87-900 WHITE - CITV CIERK
PINK - FINANCE GITY OF SAINT PALTL Council 7�
CANARV - DEPARTMENT File NO. �� ��r"
BLUE - MAVOR
Council Resolution
Presented By �
Referred To Committee: Date
Out of Committee By Date
WI�RF,AS, Dollars were designated in 1/1/1986 Fund Balance for a planned 1987 Citywide
coanputer upgrade r�ecessary to keep response times at a level required to su�ort
Department employees productivity, ar�d
Wf�REAS, The Mayor; pursuant to Section 10.07.1 of the City Charter, does certify
that there are available for appropriation revenues in eccess of those estimated
in the 1987 budget; ar�d
W�REAS, The Mayor recomner�ds the follawing changes to the 1987 budget:
B�i.�drgett Changes B�ud�td
FII�INCING PLAN
001 GII�RAI, FUI�D
9890 Fund Balance, Unreserved 109,646 +56,460 166,106
Designa� ted
All Other Financing 113,614,938 0 113,614,938
��� � 113,724,584 +56,460 113,781,044
001 GII�I3AL FU1�D
Finanee & Mar�agem�ent Services
01115 Ci�ywide Ir►formation Services
01115-0857 Data Processing Hardware 532,300 +56,460 588,760
01115.A11 Other pe ing 1,050,536 0 1,050,536
All Other Fur�d Spe�l.i g 112,141,748 0 112,141,748
113,724,584 +56,460 113,781,044
1�T CHANGE +56,460
NOW Tf�'ORE BE IT RESQLVFF�, that the said Agreement is approved on behalf of the City
and the proger City officers are authorized to e�cecute the same on behalf of the City, and
FUR�RR RESOLVID, That the City Council a�roves these changes to the 1987 budget.
Financing is Avai le� App oval Recomnended
.
Director of Finance Budget Di r
COUNCILMEN Requested by Department of:
Yeas p�eW Nays
Nicosia � [n Favor � t• Finance & em�ent Services
Rettman � �
Scheibel
Sonnen __ AgBiflst BY
Tedesco
Wilson
Adopted by Council: Date JUN z � �7 Form Approv y City Attorney
Certified Pas e ouncil cr t BY
By,
Approv Mavor: Date � JUN �t �7 Approved b ayor u m ion to Council
.
By —
P�tS� J U L � 1987
Finance and Management Services DEPARTMENT �47`�QB� N� 146� .
.
Gregory �. Iiaupt CONTACT
298-4985 PHONE
June 5, 1987 DATE 1 ��� Qr �
ASSIGN NUN�ER FOR ROUTING ORDER (Clip All Locations for Signature) :
i Department Director 4 Director of Management/Mayor
Finance and Management Services Director 5 City Clerk for 6/16 Council Agenda
2 Budget Director
� City Attorney
WHAT� WILL BE ACHIEVED BY TAKING ACTION ON THE ATTACHED MATERIALS? (Purpose/
Rationale) :
Upgrade of computer capacity on the central machine called "CIS."
Approval of Council Reso.ietian authorizing 1987 funding for upgrade
from 1986 designated fund balance.
COST/BENEFIT, BUDGETARY AND PERSONNEL IMPACTS ANTICIPATED:
$406,512 over 36 months. 1987 bud et ammendment of $56,460.
Benefit will be lowering of response times so as to permit greater employee
productivity in computer-assisted work.
FINANCING SOURCE AND BUDGET ACTIVITY NUMBER CHARGED OR CREDITED: (Mayor's signa-
ture not re-
Total Amount of Transaction: $406,512 quired if under
$10,000)
Funding Source: �eneral Fund •
q, 2yl a�av� P�� t 9 S� �u,�, �3 Do,o o� .w- �
Activity Number: 0111� �j � Dp
,G� P'w.•�� �6��h� U��WI�c'�"'�, ,
Q
ATTACHMENTS (List and Number All Attachments) : n np � �p�� o�D
a� c� �� ���� 19 s7 +�� ��,� .
1) Council Resolution � n�R ������ u���� ,, �
T
2) Report �(p.S'g'�� .
.vL
3� �orr �S"- �!o -8�- - P2/M� C U a�c�t O�
��'�?�L
DEPARTMENT REVIEW CITY ATTORNEY REVIEW
x Yes No Council Resolution Required? Resolution Required? Yes No
Yes x No Insurance Required? Insurance Sufficient? Yes No
Yes No Insurance Attached:
(SEE REVERSE SIDE FOR INSTRUCTIONS)
Revised 12/84
. - , ���` � o�
:0-=
CITY OF SAINT PAUL
INTERDEPARTMENTAL MEMORANDUM
Information Services Division - 298-5892
Dated: June 5, 1987
T0: Mayor GEORGE LATIMER
Council President VICTOR TEDESCO
Council Member JOHN DREW
Council Member CHRIS NICOSIA
Council Member JANICE RETTMAN
Council Member JAMES SCHEIBEL
Council Member KIKI SONNEN �y
Council Member BILL WILSON ` �
FR: GREGORY HAUPT, Citywide Information Services Manager
l���
817 Commerce Building
RE: Report and Recommendation on Upgrade to CIS Compute
CC: Gregory Blees
Jim Conklin
John Connelly
Ron Kline
Gary Norstrem
Betty Offermann
Gene Schiller
Lee Ann Turchin .
CIS Files Budget:1987 General Fund
CIS files Operations:Capacity Planning
CWDP Route Copy
Haupt desk copy
This memorandum presents a report and final recommendation on the planned 1987
upgrading of one of the two central computers owned by the City. This
upgrading will hopefully provide necessary departmental automation computer
capacity through 1988, at which time we will have our master planning process
in place to set further development direction.
SUMMARY/ACTION REQUEST
The action requested is approval of a resolution transferring $56,460 from 1986
designated fund balance for 1987 computer upgrade to activity 01115 (Citywide
Information Services). The transfer will apply to 1987 payments on a
three-year loan. Action must be taken with PRIME computer by June 26 in order
to capture the economic savings outlined below ($117,000 difference). The
matter was reviewed and recommended April 21 by the interdepartmental
Information Systems Policy Advisory Group (ISPAG) and is scheduled for the City
Council meeting of June 16.
. ���_ �� o
Page 2 of 2
PROPOSAL
We are proposing trade-in of the current PRIME machine called "CIS", a 9955-II,
for a 6350. The 6350 would be purchased with a loan arranged by the Treasury
Division and repaid over three years. PRIME Computer will not be involved in
the financing arrangement as Treasury can obtain more favorable rates.
BACKGROUND
The major applications which currently run on the CIS machine are:
- Police
- Fi re
- Valuations and Assessments
- Licensing
- Alarm Permits
- Certificate of Occupancy
- Inspection Monitoring
- Garage Billing
- Public Works
- Health
- Payroll/Personnel
- Workers' Compensation
- Budget applications
- Electronic mail
It is also used by CIS staff as the machine on which requested new applications
for customers are being developed (as an example, the Complaint-Handling
System).
The 6350 is double the capacity of the 9955-II. It is in the mainframe
computer class, equivalent to models of the IBM 3090 series (130E to 150E
range) , whose pricetags are more than twice the cost of the PRIME machine.
The reason for the upgrade is to restore the deteriorated response time on the
CIS machine. Response times have degraded due to continuing increased use of
that processor in departmental work automation as the 1986/1987 CIS Division
work program is implemented.
The past capacity improvements on the CIS machine, the relative performance
gains and date of order are shown as follows:
PRIME Relative
Model Performance Rating Ordered
550 II 1.0 1982
850 3.3 1983
9950 5.0 September 24, 1984
9955 8.0 December 4, 1985
9955 II 10.0 June 24, 1986
6350 20.0 Proposed June 24, 1987
. . ��'7_lo c�
Page 3 of 3
ECONOMICS
We've have been able to negotiate a 15% discount from after trade-in list price
on this machine, if the order is place by June 26 (end of PRIME's quarter).
This pricing was approved by PRIME's Vice President for Western Region Sales on
June 4. We met in face-to-face negotiations after several weeks of interaction
with PRIME that concluded with his involvement.
In addition, PRIME's trade-in depreciation schedule on the machines changes for
us (annual threshold) on June 26. The trade-in credit on the 9955-II now is
$248,050. On June 27, the depreciation credit is $186,000.
The list price of the system is $673,950.
The trade-in credit of $248,050 reduces that to $425,900.
The discount further reduces the price to $362,015, which is 54% of list price
and more than offsets the cost of borrowing.
Annual payments on the 6350 are estimated as follows (estimated using 7.5%
interest rate; exact rate depends on the market on date of placement) :
Year Principal* Interest* Total
1987 $ 50,420 $ 6,040 $ 56,460
1988 121,008 14,496 135,504
1989 121,008 14,496 135,504
1990 70,588 8,456 79,044
Totals $363,024 $ 43,488 $406,512
(*rounded figure)
Finally, the most important economics of all are those related to employee
productivity. I believe that current poor response due to overload on the CIS
machine is costing the City as much as $5,000 per week in lost employee
productivity during some work weeks. Response time on the computer, during
payroll weeks especially, has been more than double what it ought to be. This
trend will continue as departmental automated applications in progress go into
production.
We cannot forestall adding necessary production capacity during the current
planning transition period.
Attached for additional information is my report of May 26 to Mr. Schiller on
the same topic but dealing with preliminary figures.
I will be pleased to discuss this matter with you at any time.
attch: 1) Council Resolution
2) Haupt to Schiller 5/26 Re: PRIME Capacity Planning 1987/88
• � couwcu aeort�e »e� eunset � �(�-'�'7-�f'6�
AtiALYS1S OF UUBb FUMD BNLANLE F�1 TiE 6ENERAL FUND IFINl6 EQUtTY)
111/86 less Av�il�6le for
iwd Couitted Financing the
RESERVEO Balince Use 1981 Budget
Encu�bnacec 1,850,697 1,850,697
I�prest and Change Funds 57,540 57,540
IMr�nces to Other Funds 5�069,067 5,069�067
Inventory - Materi�l and Supplies 712,248 1t2,298
---------- --------- ------°--
TOTAL RESERVED 7,689,652 7,689,652 �
=__�:_�::: :.:_�:'=: ==�.=�___
UNRESERVED
__________ 8eference
Design�ted for: ----'---'
1986 financing Plan: Adopted Budqet 1�037�525 1�037,525
Cuh FIoM i Revenue Security !S1 l+1 5,501,000 5,504,000
Coun�il Rctions Anticipated in 19Bb
Incre�se Cash FIoM L Revenue Securit� lf*1 t,321�000 116,000
Lo�p�r�ble Morth Adj.: All Ueits (1985 k 19861 1,300,000
Co�piri6le North Adj.: Clerical i TecAnic�l 0 1,/25,000
f�ir L��or Standuds Overti�e CF1 86-xxx 1,OOA,000 350,000
;ncrease C.I.S. �P hud�are CFi 86-744 ��73i000 271,000
C.I.S. Uninterroptible porer source AO i D-8031 70l000 Oept. Trsfr.
Personnel Recl�ssific�tion study CFI Bb-Kx� 40,000 40,000
Budget Sivingz incentive proqn� CFt 86-192 529,51/ �,100
MEE� Training 6rint ior a4fir�. flction CFI A6-:xt 20,130 20,{30
Utility Rate Heariegs CFf 86-zxz 100,000 4
Huun Rights Oirector attorney fees 15,000 1#+i1
Co�puter M�pping: CityMide; City Council CF/Bb-xxx I8,000 /8,000
Une�ploy�ent Cap. for 1486 Cuts Y00,000 0
Norkers Ca�p. Co�puterization - City Rtt. CFi 86-zxY 25,000 25,000
Fire Ueput�ent re�odeling �ove CFt B6-xxx 50�000 0
CH L CH 14Eb budget Y 1985 bills Cft 8b-ixs 18,550 60,000
Ret�ined fw Future Lia6ilities k Other Uses
Ch�rter Coe�ission revenues 11,818 ]1,818
Tort Liability future li�bilities 600�000 100,000
E�ployee Insurince 360�000 116,000
Yorkers Co�pensation lia6ility 350�000 175,000
Balance Aviilahle for 1986 Budget Finmcing - - - - 3,602,664
-------- -------- --------
iot�l Unreserved, Oesign�ted 53,029,837 9,�27,t73 3,b02,661
Undesign�teC:
Fund 8al�oce Use in 1986 Budget R�end�ents: 2,517,5T2
1496 Budget hdj.: 6RS revenue lass CFt Ab-823 0 170,213
Increace P�rk Ranger Progr�� CFt 86-83R 0 W,52/
Pending Use of Fund Bal�nce for A�end�ents:
�udgeoents - Matergate M�rin� Settle�ent 0 325,000
Purchasing Costs: 1485 li�bilities L 1986 Set Aside 0 83,000
Court Nouse Elevitor 6enerator Advmce 0 667,000
Fire Oepart�ent Study 0 200�000
C.I.S. Co�puter Roo� Oesign 0 70,000
Restore PT of 1986 6�s Cut , 0 15,000
Une�ploy�e�t costs overcut 0 25�000
PERAlFICA lFlSA, C111 0 101,132
Building Tr�des Fringes 0 90,000
Y�tergite M�rin� Oper�tinq �dvince a �����
Acade�y of St�te L Local 6ov't. lNlC1 0 10�000
Police Feder�tion: �rug Suit Settle�ent 0 Ib,000
6. 0. Bonding Study: City Share 0 15,000
1987 Pri�e Co�puter Upgr�de 0 100,000
H.1.0. Deficit 0 76,000
Personnel Office re�odelling 0 0
Police -Vice Unit Expansion 0 76,000
Couocil Consideration lAttorneys, Council Reseirch,
Couunity Rel�tions, Puk Enterprisesl 0 149,700
B�l�nce Ar�ilable for 19W Budyet Fiamc[nq - - - - 1244,247)
Tot�l Unreserved, Undesigntted 2�511�572 2�761�869 I24/,2911
TOiAI UNRESERVE�: OESifiNATE� k UNDES(6qAiE0 15�5/7�409 12,189,042 3,358,367
:::...:..::::..:::::s:�:�:_ .:�::__=� :�:_:�==:_ =:::=:=_::
TOiAI FUND BALANCE IRESERVE� � UNRESERVE01 23,2S7�Od1 19�878,69/ 5�358,i6T
ooecv"eoaznvo=vvoevness"sen''zavs'aavza umassrs saa'z'saae ssaszn:ssx . . . .
(�1 Oesign�:ed for i�prove�mt to the C�sh Fla i protettion for Revenue lotsec in IWopted Budgetc
d' (t+i Incrc�se to I.BI of fI13,520,000.
� l*f+! Tr�esfer Peading fro�Contiaqent Reserve
(BM 126 6NFNOBAL i. CRAN 9/30186 Council Adopted
. '. �fi"F7 Qo�
.�..
:�
�
CITY OF SAINT PAUL
Info�mat4onA�ervi ces� Di vi^s�i onN� Z�-5892
Dated: May 26, 1987
T0: GENE SCHILLER, Director of Finance and Management Services ��
V
FR: GREGORY HAUPT, Citywide Information Services Manager 'i N
Third Floor, 100 East lOth Street 7
RE: PRIME Capacity Planning - 1987/1988 �
CC: Gregory Blees
Jim Conklin '
John Connelly
Ron Kline
Jim Snyder
Shirley Truax
Lee Ann Turchin
ISPAG Members
CIS Files Budget:1988 Ge�eral Fund
CIS Files Budget:1987 General Fund
v8'IS Files Operations:Capacity Planning
On May 1, you, Greg Blees, Ron Kline and I discussed the 1987 and 1988 capacity
planning needs necessary to keep the PRIMEs within an acceptable productivity
range (generally 2 - 4 second response time) for City department processing.
At that meeting, I was asked to develop an alternative lease/purchase plan
desig�ed to minimize annual cost impact while making needed capacity
available. Also, since that meeting, we have received the Fitzgerald and Long
(third party) software design audit report on FM80.
This memo puts forward a capacity planning proposal for 1987 - 1988 that takes
into account three factors:
1. Fitzgerald and Long report;
2. 1988 CIS staff work program projections as
affected by what we perceive to be elected official
direction regarding computer expenditures;
3. the consultant-assisted Information Systems Master
Planning effort.
���
I �� �7-�l o� •
Page 2 of 4 '
1. FITZGERALD & LONG
Fitzgerald and Long technically audited FM80 software design in late April .
FM80 is a large system, so they did an audit sample. Their analysis and
recommendations, dated April 30, provide valuable guidance to us regarding
where and how to improve the performance of FM80. Price Waterhouse, while not
initially supportive of having a third-party audit, concurred in the usefulness
of the assessment for the target machinery (PRIME) after reading same.
With respect to camputer capacity, Fitzgerald and Long's message is to expend
res�urces on re-doing FM80 code and file structures rather than on a FIN
comp�ter upgrade at this time. is is good news in that it appears that we
can forego upgrading the FIN machine during 1987; however, it means that we
have to invest in re-programming the code furnished by Price.
Based on the Fitzgerald and Long report, I am also hopeful that we will not
need to upgrade the FIN machine during 1988, assuming additional contract
reprogramming resources (roughly estimated at an additional $50,000 based upon
Fitzgerald and Long's assessment of the amount of work) are provided.
If timely reprogramming is not undertaken, a mid-1988 equipment upgrade will in
all likelihood be necessary. While Price Waterhouse has been trying to improve
perfarmance on the FIN PRIME, the software was originally written for a
different computer (MicroData). So, we have a functioning finance system, but
one which is not as efficient as it can be. Our goal needs to be to improve
terminal response, balancing, posting and reporting if customer agencies are to
have the financial data they need for more timely management decisisions.
2. :988 CIS STAFF WORK PROGRAM PROJECTIONS
In our meetings on developing a 1988 budget, our assessment has been that City
Council has concerns about the direction systems development is taking
citywide. Council has not expressed this concern in explicit policy terms, but
that is definitely the "signal " I read based upon their discussion of past
upgrades and of the Computer Center.
During most of 1988, CIS plans to devote its efforts to finishing and polishing
the systems we now have underway. Those are listed in the 1988 CIS budget
submittal. This is a significant workload.
Not undertaking new system work will permit us to assign appropriate senior
staff (EDP Systems Analysts) during 1988 to follow-up on the
consultant-assisted Information Systems Master Plan effort. The plan and
on-going annual process hopefully will be formulated by the end of 1987.
Formal presentation of it and debate and decisions will then need to occur in
early 1988 to tie into the 1989 budget process.
' � . �� � ����--��
' Page 3 of 4
Quring this transition period, the impact on capacity planning is that the
necessary upgrade this year to the CIS machine hopefully will be adequate on
that central processing unit (CPU) through 1988.
{PLEASE NOTE: Adequate CIS machine capacity through 1988, with the recommended
upgrade, assumes that ap lications develo ment b other users of the machine,
es ecially the Police Department s Systems Unit, a so is significantly s owed,
something over w ic I have no direct contro . It a so assumes that
departmental managers and staff will not take full advantage of the relatively
easy ad-hoc reporting capabilities of INFORMATION, either on CIS or FIN. Since
I do not have direct control over these uses, I can only request cooperation
from the user departments. I will initiate discussion with and solicit support
from ISPAG for keeping ad-hoc reporting within the bounds of machine resources
available.
3. CONSULTANT-ASSISTED INFORMATION SYSTEMS MASTER PLAN
Obviously, we cannot wait until the Information Systems Master Plan (ISMP) is
complete to upgrade the CIS machine and meet response time needs for user
departments.
Current non-finance systems are on the CIS PRIME. Those systems serve the
non-finance business of City government by providing to City staff inembers
automated processing of large-volume work. I have shared with you before (and
include again as an attachment) the analysis which describes the loss in City
employee productivity which accompanies even relatively small worsening of
computer resp�nse time. It is important, and it is a sound business decision,
to invest in enough PRIME computer horsepower in 1987/88 to keep department =
employee productivity levels reasonable during the planning transition period.
While the audit and lan ma impact our mainframe/microcom uter mix citywide,
any new direct�on will take severa years to implement pro er y and
thorough In t e meantime, we need to run t e �t s usiness on PRIME
computers of adequate size if we are to keep City sta productive �n t eir
PRIME-based automated work.
SUMMARY/RECOMMENDATIONS
1) Do not upgrade the FIN machine in 1987 or, hopefully, in 1988 - rather,
improve Price Waterhouse's software for optimal performance on PRIME.
Budget $50,000 in 1988 (and possibly 1989) for third-party contractual
assistance to optimize in a timely fashion.
2) Upgrade the CIS machine to a PRIME 6350 in 1981.
3) Book the order before June 30, 1987 in order to take advantage of
PRIME's depreciation schedule on the CIS 9955-II, saving $53,000 because of
PRIME's depreciation schedule on trading in used machines.
.. ". ��>_�/e� .
Page 4 of 4 '
4) Take delivery on the 6350 in late August during completi�on of the new
computer center to facilitate smooth switch-over to the new site (move only
one of the current PRIMEs, having the new machine in place "hot" for taking
on the load).
5) Lease/purchase the 6350 over three years to smooth the impact on the budget
(a cash-flow scenario is attached).
This plan will put the necessary "punch" in the CIS machine's support to City
staff in 1987 and 1988. The upgrade could carry us into 1989 as well , under my
assumption of slowed development of new systems while we replan and program our
citywide approach.
Please advise.
attchs:
l. Lost-time Analysis as Response Times Degrade
2. Upg�ade Cash-flow Scenario
r
' �, - , ��,--�a�
�
LOST-TIME ANALYSIS
As Computer Response Time Worsens
CIS:gjh:05/11/87 09:11:54
Analysis of the impact of poor computer responsiveness supports a
timely decision:
1. Fact: Between the two computers, we have the equivalent
of about 60 employees working 8 hours per day at
terminals for 200 work days per year. (I acknowledge that
it is not the same 60 bodies hour after hour, but it is
FTE to 60 ).
2. Assumption: Those 60 FTEs are doing something
worthwhile and produ�tive an the computer.
3. Fact: Hourly wages for those employees average about $12
or more (that is $25,Q00 per year, a conservative
estimate).
4. Fact: If response time increases 12.5X, that adds the
equivalent of one hour to the time those 60 employees
need to get their work at the terminal done ( 9 hours
divided by 8 hours = 12.5�).
5. Fact: 60 employees x 1 hour per employee x $12 x 200
days per year = $144,000 in lost employee time given a
12.5� increase in response time.
6. Fact: An increase in response time from 3 seconds to 4
seconds is 33%; from 4 seconds to 5 seconds is 25%; from
5 seconds to 6 seconds is 20�.
Conclusion: The City should address response time on the PRIMEs
earlier in 1987 rather than later.
,,�.,�.�..�-i��«��-�.�.�.s..„��.� _ _ ,�,� .. .
. -
. .-.
v
. , •N
, �
N 3
C
� � Q
a
� � N
� a
o� � -
a � N
v
W
N
Q
S
C.1 �
� O O C
Q d O O L
u
a �a M .°� E
W C
Z .J
� .
_ _ _ LA _ _ ___ 41 \, _
, _ ,
r+ . W ;o .�
t.i L
� J 2 y,�
� � Z O O t
N Z F- � � �
� a z .� � n
_ ,� r.
� Q� �
N O =
F �- W V
N +i N „
t� a+ = O O C
C � N � � �
W 0� ..
Q >. � C.� O � W
� � F- M M V
t.7 d Z i
°- a
� r- d
W � z — �v
� � W � O O aO.+
CC �p ' p
O O
a � � c � �
N �
F- N �O 'G
d 0 �
V H � N �
C
ao X � c� � uMi t
� ` v� c�
� N E � O
a Lt� O1 d
� 3 F- tt1 � �
i, v� cv > ;
' O �0 Ll. J t11 tp �.+
t1� � �..� N 4-
M O N
�O �.+ t+1
N �
O d L L
� �. �0 d
d 7 �-
� i+ C f-
— C �
� � 7 �
� d�P O 'C
Ln � L �
� ^ CO 0� � t�
p � \ o�o c
N O O
� C M M
� � � � �K �DC
Q1 ar � ^
�v a
. tp E
i �
01 N H
a ,n
� ¢ c�
r .
a�
+ �
Q
J W F- N N
t � Q >- N CO W
~ � � � �O �O
O 1 U
N � f- M M M e+'1
y„ � M M M � �
O �
.^
N 'h OD
� ^� � �
� `� \
a. tf1
t
' M G1
N ^
. O M � N
Q1 .. N
w (�
. � • . �• • . . ••• • •.. ^ • .• • . . ^
. �r � . � � . � �
M ^
N �p
M N
w �
� _ �
� � : - _ .c ' ; _
�
c
�
u cn
C�C M �
v ^ � N ,
W tf� � �
Q Ql � Q � �
M
� � . .. . .. . . ... . . � � . ... .. . . . . � :
C. � � �
� � � M
.— W r.,
W M � ^
� M {,�
� Q N
�s G. 1� � f�
N � W �p
L
V O
O
m
�
W
M �
� ^
J M O N
F- ^ � n
� oo � �O
o � �o ,�
_ � . . . . . . . . . . . . . �' . . .. . . . . . M
Va r- � �
Q .7 ,T
t� .— M
M ^ ^ �
, N �
M N
^ ^
� �p
n
0� � M 1� ^
C1 M M N N
� w
^ ^ � ^
LA 1.f� .�p � � :
J J
Q a
o � o �
�r► ao. t�- o�o c�o � \
�O � -J � O J O
M
H `�G/ 2 �D �
t� Y Q � � Z �/�
Z Q I � _....,,,,..,_,_._. .