Loading...
280163 WNITE - CITV CIERK ��j'p��� PINK - FINANCE COUIICII a 9 CANARV - DEPARTMENT G I TY OF SA I NT PAU L �'� BLUE - MAVOR File NO. COMMUNITY DEVELOPMENT CO ncil Resolution Presented By �� ���� Referred To Committee: Date Out of Committee By Date WHEREAS, the Council of the City of Saint Paul did approve, upon the recommendation of the Mayor and with the advice of the Capital Improvement Budget Committee, the Community Development Block Grant Year IX Program as part of the 1983 Capital Improvement Budget and the 1983 Special Funds Budget; and WHEREAS, the appropriate public hearings on the Community Development Block Grant Year IX Program have been held in accordance with the requirements of the U.S. Department of Housing and Urban Development; now, therefore, be it RESpLVED, th.at Mayor G�orge La�i:mer, as Ch.ief �xecu�i:ve. Offi;cer of the City of Saint Paul , is here6y authprized dnd di:rected to submit the Community Development Block Grant Year �X Statement of Community DeYe1opment Objectives and Projected Use of Funds to the U.S. Department of Housing and Urban Development along with the Housing Assistance Plan in such form as prescribed by the regulations of said department; and be it FURTHER RESOLVED, that the Mayor or his designated representative, the Deputy Director af Community Development, is further authorized to execute and submit to the U.S. Depar�ment of Housing and Urban Development any assurances, certifications, technical changes, or additional information that may be required by said Department during their review of the City's Community Development Block Grant Year IX Submission for Federal Assistance; and be it FINALLY RESOLVED, that uppn notification of approval of the City of Saint Paul 's Community Development Year IX Program by the U.S. Department of Housing and Urban Development, the Council of the City of Saint Paul does hereby authorize and direct the proper city officials to execute the grant agreement and contract between the U.S. Department of Housing and Urban Development and the City of Saint Paul for the Community Development Year IX Program. COUNCILMEN Yeas Nays Requested by Department of: �e� __�o�,°� Planning & Economic Development nnas z In Favor Galles ��,��f Nic ia ''2�(.'�O`� Sc e el Masanz _� Against BY T des Nicosia ilson g�heibsl Tedesco AP� � 2 ��3 Form A o City At or Adopted by Council:y����� D e _ Certified Y• -s b Council re BY S y, ,� t�p o by Mavor: Dat _ Ap ov d b ayor for Sub is i n to Council B , r -- � ' f1 By - I.IS ED APR 2 3 1983 � � \ ' ' � ������� CITY OF SAIi�T PAUL, MINNESOTA STATEMENT OF COMMUNITY DEVELOPMENT OBJECTIVES Since its inception in 1974, the City of Saint Paul 's Community Development Block Grant (CDBG) Program has been based largely on the goals and objectives of the Saint Paul Comprehensive Plan and the Capital Allocation Policy. These documents provide the policy direction for all community development � activities, and are used throughout the City's community development planning and capital budgeting processes. The Comprehensive Plan identifies the City's key objectives f�r the 1980's, and the Capital Allocation Policy ensures that capital improvement resources are allocated ta those activities deemed essential to the long terr� health and vitality of Saint Paul . The development of both documents involved extensive citizen participation, and residen�s continue to remain active in both the revision of po1icies and allocation of CDBG resources. Both the Saint Pau1 Comprehensive Plan and Capital A1location Policy: 1984-1985 strongly support the �bjectives of the federal Housing and Community Deve7opment Act, i .e. , to develop viable urban communities by providing decent housing and a suitable living environment, and expanding economic opportunities, prin- cipally for persons of 1ow and moderate income. Saint Paul 's CDBG Program also gives maximum feasi6le priority to activities which will benefit low and moderate income families, or aid in the prevent�on or elir�ination of slums or blight. The Saint Paul Comprehensive P1an: Objectives�for the 1980's The Comprehensive Plan is Saint Paul 's officia1 planning document. It helps to � provide a vision of the City's future potential , whi1e guiding its response to current issues and opportuni�ies. The Comprehensive Plan recognizes that Saint Pa.ul is faced with many ��mm�,�nity developr�ent neec�s whi^h surpass its limited amount of resources. Because the City may not have the resources needed to accomplish all of its objectives, attention must be directed to those activities of the most critical nature. The Comprehensive Plan and the city's CDBG objectives focus on objectives essential to the future well�being of the City. The key objectives which affect the CDBG program are: - 1. Housin : To maintain and upgrade the City's existing sound housing stock while seeking to improve deficient housing and generating con- struction of new, affordable housing choices in character with the neighborhoods surrounding them. 2. Energ-y: To achieve greater energy efficiency by maintaining and retro- fitting existing structures, while encouraging energy conservation and innovation. in construction. 3. Infrastructure: To maintain City investments, particularly sewer and water lines, streets, bridges, public buildings, arrd existing parks, through repair and/or replacement as needed. The Comprehensive Plan expands these objectives into issue or area-specific policies and recommendations, many of which pertain directly to community development activities. , . �,. � _ 2 - f����,�� Prior to the appropriation of CDBG funds, all community development programs and projects are reviewed for consistency with the adapted policies of the Comprehensive Plan. The Capital Allocation Policy: 1984-1985 The Capital Allocation Policy was specifically designed to guide Saint Paul 's Unified Capital Improvement Budgeting process and the expenditure of CDBG funds. It sets the general direction for capital expenditures . over a multi-year period. The policies are used to allocate capital resources according to City goals and objectives, and to determine the relative priority of proposed capital projects. The major goals of the Policy are close1y related to the Comprehensive Plan, and form the basis for Saint Paul 's capital improvement expenditures and community development activities: 1. To strengthen the City' s neighborhoods in order to make them better places to live. 2. To consider enerqy use in all the City's activities and to increase energy efficiency whenever possible. 3. To ensure the structural integrity of the City' s physical facilities in order to maintain basic levels of service and prevent potential health and safety hazards. The community development needs of the City are far greater than the available capital resources. The goals of the Capital A1location Policy are, therefore, supplement�d by a number of objectives to be accomplished with block grant funds. These objectives are: a) to assist in the renovation and rehabilitation of the City's "ousing sto�k; to eliminate b7i�hted structures througM spot acquisition; b) to complement public and private housing rehabilitation efforts through: the installation of public improvements such as streets, sewers, and neighborhood facilities; the provision of puvlic services; c) to promote and provide stimulus in economic development activities; d) to assist in neighborhood commercial area revitalization efforts; and e) to encourage and promote energy efficiency. The 1984-85 Capital Allocation Policy is divided into four sections: - Strategy; - Implementation and Development; - Project; and - Budget Policies. ' . �����_�� - 3 - Each policy section provides a different level of direction for the capital improvement budgeting process. The two sections which pertain most directly to the allocation of CDBG funds are described belaw. In combination, the four policy sections represent Saint Paul 's priorities for the use of its block grant and other capital resources. 1. Strateqy Policie,� - The Strategy Policies set general direction for Saint Pau] 's corr�nunity development activities within the framework of goals and principles. They establish the relative proportion of funds that should address each of four areas: City-wide service system " improvements, neighborhood-related improvements, economic development- related improvements; and support system improvements. In addition, the annual proportion of funds allocated to any one area of the City is monitored over time to avoid excessive geographic concentration of improvements and to assure that community develapment needs in all areas are addressed. Lastly, the policies identify priorities for basic service systems, economic development, neighborhood betterment, eriergy efficiency, and housing impravements. 2. Implementation and Development Policies - These policies identify criteria which are important considerations in selecting capital improvements. They are used by participants in the capital improvement budgeting process during the review of project and program proposals. Most of the policies are stated in terms of "prioritie�" or "considerations° reflecting their . use as evaluation criteria. Al1 community development programs and projects are reviewed for consistency with the adopted policies of the Capital Allocation Policy prior ta the appropriation of CDBG funds. Copies of both the Saint Paul Comprehensive Plan and Capital Allocation Policy are available for inspection during normal business hours. Information concerning either document is available by contacting: Cammun i ty Devel opr�ent Di��i s i on Department of Planning and Economic Development 1420 City Hall Annex - 25 West 4th St. Saint Paul , MN 55102 (612) 292 - 1577 CITY OF SAINT PAUL, MINNESOTA PROJECTED USE OF CDBG YEAR IX FUNDS Acquisi.tion Acti.vity 9/30 Nei.ghborhood Partnership Program $ 25,000 $ 25,000 Disposition Activity 9/45 Property Management 30,Q00 30,000 Public Facilities & Improvements 9/30 Neighborhood Partnership Program -0- 9/O1 Minnehaha Recreation Center 680,000 9/36 Residential Street Paving 1,120,000 9/03 Drew Passive Park 118,600 9/46 Design of CD X Public Improvements 100,000 2,018,b00 Clearance Activity 9/30 Neighborhood Partnership Program 10,Q00 10,000 Public Service Activity 9/30 Neighborhood Partnership Program -0- -0- Relocation Activity 9/30 Neighborhood Partnership Program 15,000 15,OOQ Removal of Architectural Barriers 9/02 Handicapped Pedestrian Ramps -0- -0- Rehabilitation Activities 9/22 Commercial Rehabilitation 608,795 9/25 Housing Publicity 58,373 9/27 Multi-Unit Assistance Fund 1,217,591 9/28 Owner-Occupied Rehab Loans 1,217,591 9/29 Deferred Payment Loans 1,517,805 9/3� Neighborhood Partnership Program 91,737 9/38 NHS Revolving Loan Fund 250,000 4,961,892 Planning 222,000 General Administration 1,700,000 Unspecified Contingency 174,866 TOTAL PROGRAM COSTS $9,157,358 . . ����.�-y�� - 2 - General Administration General Management, Oversight & Coordination $ 875,266 Indirect Costs : 350,000 - Citizen Participation 300,000 Environmental Studies 30,000 � Housing Information Office 144,734 Total General Administrative Costs $1,700,000 Block Grant Resources Entitlement Amount $8>199,000 Unobligated Support Services from prior years 236,777 HUD Rental Rehab Demonstration fands reprogrammed from CD VI 100,000 Unobligated Program Income: CD V 102,746 Unobligated Program Income: CD VI 12,137 - Anticipated Prograrr� Incoine: CC IX 506,698 Total Block Grant Resources $9,157,358 Program Benefit Costs subject to program benefit $7,060,492 Expenditures principally benefitting 7,060,492 low/moderate income persons Line 2 as a % of Line 1 100% Total Block Grant Resources Available $9,15�,358 General Administrative Costs 1,700,000 Line 2 as a % of Line 1 18.6% � ���'�.�� . Itevised 12/23/ 82 " . CE RTIFI C ATION S The grantee hereby assures and certifies that it will comply with the re�lations, policies, guidelines and requirements with respect to the acceptance and use of Federal funds for this federally-assisted program. Also the grantee gives assurances and certifies with respect to the grant that: (a) It Qossesses legal authority to make a grant submission and to execute a commmunity development and housing program; (b) Its governin� body has duly adopted or passed as an official aeti a resolution, motion or similar actian authorizing the person identified as the official representative of the grantee to submit the final statement, all understandings and assurances contained therein, and directing and authorizing the person identified as the official representative of the grantee to act in connection with the submission of the final statement and to provide such additional infarmation as may be required. (c) That prior to submission o� its final statement to HUD, the grantee has met the citizen participation requirements, prepared its final statement of community development objectives and proje�ted use of funds, and made the final statement available to the public, as required by section 104(a)(2) of the Housing and Community Development Act of 1974, as amended; (d) It is following a current housing assistance plan which has been approved by HUD and which meets the requirements of section 104(c)(1) of the Housing and Coomunity Development Act of 1974, as amended; (e) It has developed its final statement of projected use of funds so as to give maximum feasible prio:ity to activities which benefit low- and moderate-income families or aid in the prevention or efimination of slums or blight; the final statement nf projected use af fu�ds may also include e�tivities which the grantee certifies are designed to meet other community development needs having a particular urgency because existing conditions pose a serious threat to the health and welfare of the community, and other financial resources are not available; (f) Its chief executive officer or other officer of the grantee approved by HUD: (1) Consents to assume the status of a responsible Federal offical under the National Environmental Policy Act of 1969 and other authorities as specified in 24 CFR 58.5; and (2) Ls authorized and consents on behalf of the grante-e and himself/herself to accept the jurisdiction of the Federal courts for the purpose of enforcement of his/her responsibilities as such an official; (g) The grant will be eonducted and administered in compliance with: (1) Title VI of the Civil Rights Act of 1964 (Pub. L. 88-352) and implementing regulations issued at 24 CFR Part 1; (2) Title VIII of the Civil Rights Act of 1968 (Pub.L. 90-284), as arriended; and that the grantee will aciminister all programs and activities related � � Certifications - Page 2 to housin� and commmunity development in a manner to affirmatively further fair housing; (3) Section 109 of the Housing and Community Development Act of 1974, as amended; and the regulations issued pursuant thereto; (4) Section 3 of the Housing and Urban Development Act of 1968, as am ended; (5) Executive Order 11246, as amended by Executive Orders 11375 �nd 12086, and impiementing regulations issues at 41 CFR Chapter 60; (6) Executive Order 11063, as amended by Executive Order 12259, And implementing regulations at 24 CFR Part 107; (7) Section 504 of the Rehabilitation Aet af 1973 (Pub. L. 93-112), as amended, and implementing regulations when published for ef.fect; (8) The Age Discrimination Act of 1975 (Pub. L. 94-135), es �mended, and implementing regulations when published for effect; (9) The relocation requirements of Title II and the acquisition requirements of Title III of the Uniform Relocation Assistance and Real Property Acquisition Policies Act of 1970, and the implementing regulations at 24 CRR. Pa:t 42; (10) The labor standards requirements as set forth in 24 CFR �_^ r� ' __.'� t: ' ' F.. � 1......i.•�? •inl-. YFiI'l .7(V� aliV�lti1'l i1 Lllltl 11VL 1�G�u1tillVilj la�uci► w itTiYi�.iai�.ai� a.+..a, requirem ents; - (lI) Executivz order 11988 relating to th� �va�.<lation of flood hazards and Executive Order 11288 relating to the prevention, control, and abatement of water pollution; (12) The flood insurance purchase requirements of Section 102(a) of the Flood Disaster Protection Act of 1973 (Pub. 1. 93-234); and (13) The regulations, policies, guidelines and requirements of OMB Circular Nos. A-IO2, Revised, A-87, A-110, and A-122 as they relate to the aceeptance and use of Federal funds under this federally-assisted program; (h) No member, officer or employee of the Grantee, or its designees or agents, no member of the governing body of the locality in which the program is situated, and no other public official of such locality or localities who exercises any functions or responsibilities with respect to the program during his/her tenure or for one year thereafter, shall have any interest, direct or indirect, in any contract or subcontract, or the procees thereof, for work to be performed in connection with the program assisted under the Grant, and that it shall incorporate, or cause to be incorporated, in all such contraets or subcontracts a provision prohibiting such interest pursuant to the purposes of this certification; � ' ' ����,�� �. Certifications - Page 3 (i) It will comply with the provisions of the Hatch Act which limits the political activity of employees; (j) It will give HUD and the Comptroller General or any authorized representatives access to and the right to examine all records, books, papers, or documents ' related to the grant,• (k) It will comply with the lead-based paint requirements of 24 CFR Part 35 issued pursuant to the Lead-based Paint Poisoning Prevention Act (42 U.S.C. 4801 et seq.). . . ����,��� CITY OF SAINT PAUL, MINNES07A PROJECTED USE OF CDBG YEAR IX FUNDS Acquisition Activity 9/30 Neighborhood Partnership Program $ 25,000 $ 25,000 Disposition Activity 9/45 Property Management 30,000 30,000 Public Facilities & Improvements 9/30 Neighborhood Partnership Program -0- 9/O1 Minnehaha Recreation Center 680,000 9/36 Residential Street Paving 1,120,000 9/03 Drew Passive Park 118,600 2,p18,600 9/46 Design of CD X Public Improvements 1�0,000 Clearance Activity 9/30 Weighborhood Partnership Program �0,000 10,000 Relocation Activity 9/30 Neighborhood Partnership Program 15,000 15,000 Removal of Architectural Barriers 9/02 Handicapped Pedestrian Ramps -0- -0- Rehabilitation Activities 9/22 Commercial Rehabilitation 608,795 9/25 Housing Publicity 58,373 9/27 Multi-Unit Assistance Fund I,217,591 9/28 Owner-Occuppied Rehab Loans 1,217,591 9/29 Deferred Payment Loans 1,517,805 9/30 Neighborhood Partnership Program 91,737 9/38 NHS Revolving Loan Fund 250,000 4,961,892 Planning 222,000 General Administration 1,700,000 Unspecified Contingency 17 4,8b6 TOTAL PROGRAM COSTS $9,157,358 ������ . + - 2 - General Administration General Management, Oversight & Coordination $ 875,266 Indirect Costs ; 350,000 ' , Citizen Participation 300,000 Environmental Studies 30,000 Housing Information Office 144,734 Total General Administrative Costs $1,700,000 Block Grant Resources Entitlement Amount $8,19 9,000 Unobligated Support Services from prior years 236,777 HUD Rental Rehab Demonstration 'funds --- reprogrammed from CD VI 100,000 Unobligated Program Income: CD V 102,746 Unobligated Program Income: CD VI 12,137 Anticipated Program Income: CD IX 506,698 Total Block Grant Resources $9,157,358 Program Benefit Costs subject to program benefit $7,060,492 Expenditures principally benefitting 7,060,492 low/moderate income persons Line 2 as a % of Line 1 100% Total Block Grant Resources Available $9,157,358 General Administrative Costs 1,700,000 Line 2 as a % of Line 1 18.6% 'PED - COMMUN�TY DEV. DEPARTh1ENT ������ Bob Hammer �ONTACT 7494 - ext. 211 PHONE March 25, 1983 DATE �v�� �� � (Routing and Explanation Sheet) Assign Number for Routing Order (Clip All Locations for Mayoral Signature): partment Director Ci Atto�rr�ey s y � � �QEC�'�l��-"� t�a�gement�INaYor � 5 AP�', �! `�:�: ; Finance and Management Ser�ices Director 6 Ci ty Clerk �F�a�U�::� �r r.r�� 4 Budget Director 7 Councilman �t�i�3�e�ei1 What Will be Achieved by Taking Action on the Attached Materials? (Purpose/Rationale): The City_';s adopted 1983 Capital Improvement Budget and Special Funds Budget identifiied ti� Community Development B1ock Grant Year IX Program as a major funding source. Approva1 of this Resolution will allow the City to submit the CDBG Year IX Program to the Department of Housing and Urban Development for funding. Financial , �udgetary and Personnel Impacts Anticipated: The City will receive $8,199,000 through its CDBG Year IX Program Funding Source and Fund Activity Number Charged or Credited: CDBG Year IX Program: Funding Codes 39901 through 39918 Attachments (List and Number all Attachments� : 1. Proposed Resolution � 2. CDBG Year IX Summary DEPARTMENT REVIEW CITY ATTORNEY REVIEW XX Yes No Council Resolution Required? Resolution Required? XX Yes No Yes XX No Insurance Required? Insurance Sufficient? NA Yes _ No Yes NA No Insurance Attached? Revision of October, 1982 (See Reverse Side for �instructions)