D002675No: voar��s
Date: - � � D']
City of Saint Paul
Office of the Mayor
ADMINISTRATIVE ORDER
Approved Copies to:
• Ciry Clerk
• Financial Services — Accountina
• Requesting Department
1
2
3
4
5
6
7
8
9
10
11
12
13
14
15
16
17
18
19
20
21
22
23
24
25
ADMINISTRATIVE ORDER, Consistent with the authority granted to the Mayor in Section 10.07 of the Ciry Chapter and
based on the request of the D'uector of the Depaziment of Planning and Economic Development, to amend the 200� budget.
The Director of the Office of Financial Services is authorized to amend said budget in the following manner:
Administrative Order distributes pending projects budget to 2007 PED Administrative costs. Matching requirement for Block
4 (Minnesota Mutual) TIF District.
City downtown Capital Projects Fund #149
SPENDING PLAN
149-76902-0547-68002
149-76901-0547-69107
149-76901-0299-69106
Total Spending Plan
Net dncrease
Pending Capital Projects
Locai Match Block 4 TIF District
PED Administration
APP VED S TO ORM
�' � 01
Assistant ' Attorney Date
i �t.�.ca �` �121-n�
Prepared by: Activity Man er Date
Cunent
Budeet
4,000,000
0
0
4,OOQ000
Amended
Chanees Budeet
(1,075,500) 2,924,500
75,500 75,000
1.000.000
0
I.000,000
4,OOQ000
� Green Sheet Green Sheet Green Sheet Green Sheet Green Sheet Green Sheet �
!JV��'lY !`J
'� DepartmentlofficelcounciL j Date Initiated: �
, PE -p,� � o,-A��-0� Green Sheet NO: 3042472
�� ConWd Person 8 Phone:
Sutjeet Verma �
266-6672 I
, Must Be on Council Agenda by (Date): '�
; Doc.Type: OTHERADMINISTRATIVEOi
� E-0ocument Required: N
i Document Contact:
ContactPhone:
�
Assign
Number
For
Routing
Order i
7otai # of Signature Pages _(Ctip Alf Locations for Signature)
0 laoning & Economic Develanmei Bob Geurs
1 ,Plannio¢ & Economic Develapmel Tom Mever '
2 ,Planning & Econamic Developmei DirectorlCec�e Bedor I
3 ;CityAttomev PeteMcCall
4 � nantial Servica Director
5 ;C7'ty Clerk City Clerk
6 lannine & Economic Develoo�e Sorieet Verma I
Adminisfrative Order to Downtown Capital Projects Fund F-149 that distributes pending projects budget to 2007 PED
Administrafive costs, matching requirement for Block 4 TIF District.
Plamm�g Commission I t Has Nis person/firm ever worked under a contract for this departmenY?
CIB Committee � Yes No
Civil Service Commission 2 Has this person/frtn ever been a city employee?
Yes No
3. Does this person/firm possess a skill not normally possessed by any
current city employee?
Yes No
i Explain ati yes answers on separate sheet and attach to green sheet
Initiating Problem, Issues, Opportunity (Who, What, When, Where, Why):
The 2007 budget placed an amount in the Peding Projects activity in anticipation of assigning project codes and fiuther refinement of
spending decisions. Net change is zero to the budget.
AdvanWges If Approved: i
The budgets will now reflect spending plans and allow simpler treatment of the subordinated note expenditures. �
�������¢�
Disadvantages If Approved:
None.
���� ��
J �o��
DisadvanWges If NotApproved:
The process of accounting for the Subordinated Note will be unduly complicated and possible double budgeting of projects will be
avoided.
Trensaction:
Funding Source:
Financial Information:
(Explain)
149
CosVRevenue Budgeted:
Activity Number: 149-76901
RECEIVED
AUG 2 4 2007
August 7, 2007 11:45 AM Page 1