280163 WNITE - CITV CIERK ��j'p���
PINK - FINANCE COUIICII a 9
CANARV - DEPARTMENT G I TY OF SA I NT PAU L �'�
BLUE - MAVOR File NO.
COMMUNITY DEVELOPMENT CO ncil Resolution
Presented By �� ����
Referred To Committee: Date
Out of Committee By Date
WHEREAS, the Council of the City of Saint Paul did approve, upon the
recommendation of the Mayor and with the advice of the Capital Improvement
Budget Committee, the Community Development Block Grant Year IX Program as part
of the 1983 Capital Improvement Budget and the 1983 Special Funds Budget; and
WHEREAS, the appropriate public hearings on the Community Development Block
Grant Year IX Program have been held in accordance with the requirements of the
U.S. Department of Housing and Urban Development; now, therefore, be it
RESpLVED, th.at Mayor G�orge La�i:mer, as Ch.ief �xecu�i:ve. Offi;cer of the
City of Saint Paul , is here6y authprized dnd di:rected to submit the Community
Development Block Grant Year �X Statement of Community DeYe1opment Objectives
and Projected Use of Funds to the U.S. Department of Housing and Urban Development
along with the Housing Assistance Plan in such form as prescribed by the
regulations of said department; and be it
FURTHER RESOLVED, that the Mayor or his designated representative, the
Deputy Director af Community Development, is further authorized to execute and
submit to the U.S. Depar�ment of Housing and Urban Development any assurances,
certifications, technical changes, or additional information that may be
required by said Department during their review of the City's Community Development
Block Grant Year IX Submission for Federal Assistance; and be it
FINALLY RESOLVED, that uppn notification of approval of the City of Saint
Paul 's Community Development Year IX Program by the U.S. Department of Housing
and Urban Development, the Council of the City of Saint Paul does hereby authorize
and direct the proper city officials to execute the grant agreement and contract
between the U.S. Department of Housing and Urban Development and the City of
Saint Paul for the Community Development Year IX Program.
COUNCILMEN
Yeas Nays Requested by Department of:
�e� __�o�,°�
Planning & Economic Development
nnas z In Favor
Galles ��,��f
Nic ia ''2�(.'�O`�
Sc e el Masanz _� Against BY
T des Nicosia
ilson g�heibsl
Tedesco AP� � 2 ��3 Form A o City At or
Adopted by Council:y����� D e _
Certified Y• -s b Council re BY S
y, ,�
t�p o by Mavor: Dat _ Ap ov d b ayor for Sub is i n to Council
B , r -- � ' f1
By - I.IS ED APR 2 3 1983 � �
\
' ' � �������
CITY OF SAIi�T PAUL, MINNESOTA
STATEMENT OF COMMUNITY DEVELOPMENT OBJECTIVES
Since its inception in 1974, the City of Saint Paul 's Community Development
Block Grant (CDBG) Program has been based largely on the goals and objectives
of the Saint Paul Comprehensive Plan and the Capital Allocation Policy.
These documents provide the policy direction for all community development �
activities, and are used throughout the City's community development planning
and capital budgeting processes. The Comprehensive Plan identifies the
City's key objectives f�r the 1980's, and the Capital Allocation Policy ensures
that capital improvement resources are allocated ta those activities deemed
essential to the long terr� health and vitality of Saint Paul . The development
of both documents involved extensive citizen participation, and residen�s
continue to remain active in both the revision of po1icies and allocation of
CDBG resources.
Both the Saint Pau1 Comprehensive Plan and Capital A1location Policy: 1984-1985
strongly support the �bjectives of the federal Housing and Community Deve7opment
Act, i .e. , to develop viable urban communities by providing decent housing
and a suitable living environment, and expanding economic opportunities, prin-
cipally for persons of 1ow and moderate income. Saint Paul 's CDBG Program
also gives maximum feasi6le priority to activities which will benefit low and
moderate income families, or aid in the prevent�on or elir�ination of slums
or blight.
The Saint Paul Comprehensive P1an: Objectives�for the 1980's
The Comprehensive Plan is Saint Paul 's officia1 planning document. It helps to
� provide a vision of the City's future potential , whi1e guiding its response to
current issues and opportuni�ies. The Comprehensive Plan recognizes that Saint
Pa.ul is faced with many ��mm�,�nity developr�ent neec�s whi^h surpass its limited
amount of resources. Because the City may not have the resources needed to
accomplish all of its objectives, attention must be directed to those activities
of the most critical nature. The Comprehensive Plan and the city's CDBG objectives
focus on objectives essential to the future well�being of the City. The key
objectives which affect the CDBG program are: -
1. Housin : To maintain and upgrade the City's existing sound housing stock
while seeking to improve deficient housing and generating con-
struction of new, affordable housing choices in character with
the neighborhoods surrounding them.
2. Energ-y: To achieve greater energy efficiency by maintaining and retro-
fitting existing structures, while encouraging energy conservation
and innovation. in construction.
3. Infrastructure: To maintain City investments, particularly sewer and water
lines, streets, bridges, public buildings, arrd existing parks,
through repair and/or replacement as needed.
The Comprehensive Plan expands these objectives into issue or area-specific
policies and recommendations, many of which pertain directly to community
development activities.
, . �,.
� _ 2 - f����,��
Prior to the appropriation of CDBG funds, all community development
programs and projects are reviewed for consistency with the adapted
policies of the Comprehensive Plan.
The Capital Allocation Policy: 1984-1985
The Capital Allocation Policy was specifically designed to guide Saint
Paul 's Unified Capital Improvement Budgeting process and the expenditure
of CDBG funds. It sets the general direction for capital expenditures .
over a multi-year period. The policies are used to allocate capital
resources according to City goals and objectives, and to determine the
relative priority of proposed capital projects.
The major goals of the Policy are close1y related to the Comprehensive
Plan, and form the basis for Saint Paul 's capital improvement expenditures
and community development activities:
1. To strengthen the City' s neighborhoods in order to make them better
places to live.
2. To consider enerqy use in all the City's activities and to increase
energy efficiency whenever possible.
3. To ensure the structural integrity of the City' s physical facilities
in order to maintain basic levels of service and prevent potential
health and safety hazards.
The community development needs of the City are far greater than the
available capital resources. The goals of the Capital A1location Policy
are, therefore, supplement�d by a number of objectives to be accomplished
with block grant funds. These objectives are:
a) to assist in the renovation and rehabilitation of the City's
"ousing sto�k; to eliminate b7i�hted structures througM spot acquisition;
b) to complement public and private housing rehabilitation efforts
through: the installation of public improvements such as streets,
sewers, and neighborhood facilities; the provision of puvlic services;
c) to promote and provide stimulus in economic development activities;
d) to assist in neighborhood commercial area revitalization efforts; and
e) to encourage and promote energy efficiency.
The 1984-85 Capital Allocation Policy is divided into four sections:
- Strategy;
- Implementation and Development;
- Project; and
- Budget Policies.
' . �����_��
- 3 -
Each policy section provides a different level of direction for the capital
improvement budgeting process. The two sections which pertain most directly
to the allocation of CDBG funds are described belaw. In combination, the four
policy sections represent Saint Paul 's priorities for the use of its block
grant and other capital resources.
1. Strateqy Policie,� - The Strategy Policies set general direction for
Saint Pau] 's corr�nunity development activities within the framework of
goals and principles. They establish the relative proportion of funds
that should address each of four areas: City-wide service system
" improvements, neighborhood-related improvements, economic development-
related improvements; and support system improvements. In addition, the
annual proportion of funds allocated to any one area of the City is
monitored over time to avoid excessive geographic concentration of
improvements and to assure that community develapment needs in all areas
are addressed. Lastly, the policies identify priorities for basic
service systems, economic development, neighborhood betterment, eriergy
efficiency, and housing impravements.
2. Implementation and Development Policies - These policies identify criteria
which are important considerations in selecting capital improvements.
They are used by participants in the capital improvement budgeting process
during the review of project and program proposals. Most of the policies
are stated in terms of "prioritie�" or "considerations° reflecting their .
use as evaluation criteria.
Al1 community development programs and projects are reviewed for consistency
with the adopted policies of the Capital Allocation Policy prior ta the
appropriation of CDBG funds.
Copies of both the Saint Paul Comprehensive Plan and Capital Allocation
Policy are available for inspection during normal business hours. Information
concerning either document is available by contacting:
Cammun i ty Devel opr�ent Di��i s i on
Department of Planning and Economic Development
1420 City Hall Annex -
25 West 4th St.
Saint Paul , MN 55102
(612) 292 - 1577
CITY OF SAINT PAUL, MINNESOTA
PROJECTED USE OF CDBG YEAR IX FUNDS
Acquisi.tion Acti.vity
9/30 Nei.ghborhood Partnership Program $ 25,000 $ 25,000
Disposition Activity
9/45 Property Management 30,Q00 30,000
Public Facilities & Improvements
9/30 Neighborhood Partnership Program -0-
9/O1 Minnehaha Recreation Center 680,000
9/36 Residential Street Paving 1,120,000
9/03 Drew Passive Park 118,600
9/46 Design of CD X Public Improvements 100,000 2,018,b00
Clearance Activity
9/30 Neighborhood Partnership Program 10,Q00 10,000
Public Service Activity
9/30 Neighborhood Partnership Program -0- -0-
Relocation Activity
9/30 Neighborhood Partnership Program 15,000 15,OOQ
Removal of Architectural Barriers
9/02 Handicapped Pedestrian Ramps -0- -0-
Rehabilitation Activities
9/22 Commercial Rehabilitation 608,795
9/25 Housing Publicity 58,373
9/27 Multi-Unit Assistance Fund 1,217,591
9/28 Owner-Occupied Rehab Loans 1,217,591
9/29 Deferred Payment Loans 1,517,805
9/3� Neighborhood Partnership Program 91,737
9/38 NHS Revolving Loan Fund 250,000 4,961,892
Planning 222,000
General Administration 1,700,000
Unspecified Contingency 174,866
TOTAL PROGRAM COSTS $9,157,358
. . ����.�-y��
- 2 -
General Administration
General Management, Oversight &
Coordination $ 875,266
Indirect Costs : 350,000 -
Citizen Participation 300,000
Environmental Studies 30,000 �
Housing Information Office 144,734
Total General Administrative Costs $1,700,000
Block Grant Resources
Entitlement Amount $8>199,000
Unobligated Support Services
from prior years 236,777
HUD Rental Rehab Demonstration fands
reprogrammed from CD VI 100,000
Unobligated Program Income: CD V 102,746
Unobligated Program Income: CD VI 12,137 -
Anticipated Prograrr� Incoine: CC IX 506,698
Total Block Grant Resources $9,157,358
Program Benefit
Costs subject to program benefit $7,060,492
Expenditures principally benefitting 7,060,492
low/moderate income persons
Line 2 as a % of Line 1 100%
Total Block Grant Resources Available $9,15�,358
General Administrative Costs 1,700,000
Line 2 as a % of Line 1 18.6%
� ���'�.��
. Itevised 12/23/ 82 "
.
CE RTIFI C ATION S
The grantee hereby assures and certifies that it will comply with the re�lations,
policies, guidelines and requirements with respect to the acceptance and use of Federal
funds for this federally-assisted program. Also the grantee gives assurances and certifies
with respect to the grant that:
(a) It Qossesses legal authority to make a grant submission and to execute a
commmunity development and housing program;
(b) Its governin� body has duly adopted or passed as an official aeti a resolution,
motion or similar actian authorizing the person identified as the official
representative of the grantee to submit the final statement, all understandings
and assurances contained therein, and directing and authorizing the person
identified as the official representative of the grantee to act in connection with
the submission of the final statement and to provide such additional infarmation
as may be required.
(c) That prior to submission o� its final statement to HUD, the grantee has met the
citizen participation requirements, prepared its final statement of community
development objectives and proje�ted use of funds, and made the final statement
available to the public, as required by section 104(a)(2) of the Housing and
Community Development Act of 1974, as amended;
(d) It is following a current housing assistance plan which has been approved by HUD
and which meets the requirements of section 104(c)(1) of the Housing and
Coomunity Development Act of 1974, as amended;
(e) It has developed its final statement of projected use of funds so as to give
maximum feasible prio:ity to activities which benefit low- and moderate-income
families or aid in the prevention or efimination of slums or blight; the final
statement nf projected use af fu�ds may also include e�tivities which the grantee
certifies are designed to meet other community development needs having a
particular urgency because existing conditions pose a serious threat to the health
and welfare of the community, and other financial resources are not available;
(f) Its chief executive officer or other officer of the grantee approved by HUD:
(1) Consents to assume the status of a responsible Federal offical under the
National Environmental Policy Act of 1969 and other authorities as
specified in 24 CFR 58.5; and
(2) Ls authorized and consents on behalf of the grante-e and himself/herself
to accept the jurisdiction of the Federal courts for the purpose of
enforcement of his/her responsibilities as such an official;
(g) The grant will be eonducted and administered in compliance with:
(1) Title VI of the Civil Rights Act of 1964 (Pub. L. 88-352) and
implementing regulations issued at 24 CFR Part 1;
(2) Title VIII of the Civil Rights Act of 1968 (Pub.L. 90-284), as arriended;
and that the grantee will aciminister all programs and activities related
�
� Certifications - Page 2
to housin� and commmunity development in a manner to affirmatively
further fair housing;
(3) Section 109 of the Housing and Community Development Act of 1974, as
amended; and the regulations issued pursuant thereto;
(4) Section 3 of the Housing and Urban Development Act of 1968, as
am ended;
(5) Executive Order 11246, as amended by Executive Orders 11375 �nd
12086, and impiementing regulations issues at 41 CFR Chapter 60;
(6) Executive Order 11063, as amended by Executive Order 12259, And
implementing regulations at 24 CFR Part 107;
(7) Section 504 of the Rehabilitation Aet af 1973 (Pub. L. 93-112), as
amended, and implementing regulations when published for ef.fect;
(8) The Age Discrimination Act of 1975 (Pub. L. 94-135), es �mended, and
implementing regulations when published for effect;
(9) The relocation requirements of Title II and the acquisition requirements
of Title III of the Uniform Relocation Assistance and Real Property
Acquisition Policies Act of 1970, and the implementing regulations at 24
CRR. Pa:t 42;
(10) The labor standards requirements as set forth in 24 CFR
�_^ r� ' __.'� t: ' ' F.. � 1......i.•�? •inl-.
YFiI'l .7(V� aliV�lti1'l i1 Lllltl 11VL 1�G�u1tillVilj la�uci► w itTiYi�.iai�.ai� a.+..a,
requirem ents; -
(lI) Executivz order 11988 relating to th� �va�.<lation of flood hazards and
Executive Order 11288 relating to the prevention, control, and
abatement of water pollution;
(12) The flood insurance purchase requirements of Section 102(a) of the Flood
Disaster Protection Act of 1973 (Pub. 1. 93-234); and
(13) The regulations, policies, guidelines and requirements of OMB Circular
Nos. A-IO2, Revised, A-87, A-110, and A-122 as they relate to the
aceeptance and use of Federal funds under this federally-assisted
program;
(h) No member, officer or employee of the Grantee, or its designees or agents, no
member of the governing body of the locality in which the program is situated,
and no other public official of such locality or localities who exercises any
functions or responsibilities with respect to the program during his/her tenure or
for one year thereafter, shall have any interest, direct or indirect, in any contract
or subcontract, or the procees thereof, for work to be performed in connection
with the program assisted under the Grant, and that it shall incorporate, or cause
to be incorporated, in all such contraets or subcontracts a provision prohibiting
such interest pursuant to the purposes of this certification;
� ' ' ����,��
�.
Certifications - Page 3
(i) It will comply with the provisions of the Hatch Act which limits the political
activity of employees;
(j) It will give HUD and the Comptroller General or any authorized representatives
access to and the right to examine all records, books, papers, or documents '
related to the grant,•
(k) It will comply with the lead-based paint requirements of 24 CFR Part 35 issued
pursuant to the Lead-based Paint Poisoning Prevention Act
(42 U.S.C. 4801 et seq.).
. . ����,���
CITY OF SAINT PAUL, MINNES07A
PROJECTED USE OF CDBG YEAR IX FUNDS
Acquisition Activity
9/30 Neighborhood Partnership Program $ 25,000 $ 25,000
Disposition Activity
9/45 Property Management 30,000 30,000
Public Facilities & Improvements
9/30 Neighborhood Partnership Program -0-
9/O1 Minnehaha Recreation Center 680,000
9/36 Residential Street Paving 1,120,000
9/03 Drew Passive Park 118,600 2,p18,600
9/46 Design of CD X Public Improvements 1�0,000
Clearance Activity
9/30 Weighborhood Partnership Program �0,000 10,000
Relocation Activity
9/30 Neighborhood Partnership Program 15,000 15,000
Removal of Architectural Barriers
9/02 Handicapped Pedestrian Ramps -0- -0-
Rehabilitation Activities
9/22 Commercial Rehabilitation 608,795
9/25 Housing Publicity 58,373
9/27 Multi-Unit Assistance Fund I,217,591
9/28 Owner-Occuppied Rehab Loans 1,217,591
9/29 Deferred Payment Loans 1,517,805
9/30 Neighborhood Partnership Program 91,737
9/38 NHS Revolving Loan Fund 250,000 4,961,892
Planning 222,000
General Administration 1,700,000
Unspecified Contingency 17 4,8b6
TOTAL PROGRAM COSTS $9,157,358
������
. + - 2 -
General Administration
General Management, Oversight &
Coordination $ 875,266
Indirect Costs ; 350,000 '
,
Citizen Participation 300,000
Environmental Studies 30,000
Housing Information Office 144,734
Total General Administrative Costs $1,700,000
Block Grant Resources
Entitlement Amount $8,19 9,000
Unobligated Support Services
from prior years 236,777
HUD Rental Rehab Demonstration 'funds ---
reprogrammed from CD VI 100,000
Unobligated Program Income: CD V 102,746
Unobligated Program Income: CD VI 12,137
Anticipated Program Income: CD IX 506,698
Total Block Grant Resources $9,157,358
Program Benefit
Costs subject to program benefit $7,060,492
Expenditures principally benefitting 7,060,492
low/moderate income persons
Line 2 as a % of Line 1 100%
Total Block Grant Resources Available $9,157,358
General Administrative Costs 1,700,000
Line 2 as a % of Line 1 18.6%
'PED - COMMUN�TY DEV. DEPARTh1ENT ������
Bob Hammer �ONTACT
7494 - ext. 211 PHONE
March 25, 1983 DATE �v�� �� �
(Routing and Explanation Sheet)
Assign Number for Routing Order (Clip All Locations for Mayoral Signature):
partment Director
Ci Atto�rr�ey s y � � �QEC�'�l��-"�
t�a�gement�INaYor �
5 AP�', �! `�:�: ;
Finance and Management Ser�ices Director
6 Ci ty Clerk �F�a�U�::� �r r.r��
4 Budget Director
7 Councilman �t�i�3�e�ei1
What Will be Achieved by Taking Action on the Attached Materials? (Purpose/Rationale):
The City_';s adopted 1983 Capital Improvement Budget and Special Funds Budget
identifiied ti� Community Development B1ock Grant Year IX Program as a major
funding source. Approva1 of this Resolution will allow the City to submit
the CDBG Year IX Program to the Department of Housing and Urban Development
for funding.
Financial , �udgetary and Personnel Impacts Anticipated:
The City will receive $8,199,000 through its CDBG Year IX Program
Funding Source and Fund Activity Number Charged or Credited:
CDBG Year IX Program: Funding Codes 39901 through 39918
Attachments (List and Number all Attachments� :
1. Proposed Resolution
� 2. CDBG Year IX Summary
DEPARTMENT REVIEW CITY ATTORNEY REVIEW
XX Yes No Council Resolution Required? Resolution Required? XX Yes No
Yes XX No Insurance Required? Insurance Sufficient? NA Yes _ No
Yes NA No Insurance Attached?
Revision of October, 1982
(See Reverse Side for �instructions)