The URL can be used to link to this page

00-193ORIGlNAL Presented By Referred To Committee: Date WHEREAS, The Mayor recommended, and the Saint Paul City Council approved City Council Resolution 99-44, which approved the Residential Street Paving projects to be constructed in 1999 and tentatively approved projects for the years 2000 through 2003; and WHEREAS, The tentatively approved projects for subsequent years must be reviewed by the CIB Committee and the Mayor, and be approved by the City Council and the Mayor prior to each construction year; and WHEREAS, The Department of Public Works has been directed, on a yearly basis, to bring forward a revised list of Residential Street Paving projects, moving up another year of projects for final approval and adding another year of tentative projects; and WHEREAS, The projects listed in Council Resolution 99-44 were developed assuming that the Residential Street Vitality Program was funded at a level of $8.6 million of CIB Funds starting in year 2000, and be increased every year thereafter until the end of the program; and WHEREAS, The adopted 2000 Capital Improvement Budget funds the Residential Street Vitality Program at $7.670 million of CIB Funds in 2000 and tentatively recommends $7.143 million of CIB Funds in 2001; and WHEREAS, Public Works recommends that the Marshall/Dayton Project be delayed from 2000 to 2004 in order to keep the Residential Street Vitality Program within the adopted Capital Improvement Budget; now, therefore be it RESOLVED, The City Council accepts the following list of projects, giving final approval for those listed for 2000 and tentative approval for the projects listed for years 2001 through 2004; YEAR PROJECT N0. PROJECT NAME 2000 54 SEVENTH/ELEANOR 2000 39 CHARLES/CHATSWORTH 200� 33 VdESTERN/LAWSON 2000 77 PRIOR/JEFFERSON 2001 2001 2001 2001 2001 2002 2002 2002 Council File # �p -��q3 Green Sheet # 102738 RESOLUTION SAINT PAUL, M{IVNESOTA a� 5 FIFTH/KENNARD 15 PAGE/MANOMIN 7 CASE/HAZELWOOD 66 KNAPP/HILLSIDE 63 CHARLES/GRIGGS 69 WHEELER/IGLEHART 22 MARGARET/ATLANTIC 23 COTTAGE/GREENBRIAR „�'[ ?� {0'�0 2002 82 0 R I G I N A L DAVERN/BAYARD OO _, 2003 2003 2003 2003 2003 2003 2004 2004 2004 2004 2004 2004 2004 42 EDMUND/GALTIER 2 EDGEBROOK/MORNINGSIDE 48 SEVENTH/DALY 87 CHATSWORTF3/GOODRICH 8 CASE/RUTH 16 BAKER/BELLOW 44 MARSHALLDAYTON 61 HUBBARD/GRIGGS 80 GRIGGS/JEFFERSON 34 ORANGE/PARK 49 SEVENTH/BAY 4 WHITE BEAR/BURNS 10 IVY/KENNARD ,., . � � �',�,� t3 z° °° , , - . . _ _ .. , -.. . --- _`� , .� .....,.,.-,_>��,.., ,.....w...�- __`-. ....A= Gl2i G ar�:;;,•::,• •--'""".-"«. � y .a.. .-_ , . . =-v;= a eS1Tc y os ro� ei e� Harris Benanav Lantry o eman Yeas Nays �— ✓ ✓ �- � � Y�-- Absent Requested by Departments of: PUBLIC WORKS By : �Ji Adopted by Council: Date �,�� i Adoption Certified by Council Secretary '-�� Form Approved by City Attorney (� . BY= � • � P. l0. 06 B�'' - 1 \ .- � 3- . �� .�.�_ � A � Approved by Mayor for Submission to Approved By Ma Date /✓[u�✓Fif/( �S �6as�0 Counc(`�� ✓� By: C �� BY- / G�Ci9 DEPARTMENr/OFFICE/COUNCIL Public Works CANTACT PERSON & PHONE Paul St. Martin 266-6118 �PS MU5T BE ON CWNCILAGENDA BY (DA"fE) ASAP TOTAL # OF SIGNATURE PAGES ACTION REWESiED DAiE INfT1ATED 1/4/2000 � ASSIGN NU46ERFOR R011fQJG GREEN SHEET No. 102738 IniliaVDa[e InNaVDate � DEPARTMENTDIREC�OR � I ICffYCAUNCIL v � , l� 3 I-5 �D� ❑ CITVATfORNEY � �� GfiYCLFHK i�i ❑ 4 FINANGAlSEFiVICESDIR FlNANqALSERV/ACCTG � 1 � �fs�a MAYORIORASSISTANi) � ❑ ❑ (CLIP ALL LOCATIONS FOR SIGNATURE) Approve Council Resolution giving final approval of the 2000 Residential Street Vitality Project Areas and tentarive approval of 2001-2004 project azeas. � RECOMMENDATIONS Appro�e (A) or Rejeci (R) � qBCOMMITTEE _ CIVILSERVICECOMMISSION A STAFF PEPSONAL SEHVICE COMRACTS MU5fANSWEH THE FOLLOWING GIUEST�ONS: t. HasthisperSOMirtnevervrorkeduntlerecontrac[forihistlepaMrent? - YES NO ' 2. Hulh�s persoMirtn ever been a c�ty empbyee? L YE$ NO 3. Does this persoNfirm possess a skill not nortnalty possessetl by any current dry employee? VE$ NO 4. Is �his pe�wNM1rm a targetetl veridor? INRIATINGPROBLEM, ISSUE.OPPORTUNFiY(WHO, WHAT, WHEN, WHERE, WHV): This Resolufion is a follow-up on Resolution 99-44, which approved the 1999-2003 RSVP Projects. Note that the MazshalUDayton project which was scheduled for the year 2000 in Resolution 99-44, is proposed to be postponed to the yeaz 2004. ADVANTAGESIFAPPROVED: Public W orks, other City Departments, Utility Companies and outside agencies can start the planning and coordination for the 2000-2004 projects. DISADVANTAGES IF APPROVED: None .. � . 111 DISADVAMAGES IF NOT APPROVED. Difficult to pian for future projects. Expectations of residents will not be met. l fOTAL AMOUNT OF TRANSACTION $ N/A COST/REVENUE BUDGETED (CIRCIE ONE) � elo FUNDING SOURCE ACTNfTI' NUMBER �� FINANCIALINFORMA710N(EXPLAIN) �� ^�Q q 2 _ J � � Z�P9� ORIGlNAL Presented By Referred To Committee: Date WHEREAS, The Mayor recommended, and the Saint Paul City Council approved City Council Resolution 99-44, which approved the Residential Street Paving projects to be constructed in 1999 and tentatively approved projects for the years 2000 through 2003; and WHEREAS, The tentatively approved projects for subsequent years must be reviewed by the CIB Committee and the Mayor, and be approved by the City Council and the Mayor prior to each construction year; and WHEREAS, The Department of Public Works has been directed, on a yearly basis, to bring forward a revised list of Residential Street Paving projects, moving up another year of projects for final approval and adding another year of tentative projects; and WHEREAS, The projects listed in Council Resolution 99-44 were developed assuming that the Residential Street Vitality Program was funded at a level of $8.6 million of CIB Funds starting in year 2000, and be increased every year thereafter until the end of the program; and WHEREAS, The adopted 2000 Capital Improvement Budget funds the Residential Street Vitality Program at $7.670 million of CIB Funds in 2000 and tentatively recommends $7.143 million of CIB Funds in 2001; and WHEREAS, Public Works recommends that the Marshall/Dayton Project be delayed from 2000 to 2004 in order to keep the Residential Street Vitality Program within the adopted Capital Improvement Budget; now, therefore be it RESOLVED, The City Council accepts the following list of projects, giving final approval for those listed for 2000 and tentative approval for the projects listed for years 2001 through 2004; YEAR PROJECT N0. PROJECT NAME 2000 54 SEVENTH/ELEANOR 2000 39 CHARLES/CHATSWORTH 200� 33 VdESTERN/LAWSON 2000 77 PRIOR/JEFFERSON 2001 2001 2001 2001 2001 2002 2002 2002 Council File # �p -��q3 Green Sheet # 102738 RESOLUTION SAINT PAUL, M{IVNESOTA a� 5 FIFTH/KENNARD 15 PAGE/MANOMIN 7 CASE/HAZELWOOD 66 KNAPP/HILLSIDE 63 CHARLES/GRIGGS 69 WHEELER/IGLEHART 22 MARGARET/ATLANTIC 23 COTTAGE/GREENBRIAR „�'[ ?� {0'�0 2002 82 0 R I G I N A L DAVERN/BAYARD OO _, 2003 2003 2003 2003 2003 2003 2004 2004 2004 2004 2004 2004 2004 42 EDMUND/GALTIER 2 EDGEBROOK/MORNINGSIDE 48 SEVENTH/DALY 87 CHATSWORTF3/GOODRICH 8 CASE/RUTH 16 BAKER/BELLOW 44 MARSHALLDAYTON 61 HUBBARD/GRIGGS 80 GRIGGS/JEFFERSON 34 ORANGE/PARK 49 SEVENTH/BAY 4 WHITE BEAR/BURNS 10 IVY/KENNARD ,., . � � �',�,� t3 z° °° , , - . . _ _ .. , -.. . --- _`� , .� .....,.,.-,_>��,.., ,.....w...�- __`-. ....A= Gl2i G ar�:;;,•::,• •--'""".-"«. � y .a.. .-_ , . . =-v;= a eS1Tc y os ro� ei e� Harris Benanav Lantry o eman Yeas Nays �— ✓ ✓ �- � � Y�-- Absent Requested by Departments of: PUBLIC WORKS By : �Ji Adopted by Council: Date �,�� i Adoption Certified by Council Secretary '-�� Form Approved by City Attorney (� . BY= � • � P. l0. 06 B�'' - 1 \ .- � 3- . �� .�.�_ � A � Approved by Mayor for Submission to Approved By Ma Date /✓[u�✓Fif/( �S �6as�0 Counc(`�� ✓� By: C �� BY- / G�Ci9 DEPARTMENr/OFFICE/COUNCIL Public Works CANTACT PERSON & PHONE Paul St. Martin 266-6118 �PS MU5T BE ON CWNCILAGENDA BY (DA"fE) ASAP TOTAL # OF SIGNATURE PAGES ACTION REWESiED DAiE INfT1ATED 1/4/2000 � ASSIGN NU46ERFOR R011fQJG GREEN SHEET No. 102738 IniliaVDa[e InNaVDate � DEPARTMENTDIREC�OR � I ICffYCAUNCIL v � , l� 3 I-5 �D� ❑ CITVATfORNEY � �� GfiYCLFHK i�i ❑ 4 FINANGAlSEFiVICESDIR FlNANqALSERV/ACCTG � 1 � �fs�a MAYORIORASSISTANi) � ❑ ❑ (CLIP ALL LOCATIONS FOR SIGNATURE) Approve Council Resolution giving final approval of the 2000 Residential Street Vitality Project Areas and tentarive approval of 2001-2004 project azeas. � RECOMMENDATIONS Appro�e (A) or Rejeci (R) � qBCOMMITTEE _ CIVILSERVICECOMMISSION A STAFF PEPSONAL SEHVICE COMRACTS MU5fANSWEH THE FOLLOWING GIUEST�ONS: t. HasthisperSOMirtnevervrorkeduntlerecontrac[forihistlepaMrent? - YES NO ' 2. Hulh�s persoMirtn ever been a c�ty empbyee? L YE$ NO 3. Does this persoNfirm possess a skill not nortnalty possessetl by any current dry employee? VE$ NO 4. Is �his pe�wNM1rm a targetetl veridor? INRIATINGPROBLEM, ISSUE.OPPORTUNFiY(WHO, WHAT, WHEN, WHERE, WHV): This Resolufion is a follow-up on Resolution 99-44, which approved the 1999-2003 RSVP Projects. Note that the MazshalUDayton project which was scheduled for the year 2000 in Resolution 99-44, is proposed to be postponed to the yeaz 2004. ADVANTAGESIFAPPROVED: Public W orks, other City Departments, Utility Companies and outside agencies can start the planning and coordination for the 2000-2004 projects. DISADVANTAGES IF APPROVED: None .. � . 111 DISADVAMAGES IF NOT APPROVED. Difficult to pian for future projects. Expectations of residents will not be met. l fOTAL AMOUNT OF TRANSACTION $ N/A COST/REVENUE BUDGETED (CIRCIE ONE) � elo FUNDING SOURCE ACTNfTI' NUMBER �� FINANCIALINFORMA710N(EXPLAIN) �� ^�Q q 2 _ J � � Z�P9� ORIGlNAL Presented By Referred To Committee: Date WHEREAS, The Mayor recommended, and the Saint Paul City Council approved City Council Resolution 99-44, which approved the Residential Street Paving projects to be constructed in 1999 and tentatively approved projects for the years 2000 through 2003; and WHEREAS, The tentatively approved projects for subsequent years must be reviewed by the CIB Committee and the Mayor, and be approved by the City Council and the Mayor prior to each construction year; and WHEREAS, The Department of Public Works has been directed, on a yearly basis, to bring forward a revised list of Residential Street Paving projects, moving up another year of projects for final approval and adding another year of tentative projects; and WHEREAS, The projects listed in Council Resolution 99-44 were developed assuming that the Residential Street Vitality Program was funded at a level of $8.6 million of CIB Funds starting in year 2000, and be increased every year thereafter until the end of the program; and WHEREAS, The adopted 2000 Capital Improvement Budget funds the Residential Street Vitality Program at $7.670 million of CIB Funds in 2000 and tentatively recommends $7.143 million of CIB Funds in 2001; and WHEREAS, Public Works recommends that the Marshall/Dayton Project be delayed from 2000 to 2004 in order to keep the Residential Street Vitality Program within the adopted Capital Improvement Budget; now, therefore be it RESOLVED, The City Council accepts the following list of projects, giving final approval for those listed for 2000 and tentative approval for the projects listed for years 2001 through 2004; YEAR PROJECT N0. PROJECT NAME 2000 54 SEVENTH/ELEANOR 2000 39 CHARLES/CHATSWORTH 200� 33 VdESTERN/LAWSON 2000 77 PRIOR/JEFFERSON 2001 2001 2001 2001 2001 2002 2002 2002 Council File # �p -��q3 Green Sheet # 102738 RESOLUTION SAINT PAUL, M{IVNESOTA a� 5 FIFTH/KENNARD 15 PAGE/MANOMIN 7 CASE/HAZELWOOD 66 KNAPP/HILLSIDE 63 CHARLES/GRIGGS 69 WHEELER/IGLEHART 22 MARGARET/ATLANTIC 23 COTTAGE/GREENBRIAR „�'[ ?� {0'�0 2002 82 0 R I G I N A L DAVERN/BAYARD OO _, 2003 2003 2003 2003 2003 2003 2004 2004 2004 2004 2004 2004 2004 42 EDMUND/GALTIER 2 EDGEBROOK/MORNINGSIDE 48 SEVENTH/DALY 87 CHATSWORTF3/GOODRICH 8 CASE/RUTH 16 BAKER/BELLOW 44 MARSHALLDAYTON 61 HUBBARD/GRIGGS 80 GRIGGS/JEFFERSON 34 ORANGE/PARK 49 SEVENTH/BAY 4 WHITE BEAR/BURNS 10 IVY/KENNARD ,., . � � �',�,� t3 z° °° , , - . . _ _ .. , -.. . --- _`� , .� .....,.,.-,_>��,.., ,.....w...�- __`-. ....A= Gl2i G ar�:;;,•::,• •--'""".-"«. � y .a.. .-_ , . . =-v;= a eS1Tc y os ro� ei e� Harris Benanav Lantry o eman Yeas Nays �— ✓ ✓ �- � � Y�-- Absent Requested by Departments of: PUBLIC WORKS By : �Ji Adopted by Council: Date �,�� i Adoption Certified by Council Secretary '-�� Form Approved by City Attorney (� . BY= � • � P. l0. 06 B�'' - 1 \ .- � 3- . �� .�.�_ � A � Approved by Mayor for Submission to Approved By Ma Date /✓[u�✓Fif/( �S �6as�0 Counc(`�� ✓� By: C �� BY- / G�Ci9 DEPARTMENr/OFFICE/COUNCIL Public Works CANTACT PERSON & PHONE Paul St. Martin 266-6118 �PS MU5T BE ON CWNCILAGENDA BY (DA"fE) ASAP TOTAL # OF SIGNATURE PAGES ACTION REWESiED DAiE INfT1ATED 1/4/2000 � ASSIGN NU46ERFOR R011fQJG GREEN SHEET No. 102738 IniliaVDa[e InNaVDate � DEPARTMENTDIREC�OR � I ICffYCAUNCIL v � , l� 3 I-5 �D� ❑ CITVATfORNEY � �� GfiYCLFHK i�i ❑ 4 FINANGAlSEFiVICESDIR FlNANqALSERV/ACCTG � 1 � �fs�a MAYORIORASSISTANi) � ❑ ❑ (CLIP ALL LOCATIONS FOR SIGNATURE) Approve Council Resolution giving final approval of the 2000 Residential Street Vitality Project Areas and tentarive approval of 2001-2004 project azeas. � RECOMMENDATIONS Appro�e (A) or Rejeci (R) � qBCOMMITTEE _ CIVILSERVICECOMMISSION A STAFF PEPSONAL SEHVICE COMRACTS MU5fANSWEH THE FOLLOWING GIUEST�ONS: t. HasthisperSOMirtnevervrorkeduntlerecontrac[forihistlepaMrent? - YES NO ' 2. Hulh�s persoMirtn ever been a c�ty empbyee? L YE$ NO 3. Does this persoNfirm possess a skill not nortnalty possessetl by any current dry employee? VE$ NO 4. Is �his pe�wNM1rm a targetetl veridor? INRIATINGPROBLEM, ISSUE.OPPORTUNFiY(WHO, WHAT, WHEN, WHERE, WHV): This Resolufion is a follow-up on Resolution 99-44, which approved the 1999-2003 RSVP Projects. Note that the MazshalUDayton project which was scheduled for the year 2000 in Resolution 99-44, is proposed to be postponed to the yeaz 2004. ADVANTAGESIFAPPROVED: Public W orks, other City Departments, Utility Companies and outside agencies can start the planning and coordination for the 2000-2004 projects. DISADVANTAGES IF APPROVED: None .. � . 111 DISADVAMAGES IF NOT APPROVED. Difficult to pian for future projects. Expectations of residents will not be met. l fOTAL AMOUNT OF TRANSACTION $ N/A COST/REVENUE BUDGETED (CIRCIE ONE) � elo FUNDING SOURCE ACTNfTI' NUMBER �� FINANCIALINFORMA710N(EXPLAIN) �� ^�Q q 2 _ J � � Z�P9�