The URL can be used to link to this page

99-496/ ,.;. �:v CITY OF ST. PAUL CO L F L� ��l _i5 PRELIMINARY ORDER By � File No. 59 1�& 599106 ORIG�NAL Voting Ward_ 3 � � In the Matter o£ sidevPalk reconstruction at the following locations: S99105 - South side Juliet Avenue from South Hamline Avenue to South Syndicate Street at 1298, 1304 & 1306 Juliet Avenue. S99106 - Both sides Woodlawn Avenue Prom Ford Parkway to Highland Parkway. *ESTIMATED CONSTRUCTION RATES RESIDENTIAL RATES (One, two or three family structures) Reconstruction (replacement of old sidewalk) -$8.65 per front foot for a five (5) foot wide walk and $10.38 per front foot for a six (6) foot wide walk. Al1 other widths will be prorated accordingly. Nem construction (where no walk existed) - 100% of the actual cost estimated to be approximately 53.87 per square foot. All cosner residential properties will receive a credit up to the first 150 feet of new or reconstructed sidewalk along and abutting the "long side" of the property. MULTI-RESIDENTIAL(More than three family structures), NON-RESIDENTIAL RATES For new and reconstructed sidewalk; 1000 of actual cost estimated to be approximately $5.23 per square foot. The Council o£ the City of Saint Paul having received the report o£ the Mayor upon the above improvement, and having considered said report, hereby resolves: l. That the said report and the same is hereby approved with no alternatives, u� that the estimated cost thereof is *SEE ABOVE for estimated construction rates, financed by assessments and 1998 Public Improvement Aid. 2 3. That a public hearing be had on said improvement on the 28 dav of Julv, 1999 5:30 o`clock P.M. in the Council Chambers of the City Hall and Court House Building in the City of Saint Paul. That notice of said public hearing be given to the persons and in the manner provided by the Charter, stating the time and place of hearing, the nature of the improvement and the total cost thereof as estimated. COUNCILPEI2SONS Yeas Nays ✓ Benanav � Blakey ✓ Bostrom Coleman -- ��'� � Harris ✓ Lantry , Reiter �.I�G JUL 3 1999 �In Favor /J Against / ./�5srnt Adopted by Council: Date Certified-�ass 1 Secretary Mayor sae�a��s 266�&t187 � GREEN +�''�� s �1 yy-�� ET No. �8065_-- JAA7E Nff1ALAATE __ ❑CffVCWNCLL _ ❑CrtraaK _ �O — a� �s� �6B3fG�1 —_ / _ �G.PALLIOCAT10M6lptllW�T{IRE) � � /t�ppATE R :^�,!i7�!i� �� . S Reconstruct Siderya8c in WaW 3(See at�ed fist) �-••�' PHiSOpAI SERVICE COp7AACTS W76T JIt�WHt THE FOLLOWNG CI�STIONS: _Wt861VICECCMOSgON 7. ►YstltiSPe��eVarro�keCwNxaoonbaGfortldsCePerhreM? YES t10 — 2 Fies tl�is pe�saNfmm everbeen a dly d�qbyee? — YES ND _ 8 Doss tl� persm?rtn possess a tlaY not nommly P�etl bY a^Y ewrent ciy' en4�%'ee? � YES NO 4pWn a6 y�s arorr�rs on parab al�wt antl a�h 10 y�x� �trt 91NTlIfi Pfq91.EM.ISSUF.OPPORTIMfY (MIIIO. MM11�T. MIIEN. MRF17E. Mryfl'k The Problem �tlefecfive sidewalk' was caused by mumpte problems. tree roots, Poor subgrade materials. freezeRhaw cycles, service ife 6mits, chemical additives. euheme tempereture variations� etc. These problems oxur on a citywide basis and must be addressed and corrected annuairy. Left unconected, the sidewalk condition would worsen to a state where it would be unusabie and subject to M�xeased pedestrian injuries from faus and possible litigatia�s. The community wili ber�efil irom this project because ft wili provide safe defect free sidewalks fw its citizens. The sidewalk coMracts are done by private contradors generating private Sectw jobs as a resutt. Historicaly, the sidewalk reconstnic6pr�s have peated rregative feedbadc because of cor�struction procedures atW assessments. Property owners ques6on ttie assessmer�ts, despite the fact that up to one-half the assessrneM is City subsidized. Having to assess for walk recons7uction remains a controversia4 issue. T� oPb°^ �b a�bw the q�hastnrc[ure of sidewaUc stodc to deteriorate. which in tum, wiH generate rtare personal injury suits, �esuiting in the expenditure of farger doilaz amounts in repairs and repiacemeM, as well as daim payouts. Counc� Resea�ch C�nt°� MAY 2 8 19�9 � . _ -, � . _� o� v� .,a� — 77� �wv C; Ct6 99 • 50,000 ORIG�NAL City of St. Paul � RESOLUTION APPROVING ASSSSSMENT AND aq - a4 CDUNCIL By � a FIXING TIN� OF HBARING TAEREON File No. 18831 Assessment No. 0651 Voting Ward In the matter of the assessment of benefits, cost and e�enses for 2 painting the skyway bridges in downtown, Saint Paul. Preliminary Order: 96-675 approved 3une 12, 1996 Final Order: 96-801 approved Julv 10, 1996 The assessments of benefits, cost and expenses for and in connection with the above improvement having been submitted to the Council having considered same and found the said assessment satisfactory, therefore, be it RESOLVED,That the said assessment be and the same is hereby in all respects approved. RESOLVED FURTHER, That a public hearing be had on said assessment on the 28th day of July, 1999, at the hour of Five thirty o'clock P.M., in the Council Chamber of the Court House and City Hall Building, in the City of St. Paul; that the Valuation and Assessment Engineer give notice of said meetings, as required by the Charter, stating in said notice the time and place of hearing, the nature of the improvement, and the amount assessed against the lot or lots of the particular owner to whom the notice is directed. the Ye�s Nays � " Benanav � Blakey �—" Bostrom Coleman.- 9��T ✓ Harris _/�In Favor � Lantry � Reiter � Against / �6 SP>rt _ed/Passed C� 7�../ U/i?�� 9 /99-�1 Council Secretary Mayor PUA[ISHFh JUL 3 �999 �� ►ntilicHearing Date: 7t28l99 - a �T.M.SJREAi, ESTA'�'E. DIVISION ��` . Grcen Sheet Nnmber. 63020 - -- nsrwara�nrrn�cros cirrcomvcu, - � - Person - ae Namber a - ._ � ' � v �rerm�r carcqaa�c � ��er �VLite`�� 266-8853 Bimcern�croa FIN. & MGT. SVG DIR. � �� MAYOB(OBASSSGNT) 1 CODNCII.YFCeenCg nst be on Coancil Agenda by: 06/09/99 AL A OF SIGNATURE pAGES 2 (QdP ALI, IACAT[ONS FOR SIGNAtORE) AEQUESIEDc ettiag date of public heariag for the ratification of asaessmeats for the aa.ntiag of the skyway bridges ia dowatowa Saiat Paui. = ile Ido. 18831 Assesemea.t No. 0651 ATIONS: APPAOVE (A) OR RE7ECf (R) ERSONAL SERVICE CON7RAG15 MUST ANSWER 1'HE FOLLOWA'G: . Hu ihe peraont6rm ever worlctd mder a rnntraU tor ttiis deqrtment? - YES NO rw+nu+cco�.n.�oK A sTNm Has this pe[soolfirm erer ban a Gtty employee? Y6S NO �: rnn.soeviceeo�ss�o�c �� . Does tLis persoo/firm poasess a akill not oormally possessed by any YES NO current City employee? cmco�nrree Ezplaio e1! YES answers on a sepante sheet and attaeh. � PORTS WffiCH COUNCII. OBdECTIYE? Neighborhoods �. CODNCII� WARD(3) Z _ D33fRiCT PI.ANNING COUNCII. 17 � �b 17NG PROBLEM, ISSUE, OPPOR7'[INITY (Who, What, When Where, Wdy?): -- roject is completed. Ratification is aecessary ia order to begia collectiag ssessmeate to help pay for the project. YANTAGES IF AYPROVED: �� ame as above. � �, ISADVANfAGESIFAPPROVED: � �` eaefitted property owaers have assessmeats payable via property taxes. � Sn �; ISADVANTAGFSIFNOTAPPROVED: o aot assess the beaefits would be inconsistent with City policy. � �, ALAMOUNfOF1RANSAGI'[ON: $`j']]„ �'��USSVncET�n(e�ec[,�a�> �s No p Assessments onlyl �re souxcE: Councti Research Gentet ACfIV1TY 1VOA�ER ,+��.��,TTaN: c�►.,�,, MAY 101999 / ,.;. �:v CITY OF ST. PAUL CO L F L� ��l _i5 PRELIMINARY ORDER By � File No. 59 1�& 599106 ORIG�NAL Voting Ward_ 3 � � In the Matter o£ sidevPalk reconstruction at the following locations: S99105 - South side Juliet Avenue from South Hamline Avenue to South Syndicate Street at 1298, 1304 & 1306 Juliet Avenue. S99106 - Both sides Woodlawn Avenue Prom Ford Parkway to Highland Parkway. *ESTIMATED CONSTRUCTION RATES RESIDENTIAL RATES (One, two or three family structures) Reconstruction (replacement of old sidewalk) -$8.65 per front foot for a five (5) foot wide walk and $10.38 per front foot for a six (6) foot wide walk. Al1 other widths will be prorated accordingly. Nem construction (where no walk existed) - 100% of the actual cost estimated to be approximately 53.87 per square foot. All cosner residential properties will receive a credit up to the first 150 feet of new or reconstructed sidewalk along and abutting the "long side" of the property. MULTI-RESIDENTIAL(More than three family structures), NON-RESIDENTIAL RATES For new and reconstructed sidewalk; 1000 of actual cost estimated to be approximately $5.23 per square foot. The Council o£ the City of Saint Paul having received the report o£ the Mayor upon the above improvement, and having considered said report, hereby resolves: l. That the said report and the same is hereby approved with no alternatives, u� that the estimated cost thereof is *SEE ABOVE for estimated construction rates, financed by assessments and 1998 Public Improvement Aid. 2 3. That a public hearing be had on said improvement on the 28 dav of Julv, 1999 5:30 o`clock P.M. in the Council Chambers of the City Hall and Court House Building in the City of Saint Paul. That notice of said public hearing be given to the persons and in the manner provided by the Charter, stating the time and place of hearing, the nature of the improvement and the total cost thereof as estimated. COUNCILPEI2SONS Yeas Nays ✓ Benanav � Blakey ✓ Bostrom Coleman -- ��'� � Harris ✓ Lantry , Reiter �.I�G JUL 3 1999 �In Favor /J Against / ./�5srnt Adopted by Council: Date Certified-�ass 1 Secretary Mayor sae�a��s 266�&t187 � GREEN +�''�� s �1 yy-�� ET No. �8065_-- JAA7E Nff1ALAATE __ ❑CffVCWNCLL _ ❑CrtraaK _ �O — a� �s� �6B3fG�1 —_ / _ �G.PALLIOCAT10M6lptllW�T{IRE) � � /t�ppATE R :^�,!i7�!i� �� . S Reconstruct Siderya8c in WaW 3(See at�ed fist) �-••�' PHiSOpAI SERVICE COp7AACTS W76T JIt�WHt THE FOLLOWNG CI�STIONS: _Wt861VICECCMOSgON 7. ►YstltiSPe��eVarro�keCwNxaoonbaGfortldsCePerhreM? YES t10 — 2 Fies tl�is pe�saNfmm everbeen a dly d�qbyee? — YES ND _ 8 Doss tl� persm?rtn possess a tlaY not nommly P�etl bY a^Y ewrent ciy' en4�%'ee? � YES NO 4pWn a6 y�s arorr�rs on parab al�wt antl a�h 10 y�x� �trt 91NTlIfi Pfq91.EM.ISSUF.OPPORTIMfY (MIIIO. MM11�T. MIIEN. MRF17E. Mryfl'k The Problem �tlefecfive sidewalk' was caused by mumpte problems. tree roots, Poor subgrade materials. freezeRhaw cycles, service ife 6mits, chemical additives. euheme tempereture variations� etc. These problems oxur on a citywide basis and must be addressed and corrected annuairy. Left unconected, the sidewalk condition would worsen to a state where it would be unusabie and subject to M�xeased pedestrian injuries from faus and possible litigatia�s. The community wili ber�efil irom this project because ft wili provide safe defect free sidewalks fw its citizens. The sidewalk coMracts are done by private contradors generating private Sectw jobs as a resutt. Historicaly, the sidewalk reconstnic6pr�s have peated rregative feedbadc because of cor�struction procedures atW assessments. Property owners ques6on ttie assessmer�ts, despite the fact that up to one-half the assessrneM is City subsidized. Having to assess for walk recons7uction remains a controversia4 issue. T� oPb°^ �b a�bw the q�hastnrc[ure of sidewaUc stodc to deteriorate. which in tum, wiH generate rtare personal injury suits, �esuiting in the expenditure of farger doilaz amounts in repairs and repiacemeM, as well as daim payouts. Counc� Resea�ch C�nt°� MAY 2 8 19�9 � . _ -, � . _� o� v� .,a� — 77� �wv C; Ct6 99 • 50,000 ORIG�NAL City of St. Paul � RESOLUTION APPROVING ASSSSSMENT AND aq - a4 CDUNCIL By � a FIXING TIN� OF HBARING TAEREON File No. 18831 Assessment No. 0651 Voting Ward In the matter of the assessment of benefits, cost and e�enses for 2 painting the skyway bridges in downtown, Saint Paul. Preliminary Order: 96-675 approved 3une 12, 1996 Final Order: 96-801 approved Julv 10, 1996 The assessments of benefits, cost and expenses for and in connection with the above improvement having been submitted to the Council having considered same and found the said assessment satisfactory, therefore, be it RESOLVED,That the said assessment be and the same is hereby in all respects approved. RESOLVED FURTHER, That a public hearing be had on said assessment on the 28th day of July, 1999, at the hour of Five thirty o'clock P.M., in the Council Chamber of the Court House and City Hall Building, in the City of St. Paul; that the Valuation and Assessment Engineer give notice of said meetings, as required by the Charter, stating in said notice the time and place of hearing, the nature of the improvement, and the amount assessed against the lot or lots of the particular owner to whom the notice is directed. the Ye�s Nays � " Benanav � Blakey �—" Bostrom Coleman.- 9��T ✓ Harris _/�In Favor � Lantry � Reiter � Against / �6 SP>rt _ed/Passed C� 7�../ U/i?�� 9 /99-�1 Council Secretary Mayor PUA[ISHFh JUL 3 �999 �� ►ntilicHearing Date: 7t28l99 - a �T.M.SJREAi, ESTA'�'E. DIVISION ��` . Grcen Sheet Nnmber. 63020 - -- nsrwara�nrrn�cros cirrcomvcu, - � - Person - ae Namber a - ._ � ' � v �rerm�r carcqaa�c � ��er �VLite`�� 266-8853 Bimcern�croa FIN. & MGT. SVG DIR. � �� MAYOB(OBASSSGNT) 1 CODNCII.YFCeenCg nst be on Coancil Agenda by: 06/09/99 AL A OF SIGNATURE pAGES 2 (QdP ALI, IACAT[ONS FOR SIGNAtORE) AEQUESIEDc ettiag date of public heariag for the ratification of asaessmeats for the aa.ntiag of the skyway bridges ia dowatowa Saiat Paui. = ile Ido. 18831 Assesemea.t No. 0651 ATIONS: APPAOVE (A) OR RE7ECf (R) ERSONAL SERVICE CON7RAG15 MUST ANSWER 1'HE FOLLOWA'G: . Hu ihe peraont6rm ever worlctd mder a rnntraU tor ttiis deqrtment? - YES NO rw+nu+cco�.n.�oK A sTNm Has this pe[soolfirm erer ban a Gtty employee? Y6S NO �: rnn.soeviceeo�ss�o�c �� . Does tLis persoo/firm poasess a akill not oormally possessed by any YES NO current City employee? cmco�nrree Ezplaio e1! YES answers on a sepante sheet and attaeh. � PORTS WffiCH COUNCII. OBdECTIYE? Neighborhoods �. CODNCII� WARD(3) Z _ D33fRiCT PI.ANNING COUNCII. 17 � �b 17NG PROBLEM, ISSUE, OPPOR7'[INITY (Who, What, When Where, Wdy?): -- roject is completed. Ratification is aecessary ia order to begia collectiag ssessmeate to help pay for the project. YANTAGES IF AYPROVED: �� ame as above. � �, ISADVANfAGESIFAPPROVED: � �` eaefitted property owaers have assessmeats payable via property taxes. � Sn �; ISADVANTAGFSIFNOTAPPROVED: o aot assess the beaefits would be inconsistent with City policy. � �, ALAMOUNfOF1RANSAGI'[ON: $`j']]„ �'��USSVncET�n(e�ec[,�a�> �s No p Assessments onlyl �re souxcE: Councti Research Gentet ACfIV1TY 1VOA�ER ,+��.��,TTaN: c�►.,�,, MAY 101999 / ,.;. �:v CITY OF ST. PAUL CO L F L� ��l _i5 PRELIMINARY ORDER By � File No. 59 1�& 599106 ORIG�NAL Voting Ward_ 3 � � In the Matter o£ sidevPalk reconstruction at the following locations: S99105 - South side Juliet Avenue from South Hamline Avenue to South Syndicate Street at 1298, 1304 & 1306 Juliet Avenue. S99106 - Both sides Woodlawn Avenue Prom Ford Parkway to Highland Parkway. *ESTIMATED CONSTRUCTION RATES RESIDENTIAL RATES (One, two or three family structures) Reconstruction (replacement of old sidewalk) -$8.65 per front foot for a five (5) foot wide walk and $10.38 per front foot for a six (6) foot wide walk. Al1 other widths will be prorated accordingly. Nem construction (where no walk existed) - 100% of the actual cost estimated to be approximately 53.87 per square foot. All cosner residential properties will receive a credit up to the first 150 feet of new or reconstructed sidewalk along and abutting the "long side" of the property. MULTI-RESIDENTIAL(More than three family structures), NON-RESIDENTIAL RATES For new and reconstructed sidewalk; 1000 of actual cost estimated to be approximately $5.23 per square foot. The Council o£ the City of Saint Paul having received the report o£ the Mayor upon the above improvement, and having considered said report, hereby resolves: l. That the said report and the same is hereby approved with no alternatives, u� that the estimated cost thereof is *SEE ABOVE for estimated construction rates, financed by assessments and 1998 Public Improvement Aid. 2 3. That a public hearing be had on said improvement on the 28 dav of Julv, 1999 5:30 o`clock P.M. in the Council Chambers of the City Hall and Court House Building in the City of Saint Paul. That notice of said public hearing be given to the persons and in the manner provided by the Charter, stating the time and place of hearing, the nature of the improvement and the total cost thereof as estimated. COUNCILPEI2SONS Yeas Nays ✓ Benanav � Blakey ✓ Bostrom Coleman -- ��'� � Harris ✓ Lantry , Reiter �.I�G JUL 3 1999 �In Favor /J Against / ./�5srnt Adopted by Council: Date Certified-�ass 1 Secretary Mayor sae�a��s 266�&t187 � GREEN +�''�� s �1 yy-�� ET No. �8065_-- JAA7E Nff1ALAATE __ ❑CffVCWNCLL _ ❑CrtraaK _ �O — a� �s� �6B3fG�1 —_ / _ �G.PALLIOCAT10M6lptllW�T{IRE) � � /t�ppATE R :^�,!i7�!i� �� . S Reconstruct Siderya8c in WaW 3(See at�ed fist) �-••�' PHiSOpAI SERVICE COp7AACTS W76T JIt�WHt THE FOLLOWNG CI�STIONS: _Wt861VICECCMOSgON 7. ►YstltiSPe��eVarro�keCwNxaoonbaGfortldsCePerhreM? YES t10 — 2 Fies tl�is pe�saNfmm everbeen a dly d�qbyee? — YES ND _ 8 Doss tl� persm?rtn possess a tlaY not nommly P�etl bY a^Y ewrent ciy' en4�%'ee? � YES NO 4pWn a6 y�s arorr�rs on parab al�wt antl a�h 10 y�x� �trt 91NTlIfi Pfq91.EM.ISSUF.OPPORTIMfY (MIIIO. MM11�T. MIIEN. MRF17E. Mryfl'k The Problem �tlefecfive sidewalk' was caused by mumpte problems. tree roots, Poor subgrade materials. freezeRhaw cycles, service ife 6mits, chemical additives. euheme tempereture variations� etc. These problems oxur on a citywide basis and must be addressed and corrected annuairy. Left unconected, the sidewalk condition would worsen to a state where it would be unusabie and subject to M�xeased pedestrian injuries from faus and possible litigatia�s. The community wili ber�efil irom this project because ft wili provide safe defect free sidewalks fw its citizens. The sidewalk coMracts are done by private contradors generating private Sectw jobs as a resutt. Historicaly, the sidewalk reconstnic6pr�s have peated rregative feedbadc because of cor�struction procedures atW assessments. Property owners ques6on ttie assessmer�ts, despite the fact that up to one-half the assessrneM is City subsidized. Having to assess for walk recons7uction remains a controversia4 issue. T� oPb°^ �b a�bw the q�hastnrc[ure of sidewaUc stodc to deteriorate. which in tum, wiH generate rtare personal injury suits, �esuiting in the expenditure of farger doilaz amounts in repairs and repiacemeM, as well as daim payouts. Counc� Resea�ch C�nt°� MAY 2 8 19�9 � . _ -, � . _� o� v� .,a� — 77� �wv C; Ct6 99 • 50,000 ORIG�NAL City of St. Paul � RESOLUTION APPROVING ASSSSSMENT AND aq - a4 CDUNCIL By � a FIXING TIN� OF HBARING TAEREON File No. 18831 Assessment No. 0651 Voting Ward In the matter of the assessment of benefits, cost and e�enses for 2 painting the skyway bridges in downtown, Saint Paul. Preliminary Order: 96-675 approved 3une 12, 1996 Final Order: 96-801 approved Julv 10, 1996 The assessments of benefits, cost and expenses for and in connection with the above improvement having been submitted to the Council having considered same and found the said assessment satisfactory, therefore, be it RESOLVED,That the said assessment be and the same is hereby in all respects approved. RESOLVED FURTHER, That a public hearing be had on said assessment on the 28th day of July, 1999, at the hour of Five thirty o'clock P.M., in the Council Chamber of the Court House and City Hall Building, in the City of St. Paul; that the Valuation and Assessment Engineer give notice of said meetings, as required by the Charter, stating in said notice the time and place of hearing, the nature of the improvement, and the amount assessed against the lot or lots of the particular owner to whom the notice is directed. the Ye�s Nays � " Benanav � Blakey �—" Bostrom Coleman.- 9��T ✓ Harris _/�In Favor � Lantry � Reiter � Against / �6 SP>rt _ed/Passed C� 7�../ U/i?�� 9 /99-�1 Council Secretary Mayor PUA[ISHFh JUL 3 �999 �� ►ntilicHearing Date: 7t28l99 - a �T.M.SJREAi, ESTA'�'E. DIVISION ��` . Grcen Sheet Nnmber. 63020 - -- nsrwara�nrrn�cros cirrcomvcu, - � - Person - ae Namber a - ._ � ' � v �rerm�r carcqaa�c � ��er �VLite`�� 266-8853 Bimcern�croa FIN. & MGT. SVG DIR. � �� MAYOB(OBASSSGNT) 1 CODNCII.YFCeenCg nst be on Coancil Agenda by: 06/09/99 AL A OF SIGNATURE pAGES 2 (QdP ALI, IACAT[ONS FOR SIGNAtORE) AEQUESIEDc ettiag date of public heariag for the ratification of asaessmeats for the aa.ntiag of the skyway bridges ia dowatowa Saiat Paui. = ile Ido. 18831 Assesemea.t No. 0651 ATIONS: APPAOVE (A) OR RE7ECf (R) ERSONAL SERVICE CON7RAG15 MUST ANSWER 1'HE FOLLOWA'G: . Hu ihe peraont6rm ever worlctd mder a rnntraU tor ttiis deqrtment? - YES NO rw+nu+cco�.n.�oK A sTNm Has this pe[soolfirm erer ban a Gtty employee? Y6S NO �: rnn.soeviceeo�ss�o�c �� . Does tLis persoo/firm poasess a akill not oormally possessed by any YES NO current City employee? cmco�nrree Ezplaio e1! YES answers on a sepante sheet and attaeh. � PORTS WffiCH COUNCII. OBdECTIYE? Neighborhoods �. CODNCII� WARD(3) Z _ D33fRiCT PI.ANNING COUNCII. 17 � �b 17NG PROBLEM, ISSUE, OPPOR7'[INITY (Who, What, When Where, Wdy?): -- roject is completed. Ratification is aecessary ia order to begia collectiag ssessmeate to help pay for the project. YANTAGES IF AYPROVED: �� ame as above. � �, ISADVANfAGESIFAPPROVED: � �` eaefitted property owaers have assessmeats payable via property taxes. � Sn �; ISADVANTAGFSIFNOTAPPROVED: o aot assess the beaefits would be inconsistent with City policy. � �, ALAMOUNfOF1RANSAGI'[ON: $`j']]„ �'��USSVncET�n(e�ec[,�a�> �s No p Assessments onlyl �re souxcE: Councti Research Gentet ACfIV1TY 1VOA�ER ,+��.��,TTaN: c�►.,�,, MAY 101999