The URL can be used to link to this page

84-1483 WMITE - CITV CLERK PI�{K -FINANGE GITY OF SAINT PAUL Council CANARY- DEPARTMENT � /A� BLUE - MAVOR File �O• ��/��/ . 1 Council Resolution Presented By Referred To Committee: Date Out of Committee By Date requirements of a sanctuary of Jewish worship limit reconstruction opportunities to those proposed by the applicant. Additional parking can only be provided in the front yard. Use of the existing parking facility is limited during winter b�r reason of the severe grade of the access road. 3) The variance, as amended, can be granted without detriment to the community or intent of the code. 4) The variance can be granted without detriment to the public health and safety or the neighbors ' supply of light and air or pro- perty values. Granting the variance would reduce on-street parking and may increase traffic safety. 5) Granting the variance will not permit any use that is not permitted in the R-1 zone. 6) The request for variance is based upon a desire to enjoy full use of the property and not merely for economic gain. WHEREAS, Pursuant to the provisions of Section 64.205 , Barry L. Leafman, 1834 Hampshire, Saint Paul, Minnesota, duly filed his appeal from the determination made by the Board of Zoning Appeals, on the grounds that the findings of the Board of Zoning Appeals were in error and requesting that a hearing be held before the City Council for the purpose of considering the actions taken by the said Board; and WHEREAS, Acting pursuant to Sectior�s64 .205 through 64 .208 and upon notice to appellant and other affected property owners, a public hearing was duly conducted by the City Council on October 4 , 1984 where all interested parties were given an opportunity to be heard; and -2- COU[VC[LMEN Requested by Department of: Yeas Nays Fletcher °feN1 In Favor Maaanz Nicosia scheibet __ Against BY Tedesco . Wilson Adopted by Council: Date � Form Approved by City Attorney Certified Yassed by Council Secretary BY By t#pproved by Ylavor: Date Approved by Mayor for Submission to Council By BY M/HITE — CITV CLERK P1a{1( , —�FINANCE GITY OF SAINT PAUL Council CANARS� — DEPARTMENT File NO. u � ~ ( �� BLUE — MAVOR . � Council Resolution Presented By Referred To Committee: Date Out of Committee By Date WHEREAS, The Council having heard the statements made and having considered the variance application, the report of staff, the minutes and findings of the Board of Zoning Appeals, does hereby RESOLVE, That the Council of the City of Saint Paul does hereby modify the decision of the Board of Zoning Appeals in this matter and does hereby find and issue the following determination which shall govern the zoning variances herefor granted: 1) That the decision of the Board of Zoning Appeals to vary the provisions of the zoning code so as to allow Adath Israel Synagogue to construct a building addition to be set back 68 feet from the front property line and two feet from the rear lot line be and is hereby affirmed subject to the condition that the north curb cut and access lane meet modern public works and zoning code standards of minimum width and that the proposed south egress be posted to direct traffic to proceed with a right turn only and that all construction be completed in accordance with the application for variance and the site plan on file with the Saint Paul Planning Division. 2) That the decision of the Board of Zonyng Appeals to vary the provisions of the zoning code so as to allow vehicles to be parked 28 feet from the front property line at 2337 Edgcumbe Road be and is hereby rescinded. and, be it FURTHER RESOLVED, That the City Clerk shall mail a copy of this resolution to Adath Israel Synagogue, Barry L. Leafman, the Zoning Administrator, the Planning Commission and the Board of Zoning Appeals. -3- COUfVC[LMEN Requested by Department of: Yeas Nays �. r-�y��, � Drew [n Favor Masanz Nicosia Scheibel � __ Against BY Tedesco Wilson Adopted by Council: Date aCT � 0 �ggt� Form Approve b City Attorn Certified Yas e y ouncil Se tary BY � B� , �1ppr by �Navor• a NOV 2 - 1gg� Approved y ayor for Su�iission to Council By By PUBLISHED NOV 101984 P�-i�� ♦ (RETURN TO JEROME SEGAL AFTER ADOPTION) WHITE - GITV GLERK �� - �_� � ._ ..�. PINK - FINANCE CANARV - DEPARTMENT CITY OF SAINT PAUL COUflCIl � BLUE - MAVOR File �O. . Council Resolution Presented By Referred To Committee: Date Out of Committee By Date WHEREAS, Adath Israel Sprragogue has applied to the Board of Zoning Appeals for a variance from the strict application of the provisions of Sections61.101 and 62.104 (11) of the Saint Paul Legislative Code pertaining to minimum front and rear yar d setbacks required for buildings, and from the requirement that off-street parking not be allowed in a required front yard in an R-1 zoning district for the purpose of constructing a building addition to their existing structure and constructing an off-street parking , facility for_ their property located at 2337 Edgcumbe Road, legally described as Lots 5 through 7, Block 5, Bohland's Edgcumbe Hills Addition; and WHEREAS, Following a public hearing with notice to affected property owners, the Board of Zoning Appeals by its Resolution No. 9621 dated September 11, 1984 varied the provisions of Section 61.101 and Section 62.104 (11) permitting the construction of a building addition to be set back 68 feet from the front property line, two��£eet from the rear lot line, and allowing vehicles to be parked 28 feet from the front property line at 2337 Edgcumbe Road, subject to the condition that the north curb cut and access lane meet modern public works and zoning code standards of minimum width and that the proposed south egress be posted to direct traffic to proceed with a right turn only and that all construction be completed in accordance with the application for variance and the site plan on file with the Saint Paul Planning Division; and WHEREAS, The decision of the Board of Zoning Appeals was based upon the following findings af fact: � 1) An existing synagogue cannot be reconstructed or addition- al off-street parking provided under strict provision of the code. 2) The plight of the applicant is due to the physical condition of the property. The severe topography and structural orientation , COUNCILMEN Yeas Nays Requested by•Departmeat of: Fletcher �f°w [n Favor Masanz Nicosia scnsibe� _ Against BY Tsdesco Wilson Form Approved by City Attorney Adopted b�� Council: Date Certified Nassed by Council Secretary By B; . Approved hy 1lavor; Date _ Approved by Mayor for Submission to Council ��f-/y�� . . _ - _ - _ _ _ _ _ _ - - WMITE, - C�TY CLERK � �PINK - FINANCE � . BLUERV _ Mq�pRTMEN7 GITY OF SAINT PAUL Council � File N 0. Council Resolution Presented By . Referred To Committee: Date � Out of Committee By Date requirements of a sanctuary of Jewish worship limit reconstruction opportunities to those proposed by the applicant. Additional parking can only be provided in the front yard. Use of the existing parking facility is limited during winter by reason of the severe grade of the access road. - 3) The variance, as amended, can be granted without detriment to the community or intent of the code. 4) The variance can be granted without detriment to the public health and safety or the neighbors ' supply of light and air or pro- perty values. Granting the variance would reduce on-street parking and may increase traffic safety. 5) Granting the variance will not permit any use that is not permitted in the R-1 zone. 6) mF'�ie` request for variance is based upon a desire to enjoy full use of the property and not merely for economic gain. WHEREAS, Pursuant to the provisions of Section 64.205, Barry L. Leafman, 1834 Hampshire, Saint Paul, Minnesota, duly filed his appeal from the determination made by the Board of Zoning Appeals, on the grounds that the findings of the Board of Zoning Appeals were in error and requesting that a hearing be held before the City Gouncil for the purpose of considering the actions taken by the • said Board; and - WHEREAS, Acting pursuant to Sectiors 64.205 through 64 .208 and upon notice to appellant and other affected property owners, a public hearing was duly conducted by the City Council on October 4, 1984 where all interested parties were given an opportunity to be heard; and ' -2- COUNCILMEN Yeas Nays Requested by Department of: Fletcher ��°"' in Favor � Masanz Nicosfa Schsibel A ga i n s t BY Tedesco Wilson Adopted b�� Council: Date • Form Approved by City Attorney Certified Passe� by Council Secretary By B� Approved b� ;Navor:• Date _ Approved by Mayor for Submission to Council °° . , . wHiTE - U rr CLERK PINK - FINANCE � CO�1flC11 �CANARV - DEPARTMENT G I TY OF SA I NT PAUL � BLUE - MqYOR . Flle �O. � Council Resolution Presented By Referred To Committee: Date Out of Committee By Date WHEREAS, The Council having heard the statements made and having considered the variance application, the report of staff, the minutes and findings of the Board of Zoning Appeals, does hereby RESOLVE, That the Council of the City of Saint Paul does hereby modify the decision of the Board of Zoning Appeals in this matter and does hereby find and issue the following determination which shall govern the zoning variances herefore granted: � 1) That the decision of the Board of Zoning Appeals to vary the provisions of the zoning code so as to allow Adath Israel Synagogue to construct a building addition to be set back 68 feet from the front property line and two feet from the rear lot line be and is hereby affirmed subject to the condition that the north curb cut and access lane meet modern public works and zoning code standards of minimum width and that the proposed south egress be posted to direct traffic to proceed with a right turn only and that all constrxa.ction be completed in accordance with the application for variance and the site plan on file with the Saint Paul Planning Division. 2) That the decision of the Board of Zoning Appeals to vary the provisions of the zoning code so as to allow vehicles to be parked 28 feet from the front property line at 2337 Edgcumbe Road be and is hereby rescinded. and, be it FURTHER RESOLVED, That the City Clerk shall mail a copy of this resolution to Adath Israel Synagogue, Barry L. Leafman, the Zoning Administrator, the Planning Commission and the Board of Zoning Appeals. . -3- COUNCILMEN Requested by Department of: Yeas p�atchar Nays Drew In Favor � Masanz Nicosia scnelbe� __ Against BY Tedssco Wilson Form Approved by City Attorney Adopted by Council: Date Certified Passed by Counc.il Secretary BY B}• Approved by Vla�or: Date _ Approved by Mayor for Submission to Council �. ` � - F' * � ��'J, '.�� C7 ,� f �� , I � �. .i . . . .. . . . `, , , . + �, . . . ', ' ` . ' � - r _ ..': , • ( r . � .. .t i:, ' "T 1, - I_ . . � . . . ��. �:. . . �, ' . . �., .. .. ' .. . r . . . . . �.: . .,-. , . .. . .'. �. � � .I � _. . ! � j� _ _ ...� � .. � - y` � � � � ' _ r .. - . � . , � " ; , , � � � ;. � � { {. \ � - � � v� , ` �. �, � . . Y � - ��, / �Ji ' �Q�r'��` �.9, 19�+4 . - _ ;. ,. , ,, i' �9� � . . . , . . ,. , i. ; , , , , � � � r .� �� ,� . , , ,Can�a�y �SCCrrder',e `�fl.�a _ . , �Ro��.155 , ; F r :, `�� Eitg �I�t�.�.� � '� r , , . . ,. , , .. . . . , , : ,: - . . . , ,. . . . � . ; t; . ,. . ,. , � D+�er<��rs. � . � ; � � � �� a�`��t��,ti�3a�..a��`as�t�fii� �a� ��f .C��',� ��imL$4"� �s�"��,8��;i��; �dr•��+�ff��. -Thia'.�r�etol'n��io�nj �was adop�t�d,b�r, 1�e �i�� aut��,. ot� - _ Ats:c�bait�.30,� 1984. � � . . � . � '��._ �' . � • � . � _ �, - beai:9;c��."u13r Y�its, � �' �� ;• �%�f.�,+;�.� ��'!� �, j t' �. �'�:�ilE��` �3�'. 1�a.0iO�t f� � �'` � Gfty��(,1�ic1� '', � ` ,' `' � ' ' �. t ��i�� i � _ �. a� �- _ , � r � �. � � J , i • '� e�. �' �. ` y,'��,.. � � � J r :_?�A��.�iW��. � '" 1: - A� �� _ . . -j � .'J,�,G - � � .i . . �� t" �� , , . � ;., � , . . : . , �.. . • ;�..� �'�.. , � j " . . ,, :.� `� r�. � `� � % � � � �_Y , , . i .. , _ , . �- . �"�� ' ' . / � .. ' _ , , , ... . . ,: � . . .. �..; ., -�� :. .. . ,, . �., '; . :. ,. _ _ 'l . R� .� i - / - , . � . - . . _ i � ��I: ,�� r _ ,.a� � " �- � - ,.� � � . � - . . ., r, . . , „ �. . . . - . ._ ... ..,..:: . .. . ..i�. � • ��' _ - .., � � �,,. �_ '�.: . � . ' t . . �r . ; . . ,. �., �" � ,��. I t � .. _, .;; . 1 . �. . , ,. � ..( :Y'« .} { I�� 1 \ �� 1 � �. I_ � \ � :. .��. . . .". .. . _. • . .. .. 'li� .\ . !. �. � � 1 � � ,. 1� '. . � ' . . ' ' . �,- . - . f �':: ." � '': . ��: �_ . . , -".' , .:.i ...I "� � .. .; '� � ��; . . . t^'_ � � il � ' h . : 3 1,, I 1 h , ( T -i�. , . . • . . . ,. . .. , . _ ��; ._ . .. . . . , ,. . . , i.� �� . . . . STATE OF MINNESOTA ) County of Ramsey ) ss. CITY OF SAINT PAUL ) �� : � � Albert B. Olson ��i I. . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . .City Clerk of the , � �� City of Saint Paul, Minnesota, do hereby certify that I have 84-1483 compared the attached copy of Council File No. . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . ��` - October 30 84 '�`— as adopted by the City Council. . . . . . . . . : . . . . . . . . . . . . . 19. . . . cas '. .. � and approved by the Mayor. . . . . . , .November.2: . . . . . . . . . . . . . 19.84 .,� . . . � � with the original thereof on file in my office. � 0 � o I further certify that said copy is a true and correct copy �° ' of said original and the whole thereof. WITNESS my hand and the seal of the City of Saint Paul, Minnesota this . , , , , 19th, . . . , day of . , , ,November. . . , . .A.D. 19.84 . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . City Clerk. , , t�<,;;:r � -.+, ' +< � , , i ',.., �:,� - „fr f �. 3 ';,� �t�' � . f�.._, � fh f "+ 5.' f i Ty P " � (. . 1 i. - . h ;� R" � , CITY ON' .SAINT I�AUL FlecilNO. �� V/��'� � -. � � ; - Cnun i Res ti� n � , ,- r �cacuic� uy /i • Ref red •'� ' � C m' tee: Date � /°.. - Out of Committee By Date WHEREAS, Adath Israel Syrtagogue has applied to the Board of � Zoning Appeals for a variance from the strict application of the � provisions of Sections61.101 and 62.104 (11) o£ the Saint Paul � Legislative Code pertaining to minimum front and rear yard setbacks � required for buildings, and from the requirement that off-street � parking not be allowed in a required fron� yard in an R-1 zoning district for the purpose of constructing a building addition to � their existing structure and constructing an off-street parking facility for their property located at 2337 Edgcumbe Road, legally described as Lots 5 through 7, Block 5, Bohland's Edgcumbe Hills Addition; and WHEREAS, Following a public hearing with notice to affected property owners, the Board of Zoning Appeals by its Resolution No. 9621 dated September 11, 1984 varied the provisions of Section 61 .101 and Section 62 .104 (11) permitting the construction of a building addition to be set back 68 feet from the front property line, two feet from the rear lot line, and allowing vehicles to be parked 28 feet from the front property line at 233? Edgcumbe Road, subject to the condition that the north curb cut and access lane meet modern public works and zoning code standards of minimum width and that the proposed south egress be . posted to direct traffic to proceed with a right turn only and that all construction k:•e completed in accordance with the application for variance and t??e site plan on file with the Saint Paul Planning Division; and WHEREAS, The decision of the Board of Zoning Appeal's was based upon the following findings of fact: 1) An existing synagogue cannot be reconstructed or addition- al off-street parking provided under strict provision of the code. 2) The plight of the applicant is due to the physical condition of the property. The severe topography and structural orientation COUNCILMEN Yeas Nays Requested by�Department of: Fletcher Drew (n Favor Masanz Nicosie Scheibel Against BY Tedesco Wilson Form Approved ity Attorney Adopted by Council: Date Certified Yassed bp Council Secretary BY B; ' Approved by Mavor: Date Approved by or for Submission to Council B}• BY n�-. �{ C� l�,.t . . , �'�:,: . ��ir��NCE � . c..,..:,j,-�"ojP.RTMEN. C� 1 TY O�' SA I NT I�AU L Cbuntil �.� w`��3 e�uE — �+wror+ � File NO. . � -. � � � � Council Resolution Presented By , Referred To Committee: Date � Out of Committee By Date � requirements of a sanctuary of Jewish worship limit reconstruction � opportunities to those proposed by the applicant. Additional parking � can only be provided in the front yard. Use of the existing parking � facility is limited during winter by reason of the severe grade of ` the access road. � 3) The variance, as amended, can be granted without detriment � to the community or intent of the code. 4) The variance can be granted without detriment to the public health and safety or the neighbors ' supply of light and air or pro- perty values. Granting the variance would reduce on-street parking and may increase traffic safety. 5) Granting the variance will not permit any use that is not permitted in the R-1 zone. . 6) The request for variance is based upon a desire to enjoy full use of the property and not merely for economic gain. WHEREAS, Pursuant to the provisions of Section 64 .205 , Barry L. Leafman, 1834 HampsYrire, Saint Paul, Minnesota, duly filed his appeal from the determination made by the Board of Zoning Appeals, on the grounds that the findings of the Board of Zoning Appeals were in error and requesting that a hearing be held before the City Council for the purpose of considering the actions taken by the said Board; and WHEREAS, Acting pursuant to Sections64 . 205 through 64 .208 and upon notice to appellant and other affected property owners , a public hearing was duly conducted by the Ci•ty Council on October 4 , 1984 where all interested parties were given an opportunity to be heard; and -2- COUNCIL5IEN Yeas Naps Requested by Department oE: Fletcher °`ew [n Favor Masanz Nicosia scnetbei Against BY Tedesco - Wilson • Form Approved by City Attorney Adopted by Council: Date Certified Yassed by Council Secretary BY B; Appro��ed by Mavor: Date Approved by Mayor for Submission to Council By. By W�:I 7! - L r l v l l L W K . . �,�:. - �INANCE � .��!r'v - DEPARTMENT G I TY OF SA I NT I�A U L CqQncil (� a �llUE - MAYOH � File �0• " /� ~ /�`� � . � � -�. � � Council Resolution Presented By Referred To Committee: Date � \�� Out of Committee By Date � WHEREAS, The Council having heard the statements made and having considered the variance application, the report of staff, the minutes M and findings of the Board of Zoning Appeals, does hereby n `(`� RESOLVE, That the Council of the City of Saint Paul does hereby modify the decision of the Board of Zoning Appeals in this matter and does hereby find and issue the: following determination which shall govern the zoning variances herefor granted: 1) That the decision of the Board of Zoning Appeals to vary the provisions of the zoning code so as to allow Adath Israel Synagogue to construct a building addition to be set back 68 feet from the front property line and two feet from the rear lot line be and is hereby affirmed subject to the condition that the north curb cut and access lane meet modern public works and zoning code standards of minimum width and that the proposed south egress be posted to direct traffic to proceed with a right turn only and that all construction be completed in accordance with the application for variance and the site plan on file with the Saint Paul Planning Division. 2) That the dec�sion of the Board of Zoning Appeals to vary the provisions of the zoning code so as to allow vehicles to be parked 28 feet from the front property line at 2337 Edgcumbe Road be and is hereby rescinded. and, be it FURTHER RESOLVED, That the City Clerk shall mail a copy of this resolution to Adath Israel Synagogue, Barry L. Leafman, the Zoning Administrator, the Planning Commis�ion and the Board of Zoning Appeals. -3- o COUNCILh1EN Requested by Department of: Yeas Nays Fletcher �!� ;; ,; � Drew [n Favor Masanz Nicosia � Scheibel A gai nst BY Tedesco Wiison �(;T � O 198j� Form Approve b City Attorn Adopted hy Council: Date Certified Pati. ed b�uncil Se etary BY B�; , �� 7--`J`'^- � � / � 17avor a NOV 2 - �g�� Approved y ayor for Su�iission to Council Appr by _ .. gy — BY PUBLISHED fJOV 10 1984 � � r___ � ` , �, 1 � p � D O `.� � 0 —�j ' ` � � - t� O ,.� cn cn � C7 7> i O /A �' _t, n O -�i � a � �--� � : N m c �,i i (') (: � ro `� i � °, 4 c� ' ': '.", l.� �� cn _., .,.. -n ' y � � n ,�.. ' � ) � A•' O N �7�", �s t6 � � Z � � � - Z ,, n � 1 N ,� c� � ��- �-, :% ti � , ( � � ; "� �] �, �, r-� „� c: ; �:� � ►4� a Z a � - � � O �� (�� ' ` � G'i a� ;u = �, �� .� � a � C� ,�� .� ;, �� -;� � [1 � '� -f �- %� y' �. � f� �' z =. <ti � � �.� � `f:Ja Sti 7� —�'+. { CJ id� l.� L:J -� — � -J' ~ � ��, ' = -,' �� ' ` ;� `'� � "') � r"� fV "" , -�• � �i �� f� � '. �n a �� `�' "� � � N C A` . � , `� �� (D �.�..�.��.�.____....�. -- --� � �l 7 + �� . r � `�"/li�Cf u � � ,��$`'TY �";, CITY OF SAINT PAUL � �� ro DEPARTMENT OF PLANNING AND ECONOMIC DEVELOPMENT �m 1°� ��° �o DIVISION OF PLANNING ,,,. 25 West Fourth Street,Saint Paul,Minnesota,55102 612-292-1577 GEORGE LATIMER MAYOR September 19, 1984 Albert Olson, City Clerk Room 3t36 City Hall St. Paul , Minnesota 55102 RE: Zoniny File #9521 - Barry Leafman City Council Hearing October 4, 1984 PURPOSE: To consider an appeal of a variance granted to AdatP� Israel Synagogue by the Board of Zoning Appeals to allow construction of a building additian and parking in the front yard. Qoard of Zoniny Appe«ls Decision: Approve (5-0) on the condition that the north access lane is widenetl pursuant to modern public works standards and the south egress be posted to allow a "right turr� onl y" . Staff Recommendations: Approve Support: None Opposition: Ten individuals testified; 11 letters received; two petitions submitted (signed by 13 ovrners) ; Southwest District Council Resolution. Dear Sir: On Auyust 14 and 28, 1984, ttie Board of Zoniny Appeals P�eld public hearings on the application of Adath Israel Synagogue to vary the minimum front and rear yard standards to permit renovation of a synayogue and allow parking in the required front yard (set back 28 feet from front lot line) . Staff recommended that the applicatior� for variance be approved. The applicant explained the proposal , highlighting the severe handships that would be felt without variance and the extent to which the site plan was altered to increase the compatability with the neiyhborhood. There was considerable testimony in opposition. Concern raised included the anticipated effect the proposal �vould have on: property values; neighborhood character; pedestrian and motor vehicle safety; aesthetics of the site; functioning of the boulevard within the park system; relationship with adjacent property; and vahether the proposal is a stop gap solution to the long-term problems associated with the synayogue' s increasing membership. ' �5�-i��'.3 t r • The hearing was closed and the case was discussed by members of the Board. Two conditions to increase site safety were outlined by a member of the Board. A motion to approve the variance on the condition that the applicant widen the north access lane to meet modern public works standards and that the south egress be posted to allow a "right turn only" passed on a 5-0 vote. Mr. Barry Leafman duly filed an appeal of the Board of Zoning Appeals decision on September 17, 1984. This matter is scheduled to be heard by the City Council on October 4, 1934. Please notify me by October �, 1984, if any member of the City Council wishes to have slides of the site presented at the City Council public hearing. Si y, Fred S. Haider Zoning Section FSH/bq Attachments � , � ��-i��' �i�y o� sain� �� o� zo�� eals r�solutiQn z��C� I �i� ��..�� 9621 a�� Septembe•r 11 , 1984 WHER�AS, ADATN ISRAEL SY�aAGOGUE has applied for a variance from tne strict application of the provisions of Sections 6i .101 and 62.104(11) o� the Saint Paul Legislative Code pertaining to minimum front and rear yard setb�cks required for buildings and a requirement that parking not �e allowed in a required fir�ont yard in the R-1 zonir,g district; ,and WHrR�aS, the Saint Paul �oard of Zoning Appzals c�nducted a public nzaring on Augus� 14 and August 2�, 1984, pursuant to said appeal in accordance with the requirements cf Sec�ion 64.204 of the �egislative Code; and WHEREAS, the Saint Paul Board of Zoning Appea7s based upon evidence presen- � ted at the public hearing, as substantially reflected in the minutes, made the following findings of f act: 1 . ` An existing synogogue cannot be reconstructed or additional off-street parking provided under strict provision of the Code. 2. The plight of the applicant is due to the physical condition of the property. The severe topography and structural orientation require- ments of a sanctuary of Jewish worship limit reconstruction opportuni- tites to those proposed by the applicant. Additional parking can only be provided in the front yard. Use of the existing parking facility is limited during winter by reason of the severe grade of the access ro ad. 3. The variance, as amended, can be granted without detriment to the community or intent of the Code. 4. The variance can be granted without detriment to public health and safety or the neighbors' supply of light and air or property values. Granting the variance would reduce on-street parking and may increase traffic safety. 5. Granting the variance will not permit any use that is not permitted in the R-1 zone. � 6. The request for variance is based upon a desire to enjoy full use of the property and not merely for economic gain. NOW, THEREFORE, BE IT RESOLVED, by the Saint Paul Board of Zoning Appeals � that the provisions of Sections 61 .101 and 62.104(11) be hereby waived to allow construction of a building addition to be set back 68' from the front property line, 2' from the rear lot line and allow vehicles to be parked 28' from the front property line at 2337 Edgcumbe Road (Lots 5-7, B1ock 5, Bohland's Edgecumbe Hills Addition) on the condition that the north curb cut and �ccess lane meet modern public works and Zoning Code standards of minimum width and that the proposed south egress be posted to direct traffic to proceed with a right turn only and that all construction be completed in accordance with the application for variance and the site plan on file with the St. Paul Planning Division. m�Ved by . M�. Petersan �ec�nded by Mr. osaorn _ . i n favar 4 agair�st o � SEE RE�;ERSE SIDE FOR: TI��tE �I��1IT/APPEAL/CERTIFICATION Mailed �P�temhPr 7�., 1984 -�:� . �' ' � . �. � . . . ' . i . _ �., . .! ' '- ��. . � .... . . . . .- ', .i .. . . . . '1_ . . ' . .. � � . 1 . . . � .,. . ' .. �. . \ � . .� . .. . .... , .. ' � , � . . . . .. . .. ' .. " . ' . ' ' , �. - " • . .. . ..�.. � .. _ .. .� .�� . . � .. ' . '' � .. .. . , . :.. . � ., i . . , . �. .. . . � . . . ' . . ' !:. . . . .' ' . . . . � , .. • '. .i � . . ' �1.. . . . � . .. . . .. .1'f i.11�� . _� . �. - . . . .. ' .1. � . . . � , . . .�^. . I " : ' .. , _ ' ' . . . - . l�..� .- ' .. . . ' .. . I� . . .. � . . . . .i.. „ ,. _.�. � ;�... � . . . � .. � -. , .._ � . .. • � � . - . . � . l� . .1� . � . .. � � � . .... . ,. .... ' ' . .. . . . .. � . .. . .. . . i ' - . � . �. ... ..� . . _. . " .. . . . i � . `- . . - . . . . . "�r � � ." . � l. � � . .�. �.,� .. �. ��. . .. . _ . .. � .� . , .. a _ _ ' ' 4 . .�: . • . . 1 '. . ''. • � ,� ' . ,� � _ •. .. � � . . .. �. ��. � 1 .. . . _ . _ .. . .. yi.� ' ._ �. .1.. . . .!. _ _ �.. . • . _ . ... ..._ . , ._ � ♦... . ':ti� �� . . . ' .. ' .I . � . . . :I � .. . . ..... . .. . . . —. . � . .. . �. � . . ' . TIME LIMiT: • � No order of the Board of Zoning Appeals permitting �the erection or alteration of_a building or off-street_parkinq facility shall _ � 6e' val i d� for a peri od^1 oriqer than �ne year, unl ess .a �bui 7 di ng � permit for such erection'�or� alteration is obtained within such period and such,erection or alteration is proceeding pursuant to the terms of such permit. The Board of_Zoning Appeals or the _ City'_'Cou�cil may grant an extension not to�exceed one year: In�: granti.ng such extension; the .Board of Zoning Appeal.s r�ay ;decid�` � � ta' hol d�a publ i c h�ari ng:. ,' � , � ' � � . . . i �. . , . APPEAL: Decisions of the Board of Zoning Appeals are final subject to appeal to the City Council within 15 days by anyone affected by . the decision. . , . CERTIFICATION: I;��the undersigned �Secretary to the Soard of Zoning Appeals for. � � the City of Saint Paul ; Minnesota; do hereby certify that I have�� comYare� the foregoing copy with the original record in my of�ice; and find the same to be a true and correct copy of said original and of the whole thereof, as based on approved minutes � of the Saint Paul Board of Zoninq Appeals meeting held on 1984 , and on ,record in the Saint Paul Planning Div�s�on O �fice, 25 W. Fourth Street, Saint Paul , Minnesota . SAINT PAUL 60,4RD OF ZONING APPEALS I�'1 .,. !?� �, �nz_..�,>.� � '�--�, . _ S2cretai�,j� �to �re Soard . ;�5�- /�,�� y , • APPLICATION FOR APPEAL , ZONING OFFICE USE ONLY CITY OF SAINT PAUL File # �(9 a� 5f��' 1 �. i� , � oc� � Application Fee $ ��/" � ��_ : ��_ ,� �,��, q�;�,��u,y� �,��,' '�,�a ,; -��j�� Tentative Hearing Date /o� - 8 Application is hereby made for an Appeal to the C�r-�-t ;e-u-�+.c.�.� under the provisions of Chapter 64, Section 'u , aragrap______ of the oning ode to appeal a decision made by the XX Board o on ng Appeals on _ � � 19� . Planning Comnission q l � Zoning Administrator (date of decision) � Planning Administrator Other A. APPELLANT 698-2434 Name Barry L . Leafman Daytime phone 690-0426 Address 1834 Ham shire St . Paul MN Zip Code 55116 , B. DECISION BEING APPEALED Zoning fi le name ADATH ISRAEL SYNAGQGUE Zoning Fi le #� 9621 Property Address/Location 2337 Ed cumbe Road Legal description Lots 5 , 6 , 7 , Block 5 , Bohland ' s Ed4cumbe Hills Add�.tion C. GROUNDS FOR APPEAL (Use additional sheets if necessary. ) (Explain why you feel there has been an error in any requirement, permit, decision or refusal made by an administrative official, or an error in fact, procedure or fi ding made by the Board of Zoning Appeals or the Planning Commission.) � �i Tu c co� �A-�R-� o �*�� .t c! c� ' �� .. � A_ �� ., `� �-. c-�.� �...-�-:..�. ,�..� -- � � � A � LC �� C � w If you have any questions, please contact: qPP i ant's s gn u St. Paul Zoning Office Pd' 1100 City Hall Annex 9, , � 25 West Fourth Street Date City a ent Saint Paul , Minnesota 55102 (298-4154) C.��' �n��j� . . .. . . \ . . . . . � . � • ' � � '`. . . /�� ,i'. � /.�/ (��-�1 _ ( i^ITaUTcS Or THE ��1EETI,��G ��` TNE QOA�D Or Ztl�diilG APPcALS IN CITY COUi�1CI� C�iar�BEP,S, ST. P;�UL, ��1I1N�SOTA, AUGJST 14, 1984 PR�SENT: i�1me. P�torton; M�ssrs . Grai s , Ki rk, a;�� Osborn of tne Board - of Zoning A�peals; i�r. Segai , Assisi.ant City Ai:torney; iNs. Lane of the Divisian of Housing & t��a; lding Co�e Er�fo•rc��r,�ent; his. Kelley, P�:r. Haider and Mr. i�1cGu-ire ot the Pla�nir,g Division Staff. ASSENT: Mme. Summers and Messrs. Peterson and Woods. The me2ting was chaired by Gladys Morton, Chairman . ADATH ISRAEL SYNAGOGIfE (�9621): Request for variance to allow remodeling of synagogue and parking in the front yard. Mr. Haider gave the slide presentation and revieti�ed the staff findings. Correspon.dence wa5 received on the matter. Ms. Lane stated that the staff repor� did not include the rear yard set- back. Rab�i Asner Zeingold, representing Adat1� Israel Syna�ogue, apologized to the neignbors and residents of tf�e Synagogue area for any hardship and ill feelings that have been caus°d by their request for variance; that was not their intention. He further stated that he wanted to stress the need for an additiona1 parking area. Rabbi Zeingold t2stified that h� had lived with the site as it is presently for the past 18 years. Th� parking 1ot has a steep grade, which is a problem even under the best of situations. He stated that people of the Jewish faith do not drive any motorized vehicles on the Sabbath, therfore parking is not a prablem on the Sabbath. The available parking is severely inadequate, however, during morning and evening weekday services when typically 80 individuals come to worship. Rabbi Zeingold stated that the present parking lot accomodates a maximum of 12 cars. Synagogue members first park in those parking spaces, then park on the hill and continue to double park on the hill . This situation is made arorse in the w�nter months, especially with elderly members of the Synagogue, and it can be extremely dangerous . Ne also outlined the diffi- culty in maneuvering on-site due to the re]ationship of th2 access road to Hampshire and Edgcumbe Road. Rabbi Zeingold further testified that it was his belief and that of his architect that granting the variance would not b� detrimental to the neighbors because the entire area will be shield2d by berming and plantings. He stated that they vrill b2 more than happy to do wi�atever needs to be done to shield the area. Rabbi Zeingold stated a letter had been sent to all individuals on the City`s Notification of Public Hearing mailing list which stated the Synagogue`s position for requesting the variance, but that no one had contacted him with suggestions for im�rove- ment or objected to the proposal as outlined in the letter. ' ,� .�.. �,`�� j �u -�� , . , ; � �:, ; : . � �; � � � � .. Pay� T:��o Rab�i Z.eingcld si,ated th?y ��vould li�e to go area�i with t�e construction and addi�i�nal par'<ing as scon as possible, but if the Board recommended that i.he matter be �iaid over �nat zhey urould go along tivi�h tnat recorr�mendation. Rabbi G�rshon Grossbaum, Synagogue member, spo'�e in support. H° stated that the 5uilding is inadequate. The sanctuary nas only tv�to restroom facilities, one for men arci one for women. The kitchen is a problem in that they have a need to kezp meat and dairy and utensils separated, so thQy �ctually need two kitchens. He also autlined energy factors to the building use. Rabbi Grossbaum further stated that there are plantings on ` the surrounding properties so that houses around tr�e Synagogue are screened and that the parking lot would not be visable from Edgcumbe Road. h1r. Irv Rosenblum, 1631 8irchNiood, spoke in s�!oport stating that to get � into the Synagogue you have to first climb the steep hill . There are many eldPrly members of the Synagogue and it is very hard an tnem. f�'r. Charles Tr�zinski , 1848 Nampshire, pro�erty adjacent to the Synagogue, spo�ce in opposition. Although he is sympathetic with th� Synagogue, he is not tivilling to risk lowering the values of his property. He f ezls the cnanges pro�osed by the Synagogue are extensive and that members of the Synagogue have the obligation to protect the neighbors. He stated that be�ore he bought his home 1-1/2 years ago that he investigated the zoning rules, and that was the reason he uren� ahead with the p�rchase .of his home. H° stated that he feels the Synago�ue should prove that the value of the properties �vi11 not be lowered. He does not want tQ loo;c out his window to see asphalt. He believes that the congregation members bougnt the property kno�r�ing it �rrould not serve long-term needs, and ne is concerned r�ith what th� next five years ��rill bring with a continuing growing congregation. He requested that the Board deny the variance. P�Ir.� William Dunn, 38 Oren Cou�t, testified in opposition stating he had � bought his home 20 years ago and that he enjoys the area very much. He stated that the Synagogue property was originally sold in 1953 to a Lutheran Church until 1954 �vhen it uras sold to the Synagogue, and in 1973 the Synagogue built on a building addition at which time there were no provisions made for the f ront entrance or additional parking. When they bougnt that property they knev�l the eleva�ions and the adverse conditions. Mr. Dunn stated that aft2r rruch research ti�ith Mr. Haider and h1r. Robert Doty tha± it is his firm belief that the granting or the variance would reduce property values substantially and therefore should be denied. He also submitted a letter for the case record. , Mr•. Thomas B. Wieser, Attorney, Suite 430 Minnesota Buiiding, representing : Har•ry Kirby of 1834 Hampsnire, spoke in opposition. He stated that the burden of proof on the ap�licant is very heavy; that the applicant must sho�,� proof of hardship based sol��ly on the condition of the property; ap�licant must show that the property is not currently put to a reasonable use. Ne stated that the property has been used for the past 30 years and he questioned ho� the variance will chang� that standard. Mr. Wieser ., a � �� ._ \ l l � �%�r �tiy��/, . f� i � ' . +. . : j' [ . .,. � .. � . ��'� . � ` .... . . .. . . . . . , . . � .. ... . - � � � � Pag� Thre� stated tnat the Kirby's nome nas a large picture window and that they do not �vant to look out over a paved parking lot. Mr. Wieser had some questions of the plan as submitted, that he �.as unable to determine the elevation of the pr�operty parlcing lot, and if the Synagogue plans to elevate the grade higher off Edgcumbe. Mr. Haider stated it is the appii- cants intent to have the parking lot at grade wizh the iower level of the building, and that the architect has not provided the final elevation and grading plan. ��ir. Wieser stated tha't the plan sho+�red taking away of a parking space. Mr. Haider said that it ap�ears that one space is being covered by the building but that a substitute parking space is provided. Mr. 4Jieser submitted a letter for the record. h1r. George hlorzoef, 44 Orme Court, testified in opposition stating he objects to the approval of the variance. Ms. MichellQ Lichtig, Community Organizer of the So:�th�vest Area District 15 Cormiunity Council , testified stating she v�as not speaking either in opposition or favor, but that she v��anted th2 opportunity to have both the residents and the applicant reviear the situation and work ou-t a compromise. Ms. Lichtig sta�ed a meeting had been scheduled for Tuesday, August 14, 1984 at 7:00 by the Southvrest Area District 15 Corrrnunity Council . The District 15 Council could make its recommendatian if the Soard continued this case until August 28, 1984. � Mr. Grais moved to lay ove� a decision on the matter to A�lgust 28, 1984, but to continue with further testimony. Mr. Kirk seconded the motion, which passed on a voice vote of 4 to 0. Ms. J. C. Fesler, 1863 Hampshire, spoke in opposition. She stated that al- though the topography of the property is unique, the N�ho1e Nighland area is unique. She feels that as a homeo�rner the neighborhood integrity should be maintained. Mr. Barry Leafman, 1834 Hampshire, spoke in o�position stating he o�,�ns property at the rear of the Synagogue and that his living room area looks out across the street and front of the synagogue and he doesn't want to look out onto asphalt. He further stated 'ne dces not see any safety factors concerning tnis variance. He also indicated that he would not have purchased his home had there been a parking lot in front of the Synagogue. Mr. Harold Brunn, 1845 Hampshire, testifiecl in opposition, stating he has lived in his home for over 20 years. Ne stated that he supparts others testifying in opposition, that the congretation of the Synagogue knew the rules of the game when they purchased the property, and he urged the Board to deny the variance. h1r. Grais was excused (no quorum of BZA present) . , ' � � � . . � � . . . \ ... .. - �i �� -/�,c�� , . � , '� � . _ f . � °age Four h�•r. Oaniel Dale �estiried on behaif of his moth�r, Olga Dale ti�no resides at 2345 Edgcumbe. Mr. Da1e stated that his mo�ther has been trying to sell her home for the past six months and that out of 60 persons �.v�o have looked at her home they have not received one offer diae to the pTaeement of the Synagogue at the neighboring lot. He further stated that granting the variance alould exacerbate this situation and be an extreme nar�ship to his mother. He urged the Corr�nittee to deny the request for variance. f�s. P�orton asked Ra�bi Grossbauin if he would like to address the issues raised by the neighbors and to summarize their vari�nce requ�st. . Rabbi Grossbaum stated that the issues addressed by the neighbors nad been recognized frorr the very beginning. He stated that he realizes the neighbors want the neighborhood to be maintained and it is not tneir inten- t�on to abuse the r2ighborhood in any ti,ray. Hz relt not sufficient a�tention had been made to the site plan which illustrates efforts to provide intensive plantings to enhance both the site a�d neigi��orhood in genzral . Rabbi Grossbaum also s�ated that if granted, the variance v�iould enhance all af the adjoining properties, that they will see a "parlc" area and no�c asphalt parking area. He testified that the neighbors to the soutn have plantings that block th� view and that they have pavement 9n front o-f their home. Rabbi Grossbaum stated it is their in}ent to come up with topograhic and landscape plans that will protect neighboring properties. Rabbi Grossbaum further stated that when they purchased the buiiding and property that they had a iimited amount of -funds with w}�ich to work, and at that particular time were hoping tha� the front entrance u�lo+ald be adequate, but have found out that it is not. They have not ou�Lgrown the space. The interior square footage for assembly area will remain the same, and the variance to the rear will not disturb anyone. With regards to the suggestion that they relocate, Rabbi Grossbaum stated that is not an option, again stating that tneir congregation does not drive motorized vehicles on the Sabba�h and several holidays and relocating would caus� severe undue hardship. If the Synagogue �rere relocated outside of rvalking distance such as to Mendota, 40 or 50 families would have to relocate outside of St. Paul nearer to the Synagogue. The Synagogue would not be against relocating if there were an appropriate site available in the community, but regretably their options are limited to the proposed renovation. He concluded by stating that the questions and needs of the neighbors will be taken into considera�ion. � With no further testimony, Ms. h1orton adjourned the meeting and reminded those in attendance of the scheduled meeting of the South�vest Area District Council . ;, ` Approved by: : , � � `�, ) `' ��; �"red S. Haider Gladys Morton, Chairman ` �, � � , � . ;;;�� °��'�� _�°�'� MINUTES OF THE MEETING OF THE BOARD OF ZONING APPEALS IN CITY COUNCIL CHAMB�RS, S7. PAUL, MINNESOTA, AUGUS'C 28, 1984 PRESENT: Mmes. Morton and Summers; Messrs. Kirk, Osborn, and Woods of the Board of Zoning Appeals; Mr. Segal , Assistant City Attorney; Ms. Lane of the Qivision of Housing & Building Code Enforcement; Ms. Kelley, Mr. Haider and Mr. McGuire of the Planning Division Staff. ABSENT: Messrs. Grais and Peterson The meeting was chaired by Gladys Morton, Chairman. ADATH ISREAL SYNAGOGUE #9621 : Request variance of building and parking se ac requiremen s o aT ow remodeling of the synagogue and parking in the front yard. Mr. Haider stated this case is continued from the August 14 Board of Zoning Appeals Meeting, and that there are neighbors present today who did not attend the August 14th meeting who wish to testify. He further stated that although it is not customary to reopen public testimony in the old business � portion of the agenda, the Board should consider hearing additional testi- mony in this complex case and the Board should also consider adjusting the agenda to accomnodate a full hearing of the case at the end of the agenda. Ms. Summers made a motion to move discussion of the Adath case #9621 to the end of the meeting in order to hear further testimony. Mr. Osborn seconded the motlon, whlch passed on a voice vote of 5 to 0. Mr. Haider read a letter submitted by William Reiling after indicating that it is a fairly conclusive outline of the issues raised by neighbors opposed to the variance. He showed slides and overhead pro�ection presentations. Asked by Ms. Morton how many parking spaces are proposed in the front yard and how many are required by code, Mr. Haider stated 15 are proposed and that the code requires 11. Ms. Morton stated to the audience that the Comnittee voted to hear further testimony on this case and asked that the testimony not be repititious. �5�-i�� , � I Page Two Mr. William Rosen, Attorney, 1016 Conwed Tower, representing Adath Isreal Synagogue, stated that Mr. Haider completely outlined their situation. If the building was expanded without providing parking in the front yard and required parking was not waived, it would then be necessary to expand parkin� on the bluff after paving the all�y, but th�t waul� b� � po9r alternativ� to anly be propnsed as a last resart. Mr. Ros�n explain�d that their proposal to renovate the Synagogue and park in the front yard reflects a need to utilize the building as modern design practices dictate, as compared to a desire to accomodate membership growth. The Synagogue has members of the congregation who are handicapped and confined to wheelchairs who are denied access to the Chapel and restroom facilities. These new found building requirements must be addressed now because the building expansion of 1973 was not sensitive to accessibility of the handicapped. The proposed plan increases the Synagogue 12 feet to the east and the remainder of new floor space is for handicapped accessible restroom f acilities, hallways, an office for the Rabbi , and a small Chapel . Mr. Rosen further stated that the Sabbath to Orthodox Jews is the crux to their existence, and they are forbidden to drive on the Sabbath. He ex- plained why a car may be parked on a neighborhood street during the Sabbath worship by indicating that those members of a denomination of the Jewish , f aith other than Orthodox who are permitted to operate motor vehicles during the Sabbath do occasionally travel a long distance to worship at Adath. They may park their vehicle a few blocks away and, in respect for the Orthodox congregation they are visiting, walk the final distance to __ _ the Temple. The number of persons who park in the neighborhood on the Sabbath, however, is so small as to be insignificant. Mr. Rosen also stated that the Orthodox Synagogue have prayer worship services three times a day, with the last two worship services separated by a study period. This worship generates an average of 6 to 15 cars. He stated that Adath could live with a decision to grant the variance to expand the Synagogue and waive the required parking by using a drop-off lane on the lower level , but such a solution is not in the best interest of the Synagogue or neighborhood. He stated that his clients proposal should be viewed as an improvement that will make their property more beautiful and safe. It is their view that the presence of a house of worship in any neighborhood is an asset that sustains property values. With regard to some undercurrent that Adath Isreal Synagogue should move, Mr. Rosen stated that they must stay where they are to avoid relocating the entire congrega- tion. He urged the Committee to approve the variance. Ms. Michelle Lichtig, Southwest Area District Council Community Organizer, stated that Mr. Brunn, 1845 Hampshire, asked to be put on record in opposition to the variance. She further stated that the Brunn's are not in opposition to the building expansion as much as concerned with the parking lot and traffic problems. Ms. Lichtig also presented the Southwest Area District Council recomnendation that the variance be denied in consideration of public safety. ' �:i� ��,�_?�,�,.;��, Page Three Ms. Janet Fesler, 1863 Hampshire, testified in opposition. She believes that the variance, if approved, would be a detriment to surrounding proper- ty values, noting that neither the applicant nor city staff has provided evidence to illustrate that granting the variance would not impair property values. Ms. Fesler stated she did na� know how Mr, Ro��n �oul� s�y th�r� �vould b� small membership growth because the congreg�tlon appe�rs tu inc�ud� m�ny children who conceivably will either continue with the congregation or _ _ leave the faith. She further stated that Mr. Rosen's statements that new- __ _ found realities of life necessitate the renovation is inconsistent with the fact that little has actually changed. Snow in Minnesota has been a reality since the Ice Ages as has the Orthodox traditions mentioned. She concluded her testimony stating that the hardship of the applicant are self- created and urged the Comnittee to deny the variance. Mr. Eugene Lynsch, 64 Orme Court, testified that he has lived in the � neighborhood since 1948 and considers the proposal detrimental to the area and is strongly opposed to the variance. Daniel Dale testified in opposition on behalf of his mother. He stated that granting the variance would permit the Synagogue to stand 22 feet forward of his mothers home and this will impair the market potential of the house. Mr. Thomas Wieser, 430 Minnesota 6uilding, testified in opposition on behalf of Mr. and Mrs. Kirby, 1834 Hampshire. He stated that Mr. Rosen's presentation did not address the variance, and the plight of the applicant was created by the applicant themselves. They had the opportunity to correct building deficiencies when they renovated the Synagogue in 1973. He has attended several meetings concerning this variance and at each meeting learns about different plans. Today the applicant stated that required parking could be placed on the bluff if the alley was improved. This is not part of the plan first talked about or reflect the variance application before the Board. He asked the Board to deny the application for variance of building and parking setbacks. Mr. William J. Dunn, 38 Orme Court, testified in opposition. He stated he has lived in the area for the past 20 -,y-ears and that he en�oys living in the area. Mr. Dunn testified that he has interviewed many people, both in support and in opposition, and that he has attended several Southwest Area District Council meetings. He gave a brief history of the site from 1964 to the present, and stated the applicant knew the problems the building and land had when the purchased the property. He further stated that although Mr. Haider did send him a map with spot elevations, it did not show the proposed topography of the berm. He presented the Board with real estate statistics showing property values in the immediate neighborhood and indi- cated that property values will decline if the variance is granted. � ` ��' �� , `,`�'�� Page Four Mr. Barry Leafman, 1834 Hampshire, testifed that he is totally opposed to the variance. He stated he was speaking for neighbors that are opposed to the encroachment on the parkway area. He further stated that he questions if a landscape architect has been invalved in the site plan as was pro- mised. He also feels that no solid foundation has been presented to indi- �ate that prop�rty valu�s in the area will be maintained if the proposed ��3� �f� `��1� ��d�� 1"t� l��x Rabbi Asher Zeilengold, 1001 S. Prior, testified in support stating that members of the Synagogue read a chapter of the Bible each week, and that they judge with righteousness. He quoted a verse from Jeremiah which states they should "pray for the City in which you live", and that he does just that. Rabbi Zeilengold told the Board that a few weeks ago vandals painted in red over the sign in front of the Synagogue that reads "Save Soviet Jews", and that a man not of the Jewish f aith stopped by his office to tell him it hurts to see this desecration and requested the Rabbi to , have the sign repainted and send him the bill . The Synagogue is keenly aware of their obligatian to maintain the beauty of the site and shall aspire to improve the property if the variance is granted. Hearing no further testimony, Ms. Morton closed the public hearing portion of the meeting. Ms. Summers asked if the variance was granted would the site plan review guarantee that landscaping would be done, and also if the south exit onto Edgcumbe could be designated for "right turn only". Mr. Haider stated that the applicant will be required to furnish a performance bond to guarantee completion of all work shown on the site plan within one year. Mr. Haider stated that the "right turn only" provision could be attached to the variance approval as well as a requirement that the north curb cut and access lane be widened to comply with modern public works standards. Ms. Summers stated that she felt the Synagogue was trying to alleviate the parking problem and that the Synagogue is a permitted use of the site, and believes that a performance bond will assure neighbors that landscape screening shall be provided. Ms. Sumners made a motion for approval of the variance based on findings 1 through 6 of the staff report with the condition that the north access lane is broadened and the south egress be posted to allow "right turn only". Mr. Woods seconded the motion, which passed on a roll call vote of 5 to 0. Submitt d by: � Approved by: /;� � � � L��'�� '� �-'C-/ Fred S. Haider ��,Gladys Mor n, Chair , r � ��-�� BOARD OF ZONING APPEALS STAFF REPORT ------------------------------------ ------------------------------------ FILE #9621 1 . APPLICANT: ADATH ISRAEL SYNAGOGUE DATE OF HEARING: 8/14/84 2. CLASSIFICATION: Variance 3. LOCATION: 2336 Edgecumbe 4. LEGAL DESCRIPTION: Lots 5, 6, 7, Block 5, Bahland's Edgecumbe Hills Addn. 5. PRESENT ZONING: R-1 ZONING CODE REFERENCE: 61.101 & 62.104(11) 6. STAFF INVESTIGATION & REPORT: DATE 8/3/84 BY Fred S. Haider ----------------------------------------------------------------------------------------- ----------------------------------------------------------------------------------------- ----------------------------------------------------------------------------------------- ----------------------------------------------------------------------------------------- A. PURPOSE: To consider a variance of building and parking setback requirements to al—low remodeling of a synagogue and parking in the front yard. B. AREA & FRONTAGE: This irregular shaped parcel has approximately 195' frontage along Edgecumbe Road by an average depth of approximately 170' for 33,150 square feet plus 1,950 square feet of alley right-of-way for 35,100 square feet of total land area. C. SITE & AREA CONDITIONS: This site is occupied by a synagogue and adjunct parking lot on the upper portion of a steep sloping lot. The land in the surrounding area is exclusively used for single-family residences. D. ZONING CODE CITATION: Section 61.101 requires that structures be setback a istance equal to the average setback in the balance of the block (80' in this case) and maintain existing nonconforming rear yard. Section 62.104(11) requires that off-street parking spaces not be located within a required front or side yard. E. FINDINGS: � 1. An existing synogogue cannot be reconstructed or additional off-street parking provided under strict provision of the Code. 2. The plight of the applicant is due to the physical condition of the property. The severe topography and structural orientation requirements of a sanctuary of Jewish worship limit reconstruction opportunities to those proposed by the applicant. Additional parking can only be provided in the front yard. Use of the existing parking facility is limited during winter by reason of the severe grade of the access road. 3. The variance, as amended, can be granted without detriment to the comnunity or intent of the Code. 4. The variance can be granted without detriment to public health and safety or the neighbors' supply of light and air or property values. Granting the variance would reduce on-street parking and may increase traffic safety. 5. Granting the variance will not permit any use that is not permitted in the R-1 zone. 6. The request for variance is based upon a desire to enjoy full use of the property and not merely for economic gain. F. STAFF RECOMMENDATION: Based on findings 1 through 6, staff recommends the amended application for variance be approved. � � � �'`�-'i�� - � � � � � �� . , , � i , � , ; :_... _ . - . , , �U s .�.� . �-�-u�f �-�C/�,z, , , - _ � . � ,"Owf� �'L-.co.�:/S �Zl�-��. s} j �? /� .Y, � `°' " ,` f , � _, zo;viv� soa�� • , :i = � � , �.�:, APPLlCATION FOR ZON1��iD1NANCE VARIANCE _• _ CITY O�F�INT PAUL � y �� d /ol V - A VARIANCE OF ZONING CaDE CHAPTER.1-_;_,SECTION !�� PARAGRAPH IS REQUESTEO IN CONFORMITY WITH THE POWERS VESTFO IN THE BOARD OF ZONING AP— PEALS TO PERMIT THE �� r'i r ��a^� ?>'�/`� ON PftOPERTY ' , � � DESCRIBED BELOW. � ��'� �.. A. Applicant: NAME: ��`�`"ts� t ��ii�-�7 �"�`-�n;.�:��;� _ `°a . Ct,1GCUwtf�L� v� ADDRESS � �j�7 -- G� o— r 7 ZIP CODE S.S—((la }��•3#� . s t DAYTIME TELEPHONE NO.y � � ' 1. Property interest of applicant: owner ontract purchaser,etc.) — 2 Name of ow�er lif different) B. Property Description: ADDRESS � �37 �=�.'GLUvK1�� '��1�.,v��S ��n�B f. . egal description: LOT��BLOCK � ADD. +-�. t c C ^ ot size• �G �Q�-0 }C f �v+,�T�Z% ��r C2r71 �:t- � _ t a d resent Use �i�r1.1,��7�.L�,_s'.r_ Present Zoning Dist. �� Reas ns for Request: �T;�•`1� � �J��`� C}�� i�/�G C -`'�'�� ., � ` � , - roposed use ��y�.f� . �F G F*A 2�- r :�� ...,a �:.� ., _ `'�...a . . . 2, hat physical characteristics of the property prevent its being used for any of the permitted uses • � your zone? Itopography,soil conditions,size and shape of lot,etc.) � � S 1 Z� c�F �o'" : ..:o.. '� ate the specific variation requested,giving distances where appropriate. • �F�+w t �Ro�u'c'�/f��2D SE�'�-4t JP2rf?NCE a. ��2 *r/r4,f� �7(S��+r ✓ARt;ticf' � + Xfl� �Q��D 56T3A4� /O,S' :.�ISTi,�iG � : �' ??f�oPo�� F��E ca,v>s��v�£'a.e�c��14 { T,3,:t w. � td�f' �2�Pvs�a E o 2 '��►.�k, o�- i"t.',.��;;�� s�r,S Ac;� , . plain how your case conforms to each of the following: a. That the strict application of the provisions of the Zoning Ordiance would result in peculiar or exceptional practical difficulties,or exceptional undue hardships. '�� . , � '� r}'i"'' .'�7 't'o Q�' SJl3M� i-t�� It�� . � �� , � � . � . . . � i.i.R • � CASHIERS USE ONIY b. That the granting of a variance will ��; not be a substantial detriment to public good or a substantial impair- - ; : _ 'f��"-'�'1 ment of the intent and purposeof ,' -4 y — -t .._ i%-_ ___,_ _ . the Zoning Ordinance. - : , -. -" � . ' ':�L ''t�'-4 f . '� �� .SJ�/� �?-�(."� '_'i-�:_'`:;. �r,t::::. . � a'�.. _ ' ' ''t:�::f`. . . f t NOTE TH ILL NOT BE PROCESSED WITHOUT C011l�PLET SITE PLAN! _ s r � � � �� Si natu e �� - 9 � �� Date Received � • � � � .� � _. :� _ � ) r . .. ' . � I ' � ll `� �� . .. . ! - . �� t � � � . ._. �' I.... � �'f�'' r.� � . > . . . . . �r _�i" ,:.j'.�` ' � �� a . � � ,�� ,�4 . i : t��''�:J`�k r �.� � � 4) Ttie Sanetuary is a wide open are� together with the area ��j�'" , used for soeial activities. tiVith the remodeling the Sanctuary will be an enclosed area. 5) 6'le do not have enough toilet facilities. s) �ye have no Chapel for our daily Services. These are the main problems. There are many others and I `-, do plan to write some more of the problems in gretzter detail. , � a��i �� . { ;�_.�� ..� ,,,,,,�,�, _ F� .., , ._ , r .. r� � F� :,�#� �� . ;��:,�� , ;,�� Y ' ,��<x� _ , +a�i ss�#� - {��`_� . � . __ __ _ .. - � _ ._.. ., _ __ . .. �t. i � — s ' � _ . , . � � _ � � � � �- i�� . , � , , , ; - , - j .W .........w::.� . -.:..�. ._..._.� ._..:�..�y.,.F.., �_ __ _ .�.._ _:...�,._ _, . . .. �.W.�.u�_ ,__ .. . _, __.- , . � _ -�r i �,.��: � i � �: ?�� § � . � �� I �`�� j ;,��- � I ��..� ��--" ( July 23th 1984 �� Our intentions in making this addition to our present building is only to make our present facility more functionable. �'ve � are not going to make the Sanctunry any larger, - only nrore � Iuseable and pr�cticai. � �Ve have certain g�reat problems �vith the layout of aur Ipresent building. These problems will be rernedied �vith the � proposed addition. � . IOur main problems at present are: 1) The hill is a grent and terribly dangerous prol�le►n. ��e � have our morning services before 7 a.m, and some of those who drive to the service are elderly. �"Je have experienced ; ' some frightening moments when cars slid down the l�iil. _ R� ;` 2) Our kitchen is tiny. In our faith rve must keep separate j} y #� - � �. �s�ti`lf'7"�.�'�� . .. , ± facilities for dairy nnd meat and we are not �ble to �o that � � �-�� x,� now. �lso ti�ere is absolutely no room for �eople to Gvork. '' �,y�� ?.'��.�''t' ; 3) FVe have no front entrance and no lobby. 6Ve have 3 back ; entrances and the entrance that is usee3 most often leacis � " i directly into thc S�nctuary area. � ___ _ _ _ . ` � � . � _ - � � * � � r� ' 11 —�^+�.., �-�_ !1 ""+.....,�� d, .C�!_'/�l�c� z �, �, � 1 , r C '`'"�+"""''--�-....,,,,�""°~..,..�. - (U l�r _ U .. � C; y Y � C7 � i n �.1 4 L 4 � ~ � _ �U � � � '�--'.-- - .1� �' �` _� � : �� '� `� �' , � �o . _- , tT _ , I � � , �. , fi' �� , - � < ,� , -�_ ,t{ `�. r e ,- i �, � . I 'Y . �� - '�� }�1 `i. \ \\ '.:� i .\ , . ' , ' . .... �_._'`-�.' '_'"'1 �.r'� � , t 1 � �� 'v �,�.� r� _�� - _:,�:- _ _ _�: �� 1 % 166.3 \� ___-__�__ - -- �-.. i�_r-� -,�� !'10T"-'p_ � �" '� � N_ ' -� � , i ,�` � r , t � � - ' •, � � C� � -1' "'-----^' ,�- � - , ----- --—�_ - - 01 � , :_. ._ - 6� I, , � � ,, �.. t ��`� � 1- -- }-'� �b __ __ - - � t' ''`�' 3 � 11 = f, y � / ,�� t # �._. __„��::-=-�..�.�� i 1 � t° "u t.� _ r'; '� ��-- - �; ��` - i ��:jl � � � ' ;� � � � " c � -. -� �` 1 �� '� `�i 6 a k Q.r� , �^ , / � �� <" `Y IE,�\`�1� , ,� \ � � ' 15, � ; 9 } �_2 ._� 8_S„I 20 � A� � � !,,� • ,; ! � F�C � " �� '\ ' , .� : a, � ?,� ,,; ,- / � � _.\ ,. , ', ' I � . �� - "'S'� �\\ \ `� ,'►W�-� _ _—-- - - - _ o �q � ti C� � . p �•,` � \\\� \ \A_ ` n� , W Nt `' �`�� ,� \ � 57', `�`\ ~l,., o_ _ ` _ y � 9 � ' !, . ` � ` \ �,t-� __. . �` � � � , �".\ � �., _ _ ---=.__''" . �� .\ � . � �%I �\ . r Y/1 ` _r— ._.'"-" . �'" 1 ^�. � �� - ._�� _ _.�-i � �D 'Q � 4 % � ! . y. _.._- , Q� Pr_ V �7/� ' '�' ` � �, a - , _`�_- '�.1, w .\ . .��T I 1 ._- ' � I 1 . .♦ � � ! � �i . ( . � .� . t -!1. . �, , , ., ; _� `� � ,� ,\ 1 ;( -�.�.;, '' � _ � � %%,� , � C, �t '\ � � �' `� ' m , ' . �..�' ` _ . � � ,� i � .I � � % ' '� � ` � 1 , v - -. - -t - � � � ' , �� ' , � :.-'- " _ � - � �: . '�" y -/l / '.,, `JF� � ,� � , � .__;..�.;. . _ , ___.._____----_ -�� i � - '' ; `,� _ � r-_---.._...-----:v , �__. - � n � � � �71•a lf� x. ° u' � -' - r A � , -- � 7. � ° °' u � � ; � ,o . � D! � ��, , �, � �, „ R � � �` s � << : � � � �1t1 � 4l � �� \ ' 1 ��y , , �; _,� � � }�y CT _ . . i�� \ �� 1 1 u � ,� , �� J_ • ��1' �, - � � � � H� � .. - r ,� ,� . . , ,. �' �� : � ..._ - . �-1c c ST�NG- -��- �O'C � L c��[/�T�a�! . �\ _ - � ��i .°u� _ _ __,___.__= � __ � �.� � ��.�� I (� j�l,�ll�'�1��.}�J� n. l�' I��V� 1 ` / _��r . � . . . v�. � � l=. �� '..� . 0 i , � �� r � o. � c-`1 w p `� Y;1 L- � � � � G ; �- rJ � �::� 1 � �;,:, a- . r ��t� � �( i � � �-so�--� �. . . L 1 `c.`:1�it1y�.!i �:.�b.�l�-l- t1 �� f'T.::i:t'�lCa L� i'. -- �Y �;C I ST, }vti c('v.�'t�,� f' -- �7�J�V:=-r`Z• �� Q7 ,_ p1STv�.3. SFio�c.l�- � f��• . }��-,c.:�5 AZ��c� . � P�oT U� �'� �r�o�,lG �xts� !�!� �v��t� -- -_.� �- ,� � ''� , : • 4�' \v I��G�U�. �-- �.a . � � I ,� S�[�.�WAL;: � �,- `� ' o � '� j� `' °�.S t D,� ../.-�l'O { J J�-'L'a"' � y i.�s�-Q�� •._\' �'� '. . . . + .. ^� � _;;� � ��r.r.�� J �1�1�� J{��2a-��'r�.F�. \ � �� 1 � � I�?i:L� �� .�� ry`� t�^�� tJ��1�� / j� � t � -r.. 1 /"I'�1�~ �t� Ulfr Y. � �U 1 - �j:.��l . . _ �C+vS�Y �XISTI�u-=! GL� � � ' P�3G. '. _ i_ �, 1v t3�-TG;��'�Ilv� �Al'�; �� _ j �. . ._ � vr- Mi�f��1U�� St_c:? � � � � i ( __ � i �l�Kt r� \�!/ A.�r.i-,:��i� �- � 1 il-- �S��iLa �.�1.-d�.l �r :f. f'�' -'-' �_1' �'�'�`i:� .� �C.7 i--/'�%•—+,-�1� ;.i.L.�t � . . � O � ��LS i�,Cl--fiCTt�. ��1 ��% - ' .. . _ , ' �+ � . �. . �:.-�+ `rJ��'�; ' "�I� /�� ' �r��! l�V�t�-� �V 1 � Ki . � }_ _ ��.�' _ . ! •".i 1�• ` � . . � . . .��s� -�= : ' 1 � 5:�.�:T�;.,� r�,��riLy— � s.L , � t .-- .,.A /a 5'I-^- 1�5 �Y! ��-.E.! ►OUS_O" L -� --� � � i i . . �. �AS�,1-j. �L.: T,�" � � �� v ' ' ,� � ' � � ' �.p'_o, ul '1 °' N�\Y GN(�t�.'`( '!� ,d _� � � ' - � � � (`--lrU�. � , .t ?!.�,0 � 'tv�( — � 4v 2�L�GA,T�-=— ----- -- �-�'01��'- _._.._.. � �` .�. o-={ �. �.�`�y��h !.l�;� • T_ 1 __ �- GA�;c��SGy�'��^ . + ._,_ _ �-X15�', !'�aNO�' I��t -- 1!oC,,3� __ �o ' .. ~ � — . !%3��.-[� N�,�► C_oN�:��as},t �' —. _ u�tl7 �� `�N� N�V �r�Ur(,:�N `— . ��;(aS1!��TN� �XISjlN!� �ILDtNCa SOU�H \V�LL No�.i�-1 � . . � »,�. .. . >� � � s �� p � A, �1 , �a��: �,� = 3o'-d. . r--- . ' � � �,�a 0 00000000 0 0000a0000 0 0 0 0 0 0 < , � ' - �.-._..-__-- _1.� �.�.- _'-"C'-"�Y`__" �.' r_I,�_ I T-- - � � ' r- i ( �i � i i , � �,n � i � � � � � i � � � � � � p ( � ' � ; b '° � i4 °i � � o �o � a o 0 0 . , . YO � KS� 1 . oa ;O °; � � � oo � d ; , o 0 o c ' � Q � \` . � � � � � � I j � �O r � O 0 . I 4\ I I � i � I � � � Q � --�--- � I � � � � �� / � � � �T-'� � 0 C ''� �'� i I � � 1 i � � � � � w� ---� � o � � � , ' , �' � � � � p , --� ; � " pi � i � � �iQ Q/ � q Of � Q � _ r--- --� �---- � � � H� R E ► � � ° ° o 0 -- � . MpS q� { . P ,,, � . �---- P � ;a o ; . Q ---, p , o ;;� �-p ---� �---- D3 , . � . r � �� \� i I �� / �,� �, � � i � • , __� �----- -8-- � -Q---n ,'�r! \\ � r----- - ��- � O _ i � � ----- --- ` Q __� --- ' 0 ----_ rn � _ !_ ' � , � ' --� �--- p--- � ---�- ___ � . _ 'O� � � i � __� -p _- _--� __ --- O ._� � -�__ � __ _____ � p - � x - ~ o, G `�°`r o p ,. .�... o . , � � _,o- � ^,- . . �� a ° o � r.- �. 'Z� ,.(� � .. �'�O ! ��- °-'� ,- ,�' o o - �,- �,� /, � o --_ , o . o . , o � � o ---- - , � , . °� -' 'o .'� o o ��' . ° . �, , . � ;b;, °;� o VJ - - � ; o , .' ,, � �i 'Q � p Q� � \ � ��`� O � �' O Q�' O O � --� ' O , .o ,, �� F.o . o � - o . , n o,' 4,�. '�o'' �A ` _ / G 0_L1 � _ -- �.- - _ __ - .__ _ _ AREA MAP APPLICANT Adartti .�St'ae� LEGEND - � ZONING OISTRICT BOUNDARY. uP_ � � �� SUBJECT PROPERTY PURPOSE , .--J--- � O ONE FAMILY PLANNING � OJSTRIST FILE N0. �� I TWO FAMILY /� � MULTIPLE FAMILY ��" 0 DATE � T --' • ♦ r1 COMMERCIAL SCALE� I��= 200� NORTH � � �` �N�USTRIAL MAP N0. SAINT PAUL PI.ANNING BOARD V VACANT �� -/�� SOU i HWEST Southwest Area District Council AREA .� S` ` , D 2305 Ford Parkway, Suite 19 vv Saint Paul, Minnesota 55116 612 690-4866 DISTRICT Serving the business and residential communities of Southwest Saint Paul .. '' •� David C. McDonald, � . � � Chairman and Grid 3 � (�� (►� � � � � Representative August 9, 1984 � �� Judy Kinkead� President and At•large •��1(; 1 U 19� RepresenWtive gQ^Rp Kenneth W. Jefferson, Gladys Morton, Chairperson �( P�hNING � Vice President, Community goard of Zoning Appeals �'q�nt Pa��• Minn� � Affairs, and At•large Suite 1100 Representative � •�M�� `'" Philip P. McGuire, City Hall Annex Vice President, 25 Fourth Street Administration, and St. Paul, MN 55102 Grid 4 Representative Janet Maxson, Dear Ms. Morton: Treasurer and Grid 9 Representative James E. Barnard, A preliminary review by the Southwest Area District Counoil (SWAD) Grid 2 Representative Executive Coma�ittee on August 6th of �the Adath Synagogue variance Steve McKay, application eoneluded that there is potential neighborhood impact. Grid 5 Representative Timothy K. Baumgartner, The Exeeutive Committee is interested in having the full SWAD Board Grid 6 Representative review the plans and make recommendations that would reflect the Eugene T. Bohmert, needs of all parties. Since the SWAD Board meetings are seheduled Grid 7 Representative the third Monday of the month (next meeting August 20), there is George Doty, ooneern that SWAD will not be able to review this issue before the Grid 8 Representative goard of Zoning Appeals meeting on August 1�4. Timothy E. Sweeney, Grid 10 Representative Gerald Franck, SWAD hopes that you will consider a request to either postpone the Grid 11 Representative hearing or delay taking Pinal action on the application until August Robert Kren, 28. At the next SWAD Zoning/Environment Committee aeheduled for At-large Representative August 14, 7:00 P.M., the Adath varianee request will be reviewed. Harold W. Schmidt, The applicant and neighbors oF the property are invited. Reoommen— At-large Representative dations prepared by this eommittee will be discussed at the August Committees 20th SWAD Board meeting. Finance, Janet Maxson, Chairman IP you have any questions regarding this request Por postponement or Nousing and Economic delay� plea$e call me. Development, Tim Baumgartner, Chairman Public Safety / "Crime Sineerely, Watch," Mary Drew, Chairman � ,��'-C�� L� Recreation and Social Services, Gene Bohmert, iehelle Liehtig Chairman Transportation, Bob Kren, Community Organizer Chairman � Zoning and Environment, �,/p�q George Doty, Chairman (Positions as of June 1984) . � � � ' ,��' � , ; �J�--- ��,� _ , �� , . r �u�,. /�'�i%' �� 4 � � , „: , �� /�,��v �1j�� , ,�`�`z2L��l �� °,s � ,� � ��<�� I � � - ;`��'!� --`- �� .�n� ,l�c;,`-f_e�J,�, �J ,��r� ��t��2� � �� ;��` � � . r r��{ti��::: � � � ? ._/ f � � � �t � n � �%i'-L.� �� tJ�,+' � �1.��.�1-' �>�'�.fa-E%a.��..:,J-��'?i.�'Lf'�A°_�-'�-Zo . . /J� � :� f"\ , -�� ,��.cCu��t�,.`�., �ii� C�'t-�'-'�t-� '�-� c.� /�r ,>�.lL, � �.k'� ��/ .G� ,'�-is.-� �-,�-r�� C� �(.._ ✓�'7.�-S..c��-.� ,�-,.� ��",� ,.,�%-��:=f CZ'�-�.. � , ; �'1�;��..� ��'`-� ��;�,c--�z-�� ...��:-^�2-i.�t,�.� i � � //, 1 / , V u;��/ .� � �, �� C, 1 ��:��.�" . � � � �,!-�'L-• �J. /�"' �JtJ`.SS'��b . . .. �L/ a,- = p;« ,i . �'r...��S�s� � � d # ,� �� . . a:y:�� . 1 b !i�1.13 *� {:.. " ____ I F t t ' � `� , _ i , � � � r:, l � . :� 1 �� - � , ��-� ��,. , a r%: , r,t:�,-, p. �`��- � �� e.l,c.M��szr �t�, , 5-r, �e,�.(, //yl� �'�"II'� /� �� 8`f � � �G4.rr�� T � 'u�''1v►�Q ��atll�1 � .. } f � a5''r �t1 P�3 f' :�'f� �'�.. � .,, ._ s_,_._� � .�� ("� �`�✓�Yl �r'..�l d�. ,� � ,� y/ /e �(('' �; ��i ;`,';•, -�li � ' �/�,"Z.Y� \j �� V � . . ^�� Ji:` r+ j'?; i . � ��_.. 3 . �aa� a ..r2f�,f3...... ,_. � , �ti��,1,�" �s:=1�r.1�r7 �:� ,s • , qa� r J]11�� e . �� '� ��- ! � r. r. F +�-s I S c� I��r- �� t�S t'�"G�.� � � i/a'r 1��=�2. � t�.�� • /��`(� .�'��t �� ,�I� �e�. ��.�i- � � � ��r�:�r.tc,�� wt �.ovn R �� %,. i��'r'. c�1 ~f' ��,s�y '� �ct.3-�a.�.,c.�2 `` ,yr �7 - C � �� ^'1 l''��' � � S.��'1��t.�-z� v�� 0 ��'l ��s �- �� - `v c�,�� ' �- 5� �►ct� e t.cr� iS al�� T�`� p,-�g,�,+�- �� `.� e,s'�i�b��s�e� ,�� Q .��-- ��.�► � �— �`� �� ^ �-�' P''` ��,�- � �--1�.', a�^r � / ^ � -� �- �Q� ^ q�s:�v�- � �,� .. � rnC�E'`��a�°�-1 ��rt��''� a �� . �r �� r�r��`- � j�sh � '�'�°-n�� . ��a;�►�►sz ►+�� v►� �l��- �� s��t�-� � '� s ! .� � 7 �-t�.�- � �' o�c� �.�.�� -� h��,�. � ��h, �- � , �a �tc. ��( . _ �+ 1��,� � � �`,� i i.�`� � � r o.� Q"�' �►'"'� �� 7-' 1�.�.� � �-- ��'h. � 1^�'_ j � ° � �'1 Q/�+1� �.. ��' c.irr��1 � �►.�.� ��, �,��.�� . ' -�,,�, �� Q.csti ��^ ��.�� ,,,, �,��lr �"`' � �° P � � ''�"" �� , ��- -� ��, �� d �� h� � ��. �x��•,�-� a� �- � �-S sa�� r�' �' �' , .. S' � �- °��'�� ...�. y��I ��.�-�a.r��,�., '�- � �� - �"'`� �� ,,,c( � � s��c�� , � �,�-� `� �. � �,,�,., �, � r..��,�.�► s - :��,Q� �.d � �' � , � �-� �-- s��- �' � �( � ��- �''` � � . ,�.�.� A �' � l� 1 r� �,(�'"^ '��. `�' �(,�� ^� ` �' �.�`�.°.� � �;"�� . (� ��-��` W � ! �•�� cM�-�-J �ss �b , I � � � "=1 ��,,� , � y� � � � „ �� °�'�� Y � c f � ��'l,cs rn a.� a� l � S'�'t�'�£' G�S`�� t�w w� �'�'�u � � � . �� .� � �- � ��- � �'�`�""'� . � �� J � Ltic.rS � U e � ' a . � '� , , . _. \ i « . � , ., � �—/�� ,� ', 8< ,�'Y � � � � �� '� i � - -�� : -, 1 ;,_� " � . � r. i � ! August 10, 1984 Mr. Fred Naider Zoning Office 1100 City Hall Annex 25 West Fourth Street St. Paul , MN 55102 Dear Fred: I am responding to the notice of the expansion of the Synagogue on Edgec�ambe Bouievard. They wish to receive two variances. One for construction and that alone is not particularly offensive, but the parking violates the setback requirements significantly. Instead of 80 feet there will only be 28 feet. This is not a minor variance. Tne parking disturbs the character of the neighborhood visually which has a lawn and trees. The berming of the front of the parkinc� driveway and parking lot only helps to some degree for those persons traveling on Edgecumbe but does not help those of us who look f rom the north and south directly on to the parking lot. Actualiy, the expansion of the Synagogue will expand their attendance and the parking problem which now exists will become worse because the new parking lot tivill not alleviate the situation and they will continue to park all over the neighborhood as they are now doing. Because they cannot park on Edgecumbe they park on Hampshire all the way from Edgecumbe up to Orme Court. It is not as if their services are only one day a week. There seems to be services regularly and therefore there are people parking in front of the homes on Hampshire on a regular basis. There is another problem because Edgecumbe is a heavily traveled street being it is an extension of Fairview with access to the freeway. Con- sequently, the cars coming down Fairview and Edgecumbe to the south are going at a rapid speed and it's going to be difficult for people to puli out of driveways. It certainly is going to be a safety hazard and I suggest that the Department of Public Safety look at this situation and give a report. T)te TOWLF.REAL ESTATE Co�rtpariy•600 Secand A��enue Soutlt •Minneapolis,MN 55402•(612)3�1-4444 ' � "�� :. . ; _ i � � . \l � � r r�; , � , .��, � � � � � � • ; J�.' , . � � i � � �� r� �.e;�' � � - - r_ r� >'�� Mr. Fred Naider August 1�, 1984 Page Two I am not familiar with the situation on the rear yard but the request is for a significant variance from ten feet to two feet. It would be one thing to ask the neighbors to agre� to some minor var.iances to improve the utility of the Synagogue but these are not minor variances; these are siqnificant deviations from the ordinar�ce for a use which is in variance from the R-1 intent to begin with; hence, we believe it is quite bold to ask for thi ap roval . We object strenuously to this approval which would cre a.jo var ances and deviations to the R-1 neighborhood which exists. Sin erel , t ` ' WILLIAM S. REILING President WSR;dh cc: Mr. Harry Kirby 51 Peninsula Road St. Paul , MN 55110 - � ' � . . .. ... . .. . �. . . . . ...:. . . � � � . . . . . ` -. �- .: . ... . . . . � i .. . , � , � � � �, ( � �' L�� /�rf�;> ,, �. , , RE: File # 9621 File name: Adath Israel Synagogue August 13, 1984 �� "�-�,�,�►,�,`�'�`;°,k;�� Board of Zoning Appeals +�-1'a � � `� `'�' 25 jNest Fourth Street _ _ St . Paul, �ZN 55102 .�t R �,�: +i:�`� �'�,��: _ "' fh�Jr'�t°� �1��;7L��,3;s' i'; ��..<_ t�.a'�. : Saint Pa.ul City Council 3rd Floor City Hall Saint Paul City Hall St . Paul, MN 55102 Mr. John Drew Saint Paul City Councilman St . Paul City Hall St . Paul, MN 55102 Dear Council and Board of Appeals: tiVe are homeowners living within 350 feet of Adath Israel Synagogue. We disapprove of the applicant ' s plans for a zoning variance. ' We realize that within a Rl zone that houses of worship are permissable. However, the proposed variance will further complicate a bad situation with regards to traffic and parking in our neighborhood. We call to your attention that a variance may not be granted unless strict enforcement of the zoning code would cause undue hardship owing to circumstances unique to the individual property on which the variance is granted. Those "unique circumstances" are not present in the applicant 's situation . See, Saint Paul Legislative Code, Sect . 6Q.226 . The hardship referred to in the city ordinance must be one that relates to the topography or configuration of the lot involved. That hardship is not present in the applicant 's lot , nor is it the basis for their request . A similar restriction on variances is set forth in 1VI.S.A. � 462 . 358, subd. 6 , where the Legislature provided for "unusual hardships" as a ground for branting same, and states that variance may be granted upon the specific grounds set forth in the regulations. Granting such a variance does not meet the hardships required of the ordinance or the state statutes , and should ' be rejected. � � � � � -. � , - � � � � ' -/'i�� - � , . , , %-- . -- � r _ _ _ _ , ; Page 2 - Letter to City Council , Board of Zoning Appeals Re: File # 9621 . The applicants, by their own �.dmission , need this variance to accomodate an eYpanded membership . They should in fact seek a different location for their synagogue because of thezr increased needs . The variance should not be grantecl to squeeze more use out of the subject property . � Very truly yours , �� . � �� 9.3 ��m�'h i re �ti`e . � �� D�-�-� �� 'l�� _ � �_ �-� �4/�►� �� C�r�2 L�- . �.� Q:,��.� L�� ,� � — r s � � � .�� .�� . � . i �5`� �� G�� .---��7� �s � . � � :, . . . . : .. . . .,..... .. . . .. . � . . � � _ . . . .. , . . .,. \ O T �"�T6 d MEiER, KENN�:DY & QUINN Attorneys nt Luw NlIILIAM C. MEIER (i920- t9a+) SUITE 430, MINNE50TA BUILDING ALOIS D. KENNEDY.JR. SAINT PAUL, MINNESdTA 55101 TIMO'THY P. QUINN (S12)228-1911 AN�REW J. EISENZIMMER LFO H. DEHLER THOhiA3 B. WIESER � � . . � � � . � August i4, 1984 Ms. Gladys i��oxton Chai�pe�son City of Saint Paul Boa�rd of Zoning Appeals 25 West Fouxth Street St. Paul, Minnesota 55102 Re: Zoning File Name: Adath Isxael Synogogue ("Applicant" ) Zoning File No. 9621 Deax l�s. Morton: Our fixm represer.ts Mx. and j�ixs. Ha.x:ry P. Kirby. Mx. an� Mxs. Kirby a�e the contxact fo� deed vendors of the property located at 1834 Hampshire Avenue, St. Paul, Minnesota, and, as the cont�act for deed vendors, retain legal title to the pxoperty. The pxopexty ownad by Mx. and Mxs. Kixby is adjacent to the applicant 's propexty. i�r. and Mrs. Kix�y, thxough the undersigned, wish to register theix opposztion to the above-xefe�enced application f o�' a va�iance fxom the strict application of the zoning ordinance fox the following xeasons : 1. St�ict enfoxcement of the zoning ordinance and denial of the application fox a vaxiance f�om the o�dinance would not cause undue hardship because for approximately 30 years the p�opexty has been put to �easonable use under conditions allowed by the zoning oxdinance. 2. The plight of. the applzcant is not due to circumstances unique to the propex�ty. According to oux information, the subject propexty has been owned by the applicant since 1964, and the existing stxuctuxal modifications to the p�emises wex�e made in 1973. Since assu�ning ownexship of the propexty� the size of the applicant's membership has gxown txemendously to the point where the applicant 's membership now exceeds the capabilities of the physical plant. The�efoxe, applicant 's plight was c�eated by the applicant and is in no way related to the property. � , <. � ,_< \ ; �� _ ; r , r ' � ' � � ��t'� t i ,` � - - i ��.,. , , , . MEIER, KENNEL�Y & QUINN Page 2 August 14, 1984 Ms. Gladys Niorton Board of Zoning �ppeals ��.e: Zoning File Name: Adath Isxael Synogogue ("Applicant" ) Zonzng File ido. 9621 3. The requested vaxiance will significantly alter the essential charactex of the neighboxhood. The area is a xesidential one with substantial propexty values. Those pxoperty values have been enhanced and maintained by the large set back requixement (80 feet) from Edgecumbe. To gxant the requested vaz�iance would severely diminish propexty �alues and jeopardize the investment made by adjacent landowners, including Mx. and birs. Kixby. In conclusion� a gxant of the xequested varzance would clearly conflict with the spixit and intent of the zoning oxdinance and would have a sevexe adve�se impact on the gene�al welfare of the immediate area. It is, therefore, xespectfully requested that the Board of Zoni.ng Appeals deny the zoning ordinance vax�iance as requested by Adath Is�ael 8ynogogue. Youxs vexy tx'uly , MEIER, KENNEDY & QUINN ��}�QrJ L�- �� Thomas B. Wieser TBW:lic � � �. � '� . _ .;, - � �'�- /��._3 ; ;' � , . ; _ ; � ; � � h August 14, 1984 �card of Zoning Appeals City Council Chambers 3rd Floar - City Hall St. Paul, Minnesota 55102 Re : Hearing on Tues3ay, August 14, 1984 at 1c30 P.1"I_ and 7 :00 P.M, pertaining to Zoning File No. 9621 Applica�t - Adath Israel Synagogue Dear Board 1"lembers: My name is George B. Marzolf and I own and reside at 44 Orme �ourt, S�t. Paul, Minnesota, and I have obtained various data relating to the variance requested by �he above applicant covering premises located at 2337 Edgcumbe Road, St. Pau1., 1`�innesota, and object to the granting of said variance as it will substantially depreciate the sale value of my home and all homes in the area surrounding and adjacent to applicant' s . property at 2337 �dgcumbe Road due to the substantial increase in the size of the building and the use o� the front of the lot as a parking lot. I have read the letter dated July 23, 1984 by applicant to the Ci_ty of Saint Paul outlining six problems affecting its use of the land and build- ing, but applicant was aware of all these six problems when app?icant pur- chased the land and building on I"larch 31, 1964. Respectfully submitted, � . � �f . �--7'_.�. ,J/ 'f��"r��/ �,�'✓...�*'�/^ . �--c..a .� � . �.. ;/ George B. Marzolf � ` �. � l . .. � . .. � � � ' � . . . � . � . . . . \ � : . .. . � � , � / /, L ��!�� / ; ; • August 14, 1984 Board of Zoning Appeals City Council Chambers 3rd Floor - City Hall St. Paul, Minnesota 55102 Re: Hearing on Tuesday, �ugust 14, 1984 at 1:30 P.M. pertaining to Zoning File No. 9621 Applicant - Adath Israel Synagogue Dear Board 1"iembers= My name is Ja.mes �1. Nickitas and I reside at 28 �rme Court, St. Paul, Minnesota, and I have obtained various data relating to the variance requested by the above applicant, covering premises located at 2337 Edg c u mbe Road, St. Paul, Minnesota, and object to the granting of said variance as it wi11 substa ntially depreciate the sale value of all homes in the area surrounding and adjacent to applicant' s property at 2337 Edg c u.mbe Road due to the substantial increase in the size of the building and the provision for parking of automobiles on the front portion of the lot adjoining Edgc,u .mbe Road, which is a parkway. I am writing this letter to be presented to your Board at 1:30 P.M, on August 14, 1984 in view of the fact that I will not be able t� attend said hearing. This is to further advise you that I will be in attendance at the hearing on said matter to be held on Tuesday, August 14, 1984 at 7 :00 P.M. , our- suant to notice sent me by Southwest Area vistrict Council to object to the granting of the requested variance. Respectfully submitted, � . James W. Nickitas - � � � � ' � � - ` � _ � �� - r��'� , . , WILLIAM J. DUNN ATTORNEY AT LAW E24 COMMERCE BUILDINC3 8T. PAUL, MINNE60TA SS101 ZZ2-17B0 August 14, 1984 Board of Zoning Appeals �ity Council Chambers 3rd Floor - City Hall St. Paul, Minnesota 55102 Re: Hearing on Tuesday, August 14, 1984 at 1: 30 P.M, and 7 :00 P.M, pertaining to Zoning File No. 9621 Applicant - Adath Israel Synagogue Dear Board Members: Please be advised that I, the undersigned, William Dunn, owner and resident of 38 Orme Court, St. Paul, Minnesota, acknowledge receipt of the Public Hearing Notice, with the hearing set for 1:30 P.M, on Tuesday, August 14, 1984, pertaining to variarzce requested by applicant, Adath Israel Synagogue, being Zoning File No. 9621. I have investigated the above matter and obtained a plot plan showing the proposed development of the land owned by said applicant located at 2337 Edgcumbe Road, St. Paul, Minnesota, being Lots 5, 6 and 7, Block 5, Bohland' s Edgcumbe Hills Addition, together with other data. 'rhe original structure was built in 1953 by a Lutheran church which sold the property to applicant on March 31, 1964, and in 1973 applicant added the 46 ft, x 45 ft. addition to the original building. I have read the applicant ' s letter dated July 23, 1984 setting forth the present six problems as the basis for a variance in the zoning of its land, which six problems existed at the time of purchase by the applicant. After giving the matter serious consideration, I am opposed to the grant- ing of the variance requested by the above applicant. My grounds for opposing the granting of the above variance are as follows: l. That my residential property located at 38 Orme Court will suffer a substantial loss in monetary value, as will all other homes in the immediate vicinity of applicant ' s land. �'�/`f�� . , , P, 2 - Board of Zoning Appeals 2 , That the original structure on agplicant' s land is about 36 ft. x 72 ft. x 12 ft. , containing 2592 sq. ft. 3 . That the applicant in 1973 enlarged the original building by an ad- dition of about 46 ft. x 45 ft. , containing 2070 sq. ft. 4. That applicant now proposes a further addition to the building of about 32 ft. x 57 ft. and about 12 ft. x 46 ft. , containing a total area of 2376 sq. ft. , plus an addition adjoining the alley in the rear about 8 ft. x 30 ft. , containing 240 sq. ft. , which addition would be only 2 ft. from the rear lot line according to the plot plan submitted to the �ity of Saint Paul, plus an additional area of about 10 ft. x 20 ft. , containing 200 sq. ft. located near the Southeast corner o'f the original building. 5 . That the proposed 15 parking spaces, together with a berm on the land adjacent to Edgcumbe Road, would make a parking lot out of the front of the lot of applicant in one of the finest residential areas of the City of Saint Paul. 6. That the Southwest Area District Council should approve or disapprove of the applicant ' s request before any action on the part of your Board of Zoning Appeals. Respectfully submitted, William J. Du WJD/vo �� J; I ►h �' "'",,---,..� . ►. ;� o � N ,� " � CG . � . - V 1'� .. A . �T y � � �� _ (l � � J, Y m � � � � m �.,� � � �, :z , �I, � t� , ��. � �� P �o . �., �, . � . . �� . � ►��`�� 1 G » - ,. � 9 �' . � � � + � � � __ , � , , . , r 4. • � ! t�' , 1 - �� ' \ . :'� , ' �--=- ._. �� . , � � � �\ ��; .I . �,� ' -__. .1. —, � � � ,�;�� . �ss.s - � . -- ---- "'" `, �;" ^ y .r" L--�� 1 O r N. ' ;� �� , ' � • • � � � Wr,p ^' � �0 1 � ._. �� ._. � rt 4 __..._. oi � 36µ _v,�• _ �• • -""'�' ' � • � �r .�, _ ..... ._.. • � • �71 • � N�1'1 ��• '", �t' , = f � t. . � w �� n1 �' ,��,i t", N.G ' N fi �W � ~ 1 �,. �' o p � r, �� a; � . �. � � . n a .h-' � n ��NN�t' } � ` �f �; - � ' p,.�O � � � �P'.'YQ' � (p�l C � �- � "� ; ,� �{ �� :,°'� `° N�• � Cr• Q' � ' � ' '� ^� t' (D J � 11 � N �� rt► , 15' 9 � �. �, ►� � -a � � ' � � �� '�' � � '� 't �� . p � . rs � 'i ' .,t: .�� / � ,� y „�>»c� \I � ' . � � � �. �'y�� 4 � �E�k �` ��; �� q� • o\ ` .� ; � .��P��:.� � � �t' � ' ,9A ✓ �� .�»`� x � ..`�, o _ J :' � .�� `�. . • .�� +' •� ��....�.:-::.'�'` � �� 4 � . �� , ( � , ' �� 1� . . 'I., �,I � '` -_ _ _� � d j'�^'� , ` ��: ;�' � _ _..�+ �,c� 9 l^�. , � , � ' ^� i i ,,�� `• . _— � �i—� � ,' � � _. J , __� � � . �\. ` �j `v � � � ----` � � . •.�. •; d � �. c, � � � , �: 9 � -� .�, '�� • � a • , ` N . ', � - „� . � � � I �� _. -� I . ' 9 ` � - - .o . ' �' L.— c�i . � 9� ` � N h , ► �✓ � • '�p� / � ±� __,�.✓� �__ � t • C�__._---� � _„_ ^,,..• ...---^'""�� , � _.,,...�-��-";v� `�` — ' �g r � ��1 � %;� ...... �_ a �; �, � __ ------�' _ . , ,� : _. b 7 � � o w A� 0� � J, ' — �II V Ill� I . I° � � � �� . ? ` �. ,� r �j Ir � � ' v � , � �\ � y� . � . . . . , � , � � � �w��` $ � . �� , . , u , . �� w. , _ � �;� � . N� � . W _ . . , . . � .. ��_ ,�� . , � . �, �;� r , . . . � .. . . \ . � � . . . �, � .. ' � . � .. 1 / ' �� '� ' � j. � � � , � �� , ,. .. _�, : � _ , � e: iF�,�!i, 5 �_ �j•µ �� . � . t`,. .�. N.. �t�..�..�`,.��. � . August 22 , 1984 �' � _ ... . .- . . � k'� ;s '}� l� i� ll ��.,l � �,�► :�,. �� . � u Mr . Fred Haider Zon ing Of f ice ;,;� �s �� 1100 City Hall Annex 25 West Fourth Street ��'( �LA`�!�'�� ;�� St . Paul, MN 55102 ��irrt f�ul, rn+nne�� , . :.,._.,�..., �.:-- Dear Fred: �, I now have a clear understanding of the expansion of the Synagogue on Edgecumbe Boulevard. Hence, I would like to summarize my thoughts in this letter. I appreciate all the work your office has done and all of the work that has been done by the District Council 15 . The legal position has been well stated by the attorneys . It is encumbent upon the owner to prove that they cvill not alter the character of the neighborhood. I do not think that they have demonstrated that . It has been stated that a hardship would exist if the variance were not granted. This may be true but the hardship is created because of the owner of the property. When the congregation was started in 1964 with the purchase of this property there were 25 to 30 families . Now their con - gregation has 125 families . It is quite likely that this will continue to grow. The property cannot handle this size con- gregation and it will not be able to handle an increasing congregation which they state they anticipate in the future. Hence, this would not be a long-term solution in any event . The information that has been given out by your office and the information that has been presented at the District Council is not accurate and does not reflect the true proposal. For example, it was stated that they intend to raise the parking lot seven feet from the existing grade. This has not been shown . It was stated that no one would see the cars in the parking lot . From my front yard and from my living room windows and from my windows on the second floor at 1835 Hampshire, I view directly from the north on to their front yard. Obviously, if the parking lot were raised seven feet , it would be worse . No amount of berming would correct this situaLion . This condi- tion exists for several homes in the neighborhood. �� z� The TOWLE REAL ESTATE Company•600 Secortd Avenue Soutlt•Minneapolis,MN 55402•(b12)341-�444 ,,,_ :.� _ � , ' � ' � , � _ � ; ; _ ; �j' �,` -/��.� , . �, 7 , � ,�� f �,a!�+�... . . �i11� 1.� . . � . . Y"_:�l':��•:'''�'.� . . Mr . Fred Haider August 22 , 1984 Page Two Correcting the view fr�m the vehicles proceeding on Edgecumbe is not the �ssue . The issue is tne disturbance to the exis�- ing homes in tn.e neighborhood. The effect on home values has been mentioned on several occasions . Clearly, I believe there will be an effect on home values and I have statistics on presei�t home values . If this is an issue which needs to be analyzed in depth, I would be happy to do it . Suffice .it to say that it is just logical that when you have a major variance ar.d put a parking lot in the front yard, it is going to have an effect on values for the immediate surrounding homes . I will mention again the issue of safety because I believe that we are dealing witn an issue of safety in having a parking lot pull out into Edgecumbe which carries a significant amount of fast mov- ing trafFic f�om St . Paul to the freeway. In summary, we believe that legally the owner has to maintain the character of the neighborhood which would not be maintained with this major variance. The growth of the congregation is such that even with the granting of this variance , the solution is not adequate and at best , temporary. The granting of the variance and construction of the parking lot and building would have a negative effect on home values . The direct access to Edgecumbe would create a safety hazard. For these reasons it seems logical that the request for variance should enied. s ' cere y, � , • WIL IA S. rLIN President WSR:dh � cc: Mr. George Do y . ��I�� ,, � �°"'� . - . . . . .. . � � . \ � . . . � � ' . , • a • � . �\ '` ' � . 1 . � ♦ . v��/ '�`j 'f�� ' ��, . � � r. �." � � � � � �� -- � � � � �� --� � � � � � � � ��, � � j�� August 27, 1984 �ij�, �� ; �i�t �aul. Minr.Psota ; . M_r, Fred Haider +. .s. � ` x. Ci-cy of St. Paul Soard of Zoning Appeals 25 6a. Fourth Street St Paul, MN 55102 RE: Case against approval of Code Variance Zoning File No . 9621 Zoning rile Name - ADATH ISR.AEL SYNAGOGUE Dear Mr, Haider: The original Code �aas intended to preserve the integrity and character of the neighborhood so that a controlled environment could be created in which property owners had assurance of certain continuity of policy indefinitely. Variance from Code should not be approved where the character and quaZity of a residential neighborhood is altered by the desires of a new resident in the neighborhood. This is an area of $200, 000 residences constructed approximately 25 years ago and permitting further expansion in variance to the Code will severely diminish property value in the vicinity and jeopardize the investment therein. From a small, quiet church this facility has grown to be an activity which, because of its growing size, seriously impacts the daily lives of the area residents. It has been remodeled once and now seeks further expansion in violation of the Code. If the variance is approved and the historical pattern continues, it is reasonable to project further expansion on present property and on adjacent property which might be acquired in the future as the activity continues to expand. A dangerous precedent would be estab� lished if the current variance is approved. In past years the residences in this area had to abide by the Code though many would have liked a smaller front yard in order to increase backyard living area. It was not perr�itted then because the wide boulevard and beautiful front yards were mandatory. It would dis-- criminate to permit Code variance now! � Much of t3�e justification for this variance put forth by the petitioners � is the growth of their congregation and physical problems internally in the building. I can only say that all the complaints given by the petitioners were well known over ten years ago when they purchased the property and nothin� has changed that property since they purchased it. .. � . . ' . . . . � .rT . . . , . . �;;a .. . _ . , _ . . � < � / � _ � � �� , , ,� ��°� � . ��_.. y � �..� City of St. Paul Board of Zoning Appeals Auqust 27, 1984 Page two An estimate ma�e by a knowledgeable appraiser indicates a potential property devaluation of 25--25$ if variance is approved. I personally would not have purchased my home 20 months ago had I known the City Zoning Board would even consider legalizing the deterioration of the residential quality through irresponsible spot zoning changes. Furthermore, it seems to me somewhat ludicrous to negatively impact my property values which are subject to extremely high �roPerty taxes (over 500� higher than comparable property in previous residence in another state) in order to er.hance the value of property, presumably not even taxed. For all of the above reasons, the variance af building and parking setback requirements requested by Zoning Fi1e No. 962I should definitely not �e approved. Yours truly, � . , G�'(,�,t.��c�/� ='' ��` Charles G. Tr�Zinski 1848 Hampshire Avenu St Pau1, MN 55116 _ _. , _ _ � , t:. • � . / , �� , , . �, �, ; � , , ., _�:., _ W1L.LIAM J. I�UIVN ATTORIV EY AT LAW . , 624 COMMERCE BUILDING � . � � . 5T. PAUL, MINNESOTA 95101 � 222-2789 August 28, 1984 Board of Zoning Appeals City Council Chambers 3rd Floor - City Hall St. Paul, 1Kinnesota 55102 Re : Hearing on Tuesday, August 28, 1984 at 1:30 P.M. pertaining to Zoning File No. 9621 Applicant: A�ath Israel Synagogue Dear Board Members: Please be advised that I, the undersigned, William J. Dunn, owner and resident of 38 Orme Court, St. Paul, Minnesota acknowledge receipt of the Public Hearing Notice, with the hearing set for i:30 P.M. on Tuesday, August 28, 1984, pertaining to variance requested by applicant, Adath Israel Synagogue, being Zoning File No. 9621. I have investigated the above matter and obtained a plot plan showing the proposed development of the land owned by said applicant located at 2337 Edgcumbe Road, St. Paul, 1"linnesota, being Lots 5, 6 and 7, B1ack 5, Bohland' s Edgcumbe Hills �ddition, together with other data. The original structure was built in 1953 by a Lutheran church which sold the property to applicant on March 31, 1964 for $25, 000.00 and in 1973 ap- plicant added the 46 ft. x 45 ft. addition to the original building. I have read the applicant ` s letter dated July 23, 1984 setting forth the present six problems as the basis for a variance in the zoning of its land, whi�h six problems existed at the time of purchase by the applicant. A tter giving the matter serious consideration, I am opposed to the grant- ing of the variance requested by the above applicant for the following reasons : l. That my home located at 38 Orme Court and other homes in the area will suffer substantial loss in monetary value, . . ; n;;;�-,; . . ... , . . \ . . . . . � � . . Y �% , ; . _ - � � ;�._� �',_ %� .�i P . 2 - Board of Zoning Appeals 2 . That the original s-�ructure on applicant ' s land is a�zout 36 ft. x 72 ft. x 12 ft. , containing 2592 sq. ft. 3 . That the applicant in 1973 enlarged the original building by an ad- dition of about 46 ft. x 45 ft., containing 2070 sq. ft. 4_ That applicant now proposes a further addition to the building of about 32 ft. x 57 ft. and about 12 ft. x 46 ft. or 237o sq. ft. , plus an addition adjoining the alley in �the rear about 8 ft. x 30 ft. , con- taining 240 sq. ft. , which addition would be only 2 ft. from the rear lot line according to the plot plan submitted to the City of Saint Paul, plus an additional area of about 10 ft. x 20 ft. , containing 200 sq. ft. located near the Southeast corner of the original building or a total area of 28I6 sq. ft. 5 . That the proposed '_5 parking spaces, together with a berm on the land adjacent to Edgcumbe Road, would make a parking lot out of the front of the lot of applicant in one of the finest residential areas of the City of Saint Paul. 6. That on August 20, 1984 the Southwest Area District Council voted against the granting of a variance as requested by the applicant. Respectfully submitted, ��, ��'�� 1^1i l l iam J. �unn WJD/vo � # �� . \ , -: � � ( ,��- �� ,�,� ' �� ,� :,'_ �. � ; ., � r '�a <. � � ` � �1�TILLIA�/I J. DtJNI� ��to� an� � ��e� ��U �"�p � �,� P � * I:EALTOR� -- �••••_----- . �._... ---- . _.. .. _.__ ---- AAPRAISEAS 5ALE5 - APPRAISAL5 RE5IDENTIAL - CQMMERCIAL - INDUSTRIAL 624 Ci7MMERCE BUILDING 5t. PAU�, MlVNESOTA 55101 222-27B9 August 28, 1984 Board of Zoning Appeals City �ouncil Chambers 3rd Floor - City Hall St. Paul, Minnesota 55102 Re: Hearing on Tuesday, August 28, 1984 at 1:30 P.M. pertaining to Zoning File No. 9621 Applicant: Adath Israel Synagogue Dear Board Members : I have owned my home at 38 Orme Court, St. Paul, Minnesota since 1964 and consider it one of the finest residential areas of the City of St. Paul, with the entire area for several blocks devoted only to residential use, except for the land occupied by the applicant as a Synagogue. As justificati�n of my opinion of the quality of homes in my area ad- joining the Synagogue, � list the following recent sales of homes: Address Date of Sale �ale Price 1881 Hampshire Avenue January 30, 1984 $260, 0�0.00 64 Orme �ourt May 30, 1980 $20Q, 000.00 (Sale price includes $15, 000.00 spent by buyer to �over deferred maintenance) (1984 value estimate adjusted for time - $240, 000.00) 1834 Hampshire Avenue December l, 1981 $190, 000.00 (1984 value es�imate adjusted for time - $220, 000.00) . 6 Orme �ourt May 17, 1982 $167, 500.00 (1984 value estimate adjusted for time - $185, 000.00) 1835 Hampshire Avenue August 1984 $215, 000.0� " �, , . � � ;' ` ; , � } a , , � ' ; i= , �` %� P . 2 -� Board oF Zoning Appeals �dditional data can be furnished relating to the above sales, if inembers of your Board wish the same. It is my considered opinion that the granting of the above captioned variance will have a detrimental effect on the value of the homes in the general area of the Synagogue from 5 percent to not less than. 30 percent of the fair market value of said homes, and, therefore, I wish to again be on record as opposing the granting of the above variance as set forth above. Respectfully submitted, G`�`: - .,..-�P..�-+* William J. L}unri�,.'A,S.A_ � WJD/vo , � � � . , � �� , � .. . , ; QUALIFICATIO('1S 01= �'L�� a S.V�� 624 COMMERCE BUILOING,ST.PAUL,MINNESOTA 55101 AS AN APARAtSEA flF A�AL ESTATE A. Member and aftice; St. Paul Area 8oard of Realtors, Inc. and Past President Minnesota Association of Realtors, Inc. Nationai Association of Realtors, Inc. Senior Member American Society of Appraisers — Twin Cities Chapter and Past President Senior Member American Society of Appraisers — National Association B. Real Estate Appraisals Mada For The Following: St. Paul and other cities in Ramsey County County of Ramsey State of Minnesota � Minnesota Housing Finance Agency . Department of Highways Departma�t of A�ministration Referee in Sankruptcy at St. Paul Probate Court of Ramsey County- District Court of Ramsey County Savage State Bank Northwestern State Bank of St. Paul Northwestern National Bank of St. Paul Bethesda Hospital Economics Laboratory, Ina Oak Park Heights Housing and Redevetopment Authority of Saint Paul Church of St. G'regory,The Great Northern States Power Ca Group Health, Inc. Owners Attorneys Agents C. Ex.perience: Engaged in the general real estate business since 1928, including buying selling, appraising, managing � and leasing real estate for others and myself. Appraising real estate throughout various counties in Minnesota, including Ramsey, Hennepin, Scott, Dakota and Washingion Counties since 1923 for owners,agents,attorneys,courts,banks and various governmental agencies. Appointed a commissioner by the District Court oP Ramsey County in many condem�a#ion proceedings during past several years involving real estate. Have testified as an expert on real estate values in courts and before commissions in a number of counties in Minnesota during past several years. .x�,�:a ` ' . ��i�� . . o � t � 9� �� T0: Board of Zoning Appeals City of Saint Paul RE: APPLICANT - Adath Israel Synagogue File # 9621 DATE: August 28, 1984 We, the undersigned, are all neighbors within the immediate proximity of the Applicant's property. We are present today before the Board of Zoning Appeals, to� register our di��roval of the Applicant's request. We are ac�(nst the variance applicatinn in its entirety� including both issues regarding parking and building expansion. NAME ADDRESS �:. -, � �� -� - � �_-:rc _�' K_ � �� _ �, �;2.v!2.L'- �c�-<-�c_-'+_�� .-,,.: -- -_ � _., � � � . ' '�� , � `.��>J'1.�. � � 'U` ?� � _. � � �1��/�G'G f'6 -C�i�, �� / ,�l`� :�'�'" " � G/�''�� . - �� d,� ��' � , �� , �,� - ., ;a �// !� %��U`'f'`�G�`�--- � . �,!� �/,i�,,�y J;..F' �._-��--�-� , T -� . � � I ';/ � � _ - ; i / '' , ,� �.� _ ___. 1 ` /� _ i � un r , , -, �-, ( � �l_ c � � `� �/��'� /"?',,� �� _ �._... ' _ , - i ; - l, � � - � . ,. �'.1,a (.(. �V� 9 � ��_.�,� .. � �� ,•� '1 '�:.;� tY vr- � �4!-�/C-(,1��.' l��-�iJ�e_- _ ._ C� . �` _. --M �- �� `� �� , � � , - , ;� �,� � �� -�� q �_�� , r�.� �-� �� , � f � � � �i �J� � �,Cib�� / �/ ` ��r�`��„(�� ` �J`l • �i�i�\� � . - ��^ � � �r ,� �� , : y �.�f; p�,T /��.��llR t� �i,:�� > � . � _('��.%� � ' ��'��,,J-��'�'.�-�,Y' r Y-.: � -�' � r __� ;� . � � ,�„ a , �� /_�`�y�� <, SOUTHWEST Southwest Area District Council AREA .� 2305 Ford Parkway, Suite 19 SwApSaint Paul, Minnesota 55116 612 690-0866 a DISTRICT V Serving the business and residential communities of Southwest Saint Paul David C. McDonald� TQ� BOARD �F ZONING' APPEALS Chairman and G�id 3 Representative FROM: TIICHELLE LICHTIG � 1M< <~ ' Judy Kinkead, President and At-large DATE: AUGUST 28, 1984 Representative Kenneth W. Jefferson, g�; ADATH ISR.AEL SYNAGOGUE VARIANCS APPLICATION Vice President, Community Affairs, and At•large Repre��nt�tive �hilip P, M�Qui��, Vice President� �he 5r�uthv�e�� A�� i��E G�Uti��.3. ��et��fl�� 6 Adminisvation� and oppose the variance because the proposed entrance and Grid 4 Representative exit designs appea� to present a potential traf f ic hazard. )anec Maxson� This recommendation was approve the board oR AuBu�t 20, 1984. Treasurer and Grid 9 Representative James E. Barnard� - - Grid 2 Represenwtiv� Steve McKay� Grid S Representative Timothy K. Baumgartnar� Grid 6 Representatiw Eugene T. Bohmert, Grid 7 Representative George Doty, Grid 8 Representativo Timothy E. Sweeney, . Grid 10 Representative Gerald Franck, Grid 11 Representative Robert Kren, At-large Representative Harold W. Schmidt� At-large Representative Committees Finance, Janet Maxson, Chairman Housing and Economic Development, Tim t3aumgarmor, Ch�(rm�n Public S�fety / "Crlme Watch," Mary Drew� Chairman Recreation and Social Services, Gene Bohmert� Chairman Transportation, Bob Krcn, Chairman Zoning and Environment� Gcorgc Doty, Chairman (Pusitions as of Junc 1984� � ` �_ � � `� -i�� , � �£T. PAUL CITY COUNCIL ��p �� l��IC HEARING NOTICE cr�� e`.��,' E ZONING �J r��,�°FF�� To: Property Owners within 350 ft. ; Representatives of Planning District 15 FIL E N 0. g621 PAGE PURPOSE To consider an appeal of a decision of the Board of Zoning Appeals to relax building and parking setbacks required to . allow remodeling of a synagogue and parking in the front yard. L�CATION 2337 Edgcumbe PETITIONER gARRY LEAFMAN HEARING Thursday, October 4, 1984 �o:oo A.M. Citv Council Chambers, 3rd Floor Citv Hall - Court House Q U E S TIO N S Zoning 298-4154 (Fred Haider) Contact the Zoning Section of the Planning and Economi� Development Department, Room 1101, City Hall Annex, 25 W. 4th Street, St. Paul, Minnesoia 55102 Legal Description: Lots 5, 6, 7, Block 5, Bahland's Edgecumbe Hills Addition Notice sent 9/21/84