The URL can be used to link to this page

84-365 WHITE - CITV CLERK 1 PINK - FINANCE COUIIClI . 'ANAR�-DEPARTMENT GITY OF SAINT PAUL File NO. �� ...�1E -MAVOR • ,/ O r �n�cnce Ordinance N 0. ��7' Presented By Referred To Committee: Date Out of Committee By Date newspaper of the City on February 11, 1984 and notices were duly mailed to each owner of affected property and property situated wholly or partly within 350 feet of the property sought to be rezoned; and WHEREAS, A public hearing before the City Council, having been conducted on February 23, 1984 where all interested persons were heard, and the Council having considered all the facts and recommendations concerning the petition; now, therefore, THE COUNCIL OF THE CITY OF SAINT PAUL DOES OP.DAIN: Section 1 . That the zoning map of the City of Saint Paul, Sheet No. 10, as incorporated by reference in Section 60. 301 of the Saint Paul Legislative Code, as amended, is hereby further amended as follows : That property located on the west side of Simpson between Thomas and Edmund, being more particularly described as Lots 1-10, 18, 19 & 20 and that portion of vacated Edmund Ave. adjacent to Lots 1, 18, 19 & 20, Block 2, Hamline Syndicate Addition ��3, be and is hereby rezoned from P-1 and R-4 to RM-2 . Section 2. This ordinance shall take effect and be in force thirty (30) days from and after its passage, approval and publication. -2- COUNCILMEN Requested by Department of: Yeas Nays Fletcher �eu� In Favor Masanz � Nicosia B Scheibel A gai n s t Y Tedesco Wilaon • ,p A�1n - 3 lgg4 Form Appro by City torney Adopted by Council: Date Certified Passe C uncil Secre BY By "- p Appr Mayor: Date rR — `� �4 Approve Mayor for Submission to Council By BIISNED -� APR 141984 E - CITY CIERK - FINANCE iV�- DEPARTMENT GITY OF SAINT PAUL Council � -MAVOR File NO. � ��_�� • O/ Zn� Ordinance N 0. '7`�'� ' ��Presented By - - Referred To Committee: Date Out of Committee By Date An ordinance amending Chapter 60 of the Saint Paul Legislative Code pertaining to zoning for the City of Saint Paul and the zoning maps thereof. WHEREAS, Pursuant to Minnesota Statutes §462 . 357 and §64. 210 of the Legislative Code, Samaritan Hospital duly petitioned to re- zone Lots 1-10, 18, 19 & 20 and that portion of vacated Edmund Ave. adjacent to Lots 1, 18, 19, & 20, Block 2, Hamline Syndicate Add. ��3, located on the West side of Simpson between Thomas and Edmund, from P-1 and R-4 to RM-2 to permit construction of a two-level parking ramp, the petition having been certified by the Planning Division on September 1, 1983 as having been consented to by at least 67% of the owners of the area of the property to be rezoned, and further having been consented to by at least two-thirds of the owners of the property situated within 100 feet of the total con- tiguous descriptions of real estate l�ield by the same owner or any party purchasing any such contiguous property within one year pre- ceding the date of the petition; and WHEREAS, The current Zoning Committee on October 6, 1983 conducted a public hearing for the purpose of considering the rezoning petition, and pursuant to Section 107 . 03 of the Admini- strative Code, submitted its recommendation to the Planning Com- mission that the petition be granted; and � WHEREAS, The Planning Commission considered the rezoning petition at its meeting held on October 7, 1983 and recommended that the City Council approve the petition; and WHEREAS, Notice of a public hearing before the City Council on the said rezoning petition was duly published in the of�icial COUNCILMElV Requested by Department of: Yeas Nays Fletcher ceu� In Favor Masanz Nicosia B scneibei Against Y Tedesco Wilson Adopted by Council: Date Form Appro e by City t rney Certified Passed by Council Secretary BY By Approved by Mayor: Date Approv d y Mayor f r Submission to Council ' BY BY . - ( R�TURN TU J�RUM� S�GAL A�T�R ADOPTION) wMtTE - C�7r C�ERK . - � PiNK - FINANCE � COUDCII CwNARV -DEVARTMENT GITY OF - SAINT PAUL File NO. �'r]`"�� BIUE -MAVOR - � Oa • rGLZ1ZG�IZCP. Ordinance N O. '7/,�� Presented By Referred To Committee: Date Out of Committee By Date An ordinance amending Chapter 60 of the Saint Paul Legislative Code pertaining to zoning for the City of Saint Paul and the zoning ma.ps thereof. ' WHEREAS, Pursuant to Minnesota Statutes §462.357 and §64.210 of the Legislative Code, Samaritan Hospital duly petitioned to re- zone Lots 1-10, 18, 19 & 20 and that portion of vacated Edmund Ave. adjacent to Lots 1, 18, 19, & 20, Block 2, Hamline Syndicate Add. ��3, located on the West side of Simpson between Thomas and Edmund, from P-1 and R-4 to RM-2 to permit construction of a two-level parking ramp, the petition having been certified by the Planning Division on September 1, 1983 as having been consented to by at least 67% of the owners of the area of the property to be rezoned, and further having been consented to by at least two-thirds of the owners of the property situated within l00 feet of the total con- tiguous descriptions of real estate held by the same owner or any party purchasing any such contiguous property within one year pre- ceding the date of the petition; and s WHEREAS, The current Zoning Committee on October 6, 1983 conducted a public hearing for the purpose of considering the rezoning petition, and pursuant to Section 107 . 03 of the Admini- strative� Code, submitted its recommendation to the Planning Com- mission that the petition be granted; and � � � WHEREAS, The Planning Commission considered the �rezoning petition at its meeting held on October 7, 1983 and recommended that the City Council approve the petition; and . WHEREAS, Notice of a public hearing before the City Council on the said rezoning petition was duly published in the official , COUNCILMEN Requested by Department of: Yeas Nays . Fletctier - c,�n� In Favor . Masanz • N�cosia Against BY Schsibsl Tedesco Wilson . , Form Approved by City Attorney Adopted by Council: Date • Certified Passed by Council Secretary BY By Approved by Mayor: Date Approved by Mayor for Submission to Council writTE � - Ci7r CLERK � PINK � FINANCE CANARY - OEPARTMENT � � GITY OF SAINT PAUL . FlecilNO. . /� / v� ewe -MwroR 0rdinance Ordinance r{0. /7/0?� Presented By Referred To Committee: Date Out of Committee By � Date newspaper of the City on February 11, 1984 and notices were duly mailed to each owner of affected property and property situated wholly or partly within 350 feet of the property sought to be rezoned; and .WHEREAS, A public hearing before the City Council, having been conducted on February 23 , 1984 where all interested persons were heard, and the Council having considered all the facts and recommendations concerning the petition; now, therefore, � THE COUNCIL OF THE CITY OF SAINT PAUL DOES ORDAIN: • Section 1 . That the zoning map of the City of Saint Paul, Sheet No . 10, as incorporated by reference in Section 60 . 301 of the Saint Paul Legislative Code, as amended, is hereby further amended as follows : That property located on the west side of ' Simpson between Thomas and Edmund, being more particularly described as Lots 1-10, 18 , 19 & 20 and that portion of vacated Edmund Ave. adjacent to Lots 1, 18 , 19 & 20, Block 2 , Hamline Syndicate Addition ��3, be and is hereby rezoned from P-1 and R-4 to • RM-2. Section 2. . This ordinance shall take effect and be in force thirty (30) � days from and after its passage, approval and publication. � -2- COUNCILMEN Requested by Department of: Yeas Na}�s Fletcher �sii� In Favor Masanz Nicosia B � scneibe� Against Y Tedesco � W f lson . Form Approved by City Attorney Adopted by Council: Date Certified Passed by Council Secretary . BY By Approved by Mayor: Date � Approved by Mayor for Submission to Council ^ ^ . . • , � �1 F c�fy`3��/ - ��C t T Y pp '� ' J /Ol7�� CITY OF SAINT PAUL a �� ro DEPARTMENT OF PLANNING AND ECONOMIC DEVELOPMENT � �� hv' DIVISION OF PLANNING � �ea• 25 West Fourth Street,Saint Paul,Minnesota,55102 612-292-1577 GEORGE LATIMER MAYOR February 14, 1984 Albert Olson, City Clerk Room 386 City Hall St. Paul , Minnesota 55102 RE: Zoning File #9444 - Samaritan Hospital City Council Hearing: February 23, 1984 PURPOSE: Rezone property from P-1 and R-4 to RM-2 to permit construction of a parking ramp on property located on the west side of Simpson Street between Thomas and Edmund. PLANNING COMMISSION DECISION: Approve (11-4) ZONING COMMITTEE DECISION: Approve (4-2) STAFF RECOMMENDATION: Approve SUPPORT: Seven people testified; 61 letters OPPOSITION: Twelve people testified; 23 letters Dear Sir: On October 6, 1983 the Zoning Comnittee of the Planning Commission held a public hearing on this rezoning. The petitioner was present and explained their proposal to build a medical office building and parking ramp north of the existing hospital site. A number of people testified in opposition to the rezoning. At the close of the public hearing, the Committee voted 4 to 2 to recommend approval of the rezoning. At the same hearing, the application for a Special Condition Use Permit with modifications necessary to construct the office building and parking ramp was laid over until November 17. On October 7, 1983 the Planning Commission reviewed the Zoning Committee's recommendation and upheld it on a vote of 11 to 4. On October 21 , 1983 a letter was received from the City Council requesting that the Planning Commission take up the matter of the Special Condition Use Permit prior to the City Council consideration of the rezoning. Throughout November and December a series of ineetings was held. These meetings were attended by representatives of Samaritan Hospital , District 11 Coalition, immediate neighbors to the hospital , and City staff. A number of site plans were submitted, discussed, and reviewed by the Committee. . - �F �y-.�� Zoning File #9444 - Samaritan Hospital Page 2 On January 19, 1984 the Zoning Committee of the Planning Commission again considered the Special Condition Use Permit. At that time a proposal that was acceptable to the hospital and that the District 11 Coalition did not oppose was presented to the Committee. The Committee voted 5 to 0 to approve the Special Condition Use Permit with modifications. On January 26, 1984 the Planning Commission upheld the Zoning Comnittee's recommendation on a vote of 13 to 1. The rezoning is scheduled to be heard by the City Council on February 23, 1984. Please notify me by February 22 if any member of the City Council wishes to have slides of the site presented at the public hearing. S i cere 1 y, c--�------ � , Patricia N. James City Planner PNJ/mb attachements • ' �` 7 -I �./Y-�C . . ' /�l�� ' , +, „ �' CITY OF SAINT PAUL INTERDEPARTMENTAL MEMORANDUM . DATE: February 16, 1984 T0: Victor Tedesco, President Members of the City Council FROM: Patricia James„�� RE: Zoning File #9444 - Samaritan Hospi�al Due to the volume of correspondence on this case, the letters received regarding this rezoning have not been included in the packets. Sixty-eight letters wer•e received in support and 27 letters in apposition. The correspondence is on file in the Zoning Office. If any member� of tF�e City Council wishes to have copies of the letters, we will provide them. � . - . �:�- ��-.��.s MINUTES OF THE �ZONING COMMITTEE IN CITY COUNCIL CHAMBERS, ST. PAUL, MINNESOTA 0�! OCTOBER 6, 1983 PRESENT: Mmes. Karns and Summers; Messrs. Armstead, Bryan, Lanegran, Levy and Pangal of the Zoning Committee; Mr. Segals Assistant . City Attorney; Ms. Lane of the Division of Hausing & Building Code Enforcement; Ms. Beseman, Mr. Bunnell , P�r. Ford and Ms. James of the P,lanning Division Staff. , ABSENT: None The meeting was chaired by James Bryan, Chairman. SAtnARITA�! HOSPTIAL (#9444 & 9472) : Rezone property from P-1 and R-4 to - RP�-2 to permit construction fo a 2-level parking ra�.p, and Special Condition Use Permit with modification to construct a medical office building and parking facility. The a�rl�cart w�s represented. 7here was op�osit�on pre�ent at the hearing. i�1s. Jarnes showed slides of the site and reviewed the staff report with a recommendation for approval of the rezonirig and recammended that the Special Condition Use Permit be laid over until November 17, 1983. Sixty-one letters were received in support, of 4�hich 45 ��ere from the hospital auxiliary. Distirct 11 Coalition submitted a 7etter in opposition and 23 letters from residents were received in oppos�tion. Dick Matykiewicz, attorney representing American Health care Management, owner arid op�rator of Samaritan Hospital, reported �hat American H�alth care purchased the hospital approximately 1 1/2 years ago from the former owner Health Services Incorporated. The hospital has been in existence si n.:e <ab��t 19��, and '�he prop�; fiy �t.hat i s sut je:.�� to tl�� y�e_on i�g f.ad been owned by the hospital for several years prior to the purchase of �he hospital by Ame�ican Health care. The tenants that reside in the homes owned by the hospital have been well aware of the project for many years. He explained their proposal , stating that the proposed medical offict building �rill be adjacent to the hospital . The parking ramp wil also be connected to the medical office building and eventually to the hospital building. There will be a skyway connecting the medica7 office building to the existing hospital itself. The hospital intends to build an approximately 40,000 sq. ft, medicai- building and a 2-1eve1 parking ramp. The total height of the parking structure above existing grade will be be about 7 1/2' . The medical office building as indicated will be approx- imately 39' and basically equal to the existing hospital . Althou�h the hospital does have 95 parking spaces it is still short of adequate parking according to code. The parking in the area has had a iong history o�F congestion and causing problems and neighborhood discontent. The proposal as presented arauld provide approximately 502 parking spaces, which would be about 70 in excess of what would be needed to satisfy the code requiremerrts for the hospital and the medical office building. A 40,000 sq. ft. medical office building will accommodate somewhere betweeR 35 to 40 doctors. 7heir proposal , if permitted, would absolutely eradicate any future need for on- street parking in the area as far as the hospital and medical office . • �1,1� �y�3�� Samaritan Hospital (#9444 & �9472) Page 2 building is concerned. The hospital would be willing to join with the community in any way they desire to place restrictions on the surrounding streets with regard to parking in that area. The American Health care Management Corporation, a Texas for-profit hospital managernent company, has already invested a great deal of money in the purchase of the property and in the actual hospital i,tself. They have upgraded the interior of the � hospital drastically and added a considerable amount of new equipment. This particular project is projected to be somewhere in the area of 5 _ million dollars and the .investment will be financed totaTly f rom private sources. It will have a relatively great impact on the tax base �n the area. The financing is in place, and they are capable of moving ahead witn it as their plans progress. The hospital is presently licensed for 150 beds; however it has been operating at considerably less than that as indicated by the statistics presented by staff. It is the sole intention of �:7erican Health care to bring this hospital up to fully utilize the 150 bed license eand by doing so provide excellent medical care in the co�rmun;ty. The trend i� to have meci i cal off i ce bu i 1 d i ngs ad j acent to hospitals so th�at the doctors have tt�e abili�cy to attend tc, their patients as easily as possible. In order for the hospital to be successful , it has to have doctors that ar•e willing to admit their patients to that hospital , and th::: ability to have their office building close by is a very strong reason �or where they make their admissions. The hospital, in order to survive, has to have this improvement or it will not be aab7e to compete in the marketplace and provide the type of heal�th care trat ane would expect. Dan Hill , Vice-President of American Health care and current administrator of the hospital presented a background of the company. He stated that they do need to place Samaritan in a more competitive posture in the 198�'s and they feel that the proposed building tivill do that. It wi11 be a 4 7/2 million dollar building, constructed by local contractors and will provide � jc,bs �4u the cornmunity. P�1r. Lanegran asked Mr. Hill to comment on the low occupancy rate of the hospital . Mr. Hill stated that in looking at the history of Samaritan Hospital , it was first the old railroac; hospital . After that it was with Share HMO, whici� Samaritan helped to start by providing the seed money but due to unfavorable financia1 contractural arrangements, they could na lar�g�r continue. There was really no aggressive marketing done by the former owners to attract the private practioner. Relating to the low occupancy, . this is something that American Care is accustomed to, and that i� the way they can buy hospitals. Hospitals that are flourising are not for sale. Wayne Car•lson, 593 Laurel , spoke in support stating that it appears that � the hospital could become a viable alternative and compete in the health care business. As a resident in the area, he is interested in seeing that happen. It will add some money to the community, it is a very positive increase in the aesthetics of the neighborhood and will create more jobs. The technique of traffiic control that would be used in the parking ramp, the use of patrols and the greater activity would mean a safer � . � G��y3G� Samaritan Hospital (�9444 & #9472) Page 3 neighbornood. A facility of this magnitude wculd add to the tax rolls and help level or keep taxes at the same base, keeping the value of property up. Thomas Kershling, President of Health Services Incorporated, stated that he is aware of the conyestion in the area primarily caused by Samaritan Hospital 's inability to provide adequate parking. As a corrrnercial property ow��er in the area he would very muci� support the project. _ Gladys Carlson, 1483 Charles, testified in support stating that it would be a �ronderful addition to the neighborhood. American Nealth care is trying their very best to work with the neighbors. Melvin Jacobson, 548 Simpson, stated support because it would decrease taxes and increase jobs. 4!ill�am Murphy, 582 A.sbury, former ten�nt of Samaritan, reported th�t he was informed by the hospital that it would be a year to 18 months before they would have to move. Judy Lawstram, 1422 Lafond, Executive Directar of the i�iidway Civic & Commerce Association, read a statement on their position to support the medical office building and related parking structure. Their main reasor�s for support were increased jobs, add more tax revenues, growth of business and improve traffic. William Newhouse, 559 Asbury, resident of the neighborhood for� 50 years. testified in support stating that the Midway area is improving, it is a good location for a hopsital , it will provide more jobs, and wi71 help the - tax base. Bob Wicker, 1538 Englewood, stated he was not speaking in support or in oppasition but felt there was not enough balanced thinking given on the matter. District 11 should safeguard the welfare of all camponents af the community. He stated three points that should be considered: (1) Samaritan Nospital is not a newcomer to the neighborhood and it is not the first time they have expanded; (2) District 11 has concentrated on7y on possible negative effects, objections should be quantified; and (3) citizens often object to large scale projects. He requested that if the� rezoning is approved, a letter of ag�eement be drawn up between the hospital and the neighborhood which gives residents the po��ver and ability to work with the management, Kevin 0'Shea, 563 Asbury, presented a slide presentatian of the area. He reported that the estimated property value of the neighborhood is $10,000,000. Homes have been improved over �he years; the h�rnes Samarita� owns have become an eyesore. He stated that they submitted a Plan B to t�ne hospital which recorrmended: (1 ) they save as many homes as possible; (2) move the house on the corner of Thomas and Simpson to provide mare surface parking; (3) remove houses on Asbury for additional surface parking; and (4) use the 2-story Share clinic and existing empty hospital space. American Health care could also locate the doctors' building on � • � �� Samaritan Hospital (#9444 & 9472) Page 4 University and shuttle the patients �o the hospitaT . Ne felt the reason residents signed the rezoning petitior� was because of the traffic congestion in the area and they wanted the eyesore, Samaritan-owned houses, removed. Merrill Roi�;nson, Vice-Presi,dent of District 11 Coalition, stated the District's opposition. In the Master Plan for District ll they state the intention to cooperate with industry and cornrnerce in the neighborhood t�ut , - they are also seeking as an objective to protect and improve the residential character of the neighborhood. As to the need for a medical office building, there is an excess of such facilities within blocks af the site in question. Jerry Baldwin, 1190 Thomas, District 11 Coalition, stated that one of the primary intents of the District Plan is to preserve �he residential character of the neighborhood. The history of this property has been one of cc�n�:inued er�croach�nent on re�idential ai•Eas. Pat Siuta, 563 Asbury, testified in opposition. She stated that if the project were approved, it a�ould violate the intent and purpose of the � Zoning Code in the following way: it would adversely affect public health and safety by increasing the air pollution, traffic and noise in the area. They could expect anywhere from 1 ,600 to 2,000 additional cars coming into their residential neighborhood on a daily basis. The partcing lot entrance would be across from the playground endangering the liv�s of children in the area. From the very beginning Samaritan was a nonconforming use and tnroughout the years this nonconformity has been extended. The residents are very concerned about the continual expanrtion of the nanconforming use. The hospital has received favorable treatment for many years at the expense of the residential neighbornood. The proposed project would lessen air circ�'iaLion compo�n�iny the air poliutior� prUblem, �he bui�diny tv�uid aso affect the amount of sunlight received by many of the homes, privacy v�ould be curtailed because occupants of the 3-story building would be looking down into the yards of the surrounding homes, and eonvenience of access ta property would be seriously jeopardized because the proposed project would be constructed over Edmun� Street closing it down. She stated that the proposed medical building is not incidental to the hospital . With the hospital occupancy rate of only 24% -i� appears that the office building would be a primary rather than an incidental use. Dr. pavid Bredehoft, 616 Asbury, stated opposition for the following reasons: (1 ) there is an overburdance of inedical and office buildings in the area; (2) the addition of a parking ramp in an already severely air polluted area of the City is not conducive to the quality of life that f�e chaose when he moved into the area; (3) the increase of tax revenues does , not mean that property owners will benefit from it; and (4) it is an encroachment on the neighborhood. Lynn Purcell , 604 Asbury, reported that a lot of for-sale signs went up after the hospital 's announcement. The house they are living in is one owned by Samaritan and they had made tentative plans to buy the house and thought they had an agreement with the owners. Good residential : � � L�`,F �f�.3�� Samaritan Hospital (#9444 & �9472) Page 5 neighborhoods are very difficult to find with close proximity to shopping, transporation and businesses. Evelyn Olson, 1470 Edmund, testified in opposition. She stated the hospital has not been very accommodating. As a senior citizen, Medicare has c�t down on what they will offer, which will have an impact on the hospit��ls. The hospitals themselves are consolidating, ►��hich would �ndicate - that they are having patient count problems. American Nealtf� care has not explored all of the possibilities that are open as far as gaing along with their present facilities. Joanne Enos, 149 Exeter Place, stated opposition because the integrity of �he neighborhood would be diminished. The residents in the neighborhood have done a lot of wark on this and Plan B would be the compromise p1an. Joan �cr�niedr, representing .ynnette Sorenson, expressed concern wit{i safety, decrease in property valu�s, street to street buildings that arill not blend in with the neighborhood, upkeep, traffic, and the viability of it being successful . Gary Zaidenweber, 1519 Sherburne, stated that the staff report makes an excellent case for denying the request and yet immediately following all the final arguments, the staff recom»ends approval . He felt this was inconsistent with the findings of fact. Valerie H�ix, 1521 Thomas, expressed strong opposition, stating that the proposed expansion would be totally inappropriate in a residential area. She was concerned with the safety of her children with such an increase of traff i c as wel l as the safet,y of the general pedestri an traff i c i n the area. 4�es Kilstrom, 1543 Edmund, testified in opposition for reasons previously expressed by residents. He questioned what would hap�en if the faciltiy did not prove profitable. Flearing no further testimony, Mr. Bryan closed the public hearing portion of the meeting. Ms. Surr�ners asked Mr. Hill if he received Plan B from the neighborhood and if it had been considered. � Mr. Hill stated that they did receive Plan B but rejected it on the basis that there was not enough space for the doctors that they intend to attract to the bui7ding, and aTso it was lacking in parking space. Mr. Lanegran asked what other configurations for the office building were considered �other than constructing it 18' from the street. J. Slader, BWBR Architects, reported that there were several options considered. One of the main reasons for locating it where they did was the ability to get as many parking spaces as possible that would take care of both the parking requirements of the hospital in its anticipated capacity � . � � � � ��` �'�f�,��os Samaritan Hospital (#9444 & #9472) � Page 6 as well as for the medical office building. Another eonsideratian was where they would tie in with the pedestrian walkway to the existing hospital , and it was best located at the point where it is shown. Mr. Armstead moved to recommf.nd approval of the rezonir�g based o� finding� 2 through 6 and the staff analysis. Mr. Lanegran seconded the mQ�ion, which passed on a roll call of 4 to 2 with Ms. Karns and Mr. Pangal voting against the motion. ' Mr. Lanegran moved to lay over to November 17 the Special Condition Use Permit with modifications to allow time for City Council action an the rezoning and time for the applicant, zoning staff and �he nezgnbors to work on alternativ2s to the proposed site plan. Mr. Armstead secanded the motior�, which passed on a unanimous voice vote. Sub i tted by: �--�__� Approved by: /� '' � �--=_ _ � , T ��✓/��i�:.-�� -`✓. �-------� Patricia N. James r� 'ames 8ryan, Chai an � , � . ` �� ZONING COMMITTEE STAFF �EPORT ------------------------------ ----------------------------- FILE # 9444 8202, 6782, 6468 5529, 5488 1 . APPLICANT: SAMARITAN HOSPITAL DATE OF NEARING: 10/6/83 2. CLl��IFICATION: Rezoning � 3. LOCATION: West side of Simpson between Thomas and Edmund 4. LEGAL DESCRIPTION: Lots 1-10, 18, 19 & 20, and that portion of vacated Edmund Ave. adj . to Lots 1 , 18, 19 & 20, Bk. 2, Hamline Syndicate �2 5. PRESENT ZONING: P-1; R-4 ZONING CODE REFERENCE: Section 60.450 6. STAFF INVESTIGATION & REPORT: DATE 9/22/83 BY Patricia N. James ----------------------------------------------------------------------------------------- ----------------------------------------------------------------------------------------- --------------------------------------------------------------------=-=----=------------- ---------------------------------------------•-------------------- ---�----- A. PURPOSE: Rezone property from P-1 and R-4 to RM-2 to permit construction of a two- evel parking ramp. B. SUFFICIENCY: Petition found sufficient by Planning Division on Septeber 1 , 1983. Parcels eligible: 61 ; parcels needed: 41; parcels signed: 45. C. PARCEL SIZE: 295.7' (Simpson) x 247.85 (Thomas) = 73,289.25 square feet. D. EXISTING LAND USE: Parking lot, vacant, and single family residential . E. SURROUNDING LAND USE: North: Single f amily residential (R-4) East: Single family residential (R-4) South: Samaritan Hospital , single family residential (RM-2, R-4) West: One- and 4-unit residential (RM-2) F. ZONING HISTORY: The original hospital was constructed in 1920. In 1922 the site was zone "B" Residence, making the use nonconforming. (Hospitals were first permitted in "C" Residence districts.) Zoning file #5488: July, 1964. The City Council granted an appeal to extend the nonconforming use by permitting construction of an addition to the north. The bed capacity of 150 was not increased. Construction of the addition was begun prior to the application for appeal . Zoning File #5529: September, 1964. The City Council approved a permit to increase the parking lot from 46 to 81 spaces. Zoning File #6468: May, 1968. An appeal was granted to permit expansion of the nonconforming use by constructing a new 4-story west wing and a new clinic to the northeast of the existing hospital . In addition, the required setback alang Charles for the new wing was relaxed, from 24' required to 11 ' proposed. At that hearing, the question of whether or not the facility was becoming too large f or the site was raised. The proposed construction also reduced the off-street parking to 56 spaces. The hospital representatives expTained that since many of their patients were from out-of-town, they did not need as much parking as other hospitals. They promised to provide additional parking as soon as land became available. Zoning File #6782: September, 1969. A permit was approved for a 39-car parking 1ot. Concerns were raised regarding the future expansion plans of the hospital . A staff inemo to file recorranends that the hospital do some iong-range planning. Expansion toward 5nelling Avenue �to the west was suggested. In 1975 the site was zoned RM-2 and the parking lot to the north was designa�ed P-1. February, 1977, Edmund Street was vacated. ,a 7_oning File #�8.?.02; August, 1977. A variance requ2st t� construct an accessory . . , . � �,f" ��1'�� SMARITAN HOSPITAL (#9444) Page 2 F. ZONING HISTORY CONT'D. office building on the same site as is now proposed was submitted and then withdrawn. G. FINDINGS: 1 . Th� petitioner proposes rezoning to RM-2 in order to construct a medical ` office building and 2-level parking ramp. The office building will be 3 stories (39' ) high and will have 40,000 sq. ft. of gross floor area. The parking ramp will provide s�' parking spaces and will be 7 f eet above grade. Accessory structures must be on the same zoning lot and in the same zoning district as principal structures. 2. There is a well-establsihed trend of inedical office buildings linked to hospitals. The applicant states that such a f acility is necessary to the survival of the hospital . Inability to add the new facilities would result in undue hardship for the applicant. 3. Samaritan Hospital intends to retain a controlling interest in the office building and under the precedent established in the Midway Hospital case, the building would be appropriately considered accessory to the hospital . 4.� Rezoning of the subject property to RM-2 would not result in substantial disruption of the established zoning patterns. The property adjoins land presently zoned RM-2 on two sides. Other permitted RM-2 uses; multiple family residential , corr�nunity residential facility and nursing homes, wouid not be substantially incompatibTe. 5. If the rezoning petition is approved, petit_ioner will also need to obtain a Special Condition Use Permit with modifications for the medical office building and the parking ramp. The conditions to be met include yard setbacks, a site of at least five acres and access to parking directly from a major thoroughfare. 6. The site is located at the edge of the Midway mixed use cluster area designated in the Comprehensive Plan. The plan calls for intensifying uses in clusters. The Land Use Plan recorr�nends locating institutional uses in mixed use cluster areas. 7. Land Use Plan policy 4.5-2 states: "The city will work with the district councils and institutions to resolve land use conflicts arising from the competing needs of the institutions and their neighbors." Confliets such as traffic congestion, danger to pedestrians, and parking problems are mentioned. 8. The District 11 Plan aeknowledges concern over the expansion of Samaritan Hospital and also proposes using Samaritan Hospital for a health care delivery system. 9. The YOUniversity Avenue Plan recommends the containment of corr�nercial uses within the bounds of commercially zoned land and the concentration of vehicular traffic on major streets and highways. 10. The Metropolitan Health Planning Board estimates that there is an excess of � over 2,000 hospital beds in the metropolitan area. Ir� the Phase IV report adopted by the Metropolitan Council in May, 1982, the Council recommends that beds be reduced through competition in the market place. 11 . P�etropolitan Health Planning Board data show that in 1982 the use rate of all hospitals in the region dropped 6.3% from 1981. The highest occupancy rate was 76%; the lowest was Samaritan Hospital with 24q. The data also show that while admissions were down for Samaritan, the number of days patients stayed in thE hospital rase; the average length of stay for the patients rose 1 .5 days over 1981. 12. Metropolitan Health Planning Board staff believe that the trend toward lower hospital usage will continue. _ _ _ _ _ . ._ __ �. �. � � G� ��:3�5� SAMARITAN HOSPITAL (�9444) Page3 13. Samaritan Hospital is presently legally nonconforming as to location and setbacks. It has been legally nonconforming in one way or another since 1922, when the first zoning ordinance was enacted. 14. Chapter 62.102 of the Zoning Code states: "It is the intent of this code to permit legal nonconforming lots, structures or uses existing on the eff ective date of this c�de. . . to continue until they are removed but not to encourage their survival ." � 15. The hospital is an existing use that has been granted numerous permits and appeals in order to expand at this location. 16. The proposed construction would generate additional property tax revenue for the city. H. STAFF ANALYSIS: Samaritan Hospital 's proposed expanszon raises major land use and pu lic policy issues. While it is presently one of the least used hospitals in the metropolitan area, its current owners believe that it can become competitive if the rezoning is granted and the expansion is permitted. The office building will attract doctors who will attract potential hospital patients. Petitioner states that the trend toward accessory medical buildings will continue and wi11 be necessary far hospitals' survival . There are reasons to den,y the rezoning based on land use considerations and the history .of zoning-related concerns associated with the site. The addition of an office building and a parking ramp and the traffic associated with these wi11 make the hospital less, not more compatible with the surrounding residential land use. The zoning ordinance provision,that access must be f rom a major arterial , a provision which cannot be met in this case, is a reasonable consideration for the protection of the residential environment. Apparent excess hospital capacity in the area raises a question about the advisabili�y of zoning action to increase l.and area devoted to this use. The excess capacity and the low occupancy rate for this particular haspital do increase the importance of considsering reuse potential f or the site under both present zoning and rezoning conditions. If some other use of this site had to be considered in the future, it would appear that reuse compatible with the surrounding residential area would be more difficult to achieve with the office building and parking ramp erected on the site than without these additions. The case for approval of the rezoning is supported by the appropriateness of zoning accommodations to support continued economic viability of an existing institution, the potential positive impact of an improved f acility, the shart distance which separates the site from a major arterial , and the reasonable nature of the actual rezoning required. The applicant is requesting the rezoning in order to add components necessary f or continued successful operation of the hospital . If this occurs, the prospect is for a substantially upgraded facility albeit, with some attendent increased congestion for the residential area. . The apparent greater intrusion of less compatible land use in tMe residential area has to be balanced with consideration of the positive impact that can be expected from reinvestment in the area and upgrading of the site with new construction. The parking ramp has a low profile and the office building proposed is in scale with the present hospital building which sesems ta have been reasonably well accommodated in the neighborhood. If the rezoning is denied, the prospects would appear to include eventual closure of the hospital and eventual redevelopment of the site. The scenario could include a significant period of deterioration with vacant, boarded structures. The site is just one block east of Snelling Avenue, a major arterial and the proposed office building and parking ramp are on the north end of the site adjacent to Thomas Avenue, a collector street. _ The rezoning which has been requested, P-1 and R-3 to RM-2, is not an unreasonable or drastic rezoning considering the presence of RM-2 area on two sides of the subject property. I. STAFF RECOMMENDATION: Based on findings 2 through 6 and the staff analysis, staff recorrm en s approval of the rezoning to RM-2. i. _ . _ _ _ :. � .. .. ._ . _ : . _ _ _ � �� _ _ _ _ ` - � _ " . , ,-� �J�. � l �.3�.�. �' . �� fi-� f"]/ $ -' ` . . i � ' % a FJ; . f 1 �y j�'yi�, y, ✓..s � � . . . � ��;:. �,: � . .' - �� ,(;�i �t- . :2�i�.L � � �c:,_ � � ( v ,-'-�..,: PETITION TO AMEND ZONING CODE (, � � � CITY OF SAINT PAUL 'd ZONING OFFICE USE ONLY��::- %' f � File �i Application Fee $ � �_ _�_ _ Tentative Hearing Date _�T��= � 19��_ �-- Number of Lots or Size of Parcel: �2 �� r�' TO TNE HONORABLE MAYOR AND CITY COUNCIL DATE ____ Ju� 1 T __�__.�19�____ c/o Zoning Office, 1100 City Hall Annex St. Paul, Minnesota 55102 Pursuant to Section 64.210 of the St. Paul Zoning Ordinance and Section 462.357 (5) of the h�linnesota Statutes, _____^ TSH_ Inc_.`____ _______ __.___� , the owner of ali of the land proposed for rezoning, hereby petitions your Honorable.Body to rezone the followin� descr,ibed property: Street Address: Legal nescription:_Lots_ 12 21_3�._4�_5�_�.�_Z�$�.��_L(Z�1$��2_artd_.2D��nd_th�__.____-- portion_of_the_vacated_Edmund_yY�ny.e_ac�a.�.�ert��2J.szt�1_��,_�9_�2D.�B1�r.1�2,____.___ _�Hamline S,�dicate_Addition (�o__��____________ _ _______—__---- from a __ P,l and }2=4 ----------__.---.---_----_-.-- ----District to a R��-2 _ District � for the purpose of constr.��itt�st�wal�t�l��arlcan�r�amp�_------------------ -------- ----------------^---------------------- i — '= -- =,=`.. _ --- — ------- � �� , �_. ' *� � -� � +` �, r � �' n �:-.,.�sa, �it��° ' i I T4 - . - .?:l� 'C'v+�L r3� k _ 'A'i✓ � .. ��......_. � .. . . � � ' x_.^-..-nsa�.x....s..:..-,r�r..,P.�..�.�......^.�-' . ...�-......,....�..,�.,,,.. ....�.:_.:_�.._...-..3 �—�'� � � ! R Subscribed and sworn to �y: =�-�..--�� _�_`-�•�.. _____ -------------- ��:� --- before this __1j day n of ,1u] --19�--- Title:�t� c�f' �51� t.L_��----------- � � " . Petitioner j � � _ . ,, . , , -- T._ . , . . _ . ., : _-, .� ry ,,.. , r : . _., ��C�GJ�=c.Gr: -- = �— �� i�-',�!.t...c,t,-- :..1:. .__. ..- �otary P blic � �' wr.wsM�i��w�R+Mwww+++y+.++4 '�_i, i q . �°„��lKlc�MCZ E'a�;e 1 uf , � .�res�ra � . _ �� ,�i�l'Ct'!'�1�:O�.J�ITY � . 4USG ,at ��e�n Exp�rgs Feb.E.;�J�B `.' . .. 1�l��'JZ H�ap�M.YOCiO�ld+NfAGW i iv�e A��' . . . . . . .. . . . . .. . - � - . . . t � � - , . .. � � . . � �. �. _ . . ' � .. . . . ." �- � '. � . .�' ��.� y.."gs�+ • o • • • � • • • • • � • • • • • s • • • � • • � �,� � • �� . c.v • . • . . . . . °� . . . • . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . v o W _ + � ,. . . . � ' . . ° :� . . . .:�!, . . o � � � % � 0 ; / / / . .... � t'�� ;�.: • t° ;�:; ` �1 • • • � � �::; � � •�::' • • • • • � , �� %�:�: � �A� ='%'-� � I + . � - � � � • • • �� • • • � � • • � • • � .� , � . 0 � ' � ' /� ;.;.+;,;�; � � io.��'.o•. ��.y � ....-.... �.�.,� � � � � �•00� • ��i'i � � � � �� jF P� � � ��'%� ;�;��*�.;� i�� • �•�,� :..•C;,�.r. Q � • ��t � � • � • . 'i�i�:��;+� ��' ' �� i4� • ►er.-.�.. �� ` ' ' �� ., � �> %��:':+. s'�,'� • / .��. e a s :•.•�.:�� a:�,; • • �7 � • • • • • �� '��'p'e:'- ►�•t % �.:..'! • � '':=' C� � � �•�. � w ��ri:�A / !� �� 16r �� /.�.°f!! ��'� � j4 !i � � �� i�.�� "Y � i ��:� + : � � � � � � i '�•��'� � ' •�,�` � .�e:...� � � � � o ;•;, •-. ••-, '��1li�ei��1 �` '��.1i �; b�_1.�...� � � r � �.►�i � . �.•�-� �� k�pa`�',`�' ` '�'r�a' • ��4 (i as.i�.� �j+11"�1�� ' � i��'�i�� • �•*► :�:�//. ` `; `� � . � , � „�• „� • � - . • • : � . . . . . . . . . . ' � d � � 1`�IMt �---- _ ' �,��'�i : /il%. . . i :�,:; A � � � �� _ � _ � � � : �� • • • ��%: � • • • � • • � � ��: ►E:•� � ' �.:'% � • � � p • • • • • • s • • ♦ • • ♦ � • •� � � • . .- �� i �i i1► ` i , /// ► � � . ,��, r , . � ♦ ...• . � . � � . � if • � i �) I . . ' ` { ' �� `��3�h� _ . _ _ _ __ _ _ , � `-�` �� M I DWAY kr � �� DISTRICT � ELEVEN � � COALITION r � � �� _� .. � � . , September 29, 1983 '��' � Bryan, Chair `' Jame� Zoning Committee ' s' llth Floor City Hall Annex �' K �25 W. 4th Street St. Paul, Minnesota 55102 Dear Mr. Bryan, On Thursday, October 6, the Zoning Committee will consider a request to rezone a block in the Midway occupied by Samaritan Hospital. The Midway District 11 Coalition opposes the change for several reasons: l. The District Council is eager to work with community businesses. The Council has pursued reaching agreements with hospital management to protect xg � ; the neighbors as well as the hospital business. This effort has resulted -,.; only in vague statements of intent. We have reached no satisfactory 3 - agreemerits. � ,- � * 2. A report from the Metropolitan Council indicates that the future of � � ' the hospital industry is questionable. Before the District can support the �� -' expansion of a business with a questionable future, ws want the business to explore less drastic alternatives. An alternative building arrangement could add surface parking rather than a ramp, add to the existinq structure and preserve housing. � �� 3. The request is to do spot zoning in our district and is therefore � .v inconsistent with the district plan and the City Zoning Code which both strive to create harmony between residents and businesses in the City. ; � _. The Midway District 11 Coa].ition requests that the 2oning Conimittee CIE'�).P$ the request for rezoning. ;�. `t Respectfully, � Maryellen Swedenborg, President . Midway District 11 Coalition � � y �.r� S .:. . . ; ._'::s , ._ .:.x ..r.�, ".. —' F.�....,._........ " � - Serving the Hamline ' . � ��. � � - Midway area , �^�'t . "'�"` �_�_�_._ < ,__ __--__ 1761 University Avenue �� St. Paul, MN 55104 646-1986 _ � - • m _ - . - `. , . . _ . . . Y . _ -�> � ,'g,i� . ,� , . C��, CITY OF ST. PAUL, MINNESOTA SPECIAL CONDITION USE PERMIT APPLICANT: TSH, INC. Zoning File #9472 PURPOSE: Permit with modifications to constr�.i�,t ainedical office building and parking f acility. LOCATION: South side of Thomas Avenue between Simpson and Asbury. LEGAL DESCRIPTION: Lots 1-20, alock 2, Hamline Syndicate Addition #2 ZONING COMMITTEE ACTION: Appraved January 19, 1984 (5-0) PLANNING COt�IISSION ACTION: Approved January 26, 1984 (13-1) CONDITIONS OF TNIS PERMIT: Modifications of the following canditions were granted: a sq. t. rom acres required; (b) Access to the building and ramp from local streets rathe:r Lf�an major thoroughF,�r��; (r,) 5?_' setback on Asbury (from 70' required to 18' proposed) , and 55' setback on Simpson (froin 70' required to 15' praposed); plus the following additional conditions: (1) Subdue the impact of the skyway by choice of earthtone paint or finish and closely match rnedical office building exterior to that of the hospital ; (2) Maintain the "massed setback" open space and provide landscaping with four-season foliage as well as boulevard trees as specified by the City Forester; (3) Provide shad�ne of parkin� ra.mp lights to si�ield adjacent residential property fr�xn glare; (4) Provide appropriate security (e.g. closed circuit TV) for the parking ramp; and (5) Establish a cornmittee comprised of hospital management, ir�nediate neighbors, and District 11 Coalition representatives to provide ongoing planning and problem resoTution. Issues to be resolved include working with the Department of Public W�rks to design an appropriate on-street parking restriction plan that encourages a safe traff i c pattern. APPROVED BY: David Lanegran/PNJ, Planning Corrrnission, Chairman I, the undersigned Secretary to the Zoning Comnitte� of tne Planning Com�nission for the City of Saint Paul , Minnesota, do hereby certify that I have compared the foreyoi�ig copy with the original record in my office; and find the same. to be a true and correct �o�;y of said or�iyinal ar�d o� tne whole thereof, as �ias�d o�� appraved minutes of the Saint Paul Planning Carranission rneeting held on January 27, 1984, and on record in the Saint Paul Planning Division Office, 25 W. Faurth Street, Saint Paul , Minnesota. f�'�-�_ 1�aa�...� ar iever�ey Beseman Secr ary t� he Saint Paul Zor�ing Committee Anyone affected by this decision may appeal witi�in 15 days to the City Council . THIS PERMIT WILL EXPIRE ONE YEAR FROM THE DATE OF APPROUAL IF THE USE HEREIN � PERMITTED IS NOT ESTABLISfiED. VIOLATION OF THE CONDITIONS MAY RESULT IN REVOCATION OF SPECIAL CONDITION USE PERMIT. Copies to: Applicant City Planniny Division Zoniny Ad��inistrator License Inspector District Council Kiki Sonnen Mailed January 27, 1984 -fi�,..,w .�._... _ _ --_ _ .. . _ � _ _ .... .. __._ .�_. t�� • . , -`I • • • • • , • • � , • � • • • • • • • • o • • • • � y • ��,� , ` , � • � � • • • • • • • • � • • • • • • • • • o • • • • • ; • � � � i .� ► . - , � � � �� • • • `� � � • � • • • • • • • • • • ; � � • • � • � � � to ' '"'�i; • • �� L7 � • t7 � • • • • � • • • � : *f� C��! � [� - �, . � ► - :� � � A �.> • • � � � • � • � 0 • • • • � • • • • • • M � � � � �� `'�� f '`�. _ ,� � � .� � � , � �� c�� ,.�- :�, ; • • • .� • a • �; � • � • • • = i� �•� •�� r�� • � . r . . � .. , � �;,r ,. ► ` � � � & '1 r''' ''``1��''..�; • �` �, t� • t �e o �� s � a � • • � • • • • • • Cr : /�Di;: tv � �. � �� $i • � /�� • � i '� Q:. �� / , .,"^�`"�.iE� � � At �� I�'�t�r� '�` � .' ' be. � ,li*�'�a r�: �� i..r�� '�'�.z�.� 5 � �, ' ;��l� ��•-� C� � �� .. r: ,,,� : • ,1! ! • :�.ri.�a;,,:: '� :� ;, : i�.� • ♦ • • � • • • • i • i�� .�� . � �•� � � � .�.�.-�� , , � � r� � ° � , o • � • � . . � � � � �: , � � � : . _ • �"' ; , � � �,, � . � �- i . . i � , � , � �� . . �! . . �d __...._— . . , - . a � • • •� � . • . . . • • • . . . . . . . . • . . . . • ,�: t r . ��, k; • � ..� : • • • • • rr • � • � • • � • • � � � " �� ` � � � � r � � �' ! ,/ � ► , � � f � • • � i��l� � t �.f � � .� :. • � : • � • • � i,// • � • ` . - • - • � .. • ` ♦ � . . � � .� i • • • • r ,� � • � ' � � • �►., -� `'..r ♦ � ' � � � • • � � - • • • : • • - � • � � � - , . � p � � G�=d'��.�� . . � , 1 ��`'°'�r , �� ( �r�� P� nS �� (2"� . `�J s � �"• � ��' PETITION TO AMENp ZONING CODE �[ �' V' Y,'� ��I,� CITY OF SAINT PAUL ZONING OFFICE USE ONLY ,� File �i ----- - -- Application Fee $ 7 � M_ �^ _ Tentative Hearing Date _ Q?Cf� ��19�-3 � Number of Lots or Size of Parcel: a5o� TO THE HONORABLE MAYOR AND CITY COUNCIL DATE ___ Ju� l_1________19�____ c/o Zoning Office, 1!00 City Hall Annex St. Paul, Minnesota 55102 Pursuant to Section 64.210 of the St. Paul Zoning Ordinance and Section 462.357 (S) of the hlinnesota Statutes, ______�TSH, Inc_�____ __�___ _ _ , the owner of al! of the land proposed for rezoning, hereby petitions your Honorable Body to rezone the following descrabed property: Street Address: Legal Description._LOtS �s_?s_�s_4s_�s_�2s_Zi��.��.��2111'LC�.�-�-.�It'L�---�------ portion_of_the_yacated_E�r��.r1�. Avenu��d,��c�en�#.21at�_L��$��uL2A�.B]�r.1�2,_------- Haml i ne Syndi cate_Qddj.�i Qr.��Q__�:_________�_ from a _ p_��r�c�g-�___ District to a g�_2 __ District � for the purpose of constl^��ing.st��tel_�a.r'1c�ncJ--x'�P�-------------�-------- -�------- --------------------------------------- -------------- �ONING FILE Subscribed and sworn to BY� �____ � before this � da �� --1 Y � of T'Sf-� of 19�__ Title:�_ _ �C1C.._�------------ '�� ~' Petitioner i , . 5. F(-- ...,r`-�'1wl� r� . �'._y:.�R�a° � � N ;{�� `�°p,:� +va°�rd�3_x i T_..Y ia.+c��.�,.4 . � 1 � � Notary P blic u�ncx ��'t!� � � 1;��.{ Pa�;e 1 of �. lOI.1MY � y,� k �`�z� �� }''` "' � '�.. � r, �: 4U�0 »a1��i�E�epMn Feb.4'� . � a t. �. -'� ��' �'' ' 1�1�s 2 L d. -• � � � � C?� �y�3�s . �-� 1 " - /�/C�� f a` t' � , . .. .. . .., �... �;i . .._ �:�,.i�i ? � ��`�� `CONSENT OF ADJOINING PROPERTY OWNERS TO REZONING ,We:, the;ut�er5s.��d, owners of property within 100 feet of the total contiguous descriptions of real estate owned by Petitioner or sold by Petitioner within one year preceding the date of this petition, acknowledge that we have been furnished with the following: 1. A copy of the Petition of TSH, Inc. �__ __ _ 2. A copy of Sections --�38,--7��-- through---�� ----� inclusive, of the St. Paul Ordinance; and acknowledge that we are aware of the uses permitted under a RM� _ District zoning classification; and hereby consent to the rezoning of the property described in the Petition of TSH._�nc. �_ _� to a RM_2 �_ District. RECORD OWNER SIGNATURE LOT BLOCK ADDITION ,,/ Lawr n e W, and Helma E 33 ft Hamline �e�ir� Gtul"►�'�-Q�'�.�-Z 11 & 12 of W 67 S ndicate Block 2 � lne Thomas Dunn/Jane Nelk 15 Blo 1 Syndicate am ine Rosemary Scott 14 Block 1 Syndicate am ine LeClair Lambert 13 Block 1 Syndicate am ine Karen Doehling 18 Block 1 Syndicate ry ine ,/ Etnel May Hendry 17 � Block 1 Syndicate Y am ine pNettie M. Gilbert ~' ,� 16 Block 1 Syndicate am ine ,�Henry & Edith Sanders �•�lit�� 5,6,&7 Block 3 Syndicate Lot 4 �y,� - �.;- �'�_ am ine John G. & Marcella Fr e 1,2,&3 B1ock 3 Syndicate Ft. Lo 4 �; �/� , �� am ine William & Julia Newho se C� 5 Block 4 Syndicate am ine ,. Clifford A. Engevik ' � ' � 4 Block 4 Syndicate � am ine �� Thomas R. Holm 3 Block 4 Syndicate �� ,� -�%� - . am ine (�� . Velma Flemino � �� ' 1 & 2 Block 4 Syndicate Petitions shall not be considered as officially filed until the lapse of 7 working days after a petition is received in the Zoning Office. Any signator of any petition may withdraw his name therefrom by written request within that time. ' ��y6�� i� iFl�� `��_ I � � ,�'age 2 of � �� /�,�� . �� , �, � �� . ..��.� � _. ��- ,"�.��a ', ° r • ' CONSENT OF ADJOINING PROPERTY OWNERS TO REZON[NG _ _ ,;: ;: Vt�e, the".ur�der.signed, owners of property within 100 feet of the total contiguous descriptions of rEal estate owned by Petitioner or sold by Petitioner within one year preceding the date of this petition, acknowledge that we have been furnished with the following: 1. A copy of the Petition of TSH, Inc. _^___ _�__ _ �A_ 2. A copy of Sections --��-- -through��-----' inclusive, of the St. Paul Ordinance: and ackno�,��!ec+g.e that �,�e are aware of the uses pQrn��i*ted under a gj��_ ___! ,_ District zonin�; classifi�at�on; and hereb�- consent to t�e rezoning of the property descri5ed in the Petition o# T�j{, j,��,�� ___ _____ to a �? ____ District. —�� _� �_--- RECORD ��i;'N!�R `�I:JtiAT'.'�?.E L�T }3LOCI•: r1DDiT�O�! .__,_.�..______._.__.._._._. ____ _�_ Robert W. & Valerie J. ) � Hamline Hix � Lot 18�Block�ndicate Raymond E. & Janice R. �� ^ W �~ ~� ^ � i Hamline Richards �� __ ��__�___ Lot 17 •Block 5 � S nd'ca�. Donald E. & Joanne M. j � � j � Hamline Sobania G Lot 1 Block 5 S ndicate _�___�..____ w �_ .._.__ _.._� �. �.�.�«c T.-Scr//�.c��u•� � /r � � Lyman D. `� - 4 ��i�„ Lot 3 Block 2 airds Addition �r-- ��y -�L��-L Y ! � Lyman D. � �' ��t$ �'�-- Lot 2 Block 2 airds Addition ---t-- Lyman D. , Myrtle A. Benson __ � ac3�—y�`� y� Lot 1 Block 2 airds Addition , - Lyman D. Catherine S. Mestnik j � � Lot 10 Block 1 airds Addition Meta Anna Mitchell & { � � � _, Hamline C�� Ottilee E. Mitchell i �a� x.eu. ct. . y►'1 Lot 18 Block 6 S ndicate Warren A. & Margaret + �.�.,-,� 4 ,/�i�� Lyman D. ''� Prowse �iL �y J(�s•va�- Lot 7 Block 2 =��a�rds Addi.tior Dellas E. & Eleanor A. � Lyman D. Gatten Lot 6 Block 2 airds Addi�zan � (�� Lyiitan D. � !,,�Mary P. Cordes ' � . \`.��- Lot 5 Block 2 airdS Addition Kathleen A. and � Lyman D. ' ' Kim W. Storeby 5 �p,�,n,) ��'j Lot 4 Block 2 aird Addition . W,'4�� ,L$Ql�/ Lyman D. ="Leone G. Schatzkin Lot .l Block 3 airds Addition Thomas L. & Eudora E. Lyman D. ✓Post .� � _� Lot 9 Block 2 ' ion Roger H. & Jennifer A. / /f/�,r� Lyman D. � Youn �� C �,(+-L G� - —. _ ion� Petitions shall not be co�sidered as officiaily fiied �ntil the lapse of 7 warking d�ys after a �etition is rc:r_eived in the Zoning Office. any sinnator of any petitian rnay wi�hdraw his r�arne therefrorn by written re uest within �hat time. ___ __.�_:. .._._..__... �__:.. ._.. .._...___.�...n....�- q ` i .�� _ . �.��lNG FIL� � Page 2 s�' / � ; ,''..� _`°'� � � �a�; � � � ��fSN�3�� K,_.., _�� ,r _.� ... �� '',`�a ? � , CONSENT OF ADJOINING PROPERTY OWNERS TO REZONING __ .�. � 1�-e, the undersigned, owners of property within 1G0 feet of the total contiguous descriptions of real estate owned by Petitiuner or sold by Petitioner within one year preceding the date of this petition, acknowledge that we have been furnished w�ith the following: l. A copy of the Petition of TSH, Inc. 2. A copy of Sections --�38,--I��- through --- � ----' inclusive, of the St. Paul Ordinance; and acknowledge that we are aware of the uses permitted under a �� _______� Distr;:t zoning r_lassification; and hereby consent to the rezoning o: the property described in the Petition cf �_l��_��_______ `_ to a ,r�� ___ District. Ezi=C.ORi� O�C'tiER SIGti.ATURE LOT dLOCK ADDITIOi1 Richard H. & William ! �amline Janssen _ � � 14 �k_,;Fi,_��att,e....._ `-� Haml ine �(/l� Mathilda C. Foss �� "' `__ , 13 � ]�� ,,,��,�� Callinan "'" � ,� Hamline . Thomas W. & Viola A. � �_ 12 ! Hamline Catherine C. Phillips t � gl i �Patricia A. Siuta � Hamline Max H. Hacker ; ✓� 6 Block 4 ' /�•�� W. 34 F . Hamline � Eva B. Fairbrother �,� ' _ 11 & 12 Block 2 i a� � �iaml ine , Byrel A. Anderson U � 18 Block 6 S �. _ Ex. N. � ; Melvin �. Jacobs�n , ��lp-��"`- 1 5 lOF . Hamline Lot 17 Block ;Marshall G. & Janis R. N. 1 5/ 0 Hamline ;;'�Turner t�, t. L.l Block 6 S ndicate Plus al ` ot 16 _ Hamline Rak Investments 13 lock 2 S ndicate Randall S. & Kathryn Hamline Nystul � /� � 15 lock 6 S ndicate Fred J. & Marion --� i l � �j Hamline r�� Wippich ��2'��/IZ✓ �.', C�'G' -�d�.s�e Hamline Orlene Prytz Petitions shall not be considered as officially filed until the lapse of 7 w��nrking days after a pe*ition is received in the Zoning Office. Any signator of any pet�tion may �vithdraw his name therefrom by written request within that time. � � � �`��6 N� FI LE .�� G+4 � I _—__ . _ . _ _ Fage 2 of � � __ ._� �_,.� .s . . �:- � � � C�i �y;� ' -� � � � 5 . , �� n;.,� � ;�' . - :,, � ,, CONSENT OF ADJOINING PROPERTY OWNERS TO REZONING ., . �..; �`�,...,... We, the undersigned, owners of property within 100 feet of the total contiguous descriptions of real estate owned by Petitioner or sold by Petitioner within one year preceding the date of this petition, acknowledge that we have been furnished ��ith the following: 1. A copy of the Petition of TSH, Inc. 2. A copy of Sections --��BT-I��- through --- � ----, inclusive, of the St. Paul Ordinance; and acknowledge that we are aware of the uses permitted under a RM� ____ District zoning classification; and hereby consent to the rezoning of ihe property described in the Pet;tian of ��_j��, ___ _ __ to a RM-2 __ DistricL RECORD Ow'NER SIGIVATURE LOT BLOCK ADDITIO� Hamline Lot 12 Block 1 S ndicate r Petitions shall not be considered as officially filed until the lapse of 7 working days after a petition is received in the Zoning Office. Any signator of any petition may withdraw his n�,e therefrom by written request within that time. � _- ��s,-: R �>,�� `-I�� I -� .�,��1�1� F1L __.�� 1 '�°'�' -__r----- page 2 of r- _ _ �. � (�F d'�-3G5 ��i�� STATE OF MINNF50TA) . ss. COUNTY OF RAMSEY ) � �'' , being f irst duly sworn, deposes and states that he is the erson w o circu ate t e wit in petition and consent, consisting of pages; that affiant is informed end believes that the parties described are the owners respectively of the lots placed immediately followinb each name, that affiant is informed and believes that each of the parties described above is the o��R�er of property which is within 100 feet from any property owned ��.• F�etitic�n�r c* scic by petitioner xithin one (1) year preceding the date of this petition which is contiguous to the property described in the petition; that except for � none of the parties described above has purchased or is purchasing_Qroperty rom petitioner conti�uous to the above described property within one (1) year of the date of the petition; that t1�is consent was sianed by each of said own°rs in the presence of this affiant, and that the si�n�itures are the true and correct signatures of each and all of the parties so described. i ,� '� �S /�� dcress .�-� / e e�hone -umber Subscribed and sworn to belore � ` 1_ � me this ! Z day of .Q , 19 �3 - V Z��— � .',�,,,(/�� -✓.�,�- . of�r;� ub ic ____ __ •r � � Wl�l.inM W. WHfTE +�••,1 NOT�,Qy ru�w�IC�—�•nINNESQtA r'--:,�...• . �\:� �;�I �� {E;�hFaIN COUNTY � ' i988 �� '�� ,,�m��,ion ��xp�r�s loe.13. � �._..r„ ,,,,�t ..,�� L,�..-.:�� , ..3..�+c� s� ,..-c�i � Y..•,... .._. �j � ^ � ('�'( ! f��V-_� �l '- J'. . . � . . �.. . ..... _ , .)f.f f��:. , ,s .....,. R A � �. � � � Approved as to form - Feb. 80 M �_ � ��__ ��' _ _ Planning Department �------- -- _ - - Page of � � ' . . L�l`��:3�5� � i7id� STA1`E OP MINNESOTA) . ss. COUNTY OF RAMSEY ) �� _, �` � '` , being first duly sworn, deposes and states that he is the person w o circu ate t ie with�n pe it tion and consent, consisting of pages; that affiant is informed and believes that the parties described are the owners respectively of the lots placed immediately following each name, that affiant is informed and believes that each of the parties described above is the owner of property which is witt�in 100 feet from any property owned ~•.• c��titicn�r cr scic by petitioner within one (1) year preeeding the date of this petition wt�ieh i� c�ntiguous to the property described in the petition; that except for � none of the parties described above has purchased or is purchasing property rom pet�tioner cn�tiguous to the above described property within one (1) year of the date of the petition; that tfiis consent r��as signed by each of said own�rs in the preser.ce of this affiant, and that the si;n3tures are the true and correct si�natures of eaeh and all of the parties so described. � � �2r e (�-v�v� Z . d�re5s' ��,r (�y S°1 I 1 1 �e e�hon� �umber � , � .� ��1 �� Sub��ribed and sworr� to before n�e this I� day of ��T, 19$3 °,�� ,1�, .`, : otary ub ic ____ _ __ ';�'��y,`� oi�elAMicWMiWHQTE S1 l�''� HENNEPIN COUNTY ` Mv commission expins )an.13,1988 � ..�� ..,�� ., a "� �''�� ,,.�� Approved as to form - Feb. 8Q Planning Department Page�of � � : - G� ��..3�5� i7ia� STATE OF MINNESOTA) . ss. COUNTY OF RAMSEY ) ;��,�� , �� '` , being first duly sworn� deposes and states that he is the person w circu ate t e wit in petition and consent, consisting of pages; that affiant is informe and believes that the parties described are the owners respectively of the lots placed immediately followino each name, that affiant is informed and believes that each of the parties described above is �he owner of property which is within 100 feet from any property owned !-�� petiticn�e c r scld by petitioner within one (1) year preceding the date of this petition which is contiguous to the property described in the petition; that except for � none of the parties described above has purchased or is purchasing property rom petitione�hat contiguous to the above described property within one (1) year of the date of the petition; this consent �ti�as si�ned bv each of said owners in the pre�ence of this affiant, and that the si;natures are the true and correct si�natures of each and all of the parties so described. - - G� � c' I� / ddress � /,- � - - <_'// e e��one umber � �Subscri?�eC anc] sworn to before �`-/�'l��i Zr� �� ✓ � me this ' '3 day of ��, 198 3 '� v h/r� �✓. �/��'�-./��- �otary ub ic ____ __ ,�-,-�""."_«.,-� /��\,' � WILUAM W. VJHI'E ` '2'''2� � NOTr�r•:,,�fx'C —M{NNES'"�T', � \.. �t, �� HE�:'.� ��IN CO�JNIY � � lan.13,1988 M� �amr+�;sio^ e�D-��.��-��M �� .�-�'�"°"` � ' `�' r�L� � �, �.- ,,� �, � R �,� __. � � d ."w� � Approved as to form - Feb. 80 Planning Department Page of . , . , ; - , �-``� � 3 , � � �3 . . ��=�� t 1 ��,.- ,� , � w� � � � - � �� -�- �, (�.�%2�0,�. .t-,-, �-�C/� �Cv � _ � � �� p� 0� �-n--�-�-a-��`� �.�--�� ;c,�, �-,-�-y��r ' � Q �-� c�.� w.�—.,c ,��--�w� �. ��ti�� -�-'�u G/ � � 'L�f'-c��l � � ► � �-/ — •-�-�ti� -�. ., � �! dU L� � � d V � I�� .A��r, � 9 �98,3 CITY P�Aiv�fN� BUpRD � Saint Paul, ��innesota � � � � � _ � � �� y�� - � P UL CITY COUNCIL ��'�`� S T. A PUBLIC HEARING N OTICE - � ' �' �VING � � . .�� , �. � � �. � � 'o� � �� FILE N0. 9444 o PAGE .� � ��; ` ``�..; F � � , c` �m P-1 and R-4 to RM-2 to permit con- v r � � ;cal office building and parking ramp. � � � ._:� � - c�A l,vr- � ;F: � ��" ' N _.,-. ..Q . (-i, �a c� -fl q � ___�. �p > � ^ � � -�> w � r � � � " �6 �, r- � is� �' �n between Thomas and vacated Edmund. 1 � . � �' � � F � ' � � � � � i ° ; � � � R � `.an Hospital ) � f � �c� � ,� � .� r ° f 23, 1984 10:00 A.M. rs, 3rd Floor City Hall — Court House �S � - (Patricia James) � � � Section of the Planning and Economic nent, Room 1101, City Hall Annex, >t. Paul, MinnesoLa 55102 Lots 1-10, 18, 19 & 20 and that portion of vacated Edmund Ave. adjacent to Lots 1 , 18, 19, & 20, Block 2, Hamline Syndicate Add. #3 Notice sent 2-13-84 : � ��s . , � �� 2.r �� CITY OF SAINT PAUL INTERDEPARTMENTAL MEMORANDUM DATE: February 8, 1984 T0: Albert B. Olson, City Clerk 386 City Hall FROM: Zoning Section 1100 City Hall Annex RE: City Council Public Hearing . Please prepare notice for Legal Ledger publication on Saturday, February 11 , 1984 for the following: TSH, INC. (Samaritan Hospital ) #9444, west side of Simpson between Thomas and vacated Edmund. Irwin fine and Beverly Simon (#9431 ) southeast corner Hartford and Snelling. � � =�+ 'm �� -v r -��.f*t � c:'�7 '� r F,....� � :,�cn ,� v �° 7� �� .. � � rr� ..c. : �. , �. ��-.�� .ST. PAUL CITY COUNCIL ��'a� PUBLIC HEARING NOTICE � ZONING To: Property owners within 350' ; Representatives of Planning District 11 FIL E N 0. 9444 PAGE P U R P 0 S E Rezone property from P-1 and R-4 to RM-2 to permit con- struction of a medical offi.ce building and parking ramp. L 0 C A TI 0 N West side of Simpson between Thomas and vacated Edmund. PETITIONER TSH, INC. (Samaritan Hospital ) H E A R t N G Thursday, February 23, 1984 io:oo a.M. Citv Council Chambers, 3rd Floor Citv Hall - Court House Q U E S TIO N S zoning 298-4154 (Patricia James) Contact the Zoning Section of the Planning and Economic Development Department, Room 1101, City Hall Annex, 25 W. 4th Street, St. Paul, Minnesoia 55102 Legal Description: Lots 1-10, 18, 19 & 20 and that portion of vacated Edmund Ave. adjacent to Lots 1 , 18, 19, & 20, Block 2, Hamline Syndicate Add. #3 Notice sent 2-13-84 �F �y-3�5' � , �� NoRT M � _, � � - Lafond -� - � . � — � ' HAMLIN� 19/1 21/1 � ' PLAYGROUND � � . � � , - Thomas - - ____. _. � ' 8 homes / � 10l1 22/0 � 1 apt. bldg � � ; park ' - Edmund -- - ��r � �' �� . ' i 10/4 19/2 � � � � , . ' -- Char 1 es - - � � � � � 7/2 16/0 ZO/0 � � � � � � � � � ; � - Sherburne - - � � � � �� : .�y� � �� 1 w ' ' �� • +�' � � � `�. 1/1 ; 7/1 ; 10% '. J � � � � .� � a � � � � � � � � � .�. r � � � rr �r� , �r UN i YERS I TY AV�NU� � "" r w �n � .� w 'r w� � .. .� � �r � �,r w"w .rr wr .� � a� 'h. , ��'. . . �� . � � � .f�-AI�: ,.,. , � � F �y-�15� . _ _ r7,�� PETITION NOT TO AMEND ZONING CODE TO: The Hono'rable Mayor I.atimer and St. Paul City Council We, the undersigned, are opposed to a zoning change or the granting of a variance requested by Samaritan Hospital which would allow the construction of a commercial building and parking ramp on the block bordered by Simpson, Asbury, Thomas, and Edmund. � Indicate Whether � Property Owner Name Address Phone or Renter --� �� /� ✓ � �' Gs�r�� ,�.� �u�r� � -i 7� �v�-- �- G � -s�3 �� . -- �' ' � _ ,,9,�,c /I � v + ' / � � � � � , 7 r�" --- '' �a � f�-� ,� -�-- � , , _� ��l' �a,o �-�/�/- � 8'�3 . , r _ � �,� S ° .�,-, �'G�O�' D -�--�J . . , _ , ) � , ., , , ... , /� � ' S'r �� , � , 3.1 �8j ,- �l. , o r ' �.L�-- S'� C-�.e�� % � ` � � a � �o�3 �' 7� a�----� "` rCl'� �93 �I Pd � ��5- �a:�� a�v �_,� - , . — � - � �� ° �fy �'�I � ,� �� . ,�� -- C�r ��-.3�5� � PETITION NOT TO AMEND ZONING CODE � �� TO: The Honorable Mayor Latimer and St. Paul City Council We, the undersigned, are opposed to a zoning change or the granting of a variance requested by Samaritan Hospital which would allow the construction of a commercial building and parking ramp on the block bordered by Simpson, Asbury, Thomas, and Edmund. Indicate Whether Property Owner Name Address Phone or Renter � ��a. ,w s 6 3 �b �ST S. �ss�o�r ��s-o� ow� . , ai� / � � ��...._- �i _ ��.3 �U�. ��y/ °'r' co �o rr��r.� �«�p�c.�r Je � ��- C�S ��N . ��y`�-9�q 4 r�,��r �'iYu�/�� i�.�./, �'77 �l� .�'� ��-�� '.� 1�:��v .,� -� u1 � � i � �i �`` � .�- L d C��.�- � �' � , ._.- • S� ' � y_ �87 �, � /�f Rv �„� ��G - /� 7 �� 5t�, ` b - 50 � ��. � �►� �� • 1� I.r►� o W y� o ��--+� �• �� ' �� s+�-� —dl�v �[,i� t�l� —'-�C%l� !/�� I� .�,� � �� S�l U �`rr,,n�o-, �'�7-�S7I� _ • �� , �, � ,/ �� <� '�� ,�i_, f�C� �cri-r,�i s ��— �. 7 � v � - / � ' l�%��-�<S�.Z Gv� �5,3 �. � � �- .s�� ' l�'7 b �.��.��.� G `tG �`{`��l 1,wL. . • �,��/-.�5� � �� y CITY OF ST• PAUL, MINNESQTA SPECIAL COPaDITIOiV USE PERMIT APPLICA�JT: TSH, INC. Zonin� Fi 1e �9472 PURPOSE: �ermit with inodifications to con�tr�.i�:� a med�icat o-f�fice building and parking • facility. LOCATIOt�: South side of Thomas Avenue between Simpson and Asbury. � LEG�L DESCRIPTION: Lots 1-20, Slock 2, Hamline Syndicate Additic�n #�2 ZONING COh�'�ITTEE ACTION: Approved January 19, 1984 (5-0} � PLAPINING C�lhY�1ISSI0P� ACT�ON: Approved Januzry 26, 19a4 (13-1} CO�IDITIONS OF THIS PERi�tIT: Modifications of the follo;ving condit�ons were c�ranted: ��sq. ft: from�-acres required; (b) Access to the building and ra�np from toca7 streets ratiier .than major thoroughfares; (c) 52' setback on Asbury (frorn 70' required to 18' proposedj, and 55' setback on Simpson (from 70' required to 15' proposed); plus the following additional conditions: � (1) Subdue the impact of the skyway by choice of � earthtane paint or .finish and sely match medical off�ce '1 i � r' to t�at of the hospi tal ; (2) t�ai nta� massed setback"� aperr spac ra � e an�scapi ng wi'th four-season foliage as well as boulevard trees as specified by the City Forester; (3} Provide shading oF parkirg ramp lights to si�iel�i adjacent residential property from . glare; (4) Provide.appropriate security (e.g. closed circuit TV) for the parking ramp; and (5) Establish a co�mnittee comprised of hospital marragement, im��ediate neighbors, and District 11 Coalition representatives to provide ongoing planning and problem resolution. Issues to be resolved include working with the Departnent af Public Works to design an appropriate .on-street parkin� res�riction pTan .that encourages a safe traffic pattern, .APPROVED BY: David Lanegran/PNJ, Planning Cor►�mission, Chairman - I, the undersigned �ecretary to the Zoning Comnittee of ti�e Planning Comnission for . the City of Saint Pau1 , Minnesota, do hereby c�rt�fy that I have compared �the foregoing c�py �;th the cri�inal record in my affice; an� find �the sa�n� �c be a true and correct copy of sa�d originai and of the whoie thereof, as base� �n appro.ved minutes of the Saint Paul Planning Corr7nission cneet�ing hetd on January 27, 1984, and on record in the Saint Paul Planning Division Offiee, 25 W. Fourth Street, Saint Paul , Minnesota. �� ar � i ev�tieseman Y w . Secr .sry t� �ha Saint Paut • � Zan i ng Co�mni ttee . Anyone affected by th i s dec i s i on may appeal tiv i t��i r� 15 d.iys to the City Coun�:i 1 . THIS PERHIT WILI EXPIRE ONE YEAR FROht THE DATE OF APPROVAl. IF. 'fNE USE HEREIN PERMITTED IS �JOT ESTABLISHcD. VIOLATIOrJ OF THE CONDiTIONS MAY RESULT IN REVOCATIO�� OF SPECiAt COivDrTION USE PER�tiT. Copies to: Appiicant City Piannin� Division Zoning A�lministrator License Inspector District Cauncil Kilci Sonnen i•tr�ilecl January 27, 1931 ------_r ._---____----- _.__ ..._.___..�_____�____:_----w:__..-- _.. . .-_ �__ . _.. . .__.��.._ . _ ., .. ._..___._____--._--__ ___ _- _ . � �� a� PETITION NOT TO AMEND ZONING CODE TO: The Hono'rable Mayor Latimer and St. Paul City Council We, the undersigned, are o pp os^ed to a zoning change or the granting of a variance requested by Samaritan Aospital which would allow the construction of a commercial building and parking ramp on the block bordered by Simpson, Asbury, Thomas, and Edmund. Indicate Whether � Property Owner Name Address Phone or Renter / � �5 � � G uy- 1�y3 ��.cJ /��.- � , �u��-� - / 7� �i v.�.�-,� .- G 6 's 23 r-� � � 7 �� C. ' � �~ n � - � � Y r� ._... � ,, �d �- ,� 6 -t�- . � � ao ' � .3 ��3 . ., , , �� S ° �G�Od'� Q -�-1� . � , � � - � ., , , ... , �� s� �i c., � �7'1 -�83 �` ' �"t'l- . � o � -Y.� ��- 5�.2 0�.�� ` � c� a � � �' �/�3 � ��' ��_ .�° �{f'u..l�.�._. �93 nI P _. , , _ � � ��- �a��. b�u �. �_ _ s �� ' . �f y �'�I � ,� �` � . .:� � — �„ C i" �'y-�3G� � i��y PETITION NOT TO AMEND ZONING CODE T0: The Honorable Mayor Latimer and St. Paul City Council We, the undersigned, are opposed to a 2oning change or the granting of a variance requested by Samaritan Hospital which would allow the construction of a commercial building and parking ramp on the block bordered by Simpson, Asbury, Thomas, and Edmund. Indicate Whether Property Owner Name Address Phone or Renter � �r.c�Q. w s 6 3 A�sb ST S.Pss�o�F ��s-od% ow� . v / �/p � � LivG.•-- i _ �'�j.� �U N ��-'G�7 �/ a►�r� C't Corr,',�.,�.�`�e��e� r�r� � ��'�- �s ��ti . .�y'�-9�94 r�,��✓ �j�f,c�tJ�i� /�iilf�� c5r77 /1� ��xX ��'-��J'� (_P�rr�n.� -� , , ^ i.C� �/' � / � "�/ ��r2��-.a� � J - L 1� �Gv��.l2- � , �� . � , '_' � C � � � S� .- � . . y- y8.7 . �� . �� y� - /� 7 �� `�b ` �-�,�._ �o � ti�. � �� w y� a /��,,�.�.-t„ �'.�� `� y�� ,�f� y�� -yc�� O�U-�-�e� l� .4-� � ��•�.'f� ,S��U -�`��ar �`�7-�15�g �� '� �U - �--� , ,, � ' �.�. k O �m�-��, �''S`�— /. 7 � � � �'��'vr�-Z Gts �5.3 � � L d- s�� U � ��i��iV► �� 4�.'7 b 7�l�nn�.n.��.(�,w G `tC �`f`��'1 � � . _ _ _ �F �y�.3�s� r NQRTH � �a � � � � — Lafond -- — � � � � ' NAMLINE 19/1 21/1 � ' PLAYGROUND � . , � - Thomas -� -- _____�. � � ' 8 homes / � 1 apt, bldg 1011 22I0 � � ; park ' — Edmund — — � � � � 10/4 19/2 � � � � � - ' — Charles — — � .____ � � � 7/2 18/0 20/0 � � � r � � i � �. � — Sherburne — — � � � � ______ � � � � ,bc .,.; � � : ,� 1/1 ; 7/1 0 10% ,_' .J � � � � V� •r- e0 Q C/� Q� � � ., 11 1 1 � .� � +r � � �r �r' ' � UN I VERS I 1'Y AV�NUE - -- -» - �r � •� r � � � .� � � �r .� +rr w w �'r �r .r 5 '.r r � . .... . � . � , . . 7k'�:.: �, . . , . . . . ., � , . . .. . .,. . . .i , . r.4;�F�''�.,m��E':.,�' � , . . , � � � �� . J� _ . ... , . . . . . . , . . . ... � ' � � � . � . � . . . . ' , � ` � . . � . � . � . . .. ', ' ' ._ . . � _ , . . � . , . ' . ' .. , � . . . � . . � ' . . � � . . . ' . . � , � � . . . � � � . . � , � ' . ' . � � . . ' . . � � I . �� . . � �� . � " . - . �� . . � � . .. , " . . - � . ' ' ' . � � - / ` \ ... . . , . � . . y . . . � . . . , ,. �pril 17,. 1984 . , � � ' , - • ` . � , - ; Couitty �ecordar'� Of�ice , , . Roca 155 '' , . Citq Hall _ � � �. . D�ar Sirs , ,, • ,� . � I m tra�mitting a csxtified copy of C.F. No. 84-365 far filt�}g ia your ' ' � - : alfice. This =e�olur�on Was adopted bq _the City Coan�il on Apri1 3, 1984. Verg truly yours, . ' , . _ . � , � _ , � Alberrt B� Olaon � - . . -, , ' , City Clark , . ' . . '. , � , �z Attacbmeat � • . , , , _ ABQath • ' > , , . \;. , , . � . _ ,. _ , , , , ' , � . : ' _ , � � • . ' , - __ _ _ . , , - � ; ; _ , . , � 1 ' _ r � \ ' ' , , . , � ;, , , . . �-i� S'4��'� �'Zease remove my name from ,the �ezoning Petition filed re: �ama.ritan Hospi.tal, Zcnin�, File �'9444. Thank you. S I GATATV-RE L��r��/'��`7 `�'�� .�1� N�E ��.1�,�,�.;�5� 1 it%d ADDRESS J�L�'f�/��,�.,5 �f��-- �'�.,5/D `� . . ,�.:;,.. �a�i�r•�t?,t�,:��=, ��s� �,,� — --- .c,� aut*�C»# '_ -- y t _ �__ _x�;� �,. - - !,^� 5 s, .,^ � • �.a�/ �y l��'�,�� --�_ _ ----- — ,.�� . � , l:a A�G �° �u:�3 ZC)NING OFFICE ��=i�?". :3� E'f..!�:s�€:��:�a+,�� R, llth floor :-.°�.,=tf..:,.,,- .,r:•,;;,��;�r�t�f�d�� CITY H1�L ANNEX •._� �._,. .�... �� 2� �i'VErT �th ST ST. PAUL, T�IN 55?02 attn: I,inda Dickhut ,�=.as iy81 � . p'J L. �:�,-,.�„_ ` ,`Q ti/.y • �_�-_-,.,._.�,.�'H""'� ? P P�t �"__ r_ U �.:,;�t„�,�;;�<,..,� . • �, r 'l4 AL'G � `�s..�,�""`a" �� 4,: � - �9 a� �� .�.' �."' � �- ��..�.�_ �� ` , � ;� �,�; .,� �� . �:� � ;r � i f i i' r i::, � i`5 :: .� .� l�� :��(a �F/'�� ;, .,� , .,, . .� .-_/�� /,� �0�2 � C�.i � /�'�� ve.�> �� T 2��.� �S; �� , rYI�- /��_ .,�:�� ,�� .SS"/�� .-/�,�,� 1%c��vf : �. �'`= �'��3�� Ple��,se remotie my n��.me from the Rezoning �etition f�: ted by "�n.aritan Kospital, ' �3onin Fil e . T?Zank ou. � �`9444 y Signature �� .�L��?/�L�Q �. �"-s�:�� ,�T�e�,"� �T�11.._a A �., �C� ��a �aar�ss ��4 �l �l��Ot�1 S�� . , (� STATE OF MINNESOTA ) �.ri County of Ramsey ) ss. . �' CITY OF SAINT PAUL ) �� e�, � . �� Albert B. Olson � I. . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . .City Clerk of the � , •�¢ City of Saint Paul, Minnesota, do hereby certify that I have m � 84-365 � compared the attached copy of Council File No. . . .. . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . � as adopted by the City Council. . . . , Apri1. 3:. . . . . . . . . . . . . .1984.. � � � and approved by the Mayor. . . . . . . . . , Apri1. 4:. . .. . . . . . . . . . . 1984 � . . . . with the original thereof on file in my office. I further certify that said copy is a true and correct copy of said original and the whole thereof. WITNESS my hand and the seal of the City of Saint Paul, Minnesota this . . . . 17th , , . , , day of . . , ,Apri1. . . . . , . , ,A.D. 1984. . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . :1��'.'� . . . . . . . . . . . . . City Clerk. � ;� � �' z �i h' �� ,�:_� ��. � "; �.�.,,, , � � � q 1 ' y ..� _ ..�c+�� .4.. " �4.,�,'� �i , 5+,:., x �"g . - .__ .. .�.,.. ,.. ', T''�' ' , � , L � _ ` � .-. � ,. . ; , n: �j � C : (1 ;' ... . _; t _ WMITE — CITV CLERK Rll'�K •z�FINANCE COUIICII .ANARr —OEPARTMENT GITY OF SAINT PAiTL �S Qi.VE •s MAYOR� F11C �0. � _� • . V O/ f�/iZ/`f�L/`�G Ordinance N O. I7�� 7 "� I', � � Presented By � ��-�'" •*J� c_,� ��_'`� - - Referred To Committee: Date Out of Committee By Date � An ordinance amending Chapter 60 of � the Saint Paul Legislative Code pertaining to zoning for the City of Saint Paul and � the zoning maps thereof. � � WHEREAS, Pursuant to Minnesota Statutes §462 .357 and §64.210 �2S of the Legislative Code, Samaritan. Hospital duly petitioned to re- zone Lots 1-10, 18, 19 & 20 and that portion of vacated Edmund Ave. � adjacent to Lots 1, 18, 19, & 20, Block 2, Hamline Syndicate Add. ��3 , located on the West side of Simpson between Thomas and Edmund, from P-1 and R-4 to RM-2 to permit construction of a two-level parking ramp, the petition having been certified by the Planning � Division on September 1, 1983 as having been consented to by at least 67% of the owners of the area of the property to be rezoned, and further having been consented to by at least two-thirds of the owners of the property situated withi.n 100 feet of the total con- tiguous descriptions of real estate l�ield by the same owner or any party purchasing any such contiguous property within one year pre- ceding the date of the petition; and WHEREAS, The current Zoning Committee on October 6, 1983 conducted a public hearing for the purpose of considering the rezoning petition, and pursuant to Section 107 . 03 of the Admini- strative Code, submitted its recommendation to the Planning Com- mission that the petition be granted; and WHEREAS, The Planning Commission considered the rezoning petition at its meeting held on October 7,. 1983 and recommended that the City Council approve the petition; and WHEREAS, Notice of a public hearing before the City Council on the said rezoning petition was duly published in the of�icial COUNCILMEN Requested by Department of: Yeas Nays Fletcher � ceu� In Favor Masanz Nicosfa Against By Scheibel Tedesco Wilson Form Appr�e by City Ai orney / Adopted by Council: Date / � �� . .,.-...- .i _ Certified Passed by Council Secretary By . �`� — � / , By � �� Approved by Mayor: Date Approved by Mayor for Submission to Council ' BY — BY— --- V� . wH17E --��TV CLERK ;�N,K .�.- FINANCE GITY OF SAINT PAUL Council � r/�/ „ BLUERr - MAVORTMENT File NO. v • �� .... ' 1 . ... O��ZIZGI�IZCP. Ordinance N O. ��'`!'� Presented By Referred To Committee: Date Out of Committee By Date �0 C� newspaper of the City on February 11, 1984 and notices were duly (� mailed to each owner of affected property and property situated � wholly or partly within 350 feet of the property sought to be � rezoned; and � WHEREAS, A public hearing before the City Council, having been conducted on February 23, 1984 where a11 interested persons . were heard, and the Council having considered all the facts and recommendations concerning the petition; now, therefore, THE COUNCIL OF THE CITY OF SAINT PAUL DOES OP.DAIN: Section 1 . That the zoning map of the City of Saint Paul, Sheet No. 10, as incorporated by reference in Section 60.301 of the Saint Paul Legislative Code, as amended, is hereby further amended as follows : That property located on the west side of Simpson between Thomas and Edmund, being more particularly described as Lots 1-10, 18, 19 & 20 and that portion of vacated Edmund Ave. adjacent to Lots 1, 18, 19 & 20, Block 2, Hamline Syndicate Addition ��3, be and is hereby rezoned from P-1 and R-4 to RM-2 . Section 2 . This ordinance shall take effect and be in force thirty (30) days from and after its passage, approval and publication. -2- COUNC[LMEN Yeas Nays Requested by Department of: Flatcher cen� In Favor Mesa�Z �, Nicosia Against BY -- Scheibel Tedesco Wilson • ,� AP�� - 3 1984 Form Approv ' by City Attorney Adopted by Council: Date � � � , � _ (, Certified Passe `1 Cp;ncil Secre By ' --�� / '� f' ' -- -- gy �.�-c' p _ 'no �/ Appr Mayor: Date Pn � 1�� Approveti by Mayor for Submission to Council BY __ --- BuSHED - APP, 141984 3 � •�. . v� _.._.__..._- • � � SD � � � � � �� v � � � � �t Q N � = u'i ..0 t-+ (D ' N � C I"�7 \ O ' t.. � � �- � � � � � � � � . :;`i. ��-h ��+ ..��h\ L �`�3 o w � 'c'� � � °. 3 \ `.'v a; ! O y �� n � � C� �s � Q O � ,•�� 2 n W� � ,+ � v�i G� � !`+ ` p ��O � ~ ;< � O � � . ;;3 g�n o ,.. rt � %' ' �1 i� 9-��"3• �} =r i� � � �1� ..` `.,' tV � � •'� � k, �y , � \ ., '• ^t ] . � �3 ? � C `� ',L� n � �w .. � 'ii, =a "'" A `\� � r� � ,� � -�' -� ;v � � � -3 , . ,� �, q,� / �7 ::�_� -� N �y��/ --+� �J7 r.. ... �%: c °Q� ., ; :� � .�-� -l.� . . i� ..� �.�"'j . � � � ��' J � STATE OF MINNESOTA ) � �� County of Ramsey ) ss. . � CITY OF SAINT PAUL ) Albert B. Olson �:: I. . .. . . .. . . .. .. . . . . . . . . . .. . . . . . . . . . . . .. . ..City Clerk of the -n . ra �*� City of Saint �aul, Minnesota, do hereby certify that I have �> compared the attached copy of Council File No.. 84�365. . ... . . . . ..� ��= A ril. 3. . . . . . . . . . . . . .19. 84. . . � - as adopted by the City Council. . . . . . . p. �� and approved by the Mayor. . . . . . . . . , , Apri1. 4. . .. . . . . . . . . .�.19. 84. . . with the original thereof on file in my office. I further certify that said copy is a true and correct copy of said original and the whole thereof. WITNESS my-hand and the seal of the City of Saint Paul, Minnesota this , , . . .5th . . . . . , day of � . April . . . . . _ . � . .A.D. 19 84. . �� . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . .. . .. . . . . . . . City Clerk. Yx, ! �+s r � 49b � �. . ._. _ WHITE - CITY CLERK . �INK � - FINANCE C I TY, OF SA I NT PA U L Council .y C'xR�RY-OEPARTMENT .FIl@ NO.-- ��_v�� BIVE -MAY-0R r O/ WZ/`�/`�G Ordinance NO. I7�� ' / / Presented By_ �1 �-�'�_� �`�_;_� � ---�-z Referred To Committee: Date Out of Committee By Date An ordinance amending Chapter 60 of the Saint Paul Legislative Code pertaining to zoning for the City of Saint Paul and the zoning maps thereof. WHEREAS, Pursuant to Minnesota Statutes §462.357 and §64.210 of the Legislative Code, Samaritan Hospital duly petitioned to re- zone Lots 1-10, 18, 19 & 20 and that portion of vacated Edmund Ave. adjacent to Lots 1, 18, 19, & 20, Block 2, Hamline Syndicate Add. ��3, located on the West side of Simpson between Thomas and Edmund, from P-1 and R-4 to RM-2 to permit construction of a two-level parking ramp, the petition having been certified by the Planning � Division on September 1, 1983 as having been consented to by at least 67% of the owners of the area of the property to be rezoned, and further having been consented to by at least two-thirds of the owners of the property situated within 100 feet of the total con- tiguous descriptions of real estate 1�ield by the same owner or any party purchasing any such contiguous property within one year pre- ceding the date of the petition; and �'j WHEREAS, The current Zoning Committee on October 6, 1983 C: conducted a public hearing for the purpose of considering the 1f'J rezoning petition, and pursuant to Section 107 . 03 of the Admini- � strative Code, submitted its recommendation to the Planning Com- � mission that the petition be granted; and `� WHEREAS, The Planning Commission considered the rezoning petition at its meeting held on October 7,. 1983 and recommended that the City Council approve the petition; and WHEREAS, Notice of a public hearing before the City Council on the said rezoning petition was duly published in the official COUNC[LMEN Requested by Department of: Yeas Na)�s Fletcher cau� In Favor Masanz �h�� Against BY Teaesco Wilson Form Approve by City �lttorney �, Adopted by Council: Date � i / ` � �1_ � Certified Passed by Council Secretary BY ,.��--'—�, �'�'"�`' By �� /� �� Approved by Mayor: Date Approved liy Mayor for Submission to Council � By BY — -- , , ,. ��-, � .�TV CLERK � � FINANCE GITY OF SAINT PALTL Council . - DEPARTMENT ��/� ti -�=roR File N�. �� - . • O/ W Z/`K•/LCG Ordinance N O. � �i-1 T Presented By ' Referred To Committee: Date Out of Committee By Date � newspaper of the City on Feb�uary 11, 1984 and notices were duly mailed to each owrier of affected property and property situated wholly or partly within 350 fEet of the property sought to be rezoned; and WHEREAS, A public hearing before the City Council, having been conducted on February' 23, 1984 where all interested persons , were heard, and the Council having ccsnsidered all the facts and , recommendations concerning the petition; now, therefore, THE COUNCIL OF THE CITY OF SAINT PAUL DOES OP.DAIN: Section 1 . ; � � ; � That the zoning map �of the City of Saint Paul, Sheet No. 10, � � as incorporated by reference in Section 60.301 of the Saint Paul ' � Legislative Code, as amended, is hereby further amended as follows : � � That property located on the west side of Simpson between Thomas and Edmund, being . more particularly described as Lots 1-10, � 18, 19 & 20 and that portion of vacated j Edmund Ave. adjacent to Lots 1, 18, 19 & 20, { Block 2, Hamline Syndicate Addition ��3, be � and is hereby rezoned from P-1 and R-4 to � RM-2. � � i Section 2 . � - This ordinance shall take effect and be in force thirty (30) ' days from and after its passage, approval and publication. 3 a � � -2- COUNCILMFN Requested by Department of: � Yeas Nays � Flstchsr + ceu� [n Favor � Masanz � � sc�h�etbe� Against BY � Tsdasco � Wilson • ,p 'n APIn — � 1�� Form Appro by City �torney � Adopted by Council: Date � J Certified Passe C uncil Secre BY �� I gy - Appr Mayor: Date � — � �� App�ave Mayor for Submission to Council By ; s ' A , (� _--�__��.___-�____�� . � � � '�' � � ' ir c. m ° � � � :r �: �� L, - `� n � � � Q � � . ��' o if:� �, ^ � � .�' f; � � C jr� a �, �, 0 a � � o � � \ � � '� '� `•' � � n n x' " •` � � "�t� Z p o �' � � z �e Cr�' � � � o)� o � � � � � � � , t T� ' Q/B. _ � � �C O � � k d i � � � "� ? � ; r '�;� ',��'i Q �'`�l o � W . � � �,., � C: t� � � = �' � � ��.'.,�,a � �J tJ �, •(�D � �..v c� v iti f,Y � 7 .y t�n c]. � '' 4� = f � � y •1 � a 3 t...� • � "' � ', � - .� _.�,_ , . . ;, . � .� � � • , �� _�,� j lst 3- /� - .�� 2nd ••3 ; � 3rd ��-P( 7 '�y Adopted ?-�� ; F Yeas Nays � • DREW C?I= (,�_�� ' b FLETCHER �,��/ ! 7 + MASANZ � . i NICOSIA � SCHEIBEL WILSON i MR, PRESIDENT TEDESCO . � �