86-489 WMITE - CITV CLERK
PINK - FINANCE GITY OF SAINT PAUL Counc 1 n
CANARV - DEPARTMENT File NO. `� � ����
BLUE - MAVOR
�
ou cil Resolution
Presented By a �
Referred To Committee: Date
Out of Committee By Date
WI�REAS, the Council of the City of Saint Paul did approve, upon the
recommendation of the Mayor and with the advice of the Capital I provement
Budget Committee, the Community Development Block Grant Year XII Program as
part of the 1986 Capital Improvement Budget and the 1986 Spec�.al Funds
Budget; and
WHEREAS, the appropriate public hearings on the Community velopment
Block Grant Year XII Program have been held in accordance with e requirements
of the U.S. Department of Housing and Urban Development; now, t refore, be it
RESOLVED, that Mayor George Latimer, as Chief Executive Of icer of the
City of Saint Paul, is hereby authorized and directed to submit the Community
Development Block Grant Year XII Statement of Community Develop ent Objectives
and Projected Use of Funds to the U.S. Department of Housing an Urban
Development in such form as prescribed by the regulations of sa d
Department; and be it
FURTHER RESOLVED, that the Mayor or his designated represe tative, the
Deputy Director of Community Development, is further authorized to execute
and submit to the U.S. Department of Housing and Urban Developm nt any
assurances, certifications, technical changes or additional inf rmation that
may be required by said Department during their review of the C ty's
Community Development Block Grant Year XII Submission for Feder 1 Assistance;
and be it
FINALLY RESOLVED, that upon notification of approval of th City of
Saint Paul's Communitq Development Block Grant Year XII Progra.� by the U.S.
Department of Housing and Urban Development, the Council of the City of
Saint Paul does hereby authorize the proper City officials to ecute the
grant agreement and contract between the U.S. Department of Hou ing and
Urban Development and the City of Saint Paul for the Community evelopment
Year XII Program.
COUIVCILMEIV Requested b Department o :
Yeas �GV/t�� Nays I �
�Fslsi�er �.�
Dr�e���„�/ ��� In Favor Z _/�I1'
r�►v �
Nicosia (� BY �
s�hewd __ Against
Tedesco
Wilson
APR 2 2 1986 Form Approved by City At rne
Adopted by Council: Date /f ,
Certified Y s e ou cil c r BY ��v,
�
By,
t#pproved b Ylavor• ��--� <v nPR � '7�e(Y Mayor for Sub is n to �ounc'1
gy o s� —� \��.L► �1�..' BY
Pue�es��a '�'',,'' � �5�s
PED - GoNtMw��TY 5��7�1.oPP�lt�'r DE PARTMENT (i� `��/ No 3 3 43
L�pF, p�M�,A�R CONTACT
' l'�l�^Iq LI _ �,cr. I I PHONE
�y DATE 1 Q��� Q Q
ASS GN NUMBER FOR ROUTING ORDER Cli All Locations for Si nature :
epartment Director � Director of nagement/Mayor
- Finance and Management Services Director S City Clerk �� �
Budget Director � WM. �,�-o -
�"I ty Attorney— ,�v.� �1ART '
WN WILL BE ACHIEVED BY TAKING ACTION ON THE ATTACHED MATERIALS? (Purpo e/
Ratio ale) :
THE A'T�'AG1�tiD RES�o�.�T�on w��� A�-r,-�oR�ze uE c�TY
'� Su.6M1T TNE GOMMUIt�t��'�C OCUELOPME7�T �RANT
`�p�►R � APPI.�C.A�-toN To TµE Ll-S. S�EPI4RT � E C E 1 V E D
�rxxs�� a�.�fl �R'F�.rt �u�i,opMe�
COST/BENEFIT, BUDGETARY AND PERSONNEL IMPACTS ANTICIPATED: APR � 1986
T�E F�$� ,�n�►�� �S �,��,�.�, AT CITY ATTORNEY
�S�v�o�000. -r+o b,���,000� ��t��rr uPorl ��CEiV�,�
cx��2ES�sta�a� Ac.-ROrI. �'�.PR t�?
I�A�u�+''S OFFICE
FINANCING SOURCE AND BUDGET ACTIVITY NUMBER CHARGED OR CREDITED: (Mayor s signa-
ture ot re-
Total Amount of Transaction: quire if under
$10,0 Q)
Funding Source: GO6�
Activity Number:
ATTACHMENTS (List and Number All Attachments) :
1� PR�p Gcu�w�c�� RESou�t.T�oN
�� ���t�1JT oF C.oi.�t�lt�lHrrY OEUEWpµa.rr �6 EcT�vEs
3� PRoaE.C.T SutwtNtlkR.`( �}EET
DEPARTMENT REVIEW CITY ATTORNEY EVIEW
�(Yes No Council Resolution Required? Resolution Req ired? �C' Yes No
_ ,Ye,� No Insurance Required? Insurance Suff cient? ,,�-�es No
,��No Insurance Attached:
(SEE REVERSE SIDE FOR INSTRUCTIONS)
Revised 12/84
. . �,� �� - ���
, . -
CITY OF SAINT PAUL, MINNESOTA
PROJECTED USE OF CDBG YEAR %II FUAID S I
Acquisition Activities
12/34 Neighborhood Partnership Program $0.00 $0.00
Disposition Activitq I
12/45 Property Management/Maintenance $210,173.00 $21 ,173.00
Public_Facilities/Improvements
12/O1 E1 Rio Vista Recreation Center $79.000.00 I
12/02 Oxford Pool Rehabilitation $62,000.00
12/03 Martin Luther King Drainage $104,000.00
12/04 District �11 Recreation Center $903,000.00 $1,14 ,000.00
Clearance A�ctivity I
��-------------
12/34 Neighborhood Partnership Program $0.00 $0.00
Public Service Activity
12/34 Nei hborhood Partnershi Pro ram 0.00 I 0.00
8 P 8 $ $
Relocation Activity
12/34 Neighborhood Partnership Program $0.00 $0.00
Removal/Architectural Barriers
11/02 Handicapped Pedestrian Ramps $50,000.00 $ 0,000.00
Rehabilitation Activities i
12/30 Commercial Rehab Program $400,000.00
12/31 Rental Rehabilitation Program $1.827,000.00
12/32 Single Family Rehabilitation $100.000.00
12/33 Law Income Familq Housing $500,000.00
12/34 Neighborhood Partnership Program $700.000.00
12/35 Rain I,eader Disconnection Fund $50,000.00
12/36 Rice St. Parking/Small Business $150.000.00
12/38 NHS Revolving Loan Fund $300,000.00
Rehabilitation project salaries $783,80A.00 $4,8 0,808.00
� Economic Development Activity I
----------------------------
12/40 SBA 503 Development Fund $100,000.00 $1 0,000.00
Planning $2 2.000.00
General Administration $1.6 5.051.00
Unspecified Contingency 9,223.00
TOTAL PROGRAM COSTS $8. 5,255.00
I
- �� C�,r ��- ���
PAGE 2 OF 2
GENERAL ADMINISTRATION: I
----------------------
General Managenten.t, Oversight
and Coordination ;i�.7,543.dG
Indirect Costs $350,000.00
Citizen Participation $378.386.00
Environmental Studies $30,000.00
Housing Inforn►ation Office $161.122.00
------------
TOTAL GENERAL ADMIN. COSTS $1.645.051.00
BLOQZ GRANT RESOURCES
-------------------
Entitlement Amcunt $5,610,000.00
Unobligated Support Services
from Prior Years $210,369.00
Transfers from Prior Years $1.796,886.00 I
Anticipated Program Income: CD %II $608,000.00
and Prior Years
TOTAL BLOCK GRANT RESOURCES $8.225,255.00
PROGRAM BENEFIT
-------------
1) Costs subject to Program Benefit $6.580.204.00
2) Expenditures principally bene-
• fitting low/mod income persons $6.350.204.00
Line 2 as a � of Line 1 96.5 X
3) Total Block Grant Resources $8,225,255.00
4) General Administrative Costs $1.645,051.00
_
Line 4 as a � of Line 3 20 �
. ����-��'9
CITY OF SAINT PAUL, MINNESOTA
STATEMENT OF COMMUNITY DEVELOPMENT OBJECTIVES
Since it's inception in 1974. the City of Saint Pau1's Community
Development Block Grant Program has been based largely on the
goals and objectives of the SAINT PAUL COMPREHENSIVE PLAN and
the CAPITAL ALLOCATION POLICSi. The�e doct�^��x�±s r:���=;.dP Lhe �o1i y
direction for all community development activities, and are
used throughaut the City's community development planning and I
capital budgeting processes. The Comprehensive Plan identifies
the City's key objectives for the 1980's. and the Capital Alloca ion
Policq ensures that capital i.mprovement resources are allocated o
those activities deemed essential and necessary for the long te
health and vitality of Saint Paul. The development of both thes
documents involve extensive citizen participation, and residents
conti.nue to remain active in both the revision of policies and
the allocation of CDBG resources.
Both the Comprehensive Plan and the Capital Allocation Policy
� stroagly support the objectives of the federal Housing and
Community development Act, i.e., to develop viable urban communi ies
by providing decent housing and a suitable living environment. a d
eapanding economic opportunities, principally for persons of low
and moderate income. Saint Paul's CDBG Program also gives maaim
feasible priority to activities which benefit low and moderate
income persons. and aid in the prevention or elimination of sl
or blight.
The Saint Paul Comprehensive Plan: Objectives for the 1980's I
The Comprehensive Plan is Saint Paul's official planning docume
It helps to provide a vision of the City's future potential, wh' e
guiding its response to current issues and opportunities. The
Comprehensive Plan recognizes that Saint Paul is faced with man
community development needs which surpass its limited amount of
resources. It is because the City does nto have nnlimited re—
sources, that attention must be directed to those activities wh'ch
are most critical. The Comprehensive Plan and the the city's BG
objectives focus on those elements essential to the future well
being of the City. The key objectives which affect the CDBG Prlgram
are:
1. HOUSING: To maintain and upgrade thje City's existing housinl
stock while seeking to improve deficient housing an
generati.ng construction of new, affordable housing hoices
in character with the neighborhoods surrounding the .
Page 1 of 4
.
�
. � ��-���
2.ENERGY: To achieve greater energy efficiency by maintaining Ind
retrofitting ezisting structures, while encouraging nergq
conservation and innovation in construction.
3. INFRASTRUCTURE: To maintain City investments, particularly i
sewer and water lines, streets and bridges, public
buildings and existing parks, through repair and/or I
replacement as needed.
The Comprehensive Plan ezpands these objectives iato issue or
area specific policies and recommendations, manq of which pertai
directly to communitq developemt activities. Prior to the
appropriation of CDBG funds, all coanmunity development programs nd
projects are reviewed for consistency with the adopted policies I
of the Comprehensive Plan.
The Capital A1location Policy: 1985 - 1986
The Capital Allocation Policy was specifically designed to guide
Saint Paul's Unified Capital Budgeting Process and the espenditu e
of CDBG funds. It sets the general direction for capital espend'tures
over a multi year period. The policies are used to allocate cap'tal
resources according to City goals and objectives, and to determ' e
the relative priorty of proposed capital projects.
The major goals of the Policy are closely related to the Compre nsive
Plan, and form the basis for Saint Paul's capital improvement
egpenditures and community development activities:
1. TO STRENGHTEN TAE CITY'S NEIGHBORHOODS in order to to make
them better places to live.
2. TO CONSIDER ENERGY USE IN ALL CITY ACTIVZTIES and to increas
" energy efficiency wherever possible.
3. TO ENSURE THE STRUCTURAL INTEGRITY OF Tf� CITY'S PHYSICAL
FACILITIES in order to maintain basic levels of service and
prevent potential health and safety hazards.
The commuity development needs of the Citq are far greater thanl
the available capital resources. The goals of the Capital Allo ation
Policy are, therefore. supplemented by a number of objectives t be
accomplished with block grant funds. These objectives are:
Page 2 of 4
.
�
. ��-y��
a) to assist in the rennovation and rehabilitation of =e
City's hous.ing stock, to eliminate blighted structt =s
through spot acquisition when necessary;
b) to complement public and private housing rehabilit� -�n
efforts through: the installation of public i.mprove �nts
such as streets. sewers. and neighborhood facilitie .
to provide public service activities when necessary =_nd
appropriate;
c) to promote and grovide stimv.l.us �_r: economic c�eveloF =nt
activit ies;
d) to assist in neighb orhood revitilization efforts; _
e) to encourage and promote energy efficiency.
The Capital Allocation Policy is divided into four sections:
-Strategy;
-Implementation and Development;
-Project; and
-Budget Policies
Each policy section provides a different level of direction for
the capital improvement budgeting process. The two sections whi '
pertain most directly to the allocation of of CDBG funds are des -ibed
below. In combination, the four policy sections represent Saint
Paul's priorities for the use of its block grant and other
capital resources.
1. STRATEGY POLICIES - The Strategy Policies set general direct'ca -
for Saint Paul's community development activities within the
framework of goals and principles. They establish the relat'.=
proportion of funds that should address each of four areas:
City-wide service system i.mprovements. economic development-
related improvements. and support system improvements. In
addition, the annual proportion of funds allocated to any on
-area of the city is monitored over time to avoid e$cessive
geographic concentration of improvements and to assure that
community development needs ia all areas are addressed.
Lastly, the policies identify priorities for basic service
systems, economic development, neighborhood betterment, ener .
efficiency, and housi.ng improvements.
2. IMPLEMENTATION AAID DEVELOPMENT POLICIES - These policies
identify criteria which are important considerations in sele t:ng
capital improvements. Theq are used by community representa Tes
in the capital improvement budgeting process during review o
project and program proposals. Most of the policies are sta E:
in terms of 'priorities' or 'considerations' reflecting thei
use as evaluation criteria.
Page 3 of 4
�
, _
. ; . ������
All community development programs and projects are reviewed for
consistency with the adopted policies within the Capital Allocat' n
document prior to the appropriation of CDBG funds. .
Copies of both the Saint Paul Comprehensive Plan and Capital
Allocation Policy are available for inspection during normal bus' ess
hours. Information concerning either document is available by
contacting:
Community Development Division
Department of Planning & Economic Developmen
1420 City Hall Annes
25 West 4th Street
Saint Paul, MN 55102
(612) 292 — 1577
Page �I of �I