The URL can be used to link to this page

87-1091 WNITE - CITY CLERK PINK - FIN��,N�E GITY OF SAINT PAUL Council �9� CANA'RV - DEP RTMENT BLUE - MAV�R File NO. �� Council Resolution -� Presented � �� ,Y Reiferred To Committee: Date Ou�t of Committee By Date � WHEREAS, the Human Development Action Coalition (HUDAC) was convened by the United Way of Saint Paul for the purposes of: ; A) Developing a community consensus on the causes and ; problems of hunger and homelessness; ; B) Seeking improved responses along a continuum of strategies and services; i.e. , short term, transitional, and long term; � C) Ensurin on oin ublic accountabilit for the effec- g g g P Y � tiveness of these strategies and services; and � D) Marshaling support from the public, private, and nonprofit , sectors in a variety of community-wide initiatives for and ; with those in critical need of adequate housing, food, , and/or better nutrition; and WHEREAS, the HUDAC, after six months of joint community effort, has developed recommendations and priorities calling for a coordinated and shared aommunity network of efforts to effectively address hunger and homelessness, and has forwarded its report to the city of Saint Paul; and WHEREAS, certain recommendations of said report require that the city of Saint Paul accept specific responsibilities in implementing the HUDAC program; }�ow, therefore, be it ; RESOLVED, that the city of Saint Paul does accept for consideration the 'report and recommendations of the Human Development Action Coalition; and be 'it further ' -1- CbUNCILMEN Requested by Department of: Yeas ;p�eW Nays Nicosia ln Favor ; Rettman i Scheibel ; Sonnen _ Agei(1St BY Tedesw �� Wi�son Adopted by Council: Date Form Approved by City Attorney Certified Passed by Council Secretary BY Bp Approved by Mavor: Date _ Approved by Mayor for Submission to Council BY - – — BY WHITE - CITV CLERK � PINK �. z. FIN'�NCE CANARV - DEP�ARTMENT GITY OF SA.INT PAUL Council (//�` BLUE - MAVIpq File NO• `� 7 /��/ � Council Resolution Presented By Re�ferred To Committee: Date Out of Committee By Date � RESOLVED, that the Cit Council does re uest an administrative anal sis of Y q Y tl�e HUDAC recommendations pertaining to the city of Saint Paul, said analysis to dctail the following: � 1) Determination of those recommended measures currently ; being addressed through city initiatives; � 2) Definition of initiatives required to address recom- ; mendations not currently met; and 3) Budget impacts associated with said new initiatives. ; I� -2- �� COUNCILMEN Requested by Department of: Yeas �p�� Nays � °i1°"' [n Favor iRettman � Scheibel 'Sonnen __ Agal(1St BY ��a�s�e �U£:1�i9- 'Wilson Adopted� by Council: Date JUL 3 0 '1.98T Form Approved by City Attorney Certifieql Yas e ouncil r BY B}� ' Approv by Mavor: Date . t7 3 �� Approved by Mayor for Submission to Council By - — BY Ptl�l►S'#ED A U G 8 1987 I� . . . i . _ . , � . � � '� � �* `� . _ . . . - � - � � � � � , . I: i � �� • `� � �►JUL 1 Q 1987 ' COUNCILMAN ' � JAMES SCHEiBEL A REPORT TO TIiE UNITED WAY ' OF THE SAINT PAUL AREA ON THE RECOMMENDATIONS OF THE , HUMAN DEVELOPMENT ACTION COALITION � ON LONG—TERM SOLUTIONS TO HUNGER AND HOMELESSNESS ' IN THE GREATER SAZNT PAUL METROPOLITAN AREA -28 MAY 1987 � SUBMITTED BY THE , PUBLIC/PRIVATE INITIATIVE TEOOFCPUBLIC AFFAIRS HUBERT H. HUMPHREY INSTITU � UNIVERSITY OF MINNESOTA � 255 HUMPHREY CENTER `' ` ' � 301 19TH AVENUE SOUTH ; ; ' ' MINNEAPOLIS, MINNESOTA 55455 ' ,> a (612) 625-7803 ' _� .� , F., ._ ' � � �-� i n , �., � DIRECTOR � � � ' ARTHUR T. HIMMELMAN, '' ° AND SENIOR FELLOW, HHH INSTITUTE �fy �,.,# � gp,FtgARA LUKERMANN, CONSULTANT ,` -' AND SENIOR FELLOW, HHH INSTITUTE � ' IRIS LEWZS, RESEARCH ASSISTANTI�TE AND GRADUATE STUDENT, HHH IN ' � . I I ��-l Cx1/ � � . h ' � TABLE OF CONTENTS �UMAld DEVEI,OpMENT ACTION COALZTION (HuDAC) FINAL REPORT i . I. ACXNOWLEDGEMENTS i II. HuDAC BACKGROUND AND PROCESS 1 IIII. EXECUTIVE SUMMARY OF HuDAC FINAL REPORT 3 IIV. BACKGROUND ON HUNGER AND HOMELESSNESS . � IV. HuDAC MISSION STATEMENT 11 ' 12 IVI. HuDAC GUIDING PRINCIPLES VII. HuDAC RECOMMENDATIONS 14 I For the Public Sector - Federal 14 For the Public Sector - State 14 I For the Public Sector - CAUnty 16 For the Public Sector - City . 17 � For the Private Sector - Business 18 For the Private Sector - Philanthropy (United Way) 19 � For the Private Sector - Philanthropy (foundations) 20 For the Nonprofit Sector - Service Organizations � 21 � For the Nonprofit Sector - Religious Organizations 21 � VIII. IMPLEMENTZNG AND MONITORING HuDAC RECOMMENDATIONS 24 ' ZX. PUBLIC/PRIVATE INITIATIVE PROJECT CONCLUDING COMMENTARY 25 I X. ENDNOTES IN REPORT 26 I ATTACHMENTS I p,' iiuman Development Action Coalition participants � B A Report on the Sources and Amounts of Revenue for Shelter, . , Food, and Emergency Assistance Programs in Ramsey�o ected) Washington, and Dakota Counties, 1986 and 1987 (p � _ I Prepared by Richard A. Chase, Ph.D. , and Philip W. Cooper i Amherst H. Wilder Foundation Research Center C Organizations and programs assisting homeless and hungry I' community residents of the greater Saint Paul area �� D Informational materials provided to HuDAC participants �� E Information on the Public/Private Initiative Project i , I , . ��7 l 0 7/ � � ° � II . . . ' . � � . . � . .. � - . � . I ACKNOWLEDGEMENTS , Arthur T. Himmelman �here are a qreat many people and organizations deserving acknowledqement .for the ideas, recommendations, and work wnmarized .by this report. I would like to name at least some �ho have been particularly vital in this etfort, and thnnk all HuDAC's participanta for their involvement and contributiona. �he United Way of the Saint Paul Area brought togethar a diverse • group of representatives from the public, private, and nonprofit r�ectors, and retained the Hubert H. Humphrey Institute of Public Affairs to facilitate the HuDAC process. A special thanks goes . to United Way Board members Steve Dress, Kathleen Gretsch, Virginia Greenman, Richard Kastner, and Don Larson who �articipated directly in HuDAC and to their President, Joseph V. Haggerty, and Vice President, Roy Garza for their involvement. � Among those who made presentations and/or played key roles in the HuDAC process are: Mike Anderson from Representative Bruce Vento's office; State Representative Sandra Pappas; Ramsey County �Commissioners Diane Ahrens and Ruby Hunt, Assistant to Commissioner Hunt, Lois Yellowthunder, who with Mike Anderson, Ichaired key subcommittees of HuDAC; Mayor George Latimer and 'Council Member James Scheibel of the City of Saint Paul; private sector business representatives, John Taylor of the First INational Bank, Saint Paul and Raren Muller from the H. B. Fuller Company; philanthropic comimunity representatives Leonard H. • Wi�lkening and Dr. Richard Chase of Wilder's Research Office, IYusef Mgeni of the Northwest Area Foundation, and Donna Sherlock of The Saint Paul Foundation; nonprofit service organization representatives Judith Justad and Ellen Hart of the Saint Paul ! YWCA, Rev. Richard Goebel of Emergency Fund Service, and John Mohr of Saint Paul Rehabilitation Center; community advocates Dr. Albert de Leon, Richard Neumeister, Julie Manworren, Nancy � Naegler, Kathy Cairns, Martha Eaves, and Bradley Abelow; and religious community members Samuel Horowitz, Monsignor Jerome i Boxleitner, and Father Timothy Sawina. � Thanks also to th� organizations which provided meeting space for � I HuDAC: Neighborhood House, the Saint Paul YWCA, the Saint Paul ' Red Cross, Capitol Community Services, and Ramsey County. Acknowledgement goes to those associated with the Humphrey I Institute: my colleague and co-facilitator, Senior Fellow Barbara Lukermann, our HuDAC graduate assistant, Iris Lewis; P/PIP Research Assistant, Mark Fox; P/PIP Advisory Committee member, Alan A. Saltzman; Humphrey Institute Education for Reflective Leadership student, Patricia Wilder, and typist Ellen Carlson. i Special acknowledgement for the opportunity to undertake this work is gratefully given: to Humphrey Institute Dean Harlan Cleveland and Associate Dean Royce Hanson, who asked me to serve j on behalf of the Institute, and The Saint Paul and The F. R. Bigelow Foundations which provided funding assistance. I i j � ��7�o�/ � : . , . - , . . � �iuDAC BACKGROUND AND PROCESS - . . Tn a 23 July 1986 letter, Joseph: V. Haggerty, Executive Vice Fresident o! the United Way of the Saint Paul Area, asked Harlan G�leveland, Dean of the Hubert H. Humphrey Institute of Public 1�ffairs, for Humphrey Institute assistance in establishinq and chairing a forum which would help our ' ' community negotiate long-term roles for public and private institutions [and] reach specific agreements regarding the ' the responsibilities for developing programa, providing • funding, and delivering services. . . [attacking] the � causes and [alleviating] the effects of hunger and homelessness [in] Dakota, Ramsey, and Washington counties. IDean Cleveland and Associate Dean Royce Hanson forwarded this � 'request to Arthur T. Himmelman, Humphrey Institute Senior Fellow and Director of the Institute's Public/Private Initiative Project � (p�plp) . It appeared from the nature of the United Way's request that a pro�ect specializing in collaborative problem solving iwould be the most appropriate Humphrey Institute resource. �After several preparatory meetings with the P/PIP, on 7 October - 1986, the United Way invited supporters of its Emergency Care ! Fund to a discussion of the Fund's current status and possible new options for better meeting the needs of hungry and homeless ipeople in the greater Saint Paul area. As a result of this meeting, the United Way invited a diverse qroup of Irepresentatives from the public, private, and nonprofit sectors to participate in a task force on hunger and homelessness ! facilitated by the Humphrey Institute's P/PIP. i The P/PZP facilitatinq team included Iiimmelman, Humphrey Institute Senior Fellow Barbara Lukermann, acting as a P/PIP i consultant, and P/PIP Research Assistant, Iris Lewis. The P/PIP was also assisted in its overall process by P/PIP Advisory j Comraittee member, Alan A. Saltzman, P/PIP Research Assistant, � Mark Fox, and Iiumphrey Institute Education for Reflective , � Leadership student, Patricia Wilder. � The collaborative process began when the task force . (subsequently called the Human Development Action Coalition - � HuDAC) met on 12 November 1986, and continued with monthly meetings through April, 1987. In addition, two special subcommittees, chaired by HuDAC members Mike Anderson and Lois � Yellowthunder, met to provide detailed analysis of, and options i for, the Emergency Care Fund (Anderson) and models for case ' managed service delivery (Yellowthunder) . I I 1 , �,��-i-�o9/ , . ' . � , . ,. _ _ . . � T,he Anderson subcoiamittee also enlisted the expert assistance o! , the Amherst H. Wilder Foundation's Research Center which, under �he direction of Dr. Richard A. Chase, completed an outstanding �tudy of funding beinq provided and utilized tor the hungry and � . the homeless from the public, private., and nonprofit sectors in tChe greater Saint Paul area (see Attachment B of this report for �tudy document) . A third subcommittee also met to review the 75 overall recommendations made by HuDAC, and suggest an initial group of • �riority recommendations. The subcommittee's suggestions for 22 priorties were somewhat modified at the final HuDAC meeting of 15 �April 1987 but, in large measure, were accepted as suggested. ;Memoranda providing details of all six HuDAC meetings are �available upon request by contacting Arthur T. Himmelman at 625-7803. � � . , . , . ; . � � 2 � . � ' ��-�o �/ . . � , _ . � EXECUTIVE SUNIlKARY , HiTMAN DEVELOPMENT ACTION COALITION I FINAL REPORT In October 1986, the United Way of the Saint Paul Area (United Way) asked over 40 representatives of the public, private, and nonprofit sectors in the greater Saint Paul area to serve on a ' task force, facilitated by the Public/Private Initiative Project of the Hubert H. Humphrey Institute of Public Affairs. The ' ' United Way asked the Hwnphrey Institute "to help forge long-term solutions which attack the root causes of homelessness and hunger and negotiate appropriate roles for the public, private, and ' nonprofit sectors. " I The task force named itself the Human Development Action ' Coalition (HuDAC) to emphasize that people in critical need of housing and food were not to be -"abstracted" as the "homeless" or � the "hungry" and thereby distanced from the more fortunate in the community. Rather, the name of the task force underscores that, as a human being in community, "each member of the community has elemental rights to security and autonomy; . . .rights [which� I include adequate nutrition, shelter, clothin�, and opportunity � for employment, health care and education. " * Based on a desire to go beyond "treating symptoms of hunger and homelessness to solutions. eliminating their underlying causes, " HuDAC committed itself to: I (A) Developing a cominunity consensus on the causes and problems of hunger and homelessness; (B) Seeking improved responses along a continuum of strategies and services, i.e. , short-tena, transitional, and long-term; j (C) Ensuring ongoing public accountability for the effectiveness I of these strategies and services; and _ (D) Marshaling support from the public, private, and nonprofit sectors in a variety of community-wide initiatives for and with . those in crZtical need of adequate housing, food, and/or better nutrition. � I After six monthly full committee meetings, and several � subcommittee meetings, HuDAC developed 75 recommendations, 22 of which were designated as priorities. HuDAC members feel these recommendations begin to define, and provide an ongoing basis for, relationships and responsibilities among the public, private, and nonprofit sectors which can produce long-term solutions to the problems of hunger and homelessness in the � greater Saint Paul area. * All endnotes are found on page 26 , 3 I ��-�09/ . �. . , � uDAC RECOt�IENDS THAT THE BOARD OF DIRECTORS OF THE UNITED WAY OF i E SAINT PAUL AREA ENDORSE THE RECOMMENDATIONS .IN THIS REPORT AT i`ITS 28 MAY 1987 BOARD MEETING. ONCE. ENDORSED, THE RECOMMENDATIONS SHOULD. BE IMPLEMENTED AS SOON AS POSSIBLE WITH LEADERSHIP AND STAFFING FROM THE UNITED WAY AND ACTIVE � PARTICIPATION FROM PUBLIC, PRIVATE, AND NONPROFIT ORGANIZATIONS SERVING THE GREATER SAINT PAUL AREA. AMONG HuDAC'S KEY FINDINGS AND RECOMMENDATIONS ARE: ** The primary causes of hunger and homelessness are ongoing and structural changes in our economy which have resulted in too few - �obs paying sufficient wages and the lack of affordable housing for low-income individuals and families. ** The hungry and homeless do not fit within easy categories - ',among them are individuals and families from our communities � '�from every socio-economic, racial, ethnic, occupational, and educational background. ** Although some amonq the homeless have had, or continue to �,have, personal problems which make their self-sufficiency ' difficult or, in some cases impossible, many have had no history of employment or personal problems which would indicate an inability to provide food and housing for themselves. ** Increasing numbers of the hungry and the homeless are women and their children, often newly poverty stricken as a result of unemployment, the death of a spouse, or from having to leave an abusive domestic environment. ** Among the guiding principles which should provide ethical dimensions for specific actions with and for the hungry and the homeless are: (A) Each member of the community has elemental rights to security � and autonomy; these rights include adequate nutrition, shelter, � clothing, and opportunity for employment, health care, and � education. Human rights are thus linked to economic rights and . our vision of the general welfare of the community; I', (B) The dignity of the human person in community with others is ' the primary standard by which all other social and political acts - should be measured; and (C) Justice requires that the poor have the highest claim on the resources of the community, and that public/community policies be evaluated by their responsiveness to the needs of the poor.3 4 � (�-��a�, . � - , _ . . - �** Al1 efforts with and for comn►unity members in need of housing, 'food/nutrition, and adequate employment should be sensitive to � 'cultural differences among individuals, families, and other forms 'of association. This is vital if general programs and services _ ;are to respond effectively to the diversity within our ,communities. � ** In its guiding principles, and its priority and overall � recommendations, HuDAC reached a consensus on the necessity of ' the public sector to much more fully assume, with the political ' ' support of the private and nonprofit sectors, the primary and ' ongoing responsibility fo4 the well-being of those in critical � need of food and housing. ' , ** Ultimately, adequate public sector funding should remove � emergency shelter and food programs from dependency on charitable � contributions for ongoing service delivery with the exception of ' unusual and temporary crisis, e.g. , natural disasters, accidents . ' etc. � ** In the greater Saint Paul area, public sector responsibility , should be primarily based with Ramsey County which should - � coordinate the raising and expenditure of public sector funds, � including federal, state, and city, designated for the hungry and the homeless in Ramsey County.5 ' ** Public sector responsibilities must be emphasized and lobbied t; �. for at the. federal, state, and city levels to ensure that ; ac�equate overall public resources will be added to the funding and service contributions of Ramsey County.6 � � ** The Emergency Care Fund should be phased out _by_ 31 December � 1988 and replaced with new public, private, nonprofit, "community � caring contracts" which will provide funding, service delivery, �' ongoing monitoring and assessment, and political support for a � %'� continuum of programs with and for the hungry and the homeless in ; the greater Saint Paul area.� - ; ** The United Way of the Saint Paul Area should provide the � leadership and staffing necessary to facilitate ongoing s of . � organizational structures which will ensure the effectivenes ' :�� improved collaboration among the public, private,-and nonprofit�_ '� � � � sectors for the elimination of hunger and homelessness in the _ ; greater Saint Paul area.8 � ** Periodic public meetings should review ongoing, community-wide � efforts with and for the hunger and homeless in the greater Saint � ' Paul area and be used to assist all organizations which have ' undertaken responsibilities for HuDAC recommendations. This is essential if there is to be connectedness and comprehensiveness ' among efforts including food/adequate nutrition, affordable ' housing, financial assistance, supportive services, and , employment paying beyond subsistence wages.9 � 5 � . ! . ��-ro�j , . �* Current public and private fundinq levels must, at least, be - maintained. for the range of emerqency, transitional, and self- �� ufficiency or stabilization programs while new responsibilities, „ �s recommended by HuDAC, are established to increase tunding and improve program delivery and effectiveness. , , ** Special emphasis should be given to increasing support for �`� % transitional and self-sufficiency proqrams and services from the �rivate business sector, particularly through employment opportunities, and from private philanthropy, particularly for • transitional housing and personal development programs linked �with employment opportunities.l0 _ ** It is essential to have comprehensive financial and_ client I� �data on prot�rams in the--public, private, and nonprofit sectors �,�� .,.,� 'assisting the hungry and the homeless which is generated in `��,, cooperation w�th service delivery organizations� IiuDAC ._ Irecommends that such informational reports be provided by the - Amherst H. Wilder Foundation's Research Office.11 I i i � i � i � . � � i I I I �� 6 I - �,�-�i-�� RACTtGROUND ON HUNGER AND HOMELES3NE3S FROM A NATIONAL PERSPECTIVE In their preface to �e aces � Homelessness, currently one of the best books on the sub�ect in the United States, authors Mar�orie Hope and James Young write: In almost every ma�or city, and in some small towns as well, men, women, and children are sleeping in public - parks, bus and train stations, caves, railyards, subways, alleyways, loading docks, and on rooftops and heating grates. Every winter dozens of Americans literally freeze to death. Some have perished within sight of the White House. � Even more invisible are the evicted families who huddle together in an armory or other shelter, or the battered wives carefully protected from vengeful husbands in concealed shelters, or the "throwaway kids, " most� of them abused youngsters, who stake out a home (without heat, electricity, or running water) in an abandoned building. . . . At no time since the Great Depression has the number of Americans without homes been so large or represented such �- a wide cross-section of our society as it does today. � The homeless are not only roofless, they are hungry. To be sure, hunger is more widespread than homelessness and has been growing at a startling rate. The Physician Task Force on Hunger reported in 1985 that "Hunger is epidemic in the United States. " The task force found that despite economic recovery, "hunger is getting worse, not better. " As evidence it cited growing lines at soup kitchens and • food pantries, increases in infant mortality, and wide- � spread malnutrition among the elderly, infants, and the unemployed. , Hunger and homelessness are twin phenomena. . The family one sees standing in a soupline may have had to choose between eating at home or paying the rent. They are one step away from the street. 12 7 / ' �a��7—/O�l/ HUNGRY AND HOMELESS IN MINNESOTA AND IN THE SAINT PAUL ARE1� . ', Numerous studies and reports by Minnesota researchers have �I confirmed that the assertions of Hope and Young are also true for Minnesota in general, and in the greater Saint Paul area in particular. Neal Cuthbert's December, 1986, Metropolitan Council �, report, "Homelessness, " details the increasing numbers and '� growing diversity of homeless people in the metropolitan area.l3 ' ' Using infonaation from the Saint Paul Shelter Board, Cuthbert states that approximately 10,000 different people in Saint Paul used shelters in 1986.14 In a comprehensive report for the Saint Paul YWCA, "A Report on the Homeless in the Twin Cities, " Arla Budd states that, on a given day in January, 1986, 2,000 people in the Twin Cities were on the streets - 30� of whom were in Saint Paul.15 Of particular � concern for the YWCA are the increasing numbers of women and children without homes - estimated at 20� of the total homeless population. According to Budd, "many of these female homeless are displaced homemakers, newly poor through death, ii16 a breakdown in the family structure (divorce, abuse) . ', Hunger in Minnesota was recently examined in a •study of people Iwho use emergency food shelves by the Minnesota Food Education and Resource Center (MFERC) , a project of the Urban Coalition of Minneapolis. The study, Homegrown Hunger, documents a steady I increase in the number of people using food shelves in �every part �' of Minnesota.l� According to the study, food shelf use grew from 183,000 visits in 1983 to 850, 000 visits in 1985.18 Data from a 1986 MFERC report indicate that 1,061,261 visits were made to food shelves by Minnesota residents needing to supplement their food budgets with donated items - a 19$ increase from 1985. The overall increase from 1982 to 1986 was 481 . The Homegrow Hunger study also noted that 34� of Minnesotans in poverty must rely on food shelves each month and, even with this help, many go hungry. - Food shelf use in the East Saint Paul metro areas has followed this statewide �attern according to MFERC: in 1985, 106, 029 individuals were served; in 1986, 124, 155 individuals were served, a 17� east metro area increase in one year. In addition, the Homegrown Hunger report stated that 60� of adults in its Saint Paul area survey stated that household members had "missed � one meal or more in the previous month because they had no food � or money to buy food. . . [and] 20� of households which had children �! reported that children had skipped one meal or more in the ' previous month. i19 In reviewing these statistics, it is important to note that there ' has been an increase in the number of food shelves created and utilized as well as improved efficiency in food distribution. 8 � . ��0 9/ . � , � IBEYOND THE NUMBERS: WHO ARE THE HUNGRY AND THE HOMELESS? I iThere is a general consensus among those who have examined the backgrounds of the hungry and homeless population that "every walk of life, with every conceivable problem, all agea, sexes, Iraces, [and] educational levels" are represented. Many have had long work records and stable lives; others have histories of personal problems. In the "Final Report of the Committee on • � Street People, " a committee chaired by Saint Paul City Council member James Scheibel in 1982, those most severely in need were idescribed as: . . .having no permanent address or housing, lacking marketable skills, having limited or no monetary resources, having emotional, mental, health, or hygiene problems, � having no familial ties, having language barriers, in � flight from the law, parent or domestic abuse, having been evicted from housing or released from hospital or ! or treatment centers, or an alien or refugee19 ; Recently, substantial increases in the number of homeless women and children have been reported. Arla Budd's Saint Paul YWCA study describes the conditions of homeless women in three i categories: (1) the young mother with children, in poverty, , divorced or battered, witY� low �ob skills; (2) the middle-aged , woman, unemployed and many times mentally or emotionally unstable; and (3) the elderly woman, poverty-stricken and many times mentally i11.20 i i _ I - _ I . � I I i ,� 9 i ��'7`�09/ I . ' BEYOND THE NUMBERS: WHY ARE PEOPLE HUNGRY AND HOMELESS? � -- ' According to Arla Budd, the causea o! the increase in homeless women fall into three categories: (1) breakdown of the family ! structure involving divorce, separation or abandonment which. . .create poverty, foreclosure of mortgages, eviction; (2) � domestic abuse and violence causing the victims to flee; and (3) a reduction of welfare benefits.21 It should be kept in mind � � that these "personal" causes also fall within a larger societal context of low-paying employment opportunities for women and the i lack of affordable housing, or any housing, for women with ' children who must rent. I Federal Housing and Urban Development classifications, cited by i Hope and Young, suggest that chronic and episodic homelessness and hunger generally result from: (1) chronic disabilities i (alcoholism, drug abuse, mental illness) ; (2) personal crisis (battered women, runaway youth) ; and (3) economic conditions ; (unemployed, welfare recipients) .22 �, A summary of major societal conditions/trends, both nationally and locally, which contribute to hunger and homelessness ; includes: (1) long-term structural unemployment, particularly for youth and older, displaced workers; (2) substantial increases in ; single-parent households;• (3) the encouragement of people to flee abusive situations.; (4) increased substance abuse; (5) migration � from farm areas to urban areas, and from urban area to urban area, without success in finding employment; (6) federal � reallocations of funds from human service to military programs; (7) tightened eligibility for public assistance; (8) continuing loss of single room occupancy and other affordable housing for low-income people; (9) continuing deinstitutionalization" of the mentally ill, mentally retarded, or other dysfunctional persons � without adequate community programs to assist them; and (10) increased reliance on voluntary and philanthropic resources to I respond to emergencies when such resources are far too limited " � and should be primarily provided by the public sector. - These observations on the causes of hunger and homelessness, and ' the diversity of the individuals who find themselves without housing, food, and/or adequate nutrition, are meant to emphasize . � that responses seeking to eliminate these problems must be sensitive to specific conditions and circumstances. Such � sensitivity requires that stereotyped thinking about hunger and/or homelessness must be eliminated, and that efforts to ' fundamentally alter such conditions must always support both il individual development and social change. 10 a , � I ��'7-/6 r/ HuDAC MISSION STATEMENT IHuDAC formulated the following mission statement in order to create a common basis for the development of ita reconimendations, a guide for their implementation, and a basis for evaluating their effectiveness. i I . � The Iiuman Development Action Coalition (HuDAC) of the greater Saint Paul metropolitan area understands that hungry people "are chronically unable to purchase an adequate diet, [or] periodically run out of food altogether, " and homeless people "are those with no personal claim on adequate living space for the purpose of overnight habitation or those at risk of having no personal living space due to lack of money and/or personal ', problems. " Based on this understanding, and agreement that . community responses must go beyond treating symptoms of hunger and homelessness to solutions eliminating their underlying causes, the HuDAC defines its mission as negotiating commitments from the public, private, nonprofit, and religious sectors which 'I WILL: . * Develop a community consensus on the causes and problems of hunger and homelessness; * Identify a continuum of 'strategies for services and funding, �with and for the hungry and the homeless, that provides for: * their short-term, emergency assistance; * their transitional or interim development; and * their long-term self-sufficiency or stabilization and ,, greatest opportunities for full community participation I! * .Ensure community accountability for the implementation and ' evaluation of these strategies and services through periodic ` public meetings; and " * Secure support from public officials, representatives of business, labor, philanthropic, nonprofit, and religious organizations, advocacy organizations of the hungry and the - ' homeless, and other interested individuals in all areas of HuDAC activities. 11 ;I • C',��%/-iD�// , . , ; . � .. HuDAC GUIDING PRINCIPLES HuDAC's guiding principles resulted from discussions of various � social �ustice viewpoints offered by HuDAC members and guest �Ispeakers. HuDAC's guiding pr�nciplea reflect ethical dimensions ! within which specific actions for and with hungry and homeless people can be assessed from individual, organizational and/or general community perspectives. 1. EACH MEMBER OF THE CONIIrIiJNITY HAS ELEMENTAL RIGHTS TO � SECURITY AND AUTONOMY; THESE RIGHTS INCLUDE ADEQUATE j NUTRITION, SHELTER, CLOTHING, AN OPPORTUNITY FOR EMPLOYMENT, HEALTH CARE AND EDUCATION. HUMAN RIGHTS ARE THUS LINKED TO • ECONOMIC RIGHTS AND OUR VISION OF THE GENERAL WELFARE OF THE COMMUNITY. � I 2. THE DIGNITY OF THE HUMAN PERSON IN COMMUNITY WITH OTHERS IS ' THE PRIMARY STANDARD BY WHICH ALL OTHER SOCIAL AND POLITICAL ACTS SHOULD BE MEASURED. 3. JUSTICE REQUIRES THAT THE POOR HAVE THE HIGHEST CLAIM ON THE � RESOURCES. OF THE COMMUNITY, AND THAT PUBLIC/COMMUNITY POLICIES BE EVALUATED BY THEIR RESPONSIVENESS TO THE NEEDS OF THE POOR. ' 4. THE PUBLIC SECTOR HAS THE PRIMARY AND ONGOING RESPONSIBILITY � FOR PROVIDING FOR THE WELL-BEING OF THOSE IN NEED. TO ENSURE THAT HUMAN NEEDS ARE MET MOST EFFECTIVELY, THE PUBLIC SECTOR SHOULD COOPERATE WITH THE PRIVATE, NONPROFIT, AND RELIGIOUS SECTORS TO COORDINATE RESOURCES AND INCREASE EXPERTISE. � _ I - 5. SOCIAL INJUSTICE OFTEN RESTJLTS IN MULTI-GENERATIONAL LOSSES AND IS FAR MORE COSTLY THAN PROVIDING ACCESS TO RESOURCES TO THOSE IN NEED IN A TIMELY MANNER. 6. IT MUST BE ASSUMED THAT THE HUNGRY AND THE HOMELESS CAN CHANGE THE CONDITIONS OF THEIR LIVES. THUS EACH MEMBER OF THE COMMUNITY SEEKING ASSISTANCE SHOULD BE EMPOWERED, TO THE FULLEST DEGREE POSSIBLE, TO "NEGOTIATE A CONTRACT" WITH SERVICE PROVIDERS STATING THE RESPONSIBILITIES EXPECTED OF ', EACH WITHIN A MUTUALLY DETERMINED RANGE OF OPTIONS. � i 12 I i , � ��'7 io9i � , � � � : • ; - - . � _ ,7. THE GOAL OF COMMUNITY ASSISTANCE FOR THE FNNGRY AND THE HOMELESS WHO ARE ABLE TO WORK SHOULD BE EMPLOYMENT WHICH CAN . ' PROVIDE FOR ADEQUATE NUTRITION AND PERMANENT HOUSING. , 18. ALL COMMLJNITY EFFORTS, FOR AND WITH THE HUNGRY AND HOMELESS, � SHOULD ENHANCE THEIR SECURITY AND AUTONOMY THROUGH A COMBINATION OF SELF-HELP ACTIONS AND COORDINATED ASSISTANCE ' FROM THE PUBLIC, PRIVATE, NONPROFIT, AND RELIGIOUS SECTORS. ' OMELESS 9. ADVOCACY, INCLUDING ORGANIZING THE HUNGRY AND THE H , � i AND SUPPORTING FEDERAL, STATE, COUNTY AND LOCAL LEGISLATIVE ACTION, SHOULD BE AN ESSENTZAL PART OF COMMi7NITY EFFORTS ' SEERING LONG-TERM SOLUTIONS TO THE PROBLEMS OF HUNGER AND , HOMELESSNESS. � 10. WHILE EACH INDIVIDUAL HAS A MEASURE OF RESPONSIBILITY FOR THE CONDITIONS OF THEIR LIVES, HUNGER AND HOMELESSNESS, AS I COMMUNITY PROBLEMS, ARE CAUSED BY ATTITUDES, PRACTICES AND � VALUES, EXPRESSED IN BOTH PUBLIC AND PRIVATE POLICIES, WHICH CREATED AN IMBALANCE BETWEEN INDIVIDUAL ACCUMULATION OF ' WEALTH, GOODS, AND SERVICES AND THEIR DISTRIBUTION WITHIN THE COMMUNITY TO ALL' ITS MEMBERS. ' . " e oor shall Dissent: NUMBER THREE - Some members voted for th p � have a hicth claim" rather than "the hiahest claim. " � Dissent: NUMBER SEVEN - Some members voted for "A goal, " rather , than "The goal. " i � i � ; , . � 13 � � . C,�"�7-i o 5� � ; _ � .. �uDAC RECOMMENDATIONS �iuDAC has made 75 recommendations for emergency, transitional, and long-term efforts to attack the root causes of hunger and �omelessness in the greater Saint Paul area. These recommendations are ultimately aimed at creating self- Sufficiency, or if this is not possible for an individual, stabilization with security, as well as at ways to prevent the conditions of hunger and homeless in the first place. - The following recommendations ars grouped by sector, placed in two categories, PRIORITIES (IN BOLD TYPE.) and generally xecommended, and coded by type of emphasis as noted and the end . �of each recomYnendation with the following letter key: i p = Prevention E = Emergency ! T = Transitional . S = Self sufficiency or stabilization ! G = General �FOR THE PUBLIC SECTOR - FEDERAL PRIORITY RECOMMENDATIONS !1. THE FEDERAL GOVERNMENT SHOULD REMOVE ITS FUNDING SANCTIONS BASED ON STATE ERROR RATES IN AFDC AND FOOD STAMP PROGRAMS - P . 2. THE FEDERAL GOVERNMENT SHOULD ENSURE FUNDING FOR THE 'MAINTENANCE, AND TO INCREASE OF THE NUMBER OF, OVERNIGIiT SHELTER BEDS AND BEDS IN BATTERED WOMEN'S SHELTERS UNTIL ADEQUATE, IAFFORDABLE HOUSING EXISTS IN THE COMMUNITY - E i3. THE FEDERAL GOVERNMENT SHOULD PROVIDE PASS-THROUGH OR DIRECT FUNDING, AS APPROPRIATE, FOR EMERGENCY FOOD AND SHELTER PROGRAMS IAT THE STATE, COUNTY, AND LOCAL LEVELS - E IFor the Public Sector - Federal General Recommendations 14. The Federal Government should change the law requiring � payments (in the form of ;supplement) when retrospective AFDC _ budgeting results in income below subsistence level because of i �ob loss - S i5. The Federal Government should change the federal law ' eliminating child-to-child deeming rules in 42 USC 602 (a) (38) j requiring that, if one child in a family receives AFDC support, all children must receive it - P I OR THE PUBLIC SECTOR - STATE PRIORITY RECOMMENDATIONS I i 6. THE STATE OF MINNESOTA SHOULD PROVIDE FUNDING FOR CASE MANAGED HUMAN SERVICES FOR THE fiOMELESS MENTALLY ILL - S � 14 � I I' - ��'l/C� ��/ . , i - Attachment A � HuDAC PARTICIPANTS *=Endorsed HuDAC Recommendations � Bradley Abelow, Director * IrIIJ Food Education and Resource Center ' Diane Ahrens, Chair * ' Ramsey County Board of Commissioners ' Mike Anderson, Community Liaison * ' Office of Congressman Bruce Vento ' Msgr. Jerome Boxleitner, Director * ' Catholic Charities ' Katherine Cairns, Director * � � Saint Paul - Ramsey County Nutrition Program � � Albert de Leon, Ph.D. , Executive Director * �, Council on Asian-Pacific Minnesotans I, Steve Dress, Business Representative * � Saint Paul Trades and Labor and Member, Board of Directors � United Way of the Saint Paul Area . � Martha Eaves, Supervising Attorney - Public Benefits * � Southern Minnesota Regional Legal Services, Inc. � Sally Evert, Conunissioner * � Washington County Board of Coaimissioners � Roy Garza, Vice President ** (see below) United Way of the Saint Paul Area � Rev. Richard Goebel, Executive Director * . � Emergency Fund Service - Saint Paul Food Bank ' Virginia Greenman, Member, Board of Directors * - United Way of the Saint Paul Area ' Kathleen Gretsch, Member, Board of Directors * _ United Way of the Saint Paul Area ' Susan Guse, Assistant to the Mayor * � City of Saint Paul ' Joseph V. Haggerty, President * � United Way of the Saint Paul Area ** With emphasis on the need for United Way flexibility in the , implementation of HuDAC recommendations . . . .continued � ! ��`7-/09/ . � - Norma Haider, Home-School Liaison * Indian Education Pro�ect - Saint Paul Public Schools Ellen Hart, .Deputy Director * �Saint Paul YWCA Beverley Hawkins, Ph.D. , Executive Director * �iodel Citiea Health Center, Inc. Bobbie Henrie, Senior Program Associate * - }Jorthwest Area Foundation �'. Allen Hester, Special Projects Administrator * _ Public Housing Aqency of the City of Saint Paul ISamuel I. Horowitz, Executive Director * Joint Religious Leqislative Coalition � �Ruby Hunt, Commissioner * Ramsey County Board of Commissioners Judith Justad, Executive Director * �Saint Paul YWCA Richard L. Kastner, Executive Vice President *** (see below) ICommercial State Bank and Member, Board of Directors United Way of the Saint Paul Area �Donald Larson, Community Affairs **** (see below) Minnesota Mining and Manufacturing and Member, Board of Directors i,United Way of the Saint Paul Area George Latimer, Mayor * � City of Saint Paul iJulie Manworren, Director of Family Advocacy/Community Outreach * Family Service of Saint Paul � ! Yusef Mgeni, Senior Program Associate * Northwest Area� Foundation John Mohr, President * Saint Paul Rehabilitation Center " Karen Muller, Director of Community Affairs * IH. B. Fuller Company I *** sed overall olicies but requested that the endorsement Eni�r r be considered "qualified" because of disagreement with some I specific recommendations **** Explained that endorsement would not be possible because he I was not able to attend sufficient number of HuDAC meetings . . .continued I ; . � I C��' ��Q�� ^ _ Richard Neumeister, Community Advocate * Sandra. Pappas, State Representative * Mlnnesota House of Representatives J�mes Scheibel, Council Member * , S int Paul City Council D nna Sherlock, Director of Community Sharing Fund * T e Saint Paul Foundation William Smith, Community Relations Manager * Minnesota Mutual Life Insurance Foundation John Taylor, Senior Vice President * First Bank of Saint Paul Peter Trebtoske, Manager * Dorothy Day Center Kathleen Vallenga, State Representative *** (see note above) Minnesota House of Representatives Paul A. Verret, President * The Saint Paul Foundation arilyn Vigil, Executive Director *** (see note above) eighborhood House � $�eonard H. Wilkening, President * Amherst H. Wilder Foundation Lois Yellowthunder, Assistant to Commissioner Ruby Hunt * Ramsey County Board of Commissioners Ann Wynia, State Representative *** (see note above) Minnesota House of Representatives I I I i ��7 ia�/ � • � - - . - 71. THE STATE OF MINNESOTA SHOULD REQUIRE AUTOMATIG WITHHOLDING OF CHILD SUPPORT PAYMENTS - S 8j. THE STATE LEGISLATURE SHOULD RAISE THE MINIMUM WAGE TO $4.25 PER HOUR AS DESCRIBED IN HOUSE FILE NUMBER 3 IN TFiE 1987 LEGISLATIVE SESSION - S 9�. THE STATE OF MINNESOTA SFiOULD MAKE THE HOMELESS POPULATION A MANDATED SERVICE POPULATION AND PROVIDE ADEQUATE RESOURCES TO ENSURE THAT THE NEEDS OF THE HOMELESS ARE ADEQUATELY MET - S ]�0. THE MINNESOTA STATE LEGISLATURE SHOULD DEFEAT ANY LEGISLATIVE ACTION SEEKING TO IMPOSE TAXES ON MINNESOTA NONPROFIT, CHARITABLE � ORGANIZATIONS - G �vr Li�� ruuii� JG�iVVi ctatA rPneral Recommendations 11. The State of Minnesota should create a state low-income �Mousing property tax credit to reduce the level of non-homestead property taxes which are passed along in the form of higher rents - P � �2. The State of Minnesota should support passage of the hunger eduction bill at the Minnesota State Legislature at the following levels: (1) Supplemental WIC, $10, 000, 000; (2) Commodity, $650, 000; and (3) Food Access Project, $250,000 - T !13.� The Minnesota State Legislature should restore general assistance to all who require it because they have no other source of income - P I14. The State of Minnesota should support a government waiver and set aside program to allow for "supportive community employment" and expanded "place and train" options - S I15. The State of Minnesota should provide ongoing state analysis of the financial ramifications of existing and proposed federal � legislation on low-income Minnesota residents alerting the state Ito the need for Iegislative advocacy on behalf of low-income ' � state residents - P 16. The State of Minnesota should create state employment • specialist teams to work on site at emergency shelters to assess Iskills of clients and find jobs for those qualified - S 17. The Minnesota State Legislature should loosen criteria for general assistance and expansion of work readiness program - S I 18. The State of Minnesota should pr�vids a full range of � services for the chemically dependen �I 19. The State of Minnesota should support a state match for ' federal commodities emergency food assistance programs - E 15 I • • �,��'-/09/ • , _ ' I . . FOR THE PUBLIC SECTOR - COUNTY R�COI�II�IENDATIQNS Zp. RAMSEY COUNTY SHOULD SHIFT ITS SUPPORT FOR EMERGENCY SERVICES � FROM THE EMERGENCY CARE FUND TO DIRECT FUND2NG OF EMERGENCY SERVICE PROVIDERS BY 31 DECEMBER 1988 - E � 21. RAMSEY COUNTY SHOULD INCREASE FUNDING OF EMERGENCY SHELTER AND HOUSING, INCLUDING EMERGENCY RENTAL ASSISTANCE, OVERNIGHT SHELTER BEDS, BATTERED WOMEN'S SHELTER BEDS, AND SUPPORT AN INCREASE OF AFFORDABLE TRANSITIONAL AND PERMANENT HOUSING - S I22. RAMSEY COUNTY SHOULD TAKE PRIMARY RESPONSIBILITY FOR RAISING 'AND EXPENDING PUBLIC SECTOR FUNDS AND COORDINATING ALL FEDERAL, STATE, AND CITY FUNDS DESIGNATED FOR THE HUNGRY AND THE HOMELESS IN THE COUNTY. BASED ON THIS KEY PUBLIC SECTOR ROLE, RAMSEY COUNTY SHOULD HAVE THE PRIMARY RESPONSIBILITY FOR SEEING THAT THE NEEDS OF THE HUNGRY AND IiOMELESS ARE MET IN THE COUNTY - S For the Public Sector - Countv General Recommendations 23. Ramsey County should provide case management services for the mentally ill - E � 24. Ramsey County 'should give priority support for state legislative action restoring general assistance to all those who require it because they have no other source of income - P 25�. Ramsey. County should provide support for the improvement and increase of services providing for the special needs of children in emergency overnight shelters - E I! 26. Ramsey County, in cooperation with the City of Saint Paul, should establish an authoritative office responsible for, and capable of developing and implementing a program of care with, homeless people - G ' 2T. Ramsey County should provide leadership in convening, and - partially funding, a public/private/nonprofit case management demonstration project for people in emergency and transitional homeless and hunger programs - S ' 28. Ramsey County should provide ongoing county analysis of the ramifications of existing and proposed federal legislation on ' ' low-income Ramsey County residents alerting the county to the need for legislative advocacy on behalf of low-income county ! residents - P 29. Ramsey County should provide support for making more essential services for the homeless accessible - P ' 30. Ramsey County should supportSa full` range of services for the homelesa chemically �eren�ent 16 I ' ��j0��/ I ' . , . . - � 31. Ramsey County should provide funding for the delivery of community-based "place and train!' employment - particularly for the chronically mentally ill - S � 32. Ramsey County should support transitional housing options , designed with the More Than Shelter Program and the Wilder Foundation to assist homeless people who wish to work toward , self-sufficiency - T 133. Ramsey County should not eliminate an existing shelter - program without guaranteeing the same services will be provided , by another program in the locality - P i - 34. Ramsey County should support a civil service waiver and set aside program in county government to allow for "supportive , community employment" and/or "place and train" options - S � I FOR THE PUBLIC SECTOR - CITY PRIORITY RECOMMENDATIONS �I, 35. THE CITY OF SAINT PAUL SHOULD DESIGNATE A PORTION QF ITS '� MCKNIGHT FOUNDATION FUNDED TRANSITIONS PROGRAM RESOURCES FOR ' HARD-TO-EMPLOY HOMELESS AND HUNGRY PEOPLE IN EMERGENCY: AND � TRANSITIONAL HOUSING PROGRAMS - S I 36. THE CITY OF SAINT PAUL SHOULD SUPPORT THE CREATION. OF MORE �. . AFFORDABLE TRANSITIONAL AND PERMANENT HOUSING FOR VERY LOW-INCOME / PERSONS - S ' 37. THE CITY OF SAINT PAUL SHOULD MAKE A COMMITMENT TO MANDATE THE INCLUSION OF PROVISIONS FOR THE HOMELESS POOR IN HOUSING ASSISTANCE PLANS IN ITS OFFICE OF PLANNING AND ECONOMIC �� DEVELOPMENT PROGRAMS. SUCH PROVISIONS SHOULD BE BASED ON `�I DETAILED NEEDS ASSESSMENTS OF EMERGENCY, TRANSITIONAL, AND PERMANENT HOUSING SUBGROUPS - S '� 38. THE CITY OF SAINT PAUL SHOULD MAKE A COMMITMENT TO A �� MORATORIUM ON THE DEMOLITION OR CONVERSION OF CITY, COUNTY, OR - , PRIVATELY OWNED RESIDENTIAL FACILITIES LOCATED IN THE CITY, ' COUPLED WITH: (A) THE DEDICATION OF A PORTION OF THE PROFITS� FROM j DEVELOPMENT OF CURRENT SINGLE-ROOM-OCCUPANCY PROPERTY TOWARDS THE . CREATION OF NEW, LOW COST HOUSING; AND (B) NEW TAX REVENUE INCENTIVES FOR THE PRESERVATION AND REPAIR OF LOW COST RESIDENTIAL HOMES - S I For the Public Sector - Citv General Recommendations 39. The City of Saint Paul should encourage private sector j transitional employment programs for the homeless - T 40. The City of Saint Paul in cooperation with Ramsey County ' should support the establishment of an authoritative office i responsible for, and capable of developing and implementing a program of care with, homeless people - G 17 � I � i � l"j,��o9i �' 41. The City of Saint Paul should provide funding for the maintenance and increase of the number of overnight shelter beds, and beds in battered women's shelters, until adequate affordable � housing exists - .E 42. The City of Saint Paul should support the provision for low- income housing for independent living through the development of 'ladditional tax and governmental incentives - S 43 . The City cf Saint Paul should provide leadership in the � preservation of existing and the creation of new affordable, low- � I cost rental housing - S � 44. The City of Saint Paul should support improvements and increases in services providing for the special needs of children ; in emergency overnight shelters - E 45. The City of Saint Paul should create zoning policies � permitting emergency overnight shelters, transitional housing, and single room occupancy (SRO) options to locate in more ' residential and business zones - P 46. The City of Saint Paul should support the civil service waiver and set aside program to allow for "supportive community ! employment" and "place and train" options - S 47. The City of Saint Paul should not eliminate an existing � shelter program without guaranteeing the same services will be I pirovided by another program in the locality - P 48. The City of Saint Paul (Saint Paul Public Schools) should create a pilot program in truancy prevention that identifies at I risk children in elementary schools and provides intensive social services to children and their families - followed over a three to four year period - P I 49. The City of Saint Paul should give priority support for state legislative action restoring general assistance to all who � require it - P . �, 50. The City of Saint Paul should support more accessible services for the homeless (emergency) - E � j FOR THE PRIVATE SECTOR - BUSINESS PRIORITY RECOMMENDATIONS 51. THE SAINT PAUL BUSINESS COMMUNITY SHOULD PROVIDE PRIVATE SECTOR EMPLOYMENT OPPORTUNITIES FOR HOMELESS AND HUNGRY PEOPLE IN j TRANSITIONAL HOUSING PROGRAMS - T For the Private Sector - Business General Recommendations I 52 . The business sector should assist in requiring automatic withholding of child support payments - S ; 18 � �G'�7—io�ij �3. Businesses should solicit members cf the Minneacta Hospitality Association to make regular contributions to food shelves - improve the quality of food with donations of dried �ilk, eggs, canned meats, fish, and fresh fruits and vegetables - 54. Private businesses should support the creation of more �affordable transitional and permanent housing - S 55. The business sector should provide support for more � accessible essential services for the homeless - E I56. The business sector should support home-based literacy - services for parents and children - P IFOR THE PRIVATE SECTOR - PHILANTHROPY PRIORITY RECOMMENDATIONS � 57. THE UNITED WAY OF SAINT PAUL (UNITED WAY) SHOULD PHASE OUT THE EMERGENCY CARE FUND BY 31 DECEMBER 1988, THEREBY REDEFINING ITS IROLE IN RELATIONSHIP TO OTHER PUBLIC, PRIVATE, AND NONPROFIT SECTOR ROLES IN ASSISTING TAE HUNGRY AND THE HOMELESS BY: (A) INCREASING ITS FUNDING OF TRANSITIONAL PROGRAMS FOR THE IHUNGRY AND THE HOMELESS THROUGH ITS ANNUAL ALLOCATIONS PROCESS; (B) SEEKING AGREEMENTS WITH PUBLIC SECTOR FUNDERS TO GUARANTEE ONGOING FINANCIAL ASSISTANCE TO EMERGENCY SERVICE PROVIDERS IDIRECTLY THROUGH PURCHASE OF SERVICE CONTRACTS; (C) ADVOCATING FOR INCREASED FUNDING SUPPORT FROM OTHER PRIVATE PHILANTHROPIC ORGANIZATIONS FOR TRANSITIONAL HOUSING PROGRAMS; I AND (D) SEEKING AGREEMENTS WITFi THE CITY OF SAINT PAUL'S TRANSITIONS PROGRAM AND PRIVATE BUSINESSES TO PROVIDE TRAINING AND JOBS FOR ITHOSE ABLE TO ACHIEVE SELF-SUFFICIENCY THROUGH EMPLOYMENT - T � 58. THE UNITED WAY SHOULD FORM A COMMITTEE TO MEET WITH PRIVATE SECTOR LEADERS TO UPDATE THEM ON THE NEEDS OF THE HUNGRY AND THE . jHOMELESS, REVIEW THE RECOMMENDATIONS OF HUDAC, AND ASK FOR THEIR ' SUGGESTIONS, COMMENTS, AND FINANCIAL AND POLITICAL SUPPORT - G 59. THE UNITED WAY SHOULD PROVIDE LEADERSHIP IN NEGOTIATING � I "CARING COMMUNITY CONTRACTS" (CCCs) AMONG SECTORS AND � ORGANIZATIONS IN THE GREATER SAINT PAUL AREA. THE CCCs SHOULD SPECIFY WHAT PARTICULAR ORGANIZATIONS WILL COMMIT THEMSELVES TO DO, AND HOW THEY WILL BE ACCOUNTABLE FOR RESULTS IN SERVING THE 'I HUNGRY AND THE HOMELESS - G 60. THE UNITED WAY SHOULD PROVIDE LEADERSHIP IN DEVELOPING AN', ONGOING ORGANIZATIONAL RESPONSE BY HUDAC WHICH WILL MAXIMIZE THE ' IMPLEMENTATION OF ITS RECOMMENDATIONS, AND ENSURE ACCOUNTABILITY I FOR RESULTS, THROUGH APPROPRIATE STRUCTURES WHICH COULD INCLUDE THESE, OR OTHER, SPECIFIC COMPONENTS: . 19 � . ��-�og� � . � (A) CARING COMMUNITY COMMITTEE - BASICALLY THE HUDAC MEMBERSHIP AFND ADDITIONAL BROAD REPRESENTATION FROM THE COMMUNITY TO MEET TWICE A YEAR TO EVALUATE THE COMMUNITY'S EFFORT AND TO MONITOR AtND UPDATE CCCS AMONG ORGANIZATIONS; (�B) CARING COMMUNITY EXECUTIVE COMMITTEE - MADE OF UP CONIlKTJNITY DiECISION MAKERS FROM THE PUBLIC, PRIVATE, AND NONPROFIT SECTORS W�IHO COULD CREATE AND MAINTAIN A COMMUNITY CONSENSUS. THIS COMMITTEE WOULD MEET QUARTERLY TO MAKE POLICY, ASSIST IN FUND ' RAISING AND COORDINATION OF SERVICE DELIVERY, MONITOR AND EVALUATE CCCS, AND GENERALLY ENSURE THAT HUNGER AND HOMELESSNESS IBSUES CONTINUE TO REMAIN COMMUNITY HUMAN SERVICE PRIORITIES; � (C) CARING COMMUNITY COORDINATING GROUP - COMPOSED OF STAFF FROM R�AMSEY COUNTY, THE CITY OF SAINT PAUL, THE SAINT PAUL UNITED WAY, AND A SERVICE PROVIDER REPRESENTATIVE. THIS GROUP WOULD MEET N'fONTHLY TO ASSIST IN THE SUCCESSFUL IMPLEMENTATION OF CCCS; AND (�D) CARING COMMUNITY PROVIDER COMMITTEE - MADE UP OF ALL SERVICE PROVIDERS ASSISTING THE HUNGRY AND THE HOMELESS. THIS COMMITTEE 4�OULD MEET QUARTERLY, COORDINATED BY THE SAINT PAUL UNITED WAY, TO DEVELOP COLLABORATIVE STRATEGIES, COORDINATE SERVICES, POOL P�ESOURCES WHERE APPROPRIATE, AND ASSIST EACH OTHER IN DAY-TO-DAY TASKS OF SERVICE PROVISION. - T 61. THE WILDER FOUNDATION SHOULD PROVIDE OUTREACH AND REFERRAL STAFFING SUPPORT FOR INDIVIDUALS LIVING IN SRO HOUSING - S 82. THE WILDER FOUNDATION RESEARCH CENTER SHOULD PROVIDE, IN COOPERATION WITH SERVICE PROVIDERS, AN ONGOING FINANCIAL AND dLIENT DATA COLLECTION OVERVIEW ON THE RESOURCES OF THE PUBLIC, PRIVATE AND NONPROFIT SECTORS DESIGNATED FOR THE BENEFIT OF HUNGRY AND HOMELESS PEOPLE IN THE GREATER SAINT PAUL AREA. A SPECIAL EMPHASIS SHOULD ALSO BE GIVEN TO FOLLOW-UP THE PROGRAMS 1�iND SERVICES FOR SINGLE PARENT FAMILIES - G � For the Private Sector - Philanthropy General Recommendations i . - 63 . The Wilder Foundation should continue its assistance to �ndividuals who wish to work toward self-sufficiency in cooperation with the More Than Shelter Program's transitional , housing services - T �4. The Wilder Foundation should continue support for the More Than Shelter Program's transitional housing for individuals who wish to work toward self-sufficiency - T 'I 20 ; I . �"�7-�o�i . ,, � , _ ; . . .. � �'or the Nonprofit Sector - General Recommendations 65. Nonprofit service organizations should provide, and receive iincreased funding support for, programs for women and children providing a continuum of "case manage�d" services which can bring them from emergency assistance to self-sufficiency through ladequate employment and housing - T �66. Nonprofit service organizations should be supported to provide community-based "place and train" employment programs, � particularly for the chronically mentally ill - S 67. Nonprofit service organizations should assist in the ' imaintenance, and support the increase, of overnight shelter••beds until more affordable housing units exist for the general population and for women in battered women's shelters - E 68. Nonprofit service organizations should be supported to � iprovide a full range of services for the chemically dependent - S 69. Nonprofit service organizations should support increasing the iaccessibility of essential services for the homeless - E 70. Nonprofit service organizations should be supported to � provide community "place and train" employment programs with a job coach functioning as a case manager and trainer - S 171. Nonprofit service organizations should be supported to provide programs identifying low-income housing in communities ! with the provision of roommate seeking and linking services - shared households - S 72. Nonprofit service organizations should support the creation of more affordable transitional and permanent housing - S I 73. Nonprofit service organizations should support improvements i and increases in services providing for the special needs of ' children in emergency overnight shelters - E ' i 74. Nonprofit service organizations should be supported to • provide the home-based literacy services to parents and children - S I For the Relic,�ious Communitv - General Recommendation 75. Religious congregations should assist in making essential � services for the homeless more accessible - E � I � 21 I ' ��7`i6°I/ , ° � : .. _ iSiJNII�IARIES OF RECOMMENDATIONS ITY SECTOR AND TYPE OF RESPONSE BY SECTOR (*) INDICATES PRIORITY RECOMMENDATION � � For the Public Sector jFederal 1* (P) , 2* (E) , 3* (E) , 4 (S) , 5 (P) - I � ' State of Minnesota � 6* (S) , 7* (S) , 8* (S) , 9* (S) , 10* (G) , 11(P) , 12 (T) , 13 (P) , 14 (S) , - 15(P) , 16 (S) , 17 (S) , 18 (S) , 19 (E) I Ramsev Countv 2�*(E) � 21* (S) � 22* (S) . 23 (E) ► 24 (P) . 25 (E) , 26(G) , 27 (S) � 28 (P) � � i 29 (P) , 30 (S) , 31(S) , 32 (T) , 33 (P) , 34 (S) City of Saint Paul . I 35* (S) , 36* (S) , 37* (S) , 38* (S) , 39 (T) , 40 (G) , 41(E) , 4�2 (S) , 43 (S) , 44 (E) , 45 (P) , 46 (S) , 47 (P) , 48 (P) , 49 (P) , 50 (E) I For the Private Sector i ' Business � ! 51* (T) , 52 (S) , 53 (E) , 54 (S) , 55 (E) , 56(P) i Philanthropv 57* (T) , 58* (G) , 59* (S) , 60* (T) , 61* (S) , 62*(G) , 63 (T) , 64 (T) I For the Nonprofit Sector I � 65(T) , 66 (S) , 67. (E) , 68 (S) , 69 (E) , 70(S) , 71(S) , 72 (S) , 73 (E) , . 74 (S) For the Religious Communitv _ �5 �E� i I 22 I I ��O / l D�� . I �, • - . i . BY TYPE OF RESPONSE (*) INDICATES PRIORITY RECOMMENDATION , Prevention - 1*, 5, 11, 13, 15, 24, 28, 29, 33, 45, 47, 48, 49, 56 , EmergencY 2*, 3*, 19, 20*, 23 , 25, 41, 44, 50, 53, 55, 67, 69, 73 , 75 ITransitional ' 112, 32, 39, 51*, 57*, 60*, 63, 64, 65 ' Self-Sufficiencv 4, 6*, 7*, 8*, 9*, 14, 16, 17, 18, 21*, 22*, 27, 30, 31, 34, 35*, � i36*, 37*, 38*, 42, 43 , 46, 52, 54, 61*, 66, 68, 70, 71, 72, 74 iGeneral i10*, 26, 40, 58*, 59*, 62* � i . i ' �I i - li i I - � �� - • i 23 I � '� ' ��'7 tc�9/ �, {IMPLEMENTING AND MONITORING HuDAC RECOMMENDATIONS . Throughout the HuDAC process, there was a clear consensus that some type of ongoing implementation effort must be linked to any recommendations made by HuDAC for policy changes. There was �little, if any, interest in simply makinq policy reconunendations ,and offering yet another study to the community without �commitments, and specific mechanisms, to make things happen. ��In addition to the implementation of policy, funding, and program changes, HuDAC members want to see these new efforts monitored, . �assessed, and improved through ongoing public forums. To ensure �that direction is provided within HuDAC's recommendations, there 'are specific suggestions for the the United Way of the Saint Paul Area on how to bring together all those who should and can assist �in solving the problems of hunger and homelessness. �iuDAC members understand that their specific ideas for the structure and process of ongoing ccmmittees may or may not be �,adopted by the United Way. Having recognized this, however, �iuDAC has reached a strong consensus that the United Way should 'take responsibility for creating an effective structure and �rocess of some kind as soon as possible - be it as xuDAC �recommends or in other forms. Central to any ongoing efforts, from the perspective of HuDAC's 3aission statement and guiding principles, should be the inclusion 'of representatives from among hungry and homeless people in the �implementation, monitoring, assessing and, whenever necessary, in �the replacing of HuDAC or other community policy, funding, and �rogram priorities. More specifically, as stated in HuDAC's sixth guiding principle, iwhich assumes "that the hungry and the homeless can change the conditions of their lives, " it is the view of the Public/Private 'Iriitiative Project, and some HuDAC members, that organizers -- should be funded to support the legitmate and necessary desires of the hungry and the homeless to speak and act on their own behalf. Assistance in this type of organizing is available from: Mr. Chris Sprowal National Homeless Union - 2001 Spring Garden Street Philadelphia, PA 19130 ' (215) 751-0466 and/or from the , Public/Private Initiative Project ' Arthur T. Himmelman, 625-7803 , � � �, 24 ' (�r_ �'��/ � ' II' � - � PUBLIC/PRIVATE INITIATIVE PROJECT CONCLUDING COMMENTARY , It is our view; as facilitators of HuDAC's efforts, that the � recommendations offered to the community recognize that hunger � and homelessness have become ongoing, structural characteristics � of our society. The ongoing and structural nature of these �, problems are primarilv caused by the lack of employment � , opportunities providing adequate wages, and the lack of , affordable housing for low-income individuals and families. , Solutions to the problems of hunger and homelessness - as opposed • , to temporary and inadequate remedies - require fundamental , changes in current societal priorities in producing and , allocating public and private wealth. � It is clear that hungry and homeless individuals and families � , include those from every socio-economic, racial, ethnic, �occupational, and educational background. Many have had no �history of employment or personal problems which would suggest � such calamity in their lives. Others have had, and continue to �have, problems which make their self-sufficiency difficult or, in � some cases, impossible. No matter which conditions have brought them to their immediate emergency, however, it is vital to �emphasize, to the fullest degree possible, that personal change � is as much encouraged and .expected as is caring and assistance � from public, private, and nonprofit organizations and the . individuals associated with them. 'We must not ignore those among us who find life at its most 'desperate. If not out of humanity for others - which common 'decency requires - then for our own sake. For hunger and 'homelessness know no boundaries beyond which they cannot reach 'and care not about the circumstances of any child, woman, or man 'whom they terrorize. It is for us to care - for their sake and �our own. _ � � _ , 25 I G ��7-��1/ r � ' . • �FNDNOTES IN REPORT 1. HuDAC guiding principle number one - .report, page 12 � . HuDAC mission statement - report, page 11 3 . HuDAC guiding principle number three - report, page 12 4 . HuDAC guiding principle number four - report, page 12 • g. HuDAC recommendation number 22 - report, page 16 6. HuDAC recommendations - report, pages 14-18 7�. : HuDAC recommendation number 57 - report, page 19 8�. HuDAC recommendation number 59 - report, page 19 9�. Ibid. 1�0. HuDAC recommendations 51 and 57 - report, pages 18 and 19 1'�. HuDAC recommendation number 62 - report, page 20 . lx . Marjorie Hope and James Young, The Faces of Homelessness, Lexington Books, preface, xi and xii 1� . Neal Cuthbert, "Homelessness in the Metropolitan Area, " •_ December, 1986 � 14. Ibid. , page 5 1�. Arla Budd, "A Report on the Homeless in the Twin Cities, " for � the Saint Paul YWCA, page 9 16. Ibid. , page 10 1'� .- Bradley Abelow, "Homegrown Hunger, " a report of the Minnesota _ Food Education and Resource Center, for the Urban Coalition � of Minneapolis, page 22 " 1� . Ibid. , page 6 19. Ibid. , page 12 20',. Budd, page 4 21�. Ibid. 22. Hope and Young, page 22 ' 26 I `��'/O 7/ � � Attachment B i I i i i FUNOING SHELTER AND F000 PROGRAMS � i 1986 and 1987 Sources and Amoun ts of Revenue � i For Shelter, Food. and Emergency Assistance Programs �- In Ramsey, Dakota, and Washington Counties 1986 and 1987 (pro3ected) I ! Prepared for Human Development Action Coalition � bY . � Richard A. Chase, Ph.D. Philip W. Cooper � Wilder Research Center i � i I April , 1987 , ! . � i ��7�ag� SUMMARY OF FINOINGS This repo�t descrtbes the amount of revenue for shelter. food, and emergency assistance programs in Ramsey. Dakota. and Washington Counties; and it�'' indicates the sources from whlch the funds were received or will be requested. The tables show 1986 actual total revenue figures and 1987 pro�ected revenue figures. The information was gathered directly from the agencies and organizations providing the services. (The agencies, � organizations, and programs included 1n this report are listed in Tables 3, 4, ar�d 6.) ' In 1986. the largest amount of total revenues came from foundations and corporations, amounting to more than 2.4 million dollars or about one-third of the total amount of 7.07 million dollars. Shelter programs (emergency � sl�elters. transitional housing. single room occupancies. and rental assistance) recelved about two-thirds of the total revenues in 1986. The development of single room occupancy housing accounted for nearly half (47X) of the 1986 total revenues. � , In 1987, fees for service are pro�ected to produce the largest amount of rlevenues, about 1 .35 million dollars, or about a quarter of the total amount of 5.55 million dolla�s. Individual and religious group contributions are pro�etted to generate about 1 .26 million dollars (23 percent of the total amount) . Food and emergency assistance programs (on-site meals, food shelves. F�lare Share) are pro�ected to receive more than half (53X) of the total revenues in 1987. From 1986 to 1987, the total amount of revenues is pro3ected to decline from 7.07 million dollars to 5.55 million dollars, a decrease of 22 percent. Agencies expect to seek increased amounts of revenues from individual and � tteligious group contributlons. fees for service, the United Way. and the - Emergency Care Fund. Decreased amounts of revenue a�e pro�ected to come from foundations, corporations, and government. The biggest percentage increase in . revenues is expected from fees for services (75X) . Government funding is ro�ected to decrease by 73 percent. Fare Share, emergency rental assistance rograms. and transitional housing programs pro�ect receiving the biggest increases in the amount of revenues for 1987. j I -2- I �-�'�7-ro�/ • . � � i � . I FIGURE 1 i Arnount of Total Revenue Frorn Each Source ' 1986 and 1987 �Projected� 2600000 �400000 � �986 2200000 ❑ 1987 Pro�ected 2000000 � � 1800000 • � '�-I 1600000 O A '1400000 . � �- � I1200000 � 1000000 � � I800000 � 600000 i 400000 � � 2�000 ' 0 '� Fdn/Corp Govern Ind1Re1 Fees United Way ECF Other . Sources of Revenue KEYI: Fdn/Corp = Foundations and Corporations Govern = Government Ind/Rel = Individual and Religious Group Contributions I Fees = Fees for Service � - ECF = Emergency Care Fund Other = Mixed and Miscellaneous Sources i i . -3- � � �� -�o�i FIGURE 2 Percent of Total Revenue From Each Source - ' 1986 and 1987 �Projected� � . � � 1986 � � 1987 Pro�ected �0 � �6 , 24 . � � 20 � U "18 m `i6 a 14 12 '10 ��8 6. �4 �2 0 Fdn/Corp Govern Ind/Rel Fees United Way ECF Other Sources of Revenue KEY:', Fdn/Corp = Foundations and Corporations Govern = Government � Ind/Rel = Zndividual and Religious Group Contributions Fees = Fees for Service ' ECF = Emergency Care Fund � Other = Mixed and Miscellaneous Sources , -4- � (�,,�- �7��0 2� . � , FIGURE 3 ' . ; � � AM��UNT �1ND PERCENT QF T4TAL REVENUE PER AREA QF NEED Shelter . ' 66�89l, • • • • • , . . . . . . . s4,653,231 • • • • •'• • • • • . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . .'. . , . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . � . .'. . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . � • • • •'• • • • �ther . . . . . . .'. . . . . . . . . . 1.8% . . . . . . . . . , . . . . . . . • • • • • • • �128,738 . . . . . . � . . . . . . .'. . . � '. . . . '. . . . � . . . . . . • • • . , : ' • �_Food and Emergency Aselsta[1oe ! 3�4% ' s2,291,122 ' . I� 1956 II' Shelter ! �—44.0°,6 ' • • • • • • s2,442 532 . . . . . . . . i . .�. . . . . . . . . . . . . • . . . . . i . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . .�. . . . . . . • . . . . ' . . .�. . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . • • • . . . . . � . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . - . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . • .�.�. . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . _ , .�. . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . ' OtheC � — 2.696 , ' E145,500 i � Food and EYnergency Aesist�noe_� 53.4°•b ' ' 52,959,210 � 1987 �Projected� ' � � -5- � i ��7-�o9i . i � TABLE 1 - . _ PERCENTAGE CHANGE IN REVENUE BY SOURCE � ' 1986 to 1987 (pro�ected) ' Pe�cent Change 1986 1987 1986 to 1987 � (pro�ected) . FQundations and Corporations 52.409,292 S 804.616 - 66.6% G�vernment 51 ,320.010 S 354.380 - 73.2% Individual and Religious Group Contributions 51 .134,986 51 ,259.360 + 11 .OX F�es S 774.585 51 ,354,476 + 74.8% United Way ; 553,908 S 909,242 + 64.2X i Emergency Care Fund t 600.496 S 687,103 + 14.4X Other . t 279.814 S 178.065 - 36.4X ' Total 57,073,091 t5.547,242 - 21 .6X ' •_ i i . �I - i � � i � - I i „ ' -6- ' � �,,� (�-�o�i � , . ; . TABLE 2 PERCENTAGE CNANGE IN REYENUE BY TYPE OF PROGRAM 1986 to 1987 (pro�ected) ' Percent Change 1986 1987 1986 to 1987 (pro�ected) S�t'elter Proarams � Emergency Shelter 51 .058.993 :1 .487,181 + 40.5X Transitional Housing 198.500 359.100 + 80.9% Single Room Occupancy 3,314,738a 443.318b - 86.6X • R�ntal Assistance 81 .000 152.333 + SS.1% Total 4,653,231 2,442.532 - 47.5X �od and Emeraencv Assistance On-Site Meals 454,903 489,716 + 7.7% Emergency Assistance 1 .693.907 1 .945,894 + 14.9% F�re Share 142.312 523.600 +267.9X , Total 2,291 ,122 2.959,210 + :29.2% Other Proarams • 128,738 145,500 + 13.OX � GRAND TOTAL � 57,073,091 55,547,242 - 21 .6X a 'TM s figure includes 53,270,158 for remodeling costs. bl��This figure includes 555,000 fo� remodeling costs. . � � -7- ��7�0 9/ . , - T11BlE 3 - SHELTER PROGRAMS � EmeroencY Shelters . Tronsitional Housing ' 19g6 1987s 1986 1987 , M�ount (t) Anaunt cx) hrount (S llnaunt cx) Revenue Sou�ces ' Priv�te Contributions ; 118,810 (11.2) ; 156.729b (10.5) s 61.30� (3�.9) ; 25,� ( 1.0) Foundation Grants s 104,093 ( 9.8) s 304,120 (20.4) ; 43,� (�•�) S 85.125 (23.7) Unit�d Way ; 120.500 (11.4) ; 175,� (11.8) S 54,300 (27.4) s109.519 (30.5) - Emergency Care Fund s 411.947 (38.9) s 435,524 (29.3) - - - ' Gove�rment: Federal 0 ( 0 ) 0 ( 0 ) - - Z 9.� ( 2.5) St�te ; 28.245 ( 2.7) S 25,� t 1.7) - - - - Co�oty 1 106,200 (t0.0) ; 208,200 (14.0) - _ - City s�15.862 ( 1.5) �0 ( 0 ) - Program Fees ,Z 127,540 (12.0) � 150,780 (10.1) ; 34,300 (17.3) ; 94,656 (26.4) Agen�� Contributio� �' ; 24,996 ( 2.4) ; 31,428 ( 2.1) - - ; 34,800 ( 9.7) Miscglla�eous ' 800 ( 0.1) I 000 ( 0.1) 4 800 ( 2.4) I 000 ( 0.3) 'Tota I � S I,058,993� (I 00'L) ;I,487,781 (100'L) ;198,500 (100'L) �359,100 (100'L) -. �,, �.. ,_•_.o � - c� • . ._.._., ��. �,�.�s..c_.c>.�.• ( i L.`.a `:*• , C�-�_�� ___�_ . ause 1987.bu et a 1987•pro�ections include estimated figures for PSR based on 1986 budget bec d9 w'Il not be available until Ma�. � b Pfivate cont�ibutions include ;14,369 request from St. Paul Coalition for Haneless' Hands Across America Fund. c s115,000 in revenue fran More Than Shelter was apportioned as follows: Fopndation grants - �81,293; State - ;17,845; City - ;t5,8b2• l I� Emergency Shelters Transitional Housinq • . Dorothy Day Dorothy Day (1987 only) Protecton, Shelter and Referral (PSR) YWCA, Stage 111 (building and progra� , Salvation Army Unio� Gospel Mission YWCA, Stages I and II (includes food) ' 'll ; �; � � . , -9- � ��`y�o�/ , � � TABIE 3 - (Continued) - � SHELTER PROGRMIS Sirqle Roam OccupancY Eareroe�cY Rental 1lssistance ' 1986 1987 1996 1987 � Mrount (t) Maunt (S) hrount (t) Mrount (1) Revenue Sources • Private Contributions - - ; 25,000 ( 5.6) - - S 2,915 ( 1.9) foundation Grants �1,347�973a (40.7) s 219,871 (49.6) - - - - United May - - ; 42.828 ( 9.7) - - - - _ Emer�ency Care Fund - - � 53,079 (12.0) s 81,000 (100) ;130,000 (85.3) Goverrme�t: Federal - - - - - - � 19,418d (12.8) Stalte ; 231,273b ( 7.0) j 25,00� ( 5.6) . - - - - Coynty - - - - - - - - � City ; 885,492� (26.7) - - - - - - Progr+am Fees - - ; 77,040 (17.3) - - - - Agenqy Contributio� - - - - - - ' - St. Paui Campanies ; 150,000 ( 4.5) - - - - - ' Mie�i�can House . Qevelopers ; 700.000 (21.1) - - - - - - Miscellaneous - - 500 ( 0.1) - - - - llotal ;3,314,738e (IOOi) f 443,318f (IW'�) S 81,000 (100'i) �152.333 (IOOX) , a Includes Family Housing Fund (s250.000) and Foundation share of More Than Shelte� grant (st„053,393). b St�te/County sha�e of More Than Shelte� grant (s231.273). � Includes St. Paul's share of Mo�e Than Shelter grant (5205,492). � d Cam�unity lktion Program funds. � e TAis figti�e includes ;3,270,158 for rertadeling costs. f T�i�s figure includes �55,000 for remodeling costs. Single Room Occupancy EmeraencY Rental Assistance I, YWCA (60 units) Camrunity Action Council Mierican House (56 units) (1987 only, received ;44,000 from ' Wilder Apa�tments (76 units) Scott�arver Counties in 1986) � Dorothy Da� (25 units) Enie�gency Fund Se�vice Washington Cou�ty RAP li —10— ; �' �7-io `�/ • , �. , i ' TJIBLE 4 - � � , F000 N� El�faGENCY ASS 1 STIINCE PROGRIIlIS ' - Eeierqeoc� Assistance ' On-S i te Mea 1 Proqroms (Food She I vesa) Fare Shareb (se I f-�fie 1 p) ' 1966 1987 1966 1987 1966 1987 �_ (x) �_ cs� _� �.�. �_ � � x �- x Private Contributions 329,972 (72.5) 345.716 (70.6) 523,126 (30.9) 610,000 (31.3) - - - - Foundatior� Grants 9,285 ( Z.0) - - 22,981 ( 1.4) 130,000 ( 6.7) 22,000 (15.5) 30,000 ( 5.7) United Nay 26,496 ( 5.8) 41,500 ( 8.5) 350,112 (20.7) 54U.395 (27.6) - - - - Emergenc��Care Fund 14,450 ( 3.2) 28,500 ( 5.8) 53,099 ( 3.U - - - - - - Gover'rme�t• Federal ! - - - - - - 8,142 ( 0.4) - - 12,000 ( 2.3) ' State � - - - - 22.918 ( 1.4) 16,500 ( 0.8) - - - - County � - - - - 30,020 ( 1.8) 31,120 ( 1.6) - - - - City � - - - - - - - �,\:�',*..,�•�..,_, � '�'` �,..c•� vv �' ';�e��-�� Cw c- E-��.v� - Program Fees� 50,000 (II.0) 50,000 (10.2) 442,433 `(26.1) 502,000 (25.8) 120;312 (84.5) 480,000 (91.7) Agency Contribution - - � - - - - 7,737 ( 0.4) - - - - Other Sources: • Assumptjon Chu�ch 24,700 ( 5.4) 24,000 ( 4'.9) - - - - - - - ' SpecialiProjectsd - - - - 38,780 ( 2.3) 50,000 ( 2.6) - - - - Designated Food � Purchasesd - - - - 204,297 (12.1) - - - - - - Miscell�neous - - - - 6.141 ( 0.4) 50,000 ( 2.6) - - 1,600 ( 0.3) Total 454,903 (100�) 489,716 (100'L) 1,693,�7 (100'L) 1,945.894 (IOOS) 142.312 (IOOZ) 523,� (100'L) e F�ne�gency•Assistance includes food shelves as well as assistance for other Dasic needs such as clothes .: and fur`n i ture. � . b Estima�ed East�letro portion (40S) of statewide budget. Program started mid-1986. ' � Includes membership fees and use� fees. ' d ��e5 �evenue fran foundations, corporatioos, and goverrment. � 0�-Site Meal Programs EmergencY Assistance (food shelves) � Dorothy Day Center and Lunch Program ' Emer9e�cy Fund Se�vice Lqaves and Fishes, Too United Nay-funded agencies with food shelves (Dorothy Day and Neighborhood House, (Note: Other ayencies and churches also proviGing emergencY supper) assistance are not accounted for here. For example, in U�iion Gospel Missio� Washington County, 10 food and emergenc� assistance ; programs p�ivately ope�ated by chu�ches a�d volunteers � raised and spent an estimated ;200,000 in 1986.) � ' -11- - �,��/D�'J� . , . � TABLE S : � , Sl1MARY Of REVENUES � Shelter Pro�rams Food and EmeraencY Assistance Proqrams � 1966 1987 1996 1987 ' hrou�t (x) hmunt (x) hrou�t (x) Mnuot (Z) Private Contribution, s 180,110 ( 3.9) � 209,644 ( 8.6) s 853,098 (37.2) : 955.716 (32.3) � Fowndation Grants 1,495,866 (32.1) 609.116 (24.9) 54,266 ( 2.4) 160,000 ( 5.4) Uni,ted Way 174,800 ( 3.8) � 327,347 (13.4) 376,608 (16.4) 581,895 (19.1) - Ern�rgency Care Funda 492�947 (10.6) 618,603 (25.3) 67,549 ( 2.9) 28,500 ( I.0) Gove�rment: Pederal 0 ( 0 ) 28,418 ( 1.2) 0 ( 0 ) 20,142 ( 0.7) . S�tate 259,518 ( 5.6) 50,000 ( 2.0) 22,918 ( 1.0) 16�500 ( 0.6) Cpunty 106,200 ( 2.3) 208,200 ( 8.5) 30,020 ( 1.3) i1,120 ( 1.1) _ �,...., :�... i •.�,.o�� •` �1 �'c�_c' � ` �� '� � C�,i ty 901,354 (19.4) 0 ( 0 ) 0� ✓ ( 0 ) 0 ' ( 0 ) . Prog�am Fees 161,840 ( 3.5) 322,476 (13.2) 612,745 (26.7) 1,032,000 (34.9) Agehcy Contribution 24,996 ( 0.5) 66,228 ( 2.7) 0 ( 0 ) • 7,737 ( 0.3) Other. Am. House Developers 700,000 (15.0) . 0 ( 0 ) 0 ( 0 ) 0 ( 0 ) A�surp�tion Church 0 ( 0 ) 0 ( 0 ) 24,700 ( I.1) 24,000 ( 0.8) Designated Food ' Purchases 0 ( 0 ) 0 ( 0 ) 204,297 ( 8.9) 0 ( 0 ) EFS Special Projects 0 ( 0 ) 0 ( 0 ) 38,780 ( 1.7) 50,000 ( 1.7) Sfi. Paul Companies 150,000 ( 3.2) 0 ( 0 ) 0 ( 0 ) 0 ( 0 ) Mi,scellaneous � 5,600 ( 0.U 2,500 ( 0.1) 6.14f ( 0.3) 51,600 ( 1.7) Totai sa,653,23ib (ioot) s2,aaz,53x (ioox) ;2,29i.i22 (ioos) ;2,959,2io tioat) Note: 1986 Shelter Prog�am totals include significant one-time investments in single roam _ ' occupancy housing. In 1986� More Tha� Shelter �aised ;2,900,000 of which ;1,605.158 was � distributed. More Than Shelter program will be raising an additional ;950,000 fram foundations in 1987, which is not included in the 1987 figures. , a The Emer enc Ca�e Fund distributes funds donated fram foundations n 9 Y a d corporations, goverrment, Uni,ted Way, religious g�oups, and individuals. See Table 10 on page 19 for a list of donors to the Emergency Care Fund. ' b Thi's figure includes ;3,270,158 for single roan occupancy �emodeling costs. � ThiIS figure includes ;55.000 for single roam occupancy remodeling costs. -12- � ��%O Zn/ , � � � � � TABLE 6 . - ' OTHER PROGRAMS' 1986 1987 � ' Amount % Anwunt �G_ Private Contrlbutions 577,078 (59.9) S70.00Oa (48.1) ' Foundation Grantsb 5.340 ( 4.1) 32.000 (22.0) r United Way 2,500 ( 1 .9) 0 ( 0 ) _ Emergency Care Fund 40.000 (31 .1) t40.000 (27.5) � Government - - - - � Program Fees - - - - Agency Contributions - - - - ' � St. Croix Valley � Emergency Loan Fund ; 3.820 ( 3.0) ; 3.500 2•4 Total 5128.738 (100X) 5145,500 (100X) ' a �Includes E4,000 from Deluxe Check Printers. b �Includes Comnunity Sharing Fund �I 07HER PROGRAMS U�iion Gospel Mission - dental . medical Mystard Seed Washington County RAP - emergency grants and loans � ' . ,I ' : -13- � � �'��'9/ � . � ,I _ ; : � TABLE :7 - � REVENUE SOURCES ANO AMOUNTS � GRANO TOTALS I 1986 1987 � Amount _GL Amount � . IPrivate Contributions Z1 ,110,286 (15.7) 51 .235.360 (22.3) Foundation Grants 1 ,555.472 (22.0) 801 ,116 (14.4) l�nited Way 553,908 ( 7.8) 909.242 (16.4) �mergency Care Funda 600.496 ( 8.5) 687.103 (12.4) 6overnment: ' Federal 0 ( 0 ) 48,560 ( 0.9) � � State 282�436 ( 4.0) 66,500 ( 1 .2) � County 136.220 ( 1 .9) 239.320 ( 4.3) I, City 901 ,354 (12.7) 0 ( 0 ) Rrogram Fees 774,585 (11 .0) 1 ,354,476 � (24.4) 1#gency Contribution � 24,996 ( 0.4) 73,965 ( 1 .3) � Other: ' Am. House Developers � 700,000 ( 9.9) 0 ( 0 ) Assumption Church 24.700 ( 0.3) 24,000 ( 0.4) Oesignated Food Purchases 204.297 ( 2.9) 0 ( 0 ) , EFS Special Pro�ects 38,780 ( 0.5) 50.000 ( 0.9) St. Croix Valley Emergency � Care Fund - 3,820 ( 0.1) 3.500 ( 0.1) ' St. Paul Companies 150,000 ( 2.1) 0 ( 0 ) ' Miscellaneous 11 ,741 �0.2) 54.100 ( 1 •0) . - 7 073 091b 100X 55.547,242� (1007G) 1 S Tota . . ( ) _ I� a mer enc Care Fund distributes funds donated from foundations and � The E g y corporations, government, United Way, religious groups, and individuals. ' See Table 10 on page 19 for a list of donors to the Emergency Care Fund. b This figure includes 53,270,158 for single �oom occupancy remodeling costs. � This figure includes t55,000 for single room occupancy remodelinq costs. �I I • -14- , �J,,c-�-lG 9/ ; _ � . � . ' 'I � _ I, GOVERNMENT FOOD AND HOUSING PROGRAMS � FISCAL 1986 EXPENDTTURES � . I' _ I � �I � '- , �I � _ ; � . . 'I . • � �I �I � -15- � � ��7��>�/ . - - ,, . - ras�E s � : - � GOVERNNENT FOOO PROGRAMS Free/Reduced Federal Breakfast j Food Stamps WIC School Lunch Programa (7/85-6/86) (10/85-7/86) (10/85-9/86) (10/85-9/86) Co nt Ramsey 514�641,091 53�459.745 52,743.586 t 582,236 , Da�COta S 2.660�675 S 552,923 S 592,639 = 15,339 Washington S 1 .449.611 t 325.572 S 340.703 ; 1.263 � Total t18,757�377 54.338�240 53.676.928 Z 604,838 Source of Funds Fetleral 518,075,832 54.301 ,385 53.676.928 S 604.838 � County/City S 681 .545 36.855 0 t 0 � Total ;18,757,317 54,338,240 53,676,928 1 604.838 , Component Costs Fobd (stamps) t17�394,288 53.492.175 - - � � Administration S 1 ,363,089 3 809,210 - - Ini kind 0 � 36.855 - - Total E18,757,377 54,338,240 - - a IFree/reduced school breakfast costs are not tabulated. so the Breakfast program figures include both regular and free/reduced meal costs. Three additional food programs operate in East Metro schools (figures are - Ifor 10/85 to 9/86) : , 1) Minnesota Lunch Program: 5725,768 � � 2) Federal Regular Lunch Program: 51 .694,230 3) Federal Special Milk Program: 5108.676 i I I i , I ' - 16- i , ��i-�`j-r 6 1/ _ ; - � . TABLE 9 - � FEDERAL HOUSING PROGRAMS . � � Annual Subsidles and Numbe� of Units � Location Public Housinq Section 8 , St. Paul 55.593,384a S 8,338.176 Suburban Ramsey - i 3.529,584 � Dakota County t 0 S 5,259.974 ' Washington County - 1 1 ,138,428 � I, Total 15,593,384 s18.266.162 � Number of Units/Active , Certificates or Vouchers St. Paul 4.229b 2,256 � Suburban Ramsey - 772 � Dakota County 266 1 ,500� � Washington County - 249 � ' Total 4,495 4�777 �I ,I . Not�e: a Includes 52,943,384 in subsidy and t2,b50,000 in long-term debt paid by HUD. b 27 additional units of public housing are under construction in ; St. Paul at cost of 51 .96 million, plus land provided by city. � � An additional 46 vouchers and certificates are not active at present. - I, , . �I i� �; ' . I� . -17- , ��T/D9/ , . ; . I EMERGENCY CARE FUND LIST OF DONORS i 1986 and 1987 (prelinninary) . ! I ; . i • � � I : i , j ' I � i . i . -18- I ' �/-�y�d9/ � . � , I� TABLE 10 _ EMERGENCY CARE FUNO DONORS 1986 and 198T (prellmina�y) II�Foundations and Coroorations L86 1987 (oreliminary)a Bigelow Foundation i20.000 - Bush Foundation 15.000 - Bremer Foundation - 525.000 Oeluxe Check Printers 10.000 - IDytech �� - 'Farm Credit Services 500 - First Bank St. Paul 25,000 - H. B. Fuller 5.000 - land 0'lakes 10,000 5,000 Mardag Foundation 10,000 - 'Minnesota Mutual Foundation 5,000 - Northwest Area Foundation 20.000 10.000 �St. Paul Companies 25,000 25,000 The Saint Paul Foundation 35,000 - United Way of St. Paul/Fannie May Candies 25,000 - � Government � ' City of St. Paul 40,000 40.000 FEMA - 32.208 50,000 � Ramsey County 150.000 165,000 Ramsey Action Programs 64.000 - Washington County 7.000 10.000 I ' Individual and Reliaious Group Contributions Archdiocese of St. Paul/Minneapolis 6.000 - Individuals/Special Events " 6.473 - St.. Paul Area Council of Churches 1 ,023 - � �I United Jeaish Fund and Council 5,796 - - United Wav of St. Paul 40.000 60,000 TOTAL 5558,010 (in progress) I I I a 1987 figures are incomplete and unaudited. The Emergency Care Fund Campaign for 1987 was in progress when this report was prepared. i , . -19- , 'I �{'��y-/D f/ . - , ` i ; � Attachment C I HUNGER AND HOMELESS SERVICE PROVIDERS IN THE EAST METROPOLITAN AREA � . _ Battered Women's Shelters Al;exandria House Community Action Council/ P.O. Box 194 B. Robert Lewis House Circle Pines, MN 55014 4750 Nichols Road ' Eaqan, I�i 55122 Ca'sa De Esperanza Women's Advocates . P.b. Box 75177 584 Grand Avenue Sa!int Paul, 1�1 55175 Saint Paul, l�t 55102 Community Action Aqencies Ramsey Action Programs, Inc. 10�0 Market Square 50�9 Sibley Street Sa'int Paul, MN 55101 _ Countv Social Serviee Aqencies Dakota County Human Services � Ramsey County Human Services Dakota County Center 160 E. Kellogg Boulevard 15I60 Highway 55 Saint Paul, MN 55101 Ha¢tings, 1�T 55033 Da�COta County Human Services Washington County Social Services 35�7 9th Avenue North 939 West Anderson Street So'. Saint Paul, 1�IN 55075 Stillwater, I�I 55082 Overniqht Emeraency Shelters � Dorothy Day Center Union Gospel Mission 183 Old Sixth Street 435 East University Avenue " Sa�.nt Paul, I�IId 55102 Saint Paul, I�T 55101 Me{� only; hot meals served. For men only; open yr.-round. Open yr.-round. Prbtection, Shelter and Referral Young Women's Christian Assoc. 45'� West 7th Street 65 East Kellogg Boulevard Sa.�nt Paul, MN 55102 Saint Paul, MN 55101 For men, women and children. For women and their children. � Open yr.-round. � ', I , � � i • O�'/ ! � �,��7-r 1 . . � � Miarant Council Offices , Minnesota Miqrant Council _ 220 South Robert Street �107 � S�int Paul, l�T 55107 Runawav/Throwawav Youth Shelters � Ain Dah Yung/ Cross Streets Program for Our Home Shelter Center Runaway Youth 1089 Portland Avenue St. Paul Youth Services Bureau - S�int Paul, 1�1 55104 421 West University Avenue Shelter for Sndian youth. Saint Paul, I�1 55103 I T�ansitional Housinq ProQrams . Juel Fairbanks Transitional Housing Young Women's Christian Assoc. 8(�4 North Albert Street Transitional Fiousing Saint Paul, rIIJ 55104 91 North Lexington, Apt. #1 Saint Paul, I�i 55104 � United Wav Agencies . American Red Cross ' Capitol Community Services, Inc. St�. Paul Area Chapter � 1021 Marion Street 100 South Robert Street Saint Paul, NIId 55117 Saint Paul, MN 55107 Catholic Charities of the Centro Legal, Inc. o�f the Archdiocese of St. Paul 179 East Robie Street and Minneapolis Saint Paul, NIId 55107 215 Old 6th Street Salint Paul, 1�IIJ 55101 ' Ch�icanos Latinos Undios Community Action Council En Servicios (CLUES) 509 Sibley Street 220 South Robert Street Saint Paul, MN 55101 � S�int Paul, I�IIJ 55107 D.A.R.T.S. Eastside Coalition - 2011 North Concord � 715 Edgerton Street Saint Paul, I�IIJ 55107 Saint Paul, I�IN 55101 Eml�ergency Fund Service Episcopal Community Services 150 Eva Street 60 Kent Street Sajint Paul, I�T 55107 Saint Paul, I�IlJ 55102 i I • , ' �,,�-�-��y� . � - . , . . - , - - . : Family Service of Greater St. Paul Family Violence Network 33'3 Sibley Street P.O. Box 854 Sa�int Paul, l�i 55Z01 Lake Elmo, 1�II1 55042 Fi,rst Cal�l for He1pTM Frogtown Community Assoc. l00 South Robert Street 911 Lafond Sa!int Paul, l�i 55107 Saint Paul, IrIId 55104 Gu�dalupe Area Project (GAP) Hallie Q. Brown Community Center 38�1 East Robie Street 270 Kent Street Saint Paul, I�i 55107 Saint Paul, 1�IId 55102 Hispanos En Minnesota Inner City Youth League � 20Ii Prescott Street 175 N. Victoria Street Saint Paul, I�i 55107 Saint Paul, 1rII1 55104 In�ernational Institute Jewish Community Center of Minnesota of Saint Paul 16Q4 Como Avenue 1375 St. Paul Avenue Saint Paul, I�1 55108 Saint Paul, 1rIId 55116 Jewish Family Service of St. Paul Jewish Vocational Service 1546 St. Clair Avenue 1821 University Avenue West Sai�nt Paul, MN 55105 Saint Paul, MN 55104 Mental Health Association of Merriam Park Community Center Minnesota in Ramsey County � 2000 St. Anthony Avenue 102i2 Grand Avenue ' Saint Paul, MN 55104 Saint, Paul, NIl1 55105 Merrick Community Services Midwa Hos it 715 Edgerton Y P al/Domestic Abuse 1700 University Avenue W. Sai�nt Paul, 1�IId 55101 Saint Paul, MN 55104 Midkaest Special Services Minnesota Institute on Black 900 Ocean Street Chemical Abuse Saint Paul, MN 55106 217 Mackubin Street , Saint Paul, I�T 55102 _ Neighborhood House Association Neighborhood Justice Center , 179 East Robie Street 500 Laurel Avenua Sai�t Pau1, 1rIN 55107 Saint Paul, MN 55102 - Neighbors, Inc. The Salvation Army - 222iNorth Concord Street 401 West 7th Street So. St. Paul, I�i 55075 Saint Paul, MN 55102 St. , Paul American Indian Center St. Paul Intervention Project 341 University Avenue West 435 Aldine Street Saint Paul, 1�T 55103 Saint Paul, MN 55104 St. jPaul Rehabilitation Center St. Paul Urban League 319 Eagle Street 401 Selby Avenue Sairit Paul, I�i 55102 Saint Paul, MN 55102 � �I � � ��-��9/ . . _ � _ � . 5t. Paul YWCA Summit-University Teen Center 85 East Kellogq Boulevard 1063 Iqlehart Avenue � Saint Paul, I�IId 55101 . Saint Paul, I�IId 55104 West Seventh Community Center Women's Advocates 2'65 Oneida Street 584 Grand Avenue S!aint Paul, I�1 55102 Saint Paul, MN 55102 � Food Shelves Np. St. Paul Emergency Food Shelf Hastin s Food She 2�537 East 7th Street g lves No. Saint Paul, I�J 55109 214 - 2nd Street East � Hastinqs, I�II1 55033 Neighbors, Inc. Baker Community Center 2�2 North Concord Street 209 West Page Street � So. St. Paul, I�T 55075 Saint Paul, I�IId 55107 Capitol Community Services East Area Servic 1Q21 Marion Street e Center S�int Paul, 1�II�I 55117 1575 Ames Avenue Saint Paul, 1�IIJ 55�106 Edgewood Community Center Hallie Q. Brown Community Center 5L00 No. Edgewood Drive 270 Kent Street Mqundsview, NIId 55112 Saint Paul, MN 55102 Me'rr�am Park Community Center Merrick Community Center 20!00 St. Anthony Avenue 951 East 5th Street Sa,int Paul, 1�Ild 55104 Saint Paul, I�1 55106 � Neighborhood House Salvation Army 179 East Robie Street 1105 Payne Avenue Sa�.nt Paul, l�t 55107 Saint Paul, I�IId 55106 - �- Salvation Army St. Paul American Indian Center 401 West 7th Street 341 University Avenue Sa�nt Paul, IrIId 55102 Saint Paul, I�IIJ 55103 , Department of Indian Work We The People 16'�1 Summit Avenue 374 Maria Avenue Sai�nt Paul, l�i 55105 Saint Paul, MN 55106 � On 'Site Meals Dorpthy Day Center Loaves and Fishes 183 Old 6th Street 51 West 9th Street Sai�t Paul, 1�Ild 55101 Saint Paul, MN 55102 Neighborhood House Union Gospel Mission 179 East Robie Street 435 University Avenue East Sai�nt Paul, 1�1 55107 Saint Paul, 1�T 55101 i - �I , ` I � ' \ s i� ' � rt . ?j`ow . � u��` b • n � . � c b �a.gv��c'aw� " da.� �-�^��e,��'a.-.c� au�7a:�� Y � '`a��?.�'3EE=o_p�� a�°. �Ega` y� 5 ..�'�.o ;S��._ o < C �C d� C C �m C O � Y Y 6-�C yi o JJ' w t �C Q��C E� � j E�u w �'- Ea,o �va =� � oS:eY$$ �c._='3 . `o?�jt _ � . = a� �� ga°� � Tm y .• C� g$".6��==��.��'c�e ° o ° o3 ° oe�3a� e = oe°°'Y•� ,a._.�.e» �u3Z '� � i �+ m� vE�' mu6o �� `03 Zr�i,�n=� u`o �i�� kw`u �L . . u� � �a< �.� ° ecsO „ n Y •yEe ° e .� 9'� _ �� _ _ . I g �;��ia � o � �.�x�st3�� r''o'� �- r ~ $��» : ' zc � �QU a�c � 3E '-' ° °. E"w3 �, ? `- uo �j � � �m e£ rE d� a.�ZE � C `^.�� o o�� `�+ u Q E� � � ?= c o e'�r�v � 'a ��= C� ` �F c �$� �9`o cQ��e e�i � +� I � ..cP 3r u��?m° ��.cs�y�'u-'` L``a-��Y .�E� �� dga � �°,'�� E�? � r m_ E- �` "� ��Ze` ,� om+ e.5�'� E D-Cu�n� � '.Zlo � a.�gu 5� m r6 = c.��- y : w � � . `?:yu` wo'u� �wdcc{� ^= _ n� � S'- ui �cC` c 5 '� r py �S .�. �' ' CO I .�.'y�L n � Y q �` u y G C�iY� � C� Y�p� Y g N Y d � C ` � s C n C� Y O O �? � Y �n �O� r $ a `w wn4 >u�i�� ekv`1S.� tes u � � '.R uot� ^_ � -ccecue� O � I s � ucE�� c$ � n ,� e0 BX �nuE 'c_°°� u �` ^ � �3y �.p � .�? 9 � ou � ��.au.4._�.5 Q � c C Y � � �� X.: n � i ee. �O � .. v � �.�' � ucnao�.� � ao�n� o�u, no we83�� `s u ^ E a. �.E .-i6�� l+ a.cc_S � � Z � k ..w��75o �Ua.Su LL��e'v`u `a.� E `oF- 'uvvL'cw9 C�r°uu� c:'. <<°,'� $� < : c` �a `-C' •�je C +� "'-' � N I p C � . Z ° v ° $ c � � 2 � � �A`��u �_ ��? �w Z °- a Z c a a Z 9� :`c � u Q �I �� ^� e� " Q a.� c a '" cq- �j v �v`�i x . �c ^E � M17 �� a ^ a ' �a E ° u C a=� �-R- i��c E� .° .. O `ga . g`y °'�y'c 2 E.�� e En °_�P x a��°`o � i X. � ' e'� ° s �� e �i w N ° �O C �6 I v'� ' 3 a'u e?�A �u� T3 '� $;'N $.�`o ov q e m� +� O 3 � � �Q �u.�� c'n .^y'� m =s�°. a, y y w� ,p a u O • R3 �P ]� N y Q U � o O E N - '^�C�G G u .". N � (/� � Y �� ' c_ u,e�o E-v �v' � ueoZr . �z o^i`e n n ��^! ��e°m N •r" N ��6A `�`C nP .� - e0?Z�I a0 ZZ'J A p� � � E ' �I Vac EZc� ��Y�� Z'T uZCQ iZeP � c�� omA `�8a •r O ]G �- ' ui�nwuaa '�e <Fv� . <F `-3°Z °uac5°-� E {-`.5°� EU � U I - � tn ao � C �? o` R" i: i. u nu u �_u � . � � O u� > c -u°u •°-c v C � . a ''e E 'n t n a^ f6 L U I a � ^ � a� n c '� >t >�� n e o u�.� �m t� � f6 � « a. c v s � � �� v'_ � v m ti Q � V f � U m I �.�� .°, a;v` ?`oL�° o, .. r °`o a° 7 c_n E� N � ^ _ � - �_ u �u t� �� u u�u 3� Q� �� r � N ° $ N v o � I u.`c � E � � 9n.c � '�� n a.c �u �°° , N L ,� ° u tr e a o �' a.2= . d;�'� � $ Sc g� °� u . L � .� o- -°-- o aQ 3� .. t u � v 3 � c >._ u o � � u °.�� u� . E vv� u �� u� E 3 fn c= E �t�y i.-� - N � � e1 q.53 E e 'u oo ��yw � CS �� 5� .b'a�' =g � � i�� .. I voo � � n � caEe �' ` °�� '�+�°ra'`°c" = m ° O � �.Q C3 ,. � 3� c �d! ti�=3H ti °u3._ti'v rn <o ��$ o`S �.� LL U L Z � � = I � = a•� +� • U O N W ' C i . d = N a ~ • �Q O u Z I = o e � 1 �F- � W a F— j °y �5 _5 .� e .�.3 aC`o u L � .�, c ° � t g "n �'-y N N U "'� g au °- g'u u o e a F 'Z � 3 C r0 N c o " s s 6 ° o �°^'C �o�'- N +� Cn � s c g V U a 3 �'w < ° � o � O U tn ¢ 'c qA_ � `o- w �d �d �� L r N �=V Oc�=.S p� 0$8 � � °y�� Qaoy� 3 v •N � 7� •- tA'� 6u tA(� y�tA y E p u u'ny{ � .. k�• u . 7 � .. "a � m �w ._ v!a'Uy� N L f0 � � I �iin3 us.in.3 �in u:vsi " iO,� � °�yvCi'n k'Q o 4yp`Oa � il O L � �y Vl 4.�N�� S fL Vl.J�V � (!� � O y o N G7 •r n- ao x 6 �°.�L ��° e o,'au�.. : `3 � �� .: �-a 3 , � n �s � .?�o n oo � r � � " ��no C'q�-'� �> �°v�� O C O � II R= °`o Z a 3 ' m m$ '.s ' r � s P „°cn'oa .> �5°�S ° �u�3a � Qa `uet w ° u° 'cg� ° ag�3a � 5 � ro V o $ `-E � ca� � �`,,.$� �o � 'v��_ �;a � Y �n � a q '� x.n= o �'.� 3 g Q �iO� E u t a. � O L �� 9 r c o`Y� = D o E- _ '°v= � ,'�u� N c p � � �� 3 u� .F-t •r •r ri � � � C- ougs _ E �n ° u >�CU'=UcZE_ � �i c tu -� mNO 4 N � O 'u^b"= cs° ._�. � E`.°_ � � :v�� t.'-°'�`o u S� u °u E i E ,'o_ � ec�e oe E R7 � m c c � '_ � m� c�c � L E ' c'�u e` - > � ._ _ ` M 4 c y.� ° E 3 ee f0 U � ° Q � 'c " c ` o > o � � 3 x ��s.�s u5 > �.__•°� ° " =z g� ;,.- _ g .' " Z VaeE w ,^, c _ � a . StEu� tiS rn ti Z> 'aY�M.� a� og - � O _.� � � o -. R i � N °e � € `u ° ` O : € ��'°�O-, E� '�"g»v $� � c> u$�y 2S 'E' ? Q10 � Q ?a a 'u °'Y 3°-a �= n ' �a'n• °- Op � °.- '"��" o C O _ 3•.. �il t�� v e c p � ��3 � a.°_ya � � e�� _ E Y �I$ °u c � � n° �d fn.o�.., o �o ^ �� -t oL.Ca 7 LL . a d� o.=.� u�7lo� ro '� w 'e°tZ e `ut 'e 3 = Gl � �" � 3 ° � u € C7`o�s c �°o o'n= � c° °a� t0 r t �a� •c v`_ e� �� ° �_°� �- € �.- s y' n p :e� C +� ' 'C o a�c g�e e a,.., L e e � i' e0`o.� 5=3 �-!i E�� € o a i1':S . 3 O r0 ° �°- uy � E-n °� m� a�'"`nm� e_ c r � � 'yc s.=�•= O Vf L au3°� ,� �o� ov ou � c� o � m._.�- L GJ 00 E'� ?�= �t�� t�c � E °�i ^ enc E y .. e.0 y e - ��> Qf C ° � 'c � g 'u u o �c� e.0 V 3 ,u n Ty ou �'a�� e 'e�^•`g �� n N C a !-_ e._ s C�a e � 2�.�� .'7�i 3 v`p 3 c' w u �'w�- Z s= E e C � ' d 3 C7 E._� � < =u � g O � � 2 C � = C1 CJ � L +� Q E +� +� � - O �1 •i' K W li .a . 3 ' 4 " � G. - < Q � i _ �%'��7�� _ THE FOI,I,OWING _ HuD INF A O � � p�1RTICIP,�TS�TIONAL MATERIA Attac�ent D I 1. A BY THE PUBLIC/PRIVATE�PROVIDED TO Care gu aa�'�°f the the Peter �, B ITIATIVE pROJECT; '" I 2. Ba r°wn review of the Emergency , �� kground � j list info�at�on serviceshunger and hoa�elessn model programs , state assisting the ness, and listin� an extensive read ' I • and local levelshungz'Y and the homeless�f prOgrams and ing at the federal, I 3' A SuJgested workplan bY mo nthly meeting. 4• An overy• � hungry and lew °hart providin identification homeless, and g a framework of Specific °f resources Special worksheetseforCeg for the I reconwendations, ' and for the formulation of 5• Special reports provided to �a) "Home each participant in grown Hun �� cluded; ger, 1985, Abelow; I �b) Report • on the Homejess in the Twin Citi �� ) "Homelessness in t �CUthbert; eS, June, 1986 he Metropolitar� � Budd; Area, �� December. lgg6, Fconom astoral Letter on Y. January� 1987 Catholic Social � , National Conferencehofg and the � �e) "Restorir�q the U.S. R�port of the Governonnesota Drea n catholic Bisho �� executive Su ps� �r made r s CO�ission on po�erty, Dece ; a�ailable at the Humphr �ary °f the �ber, I986 �f) t�e report of th eY Institue; " �g� Emer e Blue Ribbon Commission, 1982; gency Needs pra • �h) the 7ect final i Ma o r report, 19g3; and j y r S Task Force on Municipal Fo 6• The °d Policy. 1985 ; book, The Jam S Your� F� of Homeless Par�icipant, LeXington Books� 198 ness bY Marjor' : 6, was provided 1for�Pe and J �, each � Slum�ar'Y notes on H � I uDAC monthly meeti�gS. � i ' :� . . .: � ,, _ : --_.- _. - x :,-- - ,�: _ . ; � � � � � �i��`7/l31/ - � FO Attachment E - : T ON ON THE g c P , V The P/PIP began on 1 p, R JE �p/PIP) iProject the purpo8e o�pril 1986 as a� three- encoura e Which is to examine year demonstration ! g collaborations among the improve sectors, particularl Public � � and disadvanta e Y those which most benefitVand�emn We°nProfit � g d �ommunities and � �f its demonstration of individuals. P r �uccessful, lon er- multi-se�tor problem solving is I' center for coll borat�eassistance will be sou �hose discussin initiatives. ght to establish a ! hrou h g and acting upon �o Such a center Would � g collaborative efforts b �°unity issues assist forums and expert Y Providin best addressed ' process facilitation. g both substantive ! The P/pIp defines "empowerment'� a�d control resources as the ca � determination and or ' essential for increasinY tO define issues i believes that em � individual self-sufficienc c��unit ' '-- should be p°We�ent Y self- c,:: realized throu gained in collaborative The p�p2p ,' : m�lti-cultural perspectivesparticipator initiatives y democracy informed by ' In its � ; demonstration ph�se� the p ' of concern: (1) hun er �pIP is em '' � pa�rticular g and homelessness; Phasizing five areas ��` mi�4orit y advocacy by t�e disabled �2� health care, �� y access and achievement for the disabled; investment in communit in education; �3� diversity and the y-based development• �4� social arts. , and (5) cultural Ar�as of P/pIp activit factors in multi-sector collaboratl� �onductin emppWer disadvanta ed co lon which are research on the tec�nical assistance and�cor�sultatand individuals�st likely to sec or collaboration to solve ion to �2� Providing - mmunit groups using multi- for new partnerships in areas in W . y Problems; (3) adv special opportunities for the ocatin hich timely initiatives g livQS; (d� Sponsorin disadvanta ed Provide publ�i�, private g fO�S on issues of tO i�prove their level and � and nonprofit sectors • common interest to the general education courses and workshopsfoerin collaborative communit g 9raduate poli�Cies of philanthropyproblem solvin n g and on the practices and Fundinq� su or - The McKni ht t during p/plp�s first � 5 Foundation and the Generalar has been ; Mills Foundationded by Furt�er ; information about the P/pIp lS available Arthur T: by contacting: � 255 Hrt�n�phrel�elman, Director Unive sit y Center - HHH Institute of Publi� Affairs � y of Minnesota 55455 (612) ' 625-7803 ; � I 8 MaY 1987 � . ; , r . I _ _ .__ - � � . . , , , , _, � . ; , , . � , . . . ,. . . � ,. . . . . . - .. -. 4•F��:. . ; .... � ... • .�. .. .. ' • : . ...; " ' - .. �.: ,. . . . . �. . : _ . . .. . � ' � .. . .,.:. . :1. '�'. :... � . . .-