The URL can be used to link to this page

84-1266 WHITE � CiTV GLERK FSINK - FINANCE COUIICIl ///� CANARV - DEPARTMENT GITY OF SAINT PAITL File NO• r'� /�� BLUE - MAVOR � Council Resolution Presented By Referred To Committee: Date Out of Committee By Date -4- Development Project and Tax Increment Financing District constitute a redevelopment district within the meaning of Minnesota Statutes Section 273 . 73 Subdivision 10(3) and a housing district within the meaning of Section 273 . 73 Subdivision 11. RESOLVED FURTHER that the enlarged redevelopment project and tax increment district and amended Redevelopment and Tax Increment Financing Plans for the New Housing and Blighted Lands Project and District are hereby approved as submitted and HRA is directed to file copies of the amended Plans and this Resolution with the Minnesota Department of Energy and Economic Development and the Ramsey County Department of Taxation and Record Mana�ement. COUNCILMEIV Requested by Depar ent of: Yeas ��N�V �� "�'"''� .� In Favor Masanz Nicosia scnetbe� �J __ Against BY ` Tedesco Wilson SEP 2 0 i984 Form A roved b City Att ne Adopted by Council: Date Certified P s e b Council r BY � By Approved by Mavor: Date �� a'�'— �� ,�+ � r ed b Mayor for Su 's on to Council By �_ / �,Q� � � BY P�16LISHED S E P 2 g 198� • • ��/E,�� F�$p1T!Op y CITY OF SAINT PAUL . � ; OFFICE OF THE MAYOR '' {ii�i t�� + '"o �° 347 CITY HALL +�s• SAINT PAUL, MINNESOTA 55102 GEORGE LATIMER (612) 298-4323 MAYOR August 17, 1984 Council President Tedesco and Members of the City Council 719 City Hall Saint Paul , Minnesota 55102 Dear President Tedesco and Members of the City Cauncil : This letter transmits Planning Commission findings regarding a proposed amend- ment to the boundary of the New Housing and Blighted Lands Development Project Tax Increment District. The tax increment district is comprised of eighteen scattered difficult to develop sites. The primary o6jective of the program is to provide the pu6lic assistance necessary to develop ho�asing on each of these sites. The proposed amendment adds 3.57 acres to the Etna - Birmingham site, making possible the development of 60 moderately priced ownership housing units. The Planning Commission has reviewed the proposal and found it in conformance with relevant chapters of the Comprehensive Plan, including the housing and land use elements and the District 4 Plan. In addition, District 4 has reviewed and supports this proposal . Copies of this report have been forwarded directly to the Housing and Redevelop- ment authority. Should you have any questions, please contact Deb6ie P�unkberg of the Planning Staff at 74�4, ext. 275. Sincerely, � eor La i er May r GL:jg �0 � (��--/�� PED - Planning , p�pART�1ENT Ilahhie Mimkhprg CONTACT 7494 - Ext. 275 PHONE � �� 8-15-84 DATE � ' (Rauting and Explanation Sheet) Assi Number for Routin Order Cli All Loc,atio s for oral Si atu �CEIVED Department Di rector�!/. i�� . , AUG � 2 4 1984 � City Attorney (Jim Hart)�Q'� ' �11� ATTORNEY %�Di rector of Management/Ma�yor— ,�u�y�, �,,,�� ,�,�� ` Fi nance and Management Servi ces Oi rector G�+�u�, �aa��, 6 City Clerk �dget Di rector . �� R i hert �°, �!Y d�,� � � HRA-Delores Arduser . �Ih�t Will be chieve b aking Actipn on the At�ached Materfals? (Purpose/Rationale): The boundary of the Etna-Birmingham site in the New Housing and Blighted Lands Tax Increment District will be amended to add 3.57 �acres to the site. The amendment will allow the development of 60 units of ownenship housing on the southern half of the Etna-Birmingham site. ��::`-:� . , , .._. _ _, .. �� .�►,va_�� t�i gy � � � �� _ �. Financ al Bud tar and Personnel I acts ti i ted: '�f` � „ Tax increments from the site will be used to provide development assistance to project proposals in the Etna-Birmingham site. Upon termination of the district, all tax jurisdictions will receive taxes based on the entire assessed value of the site. Funding Source and Fund Activity Nurt�er Charged or Credit�d: #33599 - 100� Tax Levy Attachments (List and Number all A�tachments�: 1. Transmittal letter from Mayor to City �ouncil (to be signed) �. P��l a�nn�i n� Comm��on Report amd Resol uti on' �� DEPARTMENT REVIEW CITY ATTORNEY REVIEW Yes No Counci 1 Resol ut f on Re4ui red?I Resol r�tion Requi red? J�C Yes No Yes No Insurance Required? Insurance Sufficient? � Yes No Yes No Insurance Attached? Revision of October, 1982 ��PP RPVPI"CP SidP for �Instructions) � i > � HOW TO USE THE GREEN SHEET � The GREEN SHEET has several purposes: 1. To assfst in routina documents and in securinq requir d siqnatures � , 2 . To brief the reviewers of documents on the impacts of approval 3. To help ensure that necessary sucportina materials are prepared and, if required, attached. a'. ROUTING � �ost GREEV SHEET actions must �e rev_e�ae�? 5y a �e�ar_:aent �irec:.or, �:�e City ?,t�orzey, �he Dir�ctor os t�Ianaqes,e:�t, the Director of Finance and Manaqement Services. Other possible reviewers/signatures are listed. BRIEFING � Most of the GREEN SHEET headinqs are designed to assist in developinq a precis of the decision which the attachments represent. The headinqs are offered to remind users of some of the more critical elements of this brief. . The Financial Bud etar and Personnel ImAacts headinq provides a space to explain the cost benefit aspects of the decision. Costs and benefits relate both to City budqet (General Fund and/or Special Funds) and to broader financial impacts (cost to users, homeowners or other groups affected by the action) . The personnel impact is a description of chanqe or shift of Full-Time Equivalent (FTE) positions. SJ?PORTING MATERIALS . In the Attachments section, list all attachments. Zf the GREEN SHEET is well done, no letter of transmittal need be included (unless signing such a letter is one of the requested actions) . Note: Actions which require City Council resolutions include: ' a. Contractual relationship with another government unit. b. Collective bargaininq. c. Purchase or sale of land, or lease of land. d. Issuance of bonds by City. e. Eminent domain. - f. Assum�tion of liability by City, or qranting by City of indemnification. g. Agreements with State or Federal Government under which they are providing funding. Note also: If an aqreement requires evidence of insurance/co- insurance, a Certificate of Insurance should be one � �� ,�E`'T',°°;, ' CITY OF SAINT PAUL o � a DEPARTMENT OF PLANNING AND ECONOMIC DEVELOPMENT ., �uitt'nm , ao �� A� DIVISION OF PLANNING l�s� 25 West Fourth Street,Saint Paul,Minnesota,55102 612-292-1577 GEORGE UTIMER MAYOR DATE: August 2, 1984 T0: Planning Commission FROt•1: Anne Kel1y RE: Staf.f Report -� Review of the Proposal to Amend the New Housing and B,lighted Lands Development Project Tax Increment District #I2 INTRODUCTION The St. Paul Housing and Redeve]opment Authority adopted the New Housing and Blighted Lands Development Project in June, 1981. This project established• a city-wide tax increment district for 18 project sites. The purpose of the project is to develop housing on lands which, by reason of special problems _ or conditions, have not reached full development potential by the ordinary operations of private enterprise. The ar�endment attached proposes adding 3.57 acres of land to the tax increment district. This addition, contiguous to the Etna-Birmingham site, will make possible a development of 60 units of ownership housing in six separate buildings. The staff of the Housing Division of the St. Paul Department of Planning and Economic Development is seeking a recommendation from the Planning Commission in support of this proposed amendment at the August 10 commission meeting. The resolution, if adopted, will be a recommendation to the Housing and Redevelopment Authority Board and the City Council for adoption of the plan amendment. AUTHORITY FOR REVIEW According to the 1979 Minnesota Housing and Redevelopment Authority Act (Minnesota Statutes 462.411 et. se�c . ) , amendments to a tax increment district that result in a geographic enlargement must occur within the first five years of the existence of the district. Geographic modifications are subject to the same notification and public hearing requirements associated with the establishment of the district. The staff of the Housing Division of the St. Paul Department of Planning and Economic Development is proposing this amendment to the New Housing and Blighted Lands Development Project Tax Increment District #12 as adopted June, 1981 and amended April , 1983. In the event of such a proposed amendment qualifying a new project site; the proposal shall be submitted as a plan amendment for consideration of the Planning Commission and approval by the City Council of St. Paul in the manner provided by law in the Minnesota Tax Increment Financing Act, Chapter 273. BACKGROUNDS AND FINDINGS The purpose of the New Housing and Blighted Lands Development Project is a) ,to increase the supply of decent, safe and sanitary housing. . . (for) all income groups not being adequately met by private enterprise. . .b) to develop or redevelop sites. . .which qualify as blighted and deteriorated areas under the Housing and Redevelopment Act,. . .c) to assist in the provision of rental housing, and d) to undertake and finance these actions as one Housing Develop- ment and Redevelopment Project and Tax Increment Finance District. The development proposal is consistent with the original scope and purposes �f the project in that it will provide 60 units of housing affordable to low and moderate-income households (ranging from $60,000 to $75,000 per unit) . It will also develop an underu5ed site considered to be undevelopable solely by private enterprise because of the poor soil conditions. The cost of land acquisition, soil cor'rection, excavation, utility improvement and cost of easements would result in a land cost that would exceed its fair market value after completion of said improvements. � CONSISTENCY WITH CITY PLANS The proposed development is supportive of �he City's Comprehensive Plan, Land Use component, which identifies the Etna-Birmingham site for medium to high- density residential development. This project is also consistent with the housing component of the comprehensive plan. The housing supply objectives are to: A) Expand both ownership and rental opportunites; B) Increase the variety of housing opportunities within neighborhoods; and C) Increase rental and ownership opportunities for lower income households. The proposal is highly consistent with the plans of the District 4 Community Council which recommends in the 1982 Survey of Vacant Lands that up to 60 townhouse units be developed on that site. It also meets the goals of the Dayton's Bluff-District 4 plan which seeks to "maintain and enhance the quality of housing and the variety of housing density, price and style (and) where appropriate encourage new home construction which addresses the economic and social needs of the community."• District 4 has reviewed this amendment proposal and supports its development. STAFF RECOMMENDATION Staff recommends that the project amendment to the New Housing and Blighted Lands Development Project be found consistent with the City's Comprehensive Plan. COMMITTEE RECOMMENDATIONS The Economic Development Committee recommends the attached resolution on a 3-0 vote (Van Hoef motioned, Brown seconded with McDonnell also voting for approval � . " . � (I��i�� ot sa��t pdui _ s��ni�g co��is�on reso�u��n . .`�;� �.u�ber t a� 84-17 �C�$�' A��rnitt 1�_ 19R4 � WHEREAS, the Housing Policy Plan of the St. Paul Com�rehensive P1an and the St. Paul Housing Assistance Plan define the need for more housing of all types, more housing for lower income people, and more rental housing for families; and WHEREAS, the New, Housing and Blighted Lands Development Project worlcs toward meeting �he needs defined by the Housing Policy Plan and Housing Assistance Plan; and WNEREAS, th� Proposal to Amend the New Housing and Blighted Lands Development Project tax increment district �12 would make 60 units of new housing avail- able to low and moderate income hou�seholds; and WHEREAS, the 3.57 acres contiguous to the Etna-Birmingham site proposed for inclusion in the tax increment district would not be developable by solely privat° means due to the extraordinary expense of correcting poor soil conditions; and WHEREAS, the District 4 Com�munity Council has revieti�ed this amerdment and has given it the Council 's support; NOW, THEREFORE, BE IT RESOLVED, that the St. Paul Planning Commission supports the Proposal to Amend the New Housing and Blighted Lands Development Project Tax Ir.crement District #12 for the Etna-Birmingham site #17, proposed June, 1984, and recommends its adoption by the St. Paul Hflusing and Redevelop- ment Au�hority and the St. Paul City Council . ��,d �� ' VanHoef � ' 5�� b�� Summers i� ��' Unanimous Voice Vote � �� _ . ��,- � � ��-��/-2�� RESOLU.TION I�O. 8�-8/15-3 . � RESOLUTION APPRO��ING A17EhD17E\T OF THE � REDEVELOPAIENT �AND TAX II�CREI7ENT FI\A1�CING PLAI�S , FOR THE NE�y .HOUSII�G AND BLIGHTED LA\DS DEVELOPi17ENT PROJECT �ti'HEREAS, upon recommendation of the Hovsing and P.edevelopment Authority of the City of Saint Paul, n7innesota (HRA), the Council of the City of Saint Paul, on June 9, 1981, adopted Resolution CF No. 276969 approving a Redevelopment Project and Plan, and Resolution CF No. 276970 approving a Financina Plan and creating a Tax Increment Financing District for the New Housing and Blighted Land Development Project and Tax Increment District, encomp�ssing the provision of new housing, including hous�n; for low and moderate income persons and families, on eighteen sepa:ate, undeveloped sites; and � S4HEREAS� the designated private redeveloper of one of these sites, the southern portion of the Etna-Birmingham Site No. 13, has convinced the staff that feasibility of site development� �titould be enhanced by eapanding the size of this site by inclusion of 3:5? acres of excess highway right-of-way land, and the Minnesota Department of Transportation has indicated its willin�ess to make said land available to the . . ' Project� which proposal has been approved by the Planning Council� Community Development District No. 4, the Saint Paul Planning Commission, and the Saint Paul Capitol Improvement Budoet Committee; and _ . jti'HEREAS� amendments to the Project Redevelopment Plan �nd Ta�: Increment Financing glan, enlarging the area of the New Housing a.nd Blighted Lands Redevelopment : Project �'�'ci•Tax Increment Fina.ncing District by adding 3.57 acres of ?and to the Etna- Birmingham Site have been submitted for consider�tion of this HRA Boerd, and it � . eppears that an enlarged Etna-Birmingham Site qualifies as a redevelopmen� district and as a housing district within the meariing and provision of 17innesota Statutes Section 273.73� Subdivisions IO(3) and 11� constitutes a blighted or deteriorated area . within the provision of Section 462.421, Subdivision 13(1), (2) end (3);�now.therefore, be it . � ' RESOLVED by the Board of Commissioners af the HRA as follows: . � I) That the findings made in HRA Resolution ro. 82-fi/3-12 re��eetin; the : Etna-Birmingham Site, New Housing snd Blighted Lands Redevelopment ProJect and Tax Increment Financing District ar� hereby affirmed; � 2) Tha: the enlarged Etna-Birmin;ham Site constitutes s bli�hted area under • � � Section 462.421, Subdivision 13(1)� (2) or (3), a redevelo�ment district unde�r Section 2 i 3.i 3� �. � SuSdivision 10(3), and a housing distriet under Section 273.73, Subdivision 11 of . . i�Iinnesota Statutes; and � � (3) That enlargement of the Etna-Birmingham Site ��•ill improve the financial feasibility of its development for housing use� including provision of low and moderate income housina, consistent v��ith the public purposes and provisions of the �Zunicipal Iiousino and Redevelopment Act and the Neti�a Housing and Blighted Lands Project Redevelopment Plan. . � (O ver) � . , . � � ' 'GJ��'-/.7l�O RESOLVED FURTHER that amendment of the Project Redevelo��ent Projeet and Plan and Tax Increment Financing District znd Plan to enlarge the Efna-Birmingham Site by 3.57 acres are hereby approved as.in the public interest and �s necessary to the nccomplishment of the purposes and objectives stated in the Redevelopment and Tax Increment F.inancing Plans for the New Housin; �nd Blighted Lands Project. RESOLVED FINALLY that the Executive Director is authorized to communic�te this action and Resolution to the Saint Paul City Council and to request City Council consideration of these amendments upon public hearino called for that purpose. � .. � � —:_.i_..._� � n . �- � , - • ,� . _ .. ' � . . � . ! 0 0 wr�ITE �� C�TV ��EqK ' PINK � fINqN�E COUnCII / .:�NARV - DEP�tRTMENT G I TY OF SA I NT PAU L /� BLUE - M�vOR � FIIe NO. • �� /�`-'� �ity Attny'JTH � Council Resolution � Presented By Referred To Committee: Date Out of Committee By Date RESOLUTION APPROVING AMENDMENT OF THE REDEVELOPMENT PLAN AND TAX INCREMENT FINANCING PLAN OF THE NEW HOUSING AND BLIGHTED LANDS DEVELOPMENT PROJECT; ENLARGEr�NT OF ETNA-BIRMINGHAM SITE NO. 13 WHEREAS, by its Resolutions , CF No. 276969 and 276970 adopted June 9 , 1981 , the Council of the City of Saint Paul approved the. Redevelopment Plan and Tax Increment Financing Plan and the New Housing and Blighted Lands De�elopment �roject and Tax Increment Financing District therein provided for encompassing the provision of new housing, including housing for low and moderate income persons and families , on eighteen separate, undeveloped sites with tax increment financing assistance; and WHEREAS, there has been submitted to this meeting a Proposal to Amend.he New Housing And Blighted Lands Development Project and Tax Increment District, Etna-Birmingham, Site ��13, consisting of six mimeographed pages , a location map and site plan, and an Attachment containing the specific Plan a.mendments , which Proposal would enlarge the geographic area by 3. 57 acres contiguous to the Southerly part of Site ��13 to be acquired as excess highway right- of-way from the State of Minnesota, would increase estimated project expenditures permitting the private construction of 60 • units of low and moderate income housing on said Southerly part . of the Etna-Birmingham Site and would increase the portion of : captured assessed value to be retained by HRA for the Project ; �:nd , COU�[�TCILMEN Requested by Department of: Yeas .• Flstcher Nays Drew [R F2V0[ Mssanz • Nlcosla sensibst A gai n s t BY Tedesco Wilson Form Approved by City Attorney Adopted by Council: Date Certified Passed by Council Secretary . BY By . Approved by Mavor: Date Approved by Mayor for Submission to Council � BS - By �o� . � � �y-/�� . -2- WHEREAS , by its Resolution No . 84-17 adopted Au�ust 13 , 1984 the Saint Paul Planning Commission upon findings of need for provision of low and moderate income housing and for enlargement of the Etna-Birmingham Site to make feasible. its private develop- ment , indicated its support for the Amendment and recommended its adoption by the Housing and Redevelopment Authority of the City of Saint Paul , Minnesota (H?tA) and the City Council ; and � WHEREAS , by its Resolution No. 84-8/15-3 adopted August 15 , � 1984, the HRA upon finding,s that the enlarged Etna-Birmingham Site constituted a blighted area under Section 462 .421 , Subd. 13 (1) , (2) or (3) , a redevelopment district under Section 273 .73 Subdivision 10(3) , and a housing district under 273 . 73, Subd. 11 , of Minnesota Statutes , that enlargement of the Site would improve the financial feasibility of its development for housing use, and that enlargement of the Etna-Birmingham Site was in the public interest and necessary to accomplish the purposes and objectives of the Redevelopment and Tax Increment Financing Plans approved . the Amendr�.t; and , WHEREAS , HRA and Gaughn Land, Incorporated, a Minnesota business corporation, have entered into a Land Sale and Develop- ment Agreement under date of September 17 , 1984, providing for the staged purchase and development of the Southerly part. of the enlarged Etna-Birmingham Site by said private business corporation with 60 units of law and moderate income housing with purchase � mortgage money commitments from the Minneapolis , Saint Paul Phase � ; II Family Housing Fund and Joint Housing Fund Programs ; and WHEREAS , the HRA has provided opportunity to the members of the Ramsey County and Independent School District No. 625 Boards o�'�tu� to meet with the :iRA Board and has presented copies of the Amendment by cover letter dated August 6 , 1984, including an estimate of the fiscal and economic implications of the proposed Amendment, and the HRA has also submitted the Amendment to and � received favorable recommendations. from the District 4 Planning � � Council and the Capital Improvement Budget Committee; and v� � �� . -3- WHEREAS , the City Council has received public comment from all interested parties at a public hearing conducted on the Amendment on Thursday, September 20, 1984 , upon notice published in the Saint Paul Pioneer Press and Dispatch and the Saint Paul Legal Ledger on August 25 , 1984, has reviewed the reasons and data set forth in the Amendment supporting the findings and determinations hereafter set forth, and has considered the written findings and recommendations of the District Council , the Planning Commission, the CIB Committee and the HR.A and other information available to and .within the knowledge of the Councilmembers ; now therefore , be it RESOLVED by the Council of the City of Saint Paul , in view of the foregoing hereby approved as findings that the following further findings are hereby made: 1 . That the enlarged Etna-Birmingham Site ��13 � � would not be made available for redevelop- �onent , nor could the provision of new low and moderate income housing thereon reasonably be expected to occur solely through action by private enterprise within the reasonably foreseeable future without the use of tax increment and the other financial aid sought and to be pro- vided under the amended Project Financing and District Tax Increment Financing Plans ; 2. That the Amendment will afford 'maximum opportunity, consistent with the sound needs of the community as a whole for the provision of new housing by redevelopment of the Southerly part of the Etna-Birmingham Site by private enterprise ; � ' � 3 . That the Amendment conforms to the Saint Paul � � Comprehensive Plan, the general plan for the development of the community as a whole; and 4. That the enlarged Etna-Birming�ham Site ��13 singlely, and together with the other Sites of the New Housing and Blighted Lands nHtTE r C�Tr c�EtiK - ' c.vr: — Fi�:n!vCE � � - CA�AA� — DEFeA-ME�T G I TY OF SA I �'T �AUL Councii . e�,.:E — ti+a1oR . File N0. � —/o�lv� � Council Resolution ' Presented By Referred To Committee: Date Out of Committee 8y Date -4- Development Project and Tax Increment Financing District constitute a redevelopment district . within the meaning of Minnesota Statutes Section 273 . 73 Subdivision 10(3) and a housing district within the meaning of Section 273 . 73 Subdivision 11 . RESOLVED FURTHER that the enl�rged redevelopment project and tax increment district and amended Redevelopment and Tax Increment Financing Plans for the New Housing and Blighted Lands Project and . District are hereby approved as submitted and HRA is directed to file copies of the amended Plans and this Resolution with the Minnesota Department of Energy and Economic Development and the Ramsey Co��ty Department of Taxation and Record I�1ana�ement. COUNC[LMEN Yeas . Na}�s Requested by Department of: Fletcher °reN1 In Favor Masanz Nicosia scneibet Against BY . Tedesco Wilson Form Approved by City Attorney Adopted hy Council: Date Certified Passed b5� Council Secretary BY B; Approved by� tilavor. Date Approved by Mayor for Submission to Council By _ BY �� -i.2� � , PIZOPOSAL TO AMEND THE NEW HOUSING AND BLIGHTED LANDS DEVELOPMENT PftOJECT, ' TAX INCREMENT DISTRICT #12, AS ADOPTED JUNE, 1981, AND AMENDED APRIL, 1983 ' INTRODUCTION , The New Housing and Blighted Lands Development Project was established by the City of Saint Paul in June, 1981, for the purposes of increasing the supply of decent ' and affordable housing for all income groups, including low- and moderate-income households; to develop or redevelop sites which qualify as blighted and deteriorated � areas; and to provide financing for these activities under the R.edevelopment Project District and Tax Increment Financing Plan. ' In establishin the Redevelo ment Pro'ect and Tax Increment Financing District, g P J � eighteen sites throughout the city were identified to be included in the overall plan. The sites are either privately or publicly owned and include vacant land and existing, deteriorated buildings. An analysis of all the sites indicated that some form of public „ , � assistance would be required if development were to occur. Several of these sites have undergone, or are planned for, redevelopment according to the Project � Redevelopment Plan and Saint Paul Comprehensive Plan. ' Each site, and the District as a whole, qualifies as a Housing project and a Redevelopment project under the requirements of the T�x Increment Financing Act. The duration ' of the District may be for up to twenty-five years under that Act. ' PROPOSED AMENDMENT T----�-- The proposal consists of the addition of a parcel of land adjacent to Site #13, the ` Etna-Birmingham corridor, to the Redevelopment Plan and Tax Increment District. The amendment is proposed as a necessary modification to the District in light of � additional information concerning the site's development potential which was not available at the time the District was created. Thus, the actions to amend the District ' are being undertaken to ensure appropriate and timely development of the site through the assistance available under the Tax Increment Financing Plan and existing City ' progra ms. ' , � ��-�a� � ETNA-BIRMINGHAM CORRIDOR (SITE #13) BACKGROUND , This site is located in Planning District 4 between Sixth Street, Birmingham Street, Highway I-94 and Etna and Clarence Streets. It consists of undeveloped land which � will require extensive soil excavation, replacement and compaction prior to development. In addition, public improvements will be necessary to provide access to portions of 1 the site. The site consists of two separate development sites--a Southern site and a Northern site. Portions of the site are owned by the Housing and ftedevelopment � Authority and the State of Minnesota (as excess highway right�f-way). � At the time the development project was created (1981), no development was planned, nor firm commitments or contracts entered into for development of the site. However, City plans indicated that after proper soil correction and access improvements, the ' Southern and Northern sites would be appropriate for approximately 137 units of ownership-type housing, with approximately 68 of these units available for low- and ' moderate-income households. � Firm plans are now available for the Southern site of the Etna-Birmingham corridor. The Housing and Redevelopment Authority has designated a developer for the site ' who has proposed the construction of 60 units of ownership housing in six separate buildings. The sales prices of the units will be affordable for households of low-and moderate-income income (ranging from $60,000 to $75,000 per unit). The developer ' has received preliminary commitments for below-market mortgage financing from the Minneapolis-Saint Paul Family Housing Fund Program (Phase II) and the Joint � Housing Program. To complete land assembly for the project, the State of Minnesota will be transferring title to a portion of the site to the Housing and Redevelopment � Authority at a designated price. The complete site will then be transferred to the private developer after completion of the standard requirements for purchase of ' Housing and R.edevelopment Authority land at a negotiated sales price. Extraordinary costs associated with the site are being evaluated by City staff and � the developer but will most likely include: land acquisition costs, soil correction and excavation costs, utility improvement expenses, and the cost of easements for various ' public improvements. ' , - 2 - � ��-ia�� At the time the Tax Increment District was created, the boundaries of the Etna-Birmingham __ site were established in the absence of anticipated developments and adequate information � from the State regarding the availability of excess highway right-of-way. Therefore, City staff alone determined the boundaries to the best of their ability, without benefit � of the advice of a private developer and the State identifying specifically what lands it could transfer, based on the most likely area to be included in a housing development 1 project. The purpose of the proposed amendment is to modify the western boundary of the Southern site to include the entire housing project which is proposed. � Three years of study by City staff, a neighborhood task force, and evaluation by a private real estate development company, have determined that the most developable � site is an area including the area now in the Development Project Plan, plus approximately 3.57 acres of land directly adjacent to the westerly boundary of the site. (See attached , map -- shaded area is proposed addition to the site). The acreage of the Southern site, which is now in the Development Project Plan, is approximately 3.33 acres. Addition � of the area of the proposed amendment would result in a total site of 6.90 acres. The State of Minnesota has now identified the exact land area which it is willing to � make available to the City for redevelopment purposes. By combining the City-owned portion of the development site with the excess highway right-of-way from the State, ' private development of the Etna-Birmingham, Southern Site, for housing is now possible. The addition of land to the Redevelopment Project Plan also creates a more suitable ' development site, than previously anticipated, which is expected to reduce the total development costs of the project by reducing costs associated with the relocation ' of certain utilities. � Failure to add the acreage of the proposed amendment would result in half of the planned housing units being outside the Development Project Plan and �'ax Increment Financing District. Since many of the extraordinary costs associated with this development , have not been finalized, the development may require assistance, in addition to below market mortgage financing, from the Tax Incrernent Financing District. In the event � the planned development requires little or no assistance, it would be necessary to capture the assessed value from the entire development to provide tax increment ' revenues for assistance to the Northern site of the Etna-Birmingham corridor which are Lkely to be very significant since no pubhc access to this site exists. � - 3 - ' � �� The following is an analysis of the difference in tax increment revenue which would result from this amendment: � Total Tax Total Tax � Average Estimated Assessed Tax Increment Increment Sales Price Market Value Value Per Mill Increment Units W/I After Per Unit Per Unit Unit ftate Per Unit The District Amendment —' uni sj'T �`6�uni s � $65,000 $55,250 $9,898 110.00 $1,089 $32,670 $65,340 � IMPACT OF PROPOSED AMENDMENT TO TAXING JURISDICTIONS � The overlapping taxing jurisdictions whose assessed valuation this Tax Increment Plan amendment would affect include: ! Independent School District No. 625 -- boundaries are coterminous with the City of Saint Paul. � County of ftamsey -- to whose total assessed valuation the City of Saint Paul � contributes about 53%. � Housing and Redevelopment Authority of the City of Saint Paul -- which is the requesting authority for this amendment. The HRA will be considered 1 identical with the City of Saint Paul for purposes of this analysis. Port Authority of the City of Saint Paul -- whose power of levy and use of � the property tax is limited to .789 mills. For this analysis, it will be treated the same as the City of Saint Paul. , Metropolitan Authorities -- such as the Metropolitan Council, Metropolitan I Airports Commission, Metropolitan Transit Authority, Metropolitan Waste Control Commission, and the Metropolitan Mosquito Control District. Of these, only the Metropolitan Council, Metropolitan Transit Authority and Metropolitan � Mosquito Control District levy on real estate. , Of these jurisdictions, the only two which would be affected more than nominally by this amendment would be Independent School District No. 625 and the County � of Ramsey. � - 4 - ��-�a� � Assuming an annual captured assessed value of $296,940, which would be added to � the Tax Increment Financing Plan from this proposed amendment and an assumed mill rate of 110.00 mills, the amendment will generate an additional annual tax increment � of $32,670. The percentage of this increment contributed by the various taxing jurisdictions, if the development were to occur without public intervention, is shown below. ' Mills (Taxes Payable Annual � Taxin�Jurisdiction in_1984) Percentage Tax Increment City of Saint Paul 29.432 26.2 $ 8,559.54 1 County of Ramsey 27.143 24.1 $ 7,873.47 School District No. 625 51.166 45.5 $14,864.85 Miscellaneous* 4.709 4.2 $ 1,372.74 1�1.4�0 100.00 $',� ,�6�1 .(�i0 . � *All City and Metro Authorities � The following table shows the additional dollars per $1,000 of assessed valuation that ' would have to be levied to compensate for the loss of tax dollars in estimated tax increments for each taxing jurisdiction. The tax increments derived from projects � in this plan would not be available to any of the taxing jurisdictions were it not for the public intervention of the Saint Paul Housing and ftedevelopment Authority. If it could be assumed that the captured assessed value was available for each taxing , jurisdiction, the non-receipt of tax dollars represented as tax increments may be determined by estimating what amount the mill rate for property outside the tax � increment financing amendrr�ent area would have to be increased to raise the same amount of tax dollars in each taxing jurisdiction that would be available if the � projects occurred without the assistance of the Saint Paul HRA. � 1983 Required Annual Assessed $/$1,000 Assessed Tax Taxing Jurisdiction Valuation Valuation Increment ... .�.�� .-� . , City of Saint Paul $1,693,681,400 .000005 $ 8,559.54 County of Ramsey $3,197,727,657 .000002 $ ?,873.47 � School District No. 625 $1,69 3,681,400 .000009 $14,864.85 � � - 5 - , � � ��_,�� This table is relevant only if assumed that the development would have occurred without the existence of the Tax Increment District and the Development Program. � If this assumption is incorrect and the HRA believes it is, then the only real impact on the assessed values of the other taxing jurisdictions is: � 1. Any inflationary values from the District which have been attributable � to the tax base of these taxing jurisdictions will be lost during the duration of the District; and � 2. Upon termination of the District, all taxing jurisdictions will benefit from the entire future assessed values. � � � � � � � , � � � � - 6 - � ,�-- _ * T�IRt�- - --��.��:. � ; . ._ ... .. � � • 373.30- ._ �rt.00 - �' ...w ��,.a.� .,r ...�gp.o 0 30 30 � . �,., . ;�'�`�:..� � ;: +'` yC 3 .".ti� � ,. �w �r-�'�+f�.•, 0 1 4 � ,, '�,, , , �^ � M ��.1 � 9 • _\) I i� �3 �r � - .,,��':� :��a'r 2 9 ��-"d" _ ` . '4'�. t � O ' � .�� ` '..� . ,;:::: � . . •1: tia V. ' . .. 1 3 . . L.- "� � s ` 7'..' 6 # ' • z� r�:-. 0 �� O i . \', i: � , � l i � � . .:, titi , � 2 O V ,' , ,u. �M�•• C7 F \ '� .. ��u � s _"'.�:, M — _z_ � — _ � , i "'� ;,«�i � � i ;k . � r � y `� ' � ' ,. • ----. . .. _ � �. ". � � � � � � � i 7 � ' ; . 4`' 2 3 . � � � y .,:,, o,. 1 �—.: .. . �./ V �� •:Ab. .,� O ^ QL �'�1►•r, .`�k� .��A J�� ,� .� � �1 ( 1 � -1 �1,_ . �iir .N�..A�� •�' .� / ■ 1� Z 2 � vt! � ` J . t '� v � p �� i ' ' � , .'r.. Q r `, (/�� . • ' y j t ,_t .y_ • .::'� !� �„J'q • .� / .� t � V . , �" ;,: .� y . 2I �- � � � � � # i .... : .� � f'�. µ�__ .� .. _ ^ � '; ` E /� • �w y� y / 1I� 4 �t� .� I � � ! �. , � o ti Io � S . .�.. . � P � �` .,�„�f* '.�.y.._ 4• �`' 00� v o '� . d«d �9 ` �` O � � O, , , u �' �r � �. �°• � � S '��. ~ S. �� •�oo_ / � 1 � : �,mt .ku � /2 a .r � � , '�� j I � ��t � 0 .� , � . r ':� / 0 I 0 ��, ,�. . Y �}�� 1 � „ �- - - - - - P :-�� . , F� ��,�. .. � - . , . .:: p , �� .:.��,� . � � • � i �� 1�� 'Z� 9• � Y .ti ' I .�, —'_ � \ �y� ♦ .h Dw. .��.�x� •I�ja, � • ��• /y , � \ \\.\� /r�� , � ' � '�� 0 � \ Q `� � e• L � �• '. � �. � d 0 �i�J jy �70.� , �"/��.k., w5.� ^w��,�. - "w'y. • � •. 0 ti o -s�,.. 8. • � .S .� ° • 3'1%.J!• . ~ . `' • if � � ` ` v ' . ,, �.�— ? v,��4 :� � -�— ---- � \ ~I � 1 /�r AMF�;DM�^�T Tn FTn'A_RTP1�T��rI�L1M fSrTE #13) r�• i o �„ shaded area to be added to the pis rict � 14 �u �o , ��,.�`tapproximately 3.60 acres ) � ( �' 1�r '+� �� ' /�^ - - - [] :- '' / ,_�t� (,� U 0 lU-��-- - -- - -- /T 1�. � /� _ � ' i '.i :37 OS �../ �• .,. . - - - - - = - - -. . ��=ia��. � . _ . . . . ._. . _ �- � � - -: -. 1 _ _ � _ ��-,== -- . _ , ,-_ . : . �; , , ,;: ___ _- �,; - � '(!�� 'M7 af �I 7l� Y � � L 7 � `�'/�/ � �� O . Q � . • . � '�� I � I�!.�� ' �� ~ �; � � . '" � ;� i � , Ir I + , �, •} � I 1. ; � � � . � ' -. �� t +�.!/ , � I � .,,-' 1 . , f '" � � . !'� I _� :. � � �:�'" , � � � - . �c � �v �-= — ��;.�;� --�—± � � � �� =-', t ��.� _ � . M. 1/E ��lN � � �� ' � . . � � � ;�� ,�� t ` a { a � m ! " ' �• i" � ' ! n � � � � E �� O � , f' � �' � . �.o . tm - � � S � y `/ ' � - • :: � � ; % . � -� �I � ' � - � " ;� �,>; �($ r" j -;%% ..;�s =-' f � � - �� _ __ - �m , ! � o oe e,_, -� .. � � �� /' �.� . } -�� .o :- . , . O�e ' .1 '�!' �A : • ' •t : Z �.�� .. . � ' .. '� � � (� � � � ` t f' i � � j : � 1 . �^ 1 i � � { � �� ( 1 : � • � � � r i - , y'- , " � ��.N�t _ �, ��• � �� "L-= -- — -�- . ��-- �s �- � _ __ __�_� _,�. _ ' ETNA - BIP.MINGHAM, S011THERN SITE PROPOSEn �EVELQPMENT 60 units ownership � housing •i ' , _-......... � _ " _' �— - - � - ------ -- - •:•.cH• :. • tlYYYY • •��NY ...w.. • • • •� • ��s.Mwaw�� . :• •�a • ��t��Y•��• Nff��M�NNNwfMw •NA�i � �MN "��r f ��iLtY! • �sH� t{NN71N�� w�4� � �• f�f Af�1�� Ns� • • �� iMsti • .'��...�Mw� i«�...�w�� tA ■ ■ N��w �Nf � • • -i ��•• •��a • •Na�l�MA��jMj� ta ��YM'Nla�wl�� Y � e � '� r -=.`- ••w��• «• .7..�wr wrw sM�� M� • a .�ws� rfd� • ii �y " ��.•N •N/�ist��H��f��F�� • , •��i •��M �� • ��r\.'� '_ � :��M . �• - _ •...i'.,..� �.i'�.�C�.. � R M= _ � '• � ' " ��-�a�6 � 1 ATTACHMENT I , � , The following pages indicate the actual changes to the New Housing and Blighted Lands Development Project Plan and Tax Increment Financing District Plan, which � would occur as a result of adoption of the proposed amendments. New language is underlined; deletions are indicated with a line through the appropriate � language. Only the pages affected by the proposed amendments are included in the attachment. Copies of the complete Development Project Plan and Tax Increment � Financing District Plan may be obtained by contacting the offices of the Saint Paul Department of Planning and Economic Development. � � � i 1 � 1 1 1 i i , � ��y:fa�� 9. M15SISSJPPI-TERRACE AREA (District 5) ' This undeveloped site is located on the east side of tilississippi St. North oi Case , Avenue. The Jegal descriptions are: Subj. to esmts; and vac. al)ey adj.; Lot S-9 and 16-21, McMenemy's Subdivision A. Also, Lots 3-9, BrookvaJe Addition. Also, Lots 1, 2, 3, 6, 7, 9 & ]0, Brookvale 2nd Addition. Also, Lots 6-9 and 19-24 � Blk. I, Brookside Addition. The probJems with this area are topographical in nature. 10. BRADLEY STREET - CASE TO WHITALL (District 5) . � � These two undeveloped s;tes are maoe up of certain properties abutting BradJey � Street between Case Avenue and �t'h;ta11 Street. The 1Ega1 description is: Lots � � 4- 13, BJock 2; Lots 1S, 19 d� 20, Block 3; Lots 3-9, Block 10; and Lots 18-21, Block 13, Ed. Rice's First Addition. The main probJem with development oi these sites is the topography. , , 11. THE RAILROAD ISLAND AREA (District S) � • , This area is bounded by Bush Avenue on the norti�, Burr Street on the east, Tedesco Street and Lafayette Road on the south, and the railroad vacks on the west. The area is legally described as: Blocks 11 and 12, Stinson'sAddition. Also, � al! Stinson's Subdivision of Block !0. AJso, all L.P. Sw�anstrom Rearrangement. : A1so, all Swanstrom's Rearrangement. Also, all J. Swainson's Division. Also, all Van SJyke's Rearrangement. AJso, lots 1 through 6, and lots 11 through 15, , � ' Block 3;.those parts easterJy of the Railroad right-of-u�ay of lots 4 through 13, Block 4; those parts easter)y of the RaiJroad right-of-way of Jots 11 through � � 14, Block 5; and alJ 6locks 7, 8, 9 and 10, V��arren and Winslow's Addition. Also, ' alJ BJock 1, Crispus Attucks Addition. This area is a combination of topogra- phically severe vacant land and substandard housing. 12. HAZEL PARK (District 2) � . This undevelo ed site is located on the S�C' corner of Hazel and E. 7th Sts. The P . site is vacant and privateJy owned. Site size -- t71,S99 sq. ft. The legaJ description � is: Lots 1 thrQugh 13 and Lots 20 through 30, Blo�k 1; and Lots 1 through 11, . Block 4, Aurora Aodition. The difficulties with this site include soil repJacement, , • � soil compaction, grading and site drainage. ! � 13. ETNA/BIRMINGHAM CORRIDOR (District 4) j � This undeve)oped area is bounded (approximately) by Sixth Street on the north, Birmingham Street on the e�st, Highv.�y 1-94 on the south, �nd Etna � Clarence Streets on the west. The Jega! descripticn is: Lots 7-12, Block 2, Fease Bros. , Addition; Lots 7-l?, Bloc'►: 2, S�rgEnt's .�,oeition; Lots 1-9 ano l'�-%G. Hamer's Subdiv�sion; Lots 1-8 ;:nd 14-2G, S.enlund's �ubdivis:on; Lots 1-6 and ;�-?;, Srnith's Subdivision oi f�lock 1�, Stinson's F�ances S;ree: ,�cdition; Lo�s 3-10 and l3- ' 24, Block 3; Bi�cr�ingh;:rr�'s .=,ddition: E�locks 3, S and l� �*.insor's rrsnces Street r",dd;tion; Lots 1, 2, 7 L� S. BJock 5 cas:��;r�t� Addition �•o. 3; and, Lo�s 13-�G, �lock 4, East��ie�a� .;do;;ion ;��o. ;; those portions of Lots 2 and 3, Block 3, ' and of Lots 2 .and 3, .B1ock 8, Au � or s u iv�s�on o. w ic ies wes o oc , as v�ew i ion o. ; a so a por �on o uc � ree ying e ween e ex ension sou er y o e wes ine o oc 3 u i or s u �v�sion o. an e wes �ne o oc as v�ew , � ion o. ; oge er wi a por ion o o na ree o e ; vaca e yina e ween e sou ern r�g o way �ne o onway reet �=��/�� In any year in which the tax incre►nent exceeds the amount necessary to meet the objectives of this plan, the Authority proposes to use the excess increment , to: (a) prepay any oustanding bonds; (b) discharge ttie pledge of tax increment thereof; (c) pay into an escrow account dedicated to the payment of such bonds; or (d) return such excess increment to the taxing jurisdictions in which the tax , increment financing district is located in direct proportion to their respective mill rates. � IV. PROPERTIES TO HE ACQUIRED Enclosed in Attachment A, Appendix, is a listing of the properties that, subject to funding availability, the HRA proposes to acquire or otherwise control for the purposes iof this Scattered Site Tax Increment Housing District. Because of the HRA's concern of acquiring property and removing it f rom the tax roles, while attempting at the same time to create additional tax increment to finance the cost of development 1 wherever possible, options will be obtained so that site control rather than actual�� ownership can be conveyed for approved housing developments. , V. COST OF THE DISTRICT ' The following are intended as estimates by category of costs that will be inc�rred. � The Housing and Redevelopment Authority may amend or otherwise alter any line item while maintaining the integrity of the total estimated expenditures. Following is a proposed budget for the scattered site housing/redevelopment plan: i . Land Acquisition $ 8,085,121 �� Relocation 267,000 , 542 848 Public Improvements � Site Preparation, Demolition, Utilities 3;}Tf;688 3 2, 00�112 Special Improvements 110,000 � Housing Assistance 3,000,000 Consultant Services 250,000 Administrative Expenses 772,332 , ' TOTAL �f6;�3�3�-1 $16,226,413* � . _ � * $28,432 have been added for site correction costs associated with ' the Etna-Birmingham site amendment. � , � ' , - 31 - ��iz�� V1. SOURCES OF REVENUE TO FINANCE PUBLIC COSTS AND AMOUNT OF BONDED � INDEBTEDNESS * � A. TOTAL DISTRICT COST $16,197,981 , 8. ES7'iMATED SOURCES OF REVENUE OTHER THAN TAX INCREMENT OR BONDED INDEBTEDNESS ' 1. Capital Improvement Bond Funds $1,:500,000 2. Community Development Block , Grant Funds 1 , 500,000 3. Municipal State Aid Funds 500,000 , 4. Department of Housing and Urban Development 500,000 , 5. Land Disposition Proceeds 1,000,000 � � 6. County Aid Funds, Minnesota Department of Transportation Grants, Metro Parks Open Space Funds, Urban Development Action Grants, � Tax Levy Funds, Minnesota Housing . Finance Agency, etc. 500,000 �,500,000 , G DISTRICT COSTS TO BE BONDED $10,697,9$1 ' D. BOND COSTS 1. Capitalized Interest Payments $4,500,000 2. Debt Service Reserve 1 ,500,000 , 3. Cost of lssuance 500,000 6,500,000 E. TOTAL BONDED INDEBTEDNESS $17,197,981 � ' � i *The existing levels of funds available under the Sources of Revenue To Finanace Public Costs and Amount of Bonded Indebtedness are sufficient to cover increased costs associated with the E�na-Birmingham amendment. , � , ' � - 32 - � � �� i . � . YII. ORIGINAL ASSESSED VALUE OF TAXABLE PROPERTIES Following is a breakdown of the 1980 Assessed Value for each site in the district. These will serve as original assessed values for the district. A parcel-by-parcel , breakdown of the original assessed value is �ontained on Attachment A, Appendix. OriginaJ Assessed Value � $ 155,643 1. Baker School Site . 132,625 � 2. Ellis Avenue Site . 22,613 3. St. Theresa's 31 � 557 4. The "South-0f-Front" Area (Block 355) �53, 172 ' S, Brandtjen-Kluge Site . 657,425 ~ 6. The SeJby Avenue Area 6,140 7. Otto-Mercer Site 26,691 8. Nevada/Arkwright Site 37,869 • � 9. Mississippi-Terrace ,qrea ��233 10. Bradley St.-Case to Whitall 568,073 11. The Railroad Island Area 48, 156 i 12. Hazel Park 20,821 * 13. Etna/Birmingham Corridor ?,476 14. Robert/Concord Site 7,796 , 1S, Belvidere Park Site 3,p88,932 16. �Vliller Hospital Site 303,462 17 �nion Gospel �ission Sire � ' 315,419 � � . ]8. Ruth and Burns Site $aq616,103 � TOTAL � Parcels within some of the sites were tax exempt as of January 2, 1950. TechnicalJy, , at the date of certification of this district by the Auditor, no assessed vaJue attributable ' to such tax exempt property will be included in the original assessed value of the district. However, wh� such property becomes taxable, Section ?73.76 subd.l requires � . that the original assessed value of the d`stur oses�of the PJany the ant�c pa�ed assessed • va7ue atvibutable to such property. Fo p p value at the time these tax exempt parcels become taxabJe has been incl�ded in the , o�iginaJ assessed value computation. , *The Original Assessed Value for the Etna-Birmingham Site will � increase as a result of the proposed amendment; however, Ramsey County has not assigned a ualue to thi.s land parcel , therefore, it cannot be indicated at this time. An estimate of the base value , of the land area to be added to the •�istrict is $112 ,119.00 based on existing appraisals . , ' ��_,�� E. Garages Add for each attached single garage $ 672 � Add for each attached double garage 1 ,120 Add for each detached single garage 538 Add for each detached double garage 896 2. Rental A. Units � 650 Sq.Ft. $ 7,980 700 Sq.Ft. g,55p • 750 Sq.Ft. 9,120 800 Sq.Ft. 9,690 850 Sq.Ft. 10,260 900 Sq.Ft. 10,830 950 Sq.Ft. 11 ,400 1,000 Sq.Ft. 11 ,970 1,O50 $Q.Ft. j 2,540 1, 100 Sq.Ft. 13,110 B. Garages Add for each garage stall $ �s� � � Applying these averages and the Authority's assumptions, it is estimated that the captured assessed value of the district upon completion of all development will be approximately $11,500,000.�`T'he Authority intends to enter into assessment agreements with developer ! and assessor as permitted and described in Section 273.76, Subd. 8. f, " �' *As a result of the E±n;�-9irminham amendment, approximately �1,717,200 would ' � be. added to the Captured Assessed Value of the Tax Increment District upon completion of all development, for a total of approximately $13,277,200.00. i, '' ' ' , - 35 - ��-�� , �. 1 '1C ��i'�_�_�l � � tic)t� C:i)t"1'i:C'ti�_?tl� S1tC irnp�-ovcrncr*s and Ut111tIC:i�� 1S ull ^SilliidtC Oi f�'•i;;) •.�:c;i:IllS(li:i•'S l''_'C�I:ICCC� CO f�iil:�� f.�lt'Sl: parc�'IS iU d ��U11C�ahIC St3te. (l,��i.:C :�:�;f1 Ofl-'�li�, �Itl�l?:l��S� �l�l COS�'; �1C�' :i`:SOC131CC� \1'l`l�l I.111USU3� SO1� , t;°;' it::Cf��lil t��;!t,l�'t1Cli�';. �1f1C CStlftlLtt:::: �,.�ere �;iv��n by Cli}' Cf1�1f1CCfS : i;. tiC.�.� U�:OtI Sl�:.'. i(1`;�)��CllOtl� ci!1C�� 1Cl �;:Ct� S�ill tCSllfl�'. � , 3. 1�I�c ''cstin�ated reuse v�:lu� per square fc»t" i�, �ln estimate of tlie valtie ;S. uf ii��::e p<<rcels ,.�ftcr tl�e soil rorrrc*:��;�, si.te improvemcn�� and utility ;8i ,,r�: �s cornplei�:ri. It is t;^csed �.;;�r,n consuit�:nt a�;praisal ancl City staff II. ' �:,ti+n,.'.?s and is int�: ied to show tli��t ihe condition of these pa.rcels is St �,,ch t(�at tf�e priv�.�t �ctor would I��<:v� to e.>:pend more than tt��.: land is �vc_r�Il lIl order to rer�der it usable for t�,e construction contemplated. ' 1'I;e inii�rrnr�.tiun surnmarizcd on Attachments f3 and C, and on Analysis I, Appendix, . tot;ether :rith tl-ie data s�.;pperting such sun�m�iries, suj��orts the f.ollowing conclusions re�;;�rdinb tlie district: ' l. Sites 5, 6, 16 �nci 17 ar�:� ccrnprised of la,�d predon�inantly occupied by t�uilc'i,��s, st�-c��:s, u�ili�ies or otl�er improvements and 100a� of the buildings, S , ne>t incl�.�c!in�; o�_itb;�;ldings, are s�ructurally substandard to a de�rce requiring • : �;'�s'_;:r�:i.�l ren��v��:cn or clearance. These sites are 21.73 acri�s in area. ;� "i nis i� 15% of th�_ *etal �rca of the district. These sites are comprised ' of a tctal of ��0 �:.rccls. "Chis is 15"S of the to`��l parccls in the district. i 2. Si�ns l, 7_, 3, 4, 7, 8, 9, 10, 11, 12, 13, 14, 15 and !8 ure compris�:�:i of land ' not pr< '.>rnin,.ntty occupicd by Luildings, streeis, utilities or other improve- � , mc�nt�,, uu� lU0 ��,rccni of the total acreuge of such land, on these individual ' sit �s, n_:s a :aie- rn�irket v<il��e upcn in�.lusion in the redevelopnient district - -- wh:ch, �.vhen adc)eci tu the estim��t�e� cost of oreparing the land for use, , incl�:•iin�; u±ilities, if a,�y, ��x�.eeds its antici��ated fair ;�,a,rket value after c,ornNlcti� �; of s�zid prcpac-ation. "I�hesc �!?.cs 3rc �R.-7��`rc-s��n area. This is ':2�,� of the tot��+l ar^: of the di�trict. 't't:ese sites are comprised of a , `��ll �' 464 �,`�rcels. This is 85"0 of tl�e total parcels in the district. �. T��ken col(ectivc,�y, sites 1 thro�gh 18 �tre comprised of 1-�:nd not prcdomi- n�.nlly occuj>iec.i I,y I)UlIl�111b5� streets, i.�tili�ies ar cther ir� r y�ements, 97 02 ;:nd `�5 �;�rccnt uf ihc rut.�l acr;:a;;c of s�ich land ($8:&�,�c�e� �# 9��/ ' tot:�l uc�es of •;acant land) has a f:�ir rna.r!<et value �,pon inclusion in the recievele�, :��cnt uisirict which, whcn �r':ded to thi: �:stimated cost of preparing ' �f�e 1�-;rJ �ur use, incl� iin„ ��ilities, i:[ �iny, exceec�> its anticipated fair IT1�3C�:�'t value aftcr cornp!� .m of said pre�:�aration. The 1S sites are �3fl�� 124.07 ��-res in ��.r:�� n� ccr„ist of u�3 parcels uf larid. 544 , I3. QU/\LII�I(;;'�"1'lOi�'S /\S �� [-iOUSING DIS"CRICT i f�::ch of tl�e 1� sites �. r��,risin; the district �t�ill �ontzin a housing developm�nt, , �:�ti�e:r as � resu!t of r�ew constr• _'::on or ,-ch�t;ilitation. Lach housing ci�:•,�elopment, i�� t�_irn, �vill contafn ci�:�ellin� �nits int��nd�d f�r oc-c�ipancy b}� J�ersons or families of lo:✓ �tf1Cj �nocierate incorne, as defi;. ci in Sec�tio�� 273.73, Subdivision 11 of ' tt�e r1ct. , ' , - 37 - . - ��--�a�6 ° � � i No. 13. Etna/Birmingham Corridor � This site is legally described as: Lots 7 through l2, Block 2, Pease Bros. Addition.y , Also, lots 7 through 12, 61ock 2, Sargent' s Addition. Also, lots 1 through 9, and lot 14 through 20, Hamer's Subdivision. Also, lots 1 through 8, and lots 14 through 20, i Stenlund's Subdivision. Also, lots 1 through 6, and lots 18 through 24, Smith'S i ' Subdivision of Block 14. Also, lots 3 through 10, and lots 13 through 24, Block 3, Birmingham's Addition. Also, Blocks 3, 8 and 13, Stinson's Frances Street Addition. Also, lots 13 through 30, Block 4,� and lots 1, 2, 7 and 8, Block 5, Eastview Addit•ion' , No. 3; those ortions of Lots 2 anc�'-3 Block 3 and of Lots 2 and 3 Block 8 Auditor'� Subdivision No. 62 which lies west of Block 4, Eastview Addition No. 3; also that ortion of Euclid Street lyin between t e ex ens�on sou er y o e wes �ne f , Block 4 Eastview Addition No. 3; toget er w�t a por ion o o na ree (to be vacated lyinq between the sout ern r�g -o -way ine o onway ree and northern riqht-of-way line o u son �Fo� oca e in oc an oc _, � , Auditor's Subdivision No. 62. '02-14400-03003'' $ � 757 02-24620-30104'' S 757 02-32500-16000 S 110 02-14400-04003�� 757 02-32500-01000• 110 02-32500-17000 110 ' '02-14400-05003 - 757 02-32500-02000 110 02-32500-18000 120 02-1�400-06003 . 157 02-32500-03000 ' 120 02-32500-19000 110 02-14400-09003 2,154 02-32500-04000 110 02-32�00-20000 110 02-14400-10003 . 757 02-32500-05000 110 02-58700-07002 220 ,02-14400-13003 233 02-32500-06000 110 02-58700-08002 . 220 02-14400-14003 . 233 02-32500-07000 120 02-58700-0�002 220 02-14400-20003 � 1,513 02-32500-08000 220 02-58700-10002 200 ,02-14400-21003 • 220 OZ-32500-09000 � 220 02-58700-11002 220 02-14400-22003 • 233 02-32500-14000 200 02-58700-12002 220 02-14400-23002 -� 233 02-32500-15000 110 02-67200-07002 . 200 ,02-14400-24003 . 233 02-61200-08002 220 OZ-67200-09002 .: 220 �2-67200-10002� 220 02-71000-02000� 110 02-71400-01003�� 815 2-67200-12002.� 200 02-71000-03000 110 02-7?400-01013. �400t 02-67200-12002 � 220 � 02-71000-04000 110 �tax parcel codes �2-70200-01014 - 110 . 02-71000-05000. 120 will be added as Z-70200-02014 = 110 02-71000-06000 110 assi ned b Ramse Count 02-10200-03014 - 120 02-71000-07000 220 for new area * � �2-10200-04014 110 02-7]000-08000 � 4°6 Total $20,821 2-70200-05014 � 110 02-71000-14000 � 220 02-70200-06014 - 110 02-71000-15000 • 110 *Since the land which is ' 02-71000-16000• 110 Proposed to be added to 02-71000-17000. 120 the District is owned by 02-71000-18000� 110 the State and is not on the �2-70200-23014 '� 931 02-71000-19000 110 Tax Roles, Parcel Code 2-70200-24014 '� 640 02-71000-20000 � 110 Numbers are not avail he e 02-71000-01000 , 120 02-��400-01003 �• 815 from Ramsey Count T y will be added to �he Plan � as they become available. •;o. 14 . Robert/Concord Site This site is legally described as: Vacated Rebie S�►'E2t accruing �nd Lot ? , t'�sek 's , Rearranoement. ��-��0�-0?000 5 2,476 , w� , ti 1 ._ ._ __. _ _ ._. �. �.: . ��-�a�� c� _�, w r.� �? �o o- v c� �_� :-- w t� �— � o� � , , tn cn . . . . . . � r) . . . . . • I fv , `• , . �,- -� ,� . � -r Cn ':7 C!, C/1 C�7 C� ^ := C' �� i� r' %� " �f �� -� G ;-} c=� : --1 �- _, c� ; �.;� �, G �' r� : ;-. r� c_ �.- (� ,.- , , CJ ,`_'_ �, 'n O _7 �-r _..� cn fJ lt. (1 ^-i -' � (> .. tJ f r� -� - n I � i.� -1' - "t r ^� '� -�S _ O l� c.�� ,r �.t { ;.� �' .-T'' �� f; _+ i. ' N `G � � ; '� p � � VI , ' .' ' � � � �L v Ci t� C) � s'� n. C) �� ' rD � �r•�� %h �, n, � , � � �n � ,.� �, a $ ; �; � :� �� =�' �� , � �' � c �; o �,'- rn �_ � + � � �� -� l�` r, � (U �' . , (� _: �� .� ' C:. �= -t _. Ga �� ., �ti N 1 �= 3 :s � Ga CJ � o �, n � C� r -� c.' � � fJ 7: rh � p F W � :3 .� - �.n _. _ ' ' ^s `� `: r v �" (� �, -t �, � � --1 f'v N �t �. I�JN N '" � N , �) --�� ^ ' � � � �I � V N l �C.?�W G� W -� �.n �-- N � � �-- .n N ^t - N" _ � . (D C"i' p n r- l.� O r.) W tJ 0� N W C� �.� V L.� �: r , fi0�.� �.. G+ �— � �,_, �p C� � v � � �J `.n c�"� �lnCn�.n .-- '--• O N -� V ,fi (� rt r+� (� f 1 () J . � ` � U'� �'� .-._ Q� l,� \I �� W W V W N O � � -P �V`� '✓� �"' W �C: .-• �'. _F- C,� -� N '..n �O -� N �-- �_' '"" �p r. , O 1 � rh ' V V V . x' r� K' � � * � (� � � � �' (� F-* N � � N . �y 'Tj � ' � � 't • n �� G, cn � �.��-.�-• C.. •'j ..- 'L7 i, � Ai r- r- W � � ~ � a��v � �� ' w n� �' w � pCcn � n � (� . � .� , s J � � � �" � � �, �` c � o -, �� °' � � � a � �; r+. � =; � U �'7 �. �, a � v� �. � L N OJ (�' ' ' . � y Vf `{ O� -'� .. J � � 3 (� 3 'S O (! , 0 a w � Lv ' l"�' � C � � � � � � � � � � �' ' r� c � �+o � ' i �N � F 1..� m r� 3 �" ,,x a N n -i rD �+, iv rr �G ' X O , ~ � • , n ' O Vl �'i 'TJ � :L7 Q O -P .� '-- �_. q� W t�) W \:,� \.�� \,� N � � � C 4� cn O fD C W \U r_ {- (V `:� �`J -1:� t-- �-- r- 00 ': (� "' t � W �� .n �.� ' CI, '['' � � � O fD tv c+ ' � � tn a �G ' 6I F.; �. . r' � � v~,i C-7 N r� m ' • a O ,' N ,n 'J -t C'v � � fp � G ` � `� � �. v, �,.� .T � r O �' .i' � rt p � � � r...� � ��` C^ C . c+ O (� y � c-1� (D m � c�* n ' � �. � I sL n {-. C;� c.n �.n W cv+ �j �. W �J U �� , �: • � ' . � .' Cn C: � n.. ,-> n � r+ � � . �, ,,a �� c � � x cr r' G„= ca � � G:.`< � A� � Z n , J � ' c+ ..-� � i rJ fD (l -�� .: -- �-` u � " �-, ;h J F' d � � � � � , � � ' ' � � �'' r F .J .�' n -' .C� � � I; Ja � cn � C) fD r��t _ r r-►-r � ��_�a�l , OoVi�w �. .~-O�DOOV�W�J�-- l O ��7�In 2?3��ZOcnV��TII� V, r � o � uw -, � .. u � w ,, ' Q a u, .. ":� m . .r.f.�-.A� G � 'C+ a N � O N a� �� o � Hq7�; �-1D� � � �=•' v n��v�� ',��i,��, � 7 a� o� °; tnv > � ort. C�.D'yO`�� 7C�A j f�' � (�u V:O ' ry O T � f i ^ ^ <n � ' � � z'c,a a" � a' oa � � � � � n � � � � ' � `v�-�-..-..�- n� v�y 1-' �t�wb�o0 vo.v�v�n�-�aue��v o -, W �oa�c�P � vvv�.- •,a.oa.o. �o a `t .v�� oo:oo�ooi�wc».ni� ,��a a p••;�.�.n �O W 00 W W(ri f1�•J F W r1 � �nG�OM" CT7 �O�OvG�.rinf»4o0 Ol - � � tD � . VN � N y�VW J-lnr-IJ�-In�- � • . . � . . . . . . . Go�O O��F �O Q�O��--W C��J f»W V tD �OQ�Fw � \nW�" C')Ni� - T�-ln (:W � ' � ' � ' . v . .'✓' !�t�C) ,i I, A V�-W CT1 �--'F~�-W U � w v oo•s �w w�: o o.�,,w•o� � f; ;" ^ r, W �C��WWfY-U[�IJNG �� x,nT w ;,r O W W�,,' .tnw-'V.V O�tn ln c?�.n�,� � N � �� 4�vvi�li� N •.n v.,-•�n r o 0 0 o t� •+ p, ,.;.a � IV�•lWC)V OC�QC�C� � �,f� :T ' . 3 �-�. A n i•. � R 1� y tn'O C ��'E u ►- .I . r � (D.W O O � ' . . . . . . . � ^ ', . N t7��n Q� V Oo O�Oo O��O W�.n rh� �.. � fo �:� ►�00 Q N V�n�n O O�C'N(�r W � � ��p,� � �,n • �� ; � •i _ - , ' �' �n.r _ v� r . ( �_ i� o-. .� �--r- W r r� GJ � C) �� `� � .1; , � V O Oc'� O ��N V C7��O�V C'i�O� . a•i �� , � �'� . � ..� G 6 �� 3•C �`r�Vi~ � V Go ts�O\��\.�C+.Vi IJ��W .� C ,) U 'G fs.F ►t� �O 0�I. C O O�h>�N•�J W O p V _ry � ��o W � N� . aon�r v► 0000v��.n�oov. "•3 ,° a , �• vt �' _ �� )c ^ L V a i �� - �'• .r:�}'n , - . . i�f ;^_.' W. �_. . N N C�;1, (Y ' J . E°• �'.`•�- n 'vu w�''f. ' , . . � ��v, v, . '_,.S </� V��p�) O � 7 ' �^ I.t�- U N !� �..n � •t (�. �� sNw�' p mv�a,va,`•rvvi• r+ . .,- _. W omwuoo.r>vrnw�w � �:,'c� ,. - '0 i.; ' F�. ' ' . ':' •a��r ' !dr-�1�)� F„� i-.r��rr-WNIJ�� G � r��"'�' � Af N G�Q�O V� IJ�-- O U��j �. 'V N W A F� v r OO 00 O N�O C7�\.��- . U � .Nf � �� n ' ' r° - ��(7 n ' . , q (J C t:� ] n :> :'��(y (A �� :7 "" i-' �_,r-�-.-�-'- �-�-- (D i '•1 C�?b5 tD W N IJ r N O\O U�fl Vi •j I�J � �,ov�o v,oc�or�c�v,c�oo v�iL � , • n � z 'r1�cr� � ' . - 49 . , O� V G'� s r W N �-- O �D Oo V 0� ln � W N �-- �� " �� ' �7 C ',.�� .� ,�J CT1 � �J fp � Z � (11 �] (n (n [7] C�J C � .-. (D q r+ � w ^ti �. �p � fi� ^s O ;* � W � 0' �-- < � p=i N :' Q, VNi < r+ � � O <`n� T C� O "j �D ' w � � � � � ~ O � � a ?� aF� � � � Ih a o 'T � � �' wa`� =o' � � < � � � � � c� � o � � �o b � � � ;� ,�' v��, � n �? � ,'��, w � o , -, � ,�+ a n � � � -� x -, � �.�.N fD ° N � a'_ %�' � a a � ; � CD a � oo� � � ^• � � � � ' o � ' � � , --� O s' O A O � O � � � OjAO :v00 �� a x 7 � 7 � ' 7 � x j X � 7 � � � '+ r+ r+ .+ fD (� '+ '+ x o y (,�- ° w N W � ?'_ � ;i N � � V�f ~ N V�1 C ' G S O �' �' �' O �- O �' �' a- v, ` �v � v �v �v � v � v �v v-� � � n o yo � � o � o � o 00 • O`� .� � 4 �. ' a � � � � ? � � � � � � , o _ o � � ° � v �'� �- �- �' �? °, w y Vf N o a o ,,.: o 0 0 0 o a � w w � �7 .- � . C �" C /ro C C C �-► fp � � ,..rtr CD ' N f� N (� Vf N N � � � o- w� rt w �� wc� a � co � � � � w. � aa �' A b w � , � � ~ ~ h � ~. � � � o � �. a � � a � � � y � w y �. ,� ,� � ° � ~' � � �' 3 � N. � o � n. w �, �o �, , ' N ~ � ofD � `� �, -� w .- �,�;. �. �. '�" ° �' �• H, ? � � o -'�, (� p� �,,� �.,� N N pl,�t V F-- � V `..n r- W `n N W 0� •- .., • n 7 � w �- �' � fD ' u - N �--• U `.n -� ��1 O �O � Oo G� �• C7 � �O O O \n- N O � '"�p G r+ �p :� S �- Z 3 O' fD ,.� � . . Hs .D 0� y � Q� C C � �T . . ,.� c�n' � � n �-* � �. O Z °' •-� °-`� o p'_ v a � -� � � Z ' oo- o � � � 37 � ra .� C7 . �„f .� ca, cc � a a O l.nN N V� W � N Q� � �' � �.nNWO� r-- (3p O O 7' � "' C 3 �"ti < (D C �p � a � n � l�D C .- w o c:� o '.� -� oQ� '.�+ �D N W `.n ►-� o O� �D C7 O ti.n n- � ' „�... Q� 0G N> b 3 vn Q r~+'� � . Vl (� c ^S n � �� ' . A' /-F r- CD r+ rF O � � N ' � r-. � � � ' ZS � '"� � � �' CA � w ?' iT� � � �D � y � � � � �'> � � � � �, � � :y ° � � � � � z ° Z � � � Z � ;x � � � n � n n y � a :7ri '�7 � a 'z7a '17a 'z7 � �. a �;� n. `�1TT. 7C7� ,-. TX �, ' � � ,- :} �. � Y � �. o ' : �. ?. ?. ?. o� �. �. o O��• '� J �„� ''�v `'iv ''�v � � -'' o �n � Uo av W OC � 0� 0� -T O C � .: o R° o ,�, �- o R° o R° p ;�° �- �, o R° 0 9° �- :�- � �- � �- �- �. �,�-, �+ n � r* � n � rt � � r+ '+ �+ r+ r+ .+ Q, � �o � � � � � � � � � � � � � � � � � � ' � � y � a � a � a � ap ap � p � � , � � � � a �. � ' � � � n .� .c� � � � � � � -� � -� � � � -� � � -� � � � ^ � � -� � v' ti` � rnc� o. c. c. o� rnmma� mma. rnmc� mo` o. v. mc: mc� rnv a � 3 , N N N N N �v N N N N N N N N N N N N N N N N N N N �J ,.C� � � � � �7 nn nnnnnnn (�p O� CD O� G� � < N N W. � . ' � � � - 50 - r _ . � ��-i�� s�y o� sa��t pd�si - ��n�ng co��ss�on reso��n , �s'� n�mber 84-�� A��gist i�,, i q._ _ WHEREAS, the Housing Policy Plan of the St. Paul Comprehensive Plan and the St. Paul Housing Assistance Plan define the need for more housing of all types, more housing for lower income people, and more rental housing for families; and YJHEREAS, the New Housing and Blighted Lands Development Project works toward meeting the needs defined by the Housing Policy Plan and Housing Assistance Plan; and � WHEREAS, the Proposal to Amend the New Housing and Blignted Lands Development , Project tax increment district #12 would make 60 units of new housing avail- able to low and moderate income households; and WHERE�S, the 3.57 acres contiguous to the Etna-Birmingham site proposed for inclusion in the tax increment district v�ould not b? developable by solely privat� means due to the extraordinary expense of correcting poor soil conditions; and l•!HEREAS, the District 4 Community Council has reviewed this a�endment and has given it the Council 's support; NO�d, THEREFORE, BE IT RESOLVED, that the St. Paul Planning Commission supports the Proposal to Amend the New Housing and Blighted Lands Development Project Tax Ir.crement District #12 for the Etna-Qirmingham site #17, proposed June, 1984, and recom�;ends its adoption by the St. Paul Housing and Redevelop- ment Au�hority and the St. Paul City Council . ��d �� VanHoef � ' s��d by � Summers j� ��/��' Unanimous Voice Vote � a�� 1 �` ��{/�/��°�i. ✓ �Q.�'`lTT °' ,. . . CITY OF SAINT PAUL o �- a DEPARTMENT OF PLANNING AND ECONOMIC DEVELOPMENT � tilti[Iilll ti � �� a DIVISION OF PLANNING o ^ +.6• 25 West Fourth Street,Saint Paul,Minnesota,55102 612-292-1577 GEORGE LATIMER MAYOR DATE: August 2, 1984 T0: P1 ann i ng Corr�ni ss i on FROt•1: Anne Kelly RE: Staf.f Report -` Review of the Proposal to Amend the New Housing and B,lighted Lands Development Project Tax Increment District #12 INTRODUCTION Ti�e St. Paul Housing and Redevelopment Authority adopted the New Housing and Blighted Lands Development Project in June, 1981. This project established• a city-wide tax increment district for 18 project sites. The purpose of the project is to develop housing on lands which, by reason of special problems or conditions, have not reached full development potential by the ordinary operations of private enterprise. The ar�endment attached proposes adding 3.57 acres of land to the tax increment district. This addition, contiguous to the Etna-Birmingham site, will make possible a development of 60 units of ownership housing in six separate � � buildings. The staff of the Housing Division of the St. Paul Department of Planning and Economic Development is seeking a recommendation from the Planning Commission in support of this proposed amendnent at the August 10 corrnnission meeting. The resolution, if adopted, will be a recommendation to the Housing and Redevelopment Authority Board and the City Council for adoption of the plan amendment. AUTHORITY FOR REVIEW According to the 1979 Minnesota Housing and Redevelopment Authority Act (Minnesota Statutes 462.411 et. se . ) , amendments to a tax increment district that result in a geographic enlargement must occur within the first five years of the existence of the district. Geographic modifications are subject to the same notification and public hearing requirements associated with the establishment of the district. The staff of the Housing Division of the St. Paul Department of Planning and Economic Development is proposing this amendment to the New Housing and Blighted Lands Development Project Tax Increment District �12 as adopted June, 1981 and amended April , 1983. In the event of such a proposed amendment qualifying a new project site; the proposal shall be submitted as a plan amendment for consideration of the Planning Commission and approval by the City Council of St. Paul in the manner provided by law in the ��linnesota Tax Increment Financing Act, Chapter 273. . �►. ,) � BACKGROUNDS AND FINDINGS The purpose of the New Housing and Blighted Lands Development Project is a) ,to increase the supply of decent, safe and sanitary housing. . . (for) all income groups not being adequately met by private enterprise. . .b) to develop or redevelop sites. . .which qualify as blighted and deteriorated areas under the Housing and Redevelopment Act,. . .c) to assist in the provision of rental housing, and d) to undertake and finance these actions as one Hou�ing Develop- ment and Redevelopment Project and Tax Increment Finance District. The development proposal is consistent with the original scope and purposes �f the project in that it will provide 60 units of housing affordable to low and moderate-income households (ranging from $60,000 to $75,000 per unit) . It will also develop an underused site considered to be undevelopable solely by private enterprise because of the poor soil conditions. The cost of land acquisition, soil correction, excavation, utility improvement and cost of easements would result in a land cost that would exceed its fair market value after completion of said improvements. � CONSISTENCY WITH CITY PLANS The proposed development is supportive of The City's Comprehensive Plan, Land Use component, which identifies the Etna-Birmingham site for medium to high- density residential development. This project is also consistent with the housing component of the comprehensive plan. The housing supply objectives are to: A) Expand both ownership and rental opportunites; B) Increase the variety of housing opportunities within neighborhoods ; and C) Increase rental and ownership opportunities for lower income households. The proposal is highly consistent with the plans of the District 4 Community Council which recommends in the I982 Survey of Vacant Lands that up to 60 townhouse units be developed on that site. It also meets the goals of the Dayton's Bluff-District 4 plan which seeks to "maintain and enhance the quality of housing and the variety of housing density, price and style (and) where appropriate encourage new home construction which addresses the economic and social needs of the community." Oistrict 4 has reviewed this amendment proposal and supports its development. STAFF RECOMMENDATION Staff recommends that the project amendment to the New Housing and Blighted Lands Development Project be found consistent with the City's Comprehensive Plan. COMMITTEE RECOMMENDATIONS The Economic Development Committee recommends the attached resolution on a 3-0 vote (.Van Hoef motioned, Brown seconded with McDonnell also yoting for approval ) . � : ��r�� . RESOLU.TION I�O. 8�-8/15-3 , ' RESOLUTION APPROVIr'G A�ZEhD;i7E\T OF THE � REDEVELOPn1ENT �AND TAX INCREI7ENT FINAI�CII�G PLAI�S FOR THE NEZ4 HOUSII�TG AND BLIGHTED LA\'DS DEVELOPI7ENT PROJECT �ti'HEREAS, upon recommendation of the Housing and P�edevelopment Authority of the City of Saint Paul� A�innesota (HRA), the Council of the City of Saint Paul, on June 9, 1981� adopted Resolution CF No. 276969 approving a Redevelopment Project and Plan, and Resolution CF No. 276970 approving a Financina Plan and creating a Tax Increment Financing District for the New Housing and Blighted Land Development Project and Tax Increment District, encomp�ssing the provision of new housing, including housina for low and moderate income persons and families, on eighteen sepa:ate, undeveloped sites; and � Sti'HEREAS, the designated private redeveloper of one of these sites, the southern portion of the Etna-Birmingham Site No. 13, has convinced the staff that feasibility of site development� ��ould be enhanced by eapanding the size of this site by inclusion of 3:57 acres of excess highway right-of-way land, and the Minnesota Department of Transportation has indicated its willinoness to make said land available to the . � Project, which proposal has been approved by the Planning Council� Community Development District No. 4, the Saint Paul Planning Commission, and the Saint Paul C�pitol Improvement Budget Committee; and . _ . jti'�IEREAS� amendments to the Project Redevelopment Plan end Tax Increment Financrna glan, enlarging the area of the New Housing and Blighted Lands Redevelo�ment Projeet mTd•Taz Increment Financing District by adding 3.57 acres of�?and to the Etn�- Birmingham Site have been submitted for consideration of this HRA Board, and it • . eppears that an enlarged Etna-Birmingham Site qualifies as�a redevelopment distriet and as a housing district within the meariing and provision of �Zinnesota Statutes Section 273.73� Subdivisions 10(3) and 11� constitutes a blighted or deteriorated area . �vithin the provision of Section 462.421, Subdivision 13(1), (2) and (3);�now.therefore, be it - ' RESOLVED by the BoP.rd of Commissioners af the HRA as follows: . � 1) That the findings made in HRA Resolution ro. 82-6/3-12 re��ecting the . Etna-Birmingham Site� New Housing and Blighted Lands Redevelo�ment Project and Tax Increment Financing District ar� hereby affirrf►ed; � 2) Tha� the enlarged Etna-Birmingham Site constitutes s bli�hted area under � . � � Section 462.421, Subdivision 13(1), (2) or (3), a redevelopment district under Section 2 i 3.i 3, . ' SuSdivision 10(3)� and a housing distriet under Section 273.73, Subdivision 11 of � . i�linnesota Statutes; and ' � (3) That enlargement of the Etna-Birminaham Site ti�•ill improve the financial feasibility of its development for housing use� including provision of low and moderate income housing, consistent v��ith the public purposes and provisions of the 4'Iunicipal I3ousina and Redevelopment Act and the New Housing and Blighted Lands Project Redevelopment Plan. � (Over) .: -� •�` � . . : ��/�� RESOL��ED FURTHER that amendment of the Projeet Redevelopme;�t Project and Plan end Tax Increment Financina District and Plan to enlarge the Etna-Birmingham Site by 3.57 acres are hereby approved as.in the public interest and �s necessary to the nccomplishment of the purposes and objectives stated in the Rede�►elopment and Tax Increment Financing Plans for the New Housing �nd Blighted Lands Project. RESOLVED FINALLY that the Executive Director is authorized to communicate this action and Resolution to the Saint Paul City Council and to request City Council consideration of these amendments upon public hearing called for that purpose. . _ ` • .. � � ��ew-.' ' � n � � - � _ � � . ) . • . � �," . j • o 0 �'+niTE - C�7v CI.EWK . PINK - FIY4N�E . � .:AryARV - DEPARTMEI�7 G I TY OF SA I �'T PAU L Council /�/� / 0'VE - M4yQR File �O• • // "/ —��T � �ity Attny'JTH � Council Resolution � Presented By Referred To Committee: Date Out of Committee By Date RESOLUTION APPROVING AMENDMENT OF THE REDEVELOPMENT PLAN AND TAX INCREMENT FINANCING PLAN OF THE NEW HOUSING AND BLIGHTED LANDS DEVELOPMENT PROJECT; ENLARGEr�NT OF ETNA-BIRMINGHAM SITE N0. 13 WHEREAS, by its Resolutions , CF No. 276969 and 276970 adopted June 9 , 1981 , the Council of the City of Saint Paul approved the. Redevelopment Plan and Tax Increment Financing Plan and the New Housing and Blighted Lands Development �roject and Tax Increment Financing District therein provided for encompassing the provision of new housing, including housing for low and moderate income persons and families , on eighteen separate, undeveloped sites with tax increment financing assistance; and WHEREAS , there has been submitted to this meeting a Proposal to Amend,t,,,�he New Housing And Blighted Lands Development Project and Tax Increment District, Etna-Birmingham, Site ��13 , consisting of six mimeographed pages , a location map and site plan, and an Attachment containing the specific Plan amendments, which Proposal would enlarge the geographic area by 3.57 acres contiguous to the Southerly part of Site �k13 to be acquired as excess highway right- of-way from the State of Minnesota, would increase estimated project expenditures permitting the private construction of 60 • units of low and moderate income housing on said Southerly part of the Etna-Birmingha.m Site and would increase the portion of , captured assessed value to be retained by HR.A for the Project ; and . COUNCILMEN Yeas .• Nays Requested by Department of: • Fletcher Drew Itl F8V0[ Masanz • Nfcosla scnetbsi A gai n s t BY Tsdeseo � Wilson Form Approved by City Attorney Adopted by Council: Date �ertified Passed by Council Secretary . BY By� • �►pproved by 11av,or. Date Approved by Mayor for Submission to Council Bv � . By � . �, � � �y-�a�� -2- WHEREAS , by its Resolution No . 84-17 adopted Au,ust 13 , 1984 the Saint Paul Planning Conunission upon findings of need for provision of low and moderate income housing and for enlargement of the Etna-Birmingham Site to make feasible its private develop- ment , indicated its support for the Amendment and recommended its adoption by the Housing and Redeveloprnent Authority of the City of Saint Paul, Minnesota (HitA) and the City Council ; and WHEREAS , by its Resolution No. 84-8/15-3 adopted August 15 , 1984 , the HRA upon findings that the enlarged Etna-Birmingham Site constituted a blighted area under Section 462.421 , Subd. 13 (1) , (2) or (3) , a redevelopment district under Section 273 .73 Subdivision 10(3) , and a housing district under 273 . 73, Subd. 11 , of Minnesota Statutes , that enlargement of the Site would improve the financial feasibility of its development for housing use, . and that enlargement of the Etna-Birmingham Site was in the public interest and necessary to accomplish the purposes and objectives of the Redevelopment and Tax Increment Financing Plans approved the Amendr�.e�t; and � WHEREAS , HRA and Gaughn Land, Incorporated, a Minnesota business corporation, have entered into a Land Sale and Develop- ment Agreement under date of September 17 , 1984, providing for the staged purchase and development of the Southerly part of the enlarged Etna-Birmingham Site by said private business corporation with 60 units of lo.w and moderate income housing with purchase . ' mortgage money commitments from the Minneapolis , Saint Paul Phase ; II Family Housing Fund and Joint Housing Fund Programs ; and � WHEREAS , the HRA has provided opportunity to the members of the Ramsey County and Independent School District P1o . 625 Boards a - to meet with the �iRA Board and has presented copies of the Amendment by cover letter dated August 6 , 1984, including an estimate of the fiscal and economic implications of the proposed Amendment, and the HRA has also submitted the Amendment to and - received favorable recommendations. from the District 4 Planning Council and the Capital Improvement Budget Committee; and 00 � ' r � ��/ /��o _3_ WHEP.EAS , the City Council has received public comment from all interested parties at a public hearing conducted on the Amendment on Thursday, September 20, 1984, upon notice published in the Saint Paul Pioneer Press and Dispatch and the Saint Paul Legal Ledger on August 25 , 1984 , has reviewed the reasons and data set forth in the Amendment supporting the findings and determinations hereafter set forth, and has considered the written findings and recommendations of the District Council , . . the Planning Commission, the CIB Committee and the HRA and other information available to and within the knowledge of the Councilmembers ; now therefore , be it RESOLVED by the Council of the City of Saint Paul , in view of the foregoing hereby approved as findings that the following further findings are hereby made : 1 . That the enlarged Etna-Birmingham Site ��13 � � would not be made available for redevelop- -ment , nor could the provision of new low and moderate income housing thereon reasonably be expected to occur solely through action by private enterprise within the reasonably foreseeable future without the use of tax increment and the other financial aid sought and to be pro- � vided under the amended Project Financing and District Tax Increment Financing Plans ; 2. That the �Amendment will afford maximum opportunity, consistent with the sound needs of the community as a whole for the provision of new housing by redevelopment of the Southerly part of the Etna-Birmingham Site by private enterprise ; � ' 3 . That the Amendment conforms to the Saint Paul � � Comprehensive Plan, the general plan for the development of the community as a whole; and 4. That the enlarged Etna-Birming�ham Site ��13 singlely, and together with the other Sites of the New Housing and Blighted Lands .+�.+iTE ♦- C�TV CLE�+�c . • � c..�� - ��:•~:E � GITY OF SAI � T �AUL Council '� ARY — DEGqR!MEN! � �/' / 8,�,E — w�a;oF _ File N0._�/ —/��V' � Council Resolution Presented By Referred To Committee: Date Out of Committee By Date -4- Development Project and Tax Increment Financing District constitute a redevelopment district within the meaning of Minnesota Statutes Section � 273 . 73 Subdivision 10(3) and a housing district within the meaning of Section 273 . 73 Subdivision 11 . RESOLVED FURTHER that the enlarged redevelopment project and tax increment district and amended Redevelopment and Tax Increment Financing Plans for the New Housing and Blighted Lands Project and District are hereby approved as submitted and HRA is directed to file copies of the amended Plans and this Resolution with the Minneso.ta Department of Energy and Economic Development and the Ramsey County Department of Taxation and Recqrd Mana�ement. COUNCILMEN Requested by Department of: Yeas Na��s Fletcher Drsw [fl FBVOf Masanz Nlcosta scneibe� Against BY . Tedesco Wilson . Form Approved by City Attorney Adopted by Council: Date Certified Passed by Council Secretary BY . B� - -- -- -- Approved by \lavor: Date Apptoved by Mayor for Submission to Council B�� _ By o� ��i�� , PROPOSAL TO AMEND THE NEW HOUSING AND BLIGHTED LANDS DEVELOPMENT PROJECT, 1 TAX INCREMENT DISTRICT #12, AS ADOPTED JUNE, 1981, AND AMENDED APRIL, 1983 ' INTRODUCTION ' The New Housing and Blighted Lands Development Project was established by the City of Saint Paul in June, 1981, for the purposes of increasing the supply of decent I ' and affordable housing for all income groups, including low- and moderate-income households; to develop or redevelop sites which qualify as blighted and deteriorated � areas; and to provide financing for these activities under the ftedevelopment Project District and Tax Increment Financing Plan. , In establishing the Redevelopment Project and Tax Increment Financing District, ' eighteen sites throughout the city were identified to be included in the overall plan. The sites are either privately or publicly owned and include vacant land and existing, deteriorated buildings. An analysis of all the sites indicated that some form of public � assistance would be required if development were to occur. Several of these sites have undergone, or are planned for, redevelopment according to the Project ' Redevelopment Plan and Saint Paul Comprehensive Plan. 1 Each site, and the District as a whole, qualifies as a Housing project and a ftedevelopment project under the requirements of the Tax Increment Financing Act. The duration of the District may be for up to twenty-five years under that Act. � PR.OPOSED AMENDMENT r---- The proposal consists of the addition of a parcel of land adjacent to Site #13, the ' Etna-Birmingham corridor, to the Redevelopment Plan and Tax Increment District. The amendment is proposed as a necessary modification to the District in light of � additional information concerning the site's development potential which was not available at the time the District was created. Thus, the actions to amend the District ' are being undertaken to ensure appropriate and timely development of the site through the assistance available under the Tax Increment Financing Plan and existing City � programs. ' ��-��a� � � ETNA-BIRMINGHAM CORRIDOR (SITE #13) BACKGROUND � This site is located in Planning District 4 between Sixth Street, Birmingham Street, Highway I-94 and Etna and Clarence Streets. It consists of undeveloped land which , will require extensive soil excavation, replacement and compaction prior to development. In addition, public improvements will be necessary to provide access to portions of � the site. The site consists of two separate development sites--a Southern site and . a Northern site. Portions of the site are owned by the Housing and Redevelopment , Authority and the State of Minnesota (as excess highway right-of-way). At the time the development project was created (1981), no development was planned, , nor firm commitments or contracts entered into for development of the site. However, City plans indicated that after proper soil correction and access improvements, the � Southern and Northern sites would be appropriate for approximately 137 units of ownership-type housing, with approximately 68 of these units available for low- and ' moderate-income households. � Firm plans are now available for the Southern site of the Etna-Birmingham corridor. The Housing and Redevelopment Authority has designated a developer for the site who has proposed the construction of 60 units of ownership housing in six separate � buildings. The sales prices of the units will be affordable for households of low-and moderate-income income (ranging from $60,000 to $75,000 per unit). The developer � has received preliminary commitments for below-market mortgage financing from the Minneapolis-Saint Paul Family Housing Fund Program (Phase II) and the Joint � Housing Program. To complete land assembly for the project, the State of Minnesota will be transferring title to a portion of the site to the Housing and Redevelopment ' Authority at a designated price. The complete site will then be transferred to the private developer after completion of the standard requirements for purchase of � Housing and Redevelopment Authority land at a negotiated sales price. Extraordinary costs associated with the site are being evaluated by City staff and ' the developer but will most likely include: land acquisition costs, soil correction and excavation costs, utility improvement expenses, and the cost of easements for various � publie improvements. � ' - 2 - � ��.'�� , At the time the Tax Increment District was created, the boundaries of the Etna-Birmingham site were established in the absence of anticipated developments and adequate information � from the State regarding the availability of excess highway right-of-way. Therefore, City staff alone determined the boundaries to the best of their ability, without benefit ' of the advice of a private developer and the State identifying specifically what lands it could transfer, based on the most likely area to be included in a housing development ' project. The purpose of the proposed amendment is to modify the western boundary of the Southern site to include the entire housing project which is proposed. � Three years of study by City staff, a neighborhood task force, and evaluation by a private real estate development company, have determined that the most developable � site is an area including the area now in the Development Project Plan, plus approximately 3.57 acres of land directly adjacent to the westerly boundary of the site. (See attached ' map -- shaded area is proposed addition to the site). The acreage of the Southern site, which is now in the Development Project Plan, is approximately 3.33 acres. Addition � of the area of the proposed amendment would result in a total site of 6.90 acres. The State of Minnesota has now identified the exact land area which it is willing to ' make available to the City for redevelopment purposes. By combining the City-owned portion of the development site with the excess highway right-of-way from the State, � private development of the Etna-Birmingham, Southern Site, for housing is now possible. The addition of land to the Redevelopment Project Plan also creates a more suitable � development site, than previously anticipated, which is expected to reduce the total development costs of the project by reducing costs associated with the relocation � of certain utilities. Failure to add the acreage of the proposed amendment would result in half of the � planned housing units being outside the Development Project Plan and Tax Increment Financing District. Since many of the extraordinary costs associated with this development ' have not been finalized, the development may require assistance, in addition to below market mortgage financing, from the Tax Incrernent Financing District. In the event ' the planned development requires little or no assistance, it would be necessary to capture the assessed value from the entire development to provide tax increment � revenues for assistance to the Northern site of the Etna-Birmingham corridor which are likely to be very significant since no public access to this site exists. � - 3 - � � 1,��1-�� The following is an analysis of the difference in tax increment revenue which would result from this amendment: i Total Tax Total Tax � Average Estimated Assessed Tax Increment Increment Sales Price Market Value Value Per Mill Increment Units W/I After Per Unit Per Unit Unit Rate Per Unit The District Amendment � uni s uni s � $65,000 $55,250 $9,898 110.00 $1,089 $32,670 $65,340 � IMPACT OF PROPOSED AMENDMENT TO TAXING JURISDICTIONS � The overlapping taxing jurisdictions whose assessed valuation this Tax Increment Plan a►nendment would affect include: ' Independent School District No. 625 -- boundaries are coterminous with the City of Saint Paul. � County of Ramsey -- to whose total assessed valuation the City of Saint Paul � contributes about 53%. Housing and Redevelopment Authority of the City of Saint Paul -- which is � the requesting authority for this amendment. The HRA will be considered � identical with the City of Saint Paul for purposes of this analysis. Port Authority of the City of Saint Paul -- whose power of levy and use of , the property tax is limited to .789 mills. For this analysis, it will be treated the same as the City of Saint Paul. � Metropolitan Authorities -- such as the Metropolitan Council, Metropolitan , Airports Commission, Metropolitan Transit Authority, Metropolitan Waste Control Commission, and the Metropolitan Mosquito Control District. Of these, only , the Metropolitan Council, Metropolitan Transit Authority and Metropolitan Mosquito Control District levy on real estate. � Of these jurisdictions, the only two which would be affected more than nominally by this amendment would be Independent School District No. 625 and the County � of Ramsey. � - 4 � f� � �jo Assuming an annual captured assessed value of $296,940, which would be added to � the Tax Increment Finaneing Plan from this proposed amendment and an assumed mill rate of 110.00 mills, the amendment will generate an additional annual tax increment � of $32,670. The percentage of this increment contributed by the various taxing jurisdictions, if the development were to occur without public intervention, is shown below. ' Mills (Taxes Payable Annual � Taxin� Jurisdiction in_1984) Percentage Tax Increment City of Saint Paul 29.432 26.2 $ 8,559.54 � County of Ramsey 27.143 24.1 $ 7,873.47 School District No. 625 51.166 45.5 $14,864.85 Miscellaneous* 4.709 4.2 $ 1,372.74 1��0 100.00 $',� ,�6�.�0 , � *All City and Metro Authorities ' The following table shows the additional dollars per $1,000 of assessed valuation that � would have to be levied to compensate for the loss of tax dollars in estimated tax increments for each taxing jurisdiction. The tax increments derived from projects � in this plan would not be available to any of the taxing jurisdictions were it not for the public intervention of the Saint Paul Housing and Redevelopment Authority. � If it could be assumed that the captured assessed value was available for each taxing jurisdiction, the non-receipt of tax dollars represented as tax increments may be determined by estimating what amount the mill rate for property outside the tax , increment financing amendment area would have to be increased to raise the same amount of tax dollars in each taxing jurisdiction that would be available if the � projects occurred without the assistance of the Saint Paul HRA. � 1983 Required Annual Assessed $/$1,000 Assessed Tax Taxing Jurisdiction Valuation Valuation Increment iCity of Saint Paul $1,693,681,400 .000005 $ 8,559.54 County of Ramsey $3,197,727,657 .000002 $ 7,873.47 � School District No. 625 $1,693,681,400 .000009 $14,864.85 � � - 5 - � � �� This table is relevant only if assumed that the development would have occurred without the existence of the Tax Increment District and the Development Program. � If this assumption is incorrect and the HRA believes it is, then the only real impact on the assessed values of the other taxing jurisdictions is: , 1. Any inflationary values from the District which have been attributable , to the tax base of these taxing jurisdictions will be lost during the duration of the District; and � 2. Upon termination of the District, all taxing jurisdictions will benefit from the entire future assessed values. � � � ' � � � � � � � � - 6 - � ,�- - ,. �� - � - � 1 � ... ._ . --. -- ° , 393.30• - /s.r.oo • � -x °�± `? •'' .. /gp.o p'. 3� 3� � � '�� `_ �"�4b•: y� 3 .9�'o � !�i!♦ "w ,. .,!r_ +' , _ 9� � � 1� � _ � #`.'�, - � ��.:s'" �y ``� y� 2 9 _ ��". ` .�;� 2 � � � �� . �3 2 - ,. .v 3 . ' � � � ,f ,� 7. .B �: z� .o a� ,� O � � � ' 1; � � . �; ;. ._ ;�� M . �, r ' � " `< ,�-._._._ �'� w f � y �'t. •�, ' ��p N . �.,M.. M, z— 1•1 _ —w O , _' �� `,� � — — . t� � � •� �'� . . �, 2 M � � � • � • •---. . _ . ` .:�.. 1 � � � f .. y � 7 � ' : 4�. , 2 3 � . o � � "a :w ,. . � ��dd: : 0 0 0 „„'��.w ,..A^�� ... �.., .., � o n o .�ky� �•;� "�s ,,(1 .3 * � � � `� r.'' � �l { '� �g, � � � t.rc.w,. , .v 2 t _ � Z r �.'� . '� � �' p ' . .a � ��;� I .. �� "!� r�. �� • Q^ r �I. � /\� y p .«: ..,. � � � / .� .t '; � �"" '�'� ,Ia. � �� 2 1 �- �, � � '� � ..�" '" • � � } ` � � ..... , �I � a��'�-" .»C~ �+,rr.. !` � � , i � � . �``�',s.+ �� h � ?I° � � . ` io I � e �r, �� •Y, � `► � � `i �,�.�, ._ -�.�.� M• �`• oo" v P o �:� � d«d �9 � Q � � . � 3 ; Ir o, , � "`O' ~ �� Y. .� �, n»1�.,. .O'�. �f, �} T �,:.c�.�..d' :5a�r�e f J oo' 1 � � �2 , ..' ' ,j. ,` .., � O � OL� . ,• ..j�. � I •� �_4 __ � . ...� ;:� . .I,� o i ` � . �'� � �3 1- - - - - - P -- ' 4 � .. . - �� , /� ��: ° ; ; 1 )'. , ., ..A . �+t ti ' I � � • Y ,. �9,� Z , �.fl. � Y y� •�1� '��i,y � ' ___ � \ �y� 1 . Np ps`�'.'�..}. �/pjT`� r ,� r�• /V , \ \� \5 �r�� `d . . !; � � I \ 0 �� e. . ' � '�^� � O. � �r 0 'L 0 ��`T �r ,y�,FO•,�f8...� � �•��/jp.�',�r F�.:rs.'-'.�� ... ."�^�'� • � i� ;5` p° . - J J'/.Jl• • ' it � � v � ry � ' P v,�.4 :I � -•- ---- , \ ,I ti � . �� A.ME�;DM�^�T ?n Ern�n_grpr�I�l�H�!M ;SITE #13) r�" , o �„ shaded area to be added to the pis rict ` _ � 0 1° �o , ti,�,.�"�approximately 3.60 acres ) � ( ' 1�`v �� n -- - - � , -'- � I !✓�^ � �_.-- -- - -•_��. r � � � • � •1 � 237 OS �,•/ .. . _ - . - . : - - . . ��y��. � _ . _ . ._ . � � - - � - -�=� - -. - : -- _ ..� .- . . �-_ , . . .� ,, �;- --- _ �,; - � ' :�: . �� y � i, � � � . � � e e �r� �� , �� I LS � . ' `'".; �� S ( , ' t � � i ; � ' ~ �� I + �'_� �� r � � � , � � .�, � �. , . , • • �� i �,{ , ` i � t l ; .; j • , ■ ,--�� " ,i .�� , � ■ �' :�;� ; : � �ON � ' �:��,T �—�-± ,s � . i � ' . � � ' :,��'a _ , � '� , �aa�a�s ��.i � , j ° `� � ► - _�� . m �� t , r g ,� � mC ��'�t j� , ! �.� f !T � � p' ' �� 1"" � � § r � ' � � � � �m �� ' -� /' � � , ��y! '/ / ` + _=' �i� ' ' ' ::: �ia� � � - � ,: .i ;��' ��$ � / �!� ;.��. �� r • ': :_ �m � i : 0 0o e .. ,-� �y : �� , � r :a ; �" � :_ -aa • y � � � s � ,,� .f l i 1. �� . f�. o � i •� � a Z � � � �� ' � ( � . ' J � . ' ' E' . j� . ' ' j � : { 1 , . �' { i % � t I { � �`� � i : � � j � � �� l � . i - ' "�` - � .�: ...�. . �- __ _ � -�__ �z i: � _ __ _----___-_�, -�_ � ETNA - BIP,MINGHAM, SOUTHERN SITE PROPOSEfI �EVELQPMENT 60 units ownership 1 housing ., 1 � _ _ _. ! _ _ , _ _-�_ ___ _ � � :�� _ _ Y�yA�• • �\�i{ . l��i• ... . �.��'-�j; .• w i��N��s� '.��'� � • : � w� wN • .��u �sw.� •�ww !��tM • �~r��.� N�M��ir��Nw��N� t • N�tO�� NWf � • • ■ � YAMM� • i�M • ��AN Y ��rN .•Y � � s • :, �c.'�NI•M��• • ��MlAb7� N�� • l aj �M,/�� wt�« �M�r.+�wwaWiNi� • M�M�Ow��p � " ��.'M •N��Mt��N/��H��N�N�YN M� w ■�IfO�laA-��/�7�M� wAN„ •p�t� t �/ � � ��tM�N�t� L�T_�� HO��O�M> _— ��AM�S�r/Y��/��ww� • , � q �YI��M�/ --- _ " ,� .t: " � �� i�� 9. MJSSISSIPPI-TERRACE AREA (District S) � This undeveloped site is located on the east side of hlississippi St. North oi Case ' Avenue. The legal descriptions are: Subj. to esmts; and vac. aJley adj.; Lot S-9 and 16-21, McMenemy's Subdivision A. AJso, Lots 3-9, BrookvaJe Addition. Also, Lots 1, 2, 3, 6, 7, 9 bc l0, Brookvale 2nd Addition. Also, Lots 6-9 and 19-24 , Blk. 1, Brookside Add;tion. The problems with this area are topographical in nature. 10. BRADLEY STREET - CASE TO WHITALL (Distri�t 5) . , ' • These two undeveJoped sites are maae up of certain properties abutting BradJey � Street between Case �venue and u�h;taJ) Street. The )egaJ description is: Lots ; , 4- 13, Block 2; Lots 18, l9 � 20, BJock 3; Lots 3-9, Block 10; and Lots 18-21, ; Block 13, Ed. Rice's First Addition. The main problem with development oi these sites is the topography. , � 11. . THE RAILROAD lSLAND AREA (District 5) � • � This area is bounded by Bush Avenue on the north, Burr Street on the east, Tedesco ' Street and Lafayette Road on the so�th, and the railroad tracks on the west. The area is Jegally described as: BJocks 11 and 12, Stinson'sAddition. AJso, � all Stinson's Subdivision of Block 10. AJso, all L.P. Swanstrom Rearrangement. : Also, all Swanstrom's Rearrangement. AJso, all J. Swainson's Division. Also, all Van SJyke's Rearrangement. AJso, lots 1 through 6, and lots I1 through 15, � � � Block 3;.those parts easterJy of the Railroad right-of-way of Jots 4 through 13, Block 4; those parts easterly of the RaiJroad right-of-way of Jots 11 through � � 14, BJock S; and alJ Blocks 7, 8, 9 and 10, V�'arren and �'inslow's Addition. Also, � alJ BJock 1, Crispus Attucks Addition. This area is a combination of topogra- phically severe vacant land and substandard housing. 12. HAZEL PARK (District 2) , . This undeveJo ed site is located on the S�C' corner of Hazel and E. 7th Sts. The P site is vacant and privately owned. Site size -- 171,899 sq. ft. The legal description � is: Lots 1 thrQugh 13 and Lots 20 through 30, Block 1; and Lots 1 through 11, , . Block 4, Aurora Addition. The difficulties with this site include soil repJacement, , • � soi! compaction, grading and site drainage. ' � 13. ETNA/BIRMINGHAM CORRIDOR (District 4) � � 7his undeveloped area is bounded (approximateJ��) by Sixth Street on the north, . Birmingham Street on the e�st, Higha��y 1-94 on the south, �nd Etna d Clarence Streets on the west. The legaJ descripticn is: Lots 7- 12, BJock 2, Fease Bros. � Ado,tion; Lots 7-12, Bloc►: 2, S�rgEnt's .�oeitio�; Lots 1-9 ano 14-2G. Hamer's Subdivision; Lots 1-8 end I4-2G, S;enlund's �ubdivis:on; Lots I-6 �nd ;S-?�, S��itl�'s Subdivision of f�lock 1�, Stinson's F�ances Stree� ,�cdition; Lots 3-10 �nd 13- � 24, BJock 3; Bi�cr,ingf�::rn's .=,ddition: 1�locics 3, S and l� J*.insor�'s rrnnces Street Addition; Lo►s 1, 2, 7 d S, BJock 5 cas:��ie»� Addiiion ;��o. 3; and, Lo�s 13-�G, 81ock 4, East��ie��.� .;dd:,;on �o. 3; those portions of Lots 2 and 3, Block 3, and of Lots 2 .and 3, .B1ock 8, Au � or s u �v�s�on o. w ic ies � wes o oc , as view i ion o. ; a so a por �on o uc i ree ying e ween e ex ens�on sou er y o e wes ine o oc 3 u i or s u �vis�on o. an e wes ine o oc as view , > >on o. ; oge er wi a por ion o o na ree o e ' vaca e yina e ween e sou ern rig -o -way �ne o onway reet ! - , ��y-�.2�� In any year in which the tax incrernent exceeds the amount necessa�y to meet the objectives of this plan, the Authority proposes to use the excess increment , to: (a) prepay any oustanding bonds; (b) discharge tlie pledge of tax increment thereof; (c) pay into an escrow account dedicated to the payment of such bonds; or (d) return such excess increment to the taxing jurisdictions in which the tax ' increment financing district is located in direct proportion to their respective mill rates. , IV. PROPERTIES TO BE ACQUIRED Enclosed in Attachment A, Appendix, is a listing of the properties that, subject to funding availability, the HRA proposes to acquire or otherwise control for the purposes , of this Scattered Site Tax Increment Housing District. Because of the HRA's concern of acquiring property and removing it f rom the tax roles, while attempting at the same time to create additional tax increment to finance the cost of development , wherever possible, options will be obtained so that site control rather than actual�� ownership can be conveyed for approved housing developments. � V. COST OF THE DISTRICT " The following are intended as estimates by category of costs that will be incurred. � The Housing and Redevelopment Authority may amend or otherwise alter any line item while maintaining the integrity of the total estimated expenditures. Following is a proposed budget for the scattered site housing/redevelopment plan: , . Land Acquisition $ 8,085,121 �' Relocation 267,000 , Public Improvements 542,848 Site Preparation, Demolition, Utilities 3;}T};6$8 3 2, 00�112 Special Improvements 110,000 , Housing Assistance 3,000,000 Consultant Services 250,000 Administrative Expenses 771,332 , � TOTAL $f6;��3�3�?�81 $16,226,413* ■ ' - � * $28,432 have been added for site correction costs associated with ' the Etna-Birmingham site amendment. � 1 , r , - 31 - 1 ��-�,�� VI. SOURCES OF REVENUE 7'O FINANCE PUBLIC COSTS AND AMOUNT OF BONDED � INDEBTEDNESS * � A. TOTAL DIST RICT COST $16,197,981 , B. ESTIMATED SOURCES OF REVENUE OTHER THAN TAX INCRE�MENT OR BONDED INDEBTEDNESS , 1. Capital Improvement Bond Funds $1,:500,000 2. Community Development Block , Grant Funds 1 ,500,000 3. Municipal State Aid Funds 500,000 ' 4. Department of Housing and Urban Development 500,000 , 5. Land Disposition Proceeds 1,000,000 � 6. County Aid Funds, Minnesota , Department of Transportation Grants, Metro Parks Open Space Funds, Urban Development Action Grants, ' Tax Levy Funds, Minnesota Housing . Finance Agency, etc. 500,000 �,500,000 , C. DISTRICT COSTS TO BE BONDED $10,697,981 � D. BOND COSTS 1. Capitalized Interest Payments $4,500,000 2. Debt Service Reserve 1 ,500,000 , 3. Cost of Issuance 500,000 6,S00,000 E. TOTAL BONDED INDEBTEDNESS $17,197,981 � . � � *The existing levels of funds available under the Sources of Revenue To Finanace Public Costs and Amount of Bonded Indebtedness are sufficient to cover increased costs associated with the Etna-Birmingham amendment. � ' � ' , - 32 - • � ��//� , . YII. ORIGINAL ASSESSED VALUE OF TAXABLE PROPERTIES ' • Following is a b�eakdown of the 1980 Assessed Value for each site in the district. These wil! serve as original assessed values for the district. A parcel-by-parcel , breakdown of the original ass�ssed value is contained on Attachment A, Appendix. OriQinal Assessed Value ,. $ 155,643 1, Baker School Site . 132,625 � 2. Ellis Avenue Site . 22,613 3. St. Theresa's 31 � 557 4. The "South-0f-Front" Area (Block 355) 153, 172 5, Brandtjen-Kluge Site . 687,425 � 6. The Selby Avenue Area 6,140 7. Otto-Mercer Site 26,691 8. Nevada/Arkwright Site 37,869 • � 9. Nlississippi-Terrace Area ��233 10. BradJey St.-Case to Whitall 568,073 11. The Rail road IsJand Area �g� 156 � i 12. Hazel Park 20,821 * 13. Etna/Birmingham Corridor 2,476 14. Robert/Concord Site 7 ,796 , 1S, Belvidere Park Site 3,p88,932 16. NlilJer Hospital Site 303,4h2 17 �nion �ospel Mission Sit�e � ' 315,419 , � . 18. Ruth and Burns Site $aq6],6,I03 � TOTAL , Parcels within some of the sites were tax exempt as of January 2, 1950. Technically, , at the date of certification of this district by the Auditor, no assessed vaJue attributable ' to such tax exempt prqperty will be included in the original assessed value of the district. However, when such property becomes taxable, Section 273.76 subd.l requires � . that the original assessed value of the district be increased by the amount oi assessed • value atvibutable to such property. For p�� ome taxableahas been i clu ded nsthe ed value at the time these tax exempt parce s , origir�aJ assessed value computation. i � *The Original Assessed Value for the Etna-Birmingham Site will 1 increase as a result of the proposed amendment; however, Ramsey County has not assigned a �alue to thi.s land parcel , therefore, it cannot be indicated at this time. An estimate of the base value , of the land area to be added to the .District is $112 ,119.00 based on existing appraisals . � � __ ��r/�� (.�' E. Garages Add for each attached single garage $ 672 � Add for each attached double garage 1 , 120 Add for each detached single garage 538 Add for each detached double garage 896 2. Rental A. Units � 650 Sq.Ft. $ 7,980 700 Sq.Ft. g�550 • 750 Sq.Ft. 9,120 800 Sq.Ft. 9,690 850 Sq.Ft. 10,260 900 Sq.Ft. 10,830 950 Sq.Ft. 11 ,400 1,000 Sq.Ft. 11 ,970 1,050 Sq.Ft. 12, 540 1, 100 Sq.Ft. 13,110 B. Garages Add for each garage stall $ 730 � Applying these averages and the Authority's assumptions, it is estimated that the captured assessed value of the district upon completion of all development will be approximately $11,500,000.*7'he Authority intends to enter into assessment agreements with developer and assessor as permitted and described in Section 273.76, Subd. 8. � f *As a result of the E*n;�-airminham amendment, approximately �1,717,200 would ' ', be. added to the Captured Assessed Value of the Tax Increment District upon completion of all development, for a total of approximately $13,277,200.00. �� `' , i � _ 35 _ ��i�� ' �. I 'lt' "C�"�1 � � SL)l� COI"fCC11�;?tl� S1tC t�ll��"OVCIiICI�I±s and utilitics" IS ull CSilliidtC !�i f�•i;;� ,_`:�:t'llt_{ili:l''_� r�_c{�:ircd to brii:, t.�li'Sl: parcF'�S i0 3 �U11(j�hlC state. (��+�.t' :�:�.fl Ofl-'>lii: U11�1?:lcS� �t�l COSi'; .1C�' :iSSGC131eC� 1�'li�l I.1f111SU31 SO11 ' �_ ;� ��.�rr�in �l�;�ri��nc_i�,s. "1'he estim�.�tc::; °..�ere �:;ivern by City en�;ineers ; i; ';C:�_� 11�:0(1 Sl�:. Ifl`:�)��C110I1� ci!1C�� 1Cl ��iCl� 5��lI tC5llfl�. > , 3. 1�I�c "cstin�atcd reuse vt�lu� per square foot" i�., �ln cstimate of the valtie js uf ii��:;� p�ircels ,._ftcr tl�e soil cu;rec±:,��, si.te iml�rove�ri�n�s and utility �gi ,,r'� is cornple��::�i. It is �;-,sed �.:;�r.n consuit��:��t appraisal ancl City staff II. ' �:.,tiii�„'��s and is int�. icd to show tl��it ihe condition of these pa.rcels is 9t r_:�:cf� that tf�e priv<.�t.- �_ctor would i��:v� to e>;pend more tt,a.n tt�<: land is wor�h in order to render it usable for the construction contemplated. iT'he iniorr7��.tion summarized on Attachrnents �3 and C, and on Analysis I, Appendix, . to};ether ::ith tl��e data si.;pperting SUCFI SUR1f71aries, suj��orts the f.ollowing conclusions rcf;.�rdinb tlle district: � l. Sites 5, 6, 16 anci 17 are ccrnprised of la,�d predon�inantly oc.cupied by biiilc'i,��s, strce�.s, u�ilities or otl�cr impr�overnents and 100a� of the buildings, S , not incl�.�c!in�; outb;rildings, are s�ructurally substandard to a de�;ree requiring � : �;bsJ_::n:ial ren�?va�:cn or clearance. These sites are 21J3 acres in area. ;� "�nis :s 15% of the *etal area of the district. These sites are comprised ' of a tctal of �0 �:.;�c_els. "Chis is 15�5 of the to`.�1 parccls in the distri�t. i 2. Si��s 1, 2, 3, �l, 7, �, 9, l�, 11, 12, 13, 14, 15 and 18 ure compris�:.i of land ' not pr< '.:nin_�nt1y occupicd by b��ildings, strc:ets, uti!ities or other improve- � , men?�,, ��it IUO ��:,rccnt of the total acreuge of such lar.d, on these individual ' si-c.�s, i�.:s a ;air rnarket v�ilue upcn in�.lusion in the redcvelop,��ent district - - wh;c�h, •,vhcn adcle<i tu ihe estim��tc.d cosi of �reparing the llnd for use, , incl�:�iing u±ilitics, if a;�y, ��x�.eec+s its anticiE�ated fair ;�,a,rket value after c,��rnpleti� ;; of s��id pre�aration. "I'hese s!?.c:s �3re �S-�W��`rc:s��n area. This i� "'?_°o �f the tot�l ar^a of the district. 1't:ese sites are comprised of a , tu�al �' 464 E�`�rcefs. Tl�is is 85"0 of tl�e total p:rcels in the district. 3. T��k�_,i collec_tivc.!y, sites 1 thro�gh 18 �tre cornprised of l :nd not predomi- n<?ntly occu,�ied f_:}� buildin�s, streets, i.itilities or cther ir� rgy�ements, 97 OZ , ;:;�d `35 p�'r`ccnt of thc io^�.�1 acr::�;;c ef such land ($8:8�,��5 of ��?�/ t�>t?1 acrc�, of �;a�ant land) has a f.�ir rria;l;et value ��pon inclusion in the r�cie•,lele�, :��nt uistrict which, when ��c'cied to thc �.siimated cost of preparing , �he l� ,��! `ur� use, incl� :iin,.; �.��iii�ies, i< <iny, excee.c;> its anticipated fair mar'<et value aftcr coinpl� :�n of said preparation. The 1S sites are f�fl:�t 124.07 ��res ;n ��.��:�� n� ccr,sist of u�-3 parcels of larici. , 544 I3. i2UnLI[�I(;,'�"l�lOi�'S f\S �, (-{OU�ING DIS"CRICT i E:;ch of tf�e 1� >ites �_ �fI��C151f1; the district �ti�ill contain a housing developm�nt, � f �ti�er �.s � c-c_su!t of ncw constr� �.t:on or ;�_h<,.bilitation. Cach housing ci�_velopment, in ti.irn, �vill contain cf�vel!in� units int�:��nded f�r occ�.ipancy by persons or families of lo;r and rnoderate II1C011'1"� as dc:fi;. d in Section ?73.73, Subdivision 11 of � tf��° r�ct. , ' � - 37 - � . � �-�.-%�� ° No. 13. Etna/Birmingham Corridor � • This site is legally described as: Lots 1 through 12, Block 2, Pease Sros. Addition.y , Also, lots 7 through 12, Block 2, Sargent' s Addition. Also, lots 1 through 9, and loX 14 through 20, Hamer's Subdivision. Also, lots 1 through 8, and lots 14 through 20, � StenlunG's Subdivision. Also, lots 1 through 6, and lots 18 through 24 , Smith s � ' Subdivision of Block 14. Also, lots 3 through 10, and lots 13 through 24, Block 3, Birmingham's Addition. Also, Blocks 3, 8 and 13, Stinson's Frances Street Addition. Also, lots 13 throu h 30, Block 4,� and lots 1, 2, 1 and 8, Block 5, Eastview Addit•ion' ' No. 3; those ortions of Lots 2 anci�3 Block 3 and of Lots 2 and 3 Block 8 Auditor'� Subdivision No. 62 which lies west of Block 4, Eastview Addition No. 3; also that portion of Euclid Street lying between t e ex ens�on sou er y o e wes �ne f ' Block 4 Eastview Addition No. 3; to et er wit a por �on o o na ree�— to be vacated 1 in between the sout ern r�g -o -way ine o onway ree and northern riqht-of-way ine o 0 u son oa oca e in oc an oc _, . � Auditor's Subdivision No. 62. ,02-14400-03003'` $ � 757 02-24620-30104'' S 751 02-32500-16000 S 110 02-14400-04003�� 757 02-32500-01000• 110 02-32500-17000 110 ' 02-14400-05003 - 757 02-32500-02000 110 02-32500-18000 124 ,02-14400-06003 - 757 02-32500-03000 ' 120 02-32500-19000 110 Q2-?4400-09003 2,154 OZ-32500-04000 110 02-32500-20000 110 02-14400-10003 . 757 02-32500-05000 110 02-58700-01002 220 ,02-14400-13003 233 02-32500-06000 110 02-58700-08002 220 02-14400-14003 . 233 02-32500-07000 120 02-SE700-09002 220 02-14400-20003 � 1 ,513 02-32500-08000 220 02-58700-10002 200 ,02-14400-21003 • 220 02-32500-09000 � 220 02-58700-11002 220 02-14400-22003 • 233 02-32500-14000 200 02-58700-12002 220 02-14400-23002 •� 233 02-32500-15000 110 02-67200-07002 - 200 �2-14400-24003 � 233 02-67200-08002 220 OZ-67200-09002 .• 220 �2-67200-10002� 220 02-71000-02000� 110 02-71400-01008°� 815 2-67200-11002.� 200 02-71000-03000 110 �taX�4ar�cel �codes - 400 02-67200-12002 : 220 02-71000-04000 110 wil 'be added as �2-70200-01014 - 110 . 02-71000-05000 120 assi ned b Ramse Count 2-70200-D2014 = 110 02-71000-06000� 110 for new area * � 02-)0200-03014 � 120 02-71000-07000 220 . �2-10200-04014 110 02-71000-08000 � a°6 Total $20,821 2-10200-05014 � 110 02-71000-14000 • 220 02-70200-06014. � 110 02-71000-15000 • 110 *Since the land which is 02-71000-16000� 110 proposed to be added to ' 02-71000-17000. 120 the District is owned by 02-71000-18000• 110 the State and is not on the 2-70200-23014 '� 931 02-71000-19000� 110 Tax Roles, Parcel Code 2-70200-240I4 '� 640 02-71000-20000 ` 110 Numbers are not available Z-71000-01000 . 120 OZ-��400-01003 �• 815 from Ramsey Count They will be added to �he Plan as they become available. ;o. 14 . Robert/Concord Site This site is legally described as: Uacated Rebie Street accruing �nd Lot ? , t'�sek 's ' Rearranoement. ��-��Ou-01000 5 2,476 , .. . .. �� `�� . ��te� ��:,:; I tiosss� <e�r-� - Isss�swr��r. �tr� ��c : s+e�t- :�af!o�. �. l�IS 1�:;�a 14�M;. �s � �lt +MM�si14�1ic ' MM[k M#M�t �' � Ds< ' `;t�.lMr:�: ' Cb� , , .?w�t,lc.i� -�1►: �N d tl�t �A��rl. .. - t��iwe _ at UY� ` iwt'A�t �; �Ik' 11�s'1N�r ri! �vdowrwt MM _. +�'e+�� +�b�1' ` , w iML �'Me 1Me.� MIO�F L�ndt; D� l�o�"!r . '!!�r;�;�° tak�Me ia� .�:d_ Mte � p�it�r 4owrK:a�li�M dd�t P�nt to ��4��• �� a�Y� p�,tqt of.�ae�l 1N ao/ . loea�rt ao�d.�liYiw. b ii� �l! k- �. �-��F_. �w ti Nw �I'�l' 1�4M�rI�t � �� i, a11 �__,, wfll be� 4o bs h�atr! i W py CarselI wlwtiwr{A. �:W 41�,�wt.,b�q�.. . : Iwi;df� . �L��o�. �q t •� . p+ql��atioo �od t�eloplMet 1�aYd�iistflelt. l7�.77.U) a��w1 p�vlee!11Rd ' �ot be baide 1or 1Yt to Ix�r wi4� rMro�'iife_lut�e yelvNe ° ao AMe�r�fLoutths lhnadal° • t#aee,pro (3) Ameri� velopmenj �ad ed� i` tet Tas I� ,}+em�at , . :: PJ �t �iiord um�eonrl�nt �of , th lcealtty as�• !or ur st t�" `�reY �ud d bypriv�te t��Amr�dsd elopmmt aoi t and 1'au ' . t llnw�t`� e�orm to the C re�asiee Plan Ibr t 1Fau1.and(b) Au�eAd�d lsoHe!. Hopndarles d be e#sated and " ed Prq{sam TSqqn�Plam ld t�eproved:' pRi�s af-tke en memt ot the 6�eD�t a� �iTlrinancins `• 1' 3or ti?�r Nnv E� � La . De�t�o�a�af�1«�, �aka i�a� . ` aLSM C�t�Ck�r#, Ciq Hau e oi ti�i �udn� ind 11II��et A orlt�.ei the G�ity f fet Paul�...'' fi�6�aar.!CIl7 U�Aremi.lnc� �a milabli!w� '' �r�ul��, ' b6ufR� � �� . � ` ��t,M.�.. :.M , . �<g_-- p Cler� i_ �i A�� -- ,�"•