99-371�
�R�G1�A�.
Presented By
Referred To
Date
Green Sheet � �� g� a
RESOLUTION
CITY OF SAINT PAUL, MINNESOTA
� .����
�
1
2
3
4
5
6
RESOLUTION ADOPTING THE PLANNING CO]
NOT TO DESIGNATE THE CONEY ISLAND AS A
WHEREAS, the August Botzet BuildinglMinnesota
refened to as the Coney Island (448 and 444 St. Peter Stc�
�
a
9
io
ii
1z
13
14
15
WHEREAS, the Saint Paul Pluu�ing Co.
that preservation of these buildings would be a
very significant contribution to Comprehensive
the surrounding area and that designation of�i�i'
the Saint Paul Comphrensive Plan and may>�er
substantial negative impact on the surro}�[iding
�q
�oun��� File � g9 - 3*t �
RECOMNIENDATION
: PRESERVATION SITES
Arsenal and City Aotel, commonly
properties; and
mis�sion (hereinafter Planning Commission) resolved
ia�or obstacle to redevelopment that would make a
'lan objectives and have a higlily positive impact on
structures would not serve a purpose consistent with
: to continue the present situation which has a
area; and
i5 WHEREAS, the Planning Commission resolved that the proposed designations to be
i� inconsistent with the Comphrens�,<e Plan and recommended against designation; and
37 �y
sa NOW, THEREFORE,,<BE TT RESOLVED that the heritage preservation designation
39 nominations by the Heritag �reservation Commission for the Seventh Place properties contained in
ao File Number 99-2 are not by the Saint Paul City Council; and
Page 1 of 2
>
41
42
43
44
45
46
47
48
49
50
51
52
53
54
55
56
s�
58
59
60
61
62
63
64
65
2 of 2
ag- 3�l
,
/
a�ist heritage
File Number 99-18
Requested by Department of:
By 64�„� "
Adopted by Council:
Adoption Certified
By:
� Form App by City Attorney
Council Secretary
By:
Approved by j!'ayor: Date
ay:
ORIGINAL
BE TT FINALLY RESOLVED that the Planning Commission findings
designarions for the Seventh Place properties contained in Planning Commissi
and 99-19 are hereby adopted by the Saint Paul City Council. '
l�
Approved by Mayor for Submission to
Council
By: �_�:sE.�''�-wL
' ° �' - �tq - 3 `� 1
DFPARTMENT/OFFICElCOUNCIL oATE WmAiED
Mayor co�e�n�s Office 4-21-99 GREEN SHEET No 64882
CONTACT PERSON & PHONE InMlaiNaae InxbVData
Alberto Quintela 266-8529 3
u..nT�xrwccroR crtrcauc�
MUS7 BE ON COUNCILAGQJDA BY (DATq ❑ n . t i„ r ( _ ❑
nssicw //Al�• — 11�lL� 1
I'/ Y//1 �
xureotrdt tmanouar�—p�`— arcamK
11
Rounrc ❑ 1/ ❑
�� nuutw.aonncFSOp� wlwcw.amvi�teio
� Wvaelat�aasraxp ��/' � ❑
TOTAL # OF SIGNATURE PAGES (CLIP ALL LOCATIONS FOR SIGNATURE)
CTION REQUESTED
Denial of recommendations for heritage preseroation designation sites submitted by
Heritage Preservation Commission.
ECOMMENDATION Approve (A) or ReJeet (R) PERSONAL SERVICE CANiRACiS MUSTANSWER TNE FOLLOWiNG QUESTIONS:
� 7. Has this persoNfiim ever worked under a contract for this deparlment7
PLANNING COMMISSION YES NO
CIB COMMITTEE 2. Has this persoNfirm ever been a cily empbyee9
CIVILSERVICECOMMISSION YES NO
3. Dces this perwNfilm possess a sldll not trormalrypossessed by any curreM ciry employee7
YES NO
4. Is Mis perso�rm a farpeted vendoYl
YES NO
Explain all yes answeis on sepa2te sheet and attach to preen sheet
INITIATINC� PROBLEM ISSUE, OPPORTUNITY (Who, What, When, Where, Why)
Aeritage Preservation Commission and Planning Commission reviewed requests for heritage
preservation designations.
ADVANTAGESIFAPPROVED
Development plan for Seventh Street Place can proceed.
OISADVANTAGES IF APPROVED
Designation would serve to continue the present situation of decline which has a substantial
�ISAD NTAGES IF NO APPROVED
Redevelopment of vacant and unrestored buildings would have a highly positive impact on the
TOTAL AMOUNT OF TRANSACTION S COS7/RtVENUE BUDGEfED (CIRCLE ONE) VES NO
FUNDING SOURCE ACTNRY NUMBER
FINANGULLINFORMATION(EJ�LFJNj ������ �����;
AP� 2 � i9��
�
�R�G1�A�.
Presented By
Referred To
Date
Green Sheet � �� g� a
RESOLUTION
CITY OF SAINT PAUL, MINNESOTA
� .����
�
1
2
3
4
5
6
RESOLUTION ADOPTING THE PLANNING CO]
NOT TO DESIGNATE THE CONEY ISLAND AS A
WHEREAS, the August Botzet BuildinglMinnesota
refened to as the Coney Island (448 and 444 St. Peter Stc�
�
a
9
io
ii
1z
13
14
15
WHEREAS, the Saint Paul Pluu�ing Co.
that preservation of these buildings would be a
very significant contribution to Comprehensive
the surrounding area and that designation of�i�i'
the Saint Paul Comphrensive Plan and may>�er
substantial negative impact on the surro}�[iding
�q
�oun��� File � g9 - 3*t �
RECOMNIENDATION
: PRESERVATION SITES
Arsenal and City Aotel, commonly
properties; and
mis�sion (hereinafter Planning Commission) resolved
ia�or obstacle to redevelopment that would make a
'lan objectives and have a higlily positive impact on
structures would not serve a purpose consistent with
: to continue the present situation which has a
area; and
i5 WHEREAS, the Planning Commission resolved that the proposed designations to be
i� inconsistent with the Comphrens�,<e Plan and recommended against designation; and
37 �y
sa NOW, THEREFORE,,<BE TT RESOLVED that the heritage preservation designation
39 nominations by the Heritag �reservation Commission for the Seventh Place properties contained in
ao File Number 99-2 are not by the Saint Paul City Council; and
Page 1 of 2
>
41
42
43
44
45
46
47
48
49
50
51
52
53
54
55
56
s�
58
59
60
61
62
63
64
65
2 of 2
ag- 3�l
,
/
a�ist heritage
File Number 99-18
Requested by Department of:
By 64�„� "
Adopted by Council:
Adoption Certified
By:
� Form App by City Attorney
Council Secretary
By:
Approved by j!'ayor: Date
ay:
ORIGINAL
BE TT FINALLY RESOLVED that the Planning Commission findings
designarions for the Seventh Place properties contained in Planning Commissi
and 99-19 are hereby adopted by the Saint Paul City Council. '
l�
Approved by Mayor for Submission to
Council
By: �_�:sE.�''�-wL
' ° �' - �tq - 3 `� 1
DFPARTMENT/OFFICElCOUNCIL oATE WmAiED
Mayor co�e�n�s Office 4-21-99 GREEN SHEET No 64882
CONTACT PERSON & PHONE InMlaiNaae InxbVData
Alberto Quintela 266-8529 3
u..nT�xrwccroR crtrcauc�
MUS7 BE ON COUNCILAGQJDA BY (DATq ❑ n . t i„ r ( _ ❑
nssicw //Al�• — 11�lL� 1
I'/ Y//1 �
xureotrdt tmanouar�—p�`— arcamK
11
Rounrc ❑ 1/ ❑
�� nuutw.aonncFSOp� wlwcw.amvi�teio
� Wvaelat�aasraxp ��/' � ❑
TOTAL # OF SIGNATURE PAGES (CLIP ALL LOCATIONS FOR SIGNATURE)
CTION REQUESTED
Denial of recommendations for heritage preseroation designation sites submitted by
Heritage Preservation Commission.
ECOMMENDATION Approve (A) or ReJeet (R) PERSONAL SERVICE CANiRACiS MUSTANSWER TNE FOLLOWiNG QUESTIONS:
� 7. Has this persoNfiim ever worked under a contract for this deparlment7
PLANNING COMMISSION YES NO
CIB COMMITTEE 2. Has this persoNfirm ever been a cily empbyee9
CIVILSERVICECOMMISSION YES NO
3. Dces this perwNfilm possess a sldll not trormalrypossessed by any curreM ciry employee7
YES NO
4. Is Mis perso�rm a farpeted vendoYl
YES NO
Explain all yes answeis on sepa2te sheet and attach to preen sheet
INITIATINC� PROBLEM ISSUE, OPPORTUNITY (Who, What, When, Where, Why)
Aeritage Preservation Commission and Planning Commission reviewed requests for heritage
preservation designations.
ADVANTAGESIFAPPROVED
Development plan for Seventh Street Place can proceed.
OISADVANTAGES IF APPROVED
Designation would serve to continue the present situation of decline which has a substantial
�ISAD NTAGES IF NO APPROVED
Redevelopment of vacant and unrestored buildings would have a highly positive impact on the
TOTAL AMOUNT OF TRANSACTION S COS7/RtVENUE BUDGEfED (CIRCLE ONE) VES NO
FUNDING SOURCE ACTNRY NUMBER
FINANGULLINFORMATION(EJ�LFJNj ������ �����;
AP� 2 � i9��
�
�R�G1�A�.
Presented By
Referred To
Date
Green Sheet � �� g� a
RESOLUTION
CITY OF SAINT PAUL, MINNESOTA
� .����
�
1
2
3
4
5
6
RESOLUTION ADOPTING THE PLANNING CO]
NOT TO DESIGNATE THE CONEY ISLAND AS A
WHEREAS, the August Botzet BuildinglMinnesota
refened to as the Coney Island (448 and 444 St. Peter Stc�
�
a
9
io
ii
1z
13
14
15
WHEREAS, the Saint Paul Pluu�ing Co.
that preservation of these buildings would be a
very significant contribution to Comprehensive
the surrounding area and that designation of�i�i'
the Saint Paul Comphrensive Plan and may>�er
substantial negative impact on the surro}�[iding
�q
�oun��� File � g9 - 3*t �
RECOMNIENDATION
: PRESERVATION SITES
Arsenal and City Aotel, commonly
properties; and
mis�sion (hereinafter Planning Commission) resolved
ia�or obstacle to redevelopment that would make a
'lan objectives and have a higlily positive impact on
structures would not serve a purpose consistent with
: to continue the present situation which has a
area; and
i5 WHEREAS, the Planning Commission resolved that the proposed designations to be
i� inconsistent with the Comphrens�,<e Plan and recommended against designation; and
37 �y
sa NOW, THEREFORE,,<BE TT RESOLVED that the heritage preservation designation
39 nominations by the Heritag �reservation Commission for the Seventh Place properties contained in
ao File Number 99-2 are not by the Saint Paul City Council; and
Page 1 of 2
>
41
42
43
44
45
46
47
48
49
50
51
52
53
54
55
56
s�
58
59
60
61
62
63
64
65
2 of 2
ag- 3�l
,
/
a�ist heritage
File Number 99-18
Requested by Department of:
By 64�„� "
Adopted by Council:
Adoption Certified
By:
� Form App by City Attorney
Council Secretary
By:
Approved by j!'ayor: Date
ay:
ORIGINAL
BE TT FINALLY RESOLVED that the Planning Commission findings
designarions for the Seventh Place properties contained in Planning Commissi
and 99-19 are hereby adopted by the Saint Paul City Council. '
l�
Approved by Mayor for Submission to
Council
By: �_�:sE.�''�-wL
' ° �' - �tq - 3 `� 1
DFPARTMENT/OFFICElCOUNCIL oATE WmAiED
Mayor co�e�n�s Office 4-21-99 GREEN SHEET No 64882
CONTACT PERSON & PHONE InMlaiNaae InxbVData
Alberto Quintela 266-8529 3
u..nT�xrwccroR crtrcauc�
MUS7 BE ON COUNCILAGQJDA BY (DATq ❑ n . t i„ r ( _ ❑
nssicw //Al�• — 11�lL� 1
I'/ Y//1 �
xureotrdt tmanouar�—p�`— arcamK
11
Rounrc ❑ 1/ ❑
�� nuutw.aonncFSOp� wlwcw.amvi�teio
� Wvaelat�aasraxp ��/' � ❑
TOTAL # OF SIGNATURE PAGES (CLIP ALL LOCATIONS FOR SIGNATURE)
CTION REQUESTED
Denial of recommendations for heritage preseroation designation sites submitted by
Heritage Preservation Commission.
ECOMMENDATION Approve (A) or ReJeet (R) PERSONAL SERVICE CANiRACiS MUSTANSWER TNE FOLLOWiNG QUESTIONS:
� 7. Has this persoNfiim ever worked under a contract for this deparlment7
PLANNING COMMISSION YES NO
CIB COMMITTEE 2. Has this persoNfirm ever been a cily empbyee9
CIVILSERVICECOMMISSION YES NO
3. Dces this perwNfilm possess a sldll not trormalrypossessed by any curreM ciry employee7
YES NO
4. Is Mis perso�rm a farpeted vendoYl
YES NO
Explain all yes answeis on sepa2te sheet and attach to preen sheet
INITIATINC� PROBLEM ISSUE, OPPORTUNITY (Who, What, When, Where, Why)
Aeritage Preservation Commission and Planning Commission reviewed requests for heritage
preservation designations.
ADVANTAGESIFAPPROVED
Development plan for Seventh Street Place can proceed.
OISADVANTAGES IF APPROVED
Designation would serve to continue the present situation of decline which has a substantial
�ISAD NTAGES IF NO APPROVED
Redevelopment of vacant and unrestored buildings would have a highly positive impact on the
TOTAL AMOUNT OF TRANSACTION S COS7/RtVENUE BUDGEfED (CIRCLE ONE) VES NO
FUNDING SOURCE ACTNRY NUMBER
FINANGULLINFORMATION(EJ�LFJNj ������ �����;
AP� 2 � i9��