00-249ORIGII�AL
Presented By
Referred To
�,�h�3\`S °a
RESOLUTI
SAINT , MIlVNESOTA
Committee:
WHEREAS, a fine of $500 was imposed against the li
d/b/a Food-N-Fuel (License ID # 17138) by Council File 00-3�
WHEREAS, the Licensee was notified of the impo:
January 25, 2000 by the OfFice of License, Inspections and
which was to be paid by Friday, February 11, 2000; and �
Council File # pp � '�.�g
Green Sheet # 1 o0'T 6 a
=_�
by Food-N-Fuel, Inc.,
of the fine by letter dated
�onmental Protection (LIEP),
WHEREAS, as of Febnxary 23, 2000, no fine l�ad been received by the Office of LIEP;
now, therefore, be it �
RESOLVED, that the licenses held by F od-N-Fuel, Inc., d/b/a Food-N-Fuel (License ID
#17138) are hereby suspended until such tim s the fine of $500 has been paid.
Requested by Department of:
�� //
i� p ,, ��
Adopted by Counci
Adoption Certif' a
Hy'
AppYOVed y Mayor:
BY:
Date
by Council Secretary
Date
Form Appxoved by City Attomey �
BY: � �.%'-�_ l � ;�
Approved by Mayor for Submission to Council
By:
00 -ay�
March 6, 2000
��
�
TOTAL # OF SIGNATURE PAC,ES
GREEN SHEET
«,�: , �:�,..�..:�
No �'��-�?7�2
�_._ �
❑ �.�. ❑ m.�
❑ „�,�� ❑ ..�.,�,�,o
❑YYDR�GlhsmfANi) ❑
(CL1P ALL LOCATIONS FOR SIGNATURt�
Resolution suspending licenses held by Food-N-Fuel, 675 7th Street West, until the fine imposed by the City
Council on January 12, 2000, (C.F. 00-31) is paid.
PL4NNING CAMMISSION
CIB COMMITTEE
CIVIL SERVICE COMMISSION
AMOUNTOFTRANSACTION
(IXPWN)
tl�uns v���m � woncea uMe. a convact rauns aepanmem�
VES NO
Hes m�s perarnlfirm aer heen a dlv emWcyeeT
YES NO
Dces this pereanlfi'm pwaess a sWli not IwrmallyposeesaeE by arry arreM cRy employee7
YES �
k Mis pereoNfi�m a farpNetl �entloY7
VES NO
fain ali vec answets m aeoarete sheet and atlach fn nrePn sheet
COSTrttEVQlUE BUDfiETED (CIRCLE ONq
ACTMSY NUMBER
1C"3-'�:G7
i
ORIGINAL
�
Tlrc�!"1T TimTi-.�.T
00 - �yq
Cuuncil File T QQ — 3{
Green Sheet � 104498
.1
Presented By
Referred To
Committee: Date
i
2
3
4
5
6
7
8
9
10
11
12
13
RESOLVED, that the Licensee Food-N-Fuel, Inc. d/b/a Food-N-Fuel (License
ID I�TO. 17138), located at 67� 7`" Street R'est in Saint Paul is hereby ordered to pay a fine of
$500.00 for the violation of Sale of Alcoholic Beveraoes to UnderaQe Persons.
Said fine shall be paid to the O�ce of License, Inspections and Environmental Protection
within thirty (30) da}�s of the adoption of this resolution by the Council and si�nature by the
Mayor.
This resolution and the action of the Council in this matter aze based upon the facts
contained in the December 2, 1999, I`'otic� of Violation letter to the licensee, the Police Report
CN 99-197211, and such arguments as m2�� have been presented to the Council at the public
hearing. The facts were not contested by the licensee.
Recuested by De�a=tnent ef:
�Y� FJlIL'�ea .TU3lifc�(yn
Adopted by Covncil: Dat_ �� 2pp.q
�� � T�'
Rdoptien Certified by Council�$ec-etary
ay• 1 ..
.lpprove3 by N.ayor: ate
BY.� —_ _
Fcrm :,pnroved by City a[.o-i_y
/�
a ��,/; «� :� � c�.��u,n
Acprwed �y Mayor £cr St'�missicn to Cow�cil
By:
be�a`�`�
March 8, 2000, City Council Action Minutes Page 3
Heritage Preservation Commission. (Public testimony will be taken on this
issue only)
11. . Resolution - 00-224 - Approving a Single Fanuly Housing Program to be financed
by the issuance of Single Family Mortgage Revenue Bonds and Mortgage Credit
Certificates.
This item was considered as a public hearing at 5:30 p.m:
Adopted Yeas - 7 Nays - 0
12. Resolurion - 00-225 - Establishing the upgrade in Pazk and Recreation Manager to
Grade 26 of the Supervisory Range of Compensation in the Salary Plan and Rates
of Compensation.
Laid over to March 15 Yeas - 7 Nays - 0
The Council requested that the Administration report on March 15 on the
proposed reductions in spending under the City's 2000 budget.
13. Resolution - 00-226 - Adjusting the rates for a number of Special Employment
tifles in the Salary Plan and Rates of Compensation.
Adopted Yeas - 7 Nays - 0
14. Resolution - 00-227 - Direcring the Deparhnent of Planning and Economic
Development to work with the Capital River Council to prepare appropriate
amendments to the Legislarive Code related to signage in downtown.
Adopted Yeas - 7 Nays - 0
15. Resolution - 00-228 - Approving application for Auto Repair Garage, Second
Hand Dealer-Motor Vehicles, and Motor Vehicle Dealer-New Licenses by Mid-
America Emergency Vehicles, dba Road Rescue Emergency Vehicles, 1133
Rankin Street. (Legislative Hearing Officer recommends ap�rovai�
Adopted Yeas - 7 Nays - 0
16. Resolurion - 00-229 - Approving change in the Brewery Neighborhood Project
budget.
Adopted Yeas - 7 Nays - 0
�� Cify Councii's Additions fo the 2000 Budget
Se/ecfed Items Affec6ng Fund Balance
Deseription
CTtv Aftomev
9 Mtl f�mQing relatad to law Werk
2 Add fundmg tetateG to derk typist 0
iRf n c ry/ �
3 Fundng for Properly CoOe EMorcement �efated fo
seasonal inspectots. Cletk N, and Typist 1
HumaiR(qh�fc
4 Souti�em Mn. Regionat Legal Services Contract
for 12 monNu
ra•; <
5 Sunday Service Hours at Riverview and SC Mthony
6 Moming Service Hours at ArGngron, Hamnne, Rice,
Riveniew and St Anthony
� Materiais BuOget
Parke a��-�h',on'� ,
8 Restore wt for swe'eping seleci seasonal Ice rinks
9 ' Restore fundng related ro rec d'irector cut at Eastview
10 Restore funtling related to rec diractor for senior rec progrertu
� 1 Loan fpr Design of HigNand Park Driving Range
12 Mertiam Park Rivec Traii Connection
Fechnoloav d Manae�e.+r Serviee< � ,
13,14 Health Fair
Ssanerai Gevemm nt aM.,..nfe
Spe�tifmd ContUgency
'IS Loan for HighWnO Driving Range Construe6o�
]6 City Attomey, improving Serv�p Dei'rvery
17 fair �ning Standards Testing and Remed"adon
1a Parks / Pubiic Works - Slveeper for sidewatks and ke rinks
19 PEO -tunding reiated lo Gry PWnner 11
20 Code Er�forcement
Spending
bb
Keep Reduca
3T,061
34,468 22579
• 8 months
102,276 75.493
1 derk N
seasena� inspectors
9,000
43,193
65,929
100,000
23.794
5�,000
50,000
170.000
10,000
11,760
500,000
51,371
35,000. .
46,5� 6
48.500
100,000
37,061
11.489
26,783
9,ODD
18,373
etf 5/5/00
28,039
eff W5�00
100,000
24,820
37,890
12,794 1't,000
early winter 00
50.000
50,000
no,00a
10,000
97,760
500.000
rr�aybe
59.371
35,000
46,516 .
48,500
100,000
490.819
Total - - - 1�488.868 998.049
.
:
w i
C
T C V y
� W m �
N €w o
4 �
o mom
�—
N �' � Q
(q � .�..
�
N � �
�
� a
�
0
° o
N
�
Q!
Q>
r
0
N
�
a
� O
0
� N
�
�
�
` �
� �
V
1
�
T �
W
0
cV
O
N
�
�
�
O N �N t'^V p� '� '� f�D e� � � �p � ... i. .-. � N
7 � O [� ^ O �1 1n �O m Ql i0 O f� � O�D N � � � .
� CD 'p s0 m N v) � W co Q � r �O O � $
�.. " � � ` [V -' „ " � v v v � N O O y � � t9 Oi e�7
� � v � � � tO -
T
� � oo-a�q . v
� .. �
� m $ � ^ �o ca n a �o o � m `° o `° o� m m
n ° � r m .°- n � m e� . c v 'q W n � p � c m i °
� o �
v � v � � v v v N v v w � v f� O � O r � N
v v ' "
v '
e a
N m N C l7 N Q N m p Q � � � N 0 � O � O a N e
c�i < o � � cv t� o�; c�i � c�i o n oi o o c o°- ��n
. . � .- �i
m
� C N t��] M � � m O � m 0 lD � O O � N O f0 n � '�Q� O
p= h w !7 Q n N � V' Q � N � c9 m < iD
0 V I Q N �rj � O 1� Of �., CO N � Q 0 � � M tp a p O N t�4
v t- Q ' v � N l�J � l'> Q � N Q � � [O
� � ` s t7
a e v
o m .cr v w ao m v t� . m < a ° o � n < Q Q m o»
G1 N �- ' 1� N R W O v t`� �
�� < m O � 1� Q O N 1C1 tfi f0 01 f0 O P � m nj W Q Q - �D
Q m O N tD n N N m eN O�1 � M A t�7 � n � p � W �
N e= � (�j � M t9 C+ Qj N � t�q � c�7 � t0 t�0
�
a
O
n d � c m o m � v r. u ° v m m ° o 'y u� < Q v m co m
a'o a�i m N ~ � � � o`ti w n c� �n ro ° rn Q o � a m
P C� r 'a
�" m N � � � � N N � M C�0 C Q � � � �`�` � O O T m �:
� N � t7 1�i 1� Oi N Oi � .� � .r tn f�p
�
M e N O � O � N tq N i0 . �q l7 t0 t0 r O M N �P tn Oi
m m ^ �' R M Q�f 7 P � a�� � LL� r m � W e � N � N � �
,� j O N � ~ n N N fpD O f��l 1� t�0_ n m � � � O r h �
Q m N � r nj � � W � N h R 1� m a
tl! a� i� 0 N W ` p � � .r Yj »
� �
�
� �
.i
o p � m c
L° a � m c � e C7
� y W V p m C C
� e
E m o.c o Q ° �. U � w W
c q � � � � m m c " � " c
� y �, �, z z a m � s 3 E
U o e � �m � � � 3 a' �
Q U � U N � dl E
� W � o � 3 � � w 2• � m � W � U U
U � �T 2 2 2 ¢ � � U U. 1- a LL � C
m
LL
d
c
U
C
0
.�
E
U �
W
a
m
E
c
>
0
c�
m
C
0
C7 Ta
H
Entered on the 2001 6enerat Fund Gap Projection
see fi:W SERS1flU0GEti1�231YR799811498GAP 6k tor ust of Ws sheet
Rem
�b-a�
�ooi ? ? eenotes change artaun musi
be esUmated an0 entered by
rlspons�e staff Gsted
ResPo�sible
AmouM Staff
Fxplanatinn
Financing
ttACA �ustment (Qurent Stam Law) 2006 AdopfeC -S?A.809.726 -no dian9e iP� Tom C.}
neweK Legklatfve viopod
LCA Ad'pstment (Curent State le«I 2000 Adapted 548�84t,193 -2Wtnumber [efkcts 2.SX inaease
Wirent qw -nOt Z000 Llgi.ta6re PApo521
Ch2ngt in USC Df FYtq H21ant6 2000l02001
ASiat cxneril kKl or ru�M 6al�s appKd u rnandig• badc arc amo�a�t apvfied n z000 sudget
FWb BdxCeS dareasE •�D00 tsdyWbpy iNi6iW�3
Fuw sauexasaaa�se-a000v2�c bw� Cga+s�fv�.+es�n�.s �nus�.cs.�sz tnen,�s amc�a�cgraa�+)
5ma eahnca dea6nx-tfi�leM Omh+D Ranu Desi9n
Fwb Bsbnoe Oeceasa-200o Speo'fkd Raerve • Cowwt-hiphlane pivin8 Rangp tonswdbn
FunO 9atanrs decresse-2J00 Speofietl Roswe-COUnd-ad?Jb�al aNOmay
f�d 8etante Oeaease •2000 SD� Racervs - Wwit3-FairSqn0ar0s Houeing 7esting
FuM Balanee Oeuease -2000 SpedGed Raa�e-Couneil • Sweecer
FwW Baia� tle�ase • 20D0 SD0�7eC Racenra. CoV�d -fSly Planner
FunO &�Wnce deerease • II000 SpecifieC Raem • Counol • uncpeeGc eo0a Worcement
TOTA� (6.023.96�
Property Tax Financing
uKrsam n kvy �
SNft (bI /aom oeet Ss+v'ae •(CanY olomm u�s� ahw deetsema butlget baa)
StaM1 pro6eGMJ OUkpuendes
ReOUce eNinkaga zPP6eC b 2 percent7?
2000 GranS (irot repeacn9 ;n ?A01)
Po�'¢e
WetOnSee6
Franctdse Fee Atljustrnent
DH ampire 6ulitler
Norenco steam - eant pra0td Incase. NRG Energy has not nepotiateE agraement w! payer,
District CooGng
Energy park
NSP GEFF - rrte invease antidpated'm 2000 budge� is there another for 200l4?
fnaease In Budgef Estimate !or Mterest 6rtiug5 -?AOOACOpteC 3,000,000 (mdutles PW Sewor stuR)
NelO b meet rilh Joo. Tadd t0 redew Wnges ei GF Wt mi9At stlect sae of G� ThM Totld�n OPO�Y Merest
fa4 tl akWare Interest COnYnue Courr+l Pdded SOauiGC3 kn0ln9? 1�0 AGpqed 275.000
hler Fund Traesters (Central Service Cnsh)
ware� ur,bty ow+vaa ror eenua� smkes
hur funA TransFers -othet
PW rNund N WM�u Sveet eacass-net of SN10.000 tor 6rae y�s
HotN Motet Tases - posstDle inarease?
(pa ee. ro, eu rceeoes an�a,sooau� ae�u:u�enes = ssoo.e� vs ssra.azz a+zoeo cF eaye
e�m�owaru+a*axa>szs.00a ee.x�.'rc+xea�oarwss�
Snare of County Fmes
�+�a�u.sas.acz �essncamsz.oze.sz�. co�dap,c��ny:�vease5�s.000ao.000.
��.
7,227.105
S+uce
B�uCO
(4,�tOS95)
(150.000)
R�t000)
(+�.�1
(500.000)
(sa.371)
�ss.ono�
(46576)
(a8.500)
(toD,00o)
0
0
0
2001 ? 4
(30.000)
0
0
0
0
0
2COt ? ?
0
zeo� t t
720.000
0
0
BryCe / Joe
Tom
Ron
8ruce
Ron
iZOn
Etit
Ron
Ron
Ron
BNOL'
BNLC
Bntce
Bruce
Fton
BNCB
Bruee
Bruce
HNCt
BNCE
Bruce
Bruee
eruce
7om
6ruce
BNC9
�
Item
Amount
Exolanation
Z000 COWJqIlTEl.t Mxriam Pak RivetTral CanecLon
, (�iMl2� CaO�lRl[�1211I � (EJf10VB tlWll SyC�Ed flSENE
Caun�'F6gNaM OmrmD Wnpe coi661dm
Counea-ada�analanomey
Cbund-Fav SmMerOs Flouce�g T�
CouneA -;,weecer
C�nd-Gty?hm9r
Caxid • w�Cw mOe �orcement
General City YYde Iterts
200t Department Base Adustrnents - estcnated
20D7 Projeete0 Salary Inueases
2001 frkfge 8enebt es�ria0es. Gh?JERAL FUND share
Woeice�s Compenca4on
Ertpbyee Inswance
ReGrae inswanra
Ss�lr3nC! Pey
Po6ce pension (Re1ieG PERA antl me�a�e)
Fre per�on (ReGet. PERA and meGfore)
FICA
Mediwe
PER4
Otl�er pensipn
?A01 AOpitlon forinllaUon 2.3%of utiGGes 371,373
2007 Addition fw in0ation f.6% of?AO's. 300'a, 800's
(PW � 539,000: 57.3M�3%)
Departments
Human Resources
Employce OevNOprnent anE Supavbory Tralnfi9
Ciry ACorney
CAO doD SNOy and Contrya $ettle�nenb
TMS
PC Reptacement PWn - aQd NII annual effect of 2000's lease 5 whiq� was 6S monws and whatever
ow�eC rtm�U�ines w[ repbce In 2001. Leese 1 In 1886, lesm 2 h 7987. leas�e 3 in 1998. ka5e t N SH99.
lease 5 in 2000 antl balarce o! 5 anE iU of some nurMer M�ronttis for kese 8(at XXY:) is �ew fot 2001_
Geaero� Fund Iransfer tor bau growM H speriai fwds
7M5 -PRELIMINARY pasipn group
Conaaet Swioes-P�ra�ss++p (tiEw kr2007) At 200t SE
Remove One Time 200� Programs
kortwve New IS OneTime MvesEnanb-2000
W�C bone yesr 7 of3
seDa�am t00 mb segmenc
movo Oonuin name sarvico b NT
Pu61k Workt
PW cicrease for added signs, slpnaB, and SVeet Lighting
General Fund Iransfer tor base growU� tn spedai funds
vu6Gewort�s Siree[Maineenaneetr 022T142330 =563.120
PuDtie Waks T2f11e yfC ytreeVghG O?283 �57,543
Removt� One Thro 200p proprams
remowaueccwoncs•Manayame�a^+a^rerineaaaearar�000 •Sta.soo
(t0,000)
(500.000)
(5f.a7�)
C3+.000)
(�658)
(48.5a01
(ioD.000)
�oo� ? ?
2055.976
2001 i ?
7.tSa.977
716.789
2oot 7 ?
Z001 9 7
1001 ? 7
200� a t
Zoo7 7 �
2001 17
2601 T ?
zoot � ?
zooi ? ?
0
too.000
d
0
0
poo.000)
I?5.000)
(?SA00)
0
p,i?A
57.643
0
Responsihie
Staff
�b-��9
BNCE
RAn
Ron
Ron
Ron
Ftan
Ron
0
Joe/EriC
Ron
Ron
ftOH
Ron
Ron
Ron
Ron
Ron
Ron
Ron
Joe
Joe
627b
Barb
Tom
Tom
Tom
Tom
7om
7am
Tom
Tom
Tom
Tom
OFFICE OF THE MAYOR �l/ - '���'J
FINANCIAL SERVICES OFFICE, Budget Section �
Joseph %eid, Director of Financial Services
CITY OF SAINT PAITL zso c�ry x�rt Telephone: (6I2) 26(r8543
Norm Coleman, Mayor IS We.st Kelingg Boulevard Fatsimile: (612) 266-8547
Saint Pau1, Mimresota 55102-I63I
MEMORANDUM
To: Council President Dan Bostrom
Council Members
From: Joe Reid, Financial Services Direct
RE: Budget Update
Date: Mazch 15, 2000
The attached material is being submitted to you for your information on a number of matters
related to the 2000 and 2001 budget. At the council meeting on March 15, 2000, I will also
report to you on some additional issues and propose a schedule for future updates.
1. A spreadsheet providing a status report on changes to the 2000 proposed general fund
spending and fmancing budget as of Mazch 15, 2000.
2. A description of how the budget office began its review of the budget for 2001 by examining
planned spending in 2000 and the current status of that review.
3. The pern�anent spending reduction goals for each department.
4. A current analysis of spending and financing projections.
If you have additional questions on these subjects, please contact me at your convenience.
ob-a�9
w
d
�
3
m
�
�
N
N
w
v
d
�
R
V
N
C
3
�..�
w
C)
m
6 6
0 0
d m
L m
`m `m
m `
m'
a v
n' a'
g $
a n
oa
r m
c c
m m
w N
9 p
q � O O O
C `�
a
R
C
LL
0
0
N
&
�
o m
° r `Bv
0 � �
m
3 � e � V
m � u
A o 0
� m m �
� � 0
n
'�
C
m � ° �
]I N Q Q
�
0
a
s
c -
o E
6
`m �
Q a
� T C
O C
N 0
C °�
E u
n n
a `
5 0
c "
w�
Q � p E N
p v �
m
E
Q m
n E
� � a
O r _
A p m �
N V � n
m m �
Am gm
� LL � ? �
a � w m
V ° m � a
� i ° c o U U
`� 9 ^ m m ° o m F�i
9 q T�• C � O C
° q a _
c ` _ u
= m � `o
m
m m� m 9 N
Q m U'
VJ `d li �
O
a
g
m
m
m
@
�
a
O
m
0
�i
�
�
c
�
m
`a
LL
s'
g
a
S
w
00
tt —
rr -
00 0
v v v
a n n
0 0
C C �
a m a
m m m
m m
v a a
m m `a
'm m 'm
aa a
' n'
$ g g
lV N
E E E
m � z
n n n
v a o
b =
c c c
m m m
� w w
� O 0
o'
N
b
N
m m m m
�8 � g� �� m�'_m �
0 g b � ^ m � P IG S
N t�i " q'
0
m
m m
� E
n
� y n
C
m A
�NN
0
3 m
yy � 0
q � C
� � c
� O
� W`c
C m
� � 6
�
a
N
m
�
m�
{ p
� W
n
° � �
" e c
m m
c O c
E 'u
� N Q O
�
V
$
2 0
b H
� �
J
C'
� o
0 �
w�. � L
aa o
�a$`'
� �
N N
o $
��
C
fO E
° c
m 2 i
& O
a ; �
n � m O
w m [
� j 3 Q
m s s N
0 � � m d
n m m � m '
m N y
� ° c a � i `m
E p _
� N N � �
3
a m n
�
�
s
���
��eg
� m m �
� m '- �
as�
C
w a c a
C l {L J
n m m � C
_ � � w
$ E E c n
w c c 3 3
n o 0
�_ O D j. T T >'.
¢ a a u ii `o o`o `o `o
� L S L Y £
� O D 9 a N N N N Vl
25 25 25 z5 $ E E� E E E
« W w�`V o F 0 0 0
K C K C K$.a B B$
n u a a n o r 'o 0 0 0
c c c 5 c g � y g
� m m ` `m � m � m �
u� � w w w Z Z 2 Z Z
O O O O Y'y Y] O D
o �o.=m ro
$�r' 7 �SS
0 N�[I h��� m fD S O
VI
N V
E
@
n 3 �
m �
`- w o w ei
� A W p 3
- 0 m
'° � � o
$ 5 `o ? � W
� m � �
o J � � 4 °
8 Po m � 9 �
° = ° � i
c � - m E
1 0 m L
� m m x�'U
@ � m m ° � �
� m� o o m� U
W
m U � �
^ m w � � o
C H
�NCCC._�if K
u
m m° �.^�-
M
2
0 W
LL
r m
�
' m
W m
; F
Z
2
O
a
m
c
3
6
a
�
0
n
5
�
��
^ 0
`m �
y c
� U
c m
� � N
n g q
c m
�a 3
� � s
m ° m
° C � O C
� $_ a
O
1
ba
m
s
ry
c
6
a
m
`m
w
L
d
C
m
E
`o
a
a
`m
Z
a R
a' b
� LL
m �
L m
p LL
0 y
5 �,
c �
m �
w�
8 O
m
p O O N n O
o� e �
N A
N
� c
$ ° m
m g9
� F
m ` d O �
�5 mt�
a fn'.5
� m t w
v =�
m m s' g
n _ 3 �
6 � @ m
� o m `
U K m U
O
�
0
n
U
O
yy a
` � N
m '�-"
� E
R �
m c
LL
� ` �
� a c y
p m �
�N f
a
�
m
c
L
E
a
m
m
a
O
0
�
m
d d m @
S
m c c D c �
m m m m m
cs_ c
m m m m m m
m m m m �
- 'm m m o m
0 0 0 0 o g
9 m m V 9 m O m
E E£ E E E
c c c c c c
c s a a m
m m
L L L L L t
o` `o `o o `o 0
° m m m m
0 0 0 0 0 0
Z z z 2 z Z
c c �' ° c $
c c c � m
C C C
�
c c c c c c
o a � m o 0
_ _ `m `a
m m a m
9 9 9 9 D 9
n' a' n' s' a' a'
� t 0 m m 0
o c c c c c
m m m m m o
`m `m `m `m `m m`
qgwwww
0 0 0
6 d o
O
8
�� 8 $ 8��oh���
�N $ `f �inmvv�m
N
� Z
a '° _
m m ` �
W m C � W sJ
$ ? � g m Y a
o $ c 0 2 z m� �
mW aFa iap p
h N` m` � � 0 W
g°, ° ?.
c � p q
� � Of � S'- Y C U� y T O
� m ro r� m m N 2� m_.
a 2 b E m m W H F� U €
m 6 m$ p� O� N 9
� Y � O � � w m
� i ti� v y m � D:'a �
m w�� m c� c m E y J m E�
8�� m W E£ � a, � n �$ x
� i Q E 2 P � �-° 'o a w` m
.� o T^ 'o ° m m� C a
g� mm3o�sm��m�� ° ,S�
� n 5 a� @ n� U LL 6 4 V O
N U D 1 F W
� � � � � q
y P � S 8
N fp m A
2
m
¢
0
y
q 3
` o_ m
m O e` a
N
-S 0 �` J
n : °
�E3
a`a�wm
C Q
m c
� m �
$ m
c I � c
c 'c E E c 'c
° o w ° m m
_ = � = _ _
`o �`o € `o `o `o `o
'm 'm 'm L L
6 d d
0 o a - - -
`m m `m
n n n
a a v 'q a o v
0 �41 m m m
� 0 0
m m m m m m
_ _ L _ _
- > 2 > a >
a `o �5 0 `a `o
° m ° m_ � m ° m ° m_
v n� m n n
m n m m m
a n a a a�
.
cc`c"� c c
0 N W
� 4 4 V L V
3�����
m m �
a a a� a c
� ° c � > j c
u�i u.unu'.
O O O � O m O 1p N a N �
O � W O O
N� � � � b� Y O O O
N •� �
W
U � a
m O q
c � u � 0 9
� ° `5 z 2 2, £ 3
U � ~ � � j 9 ?
C N � c m
`-�� c�+ W m o ° �`m E`
0 � �j � p � d {p Z � � �
K
y� � N� n c m N F ' 3 N
m m Y�� � c =� E y _ O
c y � � m 8 m o� v E m 3�� m
w
mti ��
0
�j m m m OO p 0 O � O m � _� U W li
� O N- O N m_ LL`= T' � m
qm
O C� V� Q C 0 j� J U 1Y 1 1 U j
�UU. Y?
6 d
� � � � � � N
m
O 0 �
Y m
�« �
0
m
V °
� � $
C LL
'o m
t? ` °
m Oii
N
�
$
�
m
r
2
�b-a��
Budget Management Team Rationale for egamining adopted spending in 2000.
Goal: Keep snending within budeet limits in 2000 and 2001.
Decisions leading up to the adopted spending for 2000 occurred in several steps:
April-May, 1999. Department staff, led by the department or office director, reviewed the
department or office spending priorities within established limits and proposed a spending plan.
T'heir plan, given those spending limits, could not include all the spending they may have
desired. They had to say what service or activity would not be continued in order to stay within
the limits. Presumably, if guidelines were followed, all the services or activities that were
inciuded were more important than those that were not.
2. May-June, 1999. Next, budget staff, working with the department or office director and his or
her key stafF and the budget director did a further review of the spending plan and, either agreed
with the plan, or suggested modificarions to it. The modifications could include substitution of a
service that was included for one that was not or the spending limits may have been relaxed
because the spending plan, in the opinion of the analyst, needed something that was excluded and
he or she did not propose a substitute.
July, 1999. Next, budget staff, the department or of£ice director, the budget director and the
mayor completed a similaz analysis, on a nanower set of items, to what was done in step three
and again agreed to decisions made in step three or made other modifications to the plan. The
mayor then proposed the composite spending plan to the council for 2000.
4. September-December, 1999. Nea�t, the city council assisted by their fiscal director and the
budget director completed their own review and analysis and agreed with eazlier decisions or
made new modifications.
5. In each step of the process, the review may have focused on similar services or activities or one
step may have examined a service not considered in another step. At each step, however, a
whole group of services and activities, in fact the vast majority of them, were inciuded in the
spending plan because everyone agreed that they were important, in fact, more important than the
service or activity that one group of decision makers may have decided to exclude.
6. January, 2000. As the budget staff and the budget management team prepazed to begin the cycle
ali over again and looked at the spending limits that decision makers would face in 2001, it
seemed to make sense to first reexamine the last set of spending proposals that were added to the
2000 adopted budget. It made sense because, first department staff, then budget staff, then the
mayor, and finally, the council had agreed that all other spending proposals were at least as
important or more important than the fmal items because the last items added had not replaced
any of the others.
7. Recognizing that some decision makers might make different decisions if they had this to do all
over again, the budget office and management team will treat all spending proposais of equal
value at this point and give each proposal an opportunity to prove that it should be preserved and
some other spending item excluded. That will enable us to consider options for controlling costs
without predetermining what any of the items might be.
3
C �
� C U N
N � W m
� ol
O c � p_I
� d � ��
N y N af
n R' O I
O
O �
rn
N � c�a
Of
� a v
r
c�0 t N ti (�.. � � � u�'i c a�i t�o � � � � N
< m O O t0 � N (D N � �- of M � _ ^ (O � O
v LV (O v v v v t") Oi th t� N O O � SO
.., �. ,_. � � C °' � ... � �- v
�e-ay�
� 7 I
�
N � �I
� � � �
v (v I (O
j`
I vl
� N � V' � � tn N � � tn O � � � O � tn O I t0
t� I� 6� O I
� r 0 O ^ W � n � t0 th 7 C � W r N � p O Q � [�
,� � � � � ._. �'' � N . � . � .�_. � O r � N I
� � "" � `-� v I
��
i
�
0 0
0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 � o o � o 0 0 0 0 0 � ° o N o
N oJ N O M N Q � � O V; r t0 c- N T O aD
N � O 0 r N f� O � (7 � N O 1� � O O O � � p � (y
O
o •. rn � o ° n v �n rn � � M o rn o co o � ^ � v o
N � � N � � M � M � n � o � � � c
o m n v �n m v_ co
� � U [t N � r � V � � v � ' N c• � � � M N � � o N (�p
!' ° r v '- M
O
N
�
�
�
� O
0
(J� N
�
�
u.
\
� Q�
� �
/��
V
�M.
�
a a�
M �
W
�
�
N
Q
O
�
N
�
�
�
�
m �
O�
� �
Q m
N
W
C
o �
� �
aa
3
Q m�
N
�
d �
d �
O >
Q m
r a <o
�n v < � m � � u� m °� u ° 0 1 D r�- v v
� N � f� � d' tn N 1� M f0 N O V � O
�n t0 fV o f� � ui ifi (O ai {p � ` c" ej N
O N f�0_ n N N M � p�i, a�- C�'1 f� M � f M O
N < <- N c- P') t0 (� � N � � � M
�
� � o �
O � � W (�D
N O rn
� � � �
t�(� � < O c0 p�p `�Y 1� � O f� N O N (p � � �
(O N � � I� r V� tn � N t�n (�p � p�j � p �
Oi (D N n h � try th 1n t7 (P � I� � O� � O
M OJ O (G N � O �[J N � f9 O o� m
O N (O � ^ (V N � 07 aD O � I`: � p�j n c�j �
N �- < N a- th M I'� Q� N � � c M
�
V N � O
� O � �
� �
� h �
'�t N O O � N � N O] tn M t0 aD O N u� eD fp
th tO 01 � N f� � N � t0 Ol tn t0 � 1� m 1� N
f� 01 V' M O1 � t� � .-- N 1� t0 f� O� N f� o� th
(V o'i 1%} Oi t0 C o � V ai cV ah tci co ui c0 o aD oD tD
O N N � � N N o�') ? W O (�p n p�p � N � � � �
N c- � N s- Ci th I� W o O> O vi � �
N N M
U
O � �
'R O C
O N
y V R (�j p
N
E d �O L y Q �
.� Q � � � � � ��
d' Q' > N
U o •C C � � � �
� � � O > > � �
U � ii 2 S 2 Q J
U
�
Q
�
�z
tA
C
N
�
� U
� L
o �
Q U
W ,Z' �'
J U U
U
N
C
�
�
T Y
O �
= 3 y
Y
F a' d
N
N
R U
n
� a
N
c
�
U
O
U
.�
O
U
d
�
a�-i
c
N
U
�
O
U
C
�
�
O
U �
w
a
N
�U
C
�
O
U
0
O
C
0
3
a
C
U
W N
� n
m �
N �
c
�
�
>
O
�
N
N
d
U' m
0
F
T
2001 Budget Planning Summary
Gap Projection and Strategy
�� �._v��� ._ �6-a��
Spending Financing Gap
2000 Adopted Budget - Gene21 Fund
Fund Balance Use - Mayor 54.77�,798
Fund Balance Use - Council $1253,184
Total Fund Balance Use $6,023,982
Change in Use of Fund Balance 2000 to 2001 - Financing Column
Changes to Spending - Spending Column
Fund Balances decrease - 2000 Amounts
Fund Balances deaease - 2000 Technology Initiatives
Fund Balances decrease - 2000 Y2K
Fund Balances decrease - 2000 Speafied Reserve items
Fund Balances decrease - 2000 Highland Driving Range Design
Total Changes in use of fund balance
Year 2��� Proposed fund Balartce Use
2000 Adopted Budget Less One Time Use of Fund Balance
Changes to Financing
Change from 2000
HACA AdjusVnent
Levy Adjustment
Tax Levy Shift to or from Debt Service
Non Repealing GraMs
One Time Financing in 2000 (Science Museum sale)
One Time Financing in 2000 (from Contract Services)
Library Technical Training Specialist
New Financing for 2001
LGA (expected normal increase)
Interest Eamings
One Time Financing in 2001 (internal Vansfer)
Changes to Spending
Change from 2000
2000 COUNCIL ITEM: One Time Technical Change
2000 COUNCIL ITEM: One Time River Bluff 7rai1 Connection
Remove Remaining Specified ConGngency
2000 COUNCiI ITEM: Move Hf0 $$ Dutaf Contingency
Move Workers' Comp Incentive Progrem out of Contingency
Remove Remaining Y2K Budget
New Spending for 2001
Salary Increases
Fringes Increase
Gene21 Fund Transfers for base growth in speciai tunds
Inflation for UGlities
Inflation for Other Non Compensation Related Spending
Planned Shift of Officers From Pension Assets Fund
Census PoSition
Tort Claims increase
Elections
Municipal Memberships
Exempt and Forfeited Properly Assessments
CIB Per Diem
Total Changes
Totai General Fund Spending, Financing, and Gap
Changes to Spending Base
Reduction AllocaHons
Changes to Financing Base
Property Tax Relief (FUnd Balances)
Total Changes to Base
Year 2001 Generai Fund Base
163,608,599
('150.000)
(212,000)
(785.387)
('170.000)
(6,023,982)
??
162,295,212
(30,000)
(200,000)
salary increases INCOMPLETE EST
(6,304)
(10,000)
(288,350)
88,350
200,000
(243,742)
2,655,977
1,366,042
187.248
v �
o v
152,076
� �
200,000
� �
8,000
25.272
4,100
4,tOS,609
163,608.599
(4,710,595)
(150,000)
(272,000)
(78�,387)
('170,000)
157,584,677
0
0
� �
(30,000) ,
(200,000)
(97,377)
(3,743)
1,221,105
500,000
120,000
1,509,985
'f66,403,821 'f59,094,602 (7,309,219)
0 0
'I66,A03,82'I '159,094,602 (7,309,219)
GISHARE��BUDGETt2l\YR2001�200tGAP ^
V
ORIGII�AL
Presented By
Referred To
�,�h�3\`S °a
RESOLUTI
SAINT , MIlVNESOTA
Committee:
WHEREAS, a fine of $500 was imposed against the li
d/b/a Food-N-Fuel (License ID # 17138) by Council File 00-3�
WHEREAS, the Licensee was notified of the impo:
January 25, 2000 by the OfFice of License, Inspections and
which was to be paid by Friday, February 11, 2000; and �
Council File # pp � '�.�g
Green Sheet # 1 o0'T 6 a
=_�
by Food-N-Fuel, Inc.,
of the fine by letter dated
�onmental Protection (LIEP),
WHEREAS, as of Febnxary 23, 2000, no fine l�ad been received by the Office of LIEP;
now, therefore, be it �
RESOLVED, that the licenses held by F od-N-Fuel, Inc., d/b/a Food-N-Fuel (License ID
#17138) are hereby suspended until such tim s the fine of $500 has been paid.
Requested by Department of:
�� //
i� p ,, ��
Adopted by Counci
Adoption Certif' a
Hy'
AppYOVed y Mayor:
BY:
Date
by Council Secretary
Date
Form Appxoved by City Attomey �
BY: � �.%'-�_ l � ;�
Approved by Mayor for Submission to Council
By:
00 -ay�
March 6, 2000
��
�
TOTAL # OF SIGNATURE PAC,ES
GREEN SHEET
«,�: , �:�,..�..:�
No �'��-�?7�2
�_._ �
❑ �.�. ❑ m.�
❑ „�,�� ❑ ..�.,�,�,o
❑YYDR�GlhsmfANi) ❑
(CL1P ALL LOCATIONS FOR SIGNATURt�
Resolution suspending licenses held by Food-N-Fuel, 675 7th Street West, until the fine imposed by the City
Council on January 12, 2000, (C.F. 00-31) is paid.
PL4NNING CAMMISSION
CIB COMMITTEE
CIVIL SERVICE COMMISSION
AMOUNTOFTRANSACTION
(IXPWN)
tl�uns v���m � woncea uMe. a convact rauns aepanmem�
VES NO
Hes m�s perarnlfirm aer heen a dlv emWcyeeT
YES NO
Dces this pereanlfi'm pwaess a sWli not IwrmallyposeesaeE by arry arreM cRy employee7
YES �
k Mis pereoNfi�m a farpNetl �entloY7
VES NO
fain ali vec answets m aeoarete sheet and atlach fn nrePn sheet
COSTrttEVQlUE BUDfiETED (CIRCLE ONq
ACTMSY NUMBER
1C"3-'�:G7
i
ORIGINAL
�
Tlrc�!"1T TimTi-.�.T
00 - �yq
Cuuncil File T QQ — 3{
Green Sheet � 104498
.1
Presented By
Referred To
Committee: Date
i
2
3
4
5
6
7
8
9
10
11
12
13
RESOLVED, that the Licensee Food-N-Fuel, Inc. d/b/a Food-N-Fuel (License
ID I�TO. 17138), located at 67� 7`" Street R'est in Saint Paul is hereby ordered to pay a fine of
$500.00 for the violation of Sale of Alcoholic Beveraoes to UnderaQe Persons.
Said fine shall be paid to the O�ce of License, Inspections and Environmental Protection
within thirty (30) da}�s of the adoption of this resolution by the Council and si�nature by the
Mayor.
This resolution and the action of the Council in this matter aze based upon the facts
contained in the December 2, 1999, I`'otic� of Violation letter to the licensee, the Police Report
CN 99-197211, and such arguments as m2�� have been presented to the Council at the public
hearing. The facts were not contested by the licensee.
Recuested by De�a=tnent ef:
�Y� FJlIL'�ea .TU3lifc�(yn
Adopted by Covncil: Dat_ �� 2pp.q
�� � T�'
Rdoptien Certified by Council�$ec-etary
ay• 1 ..
.lpprove3 by N.ayor: ate
BY.� —_ _
Fcrm :,pnroved by City a[.o-i_y
/�
a ��,/; «� :� � c�.��u,n
Acprwed �y Mayor £cr St'�missicn to Cow�cil
By:
be�a`�`�
March 8, 2000, City Council Action Minutes Page 3
Heritage Preservation Commission. (Public testimony will be taken on this
issue only)
11. . Resolution - 00-224 - Approving a Single Fanuly Housing Program to be financed
by the issuance of Single Family Mortgage Revenue Bonds and Mortgage Credit
Certificates.
This item was considered as a public hearing at 5:30 p.m:
Adopted Yeas - 7 Nays - 0
12. Resolurion - 00-225 - Establishing the upgrade in Pazk and Recreation Manager to
Grade 26 of the Supervisory Range of Compensation in the Salary Plan and Rates
of Compensation.
Laid over to March 15 Yeas - 7 Nays - 0
The Council requested that the Administration report on March 15 on the
proposed reductions in spending under the City's 2000 budget.
13. Resolution - 00-226 - Adjusting the rates for a number of Special Employment
tifles in the Salary Plan and Rates of Compensation.
Adopted Yeas - 7 Nays - 0
14. Resolution - 00-227 - Direcring the Deparhnent of Planning and Economic
Development to work with the Capital River Council to prepare appropriate
amendments to the Legislarive Code related to signage in downtown.
Adopted Yeas - 7 Nays - 0
15. Resolution - 00-228 - Approving application for Auto Repair Garage, Second
Hand Dealer-Motor Vehicles, and Motor Vehicle Dealer-New Licenses by Mid-
America Emergency Vehicles, dba Road Rescue Emergency Vehicles, 1133
Rankin Street. (Legislative Hearing Officer recommends ap�rovai�
Adopted Yeas - 7 Nays - 0
16. Resolurion - 00-229 - Approving change in the Brewery Neighborhood Project
budget.
Adopted Yeas - 7 Nays - 0
�� Cify Councii's Additions fo the 2000 Budget
Se/ecfed Items Affec6ng Fund Balance
Deseription
CTtv Aftomev
9 Mtl f�mQing relatad to law Werk
2 Add fundmg tetateG to derk typist 0
iRf n c ry/ �
3 Fundng for Properly CoOe EMorcement �efated fo
seasonal inspectots. Cletk N, and Typist 1
HumaiR(qh�fc
4 Souti�em Mn. Regionat Legal Services Contract
for 12 monNu
ra•; <
5 Sunday Service Hours at Riverview and SC Mthony
6 Moming Service Hours at ArGngron, Hamnne, Rice,
Riveniew and St Anthony
� Materiais BuOget
Parke a��-�h',on'� ,
8 Restore wt for swe'eping seleci seasonal Ice rinks
9 ' Restore fundng related ro rec d'irector cut at Eastview
10 Restore funtling related to rec diractor for senior rec progrertu
� 1 Loan fpr Design of HigNand Park Driving Range
12 Mertiam Park Rivec Traii Connection
Fechnoloav d Manae�e.+r Serviee< � ,
13,14 Health Fair
Ssanerai Gevemm nt aM.,..nfe
Spe�tifmd ContUgency
'IS Loan for HighWnO Driving Range Construe6o�
]6 City Attomey, improving Serv�p Dei'rvery
17 fair �ning Standards Testing and Remed"adon
1a Parks / Pubiic Works - Slveeper for sidewatks and ke rinks
19 PEO -tunding reiated lo Gry PWnner 11
20 Code Er�forcement
Spending
bb
Keep Reduca
3T,061
34,468 22579
• 8 months
102,276 75.493
1 derk N
seasena� inspectors
9,000
43,193
65,929
100,000
23.794
5�,000
50,000
170.000
10,000
11,760
500,000
51,371
35,000. .
46,5� 6
48.500
100,000
37,061
11.489
26,783
9,ODD
18,373
etf 5/5/00
28,039
eff W5�00
100,000
24,820
37,890
12,794 1't,000
early winter 00
50.000
50,000
no,00a
10,000
97,760
500.000
rr�aybe
59.371
35,000
46,516 .
48,500
100,000
490.819
Total - - - 1�488.868 998.049
.
:
w i
C
T C V y
� W m �
N €w o
4 �
o mom
�—
N �' � Q
(q � .�..
�
N � �
�
� a
�
0
° o
N
�
Q!
Q>
r
0
N
�
a
� O
0
� N
�
�
�
` �
� �
V
1
�
T �
W
0
cV
O
N
�
�
�
O N �N t'^V p� '� '� f�D e� � � �p � ... i. .-. � N
7 � O [� ^ O �1 1n �O m Ql i0 O f� � O�D N � � � .
� CD 'p s0 m N v) � W co Q � r �O O � $
�.. " � � ` [V -' „ " � v v v � N O O y � � t9 Oi e�7
� � v � � � tO -
T
� � oo-a�q . v
� .. �
� m $ � ^ �o ca n a �o o � m `° o `° o� m m
n ° � r m .°- n � m e� . c v 'q W n � p � c m i °
� o �
v � v � � v v v N v v w � v f� O � O r � N
v v ' "
v '
e a
N m N C l7 N Q N m p Q � � � N 0 � O � O a N e
c�i < o � � cv t� o�; c�i � c�i o n oi o o c o°- ��n
. . � .- �i
m
� C N t��] M � � m O � m 0 lD � O O � N O f0 n � '�Q� O
p= h w !7 Q n N � V' Q � N � c9 m < iD
0 V I Q N �rj � O 1� Of �., CO N � Q 0 � � M tp a p O N t�4
v t- Q ' v � N l�J � l'> Q � N Q � � [O
� � ` s t7
a e v
o m .cr v w ao m v t� . m < a ° o � n < Q Q m o»
G1 N �- ' 1� N R W O v t`� �
�� < m O � 1� Q O N 1C1 tfi f0 01 f0 O P � m nj W Q Q - �D
Q m O N tD n N N m eN O�1 � M A t�7 � n � p � W �
N e= � (�j � M t9 C+ Qj N � t�q � c�7 � t0 t�0
�
a
O
n d � c m o m � v r. u ° v m m ° o 'y u� < Q v m co m
a'o a�i m N ~ � � � o`ti w n c� �n ro ° rn Q o � a m
P C� r 'a
�" m N � � � � N N � M C�0 C Q � � � �`�` � O O T m �:
� N � t7 1�i 1� Oi N Oi � .� � .r tn f�p
�
M e N O � O � N tq N i0 . �q l7 t0 t0 r O M N �P tn Oi
m m ^ �' R M Q�f 7 P � a�� � LL� r m � W e � N � N � �
,� j O N � ~ n N N fpD O f��l 1� t�0_ n m � � � O r h �
Q m N � r nj � � W � N h R 1� m a
tl! a� i� 0 N W ` p � � .r Yj »
� �
�
� �
.i
o p � m c
L° a � m c � e C7
� y W V p m C C
� e
E m o.c o Q ° �. U � w W
c q � � � � m m c " � " c
� y �, �, z z a m � s 3 E
U o e � �m � � � 3 a' �
Q U � U N � dl E
� W � o � 3 � � w 2• � m � W � U U
U � �T 2 2 2 ¢ � � U U. 1- a LL � C
m
LL
d
c
U
C
0
.�
E
U �
W
a
m
E
c
>
0
c�
m
C
0
C7 Ta
H
Entered on the 2001 6enerat Fund Gap Projection
see fi:W SERS1flU0GEti1�231YR799811498GAP 6k tor ust of Ws sheet
Rem
�b-a�
�ooi ? ? eenotes change artaun musi
be esUmated an0 entered by
rlspons�e staff Gsted
ResPo�sible
AmouM Staff
Fxplanatinn
Financing
ttACA �ustment (Qurent Stam Law) 2006 AdopfeC -S?A.809.726 -no dian9e iP� Tom C.}
neweK Legklatfve viopod
LCA Ad'pstment (Curent State le«I 2000 Adapted 548�84t,193 -2Wtnumber [efkcts 2.SX inaease
Wirent qw -nOt Z000 Llgi.ta6re PApo521
Ch2ngt in USC Df FYtq H21ant6 2000l02001
ASiat cxneril kKl or ru�M 6al�s appKd u rnandig• badc arc amo�a�t apvfied n z000 sudget
FWb BdxCeS dareasE •�D00 tsdyWbpy iNi6iW�3
Fuw sauexasaaa�se-a000v2�c bw� Cga+s�fv�.+es�n�.s �nus�.cs.�sz tnen,�s amc�a�cgraa�+)
5ma eahnca dea6nx-tfi�leM Omh+D Ranu Desi9n
Fwb Bsbnoe Oeceasa-200o Speo'fkd Raerve • Cowwt-hiphlane pivin8 Rangp tonswdbn
FunO 9atanrs decresse-2J00 Speofietl Roswe-COUnd-ad?Jb�al aNOmay
f�d 8etante Oeaease •2000 SD� Racervs - Wwit3-FairSqn0ar0s Houeing 7esting
FuM Balanee Oeuease -2000 SpedGed Raa�e-Couneil • Sweecer
FwW Baia� tle�ase • 20D0 SD0�7eC Racenra. CoV�d -fSly Planner
FunO &�Wnce deerease • II000 SpecifieC Raem • Counol • uncpeeGc eo0a Worcement
TOTA� (6.023.96�
Property Tax Financing
uKrsam n kvy �
SNft (bI /aom oeet Ss+v'ae •(CanY olomm u�s� ahw deetsema butlget baa)
StaM1 pro6eGMJ OUkpuendes
ReOUce eNinkaga zPP6eC b 2 percent7?
2000 GranS (irot repeacn9 ;n ?A01)
Po�'¢e
WetOnSee6
Franctdse Fee Atljustrnent
DH ampire 6ulitler
Norenco steam - eant pra0td Incase. NRG Energy has not nepotiateE agraement w! payer,
District CooGng
Energy park
NSP GEFF - rrte invease antidpated'm 2000 budge� is there another for 200l4?
fnaease In Budgef Estimate !or Mterest 6rtiug5 -?AOOACOpteC 3,000,000 (mdutles PW Sewor stuR)
NelO b meet rilh Joo. Tadd t0 redew Wnges ei GF Wt mi9At stlect sae of G� ThM Totld�n OPO�Y Merest
fa4 tl akWare Interest COnYnue Courr+l Pdded SOauiGC3 kn0ln9? 1�0 AGpqed 275.000
hler Fund Traesters (Central Service Cnsh)
ware� ur,bty ow+vaa ror eenua� smkes
hur funA TransFers -othet
PW rNund N WM�u Sveet eacass-net of SN10.000 tor 6rae y�s
HotN Motet Tases - posstDle inarease?
(pa ee. ro, eu rceeoes an�a,sooau� ae�u:u�enes = ssoo.e� vs ssra.azz a+zoeo cF eaye
e�m�owaru+a*axa>szs.00a ee.x�.'rc+xea�oarwss�
Snare of County Fmes
�+�a�u.sas.acz �essncamsz.oze.sz�. co�dap,c��ny:�vease5�s.000ao.000.
��.
7,227.105
S+uce
B�uCO
(4,�tOS95)
(150.000)
R�t000)
(+�.�1
(500.000)
(sa.371)
�ss.ono�
(46576)
(a8.500)
(toD,00o)
0
0
0
2001 ? 4
(30.000)
0
0
0
0
0
2COt ? ?
0
zeo� t t
720.000
0
0
BryCe / Joe
Tom
Ron
8ruce
Ron
iZOn
Etit
Ron
Ron
Ron
BNOL'
BNLC
Bntce
Bruce
Fton
BNCB
Bruee
Bruce
HNCt
BNCE
Bruce
Bruee
eruce
7om
6ruce
BNC9
�
Item
Amount
Exolanation
Z000 COWJqIlTEl.t Mxriam Pak RivetTral CanecLon
, (�iMl2� CaO�lRl[�1211I � (EJf10VB tlWll SyC�Ed flSENE
Caun�'F6gNaM OmrmD Wnpe coi661dm
Counea-ada�analanomey
Cbund-Fav SmMerOs Flouce�g T�
CouneA -;,weecer
C�nd-Gty?hm9r
Caxid • w�Cw mOe �orcement
General City YYde Iterts
200t Department Base Adustrnents - estcnated
20D7 Projeete0 Salary Inueases
2001 frkfge 8enebt es�ria0es. Gh?JERAL FUND share
Woeice�s Compenca4on
Ertpbyee Inswance
ReGrae inswanra
Ss�lr3nC! Pey
Po6ce pension (Re1ieG PERA antl me�a�e)
Fre per�on (ReGet. PERA and meGfore)
FICA
Mediwe
PER4
Otl�er pensipn
?A01 AOpitlon forinllaUon 2.3%of utiGGes 371,373
2007 Addition fw in0ation f.6% of?AO's. 300'a, 800's
(PW � 539,000: 57.3M�3%)
Departments
Human Resources
Employce OevNOprnent anE Supavbory Tralnfi9
Ciry ACorney
CAO doD SNOy and Contrya $ettle�nenb
TMS
PC Reptacement PWn - aQd NII annual effect of 2000's lease 5 whiq� was 6S monws and whatever
ow�eC rtm�U�ines w[ repbce In 2001. Leese 1 In 1886, lesm 2 h 7987. leas�e 3 in 1998. ka5e t N SH99.
lease 5 in 2000 antl balarce o! 5 anE iU of some nurMer M�ronttis for kese 8(at XXY:) is �ew fot 2001_
Geaero� Fund Iransfer tor bau growM H speriai fwds
7M5 -PRELIMINARY pasipn group
Conaaet Swioes-P�ra�ss++p (tiEw kr2007) At 200t SE
Remove One Time 200� Programs
kortwve New IS OneTime MvesEnanb-2000
W�C bone yesr 7 of3
seDa�am t00 mb segmenc
movo Oonuin name sarvico b NT
Pu61k Workt
PW cicrease for added signs, slpnaB, and SVeet Lighting
General Fund Iransfer tor base growU� tn spedai funds
vu6Gewort�s Siree[Maineenaneetr 022T142330 =563.120
PuDtie Waks T2f11e yfC ytreeVghG O?283 �57,543
Removt� One Thro 200p proprams
remowaueccwoncs•Manayame�a^+a^rerineaaaearar�000 •Sta.soo
(t0,000)
(500.000)
(5f.a7�)
C3+.000)
(�658)
(48.5a01
(ioD.000)
�oo� ? ?
2055.976
2001 i ?
7.tSa.977
716.789
2oot 7 ?
Z001 9 7
1001 ? 7
200� a t
Zoo7 7 �
2001 17
2601 T ?
zoot � ?
zooi ? ?
0
too.000
d
0
0
poo.000)
I?5.000)
(?SA00)
0
p,i?A
57.643
0
Responsihie
Staff
�b-��9
BNCE
RAn
Ron
Ron
Ron
Ftan
Ron
0
Joe/EriC
Ron
Ron
ftOH
Ron
Ron
Ron
Ron
Ron
Ron
Ron
Joe
Joe
627b
Barb
Tom
Tom
Tom
Tom
7om
7am
Tom
Tom
Tom
Tom
OFFICE OF THE MAYOR �l/ - '���'J
FINANCIAL SERVICES OFFICE, Budget Section �
Joseph %eid, Director of Financial Services
CITY OF SAINT PAITL zso c�ry x�rt Telephone: (6I2) 26(r8543
Norm Coleman, Mayor IS We.st Kelingg Boulevard Fatsimile: (612) 266-8547
Saint Pau1, Mimresota 55102-I63I
MEMORANDUM
To: Council President Dan Bostrom
Council Members
From: Joe Reid, Financial Services Direct
RE: Budget Update
Date: Mazch 15, 2000
The attached material is being submitted to you for your information on a number of matters
related to the 2000 and 2001 budget. At the council meeting on March 15, 2000, I will also
report to you on some additional issues and propose a schedule for future updates.
1. A spreadsheet providing a status report on changes to the 2000 proposed general fund
spending and fmancing budget as of Mazch 15, 2000.
2. A description of how the budget office began its review of the budget for 2001 by examining
planned spending in 2000 and the current status of that review.
3. The pern�anent spending reduction goals for each department.
4. A current analysis of spending and financing projections.
If you have additional questions on these subjects, please contact me at your convenience.
ob-a�9
w
d
�
3
m
�
�
N
N
w
v
d
�
R
V
N
C
3
�..�
w
C)
m
6 6
0 0
d m
L m
`m `m
m `
m'
a v
n' a'
g $
a n
oa
r m
c c
m m
w N
9 p
q � O O O
C `�
a
R
C
LL
0
0
N
&
�
o m
° r `Bv
0 � �
m
3 � e � V
m � u
A o 0
� m m �
� � 0
n
'�
C
m � ° �
]I N Q Q
�
0
a
s
c -
o E
6
`m �
Q a
� T C
O C
N 0
C °�
E u
n n
a `
5 0
c "
w�
Q � p E N
p v �
m
E
Q m
n E
� � a
O r _
A p m �
N V � n
m m �
Am gm
� LL � ? �
a � w m
V ° m � a
� i ° c o U U
`� 9 ^ m m ° o m F�i
9 q T�• C � O C
° q a _
c ` _ u
= m � `o
m
m m� m 9 N
Q m U'
VJ `d li �
O
a
g
m
m
m
@
�
a
O
m
0
�i
�
�
c
�
m
`a
LL
s'
g
a
S
w
00
tt —
rr -
00 0
v v v
a n n
0 0
C C �
a m a
m m m
m m
v a a
m m `a
'm m 'm
aa a
' n'
$ g g
lV N
E E E
m � z
n n n
v a o
b =
c c c
m m m
� w w
� O 0
o'
N
b
N
m m m m
�8 � g� �� m�'_m �
0 g b � ^ m � P IG S
N t�i " q'
0
m
m m
� E
n
� y n
C
m A
�NN
0
3 m
yy � 0
q � C
� � c
� O
� W`c
C m
� � 6
�
a
N
m
�
m�
{ p
� W
n
° � �
" e c
m m
c O c
E 'u
� N Q O
�
V
$
2 0
b H
� �
J
C'
� o
0 �
w�. � L
aa o
�a$`'
� �
N N
o $
��
C
fO E
° c
m 2 i
& O
a ; �
n � m O
w m [
� j 3 Q
m s s N
0 � � m d
n m m � m '
m N y
� ° c a � i `m
E p _
� N N � �
3
a m n
�
�
s
���
��eg
� m m �
� m '- �
as�
C
w a c a
C l {L J
n m m � C
_ � � w
$ E E c n
w c c 3 3
n o 0
�_ O D j. T T >'.
¢ a a u ii `o o`o `o `o
� L S L Y £
� O D 9 a N N N N Vl
25 25 25 z5 $ E E� E E E
« W w�`V o F 0 0 0
K C K C K$.a B B$
n u a a n o r 'o 0 0 0
c c c 5 c g � y g
� m m ` `m � m � m �
u� � w w w Z Z 2 Z Z
O O O O Y'y Y] O D
o �o.=m ro
$�r' 7 �SS
0 N�[I h��� m fD S O
VI
N V
E
@
n 3 �
m �
`- w o w ei
� A W p 3
- 0 m
'° � � o
$ 5 `o ? � W
� m � �
o J � � 4 °
8 Po m � 9 �
° = ° � i
c � - m E
1 0 m L
� m m x�'U
@ � m m ° � �
� m� o o m� U
W
m U � �
^ m w � � o
C H
�NCCC._�if K
u
m m° �.^�-
M
2
0 W
LL
r m
�
' m
W m
; F
Z
2
O
a
m
c
3
6
a
�
0
n
5
�
��
^ 0
`m �
y c
� U
c m
� � N
n g q
c m
�a 3
� � s
m ° m
° C � O C
� $_ a
O
1
ba
m
s
ry
c
6
a
m
`m
w
L
d
C
m
E
`o
a
a
`m
Z
a R
a' b
� LL
m �
L m
p LL
0 y
5 �,
c �
m �
w�
8 O
m
p O O N n O
o� e �
N A
N
� c
$ ° m
m g9
� F
m ` d O �
�5 mt�
a fn'.5
� m t w
v =�
m m s' g
n _ 3 �
6 � @ m
� o m `
U K m U
O
�
0
n
U
O
yy a
` � N
m '�-"
� E
R �
m c
LL
� ` �
� a c y
p m �
�N f
a
�
m
c
L
E
a
m
m
a
O
0
�
m
d d m @
S
m c c D c �
m m m m m
cs_ c
m m m m m m
m m m m �
- 'm m m o m
0 0 0 0 o g
9 m m V 9 m O m
E E£ E E E
c c c c c c
c s a a m
m m
L L L L L t
o` `o `o o `o 0
° m m m m
0 0 0 0 0 0
Z z z 2 z Z
c c �' ° c $
c c c � m
C C C
�
c c c c c c
o a � m o 0
_ _ `m `a
m m a m
9 9 9 9 D 9
n' a' n' s' a' a'
� t 0 m m 0
o c c c c c
m m m m m o
`m `m `m `m `m m`
qgwwww
0 0 0
6 d o
O
8
�� 8 $ 8��oh���
�N $ `f �inmvv�m
N
� Z
a '° _
m m ` �
W m C � W sJ
$ ? � g m Y a
o $ c 0 2 z m� �
mW aFa iap p
h N` m` � � 0 W
g°, ° ?.
c � p q
� � Of � S'- Y C U� y T O
� m ro r� m m N 2� m_.
a 2 b E m m W H F� U €
m 6 m$ p� O� N 9
� Y � O � � w m
� i ti� v y m � D:'a �
m w�� m c� c m E y J m E�
8�� m W E£ � a, � n �$ x
� i Q E 2 P � �-° 'o a w` m
.� o T^ 'o ° m m� C a
g� mm3o�sm��m�� ° ,S�
� n 5 a� @ n� U LL 6 4 V O
N U D 1 F W
� � � � � q
y P � S 8
N fp m A
2
m
¢
0
y
q 3
` o_ m
m O e` a
N
-S 0 �` J
n : °
�E3
a`a�wm
C Q
m c
� m �
$ m
c I � c
c 'c E E c 'c
° o w ° m m
_ = � = _ _
`o �`o € `o `o `o `o
'm 'm 'm L L
6 d d
0 o a - - -
`m m `m
n n n
a a v 'q a o v
0 �41 m m m
� 0 0
m m m m m m
_ _ L _ _
- > 2 > a >
a `o �5 0 `a `o
° m ° m_ � m ° m ° m_
v n� m n n
m n m m m
a n a a a�
.
cc`c"� c c
0 N W
� 4 4 V L V
3�����
m m �
a a a� a c
� ° c � > j c
u�i u.unu'.
O O O � O m O 1p N a N �
O � W O O
N� � � � b� Y O O O
N •� �
W
U � a
m O q
c � u � 0 9
� ° `5 z 2 2, £ 3
U � ~ � � j 9 ?
C N � c m
`-�� c�+ W m o ° �`m E`
0 � �j � p � d {p Z � � �
K
y� � N� n c m N F ' 3 N
m m Y�� � c =� E y _ O
c y � � m 8 m o� v E m 3�� m
w
mti ��
0
�j m m m OO p 0 O � O m � _� U W li
� O N- O N m_ LL`= T' � m
qm
O C� V� Q C 0 j� J U 1Y 1 1 U j
�UU. Y?
6 d
� � � � � � N
m
O 0 �
Y m
�« �
0
m
V °
� � $
C LL
'o m
t? ` °
m Oii
N
�
$
�
m
r
2
�b-a��
Budget Management Team Rationale for egamining adopted spending in 2000.
Goal: Keep snending within budeet limits in 2000 and 2001.
Decisions leading up to the adopted spending for 2000 occurred in several steps:
April-May, 1999. Department staff, led by the department or office director, reviewed the
department or office spending priorities within established limits and proposed a spending plan.
T'heir plan, given those spending limits, could not include all the spending they may have
desired. They had to say what service or activity would not be continued in order to stay within
the limits. Presumably, if guidelines were followed, all the services or activities that were
inciuded were more important than those that were not.
2. May-June, 1999. Next, budget staff, working with the department or office director and his or
her key stafF and the budget director did a further review of the spending plan and, either agreed
with the plan, or suggested modificarions to it. The modifications could include substitution of a
service that was included for one that was not or the spending limits may have been relaxed
because the spending plan, in the opinion of the analyst, needed something that was excluded and
he or she did not propose a substitute.
July, 1999. Next, budget staff, the department or of£ice director, the budget director and the
mayor completed a similaz analysis, on a nanower set of items, to what was done in step three
and again agreed to decisions made in step three or made other modifications to the plan. The
mayor then proposed the composite spending plan to the council for 2000.
4. September-December, 1999. Nea�t, the city council assisted by their fiscal director and the
budget director completed their own review and analysis and agreed with eazlier decisions or
made new modifications.
5. In each step of the process, the review may have focused on similar services or activities or one
step may have examined a service not considered in another step. At each step, however, a
whole group of services and activities, in fact the vast majority of them, were inciuded in the
spending plan because everyone agreed that they were important, in fact, more important than the
service or activity that one group of decision makers may have decided to exclude.
6. January, 2000. As the budget staff and the budget management team prepazed to begin the cycle
ali over again and looked at the spending limits that decision makers would face in 2001, it
seemed to make sense to first reexamine the last set of spending proposals that were added to the
2000 adopted budget. It made sense because, first department staff, then budget staff, then the
mayor, and finally, the council had agreed that all other spending proposals were at least as
important or more important than the fmal items because the last items added had not replaced
any of the others.
7. Recognizing that some decision makers might make different decisions if they had this to do all
over again, the budget office and management team will treat all spending proposais of equal
value at this point and give each proposal an opportunity to prove that it should be preserved and
some other spending item excluded. That will enable us to consider options for controlling costs
without predetermining what any of the items might be.
3
C �
� C U N
N � W m
� ol
O c � p_I
� d � ��
N y N af
n R' O I
O
O �
rn
N � c�a
Of
� a v
r
c�0 t N ti (�.. � � � u�'i c a�i t�o � � � � N
< m O O t0 � N (D N � �- of M � _ ^ (O � O
v LV (O v v v v t") Oi th t� N O O � SO
.., �. ,_. � � C °' � ... � �- v
�e-ay�
� 7 I
�
N � �I
� � � �
v (v I (O
j`
I vl
� N � V' � � tn N � � tn O � � � O � tn O I t0
t� I� 6� O I
� r 0 O ^ W � n � t0 th 7 C � W r N � p O Q � [�
,� � � � � ._. �'' � N . � . � .�_. � O r � N I
� � "" � `-� v I
��
i
�
0 0
0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 � o o � o 0 0 0 0 0 � ° o N o
N oJ N O M N Q � � O V; r t0 c- N T O aD
N � O 0 r N f� O � (7 � N O 1� � O O O � � p � (y
O
o •. rn � o ° n v �n rn � � M o rn o co o � ^ � v o
N � � N � � M � M � n � o � � � c
o m n v �n m v_ co
� � U [t N � r � V � � v � ' N c• � � � M N � � o N (�p
!' ° r v '- M
O
N
�
�
�
� O
0
(J� N
�
�
u.
\
� Q�
� �
/��
V
�M.
�
a a�
M �
W
�
�
N
Q
O
�
N
�
�
�
�
m �
O�
� �
Q m
N
W
C
o �
� �
aa
3
Q m�
N
�
d �
d �
O >
Q m
r a <o
�n v < � m � � u� m °� u ° 0 1 D r�- v v
� N � f� � d' tn N 1� M f0 N O V � O
�n t0 fV o f� � ui ifi (O ai {p � ` c" ej N
O N f�0_ n N N M � p�i, a�- C�'1 f� M � f M O
N < <- N c- P') t0 (� � N � � � M
�
� � o �
O � � W (�D
N O rn
� � � �
t�(� � < O c0 p�p `�Y 1� � O f� N O N (p � � �
(O N � � I� r V� tn � N t�n (�p � p�j � p �
Oi (D N n h � try th 1n t7 (P � I� � O� � O
M OJ O (G N � O �[J N � f9 O o� m
O N (O � ^ (V N � 07 aD O � I`: � p�j n c�j �
N �- < N a- th M I'� Q� N � � c M
�
V N � O
� O � �
� �
� h �
'�t N O O � N � N O] tn M t0 aD O N u� eD fp
th tO 01 � N f� � N � t0 Ol tn t0 � 1� m 1� N
f� 01 V' M O1 � t� � .-- N 1� t0 f� O� N f� o� th
(V o'i 1%} Oi t0 C o � V ai cV ah tci co ui c0 o aD oD tD
O N N � � N N o�') ? W O (�p n p�p � N � � � �
N c- � N s- Ci th I� W o O> O vi � �
N N M
U
O � �
'R O C
O N
y V R (�j p
N
E d �O L y Q �
.� Q � � � � � ��
d' Q' > N
U o •C C � � � �
� � � O > > � �
U � ii 2 S 2 Q J
U
�
Q
�
�z
tA
C
N
�
� U
� L
o �
Q U
W ,Z' �'
J U U
U
N
C
�
�
T Y
O �
= 3 y
Y
F a' d
N
N
R U
n
� a
N
c
�
U
O
U
.�
O
U
d
�
a�-i
c
N
U
�
O
U
C
�
�
O
U �
w
a
N
�U
C
�
O
U
0
O
C
0
3
a
C
U
W N
� n
m �
N �
c
�
�
>
O
�
N
N
d
U' m
0
F
T
2001 Budget Planning Summary
Gap Projection and Strategy
�� �._v��� ._ �6-a��
Spending Financing Gap
2000 Adopted Budget - Gene21 Fund
Fund Balance Use - Mayor 54.77�,798
Fund Balance Use - Council $1253,184
Total Fund Balance Use $6,023,982
Change in Use of Fund Balance 2000 to 2001 - Financing Column
Changes to Spending - Spending Column
Fund Balances decrease - 2000 Amounts
Fund Balances deaease - 2000 Technology Initiatives
Fund Balances decrease - 2000 Y2K
Fund Balances decrease - 2000 Speafied Reserve items
Fund Balances decrease - 2000 Highland Driving Range Design
Total Changes in use of fund balance
Year 2��� Proposed fund Balartce Use
2000 Adopted Budget Less One Time Use of Fund Balance
Changes to Financing
Change from 2000
HACA AdjusVnent
Levy Adjustment
Tax Levy Shift to or from Debt Service
Non Repealing GraMs
One Time Financing in 2000 (Science Museum sale)
One Time Financing in 2000 (from Contract Services)
Library Technical Training Specialist
New Financing for 2001
LGA (expected normal increase)
Interest Eamings
One Time Financing in 2001 (internal Vansfer)
Changes to Spending
Change from 2000
2000 COUNCIL ITEM: One Time Technical Change
2000 COUNCIL ITEM: One Time River Bluff 7rai1 Connection
Remove Remaining Specified ConGngency
2000 COUNCiI ITEM: Move Hf0 $$ Dutaf Contingency
Move Workers' Comp Incentive Progrem out of Contingency
Remove Remaining Y2K Budget
New Spending for 2001
Salary Increases
Fringes Increase
Gene21 Fund Transfers for base growth in speciai tunds
Inflation for UGlities
Inflation for Other Non Compensation Related Spending
Planned Shift of Officers From Pension Assets Fund
Census PoSition
Tort Claims increase
Elections
Municipal Memberships
Exempt and Forfeited Properly Assessments
CIB Per Diem
Total Changes
Totai General Fund Spending, Financing, and Gap
Changes to Spending Base
Reduction AllocaHons
Changes to Financing Base
Property Tax Relief (FUnd Balances)
Total Changes to Base
Year 2001 Generai Fund Base
163,608,599
('150.000)
(212,000)
(785.387)
('170.000)
(6,023,982)
??
162,295,212
(30,000)
(200,000)
salary increases INCOMPLETE EST
(6,304)
(10,000)
(288,350)
88,350
200,000
(243,742)
2,655,977
1,366,042
187.248
v �
o v
152,076
� �
200,000
� �
8,000
25.272
4,100
4,tOS,609
163,608.599
(4,710,595)
(150,000)
(272,000)
(78�,387)
('170,000)
157,584,677
0
0
� �
(30,000) ,
(200,000)
(97,377)
(3,743)
1,221,105
500,000
120,000
1,509,985
'f66,403,821 'f59,094,602 (7,309,219)
0 0
'I66,A03,82'I '159,094,602 (7,309,219)
GISHARE��BUDGETt2l\YR2001�200tGAP ^
V
ORIGII�AL
Presented By
Referred To
�,�h�3\`S °a
RESOLUTI
SAINT , MIlVNESOTA
Committee:
WHEREAS, a fine of $500 was imposed against the li
d/b/a Food-N-Fuel (License ID # 17138) by Council File 00-3�
WHEREAS, the Licensee was notified of the impo:
January 25, 2000 by the OfFice of License, Inspections and
which was to be paid by Friday, February 11, 2000; and �
Council File # pp � '�.�g
Green Sheet # 1 o0'T 6 a
=_�
by Food-N-Fuel, Inc.,
of the fine by letter dated
�onmental Protection (LIEP),
WHEREAS, as of Febnxary 23, 2000, no fine l�ad been received by the Office of LIEP;
now, therefore, be it �
RESOLVED, that the licenses held by F od-N-Fuel, Inc., d/b/a Food-N-Fuel (License ID
#17138) are hereby suspended until such tim s the fine of $500 has been paid.
Requested by Department of:
�� //
i� p ,, ��
Adopted by Counci
Adoption Certif' a
Hy'
AppYOVed y Mayor:
BY:
Date
by Council Secretary
Date
Form Appxoved by City Attomey �
BY: � �.%'-�_ l � ;�
Approved by Mayor for Submission to Council
By:
00 -ay�
March 6, 2000
��
�
TOTAL # OF SIGNATURE PAC,ES
GREEN SHEET
«,�: , �:�,..�..:�
No �'��-�?7�2
�_._ �
❑ �.�. ❑ m.�
❑ „�,�� ❑ ..�.,�,�,o
❑YYDR�GlhsmfANi) ❑
(CL1P ALL LOCATIONS FOR SIGNATURt�
Resolution suspending licenses held by Food-N-Fuel, 675 7th Street West, until the fine imposed by the City
Council on January 12, 2000, (C.F. 00-31) is paid.
PL4NNING CAMMISSION
CIB COMMITTEE
CIVIL SERVICE COMMISSION
AMOUNTOFTRANSACTION
(IXPWN)
tl�uns v���m � woncea uMe. a convact rauns aepanmem�
VES NO
Hes m�s perarnlfirm aer heen a dlv emWcyeeT
YES NO
Dces this pereanlfi'm pwaess a sWli not IwrmallyposeesaeE by arry arreM cRy employee7
YES �
k Mis pereoNfi�m a farpNetl �entloY7
VES NO
fain ali vec answets m aeoarete sheet and atlach fn nrePn sheet
COSTrttEVQlUE BUDfiETED (CIRCLE ONq
ACTMSY NUMBER
1C"3-'�:G7
i
ORIGINAL
�
Tlrc�!"1T TimTi-.�.T
00 - �yq
Cuuncil File T QQ — 3{
Green Sheet � 104498
.1
Presented By
Referred To
Committee: Date
i
2
3
4
5
6
7
8
9
10
11
12
13
RESOLVED, that the Licensee Food-N-Fuel, Inc. d/b/a Food-N-Fuel (License
ID I�TO. 17138), located at 67� 7`" Street R'est in Saint Paul is hereby ordered to pay a fine of
$500.00 for the violation of Sale of Alcoholic Beveraoes to UnderaQe Persons.
Said fine shall be paid to the O�ce of License, Inspections and Environmental Protection
within thirty (30) da}�s of the adoption of this resolution by the Council and si�nature by the
Mayor.
This resolution and the action of the Council in this matter aze based upon the facts
contained in the December 2, 1999, I`'otic� of Violation letter to the licensee, the Police Report
CN 99-197211, and such arguments as m2�� have been presented to the Council at the public
hearing. The facts were not contested by the licensee.
Recuested by De�a=tnent ef:
�Y� FJlIL'�ea .TU3lifc�(yn
Adopted by Covncil: Dat_ �� 2pp.q
�� � T�'
Rdoptien Certified by Council�$ec-etary
ay• 1 ..
.lpprove3 by N.ayor: ate
BY.� —_ _
Fcrm :,pnroved by City a[.o-i_y
/�
a ��,/; «� :� � c�.��u,n
Acprwed �y Mayor £cr St'�missicn to Cow�cil
By:
be�a`�`�
March 8, 2000, City Council Action Minutes Page 3
Heritage Preservation Commission. (Public testimony will be taken on this
issue only)
11. . Resolution - 00-224 - Approving a Single Fanuly Housing Program to be financed
by the issuance of Single Family Mortgage Revenue Bonds and Mortgage Credit
Certificates.
This item was considered as a public hearing at 5:30 p.m:
Adopted Yeas - 7 Nays - 0
12. Resolurion - 00-225 - Establishing the upgrade in Pazk and Recreation Manager to
Grade 26 of the Supervisory Range of Compensation in the Salary Plan and Rates
of Compensation.
Laid over to March 15 Yeas - 7 Nays - 0
The Council requested that the Administration report on March 15 on the
proposed reductions in spending under the City's 2000 budget.
13. Resolution - 00-226 - Adjusting the rates for a number of Special Employment
tifles in the Salary Plan and Rates of Compensation.
Adopted Yeas - 7 Nays - 0
14. Resolution - 00-227 - Direcring the Deparhnent of Planning and Economic
Development to work with the Capital River Council to prepare appropriate
amendments to the Legislarive Code related to signage in downtown.
Adopted Yeas - 7 Nays - 0
15. Resolution - 00-228 - Approving application for Auto Repair Garage, Second
Hand Dealer-Motor Vehicles, and Motor Vehicle Dealer-New Licenses by Mid-
America Emergency Vehicles, dba Road Rescue Emergency Vehicles, 1133
Rankin Street. (Legislative Hearing Officer recommends ap�rovai�
Adopted Yeas - 7 Nays - 0
16. Resolurion - 00-229 - Approving change in the Brewery Neighborhood Project
budget.
Adopted Yeas - 7 Nays - 0
�� Cify Councii's Additions fo the 2000 Budget
Se/ecfed Items Affec6ng Fund Balance
Deseription
CTtv Aftomev
9 Mtl f�mQing relatad to law Werk
2 Add fundmg tetateG to derk typist 0
iRf n c ry/ �
3 Fundng for Properly CoOe EMorcement �efated fo
seasonal inspectots. Cletk N, and Typist 1
HumaiR(qh�fc
4 Souti�em Mn. Regionat Legal Services Contract
for 12 monNu
ra•; <
5 Sunday Service Hours at Riverview and SC Mthony
6 Moming Service Hours at ArGngron, Hamnne, Rice,
Riveniew and St Anthony
� Materiais BuOget
Parke a��-�h',on'� ,
8 Restore wt for swe'eping seleci seasonal Ice rinks
9 ' Restore fundng related ro rec d'irector cut at Eastview
10 Restore funtling related to rec diractor for senior rec progrertu
� 1 Loan fpr Design of HigNand Park Driving Range
12 Mertiam Park Rivec Traii Connection
Fechnoloav d Manae�e.+r Serviee< � ,
13,14 Health Fair
Ssanerai Gevemm nt aM.,..nfe
Spe�tifmd ContUgency
'IS Loan for HighWnO Driving Range Construe6o�
]6 City Attomey, improving Serv�p Dei'rvery
17 fair �ning Standards Testing and Remed"adon
1a Parks / Pubiic Works - Slveeper for sidewatks and ke rinks
19 PEO -tunding reiated lo Gry PWnner 11
20 Code Er�forcement
Spending
bb
Keep Reduca
3T,061
34,468 22579
• 8 months
102,276 75.493
1 derk N
seasena� inspectors
9,000
43,193
65,929
100,000
23.794
5�,000
50,000
170.000
10,000
11,760
500,000
51,371
35,000. .
46,5� 6
48.500
100,000
37,061
11.489
26,783
9,ODD
18,373
etf 5/5/00
28,039
eff W5�00
100,000
24,820
37,890
12,794 1't,000
early winter 00
50.000
50,000
no,00a
10,000
97,760
500.000
rr�aybe
59.371
35,000
46,516 .
48,500
100,000
490.819
Total - - - 1�488.868 998.049
.
:
w i
C
T C V y
� W m �
N €w o
4 �
o mom
�—
N �' � Q
(q � .�..
�
N � �
�
� a
�
0
° o
N
�
Q!
Q>
r
0
N
�
a
� O
0
� N
�
�
�
` �
� �
V
1
�
T �
W
0
cV
O
N
�
�
�
O N �N t'^V p� '� '� f�D e� � � �p � ... i. .-. � N
7 � O [� ^ O �1 1n �O m Ql i0 O f� � O�D N � � � .
� CD 'p s0 m N v) � W co Q � r �O O � $
�.. " � � ` [V -' „ " � v v v � N O O y � � t9 Oi e�7
� � v � � � tO -
T
� � oo-a�q . v
� .. �
� m $ � ^ �o ca n a �o o � m `° o `° o� m m
n ° � r m .°- n � m e� . c v 'q W n � p � c m i °
� o �
v � v � � v v v N v v w � v f� O � O r � N
v v ' "
v '
e a
N m N C l7 N Q N m p Q � � � N 0 � O � O a N e
c�i < o � � cv t� o�; c�i � c�i o n oi o o c o°- ��n
. . � .- �i
m
� C N t��] M � � m O � m 0 lD � O O � N O f0 n � '�Q� O
p= h w !7 Q n N � V' Q � N � c9 m < iD
0 V I Q N �rj � O 1� Of �., CO N � Q 0 � � M tp a p O N t�4
v t- Q ' v � N l�J � l'> Q � N Q � � [O
� � ` s t7
a e v
o m .cr v w ao m v t� . m < a ° o � n < Q Q m o»
G1 N �- ' 1� N R W O v t`� �
�� < m O � 1� Q O N 1C1 tfi f0 01 f0 O P � m nj W Q Q - �D
Q m O N tD n N N m eN O�1 � M A t�7 � n � p � W �
N e= � (�j � M t9 C+ Qj N � t�q � c�7 � t0 t�0
�
a
O
n d � c m o m � v r. u ° v m m ° o 'y u� < Q v m co m
a'o a�i m N ~ � � � o`ti w n c� �n ro ° rn Q o � a m
P C� r 'a
�" m N � � � � N N � M C�0 C Q � � � �`�` � O O T m �:
� N � t7 1�i 1� Oi N Oi � .� � .r tn f�p
�
M e N O � O � N tq N i0 . �q l7 t0 t0 r O M N �P tn Oi
m m ^ �' R M Q�f 7 P � a�� � LL� r m � W e � N � N � �
,� j O N � ~ n N N fpD O f��l 1� t�0_ n m � � � O r h �
Q m N � r nj � � W � N h R 1� m a
tl! a� i� 0 N W ` p � � .r Yj »
� �
�
� �
.i
o p � m c
L° a � m c � e C7
� y W V p m C C
� e
E m o.c o Q ° �. U � w W
c q � � � � m m c " � " c
� y �, �, z z a m � s 3 E
U o e � �m � � � 3 a' �
Q U � U N � dl E
� W � o � 3 � � w 2• � m � W � U U
U � �T 2 2 2 ¢ � � U U. 1- a LL � C
m
LL
d
c
U
C
0
.�
E
U �
W
a
m
E
c
>
0
c�
m
C
0
C7 Ta
H
Entered on the 2001 6enerat Fund Gap Projection
see fi:W SERS1flU0GEti1�231YR799811498GAP 6k tor ust of Ws sheet
Rem
�b-a�
�ooi ? ? eenotes change artaun musi
be esUmated an0 entered by
rlspons�e staff Gsted
ResPo�sible
AmouM Staff
Fxplanatinn
Financing
ttACA �ustment (Qurent Stam Law) 2006 AdopfeC -S?A.809.726 -no dian9e iP� Tom C.}
neweK Legklatfve viopod
LCA Ad'pstment (Curent State le«I 2000 Adapted 548�84t,193 -2Wtnumber [efkcts 2.SX inaease
Wirent qw -nOt Z000 Llgi.ta6re PApo521
Ch2ngt in USC Df FYtq H21ant6 2000l02001
ASiat cxneril kKl or ru�M 6al�s appKd u rnandig• badc arc amo�a�t apvfied n z000 sudget
FWb BdxCeS dareasE •�D00 tsdyWbpy iNi6iW�3
Fuw sauexasaaa�se-a000v2�c bw� Cga+s�fv�.+es�n�.s �nus�.cs.�sz tnen,�s amc�a�cgraa�+)
5ma eahnca dea6nx-tfi�leM Omh+D Ranu Desi9n
Fwb Bsbnoe Oeceasa-200o Speo'fkd Raerve • Cowwt-hiphlane pivin8 Rangp tonswdbn
FunO 9atanrs decresse-2J00 Speofietl Roswe-COUnd-ad?Jb�al aNOmay
f�d 8etante Oeaease •2000 SD� Racervs - Wwit3-FairSqn0ar0s Houeing 7esting
FuM Balanee Oeuease -2000 SpedGed Raa�e-Couneil • Sweecer
FwW Baia� tle�ase • 20D0 SD0�7eC Racenra. CoV�d -fSly Planner
FunO &�Wnce deerease • II000 SpecifieC Raem • Counol • uncpeeGc eo0a Worcement
TOTA� (6.023.96�
Property Tax Financing
uKrsam n kvy �
SNft (bI /aom oeet Ss+v'ae •(CanY olomm u�s� ahw deetsema butlget baa)
StaM1 pro6eGMJ OUkpuendes
ReOUce eNinkaga zPP6eC b 2 percent7?
2000 GranS (irot repeacn9 ;n ?A01)
Po�'¢e
WetOnSee6
Franctdse Fee Atljustrnent
DH ampire 6ulitler
Norenco steam - eant pra0td Incase. NRG Energy has not nepotiateE agraement w! payer,
District CooGng
Energy park
NSP GEFF - rrte invease antidpated'm 2000 budge� is there another for 200l4?
fnaease In Budgef Estimate !or Mterest 6rtiug5 -?AOOACOpteC 3,000,000 (mdutles PW Sewor stuR)
NelO b meet rilh Joo. Tadd t0 redew Wnges ei GF Wt mi9At stlect sae of G� ThM Totld�n OPO�Y Merest
fa4 tl akWare Interest COnYnue Courr+l Pdded SOauiGC3 kn0ln9? 1�0 AGpqed 275.000
hler Fund Traesters (Central Service Cnsh)
ware� ur,bty ow+vaa ror eenua� smkes
hur funA TransFers -othet
PW rNund N WM�u Sveet eacass-net of SN10.000 tor 6rae y�s
HotN Motet Tases - posstDle inarease?
(pa ee. ro, eu rceeoes an�a,sooau� ae�u:u�enes = ssoo.e� vs ssra.azz a+zoeo cF eaye
e�m�owaru+a*axa>szs.00a ee.x�.'rc+xea�oarwss�
Snare of County Fmes
�+�a�u.sas.acz �essncamsz.oze.sz�. co�dap,c��ny:�vease5�s.000ao.000.
��.
7,227.105
S+uce
B�uCO
(4,�tOS95)
(150.000)
R�t000)
(+�.�1
(500.000)
(sa.371)
�ss.ono�
(46576)
(a8.500)
(toD,00o)
0
0
0
2001 ? 4
(30.000)
0
0
0
0
0
2COt ? ?
0
zeo� t t
720.000
0
0
BryCe / Joe
Tom
Ron
8ruce
Ron
iZOn
Etit
Ron
Ron
Ron
BNOL'
BNLC
Bntce
Bruce
Fton
BNCB
Bruee
Bruce
HNCt
BNCE
Bruce
Bruee
eruce
7om
6ruce
BNC9
�
Item
Amount
Exolanation
Z000 COWJqIlTEl.t Mxriam Pak RivetTral CanecLon
, (�iMl2� CaO�lRl[�1211I � (EJf10VB tlWll SyC�Ed flSENE
Caun�'F6gNaM OmrmD Wnpe coi661dm
Counea-ada�analanomey
Cbund-Fav SmMerOs Flouce�g T�
CouneA -;,weecer
C�nd-Gty?hm9r
Caxid • w�Cw mOe �orcement
General City YYde Iterts
200t Department Base Adustrnents - estcnated
20D7 Projeete0 Salary Inueases
2001 frkfge 8enebt es�ria0es. Gh?JERAL FUND share
Woeice�s Compenca4on
Ertpbyee Inswance
ReGrae inswanra
Ss�lr3nC! Pey
Po6ce pension (Re1ieG PERA antl me�a�e)
Fre per�on (ReGet. PERA and meGfore)
FICA
Mediwe
PER4
Otl�er pensipn
?A01 AOpitlon forinllaUon 2.3%of utiGGes 371,373
2007 Addition fw in0ation f.6% of?AO's. 300'a, 800's
(PW � 539,000: 57.3M�3%)
Departments
Human Resources
Employce OevNOprnent anE Supavbory Tralnfi9
Ciry ACorney
CAO doD SNOy and Contrya $ettle�nenb
TMS
PC Reptacement PWn - aQd NII annual effect of 2000's lease 5 whiq� was 6S monws and whatever
ow�eC rtm�U�ines w[ repbce In 2001. Leese 1 In 1886, lesm 2 h 7987. leas�e 3 in 1998. ka5e t N SH99.
lease 5 in 2000 antl balarce o! 5 anE iU of some nurMer M�ronttis for kese 8(at XXY:) is �ew fot 2001_
Geaero� Fund Iransfer tor bau growM H speriai fwds
7M5 -PRELIMINARY pasipn group
Conaaet Swioes-P�ra�ss++p (tiEw kr2007) At 200t SE
Remove One Time 200� Programs
kortwve New IS OneTime MvesEnanb-2000
W�C bone yesr 7 of3
seDa�am t00 mb segmenc
movo Oonuin name sarvico b NT
Pu61k Workt
PW cicrease for added signs, slpnaB, and SVeet Lighting
General Fund Iransfer tor base growU� tn spedai funds
vu6Gewort�s Siree[Maineenaneetr 022T142330 =563.120
PuDtie Waks T2f11e yfC ytreeVghG O?283 �57,543
Removt� One Thro 200p proprams
remowaueccwoncs•Manayame�a^+a^rerineaaaearar�000 •Sta.soo
(t0,000)
(500.000)
(5f.a7�)
C3+.000)
(�658)
(48.5a01
(ioD.000)
�oo� ? ?
2055.976
2001 i ?
7.tSa.977
716.789
2oot 7 ?
Z001 9 7
1001 ? 7
200� a t
Zoo7 7 �
2001 17
2601 T ?
zoot � ?
zooi ? ?
0
too.000
d
0
0
poo.000)
I?5.000)
(?SA00)
0
p,i?A
57.643
0
Responsihie
Staff
�b-��9
BNCE
RAn
Ron
Ron
Ron
Ftan
Ron
0
Joe/EriC
Ron
Ron
ftOH
Ron
Ron
Ron
Ron
Ron
Ron
Ron
Joe
Joe
627b
Barb
Tom
Tom
Tom
Tom
7om
7am
Tom
Tom
Tom
Tom
OFFICE OF THE MAYOR �l/ - '���'J
FINANCIAL SERVICES OFFICE, Budget Section �
Joseph %eid, Director of Financial Services
CITY OF SAINT PAITL zso c�ry x�rt Telephone: (6I2) 26(r8543
Norm Coleman, Mayor IS We.st Kelingg Boulevard Fatsimile: (612) 266-8547
Saint Pau1, Mimresota 55102-I63I
MEMORANDUM
To: Council President Dan Bostrom
Council Members
From: Joe Reid, Financial Services Direct
RE: Budget Update
Date: Mazch 15, 2000
The attached material is being submitted to you for your information on a number of matters
related to the 2000 and 2001 budget. At the council meeting on March 15, 2000, I will also
report to you on some additional issues and propose a schedule for future updates.
1. A spreadsheet providing a status report on changes to the 2000 proposed general fund
spending and fmancing budget as of Mazch 15, 2000.
2. A description of how the budget office began its review of the budget for 2001 by examining
planned spending in 2000 and the current status of that review.
3. The pern�anent spending reduction goals for each department.
4. A current analysis of spending and financing projections.
If you have additional questions on these subjects, please contact me at your convenience.
ob-a�9
w
d
�
3
m
�
�
N
N
w
v
d
�
R
V
N
C
3
�..�
w
C)
m
6 6
0 0
d m
L m
`m `m
m `
m'
a v
n' a'
g $
a n
oa
r m
c c
m m
w N
9 p
q � O O O
C `�
a
R
C
LL
0
0
N
&
�
o m
° r `Bv
0 � �
m
3 � e � V
m � u
A o 0
� m m �
� � 0
n
'�
C
m � ° �
]I N Q Q
�
0
a
s
c -
o E
6
`m �
Q a
� T C
O C
N 0
C °�
E u
n n
a `
5 0
c "
w�
Q � p E N
p v �
m
E
Q m
n E
� � a
O r _
A p m �
N V � n
m m �
Am gm
� LL � ? �
a � w m
V ° m � a
� i ° c o U U
`� 9 ^ m m ° o m F�i
9 q T�• C � O C
° q a _
c ` _ u
= m � `o
m
m m� m 9 N
Q m U'
VJ `d li �
O
a
g
m
m
m
@
�
a
O
m
0
�i
�
�
c
�
m
`a
LL
s'
g
a
S
w
00
tt —
rr -
00 0
v v v
a n n
0 0
C C �
a m a
m m m
m m
v a a
m m `a
'm m 'm
aa a
' n'
$ g g
lV N
E E E
m � z
n n n
v a o
b =
c c c
m m m
� w w
� O 0
o'
N
b
N
m m m m
�8 � g� �� m�'_m �
0 g b � ^ m � P IG S
N t�i " q'
0
m
m m
� E
n
� y n
C
m A
�NN
0
3 m
yy � 0
q � C
� � c
� O
� W`c
C m
� � 6
�
a
N
m
�
m�
{ p
� W
n
° � �
" e c
m m
c O c
E 'u
� N Q O
�
V
$
2 0
b H
� �
J
C'
� o
0 �
w�. � L
aa o
�a$`'
� �
N N
o $
��
C
fO E
° c
m 2 i
& O
a ; �
n � m O
w m [
� j 3 Q
m s s N
0 � � m d
n m m � m '
m N y
� ° c a � i `m
E p _
� N N � �
3
a m n
�
�
s
���
��eg
� m m �
� m '- �
as�
C
w a c a
C l {L J
n m m � C
_ � � w
$ E E c n
w c c 3 3
n o 0
�_ O D j. T T >'.
¢ a a u ii `o o`o `o `o
� L S L Y £
� O D 9 a N N N N Vl
25 25 25 z5 $ E E� E E E
« W w�`V o F 0 0 0
K C K C K$.a B B$
n u a a n o r 'o 0 0 0
c c c 5 c g � y g
� m m ` `m � m � m �
u� � w w w Z Z 2 Z Z
O O O O Y'y Y] O D
o �o.=m ro
$�r' 7 �SS
0 N�[I h��� m fD S O
VI
N V
E
@
n 3 �
m �
`- w o w ei
� A W p 3
- 0 m
'° � � o
$ 5 `o ? � W
� m � �
o J � � 4 °
8 Po m � 9 �
° = ° � i
c � - m E
1 0 m L
� m m x�'U
@ � m m ° � �
� m� o o m� U
W
m U � �
^ m w � � o
C H
�NCCC._�if K
u
m m° �.^�-
M
2
0 W
LL
r m
�
' m
W m
; F
Z
2
O
a
m
c
3
6
a
�
0
n
5
�
��
^ 0
`m �
y c
� U
c m
� � N
n g q
c m
�a 3
� � s
m ° m
° C � O C
� $_ a
O
1
ba
m
s
ry
c
6
a
m
`m
w
L
d
C
m
E
`o
a
a
`m
Z
a R
a' b
� LL
m �
L m
p LL
0 y
5 �,
c �
m �
w�
8 O
m
p O O N n O
o� e �
N A
N
� c
$ ° m
m g9
� F
m ` d O �
�5 mt�
a fn'.5
� m t w
v =�
m m s' g
n _ 3 �
6 � @ m
� o m `
U K m U
O
�
0
n
U
O
yy a
` � N
m '�-"
� E
R �
m c
LL
� ` �
� a c y
p m �
�N f
a
�
m
c
L
E
a
m
m
a
O
0
�
m
d d m @
S
m c c D c �
m m m m m
cs_ c
m m m m m m
m m m m �
- 'm m m o m
0 0 0 0 o g
9 m m V 9 m O m
E E£ E E E
c c c c c c
c s a a m
m m
L L L L L t
o` `o `o o `o 0
° m m m m
0 0 0 0 0 0
Z z z 2 z Z
c c �' ° c $
c c c � m
C C C
�
c c c c c c
o a � m o 0
_ _ `m `a
m m a m
9 9 9 9 D 9
n' a' n' s' a' a'
� t 0 m m 0
o c c c c c
m m m m m o
`m `m `m `m `m m`
qgwwww
0 0 0
6 d o
O
8
�� 8 $ 8��oh���
�N $ `f �inmvv�m
N
� Z
a '° _
m m ` �
W m C � W sJ
$ ? � g m Y a
o $ c 0 2 z m� �
mW aFa iap p
h N` m` � � 0 W
g°, ° ?.
c � p q
� � Of � S'- Y C U� y T O
� m ro r� m m N 2� m_.
a 2 b E m m W H F� U €
m 6 m$ p� O� N 9
� Y � O � � w m
� i ti� v y m � D:'a �
m w�� m c� c m E y J m E�
8�� m W E£ � a, � n �$ x
� i Q E 2 P � �-° 'o a w` m
.� o T^ 'o ° m m� C a
g� mm3o�sm��m�� ° ,S�
� n 5 a� @ n� U LL 6 4 V O
N U D 1 F W
� � � � � q
y P � S 8
N fp m A
2
m
¢
0
y
q 3
` o_ m
m O e` a
N
-S 0 �` J
n : °
�E3
a`a�wm
C Q
m c
� m �
$ m
c I � c
c 'c E E c 'c
° o w ° m m
_ = � = _ _
`o �`o € `o `o `o `o
'm 'm 'm L L
6 d d
0 o a - - -
`m m `m
n n n
a a v 'q a o v
0 �41 m m m
� 0 0
m m m m m m
_ _ L _ _
- > 2 > a >
a `o �5 0 `a `o
° m ° m_ � m ° m ° m_
v n� m n n
m n m m m
a n a a a�
.
cc`c"� c c
0 N W
� 4 4 V L V
3�����
m m �
a a a� a c
� ° c � > j c
u�i u.unu'.
O O O � O m O 1p N a N �
O � W O O
N� � � � b� Y O O O
N •� �
W
U � a
m O q
c � u � 0 9
� ° `5 z 2 2, £ 3
U � ~ � � j 9 ?
C N � c m
`-�� c�+ W m o ° �`m E`
0 � �j � p � d {p Z � � �
K
y� � N� n c m N F ' 3 N
m m Y�� � c =� E y _ O
c y � � m 8 m o� v E m 3�� m
w
mti ��
0
�j m m m OO p 0 O � O m � _� U W li
� O N- O N m_ LL`= T' � m
qm
O C� V� Q C 0 j� J U 1Y 1 1 U j
�UU. Y?
6 d
� � � � � � N
m
O 0 �
Y m
�« �
0
m
V °
� � $
C LL
'o m
t? ` °
m Oii
N
�
$
�
m
r
2
�b-a��
Budget Management Team Rationale for egamining adopted spending in 2000.
Goal: Keep snending within budeet limits in 2000 and 2001.
Decisions leading up to the adopted spending for 2000 occurred in several steps:
April-May, 1999. Department staff, led by the department or office director, reviewed the
department or office spending priorities within established limits and proposed a spending plan.
T'heir plan, given those spending limits, could not include all the spending they may have
desired. They had to say what service or activity would not be continued in order to stay within
the limits. Presumably, if guidelines were followed, all the services or activities that were
inciuded were more important than those that were not.
2. May-June, 1999. Next, budget staff, working with the department or office director and his or
her key stafF and the budget director did a further review of the spending plan and, either agreed
with the plan, or suggested modificarions to it. The modifications could include substitution of a
service that was included for one that was not or the spending limits may have been relaxed
because the spending plan, in the opinion of the analyst, needed something that was excluded and
he or she did not propose a substitute.
July, 1999. Next, budget staff, the department or of£ice director, the budget director and the
mayor completed a similaz analysis, on a nanower set of items, to what was done in step three
and again agreed to decisions made in step three or made other modifications to the plan. The
mayor then proposed the composite spending plan to the council for 2000.
4. September-December, 1999. Nea�t, the city council assisted by their fiscal director and the
budget director completed their own review and analysis and agreed with eazlier decisions or
made new modifications.
5. In each step of the process, the review may have focused on similar services or activities or one
step may have examined a service not considered in another step. At each step, however, a
whole group of services and activities, in fact the vast majority of them, were inciuded in the
spending plan because everyone agreed that they were important, in fact, more important than the
service or activity that one group of decision makers may have decided to exclude.
6. January, 2000. As the budget staff and the budget management team prepazed to begin the cycle
ali over again and looked at the spending limits that decision makers would face in 2001, it
seemed to make sense to first reexamine the last set of spending proposals that were added to the
2000 adopted budget. It made sense because, first department staff, then budget staff, then the
mayor, and finally, the council had agreed that all other spending proposals were at least as
important or more important than the fmal items because the last items added had not replaced
any of the others.
7. Recognizing that some decision makers might make different decisions if they had this to do all
over again, the budget office and management team will treat all spending proposais of equal
value at this point and give each proposal an opportunity to prove that it should be preserved and
some other spending item excluded. That will enable us to consider options for controlling costs
without predetermining what any of the items might be.
3
C �
� C U N
N � W m
� ol
O c � p_I
� d � ��
N y N af
n R' O I
O
O �
rn
N � c�a
Of
� a v
r
c�0 t N ti (�.. � � � u�'i c a�i t�o � � � � N
< m O O t0 � N (D N � �- of M � _ ^ (O � O
v LV (O v v v v t") Oi th t� N O O � SO
.., �. ,_. � � C °' � ... � �- v
�e-ay�
� 7 I
�
N � �I
� � � �
v (v I (O
j`
I vl
� N � V' � � tn N � � tn O � � � O � tn O I t0
t� I� 6� O I
� r 0 O ^ W � n � t0 th 7 C � W r N � p O Q � [�
,� � � � � ._. �'' � N . � . � .�_. � O r � N I
� � "" � `-� v I
��
i
�
0 0
0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 � o o � o 0 0 0 0 0 � ° o N o
N oJ N O M N Q � � O V; r t0 c- N T O aD
N � O 0 r N f� O � (7 � N O 1� � O O O � � p � (y
O
o •. rn � o ° n v �n rn � � M o rn o co o � ^ � v o
N � � N � � M � M � n � o � � � c
o m n v �n m v_ co
� � U [t N � r � V � � v � ' N c• � � � M N � � o N (�p
!' ° r v '- M
O
N
�
�
�
� O
0
(J� N
�
�
u.
\
� Q�
� �
/��
V
�M.
�
a a�
M �
W
�
�
N
Q
O
�
N
�
�
�
�
m �
O�
� �
Q m
N
W
C
o �
� �
aa
3
Q m�
N
�
d �
d �
O >
Q m
r a <o
�n v < � m � � u� m °� u ° 0 1 D r�- v v
� N � f� � d' tn N 1� M f0 N O V � O
�n t0 fV o f� � ui ifi (O ai {p � ` c" ej N
O N f�0_ n N N M � p�i, a�- C�'1 f� M � f M O
N < <- N c- P') t0 (� � N � � � M
�
� � o �
O � � W (�D
N O rn
� � � �
t�(� � < O c0 p�p `�Y 1� � O f� N O N (p � � �
(O N � � I� r V� tn � N t�n (�p � p�j � p �
Oi (D N n h � try th 1n t7 (P � I� � O� � O
M OJ O (G N � O �[J N � f9 O o� m
O N (O � ^ (V N � 07 aD O � I`: � p�j n c�j �
N �- < N a- th M I'� Q� N � � c M
�
V N � O
� O � �
� �
� h �
'�t N O O � N � N O] tn M t0 aD O N u� eD fp
th tO 01 � N f� � N � t0 Ol tn t0 � 1� m 1� N
f� 01 V' M O1 � t� � .-- N 1� t0 f� O� N f� o� th
(V o'i 1%} Oi t0 C o � V ai cV ah tci co ui c0 o aD oD tD
O N N � � N N o�') ? W O (�p n p�p � N � � � �
N c- � N s- Ci th I� W o O> O vi � �
N N M
U
O � �
'R O C
O N
y V R (�j p
N
E d �O L y Q �
.� Q � � � � � ��
d' Q' > N
U o •C C � � � �
� � � O > > � �
U � ii 2 S 2 Q J
U
�
Q
�
�z
tA
C
N
�
� U
� L
o �
Q U
W ,Z' �'
J U U
U
N
C
�
�
T Y
O �
= 3 y
Y
F a' d
N
N
R U
n
� a
N
c
�
U
O
U
.�
O
U
d
�
a�-i
c
N
U
�
O
U
C
�
�
O
U �
w
a
N
�U
C
�
O
U
0
O
C
0
3
a
C
U
W N
� n
m �
N �
c
�
�
>
O
�
N
N
d
U' m
0
F
T
2001 Budget Planning Summary
Gap Projection and Strategy
�� �._v��� ._ �6-a��
Spending Financing Gap
2000 Adopted Budget - Gene21 Fund
Fund Balance Use - Mayor 54.77�,798
Fund Balance Use - Council $1253,184
Total Fund Balance Use $6,023,982
Change in Use of Fund Balance 2000 to 2001 - Financing Column
Changes to Spending - Spending Column
Fund Balances decrease - 2000 Amounts
Fund Balances deaease - 2000 Technology Initiatives
Fund Balances decrease - 2000 Y2K
Fund Balances decrease - 2000 Speafied Reserve items
Fund Balances decrease - 2000 Highland Driving Range Design
Total Changes in use of fund balance
Year 2��� Proposed fund Balartce Use
2000 Adopted Budget Less One Time Use of Fund Balance
Changes to Financing
Change from 2000
HACA AdjusVnent
Levy Adjustment
Tax Levy Shift to or from Debt Service
Non Repealing GraMs
One Time Financing in 2000 (Science Museum sale)
One Time Financing in 2000 (from Contract Services)
Library Technical Training Specialist
New Financing for 2001
LGA (expected normal increase)
Interest Eamings
One Time Financing in 2001 (internal Vansfer)
Changes to Spending
Change from 2000
2000 COUNCIL ITEM: One Time Technical Change
2000 COUNCIL ITEM: One Time River Bluff 7rai1 Connection
Remove Remaining Specified ConGngency
2000 COUNCiI ITEM: Move Hf0 $$ Dutaf Contingency
Move Workers' Comp Incentive Progrem out of Contingency
Remove Remaining Y2K Budget
New Spending for 2001
Salary Increases
Fringes Increase
Gene21 Fund Transfers for base growth in speciai tunds
Inflation for UGlities
Inflation for Other Non Compensation Related Spending
Planned Shift of Officers From Pension Assets Fund
Census PoSition
Tort Claims increase
Elections
Municipal Memberships
Exempt and Forfeited Properly Assessments
CIB Per Diem
Total Changes
Totai General Fund Spending, Financing, and Gap
Changes to Spending Base
Reduction AllocaHons
Changes to Financing Base
Property Tax Relief (FUnd Balances)
Total Changes to Base
Year 2001 Generai Fund Base
163,608,599
('150.000)
(212,000)
(785.387)
('170.000)
(6,023,982)
??
162,295,212
(30,000)
(200,000)
salary increases INCOMPLETE EST
(6,304)
(10,000)
(288,350)
88,350
200,000
(243,742)
2,655,977
1,366,042
187.248
v �
o v
152,076
� �
200,000
� �
8,000
25.272
4,100
4,tOS,609
163,608.599
(4,710,595)
(150,000)
(272,000)
(78�,387)
('170,000)
157,584,677
0
0
� �
(30,000) ,
(200,000)
(97,377)
(3,743)
1,221,105
500,000
120,000
1,509,985
'f66,403,821 'f59,094,602 (7,309,219)
0 0
'I66,A03,82'I '159,094,602 (7,309,219)
GISHARE��BUDGETt2l\YR2001�200tGAP ^
V