The URL can be used to link to this page

84-761 WMITE — CITV CLERK � � PINK — FINANCE CANARY,— ISEPARTMENT GITY OF SAINT PAUL COUIICI //`. BI.UE .— MAVOR File NO. � • ��/ � ^ C cil Resolution Presented By � Referred To Committee: Date Out of Committee By Date WHEREAS, Daniel and Beverly Oren have applied to the Board of Zoning Appeals for a variance from the strict application of the provisions of Section 61 .101 (f) of the Saint Paul Legislative Code pertaining to the minimum lot area required for multi-family structures in the RM-2 zoning district for their property located at 1977 Marshall Avenue, legally described as the West 10 feet of Lot 8 and all of Lot 7, Block 27, Rearrangement of Merriam, so as to permit a six dwelling unit structure at this location; and WHEREAS, Following a public hearing with notice to affected property owners, the Board of Zoning Appeals by its Resolution 9536 adopted April 10, 1984 granted the variance petition so as to permit four dwelling units on the above described property based upon the findings as set forth in the said resolution; and WHEREAS, Pursuant to the provisions of Section 64.205, William and Mary Anderson, 1969 Marshall Avenue, Saint Paul , Minnesota, duly filed with the City Clerk their appeal from this determination made by the Board of Zoning Appeals requesting that a hearing be held before the City Council for the purpose of considering the actions taken by the said Board; and WHEREAS, Acting pursuant to Sections 64.205 and 64.208 and upon notice to appellant and other affected property owners a public hearing was duly conducted by the City Council on h1ay 3, 1984 where all interested parties were given an opportunity to be heard; and WHEREAS, The Council having heard the statements made, and having considered the variance application, the report of staff, the minutes and findings of the Board of Zoning Appeals, does hereby RESOLVE, That the Council of the City of Saint Paul does hereby modify the decision of the Board of Zoning Appeals in this matter and does hereby approve and grant an area variance for the subject property located at 1977 Marshall Avenue, Saint Paul , Minnesota, legally described as the west 10 feet of Lot 8 and all of Lot 7, Block 27, Rearrangement of Merriam, so as to permit the use COUNC[LMEN Requested by Department of: Yeas Nays Fletcher 's°N°s�'E�d� [n Favor Ys.arr' NlCOSie scne�be� _ Against BY Tedesco W ilson Form Approv d y City Att rney Adopted by Council: Date Certified Passed by Council Secretary BY ` By % � t�pproved by Mavor: Date Approv y Mayor for Submission to Council By BY WHITE - CITV CLERK PINK - FINANCE G I TY O F SA I NT PA U L Council /� i C�,NARY �DEPARTMENT File NO. Q �_�TI BLUE " - MAVOR i � ' �� Council Resolution Presented By Referred To Committee: Date Out of Committee By Date of this property for three dwelling units, with the condition that three off- street parking spaces be provided on the property; and, be it FURTHER RESOLVED, That the appeal of William and Mary Anderson is hereby granted as modified herein; and, be it FURTHER RESOLVED, That the City Clerk shall mail a copy of this resolution to Daniel and Beverly Oren, William and Mary Anderson, the Zoning Administrator, the Planning Commission and the Board of Zoning Appeals. -2- COUIVCILMEN Requested by Department of: Yeas Nays � FletCher '°�— In Favor Masanz�— Wieea�l� schelbe� __�__ Against BY Tedesco Wilson Adopted by Council: Date JUN 1 2 1984 Form Approv by City Attorn Certified • d by Co .il , retar • BY � By� t�pprove by Mav `. Date - , JUN 13 19 Appro d y Mayor for ubmission to Council � ��: By p()BI,�St�ED J UN 2 3 1984 ... �.---- _ . _- _--_-----�RETURN .�Q_JERDME SEGAL_AET�R_ADQPIIDf�-- - - WMtTE - CITY CLERK � � PINK - FINANCE GITY OF. SAINT PAUL Council � CANARY - OEPARTMENT BLUE - MAVOR File . NO• �_�� 1 Council Resolution Presented By Referred To Committee: Date Out of Committee By Date WHEREAS, Daniel and Beverly Oren have applied to the Board of Zoning Appeals for a variance from the strict application of the provisions of Section 61 .101 (f) of the Saint Paul Legislative Code pertaining to the minimum lot area required for. multi-family structures in the RM-2 zoning district for their property located at 1977 Marshall Avenue, lega.11y described as the West 10 feet of Lot 8 and .all of Lot 7, Block 27, Rearrangement of Merriam, so as to permit a six dwelling unit structure at this location; and WHEREAS, Following a public hearing with notice to affected property owners, the Board of Zoning Appeals .by its Resolution 9536 adopted April 10, 1984 granted the variance petition so as to permit four dwelling units on the above described property based upon the findings as set forth in the said resolution; and WHEREAS; Pursuant to the provisions of Section 64.205, William and Mary Anderson, 1969 Marshall Avenue, Saint Paul , Minnesota, duly filed with the City Clerk their appeal from this determination made by the Board of Zoning Appeals requesting that .a hearing be held before the City Council for the purpose of _ considering ��e actions taken by the said Board; and � WHEREAS, Acting pursuant to Sections 64.205 and 64.208 and upon notice to appellant and other affected property owners a public hearing was duly conducted by the City Council on May 3, 1984 where all interested parties were given an opportunity to be heard; and WHEREAS, The Council having heard the statements made, and having considered the variance application, the -report of staff, the minutes and findings of the Board of Zoning Appeals, does hereby RESOLVE, That the Council of the City of Saint Paul does hereby modify the decision of the Board of Zoning Appeals in this matter and does hereby approve and grant an area variance for the subject property located at 1977 Marshall Avenue, Saint Paul , Minnesota, .legally described as the west 10 feet of Lot 8 and all of Lot 7, Block 27, Rearr.angement of Merriam, so as to permit the use COUNC[LMEN ' , Requested by Department of: Yeas Nays � Fletcher c'�� In Favor Masanz Nicosia scne�bet Against BY Tedesco Wilson Form Approved by City Attorney Adopted by Councit: Date Certified Passed by Council Secretary BY B}� Approved by Mavor: Date Approved by Mayor fot Submission to Council � - � . ;, x ` ;_ w :. _ _ _ - - - _ : _ _ M'HITE - C�TV CLERK •< �� - ' P��K - FINANCE GITY OF SAINT PAUL Council ' � �� CAN4RV -�DEP4RTMENT BLUE - MAVOR � . Flle NO. �� Z�/ � � Council Resolution Presented By ° Referred To Committee: Date Out of Committee By Date of this property for three dwelling units, with the condition that three off- street parking spaces be provided on the property; and, be it FURTHER RESOLVED, That the appeal of William and Mary Anderson is hereby granted as modified herein; and, be it � FURTHER RESOLVED, That the City Clerk shall mail a copy of this resolution to Daniel and Beverly Oren, William and Mary Anderson, the Zoning Administrator, the Planning Commission and the Board of Zoning Appeals. �4 �;. � -2- COUNCILMEN Requested by Department of: Yeas Nays Fletcher °fe1N in Favor Masanz Nicosia scnetbe� _ Against BY Tedesco Wflson Form Approved by City Attorney Adopted by Council: Date Certified Passed by Counc.il Secretary BY B� Approved by A'lavor: Date _ Approved by Mayor for Submission to Council � B�. _ gy _ y � ' r� Y ' STATE OF MINNESOTA ) County of Ramsey ) ss. CITY OF SAINT PAUL ) G� �� Albert B. Olson �,� I. . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . .City Clerk of the � City of Saint Paul, Minnesota, do hereby certify that I have � ` � �'� compared the attached copy of Council File No. . . 84:761. . . . . . . . , . . �_ ~ as adopted by the City Council. . . . ,June 12.. . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 19 84. . . � " . and approved by the Mayor. . . . . . . . . ,June .13.. . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 19 84. . . . __._. with the original thereof on file in my office. I further certify that said copy is a true and correct copy of said original and the whole thereof. WITNESS my hand and the seal of the City of Saint Paul, Minnesota this . . . . 17th. . . , , , day of . ,September . , , , , , ,A.D. 19 84. . . . . . . . .�-��. .�'.`. . .L.e:r!1;�-?:�:. . . . . . . . . . City Clerk. � , , . ' �{. ?,,:.. �--.,{��'=` � , a,�" b-, t. �47h �. r �"k « `�`". f . `c ' . r� :7 ,y.":. rv� �' vl'! - �-;' . rr l. WHITE CITF CLE�+K COUflCIl PINK w FIIVqNCE G I TY OF SA I NT PA U L ` � . CANAH�- aEpARTMENT � B�,U.�, - MA''OR File . NO• � � / C u cil Resolution � � ; Presented By Referred To Committee: Date Out of Committee By Date WHEREAS, Daniel and Beverly Oren have applied to the Board of Zoning � Appeals for a variance from the strict application of the provisions of Section � 61 .101 (f) of the Saint Paul Legislative Code pertaining to the minimum lot area �9 required for multi-family structures in the RM-2 zoning district for their �n property located at 1977 Marshall Avenue, legally described as the West 10 feet � of Lot 8 and all of Lot 7, Block 27, Rearrangement of Merriam, so as to permit � a six dwelling unit structure at this location; and WHEREAS, Following a public hearing with notice to affected property owners, the Board of Zoning Appeals by its Resolution 9536 adopted April 10, 1984 granted the variance petition so as to permit four dwelling units on the above described property based upon the findings as set forth in the said resolution; and WHEREAS, Pursuant to the provisions of Section 64.205, William and Mary Anderson, 1969 Marshall Avenue, Saint Paul , Minnesota, duly filed with the City Clerk their appeal from this determination made by the Board of Zoning Appeals requesting that a hearing be held before the City Council for the purpose of considering the actions taken by the said Board; and WHEREAS, Acting pursuant to Sections 64.205 and 64.208 and upon notice to appellant and other affected property owners a public hearing was duly conducted by the City Council on hlay 3, 1984 where all interested parties were given an opportunity to be heard; and WHEREAS, The Council having heard the statements made, and having considered the variance application, the report of staff, the minutes and findings of the Board of Zoning Appeals, does hereby RESOLVE, That the Council of the City of Saint Paul does hereby modify the decision of the Board of Zoning Appeals in this matter and does hereby approve and grant an area variance for the subject property located at 1977 Marshall Avenue, Saint Paul , Minnesota, legally described as the west 10 feet of Lot 8 and all of Lot 7, Block 27, Rearrangement of Merriam, so as to permit the use COUNC[LMEN Yeas Nays Requested by Department of: Fletcher 's'�+°S"�'t�' [n Favor _�asa�- Nicosia scneibet _ Against BY Tedesco '°"° : Wilson - � Form Approv d y City Att rney Adopted b�� Council: Date Cert�fied Passed by Council Secretary BY ` B� i/ � . Appro��ed by Uavor. Date Approv y Mayor Eor Submission to Council B�• BY d� RINK� - FINANCE�`� GITY OF SAINT PAUL Council ��N�RV�.- OFPARTMENT � G��// �j� BLUE - Mp.VOR File �0.- ^ -/ _��f"/ ►� + � � � � Council Resolution . Presented By � Referred To Committee: Date Out of Committee By Date- - �� of this property for three dwelling units, with the condition that three off- � street parking spaces be provided on the property; and, be it � �n FURTHER RESOLVED, That the appeal of William and Mary Anderson is hereby � granted as modified herein; and, be it � FURTHER RESOLVED, That the City Clerk shall mail a copy of this resolution to Daniel and Beverly Oren, William and Mary Anderson, the Zoning Administrator, the Planning Corr�nission and the Board of Zoning Appeals. - -2- COUIVCILMEN Requested by Department of: Yeas Fletcher Nays � '°�— In Favor Massnz'— Nicosi� schetbe� � _ Against BY Tedesco . Wflson : Adopted by Council: Date JUN 1 2 1984 Form Approv by City Attorn Certified�a5_ d by Co cil �ecretar � • BY ! � r Bl. � �� 1�' _.%'`��..� . �,-� � � a11 �UN 13 19 Appro d y Mayor for ubmission to Council Approve by Mav . Date +- ---- . `s` y�`�4�..— � ��w:.. By �UB�I�ED JUN 2 3 1984 3 � � � � D � d ? � � • ' "� . � � cu v ,_„ v� y � o � j1'a � � r � _~ vi � c fn �i �,I� Q (�p � �' h � � O . O �G 1 � � "Ti � ��y N � v � � � � � � �;<y, O � ,�. ,,,i �, n '� z � � � c'., () --n� �- o � c � z l li m . . � .0 ''� _7_ o o� a ? ' � cn � a\ ..: � �- c� -'' � '"" � .� O� ```? � �. a� , ,+ 7� /� \\, .�,i �- O� .+ 7' fD � V♦ � :) � � CD o f"i � N � Q �-i� _ t� o � W (J� r. % I"� � _"• � -• � ~W; �� N � � r...�... �:y :°1 � � � N �y -�- d�° �'.., n �- N � �L � �:7 C � :� � ,. . � � "D (D ,.. C rt u.M1�.. � . . , (JF �'y-�'�/ - ,��`lrY �";, � `�� CITY OF SAINT PAUL e ";��;�� ro DEPARTMENT OF PLANNING AND ECONOMIC DEVELOPMENT vm �o DIVISION O� PLANNING ,,,. 25 West Fourth Street,Saint Paul,Minnesota,55102 612-292-1577 GEORGE LATIMER MAYOR April 23, 1984 Albert Olson, City Clerk Room 386 City Hall St. Paul , Minnesota 55102 RE: Zoning File #9536 - Anderson City Council Hearing: May 3, 1984 PURPOSE: To consider an appeal of a variance granted to Daniel and Beverly Oren by the Board of Zoning Appeals to allow a 4-unit apartment structure on a lot with 9,090 square feet. BOARO OF ZONING APPEALS DECISION: Approve (6-1) STAFF RECOMMENDATION: Approve SUPPORT• None OPPOSITION: Four individuals testified; 3 letters of opposition. Dear Sir: On March 27, 1984, the Board of Zoning Appeals held a public hearing on an amended application of Daniel and Beverly Oren to permit a 4-unit apartment building at 1977 Marshall . The ariginal application for variance requested permission to establish six units on the lot. Daniel Oren outlined his proposal and answered questions from Board members. Four individuals testified in opposition to the variance. They felt that granting the variance would contribute to overcrowding, traffic congestion, as well as set an adverse precedent for the comnunity. The hearing was closed and the case was discussed by members of the Board. A motion to approve the variance as amended passed on a vote of 6 to 1. William and Mary Anderson filed an appeal of the Board of Zoning Appeals decision on April 16, 1984. The appeal is based on six points outlined in their letter of appeal (see attachment). This matter is scheduled to be heard by the City Council on May 3, 1984. Please notify me by May 2, 1984 if any member of the City Council wishes to have slides of the site presented at the public hearing. Sincer ly, ., Fred S. Haider Zoning Section, PED FSH/mb . . . �1= �y�7'�/ APPLICATIOfJ FOR APPEAL ZONING OFFICE USE ONLY CITY OF SAi?JT PAUL F i 1 e #� r .� � Application Fee $ ;�v �i . Tentative Hearing Date �v1�,�� , � Application is hereby made for an Appeal to the St Paul Cit Council under the provisions of Chapter 64, Section 64• , Paragraph of the Zoning Code to appeal a decision made by the � Board of Zoning Appeals � Planning Commission on March 27 , 19�84. Zoning Administrator (date of decision} Planning Administrator Other A. APPELLANT Name William and Mary Anderson Daytime phone 644-4534 Address 1969 Marshall Avenue Zip Code 55104 B. DECISION BEING APPEALED Zon i ng f i 1 e name Daniel and Beverlv Oren Zoni ng Fi le � �5�� Property Address/Location 1977 Marshall Avenue, St. Paul. Mn 55104 Legal description�;,� �f r.At g a„ri all nf T nt 7��,�,o�k�7� KParr ]��erx.�a� �, rP.OUNDS FOR APPEA!_ !l►s� a�iditi3~�al sheets if ►�ecPssary.} (Explain why you feel there has been an error in any requirement, permit, decision or refusal made by an administrative official , or an error in fact, procedure or finding made by the Board of Zoning Appeals or the Planning Commission.) - Please see the attached letter � � �'j� !`� �':�i�%�G�-d'�t/. , If you have any questions, please contact: , � St. Paul Zoning Office Applicant's siqnature �; � 1100 City Hall Annex ��_ �� 25 west Fourth Street y"' Saint Paul, Minnesota 55102 � Date City age`nt (298-4154) 9/82 t . . . �' d'y-�'�o� • ' . Willi�m R. Anderson, Jr. ' ' hiary Anderson 1969 Marshall Avenue St. Paul, D'IN 55104 6C4-4534 �lpril 13, 1984 President Victor Tedesco- St. Paul City Council 7th Floor St. Paul, MN 55102 - Dear President Tedesco: ihe purpose of this letter is to set forth the grounds for our appeai of the April 10, 1984 decision of the Board of Zoning Appeals regarding the conversion of 1977 Marshall Avenue into a 4-plex by Dan and Beverly Oren. We believe the Board of Zoning Appeals erred for the following reasons: l. The intent of the 10,000 sq. ft. area requirement is to provide adequate space for the multi-family building, off street parking, and yard space on one lot. 1977 Marshall only has 9,090 sq. f t. , � which includes 600 sq. ft. of the alley. Furthermore, the Board of Zoning Appeals required 6 off street parking spaces (2 in the garage, 4 next to the garage) . The measurement between the garage and the neighbor's property line is approximately 37 feet. With the 4 foot setback requirement the developeYS do not have enough room to add 4 off street parking spaces. Thus, the development will be in violation ' of the Board's April lOth resolution. 2. The request for variance is not based on circumstances unictue to the individual property. The lot size and topoqraphy are similar to other lots in the neighborhood. 3. Without the variance, the owner would not incur exceptional practical difficulties or hardship. The structure could reasonably be used as a triplex or duplex. 4. The variance is being requested to defray the cost of remodeling/ converting the structure to a more intensive use, and assuring a substantial profit margin. The request for variance, therefore, appears to be based primarily on a desire for economic gain, which is contrary to the Minnesota zoning enablincs act. Furthermore, the claim of "financial hardship" should only be used for those owners who are, in fact, poor and cannot afford required improvements. 5. The City should enforce zoning regulations in an even-handed, consistent manner to protect the residential character of the neighborhood. T However, the Board ot Zoning Appeals' April lOth decision is not consistent with a decision of theirs in June of I982: In Zoning Case #9184, 1985 Marshall Avenue, which is directly across the side street, L�i= PY-7�/- President Victor Tedesco. . .Page 2 April 13, 1984 5. cont. , the applicant requested a variance of 2,425 sq. ft. The granting of this variance would have allowed a triplex on a 7,575 sq. ft. lot. P.E.D. staff recommended denial and the Board did deny the variance, thus, only allowing a duplex. In other words, the Board determined that 2,525 sq. ft. of lot per unit at 1985 Marshall was not adequate. Rather, the Board only allowed a duplex with 3,787.5 sq. ft. of lot per unit. Now, less than two years later, the P.E.D. sta�f and the Board of Zoning Appeals determine that 2,272 sq. ft. of lot per unit -- is adequate. Why is there such a discrepancy? 6. The variance request is not in keeping with the intent of sparit of the Code, and is inconsistent with the health, safety, comfort, morals and welfare of the residents of the neighborhood. We are deeply concerned about overcrowding and congestion in our area, with its related parking, trash and noise problems. These problems often focus around the presence of absentee-owned multiple dwellings. This one block alone has 28 dwelling units not including the property in question. Nine of the twelve buildings on the block are owner-occupied, sinqle-family homes (7) and duplexes (2) . We are deeply concerned that, while residents and the Merriam Park Co�anunity Council have encouraged code compliance in Merriam Park, we are not receiving support at the City level. Zoning Codes were adopted to protect the neighbor- hoods from abuse. Refusing to enforce the existing Zoning Codes is to turn your back on the neighborhoods, and our efforts to stop blight and deterioration. Therefore, we request that the City Gouncil review and revoke the April 10, 1984 decision of the Board of Zoning Appeals. Since.rely, ��!- � ,�r/-�'.�'��-� William R. Anderson, J . and Mary Anderson . • �f ��-7'6/ NII�lUTES OF THE h1EETING OF TH� 60ARD OF ZONING APP��;►j IP� CITY COU�dCIL CHAh1BERS, ST. P�IUL, t-1?NNESOTA, MARCH 27, 1984 PRESENT: Mmes. i�lorton and Summers; �ie�srs. Grais, Kirk, Os�orr:, � �' Peterson and Woods of the Boar•d of Zoning Appeals; ��tr. Sega1, Assistant City Attorney; Ms. Lane of the Division of Nousing and Building Code Enforcement; Ms. Beseman, Mr. Haider and Mr. McGuire of the Planning Division Staff. ABSENT• None . - - � The meeting ��as chaired by Gladys P�orton, Chairman. DANIEL AND BEVERLY OREN (9536): Request for variance to permit a 4-unit apartment uilding at 1977 Marshall . The applicants were present. 7here was oppasition present at the hearing. This matter r�tas laid over from P9arch 13, ��II4 to allow ti�ne f�r the - applicant to submit additional information. Mr. Haider showed slides of the site and revie�ved the staff report. The applicants have amended the request for variance and site pian to de�ete the carriage house krith related rear and side yard variance as V:ell as to reduce the number of apartment units in the main structure to four units. Staff recommended approval of the request for variance as a�nended. Two letters tdere received in opposition. , Daniel Oren stated that when they presented their original p7an to the corr�nunity there was strong objection to the carriage hause. After meetinq with staff it was determined that 4 or 5 units would be feasible. 8ecause of overcrowding, staff sug�ested 4 units with six off-street parking spaces. Whei� the revised proposal was presented to the Merriam �'ark Corr�nunity Council , they had different objections. The dis�rict wanted on7y 3 units with 3 off-street parking spaces, ta�a in the garage and one additional space. He explained that the City was supporting development of rental property and designated money for rehabilitating the house as a mu�tti-unit rental structure. Their proposal would upgrade the ne9ghborhood, increase the value of homes in the area, provide more livable units and increase the City tax base. Peter Olin, 1899 P�arshall , representing h1erriam Park, presented a ietter stating their support for a 3-unit apartment building with 3 off-street parking spaces. The community's opposition to the intensified use included on-street parking problems, increased traffic in an already overused a�1ey, noise problems from a high density building, absentee ownership af the proper�y, the use of $35,000 at 2� rental rehab money form the City to T undertake the conversion, and in June of 19$2 the 8oard of Zoning Appeals supported thz P�lerriam Park Cor�munity Council 's opposition to allowing a third unit at 1985 Marshall Avenue, which is directly acrcSss the street. Michael Spreigl , 1966 Tglehart, spoke in opposition. Ne stated that if property is not maintained, the owner should pay the price at the time the property is sold. It appears that the City would be fznancing the x . . . 11i/=��"y6/ Danie� � E3zverly Oren (�9536) Page 2 capitol gain �ro�i the sale of the p;operty. Given the size of the bactc yard, if the p•roposed parking vrer� allowed, it would reduce the value of the adjacent properties. He spoke iri favor of the structure �eing used as a group home because it would not have the turnover and there would be some consistency in the neighborhood. Mary Anderson, 1969 Marshall , testified in opposition stating that the area � should be maintained as a family neighborhood. She did not fezl the applicants were completely honest with the community. There was discussion regarding the previous use of the 5tructure. Ms. Lane reparted that because the house had been used as a commurrity residential facility, the status as a rooming house has ceased. If the applicants wanteJ to reestablish the prev-ious r�oming house, they w�uld have to apply for a Special Condition Use Permit from the PTanning Corr�n i s s i on. Phi1 Gerlach, 2005 Marshall , stated that he was against the propasaT and expressed concern with the property not being o�vner-occupied_ He felt the • rehab money should be used for families. htr. Oren reported that they have a pu.rchase agre�ment on the property. It tivould take approximately $50,000 ta rehabilitate the property and 5Q� of that would come from the City. The purchase price of the ho�se and the balance of the cost of rehabilitation would be provided �y them. The money that is borro��ed from the City is to be used for renta� property only and they have to keen the property for eight years. He stated that foi�r . units makes it feasible but if they were allowed only 3 units, they couid not afford to put as much money into the rehabilitation of tt�e structure. Hearing no further testimony, h1s. Morton closed the public hearing portion of the meeting. Mr. Kirk moved approval based on findings l through 6 pravided that six parking spaces be provided. t�1r. Woods seconded the motian, ��hich passed on a roll call vote of 6 to 1 with Ms. Summers voting agains��. Submitted by: � Approved by: , __ � ' '.., -, � %� i��'�� `-� � �r e � Fred S. Naider , Gladys Mo�"ton, Chairma� _ £ � �, . . _ ��-r�i � �c�� of saint pa�� o��d of zoning a��eals resolution zo��ng file nurr,�er 9536 - (�� Apri 1 10, 1984 _ WHEREAS, Danie� and Leverly Oren have applied for a variance from the strict application of the provisions of Section 61 .101(f) of the St. Paul Legislative Code pertaining to minimum lot area required for multi-family ��r�uctures in the RM-2 zoning district; and WHEREAS, the Saint Paul Board of Zoning Ap�eals conducted a public hearing on P�arch 27, 1984, pursuant to said appeal in accordance r�ith the require- mer�ts of Section 64.2U4 of the Legislative Code; and _ 4�lHEREAS, the Saint Paul Board of Zoning Appeals based upon evidence presented at the public hearing, as substantially reflected in the minutes, made the following findings of f act: 1 . The applicants amended the request f or variance and site plan to delete a carriage house with related rear and side yard variance as well as to reduce the number of apartment units in the main structure. The � applicants propose to restore and remodel the subject property and change the use of the building from a former 11-unit rooming house and group home to four residential apartments. 2. Without variance, the applicants will incur hardship based on the unique physical condition of the property. The building is in blighted and deteriorated condition requiring rehabilitation with costs that nearl,y equal the f air market value of the existing building. It appears that the extraordinary costs associated with rehabilitating this previously placarded building prevent development in accordance H�ith the strict provisions of the code. 3. The variance request is in keeping with the intent and spirit of the code and is consistent with the health, safety, comfort, morals and welfare of the inhabitants of the City of St. Paul . The code "recognizes the existence of older residential areas of the city where larger houses can be converted in vrder to extend the economic life of these structures and allow the owners to justify the expenditures for repairs and modernization." This is precisely what the applicant is proposing for this building constructed in 1905. The code requires a minimum lot area to provide adequate open space on the site for the recreational and parking needs of inhabitants of the building. This intent is met if the applicant provides six parking spaces as illustrated on the amended site plan. Six parking spaces conform to modern zoning standards for four residential units. 4. The proposed variance will not impair an adequate supply of light and air to adjacent property, nor will it alter the essential character of � the surrounding area. 5. Granting the variance will not permit any use that is not permitted in the RM-2 (moderate density multi-family) zone, nor would it alter or change the zoning district classification of the property. 6. The request for variance does not appear to be based primarily on a = desire for economic gain. moved by Mr. Kirk � seconded by Mr. Woods _ in favor � � againJt � ' SEE REVERSE SIDE FOR: TIME LIMIT/APPEAL/CERTIFICATION Mailed April 13, 1984 ,. ._. .. _., _ . _,_ _ ,_ .. � . . . �...,_ ., A .�� -. - . . . . G"1= ��-7(/ Daniel and Beverly Oren (#9535) . i�0'vJ, THEREFORE, BE IT RESOLVED, by the S�int Paul Board of Zoning Appeals that the provisions of Section 61 .101 (f) be hereby waived to allow Daniel and Beverly Oren to remodel a building located at 1977 ��larshall and provide a one bedroom unit and three 2-bedroom units on the condition that six par�king spaces are provided and all constr�uction is completed in accordance with the application for variance and the site plan on file with the St. Paul Planning Division. / TIME_ LIMIT: PJo order of the Board of Zoning Appeals permittinq the erection or alteration of a building or off-street parkinc� facility shall be valid for a period longer than one year, unless a building permit for such erection or alteration is obtained within such period and such erection or alteration is proceeding pursuant to the terms of such permit. The Board of Zoning Appeals or the City Council may grant an extension not to exceed one year. In granting such extension, the Board of Zoning Appeals ma,y �decide to hold a public hearing. APPEAL: Decisions of the Board of Zoning Appeals are final subject to appeal to the City Council within 15 days by anyone affected by the decision. CERTIFICATION: I , the undersigned Secretary to the Board of Zoninc� Appeals for the City of Saint Paul , Minnesota, do hereby certify that I have � compared the foregoing copy with the original record in my office; and find the same to be a true and correct copy of said original and of the whole thereof, as based on approved minutes of the Saint Paul Board of Zoning Appeals meetinq held on Anr;l ln 1984 , and on record in the Saint Paul Planning Division 0'ffice, 25 4J. Fourth Street, Sa�nt Paul , Minnesota . � Mary Qieveney Beseman Secretar,y to the Saint Paul Board of Zoning Appeals . � _. _ �.�s � _ . _ ,... .._. ._.:__,_.. __.:.� .._,...: _y ,�.�., . . _ _ . _ .-�. ��y-y(o/ ��1,fD �;� Z.Oi,IfdG �1PPcALS ST:',.�� ?EPUr2T FILE r 953� 1 . P,��'�i;APtiT: DA"dIEL APlD t�EVERLY Or2EN DATE OF HE�.?Ii;G: 3/27/84 2. Ci_!;i�1FICATIO"J: Variarice 3. LOC�;TIO�J: 1977 (Ylarshall ;'';=;rth side bet�,reen rrior and Moare) 4. L��:!':L �ESCRIPTIO�J: LJ. 10' o� Lot 8, and all or LoL 7, B1ock 27, Re�:rr. �ierriam. 5. P;,�S`�"JT LOtJI�;G: Rf�l-2 ZO"dI�vG CG�E RErEREWCE: Section o1 .101 (f) _ G. Si,'1;=� I�rVtSTIGATIO�! & REPORT: DATE 3/15/84 BY Fred S. Naider A. Pi1RPOSE: To consider a variance of code provisions that require a minimum lot area of 10,0UJ square feet for multi-family structures to permit the applicant to �- remodel the building from a forrner 11-unit rooming house and group home to a 4-unit apartment buil�ing. 8. AREA & FROiJTAGE: GO' frontage along h-�arshall x 1�+1 .5' frontage along P�:oore treet incfudes one-half of alley) for 9,090 square feet of total lot area. C. SITE & AREA CO^1�JITIONS: The site is occupied by a 3-story frame house and t1�o story oub e garag2. The site is elevated approxirnately 3 feet above street grade. The site is among a variety of land uses includi�g one- and two-f.am�ly da�iellinys, moderate density apartr;�ents and cor�nercial 2 blocks �vest at the intersection of i�larshall and Cleveland. D. ZO^,If�G CODE CITATIOPd: Section 61 .iU1 (f) limits multi-family structures to parcels of 10,U00 square feet or greater. Applicant proposes a 4-unit apartment on a 9,090 square foot parcel . E. ZO"!I�dG HISTORY: On P�°ay 16, 1983, the P�anning Commissior� granted a Special Condition Use Permit to Gur House of P�tinnesota, Inc. , to operate a groua homn for six retarded individuals. A state license was not issued due ta a state rnoratorium and the applicant released all interest in the property. Prior to 1�33, the structure �ras used as a group iiorne of i ndi vi dual s 1 i ti gatQd hy the ;;�.�:�enile j�:stice s�!stem and �rior to th�t the structure ��as l�censed as a rooming house. F. FI�!DIPIGS: 1. The applicant has amended the request for variance an�i site �i�n to delete a carriage house �,�ith related rear and side yard variance as .�►ell as to reduce the numoer of apartment units in the main structure. The applicant proposes to restore and remodel the subject pro�erty and change the use of the building from a rormer 11-��nit roomirig house and group home to four residential apartments. 2. L�lithout variance, the applicant aiill incur hardship based on the unique physical condition of the property. The building is in blighted and deterior�ated condition requirirg rehabilitation Lvith casts that nearly equal the fair market value of the existing building. It apaears ti�at the � extraordinary costs associated with rehabilitating this previ��sly placarded build�ing prevent development in accordance 41ith the strict provisions of the code. � 3. The variance request is in lceeping ��rith the intent and sairit of the coe�e and is consistent with the health, safety, comfort, morals and Urelf are of the in�iabitants of the City of St. Paul . + The code "recognizes the existence of older residential areas of the city where laryer houses can be converted in order to exter.d the economic life of these structures and allo�fr the o��ners to justify the expenditures for repairs and mc,dernization." This i5 precisely �r�hat the applicant is preposing for thi s bui l.ii n� corstructed i n 1�.�05. . . . _ . ...�.. _ .�_ __._ � _ ___ .. .. _. ._ .,� ._ ..�.,_.. �_T.�..__�._._ .u�...._, . ____ . � . , - . _ ;9�;:`_,Y -; -fi^� . • . . ('/� ��-��/ �?,�',:;?rL Ai�}t) EEV�;;LY OR�?�i (;�.�,�53fi) Page 2 F. FI�d[?I(;GS C(;'<i' `?. The co�e r'equires a minimu�r� lo� �r•pa t�� provide dCJE'.C�UdLP open space on th� site for �'r�e recreational and �<,rkin; needs of in�abitar��s of the building. Thi s i nt��r�t i s �;�et i f the app� i can t provi des s i x par•'�i n; spaces as illustratQd on the amended s�te �� an. Six par�irg spaccs conform to modern zoning star��,�ards for four residert ; al units . 4. The proposc� vari ance wi 11 not imr�ai r an adequate supp�� of 1 i ght artd ai r t�o adjacent prop�rt�, nor tivi11 it �i'�er the essent�ial cha��ac±er of the surrounding area. 5. Grantin, the variance ��iill not per�mit any use that is not �ermitted in the Rf�-2 (moderate density multi-family) zone, nor a�ould it alter or cr`�ange the zoning district classification of tf�e property. 5. Ttie request for variance does not appear to be 5ased prir;�arily on a desire forT econom�ic gain. G. SiAFF RcCOP•1��1EN�ATIOP�: Sased on findir�gs 1 through 6, staff recor�nends the req�.iest for variance as amer��eci be approved. ; t . � . __ _ ._._ . _ _ . , -- .__ __,..__r_...__�_. ... __.,._�_ x__..,��::�...., ..,....,�a.._-..,.�x�..,:.�._...,.._, . . . .. .. -. . . . . . . .. . ... .. . ._ . _ . :��-�~� , _ e;4 y�'.� . -G��t` �'".�.CD'L �. �I7v�'� ,' .�. _ � � � u �1 �_ ��`> ��,�--_ � ��_7�f . . ��_� �'�.I� �- � � Za,�� flA�� `� .7 G E' � � ��-�� I Ai'�'L�CATION FOR ��l�(� i O�i DiNANCE VARIA�ICE � �3 , �['r 1 T 1:�" �"�e°,'��7 {k �(��j t- {C; a �� A VARIANCE OF ZONIiVG CO��fA�PTEf3��``�`,,��T1�IC(��- PARAGRA?i-f �` _ 'IS REQUESTED IN CONFORMITY WITH THE POWERS VE3TED IN THE BOARD OF ZONING AP— ''"" � , ,s� , t, ��i7 PEALSTOPERMITTHE �( ii.E�'!Gi, r"� i l � , ��.' . --� .a ;�,, E�/��.__x ; � ON PROPERTY �� DESCRIBED BELOW.'�� ,S Vdl�7 �j,:lc( ,1Lla.� , ;,1_ ; �:r'�� -� .., s �% a � :��, , l� :,.� _:�_�� F: , ,� A. Applicant; NAME:�:�ttiPl �lrF+r a-�ri R-,y�.-� �� a-s t ADDRESS 3��.� Sandv HOOk Dr. .��t ' - � DAYTIME TELEPHONE NO. _�._ � � �� ZIP CODE_c �y -. ., . '. ... . �. . Tr—y�— 1. Property interest of applicant: (owner;contract purchaser,e .) Q w n e r ! �Lc — �.�� 2. Name of owner (if different) B. Property Description: ADDRESS 1977 Marshall Ave. Tr1I0 0� a�o� g, ar.� aI. pf t e rr . 1. Legal descnption: �OT 7 BLOCK ` ? n:- ; �DD. � 2. Lot size: '.7 x 1 4 7 5 = 9�l 9 n`}1 i��1 tr i3 i '� ��z 7 3. Present Use , ��r�� xi'I " � r n r�t n f- 3 r p L.T_Present Zoning Dist. . C. Reasons for Request: 1. Proposeduse SiX unit dwellin4 2 - 2 bedror�i�s ' 3 - l bedroom.s � 2. What physical characteris�ics2ff tfi��p�t��r�rEn{its being used for any.of the permitted uses in your zone? (topography,soil conditions,size and shape of lot,etc.) S�Ze O� �.0� [i�` tate the specific variation requested,giving distances where appropriate. �"'ea� � See attac�ed �� 4, xplain how your case conforms to each of the foilowing: �9.� . That the strict application of the provisions of the Zoning Ordiance would result in pecutiar -�.�r;� g r�9 or exceptional practical difficulties,or exceptional undue hardships. ;r.� . m%r�'.,'7. � ._y. r . � S�2 2�t8C�18� . ��,�y � , { #_ ,�.i �.� 1� -�, ��_: CASHIERS U5E ONLY ,j�� , � b. That the granting of a variance will '�y . • .y F � � � not be a substantial detriment to � �'° public good or a substantial impair- ��; '�t-. �={t .1?v c.< ,-� ment of the intent and purposeof ,�-�;--•�;*i-•+' �=e � � the Zoning Ordinance. `1`�':'•-- `-�� `i':-��_� � '�';:."'.. �..a^ �t� .FS��j - �� See attached �_.. '''_=x=_ rr.'�i;t_.Y!, !i E's�_:t`,-'i�_ , � t 1 NOTE: THIS WILL NOT BE PROCESSED WITHOUT A COMPLETE SITE PLAN! ,i f � Signature �/ �.�'l!.:5 J/ � i. �_ _ ,�,,^,CG'!¢�/ i '� JY�C�Y� ~ � � � � � . j ✓1 ``v' Date Received ,r�? /�(�� '� ��• � �l= ��-y�� P . 2 Application for Zoning Ordinance Variance 3. l. 910� variance , 10, 000� required 2 . Rear yard set back variance of 25 ' for - carriage house. Exising carriage house T is on the rear property 1ine. 3. Side yard set back variance of 4' for carriage house. 4 ' required , 0 ' available. 4 . a. & b . Because this structure has been used in the past as an eleven unit aprtment building, and as a group home, it requires a great deal of renovation to m�ke it habitable. The City of St . Paul has , however , made it possible to renovate this building by designating $35 , 000 of 2% rehab money, which must be matched by the owner and which must be used to create rental property, additional parking and shelter. With- out the city money, any sizeable renovation proj- ' ect would be impractical , leaving the owners with a low budget , fuel inefficient rooming house and leaving the community raith an eye sore and a potential college party house. A variance, however, would allow us to return the Marshall property to its finer state. We would upgraue anci renova�e all the existing space. We will add off street parking spaces . The exterior house and yard will be refurbished in keeping with exising neighborhood standards . We hope to provide attractive, moderate rental units in a good, established neighborhood. � � �''�a�� ,�� .� �ti�!�. , ` : ,�. .. >..... . - I� _ - r� �- l�j - �jG��'�fo� � �� U � �� .',',� `, 01984 1�,p�t�, �J C�jY �'�..AI'!;4l�vG �U��I�D "�int ��l. ��9fnne�vta ��` ... .,. � �;' - 3105 Sandy Hook Dr. St . Paul, MN 55113 March 19 , 1984 City of St . Paul Department of Planning and Economic Development Division of Planning 25 W Fourth St . , St . Paul , Mn 55102 � DPar Mr. Haider : This letter confirms the amendments to the variance application for the property at 1977 Marshall. T. Proposed use as a six unit dwelling withdrawn. Proposed use as a four unit dweZling replaced. 2 . Rear yard set back variance of 25' withdrawn. 3. Side yard set back of 4 ' withdrawn. Thank you for your cooperation, time and input . Sincerely, Daniel L. Oren rly J. Oren G-r'ti"1 • �� s 7 . � ��,� � � �tc y'�-yd/ a�. i � _ , . } � - � ► � � ' . � � � �..�.Purchasers - Q � �aniel L. Oren Beverly J. Oren -�� `N° 31Q5 Sandy Hook Dr. � � St. Paul , ��T 55113 645-0323 � Legal Description ' W. 1Q' of iot 8 � and all of lot 7 � Block 27 , �+Berriam Rearr. a � � Scale 1" = 20 ` � 1 . 9090 ' lat t 2 . 0 ' setbaack from � side yard 3. and back yard 0 U-�``�c �a � � d � � � i i � I _._ 6 0 - ' t � . ! _.a.�.�..�. � /ti'IBrsh a �/ . . � . t� � � � �o . s �¢��i �,q . � - - �/=�� y�� 4a,- ` . � � �b : � . � , ��4$ ,�► � : ;� � f �� ' C�� ., Ir��. -y � 645-0349 • WILDER AT SA1NT ANTHONY . SAIN7 PAUL,MItVNESOTA 55104 c4��, ' ��° �,� p�A� The Merriam Park Community Council has met twice to discuss the variance request of Dan and Beverly Oren to convert 1977 Marshall Avenue to a 4-plex. ° At each of the meetings approximately twenty neighbothood peaple came to discuss the conversion proposal with the Orens. After two hours of discussion, at the last meeting, the Housing Committee unanimously voted to support the conversion of 1977 Marshall Avenue into a 3-unit structure with three parking spaces � (2 in the existing garage and Z alongside - the garage) . The group believed there should be one unit on the first floor, second floor, third floor, and none in the basement. The community's opposition to the intensified use included on-street i parking problems, due to the nearby church, increased traffic in an already overused alley, noise problems from a high density building, absentee ownership of the �roper*,i, the use cf. $35,OOq at 2$ �?ntal rehab rn�zey fx�m the City to undertake the conversion, and i.n June of 1982 the Board of Zoning Appeals supported the bierriam Park Community Council's opposition to allowing a third unit at 1985 Marshall Avenue, which is directly across the street (the v.ariance was for a three family unit with 7,075 square feet) . The neighbors believe three larger units wouid lend themselves to occupancy by elderly tenants, due to the adjacent transit line and the single family residential character of the neighborhood. � , ;�I`1 P,q . �,��-�� - ��- � '��.._.�:-2'� . �. � r,r,:':. 4 _ w'' y sA A�� t� �� `- • �� p��, .. _ �J �� _ ��-` �" - � �5��- _ �� i:1�� c, �r : � � � � .� �� :� ��v;°h�,►:��,, ��'�,� -y � � 645-0349 • WILDER AT SAIN7 ANTF{OkVY . SAfNT PAUL,MINIIIESOTA 55l44 �� ; �,to _ �F� P�-A� . March 12, 1984 _ bis. Gladis l�lorton, Chair - Board of Zoning Appeals 1100 City Hall Annex • - 25 t�est r^ourth Street St. Paul, t4innesota 55102 , Re: Zoning File 9536 Dear i�is. t•Iorton: The i4erriam Park Community Council's Housing Committee met with. Daniel and Beverly Oren regarding the conversion of 1977 i�iarshall Avenue to a 6-plex, and the resulting variance request. Due to the lack of any financial data on the feasibility of 3, 4, 5 or 6 units in the house, and the lack of any floor plans, the Housing Committee overwhelmingly voted to request that the pubiic hearing be - held over until the t4arch 27th Board of Zoning Appeals meeting. The Orens have agreed to this layover, and have agreed to r�eet with the Planning and Economic Development staff to do the necessary €inancial analysis and floor plans for our Committee's review. Our Ho;.Ging C�m:nittee has scr_e�•ilec� a spe��.�l mee�in� on Pic^day eveMin�, t�Iarch 26th to review the information and make a final recommendation to your Board on the 27th. Xour willingness to lay this matter over is greatly appreciated. Best re�ards, ? / _��r,:'%-,' �=_; _�,% 'f . .� - �. �`.�___j� �� Molly O'Rourke Community Organizer hi0/em . e . _n_ . _ ._ , , .. .a g r � . - . � - � - 7�a� . Joel. 1J. �hinovall 1984 1ti1a_��a11 �Avenue �.7aint paul, ,��inneso�a 55104 'ul �" :�; � '� '� !�I ,j+i ��, , t ° � :_� 141arch 8, 1984 �,�� :�� ' . _ �� _ . �x� �. 44 Board of Zonin A �i�� `'� ;f' }� g ppeals c��t �.� �,'�,`�� F�� 3 25 West Fourth Street '� n�'`v`� "�`� : Saint Paul, Minnesota 5510 � `'� � �i ` , Dear Board of Zoning Appeals: As residents of Planning District 13, we are not in favor of the conversion o� 19?? rQarshall into a 6 unit dwelling, The idea of maintainina a single dwelling neighborhood is very dear to us. 1 Problems do develop with property used as multi-purpose housing: tenants who constantly change, greater traffic and parkin.g congestion, an influx of people in the neighborhood. It is our hope that the propert You will not allow y to be re-zoned. Would also like to say that the microwave disk in the front yard• of 2089 Marshali is an eyes�re. - - ° incerely, ``� t �. '.` , a ,� `� � 1 �=""�'^� ' "�� ` . -____,..,� � � j : `,� �,, � J el and Catherine Thingvall - t ��:� t __ �� i�� k C J� ��* . ' e }� . ��r . .-`'.f��' . :;;_fS�# . �;.��•. : t. . . , . . � � . . ._. ...._.._..._ _. . . .. , 2 �.�:,.. (� C �� rlarch 21 , 1984 . . ' �� t� � � �� f Bo�r'd of Zoning Appeals �"�� '( �y�'+ �'��7�°� 2 S We s t Fo ur th S t . �� S L' . Pa ul, MN S 510 2 _ �Int Pauf. Ivlinne� ke : Zoning File �r9S36 �: ;� , . _, , .. •.- Zoning File i�amz - Oren � . ��. R-�•. � ' � Locatian of Property - 1977 Marshall Ave . This letter is to voice my opinion on Daniel and Beverly Oren�s rP�uest for a variance to a,llow four rental units in the building at 1977 Marshall Ave . I am opposed to allowing this variance because I feel it will have � a negative impact on the surrounding residental area . With four rental units there will be additional traffic . With two grade schools less then 1� blocks away this presents a potential danger for the children of the neighborhood. Since there is limited parking on Marshall Avenue there will be a shortage of parking spaces . Y feel it is important the area maintains its association as a neighborhood of families and that every structure is not turned into a rnultiple unit buildiRg . Buiidings that are not owner occupied tend to cause problems in the area and therefore I feel any building that is allowed to have more than one unit in this area should be owner occupied. , The zoning 1aw s were made to maintain the c haracter of the area and therefore they should be enforced. Last year the zoning board did not a11ow a variance for a third unit for the awner Qc�upied structure th�t is a�;ross �he street from 1977 Marshall. and therefore I feel the board should only allow a two unit structure at 1977 Marshall Ave. S inc ere Iy , ,:�� f � /� u,x' � 2,�x� �_ . � �) � � , CT� � Philip E. Gerla�h 2005 Marshall Ave . St. Pau1 , MN 55104 (612) 645-3502 � � . . �/=��f-y�/ ` � � � �� , ..,-�_�;� . . _ , . . ---___________----------------------- --------------- ------_ __ I PED i RE�4T UN I T5 i ! I P�0-fORMA ANf�YSIS I ONE bR s00 1 I PR�33ECT C�5T fi0975 I I �EJTAL t�USINfi VER5ION ! TWO 9R 375 1 ( ��10PERS EQllI1Y ��0�0 ( 1 I TWa $R 4II0 i 1 Pl1biIC EQIIITY 8 I 1 LATE: 12-hlar -8� i TWO BR 450 1 ! DEBT SERVICE 90975 ! 1 PR�JECT: i LAUNDRY 20 1 I H.A�D t�5TS 1100@8 I I LL�ATION: ! EXPENSE5- 35.00%GF GROSS t L�1d VALiIE I2975 C �--- --- - � — � _,f t i DEHi �RVICE CRLCI�RTIONS i COtR4I55IQN 7.�0X E DEPRECIATI�{ INF'� t t N�RT6A6'E 1 2 3 I CAP 6AIN5 RATE 40.0fh� t IdQNTH AC4�t1IRED - 1 I I i INC.TAX A.ATE 50.@@X t T�RpI-YR5 DDB% AP�N+I? 1 y 1 RRINCIPNL P.MOtI�!'i Eb488 64487 0 1 YEAR OF 5AL.E 10 i f5 175 98�8 ! I INTEREST RATE 2.�r1% 11.50% 1�.08% I SALE PRIGE ASS�JMP 2 I 5 ACRS @ I I TC� 3� 39 25 I 6liES5 50.00X I PEREENT PI�JNT I i YEARLY PflYMEIVT 1175 7fi�3 0 1 IRR-SALE 47.51X i ITG @X 0 ( ! I -ND SflLE 39.67x i H��f CR 07c 8 I �---_____�_-- --------__�__�_____ _�_� ► � �_� I IN�LATION YEAR 1 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 9 f0� 1 . I REHET�UE at4 1.0'5 1.�,.i t.05 �.05 I.�,5 1.05 1.05 1.@5 1.�i t I EXRENSES 1+� 1.07 1.07 1.07 1.07 1.07 1.07 1.�7 1.07 I.�7 I i Vt1Cr�CIES 0.�� 0.�X @.00% @.(�X 0.�10% 0.0D% 0.@�% 8.Pa3X 8.�7C �.@0X t I PRQPERTY APPREC @ 105,00% 1 �____�_�_ ____�______ ____�_.�____��r----�_�� _� _�� I 1'r1 YEAR CA5H FLOW Z i P.E�i�lE: � i DtlE BR 8106 8505 89�0 9377 9846 10338 1@855 12398 119S7 12565 1 I TWO BR 93� 9765 10253 1�756 113d4 11869 12463 13�85 1374@ 14kz7 E I THREE BR 0 @ @ � ' 0 0 0 0 0 0 i f RARKIt� 24@ 252 Zb5 278 292 306 32� 339 355 372 t i - -�� — _�._�_�_w._�._._r_M�_____ - � - � I 6RDS5 REVENUE 17b40 l85� i9448 2�4�1 21442 22514 Z3639 Z48�I 268�2 27355 i i LE65:UACANCIES 0 0 0 0 0 � @ � @ 0 1 i =�N.._:=._..�:��.__. —___�_�_ .:_-__�M�__Y.._,_�.____._.�_—____�_ � f I IvFT REVEPiIl� 17�i40 1852�' 19448 204'cl �1442 22514 23639 24821 �6062 27365 i � t I OPERATINS EXPEN5ES 6174 6606 1a69 7�3 8093 8659 9266 99F4 I�36�iB I2351 t I =—� ____� ______ ____--_��_�_ - ._._�------ --��- �= I f I�T OPER INCOME 11466 11916 12379 12857 13349 ls'854 I4374 I4907 15454 15015 I I i I QEBT SERVICE 8838 8838 8838 8838 8838 8838 8838 88s'8 88s8 8838 t � _�—�.__��...��_��_ �� ---��_�_ �� t YEAR: 1 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 9 I0 i 1 CASN R�J AFT FIN 2628 3�78 3541 4019 4511 5416 5535 6@53 651fi 7I77 t i W+l�RTIZRTItli�! 9i2 957 1P.85 1059 1117 1182 I252 23?,� 1415 15i0 ! I DEPRECIRTION 15YR 117b� 98� 8820 7840 6860 5880 5889 5880 5889 49V� I 1 DEPRECIATION 5YR . 0 0 � 0 0 1 � � ��__� _ -�� — -- — ! ! P�T TAXABLE INCDME -8220 -5755 -4�73 -2762 -123� 318 908 1519 2151 3786 I ` t TAX SAVI�65 4110 2883 P137 1381 615 -159 -454 759 -1�7b -1893 i ! ITClHIST CREDITS 0 � � i --- — — _____ �_ � � I CflSH Fl.ON AFT TAX 6738 5961 5579 54�8 5127 4857 5082 5310 5540 5283 i �_�_.�________ �._�..____ � _ � I PROAE�TY APP(�CIATIDN A 1�.00X f t . . . . _ �- �, .�t;�{- �=�� ------ ------------- ------�---- ------------ - -------___ I A�Q i R-,IT l�lITS ! t I PRO-FCR'� AMALYSIS I ONE BR 3��3 P i PROJECT C05T 2�2975 I I RENTRL NOUSING UE�:SIflN I �IE B4 w�5 1 I DEVELOPER5 E�UI7Y 2�w��a I I I TWO BR 375 1 1 �PUBLIC EQUITY a I 1 DRTE: i?-P':ar -84 I TWO Br� u5�) 1 i DEBT SERVICE i@29?S 1 I PRaJECT: I �5 1 f liFiRD C05TS 1±�?�f��d I 1 LQCATID�'V: I EXPENSES- 35.Q�D�OF 6R085 } LANd VALUE 12975 I �--- ____�_�-- �_ ._.��------ -��_.- � -- I I DEBT SERVTCE CALCULATIGNS I CC��iMIS5I0N 7.�ibX 1 QEFRECIATIQN IP�FO �I I M�RTnA6E 1 2 3 I CAP Cs�INS RATf 48.t�% ! MQNT}l E�CQI.IIRED 1 t I I INC.TAX RATE 58.@0X I TEF�i-YR5 DD6X A�40UNT I I PRIN�IPAL AMOUMT' �488 7@�87� 0 1 YEAR 4F SALE 10 1 15 175 11�0�D I I TyTERE5T RflTE 2.@9X I1.S@X 1a.�0% 1 SALE PRICE AS5U�4P 2 1 5 RCRS 0 I ° 1 TERM 30 � 25 I GUE55 5a.00% t PERCEN7 AM�JNT 1 1 YEARLY PRYMENT 1441 B37b � 1 IRR-5ALE 52.261� 1 ITC 07t 0 t I I -NO SALE 49.16X t HIST CR 6% 0 1 �--- ------��_��-------------�-_----_------- -��__�,� I I II�LiaTIOPi YEAR 1 2 3 # 5 6 7 8 9 1@ �i f REVEI�tJE NA 1.05 1.�5 1.05 i.�5 1.�5 1.@5 1.05 1.05 i.0S ! I EXPErIStS l+� 1.(O7 1.07 1.07 1.07 1.�7 1.07 1.�7 1.�7 1.07 1 1 VACAhC I ES 0.��% @.00% 0.0@X 8.08% �.i�% 8.�I% 0.�NX 0,0N% �.02% 8.(c�X I 1 PROQERTY RP?REC @ 185.k�0� � � _...�____�----------- -- - - -____�____�_ I I 10 YEAR CASH fL�tJ� -- ~f ( REUENUE: � i t3�+lE BR 1I1� 11655 1�238 1�850 1349� 14267 I4975 15519 16si@8 1722�b ( 1 7W(i t�R 846� 8920 92b1 9724 10210 10721 11257 11820 12411 13831 I I THRt�E BR 0 0 0 8 0 0 0 9 @ 6 i I PRRKIN� 3@9 3i5 331 347 365 383 40C 422 443 465 I I =��_.��_-____ - - �----_--_- --��w��_ - ____ I I 6Rl3.SS REVEt�IiE 1980� P@799 21830 �2921 24Q�7 P5279 25534 27861 29PS4 387l6 ! l LE5S:VRCAi�IES 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 f I -----------_-_- -____-_�_.�-----_---_----_==-- ---��_^� - ---- I I NET REVEt�fE 19863 20790 2183@ 22921 24@b7 25278 2e5s"4 2i$61 29254 3+D7I6 I I � ! Gi�RATI�iG EXPEN5ES 69� 7415 7934 B44a 9�D84 9720 104�0 11128 i19@7 I2741 I I =---- - ----------•----_-------____ _��----�_��____.--------- ----- - __= 1 i NET OPER IitiE01� 12878 13375 13H95 l4431 14983 15551 i6134 1b733 17347 17976 i i � f D�BT �RVICE 9817 9917 9817 9817 9817 9917 9817 9817 98t7 99I7 I 1 -- - - - ��_--=-_ -_-___�_��___..��--- --- ---- ---- = 1 1 YEAR: 1 2 3 4 S 6 7 8 9 10 I I CASN �i.QW RFT FIN 3�3 3558 4a78 4614 5156 5733 6317 b915 7529 8158 t i R�P.TIZATION 1094 1134 1189 125� 1315 i388 i467 15�3 1649 I7S4 1 I DcPRECIRTI�'M I5YR 132Q0 110@0 99@@ 88E0 77@9 66P.�t 6668 6600 6fi�8 55� I I DEPRECIATI0�1 5Y� 0 0 0 0 0 � { _-=-------------��- - _=_-�._��-= - --- - -= f I NET TAXABLE INCAd� -9054 -b3�8 -4633 -2936 -1'c19 521 li$3 18b9 �578 44I3 I I TRX SRVIN6S 4532 3154 2316 1468 609 -260 -592 -934 -1�89 -�i2�D6 ( i ITC/HIST CR�DTTS @ � _ I -_--=_-.______�__��_��---______._.._..__--_-_--__--____� - � - �_______w � I CfiSFi FL061 AFT TAX 7585 fi71Z 6394 fi08?. 5775 5473 5725 598,1 6240 5952 t �_ � _�� __�� I PRCPERTY APPRECIATION C� 105.�% � , � ; � " 1 i ; i , � � � i --� —____-� -r----- O p !(^� -�- _,_- ; I« _� � ---- �= O O� ' � -�-. f v� � �'' ' ---_� G�� l.. � S^" ��.� �. i O p r " � -q- oo �� 000 0000 � ' � — O LOI�I�r�LLP:f� � ` � 0 ,1 O -o- ° -- � � -o----- o � . ' � ° 1300 �oo oc� 0000 ; � � o � � ICL �� ,��` � � -�- t � ' ' ` ' ' ' �o� u o 0 0 0 0 ' o 0 o c� o , o �� c� I ' ,U' ' �O �r- 1 � � � i 1 � t � � i � i i ! � ►3z , � � t ! , 1 � ► , . � ' � i , ; - � R Q � E � � �G (3� �� Q � Q � �� 3O � _ � -� � � � f ' �. � , - ` -- �O �^� �� 1'�. �� . � ��:�.` II,��';�'?y 'y 8 � O n �: Cl .l) (> _ r'l p � � - Q �rh -f ,Pi r Q►F .� I. ,--` [ � � U �'� � i e o # " ` � i � i Q `�-- . � � � I � I ; O , m � O �i �ps � 00 � � 0 � � � � � � RECTORY: I • 6 � �.�Y�c�r�f - ` � 000000 : o � o -�- � oo ; � o � ; o000000c �1 � ' w , P � � ., a o ,,, � , , .__. � � A q � � t i � � f E � 0 o S0000000 � -¢ 00000 oioic� ooaac ,... 5�L�-3�°`' o c� ' � � o � o � � 000 000aoo a000000c � , . ' , Q �. � � .. „ � _ � n � , � r� AREA P��►P APPLICANT �� , � ��U�-r��/ , LEGEND ""'- '-" ZONING DISTRICT 80UNDARY C7 r�h PURPOSE VGi.Y't C,L�1� P_ �,��(��r �_[[d SUBJEC'C PRQPERTY � •- � . "� C� O�E{ FANItLY PI.QNNiNG .�)I l� O1STRlS7 TWO FAMI�Y FILE N0. q-`]�� ' �ATE /�ctr 1 3 - ��" � �ULTIPI.E FAMILY Mer.�. � s e, rl COM�4ERClAL 1�K. � � �+, :;�. 31`lr� ij7r?IA�_ �°�,? r,�G. � ;C�� i` - �C� .l' '�3��?��-I -.. " � , : � � � ,-� � SAl�i�(' PAUL PLAiVNiNG BOt+�iO � V V:a�:i��T � r .r.._.�._._ , • •----1�--L--1-- – - — --._.. . _ . . .. . _. ; �i a_ � � y__.__. _�_ _� . . . .:. : . . . . . ... . . . . . . . . . . . . ::-... . .. . . .._._.._.. . .,;..,....... . .._._ . . . . . � ..... .........'".......-,�... .. .��..+.,,��..,..-..�-•;��'�.. , - � ;��Y�7�� - � ST. PAUL CITY COUNCiI. PUB�IC HEARING NOTICE ZONING T0: Property owners within 350 feet and representatives of Planning District FIL E N 0. 9536 13 (Merriam Park) PA�E P U R P 0 S E To cons i der an appeal of a deci s i on of the Board of Zon i ng Appeals to grant a variance of code provisions that require 10,000 square feet of minimum lot area for a 4-unit structure. The �oard granted a request to allow a 4-unit structure on a lot with 9,090 square feet. LOCATION 1977 Marshall (North side between Prior & Moore) P E T i T 10 N E R WILLIAM R. & MARY A. ANDERSON H E A R I N G Thursday, May 3, 1984 lo:oa a.M. City Council Chambers, 3rd Floor City Hall - Court House Q U E S TIO N S Zoning Z9s-4154 (Fred Haider) . Contact the Zoning Section of the Planning and Economic Development Department, Room 1101, City Hall Annex, 25 W. 4th Street, St. Paul, Minnesoia 55102 Legal Description: Wid of lot 8, and all of Lot 7 , Block 27 Rearr. Merriam Notice sent 4-20-84 . , , . � � ,� . ISt �' _ / y � 2nd e �Q � �/ ��/ � . � 3rd � - �� - �� Adbpted � — ��7' Yeas Nays DREW C�� y� �G� ` FLETCHER j t t MASANZ � �/y� t , NICOSIA SCHEIBEL ; WILSON � � MR, PRESIDENT TEDESCO ' i