86-1487 WHITE - CITV CLERK
PINK - FINANCE � G I Y OF SA I NT PAU L Council ` ,��
CANARV - DEPARTMENT �
BLUE - MAVOR I Flle NO.
� , � C il Resolution �
Presented By -
Referr o G I I�O J��ti 1'm U� Committee: Date �3� T' "
Out of Committele By Date
�
lr1NEREAS, the City Cou cil has previously approved a contract for consultant
services between the ity, th Riverfront Redevelopment Corporation and BRW, Inc.
to conduct a prledevel pment alysis of the riverfront (Council file �85-144 ; and
WHEREAS, there !are pr visions in the contract to amend the contract with mut al
consent of thelcity, he Riv rfront Redevelopment Corporation, and the Consu tant; and
WHEREAS, the colnsulta t and he Riverfront Redevelopment Corporation have
recommended anc� appro ed tha certain provisions of the contract be amended
to allow for tilmely a d orde ly completion of the study;
NObJ, THE�EFOREIBE IT ESOLVE , that the Council of the City of Saint Paul ap roves
amendrnents to �.he afo ementi ned contract that extend the Time of Performanc
to December 31, 198n nd inc ease the compensation to the consultant by $10, 00;
and I
{3E IT FURTHER ESOLVE , that appropriate city officials are authorized sign aid
amendments on ehalf f the ity of Saint Paul.
.
COU[VCILMEN
Yeas �� Nay� Requested by Department of:
�� /��d^� In Favor
N�cosia `
`��'P'��� __ Against By
Sonnen
Tede�Co n
� Vti 2 8 1g86 Form Approved by City AttorneyI
Adopted by Councii: Date l�����9�l�
Certified Pa•s d y ounlcil Secr ry BY
J�
By
t�pp ov b lNavor: Date _ �� . ��h Appro by Mayor for Submi on C il
� ,;.� v V 1J i,�r
BY - —
� ������r��.� :�.� : 19�$6 �
PED/Riverfront DEPARTMENT ��'�1�� Np 2762
.
�Ric�k Wiederhorn CONTACT
7494 ext. 246 PHONE
September 9, 1986 DATE � ',/�� e
ASSIGN NUMBER FOR ROU ING OR ER C1 All Locations for Si nature :
partment Direct r Director of Management/ ayor
Finance and Manag ment S rvices Director � Gity Clerk
Budget Director
ity Attorney
AT WILL BE ACHIEVEO BY TAK NG ACT ON ON THE ATTACHED MATERIALS? (Purpose/
Rationale) •
This will amend an e isting consul ant cc�ntract v�tween the city , the Riverfront Redevelopment
Corporation and BRW, Inc. ( he con ultarTt) for preparation of the Riverfront Pred velopment
Study. It will exte d the ime of Performance provision to allow the study to be ompleted by
December 31, 1986, a d will increa e the compensation paid to the consuJtant by $1 ,000 to
$254,044. These ame dments are al owed for in the contract, and are necessitated y unanticipated
meetings and work by the co sultan . The Riverfront Redevelopment Corp, already proved the
amendments.
COST/BENEFIT, BUDGETA Y AND ERSONN L IMPACTS ANTICIPATED:
$10,000, to be paid y the iverfr nt Redevelopment Corporation.
REC�IV�CJ '� CEI � � .
-,'��� tSEPy 15 "�� SE l 86
�\ nnnvl��'� OFFICE D�P'RTIV��N OF E�roR
MA:'vqGEtvfENT ` ANCE �
FINANCING SOURCE AND UDGET CTIVIT NUMBER CHARGED OR CREDITED: (Mayor's signa-
- ture not re- �
Total Amount of Tr nsacti n: $1 ,000 quired if under
$10,00Q)
Funding Source: --
-- 644-26 5-217 (Riverfront Redevelopment Corp, account)
Activity Number: -
ATTACHMENTS List and Number All At achments :
2: -u- ���a,����
3. Riverfront Redevelopmen Corp. pproval, f.y. i.
4. BRW approval, f.y. i.
DEPARTMENT REVIEW CITY ATTORNEY REVIEW
Yes No Council Resolu ion Re uired? Resolution Required? ���V s No
Yes X No Insuran e Requ red? Insurance Sufficient? �� s No
Yes �No Insuran e Atta hed:
`' (SE REVER E SIDE FOR INSTRUCTIONS)
Revised 12/84
HOW TO USE THE GREEN SHEET
. -
The GREEN SHEET has several PURPOSES: �
1, to assist in routing documents and in securing required signatures
2. to brief the reviewers of documents on the impacts of approval
3. to help ensure that necessary supporting materials are prepared, and, if
required, attached.
Providing complete information under the listed headings enables reviewers to make
decisions on the documents and eliminates follow-up contacts that may delay execution.
The COST/BENEFIT, BUDGETARY AND PERSONNEL IMPACTS heading provides space to explain
the cost/benefit aspects of the decision. Costs and benefits related both to City
budget (General Fund and/or Special Funds) and to broader financial impacts (cost
to users, homeowners or other groups affected by the action) . The personnel impact
is a description of change or shift of Full-Time Equivalent (FTE) positions.
If a CONTRACT amount is less than $10,000, the Mayor's signature is not required,
if the department director signs. A contract must always be first signed by the
outside agency before routing through City offices.
Below is the preferred ROUTING for the five most frec�uent types of documents:
CONTRACTS (assumes authorized budget exists)
1. Outside Agency 4. Mayor
2. Initiating Department 5. Finance Director
3. City Attorney 6. Finance Accounting
ADMINIST&ATIVE ORDER (Budget Revision) ADMINISTRATIVE ORDERS (all others)
l. Activity Manager 1. Initiating Department
2. Department Accountant 2. City Attorney
3. Department Director 3. Director of Management/Mayor
4. Budget Director 4. City Clerk
5. City Clerk
6. Chief Accountant, F&MS
COUNCIL RESOLUTION (Atnend. Bdgts./Accept. Grants) COUNCIL RESOLUTION (all others)
1. Department Director 1. Initiating Department
2. Budget Director 2. City Attorney
3. City Attorney 3. Director of Management/Mayor
4. Director of Management/Mayor 4. City Clerk
5. Chair, Finance, Mngmt. & Personnel Com. 5. City Council
6. City Clerk
7. City Council
8. Chief Accountant, F&MS
SUPPORTING MATERIALS. In the ATTACHMENTS section, identify all attachments. If the
Green Sheet is well done, no letter of transmittal need be included (unless signing
such a letter is one of the requested actions) .
Note: If an agreement requires evidence of insurance/co-insurance, a Certificate of
Insurance should be one of the attachments at time of routing.
Note: Actions which require City Council Resolutions include:
1. Contractual relationship with another governmental unit.
2. Collective bargaining contracts.
3. Purchase, sale or lease of land.
4. Issuance of bonds by City.
5. Eminent domain.
6. Assumption of liability by City, or granting by City of indemnification.
7. Agreements with State or Federal Government under which they are providinq
funding.
8. Budget amendments.
I � � -/���
I
I PLAN ING & URBAN DESIGN SERVICES AGREEMENT
AMENDMENT
WHEREAS, th� City f Sain Paul (the "City") , the Riverfront Redevelopmen
Corporation (the " orporation") and Bennett, Ringrose, Wolsfeld, J rvis,
Gardr�er, In . (the "Consultant") have previously entered into an A reement for
the Consult nt to rovide planning and urban design services to th City and
Corpa�ration dated November 6, 1985 (the "Agreement"); and
WHEREAS, th� Agree ent st ted that the Consultant would attend meetings, ake
prese'ntatio s and ubmit material to the City and Corporation for eview as
requi,lred; a d
WHEREAS, the City nd Cor oration have required the Consultant to attend uch
meetiings an do ad itional work that was unanticipated at the time the
Agreement w s exec ted; and
WHEREAS, Par+agraph 17 of he Agreement allows for amendment of the Agreem nt at any
time ,in wri ing by mutual consent of the Corporation, the City and the
Cons�ll tant;
NOW, THEREF�RE, in consid ration of the above, the parties do hereby mutu lly agree
as follows•
I 1.
� � � - � �/���
. .
� IN WITNESS HEREOF the p rties have caused this Amendment of the Agreem nt to be
exec ted on this day of , 1986.
.
. _ �
BENNETT, RINGROSE, 4JOLSFELD, JARVIS,
� � GARDNER, INC.
- By:
Its:
Ap roved a to for : CITY OF SAINT PAUL
o By:
. A istan City tt rney
.
I
', Director, Department of Fina ce and
', Management Services
Director, Department of Plan ing arrd
Economic Development
Source: � RIVERFRONT REDEVELOPMENT COR ORATION
Riverfront edevel pment orporation By:
26005-217-0 0
Its :
By:
4 •
' /// .' �, ^/z�/
r ` �
v
� I RI RFR NT REDEVELOPMENT CORPO ON
REP RT TO THE BOARD OF DIRECTORS
DATE: September , I986
FROM: Rick' Wiede orn
RE: ITEMIC(1): RIVERF ONT PRE-DEVELOPMENT ANAL1'SIS:
BRW �ONTRAC AMEND ENT
BRW's contract with the Ci y and the Riverfront Redevelopment Corporation o
undertake th� Pre-D velopm nt Analysis calls for completion of the study
within 300 days and for a otal payment of $244,040.00 �It does not appear
that either �f thes limit will be met. There are provisions in the cont act
to amend it y mutu 1 cons nt of the Corporation, City and consultant. -
The 300 dayslis up n Sept mber 2, 1986. The study has taken longer than
anticipated, and ha been ore expensive because of that. The delay and
expense can �e attr'buted o the difficulties the Riverfront Commission ha
had in makin� the d cision necessary within the study to direct the
consultant. On sev ral oc asions, the consultant has had to delay work an /or
�� work to deve op mor infor ation than anticipated on a particular subject, so
as to gain c�ncurre ce fro the Commission on an item before it was possib e
to move on t� anoth r.
Furthermore, IRiverf ont Of ice staff has asked the consultant to be availa le
for several r�eeting of th so-called "Project Management Team". The staf
team, compri ed of everal staffers from city agencies interested in the
results of t�e stud , was rganized to review the consultant's ideas and
details of r commen ations to insure they were based on accurate informati n.
It was also �mporta t to c ordinate the BRW study with that of other
consultants �Norking on the Shepard Road EIS. These extra meetings were be ond
the scope of �the BR propo al , and were not originally included in the
contract�
BRW has aske� that he con ract be amended to allow for additional time an
money to com lete t e stud . This is a reasonable request, given the
circumstance$. Sta f reco ends that:
a) the ontrac be am nded to require that the study be completed by
Decer�ber 31 1986; and -
b) the �ontrac be am nded to reflect that the City and Corporation
agre s to p y an a ditional $10,000 to the Consultant to cover
unan�icipat d cons ltant time on the study. The $10,000 should co e
� from the Co porati n's Planning, Design and Engineering fund.
,
r , � � �./! " /
�
� Se tember 2I 1986
P I�
Report to t�e Boar of Di ectors
�. Pa ge 2
Relevant co►{respon ence a d an updated study budget are attached.
Motion by: �7r. Pa e/Mr. M Donell .
' X Approv�d as R commen d
_ Approveld as ended:
Denied
_ Ot A�Ction:
Secre a�^
��:: �
_ � _
.
.
.
"�� i
�'�-: A (� �/y��
��� ,�j � TRANS ORTATION
� r � ������� ARC ITECTU E
.._�u
BENNETi. R�NGROSE. wOl LD. JARVIS. GARDNER. I . - iHRESMER SOIWRE • 700 TH�RO SiREET SOUTH • MINNEAPOL►S. MN SSS15 • PHONE 8t2/370-0700
_.
March 4, 19$6
Mr. Rick Wi derhor .
� . Sen i or P 1 anr�er.
� Riverfront �ffice �
. Department c�f Plan ing an
Economic Develop ent
: 25 West Fou�th Str et
St. Pau i . Mf� 5510
Re: St. Paul Ri erfron Redevelopment Analysis - �
Budg�t Amen ment
. Dear Rick:
At your req�est in Octobe , 1985 we agreed to attend and participate
in Project Managem nt Tea (PMT) meetings throughout the course of the
St. Paul Ri�erfron Pre-D velopment Analysis project. We began attending
('� PMT meetings in ea ly Nov mber, and we have continued to do so as necessa y. - -
`�- In October �e agre d that the PMT meetings were a good idea, particularly
because they would facili a#e communication bstween the two consul#ant
teams workir�g in t e same study area, but also because it would allow
broader based PED taff i put directly to our study. We also agreed
that these MT_mee ings w re not part of #he 8RW proposal or. contract -=
ry�for fihe pro ect an that here would be a budget adjustment to fund
� our PMT par icipat on. .
I have wait d unti now t write this request for budget adjustment
because 1 w�nfied t see i the PMT idea would sustair� itself after severa
meetings an� so th. t 1 co Id better estimate #he amount of extra time
required of us #o artici ate. 1n October ! est9mated 510,000. I now
; believe �-hai� estim te was accurate based upon the following analysis:
� .�;, _
"'3�„S �.,. , �.: ��.:.._ ...,...,r�r r-.. _ . _ ,
. 2 meefi i r�gslmo. x 10 m s - 20 PMT�meefi i ngs . • �
,.
4 hours/�mfig. t repara ion�, transportation, attendance, efic.T -
- _. .... . . .. . .i:1.. ,.
Profess ils i dent � 4 x 0 x $75/hr. _ $6,000
___ .
onal 9 4 x 10 x $55/hr. _ ..', $2,200 � '. "�
$8,200
�
DAVID J.BENNETT OONALD 1�N.RINGFiOSE RICHARD WOLSFELD PETER E.1ARVIS LA�NRENCE J.f3ARONER T?IOMAS f.GRROLL AiiNOL J.ULLEYK3
CRAIG A.AMUNOSEN OONALO E.M ARK G.SWENSON JOMN 8.McNAh1AM - GARY J.ERICKSON OON L CRAN3.
: ..,�. .� �
.:.;..,- ;. .. .,,. .
MINNEAPOLIS . DEN ER BRECKENRIDGE HOENIX
.: :-, _
, - .... , :
»". �
, � �l��'�
Mr. Rick iederh rn
March 4, �986 . -
Page Two
10 mt s. req ire ex ra step in revisions to material
� bef�re sen to RC
3 hrs '/rev. 10 = 0 x $65/hr. (avg.) _ $ 1 ,950
� Total $10,150
" 8ased upo� this nalysi I am now requesting a Contract Amendment in
� accordanc with ur Agr ement of $10.000 which would change the maximum
compensat�on to 254,04 .00.
If this f�rm is ppropr ate as an amendment please sign below and retur -
, one copy. Other ise, p ease send me an amendment in the appropriate -�
form.
Thank you. -
[�.:: Since�ely� _
C. ,
BENNETT-R OSE WOLSFE D-JARViS-GARONER, INC.
---_ 9 � . _...
_... �.�.
rai ds n. fA, AI P
Vice P es�de t
t Director, De�art ent of Plannina President, Riverfron# Redevelop ent
& E�on ic Dev lopmen Corporation
. .,. ... ._..
_;.: _ .
.:.
-,.;,.!_ . :. _, _ .
� _
� � .._,,, - . _. .
i
� ._....
i
,.x.. .
�, ,. ._ .
.. �i��'�
�
CIT OP' SAINT PAUL
•��sus
OB`FI OF TSE CITY COIINCZL
M��1f N�����e! �
������' D d t e : October ZO, 986
.
i CO M ( TEE RE PORT
TO = S�int au 1 Cit`y Counci t
F R � M � C p m m t t e e O h C i ty Deve 1 opment and Transportat on
C�fAIR
Wiiliam L. Wilson
1 � Res lutio amending C.F 85-1447 being a contract between
the ity, Riverfront F2edevelopment Corp. and the BRW> Inc.
I for repa ation of the Riverfront predevelopment study to
all the study to be completed by Oecember 31 , 1986, and
j to i crea e the compensation to be paid. (t,�xmni ee
� � rec end � ' approval ) �
M 2._ Appe 1 0 _ Planning Commission� to deny a non-c nforming_
I use ermi (Keith^ '�& Elaine 5inith) (Comrni�tee - "
reco mends approval with amendment)
3. Resolution estabtishing a Citizen's Participatio Task
i Forc and pproving appointments of persons as listed
to t e tas force (Committee recommends approval )
�
CTTY HALL SEV NTH FLOOR SAINT PAUL,M1NN OTA 55102
.____ . ��.