The URL can be used to link to this page

99-587�� RESOLUTION OF SAINT PAUL, MINNESOTA Presented Referred To Council File # t �(`�g� Green Sheet # �6�C1�� Committee Date �Z3 RESOLUTION DIRECTING THE HERITAGE PRESERVATION COMMISSION TO DEVELOP A HERITAGE PRESERVATIONSITE AND BUILDING DESIGNATION R'ORKPLf1tV 1 WHEREAS, the Samt Paul Heritage Preservation Commission is chazged with providing advice and counsel to 2 Mayor and City Council on all heritage preservafion matters; and 3 WHEREAS, the azeas of responsibility of the Commission include 1) recommending heritage preservation 4 designation for building and sites within the City; and 2) reviewing plans for construction and rehabilitation of 5 existing buildings and sites; and 6 WEIEREAS, it has been at least a decade since the last comprehensive review of buildings and sites in the City of 7 Saint Paul for heritage preservation designation; now, therefore, be it 8 RESOLVED, that the Saint Paul City Council hereby requests the Heritage Preservation Commission to develop a 9 workplan for the fixhire designation of heritage preservation buildings and sites in the City of Saint Paul; and be it 10 FURTHER RESOLVED, that the Aeritage Preservation Site and Building Designation Workplan contain specific 11 recommendations to the City Council on the staffing levels necessary, including the potenUal use of consultants, 12 intems and experts (per Legislative Code Chapter 73.04 (7), to accomplish the workplan goals; and be it 13 FINALLY RESOLVED, that the Heritage Preservation Site and Building Designation Workplan be presented for 14 Council consideration on September 22, 1999. Benanav Blakey Bostrom Coleman Hams Lantry Reiter Adopted by Adoption � � ✓ ✓ � ✓ ✓ —� iL Date by Counc By: - ` \..,d,/ �/�- - L%�- Approved by Mayo ate `Jr/� � �� By: E:C��lyl K-� Requested by Department of: � Form Approved by City Attomey � Approved by Mayor for Submission to Council � �� -/�-9 � �� TOTAL# OF SIC,NATURE PAGES GREEN SHEET �t�i.- S�� No 64079 � �.a,� � � �„�. _ ❑ �.,,� ❑ �� ❑�,�� ❑..�.�,�,,,.a.� ❑ �,,,��,.,�,�., ❑ (CLIP ALL LOCATIONS FORSIGNATURE) l7esc/u�ibn d;i�eehi�� t�is � ��9e /��se�va�� C' ornm�'ss:o.� tc� ��o�o a, /`i'�1�e fresei✓afiBnS:de ��ui/d:��yl�PSi9/�a�ion 1%�kp/Q.z.. PL4NNING CAMMISSION CIB COMMITTEE CNIL SERVICE COMMISSION IFAPPROVED TOTAL AMOUNT OF TRANSACTION S FUNOING SOURCE FlNANCW.INFORMATON (IXPWN) RSONALSERVICE CONTRACfS MUSTANSWER TXE FOLLOWING QUESiIONS: lias fhis persoN6rm everxrorked under a coniractforthis department'1 YES NO Has Ihie peisoN6'm ever been a city empbyee'1 YES NO Does this persoMrtn possess a sltlll rwt namallyposaessed by afry cuirerd ciry employee? VES NO Is tliis persaJfirm a tarpeted vendoY! YES NO COST/REVENUEBUDGETED(CIRCLEON� ACTIVITY NUMBER YES NO , . , , •�.,..._., �t� r�''i '� '� �g� �9-�8� r1 U • • CITY OF SAINT PAUL HERITAGE PRESERVATION COMMISSION RESOLUTION FILE N UMBER DATE e• 9 September 1999 WHEREAS, the Saint Paul Ciry Council unanimously passed a resolution on June 23, 1999 (G F. 99-587) requesting the Heritage Preservation Commission to develop a workplan for the future desi�ation of heritage preservation sites, including specific recommendations on staffmg needed to complete the plan; and WHEREAS, Section 73.04 of the Saint Paul Legislative Code states, in part, that the Heritage Preservation Commission shall have the following powers and duties: 1. Advisory body. The commission shall serve as an advisory body to the mayor and city council on municipal heritage preservation matters. 2. Survey. The commission shall conduct a continuing survey of all azeas, places, buildings, struchues or similar objects in the City of Saint Paul which the commission, on the basis of information available or presented to it, has reason to believe aze or will be eligible for designation as heritage preservation sites. 3. Designation of sites. The commission shall recommend to the mayor and city council azeas, buildings, objects or districts to be designated as heritage preservation sites ...; and WfIEREA5, the City of Saint Paul has designated few sites for heritage preservation in recent years and the last survey of historic sites in the city was conducted from 1980 to 1983; and WHEREAS, a significant body of information about the city's buildings, neighborhoods and azchitects has come to light in the 16 yeazs since publication of the 1983 Historic Sites Survey; and WHEREAS, historic and azchitectural contexts specific to Saint Paul, and indispensable for an accurate and comprehensive assessment of its historic building stock, were not developed by the 1983 or any other survey; and WFIEREAS, the HPC strongly supports the implementation of a systematic and ongoing designation program; and WHEREAS, the HPC's Education Committee has prepared, in response to the City CounciPs request, a proposal for a 14-month survey and designation project (attached) consisting of three phases; the first phase being a preliminary survey which would put City officials and developers on notice about buildings and sites that appear to have historic significance; the second phase being prepazation of provisional contexts with which to frame the final survey and nominations; the third phase being designation nomination forms for 25 properties and a fmal report that includes fully developed historic contexts and a revised list of azchitecturally and historically significant buildings and sites prioritized according to their significance and wlnerability to potential threats; this survey estimated to cost the City $40,000, the money to be used to hire a project consultant who would work in conjunction with City stafF and the HPC; NOW, THEREFORE, BE TT RESOLVED that the Heritage Preservation Commission recommends to the Mayor and City Council execution and funding of this proposed survey and designation project; and �(� � J �� _� Heritage Preservation Commission Resolution #99— 5 9 September 1999 Page Two BE IT F'URTHER RESOLVED that the commission is eager to work with the CiTy on this critically important project; and BE TT FINALLY RESOLVED that the commission strongly recommends that adequate funding be provided in subsequent yeazs for the designation of additionaI properties according to tfie prograni and schedule proposed by the consultant and amended as new information and/or new threats regazding historic properties arise. MOVED BY SECONDED BY IN FAVOR AGAINST ABSTAIN Errigo Murphy 0 • • • 99 S-�� • Proposed Saint Paul Survey and Designation Project Heritage Preservation Commission September 9,1999 Phase I: Pre]iminary Survey Resources: 1983 city/county survey, extant neighborhood and topolo�ical surveys, HPC staff and commissioners' recommendations, interviews with local historians, contractor's knowledge of city. Products: 1. Data base of buildings amendable to sorting by wazd, address, building type, yeaz of construction, and survey/designation status. To be overprinted with the word "draft." 2. Lazge format (ca. 24") map of city locating each of the buildings coded by building type. To be overprinted with the word "draft." 3. Development of a new form for designations. Fee and Timing: $7,000; 3 months. Phase II: Provisional Contests Resaurces: Historic conte#s developed for compazable Midwestem cities, contexts developed for St. Paul neighborhood studies, azchitectural conteats developed by Department of Interior and elsewhere, inteiviews with local historians, staff and commissioner input. Products: 1. Written discussion of contexts development in St. Paul: its history, its problems, its future. • 2. Citywide historic and azchitectural contexts with illustrated local example(s) of each context. Attention should be paid to contexts of both national and distinctively regional or local scope. 3. Neighborhood historic contexts with illustrated example of each context. Fee and Timing: $8,000; 3 months. Phase III: Final Report and First Round of Designations Resources: 1983 city/county survey, National Register of Historic Places nominarions, local historians, HPC staff and commissioners, tocal and ephemeral publications, etc. Products: 1. A recasting of the draft preservation list into a roster of known buildings and sites of historic and architectural significance, again in data base form amenable to multiple sortings. 2. A revision of the conteacts following HPC input. 3. Prioritization of the building and site list that balances level of significance with possible threats to the historic property. An acceptable outcome would group the list into clusters ordered according to designation urgency, without necessarily suggesting descending levels of significance. 4. Prepazation of city designation nomination forms for the top 25 properties. 5. A fmal report that details, among other things: suggestions for proceeding with remaining designations, geographical or themafic azeas that require additional survey work, contexts that may need further refinement or expansion, contexts or building types that have not been effectively pursued. 6. Consultation with the City of St. Paul as the 25 nominafions make their way through the • designation process. Fee and Timing: $25,000; 8 months. 99-�8' 7 a��At RESOLUTION OF SAtNT PAUL, MINNESOTA Presented Referred To Council File # � � Green Sheet # `D�c1� '� Committee Date `.J RESOL UTION DIRECTING THE HERITAGE PRESERVATION COMMISSION TO DEVELOP A HERITAGE PRESERVATION SITE AND BUlLDING DESlGNATION WORKPLAN WHEREAS, the Saint Paul Heritage Preservation Commission is charged with providiag advice and counsel to Mayor and City Council on all heritage preservation matters; and 3 WHEREAS, the areas of responsibility of the Commission inctude I) recommending heritage preservation 4 desi�aYioa for buiIding and sites'�vithin thz City; aad 2) :eviewing plans for ccast:cctian and;ehabi:itation of 5 existing buitdings and sites; and ` 6 VJHEREAS, it has been at least a decade since the last comprehensive review of buildings and sites in the City of 7 Saint Paul for heritage preservation designation; now, therefore, be it 8 RESOLVEI?, that the Saint Paul City Council hereby requests the Heritage Preservation Commission to devetop a 9 wotkplan for the future designation of heritage preservation buildings and sites in the City of Saint Paul; and be it 10 FURTHER RESOLVED, that the Heritage Preservation Site and Building Designation Workplan contaiu specific • 11 recommendations to the City Council on the staffing levels necessary, including the potential use of consultants, 12 intems and experts (per Legislative Code Chapter 73.04 (7), to accomplish the workplan goals; and be it 13 FINALLY RESOLVED, tha[ the Heritage Preservation Site and Building Designation Workplan be presented for 14 Council consideration on September 22, 1999. Yeu Na s Absent Benanav ,�- Btakey ,i- Bostrom �- Coleman ,i Hams y - Lantry � Reiter ,�- � � d Requested by Department of: � Form Approved by City Attorney � Adop[ed by Coun �c li Date , �".- � Adoption QeRified by Counc Ii�G By: � � Approved b}� Ma}or aIe `-� �'/� � l�� i � B.�: � '�il�F� 1�-/�/��T� Approved by b4ayor for Submission to Council B V: . QR�GINAL �q� " 0 � Council File # `�`' —�$�� RESOLUTION Presented Referred To 3a �� Committee Date RESOLUTTON DIRECTING THE HERITAGE PRESERVATION COMMISSION TO DEVELOP A HERITAGE PRESER t�ATION SITE AND BUILDlNG DESIGNATION WORRPLAN I WHEREAS, the Saint Paul Heritage Preservation Commission is chazged with providing advice and counsel to 2 Mayor and City Council on all heritage preservation matters; and 3 WHEREAS, the areas of responsibility of the Commission include 1) recommending heritage preservation 4 designation for building and sites within the City; and 2) reviewing plans for construction and rehabilitation of 5 existing buildings and sites; and 6 WHEREAS, it has been at least a decade since the last comprehensive review of buildings and sites in the City of 7 Saint Paul for heritage preservation designation; now, therefore, be it 8 RESOLVED, that the Saint Paul City Council hereby requests the Heritage Preservation Commission to develop a 9 workplan for the future designation of heritage preservation buildings and sites in the City of Saint Paul; and be it 10 FURTHER RESOLVED, that the Heritage Preservation Site and Building Designation Workplan contain specific 11 recommendations to the City Council on the sta�ng levels necessary, including the potential use of consultants, 12 intems and experts (per Legislative Code Chapter 73.04 (7), to accomplish the workplan goals; and be it FINALLY RESOLV , Council consideration on September 22, 1 Site and Building Designation Wor an be presented for Benanav Blakey Bosvom Coleman Harris Lantry Reiter Adopted by � Adoption e By: � Approved by By: v � / ✓ � ✓ / ac �Date ed by Counc G � ryo . Date OF SAINT PAUL, MINNESOTA Requested by Department of B Focm Approved b: By: Approved by May B Green Sheet # t�yc1 ��°� � C, �. GV \ l� �` S�� RESOLUTION OF SAINT PAUL, MINNESOTA Presented Referred To Council File # t �(`�g� Green Sheet # �6�C1�� Committee Date �Z3 RESOLUTION DIRECTING THE HERITAGE PRESERVATION COMMISSION TO DEVELOP A HERITAGE PRESERVATIONSITE AND BUILDING DESIGNATION R'ORKPLf1tV 1 WHEREAS, the Samt Paul Heritage Preservation Commission is chazged with providing advice and counsel to 2 Mayor and City Council on all heritage preservafion matters; and 3 WHEREAS, the azeas of responsibility of the Commission include 1) recommending heritage preservation 4 designation for building and sites within the City; and 2) reviewing plans for construction and rehabilitation of 5 existing buildings and sites; and 6 WEIEREAS, it has been at least a decade since the last comprehensive review of buildings and sites in the City of 7 Saint Paul for heritage preservation designation; now, therefore, be it 8 RESOLVED, that the Saint Paul City Council hereby requests the Heritage Preservation Commission to develop a 9 workplan for the fixhire designation of heritage preservation buildings and sites in the City of Saint Paul; and be it 10 FURTHER RESOLVED, that the Aeritage Preservation Site and Building Designation Workplan contain specific 11 recommendations to the City Council on the staffing levels necessary, including the potenUal use of consultants, 12 intems and experts (per Legislative Code Chapter 73.04 (7), to accomplish the workplan goals; and be it 13 FINALLY RESOLVED, that the Heritage Preservation Site and Building Designation Workplan be presented for 14 Council consideration on September 22, 1999. Benanav Blakey Bostrom Coleman Hams Lantry Reiter Adopted by Adoption � � ✓ ✓ � ✓ ✓ —� iL Date by Counc By: - ` \..,d,/ �/�- - L%�- Approved by Mayo ate `Jr/� � �� By: E:C��lyl K-� Requested by Department of: � Form Approved by City Attomey � Approved by Mayor for Submission to Council � �� -/�-9 � �� TOTAL# OF SIC,NATURE PAGES GREEN SHEET �t�i.- S�� No 64079 � �.a,� � � �„�. _ ❑ �.,,� ❑ �� ❑�,�� ❑..�.�,�,,,.a.� ❑ �,,,��,.,�,�., ❑ (CLIP ALL LOCATIONS FORSIGNATURE) l7esc/u�ibn d;i�eehi�� t�is � ��9e /��se�va�� C' ornm�'ss:o.� tc� ��o�o a, /`i'�1�e fresei✓afiBnS:de ��ui/d:��yl�PSi9/�a�ion 1%�kp/Q.z.. PL4NNING CAMMISSION CIB COMMITTEE CNIL SERVICE COMMISSION IFAPPROVED TOTAL AMOUNT OF TRANSACTION S FUNOING SOURCE FlNANCW.INFORMATON (IXPWN) RSONALSERVICE CONTRACfS MUSTANSWER TXE FOLLOWING QUESiIONS: lias fhis persoN6rm everxrorked under a coniractforthis department'1 YES NO Has Ihie peisoN6'm ever been a city empbyee'1 YES NO Does this persoMrtn possess a sltlll rwt namallyposaessed by afry cuirerd ciry employee? VES NO Is tliis persaJfirm a tarpeted vendoY! YES NO COST/REVENUEBUDGETED(CIRCLEON� ACTIVITY NUMBER YES NO , . , , •�.,..._., �t� r�''i '� '� �g� �9-�8� r1 U • • CITY OF SAINT PAUL HERITAGE PRESERVATION COMMISSION RESOLUTION FILE N UMBER DATE e• 9 September 1999 WHEREAS, the Saint Paul Ciry Council unanimously passed a resolution on June 23, 1999 (G F. 99-587) requesting the Heritage Preservation Commission to develop a workplan for the future desi�ation of heritage preservation sites, including specific recommendations on staffmg needed to complete the plan; and WHEREAS, Section 73.04 of the Saint Paul Legislative Code states, in part, that the Heritage Preservation Commission shall have the following powers and duties: 1. Advisory body. The commission shall serve as an advisory body to the mayor and city council on municipal heritage preservation matters. 2. Survey. The commission shall conduct a continuing survey of all azeas, places, buildings, struchues or similar objects in the City of Saint Paul which the commission, on the basis of information available or presented to it, has reason to believe aze or will be eligible for designation as heritage preservation sites. 3. Designation of sites. The commission shall recommend to the mayor and city council azeas, buildings, objects or districts to be designated as heritage preservation sites ...; and WfIEREA5, the City of Saint Paul has designated few sites for heritage preservation in recent years and the last survey of historic sites in the city was conducted from 1980 to 1983; and WHEREAS, a significant body of information about the city's buildings, neighborhoods and azchitects has come to light in the 16 yeazs since publication of the 1983 Historic Sites Survey; and WHEREAS, historic and azchitectural contexts specific to Saint Paul, and indispensable for an accurate and comprehensive assessment of its historic building stock, were not developed by the 1983 or any other survey; and WFIEREAS, the HPC strongly supports the implementation of a systematic and ongoing designation program; and WHEREAS, the HPC's Education Committee has prepared, in response to the City CounciPs request, a proposal for a 14-month survey and designation project (attached) consisting of three phases; the first phase being a preliminary survey which would put City officials and developers on notice about buildings and sites that appear to have historic significance; the second phase being prepazation of provisional contexts with which to frame the final survey and nominations; the third phase being designation nomination forms for 25 properties and a fmal report that includes fully developed historic contexts and a revised list of azchitecturally and historically significant buildings and sites prioritized according to their significance and wlnerability to potential threats; this survey estimated to cost the City $40,000, the money to be used to hire a project consultant who would work in conjunction with City stafF and the HPC; NOW, THEREFORE, BE TT RESOLVED that the Heritage Preservation Commission recommends to the Mayor and City Council execution and funding of this proposed survey and designation project; and �(� � J �� _� Heritage Preservation Commission Resolution #99— 5 9 September 1999 Page Two BE IT F'URTHER RESOLVED that the commission is eager to work with the CiTy on this critically important project; and BE TT FINALLY RESOLVED that the commission strongly recommends that adequate funding be provided in subsequent yeazs for the designation of additionaI properties according to tfie prograni and schedule proposed by the consultant and amended as new information and/or new threats regazding historic properties arise. MOVED BY SECONDED BY IN FAVOR AGAINST ABSTAIN Errigo Murphy 0 • • • 99 S-�� • Proposed Saint Paul Survey and Designation Project Heritage Preservation Commission September 9,1999 Phase I: Pre]iminary Survey Resources: 1983 city/county survey, extant neighborhood and topolo�ical surveys, HPC staff and commissioners' recommendations, interviews with local historians, contractor's knowledge of city. Products: 1. Data base of buildings amendable to sorting by wazd, address, building type, yeaz of construction, and survey/designation status. To be overprinted with the word "draft." 2. Lazge format (ca. 24") map of city locating each of the buildings coded by building type. To be overprinted with the word "draft." 3. Development of a new form for designations. Fee and Timing: $7,000; 3 months. Phase II: Provisional Contests Resaurces: Historic conte#s developed for compazable Midwestem cities, contexts developed for St. Paul neighborhood studies, azchitectural conteats developed by Department of Interior and elsewhere, inteiviews with local historians, staff and commissioner input. Products: 1. Written discussion of contexts development in St. Paul: its history, its problems, its future. • 2. Citywide historic and azchitectural contexts with illustrated local example(s) of each context. Attention should be paid to contexts of both national and distinctively regional or local scope. 3. Neighborhood historic contexts with illustrated example of each context. Fee and Timing: $8,000; 3 months. Phase III: Final Report and First Round of Designations Resources: 1983 city/county survey, National Register of Historic Places nominarions, local historians, HPC staff and commissioners, tocal and ephemeral publications, etc. Products: 1. A recasting of the draft preservation list into a roster of known buildings and sites of historic and architectural significance, again in data base form amenable to multiple sortings. 2. A revision of the conteacts following HPC input. 3. Prioritization of the building and site list that balances level of significance with possible threats to the historic property. An acceptable outcome would group the list into clusters ordered according to designation urgency, without necessarily suggesting descending levels of significance. 4. Prepazation of city designation nomination forms for the top 25 properties. 5. A fmal report that details, among other things: suggestions for proceeding with remaining designations, geographical or themafic azeas that require additional survey work, contexts that may need further refinement or expansion, contexts or building types that have not been effectively pursued. 6. Consultation with the City of St. Paul as the 25 nominafions make their way through the • designation process. Fee and Timing: $25,000; 8 months. 99-�8' 7 a��At RESOLUTION OF SAtNT PAUL, MINNESOTA Presented Referred To Council File # � � Green Sheet # `D�c1� '� Committee Date `.J RESOL UTION DIRECTING THE HERITAGE PRESERVATION COMMISSION TO DEVELOP A HERITAGE PRESERVATION SITE AND BUlLDING DESlGNATION WORKPLAN WHEREAS, the Saint Paul Heritage Preservation Commission is charged with providiag advice and counsel to Mayor and City Council on all heritage preservation matters; and 3 WHEREAS, the areas of responsibility of the Commission inctude I) recommending heritage preservation 4 desi�aYioa for buiIding and sites'�vithin thz City; aad 2) :eviewing plans for ccast:cctian and;ehabi:itation of 5 existing buitdings and sites; and ` 6 VJHEREAS, it has been at least a decade since the last comprehensive review of buildings and sites in the City of 7 Saint Paul for heritage preservation designation; now, therefore, be it 8 RESOLVEI?, that the Saint Paul City Council hereby requests the Heritage Preservation Commission to devetop a 9 wotkplan for the future designation of heritage preservation buildings and sites in the City of Saint Paul; and be it 10 FURTHER RESOLVED, that the Heritage Preservation Site and Building Designation Workplan contaiu specific • 11 recommendations to the City Council on the staffing levels necessary, including the potential use of consultants, 12 intems and experts (per Legislative Code Chapter 73.04 (7), to accomplish the workplan goals; and be it 13 FINALLY RESOLVED, tha[ the Heritage Preservation Site and Building Designation Workplan be presented for 14 Council consideration on September 22, 1999. Yeu Na s Absent Benanav ,�- Btakey ,i- Bostrom �- Coleman ,i Hams y - Lantry � Reiter ,�- � � d Requested by Department of: � Form Approved by City Attorney � Adop[ed by Coun �c li Date , �".- � Adoption QeRified by Counc Ii�G By: � � Approved b}� Ma}or aIe `-� �'/� � l�� i � B.�: � '�il�F� 1�-/�/��T� Approved by b4ayor for Submission to Council B V: . QR�GINAL �q� " 0 � Council File # `�`' —�$�� RESOLUTION Presented Referred To 3a �� Committee Date RESOLUTTON DIRECTING THE HERITAGE PRESERVATION COMMISSION TO DEVELOP A HERITAGE PRESER t�ATION SITE AND BUILDlNG DESIGNATION WORRPLAN I WHEREAS, the Saint Paul Heritage Preservation Commission is chazged with providing advice and counsel to 2 Mayor and City Council on all heritage preservation matters; and 3 WHEREAS, the areas of responsibility of the Commission include 1) recommending heritage preservation 4 designation for building and sites within the City; and 2) reviewing plans for construction and rehabilitation of 5 existing buildings and sites; and 6 WHEREAS, it has been at least a decade since the last comprehensive review of buildings and sites in the City of 7 Saint Paul for heritage preservation designation; now, therefore, be it 8 RESOLVED, that the Saint Paul City Council hereby requests the Heritage Preservation Commission to develop a 9 workplan for the future designation of heritage preservation buildings and sites in the City of Saint Paul; and be it 10 FURTHER RESOLVED, that the Heritage Preservation Site and Building Designation Workplan contain specific 11 recommendations to the City Council on the sta�ng levels necessary, including the potential use of consultants, 12 intems and experts (per Legislative Code Chapter 73.04 (7), to accomplish the workplan goals; and be it FINALLY RESOLV , Council consideration on September 22, 1 Site and Building Designation Wor an be presented for Benanav Blakey Bosvom Coleman Harris Lantry Reiter Adopted by � Adoption e By: � Approved by By: v � / ✓ � ✓ / ac �Date ed by Counc G � ryo . Date OF SAINT PAUL, MINNESOTA Requested by Department of B Focm Approved b: By: Approved by May B Green Sheet # t�yc1 ��°� � C, �. GV \ l� �` S�� RESOLUTION OF SAINT PAUL, MINNESOTA Presented Referred To Council File # t �(`�g� Green Sheet # �6�C1�� Committee Date �Z3 RESOLUTION DIRECTING THE HERITAGE PRESERVATION COMMISSION TO DEVELOP A HERITAGE PRESERVATIONSITE AND BUILDING DESIGNATION R'ORKPLf1tV 1 WHEREAS, the Samt Paul Heritage Preservation Commission is chazged with providing advice and counsel to 2 Mayor and City Council on all heritage preservafion matters; and 3 WHEREAS, the azeas of responsibility of the Commission include 1) recommending heritage preservation 4 designation for building and sites within the City; and 2) reviewing plans for construction and rehabilitation of 5 existing buildings and sites; and 6 WEIEREAS, it has been at least a decade since the last comprehensive review of buildings and sites in the City of 7 Saint Paul for heritage preservation designation; now, therefore, be it 8 RESOLVED, that the Saint Paul City Council hereby requests the Heritage Preservation Commission to develop a 9 workplan for the fixhire designation of heritage preservation buildings and sites in the City of Saint Paul; and be it 10 FURTHER RESOLVED, that the Aeritage Preservation Site and Building Designation Workplan contain specific 11 recommendations to the City Council on the staffing levels necessary, including the potenUal use of consultants, 12 intems and experts (per Legislative Code Chapter 73.04 (7), to accomplish the workplan goals; and be it 13 FINALLY RESOLVED, that the Heritage Preservation Site and Building Designation Workplan be presented for 14 Council consideration on September 22, 1999. Benanav Blakey Bostrom Coleman Hams Lantry Reiter Adopted by Adoption � � ✓ ✓ � ✓ ✓ —� iL Date by Counc By: - ` \..,d,/ �/�- - L%�- Approved by Mayo ate `Jr/� � �� By: E:C��lyl K-� Requested by Department of: � Form Approved by City Attomey � Approved by Mayor for Submission to Council � �� -/�-9 � �� TOTAL# OF SIC,NATURE PAGES GREEN SHEET �t�i.- S�� No 64079 � �.a,� � � �„�. _ ❑ �.,,� ❑ �� ❑�,�� ❑..�.�,�,,,.a.� ❑ �,,,��,.,�,�., ❑ (CLIP ALL LOCATIONS FORSIGNATURE) l7esc/u�ibn d;i�eehi�� t�is � ��9e /��se�va�� C' ornm�'ss:o.� tc� ��o�o a, /`i'�1�e fresei✓afiBnS:de ��ui/d:��yl�PSi9/�a�ion 1%�kp/Q.z.. PL4NNING CAMMISSION CIB COMMITTEE CNIL SERVICE COMMISSION IFAPPROVED TOTAL AMOUNT OF TRANSACTION S FUNOING SOURCE FlNANCW.INFORMATON (IXPWN) RSONALSERVICE CONTRACfS MUSTANSWER TXE FOLLOWING QUESiIONS: lias fhis persoN6rm everxrorked under a coniractforthis department'1 YES NO Has Ihie peisoN6'm ever been a city empbyee'1 YES NO Does this persoMrtn possess a sltlll rwt namallyposaessed by afry cuirerd ciry employee? VES NO Is tliis persaJfirm a tarpeted vendoY! YES NO COST/REVENUEBUDGETED(CIRCLEON� ACTIVITY NUMBER YES NO , . , , •�.,..._., �t� r�''i '� '� �g� �9-�8� r1 U • • CITY OF SAINT PAUL HERITAGE PRESERVATION COMMISSION RESOLUTION FILE N UMBER DATE e• 9 September 1999 WHEREAS, the Saint Paul Ciry Council unanimously passed a resolution on June 23, 1999 (G F. 99-587) requesting the Heritage Preservation Commission to develop a workplan for the future desi�ation of heritage preservation sites, including specific recommendations on staffmg needed to complete the plan; and WHEREAS, Section 73.04 of the Saint Paul Legislative Code states, in part, that the Heritage Preservation Commission shall have the following powers and duties: 1. Advisory body. The commission shall serve as an advisory body to the mayor and city council on municipal heritage preservation matters. 2. Survey. The commission shall conduct a continuing survey of all azeas, places, buildings, struchues or similar objects in the City of Saint Paul which the commission, on the basis of information available or presented to it, has reason to believe aze or will be eligible for designation as heritage preservation sites. 3. Designation of sites. The commission shall recommend to the mayor and city council azeas, buildings, objects or districts to be designated as heritage preservation sites ...; and WfIEREA5, the City of Saint Paul has designated few sites for heritage preservation in recent years and the last survey of historic sites in the city was conducted from 1980 to 1983; and WHEREAS, a significant body of information about the city's buildings, neighborhoods and azchitects has come to light in the 16 yeazs since publication of the 1983 Historic Sites Survey; and WHEREAS, historic and azchitectural contexts specific to Saint Paul, and indispensable for an accurate and comprehensive assessment of its historic building stock, were not developed by the 1983 or any other survey; and WFIEREAS, the HPC strongly supports the implementation of a systematic and ongoing designation program; and WHEREAS, the HPC's Education Committee has prepared, in response to the City CounciPs request, a proposal for a 14-month survey and designation project (attached) consisting of three phases; the first phase being a preliminary survey which would put City officials and developers on notice about buildings and sites that appear to have historic significance; the second phase being prepazation of provisional contexts with which to frame the final survey and nominations; the third phase being designation nomination forms for 25 properties and a fmal report that includes fully developed historic contexts and a revised list of azchitecturally and historically significant buildings and sites prioritized according to their significance and wlnerability to potential threats; this survey estimated to cost the City $40,000, the money to be used to hire a project consultant who would work in conjunction with City stafF and the HPC; NOW, THEREFORE, BE TT RESOLVED that the Heritage Preservation Commission recommends to the Mayor and City Council execution and funding of this proposed survey and designation project; and �(� � J �� _� Heritage Preservation Commission Resolution #99— 5 9 September 1999 Page Two BE IT F'URTHER RESOLVED that the commission is eager to work with the CiTy on this critically important project; and BE TT FINALLY RESOLVED that the commission strongly recommends that adequate funding be provided in subsequent yeazs for the designation of additionaI properties according to tfie prograni and schedule proposed by the consultant and amended as new information and/or new threats regazding historic properties arise. MOVED BY SECONDED BY IN FAVOR AGAINST ABSTAIN Errigo Murphy 0 • • • 99 S-�� • Proposed Saint Paul Survey and Designation Project Heritage Preservation Commission September 9,1999 Phase I: Pre]iminary Survey Resources: 1983 city/county survey, extant neighborhood and topolo�ical surveys, HPC staff and commissioners' recommendations, interviews with local historians, contractor's knowledge of city. Products: 1. Data base of buildings amendable to sorting by wazd, address, building type, yeaz of construction, and survey/designation status. To be overprinted with the word "draft." 2. Lazge format (ca. 24") map of city locating each of the buildings coded by building type. To be overprinted with the word "draft." 3. Development of a new form for designations. Fee and Timing: $7,000; 3 months. Phase II: Provisional Contests Resaurces: Historic conte#s developed for compazable Midwestem cities, contexts developed for St. Paul neighborhood studies, azchitectural conteats developed by Department of Interior and elsewhere, inteiviews with local historians, staff and commissioner input. Products: 1. Written discussion of contexts development in St. Paul: its history, its problems, its future. • 2. Citywide historic and azchitectural contexts with illustrated local example(s) of each context. Attention should be paid to contexts of both national and distinctively regional or local scope. 3. Neighborhood historic contexts with illustrated example of each context. Fee and Timing: $8,000; 3 months. Phase III: Final Report and First Round of Designations Resources: 1983 city/county survey, National Register of Historic Places nominarions, local historians, HPC staff and commissioners, tocal and ephemeral publications, etc. Products: 1. A recasting of the draft preservation list into a roster of known buildings and sites of historic and architectural significance, again in data base form amenable to multiple sortings. 2. A revision of the conteacts following HPC input. 3. Prioritization of the building and site list that balances level of significance with possible threats to the historic property. An acceptable outcome would group the list into clusters ordered according to designation urgency, without necessarily suggesting descending levels of significance. 4. Prepazation of city designation nomination forms for the top 25 properties. 5. A fmal report that details, among other things: suggestions for proceeding with remaining designations, geographical or themafic azeas that require additional survey work, contexts that may need further refinement or expansion, contexts or building types that have not been effectively pursued. 6. Consultation with the City of St. Paul as the 25 nominafions make their way through the • designation process. Fee and Timing: $25,000; 8 months. 99-�8' 7 a��At RESOLUTION OF SAtNT PAUL, MINNESOTA Presented Referred To Council File # � � Green Sheet # `D�c1� '� Committee Date `.J RESOL UTION DIRECTING THE HERITAGE PRESERVATION COMMISSION TO DEVELOP A HERITAGE PRESERVATION SITE AND BUlLDING DESlGNATION WORKPLAN WHEREAS, the Saint Paul Heritage Preservation Commission is charged with providiag advice and counsel to Mayor and City Council on all heritage preservation matters; and 3 WHEREAS, the areas of responsibility of the Commission inctude I) recommending heritage preservation 4 desi�aYioa for buiIding and sites'�vithin thz City; aad 2) :eviewing plans for ccast:cctian and;ehabi:itation of 5 existing buitdings and sites; and ` 6 VJHEREAS, it has been at least a decade since the last comprehensive review of buildings and sites in the City of 7 Saint Paul for heritage preservation designation; now, therefore, be it 8 RESOLVEI?, that the Saint Paul City Council hereby requests the Heritage Preservation Commission to devetop a 9 wotkplan for the future designation of heritage preservation buildings and sites in the City of Saint Paul; and be it 10 FURTHER RESOLVED, that the Heritage Preservation Site and Building Designation Workplan contaiu specific • 11 recommendations to the City Council on the staffing levels necessary, including the potential use of consultants, 12 intems and experts (per Legislative Code Chapter 73.04 (7), to accomplish the workplan goals; and be it 13 FINALLY RESOLVED, tha[ the Heritage Preservation Site and Building Designation Workplan be presented for 14 Council consideration on September 22, 1999. Yeu Na s Absent Benanav ,�- Btakey ,i- Bostrom �- Coleman ,i Hams y - Lantry � Reiter ,�- � � d Requested by Department of: � Form Approved by City Attorney � Adop[ed by Coun �c li Date , �".- � Adoption QeRified by Counc Ii�G By: � � Approved b}� Ma}or aIe `-� �'/� � l�� i � B.�: � '�il�F� 1�-/�/��T� Approved by b4ayor for Submission to Council B V: . QR�GINAL �q� " 0 � Council File # `�`' —�$�� RESOLUTION Presented Referred To 3a �� Committee Date RESOLUTTON DIRECTING THE HERITAGE PRESERVATION COMMISSION TO DEVELOP A HERITAGE PRESER t�ATION SITE AND BUILDlNG DESIGNATION WORRPLAN I WHEREAS, the Saint Paul Heritage Preservation Commission is chazged with providing advice and counsel to 2 Mayor and City Council on all heritage preservation matters; and 3 WHEREAS, the areas of responsibility of the Commission include 1) recommending heritage preservation 4 designation for building and sites within the City; and 2) reviewing plans for construction and rehabilitation of 5 existing buildings and sites; and 6 WHEREAS, it has been at least a decade since the last comprehensive review of buildings and sites in the City of 7 Saint Paul for heritage preservation designation; now, therefore, be it 8 RESOLVED, that the Saint Paul City Council hereby requests the Heritage Preservation Commission to develop a 9 workplan for the future designation of heritage preservation buildings and sites in the City of Saint Paul; and be it 10 FURTHER RESOLVED, that the Heritage Preservation Site and Building Designation Workplan contain specific 11 recommendations to the City Council on the sta�ng levels necessary, including the potential use of consultants, 12 intems and experts (per Legislative Code Chapter 73.04 (7), to accomplish the workplan goals; and be it FINALLY RESOLV , Council consideration on September 22, 1 Site and Building Designation Wor an be presented for Benanav Blakey Bosvom Coleman Harris Lantry Reiter Adopted by � Adoption e By: � Approved by By: v � / ✓ � ✓ / ac �Date ed by Counc G � ryo . Date OF SAINT PAUL, MINNESOTA Requested by Department of B Focm Approved b: By: Approved by May B Green Sheet # t�yc1 ��°� � C, �. GV \ l� �` S��