The URL can be used to link to this page

84-649 WHITE+ - CITV CLERK �,��,K -�INANCE GITY OF SAINT PAUL Council �� CANARY - DEPARTMENT File NO. ��_�� BLUE - MAVOR � cil e o ution Presented By �- Referred To Committee: Date Out of Committee By Date WHEREAS, John C. Mudek made application to the City of Saint Paul for a special condition use permit to allow construction of a storage building in the flood fringe that is not elevated on fill above the regulatory flood protection elevation for property located on the north side of Barge Channel Road lying e�est of the Chicago Northwestern Railroad and legally described as Government Lot No . 9, Section 9, Township 28, Range 22, Parcel B; and WHEREAS, the Planning Commission upon the recommendation of its Zoning Committee denied the special condition use permit, and the applicant appealed this denial to the St . Paul City Council pursuant to Section 64. 206 of the Saint Paul Legislative Code; and WHEREAS, The Council conducted a public hearing on March 22, 1984 for the purpose of considering this appeal with notice to affected property owners and having heard the statements made and considered the application, the report of staff, the minutes and findings of the Planning Commission, does hereby RESOLVE, That the Council of the City of Saint Paul does here- by grant the application for special condition use permit for the above described property so as to allow construction of a building not elevated on fill using FP-4 floodproofing standards based upon the following findings and determinations made by the City Council : (1) The services to be provided by the proposed facility for the recycling of glass, metal and paper is a valuable service to the community. (2) The proposed recycling center is compatible with existing uses in the area and the additional development will be of a similar character. COUNCILMEN Requested by Department of: Yeas Nays Fletcher Galles In Favor Masanz . Nicosia scheibei _ Against BY Tedesco Wilson Adopted by Council: Date Form Appro ed y City Att Certified Yassed by Council Secretary BY sy t#pproved by 1Aavor: Date Appro ed y Mayor f r ubmission to Council BY BY WHITE� - CITV CLERK P11� „-�INANCE GITY OF SAINT PAUL Council �CANARV - DEPARTMENT BI.UE - MAVOR File �O. �� 1 Council Resolution Presented By Referred To Committee: Date Out of Committee By Date (3) The proposed use is similar to other uses which the soil ' s topography and geology does support. (4) The proposed use is compatible with the existing charac- teristics of biologic and other natural communities . (5) The proposed use will not require service by sewer or water. (6) The proposed facility and contents are not susceptible to flood damage with the exception of oil . (7) If the proposed structure is not elevated it will not increase flood heights or velocities . (8) The height of the 100 year flood is approximately 706 feet and the velocities in the flood fringe are generally low and therefore the duration and rate of rise of the river will vary. (9) The applicant has proposed and will develop and implement a flood evacuation plan. BE IT FURTHER RESOLVED, That the appeal of John C. Mudek be and is hereby granted; and, be it FURTHER RESOLVED, That the City Clerk shall mail a copy of this resolution to John C. P�Iudek and to the Planning Commission. 2. COUIVCILMEN Requested by Department of: Yeas Nays A Fletcher r� Galles �_ In Favor Masanz Nicosia Scheibel � _ Against BY Tedesco Wilson Adopted by Council: Date MAY 2 2 �g8�4 Fotm Approve y City Attor Certified -•ed b ou .il Secr aryr� BY By � -_C� � ta d by lflavor: Date AY 2 5 198� Approved Mayor for Submission to Council sy Pus��sNeD JuN 2 - 1984 -- --------- --__ ___- --.�R�-T-I�RAF--T��-Ra� -�-EGA�,--A�'F��-A�4FT-I-0�T w � - - . . }---------'------.--�--------- � � Wti1TE � - GiTV CLERK . . � � �� . � � PINK� - FINAN�E GITY OF SAINT PAUL Council � � � � CANARY - DEPARTMENT � /1� /M/� � BIUE - MA;OR ' � FIIe . NO. O �(L7�� 'ouncil I�Z esolution Presented By � Referred To Committee: Date Out of Committee By Date WHEREAS, John C. Mudek made application to the City of Saint Paul for a special condition use permit to allow construction of a storage building in the flood. fringe that is not elevated on fill above the regulatory flood protection elevation for property located on the north side of Barge Channel Road lying west of the Chicago Northwestern P.ailroad and legally described as Government Lot No . 9, Section 9, Township 28, Ra.nge 22, Parcel B; and WHEREAS, the Planning Commission upon the recommendation of its Zoning Committee denied the special condition use permit, and the applicant appealed this denial to the 5t. Paul City Council pursuant to Section 64.206 of the Saint Paul Legislative Code; and WHEREAS, The Council conducted a public hearing on March 22, 1984 for the purpose of considering this appeal with notice to . affected property owners and having heard the statements ma.de and considered the application, the report of staff, the minutes and findings of the Planning Commission, does hereby RESOLVE, That the Council of the City of Saint Paul does here- by grant the application �or special condition use permit for the above described property so as to allow construction of a building not elevated on fill using FP-� floodproofing standards based upon the following findings and determinations made by .the City Council : : � (1) The services to be provided by the proposed facility for the recycling' of glass, metal and paper is a valuable service to the community. � . � (2) The proposed retycling center is compatible with existing � uses in the area and the additional development will be of a similar character. . . COU-!�ICILMEN Yeas Nays Requested by Department of: FletCher ca�� In Favor Masanz Nfcosia � � scne�ber � Against BY � " Tedesco Wilson Form Approved by City Attorney Adopted by Council: . Date Certified Passed by Council Sectetary �BY B� �ppro��ec by 3lavor: Date ' Approved by 17ayor for Submission to Council . .... . . I�� R. � . — -- - � –____ _ __ _ ____ _-- ------- . ---- ---_ __-------- WMITE - C�TV CLERK . • . � - - -PINK - iINAN�E COUnC1I C�r` � CAN,►Rr - DEP�aTMENT � � G I TY OF SA I NT PAU L File NO.__d�,l �Oy� BLUE - MpYOR � � � Council Resolution Presented By Referred To Committee: Date Out of Committee By Date (3) The proposed use is similar to other uses which the soil ' s topography and geology does support, (4) The proposed use is compatible with the existing charac- teristics of biologic and other natural communities . (5) The proposed use will not require service by sewer or ' water. (6) The proposed facility and contents are not susceptible to flood damage with the exception of oil . (7) If the proposed structure is not elevated it will not increase flood heights or velocities . . (8) The height of the 100 year flood is approximately 706 feet and the velocities in the flood fringe are generally low and therefore the duration and rate of rise of the river will vary. (9) Tlie applicant has proposed and will develop and implement a flood evacuation plan. • ;� BE IT FURTHER RESOLVED, TYi�t the appeal of John C. Mudek be and is hereby granted; and, be it � � FURTHER RESOLVED, That the City Clerk shall mail a copy of this resolution to Johri C. Mudek and to the Planning Commission. . � � 2 . COUNCILMEN Yeas Nays Requested by Department of: Fletcher �a�� In Favor Masanz Nicosia ' Scheibel Against BY � � Tedesco Wiison Form Approved by City Attorney Adopted b�� Council:. Date Certified Passed by Council Secietary BY B�; Appro�•ed b} �1avor. Date � _ Approved by Mayor for Submission to Council r.-. � , _.� �� '`��`� CiTY �R . � ,��` . • ;r • CITY OF SAINT PAUL F a �� 4 DEPARTMENT OF PLANNING AND ECONOMIC DEVELOPMENT pm �� ha DIVISION OF PLANNING ,eb+ 25 West Fourth Street,Saint Paul,Minnesota,55102 612-292-1577 GEORGE LATIMER MAYOR March 12, 1984 Albert Olson, City Clerk Room 386 City Hall St. Paul , Minnesota 55102 RE: Zoning File #9521 - Mudek City Council Hearing: March 22, 1984 PURPOSE: Appeal Planning Commission denial of river corridor special condition use permit to construct a storage and recycling building in the flood fringe that would not be elevated on fill to above the regulatory flood protection elevation (RFPE) . PLANNING COMMISSION DECISION: Deny (12-3) ZONING COMMITTEE DECISION: Deny (2-2) STAFF RECOMMENDATION: Deny SUPPORT: Letter from Chicago and Northwestern Transportation Company stating no objection. OPPOSITION: Letter from Department of Natural Resources stating their position and suggested changes. Dear Sir: On February 16, 1984 the Zoning Corrnnittee of the Planning Commission held a public hearing on this Special Condition Use Permit. The applicant was present and explained his proposal . There was no other testimony. At the close of the public hearing, the Committee considered the requirements of city codes, federal government standards, and the recor►mendation of the Department of Natural Resources. A motion to deny the permit failed on a vote of 2 to 2, and the application went to the full Planning Commission without recommendation. On Feburary 24, 1984 the Planning Comnission considered this application. After their discussion, they voted to deny the permit on a vote of 12 to 3. On March 5, 1984 the Zoning Office received an appeal of the Planning Commission's decision. The grounds for the appeal include the following: (1 ) A substantial amount of money has already been spent on equipment; (2) Access would be difficult if the building were required to be raised; and (3) The requirement that Barge Channel Road be elevated if this industrial area is platted would create a hardship for existing uses and would make railroad access difficult or impossible. • . . . �� y- �y� . z . . Zoning File #9521 - Mudek Page 2 This appeal is scheduled to be heard before the City Council on March 22, 1984. Please notify me by March 21 if any member of the City Council wishes to have slides of this site presented at the public hearing. Sincerely, � " � .�-��.� Patricia N. James City Planner PNJ/mb attachments � �� - � � � � G� ��y� � , . . � � APPLICATION FOR APPEAL .;� ,:j°` ZONING OFFICE USE ONLY CITY OF SAINT PAUL -�- 1'� .g��i ' , ",,�J o.�n Fi le � �� , � , J , �- aPPlication Fee $ � �; i7�_c °�— � ;� � : � °�.}-�� ` ``�' � � Tentative Hearing Date � -ZZ-�3'g - '1,,'4 7 .'.a�`:l z Application is hereby made for an Appeal to the %:r�� C/�i..Gl�— under the provisions of Chapter 64, Section �, Paragraph of the Zoning Code to appeal a decision made by the Board of Zoning Appeals � Planning Commission on J��?,. �� , 1 _ Zoning Administrator (date of decisio) � Planning Administratar Other A. APPELLANT Name ,�/-��[, �c�'�j�� Dayt ime phone 7�t��9�Z Ad d r e s s /��,�(''� �jC.,{�_ Z i p Cod e � ;r0� 8. DECISION BEING APPEALED Zoning fi le name__��'��=�� ! _Zoning Fi le #��7__� Property Address/Location��{?�� '��-� �?� , Legal description ��-�.F�-� � �-�'C�(��.c_'��...��- ��-1-� ,� -F"c�:,p �i P-�� C. GROUNDS FOR APPEAL (Use additional sheets if necessary.} (Explain why you feel there has been an error in any requ�rement, permit, decision or refusal made by an administrative official, or an error in fact, procedure or finding made by the Board of Zoning Appeals or the Planning Commission.) ��—� � �L�i�� 3 �L 'C C"if �✓ .� C�{y -�L��lr C'°.�� /�7 If you have any questions, please contact: � ..��.'�� ,�,� _, ,�, App icant's si nature St. Paul Zoning Office 6� 1100 City Hall Annex 25 West Fourth Street � —,�-7— �� ,��,�,�,�jj, Saint Paul , Mirrnesota 55102 Date City agent (298-4154) 9/82 � _ _ _ F —. — o . . �. .. . .. � � . . .. . . .�1(b • .� _ � . .i... ' � . � - . �� _ �. . . , , , ; _ . - — _ . _ �. ; � _ __ ._ y . . _ _� . __� .�_G� . _ MUDEK TR�CKIN6 JOHN MUDEK & SON Rubbish Removal - Commercial - Residential Containers - Roll-off-Boxes 1520 Ames Avenue St. Paut, Minn. 55106 Phone 771-4792 St. Paul Zoning Office March 5th 1984 1100 City Hall Annex 25 West Fourth St. St. Paul, Mn 55102 Re: Planning Commission Zoning File 9521 -- Reasons for Appeal �'1 1. Mudek trucking has already spend a substantial amount of money for equipment, bailers.loaders for the recycing building. 2. If the recycling building was raised to 707.5ft. it would be vei�difficu7i to drive from the street into the recycling building. 3. Barge Channel Rd. is appoximatly 2000 ft long,if raised, alI tends ivould be 8 ft lower than the street. 4. If Barge Channel wes raised the Nothren Coperage Co. warehouse would unusable, because of the height of the road. 5. Barge Channel Rd if raised the railroad access would be impossible. Mudek Trucking Co. , C ��,��, Joh C. Mudek JCM:jm cc. Chris Nicosia . ' t 4 �, , . . " , . • : - >�' ..;�� .'. �� . �� . , . . � , (� (l�/—� �/l0�fJ�' . . , . , . .� _-. _ . . . . .. , _. ._� _�_... . , _._. __ - , _. ..,_ . . ..s....�.:�..�,__.: . , MIhUTES OF THE ZONING COi�MITTEE IN CITY COUNCIL CHAMBERS, ST. PAUL, h1INNESOTA OP� FEBRUARY 16, 1984 � PRESE�lT: P�lessrs. Bryan, Levy and Pangal of the Zoning Committee; hir. Segal , Assistant City Attorney; t�ls. Lane of the Divsion - of Housing & Building Code Enforcement; Ms. Beseman, t�ls. James, h9r. McGuire and P�r. Ryan of the Planning Qivision Staff. ABSEPJT: Prmes. Karns and Summers; P�essr. . A�mstead. The meeting was chaired by James Bryan, Chairman. - - JOH�! C. MUDEK (�9521 ): Sp°cial Condition Use Permit to allo�r� �� construction of a storage building in the flood fringe that is not elevated on fill above the regulatory flood protection elevatior�. Property located on the north side of Barge Channel Road, west of Chicago tyorthwestern Railroad. The applicant avas present. There �ras no opposition present at the hearing. ��s. James showed slides of the site and revie4�ed the staff report with a reco�nendation f or denial . A letter was received from the Department of Natural Resources stating their position and suggesting changes in the f 1 ood warn i ng and evacuati on p 1 an i f the perni t ►yere a��rov�ed. A i etter was also received from Chicago & Pdorth��vestern Transpor�ation Company stating no objection. - John f�ude�c, 1520 Ames Avenue, stated that the reason tf�? structure cannot be built on fili is because the land is less than 2 acres and the configuration of the property. If they located the building �vhere it could be utilized best, the building vrould be sitting on top of a hill and would be very difficult to get up to the property from Barge Channel Road _ especially during the vrinter. Eventually they plan to eatilize the railroad pro�erty and to slo�e the land t��vard the railr�ad tracks would des�roy tFe use of that property. Ms. Jam�s reported that the Port Autharity is in th� prc�cess of plattfng the Southport industrial district and one of the reguiremerrts of the subdivisian regulation� is that the road be elevated. If the permit were approved, the elevation of the road could create a prablem for the applicant. P�r. htude� stated that if the �elevation of the road created a problem for him it �rould also be a prablem for the other tenants because they are at the sam� level as the raad. Hearing no further testimony, P�lr. Bryan closed the pubtic hearing portion of the meeting. � �+1r. Levy moved denial based on findings 1 throug� 7, the factors considered and the staff analysis. P�r. Lanegran seconded the motion, v�rhich failed on a roll call vote of 2 to 2 �vith I�-ir. Pagnal and P�Ir. Bryan voting against. Submitted by: � �__-- Approved by: � � � �� .� �� .::� _ , � � Patricia td. James �- James Bryan, Cha�rman � - - . _ . 41 .*' �. "�O'� �, . � � � . . �_ ��y9 . 1 ZONING COMMITTEE STAFF REPORT ----------------------------- FILE #9521 1 . APPLICANT: JOHN C. MUDEK DATE OF HEARING: 2/16�84 2. CLASSIFICATION: Special Condition Use -- River Corridor 3. LOCATION: North side of Barge Channel Road, west of Chicago Northwestern Railroad 4. LEGAL DESCRIPTION: Government Lot #9, Section 9, Township 28, Range 22, Parcel B 5. PRESENT ZONING: I-2, RC-2 ZONING CODE REFERENCE: Sections 65.223(1� 65.222(3) & 65.503 _ 6. STAFF INVESTIGATION & REPORT: DATE 2/8/84 BY Patricia N. James `� •� ------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------ ----------------------------------------------------------------------------------------- A. PURPOSE: Special Condition Use Permit to allow construction of a storage ui ing in the flood fringe that is not elevated on fill above the regulatory f1ood protection elevation. B. PARCEL SIZE: Irregular, with 349.22' of frontage on Barge Channel Road and a total area of 1 .69 acres. C. EXISTING LAND USE: Level parcel in floodplain currently used by Narthern Disrict Heating for storage. D. SURROUNDING LAND USE: North: Railroad, Industrial (I-2) East: Railroad, Industrial (I-2} South: Industrial (I-2) West: Industrial (I-2) E. ZONING CODE CITATION: Section 65.223(1) states: "Where existing streets or uti �ties are at e evations which make compliance with this chapter impractical or in other special circumstances, the planning commissian may authorize other^ techn ;yues for protecl:�i o,i of struc�ures. �tructures �;.he�• trian ,�.�;i den�es that ordinarily shall be elevated on fill as provided above may, in special . circumstances, be otherwise elevated or protected to a point above the regulatory flood protection elevation.° Section 65.222(3) states: "Buildings, structures and appurtenances used for manuf acturing or industrial purposes shall be protected to the regulatory floo� protection elevation by either construction on fill so that the cellar, basement, or first floor, if there is no basement or cellar, is above the regula�ory flaod protection elevation, or by utilizing approved flood-proofing construction to protect to the regulatory flood protection elevation. Measures shall be taken to minimize interference with normal plant operations during anticipated periods of flooding." F. FINDINGS: 1 . Applicant proposes constructing a storage building in which he will conduct a recycling business. Recyclables will be brought to the site by the applicant's rubbish hauling business. Space for individuals to drop off recyclables will also be available. 2. Applicant proposes recycling of oil as well . Storage of petroleum products in the flood fringe is not permitted under the State Building Code reguTations unless the container is buried and constrained. 3. Ground elevation at this site is 702.5: The regulatory flood protection elevation (R�PE) is 707.5' . Construction on this site must be floodproofed to the RFPE either by elevating the site on fill (a permitted use) or by using approved floodproofing techniques (a special condition use) . . . _. _._ ,.. . . , � . . . , g �� `� 9 . , JOHN C. MUDEK (#9521 ) Page 2 4. Applicant proposes using FP-4 floodproofing measures. He has submitted an evacuation plan which is being reviewed by the Minnesota Department of Natural Resources. 5. The City of St. Paul parLicipates in the National Flood Insurance Program regulated by the Federal Emergency Management Agency (FEMA) . FEMA regulations do not recognize FP-4 floodproofing techniques for purposes of the program. . 6. St. Paul 's River Corridor Regulations have not been in compliance with FEMA regulations and have recognized FP-4 floodproofing as an approved floodproofing method. On January 19, 1984 the City Council appraved - amendments to the Zoning Code that bring St. Paul into compliance with the federal standards. �� 7. Under FEMA standards, variances permitting floodproofing other than FP-1 or FP-2 may only be granted on parcels one-half acre or less in size upon a deter.mination of hardship, and when granting the variance will not threaten public safety, result in extraordinary public expense, create a nuisance, etc. • G. FACTORS CONSIDERED: The Planning Commisson must consider 14 factors in passing upon con it�ona use permits. 1 . The relationship of the proposed use to the Comp:^ehersive Plan and Floocl Plain Managernent Program for the City. . The Comprehensive Plan recommends labor intensive uses for ihdustrial areas and river-related bulk commodity storage and transfer as a primary �se in the Southport industrial area. The Flood Plain Management Program recorr�nends construction of buildings so that they are safe from flooding. Applicant's build�ng will be susceptible to flooding. 2. The importance of the services provided by the propased facility to th�� corr�nun i ty. Recycling of glass , metal , and paper is a valuable service; however, applicant's use appears to be mainly for I�is ov�n t,us:ness. 3. The compatibility of the proposed use with existing development anticipated in the foreseeable future. � The recycling center is compatible with existing uses in the. area. Additional development will probably be of a similar character. However, future development may very well be elevated on fi11 and not require a � special condition use. When Southport i,s platted, Barge Channel Road wi11 have to be elevat�d on fill as well . •' � 4. The ability of the existing topography, soils, and geology to support and accommodate the proposed use. The proposed use is similar to other uses which the soils and geology support. 5. The compatibility of the proposed use with�existing characteristics of biologic and other natural communities. The proposed use appears compatible with existing natural corrvnunities. 6. The proposed water supply and sanitation systems and the ability of� these systems to prevent disease, contamination, and unsanitary conditions. It appears the site will not be served by sewer or water. 7. The requirements of the f acility for a river-dependent location if applicable. The fa�;ility d�e� not req�atr� a ��iver l�cation . � � - -. ., , - . . ._ _ _ _ _ _ .. . ____ .,, _. _ _ _ _�__-�- ,� • �"4�,10�� . ' ' JOHN C. MUDEK (#9521 ) : Page 3 8. The safety of access to the property for ordinary vehicles. Access during times of flood will be by boat only. 9. The susceptible of the proposed f acility and its contents to flood damage and the effect of such damage on the individual owner. The proposed facility and contents are not susceptible to flood damage with the exception of the oil . 10. The dangers to life and property due to increased flood heights or velocities caused by encroachments. If the structure is not elevated, it will not increase flood heights or " � velocities. -.,� 11 . The expected heights, velocity, duration, rate of rise, and sediment transport of the flood waters expected at the site. The height of the 100-year flood is approximately 706 feet; velocities in the floodfringe are generally low; the duration and rate of rise will vary. 12. The danger tMat materials may be swept onto other lands or downstream to the injury of others. The building contents would very likely be swept downstream if the evacuation is not comp�leted on time or is not thorough. 13. The availability of alternative locations or configurations f or the proposed � use. The proposed use could be located in other I-1 or I-2 districts that are not . in the floodplain, or the structure could be elevated on fill . 14. Such other f actors as are relevant to the purposes of this chapter. • The other relevant factor is FEMA's authority to suspend the City's fload insurance program eligibility for f ailing to adequately enforce floodptain management regulations meeting their minimum standards. - H. STAFF ANALYSIS: Recycling businesses are permitted uses in industrial districts. However, t e nature of the recycling business, with so many loose materials, seems inappropriate for a flood-prone site. It seems more reasonable to require that the site be elevated on fill rather than depend on an evacuation plan. In addition, approving the FP-4 floodproofing standards seems inconsistent with federal regulations and with the intent of the City's Flood Management Program and the newly adopted floodplain regulation. I. STAFF RECOMMENDATION: Based on findings 1 through 7, the f actors considered, and t e sta ana ysis, staff recommends denial of the Special Condition Use Permit to allow construction of a building not elevated on fill using FP-4 floodproofing standards. _ _ _. - _ . _ _ __ ..a�_ _��.. � - - _. _ . ... _� . . _ _ �, � . . . . . _ _ ,_._ �� , . ,, � �'�� .-�_�� , . � . . ' - � . , . . i 4 . . ... . .. . . . . .. .. . ., . ._ . . � (jffS'! �� lr T f � , , :_: 1- ;�� 3 APPLICA7ION FOR SPECIAL CONDITION USE CiTY OF SAINT P}�UL ZOl`IING OFFICE USE ONLY File �� '�� 1 � Application Fee $ � 3� o U Tentative Hearing Date . �-�(q� � Number of Lots or Size of Parcel: Application is hereby made for a Special Condition Use Permit under the provisions of Chapter ��r' , Seetion �L 3 `, Paragraph_ , of the Zoning Code to operate a F� � ) _�"�j�"l"� '� rt 1/��CL.� �X iy�G{ �l'•1 �C`� t�1G! f�C�� / -_� � A. APPLICANT � . Name �Ol�fL� � �t j,� /�,j'`� Phone (Daytime) 77/�_/�� Address � ��J �-�1�� Zip J, /�� Property interest of Applicant (Owner, contract purchaser, etc.) �.,?�?S� C� �=��e� Name of owner (if different)��,�-{ �C��ti�c�� __ ____ B. PROPERTY DESCRIPTION � r/�n Address/Location�t=#�G1 S�c��'°�� 6'��t��.� � --c�Cr� zC �_��.__--- Legal Description: Lot Block Add. �� -�c-, •�_� ii � '� ____ �` ,E' G��C�:��c�' — ____ J --- Present Zoning �L1--�7..;/��.,-Z� Lot Size ( . �; CS ��e� c, _ G SPECIAL CONDITIONS Explain how vou will meet each of the Special Conditians. Attach supporting materials (diagrams, site plan, letters of support, etc.) � f V".—�1.;� ��k� : �C�lt,�1 (�Lil;'�Ct t'� ��C��;.?_C::.�.t'C3/ C+�`_.C:C�i�2., ��✓�-Q_ (�!>l�{aJCZ.�}��4 -�� --�t crr�� ;��- r c:.�ic ,�n f='S�c�c��i�y� �.��-c.v a-c�.:�-; -f� �"G� l'.c�;:�s �' =VI�r�P C'U'� -F�-- c-�- �� V�-C�i�i..Jl C.�S %��1� I�l/�ct�3-��ca �C l�;�" ��2� .� tre'rvtG�"�e�' i�LG�-Sc �t`' -�i�d If you have any questions, please contact: . Saint Paul Zoning Office - 1l00 City Hall Annex 25 West Fourth Street Saint Paul, Minnesota 55IO2 4102 (298-4154) 1/1/82 __ __ _ . _.. � . - r � �, ' . - � � . . . . . a �*' _ � .=� � . ,, � _ - � ' �i�`-�?�f �� ,- _ ,.,, , . r � _ _ ' ,�< . -- _. � " _._ _ - -- K � . . , '''� � 12�6 MU�SON RD. ��-y , wanncw I. FOR8�C110, coH�u�riNO a.�.s. ��3x Aa�� 4'. v/ � �Y!' L�K� � �� i��7 ��. ST 5A O6 MN �.,:-:,: ��'�:�� JAMRB [. DAMICY� P6tESIDENT� �,,x�—�Xxx � f f. X9[�►gX FOR PORT AUTHORITY CITY OF ST.PAUL ;;�� ,:��a, DESCRIBED AS: SEE SHEET 2 ;}�{. , ��,.,; .; .�# � GOVERMENT LOT 9 SECTION 9 �,� � TOWNSHIP 28-RANGE 22 3: � �'.. �.i:'. \ . ii ... y � �. ./ � R _� \\ C� � �� ,�. k' � � �C �� /'. A, � � �' \ \s ��O \� � � , r \ • � ' Q�m�� \\ F � O � - I � ` �' � � ► , , - ,, w ; �',S, � I r o� S� � \ � v � �. �oQ �tSJ, \\ , N z �v W �'Q� \\ P � � s � e � 'a � � � �s_ �� ' .r = � a ��' `�6'. � I a m ''� �' � z ?.Q' g,�, � � ^ �r) I Q �t` � ' � � r v '"^oj S 58° 04' W ; � rn ._, N,-w � 27.ss � -- � � � ��,� � P.o.g. �� '� � ,�j M00tHEAlY A..O.W. ItHE B ` `. -�� 'a� J I �� _ � . � — —1�� _'j ARGE '� `�� - 349.22 N 60' 11" '!i'Y'Y - - - i �� ` . C H _--.._ ._ '�. —— —— ——�— — —,�''—-�,: +,� �_ n eo• > >• w �oxz.o� ' � --� ANN�� N ,fl• .9• E ACCESS ROAD � ��__ �O_O O __ _ _ _.__ — __-�-- --t a ' —"�_ ��,� .t N 6 0° 1 1' W ° � . 32.50 a : _ � , . M_E. CORI.E11 OF II.W, t/�. �11L'I t • EEC. /e T26N N22M.�___� 1 .....e..- y :aaat � � � ��=--T---.�" �a� !�#a�..� '-�� , � { ��",�� a ��+� �Y �� ;Y�� '�3./' � u 9E " NO IRONS SET THIS DATE . ' Sc�le; i tnch - 1 00 Feet Sheet 1 of 2 Sheets S I hereby certify that this survey, BEARINGS ARE ASSUMIED � plon or report wos prepared by me <� y or under my direct supervision ond ' �, , that I an o duly Registered Land O Indientee tran Monument Set S ldarked R.L.S. � Surveyor under the laws of the ! Indicatea iror Monument Found, Set By Othere £Y • Stote of lAinnesoto. improvementa and or eocroachmenta focated and � �. , G� � �; `: gy shown o�lY upon �equest. ' t��, TITLE DES.=Deacribed ( REC._Raeord `RIEA_=Meesured ; �:,'•:-' ; MINN. R.L.S. No. � 4887 PREPAREQ SY LAKE ANQ ; � ` on the 9 T H DESCRlPT.ION , asy ot JAN. �g 84 LAND 5URVEYIPIG INC. i i Tht� certlticate velld oniy to party ahown hereon. } �.r:.,. ,zP � �� _ . . . . . .. ._.. ._ _._ �____"'___'. -. __._. _.. _.__..... . . .. ..__.___._..�"".."_.",.�_..._.._.-.._.__.."'.."_.`-_.._ _..»-.-.'_.._"" . .. . _' . �--..,.:...' . __ . F ....... � f � � . -^ � � . 1� . . . . . , . • � . . : ita ,�. � ._s�i'. � . . � , . . . - ' . ' '.. -�.� - � - , �� r �y-�� , ----_.._... .. .._..__ ._...v_ .; __ :. . ___._ _.______.,_ ,._.__._ .__._. �_____.__._ M___ . . J . ..`.. ... . .... .�� ..�.YYSFffEH�l. FORSOERU, CONSUlTINO R.1.9. � ��Za6 MUD$ON qp. � � LA�CE � LAND SU�1l�YiR�G, INC. �tz 55¢og� a�. .J--�� =: ST. PAUL, btN / e':;�: � � � JAMlS E. DANIEY� PRESIDENT 7Te�B2� � � ��:'. � PROPOSED �ESCRIPiION �7��—�{x71X ��` sklFZaf;t3(X FOR PORT AUTNORITY, CITY OF ST. PAUL ,t ">z' DESCRIBED AS: • �:: PARCEI A ��y �'� All that part of Government Lot i of Section 9, Tow�ship 2(1 �Iorth, P.onge 22 West that is ;" encompossed by a line described as Follows: Commencinq a{ the Nartheost carner of the North- ;'",` '�west : of Section 16, Township 28 North, Range 22 l�lest, thenee Paorth Q°5�'3Q" Wes.t for 306.22 feet, thence DJorth 60° 11 ' West for 2042.07 feet; thence tJorth 29°44' East for 30.0a feet to the point of be�inning of the line to be described, sai�l point of beginning aiso be on the t�ortheasterly right-of-way line of Barge Channel Access Road; thence Clorth 6Q° ►�' West, olong said riqht-of-way line, for 32.50 feet; thence to the righf ona tong�ntial curve having a centrol ongle 12° 11 ' 16" ond o rodius of 317.73 feet for o disfance of 6R.0! feet_; thence North 29°49' Fast a distance of 4?5.24 feet to the Y!esterly right-of-woy line of the Chicago and North Western Roilrood; thence South 15°26'47" East, along soid right-of-woy 2ine, '� a distonce of 140.7A feet; thence $outh 29°49' Ylest o distance of 3f23,36 £eet to the point of beqinning. Contoining Q,99 acres. PARCEL 8 All that part of Government Lot 9 of Sett:on 9, Township 2n Morth, Range 22 West thot fs encompassed by a line described as follows: Commencing et the f`tortheast corner oF the Northwe�t ': of Sectio� I6, iownship 2R tlorth, Ranqe 22 Ytest, thence Morth 0°50'30" Ylest foz 306.22 feet, thencc Plorth 60° 11 ' West for 2042.07 feet; therscc Ftorth 29°49' Eost for 30.00 feet to the point of beginning of the lin� to be described, said point of beginning olso be en the Ilortheasterly right-of-woy line of Borqe Channel Access Road; thence continuing Nor.h 29°49' Fast a distance of 383.36 feet to the WesterJ.y right-of-woy line of the Chicaqo and IJorth Wcstern Roilroacl; thencc South 15°26'47" eost, olonq said right-oE-rroy lirte, a � distance of 510.04 feet; thence South 58°04' West o distance of 27,6G feet Eo the said Nortneosterly right-of-woy line of f3orcjr Channel' Access f'ood; thence South 60°•�j• East, olony suid right-of-woy line o distance of 349.22 feet to the point of beginning� Cont'aining 1.69 ocres. . • I � , j i .I � � Scale: t inch = Feet Sheat Z o( 2 SAeAte I hereby certify thot this survey, plon or report was prepared by me BEARINGS ARE ASSUt�4ED ot unJer my direct supervision ond thot 1 am a duly Registered Lond O Indicatee tron Monument 3ef fi hAa�ked R.t.3. Surveyor under the laws of the O Indicatea lron Monument Found, 3et By Othata State of Minnesota. Improvementa and or encroechmertta tocated and . By ahown only upon �equeat_ TITLE DES.=Oeecrlbed � REC._Record IMEA.=Maaaured . MINN. R.L,S. No. on the DESCRIPTION •day ol �g Thia certificate valid only to purty shown hereon. � 's"` _.�� stl �' M1+ 4.M .S. .H� �.i.xT .7!'^y.:• ' '(?��k^� \�7� . .;i � ��J#�f,*�, f : � 't!.+�.I 1 r'S��{ S ,� .?2x� � 3�� 51 b a ''.h � '�.i.4F...-+�awsl�„ -� i }'� �' :' A�y �'�a�-hY-1,'�` t :'Ck 7�' c � �` K . :Z V � � w} �t..+, �' �iPt'" �r s 1,' z 'c"L .. . ,.Jy� -+�„}'��c "_ _, 1v A J 3 .. ie �+ F � l ,: t . �� !� i" ,� <"''�.. e Z,.. �t d £�� r. ��.p!� . ' r X rd d . � = t g��_C .. .tt , s"+*,:vi _°s}��;u-",y�#��'��"_`_"�_".'�"`NN'/^�°7�7a.�cv#:a;+t$f`+,4�,+�St.ad��..�'tK�;rrt'x'�...cAm:+i..c.?h.^°Y.',{aa�h.�;.tr..r,,.,:�iL,'�.a,,-....�r,....r.�.�:,.!. .sc..F�"i ,.1�'..`. . � r- . • . A . . ' ' . � . . . . . _4.> - � .� 'S ` !� �� _ J . � . _,._ _ _. .. � � / _ . , _ . � .__.�_.,.........,.,. . _ �_._... _._ _....�s..,.,.�.._..._,_. ` . ` ---— ____._f___.�`� �� y ' �IUDEK TRUCKI�s i �'�`'�� _`�;� ��'"�' � �� JOHN MUDEK & SON Rubbish Removal — Commercisl — Residentiai Containers — Roll—otf—Boxes 1520 Ames Avenue St. Paui, Minn. 55106 Phone 77t-4792 January 23 , 1984 Mr. Gene Kraut Mr. Donal d Dunsh ee . St. Paul Port Authority 25 West 4th Street, Suite 1305 � �. St. Paul, Minnesota 55102 RE: Government Lot �9, Section 9 , Township 28, Range 22, Parcel B Dear Gentlemen: The Mudek Trucking business has been in the tamily for 52 years and I nave operated it for the last 27 years. I currently operate 5 trucks on a 7-day a week basis. Tne principal part of the business is servicing ap�rtment buildingw, shopping cent.ers and restaurants, About 75� ot the business is the apartment complexes which is about 350 to 375 buildings. The apartments are _ serviced on a difterent basis, from once a day to once a week. The second largest are the shopping centers and restaurants w hich are serviced 7-days a week, 354 days a year. The volume of trash that is taken to the landfiZl daily is about 35 � tons. The recycling center that I am proposing will not recycle all rubbish because some of the rubbish is not possible to recycle. Th.�s applies to that from tne restaurants because they are total waste and rubbish from most homes because of yard waste, owner-maintained gardens, pets and absence of garbage disposals. Tne prime source of the recycled material wiI.l be from the shopping centers arid aparrments. It is e5��inatec] about 25 �cns wi�l be going through the recycl ing center which will consist of aluminum, tin cans, glass, newspaper, cardboard and white ledger paper. The paper material will be bailed and loaded on semi-trailers and transported to Champion International Corporation daily. The aluminum and tin cans including heavy metals will be loaded on roff-off boxes and transported to Great 'Western Iron daily. The glass material will be sorted on-site by color and loaded into roll-off boxes. It is estimated that 3 to 5 boxes of glass per week will be transported to Brockway Glass Company. Ninety-five percent of the estimated 25 ton waste gen�rated daily will be rec�cled. The remaining� f ive pexcent will go to the landf ill. �� i ...._ .... _ . �.....� ---+ �-.�,..� t t . -_, t�. .` . �� :�., } 9sar �- 3 � E.�_.__�e.__.`_____._�.�.__.�r._.._._�__�____ _..�..�� __ _ _ _ . __ _M .__._ _._, _ _ _________.�� 4 - i �. ... . ... � � . • , � . p . � �� . � � . . - . _ - , . � � • . � � � ,.;1_ . _� `e.'45�' . . ti \ � � , - . / . : � : , u [�g . _ , l �_..__ __ _ _,_.... ,,...�.�J.-. 7. / . _ .. .,, ' ; . January 23 , 1984 Page 2 I nave been studying the recycling business for the last 5 years. The shuttle trucks and curb recycling is not cost efficient. I belie�e I have the best method with automatic trucks and containers. Withaut packing these loads tightly the recycled material is easily seperated and it is very important that this recycl ing center be accessible so the material will be removed quickly and efficiently. ,� A part of the building will be set aside for the public to degosit their refuse and their recycling material, including drain oil. I believe this would be an asset to the community. � With the size of the building I am proposing, there wouZd be no outside storage ot any recycled material . Everything will be done from the inside and removeci daily with the exception ot glass which will be contained in roll-off boxes ancl removed 2 to 3 times a week. It I can answer--any questions concerning my proposal of the recye2 ing center, please teel free to contact me. Sincerely, � TIUDEK TRUCKING John C. Mudek, Jr. cc: Chris Nicosia • . . o ' :k- Y� ; a.'F'.. � .. . . � .. . . . . . . . .. . � . . . .. • . . ;i ('j' �1,� / �/ G o �7� t�� 't' / . _ _ � __. . , - /-°` Janua ry 23 , 1984 Page 2 I nave been studying the recycling business for the last � years. The shuttle trucks and curb recycling is not cost efficient. I believe I have the best method with automatic trucks and containers. Without � packing these loads tightly the recycled material is easily seperated and it is very important that this recycl ing� center be accessible so the material will be removed q�ickly and efficiently. ' A part of the building will be set aside for the public to deposit their retuse and their recycling material, including drain oil. I believe this would be an asset to the community. � With the size of the building I am proposing, there would be no outside storage of any recycled material . Everythinq will be done from the inside and removed daily with the exception ot glass which will be contained in roll-off boxes and removed 2 to 3 times a week. If I can answer -any questions concerning my proposal of the recycl ing center, please teel free to contact me. . Sincerely, r1UDEK TRUCKING John C. Mudek, Jr. cc: Chris Nicosia • , _ � • � . - .,� . t- � � �.� , . ..,.......,v _._�__ ._ _._. .__ ,. . . ., __ _ ,....,,..�.�:,. _. ,_,�_.__ _.._. � ._.. .. �..,F�z.�..._ �------,� � , � � � �y�y� � , ,-- � . a-. � � - -C'� a.�-�-+- s<..r.,+ i �,;s1 t"�C^F u.S�S.��Y-, � �� - �y . t+, r�- �3 �c`.. _ x.� r �� ' 1 � =f r `CP� t�'{:�� : } �'r e+'�� _ �'i.� '�'�e.�"t- � ..��j ��. �.,t t w '�k ''t ,`�` . �.. , .�`� �j � I f . -� - =� :� 1�j r �: � ° � r• ' r �� t t� �.�II. u _ "Y-� � �:. t.� � _ 4 4 v_�s' .�" ; �it�j. e. . � :�:. [(._ '�e � - q z � . ' .. .,,� j �• ''' S4� ' c' � �,�� h � "�' .E- . �f, �_- r � � - -� '`�-�?-. l�,�t &:!<R� 7 _ :l� ' � ��" _ _... �'- . _ ' ��F�' �� { . � . . �'. �.� _ 't y . F�:�7 � t'i � ,,x y-c. �{.a,�. � � . .. _$- "°�^ . r.. . F x E�� T �� .FV..:� .+ �e y� ,y'ri'�;,a;-.. �i��q. ': aa ya� �.�. °k" ' 4a9�-""' . :t�'� ��"4'�a-�. �. i�� y, t A4 j L'�^!,qf�yC�'"- r��" �. '�,a{�StSi:y�;r �3 7'Fr Ri � "yT'sf e't';, q*„ "Y,-m -�-rr .�-..� "'g'^�" _.�' ��i ,,,..s..,o„�- �� .. �;rt A4 +s.= ee -+t�."'V'5...:+k i� .c r <...r.l�4 r� �'�,R ! .m+-. �r.t. �" „ '�"" r�� i +� - }��ya `�� ,� + .� � ��} +�c7 �,��w3�� krt �, W3��1�*' µ .� `"y` . �Y ��.- .y,��. f'��1 � W.�. �`,.�� ,�,y4��,��(f,.,'��`"�" q�,�'��f�.1i+r�1 � �oR-�fa�+�--a��ce-..-..�� 'x ^k�;'"`�'��"k�� e^:i �.�. 4 4 �^ `�'i!.t�+A � i�f�� .5- �t t`.�.�'4, ..� � _� �-' . o i� Y�t ,�,;f i �. ,t'd�''R �� '"t�rD'! '4�`R� -� Sws.'wr.,-':*}°' �r�TC�.Y►?.a7w�1'�ai.' -.-a �.�y°Tf.�: r: .�' ,�'' � y�� y'4�,a �N•i.a„ � � i $uw t5 y n . �, �, ""�� ''^�i Y'�,�x e� `�..�r"S�'� c � .� �y�, ��,'i t 3�rvf��ai.F �.`�`�'.,.�,� ��'� s.i..«=�..r,i« ��a� �., 3„ -� �.�y"}°��3��`,� ��e f. :A '�f@CN �'`"` '��y��'�'I � �� +D'r.F" f��.�-Y�''�i _�2.. ��y�� '��xr� ,> :'��"'tf�K� . P i �1• �` 4 �+''�x'� � � :(,�.,J �'!sa'�i 1 ;�c�,�" � � t�di�� .�#' _ . Y � � =��4� �.��$� .. µY' �� J � i�`i�? �'�� .� ' . „'i ;: -+ •'�''��,<�� '�:a„;�>$+, �.d�1�'�i�� r ��T �'�'i � �n y`n�►�� . - � .=� ��- � ��r�'('�M'r:i ��y,,Y� ..r ,,�� MF•�+m �y��+'�3 �� h.a.t.y��`�3;ti�`�` �.t7.��.,,,, yy.:b � _! "yr,' xar'�'s "�{Y'��{r ' ,yr' "`'3.rrcr ,f3..4k'� � '"�,x .. '��o'}�t nt F�; �'1 �'�' t *f -_� F-.`.$' x; n: t -.y„S� �� s�a�i '�t..�s. � ''�' .... �i t* zf"`�A."��-�.?+h.�.'� .�_� �; �� 'y .y.� �..'�a�'a� �'�'.'��', �F^-�s -��,..,�� -:%'• �"• �a1 �'� ��7�� : �y�a �it�9F� .�{ ,t';+ _ � -- -.( . ��aj �I ��„] T�;J�2 +"e.�..'r1 y( .�� . ��j��H . y 5� Gt� � �d'•' � �+ �� 1 Y �l "*�`��u��3;'I';i��t".1•}f��i4 �ti�� '. r'� -� � =��'a.�` � i E < � �' �j k , �''` � � '? ��,a .. . . r �2;�� i;� .. 't� .� 4�3�a „�'."g��a . � � t .,Sc2 t _ �-.:i �,.� � , , J,s y�k� ':.�,,., '� � `.� t�' _ •- �y�., #J n� t '� .� Js. y. . ��i� 1 +"�� .y. ..�"�id±t�?:i4'�yy�°t�t ��. y, _ _�. +',�. a 'S" a a� f.�� 'Z ,i4} $. f'X?'. ,�pf . 'F� r.17 .�t#Y 'i�' ".,".� . � . ��?�, �� r �1' #� '� $y'' i'�k' "e ��if rt j�. '�� '4Ta��r{' <.`��ir ' �Jjp�'� _ �w.�V'1 �.. f r: �� +� -� ; .� � ,..� �'.� Y,��,'d"i��y�� .. �� ... .. ` ,. :a -. . -� � . F ' .+ S _ . �Y. s^�"a^'�Y�. „`. -['iP'+RWw,'�` '�'aL '4r+ .....�. _S.�__ vca.�.�"Y�w�__�.e�..�..".f } m�� ti' . �.. , .•; :,� •� _� ,. _. . T ... .. .�. . .: �� ".:� 4 , ... . ..,. . . � .:�: . � �:J�i. 1� �i j Y�,' `. . ��y yFta�a d�� ' � . . r, :� ��Y . . . . .. � ;� � y.;�k�.,� iaf`i� — "�� -_ �.�- y . �i �r - . . . . . . .i � �u...ae+ ,�`.t( F�.l �� :..ttlk.•� �;" � - '. . .. :. :l�:�i��'� . . .. . . ... . . .� .- '.__ n . �.- P�P'G Y'4 : I � p" _- -f- ,-�- __,_,t � � , �� _.. � ` '� �� j� �'�!�I�jlij�I' �� - � . �. � � ��:�� `�r� � � �>.r� ,�- �y 'r�" � �;r' -�f �� . �..a: t ��.��;.ts.y „�„-�,�.,_ � I i�j I� ( �� I i I !' '.r< .r+'. • .t�. <� �.�_ �.� . .�� - .1. , � i :!'I �I'I��,�f�� I� :'� ^'P ""�C F ��v1fC . l�r �_� N,y -_%0 t .Y'� 1 ,��-e.irt�_ .�.� '� ��i� I I!. :.i I � . ; ; F� .i:s ,u`i`,._..: ! fh..:: ta..v'...._...r...-v ...-�5 � ,�'�'i'�',�_� ,� .,� i .�� I� � i c.� # .. . 'r, `;�. -'� `--. � � "� � .., ��4 �� ~ .. �~\ �_ , _ , . . ' _. . .. ,. ;� ,� ! : � . • - �- \ . . .. .�- _. ... . �.. _.. .-" ... . .. ._..-. _._�..,.-. �� ' . " . � '� r _,_.. � _. -� . .I ._- � ..�- -. � �... � . _. .. . -.._..-�-y-'-._ . . ;... ,� � . �, ... . .` . . _ .-`-_. ...„ . • _ - . .._.. .. . .. . _ � � .... :_._...�_ . �r- \ ._. .:. . � ..._.......r , . -- • . ` ._. .- _ - r,_...,. .. .. � .. - -� - . .� . - -.. —� . . ��-- • ,�.._�--l-_�-��- J `�— -- , ^---�-- S � � _�,'�:`_>,� , � � .. .. , . �- .�.� -;;�u-�'�.Fy^� 3,-ta.--- _ -- xF,.y.,, �� i -- �..+ ��"8t ,: . .7�A S �. -.T . .. � ' __ � f f . .� ,.� � _ . :. �� '[ ,��r�� 7^�'tea�T`�Y.'n� -�.�.� � ..� � _�4�`' ++ � �., � . 'iw S�ai 6 - `r _ � - 1 ��A�l`1'y�s't" ^a.... , . � .__�,... .. . . . tl�ewr _— _� �•�,:��F 1" a�.9 R, n ?, �%1a s_ pym • ,� �d,.:�;�ra �� z'm p�� p�, �j�( i a3A,e�b '•:�:d�,ti'+n" ;:r,% T k a�� } 3 __ ,_. _ _. _ _. _ . _ _ ...,,. . _ ____._._._ ► _ t - � - � � ' + . . • . -'�' _�� -�.. . . . \ _ \'/ I ` � j AA ' � ��f� ' I � ��//� . \ �� . ._ . _ .. �� `r l .._—""_"____._._ 1 ., .. ..... �....�..._. �� ✓ �l / /�a��` * .._. . � �! R� �: / / � j` ..�Y� �_.�� ... r r f . r 3�j� � .. ""��F f��L�� ` � / ;�- ..Y."'��l�� / �. = l , .....,,� . / ` � / �� '�� v'"i�� _ � Mr .� - � p...�� i � ' �•,� , _,��, _ _ n �� . �s'`' � ��y.�, / / - . �; .y'�:-.--'''yy�e �' �� / / ;J�y T 3�>.... ." . ' � � ` . i+b ' � . �.' . ...� �' r ,,. ..(r�i .. � i i% . ' '' ,i - -.. �' ._�.�, - - `'-�raa'��'�� _� .•' "r,y_rsr,.�� a+ � '�ak°�'.�.�.! Li°�°�,r,�`^ ' J {,�.�.__ :` ni_��.��,��n"4n+-.�,;::, ,r,� �in� .�.�,�"�"'+�.�.,. �, .. �---'�'^ .ab._�O[^'� 1'�e+.� _'°�Y�t+ ��+�-�q .��.�. "FS+n..,e..Yr.. � � �`�.�.t . _"_^�t+A-'?m .+��'�� :. ��...r...�_"""'�,`°-�„r- � s ..�� '�� l "..a"'-�.-.--�"�' ' � � � � ' ! t . � I , � � � Ii � ( i11 !� M` - � - , , ; � �� { ' �, ` i ; � .�. .��( " ��'�� \1 :t��. �' { � � �.�f� �..-�c"''j '�� 'w-.',:�.�_. . . � . L / �_"�'�-��,..��l'%.�-�.��i-+ ' �Y'T'�"".�-�^�-��°'��y'4��-?�: - . �� r��'�. '- ... . . ... ' . . . .�- .. . .. ,,... ._ .. . . . . _ . _ .. .� . ., . . _. -� . .� .. .. . _.• •.' '• M . �5 .. 1. " t ._' ... +ur _.-.---". -. � .._. , ., .. . �.,. .> Y .::... ' ..� ..__ ' ,-'_ ._ .-�.�� ,� ' _ ' i� ._ - ' - . . .., , _. .. � - . �_. ...__,; _ ... , . .. - . . ; - - - ". '.. .. � � .. _,.� . _ , ., . �. � � . „ ...1, .,:: :...� . . , . . ..., ..,' ' _ ......�+.�s��, ...�....v�++.��.......+.^.�..a.:'�� ' :�.� _ -.�..�.�.. - �Yi+ftf7fJ(iY • tY . . . / �Ll YMpY 6�� . � '- - . �[�'�.� ��O�I�� . . � _ � � E � w _ }-E---CNV�nc�.lW9wWroY'--: > Rigid F.ame (Low Profile) ; � � � Pitch 1:12 � " ' W Eave Height Availubility: 4�� 1�' thru 20� euuaMyw . � 50' 10' tl�ru 24' 60'-90' 10' thru 30' 100'-120� 12� t111�ta 3�' Dimensions shown to nearest inc�� BLDG. BAY 12# LIVE�OAO 20N LIVE LOAD 30# LIVE P�OAD 4Q# UVE LQAD WIDTN SPACING A B C A B C A 8 C A B C 40 20 1-6 +0-5 3-4 1-8 +0-3 4-Q 1-11 +0-t 4-6 2-4 —6-4 5-2 25 1-/ +0-4 3-9 1-10 +0-i A-7 2-2 —0-4 5-4 �-8 —OJ 5 9 50 20 1-B +0-9 3-10 2-t +0-4 5-0 2-5 +0-0 5-8 2-7 —0-1 S-8 25 1-t0 +0-7 4-4 2-4 +0-t 5-8 2-7 —0-2 6-2 2-7 --0-3 6-3 60 2o i-i� +�-o a-s 2-a =oa s-�o 2-s +o-s s-�� z-a +o-a s-o 25 2-3 +0-9 5-4 2-6 +0-7 6-0 2-8 +0-4 6-5 2-10 +0-2 6-6 70 20 2-4 +1-3 5-3 2-6 +Q-10 5-10 2-9 +0-9 6-2 2-tU +0-7 6-6 25 2-7 +0-11 S-9 2-S +0-8 6-5 2-10 +0-8 6-7 3-0 +0-7 7-2 �0 so z-s +ia sa z-s +t-t s-2 z-�o +i-t s-s s-o +�-� s-s 25 2-7 +1-4 5-11 2-11 +1-t 6-8 2-11 +t-t 6-9 3-3 +0-tt 7-4 90 20 2-7 +t-10 5-9 2-it +1-8 fi-6 3-0 +1-8 6-7 3-4 +1-5 7-1 25 2-9 +t-9 6-1 3-1 -1-8 6-10 3-3 +t-6 7-3 3-6 +t-1 7-7 .100 20 2-10 +1-11 6-0 3-0 +t-11 6-7 3-2 +1-1� 7-1 3-5 +1-7 7-4 25 2-11 +1-11 6-4 3-2 +t-it 7-1 3-4 +t-10 7-9 3-9 +7-5 8-2 120 20 3-7 +2-11 6-7 3-3 +2-B 7-2 3-6 +2-5 7-6 4-0 +2-1 8-0 25 3-1 +2-11 G-9 3-4 +2-6 7-7 3-S +2-4 $-1 4-2 +1-10 8-9 � � � � q ,�zt � i , . �, ,, ,. \ �y sT� �,} f l_- e ; . ;1� � �� r ,..�x r.� �i �.u a �� i �^.._'_'..-.--'.^-�-.---- 6 . . � _ _ • . � � ' _�� .� r • � •`i= _ � ,� , c. i ' � b � —� � q - . � t _. _ _._.. .. �� . ' _ .. _- - ---_ _�-��._-_-��---� � , � _ _.._... - ' �� _--- -.-j-__ `Y � .... .. . ._.. _ _..._�. _. � ----------------.�..._.-t PORT AUTHORITY OF THE CITY OF SAINT PAUL 25 WEST FOURTH 5TREET • SUITE 13G�5 • ST. PAUL, MINN. 55102 • PHONE (612) 2�4-5686 January 5, 1984 Mr. John Mudek, Owner . Mudek Trucking Company - 1520 Ames Avenue St. Paul , Minnesota 55106 � Dear Mr. Mudek: It was a pleasure to have an opportunity to meet with you yesterday and discuss your Company's interest in leasing a site in Southport Industr�al District for your operation. I have enclosed a 30 year land lease pro�ection for the 1 .8 acre site East of the existing District Heating operation. Under terms of the lease the land rent would be renegotiated every five years during the original or any extended terms. As I indicated yesterday becaus� of the fact the site is in the flood plain it will be necessary for you to apply to the City of St. Paul for a conditiunal use permit to erect a structure in the flood plain before any construction commences. The flood plain ordinance requires that the floor of any building be raised so that it equals the level of record flood in the area. The ground elevation of the si.te is approximately 700'-702' and record flood is approximately 706` , thus, fill material woutd have to be brought to the site to elevate the flaor, I would suggest that you contact Rick Wiederhorn of the City Planning and Economic Development Department - 292-1577 - regarding the procedure that you will have to go through to obtain a special use permit to construct a building. We will be sending out an ENS notice to the local neighborhood on FridaX, January 20 to notify them that the proposed land lease would be submi�ted to our Commission on February 21 for consideration. I look forward to working with you and having you build irr St. Pau1 . A survey of the site has been ordered and will b ailed as soon as it is available. • Yo s ruly . � � f�,� G� �t ,{v�.�L,�r41,Lt � ona G. Dunshee Director cc: Chris Nicosia lndustrial Development DGD:sjs - Enclosure46b RT f. SPRAF►CA EUGENE A IQ2AUi,C.I.D DONALD G. DUNSHEE, C.I.D. CLIFFORD E. Rl,MSTEp PE(2F2Y K fEDERS Vf V�CE r'RESK)ENT GENERKMaJ�/AGERAND . DIRECTIX7.IMDIATRIAL DEVFLOPfv1EM CHEF ENC'-aNEER Q'R"tCfOR OF Flt�:r�. AS57 E7fEC viCE VRE9DEM � � . . MtSSiONERS GEORGE W WIMER WILLIAM VVILSOh ARTHUR N. GOODMAN VICTOR P. REIM JEAN M. WEST CFIRIS 1v!COSia WI�UAM�. $EI�;ZT atesoenrr vr.�oaES�r s�ca�am TREASURER C.I.D. Certified Industrial Developer _ _ __ __ . _ . , _ ._ s _ ._. __.. .____ _ � . � ..�, ! . s . _�. �.�•� :�. . . _ . i � _ ,j I � . � . :_ . __ . . ._. .. _, . .... .. ... . .._. �..� , i. ,. . , . . _ _. �_�� .��`_�� . ._ . .. � � � _ �� MU�'�K TRUCKIN6 JOI1��: t��IUDEK & SON Rubbish Removai - Commercial - Residentiel Contain��rs - Roll-off-Bvxea �� 1520 Ames Avenue St. Paul, Minn. 55106 �' Phone 771-4792 ' - FLOOD EVACUAT?ON SCHmULE - ' FEB 3.1984- "k�dek Trucking Co, Bar�e C��annel Rd. St, Pw1, Nh _ ��. Persons in charge ' . . John C. "�k Sr John D !�dek Jr. . Contact the U S Weather Bureau for flooc� conditions fran March to Jw�e� . �If weather �rxlicates floodinq I wi 11 cont�ct the Core of F�gineers for�flood conditi�ts,�- c�d when struture may be rectui red to be et��acuated, I will contact the Denartment of �Jaturai Resources for flootl conditiar�s. Appoxim�tely two weeks before flooding al� operations will cease . Apnoximately two weeks before fl000din9 ail recvcling rr�terial will be remavai frcm the �r�i; Ap�aximatelv one week befare fl�dirx� all trucks will be rerr�oved to previous location at 1520 Ames Ave. St, Paul (�h. A�poxima�ely or� week before floodicx� al1 shon materials wi11 be Ioa�d on c� trucks a�d service trucks and stored at pervious Iocation at 1520 Ames Ave. St. P�.t1, "'�. I will contact NSP to shut off the �ower �a the site, A11 entrc�ce ond exits doors wi11 be left o;?en for the w�ter to flow tha.r9h. The cftY of St, Paul will not be held res�bnsible for flood dQr�age under the FP4 stc�clards. Mc.��ek Trucking Co. ; �:��-- � ��.��-,, �� _ �- � _ . __ _ _ _ _____ . _ __ _ _ _ _ __ . _ _ _____ _____________ __ � . . . . . . ;,;�r ._3'�'. . . . . . . . . ' . _ . . . . __. . . ... . . . .. ._.. _ . .. . . . _ .. .f_..... .._ . . _ -. f ` r � � ' . . s . . � . - � . . . . . ' . _ � .'� ." z . � � - � -;' � � rf� �,.., ., .. - . . . � 1�.. l ` + ��/ . l r,.: , i CHICAGO AND i, TRANSPORTATION COMPA�NY _,a ASSISTANT DtVISiON P,IANAGFR ENGINEERIN�; � St. Paul, Minnesota February 15, 1984 Ms. Patricia James St. Paul City Zoning Comnittee 25 West Fourth Street St. Paul, MN 55102 ._ Subject: Zoning File No. 9521 --�� Zoning File Name Mudek Dear Ms. James: Regarding the above subject, the Chicago and North Western has no objections except for the following stipulations: 1) That the property adjacent to the T�ansportation Co. not be raised higher than the track creating a drainage problem. 2) That a fence be constructed in such a manner to keep all recycling materials off railroad right of way. 3) That the building be placed in such a manner that it would not obstruct visions for the crossing. Very truly yours, �� :V. Ii. Clark Assistant Division Manager-Engineerinq NHC/JJZ/2 ;; Y �(�_ � il ( i� � ��r: f� � � �� i�� --- -� �� 4�-=� � �, ;r . �.� , G��TY 't'�ri�'as:,��;� ;�_�.;�,i�1� Siitnt F''it:e �`l!�:ReSt�tc3 � � 275 EAST FOURTH STREET/ST. PAUL, M�NNESOTA 55101 /612—221-93t7 _ , _ ._ ... _ .____._. _._. ._ _ ,..� . .. .._..._-- .. t . - f !� ' � . � . • - . :�• ,,� .� :�.:�•..•. - _ .__ _ _ . ,�.w,� .,. _.:..,�... �. , i, , , ...._.. .._;.�.W�._.,�..�__��.m_.. ......,._;�,,. __... _. _. � � , . �r-� Ih/-�yq , STATE OF � UVU�JlS�O�Q DEPARTMENT OF NATURAL RESOURCES 1200 Warner Road, Saint Paul, Minnesota 55106 ,� PHONENO. 96-75 � FILEr�.VO. � February 14, 1984 -. 1f1 �; ' i'+ �;U � " �Nr . . -,,_ Ms. Patricia James � � �" .� I:.: _ City of St. Paul • �n " w' , � �f' . Dept. of Planning & Economic Development ��' �'lf'� ' � - �� ,, :y� 25 West Fourth Street �r `�':,A _`"f•: ` �-: St. Paul, Minnesota 55102 �� 7�'. � � r` � � `:-;, __ _�, , . . RE: ZONING FILE #9521---MUDEK SPECIAL CONDITIONAL USE { :��'L' - :-. Dear Ms. James: 1 I have reviewed the above-referenced project for consistency with state standards and the City's flood plain management controls. Based upon my review, I offer the following comments: -This proposal is not consistent with the zoning text amendments which were required by Federal Regulations and should have been in effect bynow. Section 65.223 was amended to state, in part, that "Structures flood-proofed to FP-3 or FP-4 classification shall not be permitted. " Considering the ordinance amendment, the applicant should be app_lying for a variance. To maintain consistency with Federal Regulations, the variance should meet the requirements contained in Chapter I-Federal Emergency Manage- ment Agency � 60.6 (copy previously sent to you). -Although state regulation will allow for use of wet fload-proofing techniques (FP-3 or FP-4), we will only support such techniques when all other methods of elevating the lawest floor have been shown to be infeasible or where a hardship can be proven. -If the City allows this request, the applicant must provide certif i- cation by a registered engineer or architect that the building is designed and constructed in accordance with the flood-proofing standards contained in the State Building Code (SBC) . If the permi= i� grant�d, conditiol� �nus± be rsquired to ene•;r� that storage of material be limited to those items which are not damage- able by flood waters or to items which can be readily evacuated within the flood warning time. Although the recycling materials which are proposed to be stored at the site have a low flood damage potential, the storage of recycled oil could pose a pollu- tion problem and could be injurious to animal or plant lif e_ Petroleum product storage is defined in the SBC as a Class X item and is considered sufficiently hazardous or vulnerable to require their prohibition in all spaces below the regulatory flood protection elevation (RFD) . �,,_....._,,,,_,..__....�-._...-i ,..,a.. ..�.---w` '".w 4 - - ' , i , , t . �,.. ' .. . . 4 �' � x v- .. �� , t „ �:�i"•\7 �x�� . �rw�..n��+"�""°MUY++� . AN EGlUAL OPPORTUNITY EMPLOYER _ _ . _ _ __. _. c � i " � ' , s + , .. � ��a.�s �� ,;r,,. . .. . ...... _ _. ..�.�� . .. ��. r..:.: � _, .. . . __ ... _ . _. _ , ....�..�:.L-�,��°'� . . . 1S��" / �,.�... __ . � 4° ,. MS. PATRICIA JAMES February 14, 1984 Page Two -If the applicant can meet City, state, and federal standards ' for hardship and the City allows this use, a flood warning and evacuation plan must be required as a condition of the permit. -The flood warning and evacuation plan which was submitted by Mr. Mudek is basically adequate but should be amended as follows: 1) The National Weather Service (U.S. Weather BureauJ River Forecast Center should be contacted weekly (at a minimum) � during flooding season and probably daily if flooding has been predicted for St. Paul. , 2) A phone number for the National Weather Service River Forecast Center (725-3091) and the Corps of Engineers (725-7584) should be listd on the Flood Evacuation Schedu).e. 3) The flood warning and evacuation plan should contain a requirement that all responsible staff review the plan at least once a year. As I have stated on previous requests of this type, we strongly encourage the City to take a. comprehensive )_ook.. at how you intend to deal with uses or expansion of uses below the regulatory flood protection eleva- tion. This is a serious issue and it should be carefully considered. Continued granting of variances by the City for such uses will threaten your eligibility in the National Flood Insurance Program. If the City continues to allow uses or expansion of uses below the regulatory f lood protection elevatio�n, we strongly urge you to consider appointing a flood warning and evacuation coordinator to ensure proper enforcernent. If you have any questions, please feel free to contact me at your convenience. S' .cerely, ��.�.��__ David P. Leuthe, Area Hydrologist Metro Region Division of Waters DPL/ch cc: Brent McMahan, FEMA Tom Lutgen, FP/SMS _ _ _ . .. _. _ •----- -__ _.___ ._.�._.. t ► � . ' 4 • � - • " >�': .�� .�.-. - _ � _. �::;�.:.:. . .. :.-.. 1'�::�i::.. `'.�:\ ` �•::'ri'�:.. '•'i':\ � � �:. ' ` �\. . \•\ � . O / V�/ / �.;� '��c ��\ � � ' ' " \\� I } - ��`'::;�:`'. i � ��`�:`'>:�:.,.`�::i�':;:::�� ')`.�.<�,,�`::";:.::;;:?� �::::•;::;;:',�. :: .'.a ,V �::`�.�;::::::`<�.i:.`� ::� ^:•'�::::,• ••i� � .•,y�:-• :.\� \, '�`�E:`:;�::..�::,;`'::?i � .. W �!•''i:ii��. ii'..':•.:. � �;;,.. . ....::.�i �., . O �.....:.. :.......:::.� r :� � � �::::::.:::.:::::::. �}.. .. � ,:::.:.:. ::..::.� , t:.::::. ...... J:�::�:'�:�;:,;::::`� �;:::::::,>::;:::�:; :i::::.:`.:`.::::'::�:� _ � �:::�::. :�:::::-:� - �: :.:;::::�;;i � 1` :.:..::� ,� �:_:::.::�::::;:;..�_...� .,.� V � i_::;`:>:::.��;;t;�;`��`� : ::� � . , � � ..::; �::��. , � ��:::�:::`::::�:::.: t'.�:::`.�:i:`:`i:=::3 �.:':'.i:?;�.';`•�7f..?`•':�.�.�.:: v `i;i:i:�l:��':::':ti:� . .__ �.••:•.:•:-:...::::.:r.. � �`:i:2:ic�:�;;i}iE:1 �::�::::;:�:•:;;:�'::."-�•. :.•.. 4:�:::�:::�::�•:•�•:�::;:1 .:.. - ?�<:i:;?�'E:.•«-`._ .:,g:, _ _. _ . J�/� _ � 't`i:E'::}::{'r}i•. '. :y.1 t / .,.,.;.;. :::1 �►Ct::�:�;},}:.'.�..�°� �� . ��::�::�:,:.:::��,�Y p d �::::�:::��:� :��; , �.::::::;;::.: :.:-. v� , �:�::::�� <:�:�::: �::.::;�:: ..:.�:::�,, .... �...:. . ....�:� i O � c�::?�:: :::::�::.a ��:::::��:�:,.v , � , �� `;`:` � � �:.:�;::;�7;�r.:.:;::., '.':`�:t::1 �/ v •.��'_X•�''..:;.. . � �;`:��':'�� i '�.:.'�. �� :;1 '�;:... , ">,�'� ' �`;:.',�.. , :�?:��-- ------..—.�_ - ---- --- - ---- � V �;�:�. .. :�:'�;::1 I u�: ¢- ��:'; . � �::r.► � � �4•. :�) ' O �. , .� ;':�:1 O �� `. � �� '`: . . `�:� ,� �,,� p , `, ` . :.' , .: `' �� . p� :., , J �. -p , �'�� :,., � 4. �;::;,...:..':::;;.::. , `::�� '; � ti♦ , � 1 � � O �:1* � �:� . i� Q v O � � �w ♦ � : ` . _ I f `� ��,,� 1 �1 . � � � .:..� �� . �3 �.:�;::::�::�::;� '�:•::�.''::'.� \1 �; � . I , \'•�i:':�.::'. ' ::� `��`�., ' � E�� ..� �` �,.^ `� '": � .. i� � � � � Q i � � `�'' ♦.....; �>, ��'^�-.. •'�..' � ' ' _ ,. ��:: {i � � � ��/� I V'� t„�, V"�:;;.. ::�, �.. (J� � � � � {;• . �,:.:•;.::•: ..:�*` �'.'....'' . � (1} �:�.:,:'>, :.:. �'`t�..'`ti;,,:,::;:�.:�� ' �, . , ' I ' Oi I t: , ,; `::� ` L � ` � ` � �,Y�0 � D �J - � � �t�1 . � ' �p ''' � � ��. ��, � � � ' �-- �/ � . : ,�. � L ` -,�. \. .� L �� }• , �� . .� L � C� �,�� v v � J. :.... . e.. �; ! W -(S ��, ` L , � , � . t;;.�;`: L. :� � HR�H �hl�� APPLICANT `-a� �+� � P�\U � tzlr'� LEG�ND ' -" "' ZONING DiSTRlCT BDUNDARY � �� SUBJECT PR�PERTY P U R P 0 S E ��r ,,,_. . v (l A • O ONE FAMILI� PLANNiNG �e�S PUC tflM n►� vtafQ��"� � DISTRICT �" `^ t ¢ TWO FAMILY �� FILE N0. _�.� � � �• � DATE ��" O MULTIPLE FAP�tLY • � n CONIMERCtAL SCALE � 1��= 200� NORTN � �0i �NDUSTRIAL M�p NO. - � :�.-.')S'1�'�,f �_�J� '!'��..}1�d i j i��i l.7 :)v�>'l r`'�.�.� -r....-�.-a. .,w.-«,.+.«.____"_ 1J�_ N��i.i'i�:! t ..t,s p _ , . ... . ... . . � + .. .. . _ ..._........ . . . , � ' . . ��. ..- . -. . ...�. _ _..._. ..,;. ._. . -.._ �. � .-, . � . . - � . . � ` � ' t.-- . �. - ' , ' . . . . . .. . ' ._ .� s� _ � � �� y . �� ST. P�4l�L CITY COUNCIL PUBLtC HEARING NOTICE ZONING To: Property owners within 350' ; Representatives of Planning District 3 FIL E N 0. 9521 PAGE PURPOSE Appeal of Planning Commission denial of Special Condition Use Permit to construct a building below the regulatory flood protection elevation. � �.0 C A T 1 0 N North side of Barge Channel Rd. , west of CNW Railroad. PETITIONER JOHN C. MUDEK HEARING Thursday, Marcn 22, 1984 lo:oa A.rc. City Council Chambers, 3rd Floor City Hall - Court House Q U E S TIO N S Zoning 298-4154 (Patricia James) Contact the Zoning Section of the Planning and Economic Development Department, Room 1101, City Hall Annex, 25 W. 4th Street, St. Paul, MinnesoLa 55102 Legal Description: Parcel B, Gov't Lot #9, Section 9� Township 28, Range 22. . ��1��D�S►�i�3�1� 1�1l� Notice sent 3-9-84 �ea�t�� Z �' � �'LI�