86-760 WMI7E — CITV CLERK
PINK — FINANCE G I TY OF SA I NT PAU L Council /`
CANARY - OEPARTMENT File NO. ��� � �`�
BLUE - MAVOR
�
4 , C cil Resolution --=--,
✓ `'R
i , e
Presente By �
Referred To � �v1—D D.�I l:.l�]� Committee: Date � ����
Out of Committee By Date
WHEREAS, on February 24, 1983, the City Council of the City of Saint Paul approved
the Neighborhood Partnership Program (N.P.P.) , C.F. 270893; and
WHEREAS, the purpose of the N.P.P, is to improve the econor��ic, physical, and environ-
mental conditions in Saint Paul 's neiynborhoods by allowin� neighborhood residents,
businesses, and property owners to develoa nei�hborhood programs and projects to meet
their needs; and
WHEREAS, the Department of Planning and Economic Development (PED) has received nine
N.P.P. applications for the sixth cycle of the N.P.P.; and
WHEREAS, PED, the Planniny Commission, Capital Improvement Budget Committee, and the
Mayor have evaluated the nine applications and forwarded their recommendations to the
City Council; and
WHEREAS, approval of projects at this point means the projects have five months to
work with PED and other involved City departments to develop detailed f unding and .
implementation agreements;
NUW, THEREFORE, BE IT RESOLVED, that the City Council approves the funding priorities
and budgets for five projects as shown on Attachment A, and the funding stipulations
on Attachment B subject to compliance with the Program Development and Implementation
requirements of the Neighborhood Partnership Program �uidelines; and
�E IT FURTHER RESOLVED, that the City Council wishes to extend its appreciation to
all the applicants f or their time and effort in developing proposals for the sixth
cycle of the Neighborhood Partnership Program.
COU[VCILMEN Requested b epa tment of:
Yeas �� Nays �
Drew In Favor
�..��R�-7r�1�•�
NiCOSia
schetbet a __ Against BY
Tedesco
Wilson
Adopted by Council: Date JUN .1 01986 Form Approve City Attorne}+
Certified }'-s e ou cil , etary BY '�
�
By,
Ap v by Mavor: Dat �LIAI � � 1��i Approv Mayor for Submi i o C ncil
B By
PllBIISHED �UP� 2 11986
PED DEPARTMENT ��'7�� ND 3598
James Zdbn ' ' CON`fACT
292-1577 ext. 302 PHONE
May 12, 1986 DATE ��j�� e�
ASS GN NUMBER FOR ROUTING ORDER Cli All Locations for Si nature :
epartment Director 4 Director of Management/Mayor
Finance and Management Services Director 5 City Clerk n��
Budget Director 1 A1 Emory t-�
� City Attorney
WHAT WILL BE ACHIEVED BY TAKING ACTION ON THE ATTACHED MATERIALS? (Purpose/
Rationale) :
Selection of Neighborhood Partnership Program Sixth Cycle projects.
�� RECEIVED
. ��
� MAY 1`4 '1996
COST/BENEFIT, BUDGETARY AND PERSONNEL IMPACTS ANTICIPATED: �
- �'`_ � � CITY ATTORNEY
Allocation of $586,000 in funds already reserved for program.�
`��ECEIV�p
MAY 1 5
MAYO�'S O��IC�
FINANCING SOURCE AND BUDGET ACTIVITY NUMBER CHARGED OR CREDITED: (Mayor's signa-
ture not re-
Total Amount of Transaction: $586,000 quired if under
$10,00Q)
Funding Source: Community Development �lock Grant
and Capital Improvements Bonds
Activity Number:
ATTACHMENTS (List and Number All Attachments) :
1 . Planning Commission Resolution (lU copies)
2. Applications and project summary (10 copies)
3. Mayor's transmittal letter to City Council (for Mayor's signature)
4. Draft City Council Resolution
DEPARTMENT REVIEW CITY ATTORNEY REVIEW
Yes x No Council Resolution Required? Resolution Required? x Yes No
Yes X No Insurance Required? Insurance Sufficient? �Yes No
Yes X No Insurance Attached:
(SEE REVERS!E SIDE FOR INSTRUCTIONS)
Revised 12/84
� v
�� �a �i��
+ ° t�'1 � , � O► W r+ (l1 W tD A 1/►
• . ' e� e'r
. � ' ' ' �
�1 D �C �V1 A 70 e�h 2 � 70 e�► fD N Z S N (") � C
� < fD � fD N Or fD +O � �� 3 C -+- Or O (D G� �
�� y .�.r.� �.J y �•�e'r !� fp ��•—�+ IA 3 �-A 01 G1 Q —DI
v� � et Z et�G Q e+� �' � Or � �D � O O Q'� —I
3 Cr Or Or O Gr C) �< «�-� ��• �r 7 � -+�ch fD _ D
c� Q �� -r D �O t*1 -+ � 3 3 a � n c'f
�..� —• �.ty �.< N �- 3 1'*1 fp � �t� G. �--� -+-S e�► 2
N N � N�G N fD C N � d X � � (D � � e'* O 3
�e�► O► � oi 3 � A� f0 � O v� A W �-fD Or C f+'1
�. �7 e+ lD e�r C e* Z � Cr �--� < �.p � et < e+ tn �
'0 C �. �a.�p �. �.A fD 3 � fD Q O �. �. �.�. --1
�C � O O e+ O �-N tn'O � cD � A O� e-r O 3
w �+ Cl 3 3 � Or s �'T fD 3 1 7r c+ Or �t0 �
.�ty �. —+a O O � 1 �- �
A � y
�. tG � ' fD t/1 (D 1
�N V '
�� � r N N N N N N N W 3 pAj
�/f v � W N tlt t0 C37 � �G W fD c+
fp N fD �
fp O e+ �
O t0
n
� �+
� �
A �
? C► t7 C'f
N O O O N r W W W W � ~
�
� 0
W n
G� . f7 z
� n 0 n �
� � � �
� C N fD
• N W N N W N W W W W 7 �y. ?
O tn Cn �. �. O� O
O J� � 3
O � Q
n �
a
'"' � �
� f'� '� d Oi
� 0 � �
� Or �7 et
N ►-+ W �-+ r N W W W 7 C 7
�• � � [D
V� �• L 'S
• H > �, N
-+•ta 7 S
Q J.
�
�
� �
A 'S
O O
� � Z
r N N W W W W W � c* 3 3
�C Q1 V �+ W W V 00 N Gi O.
�J1 CT J �
e'h
.r.
O
�
N
c� � v
o, c ru �t �
� � < a� � t� Es+ c� �s �s � � � �
-1 � d !D N N N N N C
O �G -'•� CT O W Vt N � ►�+ CI7 v a fD
-1 O � O O O CT O ? O tJ� O CT� � y
r (�D � � O O O O OO V � O O O �
'S N O O O O O � O O O �
7 O O O O O CT� O O O d
e+
v
c� c� r c� c� c� c� c� c�
S �
Ci \
N
tt► 6A fp 6A d�► 6A bA �
A �-' �-' �..� \
v� � r-� w v ►-� � a� o Qo
Q� C7'1 �--�N CT V7 CT Q1 V W � p1
N N v O O O O O O (T� O O c.n � A
O O OO O O O O O 0 �
-- � .-► � 11
� � N � �D
�i = �
� � �
N �+ �-+ fD
d �
(7t r-+ W • v► OD � � v
O t7'i ui cn O �.
v .� � . ►� C
O O O 1 O O O O O O O O W ` Q�
O O O O O �'
. �
� s , . . , �� ,7��
- ATTACHMENT B
NEIGHBORHOOD PARTNERSHIP PROGRAM
6th Cycle Funding Stipulation
(1� Vacant Housing Rehabilitation
The $67,500 grant shall meet the following conditions and budget line
- item modifications:
(a) Recovered funds from the sale of rehabilitated homes shall be
returned to a PED account. Applicant may recycle these funds for
similar program activities.
(b) No funds are budgeted for personnel salaries.
(2) Concord Revitalization Initiative
The $226,000 grant shall meet the following conditions and budget line
item modifications:
(a) Principle and interest repayments from the commercial loan program
shall be returned to a PED account. Appjicant may recycle these
funds for similar program activities.
(b) Reduction of �,10,000 in personnel salaries.
(c) No funding for proposed market analysis activities ($4,000)
(d) No funding for proposed loan guarantee fund ($10,000)
(3) Snellin Commercial Residential Im rovements
The 230,500 grant is subject to the following budget line item.
modifications:
(1) Reduction of $9,000 in personnel salaries
(2) Reduction of $1,250 in program costs (supplies, travel , printin�)
(3) Reduction of $35 in public improvements.
(4) Rainbo Summit Project
The 35,000 loan is contingent upon the Rainbo Children's Theatre
Company first securing possession of the property at 688 Selby Avenue.
, . R � � �_7��
'�`,�...: • ` CITY Of SAINT PAUL
�' •� LONG-RANGE CAPITAl. IMPROVEMENT BUDGET COMMITTEE
3 =' � ,.� OfFICE OF THE M Yl3R_�_ BUDGET SECTION
. s �
,... , l�r�f;SaiM1O�,Min�esota 55102
t;���� �� ':��:� 612-29�8-4323
GEORGE IATiMER t C� ��� ' ''�;
MAYOR '�J ' i"n., _>
l�` � a
r, , ^`'�
TO: Saint Paul Planning Commission Members ',,�; � .
Mayor George Latimer .�; ` � -.�
' lYlembers of the City Council ��� - '�' �''
- ,
�_-� :.y�
:,
FROl�l: David G. McDonnell, Chairman �� `=' �?�ir L`'•,
Saint Paul Long-Range Capital Improvement �Budget (CIB Committee
DATE: April 10, 1986
RS: REPORT OF TH$ SAINT PAUL LONG-RANGE CAPITAL IMPRCI�VEMENT BUDGET (CIB) .
COMMITTES ON CY�3 VI NEIGHBORHOQD PARTi�:RSHIP PROGRAM APPLICATIONS
t
The Saint Paul Long-Range Capital Improvement Budget- (CIB) Committee met on ,
April 10, 1986 to review applications for G�cle VI of the Neighborhood
Partnership Program. The specific charge of the CIB Committee is to review
proposals for conformance with adopted Capital Allocation Policies. In
addition, the Committee considers each proposal in light of its
appropriateness for use of capital improvement dollars.
The rating given by the CIB Committee to each proposal, based on a range of
0 points to indicate a low rating to 3 points to indicate a high rating,
are as follows:
pROPOSAL TI
Concord Revitalization Initiative 3
Highland Block Nurse Program 3
North End Resident/Commercial Revitalization 2
Rainbo Summit Project 0
Riverview Improvement and Expansion 1
Selby Avenue Revitalization Project 0
Snelling Commercial/Residential Zmprovements 3
Opper Payne Revitalization Project 0
Vacant Housing Rehabilitation Program 3
The members of the CIB Committee would like to express concern about the
scope of the North End Resident/Co�amercial Revitalization Project.
Specifically, the condition of at least part of the residential area
targeted in the proposal is such that Canmittee members question whether
the program described can have any impact. They recommend that this aspect ,
of the project be reconsidered.
ce: ��e��Zdo� .
Tamsen Aichinger �
��
. _ . � . �-� ��o
.,�lT��. CITY OF SAINT PAUL
;~ e �� OFFICE OF THE MAYOR
'' l iii i�n :
.
M+ Ac
�as•
347 CITY HALL
SAINT PAUL, MINNESOTA 55102
GEORGE LATIMER (612) 298-4323
MAYOR
May 14, 1986
Council President Victor Tedesco
and Members of the City Council
719 City Hall
Saint Paul , Minnesota 55102
Re: Neighborhood Partnership Program Funding �ecommendations
Dear President Tedesco and Members of the City Council :
I am pleased to forward for your review and action the funding recommendations
for the 6th cyc1e of the N.P.P. On May 9, 1986, the Planning Corr�nission review-
ed nine applications and decided to recommend funding for five. I support the
Commission's recommendations.
The five projects recommended by the Planning Commission, Department of Planning
and Economic Development, and me are:
1 . Vacant Housing Rehabilitation Program
2. Concord Revitalization Initiative
3. Highland Block Nurse Program
4. Snelling Commercial Residential Improvement Project
5. Rainbo Summit Project
These recommendations are based on a process that includes review by the
Capital Improvement Budget Committee, Neighborhood District Councils, Planning
Commission, and PED staff. The ratings, funding recommendations, and in four
specific cases funding stipulations are shown on the sheets attached to the
Planning Commission Resolution.
Tne four projects which were not recommended for funding include:
l . Riverview Improvement and Expansion Project - The major issue with this
proposal is the very large target area which encompasses approximately
half of the West Side. This lack of program concentration would not have
resulted in a 1asting neighborhood impact. It should be pointed out that
the large target area allowed the app1icant to overstate the private match
potential and skew the rating sheet score.
�46
, _ . , , ��-���
Council President Victor Tedesco
and Members of the City Council
May 14, 1986
Page 2
2. North End Residential Commercial Revitalization Project - The primary issue
with this proposal is the residential component. (The CIB Committee also
identified the residential component as an issue. ) The issue is not one of
need but whether an exterior improvernent program is the appropriate tool to
be using in this particular case. Within the target area are numerous vacant
houses and others with severe structural , health, and safety problems.
3. Selby Avenue Revitalization - The primary issue with this application is the
f act that there is no organization structure in place to manage the project.
N.P.P. funds cannot be used for planning and the development of organizations.
4. Upper Payne Revitalization Project - Besides its low rating, the primary
issue with this proposal is the relatively poor performance on previous
N.P.P. grants on Payne Avenue. Part of this stems f rom insufficient neigh-
borhood staff time being devoted to the projects. Until this situation is
corrected, additional funding is not recommended.
I continue to be pleased with the overall effort in the neighborhood and the
quality of the N.P.P. applications, and I would urge swift City Council selection
of the 6th cycle projects. I would also encourage the four proposals not recom-
mended to modify their proposals and reapply to the next N.P.P. cycle.
If you h ave any questions about project details, you can call James Zdon 7494,
extension 302, of the PED staff.
Sin cerely, ,
Ge r La er
Mayo
GL/JZ/bp
, • � � �--7�0�
� CITY OF SAINT PAUL
- OFFZGE OF THE CITY COIINCIL
' •fff1P�
•a n���u�ee .
s n��p s� -
= Ddte : June 2, 1986
COMM (TTEE RE PORT -
TO = Salnt PQU i Cifiy Councii
F'R O M � C o m m it t e e O h C i ty Deve 1 opment and Transportat i on
CHAIR Wi 11 iarn L. Wi tson
1 . Ordinance amending the Legislative Code so as to add
provisions restricting the spray-pairtting of motor
vehicles in residential districts. (No longer
relevant - committee recommends removal from
committes referral list)
2. Neighborhood Partnership Program sixth cycl� funding
recommendations (Committee recommends approval )
CTTY HALL SEVENTH FLOOR SAINT PAUL.MINNESOTA 55102
'`�"'