Loading...
00-249ORIGII�AL Presented By Referred To �,�h�3\`S °a RESOLUTI SAINT , MIlVNESOTA Committee: WHEREAS, a fine of $500 was imposed against the li d/b/a Food-N-Fuel (License ID # 17138) by Council File 00-3� WHEREAS, the Licensee was notified of the impo: January 25, 2000 by the OfFice of License, Inspections and which was to be paid by Friday, February 11, 2000; and � Council File # pp � '�.�g Green Sheet # 1 o0'T 6 a =_� by Food-N-Fuel, Inc., of the fine by letter dated �onmental Protection (LIEP), WHEREAS, as of Febnxary 23, 2000, no fine l�ad been received by the Office of LIEP; now, therefore, be it � RESOLVED, that the licenses held by F od-N-Fuel, Inc., d/b/a Food-N-Fuel (License ID #17138) are hereby suspended until such tim s the fine of $500 has been paid. Requested by Department of: �� // i� p ,, �� Adopted by Counci Adoption Certif' a Hy' AppYOVed y Mayor: BY: Date by Council Secretary Date Form Appxoved by City Attomey � BY: � �.%'-�_ l � ;� Approved by Mayor for Submission to Council By: 00 -ay� March 6, 2000 �� � TOTAL # OF SIGNATURE PAC,ES GREEN SHEET «,�: , �:�,..�..:� No �'��-�?7�2 �_._ � ❑ �.�. ❑ m.� ❑ „�,�� ❑ ..�.,�,�,o ❑YYDR�GlhsmfANi) ❑ (CL1P ALL LOCATIONS FOR SIGNATURt� Resolution suspending licenses held by Food-N-Fuel, 675 7th Street West, until the fine imposed by the City Council on January 12, 2000, (C.F. 00-31) is paid. PL4NNING CAMMISSION CIB COMMITTEE CIVIL SERVICE COMMISSION AMOUNTOFTRANSACTION (IXPWN) tl�uns v���m � woncea uMe. a convact rauns aepanmem� VES NO Hes m�s perarnlfirm aer heen a dlv emWcyeeT YES NO Dces this pereanlfi'm pwaess a sWli not IwrmallyposeesaeE by arry arreM cRy employee7 YES � k Mis pereoNfi�m a farpNetl �entloY7 VES NO fain ali vec answets m aeoarete sheet and atlach fn nrePn sheet COSTrttEVQlUE BUDfiETED (CIRCLE ONq ACTMSY NUMBER 1C"3-'�:G7 i ORIGINAL � Tlrc�!"1T TimTi-.�.T 00 - �yq Cuuncil File T QQ — 3{ Green Sheet � 104498 .1 Presented By Referred To Committee: Date i 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 9 10 11 12 13 RESOLVED, that the Licensee Food-N-Fuel, Inc. d/b/a Food-N-Fuel (License ID I�TO. 17138), located at 67� 7`" Street R'est in Saint Paul is hereby ordered to pay a fine of $500.00 for the violation of Sale of Alcoholic Beveraoes to UnderaQe Persons. Said fine shall be paid to the O�ce of License, Inspections and Environmental Protection within thirty (30) da}�s of the adoption of this resolution by the Council and si�nature by the Mayor. This resolution and the action of the Council in this matter aze based upon the facts contained in the December 2, 1999, I`'otic� of Violation letter to the licensee, the Police Report CN 99-197211, and such arguments as m2�� have been presented to the Council at the public hearing. The facts were not contested by the licensee. Recuested by De�a=tnent ef: �Y� FJlIL'�ea .TU3lifc�(yn Adopted by Covncil: Dat_ �� 2pp.q �� � T�' Rdoptien Certified by Council�$ec-etary ay• 1 .. .lpprove3 by N.ayor: ate BY.� —_ _ Fcrm :,pnroved by City a[.o-i_y /� a ��,/; «� :� � c�.��u,n Acprwed �y Mayor £cr St'�missicn to Cow�cil By: be�a`�`� March 8, 2000, City Council Action Minutes Page 3 Heritage Preservation Commission. (Public testimony will be taken on this issue only) 11. . Resolution - 00-224 - Approving a Single Fanuly Housing Program to be financed by the issuance of Single Family Mortgage Revenue Bonds and Mortgage Credit Certificates. This item was considered as a public hearing at 5:30 p.m: Adopted Yeas - 7 Nays - 0 12. Resolurion - 00-225 - Establishing the upgrade in Pazk and Recreation Manager to Grade 26 of the Supervisory Range of Compensation in the Salary Plan and Rates of Compensation. Laid over to March 15 Yeas - 7 Nays - 0 The Council requested that the Administration report on March 15 on the proposed reductions in spending under the City's 2000 budget. 13. Resolution - 00-226 - Adjusting the rates for a number of Special Employment tifles in the Salary Plan and Rates of Compensation. Adopted Yeas - 7 Nays - 0 14. Resolution - 00-227 - Direcring the Deparhnent of Planning and Economic Development to work with the Capital River Council to prepare appropriate amendments to the Legislarive Code related to signage in downtown. Adopted Yeas - 7 Nays - 0 15. Resolution - 00-228 - Approving application for Auto Repair Garage, Second Hand Dealer-Motor Vehicles, and Motor Vehicle Dealer-New Licenses by Mid- America Emergency Vehicles, dba Road Rescue Emergency Vehicles, 1133 Rankin Street. (Legislative Hearing Officer recommends ap�rovai� Adopted Yeas - 7 Nays - 0 16. Resolurion - 00-229 - Approving change in the Brewery Neighborhood Project budget. Adopted Yeas - 7 Nays - 0 �� Cify Councii's Additions fo the 2000 Budget Se/ecfed Items Affec6ng Fund Balance Deseription CTtv Aftomev 9 Mtl f�mQing relatad to law Werk 2 Add fundmg tetateG to derk typist 0 iRf n c ry/ � 3 Fundng for Properly CoOe EMorcement �efated fo seasonal inspectots. Cletk N, and Typist 1 HumaiR(qh�fc 4 Souti�em Mn. Regionat Legal Services Contract for 12 monNu ra•; < 5 Sunday Service Hours at Riverview and SC Mthony 6 Moming Service Hours at ArGngron, Hamnne, Rice, Riveniew and St Anthony � Materiais BuOget Parke a��-�h',on'� , 8 Restore wt for swe'eping seleci seasonal Ice rinks 9 ' Restore fundng related ro rec d'irector cut at Eastview 10 Restore funtling related to rec diractor for senior rec progrertu � 1 Loan fpr Design of HigNand Park Driving Range 12 Mertiam Park Rivec Traii Connection Fechnoloav d Manae�e.+r Serviee< � , 13,14 Health Fair Ssanerai Gevemm nt aM.,..nfe Spe�tifmd ContUgency 'IS Loan for HighWnO Driving Range Construe6o� ]6 City Attomey, improving Serv�p Dei'rvery 17 fair �ning Standards Testing and Remed"adon 1a Parks / Pubiic Works - Slveeper for sidewatks and ke rinks 19 PEO -tunding reiated lo Gry PWnner 11 20 Code Er�forcement Spending bb Keep Reduca 3T,061 34,468 22579 • 8 months 102,276 75.493 1 derk N seasena� inspectors 9,000 43,193 65,929 100,000 23.794 5�,000 50,000 170.000 10,000 11,760 500,000 51,371 35,000. . 46,5� 6 48.500 100,000 37,061 11.489 26,783 9,ODD 18,373 etf 5/5/00 28,039 eff W5�00 100,000 24,820 37,890 12,794 1't,000 early winter 00 50.000 50,000 no,00a 10,000 97,760 500.000 rr�aybe 59.371 35,000 46,516 . 48,500 100,000 490.819 Total - - - 1�488.868 998.049 . : w i C T C V y � W m � N €w o 4 � o mom �— N �' � Q (q � .�.. � N � � � � a � 0 ° o N � Q! Q> r 0 N � a � O 0 � N � � � ` � � � V 1 � T � W 0 cV O N � � � O N �N t'^V p� '� '� f�D e� � � �p � ... i. .-. � N 7 � O [� ^ O �1 1n �O m Ql i0 O f� � O�D N � � � . � CD 'p s0 m N v) � W co Q � r �O O � $ �.. " � � ` [V -' „ " � v v v � N O O y � � t9 Oi e�7 � � v � � � tO - T � � oo-a�q . v � .. � � m $ � ^ �o ca n a �o o � m `° o `° o� m m n ° � r m .°- n � m e� . c v 'q W n � p � c m i ° � o � v � v � � v v v N v v w � v f� O � O r � N v v ' " v ' e a N m N C l7 N Q N m p Q � � � N 0 � O � O a N e c�i < o � � cv t� o�; c�i � c�i o n oi o o c o°- ��n . . � .- �i m � C N t��] M � � m O � m 0 lD � O O � N O f0 n � '�Q� O p= h w !7 Q n N � V' Q � N � c9 m < iD 0 V I Q N �rj � O 1� Of �., CO N � Q 0 � � M tp a p O N t�4 v t- Q ' v � N l�J � l'> Q � N Q � � [O � � ` s t7 a e v o m .cr v w ao m v t� . m < a ° o � n < Q Q m o» G1 N �- ' 1� N R W O v t`� � �� < m O � 1� Q O N 1C1 tfi f0 01 f0 O P � m nj W Q Q - �D Q m O N tD n N N m eN O�1 � M A t�7 � n � p � W � N e= � (�j � M t9 C+ Qj N � t�q � c�7 � t0 t�0 � a O n d � c m o m � v r. u ° v m m ° o 'y u� < Q v m co m a'o a�i m N ~ � � � o`ti w n c� �n ro ° rn Q o � a m P C� r 'a �" m N � � � � N N � M C�0 C Q � � � �`�` � O O T m �: � N � t7 1�i 1� Oi N Oi � .� � .r tn f�p � M e N O � O � N tq N i0 . �q l7 t0 t0 r O M N �P tn Oi m m ^ �' R M Q�f 7 P � a�� � LL� r m � W e � N � N � � ,� j O N � ~ n N N fpD O f��l 1� t�0_ n m � � � O r h � Q m N � r nj � � W � N h R 1� m a tl! a� i� 0 N W ` p � � .r Yj » � � � � � .i o p � m c L° a � m c � e C7 � y W V p m C C � e E m o.c o Q ° �. U � w W c q � � � � m m c " � " c � y �, �, z z a m � s 3 E U o e � �m � � � 3 a' � Q U � U N � dl E � W � o � 3 � � w 2• � m � W � U U U � �T 2 2 2 ¢ � � U U. 1- a LL � C m LL d c U C 0 .� E U � W a m E c > 0 c� m C 0 C7 Ta H Entered on the 2001 6enerat Fund Gap Projection see fi:W SERS1flU0GEti1�231YR799811498GAP 6k tor ust of Ws sheet Rem �b-a� �ooi ? ? eenotes change artaun musi be esUmated an0 entered by rlspons�e staff Gsted ResPo�sible AmouM Staff Fxplanatinn Financing ttACA �ustment (Qurent Stam Law) 2006 AdopfeC -S?A.809.726 -no dian9e iP� Tom C.} neweK Legklatfve viopod LCA Ad'pstment (Curent State le«I 2000 Adapted 548�84t,193 -2Wtnumber [efkcts 2.SX inaease Wirent qw -nOt Z000 Llgi.ta6re PApo521 Ch2ngt in USC Df FYtq H21ant6 2000l02001 ASiat cxneril kKl or ru�M 6al�s appKd u rnandig• badc arc amo�a�t apvfied n z000 sudget FWb BdxCeS dareasE •�D00 tsdyWbpy iNi6iW�3 Fuw sauexasaaa�se-a000v2�c bw� Cga+s�fv�.+es�n�.s �nus�.cs.�sz tnen,�s amc�a�cgraa�+) 5ma eahnca dea6nx-tfi�leM Omh+D Ranu Desi9n Fwb Bsbnoe Oeceasa-200o Speo'fkd Raerve • Cowwt-hiphlane pivin8 Rangp tonswdbn FunO 9atanrs decresse-2J00 Speofietl Roswe-COUnd-ad?Jb�al aNOmay f�d 8etante Oeaease •2000 SD� Racervs - Wwit3-FairSqn0ar0s Houeing 7esting FuM Balanee Oeuease -2000 SpedGed Raa�e-Couneil • Sweecer FwW Baia� tle�ase • 20D0 SD0�7eC Racenra. CoV�d -fSly Planner FunO &�Wnce deerease • II000 SpecifieC Raem • Counol • uncpeeGc eo0a Worcement TOTA� (6.023.96� Property Tax Financing uKrsam n kvy � SNft (bI /aom oeet Ss+v'ae •(CanY olomm u�s� ahw deetsema butlget baa) StaM1 pro6eGMJ OUkpuendes ReOUce eNinkaga zPP6eC b 2 percent7? 2000 GranS (irot repeacn9 ;n ?A01) Po�'¢e WetOnSee6 Franctdse Fee Atljustrnent DH ampire 6ulitler Norenco steam - eant pra0td Incase. NRG Energy has not nepotiateE agraement w! payer, District CooGng Energy park NSP GEFF - rrte invease antidpated'm 2000 budge� is there another for 200l4? fnaease In Budgef Estimate !or Mterest 6rtiug5 -?AOOACOpteC 3,000,000 (mdutles PW Sewor stuR) NelO b meet rilh Joo. Tadd t0 redew Wnges ei GF Wt mi9At stlect sae of G� ThM Totld�n OPO�Y Merest fa4 tl akWare Interest COnYnue Courr+l Pdded SOauiGC3 kn0ln9? 1�0 AGpqed 275.000 hler Fund Traesters (Central Service Cnsh) ware� ur,bty ow+vaa ror eenua� smkes hur funA TransFers -othet PW rNund N WM�u Sveet eacass-net of SN10.000 tor 6rae y�s HotN Motet Tases - posstDle inarease? (pa ee. ro, eu rceeoes an�a,sooau� ae�u:u�enes = ssoo.e� vs ssra.azz a+zoeo cF eaye e�m�owaru+a*axa>szs.00a ee.x�.'rc+xea�oarwss� Snare of County Fmes �+�a�u.sas.acz �essncamsz.oze.sz�. co�dap,c��ny:�vease5�s.000ao.000. ��. 7,227.105 S+uce B�uCO (4,�tOS95) (150.000) R�t000) (+�.�1 (500.000) (sa.371) �ss.ono� (46576) (a8.500) (toD,00o) 0 0 0 2001 ? 4 (30.000) 0 0 0 0 0 2COt ? ? 0 zeo� t t 720.000 0 0 BryCe / Joe Tom Ron 8ruce Ron iZOn Etit Ron Ron Ron BNOL' BNLC Bntce Bruce Fton BNCB Bruee Bruce HNCt BNCE Bruce Bruee eruce 7om 6ruce BNC9 � Item Amount Exolanation Z000 COWJqIlTEl.t Mxriam Pak RivetTral CanecLon , (�iMl2� CaO�lRl[�1211I � (EJf10VB tlWll SyC�Ed flSENE Caun�'F6gNaM OmrmD Wnpe coi661dm Counea-ada�analanomey Cbund-Fav SmMerOs Flouce�g T� CouneA -;,weecer C�nd-Gty?hm9r Caxid • w�Cw mOe �orcement General City YYde Iterts 200t Department Base Adustrnents - estcnated 20D7 Projeete0 Salary Inueases 2001 frkfge 8enebt es�ria0es. Gh?JERAL FUND share Woeice�s Compenca4on Ertpbyee Inswance ReGrae inswanra Ss�lr3nC! Pey Po6ce pension (Re1ieG PERA antl me�a�e) Fre per�on (ReGet. PERA and meGfore) FICA Mediwe PER4 Otl�er pensipn ?A01 AOpitlon forinllaUon 2.3%of utiGGes 371,373 2007 Addition fw in0ation f.6% of?AO's. 300'a, 800's (PW � 539,000: 57.3M�3%) Departments Human Resources Employce OevNOprnent anE Supavbory Tralnfi9 Ciry ACorney CAO doD SNOy and Contrya $ettle�nenb TMS PC Reptacement PWn - aQd NII annual effect of 2000's lease 5 whiq� was 6S monws and whatever ow�eC rtm�U�ines w[ repbce In 2001. Leese 1 In 1886, lesm 2 h 7987. leas�e 3 in 1998. ka5e t N SH99. lease 5 in 2000 antl balarce o! 5 anE iU of some nurMer M�ronttis for kese 8(at XXY:) is �ew fot 2001_ Geaero� Fund Iransfer tor bau growM H speriai fwds 7M5 -PRELIMINARY pasipn group Conaaet Swioes-P�ra�ss++p (tiEw kr2007) At 200t SE Remove One Time 200� Programs kortwve New IS OneTime MvesEnanb-2000 W�C bone yesr 7 of3 seDa�am t00 mb segmenc movo Oonuin name sarvico b NT Pu61k Workt PW cicrease for added signs, slpnaB, and SVeet Lighting General Fund Iransfer tor base growU� tn spedai funds vu6Gewort�s Siree[Maineenaneetr 022T142330 =563.120 PuDtie Waks T2f11e yfC ytreeVghG O?283 �57,543 Removt� One Thro 200p proprams remowaueccwoncs•Manayame�a^+a^rerineaaaearar�000 •Sta.soo (t0,000) (500.000) (5f.a7�) C3+.000) (�658) (48.5a01 (ioD.000) �oo� ? ? 2055.976 2001 i ? 7.tSa.977 716.789 2oot 7 ? Z001 9 7 1001 ? 7 200� a t Zoo7 7 � 2001 17 2601 T ? zoot � ? zooi ? ? 0 too.000 d 0 0 poo.000) I?5.000) (?SA00) 0 p,i?A 57.643 0 Responsihie Staff �b-��9 BNCE RAn Ron Ron Ron Ftan Ron 0 Joe/EriC Ron Ron ftOH Ron Ron Ron Ron Ron Ron Ron Joe Joe 627b Barb Tom Tom Tom Tom 7om 7am Tom Tom Tom Tom OFFICE OF THE MAYOR �l/ - '���'J FINANCIAL SERVICES OFFICE, Budget Section � Joseph %eid, Director of Financial Services CITY OF SAINT PAITL zso c�ry x�rt Telephone: (6I2) 26(r8543 Norm Coleman, Mayor IS We.st Kelingg Boulevard Fatsimile: (612) 266-8547 Saint Pau1, Mimresota 55102-I63I MEMORANDUM To: Council President Dan Bostrom Council Members From: Joe Reid, Financial Services Direct RE: Budget Update Date: Mazch 15, 2000 The attached material is being submitted to you for your information on a number of matters related to the 2000 and 2001 budget. At the council meeting on March 15, 2000, I will also report to you on some additional issues and propose a schedule for future updates. 1. A spreadsheet providing a status report on changes to the 2000 proposed general fund spending and fmancing budget as of Mazch 15, 2000. 2. A description of how the budget office began its review of the budget for 2001 by examining planned spending in 2000 and the current status of that review. 3. The pern�anent spending reduction goals for each department. 4. A current analysis of spending and financing projections. If you have additional questions on these subjects, please contact me at your convenience. ob-a�9 w d � 3 m � � N N w v d � R V N C 3 �..� w C) m 6 6 0 0 d m L m `m `m m ` m' a v n' a' g $ a n oa r m c c m m w N 9 p q � O O O C `� a R C LL 0 0 N & � o m ° r `Bv 0 � � m 3 � e � V m � u A o 0 � m m � � � 0 n '� C m � ° � ]I N Q Q � 0 a s c - o E 6 `m � Q a � T C O C N 0 C °� E u n n a ` 5 0 c " w� Q � p E N p v � m E Q m n E � � a O r _ A p m � N V � n m m � Am gm � LL � ? � a � w m V ° m � a � i ° c o U U `� 9 ^ m m ° o m F�i 9 q T�• C � O C ° q a _ c ` _ u = m � `o m m m� m 9 N Q m U' VJ `d li � O a g m m m @ � a O m 0 �i � � c � m `a LL s' g a S w 00 tt — rr - 00 0 v v v a n n 0 0 C C � a m a m m m m m v a a m m `a 'm m 'm aa a ' n' $ g g lV N E E E m � z n n n v a o b = c c c m m m � w w � O 0 o' N b N m m m m �8 � g� �� m�'_m � 0 g b � ^ m � P IG S N t�i " q' 0 m m m � E n � y n C m A �NN 0 3 m yy � 0 q � C � � c � O � W`c C m � � 6 � a N m � m� { p � W n ° � � " e c m m c O c E 'u � N Q O � V $ 2 0 b H � � J C' � o 0 � w�. � L aa o �a$`' � � N N o $ �� C fO E ° c m 2 i & O a ; � n � m O w m [ � j 3 Q m s s N 0 � � m d n m m � m ' m N y � ° c a � i `m E p _ � N N � � 3 a m n � � s ��� ��eg � m m � � m '- � as� C w a c a C l {L J n m m � C _ � � w $ E E c n w c c 3 3 n o 0 �_ O D j. T T >'. ¢ a a u ii `o o`o `o `o � L S L Y £ � O D 9 a N N N N Vl 25 25 25 z5 $ E E� E E E « W w�`V o F 0 0 0 K C K C K$.a B B$ n u a a n o r 'o 0 0 0 c c c 5 c g � y g � m m ` `m � m � m � u� � w w w Z Z 2 Z Z O O O O Y'y Y] O D o �o.=m ro $�r' 7 �SS 0 N�[I h��� m fD S O VI N V E @ n 3 � m � `- w o w ei � A W p 3 - 0 m '° � � o $ 5 `o ? � W � m � � o J � � 4 ° 8 Po m � 9 � ° = ° � i c � - m E 1 0 m L � m m x�'U @ � m m ° � � � m� o o m� U W m U � � ^ m w � � o C H �NCCC._�if K u m m° �.^�- M 2 0 W LL r m � ' m W m ; F Z 2 O a m c 3 6 a � 0 n 5 � �� ^ 0 `m � y c � U c m � � N n g q c m �a 3 � � s m ° m ° C � O C � $_ a O 1 ba m s ry c 6 a m `m w L d C m E `o a a `m Z a R a' b � LL m � L m p LL 0 y 5 �, c � m � w� 8 O m p O O N n O o� e � N A N � c $ ° m m g9 � F m ` d O � �5 mt� a fn'.5 � m t w v =� m m s' g n _ 3 � 6 � @ m � o m ` U K m U O � 0 n U O yy a ` � N m '�-" � E R � m c LL � ` � � a c y p m � �N f a � m c L E a m m a O 0 � m d d m @ S m c c D c � m m m m m cs_ c m m m m m m m m m m � - 'm m m o m 0 0 0 0 o g 9 m m V 9 m O m E E£ E E E c c c c c c c s a a m m m L L L L L t o` `o `o o `o 0 ° m m m m 0 0 0 0 0 0 Z z z 2 z Z c c �' ° c $ c c c � m C C C � c c c c c c o a � m o 0 _ _ `m `a m m a m 9 9 9 9 D 9 n' a' n' s' a' a' � t 0 m m 0 o c c c c c m m m m m o `m `m `m `m `m m` qgwwww 0 0 0 6 d o O 8 �� 8 $ 8��oh��� �N $ `f �inmvv�m N � Z a '° _ m m ` � W m C � W sJ $ ? � g m Y a o $ c 0 2 z m� � mW aFa iap p h N` m` � � 0 W g°, ° ?. c � p q � � Of � S'- Y C U� y T O � m ro r� m m N 2� m_. a 2 b E m m W H F� U € m 6 m$ p� O� N 9 � Y � O � � w m � i ti� v y m � D:'a � m w�� m c� c m E y J m E� 8�� m W E£ � a, � n �$ x � i Q E 2 P � �-° 'o a w` m .� o T^ 'o ° m m� C a g� mm3o�sm��m�� ° ,S� � n 5 a� @ n� U LL 6 4 V O N U D 1 F W � � � � � q y P � S 8 N fp m A 2 m ¢ 0 y q 3 ` o_ m m O e` a N -S 0 �` J n : ° �E3 a`a�wm C Q m c � m � $ m c I � c c 'c E E c 'c ° o w ° m m _ = � = _ _ `o �`o € `o `o `o `o 'm 'm 'm L L 6 d d 0 o a - - - `m m `m n n n a a v 'q a o v 0 �41 m m m � 0 0 m m m m m m _ _ L _ _ - > 2 > a > a `o �5 0 `a `o ° m ° m_ � m ° m ° m_ v n� m n n m n m m m a n a a a� . cc`c"� c c 0 N W � 4 4 V L V 3����� m m � a a a� a c � ° c � > j c u�i u.unu'. O O O � O m O 1p N a N � O � W O O N� � � � b� Y O O O N •� � W U � a m O q c � u � 0 9 � ° `5 z 2 2, £ 3 U � ~ � � j 9 ? C N � c m `-�� c�+ W m o ° �`m E` 0 � �j � p � d {p Z � � � K y� � N� n c m N F ' 3 N m m Y�� � c =� E y _ O c y � � m 8 m o� v E m 3�� m w mti �� 0 �j m m m OO p 0 O � O m � _� U W li � O N- O N m_ LL`= T' � m qm O C� V� Q C 0 j� J U 1Y 1 1 U j �UU. Y? 6 d � � � � � � N m O 0 � Y m �« � 0 m V ° � � $ C LL 'o m t? ` ° m Oii N � $ � m r 2 �b-a�� Budget Management Team Rationale for egamining adopted spending in 2000. Goal: Keep snending within budeet limits in 2000 and 2001. Decisions leading up to the adopted spending for 2000 occurred in several steps: April-May, 1999. Department staff, led by the department or office director, reviewed the department or office spending priorities within established limits and proposed a spending plan. T'heir plan, given those spending limits, could not include all the spending they may have desired. They had to say what service or activity would not be continued in order to stay within the limits. Presumably, if guidelines were followed, all the services or activities that were inciuded were more important than those that were not. 2. May-June, 1999. Next, budget staff, working with the department or office director and his or her key stafF and the budget director did a further review of the spending plan and, either agreed with the plan, or suggested modificarions to it. The modifications could include substitution of a service that was included for one that was not or the spending limits may have been relaxed because the spending plan, in the opinion of the analyst, needed something that was excluded and he or she did not propose a substitute. July, 1999. Next, budget staff, the department or of£ice director, the budget director and the mayor completed a similaz analysis, on a nanower set of items, to what was done in step three and again agreed to decisions made in step three or made other modifications to the plan. The mayor then proposed the composite spending plan to the council for 2000. 4. September-December, 1999. Nea�t, the city council assisted by their fiscal director and the budget director completed their own review and analysis and agreed with eazlier decisions or made new modifications. 5. In each step of the process, the review may have focused on similar services or activities or one step may have examined a service not considered in another step. At each step, however, a whole group of services and activities, in fact the vast majority of them, were inciuded in the spending plan because everyone agreed that they were important, in fact, more important than the service or activity that one group of decision makers may have decided to exclude. 6. January, 2000. As the budget staff and the budget management team prepazed to begin the cycle ali over again and looked at the spending limits that decision makers would face in 2001, it seemed to make sense to first reexamine the last set of spending proposals that were added to the 2000 adopted budget. It made sense because, first department staff, then budget staff, then the mayor, and finally, the council had agreed that all other spending proposals were at least as important or more important than the fmal items because the last items added had not replaced any of the others. 7. Recognizing that some decision makers might make different decisions if they had this to do all over again, the budget office and management team will treat all spending proposais of equal value at this point and give each proposal an opportunity to prove that it should be preserved and some other spending item excluded. That will enable us to consider options for controlling costs without predetermining what any of the items might be. 3 C � � C U N N � W m � ol O c � p_I � d � �� N y N af n R' O I O O � rn N � c�a Of � a v r c�0 t N ti (�.. � � � u�'i c a�i t�o � � � � N < m O O t0 � N (D N � �- of M � _ ^ (O � O v LV (O v v v v t") Oi th t� N O O � SO .., �. ,_. � � C °' � ... � �- v �e-ay� � 7 I � N � �I � � � � v (v I (O j` I vl � N � V' � � tn N � � tn O � � � O � tn O I t0 t� I� 6� O I � r 0 O ^ W � n � t0 th 7 C � W r N � p O Q � [� ,� � � � � ._. �'' � N . � . � .�_. � O r � N I � � "" � `-� v I �� i � 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 � o o � o 0 0 0 0 0 � ° o N o N oJ N O M N Q � � O V; r t0 c- N T O aD N � O 0 r N f� O � (7 � N O 1� � O O O � � p � (y O o •. rn � o ° n v �n rn � � M o rn o co o � ^ � v o N � � N � � M � M � n � o � � � c o m n v �n m v_ co � � U [t N � r � V � � v � ' N c• � � � M N � � o N (�p !' ° r v '- M O N � � � � O 0 (J� N � � u. \ � Q� � � /�� V �M. � a a� M � W � � N Q O � N � � � � m � O� � � Q m N W C o � � � aa 3 Q m� N � d � d � O > Q m r a <o �n v < � m � � u� m °� u ° 0 1 D r�- v v � N � f� � d' tn N 1� M f0 N O V � O �n t0 fV o f� � ui ifi (O ai {p � ` c" ej N O N f�0_ n N N M � p�i, a�- C�'1 f� M � f M O N < <- N c- P') t0 (� � N � � � M � � � o � O � � W (�D N O rn � � � � t�(� � < O c0 p�p `�Y 1� � O f� N O N (p � � � (O N � � I� r V� tn � N t�n (�p � p�j � p � Oi (D N n h � try th 1n t7 (P � I� � O� � O M OJ O (G N � O �[J N � f9 O o� m O N (O � ^ (V N � 07 aD O � I`: � p�j n c�j � N �- < N a- th M I'� Q� N � � c M � V N � O � O � � � � � h � '�t N O O � N � N O] tn M t0 aD O N u� eD fp th tO 01 � N f� � N � t0 Ol tn t0 � 1� m 1� N f� 01 V' M O1 � t� � .-- N 1� t0 f� O� N f� o� th (V o'i 1%} Oi t0 C o � V ai cV ah tci co ui c0 o aD oD tD O N N � � N N o�') ? W O (�p n p�p � N � � � � N c- � N s- Ci th I� W o O> O vi � � N N M U O � � 'R O C O N y V R (�j p N E d �O L y Q � .� Q � � � � � �� d' Q' > N U o •C C � � � � � � � O > > � � U � ii 2 S 2 Q J U � Q � �z tA C N � � U � L o � Q U W ,Z' �' J U U U N C � � T Y O � = 3 y Y F a' d N N R U n � a N c � U O U .� O U d � a�-i c N U � O U C � � O U � w a N �U C � O U 0 O C 0 3 a C U W N � n m � N � c � � > O � N N d U' m 0 F T 2001 Budget Planning Summary Gap Projection and Strategy �� �._v��� ._ �6-a�� Spending Financing Gap 2000 Adopted Budget - Gene21 Fund Fund Balance Use - Mayor 54.77�,798 Fund Balance Use - Council $1253,184 Total Fund Balance Use $6,023,982 Change in Use of Fund Balance 2000 to 2001 - Financing Column Changes to Spending - Spending Column Fund Balances decrease - 2000 Amounts Fund Balances deaease - 2000 Technology Initiatives Fund Balances decrease - 2000 Y2K Fund Balances decrease - 2000 Speafied Reserve items Fund Balances decrease - 2000 Highland Driving Range Design Total Changes in use of fund balance Year 2��� Proposed fund Balartce Use 2000 Adopted Budget Less One Time Use of Fund Balance Changes to Financing Change from 2000 HACA AdjusVnent Levy Adjustment Tax Levy Shift to or from Debt Service Non Repealing GraMs One Time Financing in 2000 (Science Museum sale) One Time Financing in 2000 (from Contract Services) Library Technical Training Specialist New Financing for 2001 LGA (expected normal increase) Interest Eamings One Time Financing in 2001 (internal Vansfer) Changes to Spending Change from 2000 2000 COUNCIL ITEM: One Time Technical Change 2000 COUNCIL ITEM: One Time River Bluff 7rai1 Connection Remove Remaining Specified ConGngency 2000 COUNCiI ITEM: Move Hf0 $$ Dutaf Contingency Move Workers' Comp Incentive Progrem out of Contingency Remove Remaining Y2K Budget New Spending for 2001 Salary Increases Fringes Increase Gene21 Fund Transfers for base growth in speciai tunds Inflation for UGlities Inflation for Other Non Compensation Related Spending Planned Shift of Officers From Pension Assets Fund Census PoSition Tort Claims increase Elections Municipal Memberships Exempt and Forfeited Properly Assessments CIB Per Diem Total Changes Totai General Fund Spending, Financing, and Gap Changes to Spending Base Reduction AllocaHons Changes to Financing Base Property Tax Relief (FUnd Balances) Total Changes to Base Year 2001 Generai Fund Base 163,608,599 ('150.000) (212,000) (785.387) ('170.000) (6,023,982) ?? 162,295,212 (30,000) (200,000) salary increases INCOMPLETE EST (6,304) (10,000) (288,350) 88,350 200,000 (243,742) 2,655,977 1,366,042 187.248 v � o v 152,076 � � 200,000 � � 8,000 25.272 4,100 4,tOS,609 163,608.599 (4,710,595) (150,000) (272,000) (78�,387) ('170,000) 157,584,677 0 0 � � (30,000) , (200,000) (97,377) (3,743) 1,221,105 500,000 120,000 1,509,985 'f66,403,821 'f59,094,602 (7,309,219) 0 0 'I66,A03,82'I '159,094,602 (7,309,219) GISHARE��BUDGETt2l\YR2001�200tGAP ^ V ORIGII�AL Presented By Referred To �,�h�3\`S °a RESOLUTI SAINT , MIlVNESOTA Committee: WHEREAS, a fine of $500 was imposed against the li d/b/a Food-N-Fuel (License ID # 17138) by Council File 00-3� WHEREAS, the Licensee was notified of the impo: January 25, 2000 by the OfFice of License, Inspections and which was to be paid by Friday, February 11, 2000; and � Council File # pp � '�.�g Green Sheet # 1 o0'T 6 a =_� by Food-N-Fuel, Inc., of the fine by letter dated �onmental Protection (LIEP), WHEREAS, as of Febnxary 23, 2000, no fine l�ad been received by the Office of LIEP; now, therefore, be it � RESOLVED, that the licenses held by F od-N-Fuel, Inc., d/b/a Food-N-Fuel (License ID #17138) are hereby suspended until such tim s the fine of $500 has been paid. Requested by Department of: �� // i� p ,, �� Adopted by Counci Adoption Certif' a Hy' AppYOVed y Mayor: BY: Date by Council Secretary Date Form Appxoved by City Attomey � BY: � �.%'-�_ l � ;� Approved by Mayor for Submission to Council By: 00 -ay� March 6, 2000 �� � TOTAL # OF SIGNATURE PAC,ES GREEN SHEET «,�: , �:�,..�..:� No �'��-�?7�2 �_._ � ❑ �.�. ❑ m.� ❑ „�,�� ❑ ..�.,�,�,o ❑YYDR�GlhsmfANi) ❑ (CL1P ALL LOCATIONS FOR SIGNATURt� Resolution suspending licenses held by Food-N-Fuel, 675 7th Street West, until the fine imposed by the City Council on January 12, 2000, (C.F. 00-31) is paid. PL4NNING CAMMISSION CIB COMMITTEE CIVIL SERVICE COMMISSION AMOUNTOFTRANSACTION (IXPWN) tl�uns v���m � woncea uMe. a convact rauns aepanmem� VES NO Hes m�s perarnlfirm aer heen a dlv emWcyeeT YES NO Dces this pereanlfi'm pwaess a sWli not IwrmallyposeesaeE by arry arreM cRy employee7 YES � k Mis pereoNfi�m a farpNetl �entloY7 VES NO fain ali vec answets m aeoarete sheet and atlach fn nrePn sheet COSTrttEVQlUE BUDfiETED (CIRCLE ONq ACTMSY NUMBER 1C"3-'�:G7 i ORIGINAL � Tlrc�!"1T TimTi-.�.T 00 - �yq Cuuncil File T QQ — 3{ Green Sheet � 104498 .1 Presented By Referred To Committee: Date i 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 9 10 11 12 13 RESOLVED, that the Licensee Food-N-Fuel, Inc. d/b/a Food-N-Fuel (License ID I�TO. 17138), located at 67� 7`" Street R'est in Saint Paul is hereby ordered to pay a fine of $500.00 for the violation of Sale of Alcoholic Beveraoes to UnderaQe Persons. Said fine shall be paid to the O�ce of License, Inspections and Environmental Protection within thirty (30) da}�s of the adoption of this resolution by the Council and si�nature by the Mayor. This resolution and the action of the Council in this matter aze based upon the facts contained in the December 2, 1999, I`'otic� of Violation letter to the licensee, the Police Report CN 99-197211, and such arguments as m2�� have been presented to the Council at the public hearing. The facts were not contested by the licensee. Recuested by De�a=tnent ef: �Y� FJlIL'�ea .TU3lifc�(yn Adopted by Covncil: Dat_ �� 2pp.q �� � T�' Rdoptien Certified by Council�$ec-etary ay• 1 .. .lpprove3 by N.ayor: ate BY.� —_ _ Fcrm :,pnroved by City a[.o-i_y /� a ��,/; «� :� � c�.��u,n Acprwed �y Mayor £cr St'�missicn to Cow�cil By: be�a`�`� March 8, 2000, City Council Action Minutes Page 3 Heritage Preservation Commission. (Public testimony will be taken on this issue only) 11. . Resolution - 00-224 - Approving a Single Fanuly Housing Program to be financed by the issuance of Single Family Mortgage Revenue Bonds and Mortgage Credit Certificates. This item was considered as a public hearing at 5:30 p.m: Adopted Yeas - 7 Nays - 0 12. Resolurion - 00-225 - Establishing the upgrade in Pazk and Recreation Manager to Grade 26 of the Supervisory Range of Compensation in the Salary Plan and Rates of Compensation. Laid over to March 15 Yeas - 7 Nays - 0 The Council requested that the Administration report on March 15 on the proposed reductions in spending under the City's 2000 budget. 13. Resolution - 00-226 - Adjusting the rates for a number of Special Employment tifles in the Salary Plan and Rates of Compensation. Adopted Yeas - 7 Nays - 0 14. Resolution - 00-227 - Direcring the Deparhnent of Planning and Economic Development to work with the Capital River Council to prepare appropriate amendments to the Legislarive Code related to signage in downtown. Adopted Yeas - 7 Nays - 0 15. Resolution - 00-228 - Approving application for Auto Repair Garage, Second Hand Dealer-Motor Vehicles, and Motor Vehicle Dealer-New Licenses by Mid- America Emergency Vehicles, dba Road Rescue Emergency Vehicles, 1133 Rankin Street. (Legislative Hearing Officer recommends ap�rovai� Adopted Yeas - 7 Nays - 0 16. Resolurion - 00-229 - Approving change in the Brewery Neighborhood Project budget. Adopted Yeas - 7 Nays - 0 �� Cify Councii's Additions fo the 2000 Budget Se/ecfed Items Affec6ng Fund Balance Deseription CTtv Aftomev 9 Mtl f�mQing relatad to law Werk 2 Add fundmg tetateG to derk typist 0 iRf n c ry/ � 3 Fundng for Properly CoOe EMorcement �efated fo seasonal inspectots. Cletk N, and Typist 1 HumaiR(qh�fc 4 Souti�em Mn. Regionat Legal Services Contract for 12 monNu ra•; < 5 Sunday Service Hours at Riverview and SC Mthony 6 Moming Service Hours at ArGngron, Hamnne, Rice, Riveniew and St Anthony � Materiais BuOget Parke a��-�h',on'� , 8 Restore wt for swe'eping seleci seasonal Ice rinks 9 ' Restore fundng related ro rec d'irector cut at Eastview 10 Restore funtling related to rec diractor for senior rec progrertu � 1 Loan fpr Design of HigNand Park Driving Range 12 Mertiam Park Rivec Traii Connection Fechnoloav d Manae�e.+r Serviee< � , 13,14 Health Fair Ssanerai Gevemm nt aM.,..nfe Spe�tifmd ContUgency 'IS Loan for HighWnO Driving Range Construe6o� ]6 City Attomey, improving Serv�p Dei'rvery 17 fair �ning Standards Testing and Remed"adon 1a Parks / Pubiic Works - Slveeper for sidewatks and ke rinks 19 PEO -tunding reiated lo Gry PWnner 11 20 Code Er�forcement Spending bb Keep Reduca 3T,061 34,468 22579 • 8 months 102,276 75.493 1 derk N seasena� inspectors 9,000 43,193 65,929 100,000 23.794 5�,000 50,000 170.000 10,000 11,760 500,000 51,371 35,000. . 46,5� 6 48.500 100,000 37,061 11.489 26,783 9,ODD 18,373 etf 5/5/00 28,039 eff W5�00 100,000 24,820 37,890 12,794 1't,000 early winter 00 50.000 50,000 no,00a 10,000 97,760 500.000 rr�aybe 59.371 35,000 46,516 . 48,500 100,000 490.819 Total - - - 1�488.868 998.049 . : w i C T C V y � W m � N €w o 4 � o mom �— N �' � Q (q � .�.. � N � � � � a � 0 ° o N � Q! Q> r 0 N � a � O 0 � N � � � ` � � � V 1 � T � W 0 cV O N � � � O N �N t'^V p� '� '� f�D e� � � �p � ... i. .-. � N 7 � O [� ^ O �1 1n �O m Ql i0 O f� � O�D N � � � . � CD 'p s0 m N v) � W co Q � r �O O � $ �.. " � � ` [V -' „ " � v v v � N O O y � � t9 Oi e�7 � � v � � � tO - T � � oo-a�q . v � .. � � m $ � ^ �o ca n a �o o � m `° o `° o� m m n ° � r m .°- n � m e� . c v 'q W n � p � c m i ° � o � v � v � � v v v N v v w � v f� O � O r � N v v ' " v ' e a N m N C l7 N Q N m p Q � � � N 0 � O � O a N e c�i < o � � cv t� o�; c�i � c�i o n oi o o c o°- ��n . . � .- �i m � C N t��] M � � m O � m 0 lD � O O � N O f0 n � '�Q� O p= h w !7 Q n N � V' Q � N � c9 m < iD 0 V I Q N �rj � O 1� Of �., CO N � Q 0 � � M tp a p O N t�4 v t- Q ' v � N l�J � l'> Q � N Q � � [O � � ` s t7 a e v o m .cr v w ao m v t� . m < a ° o � n < Q Q m o» G1 N �- ' 1� N R W O v t`� � �� < m O � 1� Q O N 1C1 tfi f0 01 f0 O P � m nj W Q Q - �D Q m O N tD n N N m eN O�1 � M A t�7 � n � p � W � N e= � (�j � M t9 C+ Qj N � t�q � c�7 � t0 t�0 � a O n d � c m o m � v r. u ° v m m ° o 'y u� < Q v m co m a'o a�i m N ~ � � � o`ti w n c� �n ro ° rn Q o � a m P C� r 'a �" m N � � � � N N � M C�0 C Q � � � �`�` � O O T m �: � N � t7 1�i 1� Oi N Oi � .� � .r tn f�p � M e N O � O � N tq N i0 . �q l7 t0 t0 r O M N �P tn Oi m m ^ �' R M Q�f 7 P � a�� � LL� r m � W e � N � N � � ,� j O N � ~ n N N fpD O f��l 1� t�0_ n m � � � O r h � Q m N � r nj � � W � N h R 1� m a tl! a� i� 0 N W ` p � � .r Yj » � � � � � .i o p � m c L° a � m c � e C7 � y W V p m C C � e E m o.c o Q ° �. U � w W c q � � � � m m c " � " c � y �, �, z z a m � s 3 E U o e � �m � � � 3 a' � Q U � U N � dl E � W � o � 3 � � w 2• � m � W � U U U � �T 2 2 2 ¢ � � U U. 1- a LL � C m LL d c U C 0 .� E U � W a m E c > 0 c� m C 0 C7 Ta H Entered on the 2001 6enerat Fund Gap Projection see fi:W SERS1flU0GEti1�231YR799811498GAP 6k tor ust of Ws sheet Rem �b-a� �ooi ? ? eenotes change artaun musi be esUmated an0 entered by rlspons�e staff Gsted ResPo�sible AmouM Staff Fxplanatinn Financing ttACA �ustment (Qurent Stam Law) 2006 AdopfeC -S?A.809.726 -no dian9e iP� Tom C.} neweK Legklatfve viopod LCA Ad'pstment (Curent State le«I 2000 Adapted 548�84t,193 -2Wtnumber [efkcts 2.SX inaease Wirent qw -nOt Z000 Llgi.ta6re PApo521 Ch2ngt in USC Df FYtq H21ant6 2000l02001 ASiat cxneril kKl or ru�M 6al�s appKd u rnandig• badc arc amo�a�t apvfied n z000 sudget FWb BdxCeS dareasE •�D00 tsdyWbpy iNi6iW�3 Fuw sauexasaaa�se-a000v2�c bw� Cga+s�fv�.+es�n�.s �nus�.cs.�sz tnen,�s amc�a�cgraa�+) 5ma eahnca dea6nx-tfi�leM Omh+D Ranu Desi9n Fwb Bsbnoe Oeceasa-200o Speo'fkd Raerve • Cowwt-hiphlane pivin8 Rangp tonswdbn FunO 9atanrs decresse-2J00 Speofietl Roswe-COUnd-ad?Jb�al aNOmay f�d 8etante Oeaease •2000 SD� Racervs - Wwit3-FairSqn0ar0s Houeing 7esting FuM Balanee Oeuease -2000 SpedGed Raa�e-Couneil • Sweecer FwW Baia� tle�ase • 20D0 SD0�7eC Racenra. CoV�d -fSly Planner FunO &�Wnce deerease • II000 SpecifieC Raem • Counol • uncpeeGc eo0a Worcement TOTA� (6.023.96� Property Tax Financing uKrsam n kvy � SNft (bI /aom oeet Ss+v'ae •(CanY olomm u�s� ahw deetsema butlget baa) StaM1 pro6eGMJ OUkpuendes ReOUce eNinkaga zPP6eC b 2 percent7? 2000 GranS (irot repeacn9 ;n ?A01) Po�'¢e WetOnSee6 Franctdse Fee Atljustrnent DH ampire 6ulitler Norenco steam - eant pra0td Incase. NRG Energy has not nepotiateE agraement w! payer, District CooGng Energy park NSP GEFF - rrte invease antidpated'm 2000 budge� is there another for 200l4? fnaease In Budgef Estimate !or Mterest 6rtiug5 -?AOOACOpteC 3,000,000 (mdutles PW Sewor stuR) NelO b meet rilh Joo. Tadd t0 redew Wnges ei GF Wt mi9At stlect sae of G� ThM Totld�n OPO�Y Merest fa4 tl akWare Interest COnYnue Courr+l Pdded SOauiGC3 kn0ln9? 1�0 AGpqed 275.000 hler Fund Traesters (Central Service Cnsh) ware� ur,bty ow+vaa ror eenua� smkes hur funA TransFers -othet PW rNund N WM�u Sveet eacass-net of SN10.000 tor 6rae y�s HotN Motet Tases - posstDle inarease? (pa ee. ro, eu rceeoes an�a,sooau� ae�u:u�enes = ssoo.e� vs ssra.azz a+zoeo cF eaye e�m�owaru+a*axa>szs.00a ee.x�.'rc+xea�oarwss� Snare of County Fmes �+�a�u.sas.acz �essncamsz.oze.sz�. co�dap,c��ny:�vease5�s.000ao.000. ��. 7,227.105 S+uce B�uCO (4,�tOS95) (150.000) R�t000) (+�.�1 (500.000) (sa.371) �ss.ono� (46576) (a8.500) (toD,00o) 0 0 0 2001 ? 4 (30.000) 0 0 0 0 0 2COt ? ? 0 zeo� t t 720.000 0 0 BryCe / Joe Tom Ron 8ruce Ron iZOn Etit Ron Ron Ron BNOL' BNLC Bntce Bruce Fton BNCB Bruee Bruce HNCt BNCE Bruce Bruee eruce 7om 6ruce BNC9 � Item Amount Exolanation Z000 COWJqIlTEl.t Mxriam Pak RivetTral CanecLon , (�iMl2� CaO�lRl[�1211I � (EJf10VB tlWll SyC�Ed flSENE Caun�'F6gNaM OmrmD Wnpe coi661dm Counea-ada�analanomey Cbund-Fav SmMerOs Flouce�g T� CouneA -;,weecer C�nd-Gty?hm9r Caxid • w�Cw mOe �orcement General City YYde Iterts 200t Department Base Adustrnents - estcnated 20D7 Projeete0 Salary Inueases 2001 frkfge 8enebt es�ria0es. Gh?JERAL FUND share Woeice�s Compenca4on Ertpbyee Inswance ReGrae inswanra Ss�lr3nC! Pey Po6ce pension (Re1ieG PERA antl me�a�e) Fre per�on (ReGet. PERA and meGfore) FICA Mediwe PER4 Otl�er pensipn ?A01 AOpitlon forinllaUon 2.3%of utiGGes 371,373 2007 Addition fw in0ation f.6% of?AO's. 300'a, 800's (PW � 539,000: 57.3M�3%) Departments Human Resources Employce OevNOprnent anE Supavbory Tralnfi9 Ciry ACorney CAO doD SNOy and Contrya $ettle�nenb TMS PC Reptacement PWn - aQd NII annual effect of 2000's lease 5 whiq� was 6S monws and whatever ow�eC rtm�U�ines w[ repbce In 2001. Leese 1 In 1886, lesm 2 h 7987. leas�e 3 in 1998. ka5e t N SH99. lease 5 in 2000 antl balarce o! 5 anE iU of some nurMer M�ronttis for kese 8(at XXY:) is �ew fot 2001_ Geaero� Fund Iransfer tor bau growM H speriai fwds 7M5 -PRELIMINARY pasipn group Conaaet Swioes-P�ra�ss++p (tiEw kr2007) At 200t SE Remove One Time 200� Programs kortwve New IS OneTime MvesEnanb-2000 W�C bone yesr 7 of3 seDa�am t00 mb segmenc movo Oonuin name sarvico b NT Pu61k Workt PW cicrease for added signs, slpnaB, and SVeet Lighting General Fund Iransfer tor base growU� tn spedai funds vu6Gewort�s Siree[Maineenaneetr 022T142330 =563.120 PuDtie Waks T2f11e yfC ytreeVghG O?283 �57,543 Removt� One Thro 200p proprams remowaueccwoncs•Manayame�a^+a^rerineaaaearar�000 •Sta.soo (t0,000) (500.000) (5f.a7�) C3+.000) (�658) (48.5a01 (ioD.000) �oo� ? ? 2055.976 2001 i ? 7.tSa.977 716.789 2oot 7 ? Z001 9 7 1001 ? 7 200� a t Zoo7 7 � 2001 17 2601 T ? zoot � ? zooi ? ? 0 too.000 d 0 0 poo.000) I?5.000) (?SA00) 0 p,i?A 57.643 0 Responsihie Staff �b-��9 BNCE RAn Ron Ron Ron Ftan Ron 0 Joe/EriC Ron Ron ftOH Ron Ron Ron Ron Ron Ron Ron Joe Joe 627b Barb Tom Tom Tom Tom 7om 7am Tom Tom Tom Tom OFFICE OF THE MAYOR �l/ - '���'J FINANCIAL SERVICES OFFICE, Budget Section � Joseph %eid, Director of Financial Services CITY OF SAINT PAITL zso c�ry x�rt Telephone: (6I2) 26(r8543 Norm Coleman, Mayor IS We.st Kelingg Boulevard Fatsimile: (612) 266-8547 Saint Pau1, Mimresota 55102-I63I MEMORANDUM To: Council President Dan Bostrom Council Members From: Joe Reid, Financial Services Direct RE: Budget Update Date: Mazch 15, 2000 The attached material is being submitted to you for your information on a number of matters related to the 2000 and 2001 budget. At the council meeting on March 15, 2000, I will also report to you on some additional issues and propose a schedule for future updates. 1. A spreadsheet providing a status report on changes to the 2000 proposed general fund spending and fmancing budget as of Mazch 15, 2000. 2. A description of how the budget office began its review of the budget for 2001 by examining planned spending in 2000 and the current status of that review. 3. The pern�anent spending reduction goals for each department. 4. A current analysis of spending and financing projections. If you have additional questions on these subjects, please contact me at your convenience. ob-a�9 w d � 3 m � � N N w v d � R V N C 3 �..� w C) m 6 6 0 0 d m L m `m `m m ` m' a v n' a' g $ a n oa r m c c m m w N 9 p q � O O O C `� a R C LL 0 0 N & � o m ° r `Bv 0 � � m 3 � e � V m � u A o 0 � m m � � � 0 n '� C m � ° � ]I N Q Q � 0 a s c - o E 6 `m � Q a � T C O C N 0 C °� E u n n a ` 5 0 c " w� Q � p E N p v � m E Q m n E � � a O r _ A p m � N V � n m m � Am gm � LL � ? � a � w m V ° m � a � i ° c o U U `� 9 ^ m m ° o m F�i 9 q T�• C � O C ° q a _ c ` _ u = m � `o m m m� m 9 N Q m U' VJ `d li � O a g m m m @ � a O m 0 �i � � c � m `a LL s' g a S w 00 tt — rr - 00 0 v v v a n n 0 0 C C � a m a m m m m m v a a m m `a 'm m 'm aa a ' n' $ g g lV N E E E m � z n n n v a o b = c c c m m m � w w � O 0 o' N b N m m m m �8 � g� �� m�'_m � 0 g b � ^ m � P IG S N t�i " q' 0 m m m � E n � y n C m A �NN 0 3 m yy � 0 q � C � � c � O � W`c C m � � 6 � a N m � m� { p � W n ° � � " e c m m c O c E 'u � N Q O � V $ 2 0 b H � � J C' � o 0 � w�. � L aa o �a$`' � � N N o $ �� C fO E ° c m 2 i & O a ; � n � m O w m [ � j 3 Q m s s N 0 � � m d n m m � m ' m N y � ° c a � i `m E p _ � N N � � 3 a m n � � s ��� ��eg � m m � � m '- � as� C w a c a C l {L J n m m � C _ � � w $ E E c n w c c 3 3 n o 0 �_ O D j. T T >'. ¢ a a u ii `o o`o `o `o � L S L Y £ � O D 9 a N N N N Vl 25 25 25 z5 $ E E� E E E « W w�`V o F 0 0 0 K C K C K$.a B B$ n u a a n o r 'o 0 0 0 c c c 5 c g � y g � m m ` `m � m � m � u� � w w w Z Z 2 Z Z O O O O Y'y Y] O D o �o.=m ro $�r' 7 �SS 0 N�[I h��� m fD S O VI N V E @ n 3 � m � `- w o w ei � A W p 3 - 0 m '° � � o $ 5 `o ? � W � m � � o J � � 4 ° 8 Po m � 9 � ° = ° � i c � - m E 1 0 m L � m m x�'U @ � m m ° � � � m� o o m� U W m U � � ^ m w � � o C H �NCCC._�if K u m m° �.^�- M 2 0 W LL r m � ' m W m ; F Z 2 O a m c 3 6 a � 0 n 5 � �� ^ 0 `m � y c � U c m � � N n g q c m �a 3 � � s m ° m ° C � O C � $_ a O 1 ba m s ry c 6 a m `m w L d C m E `o a a `m Z a R a' b � LL m � L m p LL 0 y 5 �, c � m � w� 8 O m p O O N n O o� e � N A N � c $ ° m m g9 � F m ` d O � �5 mt� a fn'.5 � m t w v =� m m s' g n _ 3 � 6 � @ m � o m ` U K m U O � 0 n U O yy a ` � N m '�-" � E R � m c LL � ` � � a c y p m � �N f a � m c L E a m m a O 0 � m d d m @ S m c c D c � m m m m m cs_ c m m m m m m m m m m � - 'm m m o m 0 0 0 0 o g 9 m m V 9 m O m E E£ E E E c c c c c c c s a a m m m L L L L L t o` `o `o o `o 0 ° m m m m 0 0 0 0 0 0 Z z z 2 z Z c c �' ° c $ c c c � m C C C � c c c c c c o a � m o 0 _ _ `m `a m m a m 9 9 9 9 D 9 n' a' n' s' a' a' � t 0 m m 0 o c c c c c m m m m m o `m `m `m `m `m m` qgwwww 0 0 0 6 d o O 8 �� 8 $ 8��oh��� �N $ `f �inmvv�m N � Z a '° _ m m ` � W m C � W sJ $ ? � g m Y a o $ c 0 2 z m� � mW aFa iap p h N` m` � � 0 W g°, ° ?. c � p q � � Of � S'- Y C U� y T O � m ro r� m m N 2� m_. a 2 b E m m W H F� U € m 6 m$ p� O� N 9 � Y � O � � w m � i ti� v y m � D:'a � m w�� m c� c m E y J m E� 8�� m W E£ � a, � n �$ x � i Q E 2 P � �-° 'o a w` m .� o T^ 'o ° m m� C a g� mm3o�sm��m�� ° ,S� � n 5 a� @ n� U LL 6 4 V O N U D 1 F W � � � � � q y P � S 8 N fp m A 2 m ¢ 0 y q 3 ` o_ m m O e` a N -S 0 �` J n : ° �E3 a`a�wm C Q m c � m � $ m c I � c c 'c E E c 'c ° o w ° m m _ = � = _ _ `o �`o € `o `o `o `o 'm 'm 'm L L 6 d d 0 o a - - - `m m `m n n n a a v 'q a o v 0 �41 m m m � 0 0 m m m m m m _ _ L _ _ - > 2 > a > a `o �5 0 `a `o ° m ° m_ � m ° m ° m_ v n� m n n m n m m m a n a a a� . cc`c"� c c 0 N W � 4 4 V L V 3����� m m � a a a� a c � ° c � > j c u�i u.unu'. O O O � O m O 1p N a N � O � W O O N� � � � b� Y O O O N •� � W U � a m O q c � u � 0 9 � ° `5 z 2 2, £ 3 U � ~ � � j 9 ? C N � c m `-�� c�+ W m o ° �`m E` 0 � �j � p � d {p Z � � � K y� � N� n c m N F ' 3 N m m Y�� � c =� E y _ O c y � � m 8 m o� v E m 3�� m w mti �� 0 �j m m m OO p 0 O � O m � _� U W li � O N- O N m_ LL`= T' � m qm O C� V� Q C 0 j� J U 1Y 1 1 U j �UU. Y? 6 d � � � � � � N m O 0 � Y m �« � 0 m V ° � � $ C LL 'o m t? ` ° m Oii N � $ � m r 2 �b-a�� Budget Management Team Rationale for egamining adopted spending in 2000. Goal: Keep snending within budeet limits in 2000 and 2001. Decisions leading up to the adopted spending for 2000 occurred in several steps: April-May, 1999. Department staff, led by the department or office director, reviewed the department or office spending priorities within established limits and proposed a spending plan. T'heir plan, given those spending limits, could not include all the spending they may have desired. They had to say what service or activity would not be continued in order to stay within the limits. Presumably, if guidelines were followed, all the services or activities that were inciuded were more important than those that were not. 2. May-June, 1999. Next, budget staff, working with the department or office director and his or her key stafF and the budget director did a further review of the spending plan and, either agreed with the plan, or suggested modificarions to it. The modifications could include substitution of a service that was included for one that was not or the spending limits may have been relaxed because the spending plan, in the opinion of the analyst, needed something that was excluded and he or she did not propose a substitute. July, 1999. Next, budget staff, the department or of£ice director, the budget director and the mayor completed a similaz analysis, on a nanower set of items, to what was done in step three and again agreed to decisions made in step three or made other modifications to the plan. The mayor then proposed the composite spending plan to the council for 2000. 4. September-December, 1999. Nea�t, the city council assisted by their fiscal director and the budget director completed their own review and analysis and agreed with eazlier decisions or made new modifications. 5. In each step of the process, the review may have focused on similar services or activities or one step may have examined a service not considered in another step. At each step, however, a whole group of services and activities, in fact the vast majority of them, were inciuded in the spending plan because everyone agreed that they were important, in fact, more important than the service or activity that one group of decision makers may have decided to exclude. 6. January, 2000. As the budget staff and the budget management team prepazed to begin the cycle ali over again and looked at the spending limits that decision makers would face in 2001, it seemed to make sense to first reexamine the last set of spending proposals that were added to the 2000 adopted budget. It made sense because, first department staff, then budget staff, then the mayor, and finally, the council had agreed that all other spending proposals were at least as important or more important than the fmal items because the last items added had not replaced any of the others. 7. Recognizing that some decision makers might make different decisions if they had this to do all over again, the budget office and management team will treat all spending proposais of equal value at this point and give each proposal an opportunity to prove that it should be preserved and some other spending item excluded. That will enable us to consider options for controlling costs without predetermining what any of the items might be. 3 C � � C U N N � W m � ol O c � p_I � d � �� N y N af n R' O I O O � rn N � c�a Of � a v r c�0 t N ti (�.. � � � u�'i c a�i t�o � � � � N < m O O t0 � N (D N � �- of M � _ ^ (O � O v LV (O v v v v t") Oi th t� N O O � SO .., �. ,_. � � C °' � ... � �- v �e-ay� � 7 I � N � �I � � � � v (v I (O j` I vl � N � V' � � tn N � � tn O � � � O � tn O I t0 t� I� 6� O I � r 0 O ^ W � n � t0 th 7 C � W r N � p O Q � [� ,� � � � � ._. �'' � N . � . � .�_. � O r � N I � � "" � `-� v I �� i � 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 � o o � o 0 0 0 0 0 � ° o N o N oJ N O M N Q � � O V; r t0 c- N T O aD N � O 0 r N f� O � (7 � N O 1� � O O O � � p � (y O o •. rn � o ° n v �n rn � � M o rn o co o � ^ � v o N � � N � � M � M � n � o � � � c o m n v �n m v_ co � � U [t N � r � V � � v � ' N c• � � � M N � � o N (�p !' ° r v '- M O N � � � � O 0 (J� N � � u. \ � Q� � � /�� V �M. � a a� M � W � � N Q O � N � � � � m � O� � � Q m N W C o � � � aa 3 Q m� N � d � d � O > Q m r a <o �n v < � m � � u� m °� u ° 0 1 D r�- v v � N � f� � d' tn N 1� M f0 N O V � O �n t0 fV o f� � ui ifi (O ai {p � ` c" ej N O N f�0_ n N N M � p�i, a�- C�'1 f� M � f M O N < <- N c- P') t0 (� � N � � � M � � � o � O � � W (�D N O rn � � � � t�(� � < O c0 p�p `�Y 1� � O f� N O N (p � � � (O N � � I� r V� tn � N t�n (�p � p�j � p � Oi (D N n h � try th 1n t7 (P � I� � O� � O M OJ O (G N � O �[J N � f9 O o� m O N (O � ^ (V N � 07 aD O � I`: � p�j n c�j � N �- < N a- th M I'� Q� N � � c M � V N � O � O � � � � � h � '�t N O O � N � N O] tn M t0 aD O N u� eD fp th tO 01 � N f� � N � t0 Ol tn t0 � 1� m 1� N f� 01 V' M O1 � t� � .-- N 1� t0 f� O� N f� o� th (V o'i 1%} Oi t0 C o � V ai cV ah tci co ui c0 o aD oD tD O N N � � N N o�') ? W O (�p n p�p � N � � � � N c- � N s- Ci th I� W o O> O vi � � N N M U O � � 'R O C O N y V R (�j p N E d �O L y Q � .� Q � � � � � �� d' Q' > N U o •C C � � � � � � � O > > � � U � ii 2 S 2 Q J U � Q � �z tA C N � � U � L o � Q U W ,Z' �' J U U U N C � � T Y O � = 3 y Y F a' d N N R U n � a N c � U O U .� O U d � a�-i c N U � O U C � � O U � w a N �U C � O U 0 O C 0 3 a C U W N � n m � N � c � � > O � N N d U' m 0 F T 2001 Budget Planning Summary Gap Projection and Strategy �� �._v��� ._ �6-a�� Spending Financing Gap 2000 Adopted Budget - Gene21 Fund Fund Balance Use - Mayor 54.77�,798 Fund Balance Use - Council $1253,184 Total Fund Balance Use $6,023,982 Change in Use of Fund Balance 2000 to 2001 - Financing Column Changes to Spending - Spending Column Fund Balances decrease - 2000 Amounts Fund Balances deaease - 2000 Technology Initiatives Fund Balances decrease - 2000 Y2K Fund Balances decrease - 2000 Speafied Reserve items Fund Balances decrease - 2000 Highland Driving Range Design Total Changes in use of fund balance Year 2��� Proposed fund Balartce Use 2000 Adopted Budget Less One Time Use of Fund Balance Changes to Financing Change from 2000 HACA AdjusVnent Levy Adjustment Tax Levy Shift to or from Debt Service Non Repealing GraMs One Time Financing in 2000 (Science Museum sale) One Time Financing in 2000 (from Contract Services) Library Technical Training Specialist New Financing for 2001 LGA (expected normal increase) Interest Eamings One Time Financing in 2001 (internal Vansfer) Changes to Spending Change from 2000 2000 COUNCIL ITEM: One Time Technical Change 2000 COUNCIL ITEM: One Time River Bluff 7rai1 Connection Remove Remaining Specified ConGngency 2000 COUNCiI ITEM: Move Hf0 $$ Dutaf Contingency Move Workers' Comp Incentive Progrem out of Contingency Remove Remaining Y2K Budget New Spending for 2001 Salary Increases Fringes Increase Gene21 Fund Transfers for base growth in speciai tunds Inflation for UGlities Inflation for Other Non Compensation Related Spending Planned Shift of Officers From Pension Assets Fund Census PoSition Tort Claims increase Elections Municipal Memberships Exempt and Forfeited Properly Assessments CIB Per Diem Total Changes Totai General Fund Spending, Financing, and Gap Changes to Spending Base Reduction AllocaHons Changes to Financing Base Property Tax Relief (FUnd Balances) Total Changes to Base Year 2001 Generai Fund Base 163,608,599 ('150.000) (212,000) (785.387) ('170.000) (6,023,982) ?? 162,295,212 (30,000) (200,000) salary increases INCOMPLETE EST (6,304) (10,000) (288,350) 88,350 200,000 (243,742) 2,655,977 1,366,042 187.248 v � o v 152,076 � � 200,000 � � 8,000 25.272 4,100 4,tOS,609 163,608.599 (4,710,595) (150,000) (272,000) (78�,387) ('170,000) 157,584,677 0 0 � � (30,000) , (200,000) (97,377) (3,743) 1,221,105 500,000 120,000 1,509,985 'f66,403,821 'f59,094,602 (7,309,219) 0 0 'I66,A03,82'I '159,094,602 (7,309,219) GISHARE��BUDGETt2l\YR2001�200tGAP ^ V ORIGII�AL Presented By Referred To �,�h�3\`S °a RESOLUTI SAINT , MIlVNESOTA Committee: WHEREAS, a fine of $500 was imposed against the li d/b/a Food-N-Fuel (License ID # 17138) by Council File 00-3� WHEREAS, the Licensee was notified of the impo: January 25, 2000 by the OfFice of License, Inspections and which was to be paid by Friday, February 11, 2000; and � Council File # pp � '�.�g Green Sheet # 1 o0'T 6 a =_� by Food-N-Fuel, Inc., of the fine by letter dated �onmental Protection (LIEP), WHEREAS, as of Febnxary 23, 2000, no fine l�ad been received by the Office of LIEP; now, therefore, be it � RESOLVED, that the licenses held by F od-N-Fuel, Inc., d/b/a Food-N-Fuel (License ID #17138) are hereby suspended until such tim s the fine of $500 has been paid. Requested by Department of: �� // i� p ,, �� Adopted by Counci Adoption Certif' a Hy' AppYOVed y Mayor: BY: Date by Council Secretary Date Form Appxoved by City Attomey � BY: � �.%'-�_ l � ;� Approved by Mayor for Submission to Council By: 00 -ay� March 6, 2000 �� � TOTAL # OF SIGNATURE PAC,ES GREEN SHEET «,�: , �:�,..�..:� No �'��-�?7�2 �_._ � ❑ �.�. ❑ m.� ❑ „�,�� ❑ ..�.,�,�,o ❑YYDR�GlhsmfANi) ❑ (CL1P ALL LOCATIONS FOR SIGNATURt� Resolution suspending licenses held by Food-N-Fuel, 675 7th Street West, until the fine imposed by the City Council on January 12, 2000, (C.F. 00-31) is paid. PL4NNING CAMMISSION CIB COMMITTEE CIVIL SERVICE COMMISSION AMOUNTOFTRANSACTION (IXPWN) tl�uns v���m � woncea uMe. a convact rauns aepanmem� VES NO Hes m�s perarnlfirm aer heen a dlv emWcyeeT YES NO Dces this pereanlfi'm pwaess a sWli not IwrmallyposeesaeE by arry arreM cRy employee7 YES � k Mis pereoNfi�m a farpNetl �entloY7 VES NO fain ali vec answets m aeoarete sheet and atlach fn nrePn sheet COSTrttEVQlUE BUDfiETED (CIRCLE ONq ACTMSY NUMBER 1C"3-'�:G7 i ORIGINAL � Tlrc�!"1T TimTi-.�.T 00 - �yq Cuuncil File T QQ — 3{ Green Sheet � 104498 .1 Presented By Referred To Committee: Date i 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 9 10 11 12 13 RESOLVED, that the Licensee Food-N-Fuel, Inc. d/b/a Food-N-Fuel (License ID I�TO. 17138), located at 67� 7`" Street R'est in Saint Paul is hereby ordered to pay a fine of $500.00 for the violation of Sale of Alcoholic Beveraoes to UnderaQe Persons. Said fine shall be paid to the O�ce of License, Inspections and Environmental Protection within thirty (30) da}�s of the adoption of this resolution by the Council and si�nature by the Mayor. This resolution and the action of the Council in this matter aze based upon the facts contained in the December 2, 1999, I`'otic� of Violation letter to the licensee, the Police Report CN 99-197211, and such arguments as m2�� have been presented to the Council at the public hearing. The facts were not contested by the licensee. Recuested by De�a=tnent ef: �Y� FJlIL'�ea .TU3lifc�(yn Adopted by Covncil: Dat_ �� 2pp.q �� � T�' Rdoptien Certified by Council�$ec-etary ay• 1 .. .lpprove3 by N.ayor: ate BY.� —_ _ Fcrm :,pnroved by City a[.o-i_y /� a ��,/; «� :� � c�.��u,n Acprwed �y Mayor £cr St'�missicn to Cow�cil By: be�a`�`� March 8, 2000, City Council Action Minutes Page 3 Heritage Preservation Commission. (Public testimony will be taken on this issue only) 11. . Resolution - 00-224 - Approving a Single Fanuly Housing Program to be financed by the issuance of Single Family Mortgage Revenue Bonds and Mortgage Credit Certificates. This item was considered as a public hearing at 5:30 p.m: Adopted Yeas - 7 Nays - 0 12. Resolurion - 00-225 - Establishing the upgrade in Pazk and Recreation Manager to Grade 26 of the Supervisory Range of Compensation in the Salary Plan and Rates of Compensation. Laid over to March 15 Yeas - 7 Nays - 0 The Council requested that the Administration report on March 15 on the proposed reductions in spending under the City's 2000 budget. 13. Resolution - 00-226 - Adjusting the rates for a number of Special Employment tifles in the Salary Plan and Rates of Compensation. Adopted Yeas - 7 Nays - 0 14. Resolution - 00-227 - Direcring the Deparhnent of Planning and Economic Development to work with the Capital River Council to prepare appropriate amendments to the Legislarive Code related to signage in downtown. Adopted Yeas - 7 Nays - 0 15. Resolution - 00-228 - Approving application for Auto Repair Garage, Second Hand Dealer-Motor Vehicles, and Motor Vehicle Dealer-New Licenses by Mid- America Emergency Vehicles, dba Road Rescue Emergency Vehicles, 1133 Rankin Street. (Legislative Hearing Officer recommends ap�rovai� Adopted Yeas - 7 Nays - 0 16. Resolurion - 00-229 - Approving change in the Brewery Neighborhood Project budget. Adopted Yeas - 7 Nays - 0 �� Cify Councii's Additions fo the 2000 Budget Se/ecfed Items Affec6ng Fund Balance Deseription CTtv Aftomev 9 Mtl f�mQing relatad to law Werk 2 Add fundmg tetateG to derk typist 0 iRf n c ry/ � 3 Fundng for Properly CoOe EMorcement �efated fo seasonal inspectots. Cletk N, and Typist 1 HumaiR(qh�fc 4 Souti�em Mn. Regionat Legal Services Contract for 12 monNu ra•; < 5 Sunday Service Hours at Riverview and SC Mthony 6 Moming Service Hours at ArGngron, Hamnne, Rice, Riveniew and St Anthony � Materiais BuOget Parke a��-�h',on'� , 8 Restore wt for swe'eping seleci seasonal Ice rinks 9 ' Restore fundng related ro rec d'irector cut at Eastview 10 Restore funtling related to rec diractor for senior rec progrertu � 1 Loan fpr Design of HigNand Park Driving Range 12 Mertiam Park Rivec Traii Connection Fechnoloav d Manae�e.+r Serviee< � , 13,14 Health Fair Ssanerai Gevemm nt aM.,..nfe Spe�tifmd ContUgency 'IS Loan for HighWnO Driving Range Construe6o� ]6 City Attomey, improving Serv�p Dei'rvery 17 fair �ning Standards Testing and Remed"adon 1a Parks / Pubiic Works - Slveeper for sidewatks and ke rinks 19 PEO -tunding reiated lo Gry PWnner 11 20 Code Er�forcement Spending bb Keep Reduca 3T,061 34,468 22579 • 8 months 102,276 75.493 1 derk N seasena� inspectors 9,000 43,193 65,929 100,000 23.794 5�,000 50,000 170.000 10,000 11,760 500,000 51,371 35,000. . 46,5� 6 48.500 100,000 37,061 11.489 26,783 9,ODD 18,373 etf 5/5/00 28,039 eff W5�00 100,000 24,820 37,890 12,794 1't,000 early winter 00 50.000 50,000 no,00a 10,000 97,760 500.000 rr�aybe 59.371 35,000 46,516 . 48,500 100,000 490.819 Total - - - 1�488.868 998.049 . : w i C T C V y � W m � N €w o 4 � o mom �— N �' � Q (q � .�.. � N � � � � a � 0 ° o N � Q! Q> r 0 N � a � O 0 � N � � � ` � � � V 1 � T � W 0 cV O N � � � O N �N t'^V p� '� '� f�D e� � � �p � ... i. .-. � N 7 � O [� ^ O �1 1n �O m Ql i0 O f� � O�D N � � � . � CD 'p s0 m N v) � W co Q � r �O O � $ �.. " � � ` [V -' „ " � v v v � N O O y � � t9 Oi e�7 � � v � � � tO - T � � oo-a�q . v � .. � � m $ � ^ �o ca n a �o o � m `° o `° o� m m n ° � r m .°- n � m e� . c v 'q W n � p � c m i ° � o � v � v � � v v v N v v w � v f� O � O r � N v v ' " v ' e a N m N C l7 N Q N m p Q � � � N 0 � O � O a N e c�i < o � � cv t� o�; c�i � c�i o n oi o o c o°- ��n . . � .- �i m � C N t��] M � � m O � m 0 lD � O O � N O f0 n � '�Q� O p= h w !7 Q n N � V' Q � N � c9 m < iD 0 V I Q N �rj � O 1� Of �., CO N � Q 0 � � M tp a p O N t�4 v t- Q ' v � N l�J � l'> Q � N Q � � [O � � ` s t7 a e v o m .cr v w ao m v t� . m < a ° o � n < Q Q m o» G1 N �- ' 1� N R W O v t`� � �� < m O � 1� Q O N 1C1 tfi f0 01 f0 O P � m nj W Q Q - �D Q m O N tD n N N m eN O�1 � M A t�7 � n � p � W � N e= � (�j � M t9 C+ Qj N � t�q � c�7 � t0 t�0 � a O n d � c m o m � v r. u ° v m m ° o 'y u� < Q v m co m a'o a�i m N ~ � � � o`ti w n c� �n ro ° rn Q o � a m P C� r 'a �" m N � � � � N N � M C�0 C Q � � � �`�` � O O T m �: � N � t7 1�i 1� Oi N Oi � .� � .r tn f�p � M e N O � O � N tq N i0 . �q l7 t0 t0 r O M N �P tn Oi m m ^ �' R M Q�f 7 P � a�� � LL� r m � W e � N � N � � ,� j O N � ~ n N N fpD O f��l 1� t�0_ n m � � � O r h � Q m N � r nj � � W � N h R 1� m a tl! a� i� 0 N W ` p � � .r Yj » � � � � � .i o p � m c L° a � m c � e C7 � y W V p m C C � e E m o.c o Q ° �. U � w W c q � � � � m m c " � " c � y �, �, z z a m � s 3 E U o e � �m � � � 3 a' � Q U � U N � dl E � W � o � 3 � � w 2• � m � W � U U U � �T 2 2 2 ¢ � � U U. 1- a LL � C m LL d c U C 0 .� E U � W a m E c > 0 c� m C 0 C7 Ta H Entered on the 2001 6enerat Fund Gap Projection see fi:W SERS1flU0GEti1�231YR799811498GAP 6k tor ust of Ws sheet Rem �b-a� �ooi ? ? eenotes change artaun musi be esUmated an0 entered by rlspons�e staff Gsted ResPo�sible AmouM Staff Fxplanatinn Financing ttACA �ustment (Qurent Stam Law) 2006 AdopfeC -S?A.809.726 -no dian9e iP� Tom C.} neweK Legklatfve viopod LCA Ad'pstment (Curent State le«I 2000 Adapted 548�84t,193 -2Wtnumber [efkcts 2.SX inaease Wirent qw -nOt Z000 Llgi.ta6re PApo521 Ch2ngt in USC Df FYtq H21ant6 2000l02001 ASiat cxneril kKl or ru�M 6al�s appKd u rnandig• badc arc amo�a�t apvfied n z000 sudget FWb BdxCeS dareasE •�D00 tsdyWbpy iNi6iW�3 Fuw sauexasaaa�se-a000v2�c bw� Cga+s�fv�.+es�n�.s �nus�.cs.�sz tnen,�s amc�a�cgraa�+) 5ma eahnca dea6nx-tfi�leM Omh+D Ranu Desi9n Fwb Bsbnoe Oeceasa-200o Speo'fkd Raerve • Cowwt-hiphlane pivin8 Rangp tonswdbn FunO 9atanrs decresse-2J00 Speofietl Roswe-COUnd-ad?Jb�al aNOmay f�d 8etante Oeaease •2000 SD� Racervs - Wwit3-FairSqn0ar0s Houeing 7esting FuM Balanee Oeuease -2000 SpedGed Raa�e-Couneil • Sweecer FwW Baia� tle�ase • 20D0 SD0�7eC Racenra. CoV�d -fSly Planner FunO &�Wnce deerease • II000 SpecifieC Raem • Counol • uncpeeGc eo0a Worcement TOTA� (6.023.96� Property Tax Financing uKrsam n kvy � SNft (bI /aom oeet Ss+v'ae •(CanY olomm u�s� ahw deetsema butlget baa) StaM1 pro6eGMJ OUkpuendes ReOUce eNinkaga zPP6eC b 2 percent7? 2000 GranS (irot repeacn9 ;n ?A01) Po�'¢e WetOnSee6 Franctdse Fee Atljustrnent DH ampire 6ulitler Norenco steam - eant pra0td Incase. NRG Energy has not nepotiateE agraement w! payer, District CooGng Energy park NSP GEFF - rrte invease antidpated'm 2000 budge� is there another for 200l4? fnaease In Budgef Estimate !or Mterest 6rtiug5 -?AOOACOpteC 3,000,000 (mdutles PW Sewor stuR) NelO b meet rilh Joo. Tadd t0 redew Wnges ei GF Wt mi9At stlect sae of G� ThM Totld�n OPO�Y Merest fa4 tl akWare Interest COnYnue Courr+l Pdded SOauiGC3 kn0ln9? 1�0 AGpqed 275.000 hler Fund Traesters (Central Service Cnsh) ware� ur,bty ow+vaa ror eenua� smkes hur funA TransFers -othet PW rNund N WM�u Sveet eacass-net of SN10.000 tor 6rae y�s HotN Motet Tases - posstDle inarease? (pa ee. ro, eu rceeoes an�a,sooau� ae�u:u�enes = ssoo.e� vs ssra.azz a+zoeo cF eaye e�m�owaru+a*axa>szs.00a ee.x�.'rc+xea�oarwss� Snare of County Fmes �+�a�u.sas.acz �essncamsz.oze.sz�. co�dap,c��ny:�vease5�s.000ao.000. ��. 7,227.105 S+uce B�uCO (4,�tOS95) (150.000) R�t000) (+�.�1 (500.000) (sa.371) �ss.ono� (46576) (a8.500) (toD,00o) 0 0 0 2001 ? 4 (30.000) 0 0 0 0 0 2COt ? ? 0 zeo� t t 720.000 0 0 BryCe / Joe Tom Ron 8ruce Ron iZOn Etit Ron Ron Ron BNOL' BNLC Bntce Bruce Fton BNCB Bruee Bruce HNCt BNCE Bruce Bruee eruce 7om 6ruce BNC9 � Item Amount Exolanation Z000 COWJqIlTEl.t Mxriam Pak RivetTral CanecLon , (�iMl2� CaO�lRl[�1211I � (EJf10VB tlWll SyC�Ed flSENE Caun�'F6gNaM OmrmD Wnpe coi661dm Counea-ada�analanomey Cbund-Fav SmMerOs Flouce�g T� CouneA -;,weecer C�nd-Gty?hm9r Caxid • w�Cw mOe �orcement General City YYde Iterts 200t Department Base Adustrnents - estcnated 20D7 Projeete0 Salary Inueases 2001 frkfge 8enebt es�ria0es. Gh?JERAL FUND share Woeice�s Compenca4on Ertpbyee Inswance ReGrae inswanra Ss�lr3nC! Pey Po6ce pension (Re1ieG PERA antl me�a�e) Fre per�on (ReGet. PERA and meGfore) FICA Mediwe PER4 Otl�er pensipn ?A01 AOpitlon forinllaUon 2.3%of utiGGes 371,373 2007 Addition fw in0ation f.6% of?AO's. 300'a, 800's (PW � 539,000: 57.3M�3%) Departments Human Resources Employce OevNOprnent anE Supavbory Tralnfi9 Ciry ACorney CAO doD SNOy and Contrya $ettle�nenb TMS PC Reptacement PWn - aQd NII annual effect of 2000's lease 5 whiq� was 6S monws and whatever ow�eC rtm�U�ines w[ repbce In 2001. Leese 1 In 1886, lesm 2 h 7987. leas�e 3 in 1998. ka5e t N SH99. lease 5 in 2000 antl balarce o! 5 anE iU of some nurMer M�ronttis for kese 8(at XXY:) is �ew fot 2001_ Geaero� Fund Iransfer tor bau growM H speriai fwds 7M5 -PRELIMINARY pasipn group Conaaet Swioes-P�ra�ss++p (tiEw kr2007) At 200t SE Remove One Time 200� Programs kortwve New IS OneTime MvesEnanb-2000 W�C bone yesr 7 of3 seDa�am t00 mb segmenc movo Oonuin name sarvico b NT Pu61k Workt PW cicrease for added signs, slpnaB, and SVeet Lighting General Fund Iransfer tor base growU� tn spedai funds vu6Gewort�s Siree[Maineenaneetr 022T142330 =563.120 PuDtie Waks T2f11e yfC ytreeVghG O?283 �57,543 Removt� One Thro 200p proprams remowaueccwoncs•Manayame�a^+a^rerineaaaearar�000 •Sta.soo (t0,000) (500.000) (5f.a7�) C3+.000) (�658) (48.5a01 (ioD.000) �oo� ? ? 2055.976 2001 i ? 7.tSa.977 716.789 2oot 7 ? Z001 9 7 1001 ? 7 200� a t Zoo7 7 � 2001 17 2601 T ? zoot � ? zooi ? ? 0 too.000 d 0 0 poo.000) I?5.000) (?SA00) 0 p,i?A 57.643 0 Responsihie Staff �b-��9 BNCE RAn Ron Ron Ron Ftan Ron 0 Joe/EriC Ron Ron ftOH Ron Ron Ron Ron Ron Ron Ron Joe Joe 627b Barb Tom Tom Tom Tom 7om 7am Tom Tom Tom Tom OFFICE OF THE MAYOR �l/ - '���'J FINANCIAL SERVICES OFFICE, Budget Section � Joseph %eid, Director of Financial Services CITY OF SAINT PAITL zso c�ry x�rt Telephone: (6I2) 26(r8543 Norm Coleman, Mayor IS We.st Kelingg Boulevard Fatsimile: (612) 266-8547 Saint Pau1, Mimresota 55102-I63I MEMORANDUM To: Council President Dan Bostrom Council Members From: Joe Reid, Financial Services Direct RE: Budget Update Date: Mazch 15, 2000 The attached material is being submitted to you for your information on a number of matters related to the 2000 and 2001 budget. At the council meeting on March 15, 2000, I will also report to you on some additional issues and propose a schedule for future updates. 1. A spreadsheet providing a status report on changes to the 2000 proposed general fund spending and fmancing budget as of Mazch 15, 2000. 2. A description of how the budget office began its review of the budget for 2001 by examining planned spending in 2000 and the current status of that review. 3. The pern�anent spending reduction goals for each department. 4. A current analysis of spending and financing projections. If you have additional questions on these subjects, please contact me at your convenience. ob-a�9 w d � 3 m � � N N w v d � R V N C 3 �..� w C) m 6 6 0 0 d m L m `m `m m ` m' a v n' a' g $ a n oa r m c c m m w N 9 p q � O O O C `� a R C LL 0 0 N & � o m ° r `Bv 0 � � m 3 � e � V m � u A o 0 � m m � � � 0 n '� C m � ° � ]I N Q Q � 0 a s c - o E 6 `m � Q a � T C O C N 0 C °� E u n n a ` 5 0 c " w� Q � p E N p v � m E Q m n E � � a O r _ A p m � N V � n m m � Am gm � LL � ? � a � w m V ° m � a � i ° c o U U `� 9 ^ m m ° o m F�i 9 q T�• C � O C ° q a _ c ` _ u = m � `o m m m� m 9 N Q m U' VJ `d li � O a g m m m @ � a O m 0 �i � � c � m `a LL s' g a S w 00 tt — rr - 00 0 v v v a n n 0 0 C C � a m a m m m m m v a a m m `a 'm m 'm aa a ' n' $ g g lV N E E E m � z n n n v a o b = c c c m m m � w w � O 0 o' N b N m m m m �8 � g� �� m�'_m � 0 g b � ^ m � P IG S N t�i " q' 0 m m m � E n � y n C m A �NN 0 3 m yy � 0 q � C � � c � O � W`c C m � � 6 � a N m � m� { p � W n ° � � " e c m m c O c E 'u � N Q O � V $ 2 0 b H � � J C' � o 0 � w�. � L aa o �a$`' � � N N o $ �� C fO E ° c m 2 i & O a ; � n � m O w m [ � j 3 Q m s s N 0 � � m d n m m � m ' m N y � ° c a � i `m E p _ � N N � � 3 a m n � � s ��� ��eg � m m � � m '- � as� C w a c a C l {L J n m m � C _ � � w $ E E c n w c c 3 3 n o 0 �_ O D j. T T >'. ¢ a a u ii `o o`o `o `o � L S L Y £ � O D 9 a N N N N Vl 25 25 25 z5 $ E E� E E E « W w�`V o F 0 0 0 K C K C K$.a B B$ n u a a n o r 'o 0 0 0 c c c 5 c g � y g � m m ` `m � m � m � u� � w w w Z Z 2 Z Z O O O O Y'y Y] O D o �o.=m ro $�r' 7 �SS 0 N�[I h��� m fD S O VI N V E @ n 3 � m � `- w o w ei � A W p 3 - 0 m '° � � o $ 5 `o ? � W � m � � o J � � 4 ° 8 Po m � 9 � ° = ° � i c � - m E 1 0 m L � m m x�'U @ � m m ° � � � m� o o m� U W m U � � ^ m w � � o C H �NCCC._�if K u m m° �.^�- M 2 0 W LL r m � ' m W m ; F Z 2 O a m c 3 6 a � 0 n 5 � �� ^ 0 `m � y c � U c m � � N n g q c m �a 3 � � s m ° m ° C � O C � $_ a O 1 ba m s ry c 6 a m `m w L d C m E `o a a `m Z a R a' b � LL m � L m p LL 0 y 5 �, c � m � w� 8 O m p O O N n O o� e � N A N � c $ ° m m g9 � F m ` d O � �5 mt� a fn'.5 � m t w v =� m m s' g n _ 3 � 6 � @ m � o m ` U K m U O � 0 n U O yy a ` � N m '�-" � E R � m c LL � ` � � a c y p m � �N f a � m c L E a m m a O 0 � m d d m @ S m c c D c � m m m m m cs_ c m m m m m m m m m m � - 'm m m o m 0 0 0 0 o g 9 m m V 9 m O m E E£ E E E c c c c c c c s a a m m m L L L L L t o` `o `o o `o 0 ° m m m m 0 0 0 0 0 0 Z z z 2 z Z c c �' ° c $ c c c � m C C C � c c c c c c o a � m o 0 _ _ `m `a m m a m 9 9 9 9 D 9 n' a' n' s' a' a' � t 0 m m 0 o c c c c c m m m m m o `m `m `m `m `m m` qgwwww 0 0 0 6 d o O 8 �� 8 $ 8��oh��� �N $ `f �inmvv�m N � Z a '° _ m m ` � W m C � W sJ $ ? � g m Y a o $ c 0 2 z m� � mW aFa iap p h N` m` � � 0 W g°, ° ?. c � p q � � Of � S'- Y C U� y T O � m ro r� m m N 2� m_. a 2 b E m m W H F� U € m 6 m$ p� O� N 9 � Y � O � � w m � i ti� v y m � D:'a � m w�� m c� c m E y J m E� 8�� m W E£ � a, � n �$ x � i Q E 2 P � �-° 'o a w` m .� o T^ 'o ° m m� C a g� mm3o�sm��m�� ° ,S� � n 5 a� @ n� U LL 6 4 V O N U D 1 F W � � � � � q y P � S 8 N fp m A 2 m ¢ 0 y q 3 ` o_ m m O e` a N -S 0 �` J n : ° �E3 a`a�wm C Q m c � m � $ m c I � c c 'c E E c 'c ° o w ° m m _ = � = _ _ `o �`o € `o `o `o `o 'm 'm 'm L L 6 d d 0 o a - - - `m m `m n n n a a v 'q a o v 0 �41 m m m � 0 0 m m m m m m _ _ L _ _ - > 2 > a > a `o �5 0 `a `o ° m ° m_ � m ° m ° m_ v n� m n n m n m m m a n a a a� . cc`c"� c c 0 N W � 4 4 V L V 3����� m m � a a a� a c � ° c � > j c u�i u.unu'. O O O � O m O 1p N a N � O � W O O N� � � � b� Y O O O N •� � W U � a m O q c � u � 0 9 � ° `5 z 2 2, £ 3 U � ~ � � j 9 ? C N � c m `-�� c�+ W m o ° �`m E` 0 � �j � p � d {p Z � � � K y� � N� n c m N F ' 3 N m m Y�� � c =� E y _ O c y � � m 8 m o� v E m 3�� m w mti �� 0 �j m m m OO p 0 O � O m � _� U W li � O N- O N m_ LL`= T' � m qm O C� V� Q C 0 j� J U 1Y 1 1 U j �UU. Y? 6 d � � � � � � N m O 0 � Y m �« � 0 m V ° � � $ C LL 'o m t? ` ° m Oii N � $ � m r 2 �b-a�� Budget Management Team Rationale for egamining adopted spending in 2000. Goal: Keep snending within budeet limits in 2000 and 2001. Decisions leading up to the adopted spending for 2000 occurred in several steps: April-May, 1999. Department staff, led by the department or office director, reviewed the department or office spending priorities within established limits and proposed a spending plan. T'heir plan, given those spending limits, could not include all the spending they may have desired. They had to say what service or activity would not be continued in order to stay within the limits. Presumably, if guidelines were followed, all the services or activities that were inciuded were more important than those that were not. 2. May-June, 1999. Next, budget staff, working with the department or office director and his or her key stafF and the budget director did a further review of the spending plan and, either agreed with the plan, or suggested modificarions to it. The modifications could include substitution of a service that was included for one that was not or the spending limits may have been relaxed because the spending plan, in the opinion of the analyst, needed something that was excluded and he or she did not propose a substitute. July, 1999. Next, budget staff, the department or of£ice director, the budget director and the mayor completed a similaz analysis, on a nanower set of items, to what was done in step three and again agreed to decisions made in step three or made other modifications to the plan. The mayor then proposed the composite spending plan to the council for 2000. 4. September-December, 1999. Nea�t, the city council assisted by their fiscal director and the budget director completed their own review and analysis and agreed with eazlier decisions or made new modifications. 5. In each step of the process, the review may have focused on similar services or activities or one step may have examined a service not considered in another step. At each step, however, a whole group of services and activities, in fact the vast majority of them, were inciuded in the spending plan because everyone agreed that they were important, in fact, more important than the service or activity that one group of decision makers may have decided to exclude. 6. January, 2000. As the budget staff and the budget management team prepazed to begin the cycle ali over again and looked at the spending limits that decision makers would face in 2001, it seemed to make sense to first reexamine the last set of spending proposals that were added to the 2000 adopted budget. It made sense because, first department staff, then budget staff, then the mayor, and finally, the council had agreed that all other spending proposals were at least as important or more important than the fmal items because the last items added had not replaced any of the others. 7. Recognizing that some decision makers might make different decisions if they had this to do all over again, the budget office and management team will treat all spending proposais of equal value at this point and give each proposal an opportunity to prove that it should be preserved and some other spending item excluded. That will enable us to consider options for controlling costs without predetermining what any of the items might be. 3 C � � C U N N � W m � ol O c � p_I � d � �� N y N af n R' O I O O � rn N � c�a Of � a v r c�0 t N ti (�.. � � � u�'i c a�i t�o � � � � N < m O O t0 � N (D N � �- of M � _ ^ (O � O v LV (O v v v v t") Oi th t� N O O � SO .., �. ,_. � � C °' � ... � �- v �e-ay� � 7 I � N � �I � � � � v (v I (O j` I vl � N � V' � � tn N � � tn O � � � O � tn O I t0 t� I� 6� O I � r 0 O ^ W � n � t0 th 7 C � W r N � p O Q � [� ,� � � � � ._. �'' � N . � . � .�_. � O r � N I � � "" � `-� v I �� i � 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 � o o � o 0 0 0 0 0 � ° o N o N oJ N O M N Q � � O V; r t0 c- N T O aD N � O 0 r N f� O � (7 � N O 1� � O O O � � p � (y O o •. rn � o ° n v �n rn � � M o rn o co o � ^ � v o N � � N � � M � M � n � o � � � c o m n v �n m v_ co � � U [t N � r � V � � v � ' N c• � � � M N � � o N (�p !' ° r v '- M O N � � � � O 0 (J� N � � u. \ � Q� � � /�� V �M. � a a� M � W � � N Q O � N � � � � m � O� � � Q m N W C o � � � aa 3 Q m� N � d � d � O > Q m r a <o �n v < � m � � u� m °� u ° 0 1 D r�- v v � N � f� � d' tn N 1� M f0 N O V � O �n t0 fV o f� � ui ifi (O ai {p � ` c" ej N O N f�0_ n N N M � p�i, a�- C�'1 f� M � f M O N < <- N c- P') t0 (� � N � � � M � � � o � O � � W (�D N O rn � � � � t�(� � < O c0 p�p `�Y 1� � O f� N O N (p � � � (O N � � I� r V� tn � N t�n (�p � p�j � p � Oi (D N n h � try th 1n t7 (P � I� � O� � O M OJ O (G N � O �[J N � f9 O o� m O N (O � ^ (V N � 07 aD O � I`: � p�j n c�j � N �- < N a- th M I'� Q� N � � c M � V N � O � O � � � � � h � '�t N O O � N � N O] tn M t0 aD O N u� eD fp th tO 01 � N f� � N � t0 Ol tn t0 � 1� m 1� N f� 01 V' M O1 � t� � .-- N 1� t0 f� O� N f� o� th (V o'i 1%} Oi t0 C o � V ai cV ah tci co ui c0 o aD oD tD O N N � � N N o�') ? W O (�p n p�p � N � � � � N c- � N s- Ci th I� W o O> O vi � � N N M U O � � 'R O C O N y V R (�j p N E d �O L y Q � .� Q � � � � � �� d' Q' > N U o •C C � � � � � � � O > > � � U � ii 2 S 2 Q J U � Q � �z tA C N � � U � L o � Q U W ,Z' �' J U U U N C � � T Y O � = 3 y Y F a' d N N R U n � a N c � U O U .� O U d � a�-i c N U � O U C � � O U � w a N �U C � O U 0 O C 0 3 a C U W N � n m � N � c � � > O � N N d U' m 0 F T 2001 Budget Planning Summary Gap Projection and Strategy �� �._v��� ._ �6-a�� Spending Financing Gap 2000 Adopted Budget - Gene21 Fund Fund Balance Use - Mayor 54.77�,798 Fund Balance Use - Council $1253,184 Total Fund Balance Use $6,023,982 Change in Use of Fund Balance 2000 to 2001 - Financing Column Changes to Spending - Spending Column Fund Balances decrease - 2000 Amounts Fund Balances deaease - 2000 Technology Initiatives Fund Balances decrease - 2000 Y2K Fund Balances decrease - 2000 Speafied Reserve items Fund Balances decrease - 2000 Highland Driving Range Design Total Changes in use of fund balance Year 2��� Proposed fund Balartce Use 2000 Adopted Budget Less One Time Use of Fund Balance Changes to Financing Change from 2000 HACA AdjusVnent Levy Adjustment Tax Levy Shift to or from Debt Service Non Repealing GraMs One Time Financing in 2000 (Science Museum sale) One Time Financing in 2000 (from Contract Services) Library Technical Training Specialist New Financing for 2001 LGA (expected normal increase) Interest Eamings One Time Financing in 2001 (internal Vansfer) Changes to Spending Change from 2000 2000 COUNCIL ITEM: One Time Technical Change 2000 COUNCIL ITEM: One Time River Bluff 7rai1 Connection Remove Remaining Specified ConGngency 2000 COUNCiI ITEM: Move Hf0 $$ Dutaf Contingency Move Workers' Comp Incentive Progrem out of Contingency Remove Remaining Y2K Budget New Spending for 2001 Salary Increases Fringes Increase Gene21 Fund Transfers for base growth in speciai tunds Inflation for UGlities Inflation for Other Non Compensation Related Spending Planned Shift of Officers From Pension Assets Fund Census PoSition Tort Claims increase Elections Municipal Memberships Exempt and Forfeited Properly Assessments CIB Per Diem Total Changes Totai General Fund Spending, Financing, and Gap Changes to Spending Base Reduction AllocaHons Changes to Financing Base Property Tax Relief (FUnd Balances) Total Changes to Base Year 2001 Generai Fund Base 163,608,599 ('150.000) (212,000) (785.387) ('170.000) (6,023,982) ?? 162,295,212 (30,000) (200,000) salary increases INCOMPLETE EST (6,304) (10,000) (288,350) 88,350 200,000 (243,742) 2,655,977 1,366,042 187.248 v � o v 152,076 � � 200,000 � � 8,000 25.272 4,100 4,tOS,609 163,608.599 (4,710,595) (150,000) (272,000) (78�,387) ('170,000) 157,584,677 0 0 � � (30,000) , (200,000) (97,377) (3,743) 1,221,105 500,000 120,000 1,509,985 'f66,403,821 'f59,094,602 (7,309,219) 0 0 'I66,A03,82'I '159,094,602 (7,309,219) GISHARE��BUDGETt2l\YR2001�200tGAP ^ V