /ST G/GT /l-+ - AaoRESS: Sf. 0��.� M� .�s,as - STREET C ITY STATE ZIP TELEPHONE: ��a - I�� ' CONTACT PQZ SON F�2 THI S REQUEST: � . DAYTIME TELEPHONE: �9� - /bn o . . 1 . WHAT IS THE PROJECT PROPOSAL? The proposed project would in�hedintersectioalof DaleoandeGoodricb tbe tri'angle park located at . � � Avenues ; of sod on the � a. preparation of the soil and laying badly worn surface; � b . Addition of several groups of shrubs along the outer boundary of the triangular park; � . - c. Plantin�g _. of a few flowering trees at one p�iat of the - - park; - - - "� . Addition of an� attractive and �practical seating area at � � one corner of the_-park � � . . � unu �i�rN NP FUHD MONEY IS BEING REQUESTED? $ �oo_ o0 c. ��.. ��.,.... 3, WHAT IS THE TOTAL DECLARATI4N OF NEIGHBORNOOD CONTRIBUTIaHe?4) $ �� • �n - (Conplete Neighborhood Contributions Declaration Form, p g T PROBl0�15/NEEDS ARE BEING ADDRESSED? WHAT EVIDENCE 'IS AVAILABLE 70 DOCCIMENT 4• W� .TR c trT a, PqI0RI7IES, ETC.? � THE NEED, i .e., Ctiv�uS �H�r+, DI�T°-.... PL �! To provide green space for the "laYge concentration of population. ? ��PP APPLICATION, �Page 2 . - PROJECT NAME Trianr�le:Park ' � .'� ; � , . . t . � � . . 5. IF PROJECT ACTIVITIES, ARE TARGETED TOWARD A SPECIFIC GEOGRAPHICAL AREA OR SITE, ATTACH A MAP SHOWING THE �PROJECT. BOUNDARIES. IF PROJECT ACTIVITIES ARE CONCENTRATED. ON A SPECIFIC SUBJECT OR PROBLEM, EXPLAIN WHY THIS SUBJECT CONCENTRATION 4IAS CHOSEN. � � � This park is in bad need of improvement. i . . : . . . , , � . � • � . . 6. WHAT IMPACT WILL THE PROJECT HAVE IN THE NEIGHBORHOOD? • The park will provide a better green space for children on which to play. It will also enhance the beauty of the � � area» 7. '�IHO WILL MANAGE THE PROJECT? WHAT EXPERIENCE �OES THE MANAGING ENTITY HAVE IN THIS TYPE OF PROJECT? � Doris Sullivan, landscape architect , who has managed similar projects. 8. WILL THE PROPOSED PROJEC7 6E TIED OR COORDINATED WITH ANY OTHER PROJECT OR PROGRAM (PUBLIC OR PRIVATE)? YES R NO . IF YES� IDENTIFY. . Summer Program for Economically. Disa,dvantaged Youth 9. WHAT IS T_HE PROJECT SCHEDIJLE? . - ,� - _ . - NPP APPLICATION, Pa9e 3 . �. . � .�• � • pROJECT NAME Triangle P�rk ��'��Cl . 10. WILL THIS PROJECT B� COMPLE7ED IN 2 YRS. YES X NO . IF NOT, EXPLAIN HOW IT WILL BECOME SELF-SUSTAININ6 WITHOUT FURTHER NPP FUNDING? � ; . . . . . , , . 11 . WILL TNIS PROJECT RESULT IN INCREASED�MAINTENANCE AND OPERATENY PAYTFOR THOSE COSTS. '. YES NO X . IF YES, EXPIAIN HOW THE PROJECT WILL PRIVAT L i 12. HO�i WILL THE PROJECT BEf�EFIT LOW AND MODERATE INCOME HOUSEHOLDS? The improvement of this park will idinenthecchildren�of thesend useholds b rov g me ho Y P moderate inco P There are households with some greea s ace �cn which to play. several of these such households ia th.e neighborhood of this � park, for example in the apartments on Grand between Dale St. aad Grotto, and oa Lincoln between Dale �and Grotto. 13. H01� WILL NEIGNBORii00D CITIZEN PARTICIPATIOH BE FOSTERED DURING PROJECT DEVELOPMENT At1D IMPLEMENTA7ION? � _ The nefghbors of this� park have already voiced tlieir willingaess to participate in the implementation of this project . They also are wil2ing to maintain the watering aeeds of this project in the future. , _ • � _ _ .. .. . . . .. 14. COMPLETE PROGRAM FUNDING AN� EXPENSE FORMS PAGES S. ANP 7. 15. ATTACN LE7TERS OF SUPPORT FROM ALL INTERESTED AND AFFECTED GROU�SiOR JRfAt�IZATIQNS. Sally M. Briggs Board Member June 1 , 1983 G A7 RE (AF ND DUAL _ YPED NAME T TLE R ROIE DA + � COMPLETING APPLfC�TION � - G UR 0 C EF FFIC R . YPED NAME �I LE 0 Ol DAT OR PRESIDENT . � . - . . � .. • � � z. NPP APPLICATION, Page 4 . . PROJECT NAME Triangle Park _ NEIGHBORH000 CONTRIBUTIONS DECLARATION . 1 . ESTIMATED COMMERCIAL �PROPERTY FIXED CAPITAL � � . . . � . IMPROVEMENTS; � � . �. � - � . . - NUNRER OF PARTICI.PANTS �� - � . AVERAGE INYESTMENT ' , . � ' . � � � ' TOTAL INYESTMENT EQUALS � � S � . � . 2_ ESTIMATED RESIDENTIAL PROPERTY FIXED CAPITAL � , . . �I IMPROVEMENTS: � - NUMBER OF PARTICIPANTS � AVERAGE INYESTMENT $ . . � � TOTAL INVESTMENT EQUALS S 3, NE1� COMMERCIAL DEVELOPMENT: SI1'E (a) . . ESTIN,ATED MARKET YALUE � SITE (b) ESTIMATED MARKET VALUE . $ . TOTaL MARKET VALUE $ 4. NEW RESIDENTIAL DEVELOPMENT: SITE (a) � . . . ES7IMATED MARKET VALUE . $ SITE (b) � � ESTIMATED MARKET YALUE $ � � � � TOTAL MARKET VALUE S : 5. ESTIMATED IN-KIND-SERVICES (OFFICE SPACE, EQUIPMENT, SERVICES) : � .. SOURCE AND TYPE 1 . � - - . � . 2. ' . . � 3. $ 6. ESTIMATED YOLUNTEER LABOR: � � � - � � NUMBER OF VOLUNTEERS � . . � ' AYERAGE HOURS/VOLUN7EER ' � . � � � � TOTAL HOURS x $10/hr. EQUALS � I �� 7. ESTIMATEO SWEAT FQUITY: � . � � NUMBER OF PAR7ICIPANTS ' AYERAGE HOURS/PARTICIPANT ' TOTAL HOURS � � � � i TOTAL HOURS x $10/hr. EQUALS � - �� . NPP APPLICATION, Page 5 . . . � PROJECT NAME Triang2e Park ��,;�� 8. ESTIMATED CASH DONATIONS; � � � . . �Z � SOURCE 1 . Summit Hill Associstioa � � - � �� •• • s ' . 3. S , . ._ - 9. ANTICIPATED FOUNDATIQN GRANTS: � FOUNDATION(S� � •..._.. . .. . _. . _. . . _... � ' � � � 2. � , � ,, 10. OTHER: EXPLAIN �. � � - • ; � ESTIMATED VALUE . S TOTAL NEIGHBORHOOD � CONTRIBUTIONS DECLARATION $ 2 ,700 .00 �11 , WHAT EVIDENCE IS THERE THAT THE ASOVE DECLARATIONS ARE REALIS7IC? � . . . . . i • • t • � i . . � �1 w . , � ' NPP APPLICATION, .Page 6 PROJECT NAME _ Triangle Park . � • ESTIMATED PROGRAM FUNDING* . ' ' SOURCE � � � AMOUNT 1 . NPP Fund ' . 5900.00 . C,.�.al, dov.a- io� I � o O � 2• Summit Hill Association� 3. . Vo I uti�Q.a,�r �—a L a•r � ' I SDO�a. , 4. . 5. 6. 7. 8. � 9. 10. � . 11 . ' . 12. � 13. 14, . 15. 16: . - - � � - • � 17. � 18. 19. • 2p, T07AL � 3 , 600 . 00 * INCLUDE NEIGFiBORH000 PARTNERStiIP FUND AND SPECIFIC CA7EGORIES OF NEIGHBORHOOD � CONTRIBUTIONS. � . . '��. � �- � ' � , . ��.� NPP APPLICATION, Paqe 7 � PROJECT NAME Triangle Park • - ESTIMATEQ PROGRAM EXPENSES PROGRAM�EXPENSES � . FUNO SLIURC�* � M10UNT 1. Sod, materia].s and labor �J�I� . �,:,. ,,.'� �-,i,i, `/,� ��ie�,,� $ �2 ,000. 00 . , � , , . 2, Benches and labor • " � � `� ,SQ0.00 3; Tzees �� • � �� 300. 00 4. Shrubs and Iabor � �� 800. 00 5. fi. 7. 8. 9. � 10. 11. - � 12. 13. - 14. 15. lh. . 17. . 18. . 19. Z�. .. TOTAL EXPENSES $ 3 . 600. 00 * INCLUDE NEIGHBORHOOD PARTNERSNIP FUND AND. NEIGHBORHOOD CONTRIBU�IONS. � ' . . . � RECEIVED J U N - f i98�� l�ei ghborhood Partner shi p Program U NL Dept. Planning & Economic Development Planning� Oistrict Code No. � ZS W. 4th Street Planner-in-Charge St. Paul, Minn. 55102 Technical Support (612)292-1577 Ot �e ,. � � � CD Non CD � � � � � NPP APPLICATION ' � • LEASE R�NT OR TYPE ., � . . : . PROJECT NAME Arts and Crafts Consi�nment Proiect - . t�ROUP OR O�GANIZATION SUBMI7TING REQUEST � ' NA�ME: St. Paul American Indian Center � � � � , . . -- ADDRESS: 506 Kennv Road � St Paul � ' � • " Minne:�ota ' S5101 ' STREET CITY STATE ZIP TELEP;�ONE: ��_�5�2 . . COt�TACT PERSON FOR THIS REQUEST: Lyla Jean Stacy , Chairperson � DAYTIME TELEPHONE: 776-8592 �• 1 . WF'�AT �S THE PROJECT PROPOSAL? . � � The. project proposal is to establish a Zadian Arts and Crafts store oa the Greater East Side of St. Paul and to promote , market , displ'ay , and distribute arts and crafts on .a.� consignment basis. See attached proposal for further explanation and .detail. . . . , . - 2. ` HOW MUCH P1P FUND MONEY IS .BEING REQUES7ED? 5 42 ,600 _ 3. WHAT IS THE TOTAL OECLARATION Oi NEI6HBORHOOD COi�T"rtIBtITIC�vS? $ 42 ,6G�c (Conplete Neighborhood Contributions Declaration Form, page 4) 4. WHAT PROBLQ�IS/HEEDS ARE BEING ADDRESSED�NW�I�ITIESCEETC,�VAILABLE TO DOCUMENT 7HE NEED, i .e., CENSUS DATA, DISTRICT Provide culturally based employment opportunities for the Ame��ca.: Indian populatioa in St. Paul as well promote soci.al and economic � . self sufficiency within the Indian Population. . . . � . , . . �?P APPLICATIUN, Page 2 � . PROJECT NAME a,-t� and Crafts Consi�nment Pro� . .� �. IF PROJECT ACTIVITIES ARE TARGETED TOWARD A SPECIFIC GEOGRAPHICAL AR�EA OR SITE, ATTACH A MAP SNOWING TNE �PROJECT BOUNDARIES. IF PROJECT ACTIYITIES ARE CONCENTRATED ON A SPECIFIC SUBJECT OR PROBLEM, EXPLAIN WHY THIS SUBJECT CONCENTRATION WAS CHOSEN. • A �tentative plan is to have a store established on Payne Avenue on the Greater East Side of. St. Paul. . _ . . , - �. WHAT IMPACT WILL THE PROJECT HAVE IN THE NEIGHBORHOOD? • The project will assist low and moderate income Indian individuals within-- the St. Paul Communitp and enable American Indians to move from d.ependence on social services in a realistic manner to increased social and economic self-suffi�ciency. '. '�INO WILL MANAGE THE PROJECT? WHAT EXPERIENCE DOES THE MAKAGING ENTITY HAVE IN TNIS TYPE OF PROJECT? � The St. Paul American Indian Center Board of Directors will assume the grantee function of the project and will .maintain both process �and product evaluations to access the efiectiveness the project ' s abi:lity to achieve the economic and social self-sufficiency goal. • � The Board of Directors will rely heavily on the Economic Planning and Devel- � opment Committee for assistance and recommendations. This Committee consists of a number of Entrepreneurs with the knowledge and experience. �. WILL THE PROPOSED PROJECT BE TIEO OR COORDINATED WITH ANY OTHER PROJECT OR PROGRAM (PUBLIC OR PRIVATE)? YES NO X . IF YES, IDENTIFY. !. WHAT IS THE PROJECT SCHEDULE? . The Project Schedule is to have the financial committments and con�racts , naterials , and store opened by January of 1984 �p APPLICATION, Page 3 � PROJECT NAME Arts and Crafts Consi�nment Projec � `��-�� ). WILL THIS PROJECT 6E COMPLETED IN 2 YRS, YES X NO . IF NOT, EXPLAIN HOW IT WILL BECOME SELF-SUSTAINING WITHOUT FURTHER NPP FUNDING? . . . � . � 1 . �lILL THIS PROJECT RESULT IN INCREASED �MAINTENANCE �AND OPERATING COSTS FOR THE CITY? YES NO �. IF YES, EXPLAIN HOW THE PROJECT WILL PRIVATELY PAY FOR 7HOSE COSTS. 2, NOW WILL THE PROJECT BENEFIT LOW AND MODERATE INCOME HOUSEHOLDS? Provide culturally skilled Indian individuals within the St. Paul Community with the opportunity to market their seemly worthless skills into a meaningf�.:' income for their f amily. 3. HOW WILL NEIGHSORHOOD CITIZEN PARTICIPATION BE FOSTERED DURING PROJECT DEVELOPMENT AND IMPLEMENTATION? . The St. Paul American Indian Center h�as always had good participation from to Indian Community yet �re have been unable to provide meaningful economic and social self-sufficiency projects and with the assistance provided by the East Side Business association through a person by the name of hsr. Bill Godwin, the St. Paul American Indian Center. has for the first time had members from the non-Indian community act,ively involved in the development of a project'. � • ;. rt . COMPLETE PROGRAM FUNDING AND EXPENSE FORMS PAGES 5 AN[� 7. , 5. AT7ACN LETTERS OF SUPPORT FROM ALL INTERES7ED AND AFFECTED GROUPS/OR ORGANIZATIONS. � Lvla Stacv Chair�e rson 5J31/83 �;ATUR OF NDIVIDU TYPED NANiE 7ITLE OR ROLE DATE CONPLETItG APPLICATIO Same as above S GN TURE OF C EF FFICER YPED NAME I LE 0 ROL DATE OR PRESIDENT � ' ' i • • P APPLICA7ION, Page 4 � PROJECT NAN!E Arts and Crafts Consignment Projec� - • a . NEIGHBORHOOD CONTRIBUTIONS DECLARATION . ESTIMATED COtdMERCIAL PROPERTY FIXED CAPITAL . IMPROVEMENTS; NUMBER OF PARTICIPANTS 15 - $ AVERAGE INVESTMENT , $ TOTAL INVESTMENT EQUALS . � $ ESTIMATED RESIDENTIAL PROPERTY FIXED CAPITAL , IMPROVEMEtJTS: NUMBER OF PARTICIPANTS � � . � AVERAGE INVESTMENT � . TOTAL I NVESTMENT EQUAl.S $ NEW COMMERCIAL DEVELOPMENT: SITE (a) ESTIM,ATED MARKET VALUE �S SITE (b) ESTIMATED MARKET VALUE $ TOTA� MARKET VALUE $ � , NEW RESIDENTIAL DEVELOPMENT: SITE (a) ESTIMATED MARKET VALUE � SITE (b) � ESTIMATED N'�ARKET VALUE � TOTAL MARKET VALUE $ _ . ESTIMATED IN-KIND-SERYICES (OFFICE SPACE, EQUIPMENT, SERVICES) ; SOURCE AND TYPE 1 . � � . 2. . g 3. � $ . ESTIMATED VOLU«TEER LABOR: � NUNBER OF VOLUNTEERS 15 AVERAGE HOURS/VOLUNTEER 10 TOTAL HOURS x S10/hr. EQUALS $ 1 , 500 . ESTIMATED SwEA7 EQUITY; . . . � NUMBER OF PARTICI PANTS SO AVERtiGE HOURS/PARTICIPJ4NT 40 � � TOTAL NOURS 400 . ' TOTAL HOURS x S10/hr. EQUALS $ 4 ,000 ttPP APPL�ICATION, Page 5 . PROJECT NAME Arts and Crafts Consignment � . ',��' -t � '�. 8. ESTIMATED CASH DONATIONS: : SOURCE 1 . �•y,�,.,,y.,P c ' _ S 1, 000 Z• IndividLals $ 2 ,000 3, � 9, ANTICIPATED FOUNDATION GRANTS: . - FOUIr'DATiON(s) 1 . Honeywell Foundation _ � 5 ,000 � . 2, ��;�� .. , 0. OTHER; EXPLAIN . . � � ESTIMATED VALUE � 42�,600 . TOTAL NEIGHBORH04D � CONTRIBUTIONS DECLARATION $ l . WHAT EVIDENCE IS THERE THAT THE ABOVE DECLARATIONS ARE REALIS7IC? S�e have approach a number � of foundations on this idea and want to �ait until the Neighborhood Partnership Program feels this might� be a wotth�hile project. Until we have some kind of committment it is very h ard to get a further committment from other sources. � ' � NPP APPLICATION, Page� 6 PROJECT NAME _ Arts and Crafts Consignment � � ESTIMATED PROGRAM FUNDING* , � SOURCE $ AMOUNT 1 . St. Paul Foundation Z. Honevwell Foundation 3• r�ckieht Foundation ' 4. GPneral J�4ills Foundation 5• ('ommunitv Suoportt . 42 ,600 6. 7. . .8. - 9.. 10, 11 . ' 12. 13. 14. 15. � 16. - 17. � 18. 19. 20. TOTAL � 85 , 200 * INCLUDE NEIGHBOt�H00G �ARii�1ERShIP FUND AND SPECIFIC CATEGORIES OF NEIGHBORHOOD CONTRI BlJT IONS. • � . . NPP APPLICATION, Paqe 7 PRC►JECT NAu�1E A,-ts and Crafts Consi�nment . . '�;��"17�{[' . . . � r��...< J �• T k� ESTIMATEQ PROGRAM EXPENSES , . PROGRAM EXPENSES , FUND SOURCE* $ AMOUNT �• �PP atta�hPrl prnn��a? � . � . . 2. • . 3. � 4. . 5. 6. 7. 8. 9. 10. • 11 . 12. 13. 14. 15. � � 1F. - 17. 18. 19. 20. TOTP.L EXPEMSES � 85 200 *� iNCLUt�E P+EiGH60R�i�'JD P�RT^lERSHIP FUND AP�D NEIGNBORHQCID CnNTRIBUyIONS. � ARTS A�D CRAFTS CO�SIGNh�NT PROJECT . . , � ' � , ��F7�, � � ;'� � ABSTRACT , Chief Dan Geor�;e , a mernber of the Co-Salish Tribe � was born on the Burrard Reserve in vorth Cancouver � British Columbia in 1899. In 1974, he and He2mut Hirschall published a book entitled ''1►fi' Heart Soars" . _ The following is a statement from that publication : , � "oh � Great Spi.rit. f:ive me back the coura�e of � the olden Chiefs. Let me wrestle �•ith m�� sur- roundin�s. Let me once a�ain �' li��e in harmonS• with my environment. Let me humbly accept this ne�i culture and throuPh it rise un and �;o on. Like the thunderbirc? of old, I shall rise ae;ain out oF the sea; I shall grab the instruMents of the �rhite man ' s success----his education', his skills. t�'ith these new tools I shall build mr race into the proudest segment of vour societr. I shall see our ��oun� bra��es and our chiefs sit- tina in the houses of lav�• and Fovernment , rulin� and bein� rulec� b�� the knou�led�e and freedoms of our areat land. " The following application submitted bv the St. paul �merican Indian Center n-i11 1�2'O�-ide an exemplary culturall�� sensitice, economic and and social self-sufficiency nro�ram for the St. Paul Indian Community. The effective implementation of the project ' s proposed outcome ob- jectives will contribute to the emploS-ment , sociological and ps��cho- Iogical capabilities to enable members of the St. Paul American Indian Community to progressi��ely mo��e towards economic and social self-suf- ficiencv. CO`��':IT�'�NT: The St . Paul A^�erican Indian Center has accessed direct — intertiention and pre�•ention services to me�r��ers of the St. Paul American Indian Communitv since it ' s inception in 1970. Durin� this period, it has bui �t itself as a provider of services to the col- - lective Indian community. The enclosed application and proposal will provide an opportunit�• for the St . Paul American Indian Center to extend it' s nre�enti�•e and self- sufficiency strate�ies to enable members of the St. T'aul Ameri.can Indian Communit�� to pro�ressirel� r�ove to�t�ard economic and s�cial self-suffic- , ienc�°. . ' . • , ST. PAUL ArSERICAN INDIAN COri'�1UNIT�' NEEAS � At the request of the 19£i0 Minnesota Legislature � the State Planning Agency reviev��ed state and federal programs designed to meet the needs of l�4innesota Indians. Their report presents the follov�in� picture of the state' s 40 ,000 Indians: 57ti of the state' s Indians live in the ?,setropolitan area Over half of �tinnesota Indians are under aQe 18, as opposed to 31U in the �eneral population Indians are poorer than the general population --medium incomes �cere 4�° less than the state median income in 1970 40`� of Indian youth comnlete hi�h school as compared to gpa, of all non-Indian students L'nemnlc�ment rates for Indians are estimated from 40� t o 80 z Ct;emical dependency is considered the single most serious health problem of Indians, estimates are that 40� of Indian� hare serious alcohol problems , as opposed to 8. �� of the �eneral population SPECIFIC ST. P�tZ a'�iEP,IC3\ I�DIA'� STATISTICS . The 1980 Census Fi�ures indicate that there are : � 2 , 538 Indians residing in the �t, Paul ?�ietropolitan area 332 are under the a�e of 5 868 are between the ages of 5 and 17 1, 381 are betueen a�es of 18 and 64 99 are over the a�e of 65 It is anticipated that the C�nemplo�-ment Rate for , Heads of Households is over 7�°� C�'�aL� A\'n OBJE('TI\�S The St . naul Amer�ican Indian Center' s current �oal is to pl-omot.e the prci�rPSSive economic and self-sufficienc� of 2 , 538 .�merican Inc?ians rPSi di n�* �rithi n thei r servi ce area. The immedi ate �*oal of the St. Paul � American Indian Center, is to create and implement effecti�•e local social ' and ec��nomic d�vel�pment strate�;ies. . . . : . �� . � .,r �'�� The outcome of those strate�ies would sustain the social and economic improrements for Arnerican Indians by achievinq a balanced approach to social and economic development throu�h locally planned� implemented ' and eraluated stragies. The final impact will enable American Indians to move from. dependence on social services in a realistic manner to increased economic self-sufficiency. . The proposed program design will utilize a "Gommunity Participation ' Approach !liodel" � in planning and developing the social and economic development strategies. , ARTS AND CRAFTS C0ITSIGN�IE\T ECONOrlIC DE4�.LOPhiEVT PP.OJECT The arts and crafts consignment economic development project was an idea by the St. Paul American In dian Center IIoard of Director' s . The rationale and idea of the pro,;ect is to effecti�ely strategize a cul- turall�� based economic development �roject that u�ould be receptive by the Indian communit,y as well as providing products that ��ould be profit- able. - The business desi�n of this pro,ject ��ill work on a consi�-nment Uasis b� contractin� with American Irdian Individuals to provide American Indian Arts and Crafts that will be marketed by the Arts and Cra.f.ts Consi?ament Business. HOj4 ':4'ILL THF. PRODUCTS BE :��iARKETED? The project will lease a Uuildin� on, the Greater. East Side o� St. Paul c�bich uill be the location for display and distribution of the products. The project will also put to�ether a catalo� of products and prices that will be marketed locally and nationally to �maximize the potential of sales for the project . PRODt�CTS TO BE 11ARKETED All the products that will be marketed �Till be on a consignment basis. These products u�ill be produced bt� the American Indians in the St. Paul Corunu:�ity. These products ��ill be : Hair pieces Indian Costumes • Ci�arette li�hter cases Indian T-shirts �+occasins 3eaded leather purses Feather «�ork - � ni pestone «�ork ' Indian paintin�-s • Beaded Belts � . . . ' Beaded Z!edallions Tepees , Calen dars Post Cards Greeting Cards Watch Bands� � � � Wild Rice � Clocks� . �HE "t9RKET One o.f the lost traditions of the Indian people has been the makin� of Indian arts and crafts. �`any inquiries are made re�ardinc� �rhere csne could purchase �ndian arts and crafts. The only business in St . Daul has bPen Blue �!'aters Inc. located in the Sk�way Auildinv. ?ti'ith the presur;�ably hi�h overhead for rent , sunplies , materials , and wages thec have been able to afford this location for three �-ears and �tith consi�n- � ments , lo�ver overhead for rent and maintenance it is our feeling ae can corner the mar.ket �c=ith si�nificantiv lo«�er prices and the promotion of the . consi�nment social self-sufficienc.y oroject . Our market will be tourists , Urban and Rural Indians, . SL'?��i�,RY OF FINANCIAL NEEDS Opening E�penses : Rent �dvance � 500 Openin� Advertising 650 1►si s ce 1 I an eotis 300 Total 51 ,450 Operating Expenses : ?�tonth ly Yearl,y Rent $ 500 $ 6 ,000 Sal ar��(He lp) 20 ,00� Ad�ertisin� 4 ,�00 �`iscel�ane�us __5 , 000 Total �35 ,000 Fixture Account : Shelvin� S 1 , 200 Fittin� Chairs & Stools 600 Floor Caverinr; • � 1 �200 . . Li�hts 300 �1'ir.dow Fixtures 20200 Outsi de si�n 500 ' Ca�h Re�ister 800 � . Ai r C��nditic�ner 1 � 750 t'r�c•��l 1 un.c��u� 600 '!'c�t :�] • (i l�i() �� , � r��.I � �J�-. Total need for one year of operation is $42 ,600 and for a t�ro year 585 , 200 AiANAGEI!'[EN'T TEAbi The St. Paul American Indian Center Board of Directors will assume the . grantee function of the project and will maintain both process and product eraluations to access the effectiveness the project' � ability to achiece the econor�ic and social self-sufficiency �oal. The 3oard of DirPCtors will rely heavily on the Economic �lanning and Development Corunittee for assistance and recommendations. See attachments for list of inembers. � FINANCIAL PLA'J The St. T'aul 4merican Indian �enter has beeun the process of contactin� . the East Side ?3usinessmens �ssociation as well as Foundations and private donors to �enerate support and interest in this ver� unique business venture. CO?�t�it'NITv I�tPACT This project uill assist low and moderate income individuals within the St. Paul Indian Comr.:unit5 and enable American Indians to Mo��e from . dependence on social serrices in a realistic manner to increased social and economic self-sufficiencS•. � - � St. Paui American indian Center �� _�` 1001 PAYNE AVENUE . ,�' - ST. PAUL, MINNESOTA 55101 - - : ' 612/776•8592 � - ;;e��y ��._��r �� . ��; . ' � : � F30ARD OF DIRECTORS � . � t � 'is . Jean Stacy , Chairperson r � 314 Concord .. ;�; .St . Paul , :�N 55107 y' �, �: + � '�ir. Donald Black!?a�vk, Vice-Chairperson 1762 Rainey St . Paul � h�T 55106 :�ir. Harris Kuerth , Treasurer � Adm�n�stntive5ervices 23 Sth Ave. CMtr�l A�m�n�itr�t�On F KCaI o�,:o�� Landfall Terrace n�,��9 a�,�,� Q��.i,o�s St . Paul , :viN 55119 Fesourt� Derelocm�nt — Employmant and Tra��i�y �oo o�ace�.+�nc 6 Reterral �1(S . Vorma �iaider , Secretary Omine-�uo Trsm�nq 624 James Ave. Altohol� �eug Abus�ProyraT St . Paul �5:1 55102 intormst�on 6 Re�errsl ' f Counse��nq On�•to•one.tamily AA,AlanOn � Court AOvoucY • aelerrsls � Altarnatiwef to inc��CSratiOn � 1�Sr. Jerry Cobenais , Parlament ari an Chemicsi Dependency Program 16 35 Sherburn Eaucahon 6, Prevenuon Vouth O�vers�on . � � � St . Paul � h� 55103� , . . Human S�rvices Pro9ram wdiare aa�ocacy . Healtn EOutal�on Referral . InC��n Ch�ltl FOiter Ca�e AOvocacy � � �m�,9�,,.r Fooa s��ie :�'�I'. Floyd Jourdain FooO 6 Nutnt�on ��o.m��o� 2419 Bloomin�ton Ave. S . r+ouse i ADSrtme��t Rete�ral �^'°�m°t'°^ °^ "°'"`o'""°'s"`° :�iinneapolis , !�N 55408 Legal Senrices Drpartmtnt Cwd Gses °Smok�Si9nals"N�wslett�. �Ir. Berry Friesen 2318 ?8th Ave . S. "!!inneapol is , P,iN 55406 ?4s . Joy 8uck Route �3 �3ox 70 North Branch , b?�1 55056 ,�, , � �� A VmtcO W�Y Aqency . - � St. Paul American Indian Center , `��'��'�� 1001 PAYNE AVENUE �:s ST. PAUL, MINNESOTA 55101 `-� 612/776•8592 �=�-i . ��-.�M F � �^,•�^ �� • � Economic Planning and Development Committee � . . : ,� bir. Bill Godwin, Business Owner Payne Avenue Our Own Hardware r ' St . Paul , Minnesota� 55101 � -� Y Councilman Chris '�icosia �- • Office of the City Council City Hall and Court . House St . Paul , !�iinnesota 55102 State Senator Eu�ene T. ,Yaldorf , State of i.iinnesota Building 42-6E-02 PO Box 33331 a°'"'^'s""'"`5"�"� St . Paul , h4i nn es ot a 55133 Centr�� ACm�n�itral�on F�SUI al�SOnnC� � {fl�nnln o„o„� a�„�.o�s ;•is . Barbara Raygor , Director iiesourc�Developmenl �linnesota Chippewa Tri e :rr�ploYment snd Tnininy �� Piatement s Re�e..ai Small B11S1A@SS Administration On•me-�oo Tr��n�nq . 3045 Park Avenue Alcoho160R+qAbuuProgram hiinneapolis Minnesota 55407 InlDrmaUOn L Rt1etN1 � Counse��ng O��•to•one,tami�y AA,AlsnOn • Court ACvocaCY *tr. Leon Cook, Pres ident ��..�s Atternatrvtsto��•«*•��o� Corporation for Indian Development Chemicsl Dependancy Prognm 511 llth Avenue S011ttl Ea�caUOn 3 Provention ��^ o��«s��^ Suite 254 H�m��s�ry��P►°9��^' ' b�iinneapolis , !�iinnesot a 55415 : we�fare AGvaucy . . HGJIIh EGUC�t�Of1 RGfl��71 �nO�an Ch��O Foster c,fe �'��Y Ms , Elizabeth Hallmark, Fxecutive Director EmerqenCy FooG S�e�l FooO 6 Nutr�t�on IMO�mat�on Ha�s� a �o,,,m�„� Q�,�,,,, Hinneapolis� American Indian enter �^�°�m��,°^°^ "°'"° o'"""'",° 1530 East Frankl in Avenue Lega1 Senices Dsps►tment �inneapol is , 1liinnesot a 55404 Uv��Casef "Smok�Siynats'Newsl�tt�r 1ir . Rodney Brown , Account Executive Control Data Business Centers , Inc . 5241 Viking Drive Bloomington� Minnesota 55435 �1s . Jean St acy , Chairperson St . Paul , American Indian Center 1001 Payne Avenue St . Paul, !Kinnesota 55101 ' ?�ir. Berry Friesen, Board I!�ember and Attorney Southern hiinnesota Regional Legal Services � St . Paul , 1!4innesot a 55101 � - . Q� A Un�teO waY ApentY GCC.�uVtat�: t'10.►�i�iaaFj �....�. .... ..�...r........ ...... ..-- --- -- ' • . . `dr. Joseph Remey , Vice-President Australia-Asia-Canada, 3�� Company ' 3M Center , PO Box 33800 St. Paul , �4innesQt a 55133 Mr. Lee Ruiz, Regional �Ietro Administrator of Community Representatives bietro Customer I�ianagement . Northern States Power Compan� ' 421 �Yabasha Street , Third Floor, Executive Office St . Paul, Minnesota 55102 � �ir. Thomas Lively, Instructor and Business Owner Route 3, �ox 79H North Branch , Minnesota 55056 Uncommitted �iembers : Senator Dave Durenburger 's Office 100 "lorth Sixth Street ;tiinneapolis, Minnesota Congressman Bruce Vento 's Office 405 Sibley Street � � St . Paul , Minnesota 55101 Robert Cocker , Personnel Representative Dayton Hudson Corporation 777 Nicollet Avenue lsinneapolis, Minnesota 55402 Robert J. Orth, Ramsey County Commissioner � Ro.om 316 , Courthouse St . Paul , hiinnesota 55102 Diane Ahrens_, Ramsey County Comr.�issioner Room 316, Courthouse St . Paul , ;►tinnesot a 55102 hir. Harry 1icNeely , President Industry Finance Corporation 444 Lafayette Road St . Paul , b4innesot a 55101 bir. A1 Emery , Director Planning and Economic Development , City of St . Paul City Hall Annex � 25 West Fourth Street St . Paul , A�innesota 55102 , . oy ��°3 ��^S3��x�° �� > � o . N i.' n�Z'~ e� 3.-.c� ' ?� --n � � �.� � O � . P A ?S�-� • r •d�C� �<3 �N '� �� o�� a ... • � C, v,�� O.. .~-� �� 0� 1I Oi �On � �M � 3`� D6��,� m a � A �y . � . ..� � �_�� ,�a��. '� fi �� .. � � � � � � -, n ^ -� g �, •.�c•�-e�isl ' n ^ � > . � ' � � �.oavo � � 9 � d ��aa�� '�. � ��4 �;�� .. �J�� i't. A�rj. � •.� _ � _ . . �' � M�� A � ii+ O . 7 �`t �t �p � A '�? � �93 �f . �i �� 7�'� . .O � . . � a,� ��, �9 Ci "�' p• �5��• �� •� • G �0.� ,3 � � � •� . .3,o.�.��v_� �� ' 3 �'.�, a a+.� o�' . o�^.�-a�,,r•a�� o'.�'°�� c 5� �� •"¢ � '*�' � :. . • . --c ., � ,d 3_ � .. 8�^,, s g �� a , ::�^�'� r��3 �n`a ` n .:�.� oa �p,—�Y . . � :t'�.�� m�'^'o^��A fa ,,,tiaa �.�S•� ��,• � ' •. . -��b��' �� A ��•� S�� p � � . k, �'�sgPl��^.��•�.'. •�� 0 ' w6:'y ' � �� 8'as� ��► �� •' � �-� " �S� �• °3—'�v� s�. ^a ,. -;. � :i_:"' •,. °~ '�"��- •"�: -' . .� � .�1. -�1:L. �� q." . . - -°a `i.,r'� >�; ` � d� w �.� � �+_ �s �=3•. �!. • . • q f 3 =�'��r-o'� .-�� :3.n•Q �-•.3�.'s�j er � �.�•. '� r` . ai-ts .rj 't* ^d:5'�o.�i `�:�" �7 �';�`�n. . �� . ti .-� ..C � es .i s� 0. C] �. . � •:P A ¢'q A'�� V�•• 'T " � ,,� f7�?I �t � , � , e* �. �,�� fi , i.�t 3.�a. . ' • .��.� �.��r'..�y':A'�,��r�. ��..°�.'�'� � �•'. .��.'t., i''.. . ..� o � - � �e.,�,�*.', � �.� . . :i �r7�:�.��1f}. ��y''w.@ ',� �y Cnr�� . �_ • • ' ��q � .:�p y�Q�_. '°, Ay �A.G� a: � . • ' ;; " f 3 �� cn p �, �.. . '� '� ~ �.�•C w IIS. �•i�. .CJ 7' �� . .��`.��..��• ��.�'6i ,��.. .. O �. '_ . 'r:�_ ..�. <�''..� `�iA-�.:. �I� ,.,� �. � �y Y• m . {'� eT�e�s�.3;- r�t � e.7 w:" .Q.y �i'eZ. �'�} Rt � �;.�:i."T�.�GS�'•:-:J•..!`..lj�nt � ,.':J':��'•:)'�', � ' • ' `f a . . � T r ', ,,' •` "'�,- 't' • . � . !ri'N '. ��v�� . #��9��•��• �•�� : � � .��6��'��.�o' �.��:�5 c � �3 � v+ `.'di.e� � ��'` � ��;�y �,�. '� �± �'.,,.,iy�n �C. ��!! � �'��.��S �.r � �.��a� ! if � . �.�*��" �'1.,� i<,� L� � =f• 27 � ��A $�•�'�'A �Oi�� bi7:•� �_. a==w�r �-� �.� .��..;, `� , v.;..�.•.d,,.•►- .rz'� �.'°-�•? :: � . - •a•. ��.qa' .� �- ., ° s.��' • � �, �G•�ts p°�:' � ,�f ��[.?;'. A�o�E � � c3 Q,� � • � '� O _ , . S� .�T •� O.7 0 °� �� A.�� ' . . .�.w��M.../��` ��"`, � . .�� w � �, � . S� 3 :"!: :. � a` ''. _.�� `�'�^g'��:•�e.�� -�a�� i.�0. 'i� p a.4 �: . �'4. l;..�, ,. . .�� . '" `' � . . �..�:�a`:��i.'::..-,i-.• i:.:,:� •.. �•�- ;�' �'�y'� • � . . . : � � g,�.��.a s�'9a�' 0,3�,��..C, '� �r �+ � 0. � � � ?f� �.,�,- �.y e9't7 D O v � � �• . � � ��6$��^� �� A� � � � � � � � " •�,g�� '"�' � ��" � 3 � � : � . , . . • , . F'��Q � -'� C1,�•A C' i�' � � �'��,�.'�� ,w Q .. � � �� s��^�...�:�'� � g�:� � �� a� �� .� g `•s 2� a� � �. ' ! �,�t►•••�'; ��n� � � Ct,�,� �� .+ ' �a . ' . { `i.�':°. � � � �,,,y �� '� � . r.�� R O � .�!'!��G.....'�,;,:A �A �S� :�� • � ' . . � . ? • . • �� . . _`�r+►t �� '.��$��.5 � �� S d � ' °i e � ? p' A.O. �� 1V a. � � . . , � ��.�- �oo �� a C� .�'a �..�*� ��r+ � �,'�' � � Ea n ' '�� .��a �;��'S � � �7 � s > ��e o �o ' ^,��.�r� ��.� o � �.g7�"gi..�� r�."a • •�• �S�p�' � o~g' ~O� S� �a � !� 7�7 , , • �^ _ - ��w <� �• � � �j es�i� � �• � � . ac'.: g P � � a • �e o � ^'° � �^ o�a �i s � r"' - q � A �� e� �b� O t0 . " . G' ?.�'� � -ASs� �^_�' °-• "e'� e� ��0 i • ` � 1 < � �7 G � M�G� O �� 1 N "'ii ff N ../��y�C1� 9i 7 O ca.�1 �� t R ✓ � ' . � `��.�'�� . � � � � � N � th C O O O O O d Cp •r O tt) O O t1') t.[) �n C � I .�- 1 I I 1 ^ � I 1 1 � 1 � �- csj N � U I � - �t �D �- r-' a..� \ ti � c`7 N t,�4 b4 � � ' � I' � � r _ � � � � � � � � � •r ['�) 0 � � � � � � � � � { � � � � � 0 . � � � U � N p � � � � � O � � N � lfl lD 11') � � � � " i� N . C -i� '- � N � E O � i0 Q.U bq N O 00 N 0 r � d d N � L O � M N � O O �1 �f M O� t� �' O > �6 �� p t.c') �t ct � � �t � c+') e� M N CV Z C. O � z d' Cn r .- O O O O O O O O O O O O �- rt CO O � O � � ►n O O t0 q O O r-- � t� tt t� O �t n N O � .- �D I� �O O � H N � �1--� N � 1.l� r- 00 r cf 00 tfl �D M N N �.(') -a rtS ...L' I.S� l+) I� 00 N lU 1� �- r M '- �'i' M � > U CO �t CO M N e-- r- N > � •r .F� � , � C'7 O r- i � i U d � � �' n. nc � ¢ � � O O � a..� L] O r N �--� 1 � I 1 1 I 1� O 1 I ! � I ►n O •rr- U � � . ' . f� Q (,� Ol Gi' �O � � O � y M N n � �r- "0 6�F 4"9' � O C..) N +� l0 f� p � O �A , A � � •'.�.,� p � � . •rr L. � `� � O O O O O O O O t� O r� J J rd � O O O O O 1� O N f� O l0 ¢ . �-Q-- �d [J O � O O O O� O M ta � i.l� 1--- Q d� U ln O t.f) O � O I I lA � f'7 ' N N � 1--- f� l� N ►.C) la 0� r � l� r- d' Ql e--- '- N � Ol � � � N O � O U � •r +> CO f� I� M l� r-- d 00 t.[) 00 I� l0 lf> t1') i t/� y� r- � v- .-- •-- •-- N O'a •r- tR 4- C p � N 4-- +� '� U Ca C CrS -p d � «--� �C� O � 'O D U 4-� � r S.. ?� C� t .a "� i.. �C O ' d V r-r CD O 'O E O cJ C � � +� r0 t -F� -V p� -r t O U L 5- � � O d > •rD 4- 'n O .� C E � � Z d N Q O i 'a ..� � C OO O z L a L oD O OD C O 00+� 'L7 d R +� •r i •� •r ll� C � �f N CL 9 U N Q. r- OD N '�O 64 •r N � r .� •r � N Z O N •r >s C C +-� 5` O r- �' L r •r7 � O � � N r U I..L •r C/') t O r- N � O C �O U -1-� N i� S.. U S- O i 3 i L 7 � d (' ..0 C Q � U d-� N m � O OD � U O O Y N CL pp 1n r � Q � •r � C .Y C i O O U = � �- +� n- Q �O ¢ � X L '� O U i-� d -F� Ca i. O � O �O �F Z U ?�'r rp . •r � O U O L e- C d LL r- C r O a. �0 .� +� � z +� LL.. S� r- r0 41 • •r O O t S� d C � N\ C d . +� Cfl a. +> E O'-� G1 S •r O L N U � � � � +� LL 3 C d0 U Gl U '0 +� s O r- .L� GJ '� � U rC 7 O r6 N C ?� � •r > N rt3 •r ?> C U � OD u� �0 � •r � C�J i � . +� � � •r 00 �O S.. O •r O Vf d N N t C �- C t/) V O �6 OA d •r N S- 3 +� L r S.. i-> N 7 QO �O N �r- � N � O L N O � V) � � "d N �. � d N E � �D •r •r -F� h1 1.L � � � r i O � O C •r •r � r6 a �0 �O i QJ N L L � � d Q U L� �i � = W � � '-r S Q W � d. � Z � Q . Q n� Q r- N M �t � l� t0 00 O� O r- N M r- r r � an •� � a� +� � � a� > o o° N o +'�-� +� � o c ? J a 4a O ` ° '� +�-�'� • ��-+ �� v�i 0 f1� � 4-+ Q ° u — m +-� � b4'd 'Zi �-�I � W Q V v s °a °u c cd � f� •r-I � N p o o u = tl N Cd�+-��.s�', � 3 Q a z U 3 a 3 � � N 'i'' �"' � y �`(� �.� � � � U �o �� W Q a ��R!! ., � J � J� LL 6 � O � ¢1� V �-1 � � w °�' U v�i c°� cn4�-+ 4° � Q�.. ¢, N � •�-1�I-1 N f � � r c � � �� ,.� � � 0 � o a � � �, u � '� 9. � d N •�U-I � O Z �U � E � E � — � � � '� � 7.U 3 � 9. � � a � m '� c � � tl in ~ � N � � �' �-+ � � Q a ). � E m � � n ~ � U � v v a � a � � � � o � U cd � cd •� +�-� r-I °' p c c o -o v .- � ,n °' o r� � +-� .F-� Cd • > � � 1 N 3 3 0 0 > > �rn '9 � e '" P-'� � r�-I d .,� N � p � N Q n o a �. �°, �°. �a 3 a, o .�-�' W N N,� t�/� �•br-10� o � � m u ° o 0 0 0 „ m o o C i .1-� .� N •,� �.+� o � �"') H � a n. � � lL Ii Q Q F- Z � .r� �1-� i--i S-� U O � � o � � � �� f .: . �. ' .,,ti3 ,, ,. `r= ` -b,E:�. CITY OF SAINT Y�AUL �. �: =��1.:._�' OFFICT� OF �.`AI� CITY COIINCIL •s�r�ae. �.�. � . 7Y�)saaY��fnr � �'}, 17�-7ald�^,Y�� ,�°�: ' - `" D a t e ; Ju1y 28, 1983 ..� ��,: '-��}. _.�. .��Q.�_ CO (�iiM (TTE � RE PORT TO = Sq�nt Paul Ci�y Councit F R � � � C o rn tn i�t e e O h CITY DEVF.LOPMENT AND TRANSPORTATION C 1�A l R Councilman Bob Fletcher • Resolution approving funding and budgets for Neighborhood Partnership Program. . At its meeting of July 26, 1983, the City Development Committee recorrnnended approval of resolution for Neighborhood Partnership Program. • _ � . CITY HALL SEVENTH FLOOR SAINT PAUL, MINNESOTA SS102 ��, ��,��,� . � � �� , �, � ��°°�^��, ' CITY OF SAINT PAUL _R.`C�T7 pD:�i�'i ;� ,-, OFFICE OF THE CITY CLERK ;a u�om �y %; _" �� ° ,�� ALBERT B. OLSON, CITY CLERK ,,. _ RECEIVED 386 City Hall,Saint Paul,Minnesota 55102 1��0'�nim��a��co�\`c GEORGE LATIMER 612-298-4231 MAYOR kJUL 2 7 �83 COUNCILMAN ROBERT FLETCHER July 26, 1983 Councilman Robert Fletcher Chairman City Development & Transportation Committee Room 722 - City Hall Dear Councilman Fletcher: The City Council today referred to the City Development and Transportation Committee for consideration and recommendation a letter of the Mayor transmitting the Neighborhood Partnership Program funding recommendations. Very truly yours, ' .�""`�.. Albert B. Olson City Clerk ABO:drm cc: Planning Staff O .. ,��Q �� . � ,,,��i,��;'��'1rf NEIGHBORHOOD PARTNERSHIP PROGRAM � •� WHEREAS, on February 24, 1983 the St. Paul City Council approved the Neighborhood Partnership Program (NPP) (Council file No. 270-893); and WHEREAS, the purpose of the NPP is to improve the economic, physical , and environmental conditions in St. Paul 's neighborhoods by allowing neighborhood residents, businesses, and property owners to define needs and develop neighbor- hood programs to meet their needs; and WHEREAS, the Department of Planning and Economic Development (PED) has received thirteen NPP applications for the first cycle of the NPP; and WHEREAS, PED, the Planning Commission, Capital Improvement Budget Committee, and the Mayor have evaluated the thirteen applications and forwarded their recorranendations to the City Council ; and WHEREAS, approval of projects at this point means the projects have five months to work with PED to develop detailed agreements about what each partner will do; and NOW, THEREFORE, BE IT RESOLVED, that the St. Paul City Council approves the funding priorities and budgets for eight projects as shown on attachment A (dated 7/25/83) ; and _ BE IT FURTHER RESOLVED,that in regard to the Resident Controlled Affordable Housing project if the St. Paul Public Housing Agency is unwilling to sell the seven structues for $70,000, it is the City Council 's intention to negotiate further for the purchase price; and BE IT FURTHER RESOLVED, that the St. Paul City Council wishes to extend its appreciation to all the applicants for their time and effort in developing proposals for the first cycle of the Neighborhood Partnership Program. � � � � W N -+ O �O OD 01 01 CI7 ? W N -' � � D �c D � -� z � 'v � m D = �-+ v 3 m x � C -n c'� D � � < � � �a ru -s a o� v a � J• J• � o m o � �c � � � � a cr J• J• Q. �0 3 H v � -v N a c� c N � o � -s o m c �. u� a oo < �n �+ -s � -s c* f � w �. m w a o �' � N � -r � S N fD fD N O -+• O 'S iv 00 �• d -+ c+ � � (D � �. d O+ R� QQ Q' n 3 �G �• W lD < �• �G �G 7 fD W O C Or A a lD Q' �--� O S c+ d n lD (� 00 7 E � c+ � fD d � C") fD 'S O -�• = fD �.O � C+ 'V W C"r � � \(n � � fD 'S � O O -+. (D W -� Z �1 c+ Z � c+ v- a v o � � � � -v� � � � o c� o � �• • o� D �•� � z -i, a o —� o -s vo �+ .� �-+ � o c..• � x a o+ o � �-r -s o. x c� o o -s � x- � � �• c n ru .--.N W � N 7r O O n d 00 O '0 W fD c+ f� d 'D 7 S L7 � c C 'S Z � 'Z O 'S C'� 'S c+ N c+ (n�• •• �'1 C� --� N 7 J. C7 W � O c tn -� O 3' c+ -h C O (O'+ (D n � O � t�. -� S .0 -� O � � � � ` "''' � O Z � � J' � � � �p J. �!► p. N 00 -� 'V lD /� G � fD �G m � CT� J. J. -s �. c+ a -v a �+-ao o � o0 0 00 -s v -s z 0 00 � c � o. -s o n m v z � � v- o c�. -n �. Qr v o � cu o. o oa co -+, w < � O N � 'S 'S C) O �" �- O �t c+ �' W c+ 'S Q � C� O � n- O 00 ►-+ n 'V O P+ � W � -S Q � 7" (7 C� O -� O p fi C7 .� t.�, (D O W C ►-+ fD fD �. G7� W •• n �- •• cF -�N ' c v � '-h EA -'' d O N _a � �. � � ._. tn N 'S CJ1 CT1 Ol V 00 CJ1 00 �A -+ W W V V 00 c'* O � � O A O c+ O N �!► c+ lp � N ..� _.+ . �O A � 01 - --� 00 01 C7'1 N Ol V � O N N ' W Cl� Cl7 ' ' O CJl O CT� O CTt � Z� O � C7�O� � W O 00 O O O --+ O W �� --i D � O V N O V O O O O O � �-� � 1-- V O V O O O O O O O O r m �c-� .. -s _,, . -� c o c+ .. . lD �G ", 6Rs O N O V pl t+ N� Cn 1� lD W O O b�► �!► d �C ---' V N W Uf � O -� � 01 � �O f'f O V � In ��. o tJi 1 �D 1 I 1 O v I I I 1 to I � H -' tl� o O cn O W c* O O O O O �� t� t�A 3 � �O W O� � ct �. N < N -� � N W 00 i� O� n < � W -P � W -+ -� V fT N OD �J W CT� � � d CT N IV W 01 O� 00 A � O� -' CI� -+ N e+ . . � . . • [p '-"� O a1 V � -+ CT� O N �J ? O �! �P V � � O O 00 C� O O CT� J� CT� O C,7'i O OD a --�O O O O O O O O O O O O � - � N � � � ? fD � Z IV N W W W � ? �A � p i� cJ7 O y � � Or < O .'V V cD W � tC O O -+ N W Cs� O Z uf (D � � � � (p �p N OQ O t/i � V p 3 � O N cD ---' c+ � N cfi ! C)'1 �r► d► !!'► �19 C1 �1 N � � O �„� -+ � a► �! O N tn o v, cr� o 0 o v o0 0 i o° o°OO � � � � � � � °o o° °o °o °o � �• o 00 0 0 0 0 0 < � � # � 3 ,6,4 ir4 y► � �1 a V V N W � � e+ _, � O► A �D I.-�. 7 tT� S � � 1 � I 1 1 0 � I i I 1 � � W a \ •' cJ� CJ� O O � O 3 W O O O O O O fR N � • � 01 �r � �• 1e,^.r�.e � � • ° _i. � ��i+�t'�s � • .� . c�, , , . w iTT r ' �}�¢'`e'�,c CITY OI�' ►,rA.IN7.' P.AUL ..�-�� 7D� ' ��. � *� OFFICE OF THE MAYOR �� o a r b, .��l;tiiiq f � �ittl :,)Iji; �i� [ • �E \ �47 CiTY HALL � �� SAINT PAUL� MINI�ESOTA 55102 GF.ORGE LATI�iER (612) 298-4323 TfAYOR ' �:ugust 1, 1983 � � h� � . Council President Victor Tedesco & M+zmbers of the St. Paul City Council 7th Floor, City Nall . St. Paul , Plinnesota 55102 SUBJ�CT: Neighborhood Partnership Program-Resident Controlled Affordable Flousing (i_exington-Naml ine) Dear Councilman Tedesco: � Staff fi�om the Dept. of Planning & Economic Development have been meeting �dith representatives of the Lexington-Hamiine Community Council to further refin� the city's position regarding the Resident Controlled Affordable Housing proposal that is part of the i•l�ighborhood Partnership Program. In �. an effor� to clarify the city's commitmznt to the project so as to he1R the ne�ighborhood in their private fund raising effort, staff and the neighborhood have agreed and I would support the follo4�ing change in language as an amend- ment to th tter• ��.Y... .�.��e.a.,�.,�.�. � �-�,"City �vi71 make available ;70,000. of tVPP funds for the purchase of the seven structures from the Public Kousing A�ency. This amount is based on the assumption that HUD will waive both their repayment for. the houses as well as waiving the appraised value. If HUD does not waive these items then the entire remaining amount of Neighborhood Partnership Program funds available from-the first cycle ($48,450.) will be made availab7e to the project for the acquisition of the houses.// I would recommend the City Council approve this change in language and add it to the final resolution regarding the Neighborhood Partnership Program. If you have any questions, you can contact Jim Bellus. Sincerely, � � ; � eo le Latimer, i P�1a o r \ cc: Jim Qellus, PED � Ron Hick, Nan S�•�ift - Lexington-Hamline Community Council ��.c� .