86-1618 �MHITE - C�TV CLERK ��.
PIN�K - FINANCE C I y O F SA I NT PA U L Council -
CANARV - DEPARTMENT File NO. W
BLUE - MAVOR
�C' ncil Resolution ;,,��`�
I �� f
Presente By �
Referred To V � �- � � Committee: Date � ' 3 �4�
Out of Committ e By Date
I
WHEREAS, the Saint aul Ci y Council adopted the EIS Scoping Decision on
Shepard/Warn�r/East CBD By ass - Council File Number 86-1096; and
WHEREAS, the 'EIS Sc in D cision may be amended by the City Council ; and
WHEREAS, the Minnes ta Pol ution Control Agency and city staff recommend
alternative placeme t of a noise monitoring site near Irvine Park; and
WHEREAS, thelMinnes ta Dep rtment of Transportation and city staff recomn nd
elimination of Alte native F-2 and F-3 of the Screening Report as part o the
Draft EIS wo�^k;
NOW, THEREFORE, BE T RESO VED, that the EIS Scoping Decision is hereby
amended to c ange t e loca ion of a noise monitoring site near Irving Par and
to eliminate�Altern tives -2 and F-3.
I
I
I
COUNCILMEN Requested by Department of:
Yeas �rew NaYsl
�u"°s'a � In Favor
Rettmarr•�
S�hsibeF-
�Sonnen A gai n s t BY
�Tedesco '
�Wilson I
EC 9 — �986 Form Appr d by City A torne
Adopted by Council: , Date
Certified P ss b Coundil S et BY
BS� �
Approv d by Mavor. D�t DEC 12 � Appro y Mayor for Subm' ion o Cou cil
BY -- BY
PU8 IS�EA U E C 2 019�6
i
� � �� -���� o
PED - Plannin Div'sion DEPARTMENT � - O59SS
�Reqg� A. Reichert CDNTACT
7494 X253 PHONE
Octoberl7 , 1986 DATE �+��. e
�
ASSIC�1 NUMBER FOR RO ING OR R C1 All Locations for Si nature : .
partment D�rect r � Director of Management/ yor
Finance and Manag ent S rvices irector � � City Clerk
� Budget Qirector � Pe A R `
City Attorney
YHAT WILL BE AC�IIEVED BY TAK NG ACT N ON THE ATTACHED MATERIALS? (Purpose/
Rationale) :
The EIS Scoping Decis on for the Sh �ard/Warner/East CBD Bypass will be amended. e amendments
reflect agreements th city as wit PCA and MnDot on� procedures to be used for doi g the
Draft EIS work. ���,
' �Y�a- �►-- RECEIVED
���
OC? 2 � ,...,� .
COST BENEFIT BUDGETA Y AND ERSONN L IMPACTS ANTiCIPATED: ' MAYOR'S OFFICE
The need for staff wo k on t e Draf EIS will be somewhat reduced. No capital cos are
involved in this acti n. �
.
.
j _
FINANCING SOURCE APID UDGET CTIVIT NUMBER CHARGED OR CREDITED: (Mayor's signa-
ture not re-
Tota] Amount of"T r�sact' n: quired if under
� $10,00Q)
Funding Source; ..
Activity Number:
ATTACHMENTS List and Numbe All A acfwpents :
1 . Letter from Peggy Reiche t to Ci y Council with_attachments (10 copies).
2. Draft C9ty Council Resol tion a nding the EIS Scoping Decision. _
' • .
4
DEPA�tTMENT REVIEW CITY ATTORNEY REVIEW
Yes No Council Resol tion uired? ' Resoiution Requir�e��? es No
Yes No Insura ce Req ired? � Insurance Suf�icie�t? es No
Yes No Insura ce Att ched:
... _ . .
(S E •RfVE E SIDE FOR INSTRUCTIONS) _ �
Revised 12/84 �
�: . HOW TO USE THE GREEN SHEET
. x
The •GREEN SHEET has several PURPOSES: � � ' � � � �
1. to assist in routing documents and in securing required signatures
2. to brief the revie�vers of documents on the impacts of approval
3. to help ensure that necessary supporting materials are prepared, and, if
, . requi'red, attached.
Providing complete informa'tion under the listed headings enables reviewers to iunake
decisions on the documents and eliminates follow-up contacts that may delay executio�i,
The COST/BENEFIT, BUDGETARY AND PERSONNEL IMPACTS heading provides space to explain
� the cost/benefit aspects of the decision. Costs and benefits related both to City
budget (General Fund and/or Special Funds) and to broader financial impacts (cos.t
to users, homeowners or other groups affected by the action) . The personnel impact
is a description of change or shift of Full-T�.me Equivalent (FTE) positions. �
If a CONTRACT amount is less than $10,000, the Mayor's siqnature is not required,
if the departaient direetor signs. A contract must always be first �signed by the _
outside agency before routing through City offices.
Below is the preferred ROUTING for the five most frequent types of documents:
. CONTRACTS (assumes authorized budget exists) ' .
� 1. Outside Agency 4. Mayor
2. Initiatinq Department 5. Finance Director
3. City Attorney 6. Finance Accounting
ADMINISTRATIVE ORDER (Budget Revision) ADMINISTRATIVE ORDERS (all others)
1. Activity Manager 1. Initiating Department
2. Department Accountant 2. City Attorney
3. Department Director 3. Director of Management/Mayor ,
4. Budget Director 4. City Clerk �
5. City Clerk �
6. Chief Accountant, F&MS
COUNCIL RESOT�UTION (Amend. Bdqts./Accept. Grants) COUNCIL RESOLUTION (a11 others)
1. Department Director 1. Initiating Department
2. Budget Director 2. City Attorney
3. City Attorney 3. Director of Management/Mayor
4. Director of Management/Mayor 4. City Clerk
5. Chair, Finance, Mngmt. & Personnel Com. 5. City Council
6. City Clerk
7. City Council
8. Chief Accountant, E`&MS -
SUPPORTING MATERIALS. In the ATTACHI�NTS section, identify all attachments. If the
Green Sheet is well done'; no letter of transmittal need be included (unless signing
such a letter is one of the requested actions) .
Note: If an aqreement requires eviderice of insurance/co-insurance, a Certificate of
Insurance should be one of the attachments at time of routing.
Note: Actions which require City Council Resolutions include:
1. Contractual relationship with another governmental unft.
2.. Collective bargaining contracts. •
3. Purchase, sale or lease of'land.
4. Iasuance of bonds by City.
5. Eminent domain.
6. Assumption of liability by City, or granting by City of indemnific�tion. :
7. Agreements with State or Federal Goverrmient under which they are providing �
fundinq.
8. Budqet amendments. . .
c�,� � -����
R���1 Y �p', .
, 4 x CITY OF S INT PAUL
a ���������„ ; EPARTMENT OF PLANNING AND ECONOMIC DE ELOPMENT
`vm °° �� � �C DIVISION F PLANNING
+e 6• 25 West Fourth Streey Saint Pau,Minnesota 55102
612-292-1577
GEORGE LATIMER
MAYOR
October 17 , 1986
Council President Victo Tedes o and
Members of the,City C uncil
City Hall , Seven�h Floo
St. Paul , MN 55102
RE: Amendments to the hepard Road Scoping Decision
Dear Council President edesco and Members of the City Council :
On August 5, the City C uncil dopted a resolution that set the guidelines fo the
Draft EIS work on Shepa d Road and East CBD Bypass (see attached adopted resolution).
Since that time, the P1 nning ivision has been working with the Minnesota De artment
of Transportation and P llutio Control Agency to clarify procedures in doing the
Draft EIS. We have arr'ved at concensus on two issues which will make the Dr ft EIS
work easier and be more meanin ful . However, in order to strictly adhere to
requirements or �nviron ental aw and procedures, the City Council should officially
adopt two changes to th EIS S o ing Decision.
1. Noise Monitor Loc tions. In working with the Pollution Control Agency, the two
staffs have agree to a ifferent location for one of the noise monitoring
sites. (See atta hed le ter signed by the PCA dated August 27, 1986.) The draft
resolution reflec s the ecessary changes.
2. Eliminate Alterna ives F 2 and F-3. During preliminary work last Sprin , the
Minnesota Departm nt of ransportation requested that alternative conne tions
of the Bypass to 5E at rch-Penn be studied. The result was the inclu ion of
two elaborate and expens ve connection alternatives (F-2 and F-3) . Sin e then,
the Minnesota Dep rtment of Transportation has agreed that studying the e two
alternatives is n t nece sary as part of the Shepard/Warner/East CBD By ass
EIS. Inst�ad, Mn OT has committed to study the I-35E north corridor in a
broader context s arting next year. Pursuing only Alternative F-1 at t is time
will not preclude constr ction of an alternative connection in the mid o late
1990s when additi nal I- 5E north reconstruction will be done by MnDOT.
The above two ch,anges c n be a complished by adopting the attached draft reso ution.
Since the City Cpuncil as alr ady held a public hearing on the Sco in EAW,
the City need not hold another to comply with environmental proce ures.
If you have any questi s or t e changes or procedures, please contact Allen ovejoy
of my staff.
Sincerely, -�
,') �,� ��
� �f � ''./' ,,=f-- ��--E:( �_�t 1' �
�c;���' i - .
Peggy A. Reichert
Deputy Director for P1 ning
City of Saint Paul
° -. - "'•�oR — - - i'"Ile 1'1U. a —/V`15p
� � � � . . unc 'l Resol tion �t�PT� g•�s �,g6
� . !�� �
F�resented By � : � \
Referred To Committee: Date �a
Out of Committ�e By � Date
WHEREAS, the Cit of Sai t Paul , through its Comprehensive Plan, has en orsed
development of a East C D Bypass and improvements along Shepard/Warne Road;
and ;
WHEREAS, the Cit of Sai t Paul has decided to evaluate reconstruction f
Shepard and Warn r Roads and construction of the East Central Business
District Bypass; nd
WHEREAS, tihe pot tial i pacts from such construction/�econstruction wa rants
an Environmental Impact tatement (EIS); and
WHEREAS, t�e EIS rules quire a "Scoping Process: which evaluates a fu 1
range of alternatives an narrows that range to those alternatives cons'dered
tru ly via b le and arrant'ng detailed examination; and
WHfREAS, the She rd/War er/East CBD B ass Alternatives Screenin Re o t has
been develpped t define a full range of alternatives; and
WHEREAS, the Scr nin R ort has been reviewed by the Saint Paul River ront
Cosrenission�r the int Pa 1 Planning Commission and the Shepard/Warner/E st CBD
Bypass Taslk Forc ; and
WHER�AS, aJ Sco in Envir ninental Assessment Worksheet has been prepared to
identify the alt rnativ and to examine the potential environmental im acts of
�the project; and
WHEREAS, the Sain Paul iverfront Commission, the Saint Paul Planning
Commission and t Shepard/Warner/East CBD Bypass Task Force have made
recommenda�ions s to wh'ch alternatives warrant further consideration nd
which issues sho ld be nsidered in detail through the EIS process; an
! (continued)
COUNCILI+IEN Requested by Department of:
Y ea s N ay� �1�
FlMchsr
°rai" in Favor
Mssanz
Nioosis
� sche(bst j Against BY
fi�dssco
W ilson
Form Appro e by City Attorney
Adopted b�� Council: I Date
Certiticd Passed by Ceuncil Secrc ary HY
B�
Appruved by Mavor: �afe Ap.prov Mayo toc Sub � 'on to C unci2
.
By�
�
__ _. . . _ - _ _. _ ._
. - - ;:.,_ - , :- --_.. ..,_- --:_-_: ___..
. . .
.
...�..___ _...�. _____�._..,..�._w...� . _ ___._ _ __ .
.. �_._:_..._.....�.�_:�� r..�..._..__..
��E - �+�rOA v a a va va� aa� a a a v �. File NV• V s
- . �
- - . Co nci � Resol tion �
Presented By • • � ���
Referred To Committee: Date
Out of Committee y Date
WHEREAS, the aint aul Ci Council held a Scoping Public Hearing on Jul 8,
1986 at 10:00 a.m, o �eceive public testimony; and
WHEREAS, a Sco in ecisio has been prepared which includes the
recommendat�ons in he Scr enin Re ort and the Scoping Environmental
Assessment Workshee and i corporates comments received at the Scoping Pu lic
Hearing an during he 30 ay EAW review period;
NOW, THEREFORE, BE 7 RESO VED, that the EIS Sco in Decision be adopted nd
that the following lterna ives be evaluated as t ose a ternatives which re
truly viable and wa rantin detailed examination:
Segment A: Shepard Road - Randolph to Chestnut �
o - No Bui d Alternative
o A-1 Widen hepard Road on existing alignment ,
o A-2 Widen hepard road on existing alignment and shift aw y
from R ver near NSP and Kaplans -
a, A-3 Widen hepard Road on new alignment at base of the bl ff
�
Segment_B: C�hestnu Conne tion to Shepard Road : _ _
q'I - No Bui d alternative
d B-1 At gra e connection on existing Chestnut alignment
o B-2 Grade eparated connection on existing Chestnut align ent
Segment C: Shepard Road - Chestnut to Robert
o - No bui d Alternative
o C-1 Minor mprovements on existing alignment
o C-2 Shift oad and t�acks away from river
(continued)
COUNCIL�NEN
Requested pa ent of:
1'eas FI�tcMr Nays ,
o•QN1 In Favor
Masanz
Nicosla
Schelbsl Against BY
Tedeseo
Wilson •
Form A ov d y City Attorney
:ldopted hy Council: Qate
Certifird Y�ssed by Council Secretar BY
By
Approved b}• Mavor: Oate Approved ayoc r Submi � o Coun il
�
By.
- •----_-_-- - -- _._ ___.� . _ _._. _ _ --- - _-
------...,. _ ,,..__.__�.�,.�,�..v.........,._.�,...__--,•. ,:._ ,_ _:._ ,— --_,,_z,..�-R.. ,-. . w�. - r..,,....__.___..._...�.._-..,..
. �
^. __ _ _ . ...._.; , .�
. _. . _._„ ...; . ._.... ,_ .._ . -- �,..�.. ...__� . ..
_ �er��t�MEr�T li TY OF SA I 1\'T YAUL `"°°°�•• / c
e�.,e� _ �..voa File NO. 4' —�07�
� • - � o�ncil,Resol tion
Presented By � ^ a�^����
Referred To Committee: Date
Out of Commit'ee By Date
Segment D:'I East BD Byp ss Connection to Warner Road -
I
' o - No B ild alternative
' o D- Grad separated connection
o D- At g ade connection
Segment E: East BD Byp ss Connection to Local Streets
o - No B ild (Segment D)
o E- No 1 cal street connections
o E- Loca connections to bypass at lCellogg, East Seven h, and
Univ rsity/Lafayette
Segment F: East BD Byp ss Connection to I-35E
o - No B ild (Segment D)
o F- Penn ylvania interchange
', o F- Dire t connection to I-35E north of Pennsylvania
', o F- Comb'ned intersection (Pennsylvania)
AND, BE IT�FURTHE RESOL ED, that special studies be conducted for the
� - fol 1 owi Rg ssues: - -- -- --- _- -
' o vi ual im acts
o im acts o historic properties
o tr ffic i pacts
o la d deve opment
o re ocatio
o no se imp cts
o ai quali y impacts
o fl odplai impact
o so'ls, ge logic and subsurface conditions
COUNC[LMEN Requested Dep rtment of:
Yeas p�� Nays
. .
N��o:�. ' In Favor
Rettman I
Seh�ibei I �
�,,,,,.� Agai n s t BY
Tsdatco
Wilson '�,
Adopted by Council: , Date A G 5 - 1986 Form Approved City Attorne
Cert►f�rd P•�s b u �il r By
$1'
Appro&ed y Mavor: Date
� AUG 0 - 1986 Approved by or fo ission to C uncit
�
: By _ � �' ..�---_
ua�s�� a c 1 s �9es
. . � . . � -i���'
� TR AR-ROSCOE-FAUSCH, IN .
CONSULTING ENGINEERS 'vE�
NSPOR ATION �CIVIL�3TRUCTURAL ENGINEERS �LAN
S�� 0 2 1986
Augus't 27, 1986
MI POLLUTION
�O OL AGBdCY
Mr. David . Kel o
MINNE OTA LLUT ON CONTROL AGENCY
� Divis on o Air uality
1935 est ounty oad b2
Rosevflle, 5 113 �
SUBJECT: S PARD ARNER/EAST CBD BYPASS IN SAINT PAUL
Dear �+Ir. K so:
We are re esti your concurrence with revisions to the
noise moni oring sites which we had originally discu sed
with you e ly i Auqust. In response to your comments hat
we did not need to monitor both of the two southern- ost
sites ' beca se of their close proximity to each other we
have decid d to deZete one of these sites and to se ect
another ei . T ese siteB are •as indicated on the atta hed
fiqure and re d scribed in the attached text in the "N ise
Impacts" Be tion.
We are requ stin your written concurrence with the loca ion
of t e no'se m nitoring sites for this project a a
forma ity. We f el that this is necessary because of the
. . legal natur of he Enviromm�etal Impact Statement proc ss.
This forma conc rrence will help to avoid any quest'ons
which parti s ma have later in the EIS process and is nly
a precautio ary m asure to avoid unnecessary confusion.
Yo� � � si� l.y s; n t::is let�er in the sgace prcvide3 ar
provi�e us ith a letter indicatinq your concurrence wit
the Bites s lecte . Thank you for your assistance.
Since ely,
G -R AU CH, INC.
mes . n q, .
enior T n po ion Engineer
- ' Mr. David A. Kel o
: � ��I�'°
°I
630'hvelve Cen , 16500 Wayzata Blvd.. Wayzsta MN b5391 (612) 476-0010 �
I _
- � �
�
� � I1
_ _-�;� !!._. .
.
` I t
_--_� --_ _� ---- _ -�-- --- -
I i ` - �
�
:
,
�
� ' -�
--T- -�- �._-- --�
I
I' �
�' � � � ' _��-t------
���� ` �� ��� � ���
_ __- --- _ . ��- � �� ���� �� ���
� . � . , -- -�--�- - - - --
,, ���j � . �,�����,� � - °
_ . ��►�--t � ��, ����// .� ,
- - � � � � i
, �' �:��/ ,.
i j �\ �I ;II� ' �T ,.i
i
I
I' I � ,
, _.. . ���l1�. ---- -- -
�- - � � 4-- `�,, � � ." ' --�-
I . - �
,
I.��� ; �•.�` ��� `��j �\
��.�i�� �t-\j', �,%v `\�,�/`
` ;
- � �.
�i- � I �I�i�;-'j�'��•���1i�� \4�� �; - _ - � --
. ,
���:~ '�-- __ � � , � , �.; � -
�� � �.
,��,-.�J��r./'�`i?�j���\��� \��� j � �
-�_�'� *;���,!�5,��,����� .� '�
� � �
r' ;�'--�.�,'����f / �- . _
� � �•�.�• � � ; �-�.;�=- -� -
;� ,� ,'�!�►��,��..� - _ -`.� \ ..�
��- \�„ �"' � �
�,� �% 1►�. ��-4S?'� ���_ �_\.
`i �'-l%- �.i ,.�.,,r.�i\\-� �.�" �".�..�....
__ !'� ....�...... � / �, ,
�� �� . � � '� �-% � :......w.,
� _ �r�/ �,,�,:� , , � I ► -�,.��. �.
�I� .. � �
Tt / ��� ►..... � `�� 0
� ' �
�� / � _ ;� �� 1 ���
;� ► 1��- , ..�.
,,
.�' �
�-� �
. ��
� /'' � �t
=, / �
..:�; i � ��
.::� ' \� '�
.....,�/ ....,,..
�
�� � �
,
, . .
�
, ,
. . . - . .
�. . . - . .
►�� ' �
„
���
. . . .
� � � • �
• • - • •
�
,�-/l���'
. , ' ��NNESOr4 � ►�W L�
� yo 111.I11 ('S()t" . � C � �
• � Q D�}� rtn�c� �t O1 TI"c1115))O1"1��11OIl � C r�rT'T)
'' � �� c U1�111(�t �
��yroF TaP��� 3�8. H�cil ��� .���'c�i�uc� :�c�ril�. E3c» 9050
;�OI"i 1 5i . { cll1E. �11►lilc'tic )iil :�:�1O��
Telephone__ 779_175
September 15. 1986
Peggy A. Reichert. Deputy irector
Department of Pla ning 6 conomic Deve{opment
25 West Fourth Str et
St. Paul, Minnesot 55102
Dear Peggy:
SUBJECT: I-35E/ CBD B PASS
As a follow-up t our A gust 4th meeting, we have started to look at poss ble
alignments for e irect c nnection of the ECBD Bypass to I-35E in the Ca uga
Bridge erea. How ver, du to commitments to other projects, it may take sev ral
weeks to get alter atives valuated and layouts prepared. We will set up a mee ing
as soon as we heve somethi g for you to review.
With regard to th remov 1 of elternetives F-2 and F-3 from consideration in the
EIS. we concur t at this appears to be the most eppropriete course of act on.
However, it is el o reco mended that we initiate formal planning efforts on the
I-35E elternatives in the ery near Puture. Given the releted issues of the C'ty's
proposed East Co o Boule ard and pending ebandonment of the Burlington North rn's
rail corridor in t e same vicinity, it is further recommended that we devel a
joint planning eff rt to c nsider all of the converging options in the 1-35E/A ch.
Penn/Ceyuga area.
While we don't e pect e construc�ion stert on 1-35E improvements before 1 96,
iL is necessary to et an e �ly start on the planninq process. We anticipate nee ing
consuttant service end e cost sharing arrangement with the C�ty, steps that ill
require substantia lead ime. Therefore. I would suggest we begin discuss ons
in early 1987.
Sin ely.
Richard A. Elesky
Assistent District n neer
Traffic end Planni g
. A�+ l.y��nl ll�y+nrnmit� !)n/rliirer
��
� �-/���'
Yembers:
Chles Nicost�, Ch�lt
CIT�' OF �AI�TT PAUL lanlce [taetman
? ��m � Hild sennen
` '� ��i OFFICE OF THE CITY COIINCIIL Joha Dnw(/LL!)
� Date:November 26, 1986
� o mitte e Re p o rt -
, To: S int Paul City Council
Fr m: ommittee on Public Works
hris Nicosia, Chair
. ___
The Public Works C ittee at its meetings of November 26, t986 took the
following ction:
Hearing ate
1. 12%l1/ 6 VACA ION: Petition of the Port Authority for the vacation
of P NNSYLVANIA Avenue from Sylvan to Jackson. Arch Street
� from Park to Capitol Heights and Capitol Heights from Arch C
to ennsylvania. Purpose: For new plat of the Empire
Buil er industrial Park.
Rec ended approval.
2. 12/9/ VACA ION: Petition of Houstng and Redevelopment Authority
� for the vacation of NINTH Street between Cedar and N.
Waba ha Streets for the purpose of constructing a parking
ramp for the World Trade Center. '
', Rec ended denial - Councilwoman Rettman and Councilman
'i Tede co voting "NO".
,
12/ll/ 6 VACA fON: Petition of Como-Northtown Credit Union for the
vaca ion of part of the ailey in Block 60. Hagerman's
, Subd visfon (bounded by Lexington, Hatch, Front and
' Chur htil). Purpose: For a drive-up facility and parking
area
Rec ended approval. -
4. 12/9/ FINA ORDER: [mproving the streets by grading and paving
and nstaliing a street lightinq system and doing all work
nece sary to complete the pro,3ect known as the MARYLAND-
FLAN RAU/fURNE55-IVY STREET PAV[NG AND LIGHTING PROJECT.
Rec ended approval.
5. l2/9/ FINA ORDER: Constructing an area storm sewer to be known
as the MARYLAND-FIANDRAU/FURNE55-IVY SEWER PROJECT.
Boun ed on the north by E. Nebraska from Furness to
Wint rop and E. Ivy from Kennard to White Bear Avenue; on
the outh by Clear Avenue from Furness Parkway to Winthrop
and by Ames Avenue and Echo from approximately 600 feet
west of Kennard extended to White 8ear Ave�ue; on the aest
by F rness Parkway from Nebraska to Clear and Kennard from
�- Ivy to Maryland Avenue and 580 feet MOL west of Kennard
' from Maryland to 100 feet MOL south of Geranium then
angl nq to the southeast to meet the north line of Ames
Aven e and on the east by Winthrop from Nebraska to Clear
and hite Bear Avenue from Ivy to the Railroad tracks.
I Rec ended approval. (CONTZNUED)
.,
j
�-�6��
� 6. 12/9/6 F1NAL ORDER: Also, constructing sanitary. storm and water
conne tions, if requested by the property owners, for the
combt ed sewer separation project known as the MARYLAND-
', FLAND AU/FURNESS-IVY AREA STORM SEWER AND STREET PAVING
AND L GHTING PROJECT.
Rec ended approval.
7•I 12/9/8 FINAL ORDER: Constructing a sanitary sewer in BREEN STREET
' from Hyacinth Avenue to Hawthorne Avenue. Also the
, const uction of sanitary connections, where necessary.
Also condemning and taking a IO-foot permanent sanitary
sewer easement on east side of Breen Street between
Hyaci th and Hawthorne.
Rec ended approval.
8. l2/9/8 FINAL ORDER: Bus shelter instailatton by Ad Shelters at
the c rner of Como and Ftfield.
Rec ended approval.
9. STAFF DISCUSSION: 1987 Sewer Service Rates. �
Refer ed back to City Council without recommendation.
10. ORDIN NCE: grantfng permission to the HRA and/or its
succe sors to construct and maintain piling, ptle caps and
sprea footings within rights-of-way of E. Fourth Street.,
Sible St., E. Kellogg 81vd. and Jackson Street (Block L).
� •
�!� Refer ed back to City Council without recommendation.
11. RESOL TION: authoriaing the proper City officials to
execu e plat for Energy Park West bounded by Gibbs, Como,
I Snelling and Pierce Butler Route.
Reco nded approval.
12. E i S 1 ng Oec i s i on on SMEPAREi jMARNER/EAST C� BTPIkSS
(laid er fran November 12, 1986).
Rec approvai on 2-1 vote - Camcilwomen Rettanen
VO't�11, ��'�O~. _
13. RESOL [ON: extending the compliance date of C.F. 86-242,
being vacatton for. part of BRADLEY STREET approved March
5, l9 .
Reco nded approval.
14. RESOL ION: supporting and encouraging public acqu9sition
of ab doned railroad track in eastern Ramsey County.
Rec nded approval.
2
I